Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013

Or

For the transition period from               to               

Commission file number 000-30941

AXCELIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

108 Cherry Hill Drive

 Beverly, Massachusetts 01915

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(978) 787-4000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes x  No o .

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes x  No o .

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)  Yes o No x

As of July 26, 2013 there were 108,866,951 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

2

Table of Contents

PART 1—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.    Financial Statements.

Axcelis Technologies, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

See accompanying Notes to these Consolidated Financial Statements

3

Table of Contents

Axcelis Technologies, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

See accompanying Notes to these Consolidated Financial Statements

4

Table of Contents

Axcelis Technologies, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

See accompanying Notes to these Consolidated Financial Statements

5

Table of Contents

Axcelis Technologies, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

See accompanying Notes to these Consolidated Financial Statements

6

Table of Contents

Axcelis Technologies, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note 1.         Nature of Business

Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (“Axcelis” or the “Company”) is a worldwide producer of ion implantation, dry strip and other processing equipment used in the fabrication of semiconductor chips in the United States, Europe and Asia. In addition, the Company provides extensive aftermarket service and support, including spare parts, equipment upgrades, and maintenance services to the semiconductor industry.

In December 2012, the Company sold its intellectual property rights and certain assets relating to the Company’s dry strip product line to Lam Research Corporation (“Lam”).  As a result of this transaction, the Company will cease the sale of 300 mm dry strip wafer processing equipment in 2013.  The Company will be able to continue to sell dry strip systems for smaller wafers until December 2015 and to support its installed base of all dry strip systems indefinitely. The Gain on Sale of Dry Strip Assets and Intellectual Property are more fully described in Note 3 below and in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements in the Company’s 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments which are of a normal recurring nature and considered necessary for a fair presentation of these financial statements have been included. Operating results for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for other interim periods or for the year as a whole.

The balance sheet at December 31, 2012 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in Axcelis Technologies, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

The Company, incorporated in December 1995, is a successor to an ion implantation business founded in 1978.

Note 2.  Stock-Based Compensation

The Company maintains the Axcelis Technologies, Inc. 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2012 Equity Plan”), which became effective on May 2, 2012, and permits the issuance of options, restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance awards to selected employees, directors and consultants of the Company. The Company’s 2000 Stock Plan (the “2000 Stock Plan”), expired on May 1, 2012 and no new grants may be made under that plan after this date.  However, awards granted under the 2000 Stock Plan prior to the expiration remain outstanding and subject to the terms of the 2000 Stock Plan. The Company also maintains the Axcelis Technologies, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”), an Internal Revenue Code Section 423 plan.

The 2012 Equity Plan and the ESPP are more fully described in Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements in the Company’s 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of $0.8 million and $0.9 million for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of $1.6 million and $2.0 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  These amounts include compensation expense related to restricted stock units, non-qualified stock options and stock to be issued to participants under the ESPP.

7

Table of Contents

Note 3.   Gain on Sale of Dry Strip Assets and Intellectual Property

In December 2012, the Company sold its dry strip assets and intellectual property to Lam. A portion of the purchase consideration (up to $2.0 million) is contingent upon the Company achieving certain milestones. The Company recorded $0.8 million and $1.2 million for the proceeds received based on its achievement of milestones during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively. These amounts were partially offset by additional costs associated with the lab system purchased by Lam.

Note 4. Computation of Net Loss per Share

Basic earnings or loss per share is computed by dividing income available or loss attributable to common stockholders (the numerator) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding (the denominator) for the period. The computation of diluted earnings per share is similar to basic earnings per share, except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potentially dilutive common shares had been issued, calculated using the treasury stock method.

The components of net loss per share are as follows:

The Company incurred net losses for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, and has excluded the incremental shares attributable to outstanding stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock units from the calculation of net loss per share because the effect would have been anti-dilutive. The following table sets forth the number of incremental shares excluded from the calculation above:

Note 5.  Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

The following table presents the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax, by component for the six months ended June 30, 2013:

(1)         Amount presented before taxes as the tax effect is not material to the consolidated financial statements.

8

Table of Contents

Note 6.         Inventories, net

The components of inventories are as follows:

When recorded, inventory reserves are intended to reduce the carrying value of inventories to their net realizable value. The Company establishes inventory reserves when conditions exist that indicate inventory may be in excess of anticipated demand or is obsolete based upon assumptions about future demand for the Company’s products or market conditions. The Company regularly evaluates the ability to realize the value of inventories based on a combination of factors including the following: forecasted sales or usage, estimated product end of life dates, estimated current and future market value and new product introductions. Purchasing and usage alternatives are also explored to mitigate inventory exposure. As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, inventories are stated net of inventory reserves of $34.9 million and $33.6 million respectively.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company recorded a charge to cost of sales of $0 and $2.1 million, respectively, for 300mm dry strip components. Under the terms of the agreement with Lam, the Company was permitted to manufacture and sell dry strip products through September 2013.  Due to changes in the forecasted sales of the Company’s dry strip products that become known during the six months ended June 30, 2013, a portion of the dry strip inventory components were determined to be non-recoverable.

During the three months and six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company recorded a charge to cost of sales of $0 and $0.5 million, respectively, due to production levels below normal capacity. Similar charges recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2012, were not material to the financial results of the Company.

Note 7.         Restructuring Charges

In 2012, the Company completed reductions in force related to actions taken by management to control costs, improve the focus of its operations, sustain future profitability and conserve cash. As of December 31, 2012, approximately $0.7 million of these costs were accrued and unpaid.

During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company implemented further actions, which resulted in restructuring charges for severance and related costs of $2.2 million recorded. The liability at June 30, 2013 of $0.5 million is expected to be paid primarily in the third quarter of 2013.

Changes in the Company’s restructuring liability, which consists primarily of severance and related costs, included in amounts reported as other current liabilities, are as follows:

9

Table of Contents

Note 8.         Product Warranty

The Company generally offers a one year warranty for all of its systems, the terms and conditions of which vary depending upon the product sold. For all systems sold, the Company accrues a liability for the estimated cost of standard warranty at the time of system shipment and defers the portion of systems revenue attributable to the fair value of non-standard warranty. Costs for non-standard warranty are expensed as incurred. Factors that affect the Company’s warranty liability include the number of installed units, historical and anticipated product failure rates, material usage and service labor costs. The Company periodically assesses the adequacy of its recorded liability and adjusts the amount as necessary.

The changes in the Company’s standard product warranty liability are as follows:

Note 9.  Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.

(a)         Fair Value Hierarchy

The accounting guidance for fair value measurement requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the level of independent, objective evidence surrounding the inputs used to measure fair value. A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fair value hierarchy is as follows:

Level 1     applies to assets or liabilities for which there are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2     applies to assets or liabilities for which there are inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in which significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data.

Level 3     applies to assets or liabilities for which there are unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

(b)         Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The Company’s money market funds are included in cash and cash equivalents in the consolidated balance sheets, and are considered a level 1 investment as they are valued at quoted market prices in active markets.

10

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth Company’s assets which are measured at fair value on a recurring basis by level within the fair value hierarchy.

(c)          Other Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts reflected in the consolidated balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents (which are comprised primarily of deposit and overnight sweep accounts), accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other current assets, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate fair value due to their short-term maturities.

Note 10. Financing Arrangements

Bank Credit Facility

Until July 5, 2013, the Company had a revolving credit facility with a bank pursuant to an Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement dated April 25, 2011 and subsequently amended (the “Revolving Credit Facility”). The facility provided for borrowings up to $30 million, based primarily on accounts receivable, and was subject to certain financial covenants requiring the Company to maintain minimum levels of operating results and liquidity. The Company used the facility to support letters of credit and for short term borrowing as needed. The agreement was expected to terminate on April 10, 2015.

There were no borrowings against this facility during the six months ended June 30, 2013.

As disclosed in Note 15, the Company terminated the Revolving Credit Facility on July 5, 2013.

