e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 000-20202
CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
MICHIGAN
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
38-1999511
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
25505 WEST TWELVE MILE ROAD
SOUTHFIELD, MICHIGAN
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
48034-8339
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: 248-353-2700
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
The number of shares of Common Stock, par value $0.01, outstanding on April 23, 2010 was
31,019,762.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance charges |
|
$ |
89,663 |
|
|
$ |
76,726 |
|
Premiums earned |
|
|
7,704 |
|
|
|
6,460 |
|
Other income |
|
|
5,895 |
|
|
|
4,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
103,262 |
|
|
|
87,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and wages |
|
|
16,110 |
|
|
|
17,121 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
6,542 |
|
|
|
7,995 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
4,810 |
|
|
|
3,921 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
6,426 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
Interest |
|
|
11,705 |
|
|
|
7,923 |
|
Provision for claims |
|
|
5,212 |
|
|
|
4,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
50,805 |
|
|
|
41,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before provision for income taxes |
|
|
52,457 |
|
|
|
45,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
20,442 |
|
|
|
16,943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
32,015 |
|
|
|
29,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued United Kingdom operations |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
32,010 |
|
|
$ |
29,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
1.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
1.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
31,042,495 |
|
|
|
30,479,665 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
31,584,326 |
|
|
|
31,180,146 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
1
CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,602 |
|
|
$ |
2,170 |
|
Restricted cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
87,148 |
|
|
|
82,456 |
|
Restricted securities available for sale |
|
|
3,072 |
|
|
|
3,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable (including $11,952 and $12,674 from affiliates as of March 31, 2010
and December 31, 2009, respectively) |
|
|
1,211,486 |
|
|
|
1,167,558 |
|
Allowance for credit losses |
|
|
(123,144 |
) |
|
|
(117,545 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable, net |
|
|
1,088,342 |
|
|
|
1,050,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
18,324 |
|
|
|
18,735 |
|
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
787 |
|
|
|
3,956 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
28,481 |
|
|
|
15,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
1,227,756 |
|
|
$ |
1,176,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
102,582 |
|
|
$ |
77,295 |
|
Line of credit |
|
|
28,400 |
|
|
|
97,300 |
|
Secured financing |
|
|
221,167 |
|
|
|
404,597 |
|
Mortgage note and capital lease obligations |
|
|
4,875 |
|
|
|
5,082 |
|
Senior notes |
|
|
243,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes, net |
|
|
88,251 |
|
|
|
93,752 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
7,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
696,972 |
|
|
|
678,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value, 80,000,000 shares authorized, 31,012,513 and
31,038,217 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively |
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
Paid-in capital |
|
|
24,631 |
|
|
|
24,370 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
506,443 |
|
|
|
474,433 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax of $348 and $526 at
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively |
|
|
(600 |
) |
|
|
(904 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholders Equity |
|
|
530,784 |
|
|
|
498,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
$ |
1,227,756 |
|
|
$ |
1,176,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
2
CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash Flows From Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
32,010 |
|
|
$ |
29,001 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
6,426 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,299 |
|
|
|
1,371 |
|
(Benefit) provision for deferred income taxes |
|
|
(5,679 |
) |
|
|
3,541 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
1,183 |
|
|
|
1,484 |
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
25,776 |
|
|
|
11,187 |
|
Decrease in income taxes receivable / increase in income taxes payable |
|
|
11,021 |
|
|
|
7,330 |
|
Increase in other assets |
|
|
(12,696 |
) |
|
|
(4,601 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
59,340 |
|
|
|
49,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in restricted cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(4,692 |
) |
|
|
(6,658 |
) |
Purchases of restricted securities available for sale |
|
|
(407 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Maturities of restricted securities available for sale |
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
Principal collected on Loans receivable |
|
|
206,137 |
|
|
|
177,045 |
|
Advances to Dealer-Partners and accelerated payments of Dealer Holdback |
|
|
(212,317 |
) |
|
|
(153,181 |
) |
Purchases of Consumer Loans |
|
|
(26,443 |
) |
|
|
(41,389 |
) |
Payments of Dealer Holdback |
|
|
(12,170 |
) |
|
|
(12,811 |
) |
Net decrease (increase) in other loans |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(781 |
) |
|
|
(809 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(50,186 |
) |
|
|
(37,609 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under line of credit |
|
|
99,900 |
|
|
|
152,300 |
|
Repayments under line of credit |
|
|
(168,800 |
) |
|
|
(114,300 |
) |
Proceeds from secured financing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,900 |
|
Repayments of secured financing |
|
|
(183,430 |
) |
|
|
(107,210 |
) |
Principal payments under mortgage note and capital lease obligations |
|
|
(207 |
) |
|
|
(377 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of senior notes |
|
|
243,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
(1,896 |
) |
|
|
(540 |
) |
Proceeds from stock options exercised |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
Tax benefits from stock-based compensation plans |
|
|
954 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(9,722 |
) |
|
|
(14,918 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(568 |
) |
|
|
(3,048 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
2,170 |
|
|
|
3,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
1,602 |
|
|
$ |
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for interest |
|
$ |
13,443 |
|
|
$ |
8,729 |
|
Cash paid during the period for income taxes |
|
$ |
5,126 |
|
|
$ |
5,557 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (generally accepted
accounting principles or GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to
Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the
information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete
financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal
recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The results of
operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of actual results achieved for full
fiscal years. The consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2009 has been derived from the audited
financial statements at that date but does not include all the information and footnotes required
by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. For further
information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 for Credit Acceptance Corporation
(the Company, Credit Acceptance, we, our or us). Certain prior period amounts have been
reclassified to conform to the current presentation.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
We have evaluated events and transactions occurring subsequent to the consolidated balance
sheet date of March 31, 2010 for items that could potentially be recognized or disclosed in these
financial statements.
2. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
Since 1972, Credit Acceptance has provided auto loans to consumers, regardless of their credit
history. Our product is offered through a nationwide network of automobile dealers who benefit
from sales of vehicles to consumers who otherwise could not obtain financing; from repeat and
referral sales generated by these same customers; and from sales to customers responding to
advertisements for our product, but who actually end up qualifying for traditional financing.
We refer to dealers who participate in our programs and who share our commitment to changing
consumers lives as Dealer-Partners. Upon enrollment in our financing programs, the
Dealer-Partner enters into a dealer servicing agreement with us that defines the legal relationship
between Credit Acceptance and the Dealer-Partner. The dealer servicing agreement assigns the
responsibilities for administering, servicing, and collecting the amounts due on retail installment
contracts (referred to as Consumer Loans) from the Dealer-Partners to us. A consumer who does
not qualify for conventional automobile financing can purchase a used vehicle from a Dealer-Partner
and finance the purchase through us. We are an indirect lender from a legal perspective, meaning
the Consumer Loan is originated by the Dealer-Partner and assigned to us.
We have two programs: the Portfolio Program and the Purchase Program. Under the Portfolio
Program, we advance money to Dealer-Partners (referred to as a Dealer Loan) in exchange for the
right to service the underlying Consumer Loan. Under the Purchase Program, we buy the Consumer
Loan from the Dealer-Partner (referred to as a Purchased Loan) and keep all amounts collected
from the consumer. Dealer Loans and Purchased Loans are collectively referred to as Loans. The
following table shows the percentage of Consumer Loans assigned to us under each of the programs
for each of the last five quarters:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
Portfolio Program |
|
Purchase Program |
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
82.3 |
% |
|
|
17.7 |
% |
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
86.0 |
% |
|
|
14.0 |
% |
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
89.0 |
% |
|
|
11.0 |
% |
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
90.8 |
% |
|
|
9.2 |
% |
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
90.9 |
% |
|
|
9.1 |
% |
4
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
2. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS (Continued)
Portfolio Program
As payment for the vehicle, the Dealer-Partner generally receives the following:
|
|
|
a down payment from the consumer; |
|
|
|
a non-recourse cash payment (advance) from us; and |
|
|
|
after the advance has been recovered by us, the cash from payments made on the Consumer
Loan, net of certain collection costs and our servicing fee (Dealer Holdback). |
We record the amount advanced to the Dealer-Partner as a Dealer Loan, which is classified
within Loans receivable in our consolidated balance sheets. Cash advanced to Dealer-Partners is
automatically assigned to the originating Dealer-Partners open pool of advances. We require
Dealer-Partners to group advances into pools of at least 100 Consumer Loans. At the
Dealer-Partners option, a pool containing at least 100 Consumer Loans can be closed and subsequent
advances assigned to a new pool. All advances due from a Dealer-Partner are secured by the future
collections on the Dealer-Partners portfolio of Consumer Loans assigned to us. For
Dealer-Partners with more than one pool, the pools are cross-collateralized so the performance of
other pools is considered in determining eligibility for Dealer Holdback. We perfect our security
interest in the Dealer Loans by taking possession of the Consumer Loans, which list us as lien
holder on the vehicle title.
The dealer servicing agreement provides that collections received by us during a calendar
month on Consumer Loans assigned by a Dealer-Partner are applied on a pool-by-pool basis as
follows:
|
|
|
First, to reimburse us for certain collection costs; |
|
|
|
Second, to pay us our servicing fee, which generally equals 20% of collections; |
|
|
|
Third, to reduce the aggregate advance balance and to pay any other amounts due from the
Dealer-Partner to us; and |
|
|
|
Fourth, to the Dealer-Partner as payment of Dealer Holdback. |
Dealer-Partners have an opportunity to receive an accelerated Dealer Holdback payment at the
time a pool of 100 or more Consumer Loans is closed. The amount paid to the Dealer-Partner is
calculated using a formula that considers the forecasted collections and the advance balance on the
closed pool. If the collections on Consumer Loans from a Dealer-Partners pool are not sufficient
to repay the advance balance and any other amounts due to us, the Dealer-Partner will not receive
Dealer Holdback.
Since typically the combination of the advance and the consumers down payment provides the
Dealer-Partner with a cash profit at the time of sale, the Dealer-Partners risk in the Consumer
Loan is limited. We cannot demand repayment of the advance from the Dealer-Partner except in the
event the Dealer-Partner is in default of the dealer servicing agreement. Advances are made only
after the consumer and Dealer-Partner have signed a Consumer Loan contract, we have received the
original Consumer Loan contract and supporting documentation, and we have approved all of the
related stipulations for funding. The Dealer-Partner can also opt to repurchase Consumer Loans
that have been assigned to us under the Portfolio Program, at their discretion, for a fee.
For accounting purposes, the transactions described under the Portfolio Program are not
considered to be loans to consumers. Instead, our accounting reflects that of a lender to the
Dealer-Partner. The classification as a Dealer Loan for accounting purposes is primarily a result
of (1) the Dealer-Partners financial interest in the Consumer Loan and (2) certain elements of our
legal relationship with the Dealer-Partner. For each individual Dealer-Partner, the amount of the
Dealer Loan recorded in Loans receivable is comprised of the following:
|
|
|
the aggregate amount of all cash advances to the Dealer-Partner; |
|
|
|
Dealer Holdback payments; |
|
|
|
accelerated Dealer Holdback payments; and |
Less:
|
|
|
collections (net of certain collection costs); and |
5
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
2. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS (Concluded)
Purchase Program
The Purchase Program differs from our Portfolio Program in that the Dealer-Partner receives a
single payment from us at the time of origination instead of a cash advance and Dealer Holdback.
For accounting purposes, the transactions described under the Purchase Program are considered to be
originated by the Dealer-Partner and then purchased by us. The amount of Purchased Loans recorded
in Loans receivable is comprised of the following:
|
|
|
the aggregate amount of all amounts paid to purchase Consumer Loans from
Dealer-Partners; |
Less:
|
|
|
collections (net of certain collection costs); and |
Program Enrollment
Dealer-Partners that enroll in our programs have two enrollment options available to them.
The first enrollment option allows Dealer-Partners to assign Consumer Loans under the Portfolio
Program and requires payment of an upfront, one-time fee of $9,850. The second enrollment option,
which became effective September 1, 2009, allows Dealer-Partners to assign Consumer Loans under the
Portfolio Program and requires payment of an upfront, one-time fee of $1,950 and an agreement to
allow us to keep 50% of their first accelerated Dealer Holdback payment. Prior to September 1,
2009, Dealer-Partners who chose the second enrollment option did not pay an upfront fee but agreed
to allow us to keep 50% of their first accelerated Dealer Holdback payment. For all
Dealer-Partners enrolling in our program after August 31, 2008, access to the Purchase Program is
only granted after the first accelerated Dealer Holdback payment has been made under the Portfolio
Program.
3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Reinsurance
VSC Re Company (VSC Re), our wholly-owned subsidiary, is engaged in the business of
reinsuring coverage under vehicle service contracts sold to consumers by Dealer-Partners on
vehicles financed by us. VSC Re currently reinsures vehicle service contracts that are
underwritten by one of our two third party insurers. Vehicle service contract premiums, which
represent the selling price of the vehicle service contract to the consumer, less commissions and
certain administrative costs, are contributed to trust accounts controlled by VSC Re. These
premiums are used to fund claims covered under the vehicle service contracts. VSC Re is a
bankruptcy remote entity. As such, the exposure to fund claims is limited to the amount of premium
dollars contributed, less amounts earned and withdrawn, plus $0.5 million of equity contributed.
Premiums from the reinsurance of vehicle service contracts are recognized over the life of the
policy in proportion to expected costs of servicing those contracts. Expected costs are determined
based on our historical claims experience. Claims are expensed through a provision for claims in
the period the claim was incurred. Capitalized acquisition costs are comprised of premium taxes
and are amortized as general and administrative expense over the life of the contracts in
proportion to premiums earned. A summary of reinsurance activity is as follows (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Net assumed written premiums |
|
$ |
10,270 |
|
|
$ |
9,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums earned |
|
|
7,705 |
|
|
|
6,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for claims |
|
|
5,215 |
|
|
|
4,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of capitalized acquisition costs |
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
6
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
We are considered the primary beneficiary of the trusts and as a result, the trusts have been
consolidated on our balance sheet. The trust assets and related reinsurance liabilities are as
follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet location |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
Trust assets |
|
Restricted cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
43,185 |
|
|
$ |
39,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned premium |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
24,394 |
|
|
|
21,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claims reserve (1) |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
1,032 |
|
|
|
965 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The claims reserve is estimated based on historical claims experience. |
Prior to the formation of VSC Re, our agreements with two of our vehicle service contract
third party administrators (TPAs) allowed us to receive profit sharing payments depending upon
the performance of the vehicle service contract programs. The agreements also required that
vehicle service contract premiums be placed in trust accounts. Funds in the trust accounts were
utilized by the TPA to pay claims on the vehicle service contracts. Upon the formation of VSC Re
during the fourth quarter of 2008, the unearned premiums on the majority of the vehicle service
contracts that had been written through these two TPAs were ceded to VSC Re along with any related
trust assets. Vehicle service contracts written prior to 2008 through one of the TPAs remain under
this profit sharing arrangement. Profit sharing payments, if any, on the vehicle service contracts
are distributed to us periodically after the term of the vehicle service contracts have
substantially expired provided certain loss rates are met. We are considered the primary
beneficiary of the trusts and as a result, the assets of the remaining trust and the related
liabilities have been consolidated on our balance sheet. As of March 31, 2010 and December 31,
2009, the remaining trust had $4.3 million in assets available to pay claims and a related claims
reserve of $3.5 million. The trust assets are included in restricted cash and cash equivalents and
restricted securities available for sale. The claims reserve is included in accounts payable and
accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. A third party insures claims in excess of
funds in the trust accounts.
Our determination to consolidate the VSC Re trusts and the profit sharing trusts was based on
the following:
|
|
|
First, we determined that the trusts qualified as variable interest entities. The
trusts have insufficient equity at risk as no parties to the trusts were required to
contribute assets that provide them with any ownership interest. |
|
|
|
Next, we determined that we have variable interests in the trusts. We have a residual
interest in the assets of the trusts, which is variable in nature, given that it increases
or decreases based upon the actual loss experience of the related service contracts. In
addition, VSC Re is required to absorb any losses in excess of the trusts assets. |
|
|
|
Next, we evaluated the purpose and design of the trusts. The primary purpose of the
trusts is to provide TPAs with funds to pay claims on vehicle service contracts and to
accumulate and provide us with proceeds from investment income and residual funds. |
|
|
|
Finally, we determined that we are the primary beneficiary of the trusts. We control
the amount of premium written and placed in the trusts through Consumer Loan assignments
under our Programs, which is the activity that most significantly impacts the economic
performance of the trusts. We have the right to receive benefits from the trusts that
could potentially be significant. In addition, VSC Re has the obligation to absorb losses
of the trusts that could potentially be significant. |
Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents
Restricted cash and cash equivalents increased to $87.1 million at March 31, 2010 from $82.5
million at December 31, 2009. The following table summarizes restricted cash and cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
(in thousands) |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Cash collections related to secured financings |
|
$ |
42,725 |
|
|
$ |
42,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash held in trusts for future vehicle service contract claims (1) |
|
|
44,423 |
|
|
|
40,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restricted cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
87,148 |
|
|
$ |
82,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The unearned premium and claims reserve associated with the trusts are included in
accounts payable and accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. |
7
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Restricted Securities Available for Sale
Restricted securities available for sale consist of amounts held in accordance with vehicle
service contract trust agreements. We determine the appropriate classification of our investments
in debt securities at the time of purchase and reevaluate such determinations at each balance sheet
date. Debt securities for which we do not have the intent or ability to hold to maturity are
classified as available for sale, and stated at fair value with unrealized gains and losses, net of
income taxes included in the determination of comprehensive income and reported as a component of
shareholders equity.
Restricted securities available for sale consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
US Government and agency securities |
|
$ |
726 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
738 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
2,338 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
2,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restricted securities available for sale |
|
$ |
3,064 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
$ |
(12 |
) |
|
$ |
3,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
US Government and agency securities |
|
$ |
726 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
742 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
2,381 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
2,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restricted securities
available for sale |
|
$ |
3,107 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
$ |
3,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The cost and estimated fair values of debt securities by contractual maturity were as follows
(securities with multiple maturity dates are classified in the period of final maturity). Expected
maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or
prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010 |
|
|
As of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Contractual Maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within one year |
|
$ |
1,389 |
|
|
$ |
1,395 |
|
|
$ |
1,486 |
|
|
$ |
1,495 |
|
Over one year to five years |
|
|
1,574 |
|
|
|
1,576 |
|
|
|
1,621 |
|
|
|
1,626 |
|
Over five years to ten years |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restricted securities available for sale |
|
$ |
3,064 |
|
|
$ |
3,072 |
|
|
$ |
3,107 |
|
|
$ |
3,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Debt Issuance Costs
As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, deferred debt issuance costs were $12.9 million
(net of accumulated amortization of $4.8 million) and $6.4 million (net of accumulated amortization
of $8.9 million), respectively, and are included in other assets in the consolidated balance
sheets. Expenses associated with the issuance of debt instruments are capitalized and amortized as
interest expense over the term of the debt instrument using the effective interest method for term
secured financings and senior notes and the straight-line method for
lines of credit and revolving secured financings.
8
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Concluded)
Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets. In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166,
Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (SFAS 166).
SFAS 166 was incorporated into the Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards
Codification (FASB ASC) through Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2009-16 and is intended
to improve the information provided in financial statements about the transfer of financial assets
and the effects of the transfer on financial position and performance, and cash flows for transfers
occurring on or after the effective date. The adoption on January 1, 2010 did not have a material
impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R). In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167,
Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (SFAS 167). SFAS 167 was incorporated into the
FASB ASC through ASU No. 2009-17 and is intended to improve financial reporting related to variable
interest entities. The adoption on January 1, 2010 did not have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements, but expanded our disclosures.
4. LOANS RECEIVABLE
Loans receivable consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Dealer Loans |
|
|
Purchased Loans |
|
|
Total |
|
Loans receivable |
|
$ |
925,094 |
|
|
$ |
286,392 |
|
|
$ |
1,211,486 |
|
Allowance for credit losses |
|
|
(111,372 |
) |
|
|
(11,772 |
) |
|
|
(123,144 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable, net |
|
$ |
813,722 |
|
|
$ |
274,620 |
|
|
$ |
1,088,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Dealer Loans |
|
|
Purchased Loans |
|
|
Total |
|
Loans receivable |
|
$ |
869,603 |
|
|
$ |
297,955 |
|
|
$ |
1,167,558 |
|
Allowance for credit losses |
|
|
(108,792 |
) |
|
|
(8,753 |
) |
|
|
(117,545 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable, net |
|
$ |
760,811 |
|
|
$ |
289,202 |
|
|
$ |
1,050,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
4. LOANS RECEIVABLE (Concluded)
A summary of changes in Loans receivable is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Dealer Loans |
|
|
Purchased Loans |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
869,603 |
|
|
$ |
297,955 |
|
|
$ |
1,167,558 |
|
New Consumer Loan assignments (1) |
|
|
212,317 |
|
|
|
26,443 |
|
|
|
238,760 |
|
Principal collected on Loans receivable |
|
|
(161,991 |
) |
|
|
(44,146 |
) |
|
|
(206,137 |
) |
Dealer Holdback payments |
|
|
12,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,170 |
|
Transfers |
|
|
(6,143 |
) |
|
|
6,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
Write-offs |
|
|
(1,388 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(1,413 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
586 |
|
Net change in other loans |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
925,094 |
|
|
$ |
286,392 |
|
|
$ |
1,211,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Dealer Loans |
|
|
Purchased Loans |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
823,567 |
|
|
$ |
325,185 |
|
|
$ |
1,148,752 |
|
New Consumer Loan assignments (1) |
|
|
153,181 |
|
|
|
41,389 |
|
|
|
194,570 |
|
Principal collected on Loans receivable |
|
|
(137,540 |
) |
|
|
(39,505 |
) |
|
|
(177,045 |
) |
Dealer Holdback payments |
|
|
12,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,811 |
|
Transfers |
|
|
(4,330 |
) |
|
|
4,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
Write-offs |
|
|
(570 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(591 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
982 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
997 |
|
Net change in other loans |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
Currency translation |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
848,091 |
|
|
$ |
331,393 |
|
|
$ |
1,179,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Dealer Loans amount represents advances and accelerated Dealer Holdback payments made to
Dealer-Partners for Consumer Loans assigned under our Portfolio Program. The Purchased Loans
amount represents payments made to Dealer-Partners to purchase Consumer Loans assigned under our
Purchase Program. |
A summary of changes in the allowance for credit losses is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Dealer Loans |
|
|
Purchased Loans |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
108,792 |
|
|
$ |
8,753 |
|
|
$ |
117,545 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
3,404 |
|
|
|
3,022 |
|
|
|
6,426 |
|
Write-offs |
|
|
(1,388 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(1,413 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
111,372 |
|
|
$ |
11,772 |
|
|
$ |
123,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Dealer Loans |
|
|
Purchased Loans |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
113,831 |
|
|
$ |
17,004 |
|
|
$ |
130,835 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
(353 |
) |
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
Write-offs |
|
|
(570 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(591 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
982 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
997 |
|
Currency translation |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
113,869 |
|
|
$ |
17,515 |
|
|
$ |
131,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
5. DEBT
We currently utilize the following forms of debt financing: (1) a revolving secured line of
credit with a commercial bank syndicate; (2) revolving secured warehouse facilities with
institutional investors; (3) asset-backed secured financings (Term ABS) with qualified
institutional investors; and (4) Senior Secured Notes due 2017 issued pursuant to Rule 144A and
Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (Senior Notes). General information for
each of our financing transactions in place as of March 31, 2010 is as follows (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholly-owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate at |
Financings |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Issue Number |
|
Close Date |
|
Maturity Date |
|
Financing Amount |
|
March 31, 2010 |
Revolving Line of Credit
|
|
n/a
|
|
n/a
|
|
June 15, 2009
|
|
June 23, 2011
|
|
$ |
150,000 |
|
|
At our option, either the Eurodollar rate
plus 275 basis points
or the prime rate
plus 100 basis points |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving Secured Warehouse Facility (1)
|
|
CAC Warehouse Funding
Corp. II
|
|
2003-2
|
|
August 24, 2009
|
|
August 23, 2010 (7)
|
|
$ |
325,000 |
|
|
Commercial paper rate
plus 500 basis points
or LIBOR plus 600
basis points (4) (5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving Secured
Warehouse Facility (1)
|
|
CAC Warehouse Funding
III, LLC
|
|
2008-2
|
|
August 31, 2009
|
|
August 31, 2011 (6)
|
|
$ |
75,000 |
|
|
Commercial paper rate
plus 375 basis points
or LIBOR plus 375
basis points (3) (4)
(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term ABS 2008-1 (1)
|
|
Credit Acceptance
Funding LLC 2008-1
|
|
2008-1
|
|
April 18, 2008
|
|
April 15, 2009 (2)
|
|
$ |
150,000 |
|
|
Fixed rate (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term ABS 2009-1 (1)
|
|
Credit Acceptance
Funding LLC 2009-1
|
|
2009-1
|
|
December 3, 2009
|
|
May 15, 2011 (2)
|
|
$ |
110,500 |
|
|
Fixed rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Notes
|
|
n/a
|
|
n/a
|
|
February 1, 2010
|
|
February 1, 2017
|
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
|
Fixed rate |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Financing made available only to a specified subsidiary of the Company. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the revolving maturity date. Loans will amortize after the maturity date based on the cash flows of the contributed assets. |
|
(3) |
|
A portion of the outstanding balance is a floating rate obligation that has been converted to a fixed rate obligation via an interest rate swap. |
|
(4) |
|
The LIBOR rate is used if funding is not available from the commercial paper market. |
|
(5) |
|
Interest rate cap agreements are in place to limit the exposure to increasing interest rates. |
|
(6) |
|
Facility revolves until August 31, 2011 and matures on August 31, 2012. |
|
(7) |
|
Facility revolves until August 23, 2010 and matures on August 23, 2011. |
11
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
5. DEBT (Continued)
Additional information related to the amounts outstanding on each facility is as follows
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revolving Line of Credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum outstanding balance |
|
$ |
107,900 |
|
|
$ |
99,300 |
|
Average outstanding balance |
|
|
44,533 |
|
|
|
66,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving Secured Warehouse Facility (2003-2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum outstanding balance |
|
$ |
152,600 |
|
|
$ |
275,000 |
|
Average outstanding balance |
|
|
53,591 |
|
|
|
264,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving Secured Warehouse Facility (2008-2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum outstanding balance |
|
$ |
75,000 |
|
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
Average outstanding balance |
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Revolving Line of Credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance outstanding |
|
$ |
28,400 |
|
|
$ |
97,300 |
|
Letter(s) of credit |
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
514 |
|
Amount available for borrowing |
|
|
121,086 |
|
|
|
42,186 |
|
Interest rate |
|
|
4.25 |
% |
|
|
4.25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving Secured Warehouse Facility (2003-2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance outstanding |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
152,600 |
|
Amount available for borrowing |
|
|
325,000 |
|
|
|
172,400 |
|
Contributed eligible Loans (1) |
|
|
169,106 |
|
|
|
192,921 |
|
Interest rate |
|
|
5.25 |
% |
|
|
5.24 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving Secured Warehouse Facility (2008-2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance outstanding |
|
$ |
75,000 |
|
|
$ |
75,000 |
|
Amount available for borrowing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contributed eligible Loans |
|
|
93,957 |
|
|
|
94,073 |
|
Interest rate |
|
|
4.36 |
% |
|
|
4.36 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term ABS 2008-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance outstanding |
|
$ |
35,667 |
|
|
$ |
66,497 |
|
Contributed eligible Loans |
|
|
120,088 |
|
|
|
142,267 |
|
Interest rate |
|
|
6.37 |
% |
|
|
6.37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term ABS 2009-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance outstanding |
|
$ |
110,500 |
|
|
$ |
110,500 |
|
Contributed eligible Loans |
|
|
142,359 |
|
|
|
142,315 |
|
Interest rate |
|
|
4.40 |
% |
|
|
4.40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance outstanding |
|
$ |
243,845 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest rate |
|
|
9.13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
At March 31, 2010, the assets are the property of the wholly-owned subsidiary but are not pledged as collateral
for the facility. |
12
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
5. DEBT (Continued)
Senior Notes
On February 1, 2010, we issued $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of 9.125% First
Priority Senior Notes. The Senior Notes were issued pursuant to an indenture, dated as of February
1, 2010 (the Indenture), among us, Buyers Vehicle Protection Plan, Inc. (BVPP) and Vehicle
Remarketing Services, Inc. (VRS), as guarantors (the Guarantors), and U.S. Bank National
Association, as trustee (the Trustee). The description of the Indenture is qualified in its
entirety by reference to the complete text of the Indenture, a copy of which is filed as Exhibit
4(f)(129) to our Form 8-K filed on February 4, 2010.
The Senior Notes mature on February 1, 2017 and bear interest at a rate of 9.125% per annum,
computed on the basis of 360-day year composed of twelve 30-day months and payable semi-annually on
February 1 and August 1 of each year, beginning on August 1, 2010. The Senior Notes were issued at
97.495% of the aggregate principal amount for gross proceeds of $243.7 million, representing a
yield to maturity of 9.625%. The discount is being amortized over the life of the Senior Notes
using the effective interest method.
The Senior Notes are guaranteed on a senior secured basis by the Guarantors, which are also
guarantors of obligations under our line of credit facility. Our other existing and future
subsidiaries may become guarantors of the Senior Notes. The Senior Notes and the Guarantors
Senior Note guarantees are secured on a first-priority basis (subject to specified exceptions and
permitted liens), together with all indebtedness outstanding from time to time under the line of
credit facility and, under certain circumstances, certain future indebtedness, by a security
interest in substantially all of our assets and those of the Guarantors, subject to certain
exceptions such as real property, cash (except to the extent it is deposited with the collateral
agent), certain leases, and equity interests of our subsidiaries (other than those of specified
subsidiaries including the Guarantors). Our assets and those of the Guarantors securing the Senior
Notes and the Senior Note guarantees will not include our assets transferred to special purpose
subsidiaries in connection with securitization transactions and will generally be the same as the
collateral securing indebtedness under the line of credit facility and, under certain
circumstances, certain future indebtedness, subject to certain limited exceptions as provided in
the security and intercreditor agreements related to the line of credit facility.
Line of Credit Facility
During the first quarter of 2010, we increased the amount of the line of credit facility from
$140.0 million to $150.0 million and, concurrently with the issuance of the Senior Notes, amended
the agreements governing our line of credit facility to facilitate the issuance of the Senior Notes
and certain future secured indebtedness.
Borrowings under the line of credit facility are subject to a borrowing-base limitation. This
limitation equals 80% of the net book value of Loans, less a hedging reserve (not exceeding $1.0
million), the amount of letters of credit issued under the line of credit, and the amount of other
debt secured by the collateral which secures the line of credit. Borrowings under the line of
credit agreement are secured by a lien on most of our assets. We must pay quarterly fees on the
amount of the facility.
Revolving Secured Warehouse Facilities
We have two revolving secured warehouse facilities that are provided to our wholly-owned
subsidiaries. One is a $325.0 million facility with an institutional investor and the other is a
$75.0 million facility with another institutional investor.
Under both warehouse facilities we can contribute Loans to our wholly-owned subsidiaries in
return for cash and equity in each subsidiary. In turn, each subsidiary pledges the Loans as
collateral to institutional investors to secure financing that will fund the cash portion of the
purchase price of the Loans. The financing provided to each subsidiary under the applicable
facility is limited to the lesser of 80% of the net book value of the contributed Loans or the
facility limit.
The subsidiaries are liable for any amounts due under the applicable facility. Even though we
consolidate our subsidiaries for financial reporting purposes, the financing is non-recourse to us.
As the subsidiaries are organized as separate legal entities from us, their assets (including the
conveyed Loans) will not be available to satisfy our general obligations. All of each of our
subsidiarys assets have been encumbered to secure its obligations to its respective creditors.
13
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
5. DEBT (Continued)
If not renewed prior to August 23, 2010, the $325.0 million facility will cease to revolve.
Thereafter, no further advances would be permitted under the facility and the amounts outstanding
would be repaid over time by the collections from the Loans securing the facility. If there are
any remaining amounts outstanding on the facility when it matures on August 23, 2011, the lender
has the right to cause the Loans securing the facility to be sold to repay the outstanding
indebtedness.
Interest on borrowings under the facilities has been limited to a maximum rate of 6.75%
through interest rate cap agreements. We have also entered into an interest rate swap to convert
$25.0 million of the $75.0 million secured warehouse facility into fixed debt bearing an interest
rate of 5.11%. The subsidiaries pay us a monthly servicing fee equal to 6% of the collections
received with respect to the conveyed Loans. The fee is paid out of the collections. Except for
the servicing fee and holdback payments due to Dealer-Partners, if a facility is amortizing, we do
not have any rights in any portion of such collections until all outstanding principal, accrued and
unpaid interest, fees and other related costs have been paid in full. If a facility is not
amortizing, the applicable subsidiary may be entitled to retain a portion of such collections
provided that the borrowing base requirements of the facility are satisfied.
Term ABS Financings
In 2008 and 2009, two of our wholly-owned subsidiaries (the Funding LLCs), each completed a
secured financing transaction. In connection with these transactions, we contributed Loans on an
arms-length basis to each Funding LLC for cash and the sole membership interest in that Funding
LLC. In turn, each Funding LLC contributed the Loans to a respective trust that issued notes to
qualified institutional investors. The Term ABS 2008-1 transaction was initially rated A by
Standard and Poors Rating Services (S&P) and as of March 31, 2010 is rated AAA by S&P. The
Term ABS 2009-1 transaction consists of three classes of notes. The Class A Notes are rated AAA
by S&P and DBRS, Inc. The Class B Notes are rated AA by S&P. The Class C Note does not bear
interest, is not rated and has been retained by us.
Each financing has a specified revolving period during which we may be required, and are
likely, to convey additional Loans to each Funding LLC. Each Funding LLC will then convey the
Loans to their respective trust. At the end of the revolving period, the debt outstanding under
each financing will begin to amortize.
The financings create loans for which the trusts are liable and which are secured by all the
assets of each trust. Such loans are non-recourse to us, even though we are consolidated for
financial reporting purposes with the trusts and the Funding LLCs. Because the Funding LLCs are
organized as legal entities separate from us, their assets (including the conveyed Loans) are not
available to our creditors. We receive a monthly servicing fee on each financing equal to 6% of
the collections received with respect to the conveyed Loans. The fee is paid out of the
collections. Except for the servicing fee and Dealer Holdback payments due to Dealer-Partners, if
a facility is amortizing, we do not have any rights in any portion of such collections until all
outstanding principal, accrued and unpaid interest, fees and other related costs have been paid in
full. If a facility is not amortizing, the applicable subsidiary may be entitled to retain a
portion of such collections provided that the borrowing base requirements of the facility are
satisfied. However, in our capacity as servicer of the Loans, we do have a limited right to
exercise a clean-up call option to purchase Loans from the Funding LLCs and/or the trusts under
certain specified circumstances. Alternatively, when a trusts underlying indebtedness is paid in
full, either through collections or through a prepayment of the indebtedness, the trust is to pay
any remaining collections over to its Funding LLC as the sole beneficiary of the trust. The
collections will then be available to be distributed to us as the sole member of the respective
Funding LLC.
The table below sets forth certain additional details regarding the outstanding Term ABS
Financings (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected |
|
|
Issue |
|
|
|
Net Book Value of Dealer |
|
|
|
Annualized |
Term ABS Financing |
|
Number |
|
Close Date |
|
Loans Conveyed at Closing |
|
Revolving Period |
|
Rates (1) |
Term ABS 2008-1
|
|
2008-1
|
|
April 18, 2008
|
|
$ |
86,615 |
|
|
12 months
(Through April 15, 2009)
|
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term ABS 2009-1
|
|
2009-1
|
|
December 3, 2009
|
|
$ |
142,301 |
|
|
18 months
(Through May 15, 2011)
|
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes underwriters fees, insurance premiums and other costs. |
14
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
5. DEBT (Concluded)
Debt Covenants
As of March 31, 2010, we are in compliance with all our debt covenants relating to the line of
credit facility, including those that require the maintenance of certain financial ratios and other
financial conditions. These covenants require a minimum ratio of our assets to debt and a minimum
ratio of our earnings before interest, taxes and non-cash expenses to fixed charges. These
covenants also limit the maximum ratio of our funded debt to tangible net worth. Additionally, we
must maintain consolidated net income of not less than $1 for the two most recently ended fiscal
quarters. Some of these debt covenants may indirectly limit the repurchase of common stock or
payment of dividends on common stock.
In addition to the covenants stated above, our revolving secured warehouse facilities and Term
ABS financings contain covenants that measure the performance of the contributed assets. As of
March 31, 2010, we were in compliance with all such covenants. As of the end of the quarter, we
are also in compliance with our covenants under the Senior Notes Indenture. The Indenture includes
covenants that limit the maximum ratio of our funded debt to tangible net worth and also require a
minimum collateral coverage ratio.
6. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
Interest Rate Caps. We purchase interest rate cap agreements to manage the interest rate risk
on our $325.0 million revolving secured warehouse facility and on $50.0 million of the $75.0
million revolving secured warehouse facility.
As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, eight interest rate cap agreements with various
maturities between May 2010 and August 2011 were outstanding with a cap rate of 6.75% plus the
spread over the LIBOR rate or the commercial paper rate, as applicable, and a nominal fair value.
The interest rate caps have not been designated as hedging instruments.
Interest Rate Swaps. As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the following were
outstanding:
|
|
|
An interest rate swap to convert the outstanding balance of the 2008-1 floating rate
Term ABS financing into fixed rate debt, bearing an interest rate of 6.37%. This
interest rate swap has been designated as a cash flow hedging instrument. |
|
|
|
|
An interest rate swap, also related to the outstanding balance of the 2008-1 floating
rate Term ABS financing, that requires the counterparties to make a payment depending on
our actual debt balance outstanding on the facility
relative to our original forecasted balance and on the level of interest rates. This interest rate swap has not been
designated as a hedging instrument. |
|
|
|
|
An interest rate swap to convert $25.0 million of the $75.0 million 2008-2 revolving
secured warehouse facility into fixed rate debt, bearing an interest rate of 5.11%.
This interest rate swap has been designated as a cash flow hedging instrument. |
At March 31, 2010, we had minimal exposure to credit loss on the interest rate swaps. We do
not believe that any reasonably likely change in interest rates would have a materially adverse
effect on our financial position, our results of operations or our cash flows.
15
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
6. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS (Concluded)
Information related to the fair values of derivative instruments in our consolidated balance
sheets as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
location |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
1,480 |
|
|
$ |
1,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate caps |
|
Other assets |
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Asset Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,480 |
|
|
$ |
1,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information related to the effect of derivative instruments designated as hedging
instruments on our consolidated income statements for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and
2009 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain / (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI on Derivative |
|
|
Loss Reclassified from Accumulated |
|
|
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
OCI into Income (Effective Portion) |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Location |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Interest rate swap |
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
$ |
(474 |
) |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
(440 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,097 |
) |
As of March 31, 2010, we expect to reclassify losses of $0.5 million from accumulated
other comprehensive income into income during the next twelve months.
Information related to the effect of derivative instruments not designated as hedging
instruments on our consolidated income statements for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and
2009 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Loss Recognized in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income on Derivative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments |
|
Location |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Interest rate caps |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
(76 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
Interest rate swap |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(590 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(666 |
) |
|
$ |
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
7. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of
financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate their value.
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents. The carrying amount of
cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents approximate their fair value due
to the short maturity of these instruments.
Restricted Securities Available for Sale. Restricted securities consist of amounts held in
trusts by TPAs to pay claims on vehicle service contracts. Securities for which we do not have the
intent or ability to hold to maturity are classified as available for sale and stated at fair
value. The fair value of restricted securities are based on quoted market values.
Net Investment in Loans Receivable. Loans receivable, net represents our net investment in
Consumer Loans. The fair value is determined by calculating the present value of future Loan
payment inflows and Dealer Holdback outflows estimated by us utilizing a discount rate comparable
with the rate used to calculate our allowance for credit losses.
Derivative Instruments. The fair value of interest rate caps and interest rate swaps are
based on quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, which are influenced by a number
of factors, including interest rates, amount of debt outstanding, and number of months until
maturity.
Liabilities. The fair value of debt is determined using quoted market prices, if available,
or calculated using the estimated value of each debt instrument based on current rates offered to
us for debt with similar maturities.
A comparison of the carrying value and estimated fair value of these financial instruments is
as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, |
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents and
restricted cash |
|
$ |
87,148 |
|
|
$ |
87,148 |
|
|
$ |
84,626 |
|
|
$ |
84,626 |
|
Restricted securities available for sale |
|
|
3,072 |
|
|
|
3,072 |
|
|
|
3,121 |
|
|
|
3,121 |
|
Net investment in Loans receivable |
|
|
1,088,342 |
|
|
|
1,098,129 |
|
|
|
1,050,013 |
|
|
|
1,056,059 |
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line of credit |
|
$ |
28,400 |
|
|
$ |
28,400 |
|
|
$ |
97,300 |
|
|
$ |
97,300 |
|
Secured financing |
|
|
221,167 |
|
|
|
223,574 |
|
|
|
404,597 |
|
|
|
404,725 |
|
Mortgage note |
|
|
4,689 |
|
|
|
4,702 |
|
|
|
4,744 |
|
|
|
4,757 |
|
Senior Notes |
|
|
243,845 |
|
|
|
258,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
1,480 |
|
|
|
1,480 |
|
|
|
1,445 |
|
|
|
1,445 |
|
Fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset
or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such,
fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market
participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. We group assets and liabilities at fair
value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the
reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. These levels are:
Level 1 |
|
Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets. |
Level 2 |
|
Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar
instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions
are observable in the market. |
Level 3 |
|
Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use at least one significant assumption not observable in the
market. These unobservable assumptions reflect estimates or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing
the asset or liability. |
17
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
7. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (Concluded)
The following table provides the fair value measurements of applicable assets and liabilities,
measured at fair value on a recurring basis, as of March 31, 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted securities available
for sale |
|
$ |
3,072 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,072 |
|
Derivative Instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,480 |
|
|
$ |
1,480 |
|
8. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
In the normal course of our business, affiliated Dealer-Partners assign Consumer Loans to us
under the Portfolio and Purchase Programs. Dealer Loans and Purchased Loans with affiliated
Dealer-Partners are on the same terms as those with non-affiliated Dealer-Partners. Affiliated
Dealer-Partners are comprised of Dealer-Partners owned or controlled by: (1) our majority
shareholder and Chairman; and (2) a member of the Chairmans immediate family.
Affiliated Dealer Loan balances were $12.0 million and $12.7 million as of March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively. Affiliated Dealer Loan balances were 1.3% and 1.5% of total
consolidated Dealer Loan balances as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. A
summary of related party Loan activity is as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Affiliated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dealer-Partner |
|
|
% of |
|
|
Dealer-Partner |
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
activity |
|
|
consolidated |
|
|
activity |
|
|
consolidated |
|
New Dealer and
Purchased Loans |
|
$ |
1,599 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
$ |
2,030 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dealer Loan revenue |
|
$ |
847 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
$ |
948 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dealer Holdback payments |
|
$ |
590 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
$ |
571 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
% |
Our majority shareholder and Chairman has indirect control over entities that offer
secured lines of credit to automobile dealers and has the right or obligation to reacquire these
entities under certain circumstances until December 31, 2014 or the repayment of the related
purchase money note.
9. INCOME TAXES
A reconciliation of the U.S. federal statutory rate to the Companys effective tax rate,
excluding the results of the discontinued United Kingdom operations, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
U.S. federal statutory rate |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
State income taxes |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
Interest and penalties |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Other |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
39.0 |
% |
|
|
36.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
9. INCOME TAXES (Concluded)
The differences between the U.S. federal statutory rate and our effective tax rate are
primarily due to state income taxes and reserves for uncertain tax positions and related interest
and penalties that are included in the provision for income taxes. The increase in 2010, as
compared to the same period in 2009, is primarily due to interest related to the ongoing Internal
Revenue Service (IRS) audit detailed below.
The federal income tax returns for 2004, 2005, and 2006 have been under examination by the IRS
since February 2007, and in March 2010, the IRS began examining the federal returns for 2007 and
2008. In July 2009, we received a revised notice from the IRS, in the form of a 30-day letter,
disputing the tax valuation of our Loan portfolio for 2004 through 2006. We disagree with the
IRSs proposed valuation and will vigorously defend our position. We have filed tax returns for
2004 to 2008 applying the portfolio valuation methodology that the IRS disputes. If the IRS were
to prevail with their current position without compromise, we would owe $20.2 million of additional
federal and state taxes for the period under audit. Additionally, if we used their methodology for
2007, 2008 and 2009, we would owe additional federal and state taxes of $16.7 million. The total
amount of $36.9 million of additional taxes for the 2004 through 2009 period is an acceleration of
taxes already provided for and recorded as a deferred tax liability in our consolidated balance
sheet as of March 31, 2010. We would also owe interest related to the additional federal and state
taxes that would reduce our net income by $8.2 million. In February 2010, we have submitted to the
IRS a proposal with an alternative portfolio valuation methodology. This proposal is currently
under the IRSs review.
We believe that the ultimate deductibility of the Loan portfolio valuation position is highly
certain, but there is uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility. As of March 31, 2010, we
estimate that it is likely that the Loan portfolio valuation position will be settled with the IRS
for an amount different from the amounts filed in 2004 through 2008 tax returns. For that reason,
we have measured this uncertain tax position by applying the FASB ASCs recognition threshold and
measurement attributes for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position
taken in a tax return.
As of March 31, 2010, we have reduced the deferred income tax liability related to the Loan
portfolio valuation and recorded a liability for unrecognized tax benefit in the amount of $7.0
million. This adjustment reflects an acceleration of taxes already provided for in previous
periods. We have also recorded interest related to the additional federal and state taxes that is
included in the provision for income taxes and decreases our net income by $1.0 million.
10. CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS
Net Income Per Share
Basic net income per share has been computed by dividing net income by the basic number of
common shares outstanding. Diluted net income per share has been computed by dividing net income
by the diluted number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding using the treasury stock
method. The share effect is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Weighted average common and common equivalent shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic number of common shares outstanding |
|
|
31,042,495 |
|
|
|
30,479,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive effect of stock options |
|
|
367,735 |
|
|
|
541,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive effect of restricted stock and restricted stock units |
|
|
174,096 |
|
|
|
159,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive number of common and common equivalent shares
outstanding |
|
|
31,584,326 |
|
|
|
31,180,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no stock options, restricted stock or restricted stock units that would be
anti-dilutive for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
Stock Compensation Plans
Pursuant to our Amended and Restated Incentive Compensation Plan (the Incentive Plan), the
number of shares reserved for granting of restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock options,
and performance awards to team members, officers, directors, and contractors at any time prior to
April 6, 2019 is 1.5 million shares. The shares available for future grants under the Incentive
Plan totaled 310,600 as of March 31, 2010.
19
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
10. CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS (Concluded)
A summary of the restricted stock activity under the Incentive Plan for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009 is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
Restricted Stock |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Outstanding Beginning Balance |
|
|
242,277 |
|
|
|
245,329 |
|
Granted |
|
|
19,183 |
|
|
|
121,736 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(142,682 |
) |
|
|
(105,682 |
) |
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,711 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Ending Balance |
|
|
118,778 |
|
|
|
255,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of the restricted stock unit activity under the Incentive Plan for the three months
ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested |
|
|
Vested |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Grant-Date |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Grant-Date |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
Restricted Stock |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Restricted Stock |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Restricted Stock |
|
Restricted Stock Units |
|
Units |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
Units |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
Units |
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
648,250 |
|
|
$ |
19.35 |
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
$ |
26.30 |
|
|
|
768,250 |
|
Granted |
|
|
32,500 |
|
|
|
39.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,500 |
(1) |
Vested |
|
|
(149,650 |
) |
|
|
20.24 |
|
|
|
149,650 |
|
|
|
20.24 |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2010 |
|
|
531,100 |
|
|
$ |
20.36 |
|
|
|
269,650 |
|
|
$ |
22.94 |
|
|
|
800,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested |
|
|
Vested |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Grant-Date |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Grant-Date |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
Restricted Stock |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Restricted Stock |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Restricted Stock |
|
Restricted Stock Units |
|
Units |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
Units |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
Units |
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
640,000 |
|
|
$ |
18.99 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
$ |
26.30 |
|
|
|
700,000 |
|
Granted |
|
|
62,500 |
|
|
|
21.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,500 |
(3) |
Vested |
|
|
(60,000 |
) |
|
|
26.30 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
26.30 |
|
|
|
|
(4) |
Forfeited |
|
|
(7,500 |
) |
|
|
13.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2009 |
|
|
635,000 |
|
|
$ |
18.60 |
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
$ |
26.30 |
|
|
|
755,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The distribution date of vested restricted stock units is February 22, 2017. |
|
(2) |
|
The distribution date of vested restricted stock units is February 22, 2014 for 60,000 restricted stock units and February 22, 2016 for 89,650 restricted stock units. |
|
|
(3) |
|
The distribution date of vested restricted stock units is February 22, 2016. |
|
(4) |
|
The distribution date of vested restricted stock units is February 22, 2014. |
Stock compensation expense consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Restricted stock |
|
$ |
334 |
|
|
$ |
510 |
|
Restricted stock units |
|
|
849 |
|
|
|
974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,183 |
|
|
$ |
1,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Concluded)
(UNAUDITED)
11. BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION
We have two reportable business segments: United States and Other. The United States segment
is our dominant segment and primarily consists of the United States automobile financing business.
The Other segment consists of businesses in liquidation.
Selected segment information is set forth below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
103,261 |
|
|
$ |
87,886 |
|
Other |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
103,262 |
|
|
$ |
87,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from
continuing operations
before provision for income
taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
52,470 |
|
|
$ |
45,970 |
|
Other |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income from
continuing operations
before provision for income
taxes |
|
$ |
52,457 |
|
|
$ |
45,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Segment Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
1,227,678 |
|
|
$ |
1,175,550 |
|
Other |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
1,227,756 |
|
|
$ |
1,176,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Our comprehensive income information is set forth below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
32,010 |
|
|
$ |
29,001 |
|
Unrealized loss on securities available for sale, net of tax |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Unrealized gain on interest rate swap, net of tax |
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
32,314 |
|
|
$ |
29,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated
financial statements and related notes included in Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data, of our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as Item 1- Consolidated Financial Statements,
of this Form 10-Q, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Critical Success Factors
Critical success factors include our ability to access capital on acceptable terms, accurately
forecast Consumer Loan performance, and maintain or grow Consumer Loan volume at the level and on
the terms that we anticipate.
Access to Capital
Our strategy for accessing capital on acceptable terms needed to maintain and grow the
business is to: (1) maintain consistent financial performance; (2) maintain modest financial
leverage; and (3) maintain multiple funding sources. Our funded debt to equity ratio is 0.9:1 at
March 31, 2010. We currently utilize the following forms of debt financing: (1) a revolving
secured line of credit with a commercial bank syndicate; (2) revolving secured warehouse facilities
with institutional investors; (3) Term ABS financings with qualified institutional investors; and
(4) our Senior Notes.
Consumer Loan Performance
At the time the Consumer Loan is submitted to us for assignment, we forecast future expected
cash flows from the Consumer Loan. Based on these forecasts, an advance or one-time payment is
made to the related Dealer-Partner at a price designed to achieve an acceptable return on capital.
If Consumer Loan performance equals or exceeds our original expectation, it is likely our target
return on capital will be achieved.
We use a statistical model to estimate the expected collection rate for each Consumer Loan at
the time of assignment. We continue to evaluate the expected collection rate of each Consumer Loan
subsequent to assignment. Our evaluation becomes more accurate as the Consumer Loans age, as we
use actual performance data in our forecast. By comparing our current expected collection rate for
each Consumer Loan with the rate we projected at the time of assignment, we are able to assess the
accuracy of our initial forecast. The following table compares our forecast of Consumer Loan
collection rates as of March 31, 2010, with the forecasts as of December 31, 2009, and at the time
of assignment, segmented by year of assignment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forecasted Collection Percentage as of |
|
Variance in Forecasted Collection Percentage from |
Consumer |
|
|
|
|
Loan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assignment |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
Initial |
|
December 31, |
|
Initial |
Year |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Forecast |
|
2009 |
|
Forecast |
2001 |
|
|
67.5 |
% |
|
|
67.5 |
% |
|
|
70.4 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
-2.9 |
% |
2002 |
|
|
70.5 |
% |
|
|
70.4 |
% |
|
|
67.9 |
% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
2.6 |
% |
2003 |
|
|
73.7 |
% |
|
|
73.7 |
% |
|
|
72.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
1.7 |
% |
2004 |
|
|
73.1 |
% |
|
|
73.1 |
% |
|
|
73.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
2005 |
|
|
73.8 |
% |
|
|
73.7 |
% |
|
|
74.0 |
% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
-0.2 |
% |
2006 |
|
|
70.3 |
% |
|
|
70.3 |
% |
|
|
71.4 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
-1.1 |
% |
2007 |
|
|
68.1 |
% |
|
|
68.3 |
% |
|
|
70.7 |
% |
|
|
-0.2 |
% |
|
|
-2.6 |
% |
2008 |
|
|
69.8 |
% |
|
|
70.0 |
% |
|
|
69.7 |
% |
|
|
-0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
2009 |
|
|
76.4 |
% |
|
|
75.6 |
% |
|
|
71.9 |
% |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
Consumer Loans assigned in 2002-2004 and 2008-2009 have performed better than our initial
expectations while Consumer Loans assigned in 2001 and 2005-2007 have performed worse. During the
first quarter of 2010, forecasted collection rates increased for Consumer Loans assigned in 2009,
and decreased modestly for 2007 and 2008 Consumer Loan assignments.
As a result of current economic conditions and uncertainty about future conditions, our
forecasts of future collection rates are subject to a greater than normal degree of risk. Our
pricing strategy considers this in that we have established advance rates that are intended to
allow us to achieve acceptable levels of profitability, even if collection rates are less than we
currently forecast.
22
The following table presents forecasted Consumer Loan collection rates, advance rates
(includes amounts paid to acquire Purchased Loans), the spread (the forecasted collection rate less
the advance rate), and the percentage of the forecasted collections that had been realized as of
March 31, 2010. Payments of Dealer Holdback and accelerated Dealer Holdback are not included in
the advance percentage paid to the Dealer-Partner. All amounts are presented as a percentage of
the initial balance of the Consumer Loan (principal + interest). The table includes both Dealer
Loans and Purchased Loans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010 |
|
Consumer Loan |
|
Forecasted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Forecast |
|
Assignment Year |
|
Collection % |
|
|
Advance % |
|
|
Spread % |
|
|
Realized |
|
2001 |
|
|
67.5 |
% |
|
|
46.0 |
% |
|
|
21.5 |
% |
|
|
99.2 |
% |
2002 |
|
|
70.5 |
% |
|
|
42.2 |
% |
|
|
28.3 |
% |
|
|
99.0 |
% |
2003 |
|
|
73.7 |
% |
|
|
43.4 |
% |
|
|
30.3 |
% |
|
|
98.9 |
% |
2004 |
|
|
73.1 |
% |
|
|
44.0 |
% |
|
|
29.1 |
% |
|
|
98.4 |
% |
2005 |
|
|
73.8 |
% |
|
|
46.9 |
% |
|
|
26.9 |
% |
|
|
97.9 |
% |
2006 |
|
|
70.3 |
% |
|
|
46.6 |
% |
|
|
23.7 |
% |
|
|
94.8 |
% |
2007 |
|
|
68.1 |
% |
|
|
46.5 |
% |
|
|
21.6 |
% |
|
|
82.3 |
% |
2008 |
|
|
69.8 |
% |
|
|
44.6 |
% |
|
|
25.2 |
% |
|
|
61.3 |
% |
2009 |
|
|
76.4 |
% |
|
|
43.9 |
% |
|
|
32.5 |
% |
|
|
32.0 |
% |
2010 |
|
|
73.4 |
% |
|
|
44.9 |
% |
|
|
28.5 |
% |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
The risk of a material change in our forecasted collection rate declines as the Consumer
Loans age. For 2006 and prior Consumer Loan assignments, the risk of a material forecast variance
is modest, as we have currently realized in excess of 90% of the expected collections. Conversely,
the forecasted collection rates for more recent Consumer Loan assignments are less certain as a
significant portion of our forecast has not been realized.
The spread between the forecasted collection rate and the advance rate declined during the
2003-2007 period as we increased advance rates during this period in response to a more difficult
competitive environment. During 2008 and 2009, the spread increased as the competitive environment
improved, and we reduced advance rates. In addition, during 2009 the spread was positively
impacted by better than expected Consumer Loan performance. The decline in the spread for 2010
Consumer Loan assignments reflects advance rate increases implemented during the last four months
of 2009 and the first quarter of 2010.
The following table presents forecasted Consumer Loan collection rates, advance rates
(includes amounts paid to acquire Purchased Loans), and the spread (the forecasted collection rate
less the advance rate) as of March 31, 2010 for Purchased Loans and Dealer Loans separately.
Payments of Dealer Holdback and accelerated Dealer Holdback are not included in the advance
percentage paid to the Dealer-Partner. All amounts are presented as a percentage of the initial
balance of the Consumer Loan (principal + interest).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Loan |
|
|
Forecasted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assignment Year |
|
|
Collection % |
|
|
Advance % |
|
|
Spread % |
|
Purchased Loans |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
68.3 |
% |
|
|
48.7 |
% |
|
|
19.6 |
% |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
68.8 |
% |
|
|
46.3 |
% |
|
|
22.5 |
% |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
76.5 |
% |
|
|
45.3 |
% |
|
|
31.2 |
% |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
72.9 |
% |
|
|
47.1 |
% |
|
|
25.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dealer Loans |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
68.1 |
% |
|
|
45.9 |
% |
|
|
22.2 |
% |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
70.3 |
% |
|
|
43.6 |
% |
|
|
26.7 |
% |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
76.4 |
% |
|
|
43.6 |
% |
|
|
32.8 |
% |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
73.5 |
% |
|
|
44.6 |
% |
|
|
28.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Although the advance rate on Purchased Loans is higher as compared to the advance rate on
Dealer Loans, Purchased Loans do not require us to pay Dealer Holdback.
23
Consumer Loan Volume
Our ability to maintain and grow Consumer Loan volume is impacted by our pricing strategy, the
number of Dealer-Partners actively participating in our programs, and the competitive environment.
The following table summarizes changes in Consumer Loan assignment
volume in each of the last five quarters as compared to the same period in the previous year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year over Year Percent Change |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Unit Volume |
|
|
Dollar Volume (1) |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
-13.0 |
% |
|
|
-28.9 |
% |
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
-16.2 |
% |
|
|
-33.5 |
% |
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
-5.7 |
% |
|
|
-13.0 |
% |
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
|
5.9 |
% |
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
11.2 |
% |
|
|
21.6 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents payments made to Dealer-Partners for advances on Dealer Loans and the
acquisition of Purchased Loans. Payments of Dealer Holdback and accelerated Dealer
Holdback are not included. |
Dollar and unit volume increased during the first quarter of 2010 as compared to the same
period in 2009 due to pricing changes implemented during the last four months of 2009 and the first
quarter of 2010 that reduced per unit profitability in exchange for increased unit volume.
As a result of our success in renewing our debt facilities during the third quarter of 2009,
securing additional financing during the fourth quarter of 2009 and issuing our Senior Notes in the
first quarter of 2010, we are in position to grow year over year unit volumes. We will continue to
monitor unit volumes and will make additional pricing changes with an objective to maximize
economic profit given the capital we have available. Future growth rates will partially depend on
how unit volumes respond to pricing changes, which will be influenced to a large degree by how
quickly competition returns to our market.
The following table summarizes the changes in Consumer Loan unit volume and active
Dealer-Partners:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% change |
|
Consumer Loan unit volume |
|
|
38,903 |
|
|
|
34,991 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
% |
Active Dealer-Partners (1) |
|
|
2,346 |
|
|
|
2,305 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average volume per active Dealer-Partner |
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
15.2 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Loan unit volume from Dealer-Partners active both periods |
|
|
28,821 |
|
|
|
27,728 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
Dealer-Partners active both periods |
|
|
1,524 |
|
|
|
1,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average volume per Dealer-Partners active both periods |
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Loan unit volume from new Dealer-Partners |
|
|
1,741 |
|
|
|
2,228 |
|
|
|
-21.9 |
% |
New active Dealer-Partners (2) |
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
-36.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average volume per new active Dealer-Partners |
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
22.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attrition (3) |
|
|
-20.8 |
% |
|
|
-25.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Active Dealer-Partners are Dealer-Partners who have received funding for at least one
Loan during the period. |
|
(2) |
|
New active Dealer-Partners are Dealer-Partners who enrolled in our program and have
received funding for their first Loan from us during the periods presented. |
|
(3) |
|
Attrition is measured according to the following formula: decrease in Consumer Loan
unit volume from Dealer-Partners who have received funding for at least one Loan during the
comparable period of the prior year but did not receive funding for any Loans during the
current period divided by prior year comparable period Consumer Loan unit volume. |
24
Consumer Loans are assigned to us through either our Portfolio Program or our Purchase
Program. The following table summarizes the portion of our Consumer Loan volume that was assigned
to us through our Purchase Program:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
New Purchased Loan unit volume as a percentage of total unit volume |
|
|
9.1 |
% |
|
|
17.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Purchased Loan dollar volume as a percentage of total dollar volume |
|
|
11.1 |
% |
|
|
21.3 |
% |
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, new Purchased Loan unit and dollar volume as a
percentage of total unit and dollar volume, respectively, decreased as compared to 2009 primarily
due to the continued impact of program enrollment eligibility changes we made in 2008. For all
Dealer-Partners enrolling in our program after August 31, 2008, access to our Purchase Program is
only granted after the first accelerated Dealer Holdback payment has been made under the Portfolio
Program.
As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the net Purchased Loans receivable balance was
25.2% and 27.5%, respectively, of the total net Loans receivable balance.
25
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
The following is a discussion of our results of operations and income statement data on a
consolidated basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance charges |
|
$ |
89,663 |
|
|
$ |
76,726 |
|
|
|
16.9 |
% |
Premiums earned |
|
|
7,704 |
|
|
|
6,460 |
|
|
|
19.3 |
% |
Other income |
|
|
5,895 |
|
|
|
4,702 |
|
|
|
25.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
103,262 |
|
|
|
87,888 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and wages |
|
|
16,110 |
|
|
|
17,121 |
|
|
|
-5.9 |
% |
General and administrative |
|
|
6,542 |
|
|
|
7,995 |
|
|
|
-18.2 |
% |
Sales and marketing |
|
|
4,810 |
|
|
|
3,921 |
|
|
|
22.7 |
% |
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
6,426 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
3818.3 |
% |
Interest |
|
|
11,705 |
|
|
|
7,923 |
|
|
|
47.7 |
% |
Provision for claims |
|
|
5,212 |
|
|
|
4,809 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
50,805 |
|
|
|
41,933 |
|
|
|
21.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before provision
for income taxes |
|
|
52,457 |
|
|
|
45,955 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
20,442 |
|
|
|
16,943 |
|
|
|
20.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
32,015 |
|
|
|
29,012 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued United Kingdom operations |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
-66.7 |
% |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
-100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
-54.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
32,010 |
|
|
$ |
29,001 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
1.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
1.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
31,042,495 |
|
|
|
30,479,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
31,584,326 |
|
|
|
31,180,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
26
Continuing Operations
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
The following table highlights changes in income from continuing operations for the three
months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
29,012 |
|
Increase in finance charges |
|
|
12,937 |
|
Decrease in operating expenses (1) |
|
|
1,575 |
|
Increase in provision for credit losses |
|
|
(6,262 |
) |
Increase in interest |
|
|
(3,782 |
) |
Increase in provision for income taxes |
|
|
(3,499 |
) |
Other (2) |
|
|
2,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
32,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Operating expenses consist of salaries and wages, general and administrative, and sales
and marketing expenses. |
|
(2) |
|
Other consists of premiums earned, other income, and provision for claims. |
Finance Charges. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, finance charges increased $12.9
million, or 16.9%, as compared to the same period in 2009. The increase is primarily the result
of:
|
|
|
An increase in the average yield on our Loan portfolio resulting from an increase in
forecasted collection rates throughout 2009 as well as higher yields on Consumer Loans
assigned during the last three quarters of 2009 and the first quarter of 2010. For the
three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, the average yield on our Loan portfolio was
34.6% and 29.2%, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
A 2.9% increase in the average Loans receivable balance due to growth in new Loan
volume during the last quarter of 2009 and first quarter of 2010. |
Premiums Earned. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, premiums earned increased $1.2
million, or 19.3%, as compared to the same period in 2009. The increase is primarily due to a 2009
revision in our revenue recognition timing of vehicle service contracts reinsured through VSC Re.
During the third quarter of 2009, we revised our revenue recognition timing in order to better
match the timing with our expected costs of servicing vehicle contracts.
Other Income. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, other income increased $1.2 million,
or 25.4%, as compared to the same period in 2009. The increase is primarily due to an increase in
Guaranteed Asset Protection (GAP) profit sharing payments due to decreased GAP claims paid as a
percentage of premiums written. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, we received GAP profit
sharing payments of $0.7 million compared to $0.1 million for the same period in 2009.
Salaries and wages. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, salaries and wages decreased
$1.0 million, or 5.9%, as compared to the same period in 2009, due primarily to a $0.9 million
decrease related to Information Technology.
General and Administrative. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, general and
administrative expense decreased $1.5 million, or 18.2%, as compared to the same period in 2009 due
primarily to decreased legal costs.
Sales and Marketing. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, sales and marketing expense
increased $0.9 million, or 22.7%, as compared to the same period in 2009 due primarily to increased
sales commissions.
Provision for Credit Losses. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, the provision for
credit losses increased $6.3 million, or 3818.3%, as compared to the same period in 2009. Under
GAAP, when forecasted future cash flows decline relative to the cash flows expected at the time of
assignment, a provision for credit losses is recorded immediately as a current period expense and a
corresponding allowance for credit losses is established. For purposes of calculating the required
allowance, Dealer Loans are grouped by Dealer-Partner and Purchased Loans are grouped by month of
purchase. As a result, regardless of the overall performance of the portfolio of Consumer Loans, a
provision can be required if any individual Loan pool performs worse than expected.
27
During the most recent period, overall Consumer Loan performance was consistent with our
expectations at the start of the period. However, a $6.4 million provision for credit losses was
recorded consisting of the following components: (1) $3.4 million related to specific Dealer Loan
pools that experienced a decline in forecasted future cash flows during the period and (2) $3.0
million related to specific Purchased Loan pools that experienced a decline in forecasted cash
flows during the period. We recognized a minimal amount of provision for credit losses for the
three months ended March 31, 2009 primarily due to a slight improvement in forecasted collection
rates during the period.
Interest. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, interest expense increased $3.8 million,
or 47.7%, as compared to the same period in 2009. The following table shows interest expense, the
average outstanding debt balance, and the pre-tax average cost of debt for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
11,705 |
|
|
$ |
7,923 |
|
Average outstanding debt balance |
|
$ |
492,069 |
|
|
$ |
624,279 |
|
Pre-tax average cost of debt |
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, the increase in interest expense is primarily
due to an increase in our pre-tax average cost of debt due to the issuance of the Senior Notes
during the first quarter of 2010 and an increase in available and unused credit capacity.
Provision for income taxes. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, the effective tax rate
increased to 39.0%, from 36.9% in the same period in 2009 primarily due to an increase in reserves
for uncertain tax positions and interest related to the ongoing IRS audit.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We need capital to fund new Loans and pay Dealer Holdback. Our primary sources of capital are
cash flows from operating activities, collections of Consumer Loans and borrowings under: (1) a
revolving secured line of credit with a commercial bank syndicate; (2) revolving secured warehouse
facilities with institutional investors; (3) Term ABS financings with qualified institutional
investors; and (4) our Senior Notes. There are various restrictive debt covenants for each
financing arrangement and we are in compliance with those covenants as of March 31, 2010. For
information regarding these financings and the covenants included in the related documents, see
Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements contained in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q, which is
incorporated herein by reference.
During the first quarter of 2010, we issued $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of
9.125% First Priority Senior Notes. Concurrently with the issuance of the Senior Notes, we amended
the agreements governing our line of credit facility with a commercial bank syndicate to facilitate
the issuance of the Senior Notes and future secured indebtedness. The net proceeds from the
offering of the Senior Notes were used to repay all outstanding borrowings under our line of credit
facility and to repay all outstanding borrowings under our $325.0 million revolving secured
warehouse facility, subject to our ability to reborrow in each case.
The Senior Notes were issued pursuant to an Indenture, dated as of February 1, 2010, among us,
BVPP and VRS, as Guarantors, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee. The description of
the Indenture is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of the Indenture, a
copy of which is filed as Exhibit 4(f)(129) to our Form 8-K filed on February 4, 2010.
The Senior Notes mature on February 1, 2017 and bear interest at a rate of 9.125% per annum,
computed on the basis of 360-day year composed of twelve 30-day months and payable semi-annually on
February 1 and August 1 of each year, beginning on August 1, 2010. The Senior Notes were issued at
97.495% of the aggregate principal amount for gross proceeds of $243.7 million, representing a
yield to maturity of 9.625%.
28
Cash and cash equivalents decreased to $1.6 million as of March 31, 2010 from $2.2 million at
December 31, 2009. Our total balance sheet indebtedness decreased to $498.3 million at March 31,
2010 from $507.0 million at December 31, 2009 as the net cash provided by our operating activities
and principal collections from our Loan portfolio exceeded the cash used to fund new Loans.
Contractual Obligations
A summary of the total future contractual obligations requiring repayments as of March 31,
2010 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1 Year |
|
|
1-3 Years |
|
|
3-5 Years |
|
|
5 Years |
|
|
Other |
|
Long-term debt, including current
maturities and capital leases (1) |
|
$ |
504,442 |
|
|
$ |
36,077 |
|
|
$ |
214,657 |
|
|
$ |
3,708 |
|
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Operating lease obligations |
|
|
2,658 |
|
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
1,701 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase obligations (2) |
|
|
1,336 |
|
|
|
1,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other future obligations (3) |
|
|
19,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations (4) |
|
$ |
528,308 |
|
|
$ |
38,142 |
|
|
$ |
216,358 |
|
|
$ |
3,936 |
|
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
|
$ |
19,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Long-term debt obligations included in the above table consist solely of principal
repayments. We are also obligated to make interest payments at the applicable interest
rates, as discussed in Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements contained in Item 1
of this Form 10-Q which is incorporated herein by reference. Based on the actual amounts
outstanding under our revolving line of credit, our warehouse facilities, and our Senior
Notes at March 31, 2010, the forecasted amounts outstanding on all other debt and the
actual interest rates in effect as of March 31, 2010, interest is expected to be
approximately $18.6 million during 2010; $26.5 million during 2011; and $118.5 million
during 2012 and thereafter. |
|
(2) |
|
Purchase obligations consist solely of contractual obligations related to the
information system needs. |
|
(3) |
|
Other future obligations included in the above table consist solely of reserves for
uncertain tax positions. Payments are contingent upon examination and would occur in the
periods in which the uncertain tax positions are settled. |
|
(4) |
|
We have contractual obligations to pay Dealer Holdback to our Dealer-Partners; however,
as payments of Dealer Holdback are contingent upon the receipt of customer payments and the
repayment of advances, these obligations are excluded from the table above. |
Based upon anticipated cash flows, management believes that cash flows from operations
and its various financing alternatives will provide sufficient financing for debt maturities and
for future operations. Our ability to borrow funds may be impacted by economic and financial
market conditions. If the various financing alternatives were to become limited or unavailable to
us, our operations and liquidity could be materially and adversely affected.
Critical Accounting Estimates
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation
of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. On an ongoing basis, we review our accounting policies, assumptions, estimates
and judgments to ensure that our financial statements are presented fairly and in accordance with
GAAP. Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 discusses
several critical accounting estimates, which we believe involve a high degree of judgment and
complexity. There have been no material changes to the estimates and assumptions associated with
these accounting estimates from those discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2009.
29
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a
material current or future effect on our financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of
operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
Forward-Looking Statements
We make forward-looking statements in this report and may make such statements in future
filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We may also make forward-looking statements
in our press releases or other public or shareholder communications. Our forward-looking
statements are subject to risks and uncertainties and include information about our expectations
and possible or assumed future results of operations. When we use any of the words may, will,
should, believe, expect, anticipate, assume, forecast, estimate, intend, plan,
target or similar expressions, we are making forward-looking statements.
We claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 for all of our forward-looking statements. These
forward-looking statements represent our outlook only as of the date of this report. While we
believe that our forward-looking statements are reasonable, actual results could differ materially
since the statements are based on our current expectations, which are subject to risks and
uncertainties. Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to, the
factors set forth in Item 1A of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, other risk
factors discussed herein or listed from time to time in our reports filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and the following:
|
|
|
Our inability to accurately forecast and estimate the amount and timing of future
collections could have a material adverse effect on results of operations. |
|
|
|
|
We may be unable to execute our business strategy due to current economic conditions. |
|
|
|
|
We may be unable to continue to access or renew funding sources and obtain capital
needed to maintain and grow our business. |
|
|
|
|
The terms of our debt limit how we conduct our business. |
|
|
|
|
The conditions of the U.S. and international capital markets may adversely affect
lenders with which we have relationships, causing us to incur additional costs and reducing
our sources of liquidity, which may adversely affect our financial position, liquidity and
results of operations. |
|
|
|
|
Our substantial debt could negatively impact our business, prevent us from satisfying
our debt obligations and adversely affect our financial condition. |
|
|
|
|
Due to competition from traditional financing sources and non-traditional lenders, we
may not be able to compete successfully. |
|
|
|
|
We may not be able to generate sufficient cash flows to service our outstanding debt and
fund operations and may be forced to take other actions to satisfy our obligations under
such debt. |
|
|
|
|
Interest rate fluctuations may adversely affect our borrowing costs, profitability and
liquidity. |
|
|
|
|
Reduction in our credit rating could increase the cost of our funding from, and restrict
our access to, the capital markets and adversely affect our liquidity, financial condition
and results of operations. |
|
|
|
|
We may incur substantially more debt and other liabilities. This could exacerbate
further the risks associated with our current debt levels. |
|
|
|
|
The regulation to which we are or may become subject could result in a material adverse
effect on our business. |
|
|
|
|
Adverse changes in economic conditions, the automobile or finance industries, or the
non-prime consumer market could adversely affect our financial position, liquidity and
results of operations, the ability of key vendors that we depend on to supply us with
services, and our ability to enter into future financing transactions. |
|
|
|
|
Litigation we are involved in from time to time may adversely affect our financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows. |
|
|
|
|
Our operations are dependent on technology. |
|
|
|
|
We are dependent on our senior management and the loss of any of these individuals or an
inability to hire additional team members could adversely affect our ability to operate
profitably. |
|
|
|
|
Our reputation is a key asset to our business, and our business may be affected by how
we are perceived in the marketplace. |
30
|
|
|
The concentration of our Dealer-Partners in several states could adversely affect us. |
|
|
|
|
Failure to properly safeguard confidential consumer information could subject us to
liability, decrease our profitability and damage our reputation. |
|
|
|
|
Our founder controls a majority of our common stock, has the ability to control matters
requiring shareholder approval and has interests which may conflict with the interests of
our other security holders. |
|
|
|
|
Reliance on our outsourced business functions could adversely affect our business. |
|
|
|
|
Natural disasters, acts of war, terrorist attacks and threats or the escalation of
military activity in response to these attacks or otherwise may negatively affect our
business, financial condition and results of operations. |
Other factors not currently anticipated by management may also materially and adversely affect
our results of operations. We do not undertake, and expressly disclaim any obligation, to update
or alter our statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except
as required by applicable law.
31
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
Refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 for a complete
discussion of our market risk. There have been no material changes to the market risk information
included in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.
(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our management, with the participation of our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) as of the end of the period
covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures
are effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information
required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act and are
effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file
or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
(b) Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There have not been any changes in our internal
control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under
the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
32
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Stock Repurchases
In 1999, our board of directors approved a stock repurchase program which authorizes us to
purchase common shares in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions at price levels
we deem attractive. As of March 31, 2010, we have repurchased approximately 20.4 million shares
under the stock repurchase program at a cost of $399.2 million. Included in the stock repurchases
to date are 12.5 million shares of common stock purchased through four modified Dutch auction
tender offers at a cost of $304.4 million. As of March 31, 2010, we have authorization to
repurchase up to $29.1 million of our common stock.
The following table summarizes stock repurchases for the three months ended March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Maximum Dollar Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
|
that May Yet Be Used |
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
to Purchase Shares |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Average Price |
|
|
Announced Plans |
|
|
Under the Plans |
|
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
|
Paid per Share |
|
|
or Programs |
|
|
or Programs |
|
January 1 to January 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
29,113,295 |
|
February 1 to February 28, 2010 |
|
|
47,187 |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,113,295 |
|
March 1 to March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,113,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Amount represents shares of common stock released to us by team members as payment of tax
withholdings due to us upon the vesting of restricted stock. |
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
See Index of Exhibits following the signature page, which is incorporated herein by reference.
33
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
(Registrant)
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Kenneth S. Booth
|
|
|
|
Kenneth S. Booth |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) April 29, 2010 |
|
34
INDEX OF EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
4(f)(129)
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Indenture, dated as of February 1, 2010, among the
Company, the Guarantors named therein and U.S. Bank
National Association, as trustee. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4(f)(130)
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated February 1, 2010,
among the Company, Buyers Vehicle Protection Plan,
Inc., Vehicle Remarketing Services, Inc. and the
representative of the initial purchasers of the
Companys 9.125% First Priority Senior Secured Notes
due 2017. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4(f)(131)
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Ninth Amendment, dated as of February 1, 2010, to the
Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated
February 7, 2006, among the Company, the lenders which
are parties thereto from time to time and Comerica
Bank, as administrative agent. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4(f)(132)
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Fourth Amended and Restated Security Agreement, dated
as of February 1, 2010, among the Company, the other
Debtors party thereto and Comerica Bank, as collateral
agent. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4(g)(6)
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Intercreditor Agreement, dated as
of February 1, 2010, among Credit Acceptance
Corporation, the other Grantors party thereto,
representatives of the Secured Parties thereunder and
Comerica Bank, as administrative agent under the
Original Credit Agreement (as defined therein) and as
collateral agent. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31(a)
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31(b)
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32(a)
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32(b)
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
1 |
|
Previously filed as an exhibit to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, dated
February 5, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
2 |
|
Filed herewith. |
35