NOTICE OF MEETING: MERGER
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the
Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
|
|
o |
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|
o |
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
þ |
Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
o |
Definitive Additional Materials |
|
o |
Soliciting Material Pursuant to
§240.14a-12 |
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the
Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
|
o |
No fee required. |
|
o |
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act
Rules 14a-6(i)(1)
and 0-11. |
|
|
(1) |
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
(2) |
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
(3) |
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on
which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was
determined): |
|
|
(4) |
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
þ |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
o |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by
Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for
which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the
previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or
Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|
|
(1) |
Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
(2) |
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
8000 Bent Branch Drive, Irving, Texas 75063
September 6, 2006
Dear Stockholder:
The board of directors of Michaels Stores, Inc.
(Michaels, we, us or
our) has unanimously approved a merger agreement
providing for the merger of Michaels with affiliates of Bain
Capital Partners, LLC and The Blackstone Group, which are
private equity firms. If the merger is completed, you will
receive $44.00 in cash, without interest, for each share of our
common stock that you own, and Michaels will become wholly owned
by entities sponsored by or
co-investors with Bain
Capital Partners, LLC and The Blackstone Group.
You will be asked, at a special meeting of the Michaels
stockholders, to consider and vote on a proposal to adopt the
merger agreement. After careful consideration, our board of
directors approved the merger agreement, the merger and the
other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement and
unanimously declared that the merger agreement, the merger and
the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement are
advisable and in the best interests of our stockholders. THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE
FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT.
The time, date and place of the special meeting to consider and
vote upon the adoption of the merger agreement are as follows:
9:30 a.m., central daylight time, on October 5, 2006
8000 Bent Branch Drive, Irving, Texas 75063
The proxy statement attached to this letter provides you with
information about the merger and the special meeting. A copy of
the merger agreement is attached as Annex A to this proxy
statement. A copy of the first amendment to the merger agreement
is attached as Annex B to this proxy statement. We
encourage you to read the entire proxy statement carefully. You
may also obtain additional information on us from documents we
have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Your vote is very important, regardless of the number of
shares of our common stock you own. The merger cannot be
completed unless holders of a majority of the outstanding shares
of our common stock entitled to vote at the special meeting of
stockholders vote for the adoption of the merger agreement. If
you do not vote, it will have the same effect as a vote against
the adoption of the merger agreement.
Whether or not you plan to attend the special meeting in person,
please complete, sign, date and return promptly the enclosed
proxy card. If you hold shares through a broker or other
nominee, you should follow the procedures provided by your
broker or nominee. These actions will not limit your right to
vote in person if you wish to attend the special meeting and
vote in person.
Thank you in advance for your cooperation and continued support.
|
|
|
On behalf of your Board of Directors, |
|
|
|
|
Charles J. Wyly, Jr. |
|
|
Chairman of the Board |
|
THIS PROXY STATEMENT IS DATED SEPTEMBER 6, 2006 AND IS
FIRST BEING
MAILED TO STOCKHOLDERS ON OR ABOUT SEPTEMBER 7, 2006.
8000 Bent Branch Drive, Irving, Texas 75063
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON OCTOBER 5, 2006
TO THE STOCKHOLDERS OF MICHAELS STORES, INC.:
A special meeting of stockholders of Michaels Stores, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (Michaels, we,
us or our), will be held at 8000 Bent
Branch Drive, Irving, Texas 75063, on October 5, 2006,
beginning at 9:30 a.m., central daylight time, for the
following purposes:
|
|
|
1. Adoption of the Merger Agreement. To consider and
vote on a proposal to adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger,
dated as of June 30, 2006, as amended, among Bain Paste
Mergerco, Inc., Blackstone Paste Mergerco, Inc., Bain Paste
Finco, LLC, Blackstone Paste Finco, LLC and Michaels Stores,
Inc., pursuant to which, upon the merger becoming effective,
each outstanding share of Michaels common stock, par value
$0.10 per share (other than shares held in our treasury or
owned by Bain Paste Mergerco, Inc., Blackstone Paste Mergerco,
Inc., Bain Paste Finco, LLC or Blackstone Paste Finco, LLC,
shares held by stockholders who properly demand statutory
appraisal rights and rollover shares) will be converted into the
right to receive $44.00 in cash, without interest. |
|
|
2. Adjournment or Postponement of the Special
Meeting. To approve the adjournment or postponement of the
special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit
additional proxies if there are insufficient votes at the time
of the meeting to adopt the merger agreement. |
|
|
3. Other Matters. To transact such other business as
may properly come before the special meeting or any adjournment
thereof. |
Only stockholders of record of our common stock as of the close
of business on September 1, 2006, will be entitled to
notice of, and to vote at, the special meeting and any
adjournment or postponement of the special meeting. All
stockholders of record are cordially invited to attend the
special meeting in person.
Your vote is very important, regardless of the number of
shares of our common stock you own. The adoption of the
merger agreement requires the affirmative vote of the holders of
a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock on the
record date for the special meeting. Even if you plan to attend
the meeting in person, we request that you complete, sign, date
and return the enclosed proxy in the envelope provided and thus
ensure that your shares will be represented at the meeting if
you are unable to attend. If you sign, date and mail your proxy
card without indicating how you wish to vote, your vote will be
counted as a vote FOR the adoption of the
merger agreement.
If you fail to vote by proxy or in person, the effect will be
that your shares will not be counted for purposes of determining
whether a quorum is present at the special meeting and, if a
quorum is present, will have the same effect as a vote against
the adoption of the merger agreement. If you are a stockholder
of record and wish to vote in person at the special meeting, you
may withdraw your proxy and vote in person.
Stockholders of Michaels who do not vote in favor of the
adoption of the merger agreement will have the right to seek
appraisal of the fair value of their shares if the merger is
completed, but only if they submit a written demand for
appraisal to Michaels before the vote is taken on the merger
agreement and comply with all requirements of Delaware law,
which are summarized in the accompanying proxy statement under
the caption Appraisal Rights beginning on
page 62.
|
|
|
|
|
By order of the board of directors, |
|
|
|
|
Mark V. Beasley
Secretary |
September 6, 2006
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
62 |
|
|
64 |
|
|
65 |
|
|
67 |
|
|
67 |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 30, 2006,
among Bain Paste Mergerco, Inc., Blackstone Paste Mergerco,
Inc., Bain Paste Finco, LLC, Blackstone Paste Finco, LLC and
Michaels Stores, Inc. |
|
|
First Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of
September 1, 2006, among Bain Paste Mergerco, Inc.,
Blackstone Paste Mergerco, Inc., Bain Paste Finco, LLC,
Blackstone Paste Finco, LLC and Michaels Stores, Inc. |
|
|
Opinion of J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. |
|
|
Opinion of Goldman, Sachs & Co. |
|
|
Section 262 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware |
SUMMARY
This summary highlights selected information from this proxy
statement and may not contain all of the information that is
important to you. To understand the merger fully, and for a more
complete description of the legal terms of the merger, you
should carefully read this entire proxy statement, the annexes
attached to this proxy statement and the documents referred to
or incorporated by reference in this proxy statement. We have
included page references in parentheses to direct you to the
appropriate place in this proxy statement for a more complete
description of the topics presented in this summary. In this
proxy statement, the terms Michaels, we,
us and our refer to Michaels Stores, Inc.
The Parties to the Merger Agreement (page 13)
Michaels Stores, Inc.
8000 Bent Branch Drive
Irving, TX 75063
(972) 409-1300
Michaels, a Delaware corporation, is the largest arts and crafts
specialty retailer in the United States. As of August 23,
2006, we operate 907 Michaels retail stores in 48 states
and Canada and 165 Aaron Brothers stores in 11 states,
offering framing supplies and services and a wide selection of
art supplies. Recollections, our scrapbooking/paper crafting
retail concept, operates 11 stores located in Arizona, Maryland,
Texas, and Virginia as of August 23, 2006. In addition, we
own and operate four Star Decorators Wholesale stores located in
Arizona, California, Georgia, and Texas as of August 23,
2006, offering merchandise primarily to interior
decorators/designers, wedding/event planners, florists, hotels,
restaurants and commercial display companies.
Bain Paste Mergerco, Inc.
Bain Paste Finco, LLC
c/o Bain Capital Partners, LLC
111 Huntington Avenue
Boston, MA 02199
(617) 516-2000
Bain Paste Mergerco, Inc. is a Delaware corporation formed by a
private equity fund sponsored by Bain Capital Partners, LLC
(Bain) in anticipation of the merger. Subject to the
terms and conditions of the merger agreement and in accordance
with Delaware law, at the effective time of the merger, Bain
Paste Mergerco, Inc. will merge with and into Michaels Stores,
Inc. Bain Paste Mergerco, Inc. has de minimis assets and no
operations. Bain Paste Finco, LLC is a Delaware limited
liability company formed by a private equity fund sponsored by
Bain in anticipation of the merger. Bain is part of Bain
Capital, LLC, a global private investment firm that manages
several pools of capital including private equity, venture
capital, public equity, and leveraged debt assets with more than
$38 billion in assets under management. Since its inception
in 1984, Bain has made private equity investments and add-on
acquisitions in over 230 companies around the world,
including such leading retailers and consumer companies as Toys
R Us, Burger King, Staples, Burlington Coat Factory,
Shoppers Drug Mart, Brookstone, Dominos Pizza,
Dollarama, Sealy Corp., Sports Authority and Duane Reade.
Headquartered in Boston, Bain has offices in New York, London,
Munich, Hong Kong, Shanghai and Tokyo.
Blackstone Paste Mergerco, Inc.
Blackstone Paste Finco, LLC
c/o The Blackstone Group
345 Park Avenue, 31st Floor
New York, NY 10154
(212) 583-5000
Blackstone Paste Mergerco, Inc. is a Delaware corporation formed
by a private equity fund sponsored by The Blackstone Group
(Blackstone) in anticipation of the merger. Subject
to the terms and conditions of the merger agreement and in
accordance with Delaware law, at the effective time of the
merger, Blackstone Paste Mergerco, Inc. will merge with and into
Michaels Stores, Inc. Blackstone Paste Mergerco, Inc. has de
minimis assets and no operations. Blackstone Paste Finco, LLC is
a Delaware limited liability company
1
formed by a private equity fund sponsored by Blackstone in
anticipation of the merger. Blackstone, a global private
investment and advisory firm, was founded in 1985. The firm has
raised a total of more then $63 billion for alternative
asset investing since its formation, of which approximately
$30 billion has been for private equity investing.
Blackstones private equity group is currently investing
its fifth general private equity fund with commitments of
$15.6 billion, and has over 60 experienced professionals
with broad sector expertise. Blackstones other core
businesses include private real estate investing, corporate debt
investing, hedge funds, mutual fund management, private
placement, marketable alternative asset management and
investment banking advisory services.
The Special Meeting
|
|
|
Time, Place and Date (page 14) |
The special meeting will be held on October 5, 2006,
beginning at 9:30 a.m., central daylight time, at 8000 Bent
Branch Drive, Irving, Texas 75063.
You will be asked to consider and vote on a proposal to adopt an
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 30, 2006 (as
amended, the merger agreement), among Bain Paste
Mergerco, Inc. (Bain Mergerco), Blackstone Paste
Mergerco, Inc. (Blackstone Mergerco and, together
with Bain Mergerco, the Mergercos), Bain Paste
Finco, LLC (Bain Finco), Blackstone Paste Finco, LLC
(Blackstone Finco and, together with Bain Finco, the
Fincos; the Mergercos and Fincos, collectively, the
Sponsor Entities) and Michaels. The merger agreement
provides that the Mergercos will be merged with and into
Michaels (the merger), with Michaels being the
surviving corporation in the merger (the surviving
corporation). Each outstanding share of Michaels common
stock (other than shares held in our treasury or owned by any of
the Sponsor Entities, shares held by stockholders who properly
demand statutory appraisal rights and rollover shares) will be
converted into the right to receive $44.00 in cash, without
interest.
The persons named in the accompanying proxy card will also have
discretionary authority to vote upon other business, if any,
that properly comes before the special meeting and any
adjournments or postponements of the special meeting.
|
|
|
Record Date and Quorum (page 14) |
You are entitled to vote at the special meeting if you owned
shares of our common stock at the close of business on
September 1, 2006, the record date for the special meeting.
You will have one vote for each share of Michaels common stock
that you owned on the record date. As of the record date, there
were 133,326,962 shares of our common stock entitled to be
voted.
The holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our
common stock at the close of business on the record date
represented in person or by proxy will constitute a quorum for
purposes of the special meeting.
Completion of the merger requires the adoption of the merger
agreement by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority
of the outstanding shares of our common stock at the close of
business on the record date for the special meeting. A failure
to vote your shares of our common stock or an abstention will
have the same effect as voting against the merger.
|
|
|
Share Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers
(page 65) |
As of the record date for the special meeting, the directors and
executive officers of Michaels beneficially owned, in the
aggregate, 11,521,755 shares of our common stock, or
approximately 8.5% of the outstanding shares of our common
stock. The directors and executive officers have informed us
that they intend to vote all of their shares of Michaels common
stock FOR the adoption of the merger
agreement and FOR any adjournment or
postponement of the special meeting, if necessary or
appropriate, to solicit additional proxies.
2
|
|
|
Voting and Proxies (page 14) |
Any Michaels stockholder of record entitled to vote may submit a
proxy by returning a signed proxy card by mail, or may vote in
person by appearing at the special meeting. If your shares are
held in street name by your broker, you should
instruct your broker on how to vote your shares using the
instructions provided by your broker. If you do not provide your
broker with instructions, your shares will not be voted and that
will have the same effect as voting against the merger.
|
|
|
Revocability of Proxy (page 14) |
Any Michaels stockholder of record who executes and returns a
proxy card may revoke the proxy at any time before it is voted
in any one of the following ways:
|
|
|
|
|
filing with Computershare Investor Services, L.L.C., 3020 Legacy
Drive, Suite 100-307, Plano, Texas 75023, at or before the
special meeting, a written notice of revocation that is dated a
later date than the proxy; |
|
|
|
sending a later-dated proxy card relating to the same shares to
Computershare Investor Services, L.L.C., at or before the
special meeting; or |
|
|
|
attending the special meeting and voting in person. |
Simply attending the special meeting will not constitute
revocation of a proxy. If you have instructed your broker to
vote your shares, the above-described options for revoking your
proxy do not apply and instead you must follow the directions
provided by your broker to change your vote.
When the Merger Will be Completed (page 45)
We are working to complete the merger as soon as possible. We
anticipate completing the merger by the end of 2006, subject to
adoption of the merger agreement by our stockholders and the
satisfaction of the other closing conditions. In addition, the
Mergercos are not obligated to complete the merger until the
expiration of a 30 consecutive calendar day marketing
period throughout which the Fincos shall have the
financial information that we are required to provide pursuant
to the merger agreement to complete the debt financing of the
merger. So long as we have provided all required financial
information to the Fincos for purposes of them completing their
debt financing, the marketing period will begin to run on the
later of (i) the adoption of the merger agreement by our
stockholders and (ii) September 4, 2006.
Effects of the Merger (page 46)
If the merger agreement is adopted by our stockholders and the
other conditions to closing are satisfied, the Mergercos will
merge with and into Michaels. The separate corporate existences
of the Mergercos will cease, and Michaels will continue as the
surviving corporation, wholly owned by entities sponsored by or
co-investors with Bain and Blackstone. Upon completion of the
merger, our common stock will be converted into the right to
receive $44.00 per share, without interest and less any
required withholding taxes. The surviving corporation will be a
privately held corporation, and you will cease to have any
ownership interest in the surviving corporation or any rights as
its stockholder.
Recommendation of Our Board of Directors (page 21)
After careful consideration, our board of directors unanimously
approved the merger agreement, the merger and the other
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement and
unanimously declared that the merger agreement, the merger and
the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement are
advisable and in the best interests of our stockholders.
ACCORDINGLY, OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE
FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT.
In reaching its decision, our board of directors evaluated a
variety of business, financial and market factors and consulted
with our management team and legal and financial advisors. In
considering the recommendation of our board of directors with
respect to the merger, you should be aware that certain of our
directors and executive officers have interests in the merger
that differ from, or are in addition to, your interests as a
stockholder. See The Merger Interests of
Our Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger
beginning on page 36.
3
For the factors considered by our board of directors in reaching
its decision to approve the merger agreement and the merger, see
The Merger Reasons for the Merger
beginning on page 19.
Opinion of JPMorgan (page 21 and Annex C)
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. (JPMorgan)
delivered its opinion to our board of directors that, as of the
date of its opinion and based upon and subject to the factors
and assumptions set forth in its opinion, the merger
consideration of $44.00 in cash per share to be received by our
stockholders in the merger was fair, from a financial point of
view, to such stockholders.
The full text of the written opinion of JPMorgan, dated
June 30, 2006, which sets forth the assumptions made,
matters considered and limitations on the review undertaken in
connection with the opinion, is attached as Annex C to this
proxy statement. Our stockholders are urged to read the opinion
carefully in its entirety. JPMorgans written opinion is
addressed to our board of directors, and is directed only to the
consideration to be received in the merger and does not
constitute a recommendation to any of our stockholders as to how
such stockholder should vote at the special meeting. Pursuant to
an engagement letter between our board of directors and
JPMorgan, we have agreed to pay JPMorgan a transaction fee of
0.40% of the aggregate consideration to be paid in the
transaction, or approximately $24 million, all of which is
payable upon consummation of the transaction.
Opinion of Goldman Sachs (page 27 and Annex D)
Goldman, Sachs & Co. (Goldman Sachs)
delivered its opinion to the special advisory committee of our
board of directors and our board of directors that, as of the
date of its opinion and based upon and subject to the factors
and assumptions set forth in its opinion, the merger
consideration of $44.00 in cash per share to be received by our
stockholders in the merger was fair, from a financial point of
view, to such stockholders.
The full text of the written opinion of Goldman Sachs, dated
June 30, 2006, which sets forth the assumptions made,
procedures followed, matters considered and limitations on the
review undertaken in connection with the opinion, is attached as
Annex D to this proxy statement. Goldman Sachs provided its
opinion for the information and assistance of the special
advisory committee of our board of directors and our board of
directors in connection with their consideration of the
transaction. Goldman Sachs opinion is not a recommendation
as to how any holder of our common stock should vote at the
special meeting. Pursuant to an engagement letter between the
special advisory committee of our board of directors and Goldman
Sachs, we have agreed to pay Goldman Sachs a transaction fee of
0.15% of the aggregate consideration paid in the transaction, or
approximately $9.0 million, with one-third of the
transaction fee payable upon signing of the merger agreement,
one-third of the transaction fee payable upon the stockholder
vote for the transaction and the remainder of the transaction
fee payable upon consummation of the transaction.
Financing (page 34)
The Sponsor Entities estimate the total amount of funds
necessary to complete the merger and the related transactions to
be approximately $6.164 billion, which includes
approximately $5.920 billion to be paid out to our
stockholders and holders of other equity-based interests in
Michaels, with the remainder to be applied to pay related fees
and expenses in connection with the merger, the financing
arrangements and the related transactions. These payments are
expected to be funded by a combination of equity contributions
by entities sponsored by or co-investors with Bain and
Blackstone and debt financing, as well as our available cash.
In connection with the execution and delivery of the merger
agreement, Bain Finco, Blackstone Finco, Bain Capital
Fund IX, LLC and Blackstone Capital Partners V L.P. have
obtained commitments to provide up to $4.8 billion in debt
financing, consisting of (1) a senior secured asset-based
revolving facility with a maximum availability of
$1.0 billion, (2) a senior secured term loan facility
in an aggregate principal amount of $2.4 billion,
(3) a senior unsecured bridge loan facility in an aggregate
principal amount of up to $700 million and (4) a
senior subordinated unsecured bridge loan facility in an
aggregate principal amount of up to $700 million, to
finance, in part, the payment of the merger consideration, the
repayment or refinancing of certain of our debt outstanding on
the closing date of the merger and to pay fees and expenses in
connection with the merger, financing and related transactions
and, in the case of the asset-based revolving facility, for
4
general corporate purposes after the closing date of the merger.
The Sponsor Entities have agreed to use their reasonable best
efforts to arrange the debt financing on the terms and
conditions described in the commitments. In addition, the
Mergercos have obtained an aggregate of $2.18 billion in
equity commitments from Bain Capital Fund IX, LLC and
Blackstone Capital Partners V L.P. and their respective
affiliates. The facilities and notes contemplated by the debt
financing commitments are subject to various conditions, as
described in further detail under The
Merger Financing Debt
Financing beginning on page 35.
The closing of the merger is not conditioned on the receipt of
the debt financing by the Fincos. The Mergercos, however, are
not required to consummate the merger until after the completion
of the marketing period, as described above under When
the Merger Will be Completed and in further detail
under The Merger Agreement Effective Time;
The Marketing Period beginning on page 45.
Treatment of Stock Options and Restricted Stock
(page 36)
Each outstanding option to purchase shares of our common stock
(other than rollover options), whether or not then exercisable,
will be canceled and converted into the right to receive a cash
payment equal to the excess (if any) of the $44.00 per
share cash merger consideration over the exercise price per
share of the option, multiplied by the number of shares subject
to the option, without interest and less any applicable
withholding taxes. All outstanding shares of restricted stock
(other than rollover shares) will be converted into the right to
receive $44.00 per share in cash, without interest and less
any applicable withholding taxes.
Interests of Our Directors and Executive Officers in the
Merger (page 36)
Our directors and executive officers may have interests in the
merger that are different from, or in addition to, yours,
including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
our directors and executive officers will receive cash
consideration for their vested and unvested stock options in
connection with the merger; |
|
|
|
each of our current executive officers (other than those
executive officers who are also members of our board of
directors) is a party to a change in control severance agreement
with us that provides for (1) continued employment in an
equivalent position for two years following completion of the
merger, unless earlier terminated, (2) base compensation,
cash bonus awards, long-term incentive opportunities and
retirement, welfare and fringe benefits at levels at least equal
to the compensation and benefits received by the executive
immediately prior to completion of the merger for two years
following completion of the merger (unless earlier terminated),
(3) comprehensive officer liability insurance coverage and
continued indemnification rights, (4) severance benefits
(including cash severance payments and continued welfare and
fringe benefits or cash in lieu thereof) if the executives
employment with us is terminated in anticipation of the
completion of the merger or if, during the two-year period after
completion of the merger, the executive is terminated without
cause or resigns for good reason, (5) gross-ups
in respect of certain golden parachute excise taxes payable by
the executive and certain other taxes, interest and penalties
that may be imposed on nonqualified deferred compensation and
(6) reimbursement of certain legal fees and related expenses; |
|
|
|
each of our current executive officers (other than those
executive officers who are also members of our board of
directors) is eligible to receive a change in control retention
bonus equal to $125,000 if he is still employed on the first
anniversary of the completion of the merger or he is terminated
without cause prior to such date; |
|
|
|
each of our current executive officers (other than those
executive officers who are also members of our board of
directors) will be entitled to a guaranteed payout under our
Fiscal Year 2006 Bonus Plan at one level below target and will
be eligible to receive an additional bonus payment of up to 75%
of each individuals target annual bonus, provided that he
is still employed on the date that bonuses are paid; |
|
|
|
within 30 days following the completion of the merger, we
will terminate our nonqualified deferred compensation plan and
will cause all accounts thereunder to be paid out to
participants in cash; |
5
|
|
|
|
|
the merger agreement provides that, during the two-year period
following completion of the merger, the surviving corporation
will maintain certain benefit plans and will continue to provide
certain compensation and benefits; |
|
|
|
the merger agreement provides for indemnification and liability
insurance arrangements for each of our current and former
directors and officers; and |
|
|
|
|
while no agreements, arrangements or understandings have been
entered into as of the date of this proxy statement, members of
our management may enter into employment agreements with the
surviving corporation and may participate in the equity of the
surviving corporation, as described more fully under
Merger Agreement Arrangements with the
Sponsor Entities beginning on page 41. |
|
Our board of directors was aware of these interests and
considered them, among other matters, in making its decisions.
Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences of the
Merger (page 42)
For U.S. federal income tax purposes, the merger will be
treated as a sale of the shares of our common stock for cash by
each of our stockholders. As a result, in general, each
stockholder will recognize gain or loss equal to the difference,
if any, between the amount of cash received in the merger and
such stockholders adjusted tax basis in the shares
surrendered. Such gain or loss will be capital gain or loss if
the shares of common stock surrendered are held as a capital
asset in the hands of the stockholder, and will be long-term
capital gain or loss if the shares of common stock have a
holding period of more than one year at the time of the merger.
Stockholders are urged to consult their own tax advisors as
to the particular tax consequences to them of the merger.
Regulatory Approvals (page 43)
The Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976,
as amended (the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act), provides
that transactions such as the merger may not be completed until
certain information has been submitted to the Federal Trade
Commission and the Antitrust Division of the
U.S. Department of Justice and certain waiting period
requirements have been satisfied. Michaels and an entity to be
formed to invest in the Mergercos filed notification reports
with the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission
under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act on August 28, 2006 and
August 24, 2006, respectively.
Except as noted above with respect to the required filings under
the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act and the filing of a certificate of
merger in Delaware at or before the effective date of the
merger, we are unaware of any material federal, state or foreign
regulatory requirements or approvals required for the execution
of the merger agreement or completion of the merger.
Procedure for Receiving Merger Consideration
(page 47)
Within two business days after the effective time of the merger,
a paying agent will mail a letter of transmittal and
instructions to you and the other Michaels stockholders. The
letter of transmittal and instructions will tell you how to
surrender your stock certificates in exchange for the merger
consideration. You should not return your stock certificates
with the enclosed proxy card, and you should not forward your
stock certificates to the paying agent without a letter of
transmittal.
No Solicitation of Transactions (page 52)
The merger agreement restricts our ability to solicit or engage
in discussions or negotiations with a third party regarding
specified transactions involving Michaels. Notwithstanding these
restrictions, under certain limited circumstances required for
our board of directors to comply with its fiduciary duties, our
board of directors may respond to a bona fide written proposal
for an alternative acquisition or terminate the merger agreement
and enter into an agreement with respect to a superior proposal
after paying the termination fee specified in the merger
agreement.
6
Conditions to Closing (page 57)
Before we can complete the merger, a number of conditions must
be satisfied. These include:
|
|
|
|
|
the adoption of the merger agreement by our stockholders; |
|
|
|
the expiration or termination of the waiting period under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino Act; |
|
|
|
the absence of governmental judgments or orders that have the
effect of enjoining or otherwise prohibiting the consummation of
the merger; |
|
|
|
performance by each of the parties of its material obligations
under the merger agreement in all material respects; |
|
|
|
the accuracy of the representations and warranties of each of
the parties to the merger agreement, except to the extent the
failure of such representations and warranties to be true and
correct would not constitute a material adverse effect; and |
|
|
|
the delivery of closing certificates by each of the parties with
respect to the satisfaction of the conditions relating to its
representations and warranties and material obligations. |
Other than the conditions pertaining to the stockholder
approval, the absence of governmental orders and the expiration
or termination of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act waiting period,
either Michaels, on the one hand, or the Mergercos (on behalf of
themselves and the Fincos), on the other hand, may elect to
waive conditions to their respective performance and complete
the merger.
Termination of the Merger Agreement (page 58)
The merger agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the
effective time of the merger, whether before or after
stockholder approval has been obtained, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
by mutual written consent of the Mergercos and Michaels; |
|
|
|
by either the Mergercos or Michaels, if: |
|
|
|
|
|
our stockholders do not adopt the merger agreement at the
special meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof; |
|
|
|
a final, non-appealable governmental order prohibits the merger; |
|
|
|
the merger has not been consummated on or before
December 19, 2006, provided that if the closing shall not
have occurred prior to such date solely as a result of the
failure of the marketing period to have been completed prior to
such date, then such date is extended to March 31, 2007; or |
|
|
|
there is a breach by the non-terminating party of any of its
representations or warranties or failure to perform any of its
covenants or agreements in the merger agreement such that the
closing conditions would not be satisfied and which cannot be
cured prior to the termination date set forth above; |
|
|
|
|
|
by the Mergercos, if our board of directors withdraws or
adversely modifies its recommendation or approval of the merger
agreement or recommends or approves another takeover
proposal; or |
|
|
|
by Michaels, if |
|
|
|
|
|
prior to adoption of the merger agreement by our stockholders,
our board of directors determines that the failure to take such
action would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under
applicable law, but only after our board of directors has given
proper notice to the Mergercos and taken into account any
changes to the financial terms of the merger agreement proposed
by the Sponsor Entities to us in response to such notice or
otherwise; or |
|
|
|
all of the mutual conditions to closing and all of the
conditions to the Sponsor Entities obligations to close
have been satisfied (other than those conditions that by their
terms are to be satisfied at the closing) and, on or after the
last day of the marketing period, neither the Fincos nor the
surviving corporation has received the proceeds of the debt
financing. |
7
Termination Fees and Expenses (page 59)
Under certain circumstances, in connection with the termination
of the merger agreement, we will be required to pay to the
Mergercos an aggregate termination fee of $120 million.
The Sponsor Entities have agreed to pay us a termination fee of
$200 million if we terminate the merger agreement in
certain circumstances related to the failure of the Fincos to
receive the proceeds of the debt financing. If, in the event
that the Sponsor Entities become obligated to pay this
termination fee, none of the Sponsor Entities is otherwise in
breach of the merger agreement such that the conditions to our
obligation to close have been satisfied, then our termination of
the merger agreement in these circumstances and receipt of
payment of such termination fee shall be our sole and exclusive
remedy against the Sponsor Entities for any loss or damage
suffered as a result of any breach of the merger agreement by
the Sponsor Entities and the failure of the merger to be
consummated.
The parties have agreed that the aggregate liability of Michaels
and our subsidiaries, as a group, on the one hand, or the
Sponsor Entities, Bain Capital Fund IX, LLC and Blackstone
Capital Partners V L.P., as a group, on the other hand, arising
from any breach of the merger agreement (other than breaches
related to fraud) shall be capped at $600 million.
Specific Performance (page 61)
The parties to the merger agreement are entitled to an
injunction or injunctions to prevent breaches of merger
agreement and to enforce specifically the terms and provisions
of the merger agreement in any court of the State of Delaware or
any Federal court sitting in the State of Delaware.
Market Price of Our Stock (page 64)
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (the
NYSE) under the trading symbol MIK. The
closing sale price of our common stock on the NYSE on
March 17, 2006, which was the last trading day before we
announced that our board of directors was exploring strategic
alternatives, including a potential sale of Michaels, was
$33.96. The closing sale price of our common stock on the NYSE
on June 30, 2006, which was the last trading day before we
announced the merger, was $41.24. On September 5, 2006, the
last trading day before the date of this proxy statement, the
closing price of our common stock on the NYSE was $43.25.
Appraisal Rights (page 62 and Annex E)
Pursuant to section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation
Law, referred to as the DGCL, our stockholders have the right to
dissent from the merger and receive a cash payment for the
judicially determined fair value of their shares of our common
stock. The judicially determined fair value under
section 262 could be greater than, equal to or less than
the $44.00 per share that our stockholders are entitled to
receive in the merger. Stockholders that wish to exercise their
appraisal rights must not vote in favor of the adoption of the
merger agreement and must strictly comply with all of the
procedures required by the DGCL. A copy of section 262 of
the DGCL is attached to this proxy statement as Annex E.
8
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE SPECIAL MEETING AND THE
MERGER
The following questions and answers are intended to address some
commonly asked questions regarding the special meeting and the
merger. These questions and answers may not address all
questions that may be important to you as our stockholder.
Please refer to the more detailed information contained
elsewhere in this proxy statement, the annexes to this proxy
statement and the documents referred to or incorporated by
reference in this proxy statement.
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What is the proposed transaction? |
|
A: |
|
The proposed transaction is the merger of Michaels with
affiliates of Bain and Blackstone pursuant to the merger
agreement. Once the merger agreement has been adopted by the
Michaels stockholders and the other closing conditions under the
merger agreement have been satisfied or waived, the Mergercos
will merge with and into Michaels. Michaels will be the
surviving corporation in the merger and will become wholly owned
by entities sponsored by or co-investors with Bain and
Blackstone. |
|
Q: |
|
What will I receive in the merger? |
|
A: |
|
Upon completion of the merger, you will receive $44.00 in cash,
without interest and less any required withholding taxes, for
each share of our common stock that you own. For example, if you
own 100 shares of our common stock, you will receive
$4,400.00 in cash in exchange for your shares of our common
stock, less any required withholding taxes. You will not own
shares in the surviving corporation. |
|
Q: |
|
Where and when is the special meeting? |
|
A: |
|
The special meeting will take place at 8000 Bent Branch Drive,
Irving, Texas 75063, on October 5, 2006, at 9:30 a.m.,
central daylight time. |
|
Q: |
|
What vote of our stockholders is required to adopt the merger
agreement? |
|
A: |
|
For us to complete the merger, holders of a majority of the
outstanding shares of our common stock at the close of business
on the record date must vote their shares FOR
the adoption of the merger agreement. Accordingly, failure
to vote or an abstention will have the same effect as a vote
against adoption of the merger agreement. |
|
Q: |
|
How does our board of directors recommend that I vote on the
merger agreement? |
|
|
A: |
|
Our board of directors unanimously recommends that our
stockholders vote FOR the adoption of the
merger agreement. You should read The
Merger Reasons for the Merger beginning on
page 19 for a discussion of the factors that our board of
directors considered in deciding to recommend the adoption of
the merger agreement. |
|
|
Q: |
|
What do I need to do now? |
|
A: |
|
We urge you to read this proxy statement carefully, including
its annexes, and to consider how the merger affects you. If you
are a stockholder of record, then you can ensure that your
shares are voted at the special meeting by completing, signing,
dating and mailing each proxy card and returning it in the
envelope provided. If you hold your shares in street
name, you can ensure that your shares are voted at the
special meeting by instructing to your broker on how to vote, as
discussed below. |
|
Q: |
|
If my shares are held in street name by my
broker, will my broker vote my shares for me? |
|
A: |
|
Yes, but only if you provide instructions to your broker on how
to vote. You should follow the directions provided by your
broker regarding how to instruct your broker to vote your
shares. Without those instructions, your shares will not be
voted, which will have the same effect as voting against
adoption of the merger agreement. |
9
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Can I change my vote? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. You can change your vote at any time before your proxy is
voted at the special meeting. If you are a registered
stockholder, you may revoke your proxy by notifying
Computershare Investor Services, L.L.C., 3020 Legacy Drive,
Suite 100-307, Plano, Texas 75023 in writing or by
submitting by mail a new proxy dated after the date of the proxy
being revoked. In addition, your proxy may be revoked by
attending the special meeting and voting in person (you must
vote in person, as simply attending the special meeting will not
cause your proxy to be revoked). |
|
|
|
Please note that if you hold your shares in street
name and you have instructed your broker to vote your
shares, the above-described options for changing your vote do
not apply, and instead you must follow the directions received
from your broker to change your vote. |
|
|
Q: |
|
How do I vote my Michaels Stores, Inc. 401(k) Plan shares? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
If you participate in the Michaels Stores, Inc. Common Stock
Fund under the Michaels Stores, Inc. Employees 401(k) Plan,
which we refer to as the 401(k) Plan, you may give voting
instructions to State Street Bank and Trust Company, as trustee
of the 401(k) Plan, by completing and returning the 401(k) Plan
instruction card accompanying this proxy statement. Your
instructions will tell the trustee how to vote the number of
shares of our common stock representing your proportionate
interest in the Michaels Stores, Inc. Common Stock Fund which
you are entitled to vote under the 401(k) Plan and any such
instruction will be kept confidential. The trustee will vote
your shares in accordance with your duly executed 401(k) Plan
instruction card received by October 2, 2006. If you do not
give the trustee of the 401(k) Plan voting instructions, the
401(k) Plan trustee will vote your shares of common stock in the
same proportion as the shares for which the 401(k) Plan trustee
receives voting instructions from other 401(k) Plan
participants, unless doing so would not be consistent with
certain federal employee benefit laws. |
|
|
|
|
|
You may also revoke previously given voting instructions by
October 2, 2006, by filing with the trustee of the 401(k)
Plan either a written notice of revocation or a properly
completed and signed 401(k) Plan instruction card bearing a
later date. Your voting instructions will be kept confidential
by the trustee. |
|
|
Q: |
|
What does it mean if I get more than one proxy card or vote
instruction card? |
|
A: |
|
If your shares are registered differently or are in more than
one account, you will receive more than one proxy card or, if
you hold your shares in street name, more than one
vote instruction card. Please complete and return all of the
proxy cards or vote instruction cards you receive to ensure that
all of your shares are voted. |
|
Q: |
|
Should I send in my stock certificates now? |
|
A: |
|
No. Shortly after the merger is completed, you will receive
a letter of transmittal with instructions informing you how to
send in your stock certificates to the paying agent in order to
receive the merger consideration. You should use the letter of
transmittal to exchange stock certificates for the merger
consideration to which you are entitled as a result of the
merger. DO NOT SEND ANY STOCK CERTIFICATES WITH YOUR PROXY. |
|
Q: |
|
What happens if I sell my shares before the special
meeting? |
|
A: |
|
The record date of the special meeting is earlier than the
special meeting and the date that the merger is expected to be
completed. If you transfer your shares of our common stock after
the record date but before the special meeting, you will retain
your right to vote at the special meeting, but will have
transferred the right to receive $44.00 per share in cash
to be received by our stockholders in the merger. In order to
receive the $44.00 per share, you must hold your shares
through completion of the merger. |
10
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Am I entitled to exercise appraisal rights instead of
receiving the merger consideration for my shares? |
|
|
A: |
|
Yes. As a holder of our common stock, you are entitled to
appraisal rights under Delaware law in connection with the
merger if you meet certain conditions, which conditions are
described in this proxy statement under the caption
Appraisal Rights beginning on page 62. |
|
|
Q: |
|
Who can help answer my other questions? |
|
A: |
|
If you have more questions about the merger, please contact our
Investor Relations Department at (972) 409-1300. If you
need assistance in submitting your proxy or voting your shares
or need additional copies of this proxy statement or the
enclosed proxy card, you should contact our proxy solicitation
agent, Morrow & Co., Inc., at (631) 918-4031. If
your broker holds your shares, you should call your broker for
additional information. |
11
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This proxy statement, and the documents to which we refer you in
this proxy statement, contain forward-looking statements about
our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions.
Forward-looking statements include information concerning
possible or assumed future results of operations of our company,
the expected completion and timing of the merger and other
information relating to the merger. Generally these
forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of
forward-looking terminology such as anticipate,
believe, estimate, expect,
may, should, plan,
intend, project and similar expressions.
For each of these statements, we claim the protection of the
safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You should
read statements that contain these words carefully. They discuss
our future expectations or state other forward-looking
information, and may involve known and unknown risks over which
we have no control. Those risks include, without limitation:
|
|
|
|
|
the satisfaction of the conditions to consummation of the
merger, including the adoption of the merger agreement by our
stockholders; |
|
|
|
the occurrence of any event, change or other circumstance that
could give rise to the termination of the merger agreement,
including a termination under circumstances that could require
us to pay a $120.0 million termination fee to the Mergercos; |
|
|
|
the amount of the costs, fees, expenses and charges related to
the merger; |
|
|
|
the effect of the announcement of the merger on our business
relationships, operating results and business generally,
including our ability to retain key employees; |
|
|
|
the risk that the merger may not be completed in a timely manner
or at all, which may adversely affect our business and the price
of our common stock; |
|
|
|
the potential adverse effect on our business, properties and
operations because of certain covenants we agreed to in the
merger agreement; |
|
|
|
|
the risk that we may be subject to litigation, including the
litigation described under The Merger
Litigation Concerning the Merger beginning on
page 43, in connection with the merger; |
|
|
|
|
risks related to diverting managements attention from our
ongoing business operations; and |
|
|
|
|
other risks detailed in our filings with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the SEC), including
Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for our
fiscal year ended January 28, 2006. See Where You
Can Find More Information on page 68. |
|
We believe that the assumptions on which our forward-looking
statements are based are reasonable. However, we cannot assure
you that the actual results or developments we anticipate will
be realized or, if realized, that they will have the expected
effects on our business or operations. All subsequent written
and oral forward-looking statements concerning the merger or
other matters addressed in this proxy statement and attributable
to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified
in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or
referred to in this section. Forward-looking statements speak
only as of the date of this proxy statement or the date of any
document incorporated by reference in this document. Except as
required by applicable law or regulation, we do not undertake to
release the results of any revisions of these forward-looking
statements to reflect future events or circumstances.
12
THE PARTIES TO THE MERGER AGREEMENT
Michaels Stores, Inc.
Michaels is the largest arts and crafts specialty retailer in
the United States. As of August 23, 2006, we operate 907
Michaels retail stores in 48 states and Canada, and we also
operate 165 Aaron Brothers stores in 11 states, offering
framing supplies and services and a wide selection of art
supplies. Recollections, our scrapbooking/paper crafting retail
concept, operates 11 stores located in Arizona, Maryland, Texas,
and Virginia as of August 23, 2006. In addition, we own and
operate four Star Decorators Wholesale stores located in
Arizona, California, Georgia, and Texas as of August 23,
2006, offering merchandise primarily to interior
decorators/designers, wedding/event planners, florists, hotels,
restaurants and commercial display companies.
Michaels is incorporated in the state of Delaware with its
principal executive offices at 8000 Bent Branch Drive, Irving,
Texas 75063, and its telephone number is (972) 409-1300.
Bain Paste Mergerco, Inc.
Bain Paste Finco, LLC
Bain Paste Mergerco, Inc. is a Delaware corporation formed by a
private equity fund sponsored by Bain in anticipation of the
merger. Subject to the terms and conditions of the merger
agreement and in accordance with Delaware law, at the effective
time of the merger Bain Paste Mergerco, Inc. will merge with and
into Michaels Stores, Inc. Bain Paste Mergerco, Inc. has de
minimis assets and no operations. Bain Paste Finco, LLC is a
Delaware limited liability company formed by a private equity
fund sponsored by Bain in anticipation of the merger. Bain Paste
Mergerco, Inc. and Bain Paste Finco, LLC each have their
principal executive offices at c/o Bain Capital Partners,
LLC, 111 Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02199, and its
telephone number is (617) 516-2000. Bain is part of Bain
Capital, LLC, a global private investment firm that manages
several pools of capital, including private equity, venture
capital, public equity, and leveraged debt assets, with more
than $38 billion in assets under management. Since its
inception in 1984, Bain has made private equity investments and
add-on acquisitions in over 230 companies around the world,
including such leading retailers and consumer companies as Toys
R Us, Burger King, Staples, Burlington Coat Factory,
Shoppers Drug Mart, Brookstone, Dominos Pizza,
Dollarama, Sealy Corp., Sports Authority and Duane Reade.
Headquartered in Boston, Bain has offices in New York, London,
Munich, Hong Kong, Shanghai and Tokyo.
Blackstone Paste Mergerco, Inc.
Blackstone Paste Finco, LLC
Blackstone Paste Mergerco, Inc. is a Delaware corporation formed
by a private equity fund sponsored by Blackstone in anticipation
of the merger. Subject to the terms and conditions of the merger
agreement and in accordance with Delaware law, at the effective
time of the merger Blackstone Paste Mergerco, Inc. will merge
with and into Michaels Stores, Inc. Blackstone Paste Mergerco,
Inc. has de minimis assets and no operations. Blackstone Paste
Finco, LLC is a Delaware limited liability company formed by a
private equity fund sponsored by Blackstone in anticipation of
the merger. Blackstone Paste Mergerco, Inc. and Blackstone Paste
Finco, LLC each have their principal executive offices at
c/o The Blackstone Group, 345 Park Avenue, 31st Floor,
New York, New York 10154, and its telephone number is
(212) 583-5000. Blackstone, a global private investment and
advisory firm, was founded in 1985. The firm has raised a total
of more than $63 billion for alternative asset investing
since its formation, of which approximately $30 billion has
been for private equity investing. Blackstones private
equity group is currently investing its fifth general private
equity fund with commitments of $15.6 billion, and has over
60 experienced professionals with broad sector expertise.
Blackstones other core businesses include private real
estate investing, corporate debt investing, hedge funds, mutual
fund management, private placement, marketable alternative asset
management and investment banking advisory services.
13
THE SPECIAL MEETING
Time, Place and Purpose of the Special Meeting
This proxy statement is being furnished to our stockholders as
part of the solicitation of proxies by our board of directors
for use at the special meeting to be held on October 5,
2006, beginning at 9:30 a.m., central daylight time, at
8000 Bent Branch Drive, Irving, Texas 75063, or at any
postponement or adjournment thereof. The purpose of the special
meeting is for our stockholders to consider and vote upon the
adoption of the merger agreement. Our stockholders must adopt
the merger agreement for the merger to occur. If the
stockholders fail to adopt the merger agreement, the merger will
not occur. A copy of the merger agreement is attached to this
proxy statement as Annex A. A copy of the first amendment
to the merger agreement is attached as Annex B to this
proxy statement. This proxy statement and the enclosed form of
proxy are first being mailed to our stockholders on or about
September 7, 2006.
Record Date and Quorum
The holders of record of our common stock as of the close of
business on September 1, 2006, the record date for the
special meeting, are entitled to receive notice of, and to vote
at, the special meeting. On the record date, there were
133,326,962 shares of our common stock outstanding.
The holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our
common stock at the close of business on the record date
represented in person or by proxy will constitute a quorum for
purposes of the special meeting. A quorum is necessary to hold
the special meeting. Once a share is represented at the special
meeting, it will be counted for the purpose of determining a
quorum at the special meeting and any postponement or
adjournment of the special meeting. However, if a new record
date is set for the adjourned special meeting, then a new quorum
will have to be established.
Required Vote
Completion of the merger requires the adoption of the merger
agreement by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority
of the outstanding shares of our common stock at the close of
business on the record date for the special meeting. Each
outstanding share of our common stock is entitled to one vote.
As of September 1, 2006, the record date for the special
meeting, the directors and executive officers of Michaels
beneficially owned, in the aggregate, 11,521,755 shares of
Michaels common stock, or approximately 8.5% of the outstanding
shares of Michaels common stock. The directors and executive
officers have informed us that they intend to vote all of their
shares of our common stock FOR the adoption
of the merger agreement and FOR any
adjournment or postponement of the special meeting, if necessary
or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies.
Proxies; Revocation
If you are a stockholder of record and submit a proxy by
returning a signed proxy card by mail, your shares will be voted
at the special meeting as you indicate on your proxy card. If no
instructions are indicated on your proxy card, your shares of
Michaels common stock will be voted FOR the
adoption of the merger agreement and FOR any
adjournment or postponement of the special meeting, if necessary
or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies.
If your shares are held in street name by your
broker, you should instruct your broker how to vote your shares
using the instructions provided by your broker. If you have not
received such voting instructions or require further information
regarding such voting instructions, contact your broker and they
can give you directions on how to vote your shares. Under the
rules of the NYSE, brokers who hold shares in street
name for customers may not exercise their voting
discretion with respect to the approval of non-routine matters
such as the merger proposal and thus, absent specific
instructions from the beneficial owner of such shares, brokers
are not empowered to vote such shares with respect to the
adoption of the merger agreement (i.e., broker
non-votes). Shares of our common stock held by persons
attending the special meeting but not voting, or
14
shares for which we have received proxies with respect to which
holders have abstained from voting, will be considered
abstentions. Abstentions and properly executed broker non-votes,
if any, will be treated as shares that are present and entitled
to vote at the special meeting for purposes of determining
whether a quorum exists but will have the same effect as a vote
AGAINST adoption of the merger agreement and
any adjournment or postponement of the special meeting.
You may revoke your proxy at any time before the vote is taken
at the special meeting. To revoke your proxy, you must either
advise Computershare Investor Services, L.L.C., 3020 Legacy
Drive, Suite 100-307, Plano, Texas 75023 in writing, submit
by mail a new proxy card dated after the date of the proxy you
wish to revoke or attend the special meeting and vote your
shares in person. Attendance at the special meeting will not by
itself constitute revocation of a proxy.
Please note that if you hold your shares in street
name and you have instructed your broker to vote your
shares, the options for revoking your proxy described in the
paragraph above do not apply and instead you must follow the
directions provided by your broker to change your vote.
If you participate in the Michaels Stores, Inc. Common Stock
Fund under the 401(k) Plan, you will receive a voting
instruction card which will provide State Street Bank and Trust
Company, as trustee of the 401(k) Plan, with instructions on how
to vote the number of shares representing your proportionate
interest in the Michaels Stores, Inc. Common Stock Fund which
you are entitled to vote under the 401(k) Plan. You must submit
your voting instructions to State Street by the close of
business on October 2, 2006, to allow State Street time to
receive your voting instructions and vote on behalf of the
401(k) Plan. You may revoke previously given voting instructions
by October 2, 2006, by filing with State Street either a
written notice of revocation or a properly completed and signed
401(k) Plan instruction card bearing a later date.
Michaels does not expect that any matter other than the adoption
of the merger agreement (and the approval of the adjournment or
postponement of the special meeting, if necessary or
appropriate, to solicit additional proxies) will be brought
before the special meeting. If, however, any such other matter
is properly presented at the special meeting or any adjournment
or postponement of the special meeting, the persons appointed as
proxies will have discretionary authority to vote the shares
represented by duly executed proxies in accordance with their
discretion and judgment.
Adjournments and Postponements
Although it is not currently expected, the special meeting may
be adjourned or postponed for the purpose of soliciting
additional proxies. Any adjournment may be made without notice
(if the adjournment is not for more than thirty days), other
than by an announcement made at the special meeting of the time,
date and place of the adjourned meeting. Whether or not a quorum
exists, holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock
present in person or represented by proxy at the special meeting
and entitled to vote thereat may adjourn the special meeting. If
no instructions are indicated on your proxy card, your shares of
our common stock will be voted FOR any adjournment
or postponement of the special meeting, if necessary or
appropriate, to solicit additional proxies. Any adjournment or
postponement of the special meeting for the purpose of
soliciting additional proxies will allow our stockholders who
have already sent in their proxies to revoke them at any time
prior to their use at the special meeting as adjourned or
postponed.
Solicitation of Proxies
Michaels will pay the cost of this proxy solicitation. In
addition to soliciting proxies by mail, directors, officers and
employees of Michaels may solicit proxies personally and by
telephone, facsimile or other electronic means of communication.
These persons will not receive additional or special
compensation for such solicitation services. Michaels will, upon
request, reimburse brokers, banks and other nominees for their
expenses in sending proxy materials to their customers who are
beneficial owners and obtaining their voting instructions.
Michaels has retained Morrow & Co., Inc. to assist it
in the solicitation of proxies for the special meeting and will
pay Morrow & Co. a fee of approximately $12,500, plus
reimbursement of
out-of-pocket expenses.
15
THE MERGER
Background of the Merger
Our board of directors periodically reviews and assesses
strategic alternatives available to us. In early 2006, following
a period of consistent growth for Michaels, our board of
directors considered a review of our strategic plan and
potential alternatives to maximize shareholder value. The board
consulted with several investment banks regarding their analysis
of our strategic alternatives, and, after further discussions
between members of the board and our management, determined, at
a meeting of the board held on March 15, 2006, that it was
advisable and in the best interests of Michaels and our
stockholders to explore strategic alternatives to enhance
shareholder value, including through a potential sale of
Michaels.
We announced the boards determination to explore strategic
alternatives to enhance shareholder value, as well as the
retirement of R. Michael Rouleau as President and Chief
Executive Officer and the appointment of Jeffrey N. Boyer as
President and Chief Financial Officer and Gregory A. Sandfort as
President and Chief Operating Officer, in a March 20, 2006,
press release. We retained JPMorgan as financial advisor, and
Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP (Cravath) as
legal counsel, to Michaels and the board.
Thereafter, and continuing into June 2006, JPMorgan refined and
updated its analysis of our strategic alternatives. JPMorgan
also began to contact potential strategic and financial
acquirors of Michaels. Over the course of the following weeks,
JPMorgan contacted over 37 potential acquirors, including nine
potential strategic acquirors, to assess their interest in
acquiring Michaels.
At the meeting of our board of directors on April 7, 2006,
in order to prepare for any potential conflict of interest that
might arise in connection with the boards review of our
strategic alternatives in light of the significant ownership
interest in Michaels of Messrs. Charles J. Wyly, Jr.
and Sam Wyly, our board of directors established a special
advisory committee of the board, composed of Richard E. Hanlon,
Richard C. Marcus, Liz Minyard and Cece Smith (who was
designated as chair of the committee). From time to time over
the course of April, May and June 2006, the special advisory
committee met to consider our strategic alternatives. The
special advisory committee retained Wachtell, Lipton,
Rosen & Katz (Wachtell Lipton) as its legal
counsel.
On April 12, 2006, the board of directors met to discuss
the exploration of our strategic alternatives. Representatives
of JPMorgan reviewed for the board the work that management and
its advisors undertook in connection with the exploration of our
strategic alternatives. With respect to the sale of the company
alternative, representatives of JPMorgan updated the board on
the contacts made by JPMorgan to potential financial and
strategic acquirors, noting that several of the potential
strategic acquirors stated that they were not interested in
exploring further an acquisition of Michaels and that only one
potential strategic acquiror expressed any meaningful degree of
interest in an acquisition of Michaels. Following a discussion
between the board and its advisors regarding next steps, the
board directed our management and advisors to continue to
explore strategic alternatives.
Over the course of April 2006, JPMorgan continued to make
contacts with potential acquirors and assisted potential
financial acquirors in forming three groups of co-investors for
an acquisition of Michaels. During the week of April 18,
2006, JPMorgan distributed introductory information materials
and a form confidentiality agreement to prospective acquirors
who had expressed interest in Michaels. We subsequently executed
confidentiality agreements with 13 potential financial
acquirors, including each member of the financial acquiror
groups, and one potential strategic acquiror.
On April 26, 2006, our board of directors met to receive an
update regarding the on-going exploration of our strategic
alternatives. Representatives of Cravath reviewed with the board
the fiduciary duties of directors in the context of considering
our strategic alternatives. Representatives of JPMorgan reviewed
and discussed with the board their current analysis of the value
that each strategic alternative could yield to our stockholders.
Representatives of JPMorgan also updated the board on the
progress of the potential sale of the company process, including
on the status of confidentiality agreement negotiations with
potential acquirors, formation of three financial acquiror
groups and remaining interest by potential strategic acquirors.
16
At the April 26, 2006, meeting of the board, JPMorgan
confirmed that, to facilitate the sale process, it would be
willing to offer debt financing to all potential acquirors of
Michaels, noting that no financial acquiror would be obligated
to use JPMorgan as its debt financing source. Representatives of
Cravath discussed with the board the nature of the potential
conflict of interest that might arise from JPMorgan acting both
as the financial advisor to Michaels and a possible financing
source in connection with the sale of Michaels and described to
the board certain procedures that JPMorgan undertook to
institute to ensure the separation between the financing teams
and the team advising Michaels and the safeguards that Michaels
may undertake with regard to such conflict, including obtaining
a fairness opinion from another investment bank.
Representatives of JPMorgan were then excused from the board
meeting, and the board engaged in a discussion of the risks and
benefits relating to JPMorgans offer, including the
potential conflict of interest and the related safeguards, with
management and representatives of Cravath and Wachtell Lipton.
After this discussion, our board of directors determined that,
in the interest of facilitating the sale process, JPMorgan
should make a debt financing package available to all potential
acquirors, subject to the implementation of the appropriate
procedural safeguards. The board of directors also determined
that, should we enter into a transaction involving a change of
control of Michaels, the board would request that JPMorgan be
willing to opine on the fairness of the financial consideration
to be received by our stockholders and the board would also seek
to secure the opinion of another investment bank not providing
financing to the acquiror as to the fairness of the financial
consideration to be received by our stockholders, which
investment bank could also be the financial advisor to the
special advisory committee.
At its April 26, 2006, meeting, our board also reviewed and
approved the retention and change in control programs for our
employees, which programs were previously approved by the
compensation committee of the board at the compensation
committees meetings on April 21, 2006, and
April 26, 2006. The Hay Group, the compensation
committees outside compensation consultants, presented to
the compensation committee its recommendations with respect to
various retention and change of control arrangements, and
Cravath reviewed with the compensation committee and the board a
summary of the proposed retention and change in control
arrangements. In discussing these arrangements, the board noted
the increased threat posed by competitors offering to hire our
employees following our announcement of the review of strategic
alternatives. At the same meeting, the board also approved an
amendment to Michaels nonqualified deferred compensation
plan to provide for the distribution of all account balances
upon a change in control. For a discussion of the treatment of
Michaels nonqualified deferred compensation plan in
connection with the merger and the impact of the merger on
Michaels other compensation arrangements, see The
Merger Interests of Our Directors and Executive
Officers in the Merger beginning on page 36.
On May 8, 2006, the special advisory committee retained
Goldman Sachs as its financial advisor. Such retention
contemplated that at our request Goldman Sachs would undertake a
study to enable it to render an opinion as to the fairness from
a financial point of view of the financial consideration to be
received by our stockholders in connection with a transaction
involving a change of control of Michaels.
On May 18, 2006, our board of directors met to receive an
update regarding the ongoing exploration of our strategic
alternatives. Representatives of JPMorgan reviewed and discussed
with the board their refined analysis of our strategic
alternatives and updated the board with respect to a potential
sale of the company process, noting that while the financial
acquirors continued to be highly interested in an acquisition of
Michaels, no potential strategic acquiror was actively engaged
in the process.
Over the course of May and June 2006, the continuing potential
acquirors conducted their due diligence of Michaels with
management, Mr. Rouleau and our advisors. In mid-May 2006,
we held in-depth management presentations with each of the
continuing potential acquirors.
On June 5, 2006, JPMorgan distributed a bid procedures
letter and a draft merger agreement, both of which were
previously reviewed by members of the board, to the potential
financial acquirors that were still actively engaged in the
process, who then represented two separate acquiror groups. The
bid procedures letter requested that proposals for an
acquisition of Michaels, accompanied by equity and debt
financing commitments, sponsor guarantees and comments on the
draft merger agreement, be submitted by June 21, 2006.
17
Our board of directors met on June 12, 2006, to receive an
update regarding the ongoing exploration of our strategic
alternatives. Representatives of JPMorgan reviewed and discussed
with the board their further refined analysis of each of our
strategic alternatives. Representatives of JPMorgan also
reported to the board on the progress of the potential sale of
the company process, including the identity of the continuing
potential acquirors and their due diligence efforts.
On June 21, 2006, Bain, Blackstone and a co-investor and
another continuing potential financial acquiror group, submitted
their respective proposals for the acquisition of Michaels,
together with debt and equity financing commitments, sponsor
guarantees and comments on the draft merger agreement.
Our board of directors met on June 23, 2006, to further
analyze our strategic alternatives and to consider the proposals
submitted by the two financial acquiror groups. Representatives
of JPMorgan reviewed and discussed with the board their further
refined analysis of our strategic alternatives. Representatives
of JPMorgan also reviewed with the board the financial terms of
each of the acquisition proposals, including the amount of the
proposed equity and debt financing and the resulting transaction
leverage. Bain, Blackstone and their co-investor offered merger
consideration of $42.00 per share, while the other group
offered merger consideration of $42.50 per share.
Representatives of Cravath reviewed with the board the legal
terms of each acquiror groups proposal, including terms
relating to the conditionality of the acquiror groups
obligation to consummate the merger. Representatives of Goldman
Sachs and Wachtell Lipton were also present at the meeting.
Following discussion, the board directed that our management and
the financial advisors continue to conduct their analysis with
respect to the other strategic alternatives and that our
advisors seek improved terms from each of the potential acquiror
groups.
After the June 23, 2006, board meeting, JPMorgan
communicated to each of the acquiror groups that our board of
directors was seeking improved terms. Prior to the June 26,
2006, meeting of the board described below, Bain and Blackstone
orally informed JPMorgan that they were willing to increase
their proposal to $43.25 per share and the other potential
acquiror group orally informed JPMorgan that it was willing to
increase its proposal to $42.75 per share.
On June 26, 2006, our board of directors held a meeting
with our management and representatives of JPMorgan and Goldman
Sachs to discuss further strategic alternatives available to us.
At this meeting, management discussed with the board its views
of the risks associated with each strategic alternative. In
addition, each of JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs presented to the
board its updated preliminary financial analysis with respect to
Michaels, including a review of our strategic alternatives. With
respect to the potential sale of the company process,
representatives of JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, Cravath and Wachtell
Lipton discussed with the board, in light of the improved
financial proposals made by each of the acquiror groups, the
process to solicit best and final terms from the acquiror groups.
Following the boards meeting on June 26, 2006,
representatives of JPMorgan contacted the two acquiror groups
with a request to submit their best and final proposal on
June 29, 2006. From June 27, 2006, to June 29,
2006, Cravath held discussions and negotiated the terms of the
acquisition documents with counsel for each of the acquiror
groups.
On June 28, 2006, each of the acquiror groups presented to
Messrs. Charles J. Wyly, Jr. and Sam Wyly and
representatives of JPMorgan their plans for Michaels and
described the general structure of co-investment opportunities
they had offered in past acquisitions. No terms for
participation were offered, and no understandings or agreements
were reached, with respect to any co-investment by
Messrs. Wyly.
On the evening of June 29, 2006, each of the acquiror
groups submitted its best and final proposal, including the
proposed merger agreement and the related acquisition documents.
Bain and Blackstone increased their merger consideration offer
to $44.00 per share, while the other potential acquiror
group increased its merger consideration offer to
$43.50 per share.
On the morning of June 30, 2006, our board of directors met
to review our strategic alternatives and to discuss the best and
final proposals submitted by the potential acquiror groups.
Representatives of JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs discussed their
respective financial analyses with respect to Michaels,
including a review of our strategic alternatives.
Representatives of JPMorgan reported to the board regarding the
potential sale of
18
the company process, including with respect to the negotiations
that took place with the potential acquiror groups since the
boards meeting on June 26, 2006. Each of JPMorgan and
Goldman Sachs reviewed the terms of each of the two proposals.
Representatives of Cravath then reviewed with the board the
legal terms of the two proposals, noting that both groups had
improved their proposed merger agreement terms with respect to
deal certainty, but that overall Bain and Blackstone had offered
slightly superior terms. Representatives of Cravath responded to
questions from the board regarding the legal terms of the offers
and again discussed with the board the fiduciary duties of
directors in connection with evaluating strategic alternatives.
Following this discussion, the meeting of the board of directors
was recessed, and notwithstanding that Messrs. Charles J.
Wyly, Jr. and Sam Wyly confirmed that they had no agreement
or understanding with either potential acquiror group so that no
potential conflict of interest existed, the special advisory
committee convened separately with Wachtell Lipton and Goldman
Sachs to discuss the potential sale of Michaels. Following the
meeting of the special advisory committee, the full board of
directors reconvened, and the chair of the special advisory
committee reported to the board that each member of the special
advisory committee supported submitting the proposed sale of
Michaels to Bain and Blackstone to the full board of directors.
After further discussions between the board and representatives
of JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, Cravath and Wachtell Lipton, the
board requested that each of JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs render
an opinion as to whether the financial consideration to be
received by our stockholders in the proposed merger with
entities sponsored by Bain and Blackstone was fair from a
financial point of view to our stockholders. JPMorgan and
Goldman Sachs each delivered to the board an oral opinion, which
was subsequently confirmed by delivery of a written opinion each
dated June 30, 2006, that, as of such date and based upon
and subject to the factors and assumptions set forth in its
respective written opinion, the consideration to be received by
the holders of our common stock in the proposed merger was fair,
from a financial point of view, to such holders. The full text
of the written opinions of JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs, which set
forth the assumptions made, procedures followed, matters
considered and limitations on the review undertaken with such
opinions, are attached as Annex C and Annex D to this
proxy statement, respectively.
Following additional discussion and deliberation, our board of
directors unanimously approved the merger agreement with
entities sponsored by Bain and Blackstone, the merger and the
other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement,
authorized Michaels to enter into the merger agreement and
resolved to recommend that our stockholders vote to adopt the
merger agreement.
The merger agreement was executed by Michaels, Bain Paste
Mergerco, Inc., Blackstone Paste Mergerco, Inc., Bain Paste
Finco, LLC and Blackstone Paste Finco, LLC as of June 30,
2006. On June 30, 2006, after the close of trading on the
NYSE, Michaels, Bain and Blackstone issued a joint press release
announcing the merger.
At its September 1, 2006, meeting, our board of directors
approved an amendment to the merger agreement to permit certain
of our stockholders and members of our management to retain
certain of their shares of our common stock as shares of common
stock of the surviving corporation and, in the case of our
management, to retain their options as an equity investment in
the surviving corporation. This first amendment to the merger
agreement was executed by Michaels, Bain Paste Mergerco, Inc.,
Blackstone Paste Mergerco, Inc., Bain Paste Finco, LLC and
Blackstone Paste Finco, LLC as of September 1, 2006. At the
September 1, 2006, meeting, our board also approved a
rollover agreement among us and Highfields Capital I LP,
Highfields Capital II LP and Highfields Capital III LP
(collectively, the Highfields Funds), which was
executed by the parties thereto as of September 1, 2006.
Reasons for the Merger
In reaching its decision to approve the merger agreement with
entities sponsored by Bain and Blackstone, the merger and the
other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement,
authorize Michaels to enter into the merger agreement and
recommend that our stockholders vote to adopt the merger
agreement, our
19
board of directors consulted with its financial and legal
advisors and our management. The board of directors considered a
number of potentially positive factors, including the following
material factors:
|
|
|
|
|
the current and historical market prices of our common stock,
and the fact that the $44.00 per share to be paid for each
share of our common stock in the merger represents a premium of
29.6% to the closing price of our common stock on March 17,
2006, the last trading day before we announced exploration of
our strategic alternatives, and a premium of 31.6% to the
average closing price for the three months ended March 17,
2006; |
|
|
|
the possible alternatives to the sale of Michaels, including
continuing to operate Michaels on a stand-alone basis, and the
risks and uncertainties associated with such alternatives,
including the risks associated with our ability to meet our
projections for future results of operations, compared to the
certainty of realizing in cash a fair value for their investment
provided to our stockholders by the merger; |
|
|
|
the extensive sale process conducted by us, with the assistance
of our financial and legal advisors, which involved engaging in
discussions with approximately 37 parties to determine their
interest in acquiring Michaels, entering into confidentiality
agreements with 14 parties and the receipt of two definitive
proposals to acquire Michaels; |
|
|
|
the price proposed by Bain and Blackstone reflected extensive
negotiations between the parties and represented the highest
price that we had received for the acquisition of Michaels; |
|
|
|
|
the presentation of JPMorgan and its opinion that, as of the
date of its opinion and based upon and subject to the factors
and assumptions set forth in such opinion, the consideration to
be received by the holders of our common stock in the proposed
merger is fair, from a financial point of view, to such holders
(see The Merger Opinion of
JPMorgan beginning on page 21 and Annex C to
this proxy statement); |
|
|
|
|
|
the presentation of Goldman Sachs and its opinion that, as of
the date of its opinion and based upon and subject to the
factors and assumptions set forth in such opinion, the
consideration to be received by the holders of our common stock
in the proposed merger is fair, from a financial point of view,
to such holders (see The Merger Opinion of
Goldman Sachs beginning on page 27 and
Annex D to this proxy statement); |
|
|
|
|
the terms of the merger agreement and the related agreements,
including: |
|
|
|
|
|
the limited number and nature of the conditions to the Sponsor
Entities obligation to consummate the merger; |
|
|
|
our ability, under certain limited circumstances, to furnish
information to and conduct negotiations with third parties
regarding other proposals; |
|
|
|
our ability to terminate the merger agreement in order to accept
a financially superior proposal, subject to paying the Sponsor
Entities a $120 million termination fee; |
|
|
|
the limited number and nature of the conditions to funding set
forth in the debt financing commitment letters and the
obligation of the Sponsor Entities to use their reasonable best
efforts (1) to obtain the debt financing and (2) if
the Sponsor Entities fail to effect the closing because of a
failure to obtain the debt financing, to pay us a
$200 million termination fee; and |
|
|
|
our ability to enforce specifically the terms and provisions of
the merger agreement to prevent breaches of the merger agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that the non-financial terms of the proposal received
from Bain and Blackstone was, in the aggregate, more favorable
to us than the proposal from the other potential acquiror group;
and |
|
|
|
|
the availability of appraisal rights to our stockholders who
properly exercise their statutory rights (see Appraisal
Rights beginning on page 62 and Annex E to
this proxy statement). |
|
20
Our board of directors also considered and balanced against the
potentially positive factors a number of potentially negative
factors concerning the merger, including the following material
factors:
|
|
|
|
|
the risk that the merger might not be completed, including as a
result of a failure by the Sponsor Entities to obtain the debt
financing; |
|
|
|
the fact that our stockholders will not participate in any
future earnings or growth of Michaels; |
|
|
|
the fact that the merger consideration consists of cash and will
therefore be taxable to our stockholders for U.S. federal
income tax purposes; |
|
|
|
the restrictions on our ability to solicit or engage in
discussions or negotiations with a third party regarding other
proposals and the requirement that we pay the Sponsor Entities a
$120 million termination fee if our board of directors
accepts a superior proposal; and |
|
|
|
the possibility of disruption to our operations associated with
the merger, and the resulting effect thereof on us if the merger
does not close. |
During its consideration of the transaction with the Sponsor
Entities, our board of directors was also aware that all of our
directors and executive officers have interests in the merger
that are, or may be, different from, or in addition to, those of
our stockholders generally, as described under The
Merger Interests of Our Directors and Executive
Officers in the Merger beginning on page 36.
After taking into account all of the factors set forth above, as
well as others, our board of directors determined that the
potentially positive factors outweighed the potentially negative
factors. Furthermore, our board of directors determined it to be
advisable and in the best interests of our stockholders that we
enter into the merger agreement, and that the merger agreement,
the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement are advisable and in the best interests of our
stockholders. The board of directors has unanimously approved
the merger agreement, the merger and the other transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement and recommends that our
stockholders vote to adopt the merger agreement at the special
meeting.
The board of directors did not assign relative weights to the
above factors or the other factors considered by it. In
addition, the board of directors did not reach any specific
conclusion on each factor considered, but conducted an overall
analysis of these factors. Individual members of the board of
directors may have given different weights to different factors.
Recommendation of Our Board of Directors
On June 30, 2006, after evaluating a variety of business,
financial and market factors and consulting with our legal and
financial advisors, and after due discussion and due
consideration, our board of directors unanimously approved the
merger agreement, the merger and the other transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement and unanimously declared
that the merger agreement, the merger and the other transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement are advisable and in the
best interests of our stockholders. In addition, on
September 1, 2006, our board of directors unanimously
approved the first amendment to the merger agreement and
unanimously declared it advisable and in the best interests of
our stockholders that we enter into the first amendment.
ACCORDINGLY, OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE
FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT.
Opinion of JPMorgan
Pursuant to an engagement letter dated March 15, 2006, we
retained JPMorgan as our financial advisor in connection with
our analysis and consideration of various strategic alternatives
available to us, including the merger, and to render an opinion
to our board of directors as to the fairness, from a financial
point of view, of the consideration to be received by us or our
stockholders in connection therewith. At the meeting of our
board of directors on June 30, 2006, JPMorgan rendered its
oral opinion to our board of directors that, as of such date and
based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions set forth
in its opinion, the consideration to be received by our
stockholders in the merger was fair, from a financial point of
view, to such stockholders.
21
JPMorgan has confirmed its June 30, 2006 oral opinion by
delivering its written opinion to our board of directors, dated
as of June 30, 2006, that, as of such date, the
consideration to be received by our stockholders in the merger
was fair, from a financial point of view, to such stockholders.
No limitations were imposed by our board of directors upon
JPMorgan with respect to the investigations made or procedures
followed by it in rendering its opinions.
The full text of the written opinion of JPMorgan, dated
June 30, 2006, which sets forth the assumptions made,
matters considered and limits on the review undertaken, is
attached as Annex C to this proxy statement and is
incorporated herein by reference. Our stockholders are urged to
read the opinion in its entirety. JPMorgans written
opinion is addressed to our board of directors, and is directed
only to the consideration to be received in the merger and does
not constitute a recommendation to any of our stockholders as to
how such stockholder should vote at the special meeting. The
summary of the opinion of JPMorgan set forth in this proxy
statement is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full
text of such opinion.
In arriving at its opinion, JPMorgan, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed the merger agreement; |
|
|
|
reviewed certain publicly available business and financial
information concerning Michaels and the industries in which we
operate; |
|
|
|
compared the proposed financial terms of the merger with the
publicly available financial terms of certain transactions
involving companies JPMorgan deemed relevant and the
consideration received for such companies; |
|
|
|
compared our financial and operating performance with publicly
available information concerning certain other companies
JPMorgan deemed relevant and reviewed the current and historical
market prices of our common stock and certain publicly traded
securities of such other companies; |
|
|
|
reviewed certain internal financial analyses and forecasts
prepared by our management relating to our business; and |
|
|
|
performed such other financial studies and analyses and
considered such other information as JPMorgan deemed appropriate
for the purpose of its opinion. |
JPMorgan also held discussions with certain members of our
management with respect to certain aspects of the merger, and
the past and current business operations of Michaels, our
financial condition and future prospects and operations, and
certain other matters JPMorgan believed necessary or appropriate
to its inquiry.
JPMorgan relied upon and assumed, without assuming
responsibility or liability for independent verification, the
accuracy and completeness of all information that was publicly
available or was furnished to or discussed with JPMorgan by us
or otherwise reviewed by or for JPMorgan. JPMorgan did not
conduct or was not provided with, any valuation or appraisal of
any assets or liabilities, nor did JPMorgan evaluate the
solvency of Michaels or the Mergercos under any state or federal
laws relating to bankruptcy, insolvency or similar matters. In
relying on financial analyses and forecasts provided to it,
JPMorgan assumed that they were reasonably prepared based on
assumptions reflecting the best currently available estimates
and judgments by management as to our expected future results of
operations and financial condition to which such analyses or
forecasts relate. JPMorgan expressed no view as to such analyses
or forecasts or the assumptions on which they were based.
JPMorgan also assumed that the merger and the other transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement will be consummated as
described in the merger agreement. JPMorgan relied as to all
legal matters relevant to the rendering of its opinion upon the
advice of counsel. JPMorgan further assumed that all material
governmental, regulatory or other consents and approvals
necessary for the consummation of the merger will be obtained
without any adverse effect on us or the contemplated benefits of
the merger.
The projections furnished to JPMorgan for us were prepared by
our management. We do not publicly disclose internal management
projections of the type provided to JPMorgan in connection with
JPMorgans
22
analysis of the merger, and such projections were not prepared
with a view toward public disclosure. These projections were
based on numerous variables and assumptions that are inherently
uncertain and may be beyond the control of management,
including, without limitation, factors related to general
economic and competitive conditions and prevailing interest
rates. Accordingly, actual results could vary significantly from
those set forth in such projections.
JPMorgans opinion is based on economic, market and other
conditions as in effect on, and the information made available
to JPMorgan as of, the date of such opinion. Subsequent
developments may affect JPMorgans written opinion dated as
of June 30, 2006, and JPMorgan does not have any obligation
to update, revise, or reaffirm such opinion. JPMorgans
opinion is limited to the fairness, from a financial point of
view, of the consideration to be received by our stockholders in
the merger, and JPMorgan has expressed no opinion as to the
fairness of the merger to, or any consideration of, creditors or
other constituencies of Michaels or the underlying decision by
us to engage in the merger.
In accordance with customary investment banking practice,
JPMorgan employed generally accepted valuation methods in
reaching its opinion. The following is a summary of the material
financial analyses utilized by JPMorgan in connection with
providing its opinion.
|
|
|
Historical Stock Price Analyses |
JPMorgan reviewed the historical trading prices of our common
stock for a 52-week
period ending June 29, 2006. The high and low trading
prices of our common stock for such
52-week period were
$41.95 and $30.38, respectively. JPMorgan noted that the
$44.00 per share price in the proposed transaction
represented a 15.8% premium to our closing stock price on
June 29, 2006, the penultimate trading day prior to the
announcement of the merger, and a 29.6% premium to our closing
stock price on March 17, 2006, the last trading day prior
to the date we publicly announced that we were exploring
strategic alternatives with respect to the business.
Using publicly available information, including filings with the
SEC, as well as published Wall Street equity research estimates,
JPMorgan compared selected financial data of Michaels with
similar data for selected publicly traded companies engaged in
businesses which JPMorgan judged to be analogous to Michaels.
These companies were selected, among other reasons, because of
their operational and overall business similarities with our
business. The companies reviewed in connection with this
analysis were classified into three groups as follows: Direct
Peers Jo-Ann Stores, A.C. Moore and Hancock Fabrics;
Hardline Retail Home Depot, Lowes, Best Buy,
Staples, Office Depot, Bed, Bath & Beyond, Auto Zone
and Circuit City; and Best in Class
Brands Wal-Mart, Home Depot, Target Corp.,
Walgreens, Kohls Corp. and Williams-Sonoma.
For each company, JPMorgan computed the multiple of firm value,
which consists of the market value of the companys equity,
referred to as equity value, plus the companys net debt,
to estimated 2006 EBITDA and estimated 2007 EBITDA (fiscal years
ending January 31, 2007 and 2008, respectively). Also,
JPMorgan computed each companys price to earnings ratios
(based on IBES median EPS estimates for 2006 and 2007
calendarized to a January year-end). JPMorgan then computed
median and mean multiples for each group of
23
companies and for all the companies as a single group. The
selected financial information compiled by JPMorgan is set forth
below:
Comparable Companies Trading Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FV/2006 |
|
FV/2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA |
|
EBITDA |
|
P/E 2006 |
|
P/E 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct Peers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Median
|
|
|
7.8 |
x |
|
|
6.9 |
x |
|
|
21.6 |
x |
|
|
16.5x |
|
Mean
|
|
|
7.8 |
x |
|
|
6.9 |
x |
|
|
21.6 |
x |
|
|
16.5x |
|
Hardline retail
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Median
|
|
|
8.8 |
x |
|
|
7.6 |
x |
|
|
17.5 |
x |
|
|
14.8x |
|
Mean
|
|
|
8.6 |
x |
|
|
7.6 |
x |
|
|
17.5 |
x |
|
|
14.8x |
|
Best in class brands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Median
|
|
|
8.5 |
x |
|
|
7.6 |
x |
|
|
17.0 |
x |
|
|
14.9x |
|
Mean
|
|
|
9.0 |
x |
|
|
7.9 |
x |
|
|
17.7 |
x |
|
|
15.3x |
|
Overall Median
|
|
|
8.5 |
x |
|
|
7.6 |
x |
|
|
18.5 |
x |
|
|
15.5x |
|
Overall Mean
|
|
|
8.8 |
x |
|
|
7.8 |
x |
|
|
18.3 |
x |
|
|
15.5x |
|
Based on the multiples of firm value computed as set forth above
and taking into account differences between our business and
such other companies and such other factors as JPMorgan deemed
appropriate, JPMorgan derived a range of multiples of firm value
to 2006 EBITDA of 7.5x to 9.0x for Michaels. These multiples
were then applied to our managements estimate of 2006
EBITDA, yielding implied trading values for Michaels of
approximately $32.25 per share to $38.00 per share. In
addition, based on the price to earnings multiples computed as
set forth above and taking into account differences between our
business and such other companies and such other factors as
JPMorgan deemed appropriate, JPMorgan derived a range of price
to earnings ratios for 2006 earnings of 15.5x to 19.0x for
Michaels. These multiples were then applied to our
managements estimate of 2006 EPS, yielding implied trading
values for Michaels of approximately $31.50 per share to
$38.75 per share.
|
|
|
Selected Transaction Analysis |
Using publicly available information, JPMorgan examined
multiples of sales, EBITDA and EBIT in recent specialty retail
acquisition transactions which JPMorgan judged to be analogous
to the merger. Specifically, JPMorgan reviewed the following
transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction value |
Date Announced |
|
Acquirer |
|
Target |
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan-06
|
|
Leonard Green & Partners LP |
|
The Sports Authority |
|
$ |
1,394 |
|
Jan-06
|
|
Bain Capital |
|
Burlington Coat Factory |
|
|
1,943 |
|
Nov-05
|
|
Apollo Management |
|
Linens n Things |
|
|
1,282 |
|
Oct-05
|
|
Sun Capital Partners |
|
Shopko Stores |
|
|
1,143 |
|
Sep-05
|
|
AAH Holdings Corporation |
|
Party City |
|
|
356 |
|
May-05
|
|
Texas Pacific Group/Warburg Pincus |
|
Neiman Marcus |
|
|
5,195 |
|
Apr-05
|
|
GameStop Corp. |
|
Electronics Boutique |
|
|
1,447 |
|
Apr-05
|
|
OSIM/JW Child/Temasek |
|
Brookstone |
|
|
343 |
|
Mar-05
|
|
Bain Capital/KKR/Vornado |
|
Toys R Us |
|
|
7,811 |
|
Nov-04
|
|
Kmart |
|
Sears Roebuck |
|
|
14,239 |
|
Jul-04
|
|
Sun Capital |
|
Mervyns |
|
|
1,650 |
|
Jun-04
|
|
May Department Stores |
|
Marshall Fields |
|
|
3,240 |
|
Jul-03
|
|
Boise Cascade |
|
OfficeMax Inc. |
|
|
1,095 |
|
24
JPMorgan computed the mean and median multiples of the latest
twelve months (LTM) sales, EBITDA and EBIT for the
transaction values for each such transaction as follows:
Transaction value/ LTM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
EBITDA |
|
EBIT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Median
|
|
|
0.58x |
|
|
|
8.5x |
|
|
|
13.1x |
|
Mean
|
|
|
0.66x |
|
|
|
9.4x |
|
|
|
16.7x |
|
Based on this data and taking into account differences between
our business and such other companies and such other factors as
JPMorgan deemed appropriate, JPMorgan derived a range of
multiples for Michaels of LTM EBITDA to transaction value of
9.0x to 11.0x. JPMorgan then applied this range of multiples to
our managements estimate of LTM EBITDA as of July 31,
2006 and as of October 31, 2006 and arrived at an estimated
range of equity values for our common stock of $34.50 to
$42.25 per share.
|
|
|
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis |
JPMorgan conducted a discounted cash flow analysis for the
purpose of determining the fully diluted equity value per share
for our common stock. In conducting its analysis, JPMorgan
considered two projected financial cases: a base
case and a sensitivity case. Each of these
cases was prepared by our management and consisted of a
10-year forecast. In
the base case, JPMorgan calculated the unlevered free cash flows
that we are expected to generate during fiscal years 2006
through 2015 with estimates through the year ending 2010 based
on our managements forecasts and estimates for the years
ending 2011 to 2015 based on 2010 margins and moderating growth
trends. The sensitivity case is based on the same assumptions as
the base case through 2008, and thereafter margins remain at
2008 levels.
For each case, JPMorgan also calculated an implied range of
terminal values for Michaels at the end of the
10-year period ending
2015 by applying a perpetual growth rate ranging from 2% to 3%
of our unlevered free cash flow during the final year of the
10-year period. The
unlevered free cash flows and the range of terminal values were
then discounted to present values using a range of discount
rates from 9.5% to 10.5%, which were chosen by JPMorgan based
upon an analysis of our weighted average cost of capital. The
present value of the unlevered free cash flows and the range of
terminal values were then adjusted for our cash balances of
$442 million as of April 28, 2006. The discounted cash
flow analyses indicated a range of equity values of between
$39.50 per share and $47.75 per share of our common
stock for the base case, and a range of equity values of between
$37.00 per share and $44.50 per share for the
sensitivity case.
|
|
|
Recapitalization Analysis |
JPMorgan performed an analysis of hypothetical recapitalization
transactions involving Michaels and the theoretical per share
value that our stockholders could receive in such transactions.
In the first hypothetical recapitalization transaction, Michaels
used $200 million of existing cash and the proceeds of new
debt financing to finance a special dividend of
$1.2 billion (approximately $8.64 per share) or a
repurchase of our common stock of $1.2 billion
(approximately 30 million shares at $40 per share).
The theoretical post-recapitalization trading value of our
common stock was based upon estimated price to earnings ratios
of 15.5x to 19.0x applied to our managements projections
(adjusted to reflect the use of existing cash and additional
leverage). JPMorgan then calculated the implied per share future
equity values of our common stock from 2006 to 2008, and then
discounted those values to June 30, 2006, using a discount
rate of 10%. This analysis resulted in a range of implied
present values, inclusive of the proceeds of the dividend or
share repurchase, of approximately $34.25 per share to
$44.25 per share for our common stock. In the second
hypothetical recapitalization transaction, Michaels used
$200 million of existing cash and the proceeds of new debt
financing to finance a special dividend of $2.2 billion
(approximately $15.83 per share) or a repurchase of our
common stock of $2.2 billion (approximately 50 million
shares at $44 per share). The theoretical
post-recapitalization trading value of our common stock was
based upon estimated price to earnings ratios of 15.5x to 19.0x
applied to our managements projections (adjusted to
reflect the use of existing cash and additional leverage).
JPMorgan then calculated the implied per share future equity
values of our common stock from
25
2006 to 2008, and then discounted those values to June 30,
2006, using a discount rate of 10%. This analysis resulted in a
range of implied present values, inclusive of the proceeds of
the dividend or share repurchase, of approximately
$36.25 per share to $46.00 per share for our common
stock.
|
|
|
Leveraged Buyout Analysis |
Using projections prepared by our management, JPMorgan
calculated potential returns to equity investors in connection
with a hypothetical leveraged acquisition of Michaels. For
purposes of this analysis, JPMorgan assumed the transaction
would be completed on July 31, 2006 and that a subsequent
sale of Michaels would occur in 2011 at a price ranging from
9.0x to 10.0x our managements estimated 2010 EBITDA.
JPMorgan also assumed that the required rate of return would
range from 17.5% to 25% in a transaction of this type. Based on
this analysis, JPMorgan estimated a range of implied equity
values of between $41.00 per share and $45.50 per
share of our common stock.
The foregoing summary of certain material financial analyses
does not purport to be a complete description of the analyses or
data presented by JPMorgan. The preparation of a fairness
opinion is a complex process and is not necessarily susceptible
to partial analysis or summary description. JPMorgan believes
that the foregoing summary and its analyses must be considered
as a whole and that selecting portions of the foregoing summary
and these analyses, without considering all of its analyses as a
whole, could create an incomplete view of the processes
underlying the analyses and its opinion. In arriving at its
opinion, JPMorgan did not attribute any particular weight to any
analyses or factors considered by it and did not form an opinion
as to whether any individual analysis or factor (positive or
negative), considered in isolation, supported or failed to
support its opinion. Rather, JPMorgan considered the totality of
the factors and analyses performed in determining its opinion.
Analyses based upon forecasts of future results are inherently
uncertain, as they are subject to numerous factors or events
beyond the control of the parties and their advisors.
Accordingly, forecasts and analyses used or made by JPMorgan are
not necessarily indicative of actual future results, which may
be significantly more or less favorable than suggested by those
analyses. Moreover, JPMorgans analyses are not and do not
purport to be appraisals or otherwise reflective of the prices
at which businesses actually could be bought or sold. None of
the selected companies reviewed as described in the above
summary is identical to Michaels, and none of the selected
transactions reviewed was identical to the merger. However, the
companies selected were chosen because they are publicly traded
companies with operations and businesses that, for purposes of
JPMorgans analysis, may be considered similar to ours. The
transactions selected were similarly chosen because their
participants, size and other factors, for purposes of
JPMorgans analysis, may be considered similar to the
merger. The analyses necessarily involve complex considerations
and judgments concerning differences in financial and
operational characteristics of the companies involved and other
factors that could affect the companies compared to Michaels and
the transactions compared to the merger.
As part of its investment banking business, JPMorgan and its
affiliates are continually engaged in the valuation of
businesses and their securities in connection with mergers and
acquisitions, investments for passive and control purposes,
negotiated underwritings, secondary distributions of listed and
unlisted securities, private placements, and valuations for
estate, corporate and other purposes. JPMorgan was selected to
advise us on its analysis and consideration of various strategic
alternatives available to us on the basis of such experience and
its familiarity with us.
Pursuant to its engagement letter, JPMorgan has acted as
financial advisor to Michaels with respect to the merger and
will receive a fee equal to 0.40% of the aggregate consideration
to be paid in the transaction, or approximately
$24 million, all of which is payable upon consummation of
the transaction, from us for its services. In addition, we
agreed to indemnify JPMorgan for certain liabilities arising out
of the engagement of JPMorgan. JPMorgan acted as joint lead
arranger and book runner of our revolving credit facility in
October 2005 and JPMorgans commercial bank affiliate is a
lender thereunder. In addition, JPMorgan and its affiliates have
also provided a variety of services to Bain and Blackstone and
their respective affiliates. All such services were performed
for customary compensation. In addition, JPMorgan and its
affiliates offered financing terms to potential acquirors of
Michaels (including Bain and Blackstone and their affiliates)
and is arranging and/or providing financing of the merger
consideration for the Sponsor Entities, Bain and
26
Blackstone and their respective affiliates. In the ordinary
course of its businesses, JPMorgan and its affiliates may
actively trade the debt and equity securities of Michaels or
affiliates of Bain or Blackstone for its own account or for the
accounts of customers and, accordingly, JPMorgan may at any time
hold long or short positions in such securities. JPMorgan and
certain of its affiliates and certain of their respective
employees and certain private investment funds affiliated or
associated with JPMorgan have invested in private equity funds
managed or advised by Blackstone.
Opinion of Goldman Sachs
Goldman Sachs rendered its oral opinion, which was subsequently
confirmed in writing, to the special advisory committee of our
board of directors and our board of directors that, as of
June 30, 2006, and based upon and subject to the factors
and assumptions set forth therein, the $44.00 per share in
cash to be received by the holders of the outstanding shares of
Michaels common stock pursuant to the merger agreement was fair,
from a financial point of view, to such holders.
The full text of the written opinion of Goldman Sachs, dated
June 30, 2006, which sets forth the assumptions made,
procedures followed, matters considered and limitations on the
review undertaken in connection with the opinion, is attached as
Annex D to this proxy statement. Goldman Sachs provided its
opinion for the information and assistance of the special
advisory committee of our board of directors and our board of
directors in connection with their consideration of the
transaction. Goldman Sachs opinion is not a recommendation
as to how any holder of our common stock should vote with
respect to the merger.
In connection with rendering the opinion described above and
performing its related financial analyses, Goldman Sachs
reviewed, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
the merger agreement; |
|
|
|
annual reports to stockholders and Annual Reports on
Form 10-K of
Michaels for the five fiscal years ended January 28, 2006; |
|
|
|
certain interim reports to stockholders and Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q of
Michaels; |
|
|
|
certain other communications from Michaels to its
stockholders; and |
|
|
|
certain internal financial analyses and forecasts for Michaels
prepared by its management. |
Goldman Sachs also held discussions with members of our senior
management regarding their assessment of our past and current
business operations, financial condition, and future prospects.
In addition, Goldman Sachs reviewed the reported price and
trading activity for our common stock, compared certain
financial and stock market information for Michaels with similar
information for certain other companies the securities of which
are publicly traded, reviewed the financial terms of certain
recent business combinations in the retail industry specifically
and in other industries generally and performed such other
studies and analyses, and considered such other factors, as it
considered appropriate.
Goldman Sachs relied upon the accuracy and completeness of all
of the financial, accounting, legal, tax and other information
discussed with or reviewed by it and assumed such accuracy and
completeness for purposes of rendering the opinion described
above. In addition, Goldman Sachs did not make an independent
evaluation or appraisal of the assets and liabilities (including
any contingent, derivative or off-balance-sheet assets and
liabilities) of Michaels or any of our subsidiaries, nor was any
evaluation or appraisal of the assets or liabilities of Michaels
or any of our subsidiaries furnished to Goldman Sachs. Goldman
Sachs opinion does not address the underlying business
decision of Michaels to engage in the transaction. Goldman
Sachs opinion is necessarily based on economic, monetary,
market and other conditions as in effect on, and the information
made available to it as of, the date of the opinion.
The following is a summary of the material financial analyses
delivered by Goldman Sachs to the special advisory committee of
our board of directors and our board of directors in connection
with rendering the opinion described above. The following
summary, however, does not purport to be a complete description
of the financial analyses performed by Goldman Sachs, nor does
the order of analyses described represent
27
relative importance or weight given to those analyses by Goldman
Sachs. Some of the summaries of the financial analyses include
information presented in tabular format. The tables must be read
together with the full text of each summary and are alone not a
complete description of Goldman Sachs financial analyses.
Except as otherwise noted, the following quantitative
information, to the extent that it is based on market data, is
based on market data as it existed on or before June 28,
2006 and is not necessarily indicative of current market
conditions.
|
|
|
Historical Stock Trading Analysis |
Goldman Sachs reviewed the historical trading prices for our
common stock for the one-year period ended June 28, 2006.
Goldman Sachs noted that during the one-year period ended
June 28, 2006, our common stock closed at a low of $30.76
on October 13, 2005, and a high of $41.92 on July 5,
2005. Goldman Sachs also noted that on June 28, 2006, our
common stock closed at $37.73, and on March 17, 2006, the
last public trading date prior to Michaels announcing that it
was exploring strategic alternatives including a possible sale
of the company, our common stock closed at $33.96. Goldman Sachs
also noted that our common stock traded at an all-time high of
$43.61.
|
|
|
Selected Companies Analysis |
Goldman Sachs calculated and compared the ratio of the price per
share to the estimated 2006 earnings per share of Michaels and
the following companies that it selected based on financial data
as of June 28, 2006, information it obtained from SEC
filings, estimates provided by the Institutional Brokerage
Estimate System (a data service that compiles estimates issued
by securities analysts), or IBES, for the selected companies,
and information and forecasts for Michaels provided by our
management. The price per share to the estimated 2006 earnings
per share ratio of Michaels was calculated using the closing
price of our common stock on both March 17, 2006 and
June 28, 2006 and the price per share to the estimated 2006
earnings per share ratios of the selected companies were
calculated using the selected companies closing prices on
June 28, 2006. Although none of the selected companies is
directly comparable to Michaels, the companies included were
28
chosen because they are publicly traded companies with
operations that for purposes of analysis may be considered
similar to certain operations of Michaels. The results of these
analyses are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated 2006 P/E |
Selected Company |
|
Multiples |
|
|
|
AC Moore Arts & Crafts, Inc.
|
|
|
23.3x |
|
American Greetings Corporation
|
|
|
24.2x |
|
Barnes & Noble, Inc.
|
|
|
15.8x |
|
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.
|
|
|
15.5x |
|
Best Buy Co., Inc.
|
|
|
19.4x |
|
Borders Group, Inc.
|
|
|
13.4x |
|
Circuit City Stores, Inc.
|
|
|
25.1x |
|
GameStop Corp.
|
|
|
18.7x |
|
The Home Depot, Inc.
|
|
|
11.8x |
|
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
|
|
|
NM |
|
Lowes Companies, Inc.
|
|
|
14.8x |
|
Office Depot, Inc.
|
|
|
21.3x |
|
Staples, Inc.
|
|
|
19.4x |
|
Radioshack Corporation
|
|
|
14.3x |
|
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
|
|
|
17.0x |
|
Yankee Candle Company, Inc.
|
|
|
12.0x |
|
High
|
|
|
25.1x |
|
Median
|
|
|
18.0x |
|
Low
|
|
|
11.8x |
|
Michaels (based on closing price and estimated 2006 earnings as
of March 17, 2006)
|
|
|
17.0x |
|
Michaels (based on closing price and estimated 2006 earnings as
of June 28, 2006)
|
|
|
19.3x |
|
Michaels (based on $44.00 per share)
|
|
|
21.6x |
|
|
|
|
Present Value of Future Stock Price Analysis |
Goldman Sachs performed an illustrative analysis of the implied
present value of the future stock price of Michaels, which is
designed to provide an indication of the present value of a
theoretical future value of a companys equity as a
function of such companys estimated future earnings and
its assumed price to future earnings per share multiple. For
this analysis, Goldman Sachs used the financial projections for
Michaels prepared by our management. Goldman Sachs first
calculated implied per share values for our common stock as of
June 30 for each of the fiscal years 2007 to 2010 by
applying price to forward earnings per share multiples of 16.0x
to 20.0x to estimates prepared by our management of fiscal years
2007 to 2010 earnings per share. Goldman Sachs then calculated
the implied per share future equity values for our common stock
from 2007 to 2010, and then discounted those values to
June 30, 2006, using discount rates of 10.0% and 13.0%.
This analysis resulted in a range of implied present values of
$33.04 to $52.35 per share of our common stock.
|
|
|
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis |
Goldman Sachs performed an illustrative discounted cash flow
analysis to determine a range of implied present values per
share of our common stock. All cash flows were discounted to
July 31, 2006, and terminal values were based upon EBITDA
multiples of estimated fiscal year 2010 EBITDA. Forecasted
financial information used in this analysis was based on
projections provided by our management. Goldman Sachs used
discount rates ranging from 9.0% to 13.0%, reflecting estimates
of the weighted average cost of capital of Michaels and terminal
EBITDA multiples ranging from 8.0x to 10.0x based on historical
EBITDA multiples
29
for Michaels. This analysis resulted in a range of implied
present values of $40.31 to $53.82 per share of our common
stock.
Using the same projections provided by our management, Goldman
Sachs also performed a sensitivity analysis to analyze the
effect of increases or decreases in annual sales growth and
EBITDA margin from 2006 to 2010. The analysis utilized
(1) a range of EBITDA margin compounded annual growth rates
of 0.0% to 5.6% from fiscal years 2006 to 2010, (2) a range
of compounded annual sales growth rates of 4.4% to 8.4% from
fiscal years 2006 to 2010 and (3) terminal EBITDA multiple
of 9.0x and a discount rate of 11.0% discounted to July 31,
2006. The EBITDA margin compounded annual growth rates of 0.0%
to 5.6% from the fiscal years 2006 to 2010 implies a range of
estimated EBITDA margin in 2010 of 13.6%, which is equal to the
estimated EBITDA margins in 2006 assumed to remain constant in
the projections provided by our management, up to 17.0% through
the projection period, which is 1.3% higher than the estimated
EBITDA margin in 2010 assumed in the projections provided by our
management. The sales growth rates of 4.4% to 8.4% from fiscal
years 2006 to 2010 represent a range of -3.0% to 1.0% change in
the annual sales growth assumption of the financial projections
provided by our management. This resulted in a range of implied
present values of $38.21 to $51.47 per share of our common
stock.
|
|
|
Selected Transactions Analysis |
Goldman Sachs reviewed publicly available information for the
following announced merger or acquisition transactions in the
U.S. involving companies in the retail industries. While
none of the companies participating in the selected transactions
are directly comparable to Michaels, the companies participating
in the selected transactions are companies with operations that,
for the purposes of analysis, may be considered similar to
certain operations of Michaels. Goldman Sachs calculated and
compared the enterprise values as a multiple of the target
companys publicly reported latest twelve months, or LTM,
EBITDA prior to announcement of the applicable transaction. For
purposes of this analysis, the enterprise value was calculated
by adding the announced transaction price for the equity of the
target company to the book value of the target companys
net debt based on public information available prior to the
announcement of the applicable transaction. The following tables
set forth the transactions reviewed (listed by acquiror/target
and month and year announced) and the enterprise value multiple
of LTM EBITDA for each and the results of the analysis.
30
The $44.00 per share of our common stock to be paid to our
stockholders in this transaction implies an enterprise value
multiple of LTM EBITDA of 12.1x.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Value |
|
|
Multiple of |
Acquiror/Target |
|
LTM EBITDA |
|
|
|
Supervalu Inc., CVS Corporation, Cerebus Capital
Management, L.P./ Albertsons, Inc. (January 2006)
|
|
|
7.3 |
x |
Leonard Green & Partners, L.P./ The Sports Authority,
Inc. (January 2006)
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
Bain Capital Partners, LLC/ Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse
Corporation (January 2006)
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
Apollo Management V, L.P./ Linensn Things, Inc.
(November 2005)
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc./ Northern Department Store Group of
Saks Incorporated (October 2005)
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
Prentice Capital Management, LP, GMM Capital LLC/ Goodys
Family Clothing, Inc. (October 2005)
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
Sun Capital Partners, Inc./ Shopko Stores Inc. (October 2005)
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
Berkshire Partners LLC, Weston Presidio/ Party City Corporation
(September 2005)
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
TPG Advisers III, Inc, TPG Advisers IV, Inc., Warburg
Pincus & Co., Warburg Pincus LLC, Warburg Pincus
Partners LLC/ The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. (May 2005)
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
GameStop Corp./ Electronic Boutique Holdings Corp.(April 2005)
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
OSIM International Ltd, J.W. Childs Associates, L.P., Temasek
Capital (Private) Limited/ Brookstone, Inc. (April 2005)
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co., Bain Capital Partners
LLC and Vornado Realty Trust/ Toy R Us, Inc. (March 2005)
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
Federated Department Stores, Inc./ The May Department Stores
Company (February 2005)
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
Movie Gallery, Inc./ Hollywood Entertainment Corporation
(November 2004)
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Kmart Holding Corporation/ Sears, Roebuck and Co. (November 2004)
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
Jones Apparel Group, Inc./ Barneys New York, Inc. (November 2004)
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
Cerebus Capital Management, L.P., Sun Capital Partners Group,
Inc./ Target Corporation, Mervyns Holdings, LLC (July 2004)
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
The May Department Stores Company/ Target Corporation, Marshall
Fields (June 2004)
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
Circuit City Stores, Inc./ InterTan, Inc. (May 2004)
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Boise Cascade Corporation/ OfficeMax, Inc. (July 2003)
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
High
|
|
|
14.4 |
x |
Median
|
|
|
8.7 |
x |
Mean
|
|
|
9.4 |
x |
Low
|
|
|
5.9 |
x |
|
|
|
Leveraged Buyout Analysis |
Goldman Sachs performed an illustrative analysis of the range of
the price per share of our common stock that an acquiror would
theoretically pay if Michaels were acquired in a leverage buyout
transaction that closed as of October 31, 2006. Assuming,
among other things, (i) a sponsor targeted equity return
range of 15.0% to 20.0%, (ii) Michaels would be valued at
the end of 2010 at 8.0 to 10.0x EBITDA, (iii) a range of
EBITDA margin compounded annual growth rates of 0.0% to 5.6%
from years 2006 to 2010, and (iv) a range of sales
compounded annual growth rates of 4.4% to 8.4% from years 2006
to 2010, the analysis resulted in a range of implied values of
$37.79 to $56.67 per share of our common stock.
31
|
|
|
Recapitalization Analysis |
Goldman Sachs analyzed certain illustrative recapitalization
transactions involving Michaels and the theoretical value that
our stockholders could receive in such transactions. In the
first illustrative recapitalization transaction, Michaels used
excess cash and the proceeds of new debt financings to finance a
special dividend to its stockholders in the range of
$1.25 billion to $1.75 billion, or $9.47 to
$13.25 per share. The theoretical post-recapitalization
trading value of our shares was based upon estimated price to
earnings ratios of 14.0x to 20.0x and projections for Michaels
provided by our management after giving effect to the use of
excess cash and the additional leverage. Goldman Sachs then
calculated the implied per share future equity values for our
common stock from 2007 to 2010, and then discounted those values
to June 30, 2006, using discount rates of 11.0% and 14.0%.
This analysis resulted in a range of implied present values,
inclusive of the special dividend amount, of $33.56 and
$57.53 per share of our common stock. In the second
illustrative recapitalization transaction, the analysis assumed
that Michaels used excess cash and the proceeds of new debt
financings to finance a cash tender offer in the range of $40.00
to $41.00 per share of our common stock for
$1.25 billion to $1.75 billion of its outstanding
shares. The theoretical post-recapitalization trading value of
the shares not purchased in the tender offer was based upon
estimated price to earnings ratios of 14.0x to 20.0x and
projections for Michaels provided by our management after giving
effect to the use of excess cash and the additional leverage.
Goldman Sachs then calculated the implied per share future
equity values for our common stock from 2007 to 2010, and then
discounted those values to June 30, 2006, using discount
rates of 11.0% and 14.0%. This analysis resulted in a range of
implied present values, inclusive of the cash tender amount, of
$31.04 and $62.29 per share of our common stock.
The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process and
is not necessarily susceptible to partial analysis or summary
description. Selecting portions of the analyses or of the
summary set forth above, without considering the analyses as a
whole, could create an incomplete view of the processes
underlying Goldman Sachs opinion. In arriving at its
fairness determination, Goldman Sachs considered the results of
all of its analyses and did not attribute any particular weight
to any factor or analysis considered by it. Rather, Goldman
Sachs made its determination as to fairness on the basis of its
experience and professional judgment after considering the
results of all of its analyses. No company or transaction used
in the above analyses as a comparison is directly comparable to
Michaels or the contemplated transaction.
Goldman Sachs prepared these analyses for purposes of Goldman
Sachs providing its opinion to the special advisory
committee of our board of directors and our board of directors
as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the
holders of the outstanding shares of our common stock of the
$44.00 per share in cash to be received by such holders
pursuant to the merger agreement. These analyses do not purport
to be appraisals nor do they necessarily reflect the prices at
which businesses or securities actually may be sold. Analyses
based upon forecasts of future results are not necessarily
indicative of actual future results, which may be significantly
more or less favorable than suggested by these analyses. Because
these analyses are inherently subject to uncertainty, being
based upon numerous factors or events beyond the control of the
parties or their respective advisors, none of Michaels, Goldman
Sachs or any other person assumes responsibility if future
results are materially different from those forecast.
The merger consideration was determined through
arms-length negotiations between Michaels, Bain and
Blackstone and was approved by our board of directors. Goldman
Sachs provided advice to the special advisory committee of our
board of directors during these negotiations. Goldman Sachs did
not, however, recommend any specific amount of consideration to
the special advisory committee of our board of directors or our
board of directors or that any specific amount of consideration
constituted the only appropriate consideration for the
transaction.
As described above, Goldman Sachs opinion to the special
advisory committee of our board of directors and our board of
directors was one of many factors taken into consideration by
the special advisory committee and the board in making their
determination to approve the merger agreement. The foregoing
summary does not purport to be a complete description of the
analyses performed by Goldman Sachs in connection with the
fairness opinion and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to the written opinion of Goldman Sachs attached as Annex D
to this proxy statement.
32
Goldman Sachs and its affiliates, as part of their investment
banking business, are continually engaged in performing
financial analyses with respect to businesses and their
securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions,
negotiated underwritings, competitive biddings, secondary
distributions of listed and unlisted securities, private
placements and other transactions as well as for estate,
corporate and other purposes. Goldman Sachs has acted as
financial advisor to the special advisory committee of our board
of directors in connection with the transaction contemplated by
the merger agreement.
In addition, Goldman Sachs has provided and is currently
providing certain investment banking services to Bain and its
affiliates and portfolio companies, including having acted as
joint lead manager with respect to the high yield offering by
Houghton Mifflin Company, a portfolio company of Bain, of its
8.250% Senior Notes due 2011 (aggregate principal amount
$1,000,000,000) in January 2003; having acted as lead manager
with respect to the high yield offering by Sealy Corporation, a
former portfolio company of Bain, of its 9.875% Senior Sub
Notes due 2007 (aggregate principal amount $50,000,000) in April
2003; having acted as co-manager with respect to the high yield
offering by Dominos Pizza LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary
of Dominos Pizza Inc., an affiliate of Bain, of its
81/4% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2011 (aggregate principal amount
$403,000,000) in June 2003; having acted as co-manager with
respect to the high yield offering by Houghton Mifflin of its
111/2% Senior
Discount Notes due 2013 (aggregate principal amount
$265,000,000) in September 2003; having acted as co-financial
advisor to Sealy in connection with its sale in April 2004;
having extended a bank loan (aggregate principal amount
$70,000,000) to Maxim Crane Works, a portfolio company of Bain,
in July 2004; having acted as financial advisor to Modus Media
International Holdings, a former portfolio company of Bain, in
connection with its sale in August 2004; having acted as
financial advisor to Bain Capital (Europe) Limited, an affiliate
of Bain, in connection with its acquisition of Framatome
Connectors International in November 2005; having extended a
bank loan (aggregate principal amount of $100,000,000) to
Dominos in March 2006; having extended a bank loan
(aggregate principal amount $1,350,000,000) to Sensata
Technologies BV, a portfolio company of Bain, in April 2006;
having acted as a joint bookrunner with respect to the high
yield offering by Sensata of its 8.00% Senior Notes due
2014 and 9.00% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2016
(aggregate principal amount $752,000,000) in April 2006; having
acted as a manager with respect to the high yield offering by
Houghton Mifflin of its Floating Rate Senior PIK Notes due 2011
(aggregate principal amount $300,000,000) in May 2006; having
extended a bank loan (aggregate principal amount $650,000,000)
to Cumulus Media Partners LLC, a portfolio company of Bain, in
connection with its acquisition of Susquehanna Broadcasting
Company in April 2006; and having acted as a joint book runner
with respect to the high yield offering by Cumulus of its
9.875% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014 (aggregate
principal amount $250,000,000) in May 2006.
In addition, Goldman Sachs has provided and is currently
providing certain investment banking services to Blackstone and
its affiliates and portfolio companies, including having acted
as principal agent with respect to the mortgage financing
(aggregate principal amount $120,000,000) of a property owned by
affiliates of Blackstone in August 2003; having acted as
joint-lead managing underwriter with respect to the public
offering of 12,102,600 ordinary shares of Aspen Insurance UK
Limited, a portfolio company of Blackstone, in December 2003;
having acted as lead managing underwriter with respect to the
public offering of 24,137,931 shares of common stock of TRW
Automotive Inc., a portfolio company of Blackstone, in February
2004; having acted as financial advisor to an affiliate of
Blackstone in connection with the acquisition of Celanese AG in
April 2004; having acted as co-lead managing underwriter with
respect to the high yield offering by Graham Packaging Company,
a portfolio company of Blackstone, of its 8.5% Notes due
2012 and 9.875% Notes due 2014 (aggregate principal amount
$625,000,000) in September 2004; having acted as co-financial
advisor to Graham in connection with its acquisition of a
business unit of Owens-Illinois, Inc. in July 2004; having acted
as lead managing underwriter with respect to the public offering
of 51,111,111 shares of common stock of Nalco Holding
Company, a portfolio company of Blackstone, in November 2004;
having acted as co-managing underwriter with respect to the
public offering of 9,600,000 shares of
4.25% convertible perpetual preferred stock of Celanese
Corp., a portfolio company of Blackstone, in January 2005;
having acted as co-managing underwriter with respect to the
public offering of 50,000,000 shares of Series A
common stock of Celanese in January 2005; having acted as joint
lead managing underwriter with respect to the public offering of
13,684,100 shares of common stock of New Skies Satellites
NV, a portfolio company of Blackstone, in May 2005; having acted
as joint lead managing underwriter with respect to the public
offering
33
of 33,350,000 shares of common stock of Nalco in August
2005; having acted as financial advisor to New Skies in
connection with its sale in December 2005; and having acted as a
lead underwriter with respect to the public offering of
35,000,000 shares of Series A common stock of Celanese
in May 2006.
Goldman Sachs may also provide investment banking services to
Michaels and its affiliates and Bain, Blackstone and their
respective affiliates and portfolio companies in the future. In
connection with the above-described investment banking services
Goldman Sachs has received, and may receive, compensation.
Affiliates of Goldman Sachs have co-invested with Bain,
Blackstone and their respective affiliates from time to time and
may do so in the future.
Goldman Sachs is a full service securities firm engaged, either
directly or through its affiliates, in securities trading,
investment management, financial planning and benefits
counseling, risk management, hedging, financing and brokerage
activities for both companies and individuals. In the ordinary
course of these activities, Goldman Sachs and its affiliates may
provide such services to Michaels and its affiliates and Bain,
Blackstone and their respective affiliates and portfolio
companies, may actively trade the debt and equity securities (or
related derivative securities) of Michaels and affiliates and
portfolio companies of Bain and Blackstone for their own account
and for the accounts of their customers and may at any time hold
long and short positions of such securities.
The special advisory committee of our board of directors
selected Goldman Sachs as its financial advisor because it is an
internationally recognized investment banking firm that has
substantial experience in transactions similar to the
transaction. Pursuant to a letter agreement dated May 8,
2006, the special advisory committee of the board engaged
Goldman Sachs to act as its financial advisor in connection with
the contemplated transaction. Pursuant to the terms of this
engagement letter, Michaels has agreed to pay Goldman Sachs a
transaction fee of 0.15% of the aggregate consideration paid in
such transaction, or approximately $9.0 million, with
one-third of the transaction fee payable upon signing of the
merger agreement, one-third of the transaction fee payable upon
the stockholder vote for the transaction and the remainder of
the transaction fee payable upon consummation of the
transaction. Michaels has also agreed to reimburse Goldman
Sachs expenses and indemnify it against certain
liabilities arising out of its engagement.
Financing
The Sponsor Entities estimate the total amount of funds
necessary to complete the merger and the related transactions to
be approximately $6.164 billion, which includes
approximately $5.920 billion to be paid out to our
stockholders and holders of other equity-based interests in
Michaels, with the remainder to be applied to pay related fees
and expenses in connection with the merger, the financing
arrangements and the related transactions. These payments are
expected to be funded by a combination of equity contributions
by entities sponsored by or co-investors with Bain and
Blackstone and debt financing, as well as our available cash.
The Mergercos have obtained equity financing commitments and the
Fincos have obtained debt financing commitments for the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. After giving
effect to contemplated draws under the new debt commitments, we
currently expect total new debt outstanding at the close of the
merger to be approximately $4.2 billion, which amount may
be increased in respect of certain drawings under the
asset-based revolving facility described below on the closing
date for working capital purposes.
Bain Capital Fund IX, LLC has delivered an equity
commitment letter for $1.092 billion to Bain Mergerco, and
Blackstone Capital Partners V L.P. has delivered an equity
commitment letter for $1.092 billion to Blackstone
Mergerco, which constitute the equity portion of the merger
financing.
Each of the equity commitment letters provides that the equity
funds will be contributed to finance, in part, the consummation
of the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the
merger agreement, including the payment of the merger
consideration, the payments due to optionholders and the
associated costs and expenses, and for no other purpose. Each of
the equity commitments is generally subject to the
34
satisfaction or waiver at the closing of the conditions
precedent to the obligations of each Mergerco to consummate the
merger. We are an express third party beneficiary under the
terms of each of the equity commitment letters. The terms of
each of the equity commitment letters will expire automatically
on the date that is 30 days after the termination of the
merger agreement, except that in the event we file any claim or
suit to enforce the terms of the equity commitment letter prior
to such expiration, the commitments and obligations set forth in
the equity commitment letters will remain in full force and
effect until the final, nonappealable determination by a court
of competent jurisdiction of such claim or suit.
In connection with the execution and delivery of the merger
agreement, Bain Finco, Blackstone Finco, Bain Capital
Fund IX, LLC and Blackstone Capital Partners V L.P. have
entered into a debt financing commitment letter with Deutsche
Bank AG New York Branch and Deutsche Bank AG Cayman Islands
Branch to provide up to $4.8 billion in debt financing,
consisting of (1) a senior secured asset-based revolving
facility with a maximum availability of $1.0 billion,
(2) a senior secured term loan facility in an aggregate
principal amount of $2.4 billion, (3) a senior
unsecured bridge loan facility in an aggregate principal amount
of up to $700 million and (4) a senior subordinated
unsecured bridge loan facility in an aggregate principal amount
of up to $700 million, to finance, in part, the payment of
the merger consideration, the repayment or refinancing of
certain of our debt outstanding on the closing date of the
merger and to pay fees and expenses in connection with the
merger, financing and related transactions and, in the case of
the asset-based revolving facility, for general corporate
purposes after the closing date of the merger. Subsequent to the
date of the merger agreement, each of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.,
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., Bank of America, N.A., Banc of
America Bridge LLC, Banc of America Securities LLC, Credit
Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and Credit Suisse have been
added as commitment parties under the debt financing commitment
letter.
Borrowings under the asset-based revolving facility are limited
by our borrowing base, which is calculated
periodically based on specified percentages of the value of
eligible credit card receivables and eligible inventory, subject
to adjustments for reserves and other matters. No more than
$250 million may be borrowed under the asset-based
revolving facility for purposes of financing the merger and
related transactions, except that additional drawings under the
asset-based revolving facility may be made to fund working
capital needs. If availability under the borrowing base is less
than $500 million on the closing date of the merger, the
lenders have agreed to increase their commitments under the term
loan facility by the amount of such shortfall.
The debt financing commitments will expire if not drawn on or
prior to April 30, 2007. The facilities contemplated by the
debt financing commitments are subject to customary closing
conditions, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the consummation of the merger; |
|
|
|
the absence of a material adverse change with respect to
Michaels, to the extent such change constitutes a material
adverse change for purposes of the merger agreement; |
|
|
|
the execution of definitive credit documentation consistent with
the term sheets for the debt facilities; |
|
|
|
receipt of equity contributions in an amount equal to at least
20% of the total sources required to consummate the merger from
one or more of Bain, Blackstone and co-investors reasonably
acceptable to the lead arrangers for the debt financing; |
|
|
|
the absence of any amendments or waivers to the merger agreement
to the extent material and adverse to the lenders which have not
been approved by the lead arrangers for the debt financing; |
|
|
|
the receipt of specified financial statements of
Michaels; and |
|
|
|
receipt of customary closing documents. |
Although the debt financing described in this proxy statement is
not subject to the lenders satisfaction with their due
diligence or to a market out, such financing might
not be funded on the closing date because of failure to meet the
closing conditions or for other reasons. As of the date of this
proxy statement, no
35
alternative financing arrangements or alternative financing
plans have been made in the event the debt financing described
herein is not available as anticipated. The documentation
governing the debt financing facilities have not been finalized,
and accordingly, their actual terms may differ from those
described in this proxy statement.
Interests of Our Directors and Executive Officers in the
Merger
In addition to their interests in the merger as stockholders,
certain of our directors and executive officers have interests
in the merger that differ from, or are in addition to, your
interests as a stockholder. In considering the recommendation of
our board of directors to vote FOR the
adoption of the merger agreement, you should be aware of these
interests. Our board of directors was aware of, and considered
the interests of, our directors and executive officers in
approving the merger agreement, the merger and the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement. Except as described below,
such persons have, to our knowledge, no material interest in the
merger that differs from your interests generally.
|
|
|
Treatment of Stock Options |
As of August 25, 2006, there were approximately
3,173,973 shares of our common stock subject to outstanding
stock options granted under our equity incentive plans to our
current executive officers and directors. Each outstanding stock
option, other than rollover options, that remains unexercised as
of the completion of the merger, whether or not the option is
vested or exercisable, will be canceled, and the holder of such
stock option that has an exercise price of less than $44.00 will
be entitled to receive a cash payment, without interest and less
applicable withholding taxes, equal to the product of:
|
|
|
|
|
the number of shares of our common stock subject to the option
as of the effective time of the merger, multiplied by |
|
|
|
the excess of $44.00 over the exercise price per share of common
stock subject to such option. |
The following table summarizes the outstanding vested and
unvested options held by our executive officers and directors as
of August 25, 2006, and the consideration that each of them
will receive pursuant to the merger agreement in connection with
the cancellation of their options:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No. of Shares |
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
Underlying |
|
Per Share Exercise |
|
|
|
|
Vested and |
|
Price of Vested and |
|
Resulting |
Name |
|
Unvested Options |
|
Unvested Options |
|
Consideration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles J. Wyly, Jr.*
|
|
|
910,000 |
|
|
$ |
24.52 |
|
|
$ |
17,728,325 |
|
Sam Wyly*
|
|
|
592,500 |
|
|
$ |
23.12 |
|
|
$ |
12,374,325 |
|
Richard E. Hanlon
|
|
|
205,000 |
|
|
$ |
21.19 |
|
|
$ |
4,675,325 |
|
Richard C. Marcus
|
|
|
135,000 |
|
|
$ |
26.74 |
|
|
$ |
2,330,325 |
|
Liz Minyard
|
|
|
170,000 |
|
|
$ |
25.21 |
|
|
$ |
3,194,650 |
|
Cece Smith
|
|
|
135,000 |
|
|
$ |
27.04 |
|
|
$ |
2,289,900 |
|
Executive Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Michael Rouleau
|
|
|
450,000 |
|
|
$ |
30.21 |
|
|
$ |
6,207,250 |
|
Jeffrey N. Boyer
|
|
|
248,096 |
|
|
$ |
22.54 |
|
|
$ |
5,323,611 |
|
Gregory A. Sandfort
|
|
|
152,264 |
|
|
$ |
30.60 |
|
|
$ |
2,040,580 |
|
Thomas M. Bazzone
|
|
|
168,750 |
|
|
$ |
29.44 |
|
|
$ |
2,457,500 |
|
Thomas C. DeCaro
|
|
|
148,750 |
|
|
$ |
25.35 |
|
|
$ |
2,773,925 |
|
Harvey S. Kanter
|
|
|
131,529 |
|
|
$ |
27.22 |
|
|
$ |
2,206,839 |
|
Edward F. Sadler
|
|
|
177,084 |
|
|
$ |
24.80 |
|
|
$ |
3,400,351 |
|
|
|
* |
Messrs. Charles J. Wyly, Jr. and Sam Wyly also serve
as our executive officers. |
|
|
|
Mr. R. Michael Rouleau retired as our President and Chief
Executive Officer on March 15, 2006. |
36
|
|
|
Change in Control Severance Agreements |
We have entered into change in control severance agreements with
each of our current executive officers (other than those
executive officers who are also members of our board of
directors) and certain other key employees.
The change in control severance agreements provide that during
the two-year period following the completion of the merger, the
covered executives status, offices, titles and reporting
relationships with Michaels or the surviving corporation will be
commensurate with those in effect immediately prior to the
completion of the merger, and the covered executive will be
entitled to an annual base salary, annual bonus, long-term
incentive compensation opportunities, savings and retirement
benefit opportunities and welfare and fringe benefits in values
and amounts at least equal to those provided by us to the
executive immediately prior to completion of the merger. The
change in control severance agreements also provide for
comprehensive officer liability insurance coverage and continued
indemnification rights.
Under the change in control severance agreements, if the covered
executives employment with Michaels is terminated without
cause in anticipation of the completion of the
merger or if, during the two-year period after the completion of
the merger, the executive is terminated without
cause or resigns for good reason (which
includes, among other things, (1) the assignment to the
executive of duties and responsibilities that are materially
inconsistent with the executives status, offices, titles
and reporting relationships prior to the completion of the
merger, (2) the failure to provide the executive with the
levels of compensation and benefits required pursuant to the
change in control severance agreement and (3) a relocation
greater than 50 miles from the executives current
principal place of business), the executive would be entitled to
the following severance benefits under the change in control
severance agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
a lump-sum cash severance payment equal to two times (three
times, in the case of Messrs. Boyer and Sandfort) the sum
of (1) the executives base salary in effect on the
date of termination and (2) the greater of the average
annual incentive award for the previous three fiscal years and
the target annual bonus for the year of termination; |
|
|
|
a prorated target annual bonus, provided that in the event that
Michaels or the surviving corporation makes payments under the
annual incentive plan in which the executive participates
immediately prior to termination to participants who remain
actively employed at a level that exceeds the target level,
Michaels or the surviving corporation will make an additional
payment to the executive equal to the excess of the actual
payout level over the executives target level bonus,
prorated to reflect the period of the executives
employment during the year of termination; |
|
|
|
the continuation of welfare and fringe benefits for two years
(three years, in the case of Messrs. Boyer and Sandfort)
after termination of employment or a lump-sum cash payment in
lieu thereof; |
|
|
|
the accelerated vesting of all outstanding equity-based
compensation awards and the termination of any restrictions and
forfeiture provisions related to such awards; |
|
|
|
two additional years (three additional years, in the case of
Messrs. Boyer and Sandfort) of retirement plan age and
service credit for purposes of computing the executives
accrued benefits under our retirement plans or a lump-sum cash
payment in lieu thereof; and |
|
|
|
reimbursement for the cost of executive-level outplacement
services (subject to a $50,000 ceiling). |
In addition to the foregoing, in accordance with the change in
control severance agreements, Michaels or the surviving
corporation will make certain tax gross-up payments
to address taxes, interest and penalties that may be imposed
under applicable tax laws in connection with excess
parachute payments (as defined in Section 280G of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Internal
Revenue Code)) and nonqualified deferred
compensation (as defined in Section 409A of the
Internal Revenue Code) and will reimburse the executive for
certain legal fees and related expenses incurred in connection
with negotiations with the Sponsor Entities, including the
negotiation of equity rollovers and new employment arrangements.
The executives will be entitled to the payments and benefits
described in this paragraph even if their
37
employment does not terminate under circumstances that entitle
them to severance and they remain employed by the surviving
corporation during the two-year period following the completion
of the merger.
In order to obtain severance benefits under a change in control
severance agreement, an executive must first execute a
separation agreement with Michaels or the surviving corporation
that includes a waiver and release of any and all claims against
Michaels and a commitment that, for one year following
termination, the executive will not solicit or hire any employee
of Michaels or its subsidiaries and will not interfere with any
relationship between Michaels and its employees, customers or
suppliers.
The following table shows the amount of potential cash severance
payable to each of our current executive officers who is a party
to a change in control severance agreement (including the amount
the executive would receive as a result of additional age and
service credits under our retirement plans and including the
amount the officer would be entitled to be reimbursed for
outplacement expenses), based on compensation and benefit levels
in effect on July 25, 2006, and assuming the merger is
completed on September 25, 2006, and the executives
employment terminates under circumstances that entitle him to
severance immediately thereafter. The table also shows the
estimated value of continuing welfare and fringe benefits and
the estimated tax
gross-up payment to
each such executive in respect of the excise tax imposed on
excess parachute payments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Potential |
|
Estimated Value of |
|
|
|
|
Cash Severance |
|
Welfare and Fringe |
|
Estimated 280G |
Name |
|
Payment* |
|
Benefits |
|
Gross-up Payment** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey N. Boyer
|
|
$ |
2,539,719 |
|
|
$ |
47,815 |
|
|
$ |
1,166,973 |
|
Gregory A. Sandfort
|
|
$ |
2,529,213 |
|
|
$ |
122,094 |
|
|
$ |
1,295,871 |
|
Thomas M. Bazzone
|
|
$ |
1,106,625 |
|
|
$ |
82,172 |
|
|
$ |
653,038 |
|
Thomas C. DeCaro
|
|
$ |
943,223 |
|
|
$ |
86,240 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Harvey S. Kanter
|
|
$ |
1,107,225 |
|
|
$ |
95,696 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Edward F. Sadler
|
|
$ |
1,120,220 |
|
|
$ |
98,082 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
* |
Includes two or three times (as applicable) the sum of base
salary and current target bonus, a prorated target annual bonus
for 2006, two or three years (as applicable) of service credit
under our qualified and nonqualified retirement plans and
$50,000 for outplacement services. |
|
|
** |
Estimates are subject to change based on the date of completion
of the merger, date of termination of the executive officer,
interest rates then in effect and certain other assumptions used
in the calculation. Estimates include the estimated tax
gross-up as a result of
any acceleration of vesting of stock options as well as the
potential cash severance payment and estimated value of benefits
set forth in the preceding two columns. In addition, estimates
include the estimated tax gross-ups required to be paid in
connection with the change in control bonuses, which are
described below. |
|
|
|
Change in Control Retention Bonus Plan |
Michaels has adopted a change in control retention bonus plan in
which each of our current executive officers (other than those
executive officers who are also members of our board of
directors) and certain other key employees participate. Under
the change in control retention bonus plan, each executive
officer will receive a $125,000 bonus on the one-year
anniversary of the completion of the merger, provided that he or
she remains employed until such date. If an executives
employment is terminated without cause after the completion of
the merger but prior to the one-year anniversary, the executive
will continue to be eligible to receive the change in control
retention bonus.
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2006 Bonus Enhancement |
Participants (including our current executive officers, other
than those executive officers who are also members of our board
of directors) in our Fiscal Year 2006 Bonus Plan program will be
eligible to receive a one-time bonus enhancement. Under the
terms of the bonus plan enhancement, we have guaranteed a 2006
cash bonus for each participant at a minimum level of one
payment tier below the participants target annual
38
bonus. Each participant will also be eligible to receive an
additional bonus payment of up to 75% of the participants
target annual bonus, based on the participants individual
performance in fiscal year 2006.
The following table shows the maximum amount of the 2006 cash
bonus that would have been payable to each of our current
executive officers who participates in our Fiscal Year 2006
Bonus Plan program in the absence of the bonus enhancement, the
maximum amount of each such individuals 2006 bonus
enhancement and the sum of the two.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
Maximum 2006 |
|
|
|
|
Regular 2006 |
|
Bonus |
|
Maximum Total |
Name |
|
Bonus |
|
Enhancement |
|
2006 Bonus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
(b) |
|
(a)+(b) |
Jeffrey N. Boyer
|
|
$ |
318,750 |
|
|
$ |
178,125 |
|
|
$ |
496,875 |
|
Gregory A. Sandfort
|
|
$ |
315,000 |
|
|
$ |
176,250 |
|
|
$ |
491,250 |
|
Thomas M. Bazzone
|
|
$ |
171,750 |
|
|
$ |
85,875 |
|
|
$ |
257,625 |
|
Thomas C. DeCaro
|
|
$ |
165,000 |
|
|
$ |
82,500 |
|
|
$ |
247,500 |
|
Harvey S. Kanter
|
|
$ |
172,038 |
|
|
$ |
86,019 |
|
|
$ |
258,056 |
|
Edward F. Sadler
|
|
$ |
198,000 |
|
|
$ |
99,000 |
|
|
$ |
297,000 |
|
|
|
|
Termination of the Deferred Compensation Plan and
Distribution of Account Balances |
Upon completion of the merger, we will terminate our
nonqualified deferred compensation plan and will cause all
accounts thereunder to be distributed in cash to participants,
less any required withholding taxes. All account balances under
our nonqualified deferred compensation plan are currently vested.
The following table shows the account balances of our executive
officers as of July 25, 2006, in the nonqualified deferred
compensation plan. All account balances will be distributed as
soon as practicable following completion of the merger. Members
of our board of directors do not participate in the nonqualified
deferred compensation plan.
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Account Balance |
|
|
|
R. Michael Rouleau*
|
|
$ |
3,164,201 |
|
Jeffrey N. Boyer
|
|
$ |
55,694 |
|
Gregory A. Sandfort
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Thomas M. Bazzone
|
|
$ |
126,894 |
|
Thomas C. DeCaro
|
|
$ |
110,553 |
|
Harvey S. Kanter
|
|
$ |
204,852 |
|
Edward F. Sadler
|
|
$ |
1,923,121 |
|
|
|
* |
Mr. R. Michael Rouleau retired as our President and Chief
Executive Officer on March 15, 2006. |
|
|
|
Benefit Arrangements with the Surviving Corporation |
The surviving corporation has agreed, for a period of two years
following the completion of the merger, to either
(1) maintain our employee benefit plans and agreements
(other than equity-based plans) at the level in effect on the
date of the merger agreement, and provide compensation and
benefits to our employees (including our executive officers)
that have a value sufficient to replace the value of
compensation and benefits provided to such employees under our
equity-based plans prior to the completion of the merger or
(2) provide compensation and benefits that are not less
favorable in the aggregate (including any value attributable to
equity-based compensation) than the benefits provided to
employees on date of the completion of the merger.
In addition, the surviving corporation has agreed to honor and
continue, without amendment or modification, for a period of two
years following the completion of the merger, or, if sooner,
until all obligations thereunder have been satisfied, each of
our employment, severance, retention, termination and
39
cash incentive compensation plans, policies, programs,
agreements and arrangements (including (1) any change in
control severance agreements, (2) the Change in Control
Severance Plans I and II, (3) the Change in Control Bonus
Program, (4) the Fiscal Year 2006 Bonus Enhancement Program
and (5) the Fiscal Year 2006 MIK Power Bonus Plan).
The surviving corporation will also maintain, for a period of
two years following the completion of the merger, or, if sooner,
until all obligations thereunder have been satisfied, our
various incentive plans in accordance with their terms with
respect to all performance periods under such incentive plans
commencing prior to completion of the merger and ending
thereafter. The merger agreement provides for other benefit
arrangements for specified periods.
|
|
|
Directors and Officers Indemnification and
Insurance |
The merger agreement provides that all rights to indemnification
and exculpation from liabilities for acts or omissions occurring
at or prior to the effective time of the merger and rights to
advancement of expenses relating thereto now existing in favor
of any person who is or prior to the effective time of the
merger becomes, or has been at any time prior to the date of the
merger agreement, a director, officer, employee or agent
(including as a fiduciary with respect to an employee benefit
plan) of Michaels, any of our subsidiaries or any of our or
their respective predecessors (each, an indemnified
party) as provided in the organizational documents of
Michaels or any of our subsidiaries or any indemnification
agreement between such indemnified party and us or any of our
subsidiaries (in each case, as in effect on date of the merger
agreement or, with respect to any indemnification agreement
entered into after the date of the merger agreement, to the
extent the terms thereof are no more favorable in any material
respect to the indemnified party than those of certain
indemnification agreements existing prior to the date of the
merger agreement) shall survive the merger and shall not be
amended, repealed or otherwise modified in any manner that would
adversely affect any right thereunder of any such indemnified
party.
The merger agreement also provides that, without limiting any
right of any indemnified party pursuant to any indemnification
agreement, from and after the effective time of the merger, in
the event of any threatened or actual claim, action, suit,
proceeding or investigation, whether civil, criminal or
administrative in which any person who is now, or has been at
any time prior to the date of the merger agreement, or who
becomes prior to the effective time, a director or officer of
Michaels is or is threatened to be, made a party in his or her
capacity as a director or officer of Michaels, the surviving
corporation shall, for a period of six years after the effective
time, indemnify and hold harmless, to the fullest extent
permitted by law, each such indemnified party in his or her
capacity as a director or officer of Michaels or any of our
subsidiaries, or any of our or their respective predecessors,
against any losses, claims, damages, liabilities, costs,
expenses (including reasonable attorneys fees and
expenses), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement of or
in connection with any such threatened or actual claim, arising
out of, or pertaining to (1) the fact that such an
indemnified party was a director (including in a capacity as a
member of any board committee) or officer of Michaels, any of
our subsidiaries or any of our or their respective predecessors,
or a fiduciary with respect to any employee benefit plan
maintained by any of the foregoing, prior to the effective time
or (2) the merger agreement or any of the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement, whether in any case
asserted or arising before or after the effective time. The
surviving corporation has agreed not to settle, compromise or
consent to the entry of any judgment in any threatened or actual
claim for which indemnification could be sought by an
indemnified party under the merger agreement, unless such
settlement, compromise or consent includes an unconditional
release of such indemnified party from all liability arising out
of such claim or such indemnified party otherwise consents in
writing to such settlement, compromise or consent. The surviving
corporation has also agreed to cooperate with an indemnified
party in the defense of any matter for which such indemnified
party could seek indemnification under the merger agreement.
The merger agreement further provides that the surviving
corporation shall obtain, at the effective time, prepaid (or
tail) directors and officers liability
insurance policies in respect of acts or omissions occurring at
or prior to the effective time for six years from the effective
time, covering each indemnified party on terms with respect to
such coverage and amounts no less favorable than those of such
policies in effect on the date of the merger agreement. In the
event the surviving corporation is unable to obtain such
tail insurance policies,
40
then, for a period of six years from the effective time, the
surviving corporation is required to maintain in effect our
current directors and officers liability insurance
policies in respect of acts or omissions occurring at or prior
to the effective time, covering each indemnified party on terms
with respect to such coverage and amounts no less favorable than
those of such policies in effect on the date of the merger
agreement; provided that the surviving corporation may
substitute policies of a reputable and financially sound
insurance company containing terms no less favorable to any
indemnified party; provided further that in satisfying these
obligations the surviving corporation is not obligated to pay
for coverage for any
12-month period
aggregate premiums for insurance in excess of 250% of the amount
paid by us for coverage for the period of 12 months
beginning on June 1 most recently commenced prior to the
date of the merger agreement, although the surviving corporation
is required to provide such coverage as may be obtained for such
amount.
|
|
|
Arrangements with the Sponsor Entities |
As of the date of this proxy statement, no member of our
management has entered into any agreement, arrangement or
understanding with Bain or Blackstone or their affiliates
regarding employment with, or the right to purchase or
participate in the equity of, the surviving corporation. In
addition, as of the date of this proxy statement no member of
our board of directors has entered into any agreement,
arrangement or understanding with Bain or Blackstone or their
affiliates regarding the right to purchase or participate in the
equity of the surviving corporation. Bain and Blackstone have
informed us that it is their intention to retain members of our
existing management team with the surviving corporation after
the merger is completed. Members of management currently are
engaged in discussions with representatives of Bain and
Blackstone regarding revised terms of employment. In addition to
revised terms of employment, Bain and Blackstone have informed
us that they anticipate offering members of management the
opportunity to convert a portion of their current equity
interests in Michaels into equity in the surviving corporation,
and that they also intend to set up equity-based incentive
compensation plans for management of the surviving corporation.
Although we believe members of our management team are likely to
enter into new arrangements with the surviving corporation or
affiliates of the Sponsor Entities regarding employment with,
and the right to purchase or participate in the equity of, the
surviving corporation, such matters are subject to further
negotiations and discussion and no terms or conditions have been
finalized. Any such new arrangements are expected to be entered
into prior to the completion of the merger.
|
|
|
Non-Competition Arrangements with the Surviving
Corporation |
It is contemplated that the surviving corporation will enter
into a two-year non-compete agreement with each of
Messrs. Charles J. Wyly, Jr. and Sam Wyly, and pay an
aggregate of $6 million pursuant to the terms of those
agreements.
Appraisal Rights
Our stockholders have the right under Delaware law to dissent
from the adoption of the merger agreement, to exercise appraisal
rights and to receive payment in cash for the fair value of
their shares of our common stock determined in accordance with
Delaware law. The fair value of shares of our common stock, as
determined in accordance with Delaware law, may be more or less
than the merger consideration to be paid to non-dissenting
stockholders in the merger. To preserve their rights,
stockholders who wish to exercise appraisal rights must not vote
in favor of the adoption of the merger agreement and must follow
specific procedures. Dissenting stockholders must precisely
follow these specific procedures to exercise appraisal rights,
or their appraisal rights may be lost. These procedures are
described in this proxy statement, and the provisions of
Delaware law that grant appraisal rights and govern such
procedures are attached as Annex E to this proxy statement.
See Appraisal Rights beginning on
page 62.
Delisting and Deregistration of Our Common Stock
If the merger is completed, our common stock will be delisted
from the NYSE and deregistered under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and we will
no longer file periodic reports with the SEC on account of our
common stock.
41
Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences of the
Merger
The following is a discussion of the material United States
federal income tax consequences of the merger to
U.S. holders whose shares of our common stock are converted
into the right to receive cash in the merger. The discussion is
based upon the Internal Revenue Code, Treasury regulations,
Internal Revenue Service rulings and judicial and administrative
decisions in effect as of the date of this proxy statement, all
of which are subject to change (possibly with retroactive
effect) or to different interpretations. The following
discussion does not purport to consider all aspects of
U.S. federal income taxation that might be relevant to our
stockholders. This discussion applies only to stockholders who,
on the date on which the merger is completed, hold shares of our
common stock as a capital asset. The following discussion does
not address taxpayers subject to special treatment under
U.S. federal income tax laws, such as insurance companies,
financial institutions, dealers in securities, tax-exempt
organizations, mutual funds, real estate investment trusts,
investors in pass-through entities, S corporations and
taxpayers subject to the alternative minimum tax. In addition,
the following discussion may not apply to stockholders who
acquired their shares of our common stock upon the exercise of
employee stock options or otherwise as compensation for services
or through a tax-qualified retirement plan or who hold their
shares as part of a hedge, straddle, conversion transaction or
other integrated transaction. If our common stock is held
through a partnership, the U.S. federal income tax
treatment of a partner in the partnership will generally depend
upon the status of the partner and the activities of the
partnership. Partnerships that are holders of our common stock
and partners in such partnerships are urged to consult their own
tax advisors regarding the tax consequences to them of the
merger.
The following discussion does not address potential foreign,
state, local and other tax consequences of the merger. All
stockholders are urged to consult their own tax advisors
regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences, as well
as the foreign, state and local tax consequences, of the
disposition of their shares in the merger.
For purposes of this summary, a U.S. holder is
a holder of shares of our common stock, who or that is, for
U.S. federal income tax purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States; |
|
|
|
a corporation (or other entity taxable as a corporation) created
or organized in or under the laws of the United States, any
state of the United States or the District of Columbia; |
|
|
|
an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal
income tax regardless of its source; or |
|
|
|
a trust if (1) a U.S. court is able to exercise
primary supervision over the trusts administration and one
or more U.S. persons are authorized to control all
substantial decisions of the trust; or (2) it was in existence
on August 20, 1996 and has a valid election in place to be
treated as a domestic trust for U.S. federal income tax
purposes. |
Except with respect to the backup withholding discussion below,
this discussion does not discuss the tax consequences to any
stockholder who or that, for U.S. federal income tax
purposes, is not a U.S. holder.
For U.S. federal income tax purposes, the merger will be
treated as a sale of our common stock for cash by each of our
stockholders. Accordingly, in general, the U.S. federal
income tax consequences to a stockholder receiving cash in the
merger will be as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
The stockholder will recognize a capital gain or loss for
U.S. federal income tax purposes upon the disposition of
the stockholders shares of our common stock pursuant to
the merger. |
|
|
|
The amount of capital gain or loss recognized by each
stockholder will be measured by the difference, if any, between
the amount of cash received by the stockholder in the merger and
the stockholders adjusted tax basis in the shares of our
common stock surrendered in the merger. Gain or loss will be
determined separately for each block of shares (i.e.,
shares acquired at the same cost in a single transaction)
surrendered for cash in the merger. |
|
|
|
The capital gain or loss, if any, will be long-term with respect
to shares of our common stock that have a holding period for tax
purposes in excess of one year at the time of the merger.
Long-term capital |
42
|
|
|
|
|
gains of individuals are eligible for reduced rates of taxation.
There are limitations on the deductibility of capital losses. |
Cash payments made pursuant to the merger will be reported to
our stockholders and the Internal Revenue Service to the extent
required by the Internal Revenue Code and applicable Treasury
regulations. These amounts ordinarily will not be subject to
withholding of U.S. federal income tax. However, backup
withholding of the tax at applicable rates will apply to all
cash payments to which a U.S. holder is entitled pursuant
to the merger agreement if such holder (1) fails to supply
the paying agent with the stockholders taxpayer
identification number (Social Security number, in the case of
individuals, or employer identification number, in the case of
other stockholders), certify that such number is correct, and
otherwise comply with the backup withholding rules, (2) has
received notice from the Internal Revenue Service of a failure
to report all interest and dividends required to be shown on the
stockholders U.S. federal income tax returns, or
(3) is subject to backup withholding in certain other
cases. Accordingly, each U.S. holder will be asked to
complete and sign a Substitute
Form W-9, which is
to be included in the appropriate letter of transmittal for the
shares of our common stock, in order to provide the information
and certification necessary to avoid backup withholding or to
otherwise establish an exemption from backup withholding tax,
unless an exemption applies and is established in a manner
satisfactory to the paying agent. Stockholders who are not
U.S. holders should complete and sign a Form W-8BEN
(or other applicable tax form) and return it to the paying agent
in order to provide the information and certification necessary
to avoid backup withholding tax or otherwise establish an
exemption from backup withholding tax. Certain of our
stockholders will be asked to provide additional tax information
in the appropriate letter of transmittal for the shares of our
common stock.
Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts
withheld under the backup withholding rules will be allowed as a
refund or a credit against your U.S. federal income tax
liability provided the required information is timely furnished
to the Internal Revenue Service.
The foregoing discussion of certain material
U.S. federal income tax consequences is included for
general informational purposes only. We urge you to consult your
own tax advisor to determine the particular tax consequences to
you (including the application and effect of any state, local or
foreign income and other tax laws) of the receipt of cash in
exchange for shares of our common stock pursuant to the
merger.
Regulatory Approvals
Under the merger agreement, we and the other parties to the
merger agreement have agreed to use our reasonable best efforts
to complete the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement as promptly as practicable, including obtaining all
necessary governmental approvals. The Hart-Scott-Rodino Act
provides that transactions such as the merger may not be
completed until certain information has been submitted to the
Federal Trade Commission and the Antitrust Division of the
U.S. Department of Justice and certain waiting period
requirements have been satisfied. Michaels and an entity to be
formed to invest in the Mergercos filed notification reports
with the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission
under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act on August 28, 2006, and
August 24, 2006, respectively.
Except as noted above with respect to the required filings under
the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act and the filing of a certificate of
merger in Delaware at or before the effective date of the
merger, we are unaware of any material federal, state or foreign
regulatory requirements or approvals required for the execution
of the merger agreement or completion of the merger.
Litigation Concerning the Merger
On March 21, 2003, Julie Fathergill filed a purported
stockholder derivative action, which is pending in the
192nd District Court for Dallas County, Texas. The lawsuit
names certain former and current officers and directors,
including all of our current directors, as individual
defendants, and Michaels, as a nominal defendant.
43
On July 10, 2006, the plaintiff filed a Second Amended
Shareholder Derivative and Class Action Petition in which
she added new class action allegations regarding the proposed
merger. Among other things, the plaintiff seeks (1) a
declaration that the merger agreement violates the individual
defendants fiduciary duties and therefore is unlawful and
unenforceable, (2) an injunction that prevents the
consummation of the proposed transaction unless and until we
disclose all material facts regarding the merger and implement
procedures to obtain the highest possible price for our company,
(3) an indeterminate amount of damages from the individual
defendants, (4) certain corporate governance changes,
(5) formation of a constructive trust on the proceeds of
defendants alleged trading activities and
(6) restitution from, and disgorgement of proceeds derived
by, the named officers with respect to the alleged acts.
The lawsuit is in its preliminary stage. We believe that the
lawsuit is without merit and intend to defend the lawsuit
vigorously.
On June 9, 2006, Feivel Gottlieb and on June 12, 2006,
Roberta Schuman each filed purported stockholder derivative
actions, which are pending in the 191st and the
14th District Courts for Dallas County, Texas,
respectively. The lawsuits name our chairman of the board and
vice chairman of the board, both in their capacities as our
officers and directors, and all of our other current directors,
as individual defendants, and Michaels, as a nominal defendant.
On July 5, 2006, the plaintiffs filed First Amended
Shareholder Derivative and Class Action Petitions
(amended petitions) against the individual
defendants, Michaels, as a nominal defendant, and Bain and
Blackstone. The amended petitions add class action allegations
against our directors for breach of fiduciary duty related to
the proposed merger, and a claim against Bain and Blackstone for
aiding and abetting the directors alleged breach of
fiduciary duty. As a result of these new claims, the plaintiffs
seek (1) to enjoin the transaction with Bain and Blackstone
(or declare it void, if it is consummated), (2) require the
defendants to disgorge the property they received as a result of
their allegedly wrongful conduct and (3) an indeterminate
amount of damages from the defendants, jointly and severally.
By court order dated August 18, 2006, the Gottlieb and
Schuman actions were consolidated with the Fathergill action,
described above.
The lawsuit is in its preliminary stage. We believe that the
lawsuit is without merit and intend to defend the lawsuit
vigorously.
On June 19, 2006, Albert Hulliung filed a purported
stockholder derivative action, which is pending in the United
States District Court, Northern District of Texas, Dallas
Division. The lawsuit named our chairman of the board and vice
chairman of the board, all of our other current directors, one
additional current officer and certain of our former officers as
individual defendants and Michaels as a nominal defendant.
On July 27, 2006, the plaintiff amended his complaint
adding certain of our other former and current officers and one
former director as individual defendants and included
allegations similar to those set forth in the second amended
(July 10, 2006) Fathergill petition, described above. The
plaintiff seeks, among other relief, (1) an indeterminate
amount of damages from the individual defendants,
(2) restitution from, and disgorgement of proceeds derived
by, the individual defendants who received stock options,
(3) the imposition of a constructive trust against the
individuals who were alleged to have engaged in insider sales
and (4) other unspecified equitable relief.
The lawsuit is in its preliminary stage. We believe that the
lawsuit is without merit and intend to defend the lawsuit
vigorously.
44
THE MERGER AGREEMENT
The merger agreement is the legal document that governs the
merger. This section of the proxy statement describes the
material provisions of the merger agreement but may not contain
all of the information about the merger agreement that is
important to you. The merger agreement is included as
Annex A to this proxy statement and is incorporated into
this proxy statement by reference. The first amendment to the
merger agreement is included as Annex B to this proxy
statement and is incorporated into this proxy statement by
reference. We encourage you to read the merger agreement, as
amended, in its entirety. The merger agreement, as amended, is a
commercial document that establishes and governs the legal
relations between us and the Sponsor Entities with respect to
the transactions described in this proxy statement. The
representations, warranties and covenants made by us and the
Sponsor Entities are qualified and subject to important
limitations agreed to by us and the Sponsor Entities in
connection with negotiating the terms of the merger agreement.
Furthermore, the representations and warranties may be subject
to standards of materiality applicable to us and the Sponsor
Entities that may be different from those that are applicable to
you.
Effective Time; The Marketing Period
The effective time of the merger will occur at the time that we
file a certificate of merger with the Secretary of State of the
State of Delaware on the closing date of the merger (or such
later time as provided in the certificate of merger). So long as
the marketing period has expired, the closing date will occur on
the first business day after all of the conditions to the merger
set forth in the merger agreement have been satisfied or waived
(or such other date as we and the Mergercos may agree). In the
event that all conditions have been satisfied but the marketing
period has not expired, then the parties are not required to
effect the closing until the earlier of:
|
|
|
|
|
a date during the marketing period specified by the Mergercos on
no less than three business days notice to us; and |
|
|
|
the final day of the marketing period. |
The marketing period is defined in the merger
agreement as the first period of 30 consecutive days following
the later of (i) the adoption of the merger agreement by
our stockholders and (ii) September 4, 2006,
throughout which:
|
|
|
|
|
the Fincos shall have financial and other pertinent information
regarding Michaels as may be reasonably requested by them to
consummate the debt financing, including all financial
statements and financial data of the type required by
Regulation S-X and
Regulation S-K
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
Securities Act) (other than Rule 3-10 of
Regulation S-X)
and of type and form customarily included in private placements
pursuant to Rule 144A promulgated under the Securities Act
(collectively, the required financial
information); and |
|
|
|
nothing has occurred and no condition exists that would cause
any of the conditions to the Sponsor Entities obligations
to close not to be satisfied assuming the closing were to be
scheduled for any time during such consecutive
30-day period; and |
at the end of which, we have received stockholder approval of
the merger agreement, no judgment or order issued by any Federal
or state court is in effect that enjoins or prohibits
consummation of the merger and the waiting period under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino Act has terminated or has expired.
If the marketing period shall not have commenced prior to
November 1, 2006, as a result of the failure of the Fincos
to have the required financial information, then, subject to
Michaels having complied as of the first day of the marketing
period with our obligations under the merger agreement to use
our reasonable best efforts to provide the required financial
information to the Fincos, the marketing period
shall be the first period of 30 consecutive days after
November 1, 2006, throughout which:
|
|
|
|
|
the Fincos shall have all financial statements for a high-yield
financing during the marketing period of the type required in a
registered offering by
Regulation S-X and
Regulation S-K
under the Securities Act (other than Rule 3-10 of
Regulation S-X)
that are customarily included in private placements |
45
|
|
|
|
|
pursuant to Rule 144A promulgated under the Securities Act,
and, in the case of the annual financial statements, the
auditors report thereon (collectively, the core
required financial information); and |
|
|
|
nothing has occurred and no condition exists that would cause
any of the conditions to the Sponsor Entities obligations
to close not to be satisfied assuming the closing were to be
scheduled for any time during such consecutive
30-day period; and |
at the end of which, we have received stockholder approval of
the merger agreement, no judgment or order issued by any Federal
or state court is in effect that enjoins or prohibits
consummation of the merger and the waiting period under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino Act has terminated or has expired.
If the financial statements included in the required financial
information or the core required financial information, as the
case may be, that is available to the Fincos on the first day of
any such 30-day period
would be stale, within the meaning of Rule 3-12
of Regulation S-X,
on any day during such
30-day period if a
registration statement using such financial statements were to
be filed with the SEC on such date, then a new
30-day period commences.
Throughout the marketing period the Sponsor Entities have agreed:
|
|
|
|
|
to use reasonable best efforts to satisfy on a timely basis the
conditions to obtaining the financing set forth in the debt
financing commitments obtained in connection with the merger and
to cause the lenders providing the debt financing to fund such
financing; and |
|
|
|
in the event that any portion of the debt financing becomes
unavailable on the terms and conditions contemplated in such
commitments, to use reasonable best efforts to obtain as
promptly as practicable alternative financing. |
In addition, in the event that any portion of the debt financing
structured as high yield financing has not been consummated,
then, subject to certain exceptions, the Sponsor Entities must
use the proceeds of the bridge financing to replace the high
yield financing no later than the last day of the marketing
period. See Financing Commitments; Cooperation
of Michaels below for a further discussion of the
Sponsor Entities covenants relating to the financing
commitments.
Structure
Subject to the terms and conditions of the merger agreement and
in accordance with Delaware law, at the effective time of the
merger, each Mergerco will merge with and into Michaels. The
separate corporate existences of each Mergerco will cease, and
Michaels will continue as the surviving corporation, wholly
owned by entities sponsored by or co-investors with Bain and
Blackstone. The surviving corporation will be a privately held
corporation and our current stockholders, other than any
co-investors and members of our management who may be permitted
to invest in the surviving corporation and who choose to so
invest, will cease to have any ownership interest in the
surviving corporation or rights as our stockholders. Therefore,
such current stockholders will not participate in any future
earnings or growth of the surviving corporation and will not
benefit from any appreciation in value of the surviving
corporation.
Treatment of Stock and Options
At the effective time of the merger, each share of our common
stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective
time of the merger will automatically be canceled and will cease
to exist and will be converted into the right to receive $44.00
in cash, without interest and less applicable withholding taxes,
other than shares of our common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
held in our treasury immediately prior to the effective time of
the merger, which shares will be canceled without conversion or
consideration; |
|
|
|
owned by any of the Sponsor Entities immediately prior to the
effective time of the merger, which shares will be canceled
without conversion or consideration; |
46
|
|
|
|
|
held by stockholders who have properly demanded and perfected
their appraisal rights in accordance with Delaware law, which
shares shall be entitled to payment of the fair value of such
shares in accordance with Delaware law; and |
|
|
|
retained by the Highfields Funds and members of our management
as rollover shares. |
After the effective time of the merger, each of our outstanding
stock certificates representing shares of common stock converted
in the merger will represent only the right to receive the
merger consideration of $44.00 in cash per share, without any
interest and less applicable withholding taxes, and any
dividends declared with a record date prior to the effective
time that remain unpaid at the effective time and that are due
with respect to such shares. The merger consideration (and
dividends, if any) paid upon surrender of each certificate will
be paid in full satisfaction of all rights pertaining to the
shares of our common stock represented by that certificate.
|
|
|
Stock Options and Restricted Stock |
At the effective time of the merger, each outstanding option
(other than rollover options held by members of our management)
to purchase shares of our common stock, whether or not then
exercisable, will be canceled and converted into the right to
receive an amount in cash equal to the excess (if any) of the
$44.00 per share cash merger consideration over the
exercise price per share of the option, multiplied by the number
of shares subject to the option (such amount, the option
amount), without interest and less any applicable
withholding taxes, and all outstanding shares of restricted
stock will be converted into the right to receive
$44.00 per share in cash, without interest and less any
applicable withholding taxes.
Exchange and Payment Procedures
At or prior to the effective time of the merger, the Sponsor
Entities will deposit, or will cause the surviving corporation
to deposit, cash in an amount sufficient to pay the merger
consideration and the option amounts due to each holder of
shares of our common stock with a bank or trust company (the
paying agent) reasonably acceptable to us. Within
two business days after the effective time of the merger, the
surviving corporation will cause the paying agent to mail a
letter of transmittal and instructions to you and the other
stockholders. The letter of transmittal and instructions will
tell you how to surrender your common stock certificates in
exchange for the merger consideration.
You should not return your stock certificates with the
enclosed proxy card, and you should not forward your stock
certificates to the paying agent without a letter of
transmittal.
You will not be entitled to receive the merger consideration
until you surrender your stock certificate or certificates to
the paying agent, together with a duly completed and executed
letter of transmittal and any other documents as may reasonably
be required by the paying agent. The merger consideration may be
paid to a person other than the person in whose name the
corresponding certificate is registered if the certificate is
properly endorsed or is otherwise in the proper form for
transfer. In addition, the person who surrenders such
certificate must either pay any fiduciary or surety bonds or any
transfer or other similar taxes or establish to the reasonable
satisfaction of the surviving corporation that such taxes have
been paid or are not applicable.
No interest will be paid or will accrue on the cash payable upon
surrender of the certificates. The surviving corporation or the
paying agent will be entitled to deduct and withhold, and pay to
the appropriate taxing authorities, any applicable taxes from
the merger consideration and the option amounts. Any sum which
is withheld and paid to a taxing authority by the surviving
corporation or the paying agent will be deemed to have been paid
to the person with regard to whom it is withheld.
At the close of business on the day on which the effective time
of the merger occurs, our stock transfer books will be closed,
and there will be no further registration of transfers of
outstanding shares of our common stock. If, after the close of
business on the day on which the effective time of the merger
occurs, certificates are presented to the surviving corporation
for transfer, they will be canceled and exchanged for the merger
consideration.
47
None of Michaels, the surviving corporation, the Sponsor
Entities or the paying agent will be liable to any person for
any cash delivered to a public official pursuant to any
applicable abandoned property, escheat or similar law. Any
portion of the merger consideration deposited with the paying
agent that remains undistributed to the holders of certificates
evidencing shares of our common stock for twelve months after
the effective time of the merger, will be delivered, upon
demand, to the surviving corporation. Holders of certificates
who have not surrendered their certificates prior to the
delivery of such funds to the surviving corporation may only
look to the surviving corporation for, and the surviving
corporation shall remain liable for, the payment of the merger
consideration. Any portion of the merger consideration that
remains unclaimed as of a date that is immediately prior to such
time as such amounts would otherwise escheat to or become
property of any governmental authority will, to the extent
permitted by applicable law, become the property of the
surviving corporation free and clear of any claims or interest
of any person previously entitled to the merger consideration.
If you have lost a certificate, or if it has been stolen or
destroyed, then before you will be entitled to receive the
merger consideration, you will have to make an affidavit of that
fact and, if required by the surviving corporation, post a bond
or surety in such reasonable amount as the surviving corporation
may direct as indemnity against any claim that may be made
against it with respect to that certificate.
Representations and Warranties
We make various representations and warranties in the merger
agreement, including with respect to, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
our and our subsidiaries proper organization, good
standing and qualification to do business; |
|
|
|
our interests in our subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
our capitalization, including in particular the number of shares
of our common stock, stock options and other equity-based
interests; |
|
|
|
our outstanding indebtedness for borrowed money; |
|
|
|
our corporate power and authority to enter into the merger
agreement and to consummate the transactions contemplated by the
merger agreement; |
|
|
|
the approval and recommendation by our board of directors of the
merger agreement, the merger and the other transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement; |
|
|
|
the absence of violations of or conflicts with our and our
subsidiaries governing documents, applicable law or
certain agreements as a result of entering into the merger
agreement and consummating the merger; |
|
|
|
the required consents and approvals of governmental entities in
connection with the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement; |
|
|
|
our SEC filings since January 1, 2004, including the
financial statements contained therein; |
|
|
|
the absence of undisclosed liabilities; |
|
|
|
the accuracy of this proxy statement; |
|
|
|
the absence of a material adverse effect and certain
other changes or events related to us or our subsidiaries since
January 28, 2006; |
|
|
|
legal proceedings and judgments; |
|
|
|
contracts to which we or our subsidiaries are a party; |
|
|
|
compliance with laws; |
|
|
|
possession of permits necessary to conduct our business; |
48
|
|
|
|
|
employment and labor matters affecting us or our subsidiaries,
including matters relating to our and our subsidiaries
employee benefit plans; |
|
|
|
taxes and environmental matters; |
|
|
|
real property; |
|
|
|
intellectual property; |
|
|
|
our and our subsidiaries insurance policies; |
|
|
|
the required vote of our stockholders in connection with the
adoption of the merger agreement; |
|
|
|
the inapplicability of anti-takeover statutes to the merger; |
|
|
|
the absence of undisclosed brokers fees; |
|
|
|
the receipt by us of a fairness opinion from each of JPMorgan
and Goldman Sachs; and |
|
|
|
affiliate transactions. |
For the purposes of the merger agreement, material adverse
effect means any change, effect, event, occurrence or
state of facts that (1) is materially adverse to the
business, financial condition or results of operations of
Michaels and our subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or
(2) prevents or materially impedes, interferes with,
hinders or delays beyond December 19, 2006 (or such later
date as set forth in the merger agreement) the consummation by
Michaels of the merger or the other transactions contemplated by
the merger agreement.
A material adverse effect will not have occurred,
however, as a result of any change, effect, event, occurrence or
state of facts:
|
|
|
|
|
relating to economic, financial market or geopolitical
conditions in general; |
|
|
|
relating to changes in law or applicable accounting regulations
or principles or interpretations thereof; |
|
|
|
relating to the specialty retail industry generally, to the
extent such change, effect, event, occurrence or state of fact
does not materially, disproportionately impact Michaels and our
subsidiaries, taken as a whole; |
|
|
|
consisting of any change in our stock price or trading volume,
in and of itself, or any failure, in and of itself, by us to
meet published revenue or earnings projections (it being
understood that the facts or occurrences giving rise or
contributing to such change or failure may be deemed to
constitute, or be taken into account in determining whether
there has been or would reasonably be expected to be, a material
adverse effect, and it being further understood that any such
change or failure may be taken into account in determining
whether the facts or occurrences giving rise or contributing to
such change or failure are materially adverse to the business,
financial condition or results of operations of Michaels and our
subsidiaries, taken as a whole); |
|
|
|
relating to any outbreak or escalation of hostilities or war or
any act of terrorism; and |
|
|
|
relating to the announcement of the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby and performance of and
compliance with the terms of the merger agreement. |
The merger agreement also contains various representations and
warranties made by the Sponsor Entities, including with respect
to, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
their organization, valid existence and good standing; |
|
|
|
their corporate or other power and authority to enter into the
merger agreement and to consummate the transactions contemplated
by the merger agreement; |
|
|
|
the absence of any violation of or conflict with their governing
documents, applicable law or certain agreements as a result of
entering into the merger agreement and consummating the merger; |
49
|
|
|
|
|
the required consents and approvals of governmental entities in
connection with the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement; |
|
|
|
the accuracy of information supplied for inclusion or
incorporation by reference in this proxy statement; |
|
|
|
debt and equity financing commitments; |
|
|
|
their purpose of formation and prior activities; |
|
|
|
their lack of ownership of our common stock; and |
|
|
|
the absence of undisclosed brokers fees. |
The representations and warranties of each of the parties to the
merger agreement will expire upon the effective time of the
merger. You should be aware that these representations and
warranties made by Michaels to the Sponsor Entities or by the
Sponsor Entities to Michaels, as the case may be, subject to
important limitations and qualifications agreed to by the
parties to the merger agreement, may or may not be accurate as
of the date they were made and do not purport to be accurate as
of the date of this proxy statement.
Conduct of Our Business Pending the Merger
Under the merger agreement, we have agreed that, subject to
certain exceptions and unless the Mergercos give their prior
written consent, between June 30, 2006 and the effective
time of the merger, we will, and will cause each of our
subsidiaries to:
|
|
|
|
|
carry on business in the ordinary course; and |
|
|
|
to the extent consistent therewith, use reasonable best efforts
to preserve substantially intact our and its current business
organizations, to keep available the services of our and our
subsidiaries current officers and employees and to
preserve our and our subsidiaries relationships with
significant customers, suppliers, licensors, licensees,
distributors, wholesalers, lessors and others with which we and
our subsidiaries have significant business dealings. |
We have also agreed that during the same time period, and again
subject to certain exceptions or unless the Mergercos give their
prior written consent, we will not, and will not permit any of
our subsidiaries to:
|
|
|
|
|
declare, set aside or pay any dividends on, or make any other
distributions (whether in cash, stock or property) in respect
of, any of our or its capital stock, other than: |
|
|
|
|
|
dividends or distributions by a direct or indirect wholly owned
subsidiary to its parent; and |
|
|
|
regular quarterly cash dividends on our common stock, not to
exceed, in the case of any such quarterly dividend,
$0.12 per share; |
|
|
|
|
|
split, combine or reclassify any of our or our
subsidiaries capital stock or issue or authorize the
issuance of any other securities in lieu of or in substitution
for shares of our or our subsidiaries capital stock; |
|
|
|
purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any shares of our or our
subsidiaries capital stock or any rights, warrants or
options to acquire any such shares, other than: |
|
|
|
|
|
the acquisition by us of shares of our common stock in
connection with the surrender of shares of our common stock by
holders of stock options in order to pay the exercise price of
the stock options; |
|
|
|
the withholding of shares of our common stock to satisfy tax
obligations with respect to awards granted pursuant to our stock
plans; |
|
|
|
the acquisition by us of stock options and shares of our
restricted stock in connection with the forfeiture of such
awards; and |
|
|
|
the acquisition by the trustee of the 401(k) Plan of shares of
our common stock in order to satisfy participant investment
elections under the 401(k) Plan; |
50
|
|
|
|
|
issue, deliver or sell any shares of our or our
subsidiaries capital stock, any other voting securities or
any securities convertible into, or any rights, warrants or
options to acquire, any such shares, voting securities or
convertible securities, or any phantom stock,
phantom stock rights, stock appreciation rights or
stock based performance units, other than: |
|
|
|
|
|
upon the exercise of stock options and rights under the ESPP
outstanding on June 30, 2006, in each case in accordance
with their then present terms; |
|
|
|
as required to comply with any benefit plan or benefit agreement
of Michaels as in effect on June 30, 2006; and |
|
|
|
the issuance of shares of our common stock pursuant to our
Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan; |
|
|
|
|
|
amend our or our subsidiaries certificate of incorporation
or bylaws or comparable organizational documents; |
|
|
|
purchase an equity interest in or a substantial portion of the
assets of, any person or any division or business thereof, if
the aggregate amount of the consideration paid or transferred by
us and our subsidiaries in connection with all such transactions
would exceed $20.0 million or merge or consolidate with any
person, in each case other than any such action solely between
or among us and our subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
sell, lease or otherwise dispose of any of our or our
subsidiaries properties or assets (including capital stock
of any subsidiary) that are material, individually or in the
aggregate, to us and our subsidiaries, taken as a whole, other
than: |
|
|
|
|
|
sales or other dispositions of inventory and other assets in the
ordinary course of business, including in connection with store
relocations, closings, remodels and resets; and |
|
|
|
leases and subleases of real property, and voluntary
terminations or surrenders of real property leases, in each
case, in the ordinary course of business; |
|
|
|
|
|
pledge, encumber or otherwise subject to a lien any of our or
our subsidiaries properties or assets (including capital
stock of any subsidiary), other than in the ordinary course of
business; |
|
|
|
incur any indebtedness for borrowed money, issue or sell any
debt securities or warrants or other rights to acquire any debt
securities of us or our subsidiaries, guarantee any such
indebtedness or any debt securities of another person or enter
into any keep well or other agreement to maintain
any financial statement condition of another person, other than: |
|
|
|
|
|
indebtedness incurred in the ordinary course of business
(including any borrowings under our existing revolving credit
facilities and any trade letters of credit); and |
|
|
|
indebtedness incurred in connection with the refinancing of any
indebtedness existing on June 30, 2006, or permitted to be
incurred, assumed or otherwise entered into under the merger
agreement; |
|
|
|
make any loans or capital contributions to, or investments in,
any other person, other than: |
|
|
|
|
|
to any subsidiary; or |
|
|
|
in the ordinary course of business; |
|
|
|
|
|
make any capital expenditures, other than: |
|
|
|
|
|
in accordance with our capital expenditures plan made available
to the Sponsor Entities in writing prior to June 30, 2006; |
|
|
|
in connection with the repair or replacement of facilities
destroyed or damaged due to casualty or accident (whether or not
covered by insurance); and |
51
|
|
|
|
|
otherwise, in an aggregate amount for all such capital
expenditures not covered above not to exceed $25 million; |
|
|
|
|
|
settle any material claim or material litigation, in each case
made or pending against us or any of our subsidiaries, or any of
our or their officers and directors in their capacities as such,
other than the settlement of claims or litigation in the
ordinary course of business which, in any event; |
|
|
|
|
|
is for an amount not to exceed, for any such settlement
individually, $10 million; and |
|
|
|
would not be reasonably expected to prohibit or materially
restrict us and our subsidiaries from operating our and their
business in substantially the same manner as operated on
June 30, 2006; |
|
|
|
|
|
settle any material claim or material litigation relating to the
consummation of the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement; |
|
|
|
cancel any material indebtedness or waive any claims or rights
of substantial value, in each case other than in the ordinary
course of business; |
|
|
|
except (1) in the ordinary course of business, (2) as
contemplated by the merger agreement or (3) as required
pursuant to the terms of any benefit plan or benefit agreement
or other written agreement in effect on June 30, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
grant to any of our or our subsidiaries officers,
directors or employees any increase in compensation; |
|
|
|
grant to any of our or our subsidiaries officers,
directors or employees any increase in severance or termination
pay; |
|
|
|
enter into any employment, consulting, severance or termination
agreement with any of our or our subsidiaries officers,
directors or employees, other than any separation agreement
pursuant to which the aggregate severance benefits do not exceed
$300,000 with respect to any individual or $2 million in
the aggregate with respect to all such individuals; |
|
|
|
establish, adopt, enter into or amend in any material respect
any collective bargaining agreement or benefit plan; or |
|
|
|
accelerate any rights or benefits, or make any material
determinations, under any benefit plan; |
|
|
|
|
|
make any change in accounting methods, principles or practices
materially affecting our consolidated assets, liabilities or
results of operations, other than as required by generally
accepted accounting principles or regulatory requirements with
respect thereto; |
|
|
|
make any material tax election, file any amended tax return with
respect to any material tax or change any annual tax accounting
period, in each case, other than in the ordinary course of
business; or |
|
|
|
authorize any of, or commit or agree to take any of, the actions
described above. |
Stockholders Meeting
The merger agreement requires us, as promptly as reasonably
practicable after June 30, 2006, to establish a record date
for, duly call, give notice of and hold a meeting of our
stockholders to adopt the merger agreement. Subject to limited
circumstances contemplated by the merger agreement, our board of
directors is required to recommend that our stockholders vote in
favor of adoption of the merger agreement.
No Solicitation of Transactions
We have agreed that we will not, nor will we authorize or permit
any of our subsidiaries or any of our or their respective
directors, officers or employees to, and we will not authorize
our or our subsidiaries respective representatives to,
directly or indirectly:
|
|
|
|
|
solicit, initiate or knowingly encourage, or take any other
action to knowingly facilitate, the making of any proposal that
constitutes or is reasonably likely to lead to a takeover
proposal; or |
52
|
|
|
|
|
enter into, continue or otherwise participate in any discussions
or negotiations regarding or furnish to any person any
confidential information with respect to any takeover
proposal. |
A takeover proposal means any inquiry, proposal or
offer (other than the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement) from any person or group relating to:
|
|
|
|
|
any direct or indirect acquisition or purchase, in a single
transaction or a series of transactions, of: |
|
|
|
|
|
20% or more (based on the fair market value thereof, as
determined by our board of directors) of assets (including
capital stock of our subsidiaries) of us and our subsidiaries,
taken as a whole; or |
|
|
|
20% or more of the outstanding shares of our common stock; |
|
|
|
|
|
any tender offer or exchange offer that, if consummated, would
result in any person or group owning, directly or indirectly,
20% or more of the outstanding shares of our common
stock; or |
|
|
|
any merger, consolidation, business combination,
recapitalization, liquidation, dissolution, binding share
exchange or similar transaction involving us pursuant to which
any person or group (or the shareholders of any person) would
own, directly or indirectly, 20% or more of any class of equity
securities of us or of the surviving entity in a merger or the
resulting direct or indirect parent of us or such surviving
entity. |
Prior to adoption of the merger agreement by our stockholders,
however, we may (and may authorize and permit our subsidiaries,
directors, officers, employees and representatives to), in
response to a bona fide written takeover proposal,
(1) furnish information with respect to us and our
subsidiaries to the person making such takeover proposal and its
representatives pursuant to a customary confidentiality
agreement containing confidentiality provisions substantially
similar to those set forth in the confidentiality agreements we
previously entered into with affiliates of the Sponsor Entities
and (2) participate in discussions and negotiations with
such person and its representatives, if, prior to taking any
such actions, our board of directors determines:
|
|
|
|
|
after consultation with its financial advisor and outside
counsel, that such takeover proposal constitutes or is
reasonably likely to lead to a superior
proposal; and |
|
|
|
after consultation with its outside counsel, that the failure to
take such action would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties
under applicable law. |
For purposes of the merger agreement, superior
proposal means any bona fide takeover proposal that:
|
|
|
|
|
if consummated, would result in a person or group (or the
shareholders of any person) owning, directly or indirectly,
(1) 50% or more of any class of equity securities of
Michaels or of the surviving entity in a merger or the resulting
direct or indirect parent of Michaels or such surviving entity
or (2) 50% or more (based on the fair market value thereof,
as determined by our board of directors) of the assets of
Michaels and our subsidiaries, taken as a whole; and |
|
|
|
our board of directors determines (after consultation with its
financial advisor and outside counsel) would result in greater
value to our stockholders from a financial point of view than
the merger, taking into account all financial, legal, regulatory
and other aspects of such proposal and of the merger agreement
(including any changes to the financial terms of the merger
agreement proposed by the Sponsor Entities to Michaels in
response to such proposal or otherwise). |
Neither our board of directors nor any committee thereof may
make an adverse recommendation change or approve or
recommend, or publicly propose to approve or recommend, or cause
or permit us or any of our subsidiaries to enter into, any
letter of intent, memorandum of understanding, agreement in
principle, merger agreement, acquisition agreement or other
similar agreement related to any takeover proposal. At any time
prior to the adoption of the merger agreement by our
stockholders, however, our board of directors may (subject to
the payment of a termination fee as described below), if, after
consultation with its outside legal counsel, it determines that
the failure to take such action would be inconsistent with its
fiduciary duties under
53
applicable law, make an adverse recommendation change or cause
or permit Michaels to terminate the merger agreement, but only:
|
|
|
|
|
after the second business day following the Mergercos
receipt of written notice from us advising them that our board
of directors intends to take such action and specifying the
reasons therefor, including the material terms and conditions of
any superior proposal that is the basis of the proposed action
by our board of directors and a statement that our board of
directors intends to terminate the merger agreement; and |
|
|
|
if, in determining whether to take such action, our board of
directors takes into account any changes to the financial terms
of the merger agreement proposed by the Sponsor Entities to us
in response to such notice or otherwise. |
For purposes of the merger agreement, adverse
recommendation change means any action whereby our board
of directors or any committee thereof:
|
|
|
|
|
withdraws (or modifies in a manner adverse to the Mergercos), or
publicly proposes to withdraw (or modify in a manner adverse to
the Mergercos), the approval, recommendation or declaration of
advisability by the board or any such committee of the merger
agreement or the merger; or |
|
|
|
recommends the approval or adoption of, or approves or adopts,
or publicly proposes to recommend, approve or adopt, any
takeover proposal. |
We have also agreed:
|
|
|
|
|
to terminate, and to cause our subsidiaries and direct our
representatives to terminate all, discussions and negotiations
with any person conducted prior to signing the merger agreement
with respect to any takeover proposal, and request the prompt
return or destruction of all confidential information previously
furnished in connection therewith; |
|
|
|
to advise the Mergercos as promptly as practicable orally and in
writing of the receipt of any takeover proposal after
June 30, 2006, the material terms and conditions of any
such takeover proposal and the identity of the person making any
such takeover proposal; |
|
|
|
subject to the fiduciary duties under applicable law of our
board of directors, to keep the Mergercos reasonably informed of
any material developments with respect to any takeover proposal
(including any material changes thereto); and |
|
|
|
to provide to the Mergercos all information provided by us to a
third party in connection with a takeover proposal. |
Employee Benefits
The surviving corporation has agreed, for a period of two years
following the completion of the merger, to either
(1) maintain our employee benefit plans and agreements
(other than equity-based plans) at the level in effect on the
date of the merger agreement, and provide compensation and
benefits to our employees that have a value sufficient to
replace the value of compensation and benefits provided to such
employees under our equity-based plans prior to the completion
of the merger or (2) provide compensation and benefits that
are not less favorable in the aggregate (including any value
attributable to equity-based compensation) than the benefits
provided to employees on date of the completion of the merger.
In addition, the surviving corporation has agreed to honor and
continue, without amendment, or modification, for a period of
two years following the completion of the merger, or, if sooner,
until all obligations thereunder have been satisfied, each of
our employment, severance, retention, termination and cash
incentive compensation plans, policies, programs, agreements and
arrangements (including (1) any change in control severance
agreements, (2) the Change in Control Severance Plans I and
II, (3) the Change in Control Bonus Program, (4) the
Fiscal Year 2006 Bonus Enhancement Program and (5) the
Fiscal Year 2006 MIK Power Bonus Plan).
54
The surviving corporation will also maintain, for a period of
two years following the completion of the merger, or, if sooner,
until all obligations thereunder have been satisfied, our
various incentive plans in accordance with their terms with
respect to all performance periods under such incentive plans
commencing prior to completion of the merger and ending
thereafter.
The surviving corporation will also, subject to specified
limitations, recognize an employees service with Michaels
with respect to determining eligibility to participate, level of
benefits, vesting, benefit accruals and early retirement
subsidies under the surviving corporations employee
benefit plans to the extent that such recognition would not
result in any duplication of benefits.
The surviving corporation will also recognize expenses incurred
by employees prior to the completion of the merger during the
calendar year in which the merger occurs for purposes of
satisfying such years deductible and co-payment
limitations under such plans. In addition, the surviving
corporation will also waive pre-existing condition limitations
with respect to the employees under its welfare benefit plans
(except to the extent that such pre-existing condition
limitations would have been applicable under our employee
benefit plans).
Agreement to Use Reasonable Best Efforts
Subject to the terms and conditions of the merger agreement,
each party has agreed to use its reasonable best efforts to
take, or cause to be taken, all actions, and to do, or cause to
be done, and to assist and cooperate with the other parties in
doing, all things necessary, proper or advisable to consummate
and make effective, in the most expeditious manner practicable,
the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement, including using reasonable best efforts to accomplish
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the taking of all acts necessary to cause the conditions to
closing to be satisfied as promptly as practicable; |
|
|
|
the obtaining of all necessary actions or nonactions, waivers,
consents and approvals from governmental entities and the making
of all necessary registrations and filings and the taking of all
steps as may be necessary to obtain an approval or waiver from,
or to avoid an action or proceeding by, any governmental entity; |
|
|
|
the obtaining of consents, approvals and waivers from third
parties reasonably requested by the Mergercos to be obtained in
connection with the merger under certain contracts and real
property leases; and |
|
|
|
the execution and delivery of any additional instruments
necessary to consummate the transactions contemplated by, and to
fully carry out the purposes of, the merger agreement. |
We and our subsidiaries are not required to pay to any person
whose consent, approval or waiver under certain contracts and
real property leases with respect to the merger is being
solicited any fee, penalty or other consideration.
We and our board of directors have also agreed to take all
action necessary to ensure that no state takeover statute is or
becomes applicable to the merger and if any state takeover
statute becomes applicable to the merger, to take all action
necessary to ensure that the merger may be consummated as
promptly as practicable on the terms contemplated by the merger
agreement and otherwise to minimize the effect of such statute
or regulation on the merger.
Each Mergerco and Finco has agreed that, in the event of any
failure to perform or comply with any covenant or agreement set
forth in the merger agreement by one Mergerco (or Finco, as
applicable), the other Mergerco (or Finco, as applicable) shall
be permitted to cure such failure, including by performing such
covenant or agreement on behalf of such first Mergerco (or
Finco, as applicable), and, until and unless the other Mergerco
(or Finco, as applicable) shall have effected such cure, it
shall be deemed to have failed to perform and comply with its
covenants and agreements set forth in the merger agreement to
the same extent as the first Mergerco (or Finco, as applicable)
has so failed with respect to its covenants and agreements.
55
We have also agreed to retain a nationally recognized investment
banking or valuation firm, selected by our board of directors
and reasonably acceptable to Mergercos, to render a solvency
opinion, customary in scope and substance, as of the closing to
our board of directors.
Financing Commitments; Cooperation of Michaels
The Sponsor Entities have agreed to use, and to cause their
respective affiliates to use, reasonable best efforts to take,
or cause to be taken, all actions and to do, or cause to be
done, all things necessary, proper or advisable to arrange the
financing on the terms and conditions described in the financing
commitments, including, in the case of the debt financing,
reasonable best efforts:
|
|
|
|
|
to negotiate and enter into the definitive agreements with
respect to the debt financing on the terms and conditions
contained in the debt financing commitments (or on other terms
acceptable to the Fincos, so long as such terms do not contain
any conditions to funding on the closing date that are not set
forth in the debt financing commitments and would not otherwise
reasonably be expected to impair or delay the consummation of
the debt financing); |
|
|
|
to satisfy or to cause its affiliates to satisfy on a timely
basis all conditions applicable to the Sponsor Entities set
forth in such definitive agreements that are within the control
of any of the Sponsor Entities; and |
|
|
|
to consummate the debt financing at the closing, including using
reasonable best efforts to cause the lenders and the other
persons providing such debt financing to fund the debt financing
required to consummate the merger at the closing (including by
taking enforcement action to cause such lenders and other
persons providing such debt financing to fund such debt
financing). |
In the event any portion of the debt financing becomes
unavailable on the terms and conditions set forth in the debt
financing commitments, the Fincos are required to promptly
notify Michaels, and the Sponsor Entities are required to use
their reasonable best efforts to obtain, as promptly as
practicable, any such portion from alternative sources on terms
that will still enable the Sponsor Entities to consummate the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement and that are
not less favorable in the aggregate (as determined by the Fincos
in their reasonable judgment) to the Sponsor Entities and
Michaels than those contained in the debt financing commitments.
In addition, the Sponsor Entities have agreed that, in the event
that
|
|
|
|
|
all or any portion of the debt financing structured as high
yield financing has not been consummated; |
|
|
|
subject to limited exceptions, all closing conditions contained
in the merger agreement have been satisfied or waived; and |
|
|
|
the bridge facilities contemplated by the debt financing
commitments or alternative bridge financing is available on
terms and conditions described in the debt financing commitments
(or replacements thereof contemplated by the merger agreement); |
then the Sponsor Entities will borrow and use, or shall cause
the surviving corporation to borrow and use, the proceeds of the
bridge financing to replace the high yield financing no later
than the last day of the marketing period. See
Effective Time; The Marketing Period above for a
discussion of the marketing period.
The Fincos are required to keep us reasonably informed of the
status of their efforts to obtain the debt financing and to
provide us with copies of agreements pursuant to which any
alternative source shall have committed to provide the Fincos or
the surviving corporation with any portion of the debt financing.
We have agreed to, and have agreed to cause our subsidiaries
(and to use our reasonable best efforts to cause our and their
respective representatives) to, provide such reasonable
cooperation as may be reasonably requested by the Fincos in
connection with the debt financing, including:
|
|
|
|
|
participation in meetings, drafting sessions, presentations,
road shows and due diligence; |
|
|
|
using reasonable best efforts to furnish the Fincos and the
financing sources with financial and other pertinent information
regarding Michaels as may be reasonably requested by the Fincos
to consum- |
56
|
|
|
|
|
mate the debt financing, including all financial statements and
financial data of the type required by
Regulation S-X and
Regulation S-K
under the Securities Act (other than Rule 3-10 of
Regulation S-X)
and of type and form customarily included in private placements
pursuant to Rule 144A promulgated under the Securities Act; |
|
|
|
assisting the Fincos and the financing sources in the
preparation of offering documents and other informational and
marketing materials and documents for any portion of the debt
financing and materials for rating agency presentations; |
|
|
|
reasonably cooperating with the marketing efforts of the Fincos
and the financing sources for any portion of the debt financing; |
|
|
|
reasonably facilitating the pledging of collateral and execution
and delivery of definitive financing documents and customary
deliverables; and |
|
|
|
using reasonable best efforts to obtain accountants
comfort letters, accountants consent letters, legal
opinions, surveys and title insurance as reasonably requested by
the Fincos. |
Conditions to the Merger
The respective obligations of the parties to effect the merger
are subject to the satisfaction or (to the extent permitted by
law) waiver at or prior to the effective time of the following
mutual conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
the adoption of the merger agreement by our stockholders; |
|
|
|
the expiration or termination of the waiting period (and any
extension thereof) applicable to the merger under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino Act; and |
|
|
|
no temporary restraining order, preliminary or permanent
injunction or other judgment or order issued by any Federal or
state court being in effect enjoining or otherwise prohibiting
the consummation of the merger. |
The obligations of the Sponsor Entities to effect the merger are
further subject to the satisfaction or (to the extent permitted
by law) waiver by the Mergercos (on behalf of themselves and the
Fincos) at or prior to the effective time of the merger of the
following conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
(1) our representations and warranties regarding certain
matters relating to our capital structure and authority to
consummate the merger must be true and correct in all material
respects as of the date of the merger agreement and as of the
date the merger is completed, except to the extent that a
representation or warranty expressly speaks as of an earlier
date, in which case it need be true and correct in all material
respects only as of that date, and (2) all other
representations and warranties made by us (disregarding all
materiality qualifications) must be true and correct as of the
date of the merger agreement and as of the date the merger is
completed, except to the extent that a representation or
warranty expressly speaks as of an earlier date, in which case
it need be true and correct only as of that date, and except
where the failure of such other representations and warranties
to be so true and correct would not, individually or in the
aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a material adverse
effect; |
|
|
|
the performance, in all material respects, by us of all of our
material obligations under the merger agreement; and |
|
|
|
our delivery to the Sponsor Entities at closing of a certificate
with respect to the satisfaction of the conditions relating to
our representations and warranties and material obligations. |
Our obligation to effect the merger is further subject to the
satisfaction or (to the extent permitted by law) waiver by us at
or prior to the effective time of the merger of the following
conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
the representations and warranties made by the Sponsor Entities
(disregarding all materiality qualifications) must be true and
correct as of the date of the merger agreement and as of the
date the merger is completed, except to the extent that a
representation or warranty expressly speaks as of an |
57
|
|
|
|
|
earlier date, in which case it need be true only as of that
date, and except where the failure of such representations and
warranties to be so true and correct would not, individually or
in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a sponsor
material adverse effect; |
|
|
|
the performance, in all material respects, by the Sponsor
Entities of all of their material obligations under the merger
agreement; and |
|
|
|
the delivery to us at closing by each Sponsor Entity of a
certificate with respect to the satisfaction of the conditions
relating to its representations and warranties and material
obligations. |
None of Michaels or the Sponsor Entities may rely on the failure
of any condition to be satisfied if such failure was caused by
such partys (or, in the case of any Sponsor Entity, any
other Sponsor Entitys) failure to perform any of its
obligations under the merger agreement, to act in good faith or
to use its reasonable best efforts to consummate the merger and
the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.
Termination
The merger agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the
effective time of the merger, whether before or after
stockholder approval has been obtained, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
by mutual written consent of the Mergercos and Michaels; |
|
|
|
by either the Mergercos or Michaels, if: |
|
|
|
|
|
our stockholders do not adopt the merger agreement at the
special meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof; |
|
|
|
any temporary restraining order, preliminary or permanent
injunction or other judgment or order issued by any Federal or
state court shall have become final and non-appealable, so long
as the terminating party shall have used reasonable best efforts
to prevent the entry of and to remove such judgment or order; |
|
|
|
the merger has not been consummated on or before
December 19, 2006; provided that if the closing shall not
have occurred prior to such date solely as a result of the
failure of the marketing period to have been completed prior to
such date, then such date is extended to March 31, 2007;
provided further that this right to terminate the merger
agreement is not available to any party if the failure of such
party (or, in the case of the Mergercos, any other Sponsor
Entity) to perform any of its obligations under the merger
agreement, to act in good faith or to use its reasonable best
efforts to consummate the merger and the other transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement has been a principal cause
of or resulted in the failure of the merger to be consummated on
or before such date; or |
|
|
|
if the terminating party (or, in the case of the Mergercos, any
other Sponsor Entity) is not then in material breach and there
is a breach by the non-terminating party of any of its
representations or warranties or failure to perform any of its
covenants or agreements in the merger agreement such that the
closing conditions would not be satisfied and which cannot be
cured prior to the termination date set forth above; |
|
|
|
|
|
by the Mergercos, if our board of directors withdraws or
adversely modifies its recommendation or approval of the merger
agreement or recommends or approves another takeover
proposal; or |
|
|
|
by Michaels, if: |
|
|
|
|
|
prior to adoption of the merger agreement by our stockholders,
our board of directors, after consultation with its outside
counsel, determines that the failure to take such action would
be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable law,
but only after (1) the second business day following the
Mergercos receipt of written notice from us advising them
that our board of directors intends to take such action and
specifying the reasons therefor, including the material terms
and conditions of any superior proposal that is the basis of the
proposed action by our board of directors, |
58
|
|
|
|
|
and (2) our board of directors has taken into account any
changes to the financial terms of the merger agreement proposed
by the Sponsor Entities to us in response to such notice or
otherwise (the right to terminate in these circumstances is
referred to as the fiduciary out right to
terminate); or |
|
|
|
all of the mutual conditions to closing and all of the
conditions to the Sponsor Entities obligations to close
have been satisfied (other than those conditions that by their
terms are to be satisfied at the closing) and, on or after the
last day of the marketing period, neither the Fincos nor the
surviving corporation has received the proceeds of the debt
financing. |
Fees and Expenses
We have agreed to pay to the Mergercos an aggregate termination
fee of $120 million if:
|
|
|
|
|
the merger agreement is terminated by the Mergercos upon the
occurrence of an adverse recommendation change by our board of
directors; |
|
|
|
the merger agreement is terminated by Michaels pursuant to the
exercise of its fiduciary out right to terminate described above; |
|
|
|
the merger agreement is terminated by the Mergercos or Michaels
due to the failure to receive the approval of our stockholders
at the special meeting or any postponement or adjournment
thereof; and |
|
|
|
|
|
after June 30, 2006, and prior to the termination, a
takeover proposal has been publicly made to Michaels generally
or has been made directly to our stockholders or has otherwise
become publicly known; and |
|
|
|
within 12 months after the termination, we consummate or
enter into a definitive agreement to consummate the transactions
contemplated by any takeover proposal; or |
|
|
|
|
|
the merger agreement is terminated by the Mergercos or Michaels
because the merger is not completed prior to December 19,
2006 (or, if applicable, March 31, 2007); and |
|
|
|
|
|
the special meeting of our stockholders to approve the merger
has not been held; |
|
|
|
after June 30, 2006 and prior to the termination, a
takeover proposal has been publicly made to Michaels generally
or has been made directly to our stockholders or has otherwise
become publicly known; and |
|
|
|
within 12 months after the termination, we consummate or
enter into a definitive agreement to consummate the transactions
contemplated by any takeover proposal. |
For purposes of determining whether a termination fee is payable
by us, a takeover proposal means any inquiry,
proposal or offer (other than the transactions contemplated by
the merger agreement) from any person or group relating to:
|
|
|
|
|
any direct or indirect acquisition or purchase, in a single
transaction or a series of transactions, of: |
|
|
|
|
|
50% or more (based on the fair market value thereof, as
determined by our board of directors) of assets (including
capital stock of our subsidiaries) of us and our subsidiaries,
taken as a whole; or |
|
|
|
50% or more of the outstanding shares of our common stock; |
|
|
|
|
|
any tender offer or exchange offer that, if consummated, would
result in any person or group owning, directly or indirectly,
50% or more of the outstanding shares of our common
stock; or |
|
|
|
any merger, consolidation, business combination,
recapitalization, liquidation, dissolution, binding share
exchange or similar transaction involving us pursuant to which
any person or group (or the shareholders of any person) would
own, directly or indirectly, 50% or more of any class of equity |
59
|
|
|
|
|
securities of us or of the surviving entity in a merger or the
resulting direct or indirect parent of us or such surviving
entity. |
|
|
|
Payable by the Sponsor Entities |
The Sponsor Entities have agreed to pay us a termination fee of
$200 million if we terminate the merger agreement in the
event that all of the mutual conditions to closing and all of
the conditions to the Sponsor Entities obligations to
close have been satisfied (other than those conditions that by
their terms are to be satisfied at the closing) and, on or after
the last day of the marketing period, neither the Fincos nor the
surviving corporation has received the proceeds of the debt
financing.
If, in the circumstances in which the Sponsor Entities become
obligated to pay this termination fee, none of the Sponsor
Entities is otherwise in breach of the merger agreement such
that the conditions to our obligation to close have been
satisfied, then our termination of the merger agreement in these
circumstances and receipt of payment of such termination fee
shall be our sole and exclusive remedy against the Sponsor
Entities and any of their respective former, current or future
general or limited partners, members or stockholders or against
any of their respective former, current or future directors,
officers, employees, affiliates, general or limited partners,
stockholders, managers, members or agents (collectively,
specified persons) for any loss or damage suffered
as a result of the breach of any representation, warranty,
covenant or agreement contained in the merger agreement by the
Sponsor Entities and the failure of the merger to be
consummated, and upon payment of such termination fee, none of
the Sponsor Entities or any of their respective specified
persons shall have any further liability or obligation relating
to or arising out of the merger agreement or the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement.
The parties have agreed that in no event, whether or not the
merger agreement shall have been terminated, shall we and our
subsidiaries, as a group, on the one hand, or the Sponsor
Entities, Bain Capital Fund IX, LLC and Blackstone Capital
Partners V L.P., as a group, on the other hand, be subject to
monetary damages in excess of $600 million in the aggregate
for each such group, respectively, for all losses and damages
(including, in our case, lost stockholder premium) arising from
or in connection with breaches by the Sponsor Entities, on the
one hand, or us, on the other, of their respective
representations, warranties, covenants and agreements contained
in the merger agreement or arising from any other claim or cause
of action, and none of Michaels, the Sponsor Entities, Bain
Capital Fund IX, LLC, Blackstone Capital Partners V L.P. or
any of their respective specified persons shall have any further
liability or obligation to the other parties or otherwise
relating to or arising out of the merger agreement or the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, other than
for fraud.
Sponsor Guarantees
Bain Capital Fund IX, LLC has guaranteed the payment by
Bain Mergerco and Bain Finco of their obligations to us arising
under, or in connection with, the merger agreement, including
the payment of the termination fee, up to the maximum aggregate
liability of $300 million. Similarly, Blackstone Capital
Partners V L.P. has guaranteed the payment by Blackstone
Mergerco and Blackstone Finco of their obligations to us arising
under, or in connection with, the merger agreement, including
the payment of the termination fee, up to the maximum aggregate
liability of $300 million. Except in connection with the
enforcement of our right to seek specific performance by the
Sponsor Entities under the merger agreement, as discussed below,
and the exercise of our rights as an express third party
beneficiary under the equity commitment letters provided by Bain
and Blackstone, as discussed above, our rights under the sponsor
guarantees constitute our sole and exclusive remedy against Bain
and Blackstone, respectively, and their affiliates.
Amendment and Waiver
The merger agreement may be amended by the written agreement of
Michaels and the Mergercos (on behalf of themselves and the
Fincos) at any time prior to the closing date of the merger,
whether before or
60
after the adoption of the merger agreement by our stockholders,
provided that after the merger agreement has been adopted by our
stockholders, there shall be no amendment that by law would
require the further approval of our stockholders without such
approval having been obtained.
The merger agreement also provides that, at any time prior to
the effective time of the merger, any party may, by written
agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
extend the time for the performance of any of the obligations or
other acts of the other parties to the merger agreement; |
|
|
|
to the extent permitted by law, waive any inaccuracies in the
representations and warranties contained in the merger agreement
or in any document delivered pursuant to the merger
agreement; or |
|
|
|
to the extent permitted by law, waive compliance with any of the
agreements or conditions contained in the merger agreement,
provided that after the merger agreement has been adopted by our
stockholders, there shall be no waiver that by law would require
the further approval of our stockholders without such approval
having been obtained. |
Specific Performance
The parties to the merger agreement are entitled to an
injunction or injunctions to prevent breaches of merger
agreement and to enforce specifically the terms and provisions
of the merger agreement in any court of the State of Delaware or
any Federal court sitting in the State of Delaware.
First Amendment to Merger Agreement and Rollover Shares and
Options
On September 1, 2006, the merger agreement was amended to
permit the Highfields Funds to retain 2,500,000 shares of
our common stock held by the Highfields Funds as shares of
common stock of the surviving corporation. Pursuant to the
related rollover agreement dated as of September 1, 2006,
among the Highfields Funds and us, the Highfields Funds have
agreed to retain such 2,500,000 shares through the closing
of the merger. The Highfields Funds are not obligated to retain
through the closing date any other shares of our common stock
held by them. The Highfields Funds have also agreed to enter, on
the closing date of the merger, into a stockholders agreement
and a registration rights agreement among the surviving
corporation and its other stockholders. We have been informed by
Bain and Blackstone that, on the closing date of the merger,
Highfields Capital Management LP, an affiliate of the Highfields
Funds, and the surviving corporation will enter into a
management agreement that will provide for an annual management
fee for services that Highfields Capital Management LP renders
to the surviving corporation following the completion of the
merger. The first amendment to the merger agreement also permits
certain of our employees to retain their equity investments in
our company, including their options, as an equity investment in
the surviving corporation. While no agreements, arrangements or
understandings have been entered into as of the date of this
proxy statement, members of our management may enter into
employment agreements with the surviving corporation and may
participate in the equity of the surviving corporation, as
described more fully under Merger Agreement
Arrangements with the Sponsor Entities beginning on
page 41.
61
APPRAISAL RIGHTS
The discussion of the provisions set forth below is not a
complete summary regarding your appraisal rights under Delaware
law and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the text of
the relevant provisions of Delaware law, which are attached to
this proxy statement as Annex E. Stockholders intending to
exercise appraisal rights should carefully review Annex E.
Failure to follow precisely any of the statutory procedures set
forth in Annex E may result in a termination or waiver of
these rights.
If the merger is consummated, dissenting holders of our common
stock who follow the procedures specified in Section 262 of
the DGCL within the appropriate time periods will be entitled to
have their shares of our common stock appraised by a court and
to receive the fair value of such shares in cash as
determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery in lieu of the
consideration that such stockholder would otherwise be entitled
to receive pursuant to the merger agreement.
The following is a brief summary of Section 262, which sets
forth the procedures for dissenting from the merger and
demanding statutory appraisal rights. Failure to follow the
procedures set forth in Section 262 precisely could result
in the loss of appraisal rights. This proxy statement
constitutes notice to holders of our common stock concerning the
availability of appraisal rights under Section 262. A
stockholder of record wishing to assert appraisal rights must
hold the shares of stock on the date of making a demand for
appraisal rights with respect to such shares and must
continuously hold such shares through the effective time of the
merger.
Stockholders who desire to exercise their appraisal rights must
satisfy all of the conditions of Section 262. A written
demand for appraisal of shares must be filed with us before the
special meeting. This written demand for appraisal of shares
must be in addition to and separate from a vote against the
merger. Stockholders electing to exercise their appraisal rights
must not vote FOR the merger. Any proxy or
vote against the merger will not constitute a demand for
appraisal within the meaning of Section 262.
A demand for appraisal must be executed by or for the
stockholder of record, fully and correctly, as such
stockholders name appears on the share certificate. If the
shares are owned of record in a fiduciary capacity, such as by a
trustee, guardian or custodian, this demand must be executed by
or for the fiduciary. If the shares are owned by or for more
than one person, as in a joint tenancy or tenancy in common,
such demand must be executed by or for all joint owners. An
authorized agent, including an agent for two or more joint
owners, may execute the demand for appraisal for a stockholder
of record; however, the agent must identify the record owner and
expressly disclose the fact that, in exercising the demand, he
is acting as agent for the record owner. A person having a
beneficial interest in our common stock held of record in the
name of another person, such as a broker or nominee, must act
promptly to cause the record holder to follow the steps
summarized below and in a timely manner to perfect whatever
appraisal rights the beneficial owner may have.
A stockholder who elects to exercise appraisal rights should
mail or deliver his, her or its written demand to us at our
address at 8000 Bent Branch Drive, Irving, Texas 75063,
Attention: General Counsel. The written demand for appraisal
should specify the stockholders name and mailing address,
and that the stockholder is thereby demanding appraisal of his,
her or its share of our common stock. Within ten days after the
effective time of the merger, we must provide notice of the
effective time of the merger to all of our stockholders who have
complied with Section 262 and have not voted for the merger.
Within 120 days after the effective time of the merger (but
not thereafter), any stockholder who has satisfied the
requirements of Section 262 may deliver to us a written
demand for a statement listing the aggregate number of shares
not voted in favor of the merger and with respect to which
demands for appraisal have been received and the aggregate
number of holders of such shares. We, as the surviving
corporation in the merger, must mail such written statement to
the stockholder no later than the later of 10 days after
the stockholders request is received by us or 10 days
after the latest date for delivery of a demand for appraisal
under Section 262.
Within 120 days after the effective time of the merger (but
not thereafter), either we or any stockholder who has complied
with the required conditions of Section 262 and who is
otherwise entitled to appraisal rights may file a petition in
the Delaware Court of Chancery demanding a determination of the
fair value of the
62
shares of our common stock owned by stockholders entitled to
appraisal rights. We have no present intention to file such a
petition if demand for appraisal is made.
Upon the filing of any petition by a stockholder in accordance
with Section 262, service of a copy must be made upon us.
We must, within 20 days after service, file in the office
of the Register in Chancery in which the petition was filed, a
duly verified list containing the names and addresses of all
stockholders who have demanded payment for their shares and with
whom we have not reached agreements as to the value of their
shares. If we file a petition, the petition must be accompanied
by the verified list. The Register in Chancery, if so ordered by
the court, will give notice of the time and place fixed for the
hearing of such petition by registered or certified mail to us
and to the stockholders shown on the list at the addresses
therein stated, and notice will also be given by publishing a
notice at least one week before the day of the hearing in a
newspaper of general circulation published in the City of
Wilmington, Delaware, or such publication as the court deems
advisable. The forms of the notices by mail and by publication
must be approved by the court, and we will bear the costs
thereof. The Delaware Court of Chancery may require the
stockholders who have demanded an appraisal for their shares
(and who hold stock represented by certificates) to submit their
stock certificates to the Register in Chancery for notation of
the pendency of the appraisal proceedings and the Delaware Court
of Chancery may dismiss the proceedings as to any stockholder
that fails to comply with such direction.
If a petition for an appraisal is filed in a timely fashion,
after a hearing on the petition, the court will determine which
stockholders are entitled to appraisal rights and will appraise
the shares owned by these stockholders, determining the fair
value of such shares, exclusive of any element of value arising
from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger, together
with a fair rate of interest to be paid, if any, upon the amount
determined to be the fair value.
Stockholders considering seeking appraisal of their shares
should note that the fair value of their shares determined under
Section 262 could be more, the same or less than the
consideration they would receive pursuant to the merger
agreement if they did not seek appraisal of their shares. The
costs of the appraisal proceeding may be determined by the court
and taxed against the parties as the court deems equitable under
the circumstances. Upon application of a dissenting stockholder,
the court may order that all or a portion of the expenses
incurred by any dissenting stockholder in connection with the
appraisal proceeding, including reasonable attorneys fees
and the fees and expenses of experts, be charged pro rata
against the value of all shares entitled to appraisal. In the
absence of a determination or assessment, each party bears his,
her or its own expenses. The exchange of shares for cash
pursuant to the exercise of appraisal rights generally will be a
taxable transaction for United States federal income tax
purposes and possibly state, local and foreign income tax
purposes as well. See The Merger Material
United States Federal Income Tax Consequences of the
Merger on page 42.
Any stockholder who has duly demanded appraisal in compliance
with Section 262 will not, after the effective time of the
merger, be entitled to vote for any purpose the shares subject
to demand or to receive payment of dividends or other
distributions on such shares, except for dividends or
distributions payable to stockholders of record at a date prior
to the effective time of the merger.
At any time within 60 days after the effective time of the
merger, any stockholder will have the right to withdraw his, her
or its demand for appraisal and to accept the terms offered in
the merger agreement. After this period, a stockholder may
withdraw his, her or its demand for appraisal and receive
payment for his, her or its shares as provided in the merger
agreement only with our consent. If no petition for appraisal is
filed with the court within 120 days after the effective
time of the merger, stockholders rights to appraisal (if
available) will cease. Inasmuch as we have no obligation to file
such a petition, any stockholder who desires a petition to be
filed is advised to file it on a timely basis. No petition
timely filed in the court demanding appraisal may be dismissed
as to any stockholder without the approval of the court, which
approval may be conditioned upon such terms as the court deems
just.
Failure by any stockholder to comply fully with the procedures
of Section 262 of the DGCL (as reproduced in Annex E
to this proxy statement) may result in termination of such
stockholders appraisal rights. In view of the complexity
of Section 262, Michaels stockholders who may wish to
dissent from the merger and pursue appraisal rights should
consult their legal advisors.
63
MARKET PRICE OF OUR STOCK
Our common stock is listed on the NYSE under the trading symbol
MIK. The following table sets forth the high and low
sales prices per share of our common stock on the NYSE for the
periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
Low |
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended January 29, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$ |
29.58 |
|
|
$ |
22.16 |
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
28.15 |
|
|
|
22.29 |
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
30.76 |
|
|
|
25.23 |
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
31.39 |
|
|
|
26.70 |
|
Fiscal Year Ended January 28, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$ |
36.85 |
|
|
$ |
30.37 |
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
43.61 |
|
|
|
33.03 |
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
41.95 |
|
|
|
30.38 |
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
38.75 |
|
|
|
32.10 |
|
Fiscal Year Ending February 3, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$ |
38.35 |
|
|
$ |
31.70 |
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
42.50 |
|
|
|
35.26 |
|
|
Third Quarter (through September 5, 2006)
|
|
|
43.36 |
|
|
|
42.34 |
|
The closing sale price of our common stock on the NYSE on
March 17, 2006, which was the last trading day before we
announced that our board of directors was exploring strategic
alternatives, including a potential sale of Michaels, was
$33.96. The closing sale price of our common stock on the NYSE
on June 30, 2006, which was the last trading day before we
announced the merger, was $41.24. On September 5, 2006, the
last trading day before the date of this proxy statement, the
closing price of our common stock on the NYSE was $43.25. You
are encouraged to obtain current market quotations for our
common stock in connection with voting your shares.
As of September 5, 2006, the last trading day before the
date of this proxy statement, there were 133,330,312 shares
of our common stock outstanding.
The following table sets forth dividends announced and paid in
respect of Michaels common stock, on a per share basis, for the
periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends per Share |
|
|
of Common Stock |
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended January 29, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
Fiscal Year Ended January 28, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
Fiscal Year Ending February 3, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
64
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT
The following table presents information regarding the number of
shares of our common stock beneficially owned as of
August 25, 2006, (unless otherwise indicated) by:
|
|
|
|
|
each person who is known to us to be the beneficial owner of
more than five percent of our common stock; |
|
|
|
each director; |
|
|
|
our chief executive officer at the end of our last completed
fiscal year and our four most highly compensated executive
officers who were serving as executive officers at the end of
our last completed fiscal year; and |
|
|
|
all current directors and executive officers as a group. |
Unless otherwise indicated by footnote, the beneficial owner
exercises sole voting and investment power over the shares noted
below. The beneficial ownership percentages reflected in the
table below are based on 133,251,518 shares of our common
stock outstanding as of August 25, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and |
|
|
|
|
Nature of |
|
|
|
|
Beneficial |
|
Percent |
Name and Address of Beneficial Owners(1) |
|
Ownership(2) |
|
of Class |
|
|
|
|
|
Charles J. Wyly, Jr.
|
|
|
5,515,285 |
(3) |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
Sam Wyly
|
|
|
4,610,927 |
(4) |
|
|
3.4 |
% |
Richard E. Hanlon
|
|
|
267,600 |
(5) |
|
|
* |
|
Richard C. Marcus
|
|
|
149,000 |
(6) |
|
|
* |
|
Liz Minyard
|
|
|
170,000 |
(7) |
|
|
* |
|
Cece Smith
|
|
|
135,000 |
(8) |
|
|
* |
|
R. Michael Rouleau
|
|
|
1,064,138 |
(9) |
|
|
* |
|
Jeffrey N. Boyer
|
|
|
177,082 |
(10) |
|
|
* |
|
Edward F. Sadler
|
|
|
131,250 |
(11) |
|
|
* |
|
Gregory A. Sandfort
|
|
|
66,815 |
(12) |
|
|
* |
|
Capital Research and Management Company
|
|
|
11,520,000 |
(13) |
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
333 South Hope Street
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Los Angeles, California 90071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wellington Management Company, LLP
|
|
|
5,724,535 |
(14) |
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
75 State Street
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Putnam, LLC d/b/a Putnam Investments
|
|
|
10,163,526 |
(15) |
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
One Post Office Square
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Highfields Capital Management LP
|
|
|
8,353,200 |
(16) |
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
200 Clarendon Street, 51st Floor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boston, Massachusetts 02116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All current directors and executive officers as a group
(12 persons)
|
|
|
11,521,755 |
(17) |
|
|
8.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The address of each of our directors and executive officers is
c/o Michaels Stores, Inc., 8000 Bent Branch Drive, Irving,
TX 75063. |
|
|
(2) |
Pursuant to
Rule 13d-3 under
the Exchange Act, a person has beneficial ownership of any
securities as to which such person, directly or indirectly,
through any contract, arrangement, undertaking, relationship or
otherwise, has or shares voting power and/or investment power or
as to which such person has the right to acquire such voting
and/or investment power within 60 days. Percentage of
beneficial |
65
|
|
|
|
|
ownership by a person as of a particular date is calculated by
dividing the number of shares beneficially owned by such person
by the sum of the number of shares outstanding as of such date
and the number of unissued shares as to which such person has
the right to acquire voting and/or investment power within
60 days. Unless otherwise indicated, the number of shares
shown includes outstanding shares of common stock owned as of
July 21, 2006 by the person indicated and shares underlying
options owned by such person on July 21, 2006 that are
exercisable within 60 days of that date. Persons holding
shares of common stock pursuant to the Michaels Stores, Inc.
Employees 401(k) Plan, as amended and restated, have sole voting
power and investment power with respect to such shares. |
|
|
(3) |
Includes 726,666 shares under options; 570,039 shares
held of record by Stargate, Ltd. (a Texas limited partnership,
the general partner of which is a trust of which Mr. Wyly
and his spouse are co-trustees); 360,208 shares held of
record by Shadywood USA, Ltd. (a Texas limited partnership of
which Mr. Wyly is a general partner); and
990,268 shares held of record by family trusts of which
Mr. Wyly is the trustee. The number of shares in the table
also includes 2,867,204 shares held by subsidiaries of
certain
non-U.S. trusts of
which Mr. Charles J. Wyly, Jr. and/or certain of his
family members are direct or contingent beneficiaries.
Mr. Wyly filed an amended Schedule 13D with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on April 8, 2005 stating that he
may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of the shares held in
the subsidiaries of those
non-U.S. trusts.
It is unclear in the Schedule 13D whether or to what extent
Mr. Wyly exercises voting and/or investment power with
respect to the shares held in the subsidiaries of the
non-U.S. trusts. |
|
|
(4) |
Includes 500,832 shares under options; 400,000 shares
held of record by Tallulah, Ltd. (a Texas limited partnership of
which Mr. Wyly is the general partner); and
299,144 shares held of record by family trusts of which
Mr. Wyly is the trustee. 27,740 shares of Michaels
common stock held by Mr. Wylys spouse are not
included in the total number of shares beneficially owned by
Mr. Wyly. The number of shares in the table also includes
2,142,600 shares held by subsidiaries of certain
non-U.S. trusts of
which Mr. Sam Wyly and/or certain of his family members are
direct or contingent beneficiaries. Mr. Wyly filed an
amended Schedule 13D with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on April 8, 2005 stating that he may be deemed
to be the beneficial owner of the shares held in the
subsidiaries of those
non-U.S. trusts.
It is unclear in the Schedule 13D whether or to what extent
Mr. Wyly exercises voting and/or investment power with
respect to the shares held in the subsidiaries of the
non-U.S. trusts. |
|
|
(5) |
Includes 205,000 shares under options; 20,334 shares
held of record by a family trust of which Mr. Hanlon is a
co-trustee; and 30,000 shares held of record by HanFam, LLC
(a Virginia limited liability company of which Mr. Hanlon
is the sole manager). |
|
|
(6) |
Includes 135,000 shares under options. |
|
|
(7) |
Includes 170,000 shares under options. |
|
|
(8) |
Includes 135,000 shares under options. |
|
|
(9) |
Mr. Rouleaus beneficial ownership information is as
of March 15, 2006, the date he retired as the President and
Chief Executive Officer of Michaels Stores, Inc. Amount includes
925,000 shares under options. |
|
|
(10) |
Includes 177,082 shares under options. |
|
(11) |
Includes 131,250 shares under options. |
|
(12) |
Includes 64,583 shares under options. |
|
(13) |
Based on an amendment to a Schedule 13G filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, dated August 10, 2006,
Capital Research and Management Company, an investment advisor,
has the sole power to vote or direct the vote and to dispose or
direct the disposition of 8,170,000 shares of common stock
and has the sole power to dispose or direct the disposition of
3,350,000 shares of common stock. |
|
(14) |
Based on an amendment to a Schedule 13G filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, dated May 10, 2006,
Wellington Management Company, LLP, an investment advisor,
shares the power to vote or direct the vote and to dispose or
direct the disposition of 4,632,995 shares of common stock
and shares the power to dispose or direct the disposition of
1,091,540 shares of common stock. |
66
|
|
(15) |
Based on an amendment to a Schedule 13G filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, dated February 10,
2006, Putnam, LLC d/b/a Putnam Investments, an investment
advisor, along with its parent and certain of its affiliates in
their various capacities, shares the power to vote or direct the
vote and to dispose or direct the disposition of
826,998 shares of common stock and shares the power to
dispose or direct the disposition of 9,336,528 shares of
common stock. |
|
(16) |
Based on an amendment to a Schedule 13G filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, dated July 11, 2006,
Highfields Capital Management LP, an investment advisor, along
with its parent and certain of its affiliates in their various
capacities, has the sole power to vote or direct the vote and to
dispose or direct the disposition of 8,353,200 shares of
common stock. |
|
(17) |
Includes 2,736,939 shares under options. The number of
shares also includes (i) 2,867,204 shares held by
subsidiaries of certain
non-U.S. trusts of
which Mr. Charles J. Wyly, Jr. and/or certain of his
family members are direct or contingent beneficiaries, and
(ii) 2,142,600 shares held by subsidiaries of certain
non-U.S. trusts of
which Mr. Sam Wyly and/or certain of his family members are
direct or contingent beneficiaries. |
MULTIPLE STOCKHOLDERS SHARING ONE ADDRESS
In accordance with
Rule 14a-3(e)(1)
under the Exchange Act, one proxy statement will be delivered to
two or more stockholders who share an address, unless we have
received contrary instructions from one or more of the
stockholders. We will deliver promptly upon written or oral
request a separate copy of the proxy statement to a stockholder
at a shared address to which a single copy of the proxy
statement was delivered. Requests for additional copies of the
proxy statement, and requests that in the future separate proxy
statements be sent to stockholders who share an address, should
be directed to Michaels Stores, Inc., 8000 Bent Branch Drive,
Irving, Texas 75063, Attention: Investor Relations Department,
telephone: (972) 409-1300.
In addition, stockholders who share a single address but receive
multiple copies of the proxy statement may request that in the
future they receive a single copy by contacting us at the
address and phone number set forth in the prior sentence.
SUBMISSION OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
If the merger is not completed, you will continue to be entitled
to attend and participate in our stockholder meetings and we
will hold a 2007 annual meeting of stockholders, in which case
stockholder proposals will be eligible for consideration for
inclusion in the proxy statement and form of proxy for our 2007
annual meeting of stockholders in accordance with
Rule 14a-8 under
the Exchange Act. To be eligible for inclusion in the proxy
statement and form of proxy for the 2007 annual meeting pursuant
to Rule 14a-8,
proposals of stockholders must have been received by us no later
than January 4, 2007, and must comply with
Rule 14a-8. If the
date of the 2007 annual meeting, if any, is changed by more than
30 days from June 20, 2007, then in order to be
considered for inclusion in our proxy materials, proposals of
stockholders intended to be presented at the 2007 annual meeting
must be received by us a reasonable time before we begin to
print and mail our proxy materials for the 2007 annual meeting.
To be presented at the 2007 annual meeting of stockholders
without inclusion in our proxy materials for such meeting,
proposals of stockholders must be in writing and received by us
no later than March 2, 2007 and no earlier than
February 5, 2007, in accordance with procedures set forth
in our bylaws. If the date of the 2007 annual meeting, if any,
is changed by more than 30 days from June 20, 2007,
then in order to be presented at the 2007 annual meeting without
inclusion in our proxy materials, proposals of stockholders must
be in writing and received by us not later than the close of
business on the tenth day following the first day on which
notice of the date of such meeting is publicly disclosed by us.
In order to curtail controversy as to the date on which a
proposal was received by us, we suggest that proponents submit
their proposals by certified mail, return receipt requested, to
Michaels Stores, Inc., P.O. Box 619566, DFW, Texas
75261-9566 and directed to the Secretary of Michaels.
In addition, our bylaws provide that stockholders seeking to
nominate candidates for election as directors at an annual
meeting of stockholders must provide timely notice thereof in
writing. To be timely, a
67
stockholders notice must be delivered to or mailed and
received by the Secretary of Michaels at our principal executive
offices not less than 14 days nor more than 50 days
prior to the annual meeting. However, if less than
21 days notice of the annual meeting is given to
stockholders, such written notice may be delivered or mailed to
the Secretary of Michaels at our principal executive offices not
later than the close of business on the seventh day following
the day on which notice of the meeting was mailed to
stockholders. We reserve the right to reject, rule out of order,
or take other appropriate action with respect to any proposal
that does not comply with these and other applicable
requirements.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements
and other information with the SEC. You may read and copy any
reports, proxy statements or other information that we file with
the SEC at its Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330 for
further information on the public reference rooms. You may also
obtain copies of this information by mail from the Public
Reference Section of the SEC, 100 F Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20549, at prescribed rates. Our public
filings are also available to the public from document retrieval
services and the Internet website maintained by the SEC at
www.sec.gov.
Reports, proxy statements or other information concerning us may
also be inspected at the offices of the NYSE at 20 Broad
Street, New York, NY 10005.
We incorporate by reference into this proxy statement any
current reports on
Form 8-K filed by
us pursuant to the Exchange Act after the date of this proxy
statement and prior to the date of the special meeting. This
means that we can disclose important information to you by
referring you to those documents. The information incorporated
by reference is considered to be a part of this proxy statement,
and later information that we file with the SEC will update and
supersede that information.
Any person, including any beneficial owner, to whom this proxy
statement is delivered may request copies of proxy statements
and any of the documents incorporated by reference in this
document or other information concerning us, without charge, by
written or telephonic request directed to us at Michaels Stores,
Inc., 8000 Bent Branch Drive, Irving, Texas 75063,
Attention: Investor Relations,
Telephone: (972) 409-1300
or from the SEC through the SECs website at the address
provided above. Documents incorporated by reference are
available without charge, excluding any exhibits to those
documents unless the exhibit is specifically incorporated by
reference into those documents.
No persons have been authorized to give any information or to
make any representations other than those contained in this
proxy statement and, if given or made, such information or
representations must not be relied upon as having been
authorized by us or any other person. This proxy statement is
dated September 6, 2006. You should not assume that the
information contained in this proxy statement is accurate as of
any date other than that date, and the mailing of this proxy
statement to stockholders shall not create any implication to
the contrary.
68
ANNEX A
The merger agreement, as amended, is a commercial document that
establishes and governs the legal relations between Michaels and
the Sponsor Entities with respect to the transactions described
in the proxy statement. The representations, warranties and
covenants made by Michaels and the Sponsor Entities in the
merger agreement are qualified and subject to important
limitations agreed to by Michaels and the Sponsor Entities in
connection with negotiating the terms of the merger agreement.
Furthermore, the representations and warranties may be subject
to standards of materiality applicable to Michaels and the
Sponsor Entities that may be different from those that are
applicable to stockholders.
Conformed
Copy
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
dated as of June 30, 2006,
among
BAIN PASTE MERGERCO, INC.,
BLACKSTONE PASTE MERGERCO, INC.,
BAIN PASTE FINCO, LLC,
BLACKSTONE PASTE FINCO, LLC,
and
MICHAELS STORES, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
|
|
| |
ARTICLE I
The Merger |
SECTION 1.01.
|
|
The Merger |
|
|
2 |
|
SECTION 1.02.
|
|
Closing |
|
|
2 |
|
SECTION 1.03.
|
|
Effective Time |
|
|
2 |
|
SECTION 1.04.
|
|
Effects of the Merger |
|
|
2 |
|
SECTION 1.05.
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws |
|
|
2 |
|
SECTION 1.06.
|
|
Directors |
|
|
3 |
|
SECTION 1.07.
|
|
Officers |
|
|
3 |
|
|
ARTICLE II
Effect of the Merger on the Capital Stock of the Constituent
Corporations;
Exchange Fund; Company Equity Awards |
SECTION 2.01.
|
|
Effect on Capital Stock |
|
|
3 |
|
SECTION 2.02.
|
|
Exchange Fund |
|
|
4 |
|
SECTION 2.03.
|
|
Company Equity Awards |
|
|
7 |
|
|
ARTICLE III
Representations and Warranties |
SECTION 3.01.
|
|
Representations and Warranties of the Company |
|
|
7 |
|
SECTION 3.02.
|
|
Representations and Warranties of the Sponsor Entities |
|
|
22 |
|
|
ARTICLE IV
Covenants Relating to Conduct of Business |
SECTION 4.01.
|
|
Conduct of Business |
|
|
25 |
|
SECTION 4.02.
|
|
No Solicitation |
|
|
28 |
|
|
ARTICLE V
Additional Agreements |
SECTION 5.01.
|
|
Preparation of the Proxy Statement; Stockholders Meeting |
|
|
31 |
|
SECTION 5.02.
|
|
Access to Information; Confidentiality |
|
|
32 |
|
SECTION 5.03.
|
|
Reasonable Best Efforts |
|
|
32 |
|
SECTION 5.04.
|
|
Benefit Plans |
|
|
33 |
|
SECTION 5.05.
|
|
Indemnification, Exculpation and Insurance |
|
|
35 |
|
SECTION 5.06.
|
|
Fees and Expenses |
|
|
37 |
|
SECTION 5.07.
|
|
Public Announcements |
|
|
38 |
|
SECTION 5.08.
|
|
Stockholder Litigation |
|
|
39 |
|
SECTION 5.09.
|
|
Financing |
|
|
39 |
|
|
ARTICLE VI
Conditions Precedent |
SECTION 6.01.
|
|
Conditions to Each Partys Obligation to Effect the Merger |
|
|
42 |
|
SECTION 6.02.
|
|
Conditions to Obligations of the Sponsor Entities |
|
|
42 |
|
SECTION 6.03.
|
|
Conditions to Obligation of the Company |
|
|
43 |
|
SECTION 6.04.
|
|
Frustration of Closing Conditions |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
|
|
| |
ARTICLE VII
Termination, Amendment and Waiver |
SECTION 7.01.
|
|
Termination |
|
|
43 |
|
SECTION 7.02.
|
|
Effect of Termination |
|
|
45 |
|
SECTION 7.03.
|
|
Amendment |
|
|
45 |
|
SECTION 7.04.
|
|
Extension; Waiver |
|
|
45 |
|
SECTION 7.05.
|
|
Procedure for Termination or Amendment |
|
|
45 |
|
|
ARTICLE VIII
General Provisions |
SECTION 8.01.
|
|
Nonsurvival of Representations and Warranties |
|
|
46 |
|
SECTION 8.02.
|
|
Notices |
|
|
46 |
|
SECTION 8.03.
|
|
Definitions |
|
|
47 |
|
SECTION 8.04.
|
|
Interpretation |
|
|
48 |
|
SECTION 8.05.
|
|
Consents and Approvals |
|
|
49 |
|
SECTION 8.06.
|
|
Counterparts |
|
|
49 |
|
SECTION 8.07.
|
|
Entire Agreement; No Third-Party Beneficiaries |
|
|
49 |
|
SECTION 8.08.
|
|
GOVERNING LAW |
|
|
49 |
|
SECTION 8.09.
|
|
Assignment |
|
|
49 |
|
SECTION 8.10.
|
|
Specific Enforcement; Consent to Jurisdiction |
|
|
49 |
|
SECTION 8.11.
|
|
Severability |
|
|
50 |
|
Index of Defined Terms |
|
|
|
|
A-ii
|
|
|
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER (this Agreement)
dated as of June 30, 2006, among BAIN PASTE MERGERCO, INC.,
a Delaware corporation (Bain MergerCo),
BLACKSTONE PASTE MERGERCO, INC., a Delaware corporation
(Blackstone MergerCo and, together with Bain
MergerCo, MergerCos), BAIN PASTE FINCO, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company (Bain
FinCo), BLACKSTONE PASTE FINCO, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company (Blackstone FinCo
and, together with Bain FinCo, FinCos;
MergerCos and FinCos, collectively, the Sponsor
Entities), and MICHAELS STORES, INC., a Delaware
corporation (the Company). |
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company and each MergerCo
has approved and declared advisable, and the sole member of Bain
FinCo and the sole member of Blackstone FinCo has approved, this
Agreement and the merger of each MergerCo with and into the
Company (the Merger), upon the terms and
subject to the conditions set forth in this Agreement, whereby
each issued and outstanding share of common stock, par value
$0.10 per share, of the Company (Company Common
Stock), other than (a) shares of Company Common
Stock directly owned by the Company, as treasury stock, or by
any Sponsor Entity and (b) the Appraisal Shares, will be
converted into the right to receive $44.00 in cash;
WHEREAS, concurrently with the execution of this Agreement,
(a) Bain Capital Fund IX, LLC, an affiliate of Bain
MergerCo and Bain FinCo (the Bain Fund), has
entered into (i) a letter agreement, dated as of the date
hereof, with Bain MergerCo pursuant to which the Bain Fund has
agreed to provide certain equity financing to Bain MergerCo and
(ii) a Limited Guaranty, dated as of the date hereof, in
favor of the Company with respect to obligations of Bain
MergerCo and Bain FinCo arising under, or in connection with,
this Agreement (the Bain Limited Guaranty)
and (b) Blackstone Capital Partners V L.P., an affiliate of
Blackstone MergerCo and Blackstone FinCo (the
Blackstone Fund and, together with the Bain
Fund, the Funds), has entered into (i) a
letter agreement, dated as of the date hereof, with Blackstone
MergerCo pursuant to which the Blackstone Fund has agreed to
provide certain equity financing to Blackstone MergerCo and
(ii) a Limited Guaranty, dated as of the date hereof, in
favor of the Company with respect to the obligations of
Blackstone MergerCo and Blackstone FinCo arising under, or in
connection with, this Agreement (the Blackstone Limited
Guaranty and, together with the Bain Limited Guaranty,
the Guarantees); and
WHEREAS, the Company and each of the Sponsor Entities desire to
make certain representations, warranties, covenants and
agreements in connection with the Merger and also to prescribe
various conditions to the Merger.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the representations,
warranties, covenants and agreements contained in this
Agreement, and subject to the conditions set forth herein, the
parties hereto agree as follows:
|
|
|
(a) The Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (the
Company Bylaws) shall be amended at the
Effective Time to be in the form of Exhibit B, with such
changes thereto as may be agreed to by the Company and
MergerCos, and, as so amended, shall be the Bylaws of the
Surviving Corporation until thereafter changed or amended as
provided therein or by applicable Law. |
Section 1.06. Directors.
The directors of MergerCos immediately prior to the Effective
Time shall be the directors of the Surviving Corporation until
the earlier of their resignation or removal or until their
respective successors are duly elected and qualified, as the
case may be.
Section 1.07. Officers.
The officers of the Company immediately prior to the Effective
Time shall be the officers of the Surviving Corporation, until
the earlier of their resignation or removal or until their
respective successors are duly elected and qualified, as the
case may be.
A-1
ARTICLE II
Effect of the Merger on the Capital Stock of the
Constituent Corporations; Exchange Fund;
Company Equity Awards
Section 2.01. Effect
on Capital Stock. At the Effective Time, by virtue of
the Merger and without any action on the part of the holder of
any shares of Company Common Stock or any shares of capital
stock or other equity interests of any Sponsor Entity:
|
|
|
(a) Capital Stock of MergerCos. Each share of
capital stock of each MergerCo issued and outstanding
immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be converted into
and become one validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable
share of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the
Surviving Corporation. |
|
|
(b) Cancelation of Treasury Stock and Certain Other
Stock. Each share of Company Common Stock that is
directly owned by the Company, as treasury stock, or by any of
the Sponsor Entities immediately prior to the Effective Time
shall automatically be canceled and shall cease to exist, and no
consideration shall be delivered in exchange therefor. |
|
|
(c) Conversion of Company Common Stock. Each
share of Company Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately
prior to the Effective Time (including shares of Company
Restricted Stock, but excluding shares to be canceled in
accordance with Section 2.01(b) and, except as provided in
Section 2.01(d), the Appraisal Shares) shall be converted
into the right to receive $44.00 in cash, without interest (the
Merger Consideration). At the Effective Time,
all such shares of Company Common Stock shall no longer be
outstanding and shall automatically be canceled and shall cease
to exist, and each holder of a certificate that immediately
prior to the Effective Time represented any such shares of
Company Common Stock (each, a Certificate)
shall cease to have any rights with respect thereto, except the
right to receive the Merger Consideration and any dividends
declared in accordance with Section 4.01(a) with a record
date prior to the Effective Time that remain unpaid at the
Effective Time and that are due to such holder. |
|
|
(d) Appraisal Rights. Notwithstanding
anything in this Agreement to the contrary, shares (the
Appraisal Shares) of Company Common Stock
issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time
that are held by any holder who is entitled to demand and
properly demands appraisal of such shares pursuant to, and who
complies in all respects with, the provisions of
Section 262 of the DGCL
(Section 262) shall not be converted
into the right to receive the Merger Consideration as provided
in Section 2.01(c), but instead such holder shall be
entitled to payment of the fair value of such shares in
accordance with the provisions of Section 262. At the
Effective Time, the Appraisal Shares shall no longer be
outstanding and shall automatically be canceled and shall cease
to exist, and each holder of Appraisal Shares shall cease to
have any rights with respect thereto, except the right to
receive the fair value of such shares in accordance with the
provisions of Section 262. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
if any such holder shall fail to perfect or otherwise shall
waive, withdraw or lose the right to appraisal under
Section 262 or a court of competent jurisdiction shall
determine that such holder is not entitled to the relief
provided by Section 262, then the right of such holder to
be paid the fair value of such holders Appraisal Shares
under Section 262 shall cease and such Appraisal Shares
shall be deemed to have been converted at the Effective Time
into, and shall have become, the right to receive the Merger
Consideration as provided in Section 2.01(c). The Company
shall give prompt notice to MergerCos of any demands for
appraisal of any shares of Company Common Stock, withdrawals of
such demands and any other instruments served pursuant to the
DGCL received by the Company, and MergerCos shall have the right
to participate in and direct all negotiations and proceedings
with respect to such demands. Prior to the Effective Time, the
Company shall not, without the prior written consent of
MergerCos (which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or
delayed), voluntarily make any payment with respect to, or
settle or offer to settle, any such demands, or agree to do or
commit to do any of the foregoing. |
A-2
Section 2.02. Exchange
Fund. (a) Paying Agent. Prior to the Closing
Date, the Sponsor Entities shall appoint a bank or trust company
reasonably acceptable to the Company to act as paying agent (the
Paying Agent) for the payment of the Merger
Consideration and the Option Amounts in accordance with this
Article II and, in connection therewith, shall enter into
an agreement with the Paying Agent in a form reasonably
acceptable to the Company. At or prior to the Effective Time,
the Sponsor Entities shall deposit, or shall cause the Surviving
Corporation to deposit, with the Paying Agent, cash in an amount
sufficient to pay the aggregate Merger Consideration and the
aggregate Option Amount, in each case as required to be paid
pursuant to this Agreement (such cash being hereinafter referred
to as the Exchange Fund).
(b) Certificate Exchange Procedures. As
promptly as practicable after the Effective Time, but in any
event within two business days thereafter, the Surviving
Corporation shall cause the Paying Agent to mail to each holder
of record of a Certificate (i) a letter of transmittal
(which shall specify that delivery shall be effected, and risk
of loss and title to the Certificates shall pass, only upon
proper delivery of the Certificates to the Paying Agent and
which shall otherwise be in customary form) and
(ii) instructions for use in effecting the surrender of the
Certificates in exchange for the Merger Consideration. Each
holder of record of a Certificate shall, upon surrender to the
Paying Agent of such Certificate, together with such letter of
transmittal, duly executed, and such other documents as may
reasonably be required by the Paying Agent, be entitled to
receive in exchange therefor the amount of cash which the number
of shares of Company Common Stock previously represented by such
Certificate shall have been converted into the right to receive
pursuant to Section 2.01(c), and the Certificate so
surrendered shall forthwith be canceled. In the event of a
transfer of ownership of Company Common Stock which is not
registered in the transfer records of the Company, payment of
the Merger Consideration may be made to a person other than the
person in whose name the Certificate so surrendered is
registered if such Certificate shall be properly endorsed or
otherwise be in proper form for transfer and the person
requesting such payment shall pay any fiduciary or surety bonds
or any transfer or other similar taxes required by reason of the
payment of the Merger Consideration to a person other than the
registered holder of such Certificate or establish to the
reasonable satisfaction of the Surviving Corporation that such
tax has been paid or is not applicable. Until surrendered as
contemplated by this Section 2.02(b), each Certificate
shall be deemed at any time after the Effective Time to
represent only the right to receive upon such surrender the
Merger Consideration which the holder thereof has the right to
receive in respect of such Certificate pursuant to this
Article II and any dividends declared in accordance with
Section 4.01(a) with a record date prior to the Effective
Time that remain unpaid at the Effective Time and that are due
to such holder. No interest shall be paid or will accrue on any
cash payable to holders of Certificates pursuant to the
provisions of this Article II.
(c) No Further Ownership Rights in Company Common
Stock. All cash paid upon the surrender of Certificates
in accordance with the terms of this Article II shall be
deemed to have been paid in full satisfaction of all rights
pertaining to the shares of Company Common Stock formerly
represented by such Certificates, subject,
however, to the Surviving Corporations obligation
to pay all dividends that may have been declared by the Company
in accordance with Section 4.01(a) and that remain unpaid
at the Effective Time. At the close of business on the day on
which the Effective Time occurs, the stock transfer books of the
Company shall be closed, and there shall be no further
registration of transfers on the stock transfer books of the
Surviving Corporation of the shares of Company Common Stock that
were outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time. If,
after the close of business on the day on which the Effective
Time occurs, any Certificate is presented to the Surviving
Corporation for transfer, it shall be canceled against delivery
of cash to the holder thereof as provided in this
Article II.
(d) Termination of the Exchange Fund. Any
portion of the Exchange Fund that remains undistributed to the
holders of the Certificates for 12 months after the
Effective Time shall be delivered to the Surviving Corporation,
upon demand, and any holders of the Certificates who have not
theretofore complied with this Article II shall thereafter
look only to the Surviving Corporation for, and the Surviving
Corporation shall remain liable for, payment of their claims for
the Merger Consideration pursuant to the provisions of this
Article II.
(e) No Liability. None of the Company, the
Surviving Corporation, the Sponsor Entities or the Paying Agent
shall be liable to any person in respect of any cash from the
Exchange Fund delivered to a public official
A-3
in compliance with any applicable state, Federal or other
abandoned property, escheat or similar Law. If any Certificate
shall not have been surrendered prior to the date on which the
related Merger Consideration would escheat to or become the
property of any Governmental Entity, any such Merger
Consideration shall, to the extent permitted by applicable Law,
immediately prior to such time become the property of the
Surviving Corporation, free and clear of all claims or interest
of any person previously entitled thereto.
(f) Investment of Exchange Fund. The Paying
Agent shall invest the cash in the Exchange Fund as directed by
the Surviving Corporation; provided, however, that
such investments shall be in obligations of or guaranteed by the
United States of America or any agency or instrumentality
thereof and backed by the full faith and credit of the United
States of America, in commercial paper obligations rated A-1 or
P-1 or better by Moodys Investors Service, Inc. or
Standard & Poors Corporation, respectively, or in
certificates of deposit, bank repurchase agreements or
bankers acceptances of commercial banks with capital
exceeding $1.0 billion (based on the most recent financial
statements of such bank that are then publicly available). Any
interest and other income resulting from such investments shall
be paid solely to the Surviving Corporation. Nothing contained
herein and no investment losses resulting from investment of the
Exchange Fund shall diminish the rights of any holder of
Certificates to receive the Merger Consideration or any holder
of a Company Stock Option to receive the Option Amount, in each
case as provided herein.
(g) Lost Certificates. If any Certificate
shall have been lost, stolen or destroyed, upon the making of an
affidavit of that fact by the person claiming such Certificate
to be lost, stolen or destroyed and, if required by the
Surviving Corporation, the posting by such person of a bond or
surety in such reasonable amount as the Surviving Corporation
may direct as indemnity against any claim that may be made
against it with respect to such Certificate, the Paying Agent
shall deliver in exchange for such lost, stolen or destroyed
Certificate the applicable Merger Consideration with respect
thereto.
(h) Withholding Rights. The Surviving
Corporation or the Paying Agent shall be entitled to deduct and
withhold from the consideration otherwise payable pursuant to
this Agreement to any holder of shares of Company Common Stock
or any holder of a Company Stock Option such amounts as the
Surviving Corporation or the Paying Agent are required to deduct
and withhold with respect to the making of such payment under
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
Code), or any provision of state, local or
foreign tax Law. To the extent that amounts are so withheld and
paid over to the appropriate taxing authority by the Surviving
Corporation or the Paying Agent, such withheld amounts shall be
treated for all purposes of this Agreement as having been paid
to the holder of the shares of Company Common Stock or the
holder of the Company Stock Option, as the case may be, in
respect of which such deduction and withholding was made by the
Surviving Corporation or the Paying Agent.
Section 2.03. Company
Equity Awards. (a) As soon as reasonably
practicable following the date of this Agreement, the Board of
Directors of the Company (or, if appropriate, any committee
administering any Company Stock Plan) shall adopt such
resolutions or take such other actions as may be required to
provide that, at the Effective Time, each unexercised Company
Stock Option that is outstanding immediately prior to the
Effective Time shall be canceled, with the holder of each such
Company Stock Option becoming entitled to receive an amount in
cash equal to (i) the excess, if any, of (A) the
Merger Consideration over (B) the exercise price per share
of Company Common Stock subject to such Company Stock Option,
multiplied by (ii) the number of shares of Company Common
Stock subject to such Company Stock Option (such amount, the
Option Amount). Subject to
Section 2.02(h), all amounts payable pursuant to this
Section 2.03(a) shall be paid as promptly as practicable
following the Effective Time, without interest. In the event
that the exercise price per share of Company Common Stock
subject to a Company Stock Option is equal to or greater than
the Merger Consideration, such Company Stock Option shall be
cancelled without consideration and have no further force or
effect.
(b) With respect to the ESPP, each participants
accumulated payroll deductions shall be used to purchase shares
of Company Common Stock immediately prior to the Effective Time
in accordance with the terms of the ESPP, and the shares of
Company Common Stock purchased thereunder shall be canceled at
the Effective Time and converted into the right to receive the
Merger Consideration pursuant to Section 2.01(c).
A-4
The Company shall cause the ESPP to terminate at the Effective
Time, and no further purchase rights shall be granted or
exercised under the ESPP thereafter.
ARTICLE III
Representations and Warranties
Section 3.01. Representations
and Warranties of the Company. Except as disclosed in
any report, schedule, form, statement or other document filed
with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the SEC) by the Company and publicly
available prior to the date of this Agreement (collectively, the
Filed SEC Documents), and, for the avoidance
of doubt, without giving effect to any change of fact or
circumstance subsequent to the date such document was filed or
furnished, or as set forth in the Company Disclosure Letter (it
being understood that any information set forth in one section
or subsection of the Company Disclosure Letter shall be deemed
to apply to and qualify the Section or subsection of this
Agreement to which it corresponds in number and each other
Section or subsection of this Agreement to the extent that it is
reasonably apparent on its face that such information is
relevant to such other Section or subsection), the Company
represents and warrants to the Sponsor Entities as follows:
|
|
|
(a) Organization, Standing and Corporate
Power. Each of the Company and its Subsidiaries is duly
organized and validly existing under the Laws of its
jurisdiction of organization and has all requisite corporate,
company or partnership power and authority to carry on its
business as presently conducted. Each of the Company and its
Subsidiaries is duly qualified or licensed to do business and is
in good standing (where such concept is recognized under
applicable Law) in each jurisdiction where the nature of its
business or the ownership, leasing or operation of its
properties makes such qualification or licensing necessary,
other than where the failure to be so qualified, licensed or in
good standing has not had and would not reasonably be expected
to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse
Effect. The Company has made available to the Sponsor Entities
prior to the execution of this Agreement a true and complete
copy of the Company Certificate of Incorporation and the Company
Bylaws and the comparable organizational documents of each of
its Subsidiaries, in each case as in effect on the date of this
Agreement. |
|
|
(b) Subsidiaries. Section 3.01(b) of the
Company Disclosure Letter lists each Subsidiary of the Company
and the jurisdiction of organization thereof. All the
outstanding shares of capital stock of, or other equity
interests in, each Subsidiary of the Company have been validly
issued and are fully paid and nonassessable and are owned,
directly or indirectly, by the Company free and clear of all
pledges, liens, charges, mortgages, encumbrances or security
interests of any kind or nature whatsoever (collectively,
Liens), other than Permitted Liens. Except
for its interests in its Subsidiaries, the Company does not own,
directly or indirectly, any capital stock of, or other equity
interests in, any corporation, partnership, joint venture,
association or other entity. |
|
|
(c) Capital Structure. The authorized capital
stock of the Company consists of 350,000,000 shares of Company
Common Stock and 2,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value
$0.10 per share (the Company Preferred
Stock). At the close of business on June 27,
2006, (i) 134,937,396 shares of Company Common Stock were
issued and outstanding (which number includes (A) 2,766,400
shares of Company Common Stock held by the Company in its
treasury and (B) 12,955 shares of Company Common Stock
subject to vesting or other forfeiture conditions or repurchase
by the Company (such shares, together with any similar shares
issued after June 27, 2006, the Company Restricted
Stock)), (ii) 22,487,703 shares of Company Common
Stock were reserved and available for issuance pursuant to the
Companys Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Option Plan,
Second Amended and Restated 2001 Employee Stock Option Plan,
Second Amended and Restated 2001 General Stock Option Plan, 2005
Incentive Compensation Plan and Second Amended and Restated 1997
Employees Stock Purchase Plan (such plan, the
ESPP; the foregoing plans, collectively, the
Company Stock Plans), of which
(A) 10,847,294 shares of Company Common Stock were subject
to outstanding options (other than rights under the ESPP) to
acquire shares of Company Common Stock from the Company (such
options, together with any similar options granted after
June 27, 2006, the Company Stock
Options) and |
A-5
|
|
|
(B) 6,188 shares of Company Common Stock were subject to
outstanding rights under the ESPP (assuming that the closing
price for the Company Common Stock as reported on the New York
Stock Exchange on the last day of the offering period in effect
under the ESPP on June 27, 2006 was equal to the Merger
Consideration), (iii) 8,087,082 shares of Company Common
Stock were reserved and available under the Companys
Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (the
Company DRIP) and (iv) no shares of
Company Preferred Stock were issued or outstanding or held by
the Company in its treasury. Except as set forth above, at the
close of business on June 27, 2006, no shares of capital
stock or other voting securities of the Company were issued,
reserved for issuance or outstanding. Since June 27, 2006
to the date of this Agreement, (x) there have been no
issuances by the Company of shares of capital stock or other
voting securities of the Company, other than issuances of shares
of Company Common Stock pursuant to the exercise of the Company
Stock Options or rights under the ESPP, in each case outstanding
as of June 27, 2006, and (y) there have been no
issuances by the Company of options, warrants, other rights to
acquire shares of capital stock of the Company or other rights
that give the holder thereof any economic interest of a nature
accruing to the holders of Company Common Stock, except for
rights under the ESPP. All outstanding shares of Company Common
Stock (other than Company Restricted Stock) are, and all such
shares that may be issued prior to the Effective Time will be
when issued, duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and
nonassessable and not subject to preemptive rights. There are no
bonds, debentures, notes or other indebtedness of the Company
having the right to vote (or convertible into, or exchangeable
for, securities having the right to vote) on any matters on
which holders of Company Common Stock may vote (Voting
Company Debt). Except for any obligations pursuant to
this Agreement, any Company Stock Plan or as otherwise set forth
above, as of June 27, 2006, there are no options, warrants,
rights, convertible or exchangeable securities, stock-based
performance units, Contracts or undertakings of any kind to
which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is a party or by
which any of them is bound (1) obligating the Company or
any such Subsidiary to issue, deliver or sell, or cause to be
issued, delivered or sold, additional shares of capital stock or
other equity interests in, or any security convertible or
exchangeable for any capital stock of or other equity interest
in, the Company or of any of its Subsidiaries or any Voting
Company Debt, other than pursuant to (x) the Michaels
Stores, Inc. Employees 401(k) Plan (the Company 401(k)
Plan) and (y) the Company DRIP,
(2) obligating the Company or any such Subsidiary to issue,
grant or enter into any such option, warrant, right, security,
unit, Contract or undertaking or (3) that give any person
the right to receive any economic interest of a nature accruing
to the holders of Company Common Stock. As of the date of this
Agreement, there are no outstanding contractual obligations of
the Company or any of its Subsidiaries to repurchase, redeem or
otherwise acquire any shares of capital stock of the Company or
any such Subsidiary, other than pursuant to the Company Stock
Plans and the Company 401(k) Plan. Section 3.01(c) of the
Company Disclosure Letter sets forth a true and complete list of
all Indebtedness for borrowed money of the Company and its
Subsidiaries (other than any such Indebtedness owed to the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries, trade letters of credit and
any other such Indebtedness with a principal amount not in
excess of $10.0 million individually) outstanding on the
date of this Agreement. |
|
|
(d) Authority; Noncontravention. The Company
has all requisite corporate power and authority to execute and
deliver this Agreement and to consummate the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement, subject, in the case of the
Merger, to receipt of the Stockholder Approval. The execution
and delivery of this Agreement by the Company and the
consummation by the Company of the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement have been duly authorized by all necessary
corporate action on the part of the Company, subject, in the
case of the Merger, to receipt of the Stockholder Approval. This
Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by the Company
and, assuming the due authorization, execution and delivery by
each of the other parties hereto, constitutes a legal, valid and
binding obligation of the Company, enforceable against the
Company in accordance with its terms, subject, as to
enforceability, to bankruptcy, insolvency and other Laws of
general applicability relating to or affecting creditors
rights and to general equity principles. The Board of Directors
of the Company, at a meeting duly called and held at which all
directors of the Company were present, duly adopted resolutions
(i) approving and declaring advisable this Agreement, the
Merger and the other transactions contem- |
A-6
|
|
|
plated by this Agreement, (ii) declaring that it is in the
best interests of the stockholders of the Company that the
Company enter into this Agreement and consummate the Merger and
the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement on the
terms and subject to the conditions set forth herein,
(iii) directing that the adoption of this Agreement be
submitted to a vote at a meeting of the stockholders of the
Company and (iv) recommending that the stockholders of the
Company adopt this Agreement, which resolutions, as of the date
of this Agreement, have not been rescinded, modified or
withdrawn in any way. The execution and delivery by the Company
of this Agreement do not, and the consummation of the Merger and
the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement and
compliance with the provisions of this Agreement will not,
conflict with, or result in any violation of, or default (with
or without notice or lapse of time, or both) under, or give rise
to a right of termination, cancellation or acceleration of any
obligation or to the loss of a benefit under, or result in the
creation of any Lien upon any of the properties or assets of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries under (other than any such
Lien created in connection with the Financing or otherwise from
any action taken by any of the Sponsor Entities), any provision
of (A) the Company Certificate of Incorporation, the
Company Bylaws or the comparable organizational documents of any
of its Subsidiaries or (B) subject to the filings and other
matters referred to in the immediately following sentence,
(1) any contract, lease, indenture, note, bond or other
agreement that is in force and effect (a
Contract) to which the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries is a party or by which any of their respective
properties or assets are bound, other than any lease of real
property under which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is a
tenant or a subtenant, or (2) any statute, law, ordinance,
rule or regulation of any Governmental Entity
(Law) or any judgment, order or decree of any
Governmental Entity (Judgment), in each case
applicable to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or their
respective properties or assets, other than, in the case of
clause (B) above, any such conflicts, violations, defaults,
rights, losses or Liens that have not had and would not
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect. No consent, approval,
order or authorization of, or registration, declaration or
filing with, or notice to, any Federal, state, local or foreign
government, any court of competent jurisdiction or any
administrative, regulatory (including any stock exchange) or
other governmental agency, commission or authority (each, a
Governmental Entity) is required to be
obtained or made by or with respect to the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries in connection with the execution and delivery of
this Agreement by the Company or the consummation by the Company
of the Merger or the other transactions contemplated by this
Agreement, except for (I) the filing of a premerger
notification and report form by the Company under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended
(the HSR Act), and the filings and receipt,
termination or expiration, as applicable, of such other
approvals or waiting periods as may be required under any other
applicable competition, merger control, antitrust or similar
Law, (II) the filing with the SEC of (x) a proxy
statement relating to the adoption by the stockholders of the
Company of this Agreement (as amended or supplemented from time
to time, the Proxy Statement) and
(y) such reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (the Exchange Act), as may be
required in connection with this Agreement and the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement, (III) the filing of the
Certificate of Merger with the Secretary of State of the State
of Delaware and of appropriate documents with the relevant
authorities of other jurisdictions in which the Company or any
of its Subsidiaries is qualified to do business, (IV) any
filings required under the rules and regulations of the New York
Stock Exchange and (V) such other consents, approvals,
orders, authorizations, registrations, declarations, filings and
notices the failure of which to be obtained or made has not had
and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in
the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect. |
|
|
(e) SEC Documents. The Company has filed all
reports, schedules, forms, statements and other documents with
the SEC required to be filed by the Company since
January 1, 2004 (the SEC Documents). As
of their respective dates of filing, the SEC Documents complied
as to form in all material respects with the requirements of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities
Act), or the Exchange Act, as the case may be, and the
rules and regulations of the SEC promulgated thereunder
applicable thereto, and none of the SEC Documents contained any
untrue statement of a material fact or omitted to state a
material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in
order to make the statements therein, in light of the
circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. The |
A-7
|
|
|
Company has made available to the Sponsor Entities copies of all
comment letters received by the Company from the SEC since
January 1, 2004 and relating to the SEC Documents, together
with all written responses of the Company thereto. As of the
date of this Agreement, to the Knowledge of the Company there
are no outstanding or unresolved comments in such comment
letters received by the Company from the SEC. As of the date of
this Agreement, to the Knowledge of the Company, none of the SEC
Documents is the subject of any ongoing review by the SEC. The
audited consolidated financial statements and the unaudited
quarterly financial statements (including, in each case, the
notes thereto) of the Company included in the SEC Documents when
filed complied as to form in all material respects with the
published rules and regulations of the SEC with respect thereto,
have been prepared in all material respects in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP) (except, in the case of unaudited
quarterly statements, as permitted by Form 10-Q of the SEC
or other rules and regulations of the SEC) applied on a
consistent basis during the periods involved (except as may be
indicated in the notes thereto) and fairly present in all
material respects the consolidated financial position of the
Company and its consolidated Subsidiaries as of the dates
thereof and the consolidated results of their operations and
cash flows for the periods then ended (subject, in the case of
unaudited quarterly statements, to normal year-end adjustments).
Except for matters reflected or reserved against in the audited
consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of January 28,
2006 (or the notes thereto) included in the Filed SEC Documents,
neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has any
liabilities or obligations (whether absolute, accrued,
contingent, fixed or otherwise) of any nature that would be
required under GAAP, as in effect on the date of this Agreement,
to be reflected on a consolidated balance sheet of the Company
(including the notes thereto), except liabilities and
obligations that (i) were incurred since January 28,
2006 in the ordinary course of business consistent with past
practice, (ii) are incurred in connection with the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement or (iii) have
not had and would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect. |
|
|
(f) Information Supplied. The Proxy Statement
will not, at the date it is first mailed to the stockholders of
the Company and at the time of the Stockholders Meeting,
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in
order to make the statements therein, in light of the
circumstances under which they are made, not misleading, except
that no representation or warranty is made by the Company with
respect to statements made or incorporated by reference therein
based on information supplied by any of the Sponsor Entities for
inclusion or incorporation by reference in the Proxy Statement. |
|
|
(g) Absence of Certain Changes or Events.
Since January 28, 2006, there has not been any change,
effect, event, occurrence or state of facts that has had or
would reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect. From such date through the
date of this Agreement, the Company and its Subsidiaries have
conducted their businesses only in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practice, and during such period
there has not been: |
|
|
|
(i) any declaration, setting aside or payment of any
dividend on, or making of any other distribution (whether in
cash, stock or property) with respect to, any capital stock of
the Company, except for the regular quarterly cash dividends on
Company Common Stock; |
|
|
(ii) any split, combination or reclassification of any
capital stock of the Company or any issuance or the
authorization of any issuance of any other securities in lieu of
or in substitution for shares of capital stock of the Company; |
|
|
(iii) any purchase, redemption or other acquisition by the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries of any shares of capital
stock of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or any rights,
warrants or options to acquire any such shares, other than
(A) the acquisition by the Company of shares of Company
Common Stock in connection with the surrender of shares of
Company Common Stock by holders of options to acquire such stock
in order to pay the exercise price thereof, (B) the
withholding of shares of Company Common Stock to satisfy tax
obligations with respect to awards granted pursuant to the
Company Stock Plans, (C) the acquisition by the Company of
Company |
A-8
|
|
|
Stock Options and shares of Company Restricted Stock in
connection with the forfeiture of such awards and (D) the
acquisition by the trustee of the Company 401(k) Plan of shares
of Company Common Stock in order to satisfy participant
investment elections under the Company 401(k) Plan; |
|
|
(iv) except (A) in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice or (B) as required pursuant
to the terms of any Company Benefit Plan or Company Benefit
Agreement or other written agreement, in each case, in effect as
of January 28, 2006, (1) any granting to any director
or executive officer of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries
of any material increase in compensation, (2) any granting
to any director or executive officer of the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries of any increase in severance or termination pay
or (3) any entry by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries
into any employment, consulting, severance or termination
agreement with any director, executive officer or employee of
the Company or any of its Subsidiaries pursuant to which the
total annual compensation or the aggregate severance benefits
exceed $500,000 per person; |
|
|
(v) any change in accounting methods, principles or
practices by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries materially
affecting the consolidated assets, liabilities or results of
operations of the Company, except as required (A) by GAAP
(or any interpretation thereof), including as may be required by
the Financial Accounting Standards Board or any similar
organization, or (B) by Law, including Regulation S-X
under the Securities Act; or |
|
|
(vi) any material tax election by the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries, other than in the ordinary course of business. |
|
|
|
(h) Litigation. There is no suit, action or
proceeding pending or, to the Knowledge of the Company,
threatened against the Company or any of its Subsidiaries that
has had or would reasonably be expected to have, individually or
in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect. There is no
Judgment outstanding against the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries that has had or would reasonably be expected to
have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse
Effect. As of the date of this Agreement, to the Knowledge of
the Company, no director or officer of the Company is a
defendant in any suit, action or proceeding in connection with
his or her status as a director or officer of the Company. This
Section 3.01(h) does not relate to environmental matters,
which are the subject of Section 3.01(j)(ii). |
|
|
(i) Contracts. Except for this Agreement,
Contracts filed as exhibits to the Filed SEC Documents and
purchase orders entered into in the ordinary course of business,
Section 3.01(i) of the Company Disclosure Letter sets forth
a true and complete list, as of the date of this Agreement, and
the Company has made available to the Sponsor Entities true and
complete copies, of: |
|
|
|
(i) each Contract that would be required to be filed by the
Company as a material contract pursuant to
Item 601(b)(10) of Regulation S-K under the Securities
Act; |
|
|
(ii) each Contract to which the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries is a party that materially restricts the ability of
the Company or any of its Subsidiaries to compete in any
business or with any person in any geographical area, except for
any such Contract that may be canceled, without any material
penalty or other liability to the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries, upon notice of 90 days or less; |
|
|
(iii) each loan and credit agreement, note, debenture,
bond, indenture and other similar Contract pursuant to which any
Indebtedness of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, in each
case in excess of $10.0 million, is outstanding or may be
incurred, other than any such Contract between or among any of
the Company and any of its Subsidiaries and any letters of
credit; |
|
|
(iv) each Contract to which the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries is a party that by its terms calls for aggregate
payments by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries of more than
$20.0 million over the remaining term of such Contract,
except for any such Contract that may be canceled, without any
material penalty or other liability to the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries, upon notice of 90 days or less; and |
A-9
|
|
|
(v) each Contract to which the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries is a party for the acquisition or disposition by
the Company or any of its Subsidiaries of properties or assets
for, in each case, aggregate consideration of more than
$20.0 million, except for acquisitions and dispositions of
properties and assets in the ordinary course of business
(including acquisitions of supplies and acquisitions and
dispositions of inventory). |
|
|
|
Each such Contract described in clauses (i) through
(v) above is referred to herein as a Specified
Contract. Each of the Specified Contracts is valid and
binding on the Company or the Subsidiary of the Company party
thereto and, to the Knowledge of the Company, each other party
thereto, and is in full force and effect, except for such
failures to be valid and binding or to be in full force and
effect that have not had and would not reasonably be expected to
have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse
Effect. There is no default under any Specified Contract by the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries or, to the Knowledge of the
Company, by any other party thereto, and no event has occurred
that with the lapse of time or the giving of notice or both
would constitute a default thereunder by the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries or, to the Knowledge of the Company, by any
other party thereto, in each case except as have not had and
would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect. This Section 3.01(i)
does not relate to real property leases, which are the subject
of Section 3.01(n). |
|
|
(j) Compliance with Laws; Environmental
Matters. (i) Each of the Company and its
Subsidiaries is and since January 1, 2004 has been in
compliance with all Laws applicable to its business or
operations (including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), except
for instances of possible noncompliance that have not had and
would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect. Each of the Company and
its Subsidiaries has in effect all approvals, authorizations,
certificates, franchises, licenses, permits and consents of
Governmental Entities (collectively, Permits)
necessary for it to conduct its business as presently conducted,
and all such Permits are in full force and effect, except for
such Permits the absence of which, or the failure of which to be
in full force and effect, have not had and would not reasonably
be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a
Material Adverse Effect. This Section 3.01(j)(i) does not
relate to environmental matters, which are the subject of
Section 3.01(j)(ii), employee benefit matters, which are
the subject of Section 3.01(l), and taxes, which are the
subject of Section 3.01(m). |
|
|
|
(ii) Except for those matters that have not had and would
not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect, (A) each of the
Company and its Subsidiaries is in compliance with all
applicable Environmental Laws, and neither the Company nor any
of its Subsidiaries has received any written communication
alleging that the Company is in violation of, or has any
liability under, any Environmental Law, (B) each of the Company
and its Subsidiaries validly possesses and is in compliance with
all Permits required under Environmental Laws to conduct its
business as presently conducted, and all such Permits are valid
and in good standing, (C) there are no Environmental Claims
pending or, to the Knowledge of the Company, threatened against
the Company or any of its Subsidiaries and (D) none of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries has Released any Hazardous
Materials at, on, under or from any of the Owned Real Property,
the Leased Real Property or any other property in a manner that
would reasonably be expected to result in an Environmental Claim
against the Company or any of its Subsidiaries. |
|
|
|
The term Environmental Claims means any
administrative or judicial actions, suits, orders, claims,
proceedings or written notices of noncompliance by or from any
person alleging liability arising out of the Release of any
Hazardous Material or the failure to comply with any
Environmental Law. The term Environmental Law
means any Law relating to pollution, the environment or natural
resources. The term Hazardous Materials means
(1) petroleum and petroleum by-products, asbestos in any
form that is or could reasonably become friable, radioactive
materials, medical or infectious wastes, or polychlorinated
biphenyls, and (2) any other material, substance or waste
that is prohibited, limited or regulated because of its
hazardous, toxic or deleterious properties or characteristics.
The term Release means any release, spill,
emission, leaking, pumping, emitting, discharging, injecting,
escaping, leaching, dumping, disposing or migrating into or
through the environment. |
A-10
|
|
|
(k) Labor and Employment Matters. Neither the
Company nor any of its Subsidiaries is a party to any collective
bargaining agreement, and there are not, to the Knowledge of the
Company, any union organizing activities concerning any
employees of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries that, in
each case, has had or would reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect.
There are no labor strikes, slowdowns, work stoppages or
lockouts pending or, to the Knowledge of the Company, threatened
in writing, against the Company or any of its Subsidiaries that
have had or would reasonably be expected to have, individually
or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect. |
|
|
(l) Employee Benefit Matters.
(i) Section 3.01(l) of the Company Disclosure Letter
contains a true and complete list, as of the date of this
Agreement, of each material Company Benefit Plan that is an
employee pension benefit plan (as defined in
Section 3(2) of ERISA) (a Company Pension
Plan), each material Company Benefit Plan that is an
employee welfare benefit plan (as defined in
Section 3(1) of ERISA) and all other material Company
Benefit Plans and all material Company Benefit Agreements. Each
Company Benefit Plan has been administered in compliance with
its terms and with applicable Law (including ERISA and the
Code), other than instances of noncompliance that have not had
and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in
the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect. The Company has made
available to the Sponsor Entities true and complete copies of
(A) each material Company Benefit Plan and each material
Company Benefit Agreement, other than any Company Benefit Plan
or Company Benefit Agreement that the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries is prohibited from making available to the Sponsor
Entities as the result of applicable Law relating to the
safeguarding of data privacy, (B) the most recent annual
report on Form 5500 filed with the Internal Revenue Service
with respect to each Company Benefit Plan (if any such report
was required by applicable Law) and (C) the most recent
summary plan description for each Company Benefit Plan for which
a summary plan description is required by applicable Law. |
|
|
|
(ii) All Company Pension Plans that are intended to be
qualified for Federal income tax purposes have been the subject
of determination letters from the Internal Revenue Service to
the effect that such Company Pension Plans are so qualified and
exempt from Federal income taxes under Sections 401(a) and
501(a), respectively, of the Code, and no such determination
letter has been revoked nor, to the Knowledge of the Company,
has revocation been threatened. |
|
|
(iii) None of the Company Benefit Plans is subject to
Section 302 or Title IV of ERISA or Section 412
of the Code. None of the Company, any of its Subsidiaries or any
other person or entity under common control with the Company
within the meaning of Section 414(b), (c), (m) or
(o) of the Code participates in, or is required to
contribute to, any Multiemployer Plan. |
|
|
(iv) Except as individually or in the aggregate has not had
and would not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse
Effect, none of the Company, any of its Subsidiaries, any
officer of the Company or any such Subsidiary or any Company
Benefit Plan that is subject to ERISA, including any Company
Pension Plan, or, to the Knowledge of the Company, any trust
created thereunder or any trustee or administrator thereof, has
engaged in a prohibited transaction (as such term is
defined in Section 406 of ERISA or Section 4975 of the
Code) or any other breach of fiduciary responsibility that could
subject the Company, any of its Subsidiaries or any officer of
the Company or any such Subsidiary to the tax or penalty on
prohibited transactions imposed by such Section 4975 of the
Code or to any liability under Section 502(i) or 502(1) of
ERISA. |
|
|
(v) No Company Benefit Plan provides health benefits
(whether or not insured) with respect to employees or former
employees (or any of their beneficiaries) of the Company or any
of its Subsidiaries after retirement or other termination of
service (other than coverage or benefits (A) required to be
provided under Part 6 of Title I of ERISA or any other
similar applicable Law or (B) the full cost of which is
borne by the employee or former employee (or any of their
beneficiaries)). |
|
|
(vi) Other than payments that may be made to the persons
listed in Section 3.01(l)(vi) of the Company Disclosure
Letter, any amount that could be received (whether in cash or
property or the |
A-11
|
|
|
vesting of property) as a result of the Merger or any other
transaction contemplated by this Agreement by any employee,
officer or director of the Company or any of its affiliates who
is a disqualified individual (as such term is
defined in Treasury Regulation Section 1.280G-1) under
any employment, severance or termination agreement, other
compensation arrangement or Company Benefit Plan or Company
Benefit Agreement currently in effect would not be characterized
as an excess parachute payment (as defined in
Section 280G(b)(1) of the Code). |
|
|
(vii) The term Company Benefit Agreement
means each employment, consulting, indemnification, severance or
termination agreement or arrangement between the Company or any
of its Subsidiaries, on the one hand, and any current or former
employee, officer or director of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries, on the other hand, other than any agreement or
arrangement mandated by applicable Law. The term
Company Benefit Plan means each bonus,
pension, profit sharing, deferred compensation, incentive
compensation, stock ownership, stock purchase, stock option,
phantom stock or other equity-based compensation, retirement,
vacation, severance, disability, death benefit, hospitalization,
medical or other employee benefits plan, policy, program,
arrangement or understanding, whether formal or informal, oral
or written (but excluding any Company Benefit Agreement), in
each case sponsored, maintained or contributed to, or required
to be sponsored, maintained or contributed to, by the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries for the benefit of any current or former
employee, officer or director of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries, other than (A) any multiemployer
plan (within the meaning of Section 3(37) of the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended
(ERISA)) (a Multiemployer
Plan) or (B) any plan, policy, program, arrangement or
understanding mandated by applicable Law. |
|
|
|
(m) Taxes. (i) Each of the Company and
its Subsidiaries has filed or has caused to be filed all
material tax returns required to be filed by it (or requests for
extensions, which requests have been granted and have not
expired), and all such returns are complete and accurate in all
material respects. Each of the Company and its Subsidiaries has
either paid or caused to be paid all material taxes due and
owing by the Company and its Subsidiaries to any Governmental
Entity, or the most recent financial statements contained in the
Filed SEC Documents reflect an adequate reserve (excluding any
reserves for deferred taxes), if such a reserve is required by
GAAP, for all material taxes payable by the Company and its
Subsidiaries, for all taxable periods and portions thereof
ending on or before the date of such financial statements. |
|
|
|
(ii) No deficiencies, audit examinations, refund
litigation, proposed adjustments or matters in controversy for
any material taxes (other than taxes that are not yet due and
payable or for amounts being contested in good faith) have been
proposed, asserted or assessed in writing against the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries which have not been settled and paid.
All assessments for material taxes due and owing by the Company
or any of its Subsidiaries with respect to completed and settled
examinations or concluded litigation have been paid. There is no
currently effective agreement or other document with respect to
the Company or any of its Subsidiaries extending the period of
assessment or collection of any material taxes. |
|
|
(iii) Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has
constituted either a distributing corporation or a
controlled corporation in a distribution of stock
qualifying for tax-free treatment under Section 355 of the
Code (A) in the two years prior to the date of this
Agreement or (B) which could otherwise constitute part of a
plan or series of related transactions
(within the meaning of Section 355(e) of the Code) in
conjunction with the Merger. |
|
|
(iv) None of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries has
entered into any transaction defined in Treasury
Regulation Sections 1.6011-4(b)(2), -4(b)(3) or
-4(b)(4), or has entered into a potentially abusive tax
shelter (as defined in Treasury
Regulation Section 301.6112-1(b)). |
|
|
(v) The term taxes means all income,
profits, capital gains, goods and services, branch, payroll,
unemployment, customs duties, premium, compensation, windfall
profits, franchise, gross receipts, capital, net worth, sales,
use, withholding, turnover, value added, ad valorem,
registration, general business, employment, social security,
disability, occupation, real property, personal property |
A-12
|
|
|
(tangible and intangible), stamp, transfer (including real
property transfer or gains), conveyance, severance, production,
excise, withholdings, duties, levies, imposts, license,
registration and other taxes (including any and all fines,
penalties and additions attributable to or otherwise imposed on
or with respect to any such taxes and interest thereon) imposed
by or on behalf of any Governmental Entity. The term
tax return means any return, statement,
report, form, filing, customs entry, customs reconciliation and
any other entry or reconciliation, including in each case any
amendments, schedules or attachments thereto, required to be
filed with any Governmental Entity or with respect to taxes of
the Company or its Subsidiaries. |
|
|
|
(n) Title to Properties.
(i) Section 3.01(n)(i) of the Company Disclosure
Letter sets forth, as of the date of this Agreement, a true and
complete list of all real property owned by the Company and its
Subsidiaries (individually, an Owned Real
Property). |
|
|
|
(ii) Section 3.01(n)(ii) of the Company Disclosure
Letter sets forth, as of the date of this Agreement, a true and
complete list of all material leases of real property (the
Real Property Leases) under which the Company
or any of its Subsidiaries is a tenant or a subtenant
(individually, a Leased Real Property). |
|
|
(iii) Except as has not had and would not reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material
Adverse Effect, the Company or a Subsidiary of the Company has
good and valid fee title to each Owned Real Property, in each
case free and clear of all Liens and defects in title, except
for (A) mechanics, carriers, workmens,
warehousemens, repairmens or other like Liens
arising or incurred in the ordinary course of business,
(B) Liens for taxes, assessments and other governmental
charges and levies that are not due and payable or that may
thereafter be paid without interest or penalty, (C) Liens
affecting the interest of the grantor of any easements
benefiting Owned Real Property, (D) Liens (other than liens
securing Indebtedness), defects or irregularities in title,
easements, rights-of-way, covenants, restrictions, and other,
similar matters that would not, individually or in the
aggregate, reasonably be expected to materially impair the
continued use and operation of the assets to which they relate
in the business of the Company and its Subsidiaries as presently
conducted, (E) zoning, building and other similar codes and
regulations and (F) any conditions that would be disclosed
by a current, accurate survey or physical inspection
(collectively, Permitted Liens). |
|
|
(iv) Except as has not had and would not reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material
Adverse Effect, the Company or a Subsidiary of the Company has a
good and valid title to a leasehold estate in each Leased Real
Property, all Real Property Leases are in full force and effect,
and neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries that is
party to such leases has received or given any written notice of
any material default thereunder which default continues on the
date of this Agreement. |
|
|
(v) Section 3.01(n)(v) of the Company Disclosure
Letter sets forth, as of the date of this Agreement, a true and
complete list of all material leases, subleases or similar
agreements under which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is
the landlord or the sublandlord (such leases, subleases and
similar agreements, collectively, the Real Property
Subleases). |
|
|
(vi) The Company has made available to the Sponsor Entities
true and complete copies of the Real Property Leases and the
Real Property Subleases. |
|
|
|
(o) Intellectual Property.
Section 3.01(o) of the Company Disclosure Letter sets
forth, as of the date of this Agreement, a true and complete
list of all patents, patent applications, trademarks, trademark
applications, trade names, service marks, service mark
applications and registered copyrights and applications therefor
(collectively, Intellectual Property Rights)
that, in each case, are material to the conduct of the business
of the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, as
presently conducted and, except as has not had and would not
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect, the Company or a
Subsidiary of the Company owns, or is licensed or otherwise has
the right to use, each such Intellectual Property Right. No
claims are pending or, to the |
A-13
|
|
|
Knowledge of the Company, threatened that the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries is infringing the rights of any person with
regard to any Intellectual Property Right, which claims have had
or would reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect. To the Knowledge of the
Company, as of the date of this Agreement, no person is
infringing the rights of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries
with respect to any Intellectual Property Right, in a manner
that has had or would reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect. |
|
|
(p) Insurance. Except as has not had and
would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect, (i) the Company and
its Subsidiaries maintain insurance in such amounts and against
such risks as is sufficient to comply with applicable Law,
(ii) all material insurance policies of the Company and its
Subsidiaries are in full force and effect, except for any
expiration thereof in accordance with the terms thereof,
(iii) neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries is in
breach of, or default under, any such material insurance policy
and (iv) no written notice of cancellation or termination
has been received with respect to any such material insurance
policy, other than in connection with ordinary renewals. |
|
|
(q) Voting Requirements. Assuming the
accuracy of the representations and warranties set forth in
Section 3.02(f), the affirmative vote of holders of a
majority of the outstanding shares of Company Common Stock
entitled to vote thereon at the Stockholders Meeting or
any adjournment or postponement thereof to adopt this Agreement
(the Stockholder Approval) is the only vote
of the holders of any class or series of capital stock of the
Company necessary for the Company to adopt this Agreement and
approve the transactions contemplated hereby. |
|
|
(r) State Takeover Statutes. Assuming the
accuracy of the representations and warranties set forth in
Section 3.02(f), the approval of the Board of Directors of
the Company of this Agreement, the Merger and the other
transactions contemplated by this Agreement represents all the
action necessary to render inapplicable to this Agreement, the
Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this
Agreement, the provisions of Section 203 of the DGCL to the
extent, if any, such Section would otherwise be applicable to
this Agreement, the Merger and the other transactions
contemplated by this Agreement, and no other state takeover
statute applies to this Agreement, the Merger or the other
transactions contemplated by this Agreement. |
|
|
(s) Brokers and Other Advisors. No broker,
investment banker, financial advisor or other person, other than
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Goldman, Sachs & Co., the
fees and expenses of which will be paid by the Company, is
entitled to any brokers, finders or financial
advisors fee or commission in connection with the Merger
and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement based upon
arrangements made by or on behalf of the Company. The Company
has made available to the Sponsor Entities complete and correct
copies of the letter agreements between the Company and
(i) J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and (ii) Goldman Sachs
& Co. pursuant to which such parties could be entitled to
any payment from the Company or any of its Subsidiaries in
connection with the Merger. |
|
|
(t) Opinions of Financial Advisors. The
Company has received the opinion of each of J.P. Morgan
Securities Inc. and Goldman, Sachs & Co., in each case dated
the date of this Agreement, to the effect that, as of such date,
the Merger Consideration is fair, from a financial point of
view, to the holders of shares of Company Common Stock, a signed
copy of each of which opinions has been or will promptly be
delivered to the Sponsor Entities. |
|
|
(u) Affiliate Transactions. To the Knowledge
of the Company, no executive officer or director of the Company
or any of its Subsidiaries or any person who beneficially owns
5% or more of the Company Common Stock is a party to any
contract with or binding upon the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries or any of their respective properties or assets or
has any material interest in any material property owned by the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries or has engaged in any
material transaction with any of the foregoing within the period
of 12 months preceding the date of this Agreement, in each
case, that is of the type that would be required to be disclosed
under Item 404 of Regulation S-K under the Securities
Act. |
A-14
|
|
|
(v) No Other Representations or Warranties.
Except for the representations and warranties contained in this
Section 3.01 or in any certificates delivered by the
Company in connection with the Closing, each of the Sponsor
Entities acknowledges that neither the Company nor any person on
behalf of the Company makes any other express or implied
representation or warranty with respect to the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries or with respect to any other information
provided or made available to any of the Sponsor Entities in
connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
Neither the Company nor any other person will have or be subject
to any liability or indemnification obligation to any of the
Sponsor Entities or any other person resulting from the
distribution to any Sponsor Entity, or any Sponsor Entitys
use of, any such information, including any information,
documents, projections, forecasts or other material made
available to the Sponsor Entities in certain data
rooms or management presentations in expectation of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement, unless and then
only to the extent that any such information is expressly
included in a representation or warranty contained in this
Section 3.01 or in a certificate delivered by the Company
in connection with the Closing. Notwithstanding the foregoing or
any other provision of this Agreement or otherwise, nothing
herein shall relieve the Company or any other person from
liability for fraud. |
Section 3.02. Representations
and Warranties of the Sponsor Entities. The Sponsor
Entities jointly and severally represent and warrant to the
Company as follows:
|
|
|
(a) Organization, Standing and Corporate
Power. Each of the Sponsor Entities is duly organized,
validly existing and in good standing under the Laws of its
jurisdiction of organization and has all requisite corporate or
limited liability company, as applicable, power and authority to
carry on its business as presently conducted. |
|
|
(b) Authority; Noncontravention. Each of the
Sponsor Entities has all requisite corporate or limited
liability company, as applicable, power and authority to execute
and deliver this Agreement and to consummate the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement, including the Merger and the
Financing. The execution and delivery of this Agreement and the
consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement,
including the Merger and the Financing, have been duly
authorized by all necessary corporate or limited liability
company, as applicable, action on the part of each of the
Sponsor Entities, and no other corporate proceedings (including
no shareholder action) on the part of any Sponsor Entity are
necessary to authorize this Agreement or to consummate the
transactions contemplated hereby, including the Merger and the
Financing. This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered
by each of the Sponsor Entities and, assuming the due
authorization, execution and delivery by the Company,
constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation of each of the
Sponsor Entities, enforceable against each of them in accordance
with its terms, subject, as to enforceability, to bankruptcy,
insolvency and other Laws of general applicability relating to
or affecting creditors rights and to general equity
principles. The execution and delivery of this Agreement do not,
and the consummation of the Merger and the other transactions
contemplated by this Agreement, including the Financing, and
compliance with the provisions of this Agreement will not,
conflict with, or result in any violation or breach of, or
default (with or without notice or lapse of time, or both)
under, or give rise to a right of termination, cancellation or
acceleration of any obligation or to the loss of a benefit
under, or result in the creation of any Lien upon any of the
properties or assets of any Sponsor Entity under, any provision
of (i) the certificate of incorporation, bylaws or
comparable organizational documents of any Sponsor Entity or
(ii) subject to the filings and other matters referred to
in the immediately following sentence, (A) any Contract to
which any Sponsor Entity is a party or by which any of its
properties or assets are bound or (B) any Law or Judgment,
in each case applicable to any Sponsor Entity or its respective
properties or assets, other than, in the case of clause (ii),
any such conflicts, violations, breaches, defaults, rights,
losses or Liens that have not had and would not reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Sponsor
Material Adverse Effect. No consent, approval, order or
authorization of, registration, declaration or filing with, or
notice to, any Governmental Entity is required to be obtained or
made by or with respect to the Sponsor Entities in connection
with the execution and delivery of this Agreement by the Sponsor
Entities or the consummation by the Sponsor Entities of the
Merger or the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement,
including the Financing, except for (I) the filing of a |
A-15
|
|
|
premerger notification and report form under the HSR Act and the
filings and receipt, termination or expiration, as applicable,
of such other approvals or waiting periods as may be required
under any other applicable competition, merger control,
antitrust or similar Law, (II) the filing of the
Certificate of Merger with the Secretary of State of the State
of Delaware and (III) such other consents, approvals,
orders, authorizations, registrations, declarations, filings and
notices the failure of which to be obtained or made has not had
and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in
the aggregate, a Sponsor Material Adverse Effect. |
|
|
(c) Information Supplied. None of the
information supplied or to be supplied by any Sponsor Entity for
inclusion or incorporation by reference in the Proxy Statement
will, at the date it is first mailed to the stockholders of the
Company and at the time of the Stockholders Meeting,
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in
order to make the statements therein, in light of the
circumstances under which they are made, not misleading. |
|
|
(d) Available Funds. The financing of the
transactions contemplated hereby will consist of a combination
of equity financing provided to MergerCos (the Equity
Financing) and debt financing provided to FinCos (or
loaned directly to the Company or one of its Subsidiaries) (the
Debt Financing and, together with the Equity
Financing, the Financing). The Sponsor
Entities have delivered to the Company true and complete copies
of fully executed commitment letters pursuant to which the
parties thereto have committed to provide the Financing (such
agreements, as modified pursuant to Section 5.09(a), the
Equity Financing Commitments and the
Debt Financing Commitment, respectively, and
together the Financing Commitments). Each of
the Equity Financing Commitments, in the form so delivered, is
in full force and effect and is a legal, valid and binding
obligation of Bain MergerCo or Blackstone MergerCo, as the case
may be, and the other parties thereto, and the financing
commitments thereunder have not been withdrawn or terminated. As
of the date of this Agreement, the Debt Financing Commitment is
in full force and effect and is a legal, valid and binding
obligation of each FinCo and, to the Knowledge of the Sponsor
Entities, the other parties thereto, and the financing
commitments thereunder have not been withdrawn or terminated.
The Financing Commitments have not been amended, supplemented or
otherwise modified in any respect, except, in each case, as
permitted by Section 5.09(a). No event has occurred that,
with or without notice, lapse of time or both, would constitute
a default or breach on the part of any Sponsor Entity under any
term of the Financing Commitments. Assuming the satisfaction of
the conditions set forth in Section 6.02, (i) none of the
Sponsor Entities has any reason to believe that it will not be
able to satisfy on a timely basis any term or condition of
closing to be satisfied by it or its Affiliates set forth in the
Financing Commitments and (ii) none of the Sponsor Entities
has any reason to believe, as of the date of this Agreement,
that any portion of the Financing to be made thereunder will
otherwise not be available to the applicable Sponsor Entity or
the Surviving Corporation on a timely basis to consummate the
Merger and the other transactions contemplated hereby. FinCos
have fully paid any and all commitment fees or other fees
required by the Debt Financing Commitment to be paid by them on
or prior to the date of this Agreement and shall in the future
pay any such fees as they become due. Assuming the satisfaction
of the conditions set forth in Section 6.02, the Financing,
when funded in accordance with the Financing Commitments, will
provide the Sponsor Entities and the Surviving Corporation with
funds sufficient to satisfy all of their obligations under this
Agreement, including the payment of the Merger Consideration,
the Option Amounts and all associated costs and expenses. The
obligations to make the Financing available to the Sponsor
Entities or the Surviving Corporation pursuant to the terms of
the Financing Commitments are not subject to any conditions
other than the conditions set forth in the Financing
Commitments. Each of the Guarantees is in full force and effect
and is a legal, valid and binding obligation of the Bain Fund or
the Blackstone Fund, as the case may be. |
|
|
(e) Operations and Assets of the Sponsor
Entities. Each of the Sponsor Entities has been formed
solely for the purpose of engaging in the transactions
contemplated hereby and, prior to the Effective Time, will not
have incurred liabilities or obligations of any nature, other
than pursuant to or in |
A-16
|
|
|
connection with this Agreement and the Merger, the Debt
Financing and the other transactions contemplated by this
Agreement. |
|
|
(f) Ownership of Company Common Stock. None
of the Sponsor Entities beneficially own (within the meaning of
Section 13 of the Exchange Act and the rules and
regulations promulgated thereunder), or will prior to the
Closing Date beneficially own, any shares of Company Common
Stock, or are a party, or will prior to the Closing Date become
a party, to any Contract, arrangement or understanding (other
than this Agreement) for the purpose of acquiring, holding,
voting or disposing of any shares of Company Common Stock. |
|
|
(g) Brokers and Other Advisors. No broker,
investment banker, financial advisor or other person is entitled
to any brokers, finders or financial advisors
fee or commission in connection with the Merger and the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement based upon
arrangements made by or on behalf of any of the Sponsor
Entities, other than pursuant to a customary management
agreement to be entered into by the Surviving Corporation at or
following the Effective Time. |
|
|
(h) No Other Representations or Warranties.
Except for the representations and warranties contained in this
Section 3.02, the Company acknowledges that none of the
Sponsor Entities or any other person on behalf of any Sponsor
Entity makes any other express or implied representation or
warranty with respect to the Sponsor Entities or with respect to
any other information provided or made available to the Company
in connection with the transactions contemplated hereby. |
ARTICLE IV
Covenants Relating to Conduct of Business
Section 4.01. Conduct
of Business. (a) Except as set forth in
Section 4.01 of the Company Disclosure Letter, expressly
contemplated or required by this Agreement, required by Law or
consented to in writing by MergerCos (such consent not to be
unreasonably withheld or delayed), during the period from the
date of this Agreement to the Effective Time, the Company shall,
and shall cause each of its Subsidiaries to, carry on its
business in the ordinary course and, to the extent consistent
therewith, use reasonable best efforts to preserve substantially
intact its current business organizations, to keep available the
services of its current officers and employees and to preserve
its relationships with significant customers, suppliers,
licensors, licensees, distributors, wholesalers, lessors and
others having significant business dealings with it. Without
limiting the generality of the foregoing, except as set forth in
Section 4.01 of the Company Disclosure Letter, expressly
contemplated or required by this Agreement, required by Law
(including, as applicable, Section 409A of the Code) or
consented to in writing by MergerCos (such consent not to be
unreasonably withheld or delayed), during the period from the
date of this Agreement to the Effective Time, the Company shall
not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries to:
|
|
|
(i) declare, set aside or pay any dividends on, or make any
other distributions (whether in cash, stock or property) in
respect of, any of its capital stock, other than
(A) dividends or distributions by a direct or indirect
wholly owned Subsidiary of the Company to its parent and
(B) regular quarterly cash dividends on the Company Common
Stock, not to exceed, in the case of any such quarterly
dividend, $0.12 per share; |
|
|
(ii) split, combine or reclassify any of its capital stock
or issue or authorize the issuance of any other securities in
lieu of or in substitution for shares of its capital stock; |
|
|
(iii) purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any shares of
its capital stock or any rights, warrants or options to acquire
any such shares, other than (A) the acquisition by the
Company of shares of Company Common Stock in connection with the
surrender of shares of Company Common Stock by holders of
Company Stock Options in order to pay the exercise price of the
Company Stock Options, (B) the withholding of shares of
Company Common Stock to satisfy tax obligations with respect to
awards granted pursuant to the Company Stock Plans, (C) the
acquisition by the Company of Company Stock Options and shares
of Company Restricted Stock in connection with the forfeiture of
such awards and |
A-17
|
|
|
(D) the acquisition by the trustee of the Company 401(k)
Plan of shares of Company Common Stock in order to satisfy
participant investment elections under the Company 401(k) Plan; |
|
|
(iv) issue, deliver or sell any shares of its capital
stock, any other voting securities or any securities convertible
into, or any rights, warrants or options to acquire, any such
shares, voting securities or convertible securities, or any
phantom stock, phantom stock rights,
stock appreciation rights or stock based performance units,
other than (A) upon the exercise of Company Stock Options
and rights under the ESPP outstanding on the date of this
Agreement, in each case in accordance with their present terms,
(B) as required to comply with any Company Benefit Plan or
Company Benefit Agreement as in effect on the date of this
Agreement and (C) the issuance of shares of Company Common
Stock pursuant to the Company DRIP; |
|
|
(v) amend the Company Certificate of Incorporation or the
Company Bylaws or the comparable organizational documents of any
Subsidiary of the Company; |
|
|
(vi) purchase an equity interest in or a substantial
portion of the assets of, any person or any division or business
thereof, if the aggregate amount of the consideration paid or
transferred by the Company and its Subsidiaries in connection
with all such transactions would exceed $20.0 million or
merge or consolidate with any person, in each case other than
any such action solely between or among the Company and its
Subsidiaries; |
|
|
(vii) sell, lease or otherwise dispose of any of its
properties or assets (including capital stock of any Subsidiary
of the Company) that are material, individually or in the
aggregate, to the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a
whole, other than (A) sales or other dispositions of
inventory and other assets in the ordinary course of business,
including in connection with store relocations and closings set
forth on Section 4.01(a)(vii) of the Company Disclosure Letter
and store remodels and resets, and (B) leases and subleases
of Owned Real Properties and Leased Real Properties, and
voluntary terminations or surrenders of Real Property Leases, in
each case, in the ordinary course of business; |
|
|
(viii) pledge, encumber or otherwise subject to a Lien
(other than a Permitted Lien) any of its properties or assets
(including capital stock of any Subsidiary of the Company),
other than in the ordinary course of business; |
|
|
(ix) (A) incur any indebtedness for borrowed money,
issue or sell any debt securities or warrants or other rights to
acquire any debt securities of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries, guarantee any such indebtedness or any debt
securities of another person or enter into any keep
well or other agreement to maintain any financial
statement condition of another person (collectively,
Indebtedness), other than
(1) Indebtedness incurred in the ordinary course of
business (including any borrowings under the Companys
existing revolving credit facilities and any trade letters of
credit) and (2) Indebtedness incurred in connection with
the refinancing of any Indebtedness existing on the date of this
Agreement or permitted to be incurred, assumed or otherwise
entered into hereunder; or (B) make any loans or capital
contributions to, or investments in, any other person, other
than (1) to any of the Subsidiaries of the Company or
(2) in the ordinary course of business; |
|
|
(x) make any capital expenditures, other than (A) in
accordance with the Companys capital expenditures plan
previously made available to the Sponsor Entities in writing,
(B) in connection with the repair or replacement of
facilities destroyed or damaged due to casualty or accident
(whether or not covered by insurance) and (C) otherwise in
an aggregate amount for all such capital expenditures made
pursuant to this clause (C) not to exceed
$25.0 million; |
|
|
(xi) settle any material claim or material litigation, in
each case made or pending against the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries, or any of their officers and directors in their
capacities as such, other than the settlement of claims or
litigation in the ordinary course of business which, in any
event (A) is for an amount not to exceed, for any such
settlement individually, $10.0 million and (B) would
not be reasonably expected to prohibit or materially restrict
the Company and its subsidiaries from operating their business
in substantially the same manner as operated on the date of this
Agreement; provided that |
A-18
|
|
|
in no event shall the Company settle any material claim or
material litigation relating to the consummation of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement; |
|
|
(xii) cancel any material Indebtedness or waive any claims
or rights of substantial value, in each case other than in the
ordinary course of business; |
|
|
(xiii) except (A) in the ordinary course of business
or (B) as required pursuant to the terms of any Company
Benefit Plan or Company Benefit Agreement or other written
agreement in effect on the date of this Agreement,
(1) grant to any officer, director or employee of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries any increase in compensation,
(2) grant to any officer, director or employee of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries any increase in severance or
termination pay, (3) enter into any employment, consulting,
severance or termination agreement with any officer, director or
employee of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, other than
any separation agreement pursuant to which the aggregate
severance benefits do not exceed $300,000 with respect to any
individual or $2.0 million in the aggregate with respect to
all such individuals, (4) establish, adopt, enter into or
amend in any material respect any collective bargaining
agreement or Company Benefit Plan or (5) accelerate any
rights or benefits, or make any material determinations, under
any Company Benefit Plan; provided, however, that
the foregoing clauses (1), (2), and (3) shall not restrict
the Company or any of its Subsidiaries from entering into or
making available to newly hired employees or to employees in the
context of promotions based on job performance or workplace
requirements, in each case in the ordinary course of business,
plans, agreements, benefits and compensation arrangements
(including incentive grants) that have a value that is
consistent with the past practice of making compensation and
benefits available to newly hired or promoted employees in
similar positions; |
|
|
(xiv) make any change in accounting methods, principles or
practices materially affecting the consolidated assets,
liabilities or results of operations of the Company, other than
as required (A) by GAAP (or any interpretation thereof),
including as may be required by the Financial Accounting
Standards Board or any similar organization, or (B) by Law,
including Regulation S-X under the Securities Act; |
|
|
(xv) make any material tax election, file any amended tax
return with respect to any material tax or change any annual tax
accounting period, in each case, other than in the ordinary
course of business; or |
|
|
(xvi) authorize any of, or commit or agree to take any of,
the foregoing actions. |
(b) Advice of Changes. The Company and the
Sponsor Entities shall promptly give written notice to the other
party upon becoming aware of any material event, development or
occurrence that would reasonably be expected to give rise to a
failure of condition precedent set forth in Section 6.02
(in the case of the Company) or Section 6.03 (in the case
of the Sponsor Entities).
Section 4.02. No
Solicitation. (a) The Company shall not, nor shall
it authorize or permit any of its Subsidiaries or any of their
respective directors, officers or employees to, and shall not
authorize any investment banker, financial advisor, attorney,
accountant or other advisor, agent or representative
(collectively, Representatives) retained by
it or any of its Subsidiaries to, directly or indirectly,
(i) solicit, initiate or knowingly encourage, or take any
other action to knowingly facilitate, the making of any proposal
that constitutes or is reasonably likely to lead to a Takeover
Proposal or (ii) enter into, continue or otherwise
participate in any discussions or negotiations regarding or
furnish to any person any confidential information with respect
to any Takeover Proposal. The Company shall, and shall cause its
Subsidiaries and direct its Representatives to, immediately
cease and cause to be terminated all existing discussions and
negotiations with any person conducted heretofore with respect
to any Takeover Proposal, and shall request the prompt return or
destruction of all confidential information previously furnished
in connection therewith. Notwithstanding the foregoing or
anything else in this Agreement to the contrary, at any time
prior to obtaining the Stockholder Approval, in response to a
bona fide written Takeover Proposal, if the Board of Directors
of the Company determines (x) after consultation with its
financial advisor and outside counsel, that such Takeover
Proposal constitutes or is reasonably likely to lead to a
Superior Proposal and (y) after consultation with its
outside counsel, that the failure to take such action would be
inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under
A-19
applicable Law, the Company may (and may authorize and permit
its Subsidiaries, directors, officers, employees and
Representatives to), subject to compliance with
Section 4.02(c), (A) furnish information with respect
to the Company and its Subsidiaries to the person making such
Takeover Proposal (and its Representatives) pursuant to a
customary confidentiality agreement containing confidentiality
provisions substantially similar to those set forth in the
Confidentiality Agreement, provided that all such
information has previously been provided to MergerCos or is
provided to MergerCos prior to or substantially concurrently
with the time it is provided to such person, and
(B) participate in discussions and negotiations with the
person making such Takeover Proposal (and its Representatives)
regarding such Takeover Proposal.
The term Takeover Proposal means any inquiry,
proposal or offer from any person or group relating to
(a) any direct or indirect acquisition or purchase, in a
single transaction or a series of transactions, of (1) 20%
or more (based on the fair market value thereof, as determined
by the Board of Directors of the Company) of assets (including
capital stock of the Subsidiaries of the Company) of the Company
and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or (2) 20% or more
of outstanding shares of the Company Common Stock, (b) any
tender offer or exchange offer that, if consummated, would
result in any person or group owning, directly or indirectly,
20% or more of outstanding shares of the Company Common Stock or
(c) any merger, consolidation, business combination,
recapitalization, liquidation, dissolution, binding share
exchange or similar transaction involving the Company pursuant
to which any person or group (or the shareholders of any person)
would own, directly or indirectly, 20% or more of any class of
equity securities of the Company or of the surviving entity in a
merger or the resulting direct or indirect parent of the Company
or such surviving entity, other than, in each case, the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
The term Superior Proposal means any bona
fide Takeover Proposal that if consummated would result in a
person or group (or the shareholders of any person) owning,
directly or indirectly, (a) 50% or more of any class of
equity securities of the Company or of the surviving entity in a
merger or the resulting direct or indirect parent of the Company
or such surviving entity or (b) 50% or more (based on the
fair market value thereof, as determined by the Board of
Directors of the Company) of the assets of the Company and its
Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, which the Board of Directors of
the Company determines (after consultation with its financial
advisor and outside counsel) would result in greater value to
the stockholders of the Company from a financial point of view
than the Merger, taking into account all financial, legal,
regulatory and other aspects of such proposal and of this
Agreement (including any changes to the financial terms of this
Agreement proposed by the Sponsor Entities to the Company in
response to such proposal or otherwise).
(b) Neither the Board of Directors of the Company nor any
committee thereof shall (i)(A) withdraw (or modify in a manner
adverse to MergerCos), or publicly propose to withdraw (or
modify in a manner adverse to MergerCos), the approval,
recommendation or declaration of advisability by such Board of
Directors or any such committee of this Agreement or the Merger
or (B) recommend the approval or adoption of, or approve or
adopt, or publicly propose to recommend, approve or adopt, any
Takeover Proposal (any action described in this clause
(i) being referred to as an Adverse Recommendation
Change) or (ii) approve or recommend, or publicly
propose to approve or recommend, or cause or permit the Company
or any of its Subsidiaries to execute or enter into, any letter
of intent, memorandum of understanding, agreement in principle,
merger agreement, acquisition agreement or other similar
agreement related to any Takeover Proposal, other than any
confidentiality agreement referred to in Section 4.02(a).
Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything else in this Agreement
to the contrary, at any time prior to obtaining the Stockholder
Approval and subject to compliance with Section 5.06(b),
the Board of Directors of the Company may, if, after
consultation with its outside counsel, it determines that the
failure to take such action would be inconsistent with its
fiduciary duties under applicable Law, (1) make an Adverse
Recommendation Change or (2) cause or permit the Company to
terminate this Agreement; provided, however, that
the Board of Directors of the Company shall not make an Adverse
Recommendation Change, and the Company may not terminate this
Agreement pursuant to clause (2) above, until after the
second business day following MergerCos receipt of written
notice (a Notice of Superior Proposal) from
the Company advising MergerCos that the Board of Directors of
the Company intends to take such action and specifying the
reasons therefor, including the material terms and conditions of
any Superior Proposal that is the basis of the proposed action
by such Board of Directors and a statement that the Board of
Directors of the Company intends to terminate this Agreement
A-20
pursuant to Section 7.01(f) (it being understood and agreed
that (I) any amendment to the financial terms of such
Superior Proposal shall require a new Notice of Superior
Proposal and a new two business day period and (II) in
determining whether to make an Adverse Recommendation Change or
to cause or permit the Company to so terminate this Agreement,
the Board of Directors of the Company shall take into account
any changes to the financial terms of this Agreement proposed by
the Sponsor Entities to the Company in response to a Notice of
Superior Proposal or otherwise).
(c) In addition to the obligations of the Company set forth
in Sections 4.02(a) and 4.02(b), the Company shall as
promptly as practicable advise MergerCos orally and in writing
of the receipt of any Takeover Proposal after the date of this
Agreement, the material terms and conditions of any such
Takeover Proposal and the identity of the person making any such
Takeover Proposal. The Company shall, subject to the fiduciary
duties under applicable Law of the Board of Directors of the
Company, keep MergerCos reasonably informed of any material
developments with respect to any such Takeover Proposal
(including any material changes thereto).
(d) Nothing contained in this Section 4.02 or
elsewhere in this Agreement shall prohibit the Company from
(i) taking and disclosing to its stockholders a position
contemplated by Rule 14d-9 or Rule 14e-2(a)
promulgated under the Exchange Act or (ii) making any
disclosure to its stockholders if the Board of Directors of the
Company determines (after consultation with its outside counsel)
that failure to do so would be inconsistent with its fiduciary
duties under applicable Law, it being understood, however, that
this clause (ii) shall not be deemed to permit the Board of
Directors of the Company to make an Adverse Recommendation
Change or take any of the actions referred to in clause
(ii) of Section 4.02(b) except, in each case, to the
extent permitted by Section 4.02(b).
ARTICLE V
Additional Agreements
Section 5.01. Preparation
of the Proxy Statement; Stockholders Meeting.
(a) As promptly as reasonably practicable following the
date of this Agreement, the Company shall prepare and file with
the SEC the Proxy Statement with the assistance and approval of
MergerCos (which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or
delayed). The Sponsor Entities shall provide to the Company all
information concerning the Sponsor Entities as may be reasonably
requested by the Company in connection with the Proxy Statement
and shall otherwise assist and cooperate with the Company in the
preparation of the Proxy Statement and resolution of comments
referred to below. The Company shall promptly notify MergerCos
upon the receipt of any comments from the SEC or the staff of
the SEC or any request from the SEC or the staff of the SEC for
amendments or supplements to the Proxy Statement, and shall
provide MergerCos with copies of all correspondence between the
Company and its Representatives, on the one hand, and the SEC or
the staff of the SEC, on the other hand. The Company shall use
its reasonable best efforts to respond as promptly as
practicable to any comments of the SEC or the staff of the SEC
with respect to the Proxy Statement and to cause the Proxy
Statement to be mailed to the stockholders of the Company as
promptly as reasonably practicable following the date of this
Agreement. If at any time prior to the Stockholders Meeting
there shall occur or be discovered any event or any information
relating to the Company, any Sponsor Entity or any of their
respective Affiliates, officers or directors that should be set
forth in an amendment or supplement to the Proxy Statement so
that the Proxy Statement shall not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state any material fact required
to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the
statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which
they were made, not misleading, the Company shall promptly
prepare (with the assistance and approval of MergerCos (which
approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed)) and
file with the SEC and, to the extent required by Law, mail to
the Companys stockholders an appropriate amendment or
supplement describing such event or information. Prior to filing
or mailing the Proxy Statement (or any amendment or supplement
thereto) or responding to any comments of the SEC or the staff
of the SEC with respect thereto, the Company shall provide
MergerCos a reasonable opportunity to review and to reasonably
comment on such document or response.
A-21
(b) The Company shall, as promptly as reasonably
practicable following the date of this Agreement, establish a
record date for, duly call, give notice of, convene and hold a
meeting of its stockholders (the Stockholders
Meeting) for the purpose of obtaining the Stockholder
Approval. Subject to the ability of the Board of Directors of
the Company to make an Adverse Recommendation Change pursuant to
Section 4.02(b), the Company shall, through its Board of
Directors, recommend to its stockholders adoption of this
Agreement and shall include such recommendation in the Proxy
Statement.
Section 5.02. Access
to Information; Confidentiality. The Company shall
afford to the Sponsor Entities, and to the Sponsor
Entities officers, employees, accountants, counsel,
consultants, financial advisors and other Representatives,
reasonable access during normal business hours during the period
prior to the Effective Time or the termination of this Agreement
to all of its and its Subsidiaries properties, books and
records, financial and operating data and other information, to
those employees of the Company to whom any Sponsor Entity
reasonably requests access, and, during such period, the Company
shall furnish, as promptly as practicable, to each Sponsor
Entity all information concerning its and its Subsidiaries
business, properties and personnel as such Sponsor Entity may
reasonably request (it being agreed, however, that the foregoing
shall not permit any Sponsor Entity or any such Representatives
to conduct any environmental testing or sampling).
Notwithstanding the foregoing, neither the Company nor any of
its Subsidiaries shall be required to provide access to or
disclose information where the Company reasonably determines
that such access or disclosure would jeopardize the
attorney-client privilege of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries or contravene any Law or any Contract to which the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries is a party (it being agreed
that the parties shall use their reasonable best efforts to
cause such information to be provided in a manner that does not
cause such violation or jeopardization, provided,
however, that none of the parties hereto nor any of their
Affiliates shall be required to make monetary payments in
connection with the foregoing). Except for disclosures expressly
permitted by the terms of (a) the confidentiality letter
agreement dated as of May 3, 2006, between Bain Capital
Partners, LLC and the Company and (b) the confidentiality
letter agreement dated May 3, 2006, between Blackstone
Management Partners V, LLC (together, as such agreements may be
amended from time to time, the Confidentiality
Agreements) and except for disclosure by the Sponsor
Entities reasonably necessary to comply with customary practice
in connection with obtaining the Debt Financing, the Sponsor
Entities shall hold, and shall cause their respective officers,
employees, accountants, counsel, financial advisors and other
Representatives to hold, all information received, directly or
indirectly, from the Company or its Representatives in
confidence in accordance with the Confidentiality Agreements.
Section 5.03. Reasonable
Best Efforts. (a) Each of the parties hereto agrees
to use its reasonable best efforts to take, or cause to be
taken, all actions, and to do, or cause to be done, and to
assist and cooperate with the other parties in doing, all things
necessary, proper or advisable to consummate and make effective,
in the most expeditious manner practicable, the Merger and the
other transactions contemplated by this Agreement, including
using reasonable best efforts to accomplish the following:
(i) the taking of all acts necessary to cause the
conditions to Closing to be satisfied as promptly as
practicable, (ii) the obtaining of all necessary actions or
nonactions, waivers, consents and approvals from Governmental
Entities and the making of all necessary registrations and
filings (including filings with Governmental Entities) and the
taking of all steps as may be necessary to obtain an approval or
waiver from, or to avoid an action or proceeding by, any
Governmental Entity, (iii) the obtaining of consents,
approvals and waivers from third parties reasonably requested by
MergerCos to be obtained in connection with the Merger under the
Specified Contracts and Real Property Leases, provided,
however, that in no event shall the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries be required to pay prior to the Effective Time any
fee, penalty or other consideration to any landlord or other
person to obtain any such consent, approval or waiver, and
(iv) the execution and delivery of any additional
instruments necessary to consummate the transactions
contemplated by, and to fully carry out the purposes of, this
Agreement. In connection with and without limiting the
foregoing, the Company and its Board of Directors shall
(A) take all action necessary to ensure that no state
takeover statute is or becomes applicable to this Agreement, the
Merger or any of the other transactions contemplated by this
Agreement and (B) if any state takeover statute becomes
applicable to this Agreement, the Merger or any of the other
transactions contemplated by this Agreement, take all action
necessary to ensure that the Merger and the other transactions
contemplated by this Agreement may be consummated as promptly as
practicable on the terms contemplated by this Agreement and
otherwise to minimize the effect of such statute or regulation
on this
A-22
Agreement, the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by
this Agreement. No party shall voluntarily extend any waiting
period under the HSR Act or enter into any agreement with any
Governmental Entity to delay or not to consummate the Merger or
any of the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement
except with the prior written consent of the other party (such
consent not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed and which
reasonableness shall be determined in light of each partys
obligation to do all things necessary, proper or advisable to
consummate and make effective, in the most expeditious manner
practicable, the Merger and the other transactions contemplated
by this Agreement). Each MergerCo and FinCo hereby agrees that,
in the event of any failure to perform or comply with any
covenant or agreement set forth in this Agreement by one
MergerCo (or FinCo, as applicable), (x) the other MergerCo
(or FinCo, as applicable) shall be permitted to cure such
failure, including by performing such covenant or agreement on
behalf of such first MergerCo (or FinCo, as applicable) and, in
the case of a failure by such first MergerCo (or FinCo, as
applicable) to perform or comply with its obligations under
Section 5.09(a), by obtaining the requisite Financing), and
(y) until and unless the other MergerCo (or FinCo, as
applicable) shall have effected such cure, it shall be deemed to
have failed to perform and comply with its covenants and
agreements set forth in this Agreement to the same extent as the
first MergerCo (or FinCo, as applicable) has so failed with
respect to its covenants and agreements.
(b) The Company shall retain a nationally recognized
investment banking or valuation firm, selected by the Board of
Directors of the Company and reasonably acceptable to MergerCos,
to render a solvency opinion, customary in scope and substance,
as of the Closing to the Board of Directors of the Company.
Section 5.04. Benefit
Plans. (a) For a period of two years following the
Effective Time, the Surviving Corporation shall either
(i) maintain for the benefit of the employees of the
Company and its Subsidiaries immediately prior to the Effective
Time (the Company Employees) the Company
Benefit Plans (other than the Company Stock Plans) and Company
Benefit Agreements at the benefit levels in effect on the date
of this Agreement and provide compensation and benefits to each
Company Employee under the Company Benefit Plans or any other
employee benefit plans or other compensation arrangements of the
Surviving Corporation or any of its Subsidiaries that have a
value sufficient to replace the value of the compensation and
benefits provided to such Company Employee under the Company
Stock Plans immediately prior to the Effective Time or
(ii) provide compensation and benefits to each Company
Employee that, taken as a whole, have a value that is not less
favorable in the aggregate (including any value attributable to
equity-based compensation) than the benefits provided to such
Company Employee immediately prior to the Effective Time.
(b) Without limiting the generality of
Section 5.04(a), from and after the Effective Time, the
Surviving Corporation shall honor and continue during the
two-year period following the Effective Time or, if sooner,
until all obligations thereunder have been satisfied, all of the
Companys employment, severance, retention, termination and
cash incentive compensation plans, policies, programs,
agreements or arrangements (including (i) any change in
control severance agreement between the Company and any Company
Employee, (ii) the Change in Control Severance Plan I,
(iii) the Change in Control Severance Plan II,
(iv) the Change in Control Bonus Program, (v) the
Fiscal Year 2006 Bonus Enhancement Program and (vi) the
Fiscal Year 2006 MIK Power Bonus Plan), in each case, as in
effect at the Effective Time, including with respect to any
payments, benefits or rights arising as a result of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement (either alone or in
combination with any other event), without any amendment or
modification, other than any amendment or modification required
to comply with applicable Law.
(c) Without limiting the generality of
Sections 5.04(a) and 5.04(b), during the two-year period
following the Effective Time or, if sooner, until all
obligations thereunder have been satisfied, the Surviving
Corporation shall (i) honor and continue the cash incentive
compensation plans maintained by the Company and its
Subsidiaries at the Effective Time (the Incentive
Plans) pursuant to their respective terms as in effect
at the Effective Time with respect to all performance periods
thereunder commencing prior to and ending after the Effective
Time and (ii) at the times prescribed by the Incentive
Plans as in effect at the Effective Time, make payments to the
Company Employees in accordance with the applicable terms of the
Incentive Plans as in effect at the Effective Time.
A-23
(d) With respect to any employee benefit plan,
as defined in Section 3(3) of ERISA, maintained by the
Surviving Corporation or any of its Affiliates (including any
vacation, paid time-off and severance plans), for all purposes,
including determining eligibility to participate, level of
benefits, vesting, benefit accruals and early retirement
subsidies, each Company Employees service with the Company
or any of its Subsidiaries (as well as service with any
predecessor employer of the Company or any such Subsidiary, to
the extent service with the predecessor employer is recognized
by the Company or such Subsidiary) shall be treated as service
with the Surviving Corporation or its Affiliates;
provided, however, that such service need not be
recognized to the extent that such recognition would result in
any duplication of benefits.
(e) The Surviving Corporation shall waive, or cause to be
waived, any pre-existing condition limitations, exclusions,
actively-at-work requirements and waiting periods under any
welfare benefit plan maintained by the Surviving Corporation or
any of its Affiliates in which Company Employees (and their
eligible dependents) will be eligible to participate from and
after the Effective Time, except to the extent that such
pre-existing condition limitations, exclusions, actively-at-work
requirements and waiting periods would not have been satisfied
or waived under the comparable Company Benefit Plan immediately
prior to the Effective Time. The Surviving Corporation shall
recognize, or cause to be recognized, the dollar amount of all
co-payments, deductibles and similar expenses incurred by each
Company Employee (and his or her eligible dependents) during the
calendar year in which the Effective Time occurs for purposes of
satisfying such years deductible and co-payment
limitations under the relevant welfare benefit plans in which
they will be eligible to participate from and after the
Effective Time.
Section 5.05. Indemnification,
Exculpation and Insurance. (a) All rights to
indemnification and exculpation from liabilities for acts or
omissions occurring at or prior to the Effective Time and rights
to advancement of expenses relating thereto now existing in
favor of any person who is or prior to the Effective Time
becomes, or has been at any time prior to the date of this
Agreement, a director, officer, employee or agent (including as
a fiduciary with respect to an employee benefit plan) of the
Company, any of its Subsidiaries or any of their respective
predecessors (each, an Indemnified Party) as
provided in the Company Certificate of Incorporation, the
Company Bylaws, the organizational documents of any Subsidiary
of the Company or any indemnification agreement between such
Indemnified Party and the Company or any of its Subsidiaries (in
each case, as in effect on the date hereof or, with respect to
any indemnification agreement entered into after the date
hereof, to the extent the terms thereof are no more favorable in
any material respect to the Indemnified Party that is the
beneficiary thereof than the terms of any indemnification
agreement included as an exhibit in the Filed SEC Documents)
shall survive the Merger and shall not be amended, repealed or
otherwise modified in any manner that would adversely affect any
right thereunder of any such Indemnified Party.
(b) Without limiting Section 5.05(a) or any rights of
any Indemnified Party pursuant to any indemnification agreement,
from and after the Effective Time, in the event of any
threatened or actual claim, action, suit, proceeding or
investigation (a Claim), whether civil,
criminal or administrative in which any person who is now, or
has been at any time prior to the date of this Agreement, or who
becomes prior to the Effective Time, a director or officer of
the Company is or is threatened to be, made a party in his or
her capacity as a director or officer of the Company, the
Surviving Corporation shall indemnify and hold harmless, to the
fullest extent permitted by Law, each such Indemnified Party in
his or her capacity as a director or officer of the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries, or any of their respective
predecessors, against any losses, claims, damages, liabilities,
costs, expenses (including reasonable attorneys fees and
expenses in advance of the final disposition of any claim, suit,
proceeding or investigation to each Indemnified Party to the
fullest extent permitted by Law upon receipt of any undertaking
required by applicable Law), judgments, fines and amounts paid
in settlement of or in connection with any such threatened or
actual Claim, arising out of, or pertaining to (i) the fact
that such an Indemnified Party was a director (including in a
capacity as a member of any board committee) or officer of the
Company, any of its Subsidiaries or any of their respective
predecessors, or a fiduciary with respect to any employee
benefit plan maintained by any of the foregoing, prior to the
Effective Time or (ii) this Agreement or any of the
transactions contemplated hereby, whether in any case asserted
or arising before or after the Effective Time. The Surviving
Corporation shall not settle, compromise or consent to the entry
of any judgment in any threatened or actual Claim for which
A-24
indemnification could be sought by an Indemnified Party
hereunder, unless such settlement, compromise or consent
includes an unconditional release of such Indemnified Party from
all liability arising out of such Claim or such Indemnified
Party otherwise consents in writing to such settlement,
compromise or consent. The Surviving Corporation shall cooperate
with an Indemnified Party in the defense of any matter for which
such Indemnified Party could seek indemnification hereunder. The
Surviving Corporations obligations under this
Section 5.05(b) shall continue in full force and effect for
a period of six years from the Effective Time; provided,
however, that all rights to indemnification in respect of
any Claim asserted or made within such period shall continue
until the final disposition of such Claim.
(c) The Surviving Corporation shall obtain, at the
Effective Time, prepaid (or tail) directors
and officers liability insurance policies in respect of
acts or omissions occurring at or prior to the Effective Time
for six years from the Effective Time, covering each Indemnified
Party on terms with respect to such coverage and amounts no less
favorable than those of such policies in effect on the date of
this Agreement. In the event the Surviving Corporation is unable
to obtain such tail insurance policies, then, for a
period of six years from the Effective Time, the Surviving
Corporation shall maintain in effect the Companys current
directors and officers liability insurance policies
in respect of acts or omissions occurring at or prior to the
Effective Time, covering each Indemnified Party on terms with
respect to such coverage and amounts no less favorable than
those of such policies in effect on the date of this Agreement;
provided, however, that the Surviving Corporation
may substitute therefor policies of a reputable and financially
sound insurance company containing terms, including with respect
to coverage and amounts, no less favorable to any Indemnified
Party; provided further, however, that in
satisfying its obligation under this sentence the Surviving
Corporation shall not be obligated to pay for coverage for any
12-month period aggregate premiums for insurance in excess of
250% of the amount paid by the Company for coverage for the
period of 12 months beginning on June 1 most recently
commenced prior to the date of this Agreement, it being
understood and agreed that the Surviving Corporation shall
nevertheless be obligated to provide such coverage as may be
obtained for such amount.
(d) In the event that the Surviving Corporation or any of
its successors or assigns (i) consolidates with or merges
into any other person and is not the continuing or surviving
corporation or entity of such consolidation or merger or
(ii) transfers or conveys all or a substantial portion of
its properties and other assets to any person, or is dissolved,
then, and in each such case, the Surviving Corporation shall
cause proper provision to be made so that the applicable
successors and assigns or transferees expressly assume the
obligations set forth in this Section 5.05.
(e) The provisions of this Section 5.05 are intended
to be for the benefit of, and will be enforceable by, each
Indemnified Party, his or her heirs and his or her
representatives, and are in addition to, and not in substitution
for, any other rights to indemnification or contribution that
any such person may have by contract or otherwise.
Section 5.06. Fees
and Expenses. (a) Except as provided in
Section 5.06(b), all fees and expenses incurred in
connection with this Agreement, the Merger and the other
transactions contemplated by this Agreement, including the
Financing, shall be paid by the party incurring such fees or
expenses, whether or not the Merger is consummated.
(b) In the event that (i) this Agreement is terminated
by (A) MergerCos pursuant to Section 7.01(e) or
(B) the Company pursuant to Section 7.01(f) or (ii)
(A) after the date of this Agreement, a Takeover Proposal
shall have been publicly made to the Company generally or shall
have been made directly to the stockholders of the Company or
shall have otherwise become publicly known, (B) thereafter,
this Agreement is terminated by either MergerCos or the Company
pursuant to Section 7.01(b)(i) (but only if the
Stockholders Meeting has not been held) or
Section 7.01(b)(iii) and (C) within twelve months
after such termination, the Company enters into a definitive
agreement to consummate or consummates, the transactions
contemplated by any Takeover Proposal, then the Company shall
pay to MergerCos an aggregate amount equal to
$120.0 million (the Termination Fee) by
wire transfer of same-day funds (1) in the case of a
payment required by clause (i)(A) above, as promptly as
practicable (and, in any event, within two business days)
following the date of termination of this Agreement, (2) in
the case of payment required by clause (i)(B) above,
concurrently with such termination, and (3) in the case of
a payment required by clause
A-25
(ii) above, on the date the Company enters into a
definitive agreement to consummate any Takeover Proposal
referred to in clause (ii)(C). For purposes of this
Section 5.06(b), the term Takeover
Proposal shall have the meaning assigned to such term
in Section 4.02(b), except that all references to 20%
therein shall be deemed to be references to 50%.
(c) In the event that this Agreement is terminated by the
Company pursuant to Section 7.01(g), then the Sponsor
Entities shall pay to the Company an aggregate amount equal to
$200.0 million (the Sponsor Termination
Fee) as promptly as reasonably practicable (and, in
any event, within two business days following such termination)
by wire transfer of same-day funds.
(d) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this
Agreement, (i) if in the circumstances in which the Sponsor
Entities become obligated to pay the Sponsor Termination Fee,
none of the Sponsor Entities are otherwise in breach of this
Agreement such that (but for the Sponsor Entities failure
to satisfy their obligations under Section 1.02) the
conditions set forth in Section 6.03(a) and 6.03(b) would
otherwise be satisfied (any such event, a Non-Breach
Financing Failure), then the Companys
termination of this Agreement pursuant to Section 7.01(g)
and receipt of payment of the Sponsor Termination Fee pursuant
to Section 5.06(c) shall be the sole and exclusive remedy
of the Company and its Subsidiaries against the Sponsor Entities
and any of their respective former, current or future general or
limited partners, members or stockholders or against any of
their respective former, current or future directors, officers,
employees, Affiliates, general or limited partners,
stockholders, managers, members or agents (each a
Specified Person) for any loss or damage
suffered as a result of the breach of any representation,
warranty, covenant or agreement contained in this Agreement by
the Sponsor Entities and the failure of the Merger to be
consummated, and upon payment of the Sponsor Termination Fee in
accordance with Section 5.06(c), none of the Sponsor
Entities or any of their respective Specified Persons shall have
any further liability or obligation relating to or arising out
of this Agreement or the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement, and (ii) in no event, whether or not this
Agreement shall have been terminated, shall the Company and its
Subsidiaries, as a group, on the one hand, or the Sponsor
Entities and the Funds, as a group, on the other, be subject to
monetary damages in excess of $600.0 million in the
aggregate for each such group, respectively, for all losses and
damages (including, in the case of the Company, lost stockholder
premium) arising from or in connection with breaches by the
Sponsor Entities, on the one hand, or the Company, on the other,
of their respective representations, warranties, covenants and
agreements contained in this Agreement or arising from any other
claim or cause of action, and none of the Company, the Sponsor
Entities, the Funds or any of their respective Specified Persons
shall have any further liability or obligation to the other
parties or otherwise relating to or arising out of this
Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby, other than
for fraud. The parties acknowledge and agree that nothing in
this Section shall be deemed to affect their right to specific
performance under Section 8.10.
(e) Each of the Company and the Sponsor Entities
acknowledges and agrees that the agreements contained in this
Section 5.06 are an integral part of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement, and that, without these
agreements, neither the Company nor the Sponsor Entities would
have entered into this Agreement. If the Company or the Sponsor
Entities, as the case may be, fail promptly to pay the fees due
pursuant to this Section 5.06 when due, and, in order to
obtain such payment, the Sponsor Entities or the Company
commence a suit that results in a judgment against the other
party for any such fee, the Company or the Sponsor Entities, as
the case may be, shall pay to the other party its costs and
expenses (including attorneys fees and expenses) in
connection with such suit, together with interest on the amount
of the applicable fees due pursuant to this Section 5.06
from the date such payment was required to be made until the
date of payment at the prime rate of Citibank, N.A. in effect on
the date such payment was required to be made.
Section 5.07. Public
Announcements. The Sponsor Entities and the Company
shall consult with each other before issuing, and give each
other the opportunity to review and comment upon, any press
release or other public statements with respect to the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement, including the
Merger and the Financing, and shall not issue any such press
release or make any such public statement prior to such
consultation, except as may be required by applicable Law, court
process or the rules and regulations of any national securities
exchange or national securities quotation system and except for
any matters referred
A-26
to in Section 4.02. The parties agree that the initial
press release to be issued with respect to the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement shall be in the form heretofore
agreed to by the parties.
Section 5.08. Stockholder
Litigation. The Company shall give MergerCos the
opportunity to participate in the defense or settlement of any
stockholder litigation against the Company and/or its directors
relating to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, and
no such settlement shall be agreed to without MergerCos
prior written consent (such consent not to be unreasonably
withheld or delayed).
Section 5.09. Financing.
(a) Each of the Sponsor Entities shall use, and shall cause
its Affiliates to use, reasonable best efforts to take, or cause
to be taken, all actions and to do, or cause to be done, all
things necessary, proper or advisable to arrange the Financing
on the terms and conditions described in the Financing
Commitments, including, in the case of the Debt Financing,
reasonable best efforts (i) to negotiate and enter into the
definitive agreements with respect thereto on the terms and
conditions contained in the Debt Financing Commitments (or on
other terms acceptable to FinCos, provided such terms do
not contain any conditions to funding on the Closing Date that
are not set forth in the Debt Financing Commitments and would
not otherwise reasonably be expected to impair or delay the
consummation of the Debt Financing), (ii) to satisfy (or
cause its Affiliates to satisfy) on a timely basis all
conditions applicable to the Sponsor Entities (or their
Affiliates) set forth therein that are within the control of any
of the Sponsor Entities (or such Affiliates) and (iii) to
consummate the Debt Financing contemplated by the Debt
Commitment Letter at the Closing, including using its reasonable
best efforts to cause the lenders and the other persons
providing such Debt Financing to fund the Debt Financing
required to consummate the Merger at the Closing (including by
taking enforcement action to cause such lenders and other
persons providing such Debt Financing to fund such Debt
Financing). In the event that any portion of the Debt Financing
becomes unavailable on the terms and conditions set forth in the
Debt Financing Commitments, FinCos shall promptly notify the
Company, and the Sponsor Entities shall use their reasonable
best efforts to obtain, as promptly as practicable following the
occurrence of such event, any such portion from alternative
sources (Alternative Financing) on terms that
will still enable the Sponsor Entities to consummate the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement and that are not
less favorable in the aggregate (as determined by FinCos in
their reasonable judgment) to the Sponsor Entities and the
Company than those contained in the Debt Financing Commitments.
FinCos shall deliver to the Company true and complete copies of
all agreements (excluding any fee letters and engagement letters
which, by their terms are confidential, except to the extent any
such letters contain conditions to the consummation of the Debt
Financing (including pursuant to so-called flex
provisions)) pursuant to which any such alternative source shall
have committed to provide FinCos or the Surviving Corporation
with any portion of the Debt Financing. In the event that
(i) all or any portion of the high yield financing
described in the Debt Financing Commitments has not been
consummated, (ii) all closing conditions contained in
Article VI shall have been satisfied or waived (other than
those conditions that by their terms are to be satisfied at the
Closing, but subject to the prior or substantially concurrent
satisfaction or (to the extent permitted by Law) waiver of those
conditions) and (iii) the bridge financing described in the
Debt Financing Commitments (or Alternative Financing obtained in
accordance with this Section 5.09(a)) is available on the
terms and conditions set forth in the Debt Financing Commitments
(or a replacement thereof as contemplated by this
Section 5.09(a)), then the Sponsor Entities shall borrow
under and use, or shall cause the Surviving Corporation to
borrow under and use, such bridge financing (or such Alternative
Financing) in lieu of the high yield financing no later than the
last day of the Marketing Period. For purposes of this
Agreement, the Marketing Period shall mean
the first period of 30 consecutive days following the later of
(i) Stockholder Approval and (ii) September 4,
2006, (A) throughout which (1) FinCos shall have the
Required Financial Information and (2) nothing has occurred
and no condition exists that would cause any of the conditions
set forth in Section 6.02 not to be satisfied assuming the
Closing were to be scheduled for any time during such
consecutive 30-day period and (B) at the end of which the
conditions set forth in Section 6.01 shall be satisfied;
provided, however, that if the Marketing Period
shall not have commenced prior to November 1, 2006, as a
result of the failure of the condition set forth in clause
(A)(1) above to have been satisfied, then, subject to the
Company having complied as of the first day of the Marketing
Period with its obligations under Section 5.09(b) to use
its reasonable best efforts to provide the Required Financial
Information, the Marketing Period shall be the first period of
30 consecutive days after November 1, 2006,
(x) throughout which (1) FinCos shall have the Core
Required Financial Information (as defined below) and
A-27
(2) nothing has occurred and no condition exists that would
cause any of the conditions set forth in Section 6.02 not
to be satisfied assuming the Closing were to be scheduled for
any time during such consecutive 30-day period and (B) at
the end of which the conditions set forth in Section 6.01
shall be satisfied, and provided further, however,
that if the financial statements included in the Required
Financial Information or the Core Required Financial
Information, as the case may be, that is available to FinCos on
the first day of any such 30-day period would be
stale, within the meaning of Rule 3-12 of
Regulation S-X, on any day during such 30-day period if a
registration statement using such financial statements were to
be filed with the SEC on such date, then a new 30-day period
shall commence. For purposes of this Agreement, the term
Core Required Financial Information means all
financial statements for a high-yield financing during the
Marketing Period of the type required in a registered offering
by Regulation S-X and
Regulation S-K
under the Securities Act (other than Rule 3-10 of
Regulation S-X) that are customarily included in private
placements pursuant to Rule 144A promulgated under the
Securities Act, and, in the case of the annual financial
statements, the auditors report thereon. Each of the
Sponsor Entities shall refrain (and shall use its reasonable
best efforts to cause its Affiliates to refrain) from taking,
directly or indirectly, any action that would reasonably be
expected to result in a failure of any of the conditions
contained in the Financing Commitments or in any definitive
agreement related to the Financing. None of the Sponsor Entities
shall agree to or permit any amendment, supplement or other
modification of, or waive any of its rights under, any Financing
Commitments or the definitive agreements relating to the
Financing, in each case, without the Companys prior
written consent (which consent shall not be unreasonably
withheld or delayed), except (i) in the case of the Equity
Financing Commitment, as provided therein, and (ii) in the
case of the Debt Financing Commitment, as would not contain any
conditions to funding on the Closing Date that are not set forth
in the Debt Financing Commitment and would not otherwise
reasonably be expected to impair or delay the consummation of
the Debt Financing (it being understood that, subject to the
requirements of this clause (ii), such amendment, supplement or
modification of the Debt Financing Commitments may provide for
the assignment of a portion of the Debt Financing Commitment to
additional agents or arrangers and granting such persons
approval rights with respect to certain matters as are
customarily granted to additional agents or arrangers). FinCos
shall keep the Company reasonably informed of the status of
their efforts to obtain the Debt Financing.
(b) The Company shall provide, shall cause its Subsidiaries
to provide and shall use its reasonable best efforts to cause
its and their Representatives to provide such reasonable
cooperation in connection with the arrangement of the Debt
Financing as may be reasonably requested by FinCos, including
(i) participation in meetings, drafting sessions,
presentations, road shows and due diligence, (ii) using
reasonable best efforts to furnish FinCos and the financing
sources with financial and other pertinent information regarding
the Company as may be reasonably requested by FinCos to
consummate the Debt Financing, including all financial
statements and financial data of the type required by
Regulation S-X and Regulation S-K under the Securities
Act (other than Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X) and of
type and form customarily included in private placements
pursuant to Rule 144A promulgated under the Securities Act
(collectively, the Required Financial
Information), (iii) assisting FinCos and the
financing sources in the preparation of (A) offering
documents and other informational and marketing materials and
documents for any portion of the Debt Financing and
(B) materials for rating agency presentations,
(iv) reasonably cooperating with the marketing efforts of
FinCos and the financing sources for any portion of the Debt
Financing, (v) reasonably facilitating the pledging of
collateral and execution and delivery of definitive financing
documents and customary deliverables and (vi) using
reasonable best efforts to obtain accountants comfort
letters, accountants consent letters, legal opinions,
surveys and title insurance as reasonably requested by FinCos;
provided that none of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries shall be required to pay any commitment or other
fee or incur any other liability in connection with the Debt
Financing prior to the Effective Time; and provided
further that such requested cooperation does not
unreasonably interfere with the ongoing operations of the
Company and its Subsidiaries. FinCos shall, promptly upon
request by the Company, reimburse the Company for all reasonable
out-of-pocket costs incurred by the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries in connection with such cooperation. FinCos shall,
on a joint and several basis, indemnify and hold harmless the
Company and its Subsidiaries from and against any and all losses
or damages suffered or incurred by them in connection with the
arrangement of the Debt Financing and any information utilized
in connection therewith.
A-28
ARTICLE VI
Conditions Precedent
Section 6.01. Conditions
to Each Partys Obligation to Effect the Merger.
The respective obligation of each party to effect the Merger is
subject to the satisfaction or (to the extent permitted by Law)
waiver at or prior to the Effective Time of the following
conditions:
|
|
|
(a) Stockholder Approval. The Stockholder Approval
shall have been obtained. |
|
|
(b) HSR Act. The waiting period (and any extension
thereof) applicable to the Merger under the HSR Act shall have
been terminated or shall have expired. |
|
|
(c) No Injunctions or Restraints. No temporary
restraining order, preliminary or permanent injunction or other
judgment or order issued by any Federal or state court of
competent jurisdiction (collectively,
Restraints) shall be in effect enjoining or
otherwise prohibiting the consummation of the Merger. |
Section 6.02. Conditions
to Obligations of the Sponsor Entities. The obligations
of the Sponsor Entities to effect the Merger are further subject
to the satisfaction or (to the extent permitted by Law) waiver
by MergerCos (on behalf of themselves and FinCos) at or prior to
the Effective Time of the following conditions:
|
|
|
(a) Representations and Warranties. The
representations and warranties of the Company set forth in this
Agreement shall be true and correct (disregarding all
qualifications or limitations as to materiality,
Material Adverse Effect and words of similar import
set forth therein) as of the date of this Agreement and as of
the Closing Date as though made on the Closing Date (except to
the extent such representations and warranties expressly relate
to an earlier date, in which case as of such earlier date),
except where the failure of such representations and warranties
to be so true and correct would not, individually or in the
aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse
Effect, provided, however, that, notwithstanding
the foregoing, the representations and warranties contained in
Section 3.01(c) (Capital Structure), other than the last
sentence thereof, and the first four sentences of
Section 3.01(d) (Authority; Noncontravention) shall be true
and correct in all material respects. The Sponsor Entities shall
have received a certificate signed on behalf of the Company by
the chief financial officer of the Company to such effect. |
|
|
(b) Performance of Obligations of the
Company. The Company shall have, in all material
respects, performed or complied with all material obligations
required to be performed or complied with by it under this
Agreement by the time of the Closing, and the Sponsor Entities
shall have received a certificate signed on behalf of the
Company by the chief financial officer of the Company to such
effect. |
Section 6.03. Conditions
to Obligation of the Company. The obligation of the
Company to effect the Merger is further subject to the
satisfaction or (to the extent permitted by Law) waiver at or
prior to the Effective Time of the following conditions:
(a) Representations and Warranties. The
representations and warranties of the Sponsor Entities set forth
in this Agreement shall be true and correct (disregarding all
qualifications or limitations as to materiality,
Sponsor Material Adverse Effect and words of similar
import set forth therein) as of the date of this Agreement and
as of the Closing Date as though made on the Closing Date
(except to the extent such representations and warranties
expressly relate to an earlier date, in which case as of such
earlier date), except where the failure of such representations
and warranties to be so true and correct would not, individually
or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Sponsor
Material Adverse Effect. The Company shall have received a
certificate to such effect signed on behalf of each Sponsor
Entity by an executive officer thereof.
(b) Performance of Obligations of the Sponsor
Entities. The Sponsor Entities shall have, in all material
respects, performed or complied with all material obligations
required to be performed or complied with by them or any of them
under this Agreement by the time of the Closing, and the Company
shall have received a certificate to such effect signed on
behalf of each Sponsor Entity by an executive officer thereof.
A-29
Section 6.04. Frustration
of Closing Conditions. None of the Company or the
Sponsor Entities may rely on the failure of any condition set
forth in Section 6.01, 6.02 or 6.03, as the case may be, to
be satisfied if such failure was caused by such partys
(or, in the case of any Sponsor Entity, any other Sponsor
Entity) failure to perform any of its obligations under this
Agreement, to act in good faith or to use its reasonable best
efforts to consummate the Merger and the other transactions
contemplated by this Agreement, including the Financing, as
required by and subject to Sections 5.03 and 5.09.
ARTICLE VII
Termination, Amendment and Waiver
Section 7.01. Termination.
This Agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the
Effective Time, whether before or after receipt of the
Stockholder Approval:
|
|
|
(a) by mutual written consent of MergerCos and the Company; |
|
|
(b) by either MergerCos or the Company: |
|
|
|
(i) if the Merger shall not have been consummated on or
before December 19, 2006 (such date, as it may be extended
pursuant to the immediately following proviso, the
Outside Date); provided
however, that if the Closing shall not have occurred
prior to such date solely as a result of the failure of the
Marketing Period to have been completed prior to such date, then
the Outside Date shall be extended to March 31, 2007;
provided further, however, that the right
to terminate this Agreement under this Section 7.01(b)(i)
shall not be available to any party if the failure of such party
(or in the case of MergerCos, any other Sponsor Entity) to
perform any of its obligations under this Agreement, the failure
to act in good faith or the failure to use its reasonable best
efforts to consummate the Merger and the other transactions
contemplated by this Agreement, including the Financing, as
required by and subject to Sections 5.03 and 5.09, has been
a principal cause of or resulted in the failure of the Merger to
be consummated on or before such date; |
|
|
(ii) if any Restraint having any of the effects set forth
in Section 6.01(c) shall have become final and
nonappealable; provided that the party seeking to
terminate this Agreement pursuant to this
Section 7.01(b)(ii) shall have used reasonable best efforts
to prevent the entry of and to remove such Restraint; or |
|
|
(iii) if the Stockholder Approval shall not have been
obtained at the Stockholders Meeting duly convened
therefor or at any adjournment or postponement thereof; |
|
|
|
(c) by MergerCos, if the Company shall have breached any of
its representations or warranties or failed to perform any of
its covenants or agreements set forth in this Agreement, which
breach or failure to perform (i) would give rise to the
failure of a condition set forth in Section 6.02(a) or
6.02(b) and (ii) is incapable of being cured prior to the
Outside Date; provided that MergerCos shall not have the
right to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this
Section 7.01(c) if any Sponsor Entity is then in material
breach of any of its representations, warranties, covenants or
agreements hereunder; |
|
|
(d) by the Company, if any Sponsor Entity shall have
breached any of its representations or warranties or failed to
perform any of its covenants or agreements set forth in this
Agreement, which breach or failure to perform (i) would
give rise to the failure of a condition set forth in
Section 6.03(a) or 6.03(b) and (ii) is incapable of
being cured prior to the Outside Date; provided that the
Company shall not have the right to terminate this Agreement
pursuant to this Section 7.01(d) if the Company is then in
material breach of any of its representations, warranties,
covenants or agreements hereunder; |
|
|
(e) by MergerCos, in the event that an Adverse
Recommendation Change shall have occurred; |
|
|
(f) by the Company, in accordance with
Section 4.02(b); or |
|
|
(g) by the Company, if (i) all of the conditions set
forth in Section 6.01 and Section 6.02 have been
satisfied (other than those conditions that by their terms are
to be satisfied at the Closing) and (ii) on or after the
last day of the Marketing Period neither FinCos nor the
Surviving Corporation shall have received the proceeds of the
Debt Financing. |
A-30
Section 7.02. Effect
of Termination. In the event of termination of this
Agreement by either the Company or MergerCos as provided in
Section 7.01, this Agreement shall forthwith become void
and have no effect, without any liability or obligation on the
part of the Company or any Sponsor Entity, other than the
provisions of the last sentence of Section 5.02,
Section 5.06, this Section 7.02 and Article VIII,
which provisions shall survive such termination;
provided, however, that, subject to such
provisions, any such termination shall not relieve the Company
or any Sponsor Entity from liability for any willful and
material breach of any of its representations, warranties,
covenants or agreements set forth in this Agreement.
Section 7.03. Amendment.
This Agreement may be amended by the Company and MergerCos (on
behalf of themselves and FinCos) at any time before or after
receipt of the Stockholder Approval; provided,
however, that after such approval has been obtained,
there shall be made no amendment that by Law requires further
approval by the stockholders of the Company without such
approval having been obtained. This Agreement may not be amended
except by an instrument in writing signed on behalf of each of
the parties hereto.
Section 7.04. Extension;
Waiver. At any time prior to the Effective Time, the
parties may (a) extend the time for the performance of any
of the obligations or other acts of the other parties,
(b) to the extent permitted by Law, waive any inaccuracies
in the representations and warranties contained herein or in any
document delivered pursuant hereto or (c) subject to the
proviso to the first sentence of Section 7.03 and to the
extent permitted by Law, waive compliance with any of the
agreements or conditions contained herein. Any agreement on the
part of a party to any such extension or waiver shall be valid
only if set forth in an instrument in writing signed on behalf
of such party. The failure of any party to this Agreement to
assert any of its rights under this Agreement or otherwise shall
not constitute a waiver of such rights. No provision of this
Agreement requiring any party to use reasonable best efforts or
to act in good faith in any context shall be interpreted to
require a party, as part of such partys duty to use
reasonable best efforts or to act in good faith in the context
in question, to waive any condition to the obligations of such
party hereunder or to refrain from exercising any right or power
such party may have hereunder.
Section 7.05. Procedure
for Termination or Amendment. A termination of this
Agreement pursuant to Section 7.01 or an amendment of this
Agreement pursuant to Section 7.03 shall, in order to be
effective, require, in the case of MergerCos and the Company,
action by its Board of Directors or, with respect to any
amendment of this Agreement pursuant to Section 7.03, the
duly authorized committee of its Board of Directors to the
extent permitted by Law. For the avoidance of doubt, any
termination of this Agreement by MergerCos pursuant to
Section 7.01 shall require action by each of the MergerCos.
ARTICLE VIII
General Provisions
Section 8.01. Nonsurvival
of Representations and Warranties. None of the
representations and warranties in this Agreement or in any
instrument delivered pursuant to this Agreement shall survive
the Effective Time. This Section 8.01 shall not limit any
covenant or agreement of the parties which by its terms
contemplates performance after the Effective Time.
Section 8.02. Notices.
Except for notices that are specifically required by the terms
of this Agreement to be delivered orally, all notices, requests,
claims, demands and other communications hereunder shall be in
writing and shall be deemed given if delivered personally, faxed
(with confirmation) or sent by overnight courier (providing
proof of delivery) to the parties at the following addresses (or
at such other address for a party as shall be specified by like
notice):
if to any MergerCo or FinCo, to it:
|
|
|
c/o Bain Capital, LLC |
|
111 Huntington Avenue |
|
Boston, MA 02199 |
|
Fax: (617) 516-2010 |
|
|
|
|
Attention: |
Matthew S. Levin |
A-31
|
|
|
and |
|
|
c/o Blackstone Management Associates V, LLC |
|
345 Park Avenue, 31st Floor |
|
New York, NY 10154 |
|
Fax: (212) 583-5712 |
|
|
|
Matthew S. Kabaker |
|
|
with a copy to: |
|
|
Ropes & Gray LLP |
|
One International Place |
|
Boston, MA 02110 |
|
Fax No.: (617) 951-7050 |
|
|
|
|
Attention: |
David C. Chapin, Esq. |
|
|
|
R. Newcomb Stillwell, Esq. |
if to the Company, to:
|
|
|
Michaels Stores, Inc. |
|
8000 Bent Branch Drive |
|
Irving, TX 75261 |
|
Fax No.: (972) 409-1901 |
|
|
|
|
Attention: |
Jeffrey N. Boyer |
|
|
|
Mark V. Beasley, Esq. |
|
|
with a copy to: |
|
|
Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP |
|
Worldwide Plaza |
|
825 Eighth Avenue |
|
New York, New York 10019 |
|
Fax No.: (212) 474-3700 |
|
|
|
|
Attention: |
Robert I. Townsend, III, Esq. |
Section 8.03. Definitions.
For purposes of this Agreement:
|
|
|
(a) an Affiliate of any person means
another person that directly or indirectly, through one or more
intermediaries, controls, is controlled by, or is under common
control with, such first person; |
|
|
(b) business day means any day on which
banks are not required or authorized to be closed in the City of
New York; |
|
|
(c) Company Disclosure Letter means the
letter dated as of the date of this Agreement delivered by the
Company to the Sponsor Entities; |
|
|
(d) Knowledge means (i) with
respect to the Company, the actual knowledge, of any of the
persons set forth in Section 8.03(d) of the Company
Disclosure Letter and (ii) with respect to the Sponsor
Entities, the actual knowledge of any of the officers of any of
the Sponsor Entities; |
|
|
(e) Material Adverse Effect means any
change, effect, event, occurrence or state of facts that
(i) is materially adverse to the business, financial
condition or results of operations of the Company and its
Subsidiaries, taken as a whole or (ii) prevents or
materially impedes, interferes with, hinders or delays beyond
the Outside Date the consummation by the Company of the Merger
or the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement, in
each case, other than any change, effect, event, occurrence or
state of facts (A) relating to economic, financial market
or geopolitical conditions in general, (B) relating to
changes in Law or applicable accounting regulations or
principles or interpretations thereof, (C) relating to the
specialty retail industry generally, to the extent such change,
effect, event, occurrence or state of fact does not materially,
disproportionately impact the Company and its Subsidiaries,
taken as a whole, (D) consisting of any change in the
Companys stock price or trading volume, in and of itself,
or any |
A-32
|
|
|
failure, in and of itself, by the Company to meet published
revenue or earnings projections (it being understood that the
facts or occurrences giving rise or contributing to such change
or failure may be deemed to constitute, or be taken into account
in determining whether there has been or would reasonably be
expected to be, a Material Adverse Effect, and it being further
understood that any such change or failure may be taken into
account in determining whether the facts or occurrences giving
rise or contributing to such change or failure are materially
adverse to the business, financial condition or results of
operations of the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a
whole), (E) relating to any outbreak or escalation of
hostilities or war or any act of terrorism, and
(F) relating to the announcement of this Agreement and the
transactions contemplated hereby and performance of and
compliance with the terms of this Agreement; |
|
|
(f) person means an individual,
corporation, partnership, limited liability company, joint
venture, association, trust, unincorporated organization or
other entity; |
|
|
(g) Sponsor Material Adverse Effect
means any change, effect, event, occurrence or state of facts
that prevents or materially impedes, interferes with, hinders or
delays beyond the Outside Date the consummation by the Sponsor
Entities of the Merger or the other transactions contemplated by
this Agreement; and |
|
|
(h) a Subsidiary of any person means
another person, an amount of the voting securities, other voting
rights or voting partnership interests of which is sufficient to
elect at least a majority of its board of directors or other
governing body (or, if there are no such voting interests, more
than 50% of the equity interests of which) is owned directly or
indirectly by such first person. |
Section 8.04. Interpretation.
When a reference is made in this Agreement to an Article, a
Section or Exhibit, such reference shall be to an Article or a
Section of, or an Exhibit to, this Agreement unless otherwise
indicated. The table of contents and headings contained in this
Agreement, are for reference purposes only and shall not affect
in any way the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement.
Whenever the words include, includes or
including are used in this Agreement, they shall be
deemed to be followed by the words without
limitation. The words hereof,
herein and hereunder and words of
similar import when used in this Agreement shall refer to this
Agreement as a whole and not to any particular provision of this
Agreement. The word or when used in this Agreement
is not exclusive. All terms defined in this Agreement shall have
the defined meanings when used in any certificate or other
document made or delivered pursuant hereto unless otherwise
defined therein. The definitions contained in this Agreement are
applicable to the singular as well as the plural forms of such
terms and to the masculine as well as to the feminine and neuter
genders of such term. Any agreement, instrument or statute
defined or referred to herein or in any agreement or instrument
that is referred to herein means such agreement, instrument or
statute as from time to time amended, modified or supplemented,
including (in the case of agreements or instruments) by waiver
or consent and (in the case of statutes) by succession of
comparable successor statutes and references to all attachments
thereto and instruments incorporated therein. References to a
person are also to its permitted successors and assigns. Any
document, information or access provided or made available by or
on behalf of the Company to one of the Sponsor Entities shall be
deemed, for purposes of this Agreement, to have been provided or
made available to each of the Sponsor Entities. In the event
consent or approval of MergerCos is required pursuant to the
terms of this Agreement and one MergerCo has provided such
consent or approval, then any withholding or delay of such
consent or approval by the other MergerCo shall be deemed
unreasonable.
Section 8.05. Consents
and Approvals. For any matter under this Agreement
requiring the consent or approval of any party to be valid and
binding on the parties hereto, such consent or approval must be
in writing.
Section 8.06. Counterparts.
This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts
(including by facsimile), all of which shall be considered one
and the same agreement and shall become effective when one or
more counterparts have been signed by each of the parties and
delivered to the other parties.
Section 8.07. Entire
Agreement; No Third-Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement
(a) together with the Confidentiality Agreements, the
Equity Commitments and the Guarantees, constitutes the entire
A-33
agreement, and supersedes all prior agreements and
understandings, both written and oral, among the parties and
their affiliates with respect to the subject matter hereof and
thereof, it being understood that each of the Confidentiality
Agreements, the Equity Commitments and the Guarantees shall
survive the execution and delivery of this Agreement, and
(b) except for the provisions of Sections 2.02(b) and
5.05, is not intended to confer upon any person other than the
parties hereto any legal or equitable rights or remedies.
Section 8.08. GOVERNING
LAW. THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY,
AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
DELAWARE, REGARDLESS OF THE LAWS THAT MIGHT OTHERWISE GOVERN
UNDER APPLICABLE PRINCIPLES OF CONFLICTS OF LAWS THEREOF.
Section 8.09. Assignment.
Neither this Agreement nor any of the rights, interests or
obligations hereunder shall be assigned, in whole or in part, by
operation of law or otherwise by any of the parties without the
prior written consent of the other parties, and any assignment
without such consent shall be null and void, provided,
however, that each of the Sponsor Entities may assign all
of its rights hereunder to its lenders and debt providers for
collateral security purposes only. Subject to the preceding
sentence, this Agreement will be binding upon, inure to the
benefit of, and be enforceable by, the parties and their
respective successors and assigns.
Section 8.10. Specific
Enforcement; Consent to Jurisdiction. The parties agree
that irreparable damage would occur and that the parties would
not have any adequate remedy at law in the event that any of the
provisions of this Agreement were not performed in accordance
with their specific terms or were otherwise breached. It is
accordingly agreed that the parties shall be entitled to an
injunction or injunctions to prevent breaches of this Agreement
and to enforce specifically the terms and provisions of this
Agreement in any court of the State of Delaware or any Federal
court sitting in the State of Delaware, this being in addition,
subject to Section 5.06 and the provisions of the
Guarantees and the Equity Financing Commitments, to any other
remedy to which they are entitled at law or in equity. In
addition, each of the parties hereto (a) consents to submit
itself to the personal jurisdiction of the Delaware Court of
Chancery, any other court of the State of Delaware and any
Federal court sitting in the State of Delaware in the event any
dispute arises out of this Agreement or the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement, (b) agrees that it will not
attempt to deny or defeat such personal jurisdiction by motion
or other request for leave from any such court and
(c) agrees that it will not bring any action relating to
this Agreement or the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement in any court other than the Delaware Court of Chancery
(or, if the Delaware Court of Chancery shall be unavailable, any
other court of the State of Delaware or any Federal court
sitting in the State of Delaware). For the avoidance of doubt,
the parties agree that in the event of a Non-Breach Financing
Failure, the Companys sole remedy shall be the payment of
the Sponsor Termination Fee.
Section 8.11. Severability.
If any term or other provision of this Agreement is invalid,
illegal or incapable of being enforced by any rule of law or
public policy, all other conditions and provisions of this
Agreement shall nevertheless remain in full force and effect.
Upon such determination that any term or other provision is
invalid, illegal or incapable of being enforced, the parties
hereto shall negotiate in good faith to modify this Agreement so
as to effect the original intent of the parties as closely as
possible to the fullest extent permitted by applicable Law in an
acceptable manner to the end that the transactions contemplated
hereby are fulfilled to the extent possible.
A-34
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Bain MergerCo, Blackstone MergerCo, Bain
FinCo, Blackstone FinCo and the Company have caused this
Agreement to be signed by their respective officers thereunto
duly authorized, all as of the date first written above.
|
|
|
BAIN PASTE MERGERCO, INC., |
|
|
|
BLACKSTONE PASTE MERGERCO, INC., |
|
|
|
BLACKSTONE PASTE FINCO, LLC, |
|
|
|
|
Title: |
President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
By |
/s/ Gregory A. Sandfort |
|
|
|
|
|
Name: Gregory A. Sandfort |
|
|
|
|
Title: |
President and Chief Operating Officer |
A-35
Index of Defined Terms
|
|
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
Adverse Recommendation Change
|
|
Section 4.02(b) |
Affiliate
|
|
Section 8.03(a) |
Agreement
|
|
Preamble |
Alternative Financing
|
|
Section 5.09(a) |
Annual Amount
|
|
Section 5.05(c) |
Appraisal Shares
|
|
Section 2.01(d) |
Bain FinCo
|
|
Preamble |
Bain Fund
|
|
Preamble |
Bain Limited Guaranty
|
|
Preamble |
Bain MergerCo
|
|
Preamble |
Blackstone Limited Guaranty
|
|
Preamble |
Blackstone FinCo
|
|
Preamble |
Blackstone Fund
|
|
Preamble |
Blackstone MergerCo
|
|
Preamble |
business day
|
|
Section 8.03(b) |
Certificate
|
|
Section 2.01(c) |
Certificate of Merger
|
|
Section 1.03 |
Claim
|
|
Section 5.05(b) |
Closing
|
|
Section 1.02 |
Closing Date
|
|
Section 1.02 |
Code
|
|
Section 2.02(h) |
Company
|
|
Preamble |
Company 401(k) Plan
|
|
Section 3.01(c) |
Company Benefit Agreement
|
|
Section 3.01(l)(vii) |
Company Benefit Plan
|
|
Section 3.01(l)(vii) |
Company Bylaws
|
|
Section 1.05(b) |
Company Certificate of Incorporation
|
|
Section 1.05(a) |
Company Common Stock
|
|
Recitals |
Company Disclosure Letter
|
|
Section 8.03(c) |
Company DRIP
|
|
Section 3.01(c) |
Company Employees
|
|
Section 5.04(a) |
Company Pension Plan
|
|
Section 3.01(l)(i) |
Company Preferred Stock
|
|
Section 3.01(c) |
Company Restricted Stock
|
|
Section 3.01(c) |
Company Stock Options
|
|
Section 3.01(c) |
Company Stock Plans
|
|
Section 3.01(c) |
Confidentiality Agreements
|
|
Section 5.02 |
Contract
|
|
Section 3.01(d) |
Core Required Financial Information
|
|
Section 5.09(a) |
Debt Financing
|
|
Section 3.02(d) |
Debt Financing Commitments
|
|
Section 3.02(d) |
DGCL
|
|
Section 1.01 |
A-36
|
|
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
Effective Time
|
|
Section 1.03 |
Environmental Claims
|
|
Section 3.01(j)(ii) |
Environmental Law
|
|
Section 3.01(j)(ii) |
Equity Financing
|
|
Section 3.02(d) |
Equity Financing Commitments
|
|
Section 3.02(d) |
ERISA
|
|
Section 3.01(l)(vii) |
ESPP
|
|
Section 3.01(c) |
Exchange Act
|
|
Section 3.01(d) |
Exchange Fund
|
|
Section 2.02(a) |
Filed SEC Documents
|
|
Section 3.01 |
Financing
|
|
Section 3.02(d) |
Financing Commitments
|
|
Section 3.02(d) |
Funds
|
|
Preamble |
GAAP
|
|
Section 3.01(e) |
Governmental Entity
|
|
Section 3.01(d) |
Guarantees
|
|
Preamble |
Hazardous Materials
|
|
Section 3.01(j)(ii) |
HSR Act
|
|
Section 3.01(d) |
Incentive Plans
|
|
Section 5.04(c) |
Indebtedness
|
|
Section 4.01(a)(ix) |
Indemnified Party
|
|
Section 5.05(a) |
Intellectual Property Rights
|
|
Section 3.01(o) |
Judgment
|
|
Section 3.01(e) |
Knowledge
|
|
Section 8.03(d) |
Law
|
|
Section 3.01(d) |
Leased Real Property
|
|
Section 3.01(n)(ii) |
Liens
|
|
Section 3.01(b) |
Marketing Period
|
|
Section 5.09(a) |
Material Adverse Effect
|
|
Section 8.03(e) |
Merger
|
|
Recitals |
Merger Consideration
|
|
Section 2.01(c) |
MergerCos
|
|
Preamble |
Multiemployer Plan
|
|
Section 3.01(l)(vii) |
Non-Breach Financing Failure
|
|
Section 5.06(d) |
Notice of Superior Proposal
|
|
Section 4.02(b) |
Option Amount
|
|
Section 2.03(a) |
Outside Date
|
|
Section 7.01(b)(i) |
Owned Real Property
|
|
Section 3.01(n)(i) |
Paying Agent
|
|
Section 2.02(a) |
Permits
|
|
Section 3.01(j)(i) |
Permitted Liens
|
|
Section 3.01(n)(iii) |
person
|
|
Section 8.03(f) |
Proxy Statement
|
|
Section 3.01(d) |
Real Property Leases
|
|
Section 3.01(n)(ii) |
A-37
|
|
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
Real Property Subleases
|
|
Section 3.01(n)(v) |
Release
|
|
Section 3.01(j)(ii) |
Representatives
|
|
Section 4.02(a) |
Required Financial Information
|
|
Section 5.09(b) |
Restraints
|
|
Section 6.01(c) |
SEC
|
|
Section 3.01 |
SEC Documents
|
|
Section 3.01(e) |
Section 262
|
|
Section 2.01(d) |
Securities Act
|
|
Section 3.01(e) |
Specified Contract
|
|
Section 3.01(i) |
Specified Person
|
|
Section 5.06(d) |
Sponsor Entities
|
|
Preamble |
Sponsor Material Adverse Effect
|
|
Section 8.03(g) |
Sponsor Termination Fee
|
|
Section 5.06(c) |
Stockholder Approval
|
|
Section 3.01(q) |
Stockholders Meeting
|
|
Section 5.01(b) |
Subsidiary
|
|
Section 8.03(h) |
Superior Proposal
|
|
Section 4.02(a) |
Surviving Corporation
|
|
Section 1.01 |
Takeover Proposal
|
|
Section 4.02(a) |
tax return
|
|
Section 3.01(m)(v) |
taxes
|
|
Section 3.01(m)(v) |
Termination Fee
|
|
Section 5.06(b) |
Voting Company Debt
|
|
Section 3.01(c) |
A-38
ANNEX B
FIRST AMENDMENT TO
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER (this
Amendment) is made as of this 1st day of
September, 2006, among Bain Paste Mergerco, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (Bain MergerCo), Blackstone Paste
Mergerco, Inc., a Delaware corporation (Blackstone
MergerCo and, together with Bain MergerCo,
MergerCos), Bain Paste Finco, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company (Bain FinCo),
Blackstone Paste Finco, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company (Blackstone FinCo and, together with
Bain Finco, FinCos; MergerCos and Fincos,
collectively, the Sponsor Entities), and
Michaels Stores, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
Company).
WHEREAS, the Sponsor Entities and the Company entered
into a certain Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of
June 30, 2006 (the Merger Agreement);
WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement
the Company and the Sponsor Entities have agreed to use their
reasonable best efforts to assist and cooperate with the other
parties to the Merger Agreement in doing all things necessary,
proper or advisable to consummate and make effective, in the
most expeditious manner practicable, the Merger and the other
transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement;
WHEREAS, the Sponsor Entities have requested the Company
to enter into this Amendment in order to facilitate the
consummation by the Sponsor Entities of the Merger and the other
transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Equity Financing Commitments remain in full
force and effect, notwithstanding the execution and delivery of
this Amendment, and the Funds are obligated, subject to the
terms and conditions of the Equity Financing Commitments, to
provide the full amount of the equity contribution set forth
therein, notwithstanding that, following the effectiveness of
this Amendment, (i) the Rollover Shares will not be paid
the Merger Consideration but will continue to be outstanding as
shares of the Surviving Corporation Common Stock and
(ii) the Rollover Options will not be converted into the
right to receive cash but will continue to be outstanding as
options to acquire shares of the Surviving Corporation Common
Stock.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, mutual
covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties hereto
hereby agree as follows:
1. Definitions. All capitalized terms not
otherwise defined herein shall have the respective meanings
ascribed to them in the Merger Agreement.
2. Amendment of Merger Agreement. Effective
as of the date hereof, the Merger Agreement is hereby amended as
follows:
|
|
|
2.1. Amendment of First
Recital. The first recital to the Merger Agreement is
hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: |
|
|
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company and each
MergerCo has approved and declared advisable, and the Board of
Managers of each Finco has approved, this Agreement and the
merger of each MergerCo with and into the Company (the
Merger), upon the terms and subject to the
conditions set forth in this Agreement, whereby each issued and
outstanding share of common stock, par value $0.10 per
share, of the Company (Company Common Stock),
other than (a) shares of Company Common Stock directly
owned by the Company, as treasury stock, or by any Sponsor
Entity, (b) the Appraisal Shares and (c) the Rollover
Shares will be converted into the right to receive $44.00 in
cash ; |
B-1
|
|
|
2.2. Amendment of
Section 2.01(a). Section 2.01(a) of the Merger
Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as
follows: |
|
|
|
(a) Capital Stock of MergerCos. Each share
of capital stock of each MergerCo (the MergerCo
Shares) issued and outstanding immediately prior to
the Effective Time shall be converted into and become one
validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable share of the common
stock, par value $0.10 per share, of the Surviving
Corporation (the Surviving Corporation Common
Stock). |
|
|
|
2.3. Amendment of
Section 2.01(c). Section 2.01(c) of the Merger
Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as
follows: |
|
|
|
(c) Conversion of Company Common Stock. Each
share of Company Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately
prior to the Effective Time (including shares of Company
Restricted Stock, but excluding (i) shares to be canceled
in accordance with Section 2.01(b), (ii) except as
provided in Section 2.01(d), the Appraisal Shares and
(iii) the Rollover Shares) shall be converted into the
right to receive $44.00 in cash, without interest (the
Merger Consideration). At the Effective Time,
all such shares of Company Common Stock shall no longer be
outstanding and shall automatically be canceled and shall cease
to exist, and each holder of a certificate that immediately
prior to the Effective Time represented any such shares of
Company Common Stock (each, a Certificate)
shall cease to have any rights with respect thereto, except the
right to receive the Merger Consideration and any dividends
declared in accordance with Section 4.01(a) with a record
date prior to the Effective Time that remain unpaid at the
Effective Time and that are due to such holder. |
|
|
|
2.4. Addition of
Section 2.01(e). A new Section 2.01(e) is
hereby added to the Merger Agreement as follows: |
|
|
|
(e) Rollover Shares. Each share of Company
Common Stock that is issued and outstanding immediately prior to
the Effective Time and that (i) is owned, beneficially or
of record, by any person that is a party to the Rollover
Agreement, in the form previously agreed upon by the Company and
MergerCos (a Non-Employee Rollover
Agreement), or, with respect to any person that is an
employee of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, an Employee
Rollover Agreement, in the form to be agreed upon by the Company
and MergerCos (an Employee Rollover
Agreement), and (ii) is contemplated by any
Non-Employee Rollover Agreement or any Employee Rollover
Agreement, as the case may be, to continue outstanding as a
share of the Surviving Corporation Common Stock (a
Rollover Share), shall remain outstanding as
a validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable share of the
Surviving Corporation Common Stock. |
|
|
|
2.5. Amendment of
Section 2.02. Section 2.02 of the Merger
Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as
follows: |
|
|
|
SECTION 2.02. Exchange Fund.
(a) Paying Agent. Prior to the Closing Date, the
Sponsor Entities shall appoint a bank or trust company
reasonably acceptable to the Company to act as paying agent (the
Paying Agent) for the payment of the Merger
Consideration and the Option Amounts in accordance with this
Article II and, in connection therewith, shall enter into
an agreement with the Paying Agent in a form reasonably
acceptable to the Company. At or prior to the Effective Time,
the Sponsor Entities shall deposit, or shall cause the Surviving
Corporation to deposit, with the Paying Agent, cash in an amount
sufficient to pay the aggregate Merger Consideration and the
aggregate Option Amount, in each case as required to be paid
pursuant to this Agreement (such cash being hereinafter referred
to as the Exchange Fund). |
|
|
(b) Certificate Exchange Procedures. As
promptly as practicable after the Effective Time, but in any
event within two business days thereafter, the Surviving
Corporation shall cause the Paying Agent to mail to each holder
of record of a Certificate (i) a letter of transmittal
(which shall specify that delivery shall be effected, and risk
of loss and title to the Certificates shall pass, only upon
proper delivery of the Certificates to the Paying Agent and
which shall otherwise be in |
B-2
|
|
|
customary form) and (ii) instructions for use in effecting
the surrender of the Certificates in exchange for the Merger
Consideration. Each holder of record of a Certificate shall,
upon surrender to the Paying Agent of such Certificate, together
with such letter of transmittal, duly executed, and such other
documents as may reasonably be required by the Paying Agent, be
entitled to receive in exchange therefor the amount of cash
which the number of shares of Company Common Stock previously
represented by such Certificate shall have been converted into
the right to receive pursuant to Section 2.01(c), and the
Certificate so surrendered shall forthwith be canceled. In the
event of a transfer of ownership of Company Common Stock which
is not registered in the transfer records of the Company,
payment of the Merger Consideration may be made to a person
other than the person in whose name the Certificate so
surrendered is registered if such Certificate shall be properly
endorsed or otherwise be in proper form for transfer and the
person requesting such payment shall pay any fiduciary or surety
bonds or any transfer or other similar taxes required by reason
of the payment of the Merger Consideration to a person other
than the registered holder of such Certificate or establish to
the reasonable satisfaction of the Surviving Corporation that
such tax has been paid or is not applicable. Until surrendered
as contemplated by this Section 2.02(b), each Certificate
shall be deemed at any time after the Effective Time to
represent only the right to receive upon such surrender the
Merger Consideration which the holder thereof has the right to
receive in respect of such Certificate pursuant to this
Article II and any dividends declared in accordance with
Section 4.01(a) with a record date prior to the Effective
Time that remain unpaid at the Effective Time and that are due
to such holder. No interest shall be paid or will accrue on any
cash payable to holders of Certificates pursuant to the
provisions of this Article II. |
|
|
(c) Surrender of Rollover Shares and MergerCo
Shares. Each holder of a certificate representing the
Rollover Shares or the MergerCo Shares, upon surrender to the
Surviving Corporation of such certificate and such other
documents as may reasonably be required by the Surviving
Corporation, shall be entitled to receive a certificate or
certificates representing the number of shares of Surviving
Corporation Common Stock to which such holder is entitled
pursuant to Section 2.01(a) or 2.01(e), as applicable, and
the certificates so surrendered shall forthwith be canceled. |
|
|
(d) No Further Ownership Rights in Company Common
Stock. All cash paid upon the surrender of Certificates
in accordance with the terms of this Article II shall be
deemed to have been paid in full satisfaction of all rights
pertaining to the shares of Company Common Stock formerly
represented by such Certificates, subject,
however, to the Surviving Corporations obligation
to pay all dividends that may have been declared by the Company
in accordance with Section 4.01(a) and that remain unpaid
at the Effective Time. At the close of business on the day on
which the Effective Time occurs, the stock transfer books of the
Company shall be closed and there shall be no further
registration of transfers on the stock transfer books of the
Surviving Corporation of the shares of Company Common Stock that
were outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time. If,
after the close of business on the day on which the Effective
Time occurs, any Certificate or any certificate representing any
Rollover Shares is presented to the Surviving Corporation for
transfer, it shall be canceled and exchanged as provided in this
Article II. |
|
|
(e) Termination of the Exchange Fund. Any
portion of the Exchange Fund that remains undistributed to the
holders of the Certificates for 12 months after the
Effective Time shall be delivered to the Surviving Corporation,
upon demand, and any holders of the Certificates who have not
theretofore complied with this Article II shall thereafter
look only to the Surviving Corporation for, and the Surviving
Corporation shall remain liable for, payment of their claims for
the Merger Consideration pursuant to the provisions of this
Article II. |
|
|
(f) No Liability. None of the Company, the
Surviving Corporation, the Sponsor Entities or the Paying Agent
shall be liable to any person in respect of any cash from the
Exchange Fund delivered to a public official in compliance with
any applicable state, Federal or other abandoned property,
escheat or similar Law. If any Certificate shall not have been
surrendered prior to the date on which the related Merger
Consideration would escheat to or become the property of any |
B-3
|
|
|
Governmental Entity, any such Merger Consideration shall, to the
extent permitted by applicable Law, immediately prior to such
time become the property of the Surviving Corporation, free and
clear of all claims or interest of any person previously
entitled thereto. |
|
|
(g) Investment of Exchange Fund. The Paying
Agent shall invest the cash in the Exchange Fund as directed by
the Surviving Corporation; provided, however, that
such investments shall be in obligations of or guaranteed by the
United States of America or any agency or instrumentality
thereof and backed by the full faith and credit of the United
States of America, in commercial paper obligations rated A-1 or
P-1 or better by Moodys Investors Service, Inc. or
Standard & Poors Corporation, respectively, or in
certificates of deposit, bank repurchase agreements or
bankers acceptances of commercial banks with capital
exceeding $1.0 billion (based on the most recent financial
statements of such bank that are then publicly available). Any
interest and other income resulting from such investments shall
be paid solely to the Surviving Corporation. Nothing contained
herein and no investment losses resulting from investment of the
Exchange Fund shall diminish the rights of any holder of
Certificates to receive the Merger Consideration or any holder
of a Company Stock Option to receive the Option Amount, in each
case as provided herein. |
|
|
(h) Lost Certificates. If any Certificate or
certificate representing any Rollover Shares shall have been
lost, stolen or destroyed, upon the making of an affidavit of
that fact by the person claiming such certificate to be lost,
stolen or destroyed and, if required by the Surviving
Corporation, the posting by such person of a bond or surety in
such reasonable amount as the Surviving Corporation may direct
as indemnity against any claim that may be made against it with
respect to such certificate, (i) the Paying Agent shall
deliver in exchange for such lost, stolen or destroyed
Certificate the applicable Merger Consideration with respect
thereto or (ii) the Surviving Corporation shall issue a
certificate or certificates representing the number of shares of
Surviving Corporation Common Stock as provided in
Section 2.01(e) represented by such lost, stolen or
destroyed certificate representing Rollover Shares. |
|
|
(i) Withholding Rights. The Surviving
Corporation or the Paying Agent shall be entitled to deduct and
withhold from the consideration otherwise payable pursuant to
this Agreement to any holder of shares of Company Common Stock
or any holder of a Company Stock Option such amounts as the
Surviving Corporation or the Paying Agent are required to deduct
and withhold with respect to the making of such payment under
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
Code), or any provision of state, local or
foreign tax Law. To the extent that amounts are so withheld and
paid over to the appropriate taxing authority by the Surviving
Corporation or the Paying Agent, such withheld amounts shall be
treated for all purposes of this Agreement as having been paid
to the holder of the shares of Company Common Stock or the
holder of the Company Stock Option, as the case may be, in
respect of which such deduction and withholding was made by the
Surviving Corporation or the Paying Agent. |
|
|
|
2.6. Amendment of
Section 2.03(a). Section 2.03(a) of the Merger
Agreement is hereby amended by inserting (other than the
Rollover Options) after the first reference therein to
Company Stock Options. |
|
|
2.7. Addition of
Section 2.03(c). A new Section 2.03(c) is
hereby added to the Merger Agreement as follows: |
|
|
|
(c) Rollover Options. Each unexercised
Company Stock Option that is outstanding immediately prior to
the Effective Time and that (i) is held by any person that
is a party to an Employee Rollover Agreement and (ii) is
contemplated by such Employee Rollover Agreement to remain
outstanding as an option to acquire shares of the Surviving
Corporation Common Stock (a Rollover Option)
shall not be converted into the right to receive cash pursuant
to Section 2.03(a) and shall remain outstanding as an
option to acquire shares of the Surviving Corporation Common
Stock, with such changes thereto as are described in such
Employee Rollover Agreement. |
B-4
|
|
|
2.8. Amendment of
Section 5.09(a). Section 5.09(a) of the Merger
Agreement is hereby amended by inserting the following sentence
at the end thereof: |
|
|
MergerCos shall take all actions to ensure that each
Rollover Share represents, immediately after the Effective Time,
value per share equivalent to the Merger Consideration and, in
furtherance of the foregoing, that portion of the shares of the
Surviving Corporation Common Stock issued and outstanding
immediately after the Effective Time equal to a quotient
obtained by dividing $44.00 by the aggregate amount of the
equity financing of the Merger (including the Rollover Shares,
valued at the Merger Consideration) and the other transactions
contemplated hereby. |
3. No Breach by the Company. Each of the
Sponsor Entities hereby agrees that no representation or
warranty of the Company set forth in the Merger Agreement shall
be deemed to be inaccurate, whether as of the date of the Merger
Agreement or as of the Closing Date, and no covenant or
agreement of the Company set forth in the Merger Agreement shall
be deemed to be breached, in each case, as a result of the
Company having entered into, or contemplating entering into, any
Non-Employee Rollover Agreement or any Employee Rollover
Agreement.
4. Governing Law. This Amendment shall be
governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the
State of Delaware, regardless of the laws that might otherwise
govern under applicable principles of conflicts of laws thereof.
5. Counterparts. This Amendment may be
executed in one or more counterparts (including by facsimile),
all of which shall be considered one and the same agreement and
shall become effective when one or more counterparts have been
signed by each of the parties and delivered to the other parties.
6. Effect of this Amendment; No Other
Modifications. From and after the date of this
Amendment, all references in the Merger Agreement to this
Agreement, hereof, herein,
hereunder and words or expressions of similar import
shall be deemed to be references to the Merger Agreement as
amended by this Agreement, provided that, for the
avoidance of doubt, all references to the date
hereof, the date of this Agreement and words
and expressions of similar import shall refer to June 30,
2006. Except as amended hereby, the terms and conditions of the
Merger Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.
B-5
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Bain MergerCo, Blackstone MergerCo, Bain
FinCo, Blackstone FinCo and the Company have caused this
Amendment to be signed by their respective officers thereunto
duly authorized, all as of the date first written above.
|
|
|
BAIN PASTE MERGERCO, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
Name: Matthew S. Levin |
|
Title: President |
|
|
BLACKSTONE PASTE MERGERCO, INC. |
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Matthew S. Kabaker |
|
|
|
|
|
Name: Matthew S. Kabaker |
|
Title: Vice President, Secretary & Treasurer |
|
|
BAIN PASTE FINCO, LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
Name: Matthew S. Levin |
|
Title: President |
|
|
BLACKSTONE PASTE FINCO, LLC |
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Matthew S. Kabaker |
|
|
|
|
|
Name: Matthew S. Kabaker |
|
Title: Vice President, Secretary & Treasurer |
|
|
MICHAELS STORES, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
Name: Jeffrey N. Boyer |
|
Title: President and Chief Financial Officer |
B-6
ANNEX C
June 30, 2006
The Board of Directors
Michaels Stores, Inc.
8000 Bent Branch Drive
Irving, Texas 75063
Members of the Board of Directors:
You have requested our opinion as to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, to the holders of common stock, par
value $0.10 per share (the Company Common
Stock), of Michaels Stores, Inc. (the Company)
of the consideration to be received by such holders in the
proposed merger (the Merger) of the Company with
BAIN PASTE MERGERCO, INC., a Delaware corporation (Bain
MergerCo) and BLACKSTONE PASTE MERGERCO, INC., a Delaware
corporation (Blackstone MergerCo and, together with
Bain MergerCo, the MergerCos). Pursuant to the
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 30, 2006
(the Agreement), among the Company, the MergerCos,
BAIN PASTE FINCO, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
(Bain FinCo), and BLACKSTONE PASTE FINCO, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company (Blackstone FinCo
and, together with Bain FinCo, the FinCos; the
MergerCos and the FinCos, collectively, the Sponsor
Entities), each MergerCo will merge with and into the
Company, and each outstanding share of Company Common Stock,
other than shares of Company Common Stock held in treasury or
owned by any Sponsor Entity and other than Appraisal Shares (as
defined in the Agreement), will be converted into the right to
receive $44.00 per share in cash.
In arriving at our opinion, we have (i) reviewed the
Agreement; (ii) reviewed certain publicly available
business and financial information concerning the Company and
the industries in which it operates; (iii) compared the
proposed financial terms of the Merger with the publicly
available financial terms of certain transactions involving
companies we deemed relevant and the consideration received for
such companies; (iv) compared the financial and operating
performance of the Company with publicly available information
concerning certain other companies we deemed relevant and
reviewed the current and historical market prices of the Company
Common Stock and certain publicly traded securities of such
other companies; (v) reviewed certain internal financial
analyses and forecasts prepared by the management of the Company
relating to its business; and (vi) performed such other
financial studies and analyses and considered such other
information as we deemed appropriate for the purposes of this
opinion.
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. 277
Park Avenue, New York, NY 10172
In addition, we have held discussions with certain members of
the management of the Company with respect to certain aspects of
the Merger, and the past and current business operations of the
Company, the financial condition and future prospects and
operations of the Company, and certain other matters we believed
necessary or appropriate to our inquiry.
In giving our opinion, we have relied upon and assumed, without
assuming responsibility or liability for independent
verification, the accuracy and completeness of all information
that was publicly available or was furnished to or discussed
with us by the Company or otherwise reviewed by or for us. We
have not conducted or been provided with any valuation or
appraisal of any assets or liabilities, nor have we evaluated
the solvency of the Company or the MergerCos under any state or
federal laws relating to bankruptcy, insolvency or similar
matters. In relying on financial analyses and forecasts provided
to us, we have assumed that they have been reasonably prepared
based on assumptions reflecting the best currently available
estimates and judgments by management as to the expected future
results of operations and financial condition of the Company to
which such analyses or forecasts relate. We express no view as
to such analyses or forecasts or the assumptions on
C-1
which they were based. We have also assumed that the Merger and
the other transactions contemplated by the Agreement will be
consummated as described in the Agreement. We have relied as to
all legal matters relevant to rendering our opinion upon the
advice of counsel. We have further assumed that all material
governmental, regulatory or other consents and approvals
necessary for the consummation of the Merger will be obtained
without any adverse effect on the Company.
Our opinion is necessarily based on economic, market and other
conditions as in effect on, and the information made available
to us as of, the date hereof. It should be understood that
subsequent developments may affect this opinion and that we do
not have any obligation to update, revise, or reaffirm this
opinion. Our opinion is limited to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, of the consideration to be received by
the holders of the Company Common Stock in the proposed Merger
and we express no opinion as to the fairness of the Merger to,
or any consideration of, the holders of any other class of
securities, creditors or other constituencies of the Company or
as to the underlying decision by the Company to engage in the
Merger.
We have acted as financial advisor to the Company with respect
to the proposed Merger and will receive a fee from the Company
for our services if the proposed Merger is consummated. In
addition, the Company has agreed to indemnify us for certain
liabilities arising out of our engagement. We acted as joint
lead arranger and bookrunner of the Companys revolving
credit facility in October 2005 and our commercial bank
affiliate is a lender thereunder. In addition, we and our
affiliates have provided a variety of services to affiliates of
the Sponsor Entities, Bain Capital and The Blackstone Group, and
their respective affiliates. All such services were performed
for customary compensation. In addition, we and our affiliates
offered financing terms to potential acquirors of the Company
(including Bain Capital and The Blackstone Group and their
affiliates) and may arrange and/or provide financing of the
Merger consideration for the Sponsor Entities, Bain Capital and
The Blackstone Group and their respective affiliates. In the
ordinary course of our businesses, we and our affiliates may
actively trade the debt and equity securities of the Company or
affiliates of Bain Capital or The Blackstone Group for our own
account or for the accounts of customers and, accordingly, we
may at any time hold long or short positions in such securities.
We and certain of our affiliates and certain of our and their
respective employees and certain private investment funds
affiliated or associated with us have invested in private equity
funds managed or advised by The Blackstone Group.
On the basis of and subject to the foregoing, it is our opinion
as of the date hereof that the consideration to be received by
the holders of the Company Common Stock in the proposed Merger
is fair, from a financial point of view, to such holders.
This letter is provided to the Board of Directors of the Company
in connection with and for the purposes of its evaluation of the
Merger. This opinion does not constitute a recommendation to any
shareholder of the Company as to how such shareholder should
vote with respect to the Merger or any other matter. This
opinion may not be disclosed, referred to, or communicated (in
whole or in part) to any third party for any purpose whatsoever,
except to the Sponsor Entities as required under the Agreement
or with our prior written approval. This opinion may be
reproduced in full in any proxy or information statement mailed
to shareholders of the Company but may not otherwise be
disclosed publicly in any manner without our prior written
approval.
Very truly yours,
J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES INC.
C-2
ANNEX D
Goldman, Sachs & Co. | 85 Broad Stree t| New
York, New York 10004
Tel: 212-902-1000 Fax: 212-902-3000
PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL
June 30, 2006
Board of Directors
Special Committee of the Board of Directors
Michaels Stores, Inc.
8000 Bent Branch Drive
Irving, TX 75063
Ladies and Gentlemen:
You have requested our opinion as to the fairness from a
financial point of view to the holders of the outstanding shares
of common stock, par value $0.10 per share (the
Shares), of Michaels Stores, Inc. (the
Company) of the $44.00 per Share in cash to be
received by such holders pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of
Merger, dated as of June 30, 2006 (the
Agreement), among Bain Paste Mergerco, Inc., an
affiliate of Bain Capital LLC (Bain), Blackstone
Paste Mergerco, Inc., an affiliate of The Blackstone Group LP
(Blackstone), Bain Paste Finco, LLC, an affiliate of
Bain, Blackstone Paste Finco, LLC, an affiliate of Blackstone,
and the Company.
Goldman, Sachs & Co. and its affiliates, as part of
their investment banking business, are continually engaged in
performing financial analyses with respect to businesses and
their securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions,
negotiated underwritings, competitive biddings, secondary
distributions of listed and unlisted securities, private
placements and other transactions as well as for estate,
corporate and other purposes. We have acted as financial advisor
to the Special Committee of the Board of Directors of the
Company (the Special Committee) in connection with
the transactions contemplated by the Agreement (the
Transaction). We expect to receive fees for our
services in connection with the Transaction, the principal
portion of which is contingent upon consummation of the
Transaction, and the Company has agreed to reimburse our
expenses and indemnify us against certain liabilities arising
out of our engagement.
In addition, we have provided and are currently providing
certain investment banking services to Bain and its affiliates
and portfolio companies, including having acted as joint lead
manager with respect to the high yield offering by Houghton
Mifflin Company, a portfolio company of Bain (Houghton
Mifflin), of its 8.250% Senior Notes due 2011
(aggregate principal amount $1,000,000,000) in January 2003;
having acted as lead manager with respect to the high yield
offering by Sealy Corporation, a former portfolio company of
Bain (Sealy), of its 9.875% Senior Sub Notes
due 2007 (aggregate principal amount $50,000,000) in April 2003;
having acted as co-manager with respect to the high yield
offering by Dominos Pizza LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary
of Dominos Pizza Inc., an affiliate of Bain
(Dominos), of its
81/4% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2011 (aggregate principal amount
$403,000,000) in June 2003; having acted as co-manager with
respect to the high yield offering by Houghton Mifflin of its
111/2% Senior
Discount Notes due 2013 (aggregate principal amount
$265,000,000) in September 2003; having acted as co-financial
advisor to Sealy in connection with its sale in April 2004;
having extended a bank loan (aggregate principal amount
$70,000,000) to Maxim Crane Works, a portfolio company of Bain,
in July 2004; having acted as financial advisor to Modus Media
International Holdings, a former portfolio company of Bain, in
connection with its sale in August 2004; having acted as
financial advisor to Bain Capital (Europe) Limited, an affiliate
of Bain, in connection with its acquisition of Framatome
Connectors International in November 2005; having extended a
bank loan (aggregate principal amount of $100,000,000) to
Dominos in March 2006; having extended a bank loan
(aggregate principal amount $1,350,000,000) to Sensata
Technologies BV, a portfolio company of Bain
(Sensata), in April 2006; having acted as a joint
bookrunner with respect to the high yield offering by Sensata of
its 8.00% Senior Notes due 2014 and 9.00% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2016 (aggregate
D-1
principal amount $752,000,000) in April 2006; having acted as a
manager with respect to the high yield offering by Houghton
Mifflin of its Floating Rate Senior PIK Notes due 2011
(aggregate principal amount $300,000,000) in May 2006; having
extended a bank loan (aggregate principal amount $650,000,000)
to Cumulus Media Partners LLC, a portfolio company of Bain
(Cumulus), in connection with its acquisition of
Susquehanna Broadcasting Company in April 2006; and having acted
as a joint book runner with respect to the high yield offering
by Cumulus of its 9.875% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014
(aggregate principal amount $250,000,000) in May 2006.
In addition, we have provided and are currently providing
certain investment banking services to Blackstone and its
affiliates and portfolio companies, including having acted as
principal agent with respect to the mortgage financing
(aggregate principal amount $120,000,000) of a property owned by
affiliates of Blackstone in August 2003; having acted as
joint-lead managing underwriter with respect to the public
offering of 12,102,600 ordinary shares of Aspen Insurance UK
Limited, a portfolio company of Blackstone, in December 2003;
having acted as lead managing underwriter with respect to the
public offering of 24,137,931 shares of common stock of TRW
Automotive Inc., a portfolio company of Blackstone, in February
2004; having acted as financial advisor to an affiliate of
Blackstone in connection with the acquisition of Celanese AG in
April 2004; having acted as co-lead managing underwriter with
respect to the high yield offering by Graham Packaging Company,
a portfolio company of Blackstone (Graham), of its
8.5% Notes due 2012 and 9.875% Notes due 2014
(aggregate principal amount $625,000,000) in September 2004;
having acted as co-financial advisor to Graham in connection
with its acquisition of a business unit of Owens-Illinois, Inc.
in July 2004; having acted as lead managing underwriter with
respect to the public offering of 51,111,111 shares of
common stock of Nalco Holding Company, a portfolio company of
Blackstone (Nalco) in November 2004; having acted as
co-managing underwriter with respect to the public offering of
9,600,000 shares of 4.25% convertible perpetual
preferred stock of Celanese Corp., a portfolio company of
Blackstone (Celanese), in January 2005; having acted
as co-managing underwriter with respect to the public offering
of 50,000,000 shares of Series A common stock of
Celanese in January 2005; having acted as joint lead managing
underwriter with respect to the public offering of
13,684,100 shares of common stock of New Skies Satellites
NV, a portfolio company of Blackstone (New Skies),
in May 2005; having acted as joint lead managing underwriter
with respect to the public offering of 33,350,000 shares of
common stock of Nalco in August 2005; having acted as financial
advisor to New Skies in connection with its sale in December
2005; and having acted as a lead underwriter with respect to the
public offering of 35,000,000 shares of Series A
common stock of Celanese in May 2006.
We may also provide investment banking services to the Company
and its affiliates and Bain, Blackstone and their respective
affiliates and portfolio companies in the future. In connection
with the above-described investment banking services we have
received, and may receive, compensation. Affiliates of Goldman,
Sachs & Co. have co-invested with Bain, Blackstone and
their respective affiliates from time to time and may do so in
the future.
Goldman, Sachs & Co. is a full service securities firm
engaged, either directly or through its affiliates, in
securities trading, investment management, financial planning
and benefits counseling, risk management, hedging, financing and
brokerage activities for both companies and individuals. In the
ordinary course of these activities, Goldman, Sachs &
Co. and its affiliates may provide such services to the Company
and its affiliates and Bain, Blackstone and their respective
affiliates and portfolio companies, may actively trade the debt
and equity securities (or related derivative securities) of the
Company and affiliates and portfolio companies of Bain and
Blackstone for their own account and for the accounts of their
customers and may at any time hold long and short positions of
such securities.
In connection with this opinion, we have reviewed, among other
things, the Agreement; annual reports to stockholders and Annual
Reports on
Form 10-K of the
Company for the five fiscal years ended January 28, 2006;
certain interim reports to stockholders and Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q of the
Company; certain other communications from the Company to its
stockholders; and certain internal financial analyses and
forecasts for the Company prepared by its management (the
Forecasts). We also have held discussions with
members of the senior management of the Company regarding their
assessment of the past and current business operations,
financial condition and future prospects of the Company. In
addition, we have reviewed
D-2
the reported price and trading activity for the Shares, compared
certain financial and stock market information for the Company
with similar information for certain other companies the
securities of which are publicly traded, reviewed the financial
terms of certain recent business combinations in the retail
industry specifically and in other industries generally and
performed such other studies and analyses, and considered such
other factors, as we considered appropriate.
We have relied upon the accuracy and completeness of all of the
financial, accounting, legal, tax and other information
discussed with or reviewed by us and have assumed such accuracy
and completeness for purposes of rendering this opinion. In that
regard, we have assumed with your consent that the Forecasts
have been reasonably prepared on a basis reflecting the best
currently available estimates and judgments of the Company. In
addition, we have not made an independent evaluation or
appraisal of the assets and liabilities (including any
contingent, derivative or off-balance-sheet assets and
liabilities) of the Company or any of its subsidiaries and we
have not been furnished with any such evaluation or appraisal.
Our opinion does not address the underlying business decision of
the Company to engage in the Transaction. Our opinion is
necessarily based on economic, monetary, market and other
conditions as in effect on, and the information made available
to us as of, the date hereof. Our advisory services and the
opinion expressed herein are provided for the information and
assistance of the Special Committee and the Board of Directors
of the Company in connection with their consideration of the
Transaction and such opinion does not constitute a
recommendation as to how any holder of the Shares should vote
with respect to the Transaction.
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, it is our opinion that,
as of the date hereof, the $44.00 per Share in cash to be
received by the holders of the Shares pursuant to the Agreement
is fair from a financial point of view to such holders.
Very truly yours,
/s/ GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO.
(GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO.)
D-3
ANNEX E
GENERAL CORPORATION LAW OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
§ 262. Appraisal rights.
(a) Any stockholder of a corporation of this State who
holds shares of stock on the date of the making of a demand
pursuant to subsection (d) of this section with
respect to such shares, who continuously holds such shares
through the effective date of the merger or consolidation, who
has otherwise complied with subsection (d) of this
section and who has neither voted in favor of the merger or
consolidation nor consented thereto in writing pursuant to
§ 228 of this title shall be entitled to an appraisal
by the Court of Chancery of the fair value of the
stockholders shares of stock under the circumstances
described in subsections (b) and (c) of this section.
As used in this section, the word stockholder means
a holder of record of stock in a stock corporation and also a
member of record of a nonstock corporation; the words
stock and share mean and include what is
ordinarily meant by those words and also membership or
membership interest of a member of a nonstock corporation; and
the words depository receipt mean a receipt or other
instrument issued by a depository representing an interest in
one or more shares, or fractions thereof, solely of stock of a
corporation, which stock is deposited with the depository.
(b) Appraisal rights shall be available for the shares of
any class or series of stock of a constituent corporation in a
merger or consolidation to be effected pursuant to
§ 251 (other than a merger effected pursuant to
§ 251(g) of this title), § 252,
§ 254, § 257, § 258,
§ 263 or § 264 of this title:
|
|
|
(1) Provided, however, that no appraisal rights under this
section shall be available for the shares of any class or series
of stock, which stock, or depository receipts in respect
thereof, at the record date fixed to determine the stockholders
entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the meeting of
stockholders to act upon the agreement of merger or
consolidation, were either (i) listed on a national
securities exchange or designated as a national market system
security on an interdealer quotation system by the National
Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. or (ii) held of
record by more than 2,000 holders; and further provided that no
appraisal rights shall be available for any shares of stock of
the constituent corporation surviving a merger if the merger did
not require for its approval the vote of the stockholders of the
surviving corporation as provided in subsection (f) of
§ 251 of this title. |
|
|
(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1) of this
subsection, appraisal rights under this section shall be
available for the shares of any class or series of stock of a
constituent corporation if the holders thereof are required by
the terms of an agreement of merger or consolidation pursuant to
§§ 251, 252, 254, 257, 258, 263 and 264 of this
title to accept for such stock anything except: |
|
|
|
a. Shares of stock of the corporation surviving or
resulting from such merger or consolidation, or depository
receipts in respect thereof; |
|
|
b. Shares of stock of any other corporation, or depository
receipts in respect thereof, which shares of stock (or
depository receipts in respect thereof) or depository receipts
at the effective date of the merger or consolidation will be
either listed on a national securities exchange or designated as
a national market system security on an interdealer quotation
system by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
or held of record by more than 2,000 holders; |
|
|
c. Cash in lieu of fractional shares or fractional
depository receipts described in the foregoing subparagraphs a.
and b. of this paragraph; or |
|
|
d. Any combination of the shares of stock, depository
receipts and cash in lieu of fractional shares or fractional
depository receipts described in the foregoing subparagraphs a.,
b. and c. of this paragraph. |
|
|
|
(3) In the event all of the stock of a subsidiary Delaware
corporation party to a merger effected under § 253 of
this title is not owned by the parent corporation immediately
prior to the merger, appraisal rights shall be available for the
shares of the subsidiary Delaware corporation. |
E-1
(c) Any corporation may provide in its certificate of
incorporation that appraisal rights under this section shall be
available for the shares of any class or series of its stock as
a result of an amendment to its certificate of incorporation,
any merger or consolidation in which the corporation is a
constituent corporation or the sale of all or substantially all
of the assets of the corporation. If the certificate of
incorporation contains such a provision, the procedures of this
section, including those set forth in subsections (d) and
(e) of this section, shall apply as nearly as is
practicable.
(d) Appraisal rights shall be perfected as follows:
|
|
|
(1) If a proposed merger or consolidation for which
appraisal rights are provided under this section is to be
submitted for approval at a meeting of stockholders, the
corporation, not less than 20 days prior to the meeting,
shall notify each of its stockholders who was such on the record
date for such meeting with respect to shares for which appraisal
rights are available pursuant to subsection (b) or
(c) hereof that appraisal rights are available for any or
all of the shares of the constituent corporations, and shall
include in such notice a copy of this section. Each stockholder
electing to demand the appraisal of such stockholders
shares shall deliver to the corporation, before the taking of
the vote on the merger or consolidation, a written demand for
appraisal of such stockholders shares. Such demand will be
sufficient if it reasonably informs the corporation of the
identity of the stockholder and that the stockholder intends
thereby to demand the appraisal of such stockholders
shares. A proxy or vote against the merger or consolidation
shall not constitute such a demand. A stockholder electing to
take such action must do so by a separate written demand as
herein provided. Within 10 days after the effective date of
such merger or consolidation, the surviving or resulting
corporation shall notify each stockholder of each constituent
corporation who has complied with this subsection and has not
voted in favor of or consented to the merger or consolidation of
the date that the merger or consolidation has become
effective; or |
|
|
(2) If the merger or consolidation was approved pursuant to
§ 228 or § 253 of this title, then either a
constituent corporation before the effective date of the merger
or consolidation or the surviving or resulting corporation
within 10 days thereafter shall notify each of the holders
of any class or series of stock of such constituent corporation
who are entitled to appraisal rights of the approval of the
merger or consolidation and that appraisal rights are available
for any or all shares of such class or series of stock of such
constituent corporation, and shall include in such notice a copy
of this section. Such notice may, and, if given on or after the
effective date of the merger or consolidation, shall, also
notify such stockholders of the effective date of the merger or
consolidation. Any stockholder entitled to appraisal rights may,
within 20 days after the date of mailing of such notice,
demand in writing from the surviving or resulting corporation
the appraisal of such holders shares. Such demand will be
sufficient if it reasonably informs the corporation of the
identity of the stockholder and that the stockholder intends
thereby to demand the appraisal of such holders shares. If
such notice did not notify stockholders of the effective date of
the merger or consolidation, either (i) each such
constituent corporation shall send a second notice before the
effective date of the merger or consolidation notifying each of
the holders of any class or series of stock of such constituent
corporation that are entitled to appraisal rights of the
effective date of the merger or consolidation or (ii) the
surviving or resulting corporation shall send such a second
notice to all such holders on or within 10 days after such
effective date; provided, however, that if such second notice is
sent more than 20 days following the sending of the first
notice, such second notice need only be sent to each stockholder
who is entitled to appraisal rights and who has demanded
appraisal of such holders shares in accordance with this
subsection. An affidavit of the secretary or assistant secretary
or of the transfer agent of the corporation that is required to
give either notice that such notice has been given shall, in the
absence of fraud, be prima facie evidence of the facts stated
therein. For purposes of determining the stockholders entitled
to receive either notice, each constituent corporation may fix,
in advance, a record date that shall be not more than
10 days prior to the date the notice is given, provided,
that if the notice is given on or after the effective date of
the merger or consolidation, the record date shall be such
effective date. If no record date is fixed and the notice is
given prior to the effective date, the record date shall be the
close of business on the day next preceding the day on which the
notice is given. |
(e) Within 120 days after the effective date of the
merger or consolidation, the surviving or resulting corporation
or any stockholder who has complied with subsections
(a) and (d) hereof and who is otherwise
E-2
entitled to appraisal rights, may file a petition in the Court
of Chancery demanding a determination of the value of the stock
of all such stockholders. Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any
time within 60 days after the effective date of the merger
or consolidation, any stockholder shall have the right to
withdraw such stockholders demand for appraisal and to
accept the terms offered upon the merger or consolidation.
Within 120 days after the effective date of the merger or
consolidation, any stockholder who has complied with the
requirements of subsections (a) and (d) hereof, upon
written request, shall be entitled to receive from the
corporation surviving the merger or resulting from the
consolidation a statement setting forth the aggregate number of
shares not voted in favor of the merger or consolidation and
with respect to which demands for appraisal have been received
and the aggregate number of holders of such shares. Such written
statement shall be mailed to the stockholder within 10 days
after such stockholders written request for such a
statement is received by the surviving or resulting corporation
or within 10 days after expiration of the period for
delivery of demands for appraisal under
subsection (d) hereof, whichever is later.
(f) Upon the filing of any such petition by a stockholder,
service of a copy thereof shall be made upon the surviving or
resulting corporation, which shall within 20 days after
such service file in the office of the Register in Chancery in
which the petition was filed a duly verified list containing the
names and addresses of all stockholders who have demanded
payment for their shares and with whom agreements as to the
value of their shares have not been reached by the surviving or
resulting corporation. If the petition shall be filed by the
surviving or resulting corporation, the petition shall be
accompanied by such a duly verified list. The Register in
Chancery, if so ordered by the Court, shall give notice of the
time and place fixed for the hearing of such petition by
registered or certified mail to the surviving or resulting
corporation and to the stockholders shown on the list at the
addresses therein stated. Such notice shall also be given by 1
or more publications at least 1 week before the day of the
hearing, in a newspaper of general circulation published in the
City of Wilmington, Delaware or such publication as the Court
deems advisable. The forms of the notices by mail and by
publication shall be approved by the Court, and the costs
thereof shall be borne by the surviving or resulting corporation.
(g) At the hearing on such petition, the Court shall
determine the stockholders who have complied with this section
and who have become entitled to appraisal rights. The Court may
require the stockholders who have demanded an appraisal for
their shares and who hold stock represented by certificates to
submit their certificates of stock to the Register in Chancery
for notation thereon of the pendency of the appraisal
proceedings; and if any stockholder fails to comply with such
direction, the Court may dismiss the proceedings as to such
stockholder.
(h) After determining the stockholders entitled to an
appraisal, the Court shall appraise the shares, determining
their fair value exclusive of any element of value arising from
the accomplishment or expectation of the merger or
consolidation, together with a fair rate of interest, if any, to
be paid upon the amount determined to be the fair value. In
determining such fair value, the Court shall take into account
all relevant factors. In determining the fair rate of interest,
the Court may consider all relevant factors, including the rate
of interest which the surviving or resulting corporation would
have had to pay to borrow money during the pendency of the
proceeding. Upon application by the surviving or resulting
corporation or by any stockholder entitled to participate in the
appraisal proceeding, the Court may, in its discretion, permit
discovery or other pretrial proceedings and may proceed to trial
upon the appraisal prior to the final determination of the
stockholder entitled to an appraisal. Any stockholder whose name
appears on the list filed by the surviving or resulting
corporation pursuant to subsection (f) of this section
and who has submitted such stockholders certificates of
stock to the Register in Chancery, if such is required, may
participate fully in all proceedings until it is finally
determined that such stockholder is not entitled to appraisal
rights under this section.
(i) The Court shall direct the payment of the fair value of
the shares, together with interest, if any, by the surviving or
resulting corporation to the stockholders entitled thereto.
Interest may be simple or compound, as the Court may direct.
Payment shall be so made to each such stockholder, in the case
of holders of uncertificated stock forthwith, and the case of
holders of shares represented by certificates upon the surrender
to the corporation of the certificates representing such stock.
The Courts decree may be enforced as other decrees in the
Court of Chancery may be enforced, whether such surviving or
resulting corporation be a corporation of this State or of any
state.
E-3
(j) The costs of the proceeding may be determined by the
Court and taxed upon the parties as the Court deems equitable in
the circumstances. Upon application of a stockholder, the Court
may order all or a portion of the expenses incurred by any
stockholder in connection with the appraisal proceeding,
including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys fees
and the fees and expenses of experts, to be charged pro rata
against the value of all the shares entitled to an appraisal.
(k) From and after the effective date of the merger or
consolidation, no stockholder who has demanded appraisal rights
as provided in subsection (d) of this section shall be
entitled to vote such stock for any purpose or to receive
payment of dividends or other distributions on the stock (except
dividends or other distributions payable to stockholders of
record at a date which is prior to the effective date of the
merger or consolidation); provided, however, that if no petition
for an appraisal shall be filed within the time provided in
subsection (e) of this section, or if such stockholder
shall deliver to the surviving or resulting corporation a
written withdrawal of such stockholders demand for an
appraisal and an acceptance of the merger or consolidation,
either within 60 days after the effective date of the
merger or consolidation as provided in
subsection (e) of this section or thereafter with the
written approval of the corporation, then the right of such
stockholder to an appraisal shall cease. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, no appraisal proceeding in the Court of Chancery
shall be dismissed as to any stockholder without the approval of
the Court, and such approval may be conditioned upon such terms
as the Court deems just.
(l) The shares of the surviving or resulting corporation to
which the shares of such objecting stockholders would have been
converted had they assented to the merger or consolidation shall
have the status of authorized and unissued shares of the
surviving or resulting corporation. (8 Del. C. 1953,
§ 262; 56 Del. Laws, c. 50; 56 Del. Laws, c. 186,
§ 24; 57 Del. Laws, c. 148, §§ 27-29;
59 Del. Laws, c. 106, § 12; 60 Del. Laws, c. 371,
§§ 3-12;
63 Del. Laws, c. 25, § 14; 63 Del. Laws, c. 152,
§§ 1, 2; 64 Del. Laws, c. 112,
§§ 46-54; 66 Del. Laws, c. 136,
§§ 30-32; 66 Del. Laws, c. 352, § 9; 67
Del. Laws, c. 376, §§ 19, 20; 68 Del. Laws, c.
337, §§ 3, 4; 69 Del. Laws, c. 61,
§ 10; 69 Del. Laws, c. 299, §§ 2, 3; 70
Del. Laws, c. 349, § 22; 71 Del. Laws, c. 120,
§ 15; 71 Del. Laws, c. 339, §§ 49-52;
73 Del. Laws, c. 82, § 21.)
E-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MR A SAMPLE DESIGNATION (IF ANY) ADD 1 ADD 2 ADD 3 ADD 4 ADD 5 ADD 6
|
|
000004
Least Address Line
|
|
000000000.000
ext 000000000.000 ext 000000000.000 ext 000000000.000 ext 000000000.000 ext 000000000.000 ext 000000000.000 ext
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
Mark this box with an X if you have made
changes to your name or address details above. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Meeting Proxy Card
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A |
Business
Submitted For Vote
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Board of Directors recommends voting FOR proposal 1. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
To adopt the Agreement and
Plan of Merger, dated as of June 30, 2006, as amended,
among Bain Paste Mergerco, Inc., Blackstone Paste Mergerco, Inc.,
Bain Paste Finco, LLC, Blackstone Paste Finco, LLC and Michaels
Stores, Inc. (the Merger Agreement). |
|
o |
|
o |
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Board of Directors recommends voting FOR proposal 2. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
To adjourn or postpone the Special Meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit
additional proxies if there are insufficient votes at the time of the meeting to adopt the Merger Agreement.
|
|
o |
|
o |
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon such
other business as may properly come before the Special Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof, including to
consider any procedural matters incident to the conduct of the Special Meeting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B |
Authorized Signatures Sign Here This section must be completed for your instructions to be executed.
|
Please sign exactly as your name appears hereon
and mail promptly this proxy card in the enclosed envelope. Joint
owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, administrator,
executor, guardian or trustee, please give your full title as such.
If executed by a corporation, the proxy should be signed by a duly
authorized officer. If executed by a partnership, please sign in
partnership name by an authorized person.
|
|
|
|
|
Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
|
|
Signature 1 - Please keep signature within the box
|
|
Signature 2 - Please keep signature within the box |
|
/ / |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
0 1 0 3 2 3 1 |
|
1 U P X
|
|
C O Y
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proxy
- Michaels Stores, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SPECIAL
MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS, OCTOBER 5, 2006
PROXY SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The undersigned hereby appoints Jeffrey N. Boyer and Mark V. Beasley, each with power to act
without the other and with full power of substitution, as proxies to vote, as specified below, all
stock
of Michaels Stores, Inc. owned by the undersigned at the Special Meeting of Stockholders to be held
at 8000 Bent Branch Drive, Irving, Texas 75063 on
October 5, 2006, at 9:30 a.m., central daylight time, or any adjournment thereof, upon such business as may
properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.
WHEN THIS PROXY CARD IS PROPERLY EXECUTED, SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AT THE
SPECIAL MEETING AS SPECIFIED HEREIN. IF YOU FAIL
TO VOTE BY PROXY OR IN PERSON, IT WILL HAVE THE SAME EFFECT AS A VOTE AGAINST THE ADOPTION OF THE
MERGER AGREEMENT AND AGAINST APPROVAL OF
THE ADJOURNMENT OR POSTPONEMENT PROPOSAL. IF YOU RETURN A PROPERLY SIGNED PROXY CARD BUT DO NOT
INDICATE HOW YOU WANT TO VOTE, YOUR PROXY
WILL BE COUNTED AS A VOTE FOR ADOPTION OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT AND FOR APPROVAL OF THE
ADJOURNMENT OR POSTPONEMENT PROPOSAL.
YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT!
PLEASE VOTE, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
(Continued and to be signed and dated on reverse side)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MR A SAMPLE DESIGNATION (IF ANY) ADD 1 ADD 2 ADD 3 ADD 4 ADD 5 ADD 6
|
|
000004
Least Address Line
|
|
000000000.000
ext 000000000.000 ext 000000000.000 ext 000000000.000 ext 000000000.000 ext 000000000.000 ext 000000000.000 ext
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
Mark this box with an X if you have made
changes to your name or address details above. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Meeting Instruction Card
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A |
Business
Submitted For Vote
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Board of Directors recommends voting FOR proposal 1. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
To adopt the Agreement and
Plan of Merger, dated as of June 30, 2006, as amended,
among Bain Paste Mergerco, Inc., Blackstone Paste Mergerco, Inc.,
Bain Paste Finco, LLC, Blackstone Paste Finco, LLC and Michaels
Stores, Inc. (the Merger Agreement). |
|
o |
|
o |
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Board of Directors recommends voting FOR proposal 2. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
To adjourn or postpone the Special Meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit
additional proxies if there are insufficient votes at the time of the meeting to adopt the Merger Agreement.
|
|
o |
|
o |
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon such
other business as may properly come before the Special Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof, including to
consider any procedural matters incident to the conduct of the Special Meeting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B |
Authorized Signatures Sign Here This section must be completed for your instructions to be executed.
|
Please sign exactly as your name appears hereon
and mail promptly this instruction card in the enclosed envelope.
|
|
|
|
|
Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
|
|
Signature 1 - Please keep signature within the box
|
|
|
|
/ / |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
0 1 0 3 2 3 2 |
|
1 U P X
|
|
C O Y
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instruction
Card - Michaels Stores, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SPECIAL
MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS, OCTOBER 5, 2006
CONFIDENTIAL VOTING INSTRUCTIONS
TO THE TRUSTEE
OF THE MICHAELS STORES, INC. EMPLOYEES 401(K) PLAN (PLAN)
The undersigned hereby instructs the Investment Committee under the Plan to direct the Trustee
of the Plan to vote in person or by proxy the number of shares of Common Stock of Michaels
Stores, Inc. representing my proportionate interest in the Michaels Stores, Inc. Common Stock Fund
which are entitled to vote under the Plan at the Special Meeting of Stockholders to be held
at 8000 Bent Branch Drive, Irving, Texas 75063 on
October 5, 2006, at 9:30 a.m., central daylight time, or any adjournment thereof, upon such business as may
properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.
UNLESS OTHERWISE MARKED, THIS INSTRUCTION CARD WILL BE COUNTED AS A VOTE FOR ADOPTION OF THE
MERGER AGREEMENT AND FOR APPROVAL OF THE
ADJOURNMENT OR POSTPONEMENT PROPOSAL.
YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT!
PLEASE VOTE, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS INSTRUCTION CARD PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
(Continued and to be signed and dated on reverse side)