Note 11.  Income Taxes

Income tax expense relates principally to operating results of foreign entities in jurisdictions, primarily in Europe and Asia, where the Company earns taxable income. The Company has significant net operating losses in the United States and certain jurisdictions and, as a result, does not pay significant income taxes in those jurisdictions.

As of December 31, 2012 there was a valuation allowance of approximately $145 million.  The Company is in a three year cumulative loss position in the United States.  As a result, the Company maintains a 100% valuation allowance to reduce the carrying value of the related deferred tax assets to zero.  The Company will continue to maintain a full valuation allowance for those tax assets until sustainable future levels of profitability are evident.

11

Table of Contents

Note 12. Concentration of Risk

For the three months ended June 30, 2013, three customers accounted for approximately 15.1%, 14.7%, and 10.6% of consolidated revenue. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, one customer accounted for approximately 10.6% of consolidated revenue.

For the three months ended June 30, 2012, three customers accounted for approximately 23.4%, 15.7%, and 10.2% of consolidated revenue, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, two customers accounted for approximately 24.0% and 15.0% of consolidated revenue, respectively.

At June 30, 2013, one customer accounted for 28.4% of consolidated accounts receivable.  At December 31, 2012, two customers accounted for 11.9% and 11.5% of consolidated accounts receivable, respectively.

Note 13.  Contingencies

(a)         Litigation

The Company is not presently a party to any litigation that it believes might have a material adverse effect on its business operations. The Company is, from time to time, a party to litigation that arises in the normal course of its business operations.

(b)         Indemnifications

The Company’s system sales agreements typically include provisions under which the Company agrees to take certain actions, provide certain remedies and defend its customers against third-party claims of intellectual property infringement under specified conditions and to indemnify customers against any damage and costs awarded in connection with such claims. The Company has not incurred any material costs as a result of such indemnifications and has not accrued any liabilities related to such obligations in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Note 14. Recent Accounting Guidance

Accounting Standards or Updates Recently Adopted

Effective January 1, 2013, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. This newly issued accounting update requires that companies present either in a single note or parenthetically on the face of the financial statements, the effect of significant amounts reclassified from each component of accumulated other comprehensive income based on its source and the income statement line items affected by the reclassification. If a component is not required to be reclassified to net income in its entirety, companies would instead cross reference to the related footnote for additional information. As this update only requires enhanced disclosure, the adoption of this update did not impact the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Accounting Standards or Updates Not Yet Effective

The Company has evaluated the accounting guidance recently issued and has determined that these standards or updates will not have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

Note 15. Subsequent Events

Term Loan Secured by Real Estate

On July 5, 2013, the Company entered into a Business Loan Agreement with Northern Bank & Trust Company (the “Bank”), which provides for a three year term loan of $15.0 million, secured by the Company’s real estate in Beverly, Massachusetts (the “Term Loan”). The Company will use the proceeds of the Term Loan as needed to fund growth, specifically investments in the leading edge Purion ion implant platform, and other working capital and general corporate purposes.

12

Table of Contents

The Term Loan bears interest at the rate of 5.5% per annum, with payments of principal beginning August 5, 2014 on a 10 year amortization schedule. Interest is payable monthly beginning on August 5, 2013. All outstanding principal and unpaid interest is due and payable on July 5, 2016.

Subject to exceptions, the Term Loan limits the Company’s ability to, among other things, dispose of assets, engage in a new line of business, have a material change in its executive management, have a change of control, acquire another business, incur additional indebtedness, incur liens, pay dividends and make other distributions, and make investments. In addition, under the Term Loan, the Company must comply with the following financial covenants:

·                  Debt Service Ratio. Commencing in 2014, the Company’s quarterly net operating income multiplied by 4 must be not less than the actual annual debt service over the twelve months following the start of such quarter, multiplied by 1.45.

·                  Net Worth. The Company must maintain a net worth of at least $100.0 million, as shown in its quarterly financial statements.

·                  Liquidity. The Company must maintain consolidated domestic cash and cash equivalents, and investments with maturities of fewer than twelve (12) months of not less than $7.5 million.

The Term Loan provides for events of default including, but not limited to, non-payment, breach of covenants, material adverse change to the business or impairment of the collateral, insolvency, or defaults on other debt. Upon an event of default and during its continuance, the interest rate will automatically increase 5% above the otherwise applicable interest rate.

In addition, upon an event of default, the Bank may elect a number of remedies including, but not limited to, declaring all obligations (including principal, interest and expenses) immediately due and payable, which shall occur automatically if the Company becomes insolvent. The Term Loan is secured by a mortgage on the property located at 108 Cherry Hill Drive and 25 Sam Fonzo Drive, Beverly, Massachusetts.

Except for prepayments of up to 20% of the outstanding Term Loan balance per annum, the Company must pay a 3% early termination fee on amounts prepaid prior to July 5, 2014, a 2% fee on amounts prepaid between July 5, 2014 and July 5, 2015 and a 1% fee on amounts prepaid between July 5, 2015 and July 5, 2016.

Termination of Revolving Credit Facility

Effective July 5, 2013, the Company terminated the Revolving Credit Facility with Silicon Valley Bank, which had provided for borrowings up to $30.0 million based primarily on accounts receivable. With the termination of this facility, the Company has cash collateralized two letters of credit issued by Silicon Valley Bank in the aggregate amount of $1.5 million. The Company paid a $0.3 million early termination fee to Silicon Valley Bank.

Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Certain statements in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” are forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Words such as may, will, should, would, anticipates, expects, intends, plans, believes, seeks, estimates and similar expressions identify such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements contained herein are based on current expectations and entail various risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in such forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a difference include, among other things, those set forth under “Liquidity and Capital Resources” and “Risk Factors” and others discussed elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect management’s analysis only as of the date hereof. We assume no obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect actual results or changes in factors or assumptions affecting forward-looking statements, except as may be required by law.

13

Table of Contents

Overview

The semiconductor capital equipment industry is subject to significant cyclical swings in capital spending by semiconductor manufacturers. Capital spending is influenced by demand for semiconductors and the products using them, the utilization rate and capacity of existing semiconductor manufacturing facilities and changes in semiconductor technology, all of which are outside of our control. As a result, our revenue and gross margins fluctuate from year to year and period to period. Our established cost structure does not vary significantly with changes in volume.  We may experience fluctuations in operating results and cash flows depending on our revenue as driven by the level of capital expenditures by semiconductor manufacturers.

In December 2012, we sold to Lam Research Corporation the intellectual property rights and other assets relating to our dry strip systems product line.  The purchased intellectual property rights include, among other things, worldwide patent rights, patent applications, copyrights, industrial designs, know-how and related rights used by us in our dry strip products.  Lam granted us a worldwide, non-exclusive, non-transferable, royalty free license to use the intellectual property rights sold by us.  The license allows us to make and sell 300 mm dry strip wafer processing equipment for semiconductor applications through September 2013. We will continue to sell dry strip systems for smaller wafers until December 2015 and support our installed base of dry strip systems indefinitely. Due to this continuing interest in the dry strip business, the sale of the intellectual property rights and other assets to Lam have been reported in continuing operations.

The sizable expense of building, upgrading or expanding a semiconductor fabrication facility is increasingly causing semiconductor companies to contract with foundries to manufacture their semiconductors. Consolidation and partnering within the semiconductor manufacturing industry has resulted in a small number of customers representing a substantial portion of our business. Our net revenue from our ten largest customers accounted for 70.0% of total revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2013; compared to 83.8% of revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2012.

Weak industry conditions that we experienced in 2012 continued through the first quarter of 2013, but we believe that beginning in the second quarter of 2013 we have entered a period of market improvement. We continue to maintain tight control of discretionary spending.  Our financial results reflect efforts in recent years to lower our breakeven revenue levels while continuing to invest a significant portion of our personnel and financial resources in research and development programs.

Operating results for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for future interim periods or years as a whole.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon Axcelis’ consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates and assumptions. Management’s estimates are based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Management has not identified any need to make any material change in, and has not changed, any of our critical accounting estimates and judgments as described in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

14

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth our results of operations as a percentage of total revenue:

15

Table of Contents

Revenue

The following table sets forth our revenues.

Three Months Ended June 30, 2013 Compared with Three Months Ended June 30, 2012

Product

Product revenue, which includes system sales, sales of spare parts and product upgrades, was $40.8 million, or 85.8%, of revenue during the three months ended June 30, 2013, compared with $51.5 million, or 87.1% of revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2012. The year over year decrease in product revenue is attributable to weak semiconductor market spending which has kept revenue levels low over the past four quarters.

A portion of our revenue from system sales is deferred until installation and other services related to future deliverables are performed. The total amount of deferred revenue at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was $6.0 million and $6.9 million, respectively. The decrease was mainly due to the decrease in systems sales during the six months ended June 30, 2013, and the timing of acceptance of deferred system sales.

Services

Service revenue, which includes the labor component of maintenance and service contracts and fees for service hours provided by on-site service personnel, was $6.7 million, or 14.2% of revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2013, compared with $7.6 million, or 12.9% of revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2012. Service revenue fluctuates from period to period based on capacity utilization at customers’ manufacturing facilities, which affects the need for equipment service. The decrease during the three months ended June 30, 2013 was primarily due to lower fab utilization in the semiconductor industry as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2012.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 Compared with Six Months Ended June 30, 2012

Product

Product revenue was $75.2 million, or 85.3% of revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared with $99.0 million, or 86.8% of revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The decrease in product revenue is attributable to weak semiconductor market spending.

16

Table of Contents

Services

Service revenue, which includes the labor component of maintenance and service contracts and fees for service hours provided by on-site service personnel, was $13.0 million, or 14.7% of revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared with $15.1 million, or 13.2% of revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2012. Service revenue fluctuates from period to period based on capacity utilization at customers’ manufacturing facilities, which affects the need for equipment service. Results for the first two quarters of 2013 were primarily driven by lower fab utilization in the semiconductor industry as compared to the first two quarters of 2012.

Revenue Categories used by Management

As an alternative to the line item revenue categories discussed above, management also uses revenue categorizations which look at revenue by product line (the most significant of which is ion implant) and by aftermarket, as described below.

Three Months Ended June 30, 2013 Compared with Three Months Ended June 30, 2012

Ion Implant

Included in total revenue of $47.5 million during the three months ended June 30, 2013 is revenue from sales of ion implantation products and related service of $39.0 million, or 82.1% of total revenue, compared with $50.6 million, or 85.6%, of total revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2012. The dollar decrease was due to the factors discussed above for product revenue.

Aftermarket

Our product revenue includes sales of spare parts and product upgrades as well as complete systems. We refer to the business of selling spare parts and product upgrades, combined with the sale of maintenance labor and service contracts and service hours, as the “aftermarket” business. Included in total revenue of $47.5 million during the three months ended June 30, 2013 is revenue from our aftermarket business of $30.9 million, compared to $32.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012. Aftermarket revenue fluctuates from period to period based on capacity utilization at customers’ manufacturing facilities which affects the sale of spare parts and demand for equipment service.  The decrease in aftermarket revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012 was due to lower levels of fab utilization in the semiconductor industry that began in the second half of 2012 and has continued through the first quarter of 2013.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 Compared with Six Months Ended June 30, 2012

Ion Implant

Included in total revenue of $88.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2013 is revenue from sales of ion implantation products and related service of $71.4 million, or 81.0% of total revenue, compared with $90.9 million, or 79.7%, of total revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The dollar decrease was due to the factors discussed above for product revenue.

Aftermarket

Included in total revenue of $88.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2013 is revenue from our aftermarket business of $58.9 million, compared to $65.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. Aftermarket revenue fluctuates from period to period based on capacity utilization at customers’ manufacturing facilities which affects the sale of spare parts and demand for equipment service.  The decrease in aftermarket revenue in the first half of 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012 was due to a decrease in fab utilization in the semiconductor industry that began in the second half of 2012 and has continued through the first quarter of 2013.

17

Table of Contents

Gross Profit / Gross Margin

The following table sets forth our gross profit / gross margin.