Edgar Filing: INTERNATIONAL ENERGY, INC.

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-QSB

(Mark One)

X QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For quarterly period ended June 30, 2005

____ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _____ to _____

INTERNATIONAL ENERGY, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)

333-52040

(Commission File Number)

98-0195748

(I.R.S Employer Identification No.)

1628 West 1st Avenue, Suite 216, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6J 1G1

(Address of principal executive offices)

(604) 659-5005

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes X No

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the Issuer’s classes of common equity as of the latest practicable date. As of August 3, 2005, there were 36,882,500 shares of the Issuer’s Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share outstanding.

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (Check One): Yes [ ] No [X]

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTERNATIONAL ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

FORM 10-QSB, QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2005

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Interim Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheet

Interim Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations

Interim Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Notes to Interim Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation

Item 3. Controls and Procedures

PART II OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

Item 5. Other Information

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

Signatures

Certifications

ITEM 1. Financial Statements

In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-QSB reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations for the periods are presented. The results of operations for the periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

INTERNATIONAL ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY “e.Deal.net, Inc.”)

(A Development Stage Company)

INTERIM UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

JUNE 30, 2005

(Expressed in US Dollars)

BASIS OF PRESENTATION – GOING CONCERN UNCERTAINITIES (NOTE 1)

ASSETS

Current Assets
Cash	$112,755
Total Current Assets	$112,755

Property and Equipment, net (Note 6)	1,471

Oil, Gas and Mineral Leases, unproven (Note 7)	112,000

Total Assets	$226,226

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY

Current Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$13,307
Accrued management fees – related party (Note 5)	162,945
Accrued interest – related party (Note 5)	23,926
Note payable – related party (Note 5)	110,000
Total Current Liabilities	$310,178

Stockholders' Deficiency
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding	-
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 36,882,500 shares issued and outstanding	11,561
Additional paid in capital	864,025
Deficit accumulated during the development stage	(959,538)
Total Stockholders' Deficiency	(83,952)

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficiency	$226,226

See notes to interim unaudited consolidated financial statements.

INTERNATIONAL ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY “e.Deal.net, Inc.”)

(A Development Stage Company)

INTERIM UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2005 AND 2004, AND FOR THE PERIOD FROM INCEPTION (NOVEMBER 6, 1998) TO JUNE 30, 2005

(Expressed in US Dollars)

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2005	Three Months Ended June 30, 2004	Cumulative From Inception (November 6, 1998 to June 30, 2005)
Revenues	$-	$-	$-

Operating Expenses
General and Administrative	6,535	1,720	235,940
Website fees – related party	0	0	48,050
Management and consulting fees – related party (Note 5)	0	0	193,218
Rent	0	0	27,631
Payroll and payroll related expense	0	0	95,024
Depreciation (Note 6)	179	179	4,201
Stock Based Compensation	331,536	0	331,536
Total operating expenses	338,250	1,899	935,600

Other Income (Expense)
Interest Income	329	160	9,700
Interest Expense	(2,069)	(1,994)	(33,638)
Total Other Income (Expense)	(1,740)	(1,834)	(23,938)

Provision for Income Taxes	0	0	0

Net Loss Available to Common Stockholders	$(339,990)	$(3,733)	$(959,538)

Basic and Diluted Loss Per Common Share (Note 4)	$(0.0092)	$(0.0001)	$(0.0419)

Basic and Diluted Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding	36,882,500	36,882,500	22,898,486

See notes to interim unaudited consolidated financial statements.

INTERNATIONAL ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY “e.Deal.net, Inc.”)

(A Development Stage Company)

INTERIM UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2005 AND 2004, AND FOR THE

PERIOD FROM INCEPTION (NOVEMBER 6, 1998) TO JUNE 30, 2005

(Expressed in US Dollars)

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2005	Three Months Ended June 30, 2004	Cumulative From Inception (November 6, 1998 to June 30, 2005)
Cash Flows From (Used In) Operating Activities
Net Loss	$(339,990)	$(3,733)	$(959,538)
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Loss to Net Cash Flows Used In Operating Activities
Depreciation and amortization	179	179	4,201
Common stock issued for management services	0	0	53,050
Stock Based Compensation	331,536	0	331,536
Changes in Working Capital
Increase (Decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses	170	120	7,325
Increase (Decrease) in accrued management fees - related party	0	0	162,945
Increase (Decrease) in accrued interest-related party	1,994	1,994	29,908
Net Cash Flows Used In Operating Activities	(6,111)	(1,440)	(370,573)

Cash Flows (Used In) Investing Activities
Purchase of oil, gas and mineral leases	(112,000)	0	(117,672)
Net Cash Flows Used In Investing Activities	(112,000)	0	(117,672)

Cash Flows From Financing Activities
Proceed From Issuance of Common Stock	156,000	0	491,000
Proceeds from loans from related parties	0	0	110,000
Net Cash Flows Provided By Financing Activities	156,000	0	601,000

Increase (Decrease) in Cash	37,889	(1,440)	112,755
Cash, Beginning of Period	74,866	129,313	0
Cash, End of Period	$112,755	$127,873	$112,755

Supplemental Information

Interest paid during the period	$0	$0	$0
Income taxes paid during the period	$0	$0	$0

Supplemental non-cash investing and financing activities:
Common stock issued for services rendered	$0	$0	$53,050

See notes to interim unaudited consolidated financial statements.

INTERNATIONAL ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY “e.Deal.net, Inc.”)

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO INTERIM UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2005

Note 1 – Basis of Presentation - Going Concern Uncertainties

International Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on November 6th, 1998, under the name “e.Deal.net, Inc.”, with an authorized capital of 100,000,000 shares of common stock, par value of $0.001 per share, and 1,000,000 preferred stock, par value of $0.01. On June 20, 2005, the Company amended its Articles of Incorporation to effect a change of name to International Energy, Inc. from e.Deal.net, Inc.

The Company has been a development stage company and has incurred net operating losses of $959,538 since inception (November 6, 1998). The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, which contemplates continuation of the Company as a going concern, which is dependent upon the Company’s ability to establish itself as a profitable business.

On June 9, 2005, the Company incorporated two wholly owned subsidiaries; International Energy Corp. and e.Deal Enterprises Corp., both subsidiaries are incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada.

Effective June 20, 2005, the Company completed a reorganization by changing its name to International Energy, Inc. and completing a forward split of its common stock by issuing four new shares for one old share.

Through International Energy Corp., the Company plans to be involved in the exploration for petroleum and natural gas in various parts of the United States and Canada. The Company is also involved in the business of providing online automotive information through e.Deal Enterprises Corp.

Due to the “start up” nature of the Company’s business, the Company expects to incur losses as it expands. To date, the Company’s cash flow requirements have been primarily met by debt and equity financings. Management believes it has sufficient cash flow to meet its capital requirements for at least the next twelve months. If the Company is unable to generate profits or unable to obtain additional funds for its working capital needs, it may have to cease operations.

Management is devoting substantially all of its present efforts in securing and establishing a new business and has not generated any revenues. To meet these objectives, the Company expects to raise additional funds through private or public equity investment in order to expand the range and scope of its business operations, but there is no assurance that such additional funds will be available for the Company to finance its operations on acceptable terms, if at all. Furthermore, there is no assurance the net proceeds from any successful financing arrangement will be sufficient to cover cash requirements during the initial stages of the Company’s operations.

