United States
Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549

 

SCHEDULE 14A
(Rule 14a-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No.  )

 

Check the appropriate box:

MFA Financial, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

TABLE OF CONTENTS

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON MAY 22, 2013

To the Stockholders of MFA Financial, Inc.:

The 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of MFA Financial, Inc., a Maryland corporation (“MFA,” “we” or “our”), will be held at The Peninsula Hotel, 700 Fifth Avenue (at 55^th Street), New York, New York, on Wednesday, May 22, 2013, at 10:00 a.m., New York City time, for the following purposes:

The close of business on March 26, 2013, has been fixed by the Board as the record date for the determination of the stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof.

Whether or not you plan to attend in person, in order to assure proper representation of your shares at the Annual Meeting, we urge you to submit your proxy voting instructions to MFA by using our dedicated internet voting website, our toll-free telephone number or, if you prefer, the mail. By submitting your proxy voting instructions promptly, either by internet, telephone or mail, you can help MFA avoid the expense of follow-up mailings and ensure the presence of a quorum at the Annual Meeting. If you attend the Annual Meeting, you may, if so desired, revoke your prior proxy voting instructions and vote your shares in person.

In order to submit proxy voting instructions prior to the Annual Meeting, you have the option of authorizing your proxy (a) through the internet at www.proxyvote.com and following the instructions described on the notice and access card previously mailed to you or on your proxy card, (b) by toll-free telephone at 1-800-690-6903 and following the instructions described on your proxy card or (c) by completing, signing and dating your proxy card and returning it promptly in the postage-prepaid envelope provided.

Your proxy is being solicited by the Board. The Board recommends that you vote in favor of the proposed items.

By Order of the Board

Shira E. Finkel
Senior Vice President and Secretary

New York, New York
April 9, 2013

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

General Information			1
Annual Report			1
Voting Information			2
Corporate Governance			3
Board and Committee Matters			8
Report of the Audit Committee			9
Compensation of Non-Employee Directors			11
Election of Directors			13
Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm			17
Management			19
Executive Compensation			21
Compensation Discussion and Analysis			21
Report of the Compensation Committee			32
Summary Compensation Table			33
Advisory (Non-Binding) Resolution to Approve Executive Compensation			47
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance			48
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions			48
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management			49
Other Matters			50
Submission of Stockholder Proposals			50
Householding of Proxy Materials			50
Miscellaneous			51

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT
FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON MAY 22, 2013

GENERAL INFORMATION

This Proxy Statement is being furnished to stockholders in connection with the solicitation of proxies by and on behalf of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of MFA Financial, Inc., a Maryland corporation (“MFA,” the “Company,” “we,” “our” or “us”), for use at MFA’s 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held at The Peninsula Hotel, 700 Fifth Avenue (at 55^th Street), New York, New York, on Wednesday, May 22, 2013, at 10:00 a.m., New York City time, or at any postponement or adjournment thereof.

In order to submit proxy voting instructions prior to the Annual Meeting, stockholders have the option to authorize their proxy by internet, telephone or mail. Stockholders are requested to authorize a proxy to vote their shares of our common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”), at the Annual Meeting by using the dedicated internet voting website or toll-free telephone number provided for this purpose. Alternatively, stockholders may authorize their proxy by completing, signing and dating their proxy card and returning it in the postage-prepaid envelope provided. Specific instructions regarding the internet and telephone voting options are described on the notice of access card previously mailed to you and/or on your proxy card. Stockholders who authorize their proxy by using the internet or telephone voting options do not need to also return a proxy card.

Shares of Common Stock represented by properly submitted proxies received by us prior to the Annual Meeting will be voted according to the instructions specified on such proxies. Any stockholder submitting a proxy retains the power to revoke such proxy at any time prior to its exercise at the Annual Meeting by (i) delivering prior to the Annual Meeting a written notice of revocation to the attention of our Corporate Secretary at MFA Financial, Inc., 350 Park Avenue, 20^th Floor, New York, New York 10022, (ii) submitting a later dated proxy or (iii) voting in person at the Annual Meeting. Attending the Annual Meeting will not automatically revoke a stockholder’s previously submitted proxy unless such stockholder votes in person at the Annual Meeting.

If a proxy is properly completed, submitted without specifying any instructions thereon and not revoked prior to the Annual Meeting, the shares of Common Stock represented by such proxy will be voted (i) FOR the election of the three directors named in this Proxy Statement to serve on the Board until our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualify, (ii) FOR the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2013 and (iii) FOR the advisory (non-binding) resolution to approve our executive compensation. As to any other business which may properly come before the Annual Meeting, the persons named as proxy holders on your proxy card will vote the shares of Common Stock represented by properly submitted proxies in their discretion.

This Proxy Statement, the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and the related proxy card are first being sent and made available to stockholders on or about April 9, 2013.

ANNUAL REPORT

This Proxy Statement is accompanied by our Annual Report to Stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2012, including financial statements audited by KPMG LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, and their report thereon, dated March 6, 2013.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

VOTING INFORMATION

Record Date

Stockholders will be entitled to one vote for each share of Common Stock held of record at the close of business on March 26, 2013 (the “Record Date”), with respect to (i) the election of the three directors named in this Proxy Statement to serve on the Board until our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualify, (ii) the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2013, (iii) the advisory (non-binding) resolution to approve our executive compensation (“Say-on-Pay”) and (iv) any other proposal for stockholder action that may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof.

As of the Record Date, we had issued and outstanding 358,871,227 shares of Common Stock.

Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes

Abstentions and broker non-votes are each included in the determination of the number of shares present at the Annual Meeting for the purpose of determining whether a quorum is present.

An abstention is the voluntary act of not voting by a stockholder who is present at a meeting and entitled to vote.

A broker non-vote occurs when a nominee (i.e., a broker) holding shares for a beneficial owner has not received instructions from the beneficial owner on a particular proposal for which the nominee is not permitted to exercise discretionary voting power under New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) rules, and therefore, the nominee does not cast a vote on the proposal.

Under NYSE rules, brokers are not permitted to vote shares held in their clients’ accounts on uncontested elections of directors or on the non-binding Say-on-Pay vote, unless, in each case, the client (as beneficial owner) has provided voting instructions to the broker. The ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm is, however, a proposal for which brokers do have discretionary voting authority. If you hold your shares in “street name” (i.e., through a broker or other nominee), your broker or nominee will not vote your shares unless you provide instructions on how to vote your shares. You can instruct your broker or nominee how to vote your shares by following the voting procedures provided by such broker or nominee.

Abstentions do not count as votes cast on the election of directors, the ratification of the appointment of KPMG or the advisory (non-binding) vote on Say-or-Pay. Accordingly, abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, will have no effect on the election of directors, the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP or the advisory (non-binding) vote on Say-on-Pay.

Quorum and Required Vote

The presence, in person or by proxy, of holders of Common Stock entitled to cast a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast at the Annual Meeting shall constitute a quorum.

The disposition of business scheduled to come before the Annual Meeting, assuming a quorum is present, will require the following affirmative votes:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Role of the Board

Pursuant to our Charter and Bylaws and the Maryland General Corporation Law, our business and affairs are managed under the direction of the Board. The Board has the responsibility for establishing broad corporate policies and for our overall performance and direction, but is not involved in our day-to-day operations. Members of the Board keep informed of our business by participating in meetings of the Board and its committees, by reviewing analyses, reports and other materials provided to them and through discussions with our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers.

Board Leadership Structure

The positions of our Chairman of the Board and our Chief Executive Officer are currently held by Stewart Zimmerman. In 2010, the Board established the function of Lead Director (who is, as discussed below, a director fully independent of MFA’s management). At the annual meeting of the Board held in May 2012 following our 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the Board’s independent directors appointed George H. Krauss to this position to serve until the 2013 annual meeting of the Board. We believe that this Board leadership structure is appropriate for MFA, in that the combined role of the Chairman of the Board and the Chief Executive Officer promotes unified leadership and direction for MFA, allowing for a single, clear focus for management to execute MFA’s strategy and business plan, while also providing for effective oversight by an independent Board assisted by the Lead Director. We believe the Chief Executive Officer is in the best position to focus the independent directors’ attention on the issues of greatest importance to MFA and its stockholders. We believe that our overall corporate governance policies and practices combined with the strength of our independent directors minimize any potential conflicts that may result from combining the roles of our Chairman of the Board and our Chief Executive Officer. As part of its annual self-assessment, the Board will consider whether the current leadership structure continues to be optimal for MFA and its stockholders.

Lead Director Position

The Board established the Lead Director role to be fully independent of MFA’s management. George H. Krauss, an independent director, currently serves as the Lead Director. Among other things, the Lead Director: (1) presides at all meetings of the Board at which the Chairman of the Board is not present; (2) has the authority to call, and will lead, meetings and executive sessions of our independent and non-management directors; (3) consults with the Chairman of the Board in establishing the agenda for Board meetings; (4) helps facilitate communication between the Chairman of the Board/Chief Executive Officer and the Board; (5) acts as a liaison between the Board and management; (6) confirms the Board has a process of regularly assessing the effectiveness of the Board, its committees and individual directors and management; and (7) performs such other functions as may be designated from time to time. The Lead Director is elected annually by a majority of the non-management and independent directors then serving on the Board.

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

The Board is responsible for the oversight of MFA’s risk management. The Board oversees and monitors MFA’s risk management framework and actively reviews risks that may be material to us. As part of this oversight process, the Board regularly receives reports from management on areas of material risk to MFA, including operational, financial, interest rate, liquidity, credit, market, legal and regulatory, accounting and strategic risks. The Board receives these reports from the appropriate sources within MFA to enable it to understand our risk identification, risk management and risk mitigation strategies. To the extent applicable, the Board and its committees coordinate their risk oversight roles. As part of its written charter, the Audit Committee discusses guidelines and policies to govern the process by which risk assessment and risk management, including major financial risk exposures, is undertaken by MFA and its management and the Compensation Committee oversees our compensation programs to ensure that they do not encourage unnecessary or excessive risk taking. The goal of these processes is to achieve serious and thoughtful board-level attention to our risk management process and framework, the nature of the material risks we face and the adequacy of our risk management process and framework designed to respond to and mitigate these risks.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Director Independence

The Corporate Governance Guidelines (the “Governance Guidelines”) provide that a majority of the directors serving on the Board must be independent as affirmatively determined by the Board in accordance with the rules and standards established by the NYSE. In addition, as permitted under the Governance Guidelines, the Board has also adopted certain additional categorical standards (the “Independence Standards”) to assist it in making determinations with respect to the independence of directors. Based upon its review of all relevant facts and circumstances, the Board has affirmatively determined that six of our eight current directors, Stephen R. Blank, James A. Brodsky, Michael L. Dahir, Alan L. Gosule, Robin Josephs and George H. Krauss, qualify as independent directors under the NYSE listing standards and the Independence Standards.

The Independence Standards can be found on our website at www.mfafinancial.com.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

The Board has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code of Conduct”) that applies to our directors, officers and employees. The Code of Conduct was designed to assist directors, officers and employees in complying with the law, in resolving moral and ethical issues that may arise and in complying with our policies and procedures. Among the areas addressed by the Code of Conduct are compliance with applicable laws, conflicts of interest, use and protection of our assets, confidentiality, communications with the public, internal accounting controls, improper influence of audits, records retention, fair dealing, discrimination and harassment, and health and safety. The Board’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for assessing and periodically reviewing the adequacy of the Code of Conduct and will recommend, as appropriate, proposed changes to the Board.

The Code of Conduct can be found on our website at www.mfafinancial.com. We will also provide the Code of Conduct, free of charge, to stockholders who request it. Requests should be directed to the attention of our General Counsel at MFA Financial, Inc., 350 Park Avenue, 20^th Floor, New York, New York 10022.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

The Board has adopted the Governance Guidelines that address significant issues of corporate governance and set forth procedures by which the Board carries out its responsibilities. Among the areas addressed by the Governance Guidelines are Board composition, Board functions and responsibilities, Board committees, director qualification standards, director resignations, access to management and independent advisors, director compensation, management succession, director orientation and continuing education and Board and committee performance evaluations. The Board’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for assessing and periodically reviewing the adequacy of the Governance Guidelines and will recommend, as appropriate, proposed changes to the Board.

The Governance Guidelines can be found on our website at www.mfafinancial.com. We will also provide the Governance Guidelines, free of charge, to stockholders who request them. Requests should be directed to the attention of our General Counsel at MFA Financial, Inc., 350 Park Avenue, 20^th Floor, New York, New York 10022.

Majority Voting for Directors/Director Resignation Policy.  Our Bylaws provide that a nominee for director will be elected by receiving the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on the election of such nominee on a per nominee basis in a non-contested election (i.e., where the number of nominees is the same as the number of directors to be elected).

Under the terms of our Governance Guidelines, if a nominee for director who is an incumbent director receives a greater number of votes “against” than votes “for” his or her election, the director is required to promptly tender to the Board his or her offer to resign from the Board. Upon recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Board, excluding such individual, will decide whether or not to accept such offer to resign, and thereafter, it will promptly and publicly disclose its decision. If the Board determines not to accept the director’s offer to resign, the director will continue to serve on the Board until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until the director’s successor is duly elected and qualified or until the director’s earlier resignation or removal. The Board may consider any factors it deems relevant in deciding whether to accept a director’s resignation.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

In a contested election, the director nominees who receive a plurality of votes cast are elected as directors. Under the plurality standard, the number of persons equal to the number of vacancies to be filled who receive more votes than other nominees are elected to the board, regardless of whether they receive a majority of votes cast.

Review and Approval of Transactions with Related Persons

The Board has adopted written policies and procedures for review, approval and monitoring of transactions involving us and “related persons” (directors and executive officers, stockholders beneficially owning greater than 5% of our outstanding capital stock or immediate family members of any of the foregoing). The policy covers any related person transaction that meets the minimum threshold for disclosure in the Proxy Statement under the relevant rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) (generally, transactions involving amounts exceeding $120,000 in which a related person has a direct or indirect material interest). A summary of these policies and procedures is set forth below:

Policies

Procedures

Identification of Director Candidates

In accordance with the Governance Guidelines and its written charter, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for identifying and evaluating director candidates for the Board and for recommending director candidates to the Board for consideration as nominees to stand for election at our annual meetings of stockholders. Director candidates are nominated to stand for election to the Board in accordance with the procedures set forth in the written charter of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

We seek highly-qualified director candidates from diverse business, professional and educational backgrounds who combine a broad spectrum of experience and expertise with a reputation for the highest personal and professional ethics, integrity and values. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee periodically reviews the appropriate skills and characteristics required of our directors in the context of the current composition of the Board, our operating requirements and the interests of the Company. In accordance

TABLE OF CONTENTS

with the Governance Guidelines, director candidates should have experience in positions with a high degree of responsibility and decision making, be able to exercise good business judgment, be able to provide practical wisdom and mature judgment and be leaders in the companies or institutions with which they are affiliated. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews director candidates with the objective of assembling a slate of directors that can best fulfill and promote our goals, and recommends director candidates based upon contributions they can make to the Board and management and their ability to represent our long-term interests and those of our stockholders.

Although we do not have a formal written diversity policy, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers diversity of race, ethnicity, gender, age, cultural background, professional experiences and expertise and education in evaluating director candidates for Board membership. We believe that considerations of diversity are, and will continue to be, an important component relating to the Board’s composition as multiple and varied points of view contribute to a more effective decision-making process.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee accepts stockholder recommendations of director candidates and applies the same standards in considering director candidates submitted by stockholders as it does in evaluating director candidates recommended by members of the Board or management. Upon determining the need for additional or replacement Board members, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee identifies director candidates and assesses such director candidates based upon information it receives in connection with the recommendation or otherwise possesses, which may be supplemented by certain inquiries. In conducting this assessment, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers knowledge, experience, skills, diversity and such other factors as it deems appropriate in light of our current needs and those of the Board. If the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee determines, in consultation with other directors, including the Chairman of the Board, that a more comprehensive evaluation is warranted, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may then obtain additional information about a director candidate’s background and experience, including by means of personal interviews. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will then re-evaluate the director candidate using its evaluation criteria. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receives input on such director candidates from other directors, including the Chairman of the Board, and recommends director candidates to the Board for nomination. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may, in its sole discretion, engage one or more search firms and/or other consultants, experts or professionals to assist in, among other things, identifying director candidates or gathering information regarding the background and experience of director candidates. If the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee engages any such third party, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will have sole authority to approve any fees or terms of retention relating to these services.

