UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For quarter ended March 31, 2009 Commission File No. 0-15087
-------------- --------
HEARTLAND EXPRESS, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Nevada 93-0926999
------ ----------
(State or Other Jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or Organization) Identification Number)
901 North Kansas Avenue, North Liberty, Iowa 52317
-------------------------------------------- -----
(Address of Principal Executive Office) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code (319) 626-3600
---------------
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant
was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and
posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required
to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of
this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that
the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [ ] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. (See definition of "accelerated
filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Large
accelerated filer [X] Accelerated filer [ ] Non-accelerated filer [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [X]
At March 31, 2009, there were 90,688,621 shares of the Company's $.01 par value
common stock outstanding.
HEARTLAND EXPRESS, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Page
Number
Item 1. Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of
March 31, 2009 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2008 1
Consolidated Statements of Income
for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 (Unaudited) 2
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity
for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 (Unaudited) 3
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 (Unaudited) 4
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 5
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations 12
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 19
Item 4. Controls and Procedures 19
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings 20
Item 2. Changes in Securities 20
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities 20
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 20
Item 5. Other Information 20
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K 20
Signatures 20
HEARTLAND EXPRESS, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
March 31, December 31,
ASSETS 2009 2008
--------- -----------
CURRENT ASSETS (Unaudited)
Cash and cash equivalents ......................... $ 46,601 $ 56,651
Short-term investments ............................ 133 241
Trade receivables, net of allowance for
doubtful accounts of $775 at
March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 ............ 34,487 36,803
Prepaid tires ..................................... 5,732 6,449
Other current assets .............................. 5,001 2,834
Deferred income taxes ............................. 36,331 35,650
--------- ---------
Total current assets .................... 128,285 138,628
--------- ---------
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Land and land improvements ........................ 17,442 17,442
Buildings ......................................... 26,761 26,761
Furniture & fixtures .............................. 2,269 2,269
Shop & service equipment .......................... 5,345 5,290
Revenue equipment ................................. 333,824 337,799
--------- ---------
385,641 389,561
Less accumulated depreciation ..................... 158,605 151,881
--------- ---------
Property and equipment, net ....................... 227,036 237,680
--------- ---------
GOODWILL ............................................. 4,815 4,815
OTHER ASSETS ......................................... 5,376 5,469
LONG-TERM INVESTMENTS ................................ 169,472 171,122
--------- ---------
$ 534,984 $ 557,714
========= =========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities .......... $ 14,626 $ 10,338
Compensation & benefits ........................... 15,190 15,862
Income taxes payable .............................. 7,899 452
Insurance accruals ................................ 71,699 70,546
Other accruals .................................... 7,182 7,498
--------- ---------
Total current liabilities ............... 116,596 104,696
--------- ---------
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
Income taxes payable .............................. 34,319 35,264
Deferred income taxes ............................. 56,938 57,715
--------- ---------
Total long-term liabilities ............ 91,257 92,979
--------- ---------
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Preferred stock, par value $.01;
authorized 5,000 shares; none issued ............ -- --
Capital stock; common, $.01 par value;
authorized 395,000 shares; issued and
outstanding 90,689 in 2009 and 94,229 in 2008 ... 907 942
Additional paid-in capital ........................ 439 439
Retained earnings ................................. 334,283 367,281
Accumulated other comprehensive loss .............. (8,498) (8,623)
--------- ---------
327,131 360,039
--------- ---------
$ 534,984 $ 557,714
========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
1
HEARTLAND EXPRESS, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
Three months ended
March 31,
2009 2008
--------- ---------
OPERATING REVENUE ................................ $ 114,979 $ 149,049
--------- ---------
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Salaries, wages, and benefits ................. $ 44,059 $ 48,592
Rent and purchased transportation ............. 2,938 5,106
Fuel .......................................... 24,558 50,499
Operations and maintenance .................... 4,040 3,963
Operating taxes and licenses .................. 2,284 2,243
Insurance and claims .......................... 3,514 3,782
Communications and utilities .................. 996 1,005
Depreciation .................................. 11,814 10,412
Other operating expenses ...................... 3,403 4,332
Gain on disposal of property & equipment ...... (1,667) (644)
--------- ---------
95,939 129,290
--------- ---------
Operating income ......................... 19,040 19,759
Interest income .................................. 871 2,863
--------- ---------
Income before income taxes ....................... 19,911 22,622
Federal and state income taxes ................... 5,770 7,959
--------- ---------
Net Income ....................................... $ 14,141 $ 14,663
========= =========
Earnings per share ............................... $ 0.15 $ 0.15
========= =========
Weighted average shares outstanding .............. 92,485 96,215
========= =========
Dividends declared per share ..................... $ 0.020 $ 0.020
========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
2
HEARTLAND EXPRESS, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
Accumulated
Capital Additional Other
Stock, Paid-In Retained Comprehensive
Common Capital Earnings Loss Total
--------- ---------- --------- -------------- ---------
Balance, January 1, 2009 .... $ 942 $ 439 $ 367,281 $ (8,623) $ 360,039
Comprehensive income:
Net income ................. -- -- 14,141 -- 14,141
Change in unrealized gain on
fuel hedging, net of tax .. -- -- -- 125 125
---------
Total comprehensive income . 14,266
Dividends on common stock,
$0.020 per share ........... -- -- (1,814) -- (1,814)
Stock repurchase ............ (35) -- (45,325) -- (45,360)
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Balance, March 31, 2009 ..... $ 907 $ 439 $ 334,283 $ (8,498) $ 327,131
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
3
HEARTLAND EXPRESS, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
Three months ended
March 31,
2009 2008
--------- ---------
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income .......................................... $ 14,141 $ 14,663
Adjustments to reconcile net income to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization .................... 11,814 10,412
Deferred income taxes ............................ (1,538) (1,408)
Gain on disposal of property and equipment ....... (1,667) (644)
Changes in certain working capital items:
Trade receivables .............................. 2,316 50
Prepaid expenses and other current assets ...... (1,237) (3,338)
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities,
and accrued expenses ......................... 1,215 2,485
Accrued income taxes ........................... 6,502 8,495
-------- --------
Net cash provided by operating activities ....... 31,546 30,715
-------- --------
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment ........ 4,436 1,827
Purchases of property and equipment, net of trades .. (2,523) (136)
Net sale (purchases) of investments ................. 1,758 (12,032)
Change in other assets .............................. 93 66
-------- --------
Net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities ..................................... 3,764 (10,275)
-------- --------
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Cash dividend .................................... -- (1,940)
Stock repurchase ................................. (45,360) (10,622)
-------- --------
Net cash used in financing activities ........... (45,360) (12,562)
-------- --------
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents (10,050) 7,878
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Beginning of period ................................. 56,651 7,960
-------- --------
End of period ....................................... $ 46,601 $ 15,838
======== ========
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash paid during the period for:
Income taxes, net .................................. $ 807 $ 872
Noncash investing and financing activities:
Fair value of revenue equipment traded ............. $ 1,695 $ 1,818
Purchased property and equipment in accounts payable $ 3,884 $ 323
Common stock dividends declared in accounts payable $ 1,829 $ 1,939
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
4
HEARTLAND EXPRESS, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Heartland
Express, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") have been prepared in accordance
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial
information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Regulation S-X.
Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required
by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial
statements. In the opinion of management, all normal, recurring adjustments
considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The
consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited
consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes for the year ended
December 31, 2008 included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Interim results of operations
are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year
or any other interim periods. There were no changes to the Company's significant
accounting policies during the three month period ended March 31, 2009 other
than the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No.
161, "Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities an
Amendment of SFAS 133" ("SFAS 161").
Note 2. Use of Estimates
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Note 3. Segment Information
The Company has eleven regional operating divisions; however, it has determined
that it has one reportable segment. All of the divisions are managed based on
similar economic characteristics. Each of the regional operating divisions
provides short-to medium-haul truckload carrier services of general commodities
to a similar class of customers. In addition, each division exhibits similar
financial performance, including average revenue per mile and operating ratio.
As a result of the foregoing, the Company has determined that it is appropriate
to aggregate its operating divisions into one reportable segment, consistent
with the guidance in SFAS No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise
and Related Information". Accordingly, the Company has not presented separate
financial information for each of its operating divisions as the Company's
consolidated financial statements present its one reportable segment.
Note 4. Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash equivalents are short-term, highly liquid investments with insignificant
interest rate risk and original maturities of three months or less. Restricted
and designated cash and short-term investments totaling $5.4 and $5.5 million at
March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, are included in non-current
other assets. The restricted funds represent deposits required by state agencies
for self-insurance purposes and designated funds that are earmarked for a
specific purpose and not for general business use.
Note 5. Investments
The Company's investments are primarily in the form of tax free, auction rate
student loan educational bonds backed by the U.S. government and are classified
as available-for-sale. As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, all of the
Company's long-term investment balance was invested in auction rate student loan
educational bonds. The investments typically have an interest reset provision of
35 days with contractual maturities that range from 6 to 39 years as of March
31, 2009. At the reset date the Company has the option to roll the investments
and reset the interest rate or sell the investments in an auction. The Company
receives the par value of the investment plus accrued interest on the reset date
if the underlying investment is sold. The majority, (approximately 97% at par)
5
of the underlying investments is backed by the U.S. government. The remaining 3%
of the student loan auction rate securities portfolio are insurance backed
securities. As of March 31, 2009, approximately 93% of the underlying
investments of the total portfolio held AAA (or equivalent) ratings from
recognized rating agencies. Of the remaining 7% with less than AAA (or
equivalent ratings), the Company received a partial call, at par, on May 1, 2009
which reduced the amount of holdings with credit ratings less than AAA (or
equivalent ratings) to approximately 5% of the Company's portfolio at par.
As of March 31, 2009, all of the Company's auction rate student loan bonds were
associated with unsuccessful auctions. To date, there have been no instances of
delinquencies or non-payment of applicable interest from the issuers and all
partial calls of securities by the issuers have been at par value plus accrued
interest. Investment income received is generally exempt from federal income
taxes and is accrued as earned. Accrued interest income is included in other
current assets in the consolidated balance sheet.
The Company estimates the fair value of the auction rate securities applying the
guidance in SFAS No. 157 ("SFAS 157"). Fair value represents an estimate of what
the Company could sell the investments for in an orderly transaction with a
third party as of the March 31, 2009 measurement date although it is not the
intent of the Company to sell such securities at discounted pricing.
Historically, the fair value of such investments was reported based on amortized
cost. Until auction failures began, the fair value of these investments were
calculated using Level 1 observable inputs per SFAS 157 and fair value was
deemed to be equivalent to amortized cost due to the short-term and regularly
occurring auction process. Based on auction failures beginning in mid-February
2008 and continued failures through March 31, 2009, there were not any
observable quoted prices or other relevant inputs for identical or similar
securities. Estimated fair value of all auction rate security investments as of
March 31, 2009 was calculated using unobservable, Level 3 inputs, as defined by
SFAS 157 due to the lack of observable market inputs specifically related to
student loan auction rate securities. The fair value of these investments as of
the March 31, 2009 measurement date could not be determined with precision based
on lack of observable market data and could significantly change in future
measurement periods.
The estimated fair value of the underlying investments as of March 31, 2009
declined below amortized cost of the investments, as a result of liquidity
issues in the auction rate markets. With the assistance of the Company's
financial advisors, fair values of the student loan auction rate securities were
estimated, on an individual investment basis, using a discounted cash flow
approach to value the underlying collateral of the trust issuing the debt
securities considering an anticipated estimated outstanding average life of the
underlying student loans (range of two to ten years) that are the collateral to
the trusts, principal outstanding, expected rates of returns, and payout
formulas. These underlying cash flows, by individual investment, were discounted
using interest rates consistent with instruments of similar quality and duration
with an adjustment for a higher required yield for lack of liquidity in the
market for these auction rate securities (range of 2.6%-11.0%). The Company
obtained an understanding of assumptions in models used by third party financial
institutions to estimate fair value and considered these assumptions in the
Company's cash flow models but did not exclusively use the fair values provided
by financial institutions based on their internal modeling. The Company is aware
that trading of student loan auction rate securities is occurring in secondary
markets, which were considered in the Company's fair value assessment, although
the Company has not listed any of its assets for sale on the secondary market.
As a result of the fair value measurements, there were no changes to the
unrealized loss and reduction to investments, of $8.6 million, net of tax,
during period ended March 31, 2009. The unrealized loss of $8.6 million, net of
tax, is recorded as an adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive loss. There
were not any realized gains or losses related to these investments for the
period ended March 31, 2009.
During the third and fourth quarters of 2008, various financial institutions and
respective regulatory authorities announced proposed settlement terms in
response to various regulatory authorities alleging certain financial
institutions misled investors regarding the liquidity risks associated with
auction rate securities that the respective financial institutions underwrote,
marketed and sold. Further the respective regulatory authorities alleged the
respective financial institutions misrepresented to customers that auction rate
securities were safe, highly liquid investments that were comparable to money
markets. Certain settlement agreements were finalized prior to December 31,
2008. Approximately 97% (at par value) of our auction rate security investments
were not covered by the terms of the above mentioned settlement agreements. The
focus of the initial settlements was generally towards individuals, charities,
and businesses with small investment balances, generally with holdings of $25
million and less. As part of the general terms of the settlements, the
respective financial institutions have agreed to provide their best efforts in
providing liquidity to the auction rate securities market for investors not
specifically covered by the terms of the respective settlements. Such liquidity
solutions could be in the form of facilitating issuer redemptions,
6
resecuritizations, or other means. The Company can not currently project when
liquidity will be obtained from these investments, and plans to continue to hold
such securities until the securities are called, redeemed, or resecuritized by
the debt issuers.
The remaining 3.0% (at par value) was specifically covered by a settlement
agreement which the Company signed during the fourth quarter of 2008. By signing
the settlement agreement the Company relinquished its rights to bring any claims
against the financial institution as well as its right to serve as a class
representative or receive benefits under any class action. Further, the Company
no longer has the sole discretion and right to sell or otherwise dispose of,
and/or enter orders in the auction process with respect to the underlying
securities. As part of the settlement, the Company obtained a put option to sell
the underlying securities to the financial institution which is exercisable
during the period starting on June 30, 2010 through July 2, 2012 plus accrued
interest. Should the financial institution sell or otherwise dispose of our
securities the Company will receive the par value of the securities plus accrued
interest one business day after the transaction. Upon signing the settlement
agreement the Company no longer maintains the intent and ability to hold the
underlying securities for recovery of the temporary decline in fair value. The
Company also acquired an asset, a put option that is valued as a stand alone
financial instrument separate from the underlying securities. There was not any
significant change in the value of the put option during the period ended March
31, 2009. During the quarter ended March 31, 2009, the Company received $1.65
million in partial calls, at par, of the investments covered by the settlement
agreement. The value of these securities is included in long-term investments
per the consolidated balance sheet.
The Company has evaluated the unrealized loss on securities other than
securities covered by the settlement agreement discussed above to determine
whether this decline is other than temporary. Management has concluded the
decline in fair value to be temporary based on the following considerations.
o Current market activity and the lack of severity or extended
decline do not warrant such action at this time.
o Since auction failures began in February 2008, the Company has
received approximately $20.0 million as the result of partial
calls by issuers. The Company received par value for the amount
of these calls plus accrued interest.
o On May 1, 2009 the Company received $2.9 million as the result of
a partial call by an issuer. The Company received par value for
the amount of this call plus accrued interest.
o Based on the Company's financial operating results, operating
cash flows and debt free balance sheet, the Company has the
ability and intent to hold such securities until recovery of the
unrealized loss.
o There have not been any significant changes in collateralization
and ratings of the underlying securities since the first failed
auction. The Company continues to hold 95% of the auction rate
security portfolio in senior positions of AAA (or equivalent)
rated securities after the partial call subsequent to March 31,
2009 mentioned above.
o The Company is aware of recent increases in default rates of the
underlying student loans that are the assets to the trusts
issuing the auction rate security debt which management believes
is due to current overall economic conditions. As the underlying
loans are guaranteed by the U.S. Government, defaults of the
loans accelerate payment of the underlying loan to the trust.
o Currently there is legislative pressure to provide liquidity in
student loan investments, providing liquidity to state student
loan agencies, to continue to provide financial assistance to
eligible students to enable higher educations. This has the
potential to impact existing securities with underlying student
loans.
o As individual trusts that are the issuers of the auction rate
student loan debt, which the Company holds, continue to pay
higher default rates of interest, there is the potential that the
underlying trust would seek alternative financing and call the
existing debt at which point it is estimated the Company would
receive par value of the investment.
o All of the auction rate securities are held with financial
institutions that have agreed in principle to settlement
agreements with various regulatory agencies to provide liquidity.
Although the principles of the respective settlement agreements
focus mostly on small investors (generally companies and
individual investors with auction rate security assets less than
$25 million), the respective settlements state the financial
institutions will work with issuers and other interested parties
to use their best efforts to provide liquidity solutions to
companies not specifically covered by the principle terms of the
7
respective settlements by the end of 2009 in certain settlement
agreements.
Management will monitor its investments and ongoing market conditions in future
periods to assess impairments considered to be other than temporary. Should
estimated fair value continue to remain below cost or the fair value decrease
significantly from current fair value due to credit related issues, the Company
may be required to record an impairment of these investments, through a charge
in the consolidated statement of income.
The table below presents a reconciliation for all assets and liabilities
measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable
inputs (Level 3) during the three month period ended March 31, 2009.
Available-for-sale
Level 3 Fair Value Measurements debt securities
(in thousands)
Balance, December 31, 2008 ............................ $ 171,122
Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements .......... (1,650)
Transfers in to (out of) Level 3 ...................... --
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized):
Included in earnings ................................ --
Included in other comprehensive loss ................ --
---------
Balance, March 31, 2009 ............................... $ 169,472
=========
The amortized cost and fair value of investments at March 31, 2009 and December
31, 2008 were as follows:
Gross Gross
Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Fair
Cost Gains Losses Value
March 31, 2009: (in thousands)
Current:
Municipal bonds ............ $ 133 - $ -- $ 133
Long-term
Auction rate student loan
educational bonds ......... 178,350 - 8,878 169,472
--------- ---------- ---------- ---------
$ 178,483 - $ 8,878 $ 169,605
========= ========== ========== =========
December 31, 2008:
Current:
Municipal bonds ............ $ 241 - -- $ 241
Long-term
Auction rate student loan
educational bonds ......... 180,000 - 8,878 171,122
--------- ---------- ---------- ---------
$ 180,241 - $ 8,878 $ 171,363
========= ========== ========== =========
Note 6. Fuel Hedging
In February 2007, the Board of Directors authorized the Company to begin hedging
activities related to projected future purchases of diesel fuel. During the
quarter ended March 31, 2009, the Company contracted with an unrelated third
party to hedge changes in forecasted future cash flows related to fuel
purchases. The hedge of changes in forecasted future cash flows was transacted
through the use of certain swap derivative financial instruments. The Company
accounts for derivative instruments in accordance with the provisions of SFAS
No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities", ("SFAS
133") as amended, and SFAS 161, and has designated such swaps as cash flow
8
hedges. The cash flow hedging strategy was implemented mainly to reduce the
Company's exposure to significant changes, including upward movements in diesel
fuel prices related to fuel consumed by empty and out-of-route miles and truck
engine idling time which is not recoverable through fuel surcharge agreements.
Under SFAS 133, the Company is required to record an asset or liability for the
fair value of any derivative instrument designated as a cash flow hedge with an
offsetting amount recorded to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for
the effective portion of the change in fair value as defined by SFAS 133 and an
increase or decrease to fuel expense for the ineffective portion of the change
in fair value as defined by SFAS 133. Any previous amounts included in other
comprehensive income (loss) are reclassified as increases (decreases) in fuel
expense in the period the related contracts settle.
Under the guidance of SFAS 133, the Company has recorded an asset of $0.2
million, included in other current assets, for the fair value of the hedging
instrument as of March 31, 2009. The change in the effective portion of the
hedging instrument (as defined by SFAS 133), $0.2 million gross and $0.1 million
net of tax, was included in accumulated other comprehensive loss. The
ineffective portion of the hedging instrument (as defined by SFAS 133)
recognized in the statement of income as a component of fuel expense was not
significant for the quarter ended March 31, 2009. As the hedged cash flows start
during the second quarter of 2009, the hedging contract did not affect cash
flows for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 and only covers the forecasted cash
flows expected in the second quarter of 2009. The Company has not hedged any
amounts of fuel beyond June 30, 2009. Further, as the contract was entered into
during the first quarter of 2009 and remained open at March 31, 2009, there were
no amounts previously included in accumulated other comprehensive loss that were
reclassified into earnings during the quarter ended March 31, 2009. There were
no other outstanding derivative instruments at March 31, 2009. The amounts
included in accumulated other comprehensive loss at March 31, 2009 are expected
to be reclassified into income as a reduction to fuel expense during the quarter
ending June 30, 2009 as the open contracts at March 31, 2009 settle during the
quarter ending June 30, 2009.
As of March 31, 2009, the Company had the following outstanding fuel forward
swap in place to hedge forecasted purchases:
Commodity Quantity of Gallons (000's)
------------------------------- ---------------------------
#2 Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel Fuel 1,764
The following table details the effect of derivative financial instruments on
the consolidated balance sheet and statements of income for the period ended
March 31, 2009. There was not any derivative instruments outstanding as of
December 31, 2008 or during the period ended March 31, 2008.
Location of Gain
or (Loss) Amount of Gain or
Amount of Gain Recognized in (Loss) Recognized
Amount of Gain Location of Gain or (Loss) Income on in Income on
or (Loss) or (Loss) Reclassified Derivative Derivative
Recognized in Reclassified from from (Ineffective (Ineffective
Derivatives in OCI on Accumulated OCI Accumulated OCI Portion and Amount Portion and Amount
SFAS 133 Cash Derivative into income into Income Excluded from Excluded from
Flow Hedging (Effective (Effective (Effective Effectiveness Effectiveness
Relationship Portion) Portion) Portion) Testing) Testing)
-------------- -------------- ----------------- --------------- ------------------ ------------------
(000's)
Fuel contract $ 206 Fuel expense $ - Fuel expense $ 1
Note 7. Property, Equipment, and Depreciation
Property and equipment are stated at cost, while maintenance and repairs are
charged to operations as incurred. Depreciation for financial statement purposes
is computed by the straight-line method for all assets other than tractors.
Effective January 1, 2009, the Company changed its estimate of depreciation
expense on tractors acquired subsequent to January 1, 2009, to 150% declining
balance, to better reflect the estimated trade value of the tractors at the
estimated trade date. The change was the result of current tractor trade values
and the expected values in the trade market for the foreseeable future. Tractors
acquired prior to December 31, 2008 will continue to be depreciated using the
125% declining balance method. The change in estimate did not have a significant
9
impact on depreciation expense, earnings per share, or revenue equipment as of
and for the quarter ended March 31, 2009. Tractors are depreciated to salvage
values of $15,000 while trailers are depreciated to salvage values of $4,000.
Note 8. Earnings Per Share:
Earnings per share are based upon the weighted average common shares outstanding
during each period. The Company has no common stock equivalents; therefore,
diluted earnings per share are equal to basic earnings per share.
Note 9. Dividends
On March 9, 2009, the Company's Board of Directors declared a regular quarterly
dividend of $0.02 per common share, approximately $1.8 million, payable April 2,
2009 to shareholders of record at the close of business on March 20, 2009. On
April 2, 2009, the Company paid the $1.8 million dividend.
Future payment of cash dividends and the amount of such dividends will depend
upon financial conditions, results of operations, cash requirements, tax
treatment, and certain corporate law requirements, as well as factors deemed
relevant by our Board of Directors.
Note 10. Income Taxes
In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued
Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes-An
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109" ("FIN48"). Beginning with the adoption
of FIN 48, the Company recognizes the effect of income tax positions only if
those positions are more likely than not of being sustained. Recognized income
tax positions are measured at the largest amount that is greater than 50% likely
of being realized. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the
period in which the change in judgment occurs. The Company records interest and
penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.
At March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company had a total of $22.6
million and $22.9 million in gross unrecognized tax benefits respectively. Of
these amounts, $14.7 million and $14.9 million respectively, represented the
amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would impact our
effective tax rate. Unrecognized tax benefits were reduced by approximately $1.2
million and $0.9 million during the periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, due to the expiration of certain statute of limitations. The total
amount of accrued interest and penalties for such unrecognized tax benefits was
$11.7 million at March 31, 2009 and $12.3 million at December 31, 2008. Net
interest and penalties included in income tax expense for the period ended March
31, 2009 was a benefit of approximately $0.6 million and was $0.2 million
expense for the period ended March 31, 2008. These unrecognized tax benefits
relate to risks associated with state income tax filing positions for the
Company's corporate subsidiaries.
The Company's effective tax rate was 29.0% and 35.2%, respectively, in the three
months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. The decrease in the effective tax rate for
the three months ending March 31, 2009 is primarily attributable to a favorable
income tax expense adjustment as a result of the application of FASB
Interpretation No. 48 ("FIN 48") on less taxable income during the current year
compared to the same period of 2008. Certain state tax benefits upon the filing
of the 2008 state tax returns during the first quarter further accounted for a
benefit of an approximately $0.5 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2009.
A number of years may elapse before an uncertain tax position is audited and
ultimately settled. It is difficult to predict the ultimate outcome or the
timing of resolution for uncertain tax positions. It is reasonably possible that
the amount of unrecognized tax benefits could significantly increase or decrease
within the next twelve months. These changes could result from the expiration of
the statute of limitations, examinations or other unforeseen circumstances. As
of March 31, 2009, the Company had one ongoing examination and did not have any
outstanding litigation related to tax matters. At this time, management's best
estimate of the reasonably possible net change in the amount of unrecognized tax
benefits for the next twelve months to be a decrease of approximately $2.6 to
$3.6 million mainly due to the expiration of certain statute of limitations.
The federal statute of limitations remains open for the years 2006 and forward.
Tax years 1999 and forward are subject to audit by state tax authorities
depending on the tax code of each state.
10
Note 11. Share Repurchases
In September 2001, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized a program to
repurchase 15.4 million shares, as adjusted for stock splits after the approval,
of the Company's common stock in open market or negotiated transactions using
available cash, cash equivalents, and investments. The authorization to
repurchase remains open at March 31, 2009 and has no expiration date. The
repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at any time without prior
notice. Approximately 6.5 million shares remain authorized for repurchase under
the Board of Directors' approval.
The Company repurchased the following shares of common stock under the
above-described repurchase plan:
Three Months Ended March 31,
----------------------------
2009 2008
-------- --------
Shares of Common Stock Repurchased (in Millions) 3.5 0.8
Value of stock repurchased (in Millions) $ 45.4 $ 10.6
Note 12. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is party to ordinary, routine litigation and administrative
proceedings incidental to its business. In the opinion of management, the
Company's potential exposure under pending legal proceedings is adequately
provided for in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
During 2008 the Company entered into a commitment for a tractor fleet upgrade.
The commitment is expected to include the purchase of approximately 1,600 new
tractors with a total estimated purchase commitment of approximately $80 million
net of trade value of traded tractors. The delivery of the equipment began
during the third quarter of 2008 and is expected to continue throughout 2009. As
of March 31, 2009 the Company had approximately $57 million of this net
commitment remaining of which the Company had approximately $4.0 million of
equipment purchases recorded in accounts payable and accrued liabilities.
Note 13. Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, "Business Combinations" ("SFAS
141R") and SFAS Statement No. 160, "Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements - an amendment to ARB No. 51" ("SFAS 160") (collectively,
"the Statements"). The Statements require most identifiable assets, liabilities,
noncontrolling interests, and goodwill acquired in a business combination to be
recorded at "full fair value" and require noncontrolling interests (previously
referred to as minority interests) to be reported as a component of equity,
which changes the accounting for transactions with noncontrolling interest
holders. The Statements are effective for periods beginning on or after December
15, 2008, and earlier adoption is prohibited. SFAS 141R will be applied to
business combinations occurring after the effective date. SFAS 160 will be
applied prospectively to all noncontrolling interests, including any that arose
before the effective date. The adoption of SFAS 141R did not impact the
Company's results of operations or financial position.
On March, 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, "Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities - an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133",
("SFAS 161") which amends FASB Statement No. 133 ("SFAS 133") by requiring
expanded disclosures about an entity's derivative instruments and hedging
activities, but does not change SFAS 133's scope or accounting. SFAS 161
requires qualitative, quantitative, and credit-risk disclosures. SFAS 161 is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods
beginning after November 15, 2008. As the Company entered into a derivative
instrument during the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (See Note 6), the Company was
required to comply with the expanded disclosures of SFAS 161 for the period
ended March 31, 2009.
On May 9, 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, "The Hierarchy of Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles" ("SFAS No. 162") which reorganizes the generally
accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") hierarchy as detailed in the statement.
The purpose of the new standard is to improve financial reporting by providing a
consistent framework for determining what accounting principles should be used
11
when preparing U.S. GAAP financial statements. SFAS No. 162 became effective on
November 15, 2008. The adoption did not effect the financial position, results
of operations or cash flows of the Company.
In April 2009 the FASB issued three related Staff Positions to clarify the
application of SFAS 157 to fair value measurements in the current economic
environment, modify the recognition of other-than-temporary impairments of debt
securities, and require companies to disclose the fair values of financial
instruments in interim periods ("SFAS 157 SOP's"). The SFAS 157 SOP's are
effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early
adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company is
currently evaluating the impacts of the SFAS 157 SOP's and management believes
that the SFAS 157 SOP's will have no effect on the financial position, results
of operations, and cash flows of the Company.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
Forward Looking Statements
Except for certain historical information contained herein, this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements
involve risks, assumptions and uncertainties which are difficult to predict. All
statements, other than statements of historical fact, are statements that could
be deemed forward-looking statements, including any projections of earnings,
revenues, or other financial items; any statements of plans, strategies, and
objectives of management for future operations; any statements concerning
proposed new strategies or developments; any statements regarding future
economic conditions or performance; any statements of belief and any statement
of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. Words such as "believe," "may,"
"could," "expects," "anticipates," and "likely," and variations of these words
or similar expressions, are intended to identify such forward-looking
statements. The Company's actual results could differ materially from those
discussed in the section entitled "Factors That May Affect Future Results,"
included in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" set forth in the Company's Annual report on Form 10-K,
which is by this reference incorporated herein. The Company does not assume, and
specifically disclaims, any obligation to update any forward-looking statements
contained in this Quarterly report.
Overview
Heartland Express, Inc. is a short-to-medium haul truckload carrier. The Company
transports freight for major shippers and generally earns revenue based on the
number of miles per load delivered. The Company operated eleven regional
operating divisions that provided regional dry van truckload services from nine
regional operating centers in addition to its corporate headquarters during the
quarter ended March 31, 2009. The Company's eleven regional operating divisions,
not including operations at the corporate headquarters, accounted for 73.2% and
73.7% of the 2009 and 2008 operating revenues for the respective periods ended
March 31. The Company's newest regional operating center near Dallas, Texas
opened in early January 2009. The Company takes pride in the quality of the
service that it provides to its customers. The keys to maintaining a high level
of service are the availability of late-model equipment and experienced drivers.
Operating efficiencies and cost controls are achieved through equipment
utilization, operating a fleet of late model equipment, maintaining an industry
leading driver to non-driver employee ratio, and the effective management of
fixed and variable operating costs. Fuel prices soared to historical highs
during July 2008 and declined through December 31, 2008 and remained relatively
stable throughout the quarter ended March 31, 2009. The industry experienced
soft freight demand throughout 2008 which created downward pressures on freight
rates, in combination with the decline in fuel surcharge revenue, which were
lower during the first quarter of 2009. The industry continues to fight excess
capacity in the market place along with declining freight volumes due to the
current economic downturn. During 2008 the Company undertook fuel initiative
strategies to effectively manage fuel costs. These initiatives included
encouraging fueling at terminal locations rather than over-the-road purchases to
take advantage of bulk fuel purchases when cost effective to do so, reduction of
tractor idle time, and controlling out-of-route miles. Fuel expense was reduced
approximately $26.0 million for the current quarter compared to the same quarter
of prior year mainly due to reduced price of fuel and volumes due to lower miles
driven as well as fuel cost savings initiatives previously mentioned. At March
31, 2009, the Company's tractor fleet had an average age of 2.5 years while the
trailer fleet had an average age of 4.9 years. The Company continues to focus on
growing internally by providing quality service to targeted customers with a
high density of freight in the Company's regional operating areas. In addition
to the development of its regional operating centers, the Company has made five
acquisitions since 1987. Future growth is dependent upon several factors
including the level of economic growth and the related customer demand, the
available capacity in the trucking industry, potential acquisition
opportunities, and the availability of experienced drivers.
The Company ended the first quarter of 2009 with operating revenues of $115.0
million, including fuel surcharges, net income of $14.1 million, and earnings
per share of $0.15 on average outstanding shares of 92.5 million. The Company
posted an 83.4% operating ratio (operating expenses as a percentage of operating
12
revenues) and a 12.3% net margin (net income as a percentage of operating
revenues). The Company ended the quarter with cash, cash equivalents, short-term
and long-term investments of $216.2 million and a debt-free balance sheet. The
Company had total assets of $535.0 million at March 31, 2009. The Company
achieved a return on assets of 13.1% and a return on equity of 21.0% for the
twelve months ended March 31, 2009, compared to the twelve months ended March
31, 2008 which were 11.1% and 16.2%, respectively. The Company's cash flow from
operations for the first three months of 2009 of $31.5 million represented a
2.7% increase from the same period of 2008 mainly due to a slight decrease in
net income adjusted for gains on disposal of property and equipment and
increased cash flows from working capital items which were attributable to trade
receivable cash collections and timing of certain prepaid expense items. The
Company's cash flow from operations was 27.4% of operating revenues for the
quarter ended March 31, 2008 compared to 20.6% for the same period in 2008.
Results of Operations:
The following table sets forth the percentage relationship of expense items to
operating revenue for the periods indicated.
Three Months Ended
March 31,
2009 2008
------ ------
Operating revenue .......................... 100.0% 100.0%
------ ------
Operating expenses:
Salaries, wages, and benefits ............ 38.3% 32.6%
Rent and purchased transportation ........ 2.6 3.4
Fuel ..................................... 21.4 33.9
Operations and maintenance ............... 3.5 2.7
Operating taxes and licenses ............. 2.0 1.5
Insurance and claims ..................... 3.1 2.5
Communications and utilities ............. 0.9 0.7
Depreciation ............................. 10.3 7.0
Other operating expenses ................. 3.0 2.9
Gain on disposal of property and equipment (1.4) (0.4)
------ ------
Total operating expenses ................. 83.4% 86.7%
------ ------
Operating income ......... 16.6% 13.3%
Interest income ............................ 0.8 1.9
------ ------
Income before income taxes ........ 17.3% 15.2%
Federal and state income taxes ............. 5.0 5.3
------ ------
Net income ........................ 12.3% 9.8%
====== ======
The following is a discussion of the results of operations of the three month
period ended March 31, 2009 compared with the same period in 2008.
Three Months Ended March 2009 and 2008
Operating revenue decreased $34.0 million (22.8%), to $115.0 million in the
first quarter of 2009 from $149.0 million in the first quarter of 2008. The
decrease in operating revenue resulted from a decrease in fuel surcharge revenue
of $16.4 million to $11.4 million, as a direct result in decreased fuel costs,
and a decrease in line haul revenue of approximately $17.6 million mainly due to
a reduction in fleet miles as a direct result of an overall decline in market
demand for freight. The reduction in fuel surcharge revenue from $27.8 million
in the first quarter of 2008 was the result of decreases in the national average
fuel prices for the two comparative periods, $12.5 million, and further by
reduced miles, $3.9 million.
Salaries, wages, and benefits decreased $4.5 million (9.3%), to $44.1 million in
the first quarter of 2009 from $48.6 million in the first quarter of 2008. The
decrease in salaries, wages and benefits was the net result of a decrease of
approximately $4.5 million of company driver wages and $0.7 decrease in
non-driver payroll and benefits, offset with an increase in workers'
compensation of $0.7 million. Driver wages decreased $4.5 million, (12.6%) due
to a decrease in total fleet miles as a direct result of an overall decline in
13
market demand for freight. The mix of the number of employee drivers to
independent contractors increased from a mix of 95% company drivers and 5%
independent contracts during the first quarter of 2008 to 96% company drivers
and 4% independent contractors during 2009. The increase in workers'
compensation expense of $0.7 million to $2.8 million in the quarter ended March
31, 2009 from $2.1 million in for the same period in 2008 was due to an increase
in frequency and severity of claims. Non-driver payroll and benefits mainly
decreased due to lower health insurance expense of $1.3 million in 2009 compared
to $1.8 million in 2008. This decrease was mainly due to the decrease in
frequency and severity of claims.
Rent and purchased transportation decreased $2.2 million (42.5%), to $2.9
million in the first quarter of 2009 from $5.1 million in the first quarter of
2008. Rent and purchased transportation for both periods includes amounts paid
to independent contractors under the Company's fuel stability program. Purchased
transportation decreased approximately $0.9 million during the quarter ended
March 31, 2009 compared to the quarter ended March 31, 2008 due to a decrease in
the Company's fuel stability program. Further reducing purchased transportation
was a reduction in miles driven, $1.0 million (29.6%). Other rent expenses
decreased approximately $0.3 million during the quarter ended March 31, 2009
compared to the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as a result of other rentals driven
mainly by the decreased volume of business.
Fuel decreased $25.9 million (51.4%), to $24.6 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 from $50.5 million for the same period of 2008. The
decrease is the result of decreased fuel prices and decreased miles driven
combined with an increase in fuel efficiency of our revenue equipment due to our
initiatives to reduce fuel consumed in idle time and out of route trips. The
Company's fuel cost per company-owned tractor mile decreased 44.1% in first
quarter of 2009 compared to 2008. The national average of fuel costs per the
U.S. Department of Energy was a reduction of 38.2% comparing the same two
periods. The Company's first quarter fuel cost per gallon decreased by 41.8% in
2009 compared to 2008. Fuel cost per mile, net of fuel surcharge, decreased
35.1% in the first quarter of 2009 compared to 2008.
Operations and maintenance, operating taxes and licenses, insurance and claims,
and communications and utilities remained mostly unchanged at a collective $10.8
million compared to $11.0 million for the same period of 2008.
Depreciation increased $1.4 million (13.5%), to $11.8 million during the first
quarter of 2009 from $10.4 million in the first quarter of 2008. The increase is
mainly attributable to an increase in tractor purchases for the twelve month
periods leading up to and including the quarter ends March 31, 2009 and 2008. As
tractors purchased prior to 2009 are depreciated using the 125% declining
balance method, depreciation expense in years subsequent to the first year after
initial purchase decline. Tractors purchased subsequent to January 1, 2009 are
being depreciated using the 150% declining balance method, although, tractors
purchased and placed in service during the quarter ended March 31, 2009 did not
significantly affect depreciation expense for the quarter ended March 31, 2009.
Tractor depreciation increased $1.5 million to $8.4 million in the quarter ended
March 31, 2009 from $6.9 million in the quarter ended March 31, 2008. During the
second half of 2008 and the 1st quarter of 2009 the Company has placed in
service 620 new tractors which have a higher base cost than previous tractors
purchased and are in the first year of depreciation. All other depreciation
decreased $0.1 million mainly attributable to trailers becoming fully
depreciated based on the aging of the trailer fleet.
Other operating expenses decreased $0.9 million (21.4%), to $3.4 million in the
first quarter of 2009 from $4.3 million in the first quarter of 2008. Other
operating expenses consists of costs incurred for advertising expense, freight
handling, highway tolls, driver recruiting expenses, and administrative costs.
The decrease of $0.7 million was mainly due to decreases of highway tolls,
advertising and freight handling charges due to lower volumes of business and
miles driven.
Gain on the disposal of property and equipment increased $1.0 million (159%), to
$1.7 million during the first quarter of 2009 from $0.6 million in the first
quarter of 2008. The increase in gains during the first quarter of 2009 compared
to the first quarter of 2008 was directly attributable to the increase in
sales/trades of revenue equipment during 2009 related to the Company's current
fleet upgrade program. The Company was not performing any fleet upgrade during
the first quarter of 2008.
Interest income decreased $2.0 million (69.6%), to $0.9 million in the first
quarter of 2009 from $2.9 million in the same period of 2008. The decrease is
mainly the result of lower average returns due to the decline in interest rates
applicable to short and long-term investments which the Company saw throughout
2008, and continued into 2009.
14
The Company's effective tax rate was 29.0% and 35.2%, respectively, in the first
quarter of 2009 and 2008. The decrease in the effective tax rate was due to a
favorable income tax expense adjustment as a result of the application of FIN 48
and certain state tax benefits upon filing the 2008 state tax returns. Under the
application of FIN 48, the Company reduced its liability in the three months
ended March 31, 2009, for unrecognized tax benefits related to risks associated
with state income tax filing positions for the Company's corporate subsidiaries
mainly due to the expiration of certain statutes of limitations.
As a result of the foregoing, the Company's operating ratio (operating expenses
as a percentage of operating revenue) was 83.4% during the first quarter of 2009
compared with 86.7% during the first quarter of 2008. Net income decreased $0.5
million (3.6%), to $14.1 million during the first quarter of 2009 from $14.7
million during the first quarter of 2008.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The growth of the Company's business requires significant investments in new
revenue equipment. Historically the Company has been debt-free, funding revenue
equipment purchases with cash flow provided by operations, which was the case
during 2008 with the 575 new tractors and 400 new trailers that were acquired.
The Company also obtains tractor capacity by utilizing independent contractors,
who provide a tractor and bear all associated operating and financing expenses.
The Company's primary source of liquidity for the period ended March 31, 2009,
was net cash provided by operating activities of $31.5 million compared to $30.7
million in 2008 due primarily to net income (excluding non-cash depreciation,
deferred tax, and gains on disposal of equipment) being approximately $0.3
million lower in 2009 compared to 2008 offset with an increase in operating cash
flow generated by operating assets and liabilities of approximately $1.1
million. The net increase in cash provided by operating assets and liabilities
for the first quarter of 2009 compared to the same period of 2008 was primarily
the result of reductions in accounts receivable balances due to collections,
increases in accident and workers compensation insurance accruals and accounts
payable, offset by reductions in accrued income taxes mainly due to uncertain
tax position accrual changes and certain net income taxes paid during the
quarter. Cash flow from operating activities was 27.4% of operating revenues in
2009 compared with 20.6% in 2008.
Capital expenditures for property and equipment, net of trade-ins, totaled $2.5
million for the first quarter of 2009 compared to $0.1 million during the same
quarter of 2008. Cash flows during the first quarter of 2009 were mainly
attributable to the Company's tractor fleet upgrade program. There were not any
significant capital expenditures during the first quarter of 2008. The Company
received $1.7 million in cash during the first quarter of 2009 related to a
partial call of an ARS compared to $12.0 million net investment in ARS's prior
to auction failures in February 2008. The increase in proceeds from sale of
property and equipment was directly related to cash received under the Company's
tractor fleet upgrade program.
The Company did not pay any dividends during the first quarter of 2009 compared
to cash dividends of $1.9 million paid in quarter ended March 31, 2008. The
dividend declared in the fourth quarter 2008 was paid in the fourth quarter of
2008. The Company declared a $1.8 million cash dividend in March 2009, included
in accounts payable and accrued liabilities at March 31, 2009, which was paid on
April 2, 2009.
In September, 2001, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized a program
to repurchase 15.4 million shares, adjusted for stock splits, of the Company's
Common Stock in open market or negotiated transactions using available cash and
cash equivalents. The authorization to repurchase remains open at March 31, 2009
and has no expiration date. During the quarter ended March 31, 2009,
approximately 3.5 million shares of the Company's common stock were repurchased
for approximately $45.4 million at approximately $12.81 per share. The
repurchased shares were subsequently retired. There were approximately 0.8
million shares repurchased for $10.6 million at approximately $13.40 per share
during the first quarter of 2008. At March 31, 2009, the Company has
approximately 6.5 million shares remaining under the current Board of Director
repurchase authorization. Future purchases are dependent upon market conditions.
The Company paid income taxes, net, of $0.8 million in 2009 which was slightly
lower than income taxes paid during the same period in 2008 of $0.9 million.
Management believes the Company has adequate liquidity to meet its current and
projected needs. Management believes the Company will continue to have
15
significant capital requirements over the long-term which are expected to be
funded from cash flows provided by operations and from existing cash, cash
equivalents and investments. The Company's balance sheet remains debt free. The
Company ended the quarter with $216.2 million in cash, cash equivalents and
investments a decrease of $11.8 million from December 31, 2008. This decrease
was mainly driven by stock repurchases, net of cash flows provided by operating
activities.
The Company's investments are primarily in the form of tax free, auction rate
student loan educational bonds backed by the U.S. government and are classified
as available-for-sale. As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, all of the
Company's long-term investment balance was invested in auction rate student loan
educational bonds. The investments typically have an interest reset provision of
35 days with contractual maturities that range from 6 to 39 years as of March
31, 2009. At the reset date the Company has the option to roll the investments
and reset the interest rate or sell the investments in an auction. The Company
receives the par value of the investment plus accrued interest on the reset date
if the underlying investment is sold. The majority, (approximately 97% at par)
of the underlying investments is backed by the U.S. government. The remaining 3%
of the student loan auction rate securities portfolio are insurance backed
securities. As of March 31, 2009, approximately 93% of the underlying
investments of the total portfolio held AAA (or equivalent) ratings from
recognized rating agencies. Of the remaining 7% with less than AAA (or
equivalent ratings), the Company received a partial call, at par, on May 1, 2009
which reduced the amount of holdings with credit ratings less than AAA (or
equivalent ratings) to approximately 5% of the Company's portfolio at par.
As of March 31, 2009, all of the Company's auction rate student loan bonds were
associated with unsuccessful auctions. To date, there have been no instances of
delinquencies or non-payment of applicable interest from the issuers and all
partial calls of securities by the issuers have been at par value plus accrued
interest. Investment income received is generally exempt from federal income
taxes and is accrued as earned. Accrued interest income is included in other
current assets in the consolidated balance sheet.
The Company estimates the fair value of the auction rate securities applying the
guidance in SFAS No. 157 ("SFAS 157"). Fair value represents an estimate of what
the Company could sell the investments for in an orderly transaction with a
third party as of the March 31, 2009 measurement date although it is not the
intent of the Company to sell such securities at discounted pricing.
Historically, the fair value of such investments was reported based on amortized
cost. Until auction failures began, the fair value of these investments were
calculated using Level 1 observable inputs per SFAS 157 and fair value was
deemed to be equivalent to amortized cost due to the short-term and regularly
occurring auction process. Based on auction failures beginning in mid-February
2008 and continued failures through March 31, 2009, there were not any
observable quoted prices or other relevant inputs for identical or similar
securities. Estimated fair value of all auction rate security investments as of
March 31, 2009 was calculated using unobservable, Level 3 inputs, as defined by
SFAS 157 due to the lack of observable market inputs specifically related to
student loan auction rate securities. The fair value of these investments as of
the March 31, 2009 measurement date could not be determined with precision based
on lack of observable market data and could significantly change in future
measurement periods.
The estimated fair value of the underlying investments as of March 31, 2009
declined below amortized cost of the investments, as a result of liquidity
issues in the auction rate markets. With the assistance of the Company's
financial advisors, fair values of the student loan auction rate securities were
estimated, on an individual investment basis, using a discounted cash flow
approach to value the underlying collateral of the trust issuing the debt
securities considering an anticipated estimated outstanding average life of the
underlying student loans (range of two to ten years) that are the collateral to
the trusts, principal outstanding, expected rates of returns, and payout
formulas. These underlying cash flows, by individual investment, were discounted
using interest rates consistent with instruments of similar quality and duration
with an adjustment for a higher required yield for lack of liquidity in the
market for these auction rate securities (range of 2.6%-11.0%). The Company
obtained an understanding of assumptions in models used by third party financial
institutions to estimate fair value and considered these assumptions in the
Company's cash flow models but did not exclusively use the fair values provided
by financial institutions based on their internal modeling. The Company is aware
that trading of student loan auction rate securities is occurring in secondary
markets, which were considered in the Company's fair value assessment, although
the Company has not listed any of its assets for sale on the secondary market.
As a result of the fair value measurements, there were no changes to the
unrealized loss and reduction to investments, of $8.6 million, net of tax,
during period ended March 31, 2009. The unrealized loss of $8.6 million, net of
tax, is recorded as an adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive loss. There
were not any realized gains or losses related to these investments for the
period ended March 31, 2009.
16
During the third and fourth quarters of 2008, various financial institutions and
respective regulatory authorities announced proposed settlement terms in
response to various regulatory authorities alleging certain financial
institutions misled investors regarding the liquidity risks associated with
auction rate securities that the respective financial institutions underwrote,
marketed and sold. Further the respective regulatory authorities alleged the
respective financial institutions misrepresented to customers that auction rate
securities were safe, highly liquid investments that were comparable to money
markets. Certain settlement agreements were finalized prior to December 31,
2008. Approximately 97% (at par value) of our auction rate security investments
were not covered by the terms of the above mentioned settlement agreements. The
focus of the initial settlements was generally towards individuals, charities,
and businesses with small investment balances, generally with holdings of $25
million and less. As part of the general terms of the settlements, the
respective financial institutions have agreed to provide their best efforts in
providing liquidity to the auction rate securities market for investors not
specifically covered by the terms of the respective settlements. Such liquidity
solutions could be in the form of facilitating issuer redemptions,
resecuritizations, or other means. The Company can not currently project when
liquidity will be obtained from these investments, and plans to continue to hold
such securities until the securities are called, redeemed, or resecuritized by
the debt issuers.
The remaining 3.0% (at par value) was specifically covered by a settlement
agreement which the Company signed during the fourth quarter of 2008. By signing
the settlement agreement the Company relinquished its rights to bring any claims
against the financial institution as well as its right to serve as a class
representative or receive benefits under any class action. Further, the Company
no longer has the sole discretion and right to sell or otherwise dispose of,
and/or enter orders in the auction process with respect to the underlying
securities. As part of the settlement, the Company obtained a put option to sell
the underlying securities to the financial institution which is exercisable
during the period starting on June 30, 2010 through July 2, 2012 plus accrued
interest. Should the financial institution sell or otherwise dispose of our
securities the Company will receive the par value of the securities plus accrued
interest one business day after the transaction. Upon signing the settlement
agreement the Company no longer maintains the intent and ability to hold the
underlying securities for recovery of the temporary decline in fair value. The
Company also acquired an asset, a put option that is to be valued as a stand
alone financial instrument separate from the underlying securities. There was
not any significant change in the value of the put option during the period
ended March 31, 2009. During the quarter ended March 31, 2009, the Company
received $1.65 million in partial calls, at par, of the investments covered by
the settlement agreement. The value of these securities is included in long-term
investments per the consolidated balance sheet.
The Company has evaluated the unrealized loss on securities other than
securities covered by the settlement agreement discussed above to determine
whether this decline is other than temporary. Management has concluded the
decline in fair value to be temporary based on the following considerations.
o Current market activity and the lack of severity or extended
decline do not warrant such action at this time.
o Since auction failures began in February 2008, the Company has
received approximately $20.0 million as the result of partial
calls by issuers. The Company received par value for the amount
of these calls plus accrued interest.
o On May 1, 2009 the Company received $2.9 million as the result of
a partial call by an issuer. The Company received par value for
the amount of this call plus accrued interest.
o Based on the Company's financial operating results, operating
cash flows and debt free balance sheet, the Company has the
ability and intent to hold such securities until recovery of the
unrealized loss.
o There have not been any significant changes in collateralization
and ratings of the underlying securities since the first failed
auction. The Company continues to hold 95% of the auction rate
security portfolio in senior positions of AAA (or equivalent)
rated securities after the partial call subsequent to March 31,
2009 mentioned above.
o The Company is aware of recent increases in default rates of the
underlying student loans that are the assets to the trusts
issuing the auction rate security debt which management believes
is due to current overall economic conditions. As the underlying
loans are guaranteed by the U.S. Government, defaults of the
loans accelerate payment of the underlying loan to the trust.
o Currently there is legislative pressure to provide liquidity in
student loan investments, providing liquidity to state student
loan agencies, to continue to provide financial assistance to
17
eligible students to enable higher educations. This has the
potential to impact existing securities with underlying student
loans.
o As individual trusts that are the issuers of the auction rate
student loan debt, which the Company holds, continue to pay
higher default rates of interest, there is the potential that the
underlying trust would seek alternative financing and call the
existing debt at which point it is estimated the Company would
receive par value of the investment.
o All of the auction rate securities are held with financial
institutions that have agreed in principle to settlement
agreements with various regulatory agencies to provide liquidity.
Although the principles of the respective settlement agreements
focus mostly on small investors (generally companies and
individual investors with auction rate security assets less than
$25 million), the respective settlements state the financial
institutions will work with issuers and other interested parties
to use their best efforts to provide liquidity solutions to
companies not specifically covered by the principle terms of the
respective settlements by the end of 2009 in certain settlement
agreements.
Management will monitor its investments and ongoing market conditions in future
periods to assess impairments considered to be other than temporary. Should
estimated fair value continue to remain below cost or the fair value decrease
significantly from current fair value due to credit related issues, the Company
may be required to record an impairment of these investments, through a charge
in the consolidated statement of income.
Net working capital for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 decreased by $22.2
million over December 31, 2008 largely due to a decrease in cash and cash
equivalents driven by share repurchases and an increase in income tax payables
and accounts payable due to timing of payments. Based on the Company's strong
financial position, management believes outside financing could be obtained, if
necessary, to fund capital expenditures.
Off-Balance Sheet Transactions
The Company's liquidity is not materially affected by off-balance sheet
transactions.
Risk Factors
You should refer to Item 1A of our annual report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2008, under the caption "Risk Factors" for specific details on the
following factors that are not within the control of the Company and could
affect our financial results.
o Our business is subject to general economic and business factors
that are largely out of our control, any of which could have a
materially adverse effect on our operating results.
o Our growth may not continue at historic rates.
o Increased prices, reduced productivity, and restricted
availability of new revenue equipment may adversely affect our
earnings and cash flows.
o If fuel prices increase significantly, our results of operations
could be adversely affected.
o Difficulty in driver and independent contractor recruitment and
retention may have a materially adverse effect on our business.
o We operate in a highly regulated industry and changes in
regulations could have a materially adverse effect on our
business.
o We operate in a highly regulated industry, and increased costs of
compliance with, or liability for violation of, existing or
future regulations could have a materially adverse effect on our
business.
o Our operations are subject to various environmental laws and
regulations, the violations of which could result in substantial
fines or penalties.
o We may not make acquisitions in the future, or if we do, we may
not be successful in integrating the acquired company, either of
which could have a materially adverse effect on our business.
o If we are unable to retain our key employees or find, develop,
and retain service center managers, our business, financial
condition, and results of operations could be adversely affected.
o We are highly dependent on a few major customers, the loss of one
or more of which could have a materially adverse effect on our
business.
18
o If the estimated fair value of auction rate securities continues
to remain below cost or if the fair value decreases significantly
from the current fair value, we may be required to record an
impairment of these investments, through a charge in the
consolidated statement of income, which could have a materially
adverse effect on our earnings.
o Seasonality and the impact of weather affect our operations
profitability.
o Ongoing insurance and claims expenses could significantly reduce
our earnings.
o We are dependent on computer and communications systems, and a
systems failure could cause a significant disruption to our
business.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Assuming we maintain our short-term and long-term investment balance consistent
with balances as of March 31, 2009, $169.6 million, and if market rates of
interest on our short term investments decreased by 100 basis points, the
estimated reduction in annual interest income would be approximately $1.7
million.
The Company has no debt outstanding as of March 31, 2009 and therefore, has no
market risk related to debt.
Volatile fuel prices will continue to impact us significantly. Based on the
Company's historical experience, the Company is not able to pass through to
customers 100% of fuel price increases. For the quarter ended March 31, 2009 and
2008, fuel expense, net of fuel surcharge revenue and fuel stabilization paid to
owner operators, was $13.6 million and $24.1 million or 15.7% and 23.2%,
respectively, of the Company's total net operating expenses, net of fuel
surcharge. A significant increase in fuel costs, or a shortage of diesel fuel,
could materially and adversely affect our results of operations. In February
2007, the Board of Directors authorized the Company to begin hedging activities
related to projected future purchases of diesel fuel to reduce its exposure to
diesel fuel price fluctuations. During the quarter ended March 31, 2009, the
Company contracted with an unrelated third party to hedge forecasted future cash
flows related to fuel purchases. The hedge of forecasted future cash flow was
transacted through the use of certain swap contracts. The Company has
implemented the provisions of SFAS No. 133 and SFAS No. 161, and has designated
such hedges as cash flow hedges. The cash flow hedging strategy was implemented
mainly to reduce the Company's exposure to significant upward movements in
diesel fuel prices related to fuel consumed by empty and out-of-route miles and
truck engine idling time, which is not recoverable through fuel surcharge
agreements. The contracted hedge will expire during the second quarter of 2009.
There were no other open hedging contracts at March 31, 2009.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an
evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's
management, including the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operations of the Company's
disclosure controls and procedures, and as defined in Exchange Act Rule
15d-15(e). Based upon that evaluation, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures are effective in enabling the Company to record, process, summarize
and report information required to be included in the Company's periodic SEC
filings within the required time period. There have been no changes in the
Company's internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the
Company's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over
financial reporting.
19
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The Company is a party to ordinary, routine litigation and administrative
proceedings incidental to its business. These proceedings primarily involve
claims for personal injury, property damage, and workers' compensation
incurred in connection with the transportation of freight. The Company
maintains insurance to cover liabilities arising from the transportation of
freight for amounts in excess of certain self-insured retentions.
Item 2. Changes in Securities
Purchases of Equity Securities
Period (c) Total (d) Maximum
number of number of
shares shares that
purchased as may yet be
(a) Total part of purchased under
number of (b) Average publicly the plans or
shares price paid announced plans programs ( in
Purchased per share or programs millions)
-------------------- ---------- ----------- --------------- ----------------
January 1, 2009 -
January 31, 2009 980,761 $ 13.34 980,761 9.0
February 1, 2009 -
February 28, 2009 1,820,931 12.81 1,820,931 7.2
March 1, 2009 -
March 31, 2009 .. 738,220 12.14 738,220 6.5
--------- ---------
Total ............. 3,539,912 3,539,912
========= =========
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
Item 5. Other Information
None
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibit
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act,
as amended.
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act,
as amended.
32 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
1. Report on Form 8-K, dated January 23, 2009, announcing the
Company's financial results for the quarter ended December
31, 2008.
2. Report on Form 8-K, dated March 9, 2009, announcing the
declaration of a quarterly cash dividend.
No other information is required to be filed under Part II of the form.
20
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
HEARTLAND EXPRESS, INC.
Date: May 8, 2009 BY: /S/ John P. Cosaert
-------------------
John P. Cosaert
Executive Vice President-Finance,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(principal accounting and financial officer)
21
Exhibit No. 31.1
Certification
I, Russell A. Gerdin, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Heartland Express,
Inc., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Heartland
Express, Inc. (the "Registrant");
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or cause
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's independent registered public
accounting firm and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 8, 2009 By: /s/ Russell A. Gerdin
---------------------
Russell A. Gerdin
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
22
Exhibit No. 31.2
Certification
I, John P. Cosaert, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer of Heartland Express, Inc., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Heartland
Express, Inc. (the "Registrant");
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or cause
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's independent registered public
accounting firm and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 8, 2009 By: /s/ John P. Cosaert
--------------------
John P. Cosaert
Executive Vice President-Finance
Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer
(principal accounting and financial officer)
23
Exhibit No. 32
CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Russell A. Gerdin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Heartland Express, Inc., on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained
in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of Heartland Express, Inc.
Dated: May 8, 2009 By: /s/ Russell A. Gerdin
---------------------
Russell A. Gerdin
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
I, John P. Cosaert, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Heartland Express, Inc., on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Heartland Express, Inc.
Dated: May 8, 2009 By: /s/ John P. Cosaert
-------------------
John P. Cosaert
Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer