UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy
Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant ý | ||
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o |
||
Check the appropriate box: |
||
o |
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|
o |
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
o |
Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
o |
Definitive Additional Materials |
|
ý |
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
Adolph Coors Company |
||||
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) |
||||
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): | ||||
ý |
No fee required. |
|||
o |
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|||
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: N/A |
|||
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: N/A |
|||
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): N/A |
|||
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: N/A |
|||
(5) | Total fee paid: N/A |
|||
o |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|||
o |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|||
(1) |
Amount Previously Paid: N/A |
|||
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: N/A |
|||
(3) | Filing Party: N/A |
|||
(4) | Date Filed: N/A |
This filing consists of an investor presentation given on October 13, 2004 by Leo Kiely, President and Chief Executive Officer of Adolph Coors Company ("Coors"), and Daniel J. O'Neill, President and Chief Executive Officer of Molson Inc. ("Molson"), in connection with the proposed transaction between Coors and Molson.
Link to searchable text of slide shown above
Link to searchable text of slide shown above
Link to searchable text of slide shown above
Link to searchable text of slide shown above
Link to searchable text of slide shown above
Link to searchable text of slide shown above
Link to searchable text of slide shown above
Link to searchable text of slide shown above
Link to searchable text of slide shown above
Link to searchable text of slide shown above
Link to searchable text of slide shown above
Link to searchable text of slide shown above
Link to searchable text of slide shown above
Link to searchable text of slide shown above
Link to searchable text of slide shown above
Link to searchable text of slide shown above
Link to searchable text of slide shown above
Link to searchable text of slide shown above
Link to searchable text of slide shown above
Link to searchable text of slide shown above
Link to searchable text of slide shown above
Link to searchable text of slide shown above
Link to searchable text of slide shown above
Link to searchable text of slide shown above
Link to searchable text of slide shown above
Link to searchable text of slide shown above
Link to searchable text of slide shown above
Link to searchable text of slide shown above
Link to searchable text of slide shown above
Link to searchable text of slide shown above
Link to searchable text of slide shown above
Searchable text section of graphics shown above
Molson Coors Brewing Company
Reshaping the Competitive Brewing Landscape
Leo Kiely |
|
Daniel J. O Neill |
|
October 2004 |
President and |
|
President and |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
Adolph Coors Company |
|
Molson Inc. |
|
|
[LOGO] |
|
|
|
[LOGO] |
Forward Looking Statements
This presentation includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements are commonly identified by such terms and phrases as would, may, will, expects or expected to and other terms with similar meaning indicating possible future events or actions or potential impact on the businesses or shareholders of Adolph Coors Company and Molson Inc. (separately and together the Companies). Such statements include, but are not limited to, statements about the anticipated benefits, savings and synergies of the merger between Adolph Coors Company and Molson, Inc., including future financial and operating results, Coors and Molsons plans, objectives, expectations and intentions, the markets for Coors and Molsons products, the future development of Coors and Molsons business, and the contingencies and uncertainties to which Coors and Molson may be subject and other statements that are not historical facts. The presentation also includes information that has not been reviewed by the Companies independent auditors. There is no assurance the transaction contemplated in this presentation will be completed at all, or completed upon the same terms and conditions described. All forward-looking statements in this presentation are expressly qualified by information contained in each companys filings with regulatory authorities. The Companies do not undertake to publicly update forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
The following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements: the ability to obtain required approvals of the merger on the proposed terms and schedule; the failure of Coors and Molson stockholders to approve the merger; the risk that the businesses will not be integrated successfully; the risk that the cost savings and any revenue synergies from the merger may not be fully realized or may take longer to realize than expected; and disruption from the merger making it more difficult to maintain relationships with customers, employees or suppliers. Additional factors that could cause Coors and Molsons results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements can be found in the periodic reports filed by Coors with the Securities and Exchange Commission and available at the Securities and Exchange Commissions internet site (http://www.sec.gov). Neither Coors nor Molson undertakes and each specifically disclaims, any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.
Stockholders are urged to read the joint proxy statement/management information circular regarding the proposed transaction when it becomes available, because it will contain important information. Stockholders will be able to obtain a free copy of the joint proxy statement/management information circular, as well as other filings containing information about Coors, without charge, at the Securities and Exchange Commissions internet site (http://www.sec.gov). Copies of the joint proxy statement/prospectus and the filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission that will be incorporated by reference in the joint proxy statement/management information circular can also be obtained, without charge, by directing a request to Adolph Coors Company, 311 10th Street, Golden, Colorado 80401, Attention: Investor Relations, (303) 279-6565. The respective directors and executive officers of Coors and Molson and other persons may be deemed to be participants in the solicitation of proxies in respect of the proposed merger. Information regarding Coorss directors and executive officers is available in the 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by Coors on March 12, 2004, and information regarding Molsons directors and executive officers will be included in the joint proxy statement/management information circular. Other information regarding the participants in the proxy solicitation and a description of their direct and indirect interests, by security holdings or otherwise, will be contained the joint proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant materials to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission when they become available.
2
Molsons Vision Has Remained Consistent
1. To become one of the best performing brewers in the world, as measured by
2. To remain one of the best performing brewers in the world, as measured by
3. To regain the position as one of the best performing brewers in the world, as measured by
[GRAPHIC]
Long Term Returns to Shareholders
3
Current Footprint has
Experienced Challenges in
Last Six Months Increasing Risks of Previous Plan
Clear Priorities Exist in Each of the Existing Businesses |
|
Growth Beyond Core |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada |
|
Brazil |
|
USA |
|
Export |
|
M&A Activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share Gain: |
|
Share Gain: |
|
Resolve growth strategy with Coors |
|
Build international volume through focus on 2-3 investment
markets |
|
Address risks from continued market consolidation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] |
|
[GRAPHIC] |
|
[GRAPHIC] |
|
[GRAPHIC] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A-B like |
|
Achieve targets |
|
Execute plan to |
|
Growth driver |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Year Focus / Immediate Priorities |
|
Moved up in |
|
4
Consolidation Could
Lead to Value Destruction
Most
Immediate Impact with Coors and/or Heineken
Potential Deals with Risk to Molson |
|
Conflict with Molson Portfolio of Brands |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Coors |
[GRAPHIC] |
Interbrew/AmBev |
|
Coors brand in Canada |
|
|
|
Molson brands in US |
|
|
|
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] |
Heineken |
|
Heineken and Coors brands in Canada |
|
|
|
|
Risk they go alone or team with other Cdn brewer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] |
SAB/Miller |
|
Moderate risk in Canada |
|
|
|
|
|
US marginalized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] |
Anheuser-Busch |
|
Heineken brand in Canada |
|
|
|
|
Increased domestic competition or pricing pressure |
Heineken |
|
|
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] |
Femsa |
|
Modelo brands in Canada |
Risk to Molson is not only immediate impact, but loss of
choice
and options: Molson must preempt the outcome
5
Merger Improves
Likelihood of
Regaining the Vision
To secure the current commercial relationship with Coors, which represents 20% of Molsons total shareholder value
To identify and obtain $175 million in synergies, which would not be available to Molson otherwise:
Capitalizes on Molsons proven track record in delivering cost savings
To be able to drive top line sales in Canada through increased marketing investments behind Molson Canadian and Coors Light
To reduce the financial impact of Brazil, allowing Molson shareholders greater time to receive the payback from the Brazil investment
To expand brewing operations in Montreal and Toronto by adding 2M hl of beer: new jobs supported with new capital investment
6
Enhanced Platform in
Developed Markets,
Balanced Emerging Market Exposure
Strong positions in worlds highest margin beer markets
Growth opportunities through underdeveloped regions/brands in mature markets and Brazil
2003 Volume 60M hl |
LTM Net Sales US$6B |
LTM EBITDA US$1B |
|
|
|
[CHART] |
[CHART] |
[CHART] |
(1) Includes Coors' America's segment
(2) Includes Coors' Europe segment
Strong geographically diversified company
7
With Leading Positions in Key Markets
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Brands |
|
||
Country |
|
Top Brand |
|
Rank |
|
Market |
|
Rank |
|
Canada |
|
[GRAPHIC] |
|
#1 |
|
43 |
% |
#1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United Kingdom |
|
[GRAPHIC] |
|
#1 |
|
21 |
% |
#2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
[GRAPHIC] |
|
#3 |
|
11 |
% |
#3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil |
|
[GRAPHIC] |
|
#3 |
|
11 |
% |
#3 |
|
Source: Datamonitor and Brewers of Canada (2003)
Strong brands in some of the worlds largest beer markets
8
Ability to Focus
Investments on Highest-
Margin Sectors: Canada and UK
[CHART]
Allocation of incremental
marketing spend behind growth in high
margin segments, markets and channels
9
Molson Canada
Pricing and
Margin Drive Operating Leverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPS |
|
||||
|
|
% Increase |
|
EBITDA |
|
Amount |
|
Percent(1) |
|
||
Volume |
|
1 |
% |
$ |
8 |
M |
$ |
0.04 |
|
3 |
% |
Pricing |
|
1 |
% |
$ |
25 |
M |
$ |
0.13 |
|
8 |
% |
EBITDA Margin |
|
1 |
% |
$ |
15 |
M |
$ |
0.08 |
|
5 |
% |
[GRAPHIC]
Historically, Molson has delivered a combination of these profit drivers.
Note: (1) Based on CAD$2.10 EPS LTM excluding special items and 1.34 exchange rate CAD$/US$.
10
Coors Americas Leverage: 1997-2001 vs. 2003
|
|
5-Year
CAGR |
|
2003 |
|
Volume: |
|
2.5 |
% |
(1.4 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pricing: |
|
1.9 |
% |
1.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
COGS per barrel: |
|
0.9 |
% |
0.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
MG&A per barrel: |
|
3.9 |
% |
3.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax income: |
|
21.4 |
% |
1.0 |
% |
11
Coors Americas
Operating Leverage Offers Significant Upside
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPS |
|
||||
|
|
% Increase |
|
EBITDA |
|
Amount |
|
Percent(1) |
|
||
Volume |
|
1 |
% |
$ |
11 |
M |
$ |
0.21 |
|
4 |
% |
Pricing |
|
1 |
% |
$ |
28 |
M |
$ |
0.47 |
|
11 |
% |
[GRAPHIC]
Reinvest in the business¾Drop to the bottom line
Note: (1) Based on 2003 diluted EPS of $4.77.
12
Coors Global Growth Model
Leverage strength in high-share markets to grow more strong markets
U.S. 1st:distribution, 2nd: invest with distributors (50/205)
Drivers: YAM, Hispanic programming, trial channels
U.K. Scotland, SE/London, Carling X-Cold, Coors Fine Light
International:
Mexico: Export with FEMSA sales/distribution
China: largest global beer market (volume), 20 cities (no breweries)
Japan: Zima (Coors sales force)
Reduce costs to reinvest against the front-end, grow returns on capital
13
Coors Americas Segment: Coors Brewing Co
Continued strong U.S. pricing environment
Share maintained in a flat, highly competitive beer market
Refined marketing strategy gaining traction with key demographic groups
Sales organization strengthened and making progress in key markets (Hispanic) and channels (national accounts, convenience stores)
Proven track record in improving efficiency and reducing cost of U.S. operations (Goal: US$100mm in next 5 years)
Consistently able to generate cash, pay down debt
Canada: 7+% volume growth; 28% pretax income growth in 2003
14
Coors Europe Segment: Coors Brewers Ltd
Carling #1 U.K. beer brand 30% larger than #2 brand
Significant improvements in balancing volume and margins
Achievements in productivity and cost reductions (new packaging lines in Burton, outsourcing of kegs and pub servicing)
Long-term market trends play to Coors strengths: growth in lagers, move toward off-premise/chains, where brand building is key
2003: Grew volume 7% and share 1.2 percentage points to 20.3%
15
In
the UK, Consistent Strong Growth
in Both the On-Trade
Owned Brand Market Share - On Trade
[CHART]
On-Trade (~65% of CBL volume)
16
and the Off-Trade
Owned Brand Market Share - Off-Trade
[CHART]
Off-Trade (~35% of CBL volume)
17
Synergies
|
|
Expected
Savings |
|
% of Pro
Forma |
|
|
Brewery Network Optimization |
|
$ |
60 |
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Procurement Savings |
|
43 |
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SG&A |
|
40 |
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Best In Class Savings |
|
12 |
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organizational Design |
|
10 |
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
10 |
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
175 |
|
3.3 |
% |
Molson Coors has identified a clear path to substantial synergies
18
Significant Opportunity for Margin Expansion
|
|
EBITDA to Net Sales |
|
Molson Coors |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
CY99 |
|
CY00 |
|
CY01 |
|
CY02 |
|
CY03 |
|
Without |
|
With 100% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Molson* |
|
18.3 |
% |
18.9 |
% |
20.3 |
% |
22.9 |
% |
22.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.5 |
% |
|
19.5 |
% |
Coors |
|
12.1 |
% |
12.2 |
% |
12.2 |
% |
14.1 |
% |
13.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AmBev |
|
21.1 |
% |
28.7 |
% |
30.5 |
% |
36.9 |
% |
35.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A-B |
|
25.9 |
% |
26.4 |
% |
27.6 |
% |
28.2 |
% |
28.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interbrew |
|
23.3 |
% |
21.2 |
% |
21.0 |
% |
21.0 |
% |
21.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heineken |
|
17.2 |
% |
17.1 |
% |
17.5 |
% |
17.6 |
% |
20.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
* Years aligned for comparison purposes; CY99 to CY01 as reported in F02 annual report under the comparable basis; CY02 and CY03 exclude gains on sales and charges for rationalization
US$175M in synergies represent 300
basis points of margin improvement
with significant opportunities for further margin expansion
19
Last Twelve Months Pro Forma Income Statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined |
|
||
(US$M) |
|
Molson |
|
Coors |
|
Pre-synergies |
|
$175M Synergies |
|
Net sales |
|
1,890 |
|
4,146 |
|
6,036 |
|
6,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT |
|
365 |
|
331 |
|
696 |
|
871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Margin |
|
19.3 |
% |
8.0 |
% |
11.5 |
% |
14.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA |
|
413 |
|
585 |
|
998 |
|
1,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Margin |
|
21.8 |
% |
14.1 |
% |
16.5 |
% |
19.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
187 |
|
174 |
|
361 |
|
475 |
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free cash flow* |
|
348 |
|
377 |
|
725 |
|
900 |
|
LTM as of June 30, 2004
CAD/USD exchange rate of 1.34
Excludes purchase accounting adjustments
* EBITDA Capex
(1) Synergies taxed at 35%
Margin Expansion, Stronger Cash Flow, Increased Profits
20
Pro Forma Balance Sheet
(US$M) |
|
Molson |
|
Coors |
|
Combined |
|
|||
Cash |
|
$ |
10.8 |
|
$ |
36.2 |
|
$ |
47.1 |
|
Total current assets |
|
$ |
367.6 |
|
$ |
1,128.5 |
|
$ |
1,496.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
PP&E |
|
742.3 |
|
1,411.0 |
|
2,153.3 |
|
|||
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,931.2 |
|
$ |
4,532.0 |
|
$ |
7,463.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Total current liabilities |
|
$ |
760.9 |
|
$ |
1,175.9 |
|
$ |
1,936.8 |
|
Total debt |
|
840.6 |
|
1,142.1 |
|
1,982.7 |
|
|||
Minority interests |
|
93.5 |
|
29.8 |
|
123.2 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Shareholders equity |
|
929.7 |
|
1,425.4 |
|
2,355.1 |
|
|||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
2,931.2 |
|
$ |
4,532.0 |
|
$ |
7,463.1 |
|
As of June 30, 2004
CAD/USD exchange rate of 1.34
Excludes purchase accounting adjustments
Low leverage provides Molson Coors the financial flexibility to grow
21
Pro Forma Credit Statistics
Debt to EBITDA |
Interest Coverage |
|
|
[CHART] |
[CHART] |
LTM as of June 30, 2004; CAD/USD exchange rate of 1.34. Excludes purchase accounting adjustments; Interest coverage = EBITDA / Interest Expense
All-stock merger preserves financial flexibility and strength to grow
22
Solid Canada and UK
Base with
Major US
Growth Sector and Brazil Option
Canada |
|
United |
|
United States |
|
Brazil |
|
International |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$175M IN SYNERGIES: COST SAVINGS |
||||||||
|
||||||||
Scale benefits |
|
TBD |
|
Close part of |
|
TBD |
|
TBD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ADDITIONAL SYNERGIES / IN-COUNTRY PRODUCTIVITY: REVENUE LIFT |
||||||||
|
||||||||
Coors Light |
|
On-trade |
|
Regional |
|
Rescale and |
|
Development |
support |
|
distribution |
|
development |
|
reposition |
|
markets |
+ |
|
+ |
|
spend |
|
|
|
+ |
Reallocation |
|
Regional |
|
|
|
|
|
Export |
Cdn light to Cdn |
|
development |
|
|
|
|
|
seeding spend |
|
|
spend |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merger addresses growth on
two-levels: costs savings and investments to
grow revenue
23
Revenue Growth Opportunities
Canada |
|
Incremental market investment in Canada; unleash Coors Light |
|
Redirect dollars from Canadian Light to Canadian |
|
|
Support value entry to regain share and drive volume savings |
|
|
|
|
USA |
|
Continue to enhance Coors Light focus/positioning |
|
Leverage Molson brands in full US system |
|
|
Expand testing of Marca Bavaria |
|
|
|
|
UK |
|
Incremental market investment; opportunity for Molson Lager |
|
|
|
Brazil |
|
Investigate the appeal of Coors Light (1) |
|
|
|
Interna- |
|
Mexico: Strong FEMSA sales and distribution for Coors Light |
|
China: Selective investments in worlds largest beer market |
|
|
Japan: High-end Zima profitable and growing |
|
|
Export: Coors Light in seed markets; Bavaria in Australia, NZ |
Additional synergies = more support for critical brands in key markets
Note: (1) Limited quantitative testing in 1999 and qualitative testing in 2001 yielded positive results.
24
Molson Coors A Key Strategic Step
Value Creation |
|
Critical Mass |
|
Vision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction unlocks shareholder value through US$175M of merger synergies |
|
Creates top-5 brewer with global scale and diversity |
|
Natural strategic and cultural fit new company to combine best of both organizations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Experienced management team can deliver upon key objectives |
|
Strong cash flow and balance sheet for further investment in business and Molson Coors future growth |
|
Vision shared by family owners who have been growing the business for generations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Best-run global beer company |
|
Enhanced position in consolidating global brewing industry
25
Supplemental Information
Molson and Coors: The Right Combination
[LOGO] |
|
[LOGO] |
|
|
|
[GRAPHIC] |
& |
[GRAPHIC] |
|
|
|
North Americas oldest brewer |
|
Established in 1873 by Adolph Coors |
|
|
|
13th largest brewer in the world |
|
8th largest brewer in the world |
|
|
|
Leading position
in Canada; |
|
Leading brands in
US and UK beer |
Rich Brewing Heritage, Experienced Management, Leading Brands
27
and Makes Perfect Sense
Creates top-5 brewer with the operational scale to succeed in the global brewing industry
Strong market positions in some of the worlds largest beer markets
Broader geographic base provides diversified sources of revenue, profit and cash
Experienced management team to ensure smooth integration and capitalize on growth opportunities
126 years of consumer industry experience
Proven integration skills
Natural strategic and cultural fit
Complementary product lines and operational geography
Existing strong working relationships
Common values, operating philosophies and heritages
Objective is to deliver top quartile shareholder returns
28
With Broad Scope & Scale
Pro forma LTM net sales and EBITDA(1) of approximately US$6.0 billion and US$1.0 billion, respectively
Combined 2003 volume of 60M hl/51M US bbls
Combined product portfolio of more than forty brands
[GRAPHIC]
Distribution and/or licensing agreements with leading international brewers including Heineken, Grolsch, FEMSA, and Grupo Modelo
(1) EBITDA represents earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization.
29
Balanced Board & Management Team
Molson |
|
Chairman |
|
Coors |
Independent |
|
E. Molson |
|
Independent |
|
|
|
|
|
Molson |
Office of Synergies & Integration |
Coors |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Molson |
Vice Chairman |
|
CEO |
Coors |
Independent |
D. J. O Neill |
|
L. Kiely |
Independent |
|
|
|
|
|
Molson |
|
|
|
Coors |
Family |
|
|
|
Family |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elected |
Elected |
Elected |
Coors |
|
Independent |
Independent |
Independent |
Family |
30
Profit Impact and Estimated Timing
Impact on EBITDA of 100% Synergies |
Expected Timing of Synergies |
|
|
[CHART] |
[CHART] |
50% of synergy capture to occur in the first 18 months
31