Our stockholders of record who comply with the notice procedures outlined under “Submission of Stockholder Proposals,” which may be found on page 50 of this Proxy Statement, may recommend director candidates for evaluation and consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Stockholders may make recommendations at any time, but recommendations of director candidates for consideration as director nominees at our annual meeting of stockholders must be received not less than 120 days before the first anniversary of the date of the proxy statement for the previous year’s annual meeting of stockholders. Accordingly, to submit a director candidate for consideration for nomination at our 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, stockholders must submit the recommendation, in writing, by no later than December 10, 2013. The written notice must demonstrate that it is being submitted by a stockholder of record of MFA and include information about each proposed director candidate, including name, age, business address, principal occupation, principal qualifications and other relevant biographical information. In addition, the stockholder must provide confirmation of each director candidate’s consent to serve as a director and contact information for each director candidate so that his or her interest can be verified and, if necessary, to gather further information.

Communications with the Board

The Board has established a process by which stockholders and/or other interested parties may communicate in writing with our directors, a committee of the Board, the Board’s non-employee directors as a group or the Board generally. Any such communications may be sent to the Board by U.S. mail or overnight

TABLE OF CONTENTS

delivery and should be directed to the attention of our General Counsel at MFA Financial, Inc., 350 Park Avenue, 20^th Floor, New York, New York 10022, who will forward them to the intended recipient(s). Any such communications may be made anonymously. Unsolicited advertisements, invitations to conferences or promotional materials, in the discretion of the General Counsel, are not required, however, to be forwarded to the directors. The Board has approved this communication process.

Executive Sessions of Independent Directors

In accordance with the Governance Guidelines, the independent directors serving on the Board meet in executive session at least four times per year at regularly scheduled meetings of the Board. These executive sessions of the independent directors are presided over by George H. Krauss, in his capacity as the Lead Director.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

BOARD AND COMMITTEE MATTERS

Board of Directors

The Board is responsible for directing the management of our business and affairs. The Board conducts its business through meetings and actions taken by written consent in lieu of meetings. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Board held five meetings and acted 12 times by written consent in lieu of a meeting. Each of our directors attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board and of the Board’s committees on which they served during 2012. All eight directors serving on the Board attended our 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The Board’s policy, as set forth in our Governance Guidelines, is to encourage and promote the attendance by each director at all scheduled meetings of the Board and all meetings of our stockholders.

Committees of the Board

The Board has three standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

Audit Committee.  Stephen R. Blank (Chair), Michael L. Dahir and Robin Josephs are currently the members of the Audit Committee. The Board has determined that all of the members of the Audit Committee are independent as required by the NYSE listing standards, SEC rules governing the qualifications of audit committee members, the Governance Guidelines, the Independence Standards and the written charter of the Audit Committee. The Board has also determined, based upon its qualitative assessment of their relevant levels of knowledge and business experience (see “Election of Directors” beginning on page 13 of this Proxy Statement for a description of their respective backgrounds and experience), that Mr. Blank, Mr. Dahir and Ms. Josephs qualify as “audit committee financial experts” for purposes of, and as defined by, SEC rules and have the requisite accounting or related financial management expertise required by the NYSE listing standards. In addition, the Board has determined that all of the members of the Audit Committee are financially literate as required by the NYSE listing standards. During 2012, the Audit Committee met eight times.

The Audit Committee is responsible for, among other things, engaging our independent registered public accounting firm, reviewing with the independent registered public accounting firm the plans and results of their audit engagement, approving professional services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm, reviewing the independence of the auditors, considering the range of audit and non-audit fees, reviewing the adequacy of our internal controls, accounting and reporting practices and assessing the quality and integrity of our consolidated financial statements. In accordance with its charter, the Audit Committee has a policy requiring that the terms of all auditing and non-auditing services to be provided by our independent registered public accounting firm be pre-approved by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee also reviews and evaluates the scope of all non-auditing services to be provided by our independent registered public accounting firm in order to confirm that such services are permitted by the rules and/or regulations of the NYSE, the SEC, the Financial Accounting Standards Board or other similar governing bodies. The specific responsibilities of the Audit Committee are set forth in its charter, which can be found on our website at www.mfafinancial.com.

Compensation Committee.  Robin Josephs (Chair), Stephen R. Blank, James A. Brodsky and Alan L. Gosule are currently the members of the Compensation Committee. The Board has determined that all of the members of the Compensation Committee are independent as required by the NYSE listing standards, the Governance Guidelines, the Independence Standards and the written charter of the Compensation Committee. During 2012, the Compensation Committee met seven times and acted two times by written consent in lieu of a meeting.

The Compensation Committee is responsible for, among other things, overseeing the approval, administration and evaluation of MFA’s compensation plans, policies and programs and reviewing and establishing the compensation of our directors and executive officers. The specific responsibilities of the Compensation Committee are set forth in its charter, which can be found on our website at www.mfafinancial.com.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation.  There are no compensation committee interlocks and no insider participation in compensation decisions that are required to be reported under the rules and regulations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.  Michael L. Dahir (Chair), James A. Brodsky and Alan L. Gosule are currently the members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Board has determined that all of the members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are independent as required by the NYSE listing standards, the Governance Guidelines, the Independence Standards and the written charter of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. During 2012, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met four times.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for, among other things, assisting the Board in identifying individuals qualified to become Board members, recommending to the Board the director nominees to stand for election by our stockholders, recommending to the Board the directors to serve on each of the Board’s committees, developing and recommending to the Board the corporate governance principles and guidelines applicable to us and directing the Board in an annual review of its performance. The specific responsibilities of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are set forth in its charter, which can be found on our website at www.mfafinancial.com.

We will provide the charters of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and/or Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, free of charge, to stockholders who request them. Requests should be directed to the attention of our General Counsel at MFA Financial, Inc., 350 Park Avenue, 20^th Floor, New York, New York 10022.

Report of the Audit Committee

The Audit Committee of the Board is responsible for monitoring, on behalf of the Board, the integrity of our consolidated financial statements, our system of internal controls, the performance, qualifications and independence of our independent registered public accounting firm and our compliance with related legal and regulatory requirements. The Audit Committee has the sole authority and responsibility to select, determine the compensation of, evaluate the performance of and, when appropriate, replace our independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board.

Management has the primary responsibility for our financial reporting process, including the system of internal controls, for the preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and for the report on our internal control over financial reporting. KPMG LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, is responsible for performing an independent audit of (i) our annual consolidated financial statements and expressing an opinion as to their conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and (ii) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and expressing an opinion with respect thereto. The Audit Committee’s responsibility is to oversee and review the financial reporting process and to review and discuss management’s report on our internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee is not, however, professionally engaged in the practice of accounting or auditing and does not provide any expert or other special assurance as to such financial statements concerning compliance with laws, regulations or accounting principles generally accepted in the United States or as to auditor independence. The Audit Committee relies, without independent verification, on the information provided to it and on the representations made by our management and our independent registered public accounting firm.

During 2012, the Audit Committee held eight meetings. The meetings were designed, among other things, to facilitate and encourage communication among the Audit Committee, management, KPMG LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, and Grant Thornton LLP, our internal auditing firm.

The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, and the related report prepared by KPMG LLP, with management and KPMG LLP. The Audit Committee discussed with KPMG LLP and Grant Thornton LLP the overall scope and plans for their respective audits, including internal control testing under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Audit Committee also reviewed and discussed with management, KPMG LLP and Grant Thornton LLP management’s annual report on our internal control over financial reporting and the reports prepared by

TABLE OF CONTENTS

KPMG LLP with respect to its audit of our internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee met with KPMG LLP and Grant Thornton LLP, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examinations, their evaluations of our internal controls and the overall quality of our financial reporting.

The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with KPMG LLP their audit plan for MFA and their proposed implementation of this plan. The Audit Committee also discussed with KPMG LLP matters that independent accounting firms must discuss with audit committees under generally accepted auditing standards and standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s (“PCAOB”), including, among other things, matters related to the conduct of the audit of our consolidated financial statements and the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 16, as adopted by the PCAOB, which included a discussion of KPMG LLP’s judgments about the quality (not just the acceptability) of our accounting principles as applied to financial reporting.

The Audit Committee also discussed with KPMG LLP their independence from the Company. KPMG LLP provided to the Audit Committee the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and represented that it is independent from us. When considering the independence of KPMG LLP, the Audit Committee considered if services they provided to us, beyond those rendered in connection with their audit of our consolidated financial statements, their reviews of our interim condensed consolidated financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and their audit of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting were compatible with maintaining their independence. The Audit Committee reviewed and approved the audit, tax and other professional services performed by, and the amount of fees paid for such services to, KPMG LLP. The Audit Committee has adopted policies and procedures for the pre-approval of audit and non-audit services for the purpose of maintaining the independence of our independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee received regular updates on the amount of fees and scope of audit, tax and other professional services provided.

Based on the Audit Committee’s review and the outcome of these meetings, discussions and reports, and subject to the limitations on the Audit Committee’s role and responsibilities referred to above and in its written charter, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board, and the Board has approved, that our audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC and 2012 Annual Report to Stockholders. The Audit Committee has also selected and appointed KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2013, and is presenting this selection to our stockholders for ratification.

AUDIT COMMITTEE

Stephen R. Blank, Chair
Michael L. Dahir
Robin Josephs

The foregoing Report of the Audit Committee shall not be deemed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the Exchange Act, to be (i) “soliciting material” or “filed” or (ii) incorporated by reference by any general statement into any filing made by us with the SEC, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate such report by reference.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

COMPENSATION OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

Pursuant to the terms of its charter, the Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing and making recommendations to the Board with respect to the compensation of the non-employee directors (the “Non-Employee Directors”) on the Board. The Compensation Committee, with the assistance of its independent compensation consultant, Christenson Advisors, LLC, most recently reviewed the compensation of Non-Employee Directors in the first half of 2011. Based on this review the Compensation Committee recommended, and the Board approved, the following compensation program for Non-Employee Directors effective May 24, 2011:

Our Non-Employee Directors may also participate in our Second Amended and Restated 2003 Non-Employee Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Non-Employee Directors Plan”), which allows participants to elect to defer receipt of 50% or 100% of their annual cash retainer fees.

We do not permit our Non-Employee Directors to sell or transfer their Restricted Shares until six months after their termination of service with us, subject to certain exceptions. In addition, the Non-Employee Directors are subject to a share retention/alignment requirement pursuant to which each Non-Employee Director is required to hold and maintain equity in MFA, which could include Common Stock, convertible (but not perpetual) preferred stock, Restricted Shares and/or deferred stock units under the Non-Employee Directors Plan (collectively, the “Equivalent Shares”), in an amount equal to no less than 37,500 Equivalent Shares. For Non-Employee Directors joining the Board on or after January 1, 2010, this retention requirement must be met within five years after becoming a director, and for Non-Employee Directors serving on the Board on or prior to December 31, 2009, this retention requirement must be met not later than December 31, 2014.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The following table summarizes the compensation of our Non-Employee Directors for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Name		Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)(1)				Stock Awards ($)(2)				Option Awards ($)(3)				Total ($)(4)
Stephen R. Blank		$	130,000			$	75,004			$	0			$	205,004
James A. Brodsky			106,875				75,004				0				181,879
Michael L. Dahir			113,500				75,004				0				188,504
Alan L. Gosule			99,000				75,004				0				174,004
Robin Josephs			125,000				75,004				0				200,004
George H. Krauss			98,625				132,154				0				230,779

In addition, during 2012, Mr. Krauss, our Lead Director, was granted an additional 7,500 Restricted Shares on May 31, 2012, which had a value of $7.62 per share (based on the price per share of our Common Stock on such day).

Name		Number of Unexercised NQSOs
Stephen R. Blank			5,000
James A. Brodsky			5,000
Michael L. Dahir			5,000
Alan L. Gosule			5,000
Robin Josephs			-0-
George H. Krauss			5,000

Robin Josephs exercised 5,000 NQSOs in November 2012 at an exercise price of $6.99 per share.

The following table summarizes certain additional information regarding amounts deferred by our Non-Employee Directors participating in the Non-Employee Directors Plan as of December 31, 2012.

Name		Total Amount Deferred(1)				Distribution January 15, 2012				Remaining Deferred Amount After 2012 Distribution(2)				Fair Market Value of Remaining Amount(3)
Non-Employee Directors
Stephen R. Blank		$	16,426			$	8,460			$	7,966			$	10,919
George H. Krauss			225,600				12,395				213,205				291,256

Non-employee directors are also eligible to receive other grants of NQSOs, Restricted Shares, phantom shares and DERs under the 2010 Equity Compensation Plan. We also reimburse all non-employee directors for travel and other expenses incurred in connection with attending Board, committee and stockholder meetings and other Company-sponsored events and/or other activities in which they engage or participate on our behalf. In addition, we provide all non-employee directors with up to $500,000 of accidental death and dismemberment insurance while traveling to or attending Board, committee and stockholder meetings and other Company-sponsored events. Directors who are employees of the Company (presently, Messrs. Zimmerman and Gorin) are not entitled to receive additional compensation for serving on the Board.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Board of Directors

In accordance with our Charter and Bylaws, the Board is currently comprised of eight directors, Stephen R. Blank, James A. Brodsky, Michael L. Dahir, William S. Gorin, Alan L. Gosule, Robin Josephs, George H. Krauss and Stewart Zimmerman and is divided into three classes, with Messrs. Blank and Gorin constituting the Class I directors, Messrs. Dahir and Krauss and Ms. Josephs constituting the Class II directors and Messrs. Brodsky, Gosule and Zimmerman constituting the Class III directors.

One class of directors is elected at each annual meeting of our stockholders for a term of three years. Each director holds office until his successor has been duly elected and qualified or the director’s earlier resignation, death or removal. The term of the Board’s Class III directors expires at the Annual Meeting. The terms of the other two classes of directors expire at MFA’s 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (Class I directors) and MFA’s 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (Class II directors).

Upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board, Mr. Brodsky, Mr. Gosule and Mr. Zimmerman have been nominated by the Board to stand for re-election as Class III directors by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting to serve until our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualify. If the candidacy of Mr. Brodsky, Mr. Gosule or Mr. Zimmerman should, for any reason, be withdrawn prior to the Annual Meeting, the proxies will be voted by the proxy holders in favor of such substituted candidate or candidates (if any) as shall be nominated by the Board.

The Board has no reason to believe that, if re-elected, Mr. Brodsky, Mr. Gosule and Mr. Zimmerman will be unable or unwilling to serve as Class III directors. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent Mr. Zimmerman is re-elected as a director of the Company, it is presently expected that he will resign from the Board, upon the expiration of his employment agreement with MFA, which is scheduled to occur on December 31, 2013.

The Board has determined that all of our current directors are qualified to serve as directors of the Company. The biographies of each of the Board’s nominees standing for re-election and our continuing directors set forth below contain information regarding each person’s service as a director, business experience and education, director positions held currently or at any time during the last five years, information regarding certain legal or administrative proceedings, if applicable, and the experiences, qualifications, attributes or skills that caused the Board and its Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to determine that the person should serve as a director on the Board in 2013.

In addition to the specific information set forth in their respective biographies, each of our directors also possesses the tangible and intangible attributes and skills that we believe are necessary to be an effective director on the Board, including experience at senior levels in areas of expertise relevant and beneficial to our business and industry, a willingness and commitment to assume the responsibilities required of a director of the Company and the character and integrity we expect of directors of the Company.

Nominees for Re-Election as Class III Directors

The following information is furnished regarding the nominees for re-election as Class III directors by the holders of Common Stock.

James A. Brodsky, 67, has served as a director of MFA since 2004. Mr. Brodsky is a partner in, and a founding member of, the law firm of Weiner Brodsky Kider PC in Washington, D.C., and has practiced law with that firm and its predecessor since 1977. Mr. Brodsky provides legal advice and business counsel to publicly-traded and privately-held national and regional residential mortgage lenders on secondary mortgage market transactions (including those involving Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae), mergers and acquisitions, asset purchases and sales, mortgage compliance issues and strategic business initiatives. Prior to 1977, Mr. Brodsky was a Deputy Assistant Secretary with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. He also currently serves as General Counsel of the National Reverse Mortgage Lenders

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Association. Mr. Brodsky is a graduate of Cornell University and received a Juris Doctor degree from Georgetown University Law Center and a Masters of Science in Electrical Engineering from Columbia University.

We believe that Mr. Brodsky’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his significant experience as a lawyer and founding member of a national law firm specializing in residential mortgage finance, his extensive knowledge of the origination and servicing of, and the regulatory aspects relating to, residential mortgage loans, his experience with the federal executive branch agencies that regulate and directly affect the residential mortgage sector and his general experience with corporate governance, finance and other related matters.

Alan L. Gosule, 72, has served as a director of MFA since 2001. Mr. Gosule is a partner in the law firm of Clifford Chance US LLP (“Clifford Chance”) in New York, New York, and has practiced law with such firm and its predecessor since 1991. From 2002 to August 2005, he served as the Regional Head of Clifford Chance’s Real Estate Department for the Americas and, prior to 2002, was the Regional Head of such firm’s Tax, Pension and Employment Department for the Americas. Prior to 1991, Mr. Gosule practiced law with the firm of Gaston & Snow, where he was a member of such firm’s Management Committee and the Chair of the Tax Department. Mr. Gosule currently serves as a member of the board of directors of Home Properties, Inc., where he is a member of the audit committee and chair of the corporate governance/nominating committee, F.L. Putnam Investment Management Company and Pioneer Natural Resources GP LLC, the general partner of Pioneer Southwest Energy Partners L.P., and as a member of the board of trustees of the Ursuline Academy. Mr. Gosule is a graduate of Boston University and received a Juris Doctorate degree from Boston University Law School and an LLM in Taxation from Georgetown Law School.

We believe that Mr. Gosule’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his significant experience as a lawyer and partner of a major international law firm, his extensive knowledge of tax law and related matters, including real estate investment trusts, and his considerable experience in advising, and his service on the boards and committees of, other public and private companies.

Stewart Zimmerman, 68, has served as a director of MFA since 1997 and was appointed Chairman of the Board in 2003. Mr. Zimmerman currently serves as our Chief Executive Officer. From 1997 to 2008, he also served as our President. From 1989 through 1997, he initially served as a consultant to The America First Companies and became Executive Vice President of America First Companies, L.L.C. (“America First”). During this time, he held the following positions: President and Chief Operating Officer of America First REIT, Inc. and President of several America First mortgage funds, including America First Participating/Preferred Equity Mortgage Fund, America First PREP Fund 2, America First PREP Fund II Pension Series Limited Partnership, Capital Source L.P., Capital Source II L.P., America First Tax Exempt Mortgage Fund Limited Partnership and America First Tax Exempt Fund 2 Limited Partnership. Prior to 1989, Mr. Zimmerman held various positions with other financial-related companies, including Security Pacific Merchant Bank, E.F. Hutton & Company Inc., Lehman Brothers, Bankers Trust Company and Zenith Mortgage Company. Mr. Zimmerman is a graduate of Michigan State University.

We believe that Mr. Zimmerman’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his position as our Chief Executive Officer, including his responsibility for day-to-day operations of the Company, his extensive knowledge of mortgage-backed securities and the fixed income, mortgage banking and specialty finance industries and his substantial knowledge of our business operations, corporate culture and investment strategies.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE RE-ELECTION OF MR. BRODSKY, MR. GOSULE AND MR. ZIMMERMAN AS CLASS III DIRECTORS.

Continuing Class I Directors

The following information is furnished regarding our Class I directors (who will continue to serve on the Board until our 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualify).

Stephen R. Blank, 67, has served as a director of MFA since 2002. Since 1998, Mr. Blank has been a Senior Resident Fellow, Finance, at the Urban Land Institute (“ULI”), a non-profit education and research institute which studies land use and real estate development policy. Prior to joining ULI, Mr. Blank served from

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1993 to 1998 as Managing Director — Real Estate Investment Banking of CIBC Oppenheimer Corp. From 1989 to 1993, Mr. Blank was Managing Director of the Real Estate Corporate Finance Department of Cushman & Wakefield, Inc. From 1979 to 1989, Mr. Blank served as Managing Director — Real Estate Investment Banking of Kidder, Peabody & Co. From 1973 to 1979, Mr. Blank was employed by Bache & Co., Incorporated, as Vice President, Direct Investment Group. Mr. Blank currently serves as a member of the board of directors of Home Properties, Inc., where he is Chairman of the audit committee and a member of the nominating and governance committee, and as Chair of the board of trustees of Ramco-Gershenson Properties Trust, where he is Chair of the nominating and governance committee and a member of the compensation committee. From May 1999 to February 2007, Mr. Blank was a member of the board of directors of BNP Residential Trust, Inc. Mr. Blank is a graduate of Syracuse University and received a Masters of Business Administration degree in Finance from Adelphi University.

We believe that Mr. Blank’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his extensive knowledge of the real estate industry as evidenced by his position at ULI, his experience in the investment banking industry, including his expertise in public and private real estate finance, his substantial service on the boards and committees of other public and private companies and his regular attendance of director continuing education programs.

William S. Gorin, 54, has served as a director of MFA since 2010. Mr. Gorin currently serves as our President. From 1997 to 2008, he served as our Executive Vice President and, from 2001 to September 2010, as our Chief Financial Officer. During his tenure with MFA, he has also served as our Treasurer and our Secretary. From 1989 to 1997, he held various positions with PaineWebber Incorporated/Kidder, Peabody & Co. Incorporated, serving as a First Vice President in the Research Department. Prior to that position, Mr. Gorin was Senior Vice President in the Special Products Group. From 1982 to 1988, Mr. Gorin was employed by Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc./E.F. Hutton & Company Inc. in various positions in corporate finance and direct investments. Mr. Gorin is a graduate of Brandeis University and received a Masters of Business Administration degree from Stanford University.

We believe that Mr. Gorin’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his position as our President, his extensive knowledge of mortgage-backed securities and capital markets, his substantial knowledge of our business operations and investment strategies and his overall experience in the investment banking industry, including his expertise in corporate finance.

Continuing Class II Directors

The following information is furnished regarding our Class II directors (who will continue to serve on the Board until our 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualify).

Michael L. Dahir, 64, has served as a director of MFA since 1998. From 1988 through December 2012, Mr. Dahir was the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Omaha State Bank in Omaha, Nebraska. From 1974 to 1988, Mr. Dahir held various positions with Omaha National Bank, including Senior Vice President and head of the Commercial Banking Services division, and was also Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the bank’s parent company, FirsTier Holding Company. Mr. Dahir is a non-practicing certified public accountant. Mr. Dahir serves on the board of the Catholic Charities Foundation. Mr. Dahir is a graduate of Creighton University.

We believe that Mr. Dahir’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his considerable experience in banking and financial matters, including his past positions as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Omaha State Bank and as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of a publicly-traded bank, his experience as a certified public accountant and his significant exposure to our business and industry through length of service on the Board.

Robin Josephs, 53, has served as a director of MFA since 2010. From 2005 to 2007, Ms. Josephs was a managing director of Starwood Capital Group L.P., a private equity firm specializing in real estate investments. From 1986 to 1996, Ms. Josephs was a senior executive with Goldman Sachs & Co. serving in the real estate group of the investment banking division and, later, in the equity capital markets division. Ms. Josephs currently serves as a member of the board of directors of iStar Financial, where she is lead director and serves as a

TABLE OF CONTENTS

member of the audit, compensation and nominating and governance committees, and Plum Creek Timber Company, Inc., where she serves on the audit and compensation committees. From January 2005 to December 2005, Ms. Josephs was a member of the board of directors of Instinet Group Incorporated (which was acquired by The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. in December 2005). Ms. Josephs is a trustee of the University of Chicago Cancer Research Foundation and the Tourette Syndrome Association. Ms. Josephs is a graduate of The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania and received a Masters of Business Administration degree from Columbia University.

We believe that Ms. Josephs’ qualifications to serve on the Board include her significant knowledge of the specialty finance and real estate industries, her extensive experience in the investment banking industry, including her expertise in public and private real estate finance and equity capital markets, her substantial service on the boards and committees of other public and private companies, her experience with corporate governance, finance and other related matters and her regular attendance of director continuing education programs.

George H. Krauss, 71, has served as a director of MFA since 1997. Mr. Krauss was named a Managing Director of The Burlington Capital Group LLC (“Burlington”) in 2010 and, prior thereto, had been a consultant to Burlington since 1997. From 1972 to 1997, Mr. Krauss practiced law with Kutak Rock LLP, serving as such firm’s managing partner from 1983 to 1993 and, from 1997 to 2006, was Of Counsel to such firm. Mr. Krauss currently serves as a member of the board of managers of Burlington, which is the general partner of America First Tax Exempt Investors, LP. Mr. Krauss was a member of the boards of directors of Gateway, Inc., from 1991 to October 2007, West Corporation, from January 2001 to October 2006, America First Apartment Investors, Inc., from January 2003 to September 2007, and info GROUP, Inc., from December 2007 to July 2010. Mr. Krauss received a Juris Doctorate degree and a Masters of Business Administration degree from, the University of Nebraska.

We believe that Mr. Krauss’ qualifications to serve on the Board include his significant experience as a managing partner of a major law firm, his substantial service on the boards and committees of other public and private companies, his considerable legal and business experience in corporate, mergers and acquisitions and regulatory matters and his significant exposure to our business and industry through length of service on the Board.

*********

In accordance with our Charter and Bylaws, vacancies occurring on the Board as a result of death, resignation, retirement, disqualification, removal from office or other cause may be filled by a majority vote of the remaining directors in office.

There is no familial relationship among any of the members of our Board or executive officers, except that William S. Gorin, our President and a director, and Ronald A. Freydberg, one of our Executive Vice Presidents, are brothers-in-law.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2. RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

On March 4, 2013, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors appointed KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2013.

The Board of Directors is asking stockholders to ratify the Audit Committee’s appointment of KPMG LLP for 2013. In the event that stockholders fail to ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee will consider it a direction to consider other accounting firms for the subsequent year. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in our best interests.

KPMG LLP first audited our financial statements beginning with the year ended December 31, 2011. The Audit Committee appointed KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm on May 27, 2011, upon its dismissal of Ernst & Young LLP, which, had served as the Company’s independent auditors since 2003.

Ernst & Young LLP’s audit reports on the Company’s financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. In connection with the audits of the Company’s financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, and through May 27, 2011, there were no disagreements with Ernst & Young, LLP on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedures which, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Ernst & Young LLP, would have caused Ernst & Young LLP to make reference thereto in its reports on the Company’s financial statements for such years and subsequent interim period.

During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, and during the subsequent interim period through May 27, 2011, there were no reportable events as described under Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K. The Company provided Ernst & Young LLP with a copy of the foregoing paragraph prior to filing its Current Report on Form 8-K containing such disclosure with the SEC and requested that Ernst & Young LLP furnish the Company with a letter addressed to the SEC stating whether or not it agreed with the above statements. A copy of Ernst & Young LLP’s letter to the SEC expressing its agreement with the above statements, dated June 2, 2011, was filed as Exhibit 16.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, which was filed with the SEC on such date.

During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, and during the subsequent interim period through May 27, 2011, we did not consult with KPMG LLP in respect of our consolidated financial statements for the years then ended or the subsequent interim period prior to the date of KPMG LLP’s appointment regarding any of the matters or events set forth in Item 304(a)(2)(i) and (ii) of Regulation S-K.

One or more representatives of KPMG LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting and will be provided with an opportunity to make a statement if so desired and to respond to appropriate inquiries from stockholders.

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees

The following table summarizes the aggregate fees (including related expenses) billed to us for professional services provided by KPMG LLP and Ernst & Young LLP in respect of the fiscal years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.

		Fiscal Year Ended December 31,
		2012				2011
Audit Fees(1)		$	1,055,500			$	841,900
Audit-Related Fees(2)			—				—
Tax Fees(3)			44,400				39,830
All Other Fees(4)			1,796				41,441
Total		$	1,101,696			$	923,171

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Of the amount shown for 2011, (i) Ernst & Young LLP billed the Company an aggregate of $251,730 in fees for professional services rendered for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements and for the review of the financial statements included in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, and (ii) KPMG LLP billed the Company an aggregate of $671,441 in fees for professional services rendered for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 and for the review of the financial statements included in the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended June 30 and September 30, 2011.

All audit, tax and other services provided to us were reviewed and pre-approved by the Audit Committee, which concluded that the provision of such services by KPMG LLP and Ernst & Young LLP was compatible with the maintenance of that firm’s independence in the conduct of its auditing functions.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF KPMG LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2013.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to each of our executive officers at December 31, 2012. The Board appoints or annually reaffirms the appointment of all of our executive officers:

Officer		Age		Position Held
Stewart Zimmerman		68		Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
William S. Gorin		54		President and Director
Ronald A. Freydberg		52		Executive Vice President
Craig L. Knutson		53		Executive Vice President
Stephen D. Yarad		43		Chief Financial Officer
Shira E. Finkel		38		Senior Vice President and Secretary
Elwin Ford		51		Senior Vice President
Kathleen A. Hanrahan		47		Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
Matthew Ottinger		55		Senior Vice President and Controller
Harold E. Schwartz		48		Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Assistant Secretary
Sunil Yadav		42		Senior Vice President

Biographical information on Messrs. Zimmerman and Gorin is provided in “Election of Directors” of this Proxy Statement.

Ronald A. Freydberg serves as our Executive Vice President. Mr. Freydberg joined MFA Financial, Inc. in 1997. From 1995 to 1997, Mr. Freydberg served as a Vice President of Pentalpha Capital, in Greenwich, Connecticut, where he was a fixed-income quantitative analysis and structuring specialist. From 1988 to 1995, Mr. Freydberg held various positions with J.P. Morgan & Co. From 1994 to 1995, he was in J.P. Morgan’s Global Markets Group, where he was involved in commercial mortgage-backed securitization and sale of distressed commercial real estate, including structuring, due diligence and marketing. From 1985 to 1988, Mr. Freydberg was employed by Citicorp. Mr. Freydberg holds a Masters of Business Administration degree in Finance from George Washington University and a Bachelor of Arts degree from Muhlenberg College.

Craig L. Knutson serves as our Executive Vice President. Mr. Knutson joined MFA Financial, Inc. in 2008. From 2004 to 2007, Mr. Knutson served as Senior Executive Vice President of CBA Commercial, LLC, an acquirer and securitizer of small balance commercial mortgages. From 2001 to 2004, Mr. Knutson served as President and Chief Operating Officer of ARIASYS Inc., a software development company specializing in custom solutions for small to midsize businesses. From 1986 to 1999, Mr. Knutson held various progressive positions in the mortgage trading and mortgage finance departments of First Boston Corporation (later Credit Suisse), Smith Barney and Morgan Stanley. From 1981 to 1984, Mr. Knutson served as an Analyst and then Associate in the Investment Banking Department of E.F. Hutton & Company Inc. Mr. Knutson holds a Masters of Business Administration degree from Harvard University and a Bachelor of Arts degree (magna cum laude) in Economics and French from Hamilton College.

Stephen D. Yarad serves as our Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Yarad joined MFA Financial, Inc. in 2010. Prior to joining MFA, Mr. Yarad was a partner in the financial services audit practice of KPMG LLP, having been admitted to the partnership of the firm in 2005. He has almost 19 years in public accounting serving financial services companies in the United States, Europe, United Kingdom and in Asia Pacific. He commenced his career with KPMG in Australia in 1991 and held various progressive positions, before relocating permanently to the United States at the end of 2001. In addition to being a Chartered Accountant and Associate Member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia, he is also a Certified Public Accountant licensed in New York and New Jersey. Mr. Yarad holds a Bachelor of Commerce (Accounting and Finance) with merit from the University of New South Wales (Sydney, Australia) and a Graduate Diploma in Applied Finance and Investment from the Securities Institute of Australia.

Shira E. Finkel serves as Senior Vice President and Secretary. Ms. Finkel joined MFA Financial, Inc. in 2002. From 1998 to 2002, Ms. Finkel was the Corporate Tax and Insurance Manager with O’Connor Capital Partners. Ms. Finkel began her career in public accounting in 1996 with Price Waterhouse LLP (predecessor to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP), where she specialized in corporate tax transactions involving REITs and other real estate companies. Ms. Finkel has a Bachelor of Arts Degree from Ithaca College.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Elwin Ford serves as Senior Vice President. Mr. Ford joined MFA Financial, Inc. in 2011 as First Vice President. From 2010 to 2011 Mr. Ford served as a consultant/project manager to MFA in connection with the implementation of a financial database and reporting platform. From 2004 to 2010, Mr. Ford served as a Principal of Kaxbrel Consulting and Services LLC, a technology consulting and project management firm providing services primarily to clients in the financial services industry. Mr. Ford served in the United States Army from 1983 to 1986 and holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting/Computer Science from LeMoyne College.

Kathleen A. Hanrahan serves as Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer. Ms. Hanrahan joined MFA Financial, Inc. in 2008 as Senior Vice President — Finance and was appointed Chief Accounting Officer effective October 2011. From 2007 to 2008, Ms. Hanrahan was Vice President — Financial Reporting with Arbor Commercial Mortgage LLC. From 1997 to 2006, she held progressive positions, was the First Vice President of Financial Reporting and served on the Disclosure, Corporate Benefits and Sarbanes-Oxley Committees for Independence Community Bank Corp. From 1992 to 1997, Ms. Hanrahan held various positions with North Side Savings Bank and was Controller from 1996 to 1997. Ms. Hanrahan began her career in public accounting in 1987 with KPMG Peat Marwick (predecessor to KPMG LLP). Ms. Hanrahan is a Certified Public Accountant and has a Bachelor of Business Administration degree in Public Accounting from Pace University.

Matthew Ottinger serves as Senior Vice President and Controller. Mr. Ottinger joined MFA Financial, Inc. in 2001. From 2000 to 2001, Mr. Ottinger served as Assistant Vice President at Carver Federal Savings Bank where he was the Head of Banking Operations and Control Department, responsible for all retail banking general ledger reconciliations. Mr. Ottinger began his career at Jamaica Savings Bank and served as Assistant Vice President in the Accounting Dept. from 1996 to 2001, in charge of internal financial reporting for the bank and its 26 subsidiaries. Mr. Ottinger has a Bachelor’s of Science degree from Adelphi University.

Harold E. Schwartz serves as our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Assistant Secretary. Mr. Schwartz joined MFA Financial, Inc. in August 2011. From 2001 to July 2011, Mr. Schwartz served as a Vice President and Senior Counsel for American Express Company, where he specialized in corporate, securities, corporate governance and mergers and acquisitions matters. From 1996 to 2000, Mr. Schwartz served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Caribiner International, Inc., a business communications services and audio visual equipment rental company. Mr. Schwartz began his career working for the law firm of Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, where he was an associate in the firm’s corporate department from 1989 to 1996. Mr. Schwartz has a J.D. from Georgetown University and an A.B. from Duke University.

Sunil Yadav serves as Senior Vice President. Mr. Yadav joined MFA Financial, Inc. in 2008. From 2005 to 2007, Mr. Yadav served as a residential mortgage-backed securities trading strategist at Banc of America Securities. From 1998 to 2003, Mr. Yadav was employed as an engineer at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (Fermilab). From 1996 to 1998, Mr. Yadav served as a post-doctoral research scholar at the California Institute of Technology. Mr. Yadav holds a Masters of Business Administration degree from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. Mr. Yadav also holds a masters and Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from The Johns Hopkins University and an undergraduate degree in mechanical engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology (Kanpur, India).

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The following section discusses the key features of our executive compensation program and the approach taken by the Compensation Committee of the Board in setting and determining compensation for 2012 for: Stewart Zimmerman, our Chief Executive Officer; William S. Gorin, our President; Stephen D. Yarad, our Chief Financial Officer; and Craig L. Knutson and Ronald A. Freydberg, our Executive Vice Presidents (collectively, our “Named Executive Officers”).

Overview; Important 2012 Operating Metrics and Compensation Committee Actions.  The Compensation Committee oversees the administration of our compensation programs and makes decisions relating to the compensation of our Named Executive Officers. The Compensation Committee intends that the compensation paid to the Named Executive Officers be consistent with our overall compensation philosophy and competitive with market practices.

In 2012, under the direction of senior management, MFA successfully executed its investment strategies. Through its investment in residential mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”), both Agency and Non-Agency, MFA delivered stockholder value through both the generation of distributable income and through asset performance linked to improvement in residential mortgage credit fundamentals.

In the year, total stockholders return from share price appreciation including reinvestment of dividends was 34.8%. This was driven by strong fundamental performance. Book value per share grew from $6.74 to $8.99 over the course of the year even after distributing $0.88 per share in dividends. In addition, the underlying credit performance of the mortgages underlying MFA’s Non-Agency portfolio was strongly positive. A combination of both home price appreciation and mortgage amortization led to a decrease in the loan-to-value ratio (“LTV”) for many of the underlying mortgages. Due to this lower LTV, MFA reduced its estimate of future losses for its Non-Agency portfolio and transferred $152.5 million from credit reserve to accretable discount, thereby increasing its estimate of future income over the life of the Non-Agency assets.

Income metrics did trend lower in 2012 as compared to 2011. This reflects the fact that the yield on assets in the MBS market have declined substantially due to the aggressive quantitative easing undertaken by the U.S. Federal Reserve. In response to these actions, MFA reallocated capital to niches in the Non-Agency MBS sector providing stockholders with a relatively high level of asset yield and interest spread.

As discussed in more detail below, the Compensation Committee, among other things, made the following decisions and took the following actions on compensation for the Named Executive Officers for 2012:

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives.  Through our executive compensation programs, we seek to retain, motivate and attract top quality senior executives who are committed to our core values of excellence and integrity. The Compensation Committee’s fundamental philosophy is to closely align these compensation programs with the achievement of annual and long-term performance goals tied to our financial success and the creation of stockholder value.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Compensation Committee’s objectives in developing and administering the executive compensation programs are to:

The Compensation Committee believes that it is important to create compensation programs that appropriately balance short-term, cash-based compensation with long-term, equity-based compensation. Our executive officer compensation program includes the following primary components:

In addition to the primary components of the executive officer compensation program, we maintain our Senior Officers Deferred Bonus Plan (the “Senior Officers Plan”). The Senior Officers Plan, which is described further on page 38 of this Proxy Statement, permits our executive officers to defer, at their election, up to 100% of their annual bonus compensation in the form of deferred stock units, the performance of which are tied to the performance of our Common Stock.

Other than the opportunity to participate in the Senior Officers Plan, we do not provide perquisites or other benefits to our Named Executive Officers beyond those provided to all of our other salaried employees.

The Compensation Committee is committed to the ongoing review and evaluation of the executive officer compensation levels and compensation program. It is the Compensation Committee’s view that compensation decisions are complex and best made after a deliberateive review of Company and individual performance, as well as industry compensation levels. Consistent with this view, the Compensation Committee annually assesses our performance within the context of the industry’s overall performance and internal performance standards and evaluates individual executive officer performance relative to the performance expectations for their respective position, role and responsibilities within MFA.

In addition, the Compensation Committee benchmarks from time to time the compensation levels and practices relating to our Named Executive Officers and other executive officers against industry-based compensation levels and practices, and in this regard during 2012 the Compensation Committee, with the assistance of its independent compensation consultant, Christenson Advisors, LLC, undertook a benchmarking analysis with respect to the compensation levels and practices of its Named Executive Officers. While it is the Compensation Committee’s goal to provide compensation opportunities that reflect Company and individual performance and that are competitive within industry standards, the Compensation Committee has not established, nor does it seek to establish, a specific target market position for executive officer pay levels, as pay

TABLE OF CONTENTS

practices and compensation levels among participants in our industry can vary significantly from one year to the next such that the use of a specific target market position would not necessarily reflect the Compensation Committee’s assessment of performance as the primary driver of pay levels.

Consideration of 2012 Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

Consistent with the support demonstrated by stockholders in last year’s Say-on-Pay vote outcome, pursuant to which more than 90% of the votes cast with respect to such proposal voted to approve our executive compensation, the Compensation Committee did not make significant changes to our executive compensation program for performance year 2012. The Compensation Committee will continue to consider the outcome of future Say-on-Pay votes and other stockholder input, as well as available market data, in making future decisions regarding executive compensation.

Key Elements of Compensation.

The Named Executive Officers each receive three key elements of compensation, summarized in the following chart:

Element		Key Features		Purpose
1. Base Salary		- Levels set periodically based on scope of the executive’s role, responsibilities of the position, individual performance and competitive market practices		- Provides a base level of guaranteed compensation
		- Annual discretionary increases may be considered based on performance and other factors
		- Mr. Zimmerman receives a portion in an annual grant of fully vested Restricted Shares
2. Annual Incentives		- For 2012, for Messrs. Zimmerman and Gorin, based on the annual performance-based Bonus Pool determined by achievement of specified ROAE targets, subject to upward or downward discretionary adjustments in any year of up to 30%		- Provides an incentive to achieve annual financial and individual performance goals
		- For 2012, for Mr. Knutson, based on a performance-based bonus pool determined by achievement of specified ROAE targets, subject to upward or downward discretionary adjustments		- Portion delivered in Restricted Shares to ensure that annual performance is sustainable over time, further align interests with stockholders and encourage retention
		- For 2012, for Messrs. Yarad and Freydberg, based on a discretionary determination of performance
		- Delivered in a mix of cash and Restricted Shares that vest over a three- to four-year period
3. Long-Term Equity Awards		- Periodic grants of stock-based awards with multi-year vesting requirements		- Provide long-term incentives tied to stock price
		- Available types of awards include stock options, Restricted Shares, RSUs, DERs and other stock-based awards		- Further aligns interests with stockholders and encourages retention
		- Vesting may be time-based or performance-based
		- RSU program includes additional holding period after vesting until settlement
		- For 2012, only grants that were made were of RSUs pursuant to extension of Mr. Zimmerman’s employment agreement and the terms of the 2011 extensions of employment agreements of Messrs. Gorin, Knutson and Freydberg

The following discussion provides additional explanation about each of these elements.

Base Salary.  We provide the Named Executive Officers with annual base salaries to provide them with a base level of guaranteed compensation for their services provided during the term of their employment. The Compensation Committee periodically establishes the level of base salary through mutual agreement with the executive. From time to time, the Compensation Committee has reviewed market analyses and considered the advice of its independent compensation consultant, Christenson Advisors, in setting base salaries.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Since 2006, we have provided a portion of Mr. Zimmerman’s salary in a grant of vested shares of Common Stock that are subject to certain restrictions on transfer. The Compensation Committee believes that paying a portion of Mr. Zimmerman’s base salary in shares further aligns his interests with those of our stockholders.

Consistent with the Compensation Committee’s overall philosophy, the compensation programs for the Named Executive Officers are expected to continue to emphasize incentive compensation over base salary. However, the Compensation Committee does not have a pre-set mix or target of base salary to incentive compensation awards for the Named Executive Officers.

Annual Incentives.  We have two types of annual incentive programs for our Named Executive Officers:

While the Bonus Pool amounts are based on the achievement of pre-established ROAE targets as discussed further below, its structure also provides the Compensation Committee with considerable discretion to establish the final funding level for the pool and allocation of individual awards in a manner consistent with our compensation philosophy and objectives. From time to time (including in 2012), the Compensation Committee has considered the advice of Christenson Advisors in reviewing and addressing annual incentives.

For purposes of the Bonus Pool, ROAE is calculated for the 12-month period beginning on December 1st of the prior year through November 30th of the calculated year. This timing allows us to complete our awards before the end of the calendar year. We calculate ROAE for this period as the 12-month GAAP net income (calculated using the same principles as used in our consolidated audited financial statements) excluding depreciation, merger expenses, gains/losses on asset sales and impairment charges, divided by the average stockholder equity before (i) goodwill and (ii) preferred stockholders’ equity. The Compensation Committee evaluated various measures and factors of performance in developing this structure and, in its view, ROAE was determined to be a strong indicator of our overall performance and value creation for stockholders. Further, we have calculated and reported on ROAE as a performance metric on a consistent basis since our inception in 1998.

The aggregate amount of the Bonus Pool can range annually from $750,000 to $6.3 million or more based upon our achievement of specified ROAE targets in any given year. The Compensation Committee may adjust the resulting amount upward or downward by as much as 30% in any given year based upon its assessment of certain factors, as discussed below.

In determining whether to use its discretion to increase or decrease the amount of the Bonus Pool, the Compensation Committee assesses certain factors that it considers important to our business, including our leverage, share price performance relative to the S&P Financial Index or other relevant indices, share price performance relative to our peer group, our total stockholder return (share price change plus dividends), and our other asset management activities, as well as the role, responsibilities and individual performance of the executives participating in the Bonus Pool. The Compensation Committee believes that its ability to make a discretionary adjustment to the size of the Bonus Pool is an important feature of the pool as it preserves the Compensation Committee’s authority to exercise its judgment to increase or decrease the size of the pool based on its evaluation of management’s anticipation of, and responses to, macroeconomic and general business conditions affecting our business during the course of a given year.

The Compensation Committee allocates the aggregate Bonus Pool as annual incentive awards between Messrs. Zimmerman and Gorin based on the Compensation Committee’s subjective assessment of each executive’s performance and contribution during the applicable period and, in the case of Mr. Gorin, the Compensation Committee may also seek the input of Mr. Zimmerman, our chief executive officer.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The following table shows the ROAE formula for the aggregate Bonus Pool (subject to an upward or downward discretionary adjustment by the Compensation Committee of up to 30%):

ROAE Targets		Bonus Pool Range
Less than 4.5%		$	750,000				—
4.5% – 5%			750,000			$	950,000
5% – 6%			950,000				1,150,000
6% – 7%			1,150,000				1,350,000
7% – 8%			1,350,000				1,800,000
8% – 9%			1,800,000				2,250,000
9% – 10%			2,250,000				2,700,000
10% – 11%			2,700,000				3,150,000
11% – 12%			3,150,000				3,600,000
12% – 13%			3,600,000				4,050,000
13% – 14%			4,050,000				4,500,000
14% – 15%			4,500,000				4,950,000
15% – 16%			4,950,000				5,400,000
16% – 17%			5,400,000				5,850,000
17% – 18%			5,850,000				6,300,000
18% or more			Minimum of $6,300,000 (subject to the Discretionary Adjustment of the Compensation Committee)

For the Named Executive Officers other than Mr. Zimmerman, the Compensation Committee, typically in consultation with Mr. Zimmerman, determines annual incentive awards in its discretion based upon its subjective assessment and evaluation of MFA’s annual performance and the annual performance of the executive. No specific pre-set target level is established. The Compensation Committee believes that a discretionary incentive opportunity for these Named Executive Officers provides the Compensation Committee with flexibility in assessing and rewarding annual performance and individual contributions in light of prevailing market conditions.

The Compensation Committee delivers a portion of annual incentive awards to the Named Executive Officers in cash and a portion in an award of Restricted Shares under our 2010 Equity Compensation Plan. The Restricted Shares are subject to a multi-year vesting period (generally, three to four years). The Compensation Committee believes that deferring a portion of the annual incentive award over a multi-year period in Restricted Shares guards against unnecessary risk taking by linking a meaningful portion of the annual incentive value to future stock price performance over several years. The vesting conditions for the Restricted Shares also help to encourage retention of the Named Executive Officers. The Restricted Shares awarded to the Named Executive Officers (other than Mr. Yarad) are also subject to stock retention and ownership requirements, further aligning the interests of these executives with the long-term interests of our stockholders. See “Other Features of Our Executive Compensation Program” below for additional discussion about our stock retention and ownership requirements.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

For Mr. Zimmerman, the portion of his annual incentive award delivered in Restricted Shares depends on the size of the Bonus Pool, with increasing levels of incentive compensation resulting in increasing amounts delivered as Restricted Shares, as follows:

Portion of Bonus Pool		Approximate Percentage of the Incremental Portion of Bonus Pool Delivered in Restricted Shares
Up to $2,700,000			25	%
Incremental amounts between $2,700,000 to $4,050,000			35	%
Incremental amounts over $4,050,000			50	%

For Mr. Gorin, up to 40% of his annual incentive award may be delivered in the form of Restricted Shares. For Messrs. Yarad, Knutson and Freydberg, the Compensation Committee determines the portion of any annual incentive award to be delivered in Restricted Shares in its discretion without any pre-set targets, provided that for Mr. Knutson, pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, for 2013 up to 40% of his annual incentive award may be delivered in the form of Restricted Shares.

Long-Term Equity Awards.  Under our 2010 Equity Compensation Plan, which was most recently approved by our stockholders at our Annual Meeting of Stockholders held in May 2010, the Compensation Committee has available to it a portfolio of equity compensation vehicles, including stock options, Restricted Shares, RSUs, DERs and other stock-based awards. The Compensation Committee has used this incentive compensation program in the past to periodically award Named Executive Officers with stock options, RSUs and DERs as long-term incentives. The Compensation Committee has also, on occasion, granted Restricted Shares in connection with entering into or extending the term of employment agreements or arrangements. The Compensation Committee makes these awards in its discretion without any pre-set target levels. From time to time, the Compensation Committee has considered the advice of Christenson Advisors in determining long-term equity awards.

The Compensation Committee has historically focused on time-based vesting provisions for equity awards as the simplest, most direct way to align executive interests with stockholders and encourage retention. The 2010 Equity Compensation Plan, however, also permits awards that vest based on achievement of performance goals. In this vein, as discussed in the “Grant of Plan-Based Awards for 2012” table on page 34 of this Proxy Statement, the Compensation Committee granted both time-based and performance-based RSUs in October 2012 to Mr. Zimmerman in connection with the extension of his employment agreement and in July 2012 to each of Messrs. Gorin, Freydberg and Knutson in connection with the extension and modification of their respective employment agreements entered into in mid-2011.

2012 Compensation Decisions.  The following discussion addresses the actions taken by the Compensation Committee during 2012 regarding the base salary, annual incentives and long-term equity awards for the Named Executive Officers.

Base Salary.  The Compensation Committee took no actions to adjust base salary rates for the Named Executive Officers during 2012. The Compensation Committee believes that the annual base salary paid in 2012 to each of the Named Executive Officers appropriately reflected the scope of the role and responsibilities of the applicable position, individual performance and experience and competitive market practices. The annual base salaries for each of the Named Executive Officers at December 31, 2012, were as follows:

		2012 Base Salary
		Cash				Stock Grant
Stewart Zimmerman		$	900,000			$	100,000
William S. Gorin		$	800,000				—
Stephen D. Yarad		$	357,000				—
Craig L. Knutson		$	450,000				—
Ronald A. Freydberg		$	750,000				—

In December 2012, after a review of market data and individual performance, the Compensation Committee increased Mr. Yarad’s base salary beginning January 1, 2013, to $440,000 per annum.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Annual Incentives.

Messrs. Zimmerman and Gorin.  For the Bonus Pool calculation, our ROAE for the 12 months ended November 30, 2012, was 11.19% and, in accordance with the terms of Messrs. Zimmerman and Gorin’s employment agreements, the 2012 Bonus Pool ranged from $3,150,000 to $3,600,000 (subject to the Discretionary Adjustment of the Compensation Committee).

Based upon their assessment and evaluation, the Compensation Committee used its discretion to increase the 2012 Bonus Pool above the top end of the range ($3,600,000) by approximately 13.9% and consequently set the bonus amount at $4,100,000. In determining to set the 2012 Bonus Pool at $4,100,000, the Compensation Committee took into consideration the relevant factors impacting our 2012 financial performance, including a strategy of using less leverage than many other financial institutions and mortgage REITs, the execution of our asset allocation strategy, our total stockholder return of approximately 40% (assuming reinvestment of dividends) during the 12 months ended November 30, 2012, the comparative financial performance of industry peers and the individual performance of Messrs. Zimmerman and Gorin (individually and collectively).

In addition, in determining to increase the size of the Bonus Pool above the top end of the range, the Compensation Committee considered that we were able to continue to execute on our asset diversification strategy of investing in both agency and non-agency MBS by acquiring approximately (i) $2.246 billion of Agency MBS at a weighted average purchase price of 104.9% of par value and (ii) $1.351 billion of Non-Agency MBS at a weighted average purchase price of 76.1% of par value. By acquiring higher-yielding Non-Agency MBS at discounts to par value, we were able to decrease our exposure to mortgage prepayments and changes in the yield curve.

The Compensation Committee recognized that we were also able to continue executing on our strategy to reduce reliance on short-term funding through (i) the execution of sale of $100 million (gross) of senior subordinated notes with a 30-year maturity, (ii) the extension of a multi-year collateralized financing arrangement providing up to approximately $500 million of Non-Agency MBS financing for an additional 13 months through January 2016, (iii) the execution of a $350 million three-year repurchase agreement and (iv) the resecuritization of Non-Agency MBS, which raised approximately $180 million in longer-term financing.

Ultimately, the Compensation Committee determined that a Bonus Pool amount of $4,100,000 for 2012 was appropriate given the 2012 ROAE, the level of leverage utilized, the level of dividends paid to stockholders in an extremely low interest rate environment and our continuing successful execution of the asset allocation strategy, which resulted in an increase in our book value of approximately $800 million during the year. Specifically, in the judgment of the Compensation Committee, under the leadership of Messrs. Zimmerman and Gorin (individually and collectively), we believe that we performed well during 2012 relative to the financial performance of a distinct comparative industry peer group established by the Compensation Committee, and in particular, a subgroup of these peers investing in non-agency MBS.

In comparing our 2012 financial performance to our peers, the Compensation Committee evaluated our performance against the following mortgage REITs, which focus their activities on investments in MBS or the servicing of residential mortgages:

Annaly Capital Management, Inc.		Hatteras Financial Corporation
Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation,		Ocwen Financial Corporation
Capstead Mortgage Corporation		Invesco Mortgage Capital, Inc. (“Invesco”)
Chimera Investment Corporation (“Chimera”)		Redwood Trust, Inc. (“Redwood”)

The subgroup consisted of Chimera (although there was limited information with which to assess Chimera due to limited publicly-available information), Invesco and Redwood, which, similar to the Company, also invest in non-agency MBS.

Among other things, the Compensation Committee reviewed the peers’ respective total shareholder return, level of leverage utilized to achieve such return and overhead expense as a percentage of equity. In addition, despite a decrease in absolute asset yields during what continues to be prolonged period of historically low interest rates, we continued to generate a double-digit ROAE during 2012 using a similar amount of leverage as in past years (thereby decreasing our exposure to shorter-term repurchase agreement funding) and lower leverage than our peers.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Compensation Committee then considered each Senior Executive’s contributions to our 2012 financial results and other individual accomplishments to determine the allocation of the Bonus Pool.

The specific key factors considered by the Compensation Committee for each Senior Executive were as follows:

Based on this review, the Compensation Committee allocated the Bonus Pool for 2012 between Mr. Zimmerman and Mr. Gorin as follows:

		Cash Bonus				Restricted Shares
						Shares				Value				Total Bonus
S. Zimmerman		$	1,750,000				92,025			$	750,000			$	2,500,000
W. S. Gorin			1,120,000				58,896				480,000				1,600,000

The Restricted Shares awarded to Mr. Gorin vest ratably over four years, with approximately 6.25% of the shares vesting on the last business day of each calendar quarter beginning with the quarter ended March 31, 2013, and ending with the quarter ending December 31, 2016. Dividends on Mr. Gorin’s Restricted Shares accrue during the restriction period and are paid in full only on the vesting date of the applicable shares. For Mr. Zimmerman, per the terms of his employment agreement with us, such Restricted Shares vested in full on December 31, 2012.

Mr. Yarad.   Mr. Yarad is eligible to receive an annual performance bonus in such amount as approved by the Compensation Committee after receiving the input of Mr. Zimmerman. Annual incentive compensation for Mr. Yarad is based upon subjective assessments and evaluation of MFA’s annual performance and individual performance. After receiving the input of Mr. Zimmerman, the Compensation Committee recommended, and the Board approved an annual incentive bonus of $247,800 for 2012, of which $185,850 was paid in cash and $61,950 was paid in the form of 7,602 Restricted Shares that vest annually in 25% increments on December 14, 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015. Dividends are paid currently on Mr. Yarad’s vested and unvested Restricted Shares. The decision to increase Mr. Yarad’s bonus was made based on, among other things, his efforts in directing the activities performed by our finance and accounting staff in support of our business activities, including his contributions in assisting in the execution of certain transactions to diversify our sources of funding, as well as overall company performance.

Mr. Knutson.  As identified above, for 2012, Mr. Knutson was eligible to receive an annual performance bonus in such amount as approved by the Compensation Committee in its discretion in consultation with Mr. Zimmerman. In determining the amount of Mr. Knutson’s annual performance bonus for 2012 the Compensation Committee considered, among other factors, our ROAE for the 12-month period ended November 30, 2012. In addition, the Compensation Committee also assessed, among other things, our leverage strategy, our share price performance relative to the S&P Financial Index, our share price performance relative to our peer group, our total stockholder return (share price change plus dividends), as well as Mr. Knutson’s individual performance. Taking the assessment of these factors into account, the Compensation Committee determined to award Mr. Knutson an annual incentive bonus of $1,727,000. In determining the ultimate amount of Mr. Knutson’s bonus, the Compensation Committee took into account Mr. Knutson’s role in leading the management and investment selection of our Non-Agency MBS portfolio, which experienced an increase in net unrealized gains of $784.6 million during the year as a result of market price appreciation and was the most significant driver of the increase in our book value for the year. In addition, the Compensation Committee

TABLE OF CONTENTS

considered Mr. Knutson’s critical role in continuing to lead our Non-Agency financing activities, including his leadership in successfully completing the various financing activities described above, which helped to reduce our reliance on short-term repurchase arrangements for the Non-Agency portfolio.

Of the annual incentive compensation of $1,727,000 awarded to Mr. Knutson for 2012, he received a payment of $1,176,000 in cash and $551,000 in the form of 67,608 Restricted Shares that vest ratably over four years, with approximately 6.25% of the shares vesting on the last business day of each calendar quarter beginning with the quarter ended March 31, 2013, and ending with the quarter ending December 31, 2016. Dividends on these Restricted Shares accrue during the restriction period and are paid in full only on the vesting date of the applicable shares.

Mr. Freydberg.  Under the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Freydberg is eligible to receive an annual performance bonus in such amount as approved by the Compensation Committee after receiving the input of Mr. Zimmerman. Annual incentive compensation for Mr. Freydberg is based upon subjective assessments and evaluation of MFA’s annual performance and individual performance. After receiving the input of Mr. Zimmerman, the Compensation Committee recommended, and the Board approved an annual incentive bonus of $489,000 for 2012, of which $330,400 was paid in cash and $158,600 was paid in the form of 19,461 Restricted Shares that vest annually in 25% increments on December 14, 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015. Dividends are paid currently on Mr. Freydberg’s vested and unvested Restricted Shares. As one of our Executive Vice Presidents, Mr. Freydberg successfully performed the functions of head of agency MBS funding and head of information systems and operations in 2012 and was an integral part of successfully executing our 2012 business plan, including leading the successful implementation of improvements to our disaster recovery and business continuity plans.

*****

The vesting conditions for the Restricted Shares delivered as part of the 2012 annual incentive awards vary between Messrs. Zimmerman, Gorin and Knutson, on the one hand, and Messrs. Yarad and Freydberg, on the other hand, which is primarily a reflection of the terms each individual’s respective employment contract (in the case of Messrs. Zimmerman, Gorin, Knutson and Freydberg) or offer letter or applicable equity award agreement (in the case of Mr. Yarad).

Other Elements of Compensation.  The following briefly summarizes the other elements of compensation that we provide to our Named Executive Officers beyond salary, annual incentives and long-term equity awards.

Deferred Compensation and Retirement Benefits.  On December 19, 2002, the Board adopted the Senior Officers Plan which gives executive officers the ability to elect to defer up to 100% of their annual cash incentive compensation. Amounts deferred under this plan are subject to a five-year deferral period and can be paid in a lump sum or in installment payments at the termination of the deferral period. The Senior Officers Plan is intended to provide executive officers with an opportunity to defer certain compensation. Amounts deferred under the plan are considered to be converted into “stock units” of MFA, which do not represent our capital stock, but rather the right to receive a cash payment equal to the fair market value of an equivalent number of shares of Common Stock. Deferred amounts, together with any cash dividend equivalents credited to outstanding stock units, increase or decrease in value as would an equivalent number of shares of Common Stock and are settled in cash at the termination of the deferral period, based on the value of the stock units at that time. Prior to the time that the deferred accounts are settled, participants are unsecured creditors.

The Named Executive Officers are also eligible to participate in our tax qualified retirement savings plan (the “401(k) Plan”) under which all full time employees, subject to certain restrictions, are able to contribute compensation up to the limit prescribed by the Internal Revenue Service on a before tax basis. We match 100% of the first 3% of eligible compensation deferred by our employees and 50% of the next 2%, subject to a maximum as provided by Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). We have elected to operate this plan under applicable safe harbor provisions of the Code, whereby, among other things, we must make contributions for all participating employees, and all matches contributed by us vest immediately.

Perquisites and Other Benefits.  In general, the Compensation Committee provides limited perquisites and other benefits to the Named Executive Officers. We do not reimburse the Named Executive Officers for

TABLE OF CONTENTS

automobiles, clubs, financial planning or items of a similar nature. The Compensation Committee periodically reviews the levels of perquisites and other benefits provided to Named Executive Officers in light of market practices and within the context of the total compensation program. No actions were taken during 2012 regarding perquisites.

The Named Executive Officers are eligible to participate in our employee health and welfare benefit programs that are generally available to all employees. Further, in accordance with the Code of Conduct, we do not make any loans to, or guarantee any personal loans of, any of our employees, including the Named Executive Officers.

Other Features of Our Executive Compensation Program.

Use of Employment Agreements.  We have historically used written employment agreements with certain of our executive officers to evidence our mutual understanding regarding the key terms of employment, including the employment term, level of base salary, other elements of compensation, reasons for termination of employment before the end of the term, severance payments and post-employment covenants. In October 2012, we reached a mutual agreement with Mr. Zimmerman to extend the term of his employment agreement an additional year through December 31, 2013. In June 2011, we reached a mutual agreement with Mr. Gorin to extend the term of his employment agreement through December 31, 2014. In addition, in June 2011 we also reached mutual agreements with Mr. Knutson to extend the term of his employment agreement through December 31, 2013, and with Mr. Freydberg to extend his term of employment through December 31, 2012. In December 2012, the term of Mr. Freydberg’s employment was extended an additional year through December 31, 2013. The Compensation Committee believes that the use of employment agreements for each of Messrs. Zimmerman, Gorin, Knutson and Freydberg helps the Company to retain key personnel responsible for the execution of its strategies and the management of its operations. Nonetheless, although the Compensation Committee has used written employment agreements to provide the Company and certain of its executives with certainty regarding the terms of employment and to encourage stability of key management, the Compensation Committee periodically discusses their merit in achieving these objectives and may, in its discretion, determine not to use written employment agreements in the future for certain or all of our employees. For additional details regarding the employment agreements, including the circumstances in which severance is payable and the amount of such severance benefits, see “Employment Contracts” on pages 38 to 42 and “Potential Payments upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control” on pages 42 to 45 of this Proxy Statement.

The Compensation Committee believes that the written employment agreements have been responsibly structured, including as follows:

Stock Retention and Ownership Requirements.  Equity awards received by certain of our Named Executive Officers are subject to a stock retention and ownership policy intended to further encourage significant long-term share ownership. Messrs. Zimmerman, Gorin, Knutson and Freydberg are not permitted to sell or otherwise transfer shares received from equity awards granted pursuant to their employment agreements during the executive’s employment or for a period of six months following the termination of the executive’s employment, unless the value of the executive’s stock holdings in us exceeds a specified multiple of the executive’s annual base compensation (five times in the case of Mr. Zimmerman; four times in the case of Messrs. Gorin, Knutson and Freydberg).

Hedging Policy.  Our Insider Trading Policy prohibits our employees from engaging in short sales or in transactions in puts, calls or other derivative securities on an exchange or in any other organized market. In addition, we strongly discourage our employees from engaging in other forms of hedging transactions, and any employee wishing to enter into such an arrangement must first pre-clear the proposed transaction with our General Counsel and provide a justification for the proposed transaction.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Advice from Independent Compensation Consultant.  Periodically since 2005, the Compensation Committee has retained an independent compensation consultant to assist the Compensation Committee in reviewing the competitiveness of its executive compensation program, considering the overall design of the compensation program and providing compensation advice independent of company’s management. For the last several years, the Compensation Committee has directly retained Christenson Advisors (“Christenson”), a nationally-recognized compensation consulting firm, in this role. During 2012, Christenson met with the Compensation Committee in executive session and provided assistance to the Compensation Committee with respect to the following: (i) the preparation of the 2012 Risk Analysis/Assessment of MFA’s Compensation Program; (ii) benchmarking review of peer company executive compensation; and (iii) the awards of 2012 annual incentive compensation.

Under the terms of its engagement, Christenson does not provide any other services to us, except as may be pre-approved by the Chair of the Compensation Committee. For 2012, we incurred $30,225 in fees from Christenson for services provided to the Compensation Committee.

The Compensation Committee assessed the independence of Christenson pursuant to SEC rules and concluded that Christenson’s work for the Board of Directors did not raise any conflicts of interest.

Use of Tally Sheets.  The Compensation Committee periodically examines all components of our compensation programs offered to the Named Executive Officers, including, among other things, base salary, annual incentives, equity and long-term compensation, accumulated (realized and unrealized) gains on stock options and payments on DERs, the dollar value (and the cost to us) of all perquisites and other personal benefits, the earnings and accumulated payout obligations under the Senior Officers Plan and the actual projected payout obligations under several potential severance and change in control scenarios. In connection with such review, a compensation tally sheet setting forth these components of our executive compensation program provided to each Named Executive Officer typically is prepared and reviewed by the Compensation Committee for this purpose.

Role of Executive Officers in Compensation Decisions.  The Compensation Committee, which is comprised entirely of independent directors, makes recommendations to the independent directors of the Board on all compensation decisions relating to our Chief Executive Officer and determines and approves all compensation decisions related to our other Named Executive Officers. When making compensation recommendations for Messrs. Gorin, Yarad, Knutson and Freydberg, the Compensation Committee will typically seek and consider the advice and counsel of Mr. Zimmerman, given his direct day-to-day working relationship with these senior executives. Taking this feedback into consideration, the Compensation Committee engages in discussions and makes final determinations related to compensation paid to the Named Executive Officers. All decisions regarding the compensation of Mr. Zimmerman are made independently by the independent directors of the Board.

Deductibility of Executive Compensation.  Section 162(m) of the Code provides that compensation paid to a public company’s chief executive officer and to its other three most highly compensated officers, excluding the chief financial officer, will be deductible for tax purposes up to $1 million, unless the compensation qualified as “performance-based compensation.” In this regard, stock option grants under our 2010 Equity Compensation Plan will generally be intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation,” and the Compensation Committee has the authority to structure other awards under the 2010 Equity Compensation Plan with performance-based conditions that may qualify as “performance-based compensation.” The Compensation Committee may, however, and often does, authorize payments to executives that may not be fully deductible if it believes such payments are in our interests.

Compensation Risk Considerations

The Compensation Committee monitors the risks and rewards associated with our compensation programs and considers, in establishing our compensation programs, whether these programs encourage unnecessary or excessive risk taking.

The Compensation Committee designs our compensation programs with features that are intended to mitigate risk without diminishing the incentive nature of the compensation. We believe our compensation programs encourage and reward prudent business judgment and appropriate risk taking over the long-term.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

With respect to the primary elements of our compensation programs, we use a number of practices designed to help mitigate unnecessary risk taking, including:

With respect to the performance-based Bonus Pool established for certain of the Named Executive Officers, mitigating factors included in this compensation structure include:

As a matter of good governance and oversight, the Compensation Committee requested that Christenson Advisors, its compensation consultant, review our compensation programs in light of recent regulatory guidance on risk and executive compensation. After reviewing and discussing our compensation programs and practices with the Compensation Committee and Christenson Advisors, we believe that our compensation programs are balanced, do not motivate or encourage unnecessary or excessive risk taking and do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us.

Report of the Compensation Committee

While the Company’s management has the primary responsibility for our financial reporting process, including the disclosure of executive compensation, the Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth in this Proxy Statement. Based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee is satisfied that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis fairly represents the philosophy, intent and actions of the Compensation Committee with regard to executive compensation. The Compensation Committee recommended to the Board, and the Board approved, that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Robin Josephs, Chair
Stephen R. Blank
James A. Brodsky
Alan L. Gosule

The foregoing Compensation Committee Report shall not be deemed under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act to be (i) “soliciting material” or “filed” or (ii) incorporated by reference by any general statement into any filing made by us with the SEC, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate such report by reference.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Compensation of Executive Officers

The following table summarizes the compensation of our Named Executive Officers for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.

Summary Compensation Table⁽¹⁾

Name and Principal Position		Year				Salary ($)				Bonus ($)(2)				Stock Awards ($)(1)(3)(4)(5)				All Other Compensation ($)(6)				Total ($)
S. Zimmerman Chairman and Chief Executive Officer			2012			$	900,000			$	1,750,000			$	1,027,370			$	185,950			$	3,863,320
			2011				900,000				1,450,000				648,866				189,250				3,188,116
			2010				900,000				1,500,000				1,196,824				180,925				3,777,749
W. S. Gorin President			2012				800,000				1,120,000				620,029				105,200				2,645,229
			2011				800,000				1,150,000				1,072,587				106,800				3,129,387
			2010				800,000				1,150,000				1,236,195				102,300				3,288,495
S. D. Yarad Chief Financial Officer			2012				357,000				185,850				61,729				10,200				614,779
			2011				350,000				180,000				30,000				9,800				569,800
			2010	(7)			100,625				40,000				227,500				—				368,125
C. L. Knutson Executive Vice President			2012				450,000				1,176,000				643,475				10,200				2,279,675
			2011				437,500				1,000,000				781,696				9,800				2,228,996
			2010				425,000				750,000				915,443				9,800				2,100,243
R. A. Freydberg Executive Vice President			2012				750,000				330,400				195,838				105,200				1,381,438
			2011				750,000				300,000				252,693				106,800				1,409,493
			2010				750,000				750,000				806,506				102,300				2,408,806

The RSUs granted to Mr. Zimmermann are comprised of (a) time-based (service condition) RSUs, which are scheduled to vest on the December 31, 2013 (or earlier in the event of death, disability or termination of service with us for any reason other than cause or voluntary termination), and (b) performance-based RSUs which are scheduled to vest on December 31, 2013, subject to our achieving a “total shareholder return” of at least 10% for the year ending December 31, 2013. The applicable performance-based RSUs will be forfeited by the executives if a 10% total shareholder return is not achieved during the year. For purposes of this column, we have assumed such total shareholder return goal will be achieved.

The RSUs granted to each of Messrs. Gorin, Knutson and Freydberg are comprised of (a) time-based (service condition) RSUs, which are scheduled to vest on a pro rata basis on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date (or earlier in the event of death, disability or termination of service with us for any reason other than cause or voluntary termination) and (b) performance-based RSUs which are scheduled to vest on a pro rata basis on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date (July 1, 2012), subject to our achieving a “total shareholder return” of at least 10% for the year ending on such anniversary. The applicable performance-based RSUs will be forfeited by the executives if a 10% total shareholder return is not achieved in the applicable year. For purposes of this column, we have assumed such total shareholder return goal will be achieved.

Name		Cash Distributions on DERs ($)				Accrued Dividends to be Paid on Vesting of Restricted Shares ($)				Dividends Paid on Unvested Restricted Shares ($)
S. Zimmerman		$	151,636			$	417,652				—
W. S. Gorin			291,787				185,191				—
S. D. Yarad			28,500				—			$	4,744
C. L. Knutson			169,033				51,792				55,950
R. A. Freydberg			173,467				145,544				2,919

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table summarizes certain information regarding all plan-based awards granted to the Named Executive Officers during the year ended December 31, 2012.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 2012

		Type of Award(1)				Grant Date				Date of Compensation Committee Action				Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards Target(2) (#)				All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#)				Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards(3) ($)
S. Zimmerman			Salary				01/03/2012				04/26/2006	(4)			—				14,881			$	100,893
			TRSU				10/31/2012				10/22/2012	(5)			—				14,625				119,486
			PRSU				10/31/2012				10/22/2012	(6)			7,313				—				59,747
			RS				12/14/2012				12/12/2012	(7)			—				92,025				747,243
W. S. Gorin			TRSU				07/01/2012				07/01/2011	(8)			—				12,500				78,836
			PRSU				07/01/2012				07/01/2011	(9)			25,000				—				62,957
			RS				12/14/2012				12/12/2012	(7)			—				58,896				478,236
S. D. Yarad			RS				12/14/2012				12/12/2012	(10)			—				7,602				61,728
C. L. Knutson			TRSU				07/01/2012				07/01/2011	(8)			—				8,325				52,505
			PRSU				07/01/2012				07/01/2011	(9)			16,675				—				41,992
			RS				12/14/2012				12/12/2012	(7)			—				67,608				548,977
R. A. Freydberg			TRSU				07/01/2012				07/01/2011	(8)			—				3,334				21,027
			PRSU				07/01/2012				07/01/2011	(9)			6,666				—				16,787
			RS				12/14/2012				12/12/2012	(10)			—				19,461				158,023

Salary = annual stock grant paid as part of annual base salary

RS = Restricted Shares granted as part of annual incentive award

TRSU = Time-based RSUs

PRSU = Performance-based RSUs

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Additional discussion regarding the vesting of the awards set forth in the table above upon termination of employment or change in control of MFA can be found under “Employment Contracts” on pages 38 to 42 of this Proxy Statement.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Outstanding Equity Awards

The following table summarizes all outstanding equity awards held by the Named Executive Officers on December 31, 2012:

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 2012 Year End
		Option Awards																Stock Awards
Name		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable (#)				Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable (#)				Option Exercise Price ($)				Option Expiration Date				Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)				Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(1)				Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)				Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(1)
S. Zimmerman			185,000				—			$	10.25				10/01/2013				—				—				—				—
			—				—				—				—				14,625	(2)		$	118,609				—				—
			—				—				—				—				—				—				7,313	(15)		$	59,308
W. S. Gorin			100,000				—				10.25				10/01/2013				—				—				—				—
			—				—				—				—				22,278	(3)			180,675				—				—
			—				—				—				—				39,732	(4)			322,227				—				—
			—				—				—				—				54,271	(5)			440,137				—				—
			—				—				—				—				58,896	(6)			477,647				—				—
			—				—				—				—				56,500	(7)			458,215				—				—
			—				—				—				—				—				—				28,250	(16)			229,108
			—				—				—				—				8,334	(8)			67,589				—				—
			—				—				—				—				—				—				16,667	(17)			135,169
			—				—				—				—				12,500	(9)			101,375				—				—
			—				—				—				—				—				—				25,000	(18)			202,750
			—				—				—				—				137,501	(10)			403,381				—				—
S. D. Yarad			—				—				—				—				612	(11)			4,963				—				—
			—				—				—				—				2,172	(12)			17,615				—				—
			—				—				—				—				5,702	(13)			46,243
			—				—				—				—				20,000	(7)			162,200				—				—
			—				—				—				—				—				—				10,000	(16)			81,100
C. L. Knutson			—				—				—				—				9,382	(14)			76,088				—				—
			—				—				—				—				10,697	(11)			86,753				—				—
			—				—				—				—				28,944	(12)			234,736				—				—
			—				—				—				—				67,608	(6)			548,301
			—				—				—				—				54,500	(7)			441,995				—				—
			—				—				—				—				—				—				27,250	(16)			220,998
			—				—				—				—				5,550	(8)			45,010				—				—
			—				—				—				—				—				—				11,117	(17)			90,159
			—				—				—				—				8,325	(9)			67,516				—				—
			—				—				—				—				—				—				16,675	(18)			135,234
			—				—				—				—				91,667	(10)			268,920				—				—
R. A. Freydberg			100,000				—				10.25				10/01/2013				—				—				—				—
			—				—				—				—				20,122	(3)			163,189				—				—
			—				—				—				—				21,396	(4)			173,522				—				—
			—				—				—				—				10,856	(5)			88,042				—				—
			—				—				—				—				14,596	(13)			118,374
			—				—				—				—				44,000	(7)			356,840				—				—
			—				—				—				—				—				—				22,000	(16)			178,420
			—				—				—				—				2,223	(8)			18,029				—				—
			—				—				—				—				—				—				4,444	(17)			36,041
			—				—				—				—				3,334	(9)			27,039				—				—
			—				—				—				—				—				—				6,666	(18)			54,061
			—				—				—				—				36,667	(10)			107,570				—				—

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Options Exercised and Stock Vested in 2012

The following table summarizes certain information regarding options exercised and stock awards vested with respect to the Named Executive Officers during the year ended December 31, 2012.

		Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 2012
		Option Awards								Stock Awards
Name		Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#)				Value Realized Upon Exercise ($)				Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)				Value Realized on Vesting ($)(1)
S. Zimmerman			—				—				379,530			$	3,047,541
W. S. Gorin			—				—				89,555				711,436
S. D. Yarad			—				—				3,596				29,200
C. L. Knutson			—				—				52,503				423,528
R. A. Freydberg			—				—				62,442				496,644

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans

The following table summarizes certain information regarding amounts deferred by the Named Executive Officers under our nonqualified deferred compensation plans for the period ending December 31, 2012.

Name		Plan Type				Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($)				Registrant Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($)				Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year ($)				Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($)				Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year End ($)
S. Zimmerman			2010 TRSU Grant	(1)			—				237,218				—				—				237,218
			2010 PRSU Grant	(2)			—				118,609				—				—				118,609
W. S. Gorin			2010 TRSU Grant	(1)			—				229,108				—				—				229,108
S. D. Yarad			2010 TRSU Grant	(1)			—				81,100				—				—				81,100
C. L. Knutson			2010 TRSU Grant	(1)			—				220,998				—				—				220,998
R. A. Freydberg			2010 TRSU Grant	(1)			—				178,420				—				—				178,420

Deferred Plans

On December 19, 2002, the Board adopted the Senior Officers Plan, which is intended to provide our executive officers with an opportunity to defer up to 100% of certain compensation, as delineated in the Senior Officers Plan. Under the Senior Officers Plan, amounts deferred are considered to be converted into “stock units,” which do not represent our capital stock, but rather the right to receive a cash payment equal to the fair market value of an equivalent number of shares of Common Stock. Deferred amounts, together with any cash dividend equivalents credited to outstanding stock units, increase or decrease in value as would an equivalent number of shares of Common Stock and are settled in cash at the termination of the deferral period, based on the value of the stock units at that time. The Senior Officers Plan is a non-qualified plan under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, and is not funded. Prior to the time that the deferred accounts are settled, participants are unsecured creditors.

Pension Benefits

The Named Executive Officers received no benefits in 2012 from us under defined pension plans. Our only retirement plan in which the Named Executive Officers were eligible to participate, apart from the Deferred Plans, is the 401(k) Plan.

Employment Contracts

We have employment agreements with each of the Named Executive Officers (other than Stephen D. Yarad). As described below, these employment agreements provide the Named Executive Officers with, among other things, base salary, bonus and certain payments at, following and/or in connection with certain terminations of employment or a change-in-control involving MFA.

