Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File No. 000-53235
DIGITILITI, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
26-1408538 |
|
|
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
266 East 7th
Street, 4th Floor
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(651) 925-3200
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act
(check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company þ |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date
|
|
|
Class
|
|
Outstanding at August 13, 2010 |
Common Stock, $.001 par value per share
|
|
64,745,000 shares |
DIGITILITI, INC.
Table of Contents
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
DIGITILITI, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
455,140 |
|
|
$ |
141,086 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
431,562 |
|
|
|
484,203 |
|
Prepaid and other current assets |
|
|
157,265 |
|
|
|
220,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,043,967 |
|
|
|
845,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
318,403 |
|
|
|
444,675 |
|
Software license, net |
|
|
569,405 |
|
|
|
713,199 |
|
Deferred financing costs |
|
|
8,869 |
|
|
|
113,334 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
7,322 |
|
|
|
7,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,947,966 |
|
|
$ |
2,124,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
444,256 |
|
|
$ |
436,389 |
|
Accounts payable related parties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,861 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
711,481 |
|
|
|
1,222,143 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
231,540 |
|
|
|
518,371 |
|
Current maturities of convertible debt |
|
|
572,179 |
|
|
|
2,032,771 |
|
Deferred income |
|
|
10,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of capital lease obligations |
|
|
44,923 |
|
|
|
45,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
2,015,101 |
|
|
|
4,263,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible debt, non-current |
|
|
271,383 |
|
|
|
1,646,502 |
|
Capital lease obligations, non-current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,043 |
|
Deferred rent |
|
|
6,760 |
|
|
|
11,552 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
3,607 |
|
|
|
3,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
2,296,851 |
|
|
|
5,949,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A
Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value; 1,200,000
shares authorized, 723,895 shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
724 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized, 64,209,298 and 38,808,736 shares issued and outstanding,
respectively |
|
|
64,210 |
|
|
|
38,809 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
23,286,621 |
|
|
|
15,448,392 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(23,700,440 |
) |
|
|
(19,312,136 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders deficit |
|
|
(348,885 |
) |
|
|
(3,824,935 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders deficit |
|
$ |
1,947,966 |
|
|
$ |
2,124,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
DIGITILITI, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUES |
|
$ |
539,007 |
|
|
$ |
859,669 |
|
|
$ |
1,164,134 |
|
|
$ |
1,719,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COST OF REVENUES |
|
|
378,397 |
|
|
|
544,118 |
|
|
|
680,368 |
|
|
|
1,006,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROSS PROFIT |
|
|
160,610 |
|
|
|
315,551 |
|
|
|
483,766 |
|
|
|
713,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing |
|
|
201,285 |
|
|
|
118,578 |
|
|
|
376,578 |
|
|
|
205,329 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
1,078,605 |
|
|
|
621,349 |
|
|
|
1,537,236 |
|
|
|
1,213,923 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
262,241 |
|
|
|
242,372 |
|
|
|
531,983 |
|
|
|
332,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
1,542,131 |
|
|
|
982,299 |
|
|
|
2,445,797 |
|
|
|
1,752,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS |
|
|
(1,381,521 |
) |
|
|
(666,748 |
) |
|
|
(1,962,031 |
) |
|
|
(1,038,706 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(318,294 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(318,294 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(1,879,849 |
) |
|
|
(290,477 |
) |
|
|
(2,107,979 |
) |
|
|
(2,280,724 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expenses |
|
|
(2,198,143 |
) |
|
|
(290,477 |
) |
|
|
(2,426,273 |
) |
|
|
(2,280,724 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET LOSS |
|
$ |
(3,579,664 |
) |
|
$ |
(957,225 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,388,304 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,319,430 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET LOSS PER SHARE BASIC AND DILUTED |
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEIGHTED-AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING
BASIC AND DILUTED |
|
|
45,663,981 |
|
|
|
34,231,316 |
|
|
|
43,503,332 |
|
|
|
33,437,064 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
DIGITILITI, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(4,388,304 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,319,430 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
166,868 |
|
|
|
376,335 |
|
Amortization of software licenses |
|
|
149,332 |
|
|
|
193,866 |
|
Beneficial conversion feature on converted notes |
|
|
1,478,707 |
|
|
|
977,029 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
|
36,849 |
|
|
|
140,879 |
|
Amortization of discount on convertible debt |
|
|
317,205 |
|
|
|
751,058 |
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
318,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants expense |
|
|
387,959 |
|
|
|
266,717 |
|
Bad debt expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,692 |
|
Shares issued for services |
|
|
113,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock option expense |
|
|
68,342 |
|
|
|
108,784 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
52,641 |
|
|
|
(107,392 |
) |
Prepaid and other current assets |
|
|
63,039 |
|
|
|
995 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
75,928 |
|
|
|
122,635 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
291,325 |
|
|
|
278,826 |
|
Due to related parties |
|
|
(7,861 |
) |
|
|
3,668 |
|
Deferred income |
|
|
10,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred rent |
|
|
(4,792 |
) |
|
|
(3,334 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(870,251 |
) |
|
|
(188,672 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment |
|
|
(40,596 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchase of software license |
|
|
(5,538 |
) |
|
|
(5,880 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(46,134 |
) |
|
|
(5,880 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of convertible debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
Financing costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,000 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of common stock, net of issuance costs |
|
|
1,214,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the exercise of warrants |
|
|
500,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on capital lease obligations |
|
|
(24,939 |
) |
|
|
(225,655 |
) |
Proceeds from notes payable related parties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
Proceeds from note payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
165,197 |
|
Payments on notes payable |
|
|
(364,572 |
) |
|
|
(139,572 |
) |
Payments on convertible notes |
|
|
(95,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
1,230,439 |
|
|
|
189,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
DIGITILITI, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH |
|
|
314,054 |
|
|
|
(4,582 |
) |
CASH AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
|
|
141,086 |
|
|
|
36,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AT END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
455,140 |
|
|
$ |
31,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
56,842 |
|
|
$ |
44,307 |
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Cash Financing and Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable issued for addition to property and
maintenance fees |
|
|
56,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest converted to debt principal |
|
|
21,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment acquired under capital lease |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,230 |
|
Notes payable issued to acquire software |
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,025 |
|
Common stock issued for debt and accrued interest |
|
|
3,167,833 |
|
|
|
2,648,203 |
|
Preferred stock issued for debt and accrued interest |
|
|
723,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued for liabilities |
|
|
12,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
Discount on convertible debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
212,852 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
DIGITILITI, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1. Basis of Presentation and Accounting Policies
The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of Digitiliti, Inc. have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (GAAP) and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Accordingly, they do not include all of the
information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. These consolidated
financial statements and notes should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements and notes included in the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on April 15, 2010. In the opinion of
management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair
presentation of financial position and the results of operations for the interim periods presented
have been reflected herein. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily
indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.
Restatement of Prior Period
During the Companys year-end close procedures conducted during the audit of its 2009 financial
statements, the Companys registered independent public accounting firm discovered and informed the
Company of a misstatement that occurred in the preparation of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the period ended March 31, 2009. To correct this misstatement, the Company recorded a noncash
adjustment for the three months ended March 31, 2009 of $771,453 which served to increase interest
expense and Additional Paid in Capital. This noncash adjustment resulted from an understatement in
the amount of beneficial conversion feature recognized when certain note holders converted their
notes during the six months ended June 30, 2009. The following table reflects the impact of the
above error to the consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2009:
The six months ended June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As previously |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Adjusted |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
1,509,271 |
|
|
$ |
771,453 |
|
|
$ |
2,280,724 |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
2,547,977 |
|
|
$ |
771,453 |
|
|
|
3,319,430 |
|
Loss per share Basic and diluted |
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
Software Revenue Recognition
The Company derives its revenue from sales of its products and services. Product revenue is
derived from sales of the Companys DigiBak service and new DigiLibe service.
The DigiBak service provides an offsite storage solution through a utility based computing
philosophy where customers pay for the gigabytes of data they store in the DigiBak vault.
The new DigiLibe service offers a comprehensive information management system in a completely
integrated and simplified single solution. The DigiLibe service is controlled via a centralized
policy engine that identifies, captures, develops, secures, indexes, stores and archive
information assets. The DigiLibe service is a multiple element software sales arrangement that is
comprised of three key components that act as one: Client Agent, Information Director, and Archive
Information Store. These components acting together structure the unstructured data to form a
corporate information library where content can be accessed by users and applications regardless of
where the data is stored.
7
For multiple element software license sales arrangements that do not require significant
modification or
customization of the underlying software, we recognize revenue when: (1) we enter into a legally
binding software arrangement with a customer for the license of software (2) we deliver the
software, (3) customer payment is deemed fixed or determinable and free of contingencies of
significant uncertainties; and (4) collection is probable.
For sales arrangements with multiple elements, we defer revenue for any undelivered elements, and
recognize revenue when the product is delivered or over the periods in which the service is
performed. If we cannot objectively determine the fair value of any undelivered element included in
bundled arrangements, we defer revenue until all elements are delivered and services have been
performed, or until fair value can objectively be determined for any remaining undelivered
elements.
Reclassifications
Certain accounts in the prior period were reclassified to conform with the current periods
financial statement presentation.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards
Update (ASU) No. 2009-13, Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements (ASU 2009-13) to:
|
(i) |
|
provide updated guidance on whether multiple
deliverables exist, how the deliverables in an
arrangement should be separated, and how the
consideration should be allocated; |
|
|
(ii) |
|
require an entity to allocate revenue in an arrangement
using estimated selling prices (ESP) of deliverables if
a vendor does not have vendor-specific objective
evidence of selling price (VSOE) or third-party evidence
of selling price (TPE); |
|
|
(iii) |
|
eliminate the use of the residual method and require an
entity to allocate revenue using the relative selling
price method; and |
|
|
(iv) |
|
expand the disclosure requirements to require an entity
to provide both qualitative and quantitative information
about the significant judgments made in applying the
revised guidance and subsequent changes in those
judgments that may significantly affect the timing or
amount of revenue recognition. |
In addition, in October 2009, the FASB also issued ASU No. 2009-14, Certain Revenue
Arrangements That Include Software Elements (ASU 2009-14) to amend the accounting standards for
revenue recognition to exclude tangible products containing software components and non-software
components that function together to deliver the tangible products essential functionality from
the scope of the software revenue recognition guidance. The revised revenue recognition accounting
standards are effective for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal
years beginning on or after June 15, 2010 and shall be applied on a prospective basis. Earlier
application is permitted. We are required to adopt this standard at the beginning of fiscal 2011,
which begins on January 1, 2011. We are assessing the impact of the new accounting standards on our
financial position and results of operations.
In January 2010, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that requires reporting entities to make
new disclosures about recurring or nonrecurring fair-value measurements including significant
transfers into and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements, and information on
purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements on a gross basis in the reconciliation of Level 3 fair
value measurements. The guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December
15, 2009, except for Level 3 reconciliation disclosures, which are effective for annual periods
beginning after December 15, 2010. The adoption of the above guidance did not impact the Companys
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
No other new accounting pronouncement issued or effective has had, or is expected to have, a
material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
8
2. Going Concern
As shown in the accompanying financial statements, the Company incurred net losses of $4,388,304
for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and an accumulated deficit of $23,700,440. These
conditions raise substantial doubt as to the Companys ability to continue as a going concern.
The Company continues to be dependent on its ability to generate future revenues, positive cash
flows and additional financing. There can be no guarantee that the Company will be successful in
generating future revenues, in obtaining additional debt or equity financing or that such
additional debt or equity financing will be available on terms acceptable to the Company. The
financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is
unable to continue as a going concern.
3. Notes Payable
In June 2008, the Company negotiated a six-month payment plan with its primary software vendor
Asigra, Inc. Under the terms of this payment plan, the Company was granted extended payment terms
that omitted Asigras standard 20% discount for net 30-day early payment. This payment plan
reflected monthly payments based on a percentage of outstanding invoices owed for software licenses
and maintenance, with any remaining outstanding balance payable in December 2008. In December
2008, this payment plan was extended for another 6-months with all outstanding debt payable in May
2009. In July 2009, we executed a Payment and Security Agreement (the Security Agreement) with
Asigra that reflected an 8-month payment plan that would satisfy the existing balance owed to
Asigra along with the inclusion of amounts to be charged over this 8-month period. This Security
Agreement provided Asigra a security lien in the Companys DigiBAK vault system. On March 6, 2010,
the Company made the final payment called for under this Security Agreement and now owns all of
Asigra licenses outright. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, we made payments totaling
$364,572.
4. Convertible Debt
In
June 2010, under the terms of our Incentive Offer, we initiated a request to all of our unsecured
convertible debt holders to convert their convertible notes into
shares of common stock at a preferential $0.20 per share
conversion rate. In response to this offer, the Company converted $2,462,300 of its unsecured
convertible debt and $705,532 of accrued interest into 15,839,167 shares of the Companys common
stock. Also included in this Incentive Offer was the opportunity for the secured convertible debt
holders to convert their convertible notes into shares of the Companys Series A Convertible
Preferred Stock at a conversion rate of $1.00 per share (whereby each Preferred Stock is
convertible into five shares of common stock). In response, the Company converted $650,000 of its
secured convertible debt and $73,895 of accrued interest into 723,895 shares of the Companys
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. The secured and unsecured debt holders who elected to convert
were also allowed to exercise their outstanding common stock warrants at a reduced exercise price
of $0.20 per share.
The
Company accounted for the above transactions as an induced conversion under the guidance of FASB
ASC 470-20. Under ASC 470-20, the Company recognized additional interest expense totaling
$1,661,070 which comprised of the incremental increase in the fair value of the conversion option
of the debt of $594,555, the amortization of the unamortized discounts on the date of conversion of
$182,363 and the recognition of the contingent beneficial conversion feature on the notes of
$884,152. There was no incremental compensation cost that resulted from the reduction in the
warrants exercise price.The contingency related to the contingent beneficial conversion feature
was resolved on the date of conversion. Accordingly, the beneficial conversion feature calculated
on the commitment date was fully recognized through interest expense and additional paid-in
capital.
The Company accounted for the issuance of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock for the
repayment of the secured convertible debt as a debt extinguishment under FASB ASC 470-50. As a
result, a total loss on the extinguishment of $176,696 was recognized for the six months ended
June 30, 2010.
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company entered into settlement agreements with
three unsecured convertible note holders. Pursuant to these agreements, the Company repaid an
aggregate of $85,000 of principal and $8,933 of accrued interest to settle the outstanding
convertible notes. In connection with the settlement, the note holders surrendered all of the
warrants associated with these notes.
9
In conjunction with the Incentive Offer executed during second quarter of 2010, the Company entered
into partial settlement agreements with three unsecured convertible note holders that provided for
the repayment of $39,982 of principal and interest in return for the conversion of the remaining
balances of their respective convertible notes amounting to $134,800. The partial settlement of
each of these convertible notes represented a discount to the face value of the debt and involved
the surrender of all or a portion of the warrants associated with each convertible note.
As of June 30, 2010, the unamortized discount on the secured and unsecured convertible debt totaled
$21,438. As of June 30, 2010, the Company is in default on approximately $265,000 of unsecured
convertible debt. As of June 30, 2010, the unrecognized beneficial conversion feature on the
outstanding secured and unsecured convertible debt totaled $50,216 and $68,432, respectively.
On June 30, 2010, the Company modified the terms of a previously issued $250,000 convertible note
whereby the maturity date was extended from October 16, 2009 to December 31, 2011 and the
conversion rate was reduced from $0.50 to $0.20. In connection with the modification, the Company
granted the holder 50,000 common stock warrants exercisable at $0.20 per share. The fair value of
the warrants was determined to be $9,000 (see Note 7). The incremental increase in the fair value
of the conversion option was determined to be $132,598. The Company evaluated the modification
under FASB ASC 470-50 and determined that the modification was substantial and the revised terms
constituted a debt extinguishment. As a result, a total loss on extinguishment of $141,598 was
recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2010.
On June 30, 2010, the Company modified the terms of a previously issued $250,000 convertible note
whereby the maturity date was extended from May 20, 2009 to August 31, 2010. The debt is
convertible into common stock at $0.35 per share, subject to an effective registration statement
covering the underlying common stock that has been filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. The Company evaluated the modification under FASB ASC 470-50 and determined that the
modification was not substantial and did not qualify as a debt extinguishment. Accordingly, no gain
or loss was recognized from the modification.
A summary of the changes in convertible debt for the six months ended June 30, 2010, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible debt at December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
3,679,273 |
|
Less: principal payments |
|
|
(95,000 |
) |
Less: principal converted to equity |
|
|
(3,112,300 |
) |
Add: write-off of discount |
|
|
236,747 |
|
Add: Amortization of discount |
|
|
134,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
$ |
843,562 |
|
Less: current maturities |
|
|
(572,179 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion of convertible debt |
|
$ |
271,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
5. Equity
During
the six months ended June 30, 2010, in connection with a private
placement, the Company sold 6,565,000 common shares at $0.20 per
share for cash proceeds of $1,312,000, net of issuance costs of $97,950.
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company issued 427,500 common shares for services
valued at $110,275 based on the grant-date quoted market value of the Companys stock.
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company issued 64,395 common shares to settle
payables to an officer of the Company. The shares were valued at $16,099 based on the grant-date
quoted market value of the Companys stock. In connection with this settlement, the Company
recorded additional compensation expense of $3,220.
During
the six months ended June 30, 2010, in connection with the
Incentive Offer the Company issued 2,504,500 common shares for the
exercise of 2,504,500 common stock warrants and received cash proceeds of $500,900.
10
During
the six months ended June 30, 2010, in connection with the
Incentive Offer, the Company issued 723,895 shares of Series A
Convertible Preferred Stock to repay $650,000 of principal and $73,895 of accrued interest on the
secured convertible debt (see Note 4). Each share of Series A
Convertible Preferred Stock is
convertible into 5 shares of common stock at the option of the holder and are entitled to annual cumulative
dividends at the rate of 6%. The Series A Convertible Preferred Stock will be automatically
converted into common shares if any one of the following events occur:
|
a) |
|
The Companys common stock trades at $0.60 per share for more than 10 consecutive days; |
|
b) |
|
The Company conducts a capital raise of common stock at a price of at least $0.50 per
share and raises at least $5 million of gross proceeds; or |
|
c) |
|
At least 2/3 of the authorized shares of the Series A convertible preferred stock have
been converted to common shares. |
6. Stock Options
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company granted 100,000 common stock options with an
exercise price of $0.35 per share. These options have a term of 7 years, vested immediately and have a fair
value of $21,991, as calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Variables used in the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model for the options included: (1) discount rate of 1.44%, (2)
expected term of 3.5 years, (3) expected volatility of 383% and (4) zero expected dividends.
Stock option expense for the six months ended June 30, 2010 totaled $68,342. As of June 30, 2010,
there was approximately $160,332 of unrecognized option expense which is expected to be recorded
through September 2012.
A summary of option activities for the six months ended June 30, 2010 is reflected below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Life (yrs) |
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
1,845,000 |
|
|
|
0.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
0.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30,2010 |
|
|
1,945,000 |
|
|
|
0.37 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at June 30, 2010 |
|
|
1,035,265 |
|
|
|
0.37 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted in 2010 was $0.22. The outstanding
options at June 30, 2010 have an intrinsic value of zero.
7. Stock Warrants
In conjunction with the Companys equity raise, the Company granted 340,000 common stock
warrants with an exercise price of $0.30 per share to a consulting group that introduced investors to the
Company. These warrants have a term of 5 years, vested immediately and have a fair value of
$77,395, as calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Variables used in the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model for the warrants included: (1) discount rate of 2.37%, (2)
expected life of five years, (3) expected volatility of 181% and (4) zero expected dividends. The
above warrants were accounted for against the Companys additional paid-in capital account as share
issuance costs.
Pursuant to the terms of a former executive officers severance agreement, the Company granted
1,500,000 common stock warrants with an exercise price of $0.385 per
share. These warrants have a term of 5
years, vested immediately and have a fair value of $374,995, as calculated using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model. Variables used in the Black-Scholes option-pricing model for the warrants
included: (1) discount rate of 1.79%, (2) expected life of five years, (3) expected volatility of
393% and (4) zero expected dividends. The above warrants were accounted for as stock based
compensation.
11
As compensation for computer software programming services provided, the Company granted 50,000
common stock warrants with an exercise price of $0.35 per share. These warrants have a term of 5 years,
vested immediately and have
a fair value of $12,500, as calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Variables used
in the Black-Scholes option-pricing model for the warrants included: (1) discount rate of 1.79%,
(2) expected life of five years, (3) expected volatility of 393% and (4) zero expected dividends.
The above warrants were accounted for as stock based compensation.
In
return for extending the maturity date of a convertible note (see Note 4), the Company granted
50,000 common stock warrants with an exercise price of $0.20 per share. These warrants have a term of 5
years, vested immediately and have a fair value of $9,000, as calculated using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model. Variables used in the Black-Scholes option-pricing model for the warrants
included: (1) discount rate of 1.79%, (2) expected life of five years, (3) expected volatility of
377% and (4) zero expected dividends. The above warrants were accounted for as a loss on debt
extinguishment.
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company reached settlement agreements with three
convertible note holders that included the surrender and forfeiture of an aggregate of 55,000
associated common stock warrants.
During
the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company reached partial settlement agreements that
were entered into in conjunction with the Incentive Offer (see Note 4) involving two convertible
note holders that resulted in the surrender and forfeiture of 37,500 common stock warrants.
A summary of warrant activities for the six months ended June 30, 2010 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Life (yrs) |
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
9,510,348 |
|
|
|
0.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
1,940,000 |
|
|
|
0.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(2,504,500 |
) |
|
|
0.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(592,500 |
) |
|
|
0.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2010 |
|
|
8,353,348 |
|
|
|
0.67 |
|
|
|
3.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
8,103,348 |
|
|
|
0.67 |
|
|
|
3.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted-average grant date fair value of warrants granted in 2010 was $0.24. The outstanding
warrants at June 30, 2010 have an intrinsic value of zero.
8. Commitments and Contingencies
On July 13, 2009, the Company was made a party to a complaint by nuArch, LLC, alleging breach of
contract and sought recovery of unpaid compensation of approximately $140,000 for alleged services
rendered during 2008 and 2009. On February 4, 2010, the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement
with nuArch that reflected an agreed upon payment of $75,000 to be paid over a 9-month period
commencing on March 22, 2010. Accordingly, the Company reduced the related payable based on the
agreed settlement amount. To date, all payments have been made in compliance with the terms of this
Settlement Agreement.
From time to time, Digitiliti may be subject to routine litigation, claims, or disputes in the
ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, no pending or known threatened claims,
actions or proceedings against Digitiliti are expected to have a material adverse effect on
Digitilitis consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Digitiliti
cannot predict with certainty, however, the outcome or effect of any of the litigation or
investigatory matters specifically described above or any other pending litigation or claims. There
can be no assurance as to the ultimate outcome of any lawsuits and investigations.
12
9. Subsequent Events
The
final closing of the Incentive Offer (see Note 4) took effect on July 23, 2010, resulting in the
following subsequent conversion of convertible debt and exercise of warrants:
|
1. |
|
$75,000 of unsecured debt
plus accrued interest of $23,140 was converted into 490,702
common shares, |
|
2. |
|
45,000 warrants were exercised into an equal number of common shares providing for
$9,000 of additional equity proceeds, and |
|
3. |
|
$25,000 of secured debt plus accrued interest of $3,367 was converted into 28,367
Series A Convertible Preferred shares. |
Upon
final closing of the Incentive Offer on July 23, 2010, the
Company has $258,240 of debt and
accrued interest outstanding from the $5.5 million unsecured offering and $83,958 of debt and
accrued interest outstanding from the $750,000 secured offering.
13
Item 2. Managements Discussions and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Forward-looking Statements
This quarterly report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of
the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These statements
concern goals, beliefs, plan objectives, intentions, expectations, financial condition, results of
operations, future performance, business strategies, anticipated events or trends and similar
expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts. Such forward-looking statements are
preceded by, followed by or include the words may, would, could, should, expects,
projects, anticipates, believes, estimates, plans, intends, targets or similar
expressions.
Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties, and important factors (many of
which are beyond our control) that could cause actual results to differ materially from those set
forth in the forward-looking statements, including the following: general economic or industry
conditions, nationally and/or in the communities in which we may conduct business, changes in the
interest rate environment, legislation or regulatory requirements, conditions of the securities
markets, our ability to raise capital, changes in accounting principles, policies or guidelines,
financial or political instability, acts of war or terrorism, other economic, competitive,
governmental, regulatory and technical factors affecting our current or potential business and
related matters. Accordingly, results actually achieved may differ materially from expected results
in these statements.
The information in this quarterly report is as of June 30, 2010, or, where clearly indicated, as of
the date of this filing. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made. We do
not undertake, and specifically disclaim, any obligation to update any forward-looking statements
to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of such statements. We also may make
additional disclosures in our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and
Current Reports on Form 8-K that we may file from time to time with the SEC. Please also note that
we provide a cautionary discussion of risks and uncertainties under the section entitled Risk
Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. These are factors
that could cause our actual results to differ materially from expected results. Other factors
besides those listed could also adversely affect us.
Plan of Operation
The Business
Our business is developing and delivering superior storage technologies and methodologies enabling
our customers to manage, control, protect and access their information and data with ease. Our
core business is providing a cost effective on-line data protection solution to the small to medium
business (SMB) and small to medium enterprise (SME) markets through our DigiBAK service
(previously called Pharaoh Business Fortress Storage Center). This on-line data protection
solution helps organizations properly manage and protect their entire network from one centralized
location.
Our emerging business product, announced in December, 2009, is called DigiLIBE. We believe that
DigiLIBE is a game-changing product that addresses the root cause of companies information
problems of unmanaged growth, lack of information governance and lack of ability to utilize and
leverage stored data. We designed the DigiLIBE product from our experience in the storage and
archiving business because we know that:
|
|
|
Organizations want to be able to govern their information; |
|
|
|
People want to be able to access their information; |
|
|
|
People and organizations want to be able to leverage the content of the information
stored at the company, even if it is archived; |
|
|
|
People and organizations want to be able to put disparate pieces of content together
in a context that can be used to advantage; and |
|
|
|
People and organizations want to be able to do this simply and inexpensively. |
DigiLIBE was designed from the bottom up and from a human user perspective to achieve those
objectives described above.
14
The DigiBak legacy business
Our DigiBAK solution can backup and restore emails and data on every machine in a network,
including desktops, laptops, file and print servers. We provide storage through a utility based
computing philosophy, where customers pay for the gigabytes of data they store in DigiBAK Vault
facility. Our digitiliti Data Storage Center utilizes the following technologies:
|
|
|
XO Communications Level 5 RAID System Data Center; |
|
|
|
High performance fiber channel and iSCSI RAID Systems or Arrays (ìRAID
Systemsî); |
|
|
|
Foundry Networks Fast Iron Gigabit Ethernet Switches; |
|
|
|
Qlogic fiber channel switches and iSCSI adapters; |
|
|
|
Dell Power Edge servers; |
|
|
|
N+1 Grid Architecture for backup; |
|
|
|
Diesel powered generators to protect against power outages; |
|
|
|
Unlimited bandwidth to grow;
and |
|
|
|
Exanet Global Files System and IBM DS4100 RAID Systems. |
Through our DigiBAK service, we combine powerful, agent-less backup software with our highly
protected facility, to deliver to our customers an efficient and effective online-offsite data
backup and restore solution. Our facilities enable us to provide offsite disaster recovery
emphasizing intraday protection and restore for all of our customer primary data centers and
geographically dispersed offices or campus settings. Our DigiBAK Vault is located in the base of
the former Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank. It is a one of a kind facility providing web based
on-demand backup/restore service with all the benefits of direct fiber access to a Level 5 data
center. The Vault has 24/7 onsite physical security, including security guards, motion detectors,
security cameras, card-key access, separate cages with individual locking cabinets and ladder
racking. It also has battery generator back up power, temperature and humidity controls and fire
suppression systems. Geographically, we are located at the center point of the Metropolitan area
network. Being centrally located at the focal point of the Twin Cities Fiber Channel and Gig loop,
the pipeline for data and load capabilities are immense.
The DigiBAK Vault houses all of the hardware and software needed for our DigiBAK solution. At the
customer site, DigiBAK administrator software is loaded on as many or as few workstations as
desired and requires a valid logon code, ensuring no unauthorized access. At the customer site,
the administrator software console acts as the interface with the DigiBAK Vault service and enables
the configuration of all backups and restores. The DigiBAK backup software is totally agent-less,
requiring no additional software to be installed on any machines. From the customer administration
console, the customer sets retention policies, schedules automatic backups and initiates restores.
The customer decides what files to backup: emails, Windows, Linux, Mac, Lotus, AS400 or many more.
Customers typically start backing up one system and then add more systems to their backup sets as
they continue to see how easily our DigiBAK solution works.
For large data volumes, the initial data backup may be downloaded to a portable disk unit at the
customer site. When the full backup of data is complete, the disks are transported to the Data
Storage Center where the data is loaded onto the equipment in the Data Storage Center. From then
on, all data is backed up in incremental changes over the Internet. All data is encrypted before
it leaves the customer site and when stored offsite. The encryption key is known only to the
customer. The data can be unencrypted only by the customer, who would do so upon the need of a
restore. If a customer loses their local data, they simply enter the commands to restore it via
the administration console and data flows from the Data Storage Center back to the customer site.
If the customer loses all data, DigiBAK can restore the latest data to a location of the customers
choosing using a portable disk unit. In addition to being encrypted, the data is also highly
compressed, making it safe and impenetrable from viruses and optimizing customers storage costs
per gigabyte.
We contract with XO Communications for our DigiBAK Vault space and communication lines. XO
Communications provides voice, data and IP services to businesses and other telecommunications
companies in 80 metropolitan markets across the United States. This relationship helps control
capital expenditures yet maintains flexibility to set up a new data center in any one of 80
geographically dispersed locations throughout the world, thereby reducing geographic concerns.
15
We utilize both direct in-house sales and sales through business partners such as VARs (Value
Added Remarketers) and third party integrators. Our resellers have extensive data
storage knowledge and expertise and an established customer base. Our sales plan targets reseller,
OEM and channel partnerships regionally and nationally that possess utility-oriented sales systems.
We and our partners target vertical markets specifically in the Small Business Market (SMB) and
the Small and Intermediate size Enterprises of 100 500 employees with an average of four sites
and five 20 TB of information to archive.
As a result of our sales and marketing efforts of our DigiBAK product, our customer base has
expanded from approximately 20 in fiscal 2005 to approximately 100 in
fiscal 2006; 508 in 2007; 731 in 2008; 789 in 2009 and 831 as of June 30, 2010. Correspondingly, our annual sales have
increased from $402,638 in 2006; to $1,329,386 in 2007; $3,075,308 in 2008, to $3,192,463 in
2009 and $1,164,134 as of June 30, 2010. Despite the significantly improved revenue from sales, we
continue to struggle with profitability because of new product development, legacy issues of past
due accounts payable, and potential convertible debt repayment requirements. Through most of 2009,
we struggled to clean up those legacy issues, offered incentives for convertible debt holders to
convert into equity and in the first quarter of 2010 worked diligently to complete the new product
development. As we entered into 2010, we resolved most of the legacy issues and completed the new
product development of our DigiLIBE product. While we still need to raise cash in 2010 to fund the
launch of our new product, we are in a much better position than we were a year ago.
The Emerging New DigiLibe Product
In 2008, we began to pursue a strategy of developing new archiving software to provide more
functionality to customers using our current DigiBAK service. Through 2009, we worked extremely
hard to complete the development of this product, called DigiLIBE, a virtual corporate library, and
announced that product in December, 2009. To raise capital, we determined that our future was in
the new product and that it would be in our interests to sell the legacy DigiBAK business. We
signed a Letter of Intent (LOI) to pursue this sale with a buyer, after considering a number of
alternative interested parties. From the LOI, we worked for three months to close on an Asset
Purchase Agreement. We could not agree to acceptable terms and mutually decided to end the
negotiation. Out of that effort, we considered pursuing another potential buyer or evaluating
structural changes to take our Vault forward strategically. We again considered selling the
DigiBAK business in 1Q 2010, however, as we began to launch DigiLIBE, we found that potential
customers were looking for a total archiving solution which could benefit both businesses. There
is synergism in both the current and the new business, and we believe it is to our long term
advantage to work out a strategy of moving forward with both and systematically transitioning to a
new future business model, leveraging information life cycle management and control, client-based
access to all stored information and active data archiving. We believe implementing this strategy
offers potentially much more shareholder value, but will require a strongly managed effort between
short and long term needs and goals. To better control expenses during this time, we restructured
our current DigiBAK business, outsourced technical support and cut resources. In addition, we
upgraded our Asigra software to a new version offering improved performance and features. We have
not completely eliminated the option of selling DigiBAK, but our short term approach to DigiBAK is
one of maintaining that business and customer set and shifting resources to the new DigiLIBE
product.
We believe the benefits of making a strategic decision to grow both the DigiBAK and DigiLibe
businesses are:
|
(i) |
|
to solve a major industry and customer problem of managing continually growing
information volume and associated cost of storage and retrieval; |
|
(ii) |
|
to be able to access a larger share of opportunity in the information management
storage business; |
|
(iii) |
|
to offer significant technological advantages in corporate policy level control of
information and ability to leverage knowledge from the information it creates; and |
|
(iv) |
|
to optimize how we synergistically allocate capital and resources between both
business. |
16
In the development of our new DigiLIBE product, we implemented a rigorous product development
approach, established a concrete architectural framework and a very specific product development
plan, with key development milestones and with automated test and integration systems. We
restructured the product development team, and invested heavily in customer, reseller and industry
expert demonstrations, to gain feedback on the product and to
identify critical features and functions needed for Release 1 of this product and beyond. We
established three key milestones in our development plan, the first being to have the reference
platform completed by May 15, 2009, where the basic technology underpinnings and performance
capabilities of DigiLIBE are operational and meeting requirements. This reference platform is
the core intellectual property we have and will further introduce to the market and validate the
feasibility of our approach. The second milestone was on June 15, 2009. In this milestone, we
began to integrate end user and back-office function. The third milestone was on July 15, 2009,
which was Release 1 Function-freeze. We have successfully completed each milestone and entered
customer Beta Testing in the 3rd quarter 2009. In the 4th quarter, we integrated graphics with
common look and feel and additional administrator reporting capabilities. DigiLIBE has received
excellent feedback on the capability, performance and function our new product delivers since its
December, 2009, initial release. Our sales and prospecting efforts have also reaffirmed the
potential of selling DigiBAK services as part of a DigiLIBE sale.
Through confidential disclosures and demonstrations, and from industry analysts, we believe that
our new product is positioned to change the current information management and storage approach and
achieve significant market opportunity. This is because we offer a solution addressing the root
cause of an industry-wide problem of data proliferation, volume growth, limited-to-no policy-level
information control and all of the associated cost and management problems that result and we
believe we can solve these problems with significantly better cost performance and simplicity. Our
new product represents a significant step toward our goal of becoming a technology leader in the
information content and context management marketplace. This product offers a breakthrough
approach to how companies store, archive and utilize information for competitive advantage. It will
finally enable customers to control the information they create and access that information to gain
business intelligence. DigiLIBE is disruptive technology in that it differs from the existing
industry solutions in its completely integrated and simplified approach in one solution (versus
linking point solutions together), and in the price point to implement and manage. Further, we
believe there are no competitors that currently offer the breadth and depth of this approach.
Intellectual Property Protection
The
Company has patents pending related to the architecture of its
Digilibe software. The heart of the architecture is its client, or human approach. This
client-centric approach is unique in the industry and provides differentiated capability to capture
critical information and apply policies at the time of creation. Most other approaches capture
metadata and apply policies at the time of storage, missing critical creation information. In
addition, it enables Global de-duplication or system-wide de-duplication, versus point in time
de-duplication. Most importantly, what DigiLIBE does is to take unstructured documents and emails
and creates a common information object that can then be accessed and analyzed to leverage
information and gain intelligence from all the information employees create daily, store, and
archive for years. DigiLIBE organizes CONTENT and puts information in CONTEXT for organizations to
gain more efficiency and for competitive advantage. Its an entirely different way to look at
information. Today, the market is defined by the technology surrounding information management.
With DigiLIBE, the market is defined by content creation and use.
The Market and Resellers
Similar to our current DigiBAK business, our channel strategy for DigiLIBE is to use resellers.
Unlike our current DigiBAK product, our reseller approach is to target regional and national
resellers who have technical support and infrastructure to deploy the product into the small and
intermediate size enterprises of 50 to 1500 employees or workstations. Our strategy is to develop
these channels and, because of their broader market presence and focus on the needs of the business
(versus technology), be able to achieve market penetration more rapidly. In the 2nd
quarter 2010, we added three notable regional and national resellers to the Digitiliti family, Northland
Systems, a Minnesota Company, RSM McGladrey, a National Consulting Services firm, and Coolcat, Inc,
a Florida Managed Services Provider (MSP) specializing in PCI (credit card) compliance.
DigiLIBE offers unique reseller value that goes beyond hardware and software to services at the
executive level for information policy development and refinement, at the user level for
information and workflow application development and a reoccurring revenue model for active
archiving volumes. Our targeted markets are regulated industries with a vertical segment focus on
Financial, Legal, Health Care and government (state, local). We price
DigiLIBE as a one-time fee for hardware, software and a per-client (user or workstation) fee, plus
annual maintenance. Further, there is an on-going fee for the archival part of the product which
is based on the amount of data customers archive. For resellers, the incentive is that they can
grow their business by selling the product, plus they get a monthly annuity from the cost of data
archiving.
17
Internal Operations and Capabilities
We have begun to re-staff and prepare for growth by hiring marketing, sales, and technical customer
support personnel. The company has been organized into four major areas of focus.
(1) An operational arm to manage and focus on the current DigiBAK operations, including
customer support and satisfaction, continuous operational improvements and on sales support
and growth, both with business partners and direct customers. In addition, the operations
organization will build and manage internal IT infrastructure in support of DigiLIBE.
(2) A new product development team launched Release 1 of DigiLIBE in the second quarter of
2010, and Release 2 is in the final development phases of confirming features and function
that will strengthen the development and QA release system and process.
(3) A sales and marketing team to implement the marketing strategy, sales plan and technical
customer support process for DigiLIBE, including marketing deliverables, target markets,
competitive intercept strategies, reseller development, and support system.
(4) A financial and administrative team to focus on business results, expense management,
business controls, investor and outside communications, and Human Resources.
In order to fund the new product launch, we have been aggressively reducing overall operating costs
to increase profitability of our DigiBAK operations. Since 2008, we have reduced our annual
salaries and wages by over 20%, while increasing operational efficiencies and lowering overall
costs of goods sold. As previously stated, we implemented additional restructuring of our DigiBAK
operations to increase profitability, improve cash flow and reduce cash burn rate. Through these
actions, we reduced our cash burn rate per month by approximately $100,000 in 2009. From 2008 to
2009, we reduced our operating expenses by 47%. We continue to raise additional capital to provide
the financial resources needed to achieve our strategy, albeit we are balancing our desire to
aggressively launch our new product with the reality of available
capital. As of March, 2010, we
finished 3 major payment plans related to legacy accounts payable past due. We held our first
annual shareholder meeting on October 15, 2009.
Continuing operations have been funded, in large part, through the following:
|
1. |
|
A $5.5 million offering of 12% convertible notes initiated in March 2007 and
completed in September 2008, |
|
2. |
|
A $250,000 convertible note
dated October 16, 2008, that reflected a 12% interest rate
issued to a shareholder, |
|
3. |
|
A $250,000 convertible note
dated November 11, 2008, that reflected a 12% interest rate
issued to a shareholder, |
|
4. |
|
A $750,000 offering of 12% secured convertible notes initiated in April 2009
and completed in October 2009, and |
|
5. |
|
A $2,000,000 equity offering initiated in October 2009 and closed in May 2010.
This equity offering originally reflected a maximum offering of $1,000,000, but was
increased to $1,500,000 during the first quarter of 2010 and increased again to
$2,000,000 in April 2010. This equity round of financing offered shares of our common
stock at $0.20 per share and was closed in May 2010 resulting in $1,715,550 in equity
proceeds through the issuance of 9,290,000 common shares. |
The terms of the $5.5 million offering of 12% convertible notes reflect the option to convert the
principal and accrued interest into common stock at $0.50 per share, provided a registration
statement covering the underlying common stock has been filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission and declared effective and upon expiration of an 18 month term. In addition, for each $1
in principal invested, the investor received a warrant to purchase one-half of a share of common
stock with a five year term exercisable at $1.50 per share (the A warrants) and a warrant to
acquire one-half of a share of common stock with a five year term exercisable at $2.25 per share
(the B warrants) (see inducement discussion below). Each warrant could not be exercised during
the first 6-months and one day following issuance, unless there was an effective registration
statement covering the underlying common stock filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
18
In late 2008 and early 2009, we directly contacted our 12% convertible note holders and 12% secured
convertible note holders to seek to restructure the debt by asking the holders to extend the due
dates of their respective convertible notes or to encourage them to convert their respective
convertible notes (the Modification Proposal). On November 13, 2008, as a demonstration of
confidence in our current plan and as an act of good faith, our Board of Directors unilaterally
approved by board resolutions a reduction in the $1.50 and $2.25 exercise prices of the A and B
warrants to $1.00 for both classes of warrants. In addition, our Board of Directors approved an
overall reduction in the conversion price of all convertible notes from $0.50 per share to $0.35
per share. The resolutions provided that the reduced conversion price would be retroactive to
include any convertible note holders who had already elected to convert their respective
convertible notes.
The processing of the Modification Proposal was completed during the first quarter of 2009,
resulting in the following conversion and extension of convertible debt related to the $5.5 million
offering as of March 31, 2009:
|
1. |
|
$2,607,700 of debt converted under terms of our Modification Proposal, and |
|
|
2. |
|
$2,184,500 of debt extended under terms of our Modification Proposal, and |
|
|
3. |
|
$707,800 of debt that remained unchanged and reflected the original terms of issuance. |
The terms of the $750,000 offering of 12% secured (against the Data Center Storage Vault)
convertible notes reflect the option to convert principal and accrued interest into common stock at
$0.35 per share, provided a registration statement covering the underlying common stock has been
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and declared effective and upon expiration of a
24 month term. In addition, for each $1 in principal invested, the investor received a warrant to
acquire one share of common stock with a five year term exercisable at $0.50 per share. We
completed the $750,000 12% secured convertible debt offering in October, 2009.
In
May 2010, the Company initiated an Incentive Offer affecting all
our former and current unsecured debt
holders that offered to convert their debt into shares of common
stock at $.20 per share and/or exercise their warrants at $.20
per share and our secured debt holders that offered to convert their
debt into shares of our Class Convertible Preferred Stock at $1.00 per
share. The Incentive Offer was also extended to other convertible note holders and
miscellaneous warrants holders.
The
final closing of the Incentive Offer took effect on July 23, 2010, resulting in the following
conversion of convertible debt and exercise of warrants:
As of June 30, 2010:
|
1. |
|
$2,462,300 of unsecured debt plus accrued interest of $705,532 associated with the $5.5
million offering was converted into 15,839,167 common shares, and |
|
2. |
|
2,504,500 warrants were exercised into an equal number of common shares providing for
$500,900 of additional equity proceeds, and |
|
3. |
|
$650,000 of secured debt plus accrued interest of $73,895 were converted into 723,895
Series A convertible preferred shares. |
Subsequent closings after June 30, 2010 as of July 23, 2010:
|
4. |
|
$75,000 of unsecured debt
plus accrued interest of $23,140 associated with the $5.5
million offering was converted into 490,702 common shares, and |
|
5. |
|
45,000 warrants were exercised into an equal number of common shares providing for
$9,000 of additional equity proceeds, and |
|
6. |
|
$25,000 of secured debt plus accrued interest of $3,367 were converted into 28,367
Series A convertible preferred shares. |
Upon
final closing of the Incentive Offer on July 23, 2010, the
Company has $258,240 of debt and
accrued interest outstanding from the $5.5 million offering and $83,958 of debt and accrued
interest outstanding from the $750,000 secured offering, reflecting more than 90+% successful
conversion.
19
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our liquidity is dependent, in the short term, on proceeds from the sale of our common stock for
cash and/or the issuance of additional debt. In the long term, we may need to continue the
development and marketing of our DigiLibe product and expanding the capacity of our Data Storage
Center by investing in property and equipment and software licenses.
We have financed our operations, debt service and capital requirements through cash flows generated
from operations, the issuance of secured and unsecured convertible debt financing, capital leases
and issuance of equity securities. We had a working capital deficit of $3,417,761 at December 31,
2009. At June 30, 2010, we had a working capital deficit of $971,134. We had cash of $455,140 as of
June 30, 2010, compared to cash of $141,086 as of December 31, 2009.
We used $870,251 of net cash from operating activities
for the six months ended June 30, 2010,
compared to using $188,672 for the six months ended June 30, 2009. Cash used in operating
activities during the six months ended June 30, 2010 funded a net loss of $4,388,304. This net loss
was offset by non-cash charges of $316,200 for amortization and depreciation, $68,342 associated
with stock options expense, $354,054 related to amortization of the discount on our convertible
debt and deferred financing costs, $387,959 of warrant expense, $1,478,707 of amortization
pertaining to the beneficial conversion feature associated with the convertible notes that were
converted, $318,294 loss of extinguishment of debt and $113,495 related to shares issued for
services. In addition, the Companys operating activities generated $52,641 from a decrease in
accounts receivable. Cash used in operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2009
funded a net loss of $3,319,430. This net loss was offset by non-cash charges of $570,201 for
amortization and depreciation, $108,784 associated with stock options expense, $891,937 related to
amortization of the discount on our convertible debt and deferred financing costs, $977,029
associated with the amortization of a beneficial conversion feature resulting from convertible
notes that were converted, $266,717 of warrant expense and $20,692 of bad debt expense.
Net cash flows used in investing activities was $46,134 for the six months ended June 30, 2010,
compared to net cash flows used in investing activities of $5,880 for the six months ended June 30,
2009. Both comparable totals are attributed to our purchase of property and equipment and software
licenses during these two periods.
Net cash flow provided by financing activities was $1,230,439 for the six months ended June 30,
2010, compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $189,970 for the six months ended
June 30, 2009. During six months ended June 30, 2010, cash provided by financing activities was
primarily due to proceeds of $1,214,050 received from issuance of our common stock for cash, net of
issuance costs, along with $500,900 received from the exercise of warrants. We used these
proceeds to make $24,939 in capital lease payments, $364,572 in payments on notes payable and
$95,000 of payments on convertible debt. During six months ended June 30, 2009, cash provided by
financing activities resulted from the issuance $350,000 of convertible debt and $240,197 of
proceeds from notes payable. These proceeds helped to support financing cost of $35,000, payments
on capital leases of $225,655 and payments of $139,572 on notes payable.
Upon final closing of the Incentive Offer on July 23, 2010, the Company has the following debt and
accrued interest outstanding from the $5.5 million offering and the $750,000 secured offering of
$258,240 and $83,958, respectively. To date, we continue to discuss payment and/or conversion or
extension of these notes with these note holders.
Results of Operations
For the 3 month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
Sales for the three months ended June 30, 2010 decreased 37% to $539,007 compared to $859,669 for
the three months ended June 30, 2009 reflecting a $320,662 decrease in revenue. This DigiBAK
revenue loss is a result of increasing competitive pricing pressure from an ever-expanding range of
alternative archiving storage services, a weak economy, and loss of a small number of larger
customers where the cost of outsourcing archiving services became prohibitive to them. In response
to these challenges, we took action to restructure our resources, strengthen
our Value Added Reseller and customer relationships, reposition and rebrand our offering, initiate a stronger
sales effort that had been reduced during the time we attempted to
sell this business, and refine
other aspects of the DigiBAK business to sustain our margins. From all these actions, we have
increased our customer count from 726 as of June 30, 2009 to 831 as of June 30, 2010. Despite
pricing pressure, we are adding customers who we believe will continue to grow and expand data
volumes with our DigiBAK service.
20
We have been able to retain a key large customer by offering DigiLIBE service as an alternative to
moving away from Digitiliti altogether. DigiLIBE offers the customer the ability to better control
and reduce the volume of unstructured information and emails, which were the primary drivers of the
customers growth. We are now targeting other large DigiBAK customers for similar migration as
they approach the threshold of their growth. Structured data stays on DigiBAK, unstructured data
moves to DigiLIBE. Our financials, however, reflects a short term reduction in revenue as customers
move their unstructured data on to the DigiLIBE platform. While we are going through a revenue
transition time, DigiLIBE is more profitable then DIGIBAK and our customer base remains highly
satisfied with our DigiBAK service offering, responsiveness, and reliability.
Gross profit for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was $160,610 compared to $315,551 for the
three months ended June 30, 2009, reflecting a decrease in the gross profit margins between these
two comparative periods. The Companys gross profit margin decreased to 29% for the three months
ended June 30, 2010 compared to 36% for the three months ended June 30, 2009. This gross profit
margin decrease is a result of adding personnel to our operations team as we staff for DigiLibe. In
addition, our gross profit and associated gross profit margin decrease is due to the attrition
impacting sales as referenced above. While the Companys business model can absorb increases in
sales without requiring a proportionate increase in infrastructure and costs, the same holds true
if the Company suffers from an attrition in sales. Here, weve lost sales to a weak economy,
increased competition and loss of some large customer but our operational costs have stayed
constant, which serves to lower the gross profit margin in relation to this decrease in sales.
Research and development expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was $262,241 compared to
$242,372 for the three months ended June 30, 2009. In the first quarter of 2009, we had realized
that our effort to outsource product development was not working, so we restructured and
reorganized new product development, bringing it in-house through a combination of internal and
targeted skilled contractors. This new approach implemented after April 2009 enabled us to redefine
the DigiLIBE architecture and release plan, streamline the development process and provided a more
efficient and effective development process yielding greater focus and oversight over design
architecture, cost control, and schedule integrity. Given the timing of this new development
approach, we incurred greater R&D expenditures during the second quarter of 2010 when compared to
the same period of the prior year. In addition, the second quarter 2010 effort was targeted to
development of second source hardware, implementation or release 2 of DigiLIBE, performing
technical support the channels and to direct customer DigiLIBE installs, and effort to refine test
and quality assurance processes.
Given the release and roll-out of our new DigiLIBE product, we have incurred significantly higher
sales and marketing expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2010 of $201,285 compared to
$118,578 incurred during the three months ended June 30, 2009. This increase in sales and marketing
expenditure directly relates to our DigiLibe market launch actions, which include establishment of
regional and national reseller processes and agreements and expansion of marketing communications.
Our general and administrative expenses increased by 74% from $621,349 incurred during the three
months ended June 30, 2009 compared to $1,078,605 for the three months ending June 30, 2010. As
part of the 2009 restructuring, we lowered our administrative costs and executive salaries to
reduce overhead. This was achieved through personnel realignment of priorities and goals, vendor
contract negotiations, stock based compensation alternatives, lowering insurance costs and a
daily/weekly focus on expenditures between the CEO and CFO. Beginning in 2010, to support our
DigiLIBE launch, we implemented a new accounting system, added accounting resources to implement
better management reporting and accounting and to aid in separation of duties and accountabilities.
In addition, we incurred a noncash charge of approximately $394,000 in stock based compensation
that was issued to a former executive that serves to increase our general and administrative
expenses during this period. We also added an HR and investor
relations resource, hired a company
receptionist, and implemented an improved CRM system.
21
The increase of $1,589,372 in interest expense between the comparative three months ended June 30,
2010 and June 30, 2009 is attributed to the Incentive Offer provided by the Company to the
convertible debt note holders. As
referenced in footnote 4 to our consolidated financial statements, during the second quarter of
2010 a balance of $2,462,300 of convertible debt was converted into the Companys common stock,
resulting in the recognition of approximately $1,661,070 of a non-cash charge related to the
following components of the convertible notes (1) the beneficial conversion feature, (2) the
unamortized discount (3) the fair value of the incremental compensation costs resulting from the
modification on the exercise price of the warrants and (4) the fair value of the incremental
compensation costs resulting from the modification on the conversion of options.
For the 6 month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
Sales for the six months ended June 30, 2010 decreased 32% to $1,164,134 compared to $1,719,948 for
the six months ended June 30, 2009 reflecting a $555,814 decrease in revenue. This loss in revenue
is a result of increasing competitive pricing pressure from an ever-expanding range of alternative
archiving storage services, a weak economy, and loss of a small number of larger customers where
the cost of outsourcing archiving services become prohibitive to them. In response to these
challenges, we took action to restructure our resources, strengthen a
Value Added Reseller and customer
relationships, reposition and rebrand our offering, and initiate a stronger sales effort that
had been reduced during the time we attempted to sell this business. From those actions, we have
increased our customer count from 726 as of June 30, 2009 to 831 as of June 30, 2010. Despite
pricing pressure, we are adding customers who expect to continue to grow and expand data volumes
with our DigiBAK service.
We have been able to retain a key large customer by offering DigiLIBE service as an alternative to
moving away from Digitiliti altogether. DigiLIBE offers the customer the ability to better control
and reduce the volume of unstructured information and emails, which were the primary drivers of the
customers growth. We are now targeting other large DigiBAK customers for similar migration as
they approach the threshold of their growth. Structured data stays on DigiBAK, unstructured data
moves to DigiLIBE. The financials, however, reflect a short term reduction in revenue as customers
move their unstructured data on to the DigiLIBE platform. While we are going through a revenue
transition time, DigiLIBE is more profitable then DIGIBAK. Our customer base remains highly
satisfied with our DigiBAK service offering, responsiveness, and reliability.
Gross profit for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was $483,766 compared to $713,425 for the six
months ended June 30, 2009, reflecting a consistent 41% gross profit margin between the two
comparative periods. This steady gross margin reflects the direct benefits of actions taken by the
Company during 2009 to streamline and strengthen our operations and personnel. In addition, the
gross margin improvement reflects the inherent benefits of our business model which relies on the
organic growth of our customers data, yet does not require a proportionate expenditure in capital
costs. We continue to efficiently manage our Data Storage Center to plan for growth and capacity
without requiring significant capital cost in the short term. Our strategy assumes we will refresh
technology every three or four years, so our 2010 business plan reflects the possible refresh of
our hardware technology platform to realized the performance and cost benefits of new technology.
Research and development expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2010 were $531,983 compared to
$332,879 for the six months ended June 30, 2009. In the first quarter of 2009, we terminated the
outsourcing of our product development efforts and restructured and reorganized new product
development by bringing it in-house through a combination of internal and targeted skilled
contractors. This new approach implemented after April 2009 enabled us to redefine the DigiLIBE
architecture and release plan, streamline the development process and provided a more efficient and
effective development process yielding greater focus and oversight over design architecture, cost
control, and schedule integrity. We incurred greater R&D expenditures during the first half of
2010 because of the following actions: completing hardware and software documentation and
deliverables, developing a second source for DigiLIBE hardware, implementing release 2 of DigiLIBE,
performing technical support to channels and to direct customer installs, and effort to refine test
and quality assurance processes.
Given the release and roll-out of our new DigiLibe product in the second quarter of 2010, we have
incurred significantly higher sales and marketing expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2010
of $376,578 compared to $205,329 incurred during the six months ended June 30, 2009. This increase
in sales and marketing expenditure directly relates to our DigiLibe market launch actions, which
include securing a public relations firm to create market awareness within the industry and with
trade groups, participation in trade shows, establishment of regional and national reseller
processes and agreements, and expansion of marketing communications.
22
Our general and administrative expenses increased from $1,213,923 incurred during the six months
ended June 30, 2009 compared to $1,537,236 for the six months ending June 30, 2010. During the
first six months of 2009, we purposefully restructured our administrative costs and executive
salaries to reduce our overhead. This was achieved primarily throughout the third and fourth
quarters of 2009 through personnel realignment of priorities and goals, vendor contract
negotiations, stock based compensation alternatives, insurance costs and a daily/weekly focus on
expenditures between the CEO and CFO. Beginning in 2010, we added a new accounting system and
additional accounting, HR, and investor relations resources and implemented new support and CRM
systems for DigiLIBE. In addition, we incurred a noncash charge of approximately $394,000 in stock
based compensation that was issued to a former executive that serves to increase our general and
administrative expenses during this period. Overall, our 2010 general and administration expenses
reflect greater efficiency and higher cost/benefit performance given the greater administrative
demands on the Company as compared to same period during 2009.
The
decrease of $172,745 in interest expense incurred during the first
six months of 2010 of
$2,107,979 versus $2,280,724 during the first six months of 2009 is primarily attributed to the
greater amount of debt converted during these same periods. Under the terms of the Modification
Proposal offered in 2009, the company converted approximately $2,607,700 of unsecured debt compared
to $2,462,300 of unsecured debt converted during 2010 under terms of the Companys Incentive Offer.
Again, as referenced above, the non-cash charge posted to interest expense associated with the
conversion of this unsecured debt is related to the following
components of the convertible notes:
(1) the beneficial conversion feature, (2) the unamortized discount and (3) the fair value of the
incremental compensation costs resulting from the modification on the exercise price of the
warrants.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We had no off-balance sheet arrangements during 2010 and 2009.
23
Item 4T. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 240.13a 15(e)
and 240.15d 15(e)) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our
Securities and Exchange Commission reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms. Our
disclosure controls and procedures are also designed to accumulate and communicate information to
our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, as
appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and
evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, we recognize that any controls and procedures,
no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the
desired control objectives. Accordingly, management must apply its judgment in evaluating the
cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have reviewed and evaluated the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the quarter ended June 30,
2010. Based on that evaluation, they have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as
of the end of the period covered by this report are not effective in providing reasonable assurance
that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file under the Exchange Act were
recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities
and Exchange Commissions rules, regulations and forms.
Changes in internal control over financial reporting
There have not been any changes in our internal controls over financial
reporting that occurred during our second fiscal quarter of 2010 that have materially affected, or
are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
24
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
During the second quarter of 2010, the Company closed the $2,000,000 equity raise initiated in
November of 2009 having received $1,715,550 of proceeds through the
sale of 9,290,000 shares of the Companys common stock at $0.20 per share. The
securities sold pursuant to this private placement were issued in a transaction exempt from the
registration requirements of the Securities Act under Sections 4(2) and Rule 506 of Regulation D
promulgated under the Securities Act.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
Based on the Companys final closing of the Incentive Offer on July 23, 2010, the Company has
$258,240 of principal and accrued interest from the $5.5 million unsecured offering past due and
outstanding as of June 30, 2010. To date, we continue to discuss payment and/or conversion or
extension of these notes with these note holders.
Item 5. Other Information.
Item 6. Exhibits.
We have listed the exhibits by numbers corresponding to the Exhibit Table of Item 601 in Regulation
S-K on the Exhibit list attached to this report.
25
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Digitiliti, Inc.
|
|
Date: August 16, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ Roy A. Bauer
|
|
|
|
Roy A. Bauer, President, CEO |
|
|
|
|
Date: August 16, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ William McDonald
|
|
|
|
William McDonald, CFO |
|
26
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
4.1 |
|
|
Subscription Agreement pertaining to conversion of debt and exercise of warrants under Incentive Offer |
|
4.2 |
|
|
Subscription Agreement pertaining to exercise of warrants under Incentive Offer |
|
31.1 |
|
|
302 Certification of CEO, Roy A. Bauer |
|
31.2 |
|
|
302 Certification of CFO, William McDonald |
|
32.1 |
|
|
906 Certification |
|
99.1 |
|
|
Settlement Agreement and Release dated March 8, 2010 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed
with the Commission on March 23, 2010). |
27