In view of these conditions, the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is in substantial doubt and dependent upon achieving a profitable level of operations and on the ability of the Company to obtain necessary financing to fund ongoing operations. Management believes that its current and future plans enable it to continue as a going concern. These financial statements do not give effect to any adjustments which would be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern and therefore be required to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in other than the normal course of business and at amounts different from those reflected in the accompanying financial statements.

Note 2 –Presentation of Interim Information

The accompanying interim unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Form 10-QSB instructions and in the opinion of management contains all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial position as of June 30, 2005, and the consolidated results of operations and cash flows for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004. These results have been determined on the basis of generally accepted accounting principles and practices in the United States and applied consistently with those used in the preparation of the Company's 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.

Certain information and footnote disclosure normally included in the financial statements presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States have been condensed or omitted. It is suggested that the accompanying financial statements be read in conjunction with the accompanying financial statements and notes thereto incorporated by reference in the Company's 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.

Note 3 – Significant Accounting Policies

Oil and Gas Properties

We plan to utilize the full cost method to account for our investment in oil and gas properties. Accordingly, all costs associated with acquisition, exploration and development of oil and gas reserves, including such costs as leasehold acquisition costs, capitalized interest costs relating to unproved properties, geological expenditures, tangible and intangible development costs including direct internal costs are capitalized to the full cost pool. As of June 30, 2005, we have no properties with proven reserves. When we obtain proven oil and gas reserves, capitalized costs, including estimated future costs to develop the reserves and estimated abandonment costs, net of salvage, will be depleted on the units-of-production method using estimates of proved reserves. Investments in unproved properties and major development projects including capitalized interest, if any, are not depleted until proved reserves associated with the projects can be determined. If the future exploration of unproved properties are determined uneconomical the amount of such properties are added to the capitalized cost to be depleted. As of June 30, 2005, all of our oil and gas properties were unproved and were excluded from depletion. At June 30, 2005, management believes none of our unproved oil and gas properties were considered impaired.

The capitalized costs included in the full cost pool are subject to a "ceiling test", which limits such costs to the aggregate of the estimated present value of the future net revenues from proved reserves, based on current economic and operating conditions plus the lower of cost and estimated net realizable value of unproven properties.

Sales of proved and unproved properties are accounted for as adjustments of capitalized costs with no gain or loss recognized, unless such adjustments would significantly alter the relationship between capitalized costs and proved reserves of oil and gas, in which case the gain or loss is recognized in the statement of operations.

Note 4 – Net Loss Per Common Share

Basic earnings or loss per share is based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period of the financial statements. Diluted earnings or loss per share are based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and dilutive common stock equivalents. All per share and per share information are adjusted retroactively to reflect stock splits and changes in par value, when applicable. All earnings or loss per share amounts in the financial statements are basic earnings or loss per share because the inclusion of stock options and warrants outstanding would be antidilutive. The computation of basic and diluted loss per share is as follows at June 30, 2005:

	For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2005	For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2004	Cumulative From Inception (November 6, 1998 to June 30, 2005)

Numerator for basic and diluted–Net loss	$(339,990)	$(3,733)	$(959,538)

Denominator for basic and diluted loss per share – weighted average shares	36,882,500	36,882,500	22,898,486

Basic and diluted net loss per common share	$(0.0092)	$(0.0001)	$(0.0419)

Note 5 – Related Party Transactions

Accrued management fees: During the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, the Company charged $0 and $0, respectively to operations for management and consulting fees incurred for services rendered by Harmel S. Rayat, the Company’s current Secretary, Treasurer and Director, and Herdev S. Rayat, its former President. Accrued management fees as of June 30, 2005 amounted to $162,945. There is no management agreement in place and the Company has not converted any debt to equity. Management and consulting fees total $193,218 for the period from inception (November 6, 1998) to June 30, 2005.

Notes payable and accrued – related party: Notes payable at June 30, 2005, represent four separate loans bearing interest at 7.25% per annum advanced to the Company by its former President, Herdev S. Rayat on the following dates: February 13, 2001 ($40,000); April 24, 2001 ($40,000); June 8, 2001 ($20,000); and July 26, 2001 ($10,000). The entire principal amount and accrued interest is due and payable on demand. Accrued interest on the notes amounted to $23,926 as of June 30, 2005. Interest expense was $1,994 and $1,994 as of June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and $29,908 for the period from inception (November 6, 1998) to June 30, 2005.

Property: The Company’s principal office is located at 1628 West 1st Avenue, Suite 216, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6J 1G1. These premises are owned by a private corporation controlled by a Director and majority shareholder. At present, the Company pays no rent. The fair value of the rent has not been included in the financial statements because the amount is immaterial.

Warrants: Warrants held the Company’s majority stockholder, total 1,560,000, which entitle the holder to purchase one share of common stock at $0.05 per share and expire in October 2007.

All related party transactions are recorded at the exchange amount established and agreed to between related parties.

Note 6 – Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consist of computer equipment with a stated cost of $5,672, accumulated depreciation of $4,201, for a net book value of $1,471. Depreciation expense for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 was $179 and $179, respectively, and for the period from inception (November 6, 1998) to June 30, 2005 was $4,201.

Note 7 – Oil, Gas and Mineral Properties, unproven

On June 13, 2005, the Company entered into a Joint Venture Agreement with Reserve Oil and Gas, Inc. for the purpose of purchasing oil and gas leases, drilling, completing oil and gas wells and the resale of acquired leases. The Company paid in cash $112,000 to purchase four leases totaling 372.5 acres in Sevier County, Utah.

Note 8 – Stock Options

The Company’s Board of Directors agreed to enter into 10 year Non-Statutory Stock Option Agreements with certain employees for 8,000,000 out of the 20,000,000 common shares reserved for issuance under the Company’s 2002 Incentive Stock Option Plan, which was approved by shareholders on September 30, 2002. The objective of this plan is to attract and retain the best personnel, providing for additional performance incentives and promoting the success of the Company by providing individuals the opportunity to acquire common stock.

The options have an exercise price of $0.13, which was the last sale price on May 3, 2005 and the closing bid price of the Company’s shares on June 10, 2005, and all options becoming exercisable in three (3) equal installments of thirty-three and one-third percent (33 1/3%), with the first installment to be exercisable immediately, with an additional thirty-three and one-third percent (33 1/3%) of shares exercisable in six months and the balance becoming exercisable in 12 months.

The Company recorded stock based compensation expense of $331,536 for the quarter ended June 30, 2005. For the quarter ended June 30, 2004, the Company recorded $0 for stock based compensation expense.

Summary of employee stock options information as at June 30, 2005 is as follows:

	Stocks	Weighted Average Exercise Price
Options outstanding and exercisable as at March 31, 2005	0	$0.00
Granted	8,000,000	$0.13
Options outstanding and exercisable as at June 30, 2005	8,000,000	$0.13

The weighted average remaining contractual life of the outstanding stock options at June 30, 2005 is 10 years.

The weighted average fair value of the options granted in the period ended June 30, 2005 was estimated at $0.13 by using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model with the following weighted average assumptions: dividend yield of 0%, expected volatility of 147.69%, risk-free interest rates of 2.9%, and expected lives of three years.

Note 9 – Warrants

Since March 31, 2005, 3,120,000 warrants have been exercised at $0.05/unit.