Stewart Zimmerman.  The employment agreement for Mr. Zimmerman provides for an annual base salary of not less than $900,000. Pursuant to this agreement, Mr. Zimmerman is also entitled to receive an annual grant of Common Stock, having an aggregate fair market value of $100,000 on the date of grant, on the first business day of each year during the term of his employment.

In addition, Mr. Zimmerman is eligible to participate in the Bonus Pool, ranging annually from $750,000 to $6.3 million or more in the aggregate, subject to a positive or negative adjustment in any year by as much as 30% at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. The aggregate Bonus Pool is based upon our achievement

TABLE OF CONTENTS

of specified ROAE targets. Specific information regarding the Bonus Pool, including the applicable ROAE targets, is provided under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Key Elements of Compensation” on pages 23 to 26 of this Proxy Statement. Amounts allocated to Mr. Zimmerman annually from the Bonus Pool are paid in a combination of cash and Restricted Shares based on the total size of the Bonus Pool. Specifically, (i) with respect to any Bonus Pool equal to or less than $2,700,000, approximately 75% of the amount allocated to Mr. Zimmerman and the other participants in the Bonus Pool as a group (collectively, the “Bonus Pool Participants”) is paid in cash and approximately 25% is paid in Restricted Shares, (ii) with respect to the incremental total of any Bonus Pool ranging from $2,700,000 to $4,050,000, approximately 65% of the amount allocated to the Bonus Pool Participants is paid in cash and approximately 35% is paid in Restricted Shares and (iii) with respect to the incremental total of any Bonus Pool in excess of $4,050,000, approximately 50% of the amount allocated to the Bonus Pool Participants is paid in cash and approximately 50% is paid in Restricted Shares. In addition, in accordance with Mr. Zimmerman’s employment agreement, he may not sell or otherwise transfer any of these Restricted Shares during the term of his employment or for a period of six months following the termination of his employment, unless the value of his MFA stock holdings exceeds a multiple of five times his annual base salary, provided, however, that Mr. Zimmerman may sell shares to satisfy income and employment tax obligations related to the vesting of shares.

Mr. Zimmerman’s employment agreement, which became effective on April 16, 2006, was first extended during 2010 and further extended in October, 2012, and is currently scheduled to expire on December 31, 2013, subject to earlier termination in certain circumstances. Expiration of the term of the employment agreement on December 31, 2012, does not constitute a termination without Cause or give Mr. Zimmerman the right to claim termination for Good Reason. Mr. Zimmerman’s employment agreement also provides that following the expiration of the employment agreement on December 31, 2013, MFA and he will enter into a consulting agreement pursuant to which MFA will pay him a consulting fee of $65,500 per month for the 12-month period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014.

William S. Gorin.  Mr. Gorin entered into an amended and restated employment agreement with the Company on June 30, 2011. Mr. Gorin’s employment agreement provides for an annual base salary of not less than $800,000.

In addition to his base salary, Mr. Gorin is eligible to participate in the Bonus Pool, ranging annually from $750,000 to $6.3 million or more in the aggregate, subject to a positive or negative adjustment in any year by as much as 30% at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. The aggregate Bonus Pool is based upon our achievement of specified ROAE targets. Specific information regarding the Bonus Pool, including the applicable ROAE targets, is provided under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Key Elements of Compensation” on pages 23 to 26 of this Proxy Statement. Amounts allocated to Mr. Gorin annually from the Bonus Pool will be paid in a combination of cash and Restricted Shares based on the total size of the Bonus Pool, with up to 40% of Mr. Gorin’s annual incentive bonus paid in Restricted Shares, as determined by the Compensation Committee. In addition, in accordance with Mr. Gorin’s employment agreement, he may not sell or otherwise transfer any of these Restricted Shares during the term of his employment or for a period of six months following the termination of his employment, unless the value of his stock holdings in us exceeds a multiple of four times his annual base salary. The Restricted Shares paid to Mr. Gorin in respect of his annual bonus vest on a pro rata basis on the last business day of each quarter beginning with the first calendar quarter following the year to which the bonus relates, and any dividends payable with respect to such shares will accrue and not be paid to Mr. Gorin until such shares have vested.

In addition, pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Gorin received a grant of 37,500 RSUs on each of July 1, 2011 and 2012, and he is also entitled to receive further grants of 37,500 RSUs, on each of July 1, 2013 and 2014. Each annual grant of RSUs is comprised of 12,500 TRSUs and 25,000 PRSUs. In accordance with the terms of the applicable award agreements, each of the TRSU awards is scheduled to vest on a pro rata basis on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of its date of grant. Each of the PRSU awards is scheduled to vest on a pro rata basis on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of its date of grant, subject to MFA’s achieving a “total shareholder return” of at least 10% for the year ending on such anniversary date. The applicable PRSUs that are scheduled to vest in a given year will be forfeited by Mr. Gorin if a 10% total shareholder return is not achieved in the applicable year. (The 8,333 PRSUs that were scheduled to vest on July 1, 2012, were forfeited by Mr. Gorin, as the required 10% total shareholder return for the year ended

TABLE OF CONTENTS

June 30, 2012, was not achieved.) Under the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Gorin was also granted 150,000 DERs, which represent the right to receive, on each dividend payment date in respect of our Common Stock, a distribution on each DER equal to the cash dividend paid on a share of Common Stock.

Mr. Gorin’s employment agreement expires on December 31, 2014, subject to earlier termination in certain circumstances.

Pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Gorin must provide 90 days’ notice prior to any resignation from Company and the Company must provide 90 days’ notice prior to any termination by the Company (except, in either case, a termination in connection with a Change In Control). During this period, Mr. Gorin will continue to receive salary and benefits, but will be ineligible to earn any annual bonus with respect to any year that ends after the delivery of any such notice by Mr. Gorin or the Company.

Stephen D. Yarad.  Mr. Yarad’s employment is not governed by an employment agreement, and consequently, Mr. Yarad is an “at will” employee. Mr. Yarad’s offer of employment provided for an annual base salary of $350,000 for 2010 and 2011 (the amount payable in 2010 was on an annualized basis). For 2012, Mr. Yarad was paid a base salary of $357,000. For 2010 and 2011, Mr. Yarad’s offer letter provided for a guaranteed annualized performance bonus of not less than $175,000 (the amount payable for 2010 was prorated). For 2012 and thereafter, Mr. Yarad’s annual performance bonus is determined in the discretion of the Compensation Committee, in consultation with our chief executive officer. The offer letter does not provide for any payments upon the termination of his employment or a change in control involving MFA.

Craig L. Knutson.  Mr. Knutson entered into an amended and restated employment agreement with the Company on June 30, 2011. The agreement was subsequently amended in April 2013. The employment agreement for Mr. Knutson provides for an annual base salary equal to $450,000. Under the terms of the employment agreement, as amended, Mr. Knutson is eligible to receive an annual incentive bonus in an amount determined by the Compensation Committee in its discretion.

Mr. Knutson’s bonus is paid in a combination of cash and Restricted Shares, which, for 2013, may be up to 40% in the form of Restricted Shares, as determined by the Compensation Committee. In addition, in accordance with Mr. Knutson’s employment agreement, he may not sell or otherwise transfer any of these Restricted Shares during the term of his employment or for a period of six months following the termination of his employment, unless the value of his stock holdings in us exceeds a multiple of four times his annual base salary. For 2012 and 2013, the Restricted Shares paid or to be paid to Mr. Knutson in respect of his annual bonus will vest on a pro rata basis on the last business day of each quarter beginning with the first calendar quarter following the year to which the bonus relates, and any dividends payable with respect to such shares will accrue and not be paid to Mr. Knutson until such shares have vested.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

In addition, pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Knutson received a grant of 25,000 RSUs on each of July 1, 2011 and 2012, and he is also entitled to receive further grants of 25,000 RSUs, on each of July 1, 2013 and 2014. Each annual grant of RSUs is comprised of 8,325 TRSUs and 16,675 PRSUs. In accordance with the terms of the applicable award agreements, each of the TRSU awards is scheduled to vest on a pro rata basis on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of its date of grant. Each of the PRSU awards is scheduled to vest on a pro rata basis on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of its date of grant, subject to MFA’s achieving a “total shareholder return” of at least 10% for the year ending on such anniversary date. The applicable PRSUs that are scheduled to vest in a given year will be forfeited by Mr. Knutson if a 10% total shareholder return is not achieved in the applicable year. (The 5,558 PRSUs that were scheduled to vest on July 1, 2012, were forfeited by Mr. Knutson, as the required 10% total shareholder return for the year ended June 30, 2012, was not achieved.) Under the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Knutson was also granted 100,000 DERs.

Mr. Knutson’s employment agreement expires December 31, 2013, subject to earlier termination in certain circumstances.

Pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Knutson must provide 90 days’ notice prior to any resignation from Company and the Company must provide 90 days’ notice prior to any termination by the Company (except, in either case, a termination in connection with a change in control). During this period, Mr. Knutson will continue to receive salary and benefits, but will be ineligible to earn any annual bonus with respect to any year that ends after the delivery of any such notice by Mr. Knutson or the Company.

Ronald A. Freydberg.  Mr. Freydberg entered into an amended and restated employment agreement with the Company on June 30, 2011. The employment agreement was subsequently amended in December 2012. The employment agreement for Mr. Freydberg provides for an annual base salary of not less than $750,000.

In addition to his base salary, Mr. Freydberg’s employment agreement provides that for 2012, he was eligible to receive an annual incentive bonus in an amount determined by the Compensation Committee in its discretion.

In addition, pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Freydberg received a grant of 10,000 RSUs on each of July 1, 2011 and 2012, and he is also entitled to receive further grants of 10,000 RSUs, on each of July 1, 2013 and 2014. Each annual grant of RSUs is comprised of 3,334 TRSUs and 6,666 PRSUs. In accordance with the terms of the applicable award agreements, each of the TRSU awards is scheduled to vest on a pro rata basis on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of its date of grant. Each of the PRSU awards is scheduled to vest on a pro rata basis on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of its date of grant, subject to MFA’s achieving a “total shareholder return” of at least 10% for the year ending on such anniversary date. The applicable PRSUs that are scheduled to vest in a given year will be forfeited by Mr. Freydberg if a 10% total shareholder return is not achieved in the applicable year. (The 2,222 PRSUs that were scheduled to vest on July 1, 2012, were forfeited by Mr. Freydberg, as the required 10% total shareholder return for the year ended June 30, 2012, was not achieved.) Mr. Freydberg was also granted 40,000 DERs.

In December 2012, Mr. Freydberg’s employment agreement was extended an additional year so that it now expires December 31, 2013, subject to earlier termination in certain circumstances.

Pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Freydberg must provide 90 days’ notice prior to any resignation from Company and the Company must provide 90 days’ notice prior to any termination by the Company (except, in either case, a termination in connection with a change in control). During this period, Mr. Freydberg will continue to receive salary and benefits, but will be ineligible to earn any annual bonus with respect to any year that ends after the delivery of any such notice by Mr. Freydberg or the Company.

*****

Each of the employment agreements of Messrs. Zimmerman, Gorin, Freydberg and Knutson includes limitations on (a) providing services to, or acquiring certain interests in, any other mortgage REIT and (b) soliciting our employees, in either case without our consent, for a period of time following a termination of

TABLE OF CONTENTS

employment. Further, Mr. Yarad’s offer letter includes a prohibition on soliciting our employees without our consent for a period of one year following a termination of employment as well as requiring Mr. Yarad to maintain the confidentiality of our confidential and proprietary information.

Potential Payments upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control (CIC)

The tables below show certain potential payments that would have been made to a Named Executive Officer under his respective employment agreement or award agreement(s) if such person’s employment had terminated on December 31, 2012, under various scenarios, including a Change in Control. The tables include the nonqualified deferred compensation (comprised of vested, but not yet settled, RSUs) that would be paid to a Named Executive Officer, which is set forth in the table above reporting Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans. The tables include only the value of the incremental amounts payable to the Named Executive Officer arising from the applicable scenario and do not include the value of vested, but unexercised, stock options as of December 31, 2012, and any other vested or earned, but unpaid, amounts owed to the applicable Named Executive Officer as of December 31, 2012 (including, for example, DERs relating to dividends declared but not paid as of such date or the employer 401(k) match of $10,200).

The footnotes to the tables describe the assumptions used in estimating the amounts shown in the tables.

As used below, the terms “Cause,” “Change in Control,” “Disability,” and “Good Reason” shall have the respective meanings set forth in the applicable employment agreement, each of which has been filed with the SEC or award agreement(s), forms of which have been filed with the SEC.

Because the payments to be made to a Named Executive Officer depend on several factors, the actual amounts to be paid out upon an NEO’s termination of employment can only be determined at the time of an executive’s separation from the company.

Potential Payments upon Termination of Employment/CIC as of December 31, 2012
S. Zimmerman

		Death (a)				Disability (a)				Termination Without Cause/Resignation for Good Reason (b)				Termination for Cause/ Voluntary Resignation(c)				Change in Control (d)
Incremental Benefits due to Termination Event
Severance/Payment to Representative or Estate			$2,000,000				$2,000,000				$10,500,000				—				$10,500,000
Value of Accelerated Equity Awards (1)			$177,917				$177,917				$177,917				—				$177,917
Deferred Compensation			$355,827				$355,827				$355,827				$355,827				$355,827
DER Payments			$133,200				$133,200				$133,200				—				$133,200
Other Benefits			—				$57,733				—				—				$28,866
Total Value of Incremental Benefits			$2,666,944				$2,724,677				$11,166,944				$355,827				$11,195,810

Potential Payments upon Termination of Employment/CIC as of December 31, 2012
W. S. Gorin

		Death (a)				Disability (a)				Termination Without Cause/Resignation for Good Reason (b)				Termination for Cause/ Voluntary Resignation(c)				Change in Control (d)
Incremental Benefits due to Termination Event
Severance/Payment to Representative or Estate			$800,000				$800,000				$2,283,333				$200,000				$4,966,667
Value of Accelerated Equity Awards (1)			$923,169				$923,169				$1,735,962				—				$2,386,789
Deferred Compensation			$229,108				$229,108				$229,108				—				$229,108
DER Payments			$72,000				$72,000				$72,000				—				$72,000
Other Benefits			—				$67,900				$45,267				$9,388				$90,533
Total Value of Incremental Benefits			$2,024,277				$2,092,177				$4,365,670				$209,388				$7,745,097

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Potential Payments upon Termination of Employment/CIC as of December 31, 2012
S. D. Yarad

		Death (a)				Disability (a)				Termination Without Cause/Resignation for Good Reason (b)				Termination for Cause/ Voluntary Resignation(c)				Change in Control (d)
Incremental Benefits due to Termination Event
Severance/Payment to Representative or Estate			—				—				—				—				—
Value of Accelerated Equity Awards (1)			$109,371				$109,371				$109,371				—				—
Deferred Compensation			$81,100				$81,100				$81,100				—				—
DER Payments			—				—				—				—				—
Other Benefits			—				—				—				—				—
Total Value of Incremental Benefits			$190,471				$190,471				$190,471				—				—

Potential Payments upon Termination of Employment/CIC as of December 31, 2012
C. L. Knutson

		Death (a)				Disability (a)				Termination Without Cause/Resignation for Good Reason (b)				Termination for Cause/ Voluntary Resignation(c)				Change in Control (d)
Incremental Benefits due to Termination Event
Severance/Payment to Representative or Estate			$450,000				$450,000				$1,746,500				$112,500				$2,788,500
Value of Accelerated Equity Awards (1)			$661,598				$661,598				$1,190,207				—				$1,726,465
Deferred Compensation			$220,998				$220,998				$220,998				—				$220,998
DER Payments			—				—				—				—				—
Other Benefits			—				$67,900				$45,267				$9,388				$45,267
Total Value of Incremental Benefits			$1,332,596				$1,400,496				$3,202,972				$121,888				$4,781,230

Potential Payments upon Termination of Employment/CIC as of December 31, 2012
R. A. Freydberg

		Death (a)				Disability (a)				Termination Without Cause/Resignation for Good Reason (b)				Termination for Cause/ Voluntary Resignation(c)				Change in Control (d)
Incremental Benefits due to Termination Event
Severance/Payment to Representative or Estate			$750,000				$750,000				—				$187,500				—
Value of Accelerated Equity Awards (1)			$461,500				$461,500				$685,879				—				$1,035,404
Deferred Compensation			$178,420				$178,420				$178,420				—				$178,420
DER Payments			$72,000				$72,000				$72,000				—				$72,000
Other Benefits			—				$67,900				—				$9,388				—
Total Value of Incremental Benefits			$1,461,920				$1,529,820				$936,299				$196,888				$1,285,824

(a) Death and Disability.

The following incremental benefits would be paid to a Named Executive Officer or his estate or legal representative in the event of his death or Disability:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(i) Severance/Payment to Representative or Estate:  For Mr. Zimmerman, 200% of annual base salary. For each of Messrs. Gorin, Knutson and Freydberg, 100% of annual base salary.

(ii) Value of Accelerated Equity Awards:  For each of Messrs. Zimmerman and Yarad, represents the aggregate value resulting from the (i) immediate full vesting of all outstanding Restricted Shares (and the payment of all dividends, including accrued dividends, on such shares), (ii) immediate full vesting and settlement of all outstanding TRSUs and (iii) pro rata vesting and settlement of outstanding PRSUs, subject to the achievement of applicable performance goals measured through the date of the executive’s termination.

For each of Messrs. Gorin, Knutson and Freydberg, represents the aggregate value resulting from the (i) immediate full vesting of all outstanding Restricted Shares (and the payment of all dividends, including accrued dividends, on such shares), (ii) immediate full vesting and settlement of all outstanding TRSUs and (iii) pro rata vesting and settlement of outstanding PRSUs, subject to the achievement of applicable performance goals measured through the date of the executive’s termination, in each case, that would have otherwise vested within 12 months of the date of the executive’s termination.

For purposes of these tables, we have assumed that the performance metrics with respect to the PRSUs have been achieved.

(iii) Deferred Compensation:  Value of vested, but not yet settled, TRSUs and, if applicable, PRSUs.

(iv) DER Payments:  Each of Messrs. Zimmerman, Gorin, Knutson and Freydberg is entitled to receive payments in respect of DERs associated with stock options that they may hold until the earlier of (a) 90 days following the date of the executive’s termination and (ii) the date on which each such stock option would have expired had the executive’s employment not terminated.

(v) Other Benefits:  For Mr. Zimmerman, in the event of disability only, the continued participation, at MFA’s expense, in MFA’s health insurance for the balance of the duration of his disability (subject to certain limitations and assuming payment of health insurance until age 70). For each of Messrs. Gorin, Knutson and Freydberg, in the event of disability only, the continued participation, at MFA’s expense, in MFA’s health insurance following the executive’s termination for the 18-month period following termination.

(b) Termination without Cause/Resignation for Good Reason.

The following incremental benefits would be paid to a Named Executive Officer in the event he is terminated without Cause not in connection with a Change in Control or resigns for Good Reason:

(i) Severance/Payment to Representative or Estate:  For Mr. Zimmerman, a payment equal to 300% of the greater of (a) his combined annual base salary and performance bonus for the preceding year and (b) the average of his combined annual base salary and average performance bonus for the three preceding fiscal years. For each of Messrs. Gorin and Knutson, a payment equal to the sum of (a) 75% his respective base salary and (b) the average of the annual bonuses paid to him for the three years prior to termination (the “Three Year Average Bonus”).

(ii) Value of Accelerated Equity Awards:  For Mr. Zimmerman and, in the case of Mr. Yarad only in the event of termination without cause, represents the aggregate value resulting from the (i) immediate full vesting of all outstanding Restricted Shares (and the payment of all dividends, including accrued dividends, on such shares), (ii) immediate full vesting and settlement of all outstanding TRSUs and (iii) pro rata vesting and settlement of outstanding PRSUs, subject to the achievement of applicable performance goals measured through the date of the executive’s termination.

For each of Messrs. Gorin, Knutson and Freydberg, represents the aggregate value resulting from the (i) immediate full vesting of any equity-based compensation previously granted as part of the executive’s annual bonus (and the payment of all dividends, including accrued dividends, on Restricted Shares), (ii) immediate full vesting of all outstanding Restricted Shares and full vesting and settlement of TRSUs, in each case not otherwise granted to the executive as part of his annual bonus and that would have otherwise vested within 12 months of the date of the executive’s termination (and the payment of all dividends, including accrued dividends, on such Restricted Shares) and (iii) pro rata vesting and settlement of outstanding PRSUs (and any other outstanding performance-based equity awards) not otherwise granted to the executive as part of his annual bonus, subject to the achievement of applicable performance goals measured through the date of the executive’s termination.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

For purposes of these tables, we have assumed that the performance metrics with respect to the PRSUs have been achieved.

(iii) Deferred Compensation:  Value of vested, but not yet settled, TRSUs and, if applicable, PRSUs.

(iv) DER Payments:  Each of Messrs. Zimmerman, Gorin, Knutson and Freydberg are entitled to receive payments in respect of DERs associated with stock options that they may hold until the earlier of (a) 90 days following the date of the executive’s termination and (ii) the date on which each such stock option would have expired had the executive’s employment not terminated.

(v) Other Benefits:  For each of Messrs. Gorin and Knutson, the continued participation, at MFA’s expense, in MFA’s health insurance following the executive’s termination for the 12-month period following termination.

(c) Termination for Cause/Voluntary Resignation.

The following incremental benefits would be paid to a Named Executive Officer in the event he is terminated for Cause or resigns without Good Reason:

(i) Severance/Payment to Representative or Estate:  Three months’ base salary pursuant to the “Garden Leave” provisions set forth in the employment agreement of each of Messrs. Gorin, Knutson and Freydberg.

(ii) Other Benefits:  Three months’ continued participation, at our expense, in MFA’s health insurance pursuant to the “Garden Leave” provisions set forth in the employment agreement of each of Messrs. Gorin, Knutson and Freydberg.

(d) Termination/Resignation upon Change in Control.

The following incremental benefits would be paid to a Named Executive Officer in the event he resigns or is terminated under certain circumstances in connection with a Change in Control:

For Mr. Zimmerman, benefits would be payable in the event (1) his employment is terminated by MFA within two months prior to a change in control and following the occurrence of certain pre-Change in Control events, (2) he resigns for any reason within six months following a Change in Control or (3) his employment is terminated by MFA other than for Cause or he resigns for Good Reason within 24 months following a Change in Control. For each of Messrs. Gorin, Knutson and Freydberg, benefits would be payable in the event the executive’s employment is terminated by MFA other than for Cause or he resigns for Good Reason within 12 months following a Change in Control.

(i) Severance/Payment to Representative or Estate:  For Mr. Zimmerman, 300% of the sum of his (a) base salary and (b) his most recent annual bonus. For Mr. Gorin, 200% of the sum of his (a) base salary and (b) Three Year Average Bonus. For Mr. Knutson, 150% of the sum of his (a) base salary and (b) Three Year Average Bonus.

(ii) Value of Accelerated Equity Awards:  Represents the aggregate value resulting from the (i) immediate full vesting of all outstanding Restricted Shares (and the payment of all dividends, including accrued dividends, on such shares) and (ii) immediate full vesting and settlement of all outstanding TRSUs and PRSUs.

(iii) Deferred Compensation:  Value of vested, but not yet settled, TRSUs and PRSUs.

(iv) DER Payments:  Each of Messrs. Zimmerman, Gorin, Knutson and Freydberg are entitled to receive payments in respect of DERs associated with stock options that they may hold until the earlier of (a) 90 days following the date of the executive’s termination and (ii) the date on which each such stock option would have expired had the executive’s employment not terminated.

(v) Other Benefits:  For each of Messrs. Zimmerman, Gorin and Knutson, participation, at MFA’s expense, in all health, life insurance, retirement and other benefit programs for the balance of the term of employment under their respective employment agreements to the same extent as though the executive’s employment had not been terminated.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Securities Authorized For Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table presents certain information with respect to our 2010 Equity Compensation Plan under which our Common Stock may be issued to employees or non-employees (such as directors, consultants and advisors) as of December 31, 2012, which was approved by our stockholders. We have no equity compensation plans that have not been approved by stockholders.

Award(1)		Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights				Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights				Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in the first column of this table)
Stock Options			427,000			$	10.14
Restricted Stock Units (or RSUs)			727,648				N/A	(2)
Total			1,154,648			$	N/A	(2)			9,505,879	(3)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

3. ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) RESOLUTION TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act, and in accordance with the Board’s determination, based on the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, and the non-binding recommendation of our stockholders, we are seeking an advisory (non-binding) vote on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers (as defined in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” of this Proxy Statement) as disclosed on pages 21 to 32 of this Proxy Statement. Stockholders are being asked to vote on the following advisory resolution at the Annual Meeting:

“RESOLVED, that the stockholders of MFA Financial, Inc. approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of its Named Executive Officers as disclosed in the Proxy Statement for the 2013 Annual Meeting, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, Summary Compensation Table and other related tables and disclosures.”

This proposal, commonly known as a Say-on-Pay proposal, gives our stockholders the opportunity to express their views on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our Named Executive Officers and the principles, policies and practices described in this Proxy Statement. As this is an advisory vote, the result will not be binding on the Company, the Board or the Compensation Committee, although the Compensation Committee will consider the outcome of the vote when evaluating our compensation principles, design and practices.

We believe that stockholders should vote FOR this proposal because our executive compensation program directly links pay to performance and encourages our Named Executive Officers to focus on both near-term financial performance and long-term, sustainable growth for stockholders, with the following key features:

You are encouraged to consider the description of the Compensation Committee’s executive compensation philosophy and its decisions in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” of this Proxy Statement.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) RESOLUTION TO APPROVE OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS DISCLOSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers and holders of more than 10% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock (“10% Holders”) to file with the SEC and the NYSE initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of Common Stock and other equity securities of MFA. Directors, executive officers and 10% Holders are required by the SEC’s regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms and amendments thereto filed during any given year.

Based on our records and other information, we believe that each of our directors, executive officers and greater than 10% beneficial owners complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to them during 2012, except that (i) each of the following executive officers and/or directors filed one late report: Elwin Ford, Ronald A. Freydberg, William S. Gorin, Kathleen A. Hanrahan, Robin Josephs, Craig L. Knutson, Matthew Ottinger, Harold E. Schwartz, Shira E. Siry, Sunil Yadav and Stephen D. Yarad and (ii) Stewart Zimmerman filed two late reports.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Since the beginning of our last fiscal year, we have not been a party to any transaction or proposed transaction with any related person who is (i) one of our directors or executive officers, (ii) a director nominee, (iii) a beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Common Stock or (iv) any member of the immediate family of any of the foregoing persons that involves an amount exceeding $120,000 and in which any such related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL
OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth information as of the Record Date regarding the beneficial ownership of our Common Stock by (i) each person known to us to be the beneficial owner of 5% or more of the Common Stock, (ii) the Named Executive Officers, (iii) our directors and (iv) all of our directors and executive officers as a group.

		Common Stock Beneficially Owned
Name and Business Address(1)		Shares(2)(3)				Shares Subject to Stock Options(4)				Total				Percent of Class
Directors and Officers
Stewart Zimmerman			740,777				185,000				925,777				*
William S. Gorin			687,458				100,000				787,458				*
Stephen D. Yarad			14,080				0				14,080				*
Craig L. Knutson			302,065				0				302,065				*
Ronald A. Freydberg			470,717				100,000				570,717				*
Stephen R. Blank			41,968				5,000				46,968				*
James A. Brodsky			74,027				5,000				79,027				*
Michael L. Dahir			254,986				5,000				259,986				*
Alan L. Gosule			38,636				5,000				43,636				*
Robin Josephs			73,480				0				73,480				*
George H. Krauss			65,773				5,000				70,773				*
All directors and executive officers as a group (17 persons)			2,985,520				425,000				3,410,520				*
Thornburg Investment Management Inc.(5) 2300 North Ridgetop Road Santa Fe, NM 87506			23,313,740				—				23,313,740				6.52	%
Goldman Sachs Asset Management(6) 200 West Street New York, NY 10282			19,505,540				—				19,505,540				5.50	%
BlackRock, Inc.(7) 40 East 52nd Street New York, NY 10022			19,314,523				—				19,314,523				5.40	%

TABLE OF CONTENTS

OTHER MATTERS

The Board knows of no other business to be presented at the Annual Meeting. If other matters should properly come before the Annual Meeting, the persons named as proxy holders on your proxy card will vote the shares of Common Stock represented by properly submitted proxies in their discretion.

SUBMISSION OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

Any stockholder intending to present a proposal at our 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and have the proposal included in the proxy statement for such meeting must, in addition to complying with the applicable laws and regulations governing submissions of such proposals, submit the proposal in writing to us no later than December 10, 2013.

Pursuant to our current Bylaws, any stockholder intending to nominate a director or present a proposal at an annual meeting of our stockholders, which is not intended to be included in the proxy statement for such annual meeting, must notify us in writing not less than 120 days nor more than 150 days prior to the first anniversary of the date of the proxy statement for the preceding year’s annual meeting. Accordingly, any stockholder who intends to submit such a nomination or such a proposal at our 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must notify us in writing of such proposal by December 10, 2013, but in no event earlier than November 10, 2013.

Any such nomination or proposal should be sent to the attention of our Secretary at MFA Financial, Inc., 350 Park Avenue, 20^th Floor, New York, New York 10022 and, to the extent applicable, must include the information required by our Bylaws.

HOUSEHOLDING OF PROXY MATERIALS

The SEC permits companies and intermediaries (such as banks and brokers) to satisfy the delivery requirements for proxy statements and annual reports with respect to two or more stockholders sharing the same address by delivering a single set of proxy materials (i.e., the proxy statement and annual report) addressed to those stockholders. This process, which is commonly referred to as “householding,” potentially means extra convenience for stockholders and cost savings for companies.

A number of brokers with account holders who are our stockholders will be “householding” our proxy materials. A single set of proxy materials may be delivered to multiple stockholders sharing the same address unless contrary instructions have been received from the impacted stockholders. Once a stockholder has received notice from its broker that it will be “householding” communications to such stockholder’s address, “householding” will continue until such stockholder revokes consent to “householding” or is notified otherwise. If, at any time, a stockholder no longer wishes to participate in “householding” and would prefer to receive a separate set of our proxy materials, such stockholder should so notify us by directing written requests to: MFA Financial, Inc., 350 Park Avenue, 20^th Floor, New York, New York 10022, Attention: General Counsel, or by calling our investor relations toll-free phone line at (800) 892-7547. In addition, if so requested, we will also undertake to promptly deliver a separate set of proxy materials to any stockholder for whom such proxy materials were subject to “householding.” Stockholders who currently receive multiple copies of our proxy materials at their address and would like to request “householding” of their communications should contact us as specified above or their respective brokers.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

MISCELLANEOUS

We are bearing all costs associated with the solicitation of proxies in connection with the Annual Meeting. This solicitation is being made primarily through the internet and by mail, but may also be made by our directors, executive officers, employees and representatives by telephone, telegraph, facsimile transmission, electronic transmission, internet, mail or in person. No additional compensation will be given to our directors, executive officers or employees for this solicitation. We have retained Morrow & Co., LLC, 470 West Avenue, Stamford, Connecticut 06902, a proxy soliciting firm, to assist in the solicitation of proxies for an estimated fee of $10,000 plus reimbursement of certain out-of-pocket expenses. We will request brokers and nominees who hold shares of Common Stock in their names to furnish proxy materials to beneficial owners of such shares and will reimburse such brokers and nominees for their reasonable expenses incurred in forwarding solicitation materials to such beneficial owners.

A COPY OF OUR ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K (FILED WITH THE SEC AND THE NYSE), WHICH CONTAINS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT US, IS AVAILABLE FREE OF CHARGE TO ANY STOCKHOLDER. REQUESTS SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO THE ATTENTION OF OUR GENERAL COUNSEL AT MFA FINANCIAL, INC., 350 PARK AVENUE, 20^TH FLOOR, NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10022.

By Order of the Board

Shira E. Finkel
Senior Vice President and Secretary

New York, New York
April 9, 2013

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS