Edgar Filing: SPARTAN MOTORS INC

spartan_10q-093012.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

_________________

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2012.
	OR
o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from ____________________ to _____________________

Commission File Number 000-13611

SPARTAN MOTORS, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Michigan (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		38-2078923 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1541 Reynolds Road Charlotte, Michigan (Address of Principal Executive Offices)		48813 (Zip Code)

Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (517) 543-6400

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	o		Accelerated filer	x
Non-accelerated filer	o		Smaller Reporting Company	o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).

Yes

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class	Outstanding at October 31, 2012
Common stock, $.01 par value	33,826,715 shares

SPARTAN MOTORS, INC.

INDEX

____________________________________

			Page

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS			3

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

	Item 1.	Financial Statements:
		Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets – September 30, 2012 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2011	4

		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations - Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 (Unaudited)	5

		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 (Unaudited)	6

		Condensed Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity – Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 (Unaudited)	7

		Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	8

	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	18

	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	31

	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	31

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

	Item 1A.	Risk Factors	32

	Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	32

	Item 6.	Exhibits	33

SIGNATURES			34

EXHIBIT INDEX

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

There are certain statements within this Report that are not historical facts. These statements are called “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These statements involve important known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors and can be identified by phrases using “estimate,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “project,” “expect,” “intend,” “predict,” “potential,” “future,” “may,” “will”, “should” and similar expressions or words. Our future results, performance or achievements may differ materially from the results, performance or achievements discussed in the forward-looking statements. There are numerous factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results discussed in forward-looking statements, including, among others:

·	Changes in economic conditions, including changes in interest rates, credit availability, financial market performance and the Company’s industries can have adverse effects on its earnings and financial condition, as well as its customers, dealers and suppliers. In particular, the Company could be adversely affected by the economic impact to its supply base, including those members of the supply base that support the automobile industry.

·	Changes in relationships with major customers and suppliers could significantly affect the Company’s revenues and profits.

·	Constrained government budgets may have a negative effect on the Company’s business and its operations.

·	The integration of businesses or assets we have acquired or may acquire in the future involves challenges that could disrupt our business and harm our financial condition.

·	When we introduce new products, we may incur expenses that we did not anticipate, such as start-up and recall expenses, resulting in reduced earnings.

·	Amendments of the laws and regulations governing our businesses, or the promulgation of new laws and regulations, could have a material impact on the Company’s operations.

·	We source components from a variety of domestic and global suppliers who may be subject to disruptions from natural or man-made causes. Disruptions in our supply of components could have a material and adverse impact on our results of operations or financial position.

·	Changes in the markets we serve may, from time to time, require us to re-configure our production lines or re-locate production of products between buildings or to new locations in order to maximize the efficient utilization of our production capacity. Costs incurred to effect these re-configurations may exceed our estimates and efficiencies gained may be less than anticipated.

This list provides examples of factors that could affect the results described by forward-looking statements contained in this Report. However, this list is not intended to be all inclusive. The risk factors disclosed in Item 1A “Risk Factors” of Part II of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in Part I – Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, include all known risks our management believes could materially affect the results described by forward-looking statements contained in this Report. However, those risks may not be the only risks we face. Our business, operations, and financial performance could also be affected by additional factors that are not presently known to us or that we currently consider to be immaterial to our operations. In addition, new risks may emerge from time to time that may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. We believe that the forward-looking statements contained in this Report are reasonable. However, given these risks and uncertainties, we cannot provide you with any guarantee that the anticipated results will be achieved. All forward-looking statements in this Report are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained in this Section and you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements contained in this Report as a prediction of actual results. We disclaim any obligation to update or revise information contained in any forward-looking statement to reflect developments or information obtained after the date this Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Item 1. Financial Statements

SPARTAN MOTORS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except par value)

	September 30, 2012 (Unaudited)		December 31, 2011
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	26,690	$	31,677
Accounts receivable, less allowance of $1,010 and $749		50,043		40,042
Inventories		70,796		66,991
Deferred income tax assets		6,425		6,425
Income taxes receivable		5,368		1,479
Assets held for sale		4,973		-
Other current assets		2,247		2,455
Total current assets		166,542		149,069

Property, plant and equipment, net		58,273		65,399
Goodwill		20,815		20,815
Intangible assets, net		11,275		11,943
Other assets		1,601		1,383
TOTAL ASSETS	$	258,506	$	248,609

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	30,092	$	21,649
Accrued warranty		6,262		5,802
Accrued customer rebates		2,115		1,546
Accrued compensation and related taxes		6,295		5,670
Deposits from customers		6,550		7,902
Other current liabilities and accrued expenses		8,738		7,772
Current portion of long-term debt		55		55
Total current liabilities		60,107		50,396

Other non-current liabilities		3,742		2,932
Long-term debt, less current portion		5,046		5,084
Deferred income tax liabilities		7,359		7,359

Shareholders' equity:

Preferred stock, no par value: 2,000 shares authorized (none issued)		-		-
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 40,000 shares authorized; 33,821 and 33,596 outstanding		338		336
Additional paid in capital		72,240		71,145
Retained earnings		109,674		111,357
Total shareholders' equity		182,252		182,838
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY	$	258,506	$	248,609

See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

SPARTAN MOTORS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended September 30						Nine Months Ended September 30
	2012			2011			2012			2011

Sales	$	112,857		$	120,303		$	346,087		$	314,800
Cost of products sold		98,346			99,857			294,871			266,933
Restructuring charge		1,543			-			5,760			1,731
Gross profit		12,968			20,446			45,456			46,136

Operating expenses:
Research and development		2,909			3,274			9,902			10,472
Selling, general and administrative		10,234			11,896			33,388			34,309
Restructuring charge		100			-			1,976			1,050
Total operating expenses		13,243			15,170			45,266			45,831

Operating income (loss)		(275	)		5,276			190			305

Other income (expense):
Interest expense		(81	)		(88	)		(253	)		(260	)
Interest and other income		178			(72	)		434			83
Total other income (expense)		97			(160	)		181			(177	)

Income (loss) before taxes		(178	)		5,116			371			128

Taxes		149			1,918			362			48


Net earnings (loss)	$	(327	)	$	3,198		$	9		$	80

Basic net earnings (loss) per share	$	(0.01	)	$	0.10		$	0.00		$	0.00

Diluted net earnings (loss) per share	$	(0.01	)	$	0.10		$	0.00		$	0.00

Basic weighted average common shares outstanding		33,374			33,506			33,795			33,391

Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding		33,374			33,525			33,824			33,459

See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

SPARTAN MOTORS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012			2011
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	9		$	80
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		6,870			7,510
Loss on disposal and impairment of assets		5,533			1,122
Expense from changes in fair value of contingent consideration		966			1,001
Tax expense related to stock incentive plan transactions		194			232
Stock based compensation related to stock awards		1,342			1,305
Decrease (increase) in operating assets:
Accounts receivable		(10,001	)		8,952
Inventories		(3,805	)		(3,365	)
Income taxes receivable		(3,889	)		69
Other assets		208			1,985
Increase (decrease) in operating liabilities:
Accounts payable		8,443			9,741
Accrued warranty		460			212
Accrued customer rebates		569			(74	)
Accrued compensation and related taxes		625			314
Deposits from customers		(1,352	)		(1,650	)
Other current liabilities and accrued expenses		145			(1,079	)
Taxes on income		253			85
Total adjustments		6,561			26,360
Net cash provided by operating activities		6,570			26,440

Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property, plant and equipment		(9,647	)		(3,631	)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment		65			96
Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired		-			(4,746	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(9,582	)		(8,281	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Borrowings under credit facilities		2,891			-
Payments on credit facilities		(2,891	)		-
Proceeds from long-term debt		-			17
Payments on long-term debt		(38	)		(78	)
Net use of cash from the exercise, vesting or cancellation of stock incentive awards		(51	)		(197	)
Cash paid related to tax impact of stock incentive plan transactions		(194	)		(232	)
Payment of dividends		(1,692	)		(1,671	)
Net cash used by financing activities		(1,975	)		(2,161	)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(4,987	)		15,998
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		31,677			14,507
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	26,690		$	30,505

See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

SPARTAN MOTORS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Number of Shares		Common Stock		Additional Paid In Capital			Retained Earnings			Total Shareholders' Equity
Balance at December 31, 2011		33,596	$	336	$	71,145		$	111,357		$	182,838

Issuance of common stock and the tax impact of stock incentive plan transactions		16		-		(245	)		-			(245	)

Issuance of restricted stock, net of cancellation		209		2		(2	)		-			-

Stock based compensation expense related to restricted stock		-		-		1,342			-			1,342

Dividends		-		-		-			(1,692	)		(1,692	)

Net earnings		-		-		-			9			9

Balance at September 30, 2012		33,821	$	338	$	72,240		$	109,674		$	182,252

See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

SPARTAN MOTORS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)

NOTE 1 - GENERAL AND SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES

For a description of key accounting policies followed refer to the notes to the Spartan Motors, Inc. (the “Company”) consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 14, 2012. There have been no changes in such accounting policies as of the date of this report.

The Company has five wholly-owned operating subsidiaries: Spartan Motors Chassis, Inc., located at our corporate headquarters in Charlotte, Michigan (“Spartan Chassis”); Crimson Fire, Inc., located in Brandon, South Dakota (“Crimson”); Crimson Fire Aerials, Inc., located in Ephrata, Pennsylvania (“Crimson Aerials”); Utilimaster Corporation, located in Bristol and Wakarusa, Indiana (“Utilimaster”); and, as of April 1, 2011, Classic Fire, LLC (“Classic Fire”), located in Ocala, Florida.

The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all normal and recurring adjustments that are necessary for the fair presentation of the Company’s financial position as of September 30, 2012, the results of operations for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2012 and the cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, and should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

The results of operations for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

The Company is required to disclose the fair value of its financial instruments in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Codification relating to “Disclosures about Fair Values of Financial Instruments.” The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and the Company’s fixed and variable rate debt instruments approximate their fair value at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

Certain immaterial amounts in the prior periods’ financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period’s presentation.

Recently issued accounting standards

In September, 2011 the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update 2011-08 “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment” (“ASU 2011-08”). ASU 2011-08 permits entities to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. Under the amendments in ASU 2011-08, an entity is not required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless it determines that it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. ASU 2011-08 is effective for interim and annual goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. The Company’s early adoption of ASU 2011-08 for its goodwill impairment testing as of October 1, 2011 did not have an impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In July, 2012 the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2012-02 “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment (“ASU 2012-02”). ASU 2012-02 permits entities to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform a quantitative impairment test for the indefinite-lived intangible asset. Under the amendments in ASU 2012-02, an entity is not required to determine the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset unless it determines that it is more likely than not that the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. Under the amendments in ASU 2012-02, an entity has the option to bypass the qualitative assessment and proceed directly to a quantitative impairment test for any indefinite-lived intangible asset in any period. ASU 2012-02 is effective for interim and annual goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not expect that the adoption of ASU 2012-02 will have an impact on its financial statements.

SPARTAN MOTORS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)

NOTE 2 – INVENTORIES

Inventories are summarized as follows:

	September 30,			December 31,
	2012			2011

Finished goods	$	10,159		$	14,763
Work in process		21,870			18,518
Raw materials and purchased components		42,717			37,275
Reserve for slow-moving inventory		(3,950	)		(3,565	)

	$	70,796		$	66,991

The Company has a number of demonstration units as part of its sales and training program. These demonstration units are included in the “Finished goods” line item above, and the net carrying amount was $7,753 and $8,091 at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

NOTE 3 – ACQUISITION ACTIVITIES

On April 1, 2011, the Company completed its acquisition of substantially all of the assets and related liabilities of Classic Fire, LLC (“Classic Fire”), a manufacturer of fire trucks and fire apparatus. The Company’s acquisition of Classic Fire has allowed it to expand its offerings in the fire truck market into segments and price points that complement its offerings from Spartan Motors Chassis, Inc. and Crimson Fire, Inc., as well as provide strategic sourcing of pump modules and other technology. Classic Fire is reported as a component of the Company’s Emergency Response Vehicles segment. The pro forma effect of the acquisition on the Company’s results of operations is immaterial.

The revenue and earnings of Classic Fire are included in the Company’s results since the April 1, 2011 acquisition. Acquisition related expenses included in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations are not material.

This acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and the purchase price was allocated to the assets purchased and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. Identifiable intangible assets acquired include a trade name, customer and dealer relationships, unpatented technology and certain non-compete agreements. The excess purchase price over the net tangible and intangible assets acquired of $2,397 was recorded as goodwill, which is expected to be deductible for tax purposes. The purchase price consisted of cash consideration of $3,975, net of cash acquired of $25, paid by the Company at closing; a working capital adjustment of $771; Spartan Motors, Inc. common stock valued at $1,029 and a contingency for certain performance-based earn out payments recorded at $180, discounted to April 1, 2011. During the year ended December 31, 2011 the Company recorded an adjustment to operating expenses of $97 to bring the contingent liability to $83, based on the expected future payment amounts, discounted to December 31, 2011. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012 the Company recorded an adjustment to operating expenses of $83 to bring the contingent liability to $0 based on the likelihood of future payments.

SPARTAN MOTORS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)

The purchase price was allocated to assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows:

Cash and cash equivalents	$	25
Accounts receivable		635
Inventory		1,352
Other current assets		7
Property, plant and equipment		451
Intangible assets		1,650
Goodwill		2,397
Total assets acquired		6,517


Accounts payable		186
Accrued warranty		140
Other current liabilities		31
Other non-current liabilities		180
Total liabilities assumed		537

Total purchase price	$	5,980

The Company leases the land and building that house the operations of Classic Fire, from an entity that is controlled by the sellers of Classic Fire, under an operating lease with an initial term of three years. The lease contains options allowing the Company to renew the lease for an additional three year term, or purchase the property at a fixed price at any time during the initial lease period or the renewal period, if any. For purchase accounting purposes, the Company recorded an unfavorable lease liability valued at $180 at April 1, 2011. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 the Company accreted $15 and $45 to earnings as amortization of this liability.

NOTE 4 – DEBT

Long-term debt consists of the following:

	September 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
Note payable to Prudential Investment Management, Inc. Principal due December 1, 2016 with quarterly interest only payments of $68 at 5.46%. Unsecured debt. (1)	$	5,000		$	5,000
Line of credit revolver (2)		--			--
Capital lease obligations		101			139
Total debt		5,101			5,139
Less current portion of long-term debt		(55	)		(55	)
Total long-term debt	$	5,046		$	5,084

The long-term debt due is as follows; $16 in 2012; $56 in 2013; $29 in 2014; none in 2015 and $5,000 in 2016.

(1)

The Company has a private shelf agreement with Prudential Investment Management, Inc., which allows the Company to borrow up to $45,000 to be issued in $5,000 minimum increments. The interest rate is determined based on applicable rates at the time of issuance. The Company had $5,000 of private placement notes outstanding at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 with Prudential Investment Management, Inc.

(2)

The Company’s primary line of credit is a $70,000 unsecured revolving line with Wells Fargo Bank and JPMorgan Chase Bank, expiring on December 16, 2016. Both lending institutions equally share this commitment. This line carries an interest rate of the higher of either (i) the highest of prime rate, the federal funds effective rate plus 0.5%, or the one month adjusted LIBOR plus 1.00%; or (ii) adjusted LIBOR plus margin based upon the Company’s ratio of debt to earnings from time to time. The Company had no borrowings on this line at September 30, 2012 or December 31, 2011. General Motors Company (“GM”) has the ability to draw up to $5,000 against the Company’s primary line of credit in relation to chassis supplied to Utilimaster under a chassis bailment inventory program, resulting in net available borrowings of $65,000 at September 30, 2012. See Note 6, Commitments and Contingent Liabilities for further information about this chassis bailment inventory program. The applicable borrowing rate including margin was 3.25% at September 30, 2012.

SPARTAN MOTORS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Under the terms of the primary line of credit agreement and the private shelf agreement, the Company is required to maintain certain financial ratios and other financial conditions. The agreements also prohibit the Company from incurring additional indebtedness; limit certain acquisitions, investments, advances or loans; and restrict substantial asset sales. At September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company was in compliance with all debt covenants.

NOTE 5 – RESTRUCTURING

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company incurred restructuring charges including asset impairments as the result of its planned relocation of its delivery and service vehicles operations and Reach manufacturing along with certain severance charges within its Specialty Vehicles and Emergency Response Vehicles segments to help align expenses with current and future revenue expectations.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company undertook restructuring activities to help align its structure and operating expenses with current and future revenue expectation.

Restructuring charges included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended September 30, 2012 are as follows:

	Three Months ended September 30, 2012
	Emergency Response Vehicles		Delivery and Service Vehicles		Specialty Vehicles		Other		Total

Cost of products sold
Asset Impairment	$	-	$	943	$	-	$	-	$	943
Accrual for severance		-		-		10		-		10
Production relocation costs		-		590		-		-		590
Total cost of products sold		-		1,533		10		-		1,543

General and Administrative
Accrual for severance		77		-		4		3		84
Production relocation costs		-		16		-		-		16
Total general and administrative		77		16		4		3		100

Total restructuring	$	77	$	1,549	$	14	$	3	$	1,643

SPARTAN MOTORS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Restructuring charges included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:

	Nine Months ended September 30, 2012
	Emergency Response Vehicles		Delivery and Service Vehicles		Specialty Vehicles		Other		Total

Cost of products sold
Asset impairment	$	-	$	4,315	$	-	$	-	$	4,315
Accrual for severance		74		-		127		-		201
Production relocation costs		-		1,244		-		-		1,244
Total cost of products sold		74		5,559		127		-		5,760

General and Administrative
Asset impairment		-		1,153		-		-		1,153
Accrual for severance		277		-		420		59		756
Production relocation costs		-		67		-		-		67
Total general and administrative		277		1,220		420		59		1,976

Total restructuring	$	351	$	6,779	$	547	$	59	$	7,736

	Nine Months ended September 30, 2011
	Emergency Response Vehicles		Delivery and Service Vehicles		Specialty Vehicles		Other		Total

Cost of products sold
Asset impairment	$	409	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	409
Inventory impairment		214		-		1,103		-		1,317
Accrual for severance		-		-		5		-		5
Total cost of products sold		623		-		1,108		-		1,731

General and Administrative
Asset impairment		10		-		-		767		777
Accrual for severance		-		-		160		113		273
Total general and administrative		10		-		160		880		1,050

Total restructuring	$	633	$	-	$	1,268	$	880	$	2,781

As a result of the planned move of the delivery and service vehicles operations to Bristol, Indiana, the Company classified certain buildings and related machinery and equipment within its Wakarusa, Indiana facility as held for sale during the first and third quarters of 2012. During the three months ended September 30, 2012, certain additional buildings were classified as held for sale and adjusted to their current estimated fair values less costs to sell, as determined by a market appraisal completed in March of 2012, resulting in impairment charges of $943. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, certain buildings and machinery and equipment were adjusted to their current estimated fair values less costs to sell, as determined by a market appraisal completed in March of 2012, resulting in impairment charges of $5,468. The estimated fair value of these assets of $4,973 is recorded within Assets held for sale at September 30, 2012 on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

SPARTAN MOTORS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)

The following table provides a summary of the compensation related charges incurred through the nine month period ended September 30, 2012 and the related outstanding balances to be paid out in relation to those expenses:

	Severance
Balance as of Jan 1, 2012	$	-

Accrual for severance		738

Payments made in period		(81	)

Balance as of March 31, 2012		657

Accrual for severance		125

Payments made in period		(348	)

Balance as of June 30, 2012	$	434

Accrual for severance		94

Payments made in period		(325	)

Balance as of September 30, 2012	$	203

NOTE 6 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

Under the terms of its credit agreement with its banks, the Company has the ability to issue letters of credit totaling $10,000. The balance of letters of credit outstanding was $3,784 and $5,084 at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, related to the Company’s workers compensation insurance, certain emergency response vehicle body contracts and the Utilimaster chassis agreement discussed below.

At September 30, 2012, the Company and its subsidiaries were parties, both as plaintiff and defendant, to a number of lawsuits and claims arising out of the normal course of their businesses. In the opinion of management, the financial position, future operating results or cash flows of the Company will not be materially affected by the final outcome of these legal proceedings.

Chassis Agreements

Utilimaster is party to a chassis bailment inventory agreement with GM which allows GM to draw up to $5,000 against the Company’s revolving credit line for chassis placed at Utilimaster. As a result of this agreement, there was $3,584 and $4,030 outstanding on the Company’s revolving credit line at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. Under the terms of the bailment inventory agreement, these chassis never become the property of Utilimaster, and the amount drawn against the credit line will be repaid by a GM dealer at the time an order is placed for a Utilimaster body, utilizing a GM chassis. As such, the chassis and the related draw on the line of credit are not reflected in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. See Note 4 Debt for further information on the Company’s revolving line of credit.

Contingent Consideration

In connection with the acquisition of Utilimaster in November, 2009, the Company incurred contingent obligations through 2014 in the form of certain performance-based earn-out payments, up to an aggregate maximum amount of $7,000. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company made earn out payments totaling $1,100, leaving an aggregate maximum amount of future payments of $5,900 as of September 30, 2012, and expects to make a payment of $1,000 in the fourth quarter of 2012. The Company has recorded a contingent liability for the estimated fair value of the future consideration of $2,800 based upon the likelihood of the payments, discounted to September 30, 2012. The contingent liability includes charges of $62 and $1,049 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, which are recorded within Selling, general and administrative on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The increase in estimated fair value of the contingent liability for the first nine months of 2012 is primarily due to an expected increase in Utilimaster’s revenue for 2012 over the amounts originally projected at the time of the acquisition. Management believes that the Company has sufficient liquidity to fund the contingent obligations as they become due.

SPARTAN MOTORS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Warranty Related

The Company’s subsidiaries all provide limited warranties against assembly/construction defects. These warranties generally provide for the replacement or repair of defective parts or workmanship for a specified period following the date of sale. The end users also may receive limited warranties from suppliers of components that are incorporated into the Company’s chassis and vehicles.

Certain warranty and other related claims involve matters of dispute that ultimately are resolved by negotiation, arbitration or litigation. Infrequently, a material warranty issue can arise which is beyond the scope of the Company’s historical experience. The Company provides for any such warranty issues as they become known and are estimable. It is reasonably possible that additional warranty and other related claims could arise from disputes or other matters beyond the scope of the Company’s historical experience.

Changes in the Company’s warranty liability during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

	2012			2011
Balance of accrued warranty at January 1	$	5,802		$	5,702
Warranties issued during the period		3,020			2,179
Cash settlements made during the period		(3,452	)		(3,073	)
Adjustments (1)		-			140
Changes in liability for pre-existing warranties during the period, including expirations		892			1,106
Balance of accrued warranty at September 30	$	6,262		$	6,054

(1)

Adjustments are assumed warranties outstanding at Classic Fire on April 1, 2011.

NOTE 7 – EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

The following table presents a reconciliation of the weighted average shares outstanding used in the Net earnings (loss) per share (“EPS”) calculation:

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding		33,374		33,506		33,795		33,391

Effect of dilutive stock options		-		19		29		68
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding		33,374		33,525		33,824		33,459

Anti-dilutive stock awards:
Restricted stock		642		-		-		-
Stock options		239		382		231		33
Total		881		382		231		33

SPARTAN MOTORS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Stock awards noted as anti-dilutive were not included in the basic (Restricted stock awards) and diluted (stock option awards) weighted average common shares outstanding. Although these stock awards were not included in the Company’s calculation of basic or diluted EPS, they may have a dilutive effect on the EPS calculation in future periods if the price of the common stock increases.

NOTE 8 - TAXES

The Company’s effective tax rate was (83.7)% and 97.6% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, and 37.5% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011. The effective tax rate for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 was unfavorably affected by an increase in the reserves for uncertain tax liabilities, in accordance with ASC Topic 740 “Income Taxes”, in the amount of $218 as a result of a state court ruling that occurred in the third quarter of 2012. This event was not normal or recurring in nature, and as such was a discrete event for tax purposes, with the entire impact of the uncertain tax position taken into account in the third quarter of 2012.

NOTE 9 - BUSINESS SEGMENTS

As a result of a realignment of the Company’s operating segments completed during the course of the quarter ended September 30, 2012, the Company has realigned its reportable segments into three segments: Emergency Response Vehicles, Delivery and Service Vehicles, and Specialty Vehicles. The reportable segments have been identified based on the financial data utilized by the chief operating decision makers to assess segment performance and allocate resources among the Company’s operating units. Segment results from prior periods are shown reflecting the change.

The Emergency Response Vehicles segment consists of the emergency response chassis operations of Spartan Chassis and the operations of Crimson, Crimson Aerials, and Classic Fire. This segment engineers and manufactures emergency response chassis and bodies.

The Delivery and Service Vehicles segment consists of Utilimaster and focuses on designing and manufacturing walk-in vans for the delivery and service market and the production of commercial truck bodies along with related aftermarket parts and assemblies.

The Specialty Vehicles segment consists of the Spartan Chassis operations that engineer and manufacture motor home chassis, defense vehicles and other specialty chassis and distribute related aftermarket parts and assemblies.

Appropriate expense amounts are allocated to the three reportable segments and are included in their reported operating income or loss.

The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described, or referred to, in Note 1 - General and Summary of Accounting Policies. Assets and related depreciation expense in the column labeled “Other” pertain to capital assets maintained at the corporate level. Segment loss from operations in the “Other” column contains corporate related expenses not allocable to the operating segments. Interest expense and Taxes on income are not included in the information utilized by the chief operating decision makers to assess segment performance and allocate resources, and accordingly, are excluded from the segment results presented below. Intercompany transactions between operating segments were immaterial in all periods presented.

SPARTAN MOTORS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Three Months Ended September 30, 2012

	Emergency Response Vehicles		Delivery & Service Vehicles		Specialty Vehicles		Other			Consolidated

Emergency Response Chassis Sales	$	29,109								$	29,109
Emergency Response Body Sales		10,781									10,781
Utilimaster Vehicle Sales				40,329							40,329
Motorhome Chassis Sales						17,129					17,129
Other Specialty Vehicles						1,279					1,279
Aftermarket Parts and Assemblies				8,696		5,534					14,230

Total Sales	$	39,890	$	49,025	$	23,942	$	-		$	112,857

Depreciation and Amortization Expense	$	396	$	688	$	473	$	672		$	2,229
Operating Income (Loss)		89		600		504		(1,468	)		(275	)
Segment Assets		71,798		85,118		24,483		77,107			258,506

Three Months Ended September 30, 2011

	Emergency Response Vehicles			Delivery & Service Vehicles		Specialty Vehicles			Other			Consolidated

Emergency Response Chassis Sales	$	23,585										$	23,585
Emergency Response Body Sales		11,749											11,749
Utilimaster Vehicle Sales					42,157								42,157
Motorhome Chassis Sales							14,160						14,160
Other Specialty Vehicles							4,728						4,728
Aftermarket Parts and Assemblies					19,054		4,870						23,924

Total Sales	$	35,334		$	61,211	$	23,758		$	-		$	120,303

Depreciation and Amortization Expense	$	540		$	575	$	532		$	665		$	2,312
Operating Income (Loss)		(548	)		7,715		(643	)		(1,248	)		5,276
Segment Assets		72,954			76,030		24,836			77,552			251,372

SPARTAN MOTORS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012

	Emergency Response Vehicles			Delivery & Service Vehicles		Specialty Vehicles		Other			Consolidated

Emergency Response Chassis Sales	$	81,702									$	81,702
Emergency Response Body Sales		35,687										35,687
Utilimaster Vehicle Sales					103,757							103,757
Motorhome Chassis Sales							51,715					51,715
Other Specialty Vehicles							6,410					6,410
Aftermarket Parts and Assemblies					51,867		14,949					66,816

Total Sales	$	117,389		$	155,624	$	73,074	$	-		$	346,087

Depreciation and Amortization Expense	$	1,320		$	2,025	$	1,504	$	2,021		$	6,870
Operating Income (Loss)		(3,256	)		8,157		994		(5,705	)		190
Segment Assets		71,798			85,118		24,483		77,107			258,506

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011

	Emergency Response Vehicles			Delivery & Service Vehicles		Specialty Vehicles			Other			Consolidated

Emergency Response Chassis Sales	$	76,872										$	76,872
Emergency Response Body Sales		33,603											33,603
Utilimaster Vehicle Sales					84,446								84,446
Motorhome Chassis Sales							48,304						48,304
Other Specialty Vehicles							13,716			-			13,716
Aftermarket Parts and Assemblies					39,195		18,664						57,859

Total Sales	$	110,475		$	123,641	$	80,684		$	-		$	314,800

Depreciation and Amortization Expense	$	1,798		$	1,699	$	1,655		$	2,358		$	7,510
Operating Income (Loss)		(1,042	)		8,971		(2,538	)		(5,086	)		305
Segment Assets		72,954			76,030		24,836			77,552			251,372

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Spartan Motors, Inc. was organized as a Michigan corporation on September 18, 1975, and is headquartered in Charlotte, Michigan. We began development of our first product that same year and shipped our first fire truck chassis in October 1975.

We are known as a leading niche-market engineer and manufacturer in the heavy-duty, specialty vehicles marketplace. We have five wholly-owned operating subsidiaries: Spartan Motors Chassis, Inc., located at our corporate headquarters in Charlotte, Michigan (“Spartan Chassis”); Crimson Fire, Inc., located in Brandon, South Dakota (“Crimson”); Crimson Fire Aerials, Inc., located in Ephrata, Pennsylvania (“Crimson Aerials”); Utilimaster Corporation, located in Bristol and Wakarusa, Indiana (“Utilimaster”); and, as of April 1, 2011, Classic Fire, LLC (“Classic Fire”), located in Ocala, Florida. Our brand names, Spartan Chassis™, Spartan ERV™, and Utilimaster™ are known for quality, value, service and innovation.

Spartan Chassis is a leader in the designing, engineering and manufacturing of specialty heavy-duty chassis. The chassis consists of a frame assembly, engine, transmission, electrical system, running gear (wheels, tires, axles, suspension and brakes) and, for emergency response chassis and some specialty chassis applications, a cab. Spartan Chassis customers are original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) who manufacture the body or apparatus of the vehicle which is mounted on our chassis. Crimson specializes in the engineering and manufacturing of emergency response vehicles built on chassis platforms purchased from either Spartan Chassis or outside sources. Crimson Aerials engineers and manufactures aerial ladder components for fire trucks. Classic Fire specializes in manufacturing emergency response vehicles built on chassis from outside sources and provides strategic sourcing of pump modules. Utilimaster is a leading manufacturer of vehicles made to customer specifications in the delivery and service market, including walk-in and hi-cube vans, truck bodies and the new Reach commercial van.

Our business strategy is to further diversify product lines and develop innovative design, engineering and manufacturing expertise in order to be the best value producer of specialty vehicle products. We have an innovative team focused on building lasting relationships with our customers. This is accomplished by striving to deliver premium specialty vehicles, vehicle components, and services that inspire customer loyalty. Our diversification across several sectors creates numerous opportunities while minimizing overall risk. Additionally, our business model provides the agility to quickly respond to market needs, take advantage of strategic opportunities when they arise and correctly size operations to ensure stability and growth.

2011 Acquisition

On April 1, 2011, we completed our acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Classic Fire, as more fully described in Note 3 - Acquisition Activities, of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements appearing in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q. Our acquisition of Classic Fire has allowed us to expand our offerings in the emergency response vehicle market into segments and price points that complement our offerings from Spartan Chassis and Crimson as well as provided strategic sourcing of pump modules and other technology.

Executive Overview

We reported sales of $112.9 million for the third quarter of 2012, a decrease of 6.2% from the $120.3 million in sales we reported in the third quarter of 2011. We reported a net loss of $0.3 million, or $0.01 per share for the three months ended September 30, 2012, compared to net income of $3.2 million, or $0.10 per share for the same period in 2011. Excluding the restructuring charges incurred in the third quarter, we recorded adjusted net income of $0.7 million or $0.02 per share in 2012 compared to net income of $3.2 million or $0.10 per share in 2011.

Our Emergency Response Vehicles and Specialty Vehicles segments posted stronger sales in the third quarter with increases of $4.6 million, or 13.0% and $0.1 million or 0.4%, respectively, compared with the same period in 2011. Third quarter 2012 sales in our Delivery and Service Vehicles segment decreased by $12.2 million or 19.9% compared to the same period in 2011.

During the third quarter of 2012, we incurred restructuring costs of $1.6 million, mainly as a result of a write down of certain buildings at our Wakarusa, Indiana campus that were reclassified as held for sale during the quarter, and expenses related to the planned move of our delivery and service vehicles operation to Bristol, Indiana. When fully implemented, we expect that these restructuring actions will result in future savings of approximately $4 million per year as a result of increased efficiencies in our delivery and service vehicles operations. These cost savings are expected to be realized beginning in mid 2013.

Our overall backlog increased by 18.0% to $168.3 million at September 30, 2012 compared to $142.6 million at September 30, 2011, which reflects strong order intake during the year for our emergency response bodies, motorhome chassis, and delivery and service vehicles.

Our balance sheet remains strong with a healthy cash balance, low debt and an open line of credit.

We believe we are well positioned to take advantage of long-term opportunities, and continue our efforts to bring product innovations to each of the markets that we serve. Some of our recent innovations and strategic developments include:

	·	The first shipments in the third quarter of 2012 of emergency response chassis equipped with our Spartan Advanced Protection System (APS), a pioneering blend of industry-first airbag and safety belt protections that make occupants safer than ever before. The APS offers eight airbags, including officer and driver knee airbags and a rear side curtain which is larger than any other system on the road, along with a restraint control module deploying advanced motion sensors around the cab perimeter and advanced seat belts with pretensioning and load limiting.

	·	The re-branding of Crimson Fire, Crimson Fire Aerials and Classic Fire under the Spartan ERVTM brand to focus on one brand and leverage the strength of the Spartan name.

	·	The introduction of the Spartan Telstar, a 138 foot telescopic and articulated aerial platform, which supplies an “up, over and down” range of motion to navigate over parapets for roof rescues, clear power lines and trees for access and provide for below-grade rescues.

	·	The introduction of the Spartan Intelligent Pump Solution (IPS). This new pumper system offers upgrades to traditional firefighting equipment, including improved storage, overall pump capabilities and functionality and maneuverability of the fire fighting vehicle.

	·	The award of orders to Spartan Chassis for Metro Star® emergency response chassis for multiple fire departments in China and Chile, representing another step forward in our efforts to expand sales globally.

	·	The introduction of the Spartan One-Touch Rapid Compressed Air Foam System (CAFS). Spartan engineering has incorporated smart electronics and developed an exclusive plumbing design to deliver the unique, easy to use, One-Touch Rapid CAFS.

	·	The shipment of 182 ReachTM commercial vans during the third quarter of 2012, coupled with follow-on orders from two of our largest delivery and service vehicle customers.

The following section provides a narrative discussion about our financial condition and results of operations. The comments should be read in conjunction with our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes thereto included in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q and in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 14, 2012.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the components of the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations as a percentage of sales (percentages may not sum due to rounding):

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Sales		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%
Cost of products sold		87.1			83.0			85.2			84.8
Restructuring charge		1.4			-			1.7			0.5
Gross profit		11.5			17.0			13.1			14.6

Operating expenses:
Research and development		2.6			2.7			2.9			3.3
Selling, general and administrative		9.0			9.9			9.7			10.9
Restructuring charge		0.1			0.0			0.6			0.3
Operating income (loss)		(0.3	)		4.4			0.1			0.1

Other income (expense), net		0.1			(0.2	)		0.1			(0.1	)
Income (loss) before taxes		(0.2	)		4.2			0.1			0.0

Taxes		0.1			1.6			0.1			0.0

Net earnings (loss)		(0.3	)%		2.7	%		0.0	%		0.0	%

Quarter Ended September 30, 2012 Compared to the Quarter Ended September 30, 2011

For the three months ended September 30, 2012, we reported consolidated sales of $112.9 million, a decrease of $7.4 million or 6.2% compared to $120.3 million reported for the same quarter in 2011. These results reflect a decrease in our delivery and service vehicles revenue, which was partially offset by increases in our emergency response vehicles and specialty vehicles revenue.

Cost of products sold was flat at $99.9 million in the third quarter of 2012 compared to $99.9 million in the third quarter of 2011. As a percentage of sales, cost of products sold increased to 88.5% in the third quarter of 2012, compared to 83.0% in the third quarter of 2011. This increase is mainly due to a change in product mix that included a lower proportion of aftermarket parts and assemblies sales in 2012 in our Delivery and Service Vehicles segment, along with an increase in restructuring charges in the third quarter of 2012, as compared with the prior year. Excluding restructuring charges, our adjusted cost of products sold decreased by $1.4 million or 1.4% to $98.4 million in the third quarter of 2012, compared to $99.8 million in 2011, driven by the decrease in revenue. Our adjusted cost of products sold was 87.1% of sales in the third quarter of 2012, compared to 83.0% in 2011, due to the less favorable product mix in the third quarter of 2012.

Gross profit decreased by $7.5 million, or 36.6%, to $13.0 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 from $20.5 million for the same period in 2011. Gross margin decreased to 11.5% from 17.0% over the same time period, impacted by the less favorable product mix that included a lower proportion of aftermarket parts and assemblies and higher restructuring charges as discussed above. Excluding restructuring charges, our adjusted gross profit decreased by $6.0 million, or 29.3% to $14.5 million in the third quarter of 2012 from $20.5 million in the third quarter of 2011, driven by the decrease in revenue and less favorable product mix in 2012. Our adjusted gross margin decreased to 12.9% in the third quarter of 2012 compared to 17.0% for the same period in 2011, mainly due to the less favorable product mix in 2012.

Operating expenses decreased by $2.0 million or 13.2% to $13.2 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2012, compared to $15.2 million for the same period in 2011. Research and development expense decreased by $0.4 million due to reduced spending on defense related products. Selling, general and administrative expense decreased by $1.7 million, reflecting a $0.5 million decrease in provisions for certain earn out payments associated with our 2009 acquisition of Utilimaster, a $0.4 million reduction in sales commissions and $0.8 million in savings attributable to restructuring and cost cutting efforts.

Our effective income tax rate was (83.7)% in the third quarter of 2012, compared to 37.5% in the third quarter of 2011. Our effective tax rate in the third quarter of 2012 was unfavorably impacted by a $0.2 million increase in our reserve for uncertain tax liabilities as a result of a state court ruling that occurred in the third quarter of 2012, in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification Topic 740, “Income Taxes”. This adjustment was not normal or recurring in nature, and as such was a discrete event for tax purposes, with the entire impact of the uncertain tax position taken into account in the third quarter of 2012.

We recorded a net loss of $0.3 million, or $0.01 per share, for the three months ended September 30, 2012, compared to net income of $3.2 million, or $0.10 per share for the same period in 2011. Driving the decrease in net earnings for the three months ended September 30, 2012 compared with the prior year were the factors discussed above.

Excluding restructuring charges, adjusted net earnings were $0.7 million or $0.02 per diluted share for the three months ended September 30, 2012, compared to adjusted net income of $3.2 million or $0.10 per share for the three months ended September 30, 2011.

At September 30, 2012, we had $168.3 million in backlog compared to $142.6 million at September 30, 2011, an increase of $25.7 million or 18.0%. This increase is mainly attributable to a $13.3 million increase in our emergency response bodies backlog due to strong order intake from outside North America along with an increase of $11.1 million in our delivery and service vehicles backlog due to a large order received in the third quarter of 2012 from a fleet customer, along with smaller increases in most of our other markets. Intercompany orders are eliminated from the backlog dollars presented. We anticipate filling our current backlog orders by April, 2013.

While orders in the backlog are subject to modification, cancellation or rescheduling by customers, this has not been a major factor in the past. Although the backlog of unfilled orders is one of many indicators of market demand, several factors, such as changes in production rates, available capacity, new product introductions and competitive pricing actions, may affect actual sales. Accordingly, a comparison of backlog from period-to-period is not necessarily indicative of eventual actual shipments.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 Compared to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011

For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we reported consolidated sales of $346.1 million, an increase of $31.3 million or 9.9% compared to the same period in 2011. These results reflect the strength in our Delivery and Service Vehicles segment during the first half of the year.

Cost of products sold increased by $31.9 million or 11.9%, to $300.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $268.7 million in 2011. The increase is attributable to the increase in sales along with higher restructuring charges that we experienced in 2012 compared to 2011. As a percentage of sales, cost of products sold increased to 86.9% in 2012, compared to 85.4% in 2011. This increase is mainly due to the higher restructuring costs incurred in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to the same period in 2011. We incurred restructuring charges of $5.8 million within cost of products sold during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 as a result of the planned moves of our Utilimaster operations to Bristol, Indiana and our Reach manufacturing to Charlotte, Michigan, along with restructuring actions undertaken in our specialty vehicles operations, compared to $1.7 million incurred in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 to align our structure and operating expenses with expected revenue levels. Excluding restructuring charges, our adjusted cost of products sold increased by $27.8 million or 10.4% to $294.8 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 from $267.0 million in the same period of 2011, driven by the increase in revenue. For more information on our restructuring activities, see Note 5 - Restructuring of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements appearing in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.

Gross profit decreased by $0.6 million, or 1.3%, to $45.5 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 from $46.1 million in the same period in 2011. The decrease was the result of higher restructuring charges, partially offset by higher sales volumes, as discussed above. Consolidated gross margin decreased to 13.1% from 14.6% over the same time period, mainly due to the higher restructuring charges incurred in 2012. Excluding restructuring charges, our adjusted gross profit increased by $3.4 million, or 7.1% to $51.2 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 from $47.8 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, while our adjusted gross margin decreased to 14.8% for the first nine months of 2012 compared to 15.2% for the same period in 2011.

Operating expenses decreased by $0.5 million or 1.1% to $45.3 million or 13.1% of sales for the nine month period ended September 30, 2012, compared to $45.8 million or 14.5% of sales for the same period in 2011, mainly driven by savings of approximately $0.8 million in selling, general and administrative expense due to restructuring and cost cutting efforts, along with a decrease of approximately $0.6 million in research and development expense driven by a reduction in development costs related to the Reach commercial van. These decreases were partially offset by the $1.0 million increase in restructuring charges recorded in the first nine months of 2012 compared with the same period of 2011. We recorded restructuring charges within operating expense of $2.0 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2012, with approximately $1.2 million related to the planned moves of our Utilimaster operations to Bristol, Indiana, and approximately $0.8 million related to restructuring initiatives undertaken in our Emergency Response Vehicles and Specialty Vehicles segments to align expenses with current and expected future revenue levels. Excluding restructuring charges, our adjusted operating expense decreased by $1.4 million, or 3.1% to $43.3 million or 12.5% of sales during the nine months ended September 30, 2012, from $44.7 million or 14.2% of sales during the same period of 2011 due to the factors discussed above.

Our effective income tax rate was 97.6% for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, compared to 37.5% for the same period in 2011. Our effective tax rate in the third quarter of 2012 was unfavorably impacted by a $0.2 million increase in our reserve for uncertain tax liabilities as a result of a state court ruling that occurred in the third quarter of 2012, in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification Topic 740, “Income Taxes”. This adjustment was not normal or recurring in nature, and as such was a discrete event for tax purposes, with the entire impact of the uncertain tax position taken into account in the third quarter of 2012.

We recorded net earnings at break even for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, compared to net income of $0.1 million, or $0.00 per share for the same period in 2011. Driving the decrease in net earnings for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared with the prior year were the factors mentioned above.

Excluding restructuring charges of $7.7 million ($4.7 million net of tax) incurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and $2.8 million ($1.8 million net of tax) incurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, adjusted net earnings were $4.7 million or $0.14 per diluted share for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, compared to net income of $1.9 million or $0.06 per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

The aforementioned adjusted non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) measures (adjusted cost of products sold, adjusted gross profit, adjusted operating expense, adjusted net earnings and adjusted net earnings per share) are not measurements of financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to cost of products sold, gross profit, operating expense, net earnings (loss) or net earnings (loss) per share under GAAP. These adjusted measures have limitations as analytical tools, and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of results as reported under GAAP. In addition, in evaluating adjusted cost of products sold, adjusted gross profit, adjusted operating expense, adjusted net earnings and adjusted net earnings per share, in the future additional expenses may be incurred similar to the adjustments in this presentation. This presentation of adjusted measures should not be construed as an inference that future results will be unaffected by unusual or infrequent items. These limitations are compensated by providing equal prominence of GAAP results and using adjusted measures only as a supplement.

The following table reconciles cost of products sold to adjusted cost of products sold, gross profit to adjusted gross profit, operating expense to adjusted operating expense, operating income to adjusted operating income, net earnings (loss) to adjusted net earnings and net earnings (loss) per share to adjusted net earnings per share for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) (unaudited):

Financial Summary (Non-GAAP)

(In thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended September 30,										Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012			% of sales			2011		% of sales		2012		% of sales		2011		% of sales
Cost of products sold	$	99,889			88.5		$	99,857		83.0	$	300,631		86.9	$	268,664		85.3
Subtract: restructuring charges		1,543			1.4			-		-		5,760		1.7		1,731		0.5
Adjusted cost of products sold	$	98,346			87.1		$	99,857		83.0	$	294,871		85.2	$	266,933		84.8


Gross profit/Gross margin	$	12,968			11.5		$	20,446		17.0	$	45,456		13.1	$	46,136		14.7
Add back: restructuring charges		1,543			1.4			-		-		5,760		1.7		1,731		0.5
Adjusted gross profit/Adjusted gross margin	$	14,511			12.9		$	20,446		17.0	$	51,216		14.8	$	47,867		15.2


Operating expenses	$	13,243			11.7		$	15,170		12.6	$	45,266		13.1	$	45,831		14.6
Less: restructuring charges		100			0.1			-		-		1,976		0.6		1,050		0.3
Adjusted operating expenses	$	13,143			11.6		$	15,170		12.6	$	43,290		12.5	$	44,781		14.2


Net earnings (loss)	$	(327	)		(0.3	)	$	3,198		2.7	$	9		0.0	$	80		0.0
Add back: restructuring charges, net of tax		1,002			0.9			-		-		4,719		1.4		1,796		0.6
Adjusted net earnings	$	675			0.6		$	3,198		2.7	$	4,728		1.4	$	1,876		0.6


Net earnings per share - basic and diluted	$	(0.01	)				$	0.10			$	-			$	-
Add back: restructuring charges, net of tax		0.03						-				0.14				0.06
Adjusted net earnings per share - diluted	$	0.02					$	0.10			$	0.14			$	0.06

Our Segments

As a result of a realignment of our operations completed during the course of the third quarter of 2012, we realigned our reportable segments into three segments: Emergency Response Vehicles, Delivery and Service Vehicles, and Specialty Vehicles. Our Emergency Response Vehicles segment consists of the emergency response chassis operations of Spartan Chassis and the operations of Crimson, Crimson Aerials and Classic Fire. Our Delivery and Service Vehicles segment is comprised of our Utilimaster operations and Our Specialty Vehicles segment is comprised of the motorhome, aftermarket parts and assemblies, defense and other specialty vehicle operations of Spartan Chassis. The reportable segments have been identified based on the financial data utilized by our chief operating decision makers to assess segment performance and allocate resources among our operating units. Segment results from prior periods are shown reflecting the change. For certain financial information related to each segment, see Note 9 - Business Segments, of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements appearing in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.

Emergency Response Vehicles

Income Statement Data

(Dollars in thousands)

	Three Months Ended September 30,											Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012					2011						2012						2011
	Amount		%			Amount			%			Amount			%			Amount			%

Sales	$	39,890		100.0	%	$	35,335			100.0	%	$	117,389			100.0	%	$	110,475			100.0	%

Operating Income (loss)		89		0.2	%		(548	)		(1.6)	%		(3,256	)		(2.8	)%		(1,042	)		(0.9	)%

Segment assets		71,798					72,954						71,798						72,954

Comparison of the Three Month Periods Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011

Sales in our Emergency Response Vehicles segment increased by $4.6 million, or 13.0% to $39.9 million in the third quarter of 2012 compared to $35.3 million for the same period of 2011, driven by stronger sales of emergency response chassis, which, despite the quarter’s increases, remain below historical levels due to continuing municipal budget constraints. Partially offsetting these increases was a decrease in sales of emergency response bodies due to production delays caused by later than expected receipt of certain commercial chassis. There were no changes in pricing of products sold by our Emergency Response Vehicles segment that had a significant impact on our financial statements when comparing these periods.

Operating income for our Emergency Response Vehicles segment increased by $0.6 million to income of $0.1 million in the third quarter of 2012 compared to an operating loss of $0.5 million in the third quarter of 2011, due to the higher sales volumes in 2012 compared to 2011.

Comparison of the Nine Month Periods Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011

Sales in our Emergency Response Vehicles segment increased by $6.9 million, or 6.2% to $117.4 million in the nine month period ended September 30, 2012 compared to $110.5 million for the same period of 2011. Driving the increase was stronger order intake throughout the first nine months of 2012 in both chassis and bodies, which showed sales increases of 6.3% and 6.2%, respectively, over the same period in 2011. There were no changes in pricing of products sold by our Emergency Response Vehicles Segment that had a significant impact on our financial statements when comparing these periods. We expect to see revenues in our Emergency Response Vehicles segment increase slightly for the fourth quarter of 2012, compared with the same period in 2011, due to the strong order intake experienced earlier in 2012.

Operating loss for our Emergency Response Vehicles segment increased by $2.3 million, or 230.0% to an operating loss of $3.3 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to an operating loss of $1.1 million for the same period in 2011. Approximately $1.2 million of this increase was due to the mix of products sold during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to the same period in 2011, along with additional warranty provision and engineering expense related to the development of our Advanced Protection System, which accounted for approximately $0.6 million each in 2012.

Delivery and Service Vehicles

Income Statement Data

(Dollars in thousands)

	Three Months Ended September 30,										Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012					2011					2012					2011
	Amount		%			Amount		%			Amount		%			Amount		%

Sales	$	49,025		100.0	%	$	61,211		100.0	%	$	155,624		100.0	%	$	123,641		100.0	%

Operating Income		600		1.2	%		7,715		12.6	%		8,157		5.2	%		8,971		7.3	%

Segment assets		85,118					76,030					85,118					76,030

Comparison of the Three Month Periods Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011

Sales for the third quarter of 2012 in our Delivery and Service Vehicles segment decreased by $12.2 million or 19.9% to $49.0 million compared to $61.2 million for the third quarter of 2011, due to a decrease in sales of delivery and service related aftermarket accessories. There were no changes in pricing of products sold by our Delivery and Service Vehicles segment that had a significant impact on our financial statements when comparing the third quarter of 2012 to the third quarter of 2011.

Operating income in our Delivery and Service Vehicles segment for the third quarter of 2012 decreased by $7.1 million or 92.2% to $0.6 million, compared to operating income of $7.7 million for the same period of 2011. Driving the decrease was the reduction in sales of delivery and service related aftermarket accessories in the third quarter of 2012, along with restructuring charges of $1.5 million incurred in the third quarter of 2012 as a result of the planned move of our delivery and service operations to a new facility in Bristol, Indiana.

Comparison of the Nine Month Periods Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011

Sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 for our Delivery and Service Vehicles segment increased by $32.0 million or 25.9% to $155.6 million compared to $123.6 million for same time period in 2011. The sales increase was driven by an increase in aftermarket accessories sales, which contributed approximately $13 million, and higher sales volumes of vehicles, which contributed approximately $11 million to the total sales increase. Also contributing to the sales increase was a favorable vehicle product mix, which accounted for approximately $6 million of the sales increase. Pricing increases on certain vehicles, which were largely offset by material cost increases, resulted in an increase of approximately $1.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared with the same period in 2011. Approximately $2.9 million of the additional volume related revenue in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was due to the delay of shipments on certain vehicles in the fourth quarter of 2011 in order to effect updates to meet certain regulatory safety requirements. We expect sales in our Delivery and Service Vehicles segment for the fourth quarter of 2012 to decrease somewhat from those experienced in the fourth quarter of 2011, due to a decrease in sales of certain aftermarket accessories.

Operating income for our Delivery and Service Vehicles segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 decreased by $0.8 million or 8.9% to $8.2 million, compared to operating income of $9.0 million for the same period of 2011. Driving the decrease was the $6.8 million of restructuring charges incurred in 2012 as a result of the planned moves of our delivery and service operations to a new facility in Bristol, Indiana and our Reach manufacturing to Charlotte, Michigan, which was largely offset by the impact of the increase in revenue in 2012 as compared to 2011.

Specialty Vehicles

Income Statement Data

(Dollars in thousands)

	Three Months Ended September 30,											Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012					2011						2012					2011
	Amount		%			Amount			%			Amount		%			Amount			%

Sales	$	23,942		100.0	%	$	23,758			100.0	%	$	73,074		100.0	%	$	80,684			100.0	%

Operating Income (loss)		504		2.1	%		(643	)		(2.7	)%		994		1.4	%		(2,538	)		(3.1	)%

Segment assets		24,483					24,836						24,483					24,836

Comparison of the Three Month Periods Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011

Sales for the third quarter of 2012 in our Specialty Vehicles segment increased by $0.1 million or 0.4% to $23.9 million compared to $23.8 million for the third quarter of 2011, due to an approximately $3.0 million increase in motorhome chassis sales, which was offset by an approximately $2.9 million decrease in defense related sales. There were no changes in pricing of products sold by our Specialty Vehicles segment that had a significant impact on our financial statements when comparing the third quarter of 2012 to the third quarter of 2011.

Operating income for our Specialty Vehicles segment for the third quarter of 2012 increased by $1.1 million to income of $0.5 million, compared to an operating loss of $0.6 million for the same period of 2011. Driving the increase was a reduction in operating expenses in 2012 compared to the same period of 2011 as a result of restructuring initiatives undertaken in previous periods.

Comparison of the Nine Month Periods Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011

Sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 for our Specialty Vehicles segment decreased by $7.6 million or 9.4% to $73.1 million compared to $80.7 million for same time period in 2011. The sales decrease was driven by a $9.6 million decrease in defense related sales and a $3.7 million decrease in sales of aftermarket parts and assemblies, which were partially offset by increases of $3.3 million in sales of motorhome chassis and $2.6 million in other specialty chassis. We expect to see revenues in our Specialty Vehicles segment decrease somewhat for the fourth quarter of 2012, compared with the same period in 2011, due to an expected decrease in defense related sales in 2012 as compared to 2011.

Operating income for our Specialty Vehicles segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 increased by $3.5 million to $1.0 million, compared to an operating loss of $2.5 million for the same period of 2011. Driving the operating income increase was a reduction in operating expenses year over year as a result of restructuring initiatives undertaken in previous periods.

Financial Condition

Balance Sheet at September 30, 2012 compared to December 31, 2011

Cash decreased by $5.0 million, or 15.7%, to $26.7 million at September 30, 2012 from $31.7 million at December 31, 2011, due to cash used in investing activities of $9.6 million, primarily from investments in property and equipment related to the move of our Utilimaster operations. This was partially offset by cash provided from operations of $6.6 million, largely related to increases in accounts payable and non-cash add backs from depreciation and loss on disposals. Also contributing to the decrease in cash was a dividend payment of $1.7 million made on June 14, 2012.

Accounts receivable increased by $10.0 million, or 25.0%, to $50.0 million at September 30, 2012, compared to $40.0 million at December 31, 2011, primarily due to a higher volume of sales during the latter half of the third quarter ended September 30, 2012 compared to sales in the latter half of the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2011. Days sales outstanding increased by 5 days to 38 days at September 30, 2012 compared to 33 days at December 31, 2011.

Income taxes receivable increased by $3.9 million or 260.0% to $5.4 million at September 30, 2012 compared to $1.5 million at December 31, 2011 due to estimated tax payments made during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and our net loss position for the third quarter. Estimated tax payments made during the first nine months of 2012 were based on the higher taxable income recorded during the first half of the year.

Inventory increased by $3.8 million or 5.7% to $70.8 million at September 30, 2012 compared to $67.0 million at December 31, 2011, due to an increase in inventory levels in our emergency response vehicles operations in preparation for higher production volumes, accompanied by production delays caused by later than expected receipt of certain commercial chassis. Day’s inventory outstanding decreased to 61 days at September 30, 2012, compared to 63 days at December 31, 2011, due to lower average inventory levels throughout the third quarter of 2012 and the impact of higher cost of product sold experienced in 2012 compared to the fourth quarter of 2011.

Assets held for sale of $5.0 million reflect land and buildings at our Wakarusa, Indiana location that were reclassified to held for sale from property plant and equipment in the first and third quarters of 2012.

Accounts payable at September 30, 2012 increased $8.5 million, or 38.9%, to $30.1 million compared to $21.6 million at December 31, 2011. This increase was driven by the reduction of our accounts payable balance at year end related to our traditional week long shut down for the year-end holidays, accompanied by an increase in payables activity in the third quarter of 2012 related to the higher production levels.

Deposits from customers decreased $1.3 million, or 16.5%, to $6.6 million at September 30, 2012 from $7.9 million at December 31, 2011, mainly due to the shipment of walk-in vans in the first quarter of 2012 that had been held at December 31, 2011 in order to effect updates to meet certain regulatory safety requirements.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Through September 30, 2012, cash and cash equivalents decreased by $5.0 million to a balance of $26.7 million compared to $31.7 million at December 31, 2011. These funds, in addition to cash generated from future operations and available credit facilities, are expected to be sufficient to finance the Company’s foreseeable liquidity and capital needs.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we generated $6.6 million of cash from operating activities, which represents a $19.8 million decrease from the $26.4 million of cash that was generated from operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The decrease in cash generated in 2012 was driven primarily by an increase in accounts receivable as a result of the timing of our sales, as we experienced a higher level of shipments during the latter half of the quarter ended September 30, 2012 compared to the same period of 2011. In addition, we experienced positive cash flow during the first nine months of 2011 as a result of decreasing accounts receivable balances due to lower sales volumes. This decrease in cash flow was partially offset by the non-cash charge for loss on impairment and disposal of assets, incurred in the first nine months of 2012, related to the reclassification of our Wakarusa, Indiana facility to assets held for sale.

See the Financial Condition section contained in Item 2 of this Form 10-Q for further information regarding balance sheet line items that drove cash flows for the nine month period ended September 30, 2012. Also see the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows contained in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q for the other various factors that represented the remaining fluctuation of cash from operations between the periods.

We used $9.6 million of cash in investing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2012, mainly for the purchase of property, plant and equipment, including $6.7 million related to the relocation of our delivery and service vehicles operations to Bristol, Indiana and approximately $2.9 million for replacement of existing equipment. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we used $8.3 million of cash in investing activities, including $4.7 million for the acquisition of Classic Fire and $3.6 million for replacement of existing equipment.

In the fourth quarter of 2012, we are expecting to incur capital expenditures of $2 to $3 million for new strategic initiatives, which include infrastructure for the relocation of our delivery and service vehicles operations to Bristol, Indiana, investment in our new Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system and operational improvements to our existing property, plant and equipment. We also expect to expend $10 to $12 million in the fourth quarter of 2012 to procure transition engines in preparation for the upcoming 2013 engine emissions change.

Working Capital

(In thousands)

	September 30, 2012		December 31, 2011		Change

Current assets	$	166,542	$	149,069	$	17,473

Current liabilities		60,107		50,396		9,711

Working capital	$	106,435	$	98,673	$	7,762

The increase in our working capital at September 30, 2012 from December 31, 2011, was driven by increases in accounts receivable, inventory and assets held for sale, and a decrease in customer deposits, partially offset by an increase in accounts payable. Refer to the balance sheet discussion appearing above in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for an explanation of the causes of the changes in these working capital line items.

Contingent Obligations

In connection with our acquisition of Utilimaster in November, 2009, we incurred contingent obligations through 2014 in the form of certain performance-based earn-out payments, up to an aggregate maximum amount of $7.0 million. In the first quarter of 2012, we made a $1.1 million payment, leaving an aggregate maximum amount of future payments of $5.9 million. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we recognized expense of $1.0 million to adjust our liability for the contingent obligation to the estimated fair value of the future consideration of $2.8 million based upon the likelihood of the payments, discounted to September 30, 2012. We believe that we have sufficient liquidity to fund the contingent obligations as they become due.

Debt

On December 16, 2011, we amended our unsecured revolving credit facility under which we may borrow up to $70.0 million from a syndicate of lenders, including Wells Fargo Bank N.A. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., to, among other things, extend the maturity of the credit facility for an additional five years. See Note 4, Debt, in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements appearing in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q for further details. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company may request an increase in the facility of up to $35.0 million in the aggregate, subject to customary conditions. Interest rates on borrowings under the credit facility are based on applicable rates at the time of issuance but are generally an adjusted LIBOR rate plus margin, ranging from 125 to 225 basis points, based on specified leverage ratio tiers from period to period. In addition, commitment fees range from 20 to 35 basis points on the unused portion of the line. The credit facility matures on December 16, 2016. We had no drawings against this credit line as of September 30, 2012. During the period ended September 30, 2012 our revolving credit facility was utilized, and will continue to be utilized in future periods, to finance commercial chassis received by our Utilimaster subsidiary under a chassis bailment inventory agreement with General Motors Company. This funding is reflected as a reduction of up to $5.0 million on the revolving credit facility available to us. See Note 6, Commitments and Contingent Liabilities, in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements appearing in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q for further details about Utilimaster’s chassis bailment inventory agreement.

On November 30, 2009, we amended and restated our private shelf agreement with Prudential Investment Management, Inc. Under this private shelf agreement, we issued $5.0 million of 5.46% Series B Senior Notes, due December 1, 2016. In addition, this agreement established an uncommitted shelf facility up to an additional $45.0 million. The interest rate is determined based on applicable rates at the time of issuance. The total outstanding debt under this agreement was $5 million at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

Under the terms of the line of credit and the term notes detailed above, we are required to maintain certain financial ratios and other financial conditions. The agreements prohibit us from incurring additional indebtedness; limit certain acquisitions, investments, advances or loans; and restrict substantial asset sales. At September 30, 2012, we were in compliance with all debt covenants, and, based on our current outlook for the remainder of 2012, we expect to be able to meet these financial covenants over the next twelve months.

We had capital lease obligations outstanding of approximately $0.1 million as of September 30, 2012 due and payable over the next three years.

Equity Securities

On October 19, 2011, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to a total of 1.0 million shares of our common stock in open market transactions, contingent upon market conditions. The repurchase of common stock is contingent upon market conditions. Through September 30, 2012, no shares were repurchased under this authorization.

Dividends

On October 24, 2012 our Board of Directors declared our semi-annual dividend of $0.05 per share of common stock, payable on December 13, 2012 to shareholders of record at the close of business on November 8, 2012.

On April 26, 2012, our Board of Directors declared our semi-annual dividend of $0.05 per share of common stock. The dividend was paid on June 14, 2012 to shareholders of record at the close of business on May 10, 2012. The aggregate amount of dividends paid to date in 2012 is $1.7 million and is expected to be approximately $3.4 million for all of 2012.

On October 19, 2011, our Board of Directors declared our semi-annual dividend of $0.05 per share of common stock. The dividend was paid December 8, 2011 to shareholders of record at the close of business on November 10, 2011.

On April 26, 2011, our Board of Directors declared our semi-annual dividend of $0.05 per share of common stock. The dividend was paid on June 9, 2011 to shareholders of record at the close of business on May 12, 2011. The aggregate amount of dividends paid in 2011 was $3.4 million.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The following discussion of critical accounting policies is intended to supplement Note 1 - General and Summary of Accounting Policies, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 14, 2012. These policies were selected because they are broadly applicable within our operating units, and they involve additional management judgment due to the sensitivity of the methods, assumptions and estimates necessary in determining the related income statement, asset and/or liability amounts.

Revenue Recognition - We recognize revenue in accordance with authoritative guidelines, including those of the SEC. Accordingly, revenue is recognized when title to the product and risk of ownership passes to the buyer. In certain instances, risk of ownership and title passes when the product has been completed in accordance with purchase order specifications and has been tendered for delivery to the customer. On certain customer requested bill and hold transactions, revenue recognition occurs after the customer has been notified that the products have been completed according to the customer specifications, have passed all of our quality control inspections, and are ready for delivery. All sales are shown net of returns, discounts and sales incentive programs, which historically have not been significant. The collectability of any related receivable is reasonably assured before revenue is recognized.

Accounts Receivable - We maintain an allowance for customer accounts that reduces receivables to amounts that are expected to be collected. In estimating the allowance for doubtful accounts, we make certain assumptions regarding the risk of uncollectable open receivable accounts. This risk factor is applied to the balance on accounts that are aged over 60 days: generally this reserve has an estimated range from 10-25%. The risk percentage applied to the aged accounts may change based on conditions such as: general economic conditions, industry-specific economic conditions, historical and anticipated customer performance, historical experience with write-offs and the level of past-due amounts from year to year. However, generally our assumptions are consistent year-over-year and there has been little adjustment made to the percentages used. In addition, in the event there are certain known risk factors with an open account, we may increase the allowance to include estimated losses on such “specific” account balances. The “specific” reserves are identified by a periodic review of the aged accounts receivable. If there is an account in question, credit checks are made and there is communication with the customer, along with other means to try to assess if a specific reserve is required. The inclusion of the “specific” reserve has caused the greatest fluctuation in the allowance for doubtful accounts balance historically. Please see Note 1 - General and Summary of Accounting Policies, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 for further details.

Goodwill and Other Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets – We perform our annual impairment testing for goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets as of October 1 of each year, or more frequently if an event occurs or conditions change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the asset below its carrying value. Goodwill is recorded on the financial statements of our Utilimaster, Crimson and Classic Fire subsidiaries, each of which is considered to be a separate “reporting unit” for impairment testing as defined in Accounting Standards Codification Topic 350 “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other”.

At our last annual impairment testing date, October 1, 2011, we early adopted Accounting Standards Update 2011-08 “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment” (“ASU 2011-08”) for goodwill impairment testing for our Utilimaster reporting unit. ASU 2011-08 permits us to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. Based on the results of our qualitative assessment for Utilimaster performed as of October 1, 2011, we determined that it was more likely than not that the fair value of Utilimaster exceeded its carrying value. Accordingly, the goodwill of Utilimaster was deemed to be not impaired and no further testing was performed.

For our goodwill impairment testing for our Crimson Fire and Classic Fire reporting units at October 1, 2011, we performed a two-step impairment test, whereby the first step was comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. The fair value of the reporting unit was determined by estimating the future cash flows of the reporting unit to which the goodwill relates, and then discounting the future cash flows at a market-participant-derived weighted-average cost of capital (“WACC”). Based on the results of the first step of our two-step impairment test we determined that the fair value of our Crimson Fire and Classic Fire reporting units exceeded their carrying costs, and accordingly, there was no impairment of goodwill at the annual testing date.

We performed our annual impairment testing for our indefinite-lived intangible assets, which consist of our Utilimaster and Classic Fire trade names, as of October 1, 2011 by comparing the estimated fair value of the trade name with its carrying value. We estimate the fair value of our trade names based on estimates of future royalty payments that are avoided through our ownership of the trade names, discounted to their present value. Based on the results of our impairment testing, we determined that the fair value of our indefinite-lived intangible assets exceeded their carrying cost at October 1, 2011, and accordingly, there was no impairment at the annual testing date.

Since October 1, 2011, there have been no events or changes in conditions that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of any of our reporting units below their respective carrying costs.

We cannot predict the occurrence of certain events or changes in circumstances that might adversely affect the carrying value of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets. Such events may include, but are not limited to, the impact of the general economic environment; a material negative change in relationships with significant customers; or strategic decisions made in response to economic and competitive conditions; and other risk factors as detailed in Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

See Note 1, General and Summary of Accounting Policies and Note 7, Goodwill and Intangible Assets, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 for further details on our accounting policies and other information regarding goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets.

Warranties - Our policy is to record a provision for the estimated cost of warranty-related claims at the time of the sale, and periodically adjust the warranty liability to reflect actual experience. The amount of warranty liability accrued reflects actual historical warranty cost, which is accumulated on specific identifiable units. From that point, there is a projection of the expected future cost of honoring our obligations under the warranty agreements. Historically, the cost of fulfilling our warranty obligations has principally involved replacement parts and labor for field retrofit campaigns and recalls, which increase the reserve. Our estimates are based on historical experience, the number of units involved and the extent of features and components included in product models. Over time, this method has been consistently applied and has proven to be an appropriate approach to estimating future costs to be incurred. See also Note 6 – Commitments and Contingent Liabilities, of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q, for further information regarding warranties.

EFFECT OF INFLATION

Inflation affects us in two principal ways. First, our revolving note payable is generally tied to the prime and LIBOR interest rates so that increases in those interest rates would result in additional interest expense. Second, general inflation impacts prices paid for labor, parts and supplies. Whenever possible, we attempt to cover increased costs of production and capital by adjusting the prices of our products. However, we generally do not attempt to negotiate inflation-based price adjustment provisions into our contracts. Since order lead times can be as much as ten months, we have limited ability to pass on cost increases to our customers on a short-term basis. In addition, the markets we serve are competitive in nature, and competition limits our ability to pass through cost increases in many cases. We strive to minimize the effect of inflation through cost reductions and improved productivity.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Our primary market risk exposure is a change in interest rates and the effect of such a change on outstanding variable rate short-term and long-term debt. At September 30, 2012, we had no debt outstanding under our variable rate short-term and long-term debt agreements. Therefore, an increase of 1% in interest rates would not have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations. We do not enter into market-risk-sensitive instruments for trading or other purposes.

We do not believe that there has been a material change in the nature or categories of the primary market risk exposures or the particular markets that present the primary risk of loss to us. As of the date of this report, we do not know of or expect any material changes in the general nature of our primary market risk exposure in the near term. In this discussion, “near term” means a period of one year following the date of the most recent balance sheet contained in this report.

Prevailing interest rates and interest rate relationships are primarily determined by market factors that are beyond our control. All information provided in response to this item consists of forward-looking statements. Reference is made to the section captioned “Forward-Looking Statements” before Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a discussion of the limitations on such statements.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of September 30, 2012. Based on and as of the time of such evaluation, our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1A. Risk Factors

We have included in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, a description of certain risks and uncertainties that could affect our business, future performance or financial condition (the “Risk Factors”). There have been no material changes from the disclosure provided in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 with respect to the Risk Factors. Investors should consider the Risk Factors prior to making an investment decision with respect to our stock.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

On October 19, 2011, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to a total of 1.0 million shares of our common stock in open market transactions, contingent upon market conditions. Through September 30, 2012 no shares were repurchased under this authorization.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2012 there were 21,477 shares delivered by associates in satisfaction of tax withholding obligations that occurred upon the vesting of restricted shares. These shares are not repurchased pursuant to the Board of Directors authorization disclosed above.

Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
July 1 to July 30		--		--		--		1,000,000
August 1 to August 31		21,477	$	4.86		--		1,000,000
September 1 to September 30		--		--		--		1,000,000
Total		21,477	$	4.86		--		1,000,000

Item 6. Exhibits.

(a) Exhibits. The following documents are filed as exhibits to this report on Form 10-Q:

Exhibit No.		Document

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

32		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350.

101.INS		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH		XBRL Schema Document

101.CAL		XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF		XBRL Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB		XBRL Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE		XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: November 8, 2012	SPARTAN MOTORS, INC.



	By	/s/ Joseph M. Nowicki
		Joseph M. Nowicki Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, and Chief/Corporate Compliance Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.		Document

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

32		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350.

101.INS		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH		XBRL Schema Document

101.CAL		XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF		XBRL Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB		XBRL Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE		XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document