Share purchase warrants outstanding as June 30, 2005:

Number of Warrants	Exercise Price	Expiry Date
6,880,000	$0.05	October 17, 2007

Each warrant entitles the holder to acquire one common share of the Company

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Cautionary Statement Pursuant to Safe Harbor Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995:

Except for the historical information presented in this document, the matters discussed in this Form 10-QSB for the three months ending June 30, 2005, and specifically in the items entitled "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations", or otherwise incorporated by reference into this document, contain "forward-looking statements" (as such term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995). These statements are identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "believes", "plans", "intend", "scheduled", "potential", "continue", "estimates", "hopes", "goal", "objective", expects", "may", "will", "should" or "anticipates" or the negative thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategy that involve risks and uncertainties. The safe harbor provisions of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, apply to forward-looking statements made by the Company.

The reader is cautioned that no statements contained in this Form 10-QSB should be construed as a guarantee or assurance of future performance or results. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, including those identified within this Form 10-QSB. The actual results that the Company achieves may differ materially from any forward-looking statements due to such risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, and the Company assumes no obligation to update this information. Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by the Company in this Form 10-QSB and in the Company's other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission that attempt to advise interested parties of the risks and factors that may affect the Company's business.

Overview

Through International Energy Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary of International Energy, Inc., we plan to be involved in the exploration for petroleum and natural gas in various parts of the United States and Canada. We are also involved in the business of providing online automotive information through a second wholly owned subsidiary, e.Deal Enterprises Corp.

International Energy Corp.

International Energy Corp., a subsidiary of International Energy, Inc., is an exploration stage oil and gas company engaged in the exploration for oil and gas in the State of Utah, as well as other parts of the US and Canada. On June 9, 2005, International Energy Corp. entered into a Joint Venture Agreement with Reserve Oil & Gas, Inc., pursuant to which the two companies plan on purchasing various leases, drilling and completing oil and gas wells. International Energy Corp. and Reserve Oil & Gas, Inc. currently jointly own 372.5 acres of oil, gas and mineral leases located in Sevier County, Utah.

e.Deal Enterprises Corp

e.Deal Enterprises Corp. (www.edeal.net), a subsidiary of International Energy, Inc., provides a wide range of automotive information, including maintenance and safety tips, information on how to buy and sell pre-owned vehicles, notice of safety and recalls by email alerts, information on parts and service, quotes on insurance, financing sources, automotive dealers, email alerts for service reminders, new products and accessories.

Plan of Operations

The Company’s principal source of liquidity is cash in bank, which we anticipate will be sufficient to fund our operations for the next twelve months. The Company's future funding requirements will depend on numerous factors, including: the time and investment required to source out and invest in promising technology-based ventures; potential oil and gas reserves; to recruit and train qualified management personnel; and the Company's ability to compete against other, better capitalized corporations in similar businesses.

For the next twelve months the Company and its joint venture partner, Reserve Oil & Gas, Inc. (“Reserve”), plan to explore and develop its leases in Sevier County, Utah, which are jointly held by the Company and Reserve. Currently, International Energy and Reserve jointly own 372.5 acres of oil, gas and mineral leases located in Sevier County, Utah. The Company may require additional funds to implement our growth strategy in our oil, gas and mineral exploration operations. The Company is also conducting an ongoing evaluation of its Internet business, an automotive portal located at www.edeal.net, to determine the economical viability of this business.

The Company anticipates that its major shareholder will contribute sufficient funds to satisfy the cash needs of the Company through fiscal year ending March 31, 2006, however, if necessary additional funds may be provided by debt or equity financings.

Due to the "start up" nature of the Company's businesses, the Company expects to incur losses as it expands. The Company expects to raise additional funds through private or public equity investment in order to expand the range and scope of its business operations. The Company will seek access to private or public equity but there is no assurance that such additional funds will be available for the Company to finance its operations on acceptable terms, if at all. See "Risk Factors" for additional details.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As at June 30, 2005, the Company had a cash balance of $112,755. The Company has financed its operations primarily from cash on hand and proceeds from warrant exercises during the three month period ending June 30, 2005.

Net cash flows used in by operating activities was $6,111 for the three month period ending June 30, 2005, compared to net cash flows used of $1,440 for the same period in 2004.

Net cash flows used in by investing activities was $112,000 for the three month period ending June 30, 2005, compared to net cash flows used of $0 for the same period in 2004, primarily due to the initial cost for the purchase of oil, gas and mineral property leases.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $156,000 for the three months period ending June 30, 2005 compared to $0 for the same period in 2004. The Company has financed its operations primarily from cash on hand and proceeds from warrant exercises.

Related Party Transactions

Warrants: Warrants held the Company’s majority stockholder, total 1,560,000, which entitle the holder to purchase one share of common stock at $0.05 per share and expire in October 2007.

All related party transactions are recorded at the exchange amount established and agreed to between related parties.

Off-Balance Sheet Items

The Company currently has no off-balance sheet items.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our discussion and analysis or plan of operations is based upon our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to income taxes and contingencies. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Management believes the following critical accounting policies reflect its more significant estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of its financial statements.

Oil and Gas Properties

The capitalized costs included in the full cost pool are subject to a "ceiling test", which limits such costs to the aggregate of the estimated present value, using a ten percent discount rate, of the future net revenues from proved reserves, based on current economic and operating conditions plus the lower of cost and estimated net realizable value of unproven properties.

Income Taxes

We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. We have considered future market growth, forecasted earnings, future taxable income, and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in determining the need for a valuation allowance. We currently have recorded a full valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets as we currently believe it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized

Contingencies

We may be subject to certain asserted and unasserted claims encountered in the normal course of business. It is our belief that the resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations, however, we cannot provide assurance that damages that result in a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations will not be imposed in these matters. We account for contingent liabilities when it is probable that future expenditures will be made and such expenditures can be reasonably estimated.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs-an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4”, which is the result of the FASB’s project to reduce differences between U.S. and international accounting standards. SFAS No. 151 requires idle facility costs, abnormal freight, handling costs, and amounts of wasted materials (spoilage) be treated as current-period costs. Under this concept, if the costs associated with the actual level of spoilage or production defects are greater than the costs associated with the range of normal spoilage or defects, the difference would be charged to current-period expense, not included in inventory costs. SFAS No. 151 will be effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS No. 151 will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment of APB No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions. SFAS No. 153 requires exchanges of productive assets to be accounted for at fair value, rather than at carryover basis, unless (1) neither the asset received nor the asset surrendered has a fair value that is determinable within reasonable limits or (2) the transactions lack commercial substance. SFAS 153 is effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of FASB No. 153 will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R), "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation". SFAS 123(R) establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services. This Statement focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions. SFAS 123(R) requires that the fair value of such equity instruments be recognized as expense in the historical financial statements as services are performed. Prior to SFAS 123(R), only certain pro-forma disclosures of fair value were required. SFAS 123(R) shall be effective for the Company as of the beginning of the first interim or annual reporting period that begins after December 15, 2005. The adoption of FASB No. 123(R), will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Since year ended March 31, 2005, there has been no new accounting pronouncements.

Risk Factors of the Business

We have sought to identify what we believe to be the most significant risks to our business. However, we cannot predict whether, or to what extent, any of such risks may be realized nor can we guarantee that we have identified all possible risks that might arise. Investors should carefully consider all of such risk factors before making an investment decision with respect to our Common Stock. We provide the following cautionary discussion of risks, uncertainties and possible inaccurate assumptions relevant to our business. These are factors that we think could cause our actual results to differ materially from expected results. Other factors besides those listed here could adversely affect us.

Our early stage of development makes it difficult to evaluate our business and prospects.

Our business is subject to the risks inherent in the establishment of a new business. Specifically, in formulating our business plan, we have relied on the judgment of our officers, directors and consultants but have not conducted any formal independent market studies concerning the demand for our services. Further, due to our limited operating history, we have difficulty accurately forecasting our revenue, and we have limited historical financial data upon which to base operating expense budgets. You should consider our business and prospects in light of the heightened risks and unexpected expenses and problems we may face as a company in an early stage of development in new and rapidly-evolving industries.

We have a general history of losses and cannot assure you that we will operate profitability in the future.

We were formed in 1998, and to date, we have not generated any operating revenues. We have experienced operating losses in each quarterly and annual period since inception. From inception through June 30, 2005, we have accumulated losses of $959,538.

Even if we become profitable in the future, we cannot accurately predict the level of, or our ability to sustain profitability. Because we have not yet been profitable and cannot predict any level of future profitability, you bear the risk of a complete loss of your investment in the event our business plan is unsuccessful.

The manner in which we intend to conduct our business from our automotive subsidiary and charge for our services is new and unproven. Due to the cost and delay inherent in obtaining a market or feasibility study we have not commissioned any such study with regard to our proposed business model. Our business model depends upon our ability to generate revenue streams from multiple sources through our web site, including: subscription and advertising fees from consumers; revenue from facilitating automotive e-commerce transactions (such as financing, insurance, warranties and aftermarket products); fees from the online used vehicle sales services; fees from national advertising programs, promotions and services; and fees for enhanced private seller listings.

In order for us to be successful, large numbers of consumers must visit our web site on a regular basis to attract consumers, vendors and advertisers to list vehicles and to advertise and offer products and services through our web site. Therefore, we must not only develop services that directly generate revenue, but also provide information that attracts consumers to our web site frequently. We will need to develop new offerings in each of these areas as consumer preferences change and new competitors emerge. We cannot assure you that we will be able to provide consumers with an acceptable blend of services and information. We provide information to consumers without charge, and we may not be able to generate sufficient revenue to pay for these services. Accordingly, at this time we cannot be sure that our business model will be successful or that we can generate any operating revenue or become profitable.

With our oil and gas subsidiary, we do not expect positive cash flow from operations in the near term. There is no assurance that actual cash requirements will not exceed our estimates. In particular, additional capital may be required in the event that:

- the costs to acquire additional leases are more than we currently anticipate;

- drilling and completion costs for additional wells increase beyond our expectations; or

- we encounter greater costs associated with general and administrative expenses or offering costs.

The occurrence of any of the aforementioned events could adversely affect our ability to meet our business plans.

Our development of and participation in an increasingly larger number of oil and gas prospects have required and will continue to require substantial capital expenditures. The uncertainty and factors described throughout this section may impede our ability to economically find, develop, exploit, and acquire natural gas and oil reserves. As a result, we may not be able to achieve or sustain profitability or positive cash flows from operating activities in the future.

If we do not retain our key management personnel and attract and retain other highly skilled employees, our business will suffer.

Our future success depends on the skills, experience and performance of our senior management team, other key personnel and advisors, and their ability to operate effectively, both individually and as a group. If any of our existing senior management or other key personnel were to leave the company, it would be difficult to replace them, and our business would be materially harmed. There are no employment agreements with any employee, nor do we maintain any key person life insurance policies for any of our key employees.

Our success will also depend on our ability to recruit, retain and motivate additional highly skilled sales, marketing and engineering personnel. We believe we will face significant competition for individuals with the skills required to develop, market and support our products and services.

We may be unable to raise additional capital in the future.

We may not be able to obtain additional funding when needed, which could limit future expansion and marketing opportunities and result in lower than anticipated revenues. We may require additional financing to further develop our business and to pursue other business opportunities.

If the market price of the common stock declines, some potential financiers may either refuse to offer us any financing or will offer financing at unacceptable rates or unfavorable terms. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or debt securities, the issuance of such securities could result in dilution to our existing stockholders. If additional funds are raised through the issuance of debt securities, the terms of such debt could impose additional restrictions on our operations. If we are unable to obtain financing on favorable terms, or at all, this unavailability could prevent us from expanding our business, which could materially impact our future potential revenues and our business.

The price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly and may be negatively affected by factors beyond our ability to control or predict.

The price of our common stock may be affected by broader market trends unrelated to our or our competitors' operating performances. Our stock price and the stock prices of many other companies in the technology and emerging growth sectors have historically experienced wide fluctuations, including rapid rises and declines in stock prices that have often been unrelated to the operating performance of such companies. Volatile trends and fluctuations are typically the result of the combination of general economic, political and market conditions.

These factors are beyond our ability to control or predict.

Our principal shareholders, executive officers and directors have significant voting power and may take actions that may not be in the best interests of our shareholders.

Our principal shareholders, executive officers, directors and their affiliates, in the aggregate, own more than 69% of our outstanding common stock. These shareholders, if they act together, will be able to control our management and affairs and all matters requiring shareholder approval, including the election and removal of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. This influence over our affairs might be adverse to the interest of our other shareholders. In addition, this concentration of ownership may delay or prevent a change in control and might have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.

Liquidity of Shares in Market Place

As of August 2, 2005 one of our directors beneficially owns approximately 69% of the Company’s outstanding common stock, which could affect the liquidity of the company’s shares in the market.

Applicable SEC rules governing the trading of “Penny Stocks" limits the trading and liquidity of our common stock, which may affect the trading price of our common stock.

Our common stock currently trades on the OTC Bulletin Board. Since our common stock continues to trade below $5.00 per share, our common stock is considered a "penny stock" and is subject to SEC rules and regulations, which impose limitations upon the manner in which our shares can be publicly traded.

These regulations require the delivery, prior to any transaction involving a penny stock, of a disclosure schedule explaining the penny stock market and the associated risks. Under these regulations, certain brokers who recommend such securities to persons other than established customers or certain accredited investors must make a special written suitability determination regarding such a purchaser and receive such purchaser's written agreement to a transaction prior to sale. These regulations have the effect of limiting the trading activity of our common stock and reducing the liquidity of an investment in our common stock.

Stockholders should be aware that, according to the Securities and Exchange Commission Release No. 34- 29093, the market for penny stocks has suffered in recent years from patterns of fraud and abuse. These patterns include:

Control of the market for the security by one or a few broker-dealers that are often related to the promoter or issuer;

Manipulation of prices through prearranged matching of purchases and sales and false and misleading press releases;

"Boiler room" practices involving high pressure sales tactics and unrealistic price projections by inexperienced sales persons;

Excessive and undisclosed bid-ask differentials and markups by selling broker-dealers; and

The wholesale dumping of the same securities by promoters and broker-dealers after prices have been manipulated to a desired level, along with the inevitable collapse of those prices with consequent investor losses.

Furthermore, the "penny stock" designation may adversely affect the development of any public market for the Company's shares of common stock or, if such a market develops, its continuation. Broker-dealers are required to personally determine whether an investment in "penny stock" is suitable for customers.

Penny stocks are securities (i) with a price of less than five dollars per share; (ii) that are not traded on a "recognized" national exchange; (iii) whose prices are not quoted on the NASDAQ automated quotation system (NASDAQ-listed stocks must still meet requirement (i) above); or (iv) of an issuer with net tangible assets less than $2,000,000 (if the issuer has been in continuous operation for at least three years) or $5,000,000 (if in continuous operation for less than three years), or with average annual revenues of less than $6,000,000 for the last three years.

Section 15(g) of the Exchange Act, and Rule 15g-2 of the Commission require broker-dealers dealing in penny stocks to provide potential investors with a document disclosing the risks of penny stocks and to obtain a manually signed and dated written receipt of the document before effecting any transaction in a penny stock for the investor's account. Potential investors in the Company's common stock are urged to obtain and read such disclosure carefully before purchasing any shares that are deemed to be "penny stock."

Rule 15g-9 of the Commission requires broker-dealers in penny stocks to approve the account of any investor for transactions in such stocks before selling any penny stock to that investor. This procedure requires the broker-dealer to (i) obtain from the investor information concerning his or her financial situation, investment experience and investment objectives; (ii) reasonably determine, based on that information, that transactions in penny stocks are suitable for the investor and that the investor has sufficient knowledge and experience as to be reasonably capable of evaluating the risks of penny stock transactions; (iii) provide the investor with a written statement setting forth the basis on which the broker-dealer made the determination in (ii) above; and (iv) receive a signed and dated copy of such statement from the investor, confirming that it accurately reflects the investor's financial situation, investment experience and investment objectives. Compliance with these requirements may make it more difficult for the Company's stockholders to resell their shares to third parties or to otherwise dispose of them.

Future sales of large amounts of common stock could adversely effect the market price of our common stock and our ability to raise capital.

Future sales of our common stock by existing stockholders pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, or following the exercise of outstanding warrants and future option grants, could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

Our directors and executive officers and their family members are not under lockup letters or other forms of restriction on the sale of their common stock. The issuance of any or all of these additional shares upon exercise of warrants will dilute the voting power of our current stockholders on corporate matters and, as a result, may cause the market price of our common stock to decrease. Further, sales of a large number of shares of common stock in the public market could adversely affect the market price of the common stock and could materially impair our future ability to generate funds through sales of common stock or other equity securities.

We must adhere to environmental regulations.

The Company believes it conducts its business in compliance with all environmental laws presently applicable to its facilities. To date, there have been no expenses incurred by the Company related to environmental issues.

We may not have a majority of independent directors.

We cannot guarantee our Board of Directors will have a majority of independent directors in the future. In the absence of a majority of independent directors, our executive officers, who are also principal stockholders and directors, could establish policies and enter into transactions without independent review and approval thereof. This could present the potential for a conflict of interest between the Company and its stockholders generally and the controlling officers, stockholders or directors.

We do not intend to pay dividends in the foreseeable future.

We have never declared nor paid a dividend on our common stock. We intend to retain earnings, if any, for use in the operation and expansion of our business and, therefore, do not anticipate paying any dividends in the foreseeable future.

Risk Factors in the Automotive Industry

We operate in a market that is intensely and increasingly competitive.

The market for providers of used vehicle information and automotive products and services, including classified advertising, is constantly evolving and intensely competitive, and we expect competition to increase significantly due to a number of factors, including low barriers to entry and the relative ease of establishing web sites. There are a number of web sites that offer vehicle listings, including vehicle manufacturers' own web sites and web sites containing electronic classified advertisements, and automotive products and services. In addition, there are numerous web sites that offer vehicle information and other content, as well as community offerings, directly to the vehicle-purchasing consumer or to targeted audiences such as vintage car enthusiasts. We also face competition from traditional media companies such as newspapers, niche classified publishers and television and radio companies, many of which currently operate web sites. In addition to direct competitors, we also compete indirectly with vehicle brokerage firms, discount warehouse clubs, automobile clubs and vehicle auctioneers. Due to low barrier to entry, we expect additional competitors to enter our market in the future. The automotive e-commerce market is rapidly evolving, and we expect competition among e-commerce companies to increase significantly. We cannot assure you that web sites maintained by our existing and potential competitors will not be perceived by consumers, dealers, other potential automotive vendors or advertisers as being superior to ours. We also cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain or increase the levels of visitors logging onto our web site and the number of leads these visitors generate for sellers of used vehicles and automotive products and services or that competitors will not experience greater growth in these areas than we do.

The existence of these competitors, many of which are larger and better financed, may make it impossible for us to establish ourselves as a viable business in the first place; and, even if we do establish ourselves, our ultimate market share may be less than is needed for us to attain profitability. This is turn may have a significant adverse impact on the value of our shares.

Some of our competitors have longer operating histories, larger installed customer bases, greater name recognition and longer relationships with clients and significantly greater financial, technical, marketing and public relations resources than our business. Our competitors may also be better positioned to address technological and market developments or may react more favorably to technological changes. Competitors may develop or offer strategic services that provide significant technological, creative, performance, price or other advantages over the services offered by our business. If we fail to gain market share or lose existing market share, our financial condition, operating results and business could be adversely affected and the value of the investment in us could be reduced significantly. We may not have the financial resources, technical expertise or marketing, distribution or support capabilities to compete successfully.

Our business is dependent on the economic strength of the automotive industry.

We believe that the strength of the automotive industry significantly impacts both the revenues we may potentially derive from our business, other automotive vendors and advertisers and the consumer traffic to our web site. The sales of motor vehicles historically have been subject to cyclical variation characterized by periods of surplus supply and reduced demand. Vehicles are typically discretionary for consumers and may be particularly affected by negative trends in the general economy. The success of our operations in our industry depends to a significant extent upon a number of factors relating to discretionary consumer spending, including economic conditions, consumer confidence in the economy, the prospects of war, other international conflicts or terrorist attacks, the level of manufacturer incentives, the level of personal discretionary spending, product quality, affordability and innovation, interest rates, fuel prices, credit availability, unemployment rates and the number of consumers whose vehicle leases are expiring. In addition, because the purchase of a vehicle is a significant investment and is relatively discretionary, any reduction in disposable income in general or an increase in interest rates or tightening of lending may affect us more significantly than companies in other industries.

We cannot assure that our business will not be materially adversely affected as a result of an industry or general economic downturn. If we do not time our entry into the market correctly we may not be able to implement our business due to our limited resources. Moreover, once we have entered the market, any decrease in the level of vehicle sales could have a material adverse effect on our ability to attain revenues and ultimately profitability.

We may be subject to general vehicle-related laws which may require the use of more of our capital.

There are numerous state laws regarding the sale of vehicles. In addition, government authorities may take the position that state or federal insurance licensing laws, vehicle financing laws, motor vehicle dealer laws or related consumer protection or product liability laws apply to aspects of our business. If federal or individual states' regulatory requirements change or additional requirements are imposed on us, we may be required to modify aspects of our business in those states in a manner that might undermine the attractiveness of our web site's products and services to consumers, dealers, automotive vendors or advertisers or require us to terminate operations in that state, either of which could harm our business. As we introduce new services and if we expand our operations to other countries, we could become subject to additional licensing and regulatory requirements. Substantially all states have laws that broadly define brokerage activities, and government authorities may take the position that under these laws we are acting as a broker. If this occurs, we may be required to comply with burdensome licensing requirements or terminate our operations in those states. In either case, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.

We must provide a high-quality user experience with a wide range of content and services in order to establish our brand.

Promotion and enhancement of the e.Deal.net brand will depend largely on our success in consistently providing a high-quality consumer experience for buyers and sellers of vehicles and automotive products and services, as well as relevant and useful information. In this regard, we will need to constantly develop and introduce new features, functions and services designed to enhance brand name recognition and loyalty.

If consumers, dealers, automotive vendors and advertisers do not perceive our service offerings to be of high quality, or if we introduce new services or enter into new business ventures that are not favorably received by such groups, the value of our brand could be impaired or diluted. Such brand impairment or dilution could decrease the attractiveness of e.Deal.net to one or more of these groups, which could materially and adversely affect our ability to attract advertising and other revenues. Diminished revenues will not only affect our profitability but the value of our shares as well.

Others could claim that we infringe on their intellectual property rights, which may result in substantial costs and diversion of management attention.

We are in a market in which a growing number of companies provide similar services. We cannot be certain that our services do not infringe on patents or other intellectual property rights of others that may relate to our services. We may be subject to legal proceedings and claims from time to time in the ordinary course of our business, including claims of alleged infringement of the trademarks and other intellectual property rights of third parties. Any claims against us relating to the infringement of third-party proprietary rights, even if not meritorious, could result in substantial costs, diversion of resources and management attention and in injunctions preventing us from distributing these services. A successful infringement claim against us could materially and adversely affect us in the following ways:

- we may be liable for damages and litigation costs, including attorneys' fees;

- we may be enjoined from further use of the intellectual property;

- we may have to license the intellectual property, incurring licensing fees;

- we may have to develop a non-infringing alternative, which could be costly and delay projects; and

- we may have to indemnify users of our web site with respect to losses incurred s a result of our infringement of the intellectual property.

Our strategy will require significant expenditures and our business may not generate sufficient revenues to cover these expenditures.

Our business will depend heavily on the recognition and value of the e.Deal.net brand. In particular, we believe that obtaining recognition as a marketplace destination for used vehicles is critical to attracting consumers, dealers, private sellers, commercial vendors and advertisers to our web site. In order to develop the e.Deal.net brand, we expect that operating expenses, particularly sales and marketing expenditures, will require a large portion of our resources. This high level of expenditures will have a negative impact on our results of operations. If we are unable to generate revenues as a result of these investments in our business, we may never achieve or sustain profitability and may not have the ability to or the resources to continue marketing our services.

Internet commerce has yet to attract significant regulation. Government regulations may result in increased costs that may reduce our future earnings.

There are currently very few laws or regulations that apply directly to the Internet. Since our business is entirely dependent on the Internet, the adoption of new local, state or national laws or regulations may decrease the growth of Internet usage or the acceptance of Internet commerce which could, in turn, decrease the demand for our services and increase our costs or otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Tax authorities in a number of states are currently reviewing the appropriate tax treatment of companies engaged in Internet commerce. New state tax regulations may subject us to additional state sales, use and income taxes in the future.

Risk Factors in the Oil and Gas Industry

We currently have no sales and marketing force to generate revenue.

As we remain in the development stage, we have not yet generated any revenues, nor do we have any customers.

The principal target customers for our crude oil production are expected to be refiners, remarketers and other companies, some of which are expected to have pipeline facilities near the producing properties we acquire. In the event pipeline facilities are not conveniently available, we intend to truck or barge crude oil to storage, refining or pipeline facilities.

We intend to sell our oil and gas production under both short-term (less than one year) and long-term (one year or more) agreements at prices negotiated with third parties. Under both short-term and long-term contracts, typically either the entire contract (in the case of short-term contracts) or the price provisions of the contract (in the case of long-term contracts) are renegotiated from intervals ranging in frequency from daily to annual.

We have not yet adopted any specific sales and marketing plans, nor do we expect in the short-term, the need to hire sales and marketing personnel.

Title to Properties

We believe that the title to our leasehold properties is good and defensible in accordance with standards generally acceptable in the oil and gas industry, subject to exceptions that are not so material as to detract substantially from the use of such properties. Our leasehold properties are subject to royalty, overriding royalty and other outstanding interests customary in the industry. The properties may be subject to burdens such as liens incident to operating agreements and current taxes, development obligations under oil and gas leases and other encumbrances, easements and restrictions. We do not believe any of these burdens will materially interfere with our use of these properties.

As is customary in the oil and gas industry, only a preliminary title examination is conducted at the time properties believed to be suitable for drilling operations are acquired by the Company. We rely upon the brokers of the properties to conduct the title examination. We intend to perform necessary curative work with respect to any significant defects in title prior to proceeding with operations.

We operate in a market that is intensely and increasingly competitive.

The oil and gas business is highly competitive. We compete with private, public and state-owned companies in all facets of the oil and gas business, including suppliers of energy and fuel to industrial, commercial and individual customers. Numerous independent oil and gas companies, oil and gas syndicates and major oil and gas companies actively seek out and bid for oil and gas prospects and properties as well as for the services of third-party providers, such as drilling companies, upon which we rely. Many of these companies not only explore for, produce and market oil and natural gas, but also carry out refining operations and market the resultant products on a worldwide basis. A substantial number of our competitors have longer operating histories and substantially greater financial and personnel resources than we do.

Competitive conditions may be substantially affected by various forms of energy legislation and/or regulation considered from time to time by the government of the United States and other countries, as well as factors that we cannot control, including international political conditions, overall levels of supply and demand for oil and gas, and the markets for synthetic fuels and alternative energy sources. Intense competition occurs with respect to marketing, particularly of natural gas.

Government and Environmental Regulation in the Oil and Gas Industry

Domestic development, production and sale of oil and gas are extensively regulated at both the federal and state levels. Legislation affecting the oil and gas industry is under constant review for amendment or expansion, frequently increasing the regulatory burden. Also, numerous departments and agencies, both federal and state, have issued rules and regulations binding on the oil and gas industry and its individual members, compliance with which is often difficult and costly and some of which carry substantial penalties for failure to comply. State statutes and regulations require permits for drilling operations, drilling bonds and reports concerning wells. Utah and other states in which we intend to conduct operations also have statutes and regulations governing conservation matters and establishment of maximum rates of production from oil and gas wells.

Our operations are subject to extensive and developing federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to environmental, health and safety matters; petroleum; chemical products and materials; and waste management. Permits, registrations or other authorizations are required for the operation of certain of our facilities and for our oil and gas exploration and production activities. These permits, registrations or authorizations are subject to revocation, modification and renewal. Governmental authorities have the power to enforce compliance with these regulatory requirements, the provisions of required permits, registrations or other authorizations, and lease conditions, and violators are subject to civil and criminal penalties, including fines, injunctions or both. Failure to obtain or maintain a required permit may also result in the imposition of civil and criminal penalties. Third parties may have the right to sue to enforce compliance.

Some risk of costs and liabilities related to environmental, health and safety matters is inherent in our operations, as it is with other companies engaged in similar businesses, and there can be no assurance that material costs or liabilities will not be incurred. In addition, it is possible that future developments, such as stricter requirements of environmental or health and safety laws and regulations affecting our business or more stringent interpretations of, or enforcement policies with respect to, such laws and regulations, could adversely affect us. To meet changing permitting and operational standards, we may be required, over time, to make site or operational modifications at our facilities, some of which might be significant and could involve substantial expenditures. There can be no assurance that material costs or liabilities will not arise from these or additional environmental matters that may be discovered or otherwise may arise from future requirements of law.

Our future performance is dependent upon our ability to identify, acquire and develop oil and gas properties.

Our future performance depends upon our ability to find, develop and acquire oil and gas reserves that are economically recoverable. Without successful exploration, exploitation or acquisition activities, we will not be able to develop reserves or generate revenues. No assurance can be given that we will be able to find and develop or acquire reserves on acceptable terms, or that commercial quantities of oil and gas deposits will be discovered sufficient to enable us to recover our exploration and development costs or sustain our business.

The successful acquisition and development of oil and gas properties requires an assessment of recoverable reserves, future oil and gas prices and operating costs, potential environmental and other liabilities and other factors. Such assessments are necessarily inexact and their accuracy inherently uncertain. In addition, no assurances can be given that our exploitation and development activities will result in the discovery of any reserves. Our operations may be curtailed, delayed or canceled as a result of lack of adequate capital and other factors, such as title problems, weather, compliance with governmental regulations or price controls, mechanical difficulties, or unusual or unexpected formations, pressures and/or work interruptions. In addition, the costs of exploitation and development may materially exceed initial estimates.

We can provide no assurance that oil and gas will be discovered in commercial quantities in any of the properties we currently hold interests in or properties in which we may acquire interests in the future. Our success will depend upon our ability to acquire working and revenue interests in properties upon which gas and oil reserves are ultimately discovered in commercial quantities. We do not have an established history of locating and developing properties that have oil and gas reserves.

The successful implementation of our business plan is subject to risks inherent in the oil and gas business.

Our oil and gas operations are subject to the economic risks typically associated with exploration, development and production activities, including the necessity of significant expenditures to locate and acquire properties and to drill exploratory wells. In addition, the cost and timing of drilling, completing and operating wells is often uncertain. In conducting exploration and development activities, the presence of unanticipated pressure or irregularities in formations, miscalculations or accidents may cause our exploration, development and production activities to be unsuccessful. This could result in a total loss of our investment in a particular property. If exploration efforts are unsuccessful in establishing proved reserves and exploration activities cease, the amounts accumulated as unproved costs will be charged against earnings as impairments.

We rely heavily upon reserve estimates when determining whether or not to invest in a particular oil or gas property.

The oil and gas reserve information that we use in evaluating oil and gas prospects is based on reserve estimates involving a great deal of uncertainty. Different reserve engineers may make different estimates of reserves and cash flows based on the same available data. Reserve estimates depend in large part upon the reliability of available geologic and engineering data which is inherently imprecise. Geologic and engineering data are used to determine the probability that a reservoir of oil and natural gas exists at a particular location, and whether oil and natural gas are recoverable from a reservoir. Recoverability is ultimately subject to the accuracy of data including, but not limited to, geological characteristics of the reservoir structure, reservoir fluid properties, the size and boundaries of the drainage area, reservoir pressure, and the anticipated rate of pressure depletion. The evaluation of these and other factors is based upon available seismic data, computer modeling, well tests and information obtained from production of oil and natural gas from adjacent or similar properties, but the probability of the existence and recoverability of reserves is less than 100% and actual recoveries of proved reserves usually differ from estimates.

Reserve estimates also require numerous assumptions relating to operating conditions and economic factors, including the price at which recovered oil and natural gas can be sold, the costs of recovery, assumptions concerning future operating costs, severance and excise taxes, development costs and workover and remedial costs, prevailing environmental conditions associated with drilling and production sites, availability of enhanced recovery techniques, ability to transport oil and natural gas to markets and governmental and other regulatory factors, such as taxes and environmental laws. A negative change in any one or more of these factors could result in quantities of oil and natural gas previously estimated as proved reserves becoming uneconomic. For example, a decline in the market price of oil or natural gas to an amount that is less than the cost of recovery of such oil and natural gas in a particular location could make production commercially impracticable. The risk that a decline in price could have that effect is magnified in the case of reserves requiring sophisticated or expensive production enhancement technology and equipment, such as some types of heavy oil. Each of these factors, by having an impact on the cost of recovery and the rate of production, will also affect the present value of future net cash flows from estimated reserves.

In addition, the 10% discount factor, which is required by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") to be used to calculate discounted future net cash flows for reporting purposes, is not necessarily the most appropriate discount factor based on interests rates in effect from time to time and risks associated with us or the oil and gas industry in general.

Our ability to produce sufficient quantities of oil and gas from out properties may be adversely affected by a number of factors outside of our control.

The business of exploring for and producing oil and gas involves a substantial risk of investment loss. Drilling oil and gas wells involves the risk that the wells may be unproductive or that, although productive, that the wells may not produce oil and/or gas in economic quantities. Other hazards, such as unusual or unexpected geological formations, pressures, fires, blowouts, loss of circulation of drilling fluids or other conditions may substantially delay or prevent completion of any well. Adverse weather conditions can also hinder drilling operations. A productive well may become uneconomic if water or other deleterious substances are encountered which impair or prevent the production of oil and/or gas from the well. In addition, production from any well may be unmarketable if it is impregnated with water or other deleterious substances.

There can be no assurance that oil and gas will be produced from the properties in which we have interests. In addition, the marketability of oil and gas which may be acquired or discovered may be influenced by numerous factors beyond our control. These factors include the proximity and capacity of oil and gas pipelines and processing equipment, market fluctuations of prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, allowable production and environmental protection. We cannot predict how these factors may affect our business.

In addition, the success of our business is dependent upon the efforts of various third parties that we do not control. We rely upon various companies to assist us in identifying desirable oil and gas prospects to acquire and to provide us with technical assistance and services. We also rely upon the services of geologists, geophysicists, chemists, engineers and other scientists to explore and analyze oil and gas prospects to determine a method in which the oil and gas prospects may be developed in a cost-effective manner. In addition, we rely upon the owners and operators of oil rigs and drilling equipment to drill and develop our prospects to production. Although we have developed relationships with a number of third-party service providers, we cannot assure that we will be able to continue to rely on such persons. If any of these relationships with third-party service providers are terminated or are unavailable on commercially acceptable terms, we may not be able to execute our business plan.

Market fluctuations in the prices of oil and gas could adversely affect our business.

Prices for oil and gas tend to fluctuate significantly in response to factors beyond our control. These factors include, but are not limited to, the continued threat of war in the Middle East and actions of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries and its maintenance of production constraints, the U.S. economic environment, weather conditions, the availability of alternate fuel sources, transportation interruption, the impact of drilling levels on crude oil and natural gas supply, an the environmental and access issues that limit future drilling activities for the industry.

Changes in commodity prices may significantly affect our capital resources, liquidity and expected operating results. Price changes directly affect revenues and can indirectly impact expected production by changing the amount of funds available to reinvest in exploration and development activities. Reductions in oil and gas prices not only reduce revenues and profits, but could also reduce the quantities of reserves that are commercially recoverable. Significant declines in prices could result in non-cash charges to earnings due to impairment. We do not currently engage in any hedging program to mitigate our exposure to fluctuations in oil and gas prices.

Changes in commodity prices may also significantly affect our ability to estimate the value of producing properties for acquisition and divestiture and often cause disruption in the market for oil and gas producing properties, as buyers and sellers have difficulty agreeing on the value of the properties. Price volatility also makes it difficult to budget for and project the return on acquisitions and development and exploitation of projects. We expect that commodity prices will continue to fluctuate significantly in the future.

Title deficiencies could render our leases worthless.

The existence of a material title deficiency can render a lease worthless and can result in a large expense to our business. It is our practice in acquiring oil and gas leases or undivided interests in oil and gas leases to forgo the expense of retaining lawyers to examine the title to the mineral interest to be placed under lease or already placed under lease. Instead, we rely upon the judgment of oil and gas lease brokers or landmen who perform the field work in examining records in the appropriate governmental office before attempting to place under lease a specific mineral interest. This is customary practice in the oil and gas industry. However, we do not anticipate that we, or the person or company acting as operator of the wells located on the properties that we intend to lease, will obtain counsel to examine title to the lease until the well is about to be drilled. As a result, we may be unaware of deficiencies in the marketability of the title to the leases. Such deficiencies may render the lease worthless.

If we or our operators fail to maintain adequate insurance, our business could be materially and adversely affected.

Our operations will be subject to risks inherent in the oil and gas industry, such as blowouts, cratering, explosions, uncontrollable flows of oil, gas or well fluids, fires, pollution, earthquakes and other environmental risks. These risks could result in substantial losses due to injury and loss of life, severe damage to and destruction of property and equipment, pollution and other environmental damage, and suspension of operations. Any offshore operations that we engage in will be subject to a variety of operating risks peculiar to the marine environment, such as hurricanes or other adverse weather conditions, to more extensive governmental regulation, including regulations that may, in certain circumstances, impose strict liability for personal injuries, property damage, oil spills, discharge of hazardous materials, remediation and clean-up costs and other environmental damages. We could be liable for environmental damages caused by previous property owners. As a result, substantial liabilities to third parties or governmental entities may be incurred, the payment of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

For projects in which we may act as the operator, we would maintain insurance coverage for our operations with policy limits and retention liability customary in the industry, including limited coverage for sudden environmental damages and for existing contamination. We do not believe that insurance coverage for environmental damages that occur over time or insurance coverage for the full potential liability that could be caused by sudden environmental damages is available at a reasonable cost. As a result, we may be subject to liability or may lose substantial portions of our properties in the event of certain environmental damages.

In the projects in which we own a non-operating interest directly or own an equity interest in a limited partnership which owns a non-operating interest, the operator will be required to maintain insurance of various types to cover our operations with policy limits and retention liability customary in the industry. We believe the coverage and types of insurance maintained by the operators of such prospects are adequate and, therefore, have not acquired our own insurance coverage for such prospects. The occurrence of a significant adverse event on such prospects that is not fully covered by insurance could result in the loss of all or part of our investment in a particular prospect which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Complying with environmental and other government regulations could be costly and could negatively impact our production.

Our business is governed by numerous laws and regulations at various levels of government. These laws and regulations govern the operation and maintenance of our facilities, the discharge of materials into the environment and other environmental protection issues. The laws and regulations may, among other potential consequences, require that we acquire permits before commencing drilling, restrict the substances that can be released into the environment with drilling and production activities, limit or prohibit drilling activities on protected areas such as wetlands or wilderness areas, require that reclamation measures be taken to prevent pollution from former operations, require remedial measures to mitigate pollution from former operations, such as plugging abandoned wells and remediating contaminated soil and groundwater, and require remedial measures to be taken with respect to property designated as a contaminated site.

Under these laws and regulations, we could be liable for personal injury, clean-up costs and other environmental and property damages, as well as administrative, civil and criminal penalties. We maintain limited insurance coverage for sudden and accidental environmental damages as well as environmental damage that occurs over time. However, we do not believe that insurance coverage for the full potential liability of environmental damages is available at a reasonable cost. Accordingly, we could be liable, or could be required to cease production on properties, if environmental damage occurs.

The costs of complying with environmental laws and regulations in the future may harm our business. Furthermore, future changes in environmental laws and regulations could occur that result in stricter standards and enforcement, larger fines and liability, and increased capital expenditures and operating costs, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

ITEM 3. Controls and Procedures

a. Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures:

Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time period specified in the SEC's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's management, including the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon and as of the date of that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports the Company files and submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required.

b. Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting:

There were no changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the Company evaluation of these controls as of the end of the period covered by this report that could have significantly affected those controls subsequent to the date of the evaluation referred to in the previous paragraph, including any correction action with regard to significant deficiencies and material weakness.

PART II – Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

None

Item 2. Changes in Securities

None

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

None

Item 5. Other Information

None

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

(a) Exhibits

31.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)

31.2

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)

32.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(b) Reports on Form 8-K

June 16, 2005

At a Board of Directors meeting held on June 10, 2005, the Company’s Board of Directors agreed to enter into 10 year NonStatutory Stock Option Agreements with certain employees for 2,000,000 out of the 5,000,000 common shares reserved for issuance under the Company’s 2002 Stock Option Plan, which was approved by shareholders on September 30, 2002. Also, on June 10, 2005, e.Deal.net, Inc. issued a news release to announce the reorganization of the business of the Company by establishing two new wholly owned operating subsidiaries, authorizing a name change and authorizing a four for one forward split.

On June 9, 2005, the Board of Directors of e.Deal.net, Inc. unanimously voted to reorganize the business of the Company by establishing two new wholly owned operating subsidiaries, authorized a name change and a four for one forward split. The Company’s subsidiary has entered into a joint venture agreement to acquire four oil leases comprising of 372.5 acres located in Sevier County, Utah.

June 30, 2005

International Energy, Inc., was advised by a former representative of Moore Stephens Ellis Foster Ltd. who is now associated with Ernst & Young, LLP., that Moore Stephens’ on May 5, 2005, merged with and into Ernst & Young LLP, effectively constituted their resignation as the Registrant’s independent accountant responsible for auditing its financial statements, and that effective as of such date, Moore Stephens would no longer act as our independent auditor. Effective on May 5, 2005, Ernst & Young LLP, the successor firm to Moore Stephens, was engaged as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Registrant

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Sections 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on this 17th day of August, 2005.

International Energy, Inc.

/s/ Derek Cooper

Derek Cooper

President, Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature

Title

Date

/s/ Derek Cooper

Director , President,

August 17, 2005

Derek Cooper

Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Harmel S. Rayat

Director, Secretary/Treasurer,

August 17, 2005

Harmel S. Rayat

Principal Financial Officer

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Derek Cooper, certify that:

(1)

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of International Energy, Inc. (the “registrant”);

(2)

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3)

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4)

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

(5)

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 17, 2005

By:

/s/ Derek Cooper

Derek Cooper

President and Chief Executive Officer

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Harmel S. Rayat certify that:

(1)

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of International Energy, Inc. (the “registrant”);

(2)

(3)

(4)

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(5)

(a)

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 17, 2005

By:

/s/ Harmel S. Rayat

Harmel S. Rayat

Principal Financial Officer

Exhibit 32.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of International Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on the
Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Derek Cooper, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i)

the Report filed by the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)

The information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.

	INTERNATIONAL ENERGY, INC.

Date: August 17, 2005	By:	/s/ Derek Cooper
		Derek Cooper President and Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Exhibit 32.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of International Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on the Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Harmel S. Rayat, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i)

the Report filed by the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)

	INTERNATIONAL ENERGY, INC.

Date: August 17, 2005	By:	/s/ Harmel S. Rayat
		Harmel S. Rayat Principal Financial Officer