defm14a
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
o |
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
o |
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
þ |
|
Definitive Proxy Statement |
o |
|
Definitive Additional Materials |
o |
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
Buckeye GP Holdings
L.P.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
þ |
|
No fee required. |
o |
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|
(1) |
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act
Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was
determined): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Total fee paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
o |
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2)
and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the
previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its
filing. |
|
(1) |
|
Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Filing Party: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Date Filed: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buckeye Partners, L.P.
|
|
|
|
Buckeye GP Holdings L.P.
|
MERGER
PROPOSED YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT
Buckeye Partners, L.P. (the Partnership), Buckeye GP
LLC, the general partner of the Partnership (the
Partnership GP), Grand Ohio, LLC, a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Partnership (MergerCo), Buckeye GP
Holdings L.P. (Holdings), and MainLine Management
LLC, Holdings general partner (Holdings GP),
have entered into a First Amended and Restated Agreement and
Plan of Merger dated as of August 18, 2010 (the
merger agreement). Under the merger agreement, the
Partnership will acquire Holdings through a merger of MergerCo
with and into Holdings (the merger), and all common
units and management units of Holdings (Holdings
units) will be converted into limited partner interests of
the Partnership represented by limited partnership units
(Partnership LP units). As a result of the merger,
Holdings will be a subsidiary of the Partnership, with the
Partnership as Holdings sole limited partner and Holdings
GP remaining as the non-economic general partner of Holdings. In
connection with the merger, the incentive compensation agreement
(the incentive distribution rights, or the
IDRs) held by the Partnership GP will be cancelled
and the general partner units held by the Partnership GP
(representing an approximate 0.5% general partner interest in
the Partnership) will be converted to a non-economic general
partner interest in the Partnership pursuant to the
Partnerships amended and restated partnership agreement
(the amended and restated partnership agreement).
The merger agreement is attached as Annex A to this joint
proxy statement/prospectus and is incorporated into this joint
proxy statement/prospectus by reference. The form of the
Partnerships amended and restated partnership agreement is
attached as Annex B to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus and is incorporated into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus by reference.
Pursuant to the merger agreement, the Partnership will issue to
the holders of Holdings common units and management units (the
Holdings unitholders) approximately 20 million
Partnership LP units in the merger. Each unitholder of Holdings
will receive 0.705 Partnership LP units per Holdings unit (the
stated consideration). The stated consideration
represents a 32% premium to the closing price of Holdings common
units on June 10, 2010, the last trading day before the
public announcement of the proposed merger.
The holders of Partnership LP units (the Partnership
unitholders) will continue to own their existing
Partnership LP units. Following the merger, the Partnership will
be owned approximately 72% by current Partnership unitholders
and approximately 28% by former Holdings unitholders (including
17% that will be owned by BGH GP Holdings, LLC, the sole member
of Holdings GP (BGH GP)). The Partnership LP units
will continue to be traded on the New York Stock Exchange under
the symbol BPL following the merger.
YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT. We cannot
complete the merger unless, among other things, (a) the
Partnership unitholders approve the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger, the
issuance of Partnership LP units pursuant to the merger
agreement and the amended and restated partnership agreement and
(b) the Holdings unitholders approve the merger, the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby at the
special meetings of the Partnership unitholders and Holdings
unitholders.
The Partnership will hold a special meeting on Tuesday,
November 16, 2010 at 11:00 a.m., local time, at the
Four Seasons Hotel, 1300 Lamar Street, Houston, Texas 77010.
Holdings will hold a special meeting on Tuesday,
November 16, 2010 at 12:00 noon, local time, at the Four
Seasons Hotel, 1300 Lamar Street, Houston, Texas 77010.
Whether or not you plan to attend your meeting, to ensure your
units are represented at the meeting, please complete and submit
the enclosed proxy card as soon as possible or transmit your
voting instructions by using the telephone or internet as
described on your proxy card.
The Audit Committee (the Partnership Audit
Committee) of the board of directors of the Partnership GP
(the Partnership Board), comprised of independent
directors, to which the Partnership Board has delegated full
authority to negotiate and approve the merger and any definitive
documentation related to the
merger, has unanimously approved and declared the advisability
of the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated
thereby, including the merger and the issuance of Partnership LP
units pursuant thereto, and has determined that the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including
the merger and the issuance of Partnership LP units pursuant to
the merger agreement, are fair and reasonable to and in the best
interests of, the Partnership and the unaffiliated Partnership
unitholders. Accordingly, the Partnership Audit Committee
unanimously recommends that the Partnership unitholders vote to
approve the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated
thereby, including the merger and the issuance of the
Partnership LP units pursuant to the merger agreement. In
addition, the Partnership Audit Committee has unanimously
approved and declared the advisability of the amended and
restated partnership agreement, has determined that the amended
and restated partnership agreement is fair and reasonable to,
and in the best interest of, the Partnership and the
unaffiliated Partnership unitholders, and unanimously recommends
that the Partnership unitholders vote to approve the amended and
restated partnership agreement.
The board of directors of Holdings GP (the Holdings
Board) has unanimously (with the director who is also the
chief executive officer of the Partnership GP and Holdings GP
recusing himself) approved and declared the advisability of the
merger, the merger agreement and the transactions completed
thereby and determined that the merger, the merger agreement and
the transactions contemplated thereby are fair and reasonable
to, and in the best interests of, Holdings and the Holdings
unitholders. Accordingly, the Holdings Board unanimously
recommends that the Holdings unitholders vote to approve the
merger, the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated
thereby.
This joint proxy statement/prospectus gives you detailed
information about the special meetings and the proposed merger.
The Partnership and Holdings both urge you to read carefully
this entire joint proxy statement/prospectus, including all of
its annexes. In particular, please read Risk
Factors beginning on page 24 of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus for a discussion of risks relevant to the
merger, the Partnership and other matters.
The Partnership LP units are traded on the New York Stock
Exchange under the symbol BPL. The last reported
sale price of the Partnership LP units on the New York Stock
Exchange on September 21, 2010 was $62.80. Holdings common
units are traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
BGH. The last reported sale price of Holdings common
units on the New York Stock Exchange on September 21, 2010
was $42.79.
|
|
|
Forrest E. Wylie
Chief Executive Officer
MainLine Management LLC
|
|
Keith E. St.Clair
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Buckeye GP LLC
|
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of the
securities to be issued under this joint proxy
statement/prospectus or has passed upon the adequacy or accuracy
of the disclosure in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. Any
representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
This joint proxy statement/prospectus is dated
September 24, 2010 and is first being mailed to the
Partnership unitholders and the Holdings unitholders on or about
September 27, 2010.
NOTICE OF
SPECIAL MEETING OF
BUCKEYE PARTNERS, L.P. UNITHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 16, 2010
To the Unitholders of Buckeye Partners, L.P.:
This is a notice that a special meeting of the unitholders of
Buckeye Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) will be
held on November 16, 2010 at 11:00 a.m., local time,
at the Four Seasons Hotel, 1300 Lamar Street, Houston, Texas
77010. The purpose of the special meeting is:
1. To consider and vote upon the approval of a First
Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger (the
merger agreement) by and among the Partnership,
Buckeye GP LLC, the general partner of the Partnership (the
Partnership GP), Grand Ohio, LLC
(MergerCo), Buckeye GP Holdings L.P.
(Holdings) and MainLine Management LLC, the general
partner of Holdings (Holdings GP), dated as of
August 18, 2010, as such agreement may be amended from time
to time, and the transactions contemplated thereby, including
(i) the merger of MergerCo with and into Holdings with
Holdings surviving as a subsidiary of the Partnership, the
Partnership becoming Holdings sole limited partner and
Holdings GP remaining as the sole general partner of Holdings
and (ii) the issuance of limited partner interests of the
Partnership represented by limited partnership units
(Partnership LP units) pursuant to the merger
agreement;
2. To consider and vote upon the approval of the Amended
and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Partnership
(the amended and restated partnership agreement, a
copy of which is attached as Annex B to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus); and
3. To transact such other business as may properly come
before the special meeting and any adjournment or postponement
thereof.
Pursuant to the merger agreement (i) MergerCo will merge
with and into Holdings and Holdings will survive as a subsidiary
of the Partnership with the Partnership as Holdings sole
limited partner and Holdings GP remaining as the sole general
partner of Holdings and (ii) all common units and
management units of Holdings will be converted into Partnership
LP units (a copy of the merger agreement is attached as
Annex A to this joint proxy statement/prospectus).
The Audit Committee of the board of directors of the Partnership
GP (the Partnership Audit Committee), comprised of
independent directors, has unanimously approved and declared the
advisability of the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby, including the merger and the issuance of
Partnership LP units pursuant thereto, and has determined that
the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby,
including the merger and the issuance of Partnership LP units
pursuant to the merger agreement, are fair and reasonable to,
and in the best interests of, the Partnership and the holders of
Partnership LP units (the Partnership unitholders)
who are not affiliated with the Partnership GP. Accordingly, the
Partnership Audit Committee unanimously recommends that the
Partnership unitholders vote to approve the merger agreement and
the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger and
the issuance of Partnership LP units pursuant to the merger
agreement. In addition, the Partnership Audit Committee has
unanimously approved and declared the advisability of the
amended and restated partnership agreement, has determined that
the amended and restated partnership agreement is fair and
reasonable to, and in the best interest of, the Partnership and
the unaffiliated Partnership unitholders, and unanimously
recommends that the Partnership unitholders vote to approve the
amended and restated partnership agreement.
The proposals described in paragraphs 1 and 2 above require
the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the
Partnerships outstanding LP units entitled to vote as of
the record date. The approval of the proposals described in
paragraphs 1 and 2 is a condition to consummation of the
merger. Only Partnership unitholders of record at the close of
business on September 17, 2010, the record date, are
entitled to receive this notice and to vote at the Partnership
special meeting or any adjournment or postponement of that
meeting.
YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT. Whether or not
you plan to attend the special meeting, please submit your proxy
with voting instructions as soon as possible. If you hold
Partnership LP units in your name as a unitholder of record,
please complete, sign, date and return the accompanying proxy
card in the enclosed self-addressed stamped envelope, use the
toll-free telephone number shown on the proxy card or use the
internet website shown on the proxy card. If you hold your
Partnership LP units through a bank or broker, please use the
voting instructions you have received from your bank or broker.
Submitting your proxy will not prevent you from attending the
Partnership special meeting and voting in person. Please note,
however, that if you hold your Partnership LP units through a
bank or broker, and you wish to vote in person at the
Partnership special meeting, you must obtain from your bank or
broker a proxy issued in your name. You may revoke your proxy by
attending the Partnership special meeting and voting your
Partnership LP units in person at the special meeting. You may
also revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted by giving
written notice of revocation to Computershare Trust Company,
N.A. at the address provided with the proxy card at or before
the Partnership special meeting or by submitting a proxy with a
later date.
The accompanying document describes the proposed merger in more
detail. We urge you to read carefully the entire document before
voting your Partnership LP units at the Partnership special
meeting or submitting your voting instructions by proxy.
By Order of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of
Buckeye GP LLC, the general partner of Buckeye Partners, L.P.
William H. Schmidt, Jr.
Secretary
Houston, Texas
September 24, 2010
NOTICE OF
SPECIAL MEETING OF
BUCKEYE GP HOLDINGS L.P. UNITHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 16, 2010
To the Unitholders of Buckeye GP Holdings L.P.:
This is a notice that a special meeting of the unitholders of
Buckeye GP Holdings L.P. (Holdings) will be held on
November 16, 2010 at 12:00 noon, local time, at the
Four Seasons Hotel, 1300 Lamar Street, Houston, Texas
77010. The purpose of the special meeting is:
1. To consider and vote upon the approval of (a) the
First Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger (the
merger agreement) by and among Holdings, Buckeye
Partners, L.P. (the Partnership), Buckeye GP LLC,
the general partner of the Partnership (the Partnership
GP), Grand Ohio, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the
Partnership (MergerCo), and MainLine Management LLC,
the general partner of Holdings (Holdings GP), dated
as of August 18, 2010, as such agreement may be amended
from time to time, pursuant to which (i) MergerCo will
merge with and into Holdings and Holdings will survive as a
subsidiary of the Partnership with the Partnership as
Holdings sole limited partner and Holdings GP remaining as
the sole general partner of Holdings and (ii) all common
units and management units of Holdings will be converted into
limited partner interests of the Partnership represented by
limited partnership units (Partnership LP units) (a
copy of the merger agreement is attached as Annex A to this
joint proxy statement/prospectus), (b) the merger, and
(c) the transactions contemplated thereby; and
2. To transact such other business as may properly come
before the special meeting and any adjournment or postponement
thereof.
The board of directors of Holdings GP (the Holdings
Board) has unanimously (with the director who is also the
chief executive officer of the Partnership GP and Holdings GP
recusing himself) approved and declared the advisability of the
merger, the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated
thereby and determined that the merger, the merger agreement and
the transactions contemplated thereby are fair and reasonable
to, and in the best interests of, Holdings and the holders of
Holdings common units and management units (the Holdings
unitholders). Accordingly, the Holdings Board unanimously
recommends that the Holdings unitholders vote to approve the
merger, the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated
thereby.
The proposal described in paragraph 1 above requires the
affirmative vote of the holders of (A) a majority of the
common units of Holdings outstanding and entitled to vote at the
meeting as of the record date, voting as a separate class, and
(B) a majority of the common units and management units of
Holdings outstanding and entitled to vote at the meeting as of
the record date, voting together as a single class. The approval
and adoption of the proposal described in paragraph 1 is a
condition to consummation of the merger. Only Holdings
unitholders of record at the close of business on
September 17, 2010, the record date, are entitled to
receive this notice and to vote at the Holdings special meeting
or any adjournment or postponement of that meeting.
Whether or not you plan to attend the Holdings special meeting,
please submit your proxy with voting instructions as soon as
possible. If you hold units in your name as a unitholder of
record, please complete, sign, date and return the accompanying
proxy card in the enclosed self-addressed stamped envelope, use
the toll-free telephone number shown on the proxy card or use
the internet website shown on the proxy card. If you hold your
units through a bank or broker, please use the voting
instructions you have received from your bank or broker.
Submitting your proxy will not prevent you from attending the
Holdings special meeting and voting in person. Please note,
however, that if you hold your units through a bank or broker,
and you wish to vote in person at the Holdings special meeting,
you must obtain from your bank or broker a proxy issued in your
name. You may revoke your proxy by attending the Holdings
special meeting and voting your shares in person at the Holdings
special meeting. You may also revoke your proxy at any time
before it is voted by giving written notice of revocation to
Computershare Trust Company, N.A. at the address provided with
the proxy card at or before the Holdings special meeting or by
submitting a proxy with a later date.
The accompanying document describes the proposed merger in more
detail. We urge you to read carefully the entire document before
voting your shares at the Holdings special meeting or submitting
your voting instructions by proxy.
By Order of the Board of Directors of MainLine Management LLC,
the general partner of Buckeye GP Holdings L.P.
William H. Schmidt, Jr.
Secretary
Houston, Texas
September 24, 2010
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
v
|
|
|
vi
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
110
|
ii
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
F-1
|
iii
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
|
B-1
|
|
|
C-1
|
|
|
D-1
|
|
|
E-1
|
|
|
F-1
|
iv
IMPORTANT
NOTE ABOUT THIS JOINT PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS
This joint proxy statement/prospectus, which forms part of a
registration statement on
Form S-4
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC), constitutes a proxy statement under
Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act), of (a) the
Partnership with respect to the solicitation of proxies for the
Partnership special meeting to, among other things, approve the
merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby,
including the merger and the issuance of Partnership LP units,
and to approve the Partnerships amended and restated
partnership agreement; and (b) Holdings with respect to the
solicitation of proxies for the Holdings special meeting to,
among other things, approve the merger, the merger agreement and
the transactions contemplated thereby. This joint proxy
statement/prospectus is also a prospectus of the Partnership
under Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended
(the Securities Act), for the Partnership LP units
that Holdings unitholders will receive in the merger.
As permitted under the rules of the SEC, this joint proxy
statement/prospectus incorporates by reference important
business and financial information about the Partnership and
Holdings from other documents filed with the SEC that are not
included in or delivered with this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. Please read Where You Can Find More
Information beginning on page 155. This information
is available to you without charge upon your request. You can
obtain documents incorporated by reference in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus by requesting them in writing or by
telephone from the Partnership or Holdings at the following
addresses and telephone numbers:
|
|
|
Buckeye Partners, L.P.
|
|
Buckeye GP Holdings L.P.
|
One Greenway Plaza
|
|
One Greenway Plaza
|
Suite 600
|
|
Suite 600
|
Houston, Texas 77046
|
|
Houston, Texas 77046
|
(832)
615-8600
|
|
(832) 615-8600
|
Attention: Investor Relations
|
|
Attention: Investor Relations
|
Please note that copies of the documents provided to you will
not include exhibits.
You may obtain certain of these documents at the
Partnerships website, www.buckeye.com, by selecting
Investor Center and then selecting SEC
Filings, and at Holdings website, www.buckeyegp.com,
by selecting Investor Center and then selecting
SEC Filings. Information contained on the
Partnerships and Holdings websites is expressly not
incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
In order to receive timely delivery of the documents in advance
of the Partnership special meeting and Holdings special meeting,
your request should be received no later than November 5,
2010.
The Partnership and Holdings have not authorized anyone to give
any information or make any representation about the merger and
related matters or about the Partnership or Holdings that is
different from, or in addition to, that contained in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus or in any of the materials that have
been incorporated into this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Therefore, if anyone distributes this type of information, you
should not rely on it. If you are in a jurisdiction where offers
to exchange or sell, or solicitations of offers to exchange or
purchase, the securities offered by this joint proxy
statement/prospectus or the solicitation of proxies is unlawful,
or you are a person to whom it is unlawful to direct these types
of activities, then the offer presented in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus does not extend to you. The information
contained in this joint proxy statement/prospectus speaks only
as of the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus unless
the information specifically indicates that another date applies.
v
QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGER
In the following questions and answers, selected information
from this joint proxy statement/prospectus has been highlighted
but all of the information that may be important to the holders
of Partnership LP units and the holders of Holdings units
regarding the merger and the other transactions contemplated by
the merger agreement has not been included. To better understand
the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement, and for a complete description of their legal terms,
please read carefully this joint proxy statement/prospectus in
its entirety, including all of its annexes, as well as the
documents incorporated by reference in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. Please read Important Note About
this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus on page v and
Where You Can Find More Information beginning on
page 155.
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What are the proposed transactions? |
|
A: |
|
The Partnership and Holdings have agreed to combine by merging
MergerCo with and into Holdings under the terms of a merger
agreement that is described in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus and attached as Annex A to this joint
proxy statement/prospectus. Holdings is currently the parent of
the Partnership GP. As a result of the merger and the other
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, Holdings will
become a subsidiary of the Partnership, with the Partnership as
the sole limited partner of Holdings and Holdings GP continuing
as the non-economic general partner of Holdings. In addition,
the incentive distribution rights held by the Partnership GP
will be terminated and the general partner units held by the
Partnership GP (representing an approximate 0.5% general partner
interest in the Partnership) will be converted to a non-economic
general partner interest in the Partnership. The merger
agreement provides that all outstanding Holdings units at the
effective time of the merger will be converted into Partnership
LP units. The merger will become effective on such date and at
such time that the certificate of merger is filed with the
Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, or such later date
and time as may be set forth in the certificate of merger.
Throughout this joint proxy statement/prospectus, this is
referred to as the effective time of the merger. |
|
Q: |
|
Why am I receiving these materials? |
|
A: |
|
The merger cannot be completed without obtaining the appropriate
approvals of the Partnership unitholders and the Holdings
unitholders. The Partnership and Holdings will hold separate
special meetings of their respective unitholders to obtain these
approvals. |
|
Q: |
|
Why are the Partnership and Holdings proposing the merger? |
|
A: |
|
The Partnership and Holdings both believe that the merger will
provide substantial benefits to the Partnership unitholders and
the Holdings unitholders by combining into a single partnership
that is better positioned to compete in the marketplace. The
Partnerships Audit Committee and the Holdings Board both
believe that the combination of the Partnership and Holdings
offers the following advantages to the Partnership following the
merger: |
|
|
|
|
|
eliminates the incentive distribution rights in the Partnership,
which will provide a substantially lower cost of equity capital,
thereby enhancing the Partnerships ability to compete for
new accretive acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
improves the potential returns to the Partnership unitholders,
including former Holdings unitholders receiving Partnership LP
units in the merger, from the Partnerships enhanced
competitive position following the merger;
|
|
|
|
reduces the costly duplication of services required to maintain
two public companies; and
|
|
|
|
increases the public float and trading liquidity of the market
for the Partnership LP units.
|
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What will Holdings unitholders receive in connection with the
merger? |
|
A: |
|
If the merger is completed, Holdings unitholders will receive
0.705 Partnership LP units per Holdings unit. Based on the
number of outstanding Holdings units, the total number of
Partnership LP units to be received by Holdings unitholders is
approximately 20 million. No Holdings unitholder will
receive a |
vi
|
|
|
|
|
fractional Partnership LP unit; instead, any Holdings unitholder
who would otherwise be entitled to receive a fractional
Partnership LP unit will receive cash in lieu thereof. |
|
Q: |
|
How do I exchange my Holdings units for Partnership LP
units? |
|
A: |
|
Each holder of record of Holdings units at the close of business
on the effective date of the merger will receive a letter of
transmittal and other appropriate and customary transmittal
materials that will contain instructions for the surrender of
Holdings units for Partnership LP units. |
|
Q: |
|
Do I have appraisal rights? |
|
A: |
|
No. Neither Partnership unitholders nor Holdings
unitholders have or are entitled to exercise appraisal rights in
connection with the merger under Delaware law or either the
Partnerships or Holdings partnership agreement, as
applicable. |
|
Q: |
|
Will Holdings unitholders be able to trade Partnership LP
units that they receive pursuant to the merger? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. Partnership LP units received pursuant to the merger will
be registered under the Securities Act and will be listed on the
New York Stock Exchange under the symbol BPL. All
Partnership LP units that each Holdings unitholder receives in
the merger will be freely transferable unless such Holdings
unitholder is deemed to be an affiliate of the Partnership
following the merger for purposes of U.S. federal securities
laws. |
|
Q: |
|
What will Partnership unitholders receive in connection with
the merger? |
|
A: |
|
Partnership unitholders will not receive any consideration in
the merger. Partnership unitholders will continue to own their
existing Partnership LP units. |
|
Q: |
|
What happens to distributions by the Partnership? |
|
A: |
|
Once the merger is completed and Holdings unitholders receive
their Partnership LP units, when distributions are approved and
declared by the Partnership GP and paid by the Partnership, the
former Holdings unitholders and the current Partnership
unitholders will receive distributions on their Partnership LP
units. |
|
Q: |
|
As a Holdings unitholder, what happens to the payment of
distributions for the quarter in which the merger is
effective? |
|
A: |
|
If the merger is completed before the record date for a
quarterly distribution, Holdings unitholders will receive no
quarterly distribution from Holdings; instead, a Holdings
unitholder will receive Partnership distributions on all
Partnership LP units such unitholder received in the merger. If
the merger closes after the record date, Holdings unitholders
will receive distributions on Holdings units held as of the
record date. However, Holdings unitholders will not receive
distributions from both Holdings and the Partnership for the
same quarter. |
|
Q: |
|
What will happen to Holdings after the merger? |
|
A: |
|
As a result of the merger, MergerCo will be merged with and into
Holdings, and Holdings will become a subsidiary of the
Partnership, with the Partnership being the sole limited partner
of Holdings and Holdings GP remaining as the sole general
partner of Holdings. Holdings GPs general partner interest
in Holdings will be non-economic. Holdings units will cease to
exist. Holdings will continue to exist, but its purpose will be
solely to own the limited liability company interest in the
Partnership GP, and Holdings GP will be restricted from causing
Holdings to engage in any business activities other than such
ownership and immaterial or administrative actions relating
thereto and electing directors of the Partnership GP in
accordance with the terms of the amended and restated
partnership agreement of the Partnership. Holdings GP will
continue to have the power to cause Holdings to appoint, remove
and replace the members of the Partnership Board until the
effectiveness of the public election provisions, as discussed
below. |
vii
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What Holdings unitholder and Partnership unitholder approvals
are required? |
|
A: |
|
The following require the affirmative vote of the holders of at
least a majority of the outstanding Partnership LP units
entitled to vote as of the record date: (a) the approval of
the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby,
including the merger and the issuance of the Partnership LP
units in the merger; and (b) the approval of the
Partnerships amended and restated partnership agreement.
Accordingly, if a Partnership unitholder fails to vote, or if a
Partnership unitholder abstains from voting, that will have the
same effect as a vote against (a) and (b) above. |
|
|
|
The approval of the merger, the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby require the affirmative vote
of the holders of (a) a majority of the common units of
Holdings outstanding and entitled to vote at the meeting as of
the record date, voting as a separate class, and (b) a
majority of the common units and management units of Holdings
outstanding and entitled to vote at the meeting as of the record
date, voting as a single class. Accordingly, if a Holdings
unitholder fails to vote, or if a Holdings unitholder abstains
from voting, that will have the same effect as a vote against
the approval of the merger, the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby. |
|
|
|
BGH GP, ArcLight Energy Partners Fund III, L.P., ArcLight
Energy Partners Fund IV, L.P., Kelso Investment Associates
VII, L.P., and KEP VI, LLC, the record and/or beneficial owners
of approximately 62% of the Holdings units (the Major
Holdings Unitholders), have agreed to vote their Holdings
units in favor of the merger and the merger agreement pursuant
to a support agreement dated June 10, 2010 among the
Partnership and such unitholders (a copy of which is attached as
Annex D to this joint proxy statement/prospectus). These
units constitute approximately 61% of all outstanding Holdings
common units and 97% of all outstanding Holdings management
units. Please read The Proposed Merger
Transactions Related to the Merger Support
Agreement beginning on page 86. |
|
Q: |
|
When do you expect the merger to be completed? |
|
A: |
|
A number of conditions must be satisfied before the Partnership
and Holdings can complete the merger, including the approvals by
the Partnership unitholders and Holdings unitholders, the
receipt of applicable regulatory approvals and the effectiveness
of the registration statement on
Form S-4,
of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus is a part,
relating to the Partnership LP units to be received by Holdings
unitholders. The Partnership and Holdings expect to complete the
merger promptly following the Partnership special meeting and
the Holdings special meeting, which are scheduled for
November 16, 2010. |
|
Q: |
|
After completion of the merger, will I be able to vote to
elect directors of the Partnership Board? |
|
A: |
|
Pursuant to the merger agreement, the Partnership agreed to
amend and restate its existing partnership agreement. The
amended and restated partnership agreement will include
provisions for the Partnerships public unitholders to
elect some or all of the members of the Partnership Board
(public election provisions). Your right to vote to
elect directors of the Partnership Board will be conditioned on
either (a) the receipt of approvals from the California
Public Utilities Commission (the CPUC) and the
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (the PaPUC)
of the public election provisions or (b) a determination by
the Partnership Board that such approvals are not required. The
Partnership expects to file applications for CPUC and PaPUC
approval as soon as possible. While it is possible that such
approvals will be obtained prior to the closing of the merger,
the Partnership cannot predict when, or guarantee that, such
approvals will be obtained. See Regulatory Approvals
on page 88. |
|
|
|
Under the amended and restated partnership agreement, Holdings
GP (as general partner of Holdings) will continue to have the
right to appoint, remove and replace all of the members of the
Partnership Board until the earlier to occur of (a) the
receipt of approvals from the CPUC and the PaPUC of the public
election provisions or (b) a determination by the
Partnership Board that such approvals are not required. Upon the
occurrence of either (a) or (b) above, Holdings GP
will have the right to appoint up to two directors, with the
number depending upon the continued ownership of specified
thresholds of Partnership LP units by BGH GP and its affiliates,
and the remaining directors will be classified into three
classes and be subject to election by the holders of Partnership
LP units (other than BGH GP and its affiliates). If the
Partnership Board is not able to make the determination
described in (b) above, the Partnership GP will be
obligated |
viii
|
|
|
|
|
under the amended and restated partnership agreement to use
commercially reasonable efforts to obtain the approvals
described in (a) above. |
|
Q: |
|
After the merger, who will direct the activities of the
Partnership? |
|
A: |
|
Pursuant to the amended and restated partnership agreement of
the Partnership and the amended and restated limited liability
company agreement of the Partnership GP, each of which will be
in effect after the merger, the Partnership Board will direct
the activities of the Partnership. |
|
Q: |
|
What are the expected tax consequences to a Holdings
unitholder as a result of the merger? |
|
A: |
|
Under current law, it is anticipated that for U.S. federal
income tax purposes no income or gain should be recognized by a
Holdings unitholder solely as a result of the merger, other than
any gain resulting from the exchange of Holdings units for cash
in lieu of the distribution of fractional Partnership LP units,
in which case such unitholder would recognize gain or loss equal
to the difference between the amount of cash received and the
unitholders adjusted tax basis allocable to such
fractional unit. |
|
|
|
Please read Risk Factors Tax Risks Related to
the Merger beginning on page 28, Risk
Factors Tax Risks to Holdings Unitholders
beginning on page 29, and Material Federal Income Tax
Consequences of the Merger Tax Consequences of the
Merger to Holdings Common Unitholders beginning on
page 118. |
|
Q: |
|
Under what circumstances could the merger result in an
existing Partnership unitholder recognizing taxable gain as a
result of the recalculation of such unitholders share of
the Partnerships nonrecourse liabilities? |
|
A: |
|
Upon the completion of the merger, Holdings unitholders who
receive Partnership LP units will become limited partners of the
Partnership and will be allocated their pro rata share of the
Partnerships nonrecourse liabilities. This will result in
a reduction in the amount of nonrecourse liabilities allocated
to the Partnerships existing unitholders, which is
referred to as a reducing debt shift. When an
existing Partnership unitholder experiences a reducing debt
shift as a result of the merger, such unitholder will be deemed
to have received a cash distribution in the amount of such
shift. An existing Partnership unitholder will recognize gain to
the extent a deemed cash distribution to such holder exceeds
such holders adjusted tax basis in its Partnership LP
units. Although the Partnership has not received an opinion with
respect to whether any existing Partnership unitholders will
recognize gain from a reducing debt shift upon completion of the
merger, the Partnership does not expect that any deemed cash
distribution will exceed any existing Partnership
unitholders tax basis in its Partnership LP units. |
|
|
|
Please read Material Federal Income Tax Consequences of
the Merger Tax Consequences of the Merger to
Existing Partnership Unitholders Potential for
Reducing Debt Shifts beginning on page 117. |
|
Q: |
|
What are the expected tax consequences after the merger is
completed for Holdings unitholders who receive Partnership LP
units in the merger? |
|
A: |
|
Each Holdings unitholder who becomes a Partnership unitholder as
a result of the merger will, as is the case for existing
Partnership unitholders, be required to report on its federal
income tax return such unitholders distributive share of
the Partnerships income, gains, losses, deductions and
credits. In addition to federal income taxes, such a holder will
be subject to other taxes, including state and local income
taxes, unincorporated business taxes, and estate, inheritance or
intangibles taxes that may be imposed by the various
jurisdictions in which the Partnership conducts business or owns
property or in which the unitholder is resident. |
|
|
|
Please read Federal Income Taxation of the Partnership and
its Unitholders beginning on page 121. |
|
Q: |
|
Who is entitled to vote at the special meetings? |
|
A: |
|
Partnership special meeting: All of the
Partnerships unitholders of record at the close of
business on September 17, 2010, the record date for the
Partnerships special meeting, are entitled to receive
notice of and to vote at the Partnerships special meeting. |
ix
|
|
|
|
|
Holdings special meeting: All of
Holdings unitholders of record at the close of business on
September 17, 2010, the record date for Holdings
special meeting, are entitled to receive notice of and to vote
at Holdings special meeting. |
|
|
|
Q: What do I need to do now? |
|
|
|
|
|
A: |
|
After you have carefully read this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, please respond by completing, signing and
dating your proxy card and returning it in the enclosed
postage-paid envelope or by submitting your proxy or voting
instruction by telephone or through the internet as soon as
possible so that your Partnership LP units or Holdings units
will be represented and voted at your special meeting. |
|
|
|
If your Partnership LP units or Holdings units are held in
street name, please refer to your proxy card or the
information forwarded by your broker or other nominee to see
which options are available to you. The internet and telephone
proxy submission procedures are designed to authenticate
Partnership unitholders or Holdings unitholders and to allow you
to confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded. |
|
|
|
The method you use to submit a proxy will not limit your right
to vote in person at the Partnership special meeting or Holdings
special meeting if you later decide to attend your special
meeting. If your Partnership LP units or Holdings units are held
in the name of a broker or other nominee, you must obtain a
proxy, executed in your favor from the holder of record, to be
able to vote in person at the Partnership special meeting or
Holdings special meeting. |
|
Q: |
|
If my Partnership LP units or Holdings units are held in
street name by my broker or other nominee, will my
broker or other nominee vote my units for me? |
|
A: |
|
No. Your broker will not be able to vote your Partnership
LP units or Holdings units without instructions from you. Please
follow the procedure your broker provides to vote your units. |
|
|
|
In connection with either special meeting, abstentions and
broker non-votes will be considered in determining the presence
of a quorum. An abstention will be the equivalent of a
NO vote with respect to all of the matters to be
voted upon. A broker non-vote will have the effect of a vote
against all of the matters to be voted upon at the special
meetings. |
|
|
|
An abstention occurs when a Partnership unitholder or Holdings
unitholder abstains from voting (either in person or by proxy)
on one or more of the proposals. Broker non-votes may occur when
a person holding units through a bank, broker or other nominee
does not provide instructions as to how the units should be
voted, and the broker lacks discretionary authority to vote on a
particular proposal. |
|
Q: |
|
If I am a Holdings unitholder with certificated units, should
I send in my unit certificates with my proxy card? |
|
A: |
|
No. Please DO NOT send your Holdings unit certificates with
your proxy card. A letter of transmittal for your Holdings units
and instructions will be delivered to you in a separate mailing.
If your Holdings units are held in street name by
your broker or other nominee, you should follow their
instructions. |
|
Q: |
|
If I am a Partnership unitholder, should I send in my
Partnership unit certificates with my proxy card? |
|
A: |
|
No. Please DO NOT send your Partnership unit certificates
with your proxy card. Since the Partnership LP units are not
being exchanged, you should keep your Partnership unit
certificates. |
|
Q: |
|
If I am planning on attending a special meeting in person,
should I still submit a proxy? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. Whether or not you plan to attend your special meeting, you
should submit a proxy. Partnership LP units or Holdings units
will not be voted if the holder of such Partnership LP units or
Holdings units does not submit a proxy and if such holder does
not vote in person at such holders special meeting.
Failure to submit a proxy would have the same effect as a vote
against all the proposals at the Partnership special meeting and
will have the same effect as a vote against all the proposals at
the Holdings special meeting. |
x
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What do I do if I want to change my vote after I have
delivered my proxy card? |
|
A: |
|
You may change your vote at any time before Partnership LP units
or Holdings units are voted at your special meeting. You can do
this in any of the three following ways: |
|
|
|
|
|
by sending a written notice to Computershare Trust Company, N.A.
in time to be received before your special meeting stating that
you revoke your proxy;
|
|
|
|
|
|
by completing, signing and dating another proxy card and
returning it by mail in time to be received before your special
meeting or by submitting a later dated proxy by telephone or the
internet, in which case your later-submitted proxy will be
recorded and your earlier proxy revoked; or
|
|
|
|
if you are a holder of record, or if you hold a proxy in your
favor executed by a holder of record, by attending your special
meeting and voting in person.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If your Partnership LP units or Holdings units are held in an
account at a broker or other nominee, you should contact your
broker or other nominee to change your vote. |
|
Q: |
|
What should I do if I receive more than one set of voting
materials for the Partnership special meeting or the Holdings
special meeting? |
|
A: |
|
You may receive more than one set of voting materials for the
Partnership special meeting or the Holdings special meeting and
the materials may include multiple proxy cards or voting
instruction cards. For example, you will receive a separate
voting instruction card for each brokerage account in which you
hold units. If you are a holder of record registered in more
than one name, you will receive more than one proxy card. Please
complete, sign, date and return each proxy card and voting
instruction card that you receive according to the instructions
on it. |
|
Q: |
|
Can I submit my proxy by telephone or the internet? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. In addition to mailing your proxy, you may submit it
telephonically or on the internet. Voting instructions for using
the telephone or internet are described on your proxy card. |
|
Q: |
|
Who can I contact with questions about the special meetings
or the merger and related matters? |
|
A: |
|
If you have any questions about the merger and the other matters
contemplated by this joint proxy statement/prospectus or how to
submit your proxy or voting instruction card, or if you need
additional copies of this joint proxy statement/prospectus or
the enclosed proxy card or voting instruction card, you should
contact: |
Morrow &
Co., LLC
470 West Avenue
3rd
Floor
Stamford, CT 06902
Banks and brokers call: (203) 658-9400
Unitholders call toll-free: (800) 573-4412
Email: buckeye.info@morrowco.com
xi
SUMMARY
This brief summary highlights selected information from this
joint proxy statement/prospectus. It does not contain all of the
information that may be important to you. To understand the
merger fully and for a complete description of the terms of the
merger and related matters, you should read carefully this joint
proxy statement/prospectus, the documents incorporated by
reference and the full text of the annexes to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. Please read Where You Can Find More
Information beginning on page 155.
The
Proposed Merger (page 85)
Under the merger agreement, the Partnership will acquire
Holdings through a merger of MergerCo with and into Holdings,
and all Holdings units will be converted into Partnership LP
units. As a result of the merger, Holdings will be a subsidiary
of the Partnership, with the Partnership as the sole limited
partner of Holdings and Holdings GP remaining as the sole
general partner (with a non-economic general partner interest)
of Holdings.
The merger agreement is attached as Annex A to this joint
proxy statement/prospectus and is incorporated into this joint
proxy statement/prospectus by reference.
Please read the merger agreement carefully and fully as it is
the legal document that governs the merger. For a summary of the
merger agreement, please read The Merger Agreement
beginning on page 90.
Merger
Consideration (page 91)
Pursuant to the merger agreement, the Partnership will issue to
the Holdings unitholders approximately 20 million
Partnership LP units in the merger. Each unitholder of Holdings
will receive 0.705 Partnership LP units per Holdings unit. This
stated consideration represents a 32% premium to the closing
price of Holdings common units on June 10, 2010, the last
trading day before the public announcement of the proposed
merger.
Transactions
Related to the Merger (page 86)
Amended
and Restated Partnership Agreement
Immediately following the closing of the merger, the
Partnerships existing partnership agreement will be
amended and restated. Under the amended and restated partnership
agreement: (i) the general partner interest represented by
the incentive compensation agreement (the incentive
distribution rights) will be cancelled and the general
partner units (GP units, which currently represent
an approximate 0.5% general partner interest in the Partnership)
will be converted into a non-economic general partner interest
in the Partnership; (ii) the public election provisions
will be added but will not take effect until either approval by
the CPUC and PaPUC or a determination by the Partnership Board
that such approvals are not required; (iii) the Partnership
GPs right to acquire all Partnership LP units if the
Partnership GP or its affiliates own more than 90% of the
outstanding Partnership LP units will be eliminated;
(iv) certain provisions added to the existing partnership
agreement in 2004 to clarify the separateness of the Partnership
GP, the Partnership, and certain related entities from the
owners of the Partnership GP, which will become generally
inapplicable once the Partnership owns the Partnership GP, will
be eliminated; and (v) certain other legacy provisions that
are no longer applicable to the Partnership will be eliminated.
For a summary of the amended and restated partnership agreement,
please read The Amended and Restated Partnership Agreement
of the Partnership beginning on page 105.
The foregoing description of the amended and restated
partnership agreement is qualified in its entirety by reference
to the full text of the form of amended and restated partnership
agreement, which is attached as Annex B to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus and is incorporated by reference into this
joint proxy statement/prospectus.
1
Support
Agreement
On June 10, 2010, the Partnership entered into a support
agreement with the Major Holdings Unitholders. As of
June 10, 2010, the last trading day before the public
announcement of the proposed merger, the Major Holdings
Unitholders beneficially owned 17,004,596 Holdings common units
and 509,141 Holdings management units. These units represent
approximately 62% of all outstanding Holdings units (61% of the
total Holdings common units and 97% of the total Holdings
management units).
Pursuant to the support agreement, the Major Holdings
Unitholders agreed to vote their Holdings units (a) in
favor of the adoption of the merger and the merger agreement,
(b) against any action or agreement that would result in a
breach of any covenant, representation or warranty of Holdings
or Holdings GP contained in the merger agreement,
(c) against any acquisition proposal (as defined in the
merger agreement) and (d) against any action, agreement or
transaction that would or would reasonably be expected to
materially impede, interfere with, delay, postpone, discourage,
frustrate the purposes of or adversely affect the merger and the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. The support
agreement may be terminated upon, among other things, the
termination of the merger agreement or a change in
recommendation by the Holdings Board.
The foregoing description of the support agreement is qualified
in its entirety by reference to the full text of the support
agreement, which is attached as Annex D to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus and is incorporated by reference into this
joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Registration
Rights Agreement
Pursuant to the support agreement described above, on
June 10, 2010 the Partnership and the Major Holdings
Unitholders entered into a registration rights agreement
pursuant to which the Partnership has agreed to file a
registration statement covering the potential sale of
Partnership LP units to be issued to the Major Holdings
Unitholders in the merger. In addition, the registration rights
agreement gives the Major Holdings Unitholders piggyback
registration rights under certain circumstances.
The foregoing description of the registration rights agreement
is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of
the registration rights agreement, which is filed as an exhibit
to the registration statement of which this joint proxy
statement/prospectus is a part and incorporated herein by
reference.
Directors
and Executive Officers of the Partnership GP Following the
Merger (page 142)
The Partnership GP will continue to manage the Partnership after
the merger. Members of the Partnership GPs management team
will continue in their current roles and are expected to manage
the Partnership GP following the merger. Following the effective
time of the merger, the Partnership Board is expected to consist
of nine members. Mr. Forrest E. Wylie, the chief executive
officer of the Partnership GP and the current chairman of the
Partnership Board, as well as the three current members of the
Partnership Audit Committee are expected to continue as
directors of the Partnership GP. In addition, the three members
of the audit committee of Holdings GP are expected to be
appointed to serve as directors of the Partnership GP following
the effective time of the merger. Holdings GP has designated
Frank J. Loverro and John F. Erhard to serve as additional
members of the Partnership Board following the effective time of
the merger. Holdings GP (as general partner of Holdings) will
continue to have the right to appoint all of the members of the
Partnership Board until the earlier to occur of (a) the
receipt of approvals from the CPUC and PaPUC of the public
election provisions or (b) a determination by the
Partnership Board that such approvals are not required.
Following the occurrence of either (a) or (b) above,
Holdings GP will continue to have the right to designate two
members of the Partnership Board, subject to reduction if the
Major Holdings Unitholders ownership of Partnership LP
units drops below certain thresholds, and the remaining
directors will be classified into three classes and be subject
to election by the holders of Partnership LP units (other than
BGH GP and its affiliates).
2
Recommendation
of the Partnership Audit Committee and Its Reasons for the
Merger (page 48)
The Partnership Board delegated full authority to the
Partnership Audit Committee to negotiate and approve the merger
and any definitive documentation related to the merger on behalf
of the Partnership Board. The Partnership Audit Committee
engaged independent legal and financial advisors to assist in
the negotiations.
The Partnership Audit Committee has unanimously approved and
declared the advisability of the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger and the
issuance of Partnership LP units pursuant to the merger
agreement, and has determined that the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger and the
issuance of Partnership LP units pursuant to the merger
agreement, are fair and reasonable to, and in the best interests
of, the Partnership and its unitholders (other than the
Partnership GP, Holdings or their respective affiliates).
Accordingly, the Partnership Audit Committee unanimously
recommends that the Partnerships unitholders vote
FOR the proposal to approve the merger agreement and
the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger and
the issuance of Partnership LP units pursuant to the merger
agreement.
In addition, the Partnership Audit Committee has unanimously
approved and declared the advisability of the Partnerships
amended and restated partnership agreement and has determined
that the amended and restated partnership agreement is fair and
reasonable to, and in the best interests of, the Partnership and
its unitholders (other than the Partnership GP, Holdings or
their respective affiliates). Accordingly, the Audit Committee
unanimously recommends that the Partnerships unitholders
vote FOR the proposal to approve the amended and
restated partnership agreement.
To review the background of and the Partnership Audit
Committees reasons for the merger in greater detail,
please read Special Factors Background of the
Merger beginning on page 31 and Special
Factors Recommendation of the Partnership Audit
Committee and Its Reasons for the Merger beginning on
page 48. To review certain risks related to the merger,
please read Risk Factors beginning on page 24.
Recommendation
of the Holdings Board and Its Reasons for the Merger
(page 51)
The Holdings Board has unanimously (with the director who is the
chief executive officer of the Partnership GP and Holdings GP
recusing himself) approved and declared the advisability of the
merger, the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated
thereby and determined that the merger, the merger agreement and
the transactions contemplated thereby are fair and reasonable
to, and in the best interests of, Holdings and the Holdings
unitholders. Accordingly, the Holdings Board unanimously
recommends that Holdings unitholders vote FOR
the proposal to approve the merger, the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby.
To review the background of and the Holdings Boards
reasons for the merger in greater detail, please read
Special Factors Background of the Merger
beginning on page 31 and Special Factors
Recommendation of the Holdings Board and Its Reasons for the
Merger beginning on page 51. To review certain risks
related to the merger, please read Risk Factors
beginning on page 24.
Conditions
to the Completion of the Merger (page 100)
Before the Partnership and Holdings can complete the merger, a
number of conditions must be satisfied, or where permissible,
waived by the Partnership or Holdings, as appropriate. For the
complete list of conditions to the completion of the merger,
please see The Merger Agreement Conditions to
the Completion of the Merger.
The
Parties to the Merger Agreement (page 76)
Buckeye
Partners, L.P.
The Partnership is a publicly traded Delaware limited
partnership. The Partnership operates and reports in five
business segments: Pipeline Operations; Terminalling &
Storage; Natural Gas Storage; Energy Services;
3
and Development & Logistics. The Partnerships
principal line of business is the transportation, terminalling,
and storage of refined petroleum products in the United States
for major integrated oil companies, large refined petroleum
product marketing companies and major end users of refined
petroleum products on a fee basis through facilities it owns and
operates. The Partnership also markets refined petroleum
products in certain of the geographic areas served by its
pipeline and terminalling operations. The Partnership owns a
major natural gas storage facility in northern California. In
addition, the Partnership operates and maintains approximately
2,400 miles of other pipelines under agreements with major
oil and gas, petrochemical and chemical companies, and performs
certain engineering and construction management services for
third parties.
The executive offices of the Partnership are located at One
Greenway Plaza, Suite 600, Houston, Texas 77046. The
telephone number is
(832) 615-8600.
Buckeye
GP Holdings L.P.
Holdings is a publicly traded Delaware limited partnership that
owns the Partnership GP. Holdings only cash-generating
assets are its direct and indirect partnership interests in the
Partnership, which are comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the indirect ownership of the incentive distribution rights in
the Partnership;
|
|
|
|
the indirect ownership of the general partner interests in
certain of the Partnerships operating subsidiaries
(representing an approximate 1% interest in each of such
operating subsidiaries);
|
|
|
|
the indirect ownership of the general partner interests in the
Partnership (representing 243,914 GP units), or an approximate
0.5% interest in the Partnership; and
|
|
|
|
80,000 Partnership LP units.
|
The incentive distribution rights noted above entitle Holdings
(through its ownership of the Partnership GP) to receive amounts
equal to specified percentages of the incremental amount of cash
distributed by the Partnership to the holders of Partnership LP
units when target distribution levels for each quarter are
exceeded. The 2,573,146 Partnership LP units originally issued
to the Buckeye Pipe Line Services Company Employee Stock
Ownership Plan (the ESOP) are excluded for the
purpose of calculating incentive distributions. The target
distribution levels begin at $0.325 and increase in steps to the
highest target distribution level of $0.525 per eligible
Partnership LP unit. When the Partnership makes quarterly
distributions above this level, the incentive distributions
include an amount equal to 45% of the incremental cash
distributed to each eligible unitholder for the quarter, or
approximately 30% of total incremental cash distributed by the
Partnership above $0.525.
The executive offices of Holdings are located at One Greenway
Plaza, Suite 600, Houston, Texas 77046. The telephone
number is
(832) 615-8600.
Relationship
of the Parties (page 76)
Holdings and the Partnership are closely related. Holdings
currently owns all of the limited liability company interests of
the Partnership GP and 80,000 Partnership LP units. The
Partnership GP currently directly owns an approximate 0.5%
general partner interest in the Partnership and all of the
Partnerships incentive distribution rights, and indirectly
owns the general partner interests in certain of the
Partnerships operating subsidiaries.
Since Holdings initial public offering in August 2006,
distributions by the Partnership have increased from $0.775 per
Partnership LP unit for the quarter ended September 30,
2006 to $0.9625 per Partnership LP unit payable for the quarter
ended June 30, 2010; and as a result, distributions from
the Partnership to Holdings (through the Partnership GP) have
increased.
4
The following table summarizes the cash Holdings received for
the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and the
six months ended June 30, 2010 as a result of its direct
and indirect ownership of partnership interests in the
Partnership (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Incentive distributions from the Partnership
|
|
$
|
29,978
|
|
|
$
|
38,895
|
|
|
$
|
45,739
|
|
|
$
|
24,918
|
|
Distributions from
the ~
1% ownership in certain of the Partnerships operating
subsidiaries
|
|
|
1,292
|
|
|
|
1,131
|
|
|
|
1,955
|
|
|
|
403
|
|
Distribution from the ownership of 243,914 GP units
|
|
|
786
|
|
|
|
835
|
|
|
|
884
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
Distribution from the ownership of 80,000 Partnership LP units
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
32,314
|
|
|
$
|
41,135
|
|
|
$
|
48,868
|
|
|
$
|
25,932
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moreover, certain directors and executive officers of Holdings
GP are also directors and executive officers of the Partnership
GP. Messrs. Forrest E. Wylie, John F. Erhard and Robb E.
Turner serve as members of both the Holdings Board and the
Partnership Board. The executive officers of Holdings GP are
also executive officers of the Partnership GP.
Information
About the Special Meetings and Voting (page 78)
The
Partnership Special Meeting
Where and when: The Partnership special
meeting will take place at the Four Seasons Hotel,
1300 Lamar Street, Houston, Texas 77010, on
November 16, 2010 at 11:00 a.m., local time.
What the Partnership unitholders are being asked to vote
on: At the Partnership special meeting and any
adjournment or postponement thereof, the Partnership unitholders
will be asked to consider and vote on the following matters:
|
|
|
|
|
a proposal to approve the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby, including the merger and the issuance of
Partnership LP units pursuant to the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
a proposal to approve the Partnerships amended and
restated partnership agreement; and
|
|
|
|
any proposal to transact such other business as may properly
come before the Partnership special meeting and any adjournment
or postponement thereof.
|
Who may vote: You may vote at the Partnership
special meeting if you owned Partnership LP units at the close
of business on the record date, September 17, 2010. You may
cast one vote for each Partnership LP unit that you owned at the
close of business on the record date.
How to vote: Please complete and submit the
enclosed proxy card as soon as possible or transmit your voting
instructions by using the telephone or internet procedures
described on your proxy card.
What vote is needed: The affirmative vote of
the holders of at least a majority of the outstanding
Partnership LP units is required to: (1) approve the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including
the merger and the issuance of Partnership LP units pursuant to
the merger agreement; and (2) approve the
Partnerships amended and restated partnership agreement.
Recommendations of the Partnership Audit
Committee: The Partnership Audit Committee
unanimously recommends that you vote FOR the
proposal to approve the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby, including the merger and the issuance of
Partnership LP units pursuant to the merger agreement. In
addition, the Partnership Audit Committee unanimously recommends
that you vote FOR the proposal to approve the
Partnerships amended and restated partnership agreement.
5
The approval of each of the merger agreement and the amended and
restated partnership agreement by the Partnerships
unitholders are conditions to completion of the merger.
The
Holdings Special Meeting
Where and when: The Holdings special meeting
will take place at the Four Seasons Hotel, 1300 Lamar
Street, Houston, Texas 77010, on November 16, 2010 at
12:00 noon, local time.
What Holdings unitholders are being asked to vote
on: At the Holdings special meeting, Holdings
unitholders will be asked to consider and vote on the following
matters:
|
|
|
|
|
a proposal to approve the merger, the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby; and
|
|
|
|
any proposal to transact such other business as may properly
come before the Holdings special meeting and any adjournment or
postponement thereof.
|
Who may vote: You may vote at the Holdings
special meeting if you owned Holdings units at the close of
business on the record date, September 17, 2010. You may
cast one vote for each Holdings unit that you owned at the close
of business on the record date.
How to vote: Please complete and submit the
enclosed proxy card as soon as possible or transmit your voting
instructions by using the telephone or internet procedures
described on your proxy card.
What vote is needed: The affirmative vote of
the holders of (A) a majority of the common units of
Holdings outstanding and entitled to vote at the meeting as of
the record date, voting as a separate class, and (B) a
majority of the common units and management units of Holdings
outstanding and entitled to vote at the meeting as of the record
date, voting together as a single class, is required to approve
the merger, the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby.
Recommendations of the Holdings Board: The
Holdings Board unanimously recommends that you vote
FOR the proposal to approve the merger, the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby.
The approval of the merger and the merger agreement by the
Holdings unitholders is a condition to the completion of the
merger.
Risk
Factors (page 24)
You should consider carefully all of the risk factors together
with all of the other information included in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus before deciding how to vote. Certain risks
related to the merger are described under the caption Risk
Factors beginning on page 24 of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. Some of these risks include, but are not
limited to, those described below:
|
|
|
|
|
the directors and executive officers of the Partnership GP and
of Holdings GP may have interests that differ from your
interests;
|
|
|
|
at the effective time, the market value of the Partnership LP
units to be received in the merger could decrease and Holdings
unitholders cannot be sure of the market value of such
Partnership LP units;
|
|
|
|
no ruling has been obtained with respect to the tax consequences
of the merger; and
|
|
|
|
the benefits of the merger may not be realized.
|
Appraisal
Rights (page 87)
Neither Partnership unitholders nor Holdings unitholders have or
are entitled to exercise appraisal rights in connection with the
merger under Delaware law or either the Partnerships or
Holdings partnership agreement, as applicable.
No
Solicitation of Other Offers by Holdings
(page 99)
Pursuant to the merger agreement, Holdings agreed not to
(a) knowingly initiate, solicit or encourage the submission
of any acquisition proposal; or (b) participate in any
discussions or negotiations regarding, or
6
furnish to any person any non-public information with respect
to, any acquisition proposal. Notwithstanding these
restrictions, at any time prior to the approval of the merger
agreement by Holdings unitholders, Holdings is permitted to
enter into or participate in any discussions or negotiations
with any party that has made an unsolicited written acquisition
proposal if the Holdings Board determines, after consultation
with its outside legal counsel and financial advisors, that such
acquisition proposal constitutes or is likely to result in a
superior proposal and that failure to take such action would be
inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under the existing
partnership agreement of Holdings or applicable law. See
The Merger Agreement No Solicitation of Other
Offers by Holdings beginning on page 99.
In addition, Holdings may terminate the merger agreement and
enter into a definitive agreement with respect to a superior
proposal. See The Merger Agreement No
Solicitation of Other Offers by Holdings Change in
Recommendation by the Holdings Board on page 99.
Termination
of the Merger Agreement (page 102)
The merger agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the
effective time in any of the following ways:
|
|
|
|
|
by mutual written consent of Holdings and the Partnership;
|
|
|
|
by either Holdings or the Partnership upon written notice to the
other:
|
|
|
|
|
|
if the merger is not completed on or before December 31,
2010, unless the failure of the closing to occur by this date is
primarily due to the failure of the party seeking to terminate
the merger agreement to fulfill any material obligation under
the merger agreement or a material breach of the merger
agreement by such party. Either the Partnership or Holdings may
extend the termination date to February 28, 2011 unless a
change in U.S. law has been adopted such that gain or loss
would be recognized by holders of Holdings units upon exchange
of such Holdings units for Partnership LP units (other than gain
resulting from any decrease in partnership liabilities pursuant
to Section 752 of the Internal Revenue Code or cash or
other property distributions);
|
|
|
|
if any regulatory authority has issued a final and nonappealable
statute, rule, order, decree or regulation or taken any other
action that permanently restrains, enjoins or prohibits the
consummation of the merger; provided, that the
terminating party is not in breach of its covenant to use
commercially reasonable best efforts to complete the merger
promptly;
|
|
|
|
if Holdings fails to get the necessary unitholder approval at
the Holdings special meeting, subject to certain limitations;
|
|
|
|
if there has been a material breach of any agreements or
covenants, or there is any material inaccuracy in any of the
representations or warranties of any of the other parties set
forth in the merger agreement under certain circumstances;
|
|
|
|
if the Partnership fails to get the necessary unitholder
approval at the Partnership special meeting, subject to certain
limitations;
|
|
|
|
|
|
by the Partnership if the Holdings Board makes a change in
recommendation;
|
|
|
|
by Holdings if:
|
|
|
|
|
|
prior to obtaining the necessary unitholder approval at the
Holdings special meeting, Holdings receives a third party
acquisition proposal which the Holdings Board concludes, in good
faith, is a superior proposal; the Holdings Board makes a change
in recommendation; Holdings has not knowingly and intentionally
breached the no solicitation provisions of the merger agreement;
and Holdings subsequently enters into an agreement for the
superior proposal, and pays the termination fee described
below; or
|
|
|
|
the Partnership Audit Committee makes a change in recommendation
regarding the merger.
|
7
Termination
Fees and Expenses (page 103)
Holdings or the Partnership will be obligated to pay termination
fees (to be held by an escrow agent) upon the termination of the
merger agreement in the following circumstances:
|
|
|
|
|
Holdings will be obligated to pay a fee to the Partnership equal
to $29.0 million in cash, reduced by certain amounts paid,
if:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the merger agreement is terminated by the Partnership because
the Holdings Board makes a change in recommendation regarding
the merger;
|
|
|
|
after an acquisition proposal for 50% or more of the assets of,
the equity interest in or businesses of Holdings has been made
to the Holdings unitholders or an intention to make such an
acquisition proposal has been made known, the merger agreement
is terminated by either the Partnership or Holdings because the
merger was not consummated by the termination date or Holdings
failed to obtain the requisite unitholder approvals or by the
Partnership because of a breach of Holdings
representations and warranties or agreements and covenants and,
in either case, within 12 months after the merger agreement
is terminated, Holdings enters into a definitive agreement in
respect of any acquisition proposal and consummates the
transaction contemplated by such definitive agreement (which
need not be the same acquisition proposal as the acquisition
proposal first mentioned in this paragraph); or
|
|
|
|
the merger agreement is terminated by Holdings to enter into a
superior proposal under certain circumstances.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Partnership will be obligated to pay a fee to Holdings equal
to $29.0 million in cash if the Partnership Audit Committee
makes a change in recommendation regarding the merger and
Holdings terminates the merger agreement because of such change
in recommendation.
|
In the event that Holdings or the Partnership is obligated to
pay the termination fee to the Partnership or Holdings,
respectively, the escrow agent will release to the Partnership
or Holdings, as applicable, a portion of the termination fee
equal to no greater than 70% of the maximum remaining amount
which, in the good faith view of the Partnership GP or Holdings
GP, as applicable, may be taken in the gross income of the
Partnership or Holdings, as the case may be, without exceeding
the permissible qualifying income limits for a publicly traded
partnership based on applicable provisions of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Internal Revenue
Code). Following the year in which the initial release of
the termination fee occurs, additional amounts may be released
or a portion of the fee may be required to be returned so that
the amount released equals between 80% and 90% of the maximum
which the Partnership or Holdings, as applicable, could actually
have taken in gross income. Any amount of the termination fee
not distributed to the party to which the fee is due will be
refunded to the party that paid the fee. In addition, Holdings
has waived for itself and its affiliates, and will cause the
Partnership GP to waive, any rights to any distribution by the
Partnership of any termination fee paid to the Partnership.
To the extent that Holdings has already paid the Partnership its
expenses in connection with the termination of the merger
agreement and subsequently Holdings is obligated to pay the
termination fee to the escrow agent on the Partnerships
behalf, Holdings is only obligated to pay the escrow agent an
amount equal to the difference between the applicable
termination fee and the expenses previously paid.
Holdings or the Partnership will be obligated to pay expenses
upon the termination of the merger agreement in the following
circumstances:
|
|
|
|
|
Holdings will be obligated to pay the Partnerships
expenses, not to exceed $6.0 million, if the merger
agreement is terminated by:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the Partnership because of a breach of Holdings or
Holdings GPs material representations and warranties or
agreements and covenants; or
|
|
|
|
the Partnership or Holdings because Holdings failed to obtain
the requisite approvals from its unitholders.
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
The Partnership will be obligated to pay Holdings
expenses, not to exceed $6.0 million, if the merger
agreement is terminated by:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holdings because of a breach of the Partnerships or the
Partnership GPs material representations and warranties or
agreements and covenants; or
|
|
|
|
Holdings or the Partnership because the Partnership failed to
obtain the requisite approvals from its unitholders.
|
If the merger is consummated, the Partnership will pay the
property and transfer taxes imposed on either party in
connection with the merger. The Partnership will pay the
expenses for filing, printing, and mailing this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. Any filing fees payable pursuant to
regulatory laws and other filing fees incurred in connection
with the merger agreement will be paid by the party incurring
the fee.
Opinion
of Barclays Capital Inc. Financial Advisor to the
Partnership Audit Committee (page 56)
The Partnership Audit Committee retained Barclays Capital Inc.,
or Barclays, to act as its financial advisor in connection with
the merger. At a meeting of the Partnership Audit Committee held
on June 10, 2010, Barclays rendered its opinion to the
Partnership Audit Committee that, as of June 10, 2010, and
based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions set forth
in the opinion, the exchange ratio to be paid is fair, from a
financial point of view, to the Partnership and accordingly, the
holders of the Partnership LP units, other than Holdings, the
Partnership GP, ArcLight Capital Partners, LLC and certain of
its affiliates and Kelso & Company and certain of its
affiliates.
The full text of the Barclays opinion, dated as of June 10,
2010, which sets forth, among other things, the assumptions
made, procedures followed, matters considered, and
qualifications and limitations of the review undertaken by
Barclays in rendering its opinion, is attached as Annex E
to this joint proxy statement/prospectus and is incorporated
herein by reference. The summary of the Barclays opinion set
forth in this joint proxy statement/prospectus is qualified in
its entirety by reference to the full text of the written
opinion. The holders of Partnership LP units are urged to read
the Barclays opinion carefully and in its entirety. Barclays
provided financial advisory services and its opinion for the
information and assistance of the Partnership Audit Committee in
connection with its consideration of the merger. The Barclays
opinion does not constitute a recommendation to any holder of
Partnership LP units as to how such holder should vote with
respect to the merger or any other matter. Pursuant to an
engagement letter between the Partnership Audit Committee and
Barclays, the Partnership has agreed to pay Barclays fees
for its services, a principal portion of which is contingent
upon consummation of the merger.
Opinion
of Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC Financial
Advisor to the Holdings Board (page 67)
On June 10, 2010, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, which
we refer to as Credit Suisse, rendered its oral opinion to the
Holdings Board, in its capacity as the board of directors of the
general partner of Holdings (which was subsequently confirmed in
writing by delivery of Credit Suisses written opinion
dated the same date) to the effect that, as of June 10,
2010, the exchange ratio was fair, from a financial point of
view, to the unaffiliated unitholders of Holdings. For purposes
of its opinion, Credit Suisse defined the unaffiliated
unitholders of Holdings as the holders of Holdings units, other
than BGH GP and its affiliates.
Credit Suisses opinion was directed to the Holdings Board,
in its capacity as the board of directors of the general partner
of Holdings, and only addressed the fairness, from a financial
point of view, to the unaffiliated unitholders of Holdings of
the exchange ratio and did not address any other aspect or
implication of the merger. The summary of Credit Suisses
opinion in this joint proxy statement/prospectus is qualified in
its entirety by reference to the full text of its written
opinion, which is included as Annex F to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus and sets forth the procedures followed,
assumptions made, qualifications and limitations on the review
undertaken and other matters considered by Credit Suisse in
preparing its opinion. However, neither Credit Suisses
written opinion nor the summary of its opinion and the related
analyses set forth in this joint proxy statement/prospectus are
intended to be, and they do not constitute, advice or a
recommendation to any holder of Holdings units as to how such
holder should vote or act with respect to any matter relating to
the merger.
9
Comparison
of Partnership Unitholder Rights and Holdings Unitholder Rights
(page 146)
As a result of the merger, Holdings unitholders will become
holders of Partnership LP units. The rights of holders of
Partnership LP units will be governed by the Partnerships
amended and restated partnership agreement and applicable
Delaware law. There are differences between the rights of
Holdings unitholders and Partnership unitholders pursuant to the
existing partnership agreement of Holdings and the amended and
restated partnership agreement of the Partnership. Certain of
these differences are described under Comparison of
Partnership Unitholder Rights and Holdings Unitholder
Rights beginning on page 146.
Interests
of Certain Persons in the Merger (page 138)
In considering the recommendations of the Partnership Audit
Committee and Holdings Board, Partnership unitholders and
Holdings unitholders should be aware that some of the executive
officers and directors of the Partnership GP and Holdings GP
have interests in the merger that may differ from, or may be in
addition to, the interests of Partnership unitholders or of
Holdings unitholders generally. These interests include:
|
|
|
|
|
Holdings and Partnership Units. Some of the
executive officers and directors of the Partnership GP and
Holdings GP currently own Holdings units and will be receiving
Partnership LP units as a result of the merger. Holdings units
held by the directors and executive officers will be converted
into Partnership LP units at a ratio of 0.705 Partnership LP
units per Holdings unit. This is the same ratio as that
applicable to all other holders of Holdings units. In addition,
certain directors and officers of the Partnership GP and
Holdings GP currently own Partnership LP units.
|
|
|
|
Indemnification and Insurance. The merger
agreement provides for indemnification by the Partnership and
Holdings of each person who was, as of the date of the merger
agreement, or is at any time from the date of the merger
agreement through the effective date, an officer or director of
Holdings or any of its subsidiaries or acting as a fiduciary
under or with respect to any employee benefit plan of Holdings
and for the maintenance of directors and officers
liability insurance covering directors and executive officers of
Holdings GP for a period of six years following the merger. The
Partnership and MergerCo also agreed that all rights to
indemnification now existing in favor of indemnified parties as
provided in the Holdings agreement of limited partnership (or,
as applicable, the charter, bylaws, partnership agreement,
limited liability company agreement, or other organizational
documents of any of Holdings subsidiaries) and the
indemnification agreements of Holdings or any of its
subsidiaries will be assumed by Holdings, the Partnership and
the Partnership GP in the merger, without further action, at the
effective time of the merger and will survive the merger and
will continue in full force and effect in accordance with their
terms.
|
|
|
|
Director and Executive Officer
Interlock. Certain of Holdings GPs
directors and all of Holdings GPs executive officers are
currently directors and executive officers of the Partnership
GP, respectively, and are expected to remain directors and
executive officers of the Partnership GP following the merger.
Messrs. Wylie, Smith, St.Clair and Schmidt are officers of
BGH GP. Mr. Wylie is a director of BGH GP. After the
effective time, the Partnership Board is expected to consist of
nine members, three of whom are expected to be the existing
members of the Partnership Audit Committee, one of whom is
expected to be the existing chief executive officer of the
Partnership GP and three of whom are expected to be the three
existing members of the audit committee of the Holdings Board.
The amended and restated partnership agreement of the
Partnership will provide that, following (a) the receipt of
approvals from the CPUC and the PaPUC of the public election
provisions or (b) a determination by the Partnership Board
that such approvals are not required, Holdings GP shall have the
right to designate (a) two directors for so long as BGH GP,
ArcLight Capital Partners, LLC (ArcLight) and
Kelso & Company (Kelso) and their
affiliates (directly and indirectly) own at least 10,495,107
Partnership LP units (85% of the number they will own after the
closing of the merger) or (b) one director for so long as
they own at least 5,247,554 Partnership LP units (42.5% of the
number they will own after the closing of the merger).
|
|
|
|
Interests in BGH GP. In addition, all of the
executive officers and certain of the directors of the
Partnership GP and Holdings GP have limited liability company
interests in BGH GP, which owns approximately 61% of the total
Holdings common units and 97% of the total Holdings management
units and has entered into a support agreement and registration
rights agreement. For more information
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
on the support agreement and registration rights agreement,
please read The Proposed Merger Transactions
Related to the Merger.
|
Senior management of the Partnership GP and Holdings GP prepared
projections with respect to the Partnerships future
financial and operating performance. These projections were
provided to Barclays and Credit Suisse for use in connection
with the preparation of their opinions to the Partnership Audit
Committee and the Holdings Board, respectively, and related
financial advisory services. The projections were also provided
to the Partnership Audit Committee and the Holdings Board.
Accounting
Treatment of the Merger (page 88)
The merger will be accounted for in accordance with Financial
Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification
810, Consolidations Overall Changes
in Parents Ownership Interest in a Subsidiary, which
is referred to as FASB ASC 810. Holdings is considered as
the surviving consolidated entity for accounting purposes rather
than the Partnership, which is the surviving consolidated entity
for legal and reporting purposes. Therefore, the changes in
Holdings ownership interest will be accounted for as an
equity transaction and no gain or loss will be recognized as a
result of the merger.
Material
Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger
(page 115)
Tax matters associated with the merger are complicated. The tax
consequences to a Holdings unitholder of the merger and related
matters will depend on such unitholders own personal tax
situation. Holdings unitholders are urged to consult their tax
advisors for a full understanding of the federal, state, local
and foreign tax consequences of the merger that will be
applicable to them.
The Partnership expects to receive an opinion from
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. to the effect that no gain or
loss should be recognized by existing holders of Partnership LP
units as a result of the transactions (other than gain resulting
from any decrease in Partnership liabilities pursuant to
Section 752 of the Internal Revenue Code). Holdings expects
to receive an opinion from Latham & Watkins LLP to the
effect that no gain or loss should be recognized by the holders
of Holdings units to the extent Partnership LP units are
received in exchange therefor as a result of the merger, other
than gain resulting from either (i) any decrease in
partnership liabilities pursuant to Section 752 of the
Internal Revenue Code, or (ii) any cash or other property
distributions. Opinions of counsel, however, are not binding on
the Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, and no
assurance can be given that the IRS would not successfully
assert a contrary position regarding the merger and the opinions
of counsel.
The federal income tax consequences described above may not
apply to some holders of Partnership LP units and Holdings
units. Please read Risk Factors Tax Risks
Related to the Merger beginning on page 28,
Risk Factors Tax Risks to Holdings
Unitholders beginning on page 29, Risk
Factors Tax Risks to Existing Partnership
Unitholders beginning on page 30 and Material
Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger beginning on
page 115 for a more complete discussion of the federal
income tax consequences of the merger.
Litigation
(page 89)
On August 24, 2010, the District Court of Harris County,
Texas, entered an order consolidating the three previously filed
putative class actions under the caption of Broadbased
Equities v. Forrest E. Wylie, et al and appointing
interim co-lead class counsel and interim co-liason counsel.
Plaintiff subsequently filed a consolidated amended class action
and derivative complaint on September 1, 2010. The
consolidated amended complaint purports to be a putative class
and derivative action alleging that Holdings GP and its
directors breached their fiduciary duties to Holdings
public unitholders in connection with the merger by, among other
things, accepting insufficient consideration and failing to
disclose all material facts in order that Holdings
unitholders may cast an informed vote on the merger agreement,
and that the Partnership, Partnership GP, Holdings GP, MergerCo,
BGH GP, ArcLight and Kelso aided and abetted the breaches of
fiduciary duty. The consolidated amended complaint seeks an
order certifying a class consisting of all of Holdings
public unitholders, a determination that the action is a proper
derivative action, a declaration that the defendants have
11
breached their fiduciary duties to Holdings and Holdings
public unitholders or aided and abetted such breaches, damages
in unspecified amounts and an award of attorneys fees and
costs.
The Partnership and Holdings do not believe that the claims
alleged in the consolidated amended complaint have any merit,
and they intend to defend the action accordingly.
12
Ownership
Structure
The following diagrams depict the Partnerships and
Holdings ownership structure before and after giving
effect to the merger and based on the Partnerships
ownership as of September 21, 2010.
13
Summary
Historical and Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information of
Holdings
Holdings will be treated as the surviving consolidated entity of
the merger for accounting purposes, even though the Partnership
will be the surviving consolidated entity for legal and
reporting purposes. The following table sets forth summary
consolidated historical financial data and pro forma combined
financial data for Holdings. The summary historical financial
data as of and for the years ended December 31, 2005
through 2009 are derived from Holdings historical audited
consolidated financial statements and related notes. The summary
historical financial data as of and for the six months
ended June 30, 2010 are derived from Holdings
historical unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
and related notes. The summary financial data should be read in
conjunction with Holdings consolidated financial
statements, including the notes thereto. Holdings
consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2008 and
2009 and as of June 30, 2010 and the related consolidated
statements of operations, partners capital and cash flows
for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2009 and for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 are incorporated by reference into this joint
proxy statement/prospectus from Holdings quarterly report
on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 and annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Currently, the Partnership, a publicly traded limited
partnership, is a consolidated subsidiary of Holdings, which
also is a publicly traded limited partnership. If the merger and
merger agreement as described in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus are approved by the unitholders of both
Holdings and the Partnership and all other conditions set forth
in the merger agreement are met, the Partnership GP will become
a subsidiary of the Partnership, with the Partnership as the
sole limited partner of Holdings and Holdings GP continuing as
the non-economic general partner of Holdings. In addition, the
incentive distribution rights held by the Partnership GP will be
cancelled and the general partner units held by the Partnership
GP (representing an approximate 0.5% general partner interest in
the Partnership) will be converted to a non-economic general
partner interest in the Partnership. For accounting purposes,
Holdings is considered the accounting acquirer of the
Partnerships noncontrolling interests.
15
The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial data
provided below gives pro forma effect to the merger, reflecting
the issuance of 0.705 Partnership LP units for each outstanding
Holdings unit. In addition, the Partnerships existing
partnership agreement will be amended and restated to provide
for the cancellation of the incentive distribution rights and
the approximate 0.5% general partner interest in the Partnership
owned, directly and indirectly, by the Partnership GP will be
converted into a non-economic general partner interest in the
Partnership. The unaudited pro forma balance sheet data assumes
the merger occurred as of June 30, 2010. The unaudited pro
forma income statement data for the year ended December 31,
2009 and for the six months ended June 30, 2010 assumes the
merger occurred as of January 1, 2009 and January 1,
2010, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holdings Consolidated Historical
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2005(1)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per unit amounts)
|
|
|
Income Statement Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product sales
|
|
$
|
6,629
|
|
|
$
|
9,840
|
|
|
$
|
10,680
|
|
|
$
|
1,304,097
|
|
|
$
|
1,125,653
|
|
|
$
|
1,069,914
|
|
|
$
|
1,125,653
|
|
|
$
|
1,069,914
|
|
Transportation and other services
|
|
|
401,817
|
|
|
|
451,920
|
|
|
|
508,667
|
|
|
|
592,555
|
|
|
|
644,719
|
|
|
|
328,536
|
|
|
|
644,719
|
|
|
|
328,536
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues(2)
|
|
|
408,446
|
|
|
|
461,760
|
|
|
|
519,347
|
|
|
|
1,896,652
|
|
|
|
1,770,372
|
|
|
|
1,398,450
|
|
|
|
1,770,372
|
|
|
|
1,398,450
|
|
Cost of product sales and natural gas storage services
|
|
|
6,457
|
|
|
|
9,637
|
|
|
|
10,473
|
|
|
|
1,274,135
|
|
|
|
1,103,015
|
|
|
|
1,068,382
|
|
|
|
1,103,015
|
|
|
|
1,068,382
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
190,293
|
|
|
|
217,737
|
|
|
|
245,271
|
|
|
|
281,965
|
|
|
|
275,930
|
|
|
|
135,352
|
|
|
|
275,930
|
|
|
|
135,352
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
32,408
|
|
|
|
39,629
|
|
|
|
40,236
|
|
|
|
50,834
|
|
|
|
54,699
|
|
|
|
29,197
|
|
|
|
54,699
|
|
|
|
29,197
|
|
Asset impairment expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
23,419
|
|
|
|
29,884
|
|
|
|
28,014
|
|
|
|
43,226
|
|
|
|
41,147
|
|
|
|
24,089
|
|
|
|
41,147
|
|
|
|
24,089
|
|
Reorganization expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income(2)
|
|
|
155,869
|
|
|
|
164,873
|
|
|
|
195,353
|
|
|
|
246,492
|
|
|
|
203,800
|
|
|
|
141,430
|
|
|
|
203,800
|
|
|
|
141,430
|
|
Investment income
|
|
|
884
|
|
|
|
1,410
|
|
|
|
1,490
|
|
|
|
1,553
|
|
|
|
453
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
453
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
Interest and debt expense
|
|
|
(55,366
|
)
|
|
|
(60,702
|
)
|
|
|
(51,721
|
)
|
|
|
(75,410
|
)
|
|
|
(75,147
|
)
|
|
|
(43,006
|
)
|
|
|
(75,239
|
)
|
|
|
(43,052
|
)
|
Earnings from equity investments
|
|
|
5,303
|
|
|
|
6,219
|
|
|
|
7,553
|
|
|
|
7,988
|
|
|
|
12,531
|
|
|
|
5,416
|
|
|
|
12,531
|
|
|
|
5,416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
106,690
|
|
|
|
111,800
|
|
|
|
152,675
|
|
|
|
180,623
|
|
|
|
141,637
|
|
|
|
104,080
|
|
|
|
141,545
|
|
|
|
104,034
|
|
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(99,704
|
)
|
|
|
(103,066
|
)
|
|
|
(129,754
|
)
|
|
|
(154,146
|
)
|
|
|
(92,043
|
)
|
|
|
(81,303
|
)
|
|
|
(4,202
|
)
|
|
|
(2,511
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Holdings(2)
|
|
$
|
6,986
|
|
|
$
|
8,734
|
|
|
$
|
22,921
|
|
|
$
|
26,477
|
|
|
$
|
49,594
|
|
|
$
|
22,777
|
|
|
$
|
137,343
|
|
|
$
|
101,523
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from August 9 to December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,599
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Earnings per limited partner unit:(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
|
$
|
0.94
|
|
|
$
|
1.75
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
1.95
|
|
|
$
|
1.42
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
|
$
|
0.94
|
|
|
$
|
1.75
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
1.94
|
|
|
$
|
1.42
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holdings Consolidated Historical
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2005(1)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per unit amounts)
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA:(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
106,690
|
|
|
$
|
111,800
|
|
|
$
|
152,675
|
|
|
$
|
180,623
|
|
|
$
|
141,637
|
|
|
$
|
104,080
|
|
|
$
|
141,545
|
|
|
$
|
104,034
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(99,704
|
)
|
|
|
(103,066
|
)
|
|
|
(129,754
|
)
|
|
|
(154,146
|
)
|
|
|
(92,043
|
)
|
|
|
(81,303
|
)
|
|
|
(4,202
|
)
|
|
|
(2,511
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Holdings unitholders
|
|
|
6,986
|
|
|
|
8,734
|
|
|
|
22,921
|
|
|
|
26,477
|
|
|
|
49,594
|
|
|
|
22,777
|
|
|
|
137,343
|
|
|
|
101,523
|
|
Interest and debt expense
|
|
|
55,366
|
|
|
|
60,702
|
|
|
|
51,721
|
|
|
|
75,410
|
|
|
|
75,147
|
|
|
|
43,006
|
|
|
|
75,239
|
|
|
|
43,052
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
874
|
|
|
|
596
|
|
|
|
760
|
|
|
|
801
|
|
|
|
(343
|
)
|
|
|
(662
|
)
|
|
|
(343
|
)
|
|
|
(662
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
32,408
|
|
|
|
39,629
|
|
|
|
40,236
|
|
|
|
50,834
|
|
|
|
54,699
|
|
|
|
29,197
|
|
|
|
54,699
|
|
|
|
29,197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
95,634
|
|
|
|
109,661
|
|
|
|
115,638
|
|
|
|
153,522
|
|
|
|
179,097
|
|
|
|
94,318
|
|
|
|
266,938
|
|
|
|
173,110
|
|
Non-cash deferred lease expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,598
|
|
|
|
4,500
|
|
|
|
2,117
|
|
|
|
4,500
|
|
|
|
2,117
|
|
Asset impairment expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reorganization expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash unit-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
968
|
|
|
|
1,912
|
|
|
|
4,405
|
|
|
|
3,718
|
|
|
|
4,405
|
|
|
|
3,718
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
95,634
|
|
|
$
|
109,990
|
|
|
$
|
116,606
|
|
|
$
|
160,032
|
|
|
$
|
279,783
|
|
|
$
|
100,153
|
|
|
$
|
367,624
|
|
|
$
|
178,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data (at period end):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets(2)
|
|
$
|
2,040,832
|
|
|
$
|
2,212,585
|
|
|
$
|
2,354,326
|
|
|
$
|
3,263,097
|
|
|
$
|
3,486,571
|
|
|
$
|
3,343,879
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
$
|
3,343,879
|
|
Total debt, including current portion
|
|
|
1,104,660
|
|
|
|
1,020,449
|
|
|
|
869,463
|
|
|
|
1,555,719
|
|
|
|
1,746,473
|
|
|
|
1,619,959
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
1,633,959
|
|
Partners Capital
|
|
|
80,442
|
|
|
|
240,617
|
|
|
|
238,330
|
|
|
|
232,060
|
|
|
|
242,334
|
|
|
|
240,003
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
1,371,339
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
711,722
|
|
|
|
772,525
|
|
|
|
1,066,143
|
|
|
|
1,166,774
|
|
|
|
1,209,960
|
|
|
|
1,163,827
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
18,491
|
|
Cash Distribution Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash distributions declared per unit(5)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.350
|
|
|
$
|
1.040
|
|
|
$
|
1.260
|
|
|
$
|
1.520
|
|
|
$
|
0.880
|
|
|
$
|
3.250
|
|
|
$
|
1.727
|
|
Cash distributions paid per unit(5)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.125
|
|
|
$
|
0.980
|
|
|
$
|
1.215
|
|
|
$
|
1.440
|
|
|
$
|
0.840
|
|
|
$
|
3.180
|
|
|
$
|
1.693
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Certain amounts for the year ended December 31, 2005
presented in this table as product sales and transportation and
other services have been reclassified to conform to the
presentation for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2007,
2008 and 2009 and the six months ended June 30, 2010. These
reclassifications for 2005 have not been audited. |
|
(2) |
|
Substantial increases in revenue, operating income, net income
and total assets for the year ended December 31, 2008
resulted from the acquisitions of Lodi Gas Storage, L.L.C. and
Farm & Home Oil Company LLC in the first quarter of
2008. |
|
(3) |
|
Earnings per limited partner unit is presented only for the
period since August 9, 2006, the date Holdings became a
public company. |
|
(4) |
|
EBITDA, a measure not defined under U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles, referred to as GAAP, is defined as net
income attributable to Holdings unitholders before
interest expense, income taxes and depreciation and
amortization. EBITDA should not be considered an alternative to
net income, operating income, cash flow from operations or any
other measure of financial performance presented in accordance
with GAAP. The EBITDA measure eliminates the significant level
of non-cash depreciation and |
17
|
|
|
|
|
amortization expense that results from the capital-intensive
nature of Holdings businesses and from intangible assets
recognized in business combinations. In addition, EBITDA is
unaffected by Holdings capital structure due to the
elimination of interest expense and income taxes. Adjusted
EBITDA, which is also a non-GAAP measure, is defined as EBITDA
plus (i) non-cash deferred lease expense, which is the
difference between the estimated annual land lease expense for
the natural gas storage facility in the Natural Gas Storage
segment to be recorded under GAAP and the actual cash to be paid
for such annual land lease, and (ii) non-cash unit-based
compensation expense. In addition, for the year ended
December 31, 2009, the Buckeye NGL impairment expense of
$59.7 million and the reorganization expense of
$32.1 million have been excluded from Adjusted EBITDA in
order to evaluate Holdings results of operations on a
comparative basis over multiple periods. The EBITDA and Adjusted
EBITDA data presented may not be comparable to similarly titled
measures at other companies because EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA
exclude some items that affect net income attributable to
Holdings unitholders, and these items may vary among other
companies. Historically, the Partnerships senior
management used Adjusted EBITDA to evaluate consolidated
operating performance and the operating performance of the
business segments and to allocate resources and capital to the
business segments. In addition, the Partnerships senior
management used Adjusted EBITDA as a performance measure to
evaluate the viability of proposed projects and to determine
overall rates of return on alternative investment opportunities.
Adjusted EBITDA is provided in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus because the Partnership believes that
investors benefit from having access to the same financial
measures that the Partnership has historically used. Further,
Adjusted EBITDA is provided in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus because the Partnership and Holdings
believe that this measure is useful to investors because it is
one of the bases for comparing its operating performance with
that of other companies with similar operations, although its
measures may not be directly comparable to similar measures used
by other companies. Given the nature of the transactions the
merger agreement contemplates, the Partnership and Holdings
believe investors benefit from having Adjusted EBITDA for
partnership comparison purposes. |
|
(5) |
|
Cash distributions declared represent distributions declared
associated with each calendar year. Distributions are generally
declared and paid within 60 days following the close of
each quarter. Cash distributions paid represent cash payments
for distributions during each of the periods presented. Cash
distributions declared/paid reflect the distribution decisions
made by the Holdings Board and the Partnership Board at their
respective quarterly board meetings. As such, these pro forma
calculations are not necessarily indicative of the distribution
decision that the Holdings Board or the Partnership Board would
have made had the merger been completed at January 1, 2009
or January 1, 2010. For comparison to the historical
Holdings per unit data, the pro forma data should be multiplied
by the 0.705 conversion ratio. |
18
Selected
Historical Financial Information of the Partnership
The following table sets forth summary condensed consolidated
historical financial information for the Partnership. The
summary historical financial data as of and for the years ended
December 31, 2005 through 2009 are derived from the
Partnerships historical audited consolidated financial
statements and related notes. The summary historical financial
data as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2010 are
derived from the Partnerships historical unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes.
The summary financial data should be read in conjunction with
the Partnerships consolidated historical financial
statements, including the notes thereto. The Partnerships
consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2008 and
2009 and as of June 30, 2010 and the related consolidated
statements of operations, partners capital and cash flows
for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2009 and the six months ended June 30,
2010 are incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus from the Partnerships quarterly
report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 and annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Partnership Consolidated Historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2005(1)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per unit amounts)
|
|
|
Income Statement Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product sales
|
|
$
|
6,629
|
|
|
$
|
9,840
|
|
|
$
|
10,680
|
|
|
$
|
1,304,097
|
|
|
$
|
1,125,653
|
|
|
$
|
1,069,914
|
|
Transportation and other services
|
|
|
401,817
|
|
|
|
451,920
|
|
|
|
508,667
|
|
|
|
592,555
|
|
|
|
644,719
|
|
|
|
328,536
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues(2)
|
|
|
408,446
|
|
|
|
461,760
|
|
|
|
519,347
|
|
|
|
1,896,652
|
|
|
|
1,770,372
|
|
|
|
1,398,450
|
|
Cost of product sales and natural gas storage services
|
|
|
6,457
|
|
|
|
9,637
|
|
|
|
10,473
|
|
|
|
1,274,135
|
|
|
|
1,103,015
|
|
|
|
1,068,382
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
185,628
|
|
|
|
211,801
|
|
|
|
240,258
|
|
|
|
279,454
|
|
|
|
273,985
|
|
|
|
133,269
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
36,760
|
|
|
|
44,039
|
|
|
|
44,651
|
|
|
|
55,299
|
|
|
|
59,164
|
|
|
|
31,430
|
|
Asset impairment expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
18,288
|
|
|
|
19,216
|
|
|
|
21,885
|
|
|
|
34,143
|
|
|
|
33,984
|
|
|
|
20,510
|
|
Reorganization expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income(2)
|
|
|
161,313
|
|
|
|
177,067
|
|
|
|
202,080
|
|
|
|
253,621
|
|
|
|
208,443
|
|
|
|
144,859
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
637
|
|
|
|
1,944
|
|
|
|
1,362
|
|
|
|
1,429
|
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
Interest and debt expense
|
|
|
(43,357
|
)
|
|
|
(52,113
|
)
|
|
|
(50,378
|
)
|
|
|
(74,387
|
)
|
|
|
(74,851
|
)
|
|
|
(42,811
|
)
|
General partner incentive compensation
|
|
|
(20,180
|
)
|
|
|
(18,277
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from equity investments
|
|
|
5,303
|
|
|
|
6,219
|
|
|
|
7,553
|
|
|
|
7,988
|
|
|
|
12,531
|
|
|
|
5,416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
103,716
|
|
|
|
114,840
|
|
|
|
160,617
|
|
|
|
188,651
|
|
|
|
146,900
|
|
|
|
107,703
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,230
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income(2)
|
|
|
103,716
|
|
|
|
114,840
|
|
|
|
160,617
|
|
|
|
189,881
|
|
|
|
146,900
|
|
|
|
107,703
|
|
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(3,758
|
)
|
|
|
(4,600
|
)
|
|
|
(5,261
|
)
|
|
|
(5,492
|
)
|
|
|
(5,918
|
)
|
|
|
(3,583
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to the Partnership
|
|
$
|
99,958
|
|
|
$
|
110,240
|
|
|
$
|
155,356
|
|
|
$
|
184,389
|
|
|
$
|
140,982
|
|
|
$
|
104,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per LP unit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
2.12
|
|
|
$
|
2.14
|
|
|
$
|
2.91
|
|
|
$
|
3.00
|
|
|
$
|
1.84
|
|
|
$
|
1.52
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
2.12
|
|
|
$
|
2.14
|
|
|
$
|
2.91
|
|
|
$
|
3.00
|
|
|
$
|
1.84
|
|
|
$
|
1.51
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Partnership Consolidated Historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2005(1)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per unit amounts)
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA:(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
103,716
|
|
|
$
|
114,840
|
|
|
$
|
160,617
|
|
|
$
|
189,881
|
|
|
$
|
146,900
|
|
|
$
|
107,703
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(3,758
|
)
|
|
|
(4,600
|
)
|
|
|
(5,261
|
)
|
|
|
(5,492
|
)
|
|
|
(5,918
|
)
|
|
|
(3,583
|
)
|
Less: Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,230
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to the Partnerships unitholders
from continuing operations
|
|
|
99,958
|
|
|
|
110,240
|
|
|
|
155,356
|
|
|
|
183,159
|
|
|
|
140,982
|
|
|
|
104,120
|
|
Interest and debt expense
|
|
|
43,357
|
|
|
|
52,113
|
|
|
|
50,378
|
|
|
|
74,387
|
|
|
|
74,851
|
|
|
|
42,811
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
866
|
|
|
|
595
|
|
|
|
763
|
|
|
|
796
|
|
|
|
(348
|
)
|
|
|
(665
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
36,760
|
|
|
|
44,039
|
|
|
|
44,651
|
|
|
|
55,299
|
|
|
|
59,164
|
|
|
|
31,430
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
180,941
|
|
|
|
206,987
|
|
|
|
251,148
|
|
|
|
313,641
|
|
|
|
274,649
|
|
|
|
177,696
|
|
General partner incentive compensation
|
|
|
20,180
|
|
|
|
18,277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash deferred lease expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,598
|
|
|
|
4,500
|
|
|
|
2,117
|
|
Asset impairment expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reorganization expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash unit-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
486
|
|
|
|
3,079
|
|
|
|
2,794
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
201,121
|
|
|
$
|
225,593
|
|
|
$
|
251,526
|
|
|
$
|
318,725
|
|
|
$
|
374,009
|
|
|
$
|
182,607
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data (at period end):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets(2)
|
|
$
|
1,816,867
|
|
|
$
|
1,995,470
|
|
|
$
|
2,133,652
|
|
|
$
|
3,034,410
|
|
|
$
|
3,255,649
|
|
|
$
|
3,110,335
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
899,077
|
|
|
|
994,127
|
|
|
|
849,177
|
|
|
|
1,445,722
|
|
|
|
1,498,970
|
|
|
|
1,421,181
|
|
General Partners capital (deficit)
|
|
|
2,529
|
|
|
|
1,964
|
|
|
|
(1,005
|
)
|
|
|
(6,680
|
)
|
|
|
1,849
|
|
|
|
1,762
|
|
Limited Partners capital
|
|
|
756,531
|
|
|
|
807,488
|
|
|
|
1,100,346
|
|
|
|
1,201,144
|
|
|
|
1,214,136
|
|
|
|
1,199,649
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
785
|
|
|
|
(9,169
|
)
|
|
|
(18,967
|
)
|
|
|
(847
|
)
|
|
|
(37,533
|
)
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
19,516
|
|
|
|
20,169
|
|
|
|
21,468
|
|
|
|
20,775
|
|
|
|
20,957
|
|
|
|
22,037
|
|
Cash Distribution Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash distributions declared per LP unit(4)
|
|
$
|
2.8750
|
|
|
$
|
3.0750
|
|
|
$
|
3.2750
|
|
|
$
|
3.4750
|
|
|
$
|
3.6750
|
|
|
$
|
1.9125
|
|
Cash distributions paid per LP unit(4)
|
|
$
|
2.8250
|
|
|
$
|
3.0250
|
|
|
$
|
3.2250
|
|
|
$
|
3.4250
|
|
|
$
|
3.6250
|
|
|
$
|
1.8875
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Certain amounts for the year ended December 31, 2005
presented in this table as product sales and transportation and
other services have been reclassified to conform to the
presentation for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2007,
2008 and 2009 and the six months ended June 30, 2010. These
reclassifications for 2005 have not been audited. |
|
(2) |
|
Substantial increases in revenue, operating income, net income
and total assets for the year ended December 31, 2008
resulted from the acquisitions of Lodi Gas Storage, L.L.C. and
Farm & Home Oil Company LLC in the first quarter of
2008. |
|
(3) |
|
EBITDA, a measure not defined under GAAP, is defined as net
income attributable to the Partnerships unitholders from
continuing operations before interest expense, income taxes and
depreciation and |
20
|
|
|
|
|
amortization. EBITDA should not be considered an alternative to
net income, operating income, cash flow from operations or any
other measure of financial performance presented in accordance
with GAAP. The EBITDA measure eliminates the significant level
of non-cash depreciation and amortization expense that results
from the capital-intensive nature of the Partnerships
businesses and from intangible assets recognized in business
combinations. In addition, EBITDA is unaffected by the
Partnerships capital structure due to the elimination of
interest expense and income taxes. The Partnership defines
Adjusted EBITDA, which is also a non-GAAP measure, as EBITDA
plus (i) general partner incentive compensation,
(ii) non-cash deferred lease expense, which is the
difference between the estimated annual land lease expense for
the Partnerships natural gas storage facility in the
Natural Gas Storage segment to be recorded under GAAP and the
actual cash to be paid for such annual land lease, and
(iii) non-cash unit-based compensation expense. In
addition, for the year ended December 31, 2009, the
Partnership has excluded the Buckeye NGL impairment expense of
$59.7 million and the reorganization expense of
$32.1 million from Adjusted EBITDA in order to evaluate its
results of operations on a comparative basis over multiple
periods. The EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA data presented may not
be comparable to similarly titled measures at other companies
because EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA exclude some items that
affect net income attributable to the Partnerships
unitholders, and these items may vary among other companies. The
Partnerships senior management uses Adjusted EBITDA to
evaluate consolidated operating performance and the operating
performance of the business segments and to allocate resources
and capital to the business segments. In addition, the
Partnerships senior management uses Adjusted EBITDA as a
performance measure to evaluate the viability of proposed
projects and to determine overall rates of return on alternative
investment opportunities. The Partnership believes that
investors benefit from having access to the same financial
measures that it uses. Further, the Partnership believes that
these measures are useful to investors because they are one of
the bases for comparing its operating performance with that of
other companies with similar operations, although its measures
may not be directly comparable to similar measures used by other
companies. |
|
(4) |
|
Cash distributions declared represent distributions declared
associated with each calendar year. Distributions are generally
declared and paid within 60 days following the close of
each quarter. Cash distributions paid represent cash payments
for distributions during each of the periods presented. |
21
COMPARATIVE
PER UNIT INFORMATION
The following table sets forth certain historical per unit
information of the Partnership and Holdings and the unaudited
pro forma combined per unit information after giving pro forma
effect to the merger, and the Partnerships issuance of
0.705 Partnership LP units for each outstanding Holdings unit.
You should read this information in conjunction with the summary
historical financial information included elsewhere in this
joint proxy statement/prospectus and the historical consolidated
financial statements of Holdings and the Partnership and related
notes that are incorporated by reference in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus and in conjunction with the Unaudited Pro
Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and related
notes included elsewhere in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. The unaudited pro forma combined per unit
information does not purport to represent what the actual
results of operations of Holdings and the Partnership would have
been had the partnerships been combined or to project Holdings
and the Partnerships results of operations that may be
achieved after the merger is completed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
Per Unit Data:
|
|
Partnership
|
|
|
Holdings
|
|
|
Partnership
|
|
|
Holdings
|
|
|
Partnership(e)
|
|
|
Partnership(e)
|
|
|
Net Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic(a)
|
|
$
|
1.84
|
|
|
$
|
1.75
|
|
|
$
|
1.52
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
1.95
|
|
|
$
|
1.42
|
|
Diluted(b)
|
|
$
|
1.84
|
|
|
$
|
1.75
|
|
|
$
|
1.51
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
1.94
|
|
|
$
|
1.42
|
|
Cash Distributions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Declared Per Unit(c)
|
|
$
|
3.68
|
|
|
$
|
1.52
|
|
|
$
|
1.91
|
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
|
$
|
3.25
|
|
|
$
|
1.73
|
|
Paid Per Unit(c)
|
|
$
|
3.63
|
|
|
$
|
1.44
|
|
|
$
|
1.89
|
|
|
$
|
0.84
|
|
|
$
|
3.18
|
|
|
$
|
1.69
|
|
Book Value(d)
|
|
$
|
24.03
|
|
|
$
|
51.32
|
|
|
$
|
23.02
|
|
|
$
|
46.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
19.47
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
For the Partnership and Holdings, the amounts are based on the
weighted-average number of units outstanding for the period. The
pro forma amounts are based on information provided in
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements included elsewhere in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. |
|
(b) |
|
For the Partnership, the amount is based on the weighted-average
number of LP units outstanding plus the potential dilution that
would occur associated with certain awards granted under the
Partnerships equity compensation plans. Holdings had no
dilutive units at December 31, 2009 or June 30, 2010.
The pro forma combined amount is based on information provided
in Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements included elsewhere in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. |
|
(c) |
|
The pro forma cash distribution declared/paid amounts are based
on the weighted-average cash distributions declared/paid for the
Partnership and Holdings for each quarterly period and give
effect to the additional Partnership LP units outstanding as a
result of the merger. Cash distributions declared/paid reflect
the distribution decisions made by the Partnership GP and
Holdings GP at their respective quarterly board meetings. As
such, these pro forma calculations are not necessarily
indicative of the distribution decisions that the Partnership GP
would have made had the merger been completed at January 1,
2009 for the period ended December 31, 2009 or
January 1, 2010 for the six months ended June 30, 2010. |
|
(d) |
|
For the Partnership and Holdings, these amounts are computed by
dividing partners capital for each entity by their
respective limited partner units outstanding as of
December 31, 2009 and as of June 30, 2010, as
applicable. The pro forma combined amounts are computed by
dividing the pro forma partners capital as of
June 30, 2010 by the number of limited partner units
outstanding at June 30, 2010, adjusted to include the
estimated number of Partnership LP units to be outstanding as a
result of the merger. Pro forma data is not presented for
December 31, 2009 because a pro forma balance sheet for
that date is not included in this filing. |
|
(e) |
|
Represents the pro forma combined results of the merger. For
comparison to historical Partnership per unit data, no further
adjustments are necessary to these amounts. |
22
MARKET
PRICES AND DISTRIBUTION INFORMATION
The Partnership LP units are traded on the New York Stock
Exchange under the symbol BPL, and the Holdings
common units are traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the
symbol BGH. The Holdings management units are not
publicly traded. The following table sets forth, for the periods
indicated, the range of high and low sales prices per unit for
the Partnership LP units and the Holdings common units, as well
as information concerning quarterly cash distributions for the
Partnership LP units and Holdings common units. The sales prices
are as reported in published financial sources.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partnership LP Units
|
|
Holdings Common Units
|
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
Distributions(1)
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
Distributions(1)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
51.09
|
|
|
$
|
43.66
|
|
|
$
|
0.8500
|
|
|
$
|
29.92
|
|
|
$
|
21.65
|
|
|
$
|
0.3000
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
50.00
|
|
|
|
42.65
|
|
|
|
0.8625
|
|
|
|
26.44
|
|
|
|
18.00
|
|
|
|
0.3100
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
44.54
|
|
|
|
36.08
|
|
|
|
0.8750
|
|
|
|
22.70
|
|
|
|
13.35
|
|
|
|
0.3200
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
42.39
|
|
|
|
22.00
|
|
|
|
0.8875
|
|
|
|
18.72
|
|
|
|
9.51
|
|
|
|
0.3300
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
43.25
|
|
|
$
|
32.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.9000
|
|
|
$
|
17.25
|
|
|
$
|
12.75
|
|
|
$
|
0.3500
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
43.69
|
|
|
|
35.01
|
|
|
|
0.9125
|
|
|
|
20.56
|
|
|
|
14.90
|
|
|
|
0.3700
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
49.44
|
|
|
|
41.43
|
|
|
|
0.9250
|
|
|
|
30.00
|
|
|
|
18.17
|
|
|
|
0.3900
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
57.00
|
|
|
|
47.51
|
|
|
|
0.9375
|
|
|
|
30.00
|
|
|
|
23.01
|
|
|
|
0.4100
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
61.50
|
|
|
$
|
51.68
|
|
|
$
|
0.9500
|
|
|
$
|
34.77
|
|
|
$
|
26.45
|
|
|
$
|
0.4300
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
62.39
|
|
|
|
45.00
|
|
|
|
0.9625
|
|
|
|
40.75
|
|
|
|
27.93
|
|
|
|
0.4500
|
|
Third Quarter (through September 21, 2010)
|
|
|
66.00
|
|
|
|
57.19
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
44.05
|
|
|
|
37.00
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represent cash distributions per Partnership LP unit or Holdings
common unit declared with respect to the quarter and paid (or
payable) in the following quarter. The Holdings management units
receive cash distributions identical to those received by the
Holdings common units. |
|
(2) |
|
Cash distributions for Partnership LP units or Holdings common
units for the third quarter of 2010 have not yet been declared
or paid. |
As of September 21, 2010, the Partnership had 51,550,531
outstanding Partnership LP units. As of September 21, 2010,
the Partnership LP units were held of record by approximately
1,900 holders. The Partnership has not formally adopted a cash
distribution policy that requires it to distribute its available
cash to its partners on a quarterly or other basis, although it
has historically distributed its available cash to its partners
on a quarterly basis.
Holdings has 27,774,016 outstanding common units. As of
September 21, 2010, Holdings common units were held of
record by 7 holders. Holdings has 525,984 outstanding management
units. As of September 21, 2010, Holdings management units
were held of record by two holders. Holdings partnership
agreement requires Holdings to distribute all of its
available cash, as defined in Holdings
partnership agreement, within 75 days after the end of each
quarter.
23
RISK
FACTORS
In addition to the other information contained in or
incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, including, without limitation, the risk
factors and other information contained in the
Partnerships Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009 and Quarterly Report
on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, and the risk factors
and other information contained in Holdings Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009 and Quarterly Report
on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, you should carefully
consider the following risk factors in deciding whether to vote
to approve the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby and the Partnerships amended and
restated partnership agreement. This joint proxy
statement/prospectus also contains forward-looking statements
that involve risks and uncertainties. Please read
Forward-Looking Statements on page 75.
Risks
Related to the Merger and Related Matters
The
market value of the stated consideration to Holdings unitholders
will be determined by the price of the Partnership LP units, the
value of which will decrease if the market value of the
Partnership LP units decreases, and Holdings unitholders cannot
be sure of the market value of Partnership LP units that will be
issued.
Pursuant to the merger agreement, Holdings unitholders will
receive approximately 20 million Partnership LP units as a
result of the merger. The aggregate market value of the
Partnership LP units that Holdings unitholders will receive in
the merger will fluctuate with any changes in the trading price
of the Partnership LP units. This means there is no price
protection mechanism contained in the merger agreement
that would adjust the number of Partnership LP units that
Holdings unitholders will receive based on any decreases in the
trading price of Partnership LP units. If the Partnership LP
unit price decreases, the market value of the stated
consideration received by Holdings unitholders will also
decrease. Consider the following example:
Example: Pursuant to the merger agreement,
Holdings unitholders will receive 0.705 Partnership LP units for
each Holdings unit, subject to receipt of cash in lieu of any
fractional Partnership LP units. Based on the closing sales
price of Partnership LP units on June 10, 2010 of $58.17
per unit, the market value of all Partnership LP units to be
received by Holdings unitholders would be approximately
$1,161 million. If the trading price for Partnership LP
units decreased 10% from $58.17 to $52.35, then the market value
of all Partnership LP units to be received by Holdings
unitholders would be approximately $1,045 million.
Accordingly, there is a risk that the 32% premium estimated by
the Holdings Board to exist at the date the merger agreement was
executed will not be realized by Holdings unitholders at the
time the merger is completed. Partnership LP unit price changes
may result from a variety of factors, including general market
and economic conditions, changes in its business, operations and
prospects, and regulatory considerations. Many of these factors
are beyond the Partnerships control. For historical prices
of Holdings common units and Partnership LP units, please read
Market Prices and Distribution Information on
page 23.
The
directors and executive officers of Holdings GP and the
Partnership GP may have interests that differ from your
interests.
Certain directors and all of the executive officers of Holdings
GP are also directors and executive officers of the Partnership
GP. Messrs. Wylie, Erhard and Turner serve as members of
both the Holdings Board and the board of the Partnership GP.
Mr. Wylie is the President and Chief Executive Officer of
both Holdings GP and the Partnership GP. Clark C. Smith is the
President and Chief Operating Officer of both Holdings GP and
the Partnership GP. Keith E. St.Clair is the Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of both Holdings GP and
the Partnership GP. William H. Schmidt, Jr. is the Vice
President, General Counsel and Secretary of both Holdings GP and
the Partnership GP. Robert A. Malecky is the Vice President,
Customer Services of both Holdings GP and the Partnership GP.
Khalid A. Muslih is the Vice President, Corporate Development of
both Holdings GP and the Partnership GP.
24
In considering the recommendation of the Partnership Audit
Committee or Holdings Board, as applicable, to approve the
merger, the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated
thereby, and to approve the amended and restated partnership
agreement, you should consider that the executive officers and
directors of Holdings GP and the Partnership GP have interests
that differ from, or are in addition to, their interests as
Holdings unitholders or Partnership unitholders generally. These
interests include:
|
|
|
|
|
Some of the executive officers and directors of the Partnership
GP and Holdings GP currently own Holdings units and will be
receiving Partnership LP units as a result of the merger.
Holdings units held by the directors and executive officers will
be converted into Partnership LP units at a ratio of 0.705
Partnership LP units per Holdings unit. This is the same ratio
as that applicable to all other holders of Holdings units. In
addition, certain directors and officers of the Partnership GP
and Holdings GP currently own Partnership LP units.
|
|
|
|
The merger agreement provides for indemnification by the
Partnership and Holdings of each person who was, as of the date
of the merger agreement, or is at any time from the date of the
merger agreement through the effective date, an officer or
director of Holdings or any of its subsidiaries or acting as a
fiduciary under or with respect to any employee benefit plan of
Holdings and for the maintenance of directors and
officers liability insurance covering directors and
executive officers of Holdings GP for a period of six years
following the merger. The Partnership and MergerCo also agreed
that all rights to indemnification now existing in favor of
indemnified parties as provided in the Holdings agreement of
limited partnership (or, as applicable, the charter, bylaws,
partnership agreement, limited liability company agreement, or
other organizational documents of any of Holdings
subsidiaries) and the indemnification agreements of Holdings or
any of its subsidiaries will be assumed by Holdings, the
Partnership and the Partnership GP in the merger, without
further action, at the effective time of the merger and will
survive the merger and will continue in full force and effect in
accordance with their terms.
|
|
|
|
Certain of Holdings GPs directors and all of Holdings
GPs executive officers are currently directors and
executive officers of the Partnership GP, respectively, and are
expected to remain directors and executive officers of the
Partnership GP following the merger. Messrs. Wylie, Smith,
St.Clair and Schmidt are officers of BGH GP. Mr. Wylie is a
director of BGH GP. After the effective time, the Partnership
Board is expected to consist of nine members, three of whom are
expected to be the existing members of the Partnership Audit
Committee, one of whom is expected to be the existing chief
executive officer of the Partnership GP and three of whom are
expected to be the three existing members of the audit committee
of the Holdings Board. Holdings GP (through Holdings) will
continue to have the right to appoint all of the members of the
Partnership Board until the earlier to occur of (a) the
receipt of approvals from the CPUC and PaPUC of the public
election provisions or (b) a determination by the
Partnership Board that such approvals are not required.
Following the occurrence of either (a) or (b) above,
Holdings GP will continue to have the right to designate two
members of the Partnership Board, subject to reduction if the
Major Holdings Unitholders ownership of Partnership LP units
drops below certain thresholds. The remaining directors will be
classified into three classes and be subject to election by the
holders of Partnership LP units (other than BGH GP and its
affiliates).
|
|
|
|
In addition, all of the executive officers and certain of the
directors of the Partnership GP and Holdings GP have limited
liability company interests in BGH GP, which owns approximately
61% of the total Holdings common units and 97% of the total
Holdings management units and has entered into a support
agreement and registration rights agreement. For more
information on the support agreement and registration rights
agreement, please read The Proposed Merger
Transactions Related to the Merger.
|
Senior management of the Partnership GP and Holdings GP prepared
projections with respect to the Partnerships future
financial and operating performance. These projections were
provided to Barclays and Credit Suisse for use in connection
with the preparation of their opinions to the Partnership Audit
Committee and the Holdings Board, respectively, and related
financial advisory services. The projections were also provided
to the Partnership Audit Committee and the Holdings Board.
25
The
right of a Holdings unitholder to distributions will be changed
following the merger.
Under the Partnerships current partnership agreement,
Holdings is entitled to receive approximately 0.5% of all
distributions made by the Partnership and increasing
percentages, up to a maximum of 45%, of the amount of
incremental cash distributed by the Partnership in respect of
the Partnership LP units (other than 2,573,146 Partnership LP
units) as certain target distribution levels are reached in
excess of $0.325 per Partnership LP unit in any quarter. This
results in Holdings being currently entitled to receive
incentive distributions of approximately 21% of the aggregate
amount of distributions to the Partnerships partners and
this percentage could theoretically go as high as approximately
31%. After the merger, the former Holdings unitholders as a
group will be entitled to receive approximately 28% of all
distributions made by the Partnership. As a result of this
change, the distributions received by the former unitholders of
Holdings could be significantly different. If distributions from
the Partnership were to increase significantly, the
distributions to the former Holdings unitholders would be
significantly less than they would be if the current structure
was not changed.
The
matters contemplated by the merger agreement may not be
completed even if the requisite Holdings unitholder and
Partnership unitholder approvals are obtained, in which case the
partnership agreement of the Partnership will not be amended and
restated.
The merger agreement contains conditions that, if not satisfied
or waived, would result in the merger not occurring, even though
Holdings unitholders and Partnership unitholders may have voted
in favor of the merger agreement and related matters. In
addition, Holdings and the Partnership can agree not to complete
the merger even if all unitholder approvals have been received.
The closing conditions to the merger may not be satisfied, and
Holdings or the Partnership may choose not to waive any
unsatisfied condition, which may cause the merger not to occur.
If the merger does not occur, the Partnerships partnership
agreement will not be amended and restated.
The
Partnership and Holdings may be unable to obtain regulatory
approvals that may be required to complete the merger or provide
the Partnerships public unitholders with the right to
elect directors in the anticipated time frame, or at
all.
The merger and other matters related thereto may be subject to
the authorization, approval or consent of state agencies and
authorities. The Partnership and Holdings intend to seek all
regulatory authorizations, approvals or consents that they
determine are required. The Partnership and Holdings can provide
no assurance that all required regulatory authorizations,
approvals or consents that may be required will be obtained
prior to the termination date in the merger agreement, the
consummation of the merger or at all.
If the Partnership and Holdings fail to seek a regulatory
authorization, approval or consent that a state agency or
authority asserts is required to complete the merger, the merger
may be delayed or may not occur. If, by the termination date in
the merger agreement, the Partnership and Holdings are unable to
obtain regulatory authorizations, approvals or consents that are
required to complete the merger, the merger agreement may
terminate and the merger may not occur. Any delay beyond
December 31, 2010 increases the risk that the merger will
not occur because the ability of each of the Partnership and
Holdings to unilaterally extend the termination date to
February 28, 2011 is conditioned upon there being no law of
the United States adopted such that gain or loss should be
recognized by the holders of Holdings units to the extent
Partnership LP units are received in exchange therefor as a
result of the merger, with certain exceptions. Please see
The Merger Agreement Termination of the Merger
Agreement and Tax Risks Related to the
Merger The tax treatment of the merger could be
subject to potential legislative, judicial or administrative
changes and differing interpretations, possibly on a retroactive
basis. In addition, if the Partnership and Holdings are
unable to obtain the regulatory authorizations, approvals or
consents that are required for the effectiveness of the public
election provisions, then the Partnerships public
unitholders may never obtain the right to elect directors. If
the Partnership or Holdings fail to obtain a required regulatory
approval and consummate the merger, the Partnership could be
subject to fines, penalties, costs and other adverse action
undertaken by applicable regulatory bodies.
26
While
the merger agreement is in effect, Holdings opportunities
to enter into different business combination transactions with
other parties on more favorable terms may be limited, and both
Holdings and the Partnership may be limited in their ability to
pursue other attractive business opportunities.
While the merger agreement is in effect, Holdings is prohibited
from knowingly initiating, soliciting or encouraging the
submission of any acquisition proposal or from participating in
any discussions or negotiations regarding any acquisition
proposal, subject to certain exceptions. As a result of these
provisions in the merger agreement, Holdings opportunities
to enter into more favorable transactions may be limited.
Likewise, if Holdings were to sell directly to a third party, it
might have received more value with respect to the general
partner interest in the Partnership and the incentive
distribution rights in the Partnership based on the value of the
business at such time.
Moreover, the merger agreement provides for the payment of up to
$29.0 million in termination fees under specified
circumstances, which may discourage other parties from proposing
alternative transactions that could be more favorable to the
Holdings unitholders or Partnership unitholders. For a detailed
discussion of these termination fees, please read The
Merger Agreement Termination Fees and Expenses
beginning on page 103.
Both Holdings and the Partnership have also agreed to refrain
from taking certain actions with respect to their businesses and
financial affairs pending completion of the merger or
termination of the merger agreement. These restrictions could be
in effect for an extended period of time if completion of the
merger is delayed. These limitations do not preclude the
Partnership from conducting its business in the ordinary or
usual course or from acquiring assets or businesses so long as
such activity does not have a material adverse
effect as such term is defined in the merger agreement or
materially affect the Partnerships or Holdings
ability to complete the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement. For a detailed discussion of these restrictions,
please read The Merger Agreement Actions
Pending the Merger beginning on page 92.
In addition to the economic costs associated with pursuing the
merger, the management of Holdings GP and the Partnership GP
will continue to devote substantial time and other human
resources to the proposed merger, which could limit
Holdings and the Partnerships ability to pursue
other attractive business opportunities, including potential
joint ventures, stand-alone projects and other transactions. If
either Holdings or the Partnership is unable to pursue such
other attractive business opportunities, then its growth
prospects and the long-term strategic position of their
businesses following the merger could be adversely affected.
Existing
Partnership unitholders will be diluted by the
merger.
The merger will dilute the ownership position of the existing
Partnership unitholders. Pursuant to the merger agreement,
Holdings unitholders will receive approximately 20 million
Partnership LP units as a result of the merger. Immediately
following the merger, the Partnership will be owned
approximately 72% by its current unitholders and approximately
28% by former Holdings unitholders.
The
number of outstanding Partnership LP units will increase as a
result of the merger, which could make it more difficult to pay
the current level of quarterly distributions.
As of September 21, 2010, there were approximately
52 million Partnership LP units outstanding. The
Partnership will issue approximately 20 million Partnership
LP units in connection with the merger. Accordingly, the dollar
amount required to pay the current per unit quarterly
distributions will increase, which will increase the likelihood
that the Partnership will not have sufficient funds to pay the
current level of quarterly distributions to all Partnership
unitholders. Using the amount of $0.9625 per Partnership LP unit
payable with respect to the second quarter of 2010, the
aggregate cash distribution payable to Partnership unitholders
will total $49.6 million, resulting in a distribution of
$13.1 million to the Partnership GP for its GP units
and incentive distribution rights. Therefore, the
Partnerships combined total distribution payable with
respect to the second quarter of 2010 will be
$62.7 million. Pursuant to the merger agreement, Holdings
unitholders will receive approximately 20 million
Partnership LP units as a result of the merger. The combined pro
forma Partnership distribution with respect to the second
quarter of 2010, had the merger been completed prior to such
distribution, would result in $0.9625 per unit being distributed
on approximately 71 million
27
Partnership LP units, or a total of $68.7 million, with the
Partnership GP no longer receiving any distributions. As a
result, the Partnership would be required to distribute an
additional $6.0 million per quarter in order to maintain
the distribution level of $0.9625 per Partnership LP unit
payable with respect to the second quarter of 2010.
Although the elimination of the incentive distribution rights
may increase the cash available for distribution to Partnership
LP units in the future, this source of funds may not be
sufficient to meet the overall increase in cash required to
maintain the current level of quarterly distributions to holders
of Partnership LP units.
Failure
to complete the merger or delays in completing the merger could
negatively impact the Partnership LP unit price and Holdings
unit price.
If the merger is not completed for any reason, the Partnership
and Holdings may be subject to a number of material risks,
including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the Partnership will not realize the benefits expected from the
merger, including a potentially enhanced financial and
competitive position;
|
|
|
|
the price of Partnership LP units or Holdings units may decline
to the extent that the current market price of these securities
reflects a market assumption that the merger will be
completed; and
|
|
|
|
some costs relating to the merger, such as certain investment
banking fees and legal and accounting fees, must be paid even if
the merger is not completed.
|
The
costs of the merger could adversely affect the
Partnerships operations and cash flows available for
distribution to its unitholders.
The Partnership and Holdings estimate the total costs of the
merger to be approximately $12.0 million, primarily
consisting of investment banking and legal advisors fees,
accounting fees, financial printing and other related costs.
These costs could adversely affect the Partnerships
operations and cash flows available for distributions to its
unitholders. The foregoing estimate is preliminary and is
subject to change.
If the
merger agreement were terminated, Holdings may be obligated to
pay the Partnership for costs incurred related to the merger.
These costs could require Holdings to seek loans or use
Holdings available cash that would have otherwise been
available for distributions.
Upon termination of the merger agreement, and depending upon the
circumstances leading to that termination, Holdings could be
responsible for reimbursing the Partnership for merger related
expenses that the Partnership has paid. For a detailed
discussion of the various circumstances leading to a
reimbursement of expenses, please read The Merger
Agreement Termination Fees and Expenses
beginning on page 103.
If the merger agreement is terminated, the expense
reimbursements required by Holdings under the merger agreement
may require Holdings to seek loans, borrow amounts under its
revolving credit facility or use cash received from its
distributions from the Partnership to reimburse these expenses.
In either case, reimbursement of these costs could reduce the
cash Holdings has available to make its quarterly distributions.
Tax Risks
Related to the Merger
In addition to reading the following risk factors, you should
read Material Federal Income Tax Consequences of the
Merger beginning on page 115 and Federal Income
Taxation of the Partnership and Its Unitholders beginning
on page 121 for a more complete discussion of the expected
material federal income tax consequences of the merger and of
owning and disposing of Partnership LP units received in the
merger.
No
ruling has been obtained with respect to the tax consequences of
the merger.
No ruling has been or will be requested from the IRS with
respect to the tax consequences of the merger. Instead, the
Partnership and Holdings are relying on the opinions of their
respective counsel as to the tax
28
consequences of the merger, and counsels conclusions may
not be sustained if challenged by the IRS. Please read
Material Federal Income Tax Consequences of the
Merger.
The
intended tax consequences of the merger are dependent upon each
of the Partnership and Holdings being treated as a partnership
for tax purposes.
The treatment of the merger as nontaxable to the Partnership
unitholders and Holdings unitholders is dependent upon each of
the Partnership and Holdings being treated as a partnership for
federal income tax purposes. If either the Partnership or
Holdings were treated as a corporation for federal income tax
purposes, the consequences of the merger would be materially
different and the merger would likely be a fully taxable
transaction to a Holdings unitholder.
The
tax treatment of the merger could be subject to potential
legislative, judicial or administrative changes and differing
interpretations, possibly on a retroactive basis.
The federal income tax consequences of the merger depend in some
instances on determinations of fact and interpretations of
complex provisions of federal income tax law. The federal income
tax rules are constantly under review by persons involved in the
legislative process, the IRS and the U.S. Treasury
Department, frequently resulting in revised interpretations of
established concepts, statutory changes, revisions to Treasury
regulations and other modifications and interpretations. The IRS
pays close attention to the proper application of tax laws to
partnerships. The present federal income tax consequences of the
merger to Partnership unitholders and Holdings unitholders may
be modified by administrative, legislative or judicial
interpretation at any time. Any modification to the federal
income tax laws and interpretations thereof may or may not be
applied retroactively and could change the tax treatment of the
merger as nontaxable to Partnership unitholders and Holdings
unitholders. For example, in response to recent public offerings
of interests in the management operations of private equity
funds and hedge funds, the U.S. House of Representatives
has passed legislation that may cause the merger to be treated
as a taxable exchange to a Holdings unitholder. The
U.S. Senate is considering similar legislation, although
the most current version of the legislation under consideration
by the U.S. Senate would not cause the merger to be treated
as a taxable exchange if (i) the merger is treated as an
assets over merger of Holdings into the Partnership
(see Material Federal Income Tax Consequences of the
Merger Tax Consequences of the
Merger General) and (ii) a Holdings
unitholder agreed to make an affirmative election that, as
currently interpreted, could change the tax treatment of future
sales of Partnership LP units received in the merger. The most
current version of the legislation under consideration in the
U.S. Senate would apply to transactions, such as the
merger, that occur after December 31, 2010. We are unable
to predict whether this proposed legislation or any other
proposals will ultimately be enacted, and if so, whether any
such proposed legislation would be applied retroactively.
Tax Risks
to Holdings Unitholders
A
Holdings unitholder may recognize taxable income as a result of
receiving cash in lieu of fractional units.
Although it is anticipated that for U.S. federal income tax
purposes no gain or loss should be recognized by a Holdings
unitholder solely as a result of the merger, the receipt of cash
in lieu of any fractional Partnership LP units will result in a
Holdings unitholder recognizing gain or loss equal to the
difference between the amount of cash received and the Holdings
unitholders adjusted tax basis allocable to such
fractional Partnership LP units. Please read Material
Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger.
Holdings
estimates that the merger will result in an increase in the
amount of net income (or decrease in the amount of net loss)
allocable to all of the Holdings unitholders that receive
Partnership LP units in the merger.
Holdings estimates that the closing of the merger will result in
an increase in the amount of net income (or decrease in the
amount of net loss) allocable to all of the Holdings unitholders
that receive Partnership LP units in the merger. In addition,
the federal income tax liability of such unitholders could be
further increased if the Partnership makes a future offering of
Partnership LP units and uses the proceeds of the offering in a
29
manner that does not produce substantial additional deductions,
such as to repay indebtedness currently outstanding or to
acquire property that is not eligible for depreciation or
amortization for federal income tax purposes or that is
depreciable or amortizable at a rate significantly slower than
the rate currently applicable to the Partnerships assets.
Please read Material Federal Income Tax Consequences of
the Merger Tax Consequences of the Merger to
Holdings Common Unitholders.
Tax Risks
to Existing Partnership Unitholders
An
existing Partnership unitholder may be required to recognize
gain as a result of the decrease in its allocable share of
Partnership nonrecourse liabilities as a result of the
merger.
As a result of the merger, the allocable share of nonrecourse
liabilities allocated to the existing Partnership unitholders
will be recalculated to take into account Partnership LP units
issued by the Partnership in the merger. If an existing
Partnership unitholder experiences a reduction in its share of
nonrecourse liabilities as a result of the merger, which is
referred to as a reducing debt shift, such
Partnership unitholders will be deemed to have received a cash
distribution equal to the amount of the reduction. A reduction
in a Partnership unitholders share of liabilities will
result in a corresponding basis reduction in a Partnership
unitholders Partnership LP units. A reducing debt shift
and the resulting deemed cash distribution may, under certain
circumstances, result in the recognition of taxable gain by a
Partnership unitholder, to the extent that the deemed cash
distribution exceeds such Partnership unitholders tax
basis in its Partnership LP units. Although the Partnership has
not received an opinion with respect to the shift of nonrecourse
liabilities, the Partnership does not expect that any
constructive cash distribution will exceed an existing
unitholders tax basis in its Partnership LP units. Please
read Material Federal Income Tax Consequences of the
Merger Tax Consequences of the Merger to Existing
Partnership Unitholders.
The
Partnership estimates that the merger will result in an increase
in the amount of net income (or decrease in the amount of net
loss) allocable to most of the existing Partnership
unitholders.
The Partnership estimates that the closing of the merger will
result in an increase in the amount of net income (or decrease
in the amount of net loss) allocable to most of the existing
Partnership unitholders. In addition, the federal income tax
liability of an existing Partnership unitholder could be further
increased if the Partnership makes a future offering of
Partnership LP units and uses the proceeds of the offering in a
manner that does not produce substantial additional deductions,
such as to repay indebtedness currently outstanding or to
acquire property that is not eligible for depreciation or
amortization for federal income tax purposes or that is
depreciable or amortizable at a rate significantly slower than
the rate currently applicable to the Partnerships assets.
Please read Material Federal Income Tax Consequences of
the Merger Tax Consequences of the Merger to
Existing Partnership Unitholders.
30
SPECIAL
FACTORS
Background
of the Merger
From time to time over the past three years, senior management
of the Partnership GP (senior management), along
with the Holdings Board and the Partnership Board, evaluated
ways to enhance long-term value to unitholders of the
Partnership and Holdings. This has led to a focus on improving
the competitive position of the Partnership by reducing its cost
of equity capital and enhancing its long-term growth prospects,
which could benefit unitholders of both the Partnership and
Holdings. Senior management believed that the Partnerships
cost of equity capital was high in comparison to peer master
limited partnerships (MLPs). As the holder of the
incentive distribution rights, the Partnership GP is entitled to
increasing percentages of the cash distributed from the
Partnership above certain levels. For instance, the Partnership
GP is currently receiving approximately 21% of all cash
distributed by the Partnership and would be entitled to
approximately 30% of any incremental Partnership distribution
increases in the future. Senior managements focus on
reducing the Partnerships cost of equity capital became
more acute after other midstream MLPs, including Sunoco
Logistics Partners LP, Nustar Energy LP and Magellan Midstream
Partners, L.P. (Magellan), acted to reduce their
cost of equity capital by repurchasing, capping, or eliminating
their incentive distribution rights. By eliminating the
incentive distribution rights, senior management believed that
the Partnership would be more competitive when pursuing
acquisitions and able to finance organic growth projects less
expensively, which should enhance the Partnerships
long-term distribution growth prospects.
During late 2009 and early 2010, senior management, along with
the Holdings Board and the Partnership Board, continued to
discuss ways of reducing the Partnerships cost of equity
capital.
On February 23, 2010, Mr. Forrest Wylie, Chairman of
the Partnership Board and CEO of the Partnership GP, met with
Mr. C. Scott Hobbs, a member of the Partnership Board and
the Chairman of the Partnership Audit Committee, to suggest that
the Partnership Audit Committee consider, on behalf of the
Partnership, a possible acquisition of Holdings by the
Partnership for the purpose of eliminating the incentive
distribution rights, simplifying the Partnerships capital
structure, and reducing the Partnerships cost of equity
capital. Khalid A. Muslih, Vice President, Corporate Development
of the Partnership GP and Christopher S. Pine, Senior Corporate
Development Associate of the Partnership GP, were also present.
At the conclusion of the meeting, Mr. Hobbs asked
Mr. Wylie to contact ArcLight and Kelso to determine if
they would be receptive to a proposal for this type of
transaction. Mr. Wylie subsequently spoke with a
representative of Kelso, Mr. Frank J. Loverro, a director
of the Holdings Board, who indicated that ArcLight and Kelso
would be receptive. Mr. Wylie called Mr. Hobbs on
March 1 to suggest that Mr. Hobbs initiate a process with
the Partnership Audit Committee.
The Partnership Audit Committee held a telephonic meeting on
March 2, which was attended by Mr. Hobbs and the other
two members of the Partnership Audit Committee, Mr. Mark C.
McKinley and Mr. Oliver G. Richard, III. Also
attending the Partnership Audit Committee meeting were
representatives of Prickett, Jones & Elliott, P.A.
(Prickett Jones), special Delaware counsel to the
Partnership Audit Committee. At the meeting, Mr. Hobbs
described his conversation with Mr. Wylie. The Partnership
Audit Committee then discussed various matters, including:
(1) whether such a transaction would be in the best
interests of the public unitholders of the Partnership,
(2) precedent MLP general partner acquisition transactions,
(3) potential conflicts of interests and the special
approval process under the Partnerships partnership
agreement, (4) the likely need for a delegation of
authority by the Partnership Board to the Partnership Audit
Committee and the desirability of a resolution of the
Partnership Board to that effect, (5) the engagement of
financial advisors and initial consideration of potential
advisors, (6) the engagement of potential securities law
and M&A counsel, and (7) the unitholder approval
requirements at Holdings and at the Partnership. After
discussion, the Partnership Audit Committee decided to use
Prickett Jones as special Delaware counsel with respect to the
potential transaction and directed Prickett Jones to assemble a
list of candidates to serve as securities law and M&A
counsel to the Partnership Audit Committee. The Partnership
Audit Committee also agreed that further discussion with
Mr. Wylie was needed to understand the rationale for a
possible transaction.
31
On March 3, 2010, the Partnership Audit Committee held a
telephonic meeting, with representatives of Prickett Jones in
attendance. The Partnership Audit Committee discussed potential
law firms to act as special securities law and M&A counsel
to the Partnership Audit Committee and potential investment
banking firms to act as financial advisor to the Partnership
Audit Committee.
On March 4, 2010, the Partnership Audit Committee met
telephonically to further discuss the retention of special
securities law and M&A counsel for the Partnership Audit
Committee. Representatives of Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
(V&E) joined the call at the invitation of the
Partnership Audit Committee, and discussed their experience
representing MLPs in similar transactions, their experience with
and knowledge of the Partnership and Holdings, and their ability
to serve as counsel to the Partnership and advise the
Partnership Audit Committee under the supervision of Prickett
Jones. The Partnership Audit Committee and the representatives
of V&E also discussed V&Es prior and current
work for the Partnership and Holdings; their prior work for
Riverstone/Carlyle Global Energy and Power Fund, the former
controlling party of the Partnership GP and Holdings; and their
recent communications with Mr. Muslih and Mr. William
H. Schmidt, Jr., Vice President, General Counsel and
Secretary of the Partnership GP, regarding a possible
acquisition of Holdings. After the representatives of V&E
left the call, the Partnership Audit Committee determined to
engage V&E as special securities law and M&A counsel
to the Partnership.
On March 8, 2010, the Partnership Audit Committee met in
Houston with representatives of Prickett Jones and a
representative of V&E. Members of senior management were
also in attendance at the meeting for the purpose of making a
presentation to the Partnership Audit Committee regarding the
strategic rationale and economic case for an acquisition of
Holdings. At the meeting, senior management described the
Partnerships five-year plan and related assumptions,
together with their thoughts about the beneficial effects of
reducing the Partnerships cost of equity capital. Senior
management described the increasingly competitive market among
MLPs and discussed what other MLPs had done to reduce their high
cost of equity capital, including temporary and permanent
solutions. Senior management expressed its preference for a
permanent reduction of the cost of equity capital by eliminating
the incentive distribution rights through the acquisition of
Holdings, which currently entitles Holdings, through its
ownership of the Partnership GP, to approximately 30% of any
incremental cash distributions by the Partnership. Senior
management stated that an acquisition of Holdings could be in
the best interest of the Partnership because it would:
|
|
|
|
|
reduce the Partnerships cost of equity capital by
eliminating the incentive distribution rights and the
Partnership GPs economic interest in the Partnership,
|
|
|
|
result in an improved ability to compete successfully for
acquisition opportunities,
|
|
|
|
better position the Partnership to execute on consolidation
opportunities,
|
|
|
|
provide a much higher opportunity for long-term growth in
distributions, and
|
|
|
|
allow the Partnerships unitholders to receive valuable
corporate governance rights through the election of directors to
the Partnership Board.
|
On the downside, senior management noted that an acquisition of
Holdings could lead to:
|
|
|
|
|
dilution for a number of years resulting from the issuance of
additional Partnership LP units as acquisition
consideration, and
|
|
|
|
elimination of perceived drop-down acquisition
opportunities from the private equity owners of Holdings.
|
Also at the March 8 meeting, senior management presented an
accretion and dilution analysis of a possible acquisition of
Holdings based on a number of assumptions, including an exchange
ratio of .695, representing a 25% premium for Holdings units
based on recent trading prices, which was used for illustrative
purposes only and was the premium in the Magellan transaction.
After the presentation, senior management left the meeting, and
the Partnership Audit Committee then discussed the appropriate
scope of its authority and the appropriate level of fees to
request for their services in connection with the potential
transaction. After discussion, the Partnership Audit Committee
determined that it should have the authorization to make a
32
recommendation regarding the potential transaction with Holdings
to the entire Partnership Board, rather than absolute authority
to approve the potential transaction with Holdings. In
consideration of the anticipated work and time commitment
associated with the potential transaction, and after
consideration of fees payable to conflict committee members in
precedent situations, the Partnership Audit Committee determined
to request a continuation of the current per meeting fees and an
additional one time fee of $25,000 to the chairman and $20,000
to the other members of the Partnership Audit Committee.
At the March 8 meeting, the Partnership Audit Committee also
discussed:
|
|
|
|
|
appropriate contact personnel in management,
|
|
|
|
governance issues that may arise from the proposed transaction,
including possible unitholder votes to approve the transaction
at the Partnership and Holdings, possible benefits from a
simplification of the Partnerships governance structure,
and the potential opportunity to update the Partnerships
agreement of limited partnership,
|
|
|
|
the policy announcements of shareholder advocacy groups, such as
Risk Metrics, regarding MLP coverage and their possible effect
on a unitholder vote in connection with a proposed
transaction, and
|
|
|
|
potential issues regarding any third party bid that may arise
for either the Partnership or Holdings or both.
|
Thereafter, the Partnership Audit Committee interviewed
representatives of three investment banking firms to serve as
its financial advisor.
On March 9, 2010, Mr. Hobbs called Mr. John F.
Erhard and Mr. Loverro, both of whom are directors on the
Holdings Board, to indicate that the Partnership Audit Committee
was contemplating making a proposal to eliminate the Partnership
GPs incentive distribution rights through the acquisition
of Holdings by the Partnership.
On March 10, 2010, the Partnership Audit Committee met
telephonically, with representatives of Prickett Jones and
V&E in attendance. The Partnership Audit Committee and its
legal advisors discussed the need for confidentiality and the
Partnerships announcement of the non-binding open season
for a proposed pipeline project (the Marcellus Union
Pipeline Project). The Partnership Audit Committee then
discussed the candidates to serve as financial advisor to the
Partnership Audit Committee, including their respective
qualifications, potential conflicts and proposed fees.
On March 11, 2010, the Partnership Audit Committee again
met telephonically, with representatives of Prickett Jones and
V&E in attendance, to discuss the potential engagement of
Barclays Capital, Inc. (Barclays), one of the
investment banks previously interviewed by the Partnership Audit
Committee, as financial advisor to the Partnership Audit
Committee. The Partnership Audit Committee and its legal counsel
discussed Barclays breadth of experience in the MLP space,
Barclays knowledge of and prior work for both the
Partnership and Holdings, Barclays prior work for
organizations with which Mr. Wylie previously was
affiliated, and Barclays prior work for ArcLight and
Kelso, with particular emphasis on Barclays role as
financial advisor to ArcLight and Kelso in connection with their
acquisition of the interest in Holdings. At the conclusion of
the meeting, the Partnership Audit Committee determined to
retain Barclays as financial advisor.
To manage the potential conflicts of interest of senior
management and certain directors who are directors
and/or
officers of both the Partnership GP and Holdings GP, the
Partnership Board executed a unanimous written consent dated
March 10, 2010, authorizing and directing the Partnership
Audit Committee to, among other things, (i) consider,
review and evaluate a possible acquisition of Holdings by the
Partnership or an alternative transaction that the Partnership
Audit Committee deems appropriate, (ii) consider, review
and evaluate any conflict, agreement, transaction or situation
in connection therewith, (iii) negotiate with Holdings and
its representatives or any other appropriate person with respect
to the terms and conditions of any proposed transaction and any
such alternative transaction, (iv) determine whether any
proposed transaction or any such alternative transaction is fair
and reasonable to, and in the best interests of, the Partnership
and all of its public unitholders (other than Holdings, the
Partnership GP and other unitholders affiliated with Holdings or
the Partnership GP), (v) make a recommendation to the
Partnership Board regarding what action, if any, should be
33
taken by the Partnership Board, the Partnership GP and the
Partnership with respect to any proposed transaction or any such
alternative transaction, and (vi) determine whether to
provide Special Approval (as defined in the existing partnership
agreement of the Partnership) of any proposed transaction or any
such alternative transaction. The Partnership Board resolution
also approved and ratified the Partnership Audit
Committees engagement of legal and financial advisors, and
approved the payment of an additional one-time fee to the
members of the Partnership Audit Committee consistent with the
request of the Partnership Audit Committee.
Over the following weeks, Barclays reviewed projections prepared
by senior management and probed their assumptions. As part of
its review, Barclays applied a number of sensitivities to
develop alternate cases to the projections, including
(i) the base case of senior management, (ii) the base
case of senior management including construction of the
Marcellus Union Pipeline Project, (iii) a downside case,
and (iv) an upside case.
In mid-March, the Holdings Board interviewed potential legal and
financial advisors with respect to Holding GPs review of
strategic alternatives for Holdings.
On March 18, 2010, the Holdings Board met telephonically,
and after considering Latham & Watkins LLPs
(Latham & Watkins) knowledge and
experience with respect to public company M&A transactions,
the energy industry generally and the Partnership and Holdings
particularly, as well as Latham & Watkins
experience advising MLPs and other companies with respect to
transactions similar to the proposed transaction, the Holdings
Board determined to retain Latham & Watkins on behalf
of Holdings. At that meeting, Latham & Watkins also
discussed various issues related to a possible transaction
between the Partnership and Holdings, including, without
limitation, fiduciary duty issues and the advisability of
recusal by overlapping directors. It was later determined that
because no meetings of the Partnership Board were held between
the date of this meeting of the Holdings Board and the date the
Partnership Audit Committee was given full authority to
negotiate and approve the proposed merger, no such recusals by
overlapping directors were necessary.
On March 25, 2010, the Partnership Audit Committee met in
Houston, with representatives of Prickett Jones and V&E in
attendance. During the meeting, the Partnership Audit Committee
confirmed the continued independence of its members from the
Partnership and Holdings. Mr. Hobbs described his
relationship with Kelso, including (i) the occasional
provision of informal, unpaid advice to Kelso concerning the oil
and gas industry in connection with potential Kelso
acquisitions, (ii) his service as an officer for Optigas,
Inc., a Denver-based midstream services company in which Kelso
was an investor, and (iii) his service as an outside
director for CVR Energy, Inc., a public company in which Kelso
has an equity interest. Mr. Hobbs noted that he is not an
investor with or through Kelso. Mr. Hobbs agreed that his
informal advisory services for Kelso would cease, and expressed
his view that his prior relationships with Kelso would not
impair his independence or his ability to act on an arms-length
basis with Holdings. After discussion, the other two committee
members determined that Mr. Hobbs was independent and
should continue to serve as chairman of the Partnership Audit
Committee. In addition, the Partnership Audit Committee
discussed the fact that Mr. Richard had previously served
as a member of the Holdings Board. Mr. Richard affirmed
that the prior board service would not affect his independence
or his ability to act on an arms-length basis with Holdings, and
the other two committee members determined that Mr. Richard
was independent. Representatives of Prickett Jones and V&E
then discussed the Partnership Audit Committee members
fiduciary duties under Delaware law and the Partnerships
existing partnership agreement. Representatives of Barclays also
made an extended presentation to the Partnership Audit Committee
regarding Barclays preliminary financial analysis of a
possible acquisition of Holdings by the Partnership.
On March 29, 2010, the Holdings Board, including
Mr. Wylie, met in New York, with Latham & Watkins
in attendance, to discuss the possible acquisition of Holdings
by the Partnership. Representatives of Latham &
Watkins provided a brief overview of certain ministerial matters
associated with the interaction between the Holdings Board and
the members of the Partnership Board. The Holdings Board
considered the overlap of three directors on the Holdings Board
and the Partnership Board, noting that such directors, other
than Mr. Wylie, were affiliated with ArcLight and did not
have any material interest in the Partnership other than through
that affiliation. Accordingly, the overlapping directors (other
than Mr. Wylie) determined to recuse themselves from
meetings of the Partnership Board and Mr. Wylie was asked
to recuse himself from meetings
34
of the Holdings Board, in each case to the extent discussions
and deliberations by those boards related to the potential
strategic transaction between Holdings and the Partnership.
Representatives of Latham & Watkins then provided an
overview of the typical relationship between a public MLP and
its public general partner, together with the effect of
increases in the cost of equity capital at the MLP level caused
by increasing payments to the general partner under incentive
distribution rights. The Holdings Board discussed recent
precedent transactions in which MLPs have reduced their cost of
equity capital either temporarily or permanently. Mr. Wylie
then departed the meeting. Representatives of Latham &
Watkins then advised the Holdings Board of its fiduciary duties
under the circumstances and the normal procedure for dealing
with the inquiry from Mr. Hobbs. The Holdings Board then
asked Mr. Erhard, Mr. Loverro and Frank S. Sowinski
(the Transaction Committee) to gather information on
behalf of the Holdings Board, interact with the Holdings
Boards legal and financial advisors and facilitate
discussions with the Partnership Audit Committee. The
Transaction Committee was not authorized to approve the proposed
transaction with the Partnership or to take any other
extraordinary action, which power remained with the Holdings
Board. The Holdings Board then interviewed representatives of
Credit Suisse with respect to the potential engagement of Credit
Suisse to serve as financial advisor to Holdings in connection
with a potential transaction involving the Partnership. After
considering Credit Suisses knowledge and experience with
respect to M&A transactions and the energy industry
generally, as well as Credit Suisses experience advising
MLPs and other companies with respect to transactions similar to
the proposed transaction, the Holdings Board determined to
retain Credit Suisse as Holdings financial advisor in
connection with a potential transaction involving the
Partnership.
Over the course of several meetings from late-March until
April 12, the Partnership Audit Committee and its legal and
financial advisors discussed a number of factors relating to a
possible acquisition by the Partnership of Holdings, including:
|
|
|
|
|
transaction structures, with a focus on a post-closing structure
that would not trigger a change of control as defined under the
Partnerships credit agreement,
|
|
|
|
alternatives to the acquisition of Holdings,
|
|
|
|
anticipated growth of the Partnership, both organically and
through acquisitions,
|
|
|
|
pro forma consequences of the proposed acquisition, including
the post-closing ownership percentages of ArcLight and Kelso in
the Partnership, and their ability to appoint or elect directors
of the Partnership GP,
|
|
|
|
analyses of possible consideration to be proposed to Holdings,
including an analysis of relative post-closing ownership,
comparable companies and comparable transactions,
|
|
|
|
exclusivity of the proposed bid and whether Holdings would agree
not to shop the transaction following an offer by
the Partnership,
|
|
|
|
an analysis of incremental capital expenditures necessary to
increase cash flows across various case models in order to make
the proposed transaction accretive to the Partnerships
existing unitholders, and
|
|
|
|
the benefits and detriments of waiting to effect an acquisition
of Holdings.
|
In addition, during this period, the Partnership Audit Committee
members conferred with Barclays, and Mr. Hobbs conferred
with senior management, regarding organic growth capital
projects identified as reasonably achievable by senior
management, particularly without the incentive distribution
rights burden. At the request of the Partnership Audit
Committee, Barclays developed an additional no-acquisitions
financial case for analysis. Separately, Mr. Hobbs met with
senior management to review the planning, budget and financing
for the Marcellus Union Pipeline Project along with the status
of competing projects proposed by Buckeyes competitors.
At several meetings during this period, the Partnership Audit
Committee affirmed their strong desire to obtain for the
unitholders of the Partnership the ability to vote for directors
of the Partnership Board following the transaction. In addition,
the Partnerships financial and legal advisors conferred
with the Partnership Audit Committee regarding negotiating
tactics, deal-protection issues, including the size of any
termination fees, the effect of material adverse changes, the
scope of representations and warranties, no-shop provisions and
the appropriate level of support by ArcLight and Kelso for any
proposed transaction. During these meetings, the Partnership
Audit Committee and its legal and financial advisors discussed
whether it would be appropriate for
35
the Partnership Audit Committee to be delegated full authority
to propose and approve on behalf of the Partnership any
potential acquisition of Holdings by the Partnership.
On April 5, 2010, the Partnership Board expanded the
authority of the Partnership Audit Committee in connection with
the consideration of a potential acquisition of Holdings to
(i) consider, review, evaluate and analyze a potential
transaction and to consider, review, evaluate and analyze any
conflict, agreement, transaction or situation in connection
therewith; (ii) make proposals to Holdings with respect to
a potential transaction; (iii) consider and analyze any
counterproposal received from Holdings; (iv) negotiate or
delegate the ability to negotiate with Holdings;
(v) determine whether the potential transaction is fair and
reasonable to, advisable for and in the best interests of the
Partnership and all of its public unitholders (other than
Holdings, the Partnership GP and other unitholders affiliated
with Holdings or the Partnership GP); (vi) if applicable
and as appropriate, exercise the full authority of the
Partnership Board with respect to the approval of the potential
transaction and with respect to the solicitation of the vote or
consent of the unitholders of the Partnership and the making of
any recommendation to the unitholders in connection therewith;
and (vii) if applicable and as appropriate, provide Special
Approval with respect to the potential transaction.
On April 9, 2010, the members of Holdings Board and the
Partnership Board met with senior management to obtain an update
on the status of the Marcellus Union Pipeline Project.
On April 12, 2010, the Partnership Audit Committee met to
discuss a possible proposal to purchase Holdings. Barclays
presented updated preliminary financial analyses of the
potential acquisition. The Partnership Audit Committee
discussed, among other things, the appropriate exchange ratio
for a proposal, the exchange ratios impact on accretion
and dilution to the existing holders of Partnership LP units,
meetings with senior management regarding the Marcellus Union
Pipeline Project, an analysis of the Partnerships credit
agreement, negotiating strategy, the importance of support by
ArcLight and Kelso for any agreement between the Partnership and
Holdings, and the desirability of confidentiality and
exclusivity. The Partnership Audit Committee determined that it
would propose to acquire Holdings in a merger transaction
pursuant to which each unitholder of Holdings would receive 0.65
Partnership LP units and to request that Holdings sign a
confidentiality agreement and commit to a
60-day
exclusivity period. The Partnership Audit Committee directed
Mr. Hobbs to send a letter to the Transaction Committee to
convey the proposal. In response, Mr. Hobbs sent the
following letter on April 13.
AUDIT
COMMITTEE OF BUCKEYE GP LLC
April 13,
2010
Transaction Committee of
MainLine Management LLC
Dear Mr. Sowinski, Mr. Loverro and Mr. Erhard:
On behalf of the Audit Committee of Buckeye GP LLC and Buckeye
Partners, L.P. (Partners), I am pleased to propose
to the Transaction Committee of MainLine Management LLC a merger
transaction pursuant to which holders of common units of Buckeye
GP Holdings L.P. (Holdings) would receive LP units
of Partners in a tax-free exchange.
Consideration. We propose that each
common unit of Holdings be exchanged for 0.65 LP units of
Partners. This represents a 17% premium over Holdings
common units closing price as of April 12, 2010.
Based on managements estimated 2010 distributions and the
proposed exchange ratio, Holdings unitholders would
receive distributions which are approximately 43% higher than
the estimated 2010 Holdings distributions.
Support. We expect that ArcLight and
Kelso will support the proposed transaction to the fullest
extent lawful, and in a manner designed to avoid triggering a
change of control under the Partners credit agreement.
36
Governance. Following the proposed
transaction, the public holders of Partners would be entitled to
elect five of the directors of Buckeye GP LLC, and ArcLight and
Kelso will each be entitled to elect one director. With future
dispositions by ArcLight and Kelso of their interest in
Partners, we expect that the two director seats would be shifted
to Partners public holders.
Partnership Agreement. As part of the
proposed transaction, we expect to amend the Partners
partnership agreement primarily to (i) eliminate the
general partner interest represented by the Incentive
Compensation Agreement, (ii) eliminate allocations of cash
or income on the GP units, and (iii) facilitate public
voting for election of the members of the board of directors of
Buckeye GP LLC.
We are excited about purchasing Holdings and see benefits for
unitholders of both entities. The proposed transaction will
enable a lower, more competitive cost of capital, enhanced
opportunities for acquisitions and growth projects, and a deeper
market for securities of the asset base that the two
partnerships share. We think the proposed transaction is
attractive from Holdings perspective particularly in view
of the ability of all Holdings unitholders to continue to
participate in a faster growing and more competitive combined
Buckeye, with a premium-enhanced tax-deferred interest and
substantial accretion to Holdings expected future
distributions.
We are mindful of the process that your committee must
undertake, and are happy to discuss the foregoing with you. In
view however of the time and attention this endeavor will
consume, we ask that you agree to a 60 day period of
exclusivity to allow us to engage with you in a thoughtful way,
and that you agree that this letter and the proposed transaction
remain confidential. Both commitments are in the attached
letter. To be clear, execution of that letter does not commit
you to anything other than the exclusivity and confidentiality
provisions. Our willingness to proceed with discussions
regarding the proposed transaction is dependent upon execution
of the attached letter.
The Audit Committee of Buckeye GP LLC has been delegated full
authority to process this proposed transaction, and we look
forward to hearing your reaction.
Sincerely,
C. Scott Hobbs
|
|
|
cc:
|
Mark C. McKinley
Oliver G. Rick Richard, III
|
|
* * *
On April 14, 2010, the Holdings Board met with their legal
and financial advisors to discuss the Partnerships April
13th
proposal. Representatives of Latham & Watkins
summarized the terms and conditions of the April
13th
proposal, with an emphasis on the proposed exchange ratio, the
request for exclusivity, the soliciting of competing proposals
and possible restrictions on those rights in a definitive
agreement, the treatment of confidential information and the
nature of the support for the transaction from ArcLight and
Kelso. The Holdings Board then discussed the possible timing,
nature and content of a proposed response to the April 13th
proposal, noting that the proposed exchange ratio was
insufficient.
On April 16, 2010, the Transaction Committee met with
representatives of Credit Suisse and Latham & Watkins
to discuss the financial terms of the April 13th proposal.
Credit Suisse reviewed and discussed its preliminary financial
analyses with respect to Holdings, the Partnership and the
proposed transaction with the Transaction Committee. The
Transaction Committee then discussed the appropriate response to
the April 13th proposal.
On April 19, 2010, Mr. Erhard and Mr. Loverro
advised Mr. Hobbs that the terms of the April 13th proposal
were not acceptable. Mr. Hobbs explained the process by
which the Partnership Audit Committee arrived at the proposed
terms, including the exchange ratio, and suggested that Credit
Suisse speak with
37
Barclays to understand the assumptions used to arrive at the
proposed exchange ratio. Messrs. Erhard and Loverro
expressed their appreciation for the proposal but characterized
the exchange ratio as insufficient, while also noting that the
Holdings Board needed additional information in order to arrive
at an appropriate exchange ratio. Given that and other facts,
Messrs. Erhard and Loverro indicated that they did not
believe it was appropriate to consider exclusivity or other
terms until the parties could get closer on an exchange ratio
and Holdings could obtain additional information to facilitate a
more thorough understanding of the business and prospects of the
Partnership.
On April 20, 2010, the Partnership Audit Committee met,
with representatives of Prickett Jones, V&E and Barclays in
attendance. Mr. Hobbs reported that on the prior day he
received a telephone call from Messrs. Erhard and Loverro
with respect to the April 13th proposal letter. Mr. Hobbs
reported that the Holdings Board needed additional time and
information to complete its analysis of the April
13th
proposal. After discussion, the Partnership Audit Committee
directed Mr. Hobbs to urge the Holdings Board to provide a
specific response by April 30th or the Partnership would
withdraw its proposal, which Mr. Hobbs communicated in a
telephone call to Messrs. Erhard and Loverro, and which he
confirmed in a letter to the Transaction Committee dated
April 21.
Also on April 20, 2010, the Transaction Committee met with
representatives of Latham & Watkins and Credit Suisse
to discuss recent conversations with Mr. Hobbs. After a
discussion, Mr. Erhard and Mr. Sowinski decided to
schedule a diligence session with senior management to better
assess the business case for the proposed transaction between
Holdings and the Partnership.
On April 22, 2010, Mr. Wylie signed a waiver of notice
and recusal from all meetings of the Holdings Board where
strategic transactions for Holdings were to be discussed.
Mr. Wylie did not participate in any further meetings of
the Holdings Board where strategic transactions for Holdings
were discussed.
On April 26, 2010, members of the Holdings Board and
representatives from Credit Suisse and Latham &
Watkins attended a presentation by senior management regarding
the business and prospects of the Partnership and the strategic
rationale for, and financial implications of, the acquisition of
Holdings by the Partnership.
On April 27, 2010, the Transaction Committee met with
representatives of Latham & Watkins and Credit Suisse
to discuss the management presentation held on the preceding
day. Credit Suisse reviewed and discussed its updated
preliminary financial analyses and sensitivity analyses with
respect to Holdings, the Partnership and the proposed
transaction with the Transaction Committee. The Transaction
Committee, with the assistance of Holdings legal and
financial advisors, then discussed the range of potential
exchange ratios, the other terms of a possible transaction and
the pro forma effects of an acquisition of Holdings by the
Partnership.
On April 28, 2010, the Holdings Board met to discuss the
Holdings response to the April
13th
proposal. Credit Suisse reviewed and discussed its updated
preliminary financial analyses and sensitivity analyses with
respect to Holdings, the Partnership and the proposed
transaction. The Holdings Board, with the assistance of its
legal and financial advisors, then discussed the pro forma
effects of the proposed transaction and an appropriate counter
to the April
13th
proposal. The Holdings Board evaluated the nature of the
consideration, an increase in the exchange ratio, whether
Holdings should have an affirmative right to shop itself after
signing a definitive agreement, the universe of potential buyers
for Holdings and whether Holdings should be able to respond to
unsolicited written proposals after signing a definitive
agreement. After discussion, the Holdings Board asked the
Transaction Committee to develop a response to the April 13th
proposal and give further consideration to the appropriate
exchange ratio and the other terms of the transaction.
On April 29, 2010, the Transaction Committee met with
representatives of Latham & Watkins and Credit Suisse
to discuss the financial terms of a potential counterproposal.
On April 30, 2010, the Holdings Board met and, with the
assistance of Holdings legal and financial advisors and
input from the Transaction Committee, discussed potential
responses to the April 13th proposal. The Holdings Board again
considered the pro forma consequences of the proposed
transaction and reconsidered the appropriate components of a
counterproposal. After discussion, the Holdings Board decided to
counter with a proposed exchange ratio of 0.76, while continuing
to resist exclusivity and deferring negotiation of
38
other terms until it appeared reasonably likely that agreement
would be reached on the exchange ratio. The Holdings Board also
took action to formalize the Transaction Committee, with
Mr. Sowinski serving as chairman. As part of such action,
the Holdings Board authorized the Transaction Committee to:
(i) review, evaluate and negotiate the terms of the
proposed transaction with the Partnership, (ii) obtain
advice from and otherwise consult with the officers of Holdings
GP and the Holdings Boards legal and financial advisors,
and (iii) make a recommendation to the Holdings Board
regarding the proposed transaction. The Holdings Board did not
delegate to the Transaction Committee the ability to approve or
otherwise authorize the proposed transaction with the
Partnership. Later that day, Mr. Erhard and
Mr. Loverro delivered the Holdings Boards response to
the April 13th proposal to Mr. Hobbs.
On April 30, 2010, the Partnership Audit Committee held a
telephonic meeting, with representatives of Prickett Jones,
V&E and Barclays in attendance. Mr. Hobbs reported
that the Transaction Committee had responded earlier in the day
with a counterproposal of 0.76 for the exchange ratio.
Mr. Hobbs explained his understanding of Holdings
rationale for the 0.76 exchange ratio. Mr. Hobbs then
advised the Partnership Audit Committee that the Transaction
Committee informed him that the other issues could be resolved
quickly if the parties could agree to a mutually acceptable
exchange ratio. After discussion, the Partnership Audit
Committee directed Barclays to prepare an analysis of
Holdings counterproposal, and to arrange a meeting with
Credit Suisse to discuss the financial assumptions underlying
the Partnerships proposal and the Transaction
Committees counterproposal.
On May 4, 2010, a telephonic meeting of the Partnership
Audit Committee was held, with representatives of Prickett
Jones, V&E and Barclays in attendance. Barclays presented
an analysis of Holdings proposed exchange ratio of 0.76.
As part of its presentation, Barclays estimated the incremental
growth capital required to reach accretion within a fixed number
of years, and the types and availability of acquisition
opportunities and managements history in executing
sizeable acquisitions. In addition, the Partnership Audit
Committee and its financial and legal advisors discussed what
would be an acceptable period of dilution resulting from the
proposed transaction for the Partnership and its unitholders.
The Partnership Audit Committee then reiterated its request that
Barclays meet with Credit Suisse to discuss the financial
assumptions underlying the Partnerships proposal and
Holdings counterproposal.
On May 5 and May 6, 2010, the Holdings Board and the
Partnership Board met in regularly scheduled joint sessions to
discuss the Partnerships operations and financial results
for the first quarter of 2010. The proposed transaction between
Holdings and the Partnership was not discussed at these sessions.
On May 7, 2010, as directed by the Holdings Board and the
Partnership Audit Committee, respectively, Credit Suisse and
Barclays met to discuss certain aspects of the April 13th
proposal and Holdings counterproposal and the financial
assumptions underlying both proposals.
On May 11, 2010, the Transaction Committee, Credit Suisse
and Latham & Watkins met to discuss the status of
negotiations with the Partnership.
On May 12, 2010, the Partnership Audit Committee met
telephonically, with representatives of Prickett Jones, V&E
and Barclays in attendance. The Partnership Audit Committee
heard additional detail from Barclays regarding a number of
financial aspects associated with the Holdings counterproposal,
including a review of incremental exchange ratios between the
initial 0.65 proposal by the Partnership and the 0.76
counterproposal by Holdings, the required growth capital to
reach accretion under each case and the valuation suggested by
an array of different analyses, including a discounted cash flow
analysis. The Partnership Audit Committee also determined that
senior management should provide an updated forecast for 2010
based on actual results to-date and expectations for the balance
of the year. In addition, Barclays reported on its meeting with
Credit Suisse, and reported to the Partnership Audit Committee
on the recently announced acquisition by Energy Transfer Equity,
L.P. of the general partner of Regency Energy Partners LP. The
Partnership Audit Committee then directed its advisors to
prepare a letter to the Transaction Committee with (i) a
revised proposed exchange ratio to be determined, (ii) a
proposal regarding the
make-up of
the Partnership Board following the transaction, including a
representative from each of ArcLight and Kelso, (iii) a
45-day
period of exclusive negotiations, and (iv) full support for
the transaction by ArcLight and Kelso.
39
On May 18, 2010, the Partnership Audit Committee met
telephonically, with representatives of Prickett Jones, V&E
and Barclays in attendance. Barclays presented its preliminary
financial analysis, taking into account a new exchange ratio and
an updated financial forecast from senior management. Barclays
presented its analysis under four financial cases: (i) the
base case of senior management, (ii) a no-acquisition case,
(iii) a downside case, and (iv) an upside case (which
included construction of the Marcellus Union Pipeline Project).
The Partnership Audit Committee discussed an exchange ratio of
0.705, the midpoint between the initial proposal of 0.65 and the
counterproposal of 0.76, and the Partnerships ability to
maintain its distribution growth, together with a break even
analysis to achieve accretion for the Partnership unitholders.
Based on the closing price for the Partnership LP units for the
prior day and based on the prior
30-day and
90-day
average closing prices for the Partnership LP units, the premium
associated with the proposed exchange ratio was approximately
25%, which was consistent with the premium paid in the Magellan
transaction. Based on Barclays preliminary pro forma
analysis and assuming reasonable levels of incremental annual
capital expenditures, the Partnership Audit Committee believed
the dilution from the proposed exchange ratio would be for no
more than four years and then become accretive to the
Partnerships unitholders. The Partnership Audit Committee
emphasized the importance of signaling to Holdings that this
represented its final and best offer. The Partnership Audit
Committee also discussed with its advisors possible transaction
terms, including the likelihood of a third party bid for
Holdings, the Partnership or both, and potential protections for
Holdings if directors are elected by the public unitholders,
including a staggered board and a rights plan. The Partnership
Audit Committee also heard a presentation from Prickett Jones
respecting the directors fiduciary duties under Delaware
law and the Partnerships existing partnership agreement in
connection with consideration of the possible acquisition
transaction.
On May 19, 2010, the Partnership Audit Committee met and
authorized Mr. Hobbs to send to the Transaction Committee a
letter with revised terms. Accordingly, on May 20,
Mr. Hobbs sent the following letter and, in a subsequent
telephone call with Messrs. Erhard and Loverro, reinforced
the best and final nature of the proposal:
AUDIT
COMMITTEE OF BUCKEYE GP LLC
May 20,
2010
Confidential
Transaction Committee of
MainLine Management LLC
Dear Mr. Sowinski, Mr. Loverro and Mr. Erhard:
On behalf of the Audit Committee of Buckeye GP LLC and Buckeye
Partners, L.P. (Partners), I am following up on our
earlier letter to you of April 13, 2010 and our subsequent
phone calls regarding a proposed merger transaction pursuant to
which holders of common units of Buckeye GP Holdings L.P.
(Holdings) would receive LP units of Partners in a
tax-free exchange.
Consideration. We propose that each
common unit of Holdings be exchanged for 0.705 LP units of
Partners. This represents a significant premium to
Holdings common units and based on managements
estimated 2011 distributions and the proposed exchange ratio,
Holdings unitholders would receive distributions which are
approximately 46% higher than the estimated 2011 Holdings
distributions.
Support. Pursuant to the proposed
transaction, (i) the board of MainLine Management LLC will
agree, to the fullest extent permitted by the terms of the
Holdings partnership agreement and Delaware law, to recommend
and bring the proposed transaction to a vote of Holdings
unitholders, (ii) BGH GP Holdings, LLC (and ArcLight and
Kelso as controlling persons of the general partner of Holdings)
will commit to vote in favor of and to support the proposed
transaction, and (iii) Holdings and its representatives
will agree, to the fullest extent permitted by the terms of the
Holdings partnership agreement and Delaware law, not to solicit,
facilitate, discuss or negotiate an alternative transaction. The
issuance by Partners of the LP units pursuant to
40
the proposed transaction and the related amendments to the
Partners partnership agreement will be subject to the approval
of a majority interest of Partners unitholders.
Structure. We believe that the proposed
transaction can be effected without triggering a change of
control under the Partners credit agreement, and look forward to
sharing with you and your advisors our thoughts on the
post-closing structure of Partners.
Governance. Following the consummation
of the proposed transaction, the holders of the Partners units
will elect the directors of Buckeye GP LLC. We envision the
initial board of Buckeye GP LLC to be composed of nine members,
namely, (a) the three current members of the audit
committee of Buckeye GP LLC, (b) the three members of the
audit committee of MainLine Management LLC, (c) a
representative from each of ArcLight and Kelso, and (d) the
CEO.
Partnership Agreement. In connection
with the consummation of the proposed transaction, the
Partners partnership agreement will be amended primarily
to (i) eliminate the general partner interest represented
by the Incentive Compensation Agreement, (ii) eliminate
allocations of cash or income on the GP units, and
(iii) facilitate unitholder voting for election of the
members of the board of directors of Buckeye GP LLC.
You know of our enthusiasm for the proposed transaction, and our
belief that, for many reasons, it will be beneficial for the
unitholders of both Partners and Holdings. We believe that time
is of the essence for both Partners and Holdings and that
maintaining the confidentiality of these proceedings is crucial
to negotiating a mutually beneficial transaction. As such, we
ask that you execute the attached letter that provides for a
45 day exclusivity period and contains confidentiality
provisions. To be clear, execution of that letter does not
commit you to anything other than the exclusivity and
confidentiality provisions.
We look forward to hearing your endorsement of this proposal,
and ask that you respond to us within the coming week.
Sincerely,
C. Scott Hobbs
|
|
cc: |
Mark C. McKinley
Oliver G. Rick Richard, III
|
* * *
On May 24, 2010, the Transaction Committee met and, with
the assistance of representatives of Credit Suisse and
Latham & Watkins, reviewed and discussed the May 20th
proposal. Representatives of Credit Suisse reviewed and
discussed their preliminary financial analyses with respect to
the Partnership, Holdings and the proposed transaction
(including a discussion of any correlation between Holdings
common units and Partnership LP units). Representatives of
Latham & Watkins summarized other components of the
revised proposal. The Transaction Committee then discussed the
revised proposal and considered whether it should seek an
increase in the proposed exchange ratio above 0.705. The
Transaction Committee decided to take the matter under
advisement and discuss it with the Holdings Board at the next
Holdings Board meeting.
On May 25, 2010, the Holdings Board met and, with the
assistance of Holdings legal and financial advisors,
discussed potential responses to the May 20th proposal of the
Partnership Audit Committee. The Holdings Board discussed, among
other things, the pro forma consequences of the proposed
transaction, an increase in the exchange ratio, whether Holdings
should have an affirmative right to shop itself after signing a
definitive agreement, the universe of potential buyers for
Holdings and whether Holdings should be able to respond to
unsolicited written proposals after signing a definitive
agreement. Following those discussions, the Holdings Board
decided to counter with a proposed exchange ratio of 0.715. The
Holdings Board directed the Transaction Committee to
(1) continue resisting exclusivity prior to signing a
definitive agreement, (2) accept limitations on
Holdings ability to affirmatively shop itself after the
signing of a definitive agreement, (3) retain
41
the right to respond to unsolicited written proposals,
(4) accept the proposal regarding post-closing governance,
and (5) emphasize the importance of promptly executing a
definitive agreement.
On May 26, 2010, the Partnership Audit Committee met
telephonically, with representatives of Prickett Jones, V&E
and Barclays in attendance. Mr. Hobbs reported to the
Partnership Audit Committee that he had heard from the
Transaction Committee with their reaction to the May 20th
proposal. According to Mr. Hobbs, the Transaction Committee
expressed the following:
|
|
|
|
|
a counterproposal of an exchange ratio of 0.715 in response to
the proposal by the Partnership Audit Committee of 0.705,
|
|
|
|
a rejection of the Partnership Audit Committees request
regarding exclusivity,
|
|
|
|
a willingness to sign a definitive agreement within 7 days,
|
|
|
|
a willingness to obtain the full commitment of
ArcLight and Kelso within the confines of Delaware law,
|
|
|
|
a confirmation that Holdings would not insist on the right to
affirmatively market itself after the signing of a definitive
agreement with respect to the proposed transition, and
|
|
|
|
agreement on the proposal by the Partnership Audit Committee
that the post-transaction Partnership Board be composed of
9 directors, of which 2 would be effectively appointed by
BGH GP, and 7 would be elected by the unitholders of the
Partnership.
|
At the meeting, the Partnership Audit Committee discussed the
exchange ratio, and Barclays presented materials showing the
consequences of an exchange ratio of 0.705, 0.710 and 0.715. The
legal advisors discussed other aspects of the Holdings
response, including the rejection of exclusivity. The
Partnership Audit Committee also discussed the term of the two
directors to be appointed by BGH GP, and when the appointment
rights would cease. The Partnership Audit Committee continued to
express concern regarding a possible third party which might
seek to acquire Holdings following an announcement of the
merger. At the end of the meeting, the Partnership Audit
Committee members (i) authorized Mr. Hobbs to respond
that the Partnership Audit Committee was no longer flexible on
the exchange ratio and was reaffirming its proposed ratio of
0.705 and (ii) directed counsel to prepare promptly drafts
of definitive agreements for review by the Partnership Audit
Committee.
Later in the day on May 26, Mr. Hobbs advised the
Transaction Committee that the Partnership Audit Committee was
not flexible on the exchange ratio and was reaffirming its
proposed ratio of 0.705.
On May 27, 2010, the Holdings Board met, and with the
advice and assistance of its legal and financial advisors,
discussed the Partnership Audit Committees position with
respect to the exchange ratio and other terms of the potential
transaction. The Holdings Board discussed its repeated efforts
to increase the exchange ratio, the increase in the exchange
ratio since the April 13th proposal, and the relatively small
difference between the exchange ratios proposed by the Holdings
Board and the Partnership Audit Committee. The Holdings Board
considered the possibility of competing proposals and the
characteristics of potential bidders who could potentially be
interested in acquiring Holdings. The Holdings Board noted that
no such proposal had been received and that Holdings would
require customary provisions in the merger agreement to consider
unsolicited acquisition proposals and the right to accept a
superior proposal from a third party. The Holdings Board also
considered other factors, including the risk of nonconsummation
resulting from further delays and increasing volatility in the
financial markets. Representatives of Latham & Watkins
also provided an update on proposed legislation in the
U.S. Congress that could affect the taxation of certain
direct and indirect holders of incentive distribution rights.
After further discussion, the Holdings Board instructed the
Transaction Committee to communicate the Holdings Boards
agreement with the 0.705 exchange ratio, subject to prompt
negotiation of final deal terms and the execution of definitive
agreements.
On May 27, 2010, Messrs. Erhard and Loverro responded
by telephone to Mr. Hobbs and indicated agreement with the
Partnership Audit Committees proposed ratio of 0.705,
subject to prompt negotiation of final deal terms and the
execution of definitive agreements.
42
On May 29, 2010, the Partnership Audit Committee met
telephonically, with representatives of Prickett Jones, V&E
and Barclays in attendance. The Partnership Audit Committee and
its legal and financial advisors discussed the terms of a draft
merger agreement with respect to the proposed acquisition of
Holdings by the Partnership and a draft support agreement to be
entered into by ArcLight and Kelso. The Partnership Audit
Committee directed its legal advisors to send revised agreements
to Latham & Watkins, counsel to Holdings, with a copy
to Mr. Schmidt, who until that time had not been involved
in the negotiations. On May 30, counsel to the Partnership
Audit Committee sent to Latham & Watkins and
Mr. Schmidt a draft merger agreement and draft support
agreement.
On June 1, 2010, Mr. Schmidt provided comments to the
draft merger agreement and support agreement to V&E and
Prickett Jones. Also on June 1, the Transaction Committee
and representatives of Latham & Watkins met to discuss
various issues in the merger agreement and support agreement.
The Transaction Committee discussed, among other things, the
requirement for a Partnership unitholder vote, the potential for
a change in recommendation and its consequences, the right to
consider and provide information in connection with unsolicited
written proposals, termination rights and termination fees.
Further, after deliberation and consultation with its legal
advisors, the Transaction Committee determined that approval of
the merger by a majority of the minority unitholders was not
required under Delaware law or the limited partnership agreement
of Holdings.
From June 1 through June 10, 2010, representatives of
V&E held several telephone conferences with
Mr. Schmidt and other members of management respecting due
diligence matters, including tax issues, insurance issues,
accounting issues and other matters addressed in the
representations and warranties of the draft merger agreement.
On June 3, 2010, Latham & Watkins provided
comments to the draft merger agreement and support agreement to
the Partnership Audit Committees legal advisors. Later on
June 3, representatives of Prickett Jones and V&E
engaged in a telephone call with representatives of
Latham & Watkins and Richards, Layton &
Finger, P.A., special Delaware counsel to Holdings, to discuss
the necessity of a vote by the Partnerships unitholders on
the proposed transaction.
On June 4, 2010, the Partnership Audit Committee met
telephonically, with representatives of Prickett Jones, V&E
and Barclays in attendance, to discuss comments to the draft
merger agreement and draft support agreement received from
Latham & Watkins and from senior management. After
discussion, the Partnership Audit Committee determined that it
would not authorize a proposed transaction that was not
conditioned on receipt of a vote of the Partnerships
unitholders. The Partnership Audit Committee and its legal
advisors then discussed other issues raised by Holdings
comments, including changes to the deal protection provisions in
the merger agreement, the definition of material adverse effect,
and changes to the termination provisions of the support
agreement, and the terms of a registration rights agreement with
Kelso and ArcLight. After a number of questions and comments,
the Partnership Audit Committee directed its legal advisors to
send revised drafts of the merger agreement and support
agreement to Latham & Watkins. Also during the
meeting, representatives of V&E further reported on, and
answered questions with respect to, the tax treatment of the
proposed transaction.
Later on June 4, 2010, counsel for the Partnership Audit
Committee sent revised drafts of the merger agreement and
support agreement to Latham & Watkins, which provided,
among other things, for a vote of the Partnerships
unitholders, that a decision by the Holdings Board to change its
recommendation or terminate the merger agreement to accept a
superior proposal should include the approval of a majority of
the conflicts committee of the Holdings Board and maintaining a
post-closing
lock-up
period of 60 days with respect to units received by
ArcLight and Kelso in the merger.
On June 5, 2010, the Transaction Committee and
representatives of Latham & Watkins met to discuss
various issues in the merger agreement and support agreement.
The Transaction Committee discussed, among other things, the
requirement for a Partnership unitholder vote, the ability of
each of the Holdings Board and the Partnership Audit Committee
to change its recommendation, the right of each of Holdings and
the Partnership to terminate the merger agreement and the amount
of termination fees for each party.
43
Later on June 5, 2010, counsel for the Partnership Audit
Committee sent to Latham & Watkins a draft amended and
restated partnership agreement of the Partnership to be adopted
in connection with the transaction.
On June 6, 2010, Latham & Watkins provided the
Partnership Audit Committee with comments on the revised
transaction documents, with changes relating to, among other
things, the deal protection provisions (including, without
limitation, the ability to consider and accept a superior
proposal without the payment of a termination fee), the
definition of material adverse effect, termination events,
termination fees, support agreement termination and terms of a
registration rights agreement with ArcLight and Kelso.
On June 7, 2010, Mr. Hobbs engaged in a telephone
conversation with Mr. Loverro with respect to deal
protection provisions and the amount of termination fees, which
the Transaction Committee proposed to set at zero for Holdings
in the event it accepted a superior proposal, 3% to be paid by
the Partnership in the event the Partnership Board changed its
recommendation and 1% to be paid by Holdings in the event the
Holdings Board changed its recommendation.
Later on June 7, 2010, the Partnership Audit Committee met
telephonically, with representatives of Prickett Jones, V&E
and Barclays in attendance, to discuss comments to the draft
transaction documents received from Latham & Watkins,
and to discuss Mr. Hobbs conversation with
Mr. Loverro. Also during the meeting, representatives of
V&E further reported on, and answered questions with
respect to, the tax treatment of the proposed transaction. The
Partnership Audit Committee and its advisors also discussed
fluctuations in the trading prices of the Partnerships and
Holdings units, and Barclays confirmed that these factors
did not have a material effect on its analysis of the proposed
transaction. The Partnership Audit Committee expressed its
agreement with various changes proposed by the Holdings Board,
but continued to insist on a termination fee in an amount equal
to 3% of the equity value of the transaction (including in the
event Holdings accepted a superior proposal) and a provision
that an alternative proposal for both the Partnership and
Holdings could not be a superior proposal without Partnership
Audit Committee approval. Mr. Hobbs was directed to engage
in further conversations with Mr. Loverro to discuss and
attempt to resolve these open issues in accordance with the
direction provided by the Partnership Audit Committee.
Later on June 7, 2010, Mr. Hobbs engaged in further
discussions with Messrs. Loverro and Erhard with respect to
certain of the open issues. Later on June 7, counsel to the
Partnership Audit Committee distributed revised drafts of the
merger agreement and support agreement to Latham &
Watkins and senior management, which reflected the Partnership
Audit Committees determinations and Mr. Hobbs
discussions with Messrs. Loverro and Erhard.
Late on June 7, 2010, counsel for the Partnership Audit
Committee distributed to senior management a draft registration
rights agreement for their input and comments. On June 8,
Mr. Hobbs and representatives of V&E engaged in
discussions with members of senior management respecting the
draft registration rights agreement.
On June 8, 2010, the Transaction Committee and
representatives of Latham & Watkins met to discuss
various issues in the transaction documents. The Transaction
Committee provided guidance to Latham & Watkins, which
continued negotiating the transaction documents with the legal
advisors to the Partnership Audit Committee.
Later on June 8, 2010, Mr. Hobbs engaged in
discussions with Messrs. Loverro and Erhard respecting
certain open issues, including proposed termination fees. Also
on June 8, V&E sent a draft registration rights
agreement to Latham & Watkins.
Later on June 8, 2010, the Partnership Audit Committee met
telephonically, with representatives of Prickett Jones, V&E
and Barclays in attendance, to discuss the registration rights
agreement and proposed changes to the termination rights,
termination fees and other issues in the merger agreement.
Later on June 8, 2010, Latham & Watkins
distributed revised drafts of the merger agreement to the
Partnership Audit Committees legal advisors, requesting
among other things a 3% termination fee to apply to the
Partnership and a 1.5% termination fee to apply to Holdings,
eliminating the approval requirement of the Partnership Audit
Committee for a superior proposal involving an acquisition of
both the Partnership and Holdings and eliminating the
termination fee for Holdings breach of the no-solicitation
provision. Latham &
44
Watkins also distributed comments of the Holdings Board to the
draft amended and restated agreement of limited partnership of
the Partnership.
On June 9, 2010, V&E distributed to Latham &
Watkins a draft amended and restated partnership agreement for
Holdings to be adopted in connection with the proposed merger.
On June 9, 2010, the Transaction Committee and
representatives of Latham & Watkins met to discuss
various issues in the transaction documents. The Transaction
Committee provided guidance to Latham & Watkins, which
continued negotiating the transaction documents with the legal
advisors to the Partnership Audit Committee.
Also on June 9, 2010, Mr. Hobbs engaged in telephone
discussions with Messrs. Loverro and Erhard. During the
call, the parties agreed on a reciprocal termination fee of 2.5%
of transaction value for both Holdings and the Partnership, the
elimination of a termination fee for breach of the
no-solicitation provision and clarifying language with respect
to whether an acquisition proposal for both Holdings and the
Partnership could be a superior proposal without the approval of
the Partnership Audit Committee. Open issues with respect to the
registration rights agreement were identified but not resolved.
Later on June 9, 2010, Latham & Watkins
distributed a revised draft of the registration rights agreement
to the Partnership Audit Committees legal advisors.
Mr. Hobbs suggested to V&E that senior management be
involved to discuss the impact of the terms of the registration
rights agreement on Partnership activities going forward.
V&E and Mr. Hobbs discussed various issues with
members of senior management, and Mr. Schmidt delivered
senior managements recommendations to both the
representatives of the Partnership Audit Committee and the
representatives of the Transaction Committee.
On the evening of June 9, 2010, senior management,
V&E, Mr. Hobbs, Latham & Watkins and
representatives of the Transaction Committee resolved most of
the open issues with respect to the registration rights
agreement.
Late on June 9, 2010, V&E distributed to
Latham & Watkins revised drafts of the merger
agreement, the registration rights agreement and the amended and
restated partnership agreements of each of the Partnership and
Holdings.
On June 10, 2010, further drafts of the transaction
documents were exchanged between counsel for the Partnership
Audit Committee and counsel to the Holdings Board, and further
discussions were held to resolve minor drafting issues.
On June 10, 2010, the Partnership Audit Committee met
telephonically, with representatives of Prickett Jones, V&E
and Barclays in attendance, to review and consider the proposed
transaction between the Partnership and Holdings. Prior to the
meeting, the members of the Partnership Audit Committee were
provided drafts of the merger agreement and certain related
agreements as well as materials to assist the Partnership Audit
Committee in evaluating the proposed merger and the related
transactions. Barclays presented its financial analysis of the
proposed merger transaction and, at the conclusion of its
presentation, delivered to the Partnership Audit Committee its
oral opinion (which was subsequently confirmed in writing) that,
as of such date and based upon and subject to the
qualifications, limitations and assumptions stated therein, from
a financial point of view, the exchange ratio to be paid by the
Partnership in the proposed transaction is fair to the
Partnership and, accordingly, its unitholders (other than
Holdings, the Partnership GP, ArcLight and Kelso). The
Partnership Audit Committee did not discuss a price-protection
mechanism because it viewed the relative valuation of the
Partnership LP units and Holdings units as significantly more
important than the absolute value of the Partnership and
Holdings. Representatives of V&E then reviewed the terms of
the transaction documents, and the resolution of certain open
issues. A representative of Prickett Jones reviewed the
members fiduciary duties under Delaware law and the
Partnerships partnership agreement. After considering the
benefits of the proposed transaction as well as the associated
risks, and after consideration of other relevant factors
including the Barclays fairness opinion, the Partnership
Audit Committee unanimously resolved to approve and declare
advisable the merger agreement and the related agreements, and
resolved that the merger agreement, the related agreements and
the transactions contemplated thereby were fair and reasonable
to, and in the best interests of, the Partnership and the
Partnership unitholders (other than Holdings, the Partnership GP
and their respective affiliates), resolved to recommend the
approval of the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby, including the merger and the issuance of
Partnership LP units pursuant to the merger agreement, and the
amended and restated partnership agreement of the Partnership,
by the unitholders
45
of the Partnership, and resolved that such approval by the
Partnership Audit Committee constituted special approval (as
defined in the Partnerships existing limited partnership
agreement).
Later on June 10, 2010, the Holdings Board, with all
members in attendance (other than Mr. Wylie, who recused
himself), met to review and consider the proposed merger between
Holdings and the Partnership. Prior to the meeting, the members
of the Holdings Board were provided drafts of the merger
agreement and certain related agreements and other documents as
well as other materials to assist the Holdings Board in
evaluating the proposed merger. Latham & Watkins
discussed (1) the fiduciary duties of the directors and the
judicial standard of review under the circumstances, and
(2) recent developments relating to proposed legislation in
the U.S. Congress that could affect the taxation of certain
direct and indirect holders of incentive distribution rights.
Credit Suisse then reviewed and discussed its financial analyses
with respect to the Partnership, Holdings and the proposed
merger, and, thereafter, at the request of the Holdings Board,
rendered its opinion to the Holdings Board (which was
subsequently confirmed in writing by delivery of Credit
Suisses written opinion dated June 10,
2010) with respect to the fairness, from a financial point
of view, to the unaffiliated unitholders of Holdings of the
exchange ratio. The Holdings Board did not discuss
price-protection mechanisms because it viewed the relative value
received by Holdings unitholders under the exchange ratio as
significantly more important than the absolute value of the
consideration received. Latham & Watkins then
summarized, and responded to questions regarding, the merger
agreement, the support agreement, the registration rights
agreement, the amended and restated agreement of limited
partnership of the Partnership and the amended and restated
agreement of limited partnership of Holdings. The Transaction
Committee then summarized its efforts in negotiating the merger
agreement, the support agreement, the registration rights
agreement, the amended and restated agreement of limited
partnership of the Partnership and the amended and restated
agreement of limited partnership of Holdings, the meetings held
to evaluate the terms of the transaction, and its discussions
with the Holdings Boards legal and financial advisors and
representatives of the Partnership GP. The Transaction
Committee then provided its recommendation that the merger, the
merger agreement, and the transactions contemplated thereby are
advisable, fair, and reasonable to and in the best interests of
Holdings and its partners and recommended that the Holdings
Board approve and adopt the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger.
After discussion, the Holdings Board unanimously (not including
Mr. Wylie, who recused himself) (1) determined that
the merger, the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby are advisable, fair and reasonable to and
in the best interests of Holdings and its partners,
(2) approved the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby (including the merger) and
(3) resolved (subject to certain exceptions in the merger
agreement) to recommend the approval and adoption of the merger,
the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby
by the unitholders of Holdings.
During the evening of June 10, the Partnership, the
Partnership GP, MergerCo, Holdings and Holdings GP executed the
merger agreement, and the Partnership and the Major Unitholders
executed the support agreement and the registration rights
agreement.
On June 11, 2010, the Partnership and Holdings issued a
joint press release announcing the proposed merger.
On August 10, 2010, at a meeting of the Partnership Board,
the Partnership Board approved Amendment No. 1 to the
Partnerships existing partnership agreement. The amendment
permits the Partnership GP to adjourn a meeting of limited
partners, without notice of the adjourned meeting or setting a
new record date for the meeting, if the time and place thereof
are announced at the adjourned meeting, unless the adjournment
(together with any prior adjournments in connection with which a
new record date was not fixed) is for more than 60 days.
On August 11, 2010, the Holdings Board met telephonically
with Mr. Schmidt and outside counsel from
Latham & Watkins and Duane Morris LLP (Duane
Morris), California regulatory counsel to the Partnership,
to discuss regulatory matters, including the role of the CPUC.
The Holdings Board received advice from outside counsel with
respect to regulatory matters and then discussed possible
amendments to the merger agreement to defer the public election
of directors pending the outcome of regulatory proceedings.
After discussion, the Holdings Board asked representatives of
Latham & Watkins and Duane Morris to conduct further
analysis of the possible amendments to the merger agreement and
to explain what courses of action were available with respect to
certain regulatory approvals.
46
On August 12, 2010, the Partnership Audit Committee met
telephonically with Mr. Schmidt and representatives of
Prickett Jones, V&E, and Barclays and a representative of
Duane Morris to consider under what circumstances CPUC approval
might be required. The Partnership Audit Committee received
advice from outside counsel with respect to regulatory matters
and then discussed possible amendments to the merger agreement
to defer the public election of directors pending the outcome of
regulatory proceedings.
On August 13, 2010, the Holdings Board, with all members in
attendance (other than Mr. Wylie), met telephonically with
representatives of Latham & Watkins and Duane Morris
to further consider regulatory matters and possible amendments
to the merger agreement. At that time, the Holdings Board
discussed with outside counsel alternative courses of action and
the relative merits of each. After deliberating, the Holdings
Board determined to consider the matter further.
On August 13, 2010, the Partnership Audit Committee met
telephonically, with representatives of Prickett Jones and
V&E in attendance, to review and consider a First Amended
and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger and revisions to
certain related agreements, to among other things,
(1) provide that Holdings GP (through Holdings) will
continue to have the right to appoint, remove and replace all of
the directors of the Partnership Board until the earlier to
occur of (a) the receipt of approvals from the CPUC and
PaPUC of the public election provisions or (b) a
determination by the Partnership Board that such approvals are
not required, (2) remove the obligations of Holdings and
Partners to cause comfort letters to be delivered to each other
as a condition to closing of the merger and (3) to make
certain technical amendments to the merger agreement and form of
amended and restated partnership agreement. Prior to the
meeting, the members of the Partnership Audit Committee were
provided drafts of a First Amended and Restated Agreement and
Plan of Merger and a revised form of amended and restated
partnership agreement and certain related agreements.
Representatives of V&E reviewed the proposed revisions to
the transaction documents. After considering the proposed
revisions to the transaction documents, the Partnership Audit
Committee unanimously resolved to approve and declare advisable
the First Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger and
the related agreements, and resolved that the First Amended and
Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger, the related agreements
and the transactions contemplated thereby were fair and
reasonable to, and in the best interests of, the Partnership and
the Partnership unitholders (other than Holdings, the
Partnership GP and their respective affiliates).
On August 17, 2010, the Holdings Board (with Mr. Wylie
recusing himself) met telephonically with representatives of
Latham & Watkins, representatives from Jones Day,
special California regulatory counsel to the Partnership, and a
representative of Post & Schell P.C., Pennsylvania
regulatory counsel to the Partnership (Post &
Schell), to consider under what circumstances CPUC and
PaPUC approval might be required and possible amendments to the
merger agreement to defer the public election provisions. After
receiving the reports of outside counsel on regulatory issues,
the Board then discussed proposed amendments to the merger
agreement and revisions to certain related agreements to, among
other things, (1) provide that Holdings GP (through
Holdings) will continue to have the right to appoint, remove and
replace all of the directors of the Partnership Board until the
earlier to occur of (a) the receipt of applicable
regulatory approvals or (b) a determination by the
Partnership Board that such approvals are not required,
(2) remove the delivery of comfort letters to each of
Holdings and the Partnership as a condition to closing of the
merger and (3) to make certain technical amendments. After
further deliberation, the Holdings Board determined that entry
into the First Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of
Merger, the related agreements and the transactions contemplated
thereby were fair and reasonable to, and in the best interest
of, Holdings and the Holdings unitholders and unanimously
approved the First Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of
Merger, the related agreements and the transactions contemplated
thereby.
On August 17, 2010 a telephonic informational session was
held with members of the Partnership Board (including all
members of the Partnership Audit Committee), Mr. Schmidt
and representatives of Prickett Jones and V&E, and
representatives of Jones Day, to receive a report of outside
counsel on regulatory issues and consider under what
circumstances CPUC approval might be required.
On August 18, 2010, the Partnership, the Partnership GP,
MergerCo, Holdings and Holdings GP executed the First Amended
and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger to, among other
things, (1) provide that Holdings GP (through Holdings)
will continue to have the right to appoint, remove and replace
all of the directors of the Partnership Board until the earlier
to occur of (a) the receipt of approvals from the CPUC and
PaPUC of the public election provisions or (b) a
determination by the Partnership Board that such approvals are
not required, (2) remove the obligations of Holdings and
Partners to cause comfort letters to be delivered
47
to each other as a condition to closing of the merger and
(3) to make certain technical amendments to the merger
agreement and form of amended and restated partnership agreement.
Recommendation
of the Partnership Audit Committee and Its Reasons for the
Merger
At a meeting of the Partnership Audit Committee held on
June 10, 2010, the Partnership Audit Committee, comprised
of independent directors, received a presentation from its
financial advisor concerning the financial analyses of the
proposed merger, and reviewed with its legal counsel the terms
of the merger agreement and the other related agreements. At the
meeting, the Partnership Audit Committee considered the benefits
of the merger as well as the associated risks and has
unanimously determined that the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger and the
issuance of Partnership LP units pursuant to the merger
agreement, and the Partnerships amended and restated
partnership agreement, are fair and reasonable to the
Partnership, and in the best interests of the Partnership and
its unitholders (other than the Partnership GP, Holdings or
their respective affiliates) and has approved and declared the
advisability of the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby, including the merger and the issuance of
Partnership LP units pursuant to the merger agreement, and
including the Partnerships amended and restated
partnership agreement. Accordingly, the Partnership Audit
Committee unanimously recommends that the Partnership
unitholders vote to approve the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger and the
issuance of Partnership LP units pursuant to the merger
agreement and the Partnerships amended and restated
partnership agreement.
In reaching its decision on the merger, the Partnership Audit
Committee consulted with its legal and financial advisors and
considered the following factors that supported the approval of
the merger:
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that the Partnership will no longer have any issued and
outstanding incentive distribution rights as a result of the
merger;
|
|
|
|
the significant reduction in the Partnerships equity cost
of capital because the Partnership will no longer have any
issued and outstanding incentive distribution rights as a result
of the merger;
|
|
|
|
the enhancement of the Partnerships ability to compete for
new acquisitions following the merger as a result of its reduced
equity cost of capital;
|
|
|
|
the fact that the merger is expected to be long-term accretive
to the Partnerships distributable cash flow per
Partnership LP unit;
|
|
|
|
the fact that the merger is expected to result in a long-term
increase in the growth rate of the Partnerships
distributable cash flow per Partnership LP unit, thereby
improving potential total return due to both valuation and
potential distribution growth;
|
|
|
|
the potential to accelerate the anticipated strategic benefits
of the merger;
|
|
|
|
the probability that the Partnership and Holdings will be able
to complete the merger, including their ability to obtain
unitholder approvals;
|
|
|
|
the fact that the Partnerships approval of the merger is
subject to the vote of the holders of Partnership LP units;
|
|
|
|
the fact that the merger will likely result in a capital
structure and governance structure of the Partnership that is
more easily understood by the investing public;
|
|
|
|
the fact that Partnership unitholders will be entitled to elect
7 of the 9 directors of the Partnership Board;
|
|
|
|
the fact that the merger has been structured to avoid a change
of control event of default under the Partnerships credit
agreement;
|
|
|
|
the fact that the merger will eliminate potential conflicts of
interest that may arise as a result of a person being an officer
of the Partnership GP and of Holdings GP and as a result of a
person being a member of the Partnership Board and a member of
Holdings Board;
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that the merger will reduce potential conflicts of
interest between the owners of Holdings GP and the Partnership
and its unitholders;
|
|
|
|
the fact that having a greater number of outstanding Partnership
LP units is expected to increase the public float and trading
liquidity of the market for Partnership LP units;
|
|
|
|
the terms of the merger agreement permit the Partnership Audit
Committee to change or withdraw the recommendation of the merger
if the Partnership Audit Committee has concluded in good faith,
after consultation with its outside legal advisors and financial
consultants, that the failure to withdraw, modify or qualify its
recommendation would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties
under the Partnerships existing partnership agreement and
applicable law;
|
|
|
|
the written opinion of Barclays, dated as of June 10, 2010,
that, as of that date and based upon and subject to the factors
and assumptions set forth in the opinion, the stated
consideration to be paid pursuant to the merger agreement is
fair, from a financial point of view, to the Partnership and
accordingly to the holders of Partnership LP units (other than
Holdings, the Partnership GP, ArcLight and certain of its
affiliates, and Kelso and certain of its affiliates);
|
|
|
|
the elimination of certain control rights that Holdings
possesses with respect to the Partnership as the sole member of
the Partnership GP; and
|
|
|
|
the terms of the merger as set forth in the relevant agreements,
including without limitation, the Partnerships amended and
restated partnership agreement, the second amended and restated
agreement of limited partnership agreement of Holdings, the
merger agreement and the related transaction documents.
|
The Partnership Audit Committee also considered the following
factors that weighed against the approval of the merger:
|
|
|
|
|
the potential delay in timing with respect to some anticipated
benefits of the merger;
|
|
|
|
the fact that the merger is expected to be near-term dilutive to
the Partnerships distributable cash flow per Partnership
LP unit;
|
|
|
|
the fact that the merger might not be completed as a result of a
failure to satisfy the conditions contained in the merger
agreement, including the failure to receive applicable
unitholder approvals;
|
|
|
|
the fact that, as of June 10, 2010, the value of the
Partnership LP units to be issued in the merger represented a
36% premium to the per unit closing price of Holdings common
units as of June 9, 2010, the last trading day before the
approval of the proposed merger (and approximately a 32% and 24%
premium over the average closing price of Holdings for the 30
and 90 days, respectively, preceding the approval when
negotiations were being conducted);
|
|
|
|
the risk that potential benefits sought in the merger might not
be fully realized;
|
|
|
|
the fact that the bases on which the Partnership Audit Committee
made its determination, including assumptions associated with
managements projections, are uncertain;
|
|
|
|
the terms under which the Holdings Board may change its
recommendation to holders of Holdings units to approve the
merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby and
terminate the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
the fact that the Partnership may be required in certain
circumstances to pay to Holdings a termination fee or reimburse
Holdings for its expenses upon termination of the merger
agreement; and
|
|
|
|
the fact that the merger might not be completed in a timely
manner.
|
In the view of the Partnership Audit Committee, these factors
did not outweigh the advantages of the merger. The Partnership
Audit Committee also reviewed a number of procedural factors
relating to the merger, including, without limitation, the
following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
that because of the possible conflicts of interest associated
with the negotiations between the Partnership and Holdings
leading to agreement with respect to the merger, the Partnership
Audit
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
Committee was delegated the power and authority to consider,
analyze and approve, on behalf of the Partnership and the
Partnership Board, a strategic transaction between the
Partnership and Holdings;
|
|
|
|
|
|
that the delegation of power to the Partnership Audit Committee
included the authority to deny the approval, or recommend
against the approval, as applicable, of the merger or any
similar transaction;
|
|
|
|
that the Partnership Audit Committee consists of independent
directors who are not affiliated with Holdings or Holdings GP;
|
|
|
|
that the terms and conditions of the merger were determined
through arms-length negotiations between the Partnership
Audit Committee and Holdings Board and their respective
representatives and advisors;
|
|
|
|
that the Partnership Audit Committee was given authority to
select and compensate its legal, financial and other advisors in
the discretion of the Partnership Audit Committee;
|
|
|
|
that the Partnership Audit Committee retained and was advised by
independent legal counsel experienced in advising on matters of
this kind;
|
|
|
|
that the Partnership Audit Committee retained and was advised by
independent investment bankers experienced with publicly traded
limited partnerships to assist in evaluating the fairness of the
merger;
|
|
|
|
that the Partnership Audit Committee received the written
opinion of Barclays dated as of June 10, 2010, that as of
that date and based upon and subject to the factors and
assumptions set forth in the opinion, the stated consideration
to be paid pursuant to the merger agreement is fair, from a
financial point of view, to the Partnership and accordingly to
the holders of Partnership LP units (other than Holdings, the
Partnership GP, ArcLight and certain of its affiliates, and
Kelso and certain of its affiliates);
|
|
|
|
the fact that the approval of the merger requires the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of outstanding
Partnership LP units; and
|
|
|
|
the fact that the former holders of Holdings units will hold
approximately 28% of the Partnership LP units after completion
of the merger.
|
The foregoing discussion of the factors considered by the
Partnership Audit Committee is not intended to be exhaustive,
but it does set forth the principal factors considered by the
Partnership Audit Committee.
The Partnership Audit Committee reached its unanimous conclusion
to recommend the merger agreement and the Partnerships
amended and restated partnership agreement in light of various
factors described above and other factors that each member of
the Partnership Audit Committee believed were appropriate.
In view of the wide variety and complexity of factors considered
by the Partnership Audit Committee in connection with its
evaluations of these matters, the Partnership Audit Committee
did not consider it practical, and did not attempt to quantify,
rank or otherwise assign relative weights to the specific
factors it considered in reaching its decisions and did not
undertake to make any specific determination as to whether any
particular factor, or any aspect of any particular factor, was
favorable or unfavorable to the ultimate determinations. Rather,
the Partnership Audit Committee made its recommendations based
on the totality of the information presented to it and the
investigations conducted by it. In considering the factors
discussed above, individual directors may have given different
weight to different factors.
It should be noted that this explanation of the reasoning of the
Partnership Audit Committee and all other information presented
in this section is forward-looking in nature and, therefore,
should be read along with the factors discussed under the
heading Forward-Looking Statements.
For the reasons set forth above, the Partnership Audit Committee
has unanimously approved and declared the advisability of the
merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, and
the Partnerships amended and restated partnership
agreement, and unanimously recommends that Partnership
unitholders vote FOR the approval of the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including
the merger and the issuance of Partnership LP units pursuant to
the merger agreement and FOR the approval of the
Partnerships amended and restated partnership agreement.
50
Recommendation
of the Holdings Board and Its Reasons for the Merger
At a meeting of the Holdings Board held on June 10, 2010,
the Holdings Board, with the assistance of Holdings legal
and financial advisors, reviewed and discussed the terms of the
merger agreement and the other related agreements. At the
meeting, the Holdings Board considered the benefits of the
merger as well as the associated risks and unanimously
determined (with Mr. Wylie recusing himself) that the
merger, the merger agreement and the matters contemplated
thereby are fair and reasonable to, and in the best interests
of, Holdings and the Holdings unitholders. Accordingly, the
Holdings Board unanimously recommends that the Holdings
unitholders vote to approve the merger, the merger agreement and
the transactions contemplated thereby.
In reaching its decision on the merger, the Holdings Board
consulted with its legal and financial advisors and considered
the following factors that supported the approval of the merger:
|
|
|
|
|
the Holdings unitholders will hold a public equity stake
in the Partnership and participate in the expected benefits of
the operations of the Partnership, including any future unit
price appreciation
and/or
distribution increases;
|
|
|
|
after the merger, the Partnership will no longer have any
incentive distribution rights, and, as a result, the
Partnerships cost of equity capital will be reduced, which
will enhance the Partnerships ability to compete in future
acquisitions and finance organic growth projects;
|
|
|
|
the expectation that the Partnership would be able to maintain
its current distribution growth rate;
|
|
|
|
a common equity currency for the Partnership and Holdings could
facilitate future acquisitions and mergers;
|
|
|
|
the value of the consideration to be issued in the merger
represented a 32% premium to the closing price of Holdings
common units on June 10, 2010;
|
|
|
|
the merger is expected to be long-term accretive to the
distributable cash flow received by Holdings unitholders;
|
|
|
|
the merger is expected to result in a long-term increase in the
growth rate of the Partnerships distributable cash flow
per Partnership LP unit, thereby improving potential total
return due to both valuation and potential distribution growth;
|
|
|
|
the pro forma increase of approximately 42% in distributions per
unit expected to be received by Holdings unitholders in
2011;
|
|
|
|
the merger will likely result in a capital structure and
governance structure of the Partnership that is more easily
understood by the investing public;
|
|
|
|
the fact that Holdings unitholders, as Partnership unitholders
after the effective time, will be entitled to participate in the
election of 7 of the 9 directors of the Partnership Board;
|
|
|
|
the probability that the Partnership and Holdings will be able
to consummate the merger, including their ability to obtain any
necessary unitholder approvals;
|
|
|
|
the merger will eliminate potential conflicts of interest that
may arise as a result of a person being an officer of both the
Partnership GP and Holdings GP and as a result of a person being
a member of both the Partnership Board and the Holdings Board;
|
|
|
|
the merger will reduce potential conflicts of interest between
the owners of Holdings GP and the Partnership and its
unitholders;
|
|
|
|
the merger will eliminate the duplication of services required
to maintain two public limited partnerships;
|
|
|
|
as a result of the merger, Holdings will no longer be a
reporting company, which is expected to save approximately
$0.9 million annually;
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
the terms of the merger agreement permit the Holdings Board to
change its recommendation of the merger if the Holdings Board
(including, in the absence of a Holdings superior proposal, a
majority of the members of the Holdings Audit Committee) has
concluded in good faith, after consultation with its outside
legal and financial advisors, that the failure to make such a
change in recommendation would be inconsistent with its
fiduciary duties under the Holdings partnership agreement and
applicable law;
|
|
|
|
the financial analysis reviewed and discussed with the Holdings
Board by representatives of Credit Suisse as well as the oral
opinion of Credit Suisse rendered to the Holdings Board on
June 10, 2010 (which was subsequently confirmed in writing
by delivery of Credit Suisses written opinion dated the
same date) with respect to the fairness, from a financial point
of view, to the unaffiliated unitholders of Holdings of the
exchange ratio;
|
|
|
|
presentations by and discussions with representatives of
Latham & Watkins, Holdings legal counsel,
regarding the terms of the merger agreement, including the
ability of Holdings to enter into discussions with another party
in response to an unsolicited written offer, if the Holdings
Board, after consultation with its outside legal and financial
advisors, determines in good faith (a) that such
unsolicited written offer constitutes or is reasonably likely to
constitute a superior proposal and (b) that the failure to
take such action would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties
under the Holdings partnership agreement and applicable law;
|
|
|
|
Holdings ability to terminate the merger agreement under
certain conditions;
|
|
|
|
information concerning the businesses, assets, liabilities,
results of operations, financial conditions and competitive
positions and prospects of the Partnership and Holdings, in each
case, before and after the merger;
|
|
|
|
the fact that the value of the Partnership LP units to be
received by the holders of Holdings units in the merger may
increase as a result of fluctuations in the price of the
Partnership LP units and that any such increase in value will
not be limited by any collar arrangement;
|
|
|
|
the merger will mitigate the risk of underperformance associated
with the Partnerships underlying businesses to
Holdings unitholders;
|
|
|
|
the current and prospective environment in which Holdings
operates;
|
|
|
|
the holders of Holdings units, generally, should not recognize
any income or gain, for U.S. federal income tax purposes,
solely as a result of the receipt of the Partnership LP units
pursuant to the merger; and
|
|
|
|
the terms of the merger as set forth in the relevant agreements,
including without limitation, the amended and restated agreement
of limited partnership of the Partnership, the support agreement
and the merger agreement, including the conditions to closing
which include the delivery of various tax opinions.
|
The Holdings Board also considered the following factors that
weighed against the approval of the merger:
|
|
|
|
|
the possibility that the proposed carried interest legislation
could be enacted with a retroactive effective date or with an
effective date before consummation of the merger and the
potential material tax liability that could be incurred;
|
|
|
|
the potential delay in timing with respect to some anticipated
benefits of the merger;
|
|
|
|
the merger is expected to be near-term dilutive to the
Partnerships distributable cash flow per Partnership LP
unit;
|
|
|
|
there can be no assurance that the capital requirements
necessary to fund the continued growth of the Partnership can be
funded through the simplified capital structure;
|
|
|
|
the bases on which the Holdings Board made its determination are
uncertain;
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
the possibility that the Partnership LP unit price could
diminish prior to closing, reducing the premium available to
Holdings unitholders;
|
|
|
|
the risk that potential benefits sought in the merger might not
be fully realized;
|
|
|
|
the risk that the merger might not be completed in a timely
manner;
|
|
|
|
the terms under which the Partnership Audit Committee may change
its recommendation to holders of the Partnerships LP units
to approve the merger agreement and thereafter terminate the
merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
the merger might not be consummated as a result of a failure to
satisfy the conditions contained in the merger agreement,
including the failure to receive applicable unitholder approvals
or regulatory approval;
|
|
|
|
the potential adverse effects on Holdings business,
operations and financial condition if the merger is not
completed following public announcement of the execution of the
merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
the capital requirements necessary to fund the continued growth
of the combined Partnerships businesses will be
significant, and there can be no assurance that they can be
funded from operating cash flows;
|
|
|
|
the elimination of certain control rights that Holdings
possesses with respect to the Partnership;
|
|
|
|
the limitations on Holdings ability to solicit other
offers;
|
|
|
|
the fact that the merger will eliminate all benefits associated
with the incentive distribution rights in the event of increases
in distributions by the Partnership;
|
|
|
|
the fact that Holdings may be required in certain circumstances
to pay to the Partnership a termination fee upon termination of
the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
the possibility, under certain circumstances, that Holdings
could be required to reimburse the Partnership for expenses
incurred by the Partnership in connection with the
merger; and
|
|
|
|
certain members of management of Holdings may have interests
that are different from those of the holders of common units in
Holdings.
|
In the view of the Holdings Board, these factors did not
outweigh the advantages of the merger. The Holdings Board also
reviewed a number of procedural factors relating to the merger,
including, without limitation, the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
the terms and conditions of the proposed merger were determined
through arms-length negotiations between the Partnership
Audit Committee and the Holdings Board and their respective
representatives and advisors;
|
|
|
|
the Holdings Board retained legal and financial advisors with
knowledge and experience with respect to public company M&A
transactions, the energy industry generally and the Partnership
and Holdings particularly, as well as substantial experience
advising MLPs and other companies with respect to transactions
similar to the proposed transaction;
|
|
|
|
the Holdings Board reviewed and discussed financial analyses
with respect to the merger with representatives of Credit
Suisse; and
|
|
|
|
the Holdings Board received the oral opinion of Credit Suisse on
June 10, 2010 (which was subsequently confirmed in writing
by delivery of Credit Suisses written opinion dated the
same date) with respect to the fairness, from a financial point
of view, to the unaffiliated unit holders of Holdings of the
exchange ratio.
|
The foregoing discussion of the factors considered by the
Holdings Board is not intended to be exhaustive, but it does set
forth the principal factors considered by the Holdings Board.
53
The Holdings Board reached its unanimous conclusion (with
Mr. Wylie recusing himself) to recommend the approval and
adoption of the merger, the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby, in light of various factors
described above and other factors that each member of the
Holdings Board believed were appropriate.
In view of the complexity of and wide variety of factors
considered by the Holdings Board in connection with its
evaluation of these matters, the Holdings Board did not consider
it practical, and did not attempt to quantify, rank or otherwise
assign relative weights to the specific factors it considered in
reaching its decisions and did not undertake to make any
specific determination as to whether any particular factor, or
any aspect of any particular factor, was favorable or
unfavorable to the ultimate determinations. Rather, the Holdings
Board made its recommendations based on the totality of the
information presented to it and the investigations conducted by
it. In considering the factors discussed above, individual
directors may have given different weight to different factors.
Additionally, Messrs. Sowinski, White and LaSala, who are
directors unaffiliated with ArcLight and Kelso, received a fee
of $20,000 in respect of such directors service in
reviewing and analyzing the merger, and Mr. Sowinski
received an additional fee of $5,000 in respect of his service
as chairman of the Transaction Committee.
It should be noted that portions of this explanation of the
reasoning of the Holdings Board and certain information
presented in this section is forward-looking in nature and,
therefore, should be read along with the factors discussed under
the heading Forward-Looking Statements.
For the reasons set forth above, the Holdings Board (other than
Mr. Wylie, who recused himself) has unanimously
(1) determined that the merger, the merger agreement and
the transactions contemplated thereby are advisable, fair and
reasonable to and in the best interests of Holdings and its
partners, (2) approved the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby (including the merger) and
(3) recommended that the Holdings unitholders vote
FOR the approval and adoption of the merger, the
merger agreement and the matters contemplated thereby.
Financial
Projections
In connection with the proposed merger, management of the
Partnership GP and Holdings GP prepared projections that
included expected future financial and operating performance.
The projections were prepared for the Partnership on a
stand-alone basis. In addition, a projection of distributable
cash flow and distributable cash flow per unit was prepared on a
pro forma basis, giving effect to the proposed merger, in order
to illustrate the impact of the merger on the distributable cash
flow per Partnership LP unit, based on an assumed exchange
ratio. The projections were reviewed by the Partnership Audit
Committee and the Partnership stand-alone projection of
distributable cash flow was corrected to eliminate certain
redundancies in the underlying assumptions. The Partnership
stand-alone projections, including the correction, were provided
to Barclays and Credit Suisse for use in connection with the
preparation of their opinions to the Partnership Audit Committee
and the Holdings Board, respectively, and related financial
advisory services. The Partnership stand-alone projections were
also presented to the Partnership Audit Committee and the
Holdings Board. Barclays and Credit Suisse used the Partnership
stand-alone projections, as corrected, for their financial
analysis in connection with the preparation of their opinions to
the Partnership Audit Committee and the Holdings Board,
respectively, and related financial advisory services. There
have been no material changes in the Partnerships
operations or performance or in any of the projections or
assumptions upon which they are based since the delivery of the
opinions of Barclays and Credit Suisse on June 10, 2010 and
no such material changes are currently anticipated to occur
before the special meetings of Holdings or the Partnership. The
following Partnership stand-alone projected information is
included in this joint proxy statement/prospectus only because
this information was provided to the financial advisors, the
Partnership Audit Committee and the Holdings Board in connection
with the merger.
The following Partnership projections are a summary of the
corrected, stand-alone projections provided to the financial
advisors, the Partnership Audit Committee and the Holdings
Board, and include only summary projections through 2014.
Information from the projection prepared on a pro forma basis is
not presented because the pro forma calculation to give effect
to the proposed merger on distributable cash flow was not
revised when the stand-alone projections were corrected and
because the assumed exchange ratio used to calculate
distributable cash flow per unit in the projections before they
were corrected is different than the
54
stated consideration of .705 Partnership LP units per Holdings
unit subsequently agreed to. The summary projections set forth
below summarize the most recent projections provided to the
financial advisors, the Partnership Audit Committee and the
Holdings Board prior to execution of the merger agreement. The
inclusion of the following summary Partnership projections in
this joint proxy statement/prospectus should not be regarded as
an indication that either the Partnership or Holdings or their
respective representatives considered or consider the
Partnership projections to be a reliable or accurate prediction
of future performance or events, and the summary Partnership
projections set forth below should not be relied upon as such.
The summary Partnership projections set forth below were not
prepared with a view to compliance with the published guidelines
of the SEC or the guidelines established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants regarding projections
or forecasts. In addition, the summary Partnership projections
are not presented in accordance with GAAP. The projections,
including the summary projections in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, have been prepared by, and are the
responsibility of, management of Holdings and the Partnership.
Neither Deloitte & Touche LLP, nor any other
independent registered public accounting firm, have compiled,
examined or performed any procedures with respect to the
prospective financial information contained in the Partnership
projections and, accordingly, Deloitte & Touche LLP
does not express an opinion or any other form of assurance with
respect thereto. The Deloitte & Touche LLP reports
incorporated by reference in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus relate to historical financial information
of the Partnership and Holdings. Such reports do not extend to
the Partnership projections and should not be read to do so.
The internal financial forecasts (upon which the projected
information is based) of the Partnership are, in general,
prepared solely for internal use to assist in various management
decisions, including with respect to capital budgeting. Such
internal financial forecasts are inherently subjective in
nature, susceptible to interpretation and accordingly such
forecasts may not be achieved. The internal financial forecasts
also reflect numerous assumptions made by management, including
material assumptions that may not be realized and are subject to
significant uncertainties and contingencies, all of which are
difficult to predict and many of which are beyond the control of
the preparing party. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that
the assumptions made in preparing the internal financial
forecasts upon which the foregoing projected financial
information was based will prove accurate. There will be
differences between actual and forecasted results, and the
differences may be material. The risk that these uncertainties
and contingencies could cause the assumptions to fail to be
reflective of actual results is further increased due to the
length of time in the future over which these assumptions apply.
The assumptions in early periods have a compounding effect on
the projections shown for the later periods. Thus, any failure
of an assumption to be reflective of actual results in an early
period would have a greater effect on the projected results
failing to be reflective of actual events in later periods. You
should consider the risks identified in the Partnerships
and Holdings most recent Annual Reports on
Form 10-K,
which are incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, and the matters discussed elsewhere in
this joint proxy statement/prospectus under
Forward-Looking Statements.
In developing the Partnership projections, senior management of
the Partnership GP and Holdings GP made numerous material
assumptions with respect to the Partnership, including:
|
|
|
|
|
organic growth and acquisition opportunities and the amounts and
timing of related costs and potential economic returns;
|
|
|
|
the availability and cost of capital;
|
|
|
|
the cash flow from existing assets and business activities,
including assumptions related to shipments on the
Partnerships refined petroleum products pipeline systems,
annual tariff rate adjustments for these pipeline systems which
are impacted by the annual U.S. Producer Price Index
and/or
market forces, throughput volumes in the Partnerships
terminals, lease and hub services revenues related to its
natural gas storage facilities and volumes of refined products
sold and margins realized in the Partnerships energy
services segment;
|
|
|
|
the prices of crude oil, the impact it has on the broader
refined petroleum products market and prices and the impact it
has on the Partnerships commodity related activities; most
significantly its energy services segment; and
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
other general business, market and financial assumptions.
|
All of these assumptions involve variables making them difficult
to predict, and most are beyond the control of the Partnership
and Holdings. Although senior management of the Partnership GP
and Holdings GP believes that there was a reasonable basis for
the Partnership projections and underlying assumptions, any
assumptions for near-term projected cases remain uncertain, and
the risk of inaccuracy increases with the length of the
forecasted period.
Among other financial information, senior management of the
Partnership GP and Holdings GP prepared projections of
distributable cash flow. Projections for the Partnership were
prepared based on the assumption that the Partnership would
invest $75 million per year on growth capital expenditures,
assuming a 6.0x investment multiple, such investments being in
addition to projects that were already in progress at the time
the projections were prepared, and $200 million per year
for acquisitions, assuming a purchase multiple of 9.0x EBITDA.
Projections were also based on a compound annual growth rate
(CAGR) of approximately 1.5% and 2.5% for pipeline
volumes and tariffs, respectively, and for the terminalling and
storage segment, projections were based on a CAGR of
approximately 1.2% and 2.0% for volumes and rates, respectively.
Annual maintenance capital expense in the range of $30 to
$35 million (not including any capital expenses included
with additional capital investments) was assumed for the
purposes of the projections. The projections were provided to
the Partnership Audit Committee in March 2010 and Holdings Board
in April 2010 and were based on management assumptions as
of the dates of their preparation and have not been updated
since that time. Distributable cash flow as set forth in the
table below may not be indicative of distributions to be
declared or paid in the future.
The
Partnership (Stand Alone Basis)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011E
|
|
|
2012E
|
|
|
2013E
|
|
|
2014E
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Total distributable cash flow
|
|
$
|
324.5
|
|
|
$
|
360.9
|
|
|
$
|
401.3
|
|
|
$
|
447.5
|
|
The projections are forward-looking statements and are subject
to risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, the assumptions made in
preparing the projections may not prove to be reflective of
actual results, and actual results may be materially different
than those contained in the projections. Neither the Partnership
nor Holdings intends to make publicly available any update or
other revisions to the projections to reflect circumstances
existing after the date of the projections. Neither
Deloitte & Touche LLP, Barclays, Credit Suisse nor any
of their respective representatives assumes any responsibility
for the validity, reasonableness, accuracy or completeness of
the projected financial information, and neither the Partnership
nor Holdings has made any representations to Partnership
unitholders or Holdings unitholders regarding such information.
The inclusion of the projections in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus should not be regarded as an indication
that the financial advisors, the Partnership Audit Committee or
Holdings Board considered the projections predictive of
actual/future events or that the projections should be relied on
for that purpose. In light of the uncertainties inherent in any
projected data, Partnership unitholders and Holdings unitholders
are cautioned not to rely on the foregoing projections.
Opinion
of Barclays Capital Inc. Financial Advisor to the
Partnership Audit Committee
The Partnership Audit Committee selected Barclays to act as its
financial advisor with respect to the proposed merger. On
June 10, 2010, Barclays rendered its oral opinion (which
was subsequently confirmed in writing) to the Partnership Audit
Committee that, as of such date and based upon and subject to
the qualifications, limitations and assumptions stated in its
opinion, from a financial point of view, the stated
consideration to be paid by the Partnership in the proposed
merger is fair to the Partnership and accordingly, the holders
of Partnership LP units (other than Holdings, the Partnership
GP, ArcLight and certain of its affiliates and Kelso and certain
of its affiliates (the Affiliated Unitholders)).
The full text of Barclays written opinion, dated as of
June 10, 2010, is attached as Annex E to this joint
proxy statement/prospectus. Barclays written opinion sets
forth, among other things, the assumptions made, procedures
followed, factors considered and limitations upon the review
undertaken, by Barclays in rendering its opinion. You are
encouraged to read the opinion carefully in its entirety. The
following is a summary of
56
Barclays opinion and the methodology that Barclays used to
render its opinion. This summary is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the full text of the opinion.
Barclays opinion, the issuance of which was approved by
Barclays Fairness Opinion Committee, is addressed to the
Partnership Audit Committee, addresses only the fairness, from a
financial point of view, of the stated consideration to be paid
in connection with the proposed merger, and does not constitute
a recommendation to any unitholder of the Partnership or
Holdings as to how such unitholder should vote with respect to
the proposed merger or any other matter. The terms of the
proposed merger were determined through arms-length
negotiations between the Partnership Audit Committee and
Holdings and were unanimously approved by the Partnership Audit
Committee. Barclays was not requested to opine as to, and
Barclays opinion does not in any manner address,
(i) the underlying business decision to proceed with or
effect the proposed merger, (ii) any of the tax or other
consequences of the proposed merger to the holders of the
Partnership LP units, (iii) the prices at which the
Partnership LP units and the Holdings common units will trade at
any time following the announcement of the proposed merger or
the prices at which the Partnership LP units will trade at any
time following the consummation of the proposed merger or
(iv) the likelihood of the consummation of the proposed
merger. In addition, Barclays expresses no opinion on, and
Barclays opinion does not in any manner address, the
fairness of the amount or the nature of any compensation to any
officers, directors or employees of any parties to the proposed
merger, or any class of such persons, relative to the stated
consideration paid in the proposed merger or otherwise.
In arriving at its opinion, Barclays reviewed and analyzed,
among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
the merger agreement and the specific terms of the proposed
merger;
|
|
|
|
the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the
Partnership dated as of April 14, 2008 (the LP
Agreement) and the Fifth Amended and Restated Incentive
Compensation Agreement dated as of August 9, 2006 (together
with the merger agreement and the LP Agreement, the
Agreements);
|
|
|
|
publicly available information concerning the Partnership and
Holdings that Barclays believed to be relevant to its analysis,
including the Partnerships and Holdings Annual
Reports on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 and Quarterly
Reports on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010;
|
|
|
|
|
|
financial and operating information with respect to the
business, operations and prospects of the Partnership and
Holdings, furnished by the management of the Partnership,
including financial projections (the Financial
Projections) of the Partnership prepared by the management
of the Partnership;
|
|
|
|
|
|
a trading history of the Partnership LP units and the Holdings
common units from August 4, 2006 to June 9, 2010;
|
|
|
|
a comparison of the historical financial results and present
financial condition of the Partnership and Holdings with each
other and with those of other companies that Barclays deemed
relevant;
|
|
|
|
a comparison of the financial terms of the proposed merger with
the financial terms of certain other transactions that Barclays
deemed relevant;
|
|
|
|
the potential pro forma impact of the proposed merger on the
future financial performance of the combined company;
|
|
|
|
published estimates of independent research analysts with
respect to the future financial performance and trading price
targets of the Partnership and Holdings; and
|
|
|
|
the relative trading liquidity of the Partnership LP units and
the Holdings common units.
|
In addition, Barclays had discussions with the management of the
Partnership and Holdings concerning their respective businesses,
operations, assets, liabilities, financial condition and
prospects and undertook such other studies, analyses and
investigations as it deemed appropriate.
57
In arriving at its opinion, Barclays assumed and relied upon:
|
|
|
|
|
the accuracy and completeness of the financial and other
information used by Barclays without any independent
verification of such information;
|
|
|
|
the assurances of management of the Partnership that they were
not aware of any facts or circumstances that would make such
information inaccurate or misleading;
|
|
|
|
with respect to the Financial Projections, the advice of the
Partnership that such Financial Projections were reasonably
prepared on a basis reflecting the best currently available
estimates and judgments of the management of the Partnership as
to the future financial performance of the Partnership and
Holdings on a standalone basis;
|
|
|
|
the Financial Projections;
|
|
|
|
other assumptions and estimates resulting in certain adjustments
to the Financial Projections (the Adjusted
Projections) and the Partnership Audit Committees
agreement with the appropriateness of the use of such Adjusted
Projections; and
|
|
|
|
the Adjusted Projections.
|
In arriving at its opinion, Barclays did not conduct a physical
inspection of the properties and facilities of the Partnership
or Holdings and did not make or obtain any evaluations or
appraisals of the assets or liabilities of the Partnership or
Holdings. Barclays opinion was necessarily based upon
market, economic and other conditions as they existed on, and
could be evaluated as of, June 10, 2010. Barclays assumed
no responsibility for updating or revising its opinion based on
events or circumstances that may have occurred after
June 10, 2010.
In connection with rendering its opinion, Barclays performed
certain financial, comparative and other analyses as summarized
below. In arriving at its opinion, Barclays did not ascribe a
specific range of values to the Partnership LP units or the
Holdings common units but rather made its determination as to
fairness, from a financial point of view, of the stated
consideration to be paid in the proposed merger on the basis of
the various financial, comparative and other analyses described
below. The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex
process and involves various determinations as to the most
appropriate and relevant methods of financial and comparative
analyses and the application of those methods to the particular
circumstances. Therefore, a fairness opinion is not readily
susceptible to summary description.
In arriving at its opinion, Barclays did not attribute any
particular weight to any single analysis or factor considered by
it, but rather made qualitative judgments as to the significance
and relevance of each analysis and factor relative to all other
analyses and factors performed and considered by it and in the
context of the circumstances of the proposed merger.
Accordingly, Barclays believes that its analyses must be
considered as a whole, as considering any portion of such
analyses and factors, without considering all analyses and
factors as a whole, could create a misleading or incomplete view
of the process underlying its opinion.
The following is a summary of the material financial analyses
used by Barclays in preparing its opinion to the Partnership
Audit Committee. Certain financial analyses summarized below
include information presented in tabular format. In order to
fully understand the financial analyses used by Barclays, the
tables must be read together with the text of each summary, as
the tables alone do not constitute a complete description of the
financial analyses. In performing its analyses, Barclays made
numerous assumptions with respect to industry performance,
general business and economic conditions and other matters, many
of which are beyond the control of the Partnership, Holdings or
any other parties to the proposed merger.
None of the Partnership, Holdings, Barclays or any other person
assumes responsibility if future results are materially
different from those discussed. Any estimates contained in these
analyses are not necessarily indicative of actual values or
predictive of future results or values, which may be
significantly more or less favorable than as set forth below. In
addition, analyses relating to the value of the businesses do
not purport to be appraisals or reflect the prices at which the
businesses may actually be sold.
58
Summary
of Valuation Methodologies
Barclays evaluated the fairness of the stated consideration by
analyzing the value of each of Holdings and the Partnership
using the following valuation methodologies:
|
|
|
|
|
discounted cash flow analysis,
|
|
|
|
comparable company analysis,
|
|
|
|
comparable transaction analysis, and
|
|
|
|
analysis of research analyst price targets.
|
The implied equity value ranges per Holdings common unit derived
from each of these methodologies were compared to the stated
consideration. Based on the closing price of the Partnership LP
units on the New York Stock Exchange on June 9, 2010 of
$57.90 per unit, the stated consideration of 0.7050x implies a
merger consideration value of $40.82 per Holdings common unit.
The implied equity value ranges derived using the various
valuation methodologies listed above supported Barclays
conclusion that, as of the date of its opinion, from a financial
point of view, the stated consideration to be paid by the
Partnership in the proposed merger is fair to the Partnership
and accordingly, the holders of the Partnership LP units (other
than Holdings, the Partnership GP and the Affiliated
Unitholders).
In addition to analyzing the value of the Partnership and
Holdings under the above valuation methodologies, Barclays also
analyzed and reviewed (i) the pro forma impact of the
proposed merger on, among other things, projected 2010 and 2011
distributable cash flow, sometimes referred to as
DCF, and (ii) the stated consideration based on
a comparison of the historical trading prices of the Partnership
LP units and (iii) the Holdings common units to calculate
the amount of the premium paid to holders of the Partnership LP
units.
Barclays made qualitative judgments as to the significance and
relevance of each analysis. In addition, Barclays made numerous
assumptions with respect to industry performance, general
business and economic conditions and other matters, many of
which are beyond the control of the Partnership or Holdings.
Accordingly, the methodologies and the implied common equity
value range derived must be considered as a whole and in the
context of the narrative description of the financial analyses,
including the assumptions underlying these analyses. Considering
the implied common equity value ranges without considering the
full narrative description of the financial analyses, including
the assumptions underlying these analyses, could create a
misleading or incomplete view of the process underlying, and
conclusions represented by, Barclays opinion.
In performing its evaluation analysis, Barclays has analyzed
data under four different Partnership operating and financial
scenarios (the Financial Cases), as generally
described below:
|
|
|
|
|
Case I (Base Case): Operating assumptions
consistent with the Partnerships long-term plan (the
Long-Term Plan), assuming $50 million in
acquisitions capital in 2010 and $200 million annually
thereafter and $70 million in growth capital expenditures
in 2010 and $75 million annually thereafter;
|
|
|
|
Case II (No Acquisitions): Operating
assumptions consistent with the Long-Term Plan, assuming
$50 million in acquisitions capital in 2010 and none
thereafter and $70 million in growth capital expenditures
in 2010 and $75 million thereafter;
|
|
|
|
Case III (Downside): Pipeline volumes and
tariffs grow at 50% of assumed growth rate under the Long-Term
Plan, assuming $50 million in acquisitions capital in 2010
and $100 million thereafter and $70 million in growth
capital expenditures in 2010 and $50 million
thereafter; and
|
|
|
|
Case IV (Upside): Pipeline volumes and
tariffs grow at 150% of assumed growth rate under the Long Term
Plan, assuming $50 million in acquisitions capital in 2010
and $300 million thereafter, $70 million in growth
capital expenditures in 2010 and $100 million thereafter
and a large cap organic growth project operational in 2013.
|
59
Adjusted Projections. Barclays prepared
Adjusted Projections through 2014 of net income from continuing
operations before interest expense, income taxes and
depreciation and amortization (EBITDA),
distributable cash flow, distributable cash flow per Partnership
LP unit, distributable cash flow allocable to the
Partnerships general partner interest and distributions
and cash coverage per Partnership LP unit for each of the
Financial Scenarios. These projections have been provided to and
reviewed with the Partnership Audit Committee. Distributable
cash flow and distributable cash flow per unit may not be
indicative of distributions to be declared or paid in the
future. The table below sets forth this information with respect
to distributable cash flow, distributable cash flow per
Partnership LP unit and distributions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010E
|
|
2011E
|
|
2012E
|
|
2013E
|
|
2014E
|
|
|
(In millions except per unit amounts)
|
|
DCF
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case I Base Case
|
|
$
|
274
|
|
|
$
|
313
|
|
|
$
|
347
|
|
|
$
|
385
|
|
|
$
|
429
|
|
Case II No Acquisitions
|
|
$
|
274
|
|
|
$
|
306
|
|
|
$
|
325
|
|
|
$
|
346
|
|
|
$
|
372
|
|
Case III Downside
|
|
$
|
274
|
|
|
$
|
301
|
|
|
$
|
317
|
|
|
$
|
335
|
|
|
$
|
357
|
|
Case IV Upside
|
|
$
|
274
|
|
|
$
|
325
|
|
|
$
|
375
|
|
|
$
|
456
|
|
|
$
|
575
|
|
DCF/Unit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case I Base Case
|
|
$
|
4.13
|
|
|
$
|
4.53
|
|
|
$
|
4.77
|
|
|
$
|
5.05
|
|
|
$
|
5.38
|
|
Case II No Acquisitions
|
|
$
|
4.13
|
|
|
$
|
4.50
|
|
|
$
|
4.69
|
|
|
$
|
4.90
|
|
|
$
|
5.15
|
|
Case III Downside
|
|
$
|
4.13
|
|
|
$
|
4.41
|
|
|
$
|
4.51
|
|
|
$
|
4.62
|
|
|
$
|
4.79
|
|
Case IV Upside
|
|
$
|
4.13
|
|
|
$
|
4.64
|
|
|
$
|
4.94
|
|
|
$
|
5.46
|
|
|
$
|
6.33
|
|
DCF Allocable to Holdings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case I Base Case
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
Case II No Acquisitions
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
76
|
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
|
$
|
89
|
|
Case III Downside
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
|
$
|
73
|
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
$
|
84
|
|
Case IV Upside
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
89
|
|
|
$
|
112
|
|
|
$
|
147
|
|
Holdings only assets are its indirect interests, including
incentive distribution rights, its 0.5% general partner interest
in the Partnership and 80,000 Partnership LP units and an
approximate 1% interest in certain of the Partnerships
operating subsidiaries. Accordingly, Barclays valuation of
Holdings is highly dependent on the underlying prospects and
performance of the Partnership. Given the organizational and
ownership structure of Holdings and the Partnership, any
valuation of Holdings is highly dependent on the cash
distributions received by Holdings from the Partnership. In any
scenario where the Partnership reduces or suspends cash
distributions, Holdings would receive reduced or no cash
distributions. Further affecting the valuation of Holdings is
Holdings ownership (through its ownership of the
Partnership GP) of the incentive distribution rights, which do
not receive cash distributions unless the Partnership
unitholders are paid the minimum quarterly distribution and all
arrearages and certain target distribution levels above the
minimum quarterly distribution are met. When Partnership
distributions are lowered below the minimum quarterly
distribution level, the Partnership GP receives reduced cash
distributions on the Partnership LP units and its general
partner interest in the Partnership, and no cash distributions
on the incentive distribution rights. The 80,000 Partnership LP
units owned by Holdings were valued at $57.90, which was the
closing price of the Partnership LP units on the New York Stock
Exchange on June 9, 2010.
Discounted
Cash Flow Analysis
In order to estimate the present value of the Partnership LP
units and Holdings common units, Barclays performed a discounted
cash flow analysis of the Partnership and of Holdings under each
of the Financial Cases described above. A discounted cash flow
analysis is a traditional valuation methodology used to derive a
valuation of an asset by calculating the present
value of estimated future cash flows of the asset.
Present value refers to the current value of future
cash flows or amounts and is obtained by discounting those
future cash flows or amounts by a discount rate that takes into
account macroeconomic assumptions and estimates of risk, the
opportunity cost of capital, expected returns and other
appropriate factors.
60
Barclays performed a discounted cash flow analysis of projected
free cash flows to each of the Partnership and Holdings for the
fiscal year beginning April 1, 2010 and ending
December 31, 2014. For Cases I, II and III,
Barclays assumed discount rates ranging from 10% to 12%. For
Case IV, Barclays assumed discount rates ranging from 11% to
13%. In each case, Barclays calculated terminal values using a
terminal multiple on 2014 estimated distributions. The assumed
terminal value multiples were based on comparable publicly
traded general partner multiples. The range of terminal
multiples used for Holdings was 16.0x to 18.0x for Case I,
15.0x to 17.0x for Cases II and III, and 18.0x
20.0x for Case IV. For the Partnership, the range of terminal
value multiples used was 12.0x to 15.0x for Case I, 11.0x
to 14.0x for Cases II and III, and 13.0x to 16.0x for Case
IV.
Barclays then added to the resulting Holdings equity value
ranges $4.6 million in value from the 80,000 Partnership LP
units owned by Holdings (which were excluded from the DCF
analysis), and $3.6 million in cash on hand at Holdings,
and divided the resulting equity value ranges by the number of
Holdings units outstanding, to calculate the implied equity
value range per Holdings common unit. For each Partnership LP
unit Barclays divided the resulting equity value ranges by the
number of Partnership LP units outstanding, to calculate the
implied equity value range per Partnership LP unit.
The following table summarizes the results of this analysis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied Equity Value per Holdings Common Unit
|
|
Low
|
|
High
|
|
Case I Base
|
|
$
|
37.40
|
|
|
$
|
44.46
|
|
Case II No Acquisitions
|
|
$
|
30.33
|
|
|
$
|
36.51
|
|
Case III Downside
|
|
$
|
28.56
|
|
|
$
|
33.86
|
|
Case IV Upside
|
|
$
|
48.88
|
|
|
$
|
57.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied Equity Value per Partnership LP Unit:
|
|
Low
|
|
High
|
|
Case I Base
|
|
$
|
57.77
|
|
|
$
|
72.81
|
|
Case II No Acquisitions
|
|
$
|
48.54
|
|
|
$
|
61.65
|
|
Case III Downside
|
|
$
|
47.09
|
|
|
$
|
59.71
|
|
Case IV Upside
|
|
$
|
68.93
|
|
|
$
|
86.89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied Stated Consideration
|
|
Low
|
|
High
|
|
Case I Base
|
|
|
0.5136
|
x
|
|
|
0.7697
|
x
|
Case II No Acquisitions
|
|
|
0.4919
|
x
|
|
|
0.7522
|
x
|
Case III Downside
|
|
|
0.4784
|
x
|
|
|
0.7191
|
x
|
Case IV Upside
|
|
|
0.5625
|
x
|
|
|
0.8373
|
x
|
These implied exchange ratios were compared to the stated
consideration of 0.7050x in the merger.
Comparable
Company Analysis
Holdings. In order to assess how the public
market values units of similar publicly traded general partner
holding companies, Barclays reviewed and compared specific
financial data relating to Holdings with selected publicly
traded general partner holding companies (Selected GP
Holdcos) that Barclays deemed comparable to Holdings. The
Selected GP Holdcos are as follows:
Selected
GP Holdcos
|
|
|
|
|
Energy Transfer Equity, L.P.
|
|
|
|
Enterprise GP Holdings L.P.
|
|
|
|
Inergy Holdings, L.P.
|
|
|
|
NuStar GP Holdings, LLC
|
61
Barclays calculated and compared various financial multiples and
ratios of Holdings and the Selected GP Holdcos. As part of its
selected comparable company analysis, Barclays calculated and
analyzed each companys ratio of its general partner value
to estimated 2010 and 2011 distributable cash flow and
distributions and to current yields. All of these calculations
were performed, and based on publicly available financial data
and closing prices, as of June 9, 2010, the last trading
date prior to the delivery of Barclays opinion. The
results of this selected comparable company analysis are
summarized below:
Selected
Holdco Statistics and Multiples
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiple Range of Comparable
|
|
|
Companies of Holdings
|
|
|
Low
|
|
Median
|
|
High
|
|
General Partner as a Multiple of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributable Cash Flow
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010E
|
|
|
11.8
|
x
|
|
|
13.8
|
x
|
|
|
19.6
|
x
|
2011E
|
|
|
10.3
|
x
|
|
|
11.7
|
x
|
|
|
13.8
|
x
|
Distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010E
|
|
|
15.5
|
x
|
|
|
16.9
|
x
|
|
|
20.5
|
x
|
2011E
|
|
|
13.5
|
x
|
|
|
14.5
|
x
|
|
|
17.6
|
x
|
Holdco Value as a Multiple of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Yield
|
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
The Selected GP Holdcos were selected by Barclays because they
are general partners or own interests in general partners, which
for the purposes of analysis may be considered similar to
Holdings due to organizational structure and broadly, due to the
nature of the business of the underlying MLP. However, because
of the inherent differences between the business, operations and
prospects of Holdings and those of the Selected GP Holdcos,
Barclays believed that it was inappropriate to, and therefore
did not, rely solely on the quantitative results of the selected
comparable company analysis. Accordingly, Barclays also made
qualitative judgments concerning differences between the
business, financial and operating characteristics and prospects
of Holdings and the Selected GP Holdcos that could affect the
public trading values of each in order to provide a context in
which to consider the results of the quantitative analysis.
These qualitative judgments related primarily to the differing
sizes, growth prospects, profitability levels and degree of
operational risk between Holdings and the Selected GP Holdcos.
Based on these judgments, Barclays selected enterprise value
multiples of distributable cash flow of 13.0x to 19.0x for 2010
and 11.0x to 14.0x for 2011. Barclays selected enterprise value
multiples of distributions of 15.5x to 20.0x for 2010 and 14.0x
to 17.0x for 2011. Barclays selected current yields of 7.0% to
5.0% to be applied to Holdings latest annualized quarterly
distributions. Barclays then applied the reference ranges of
these multiples to the corresponding financial data for
Holdings, using estimates provided by the Partnership
management, then added the value of the 80,000 Partnership LP
units to the general partner multiples. The resulting equity
value ranges after adding Holdings cash on hand of
$3.6 million was then divided by the number of Holdings
common units outstanding as of June 9, 2010 to arrive at an
implied indicative equity valuation range per Holdings Common
Unit of $25.75 to $34.58.
The Partnership. In order to assess how the
public market values units of similar publicly traded limited
partnerships, Barclays reviewed and compared specific financial
and operating data relating to the Partnership with selected
publicly traded limited partnerships that Barclays deemed
comparable to the Partnership. The selected comparable companies
(Selected MLPs) are as follows:
Selected
MLPs
|
|
|
|
|
Holly Energy Partners L.P.
|
|
|
|
Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P.
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
NuStar Energy L.P.
|
|
|
|
Sunoco Logistics Partners L.P.
|
Barclays calculated and compared various financial multiples and
ratios of the Partnership and the Selected MLPs. As part of its
selected comparable company analysis, Barclays calculated and
analyzed each Selected MLPs ratio of its enterprise value
to EBITDA, its last quarter annualized cash distribution yield,
and its distributable cash flow yield. All of these calculations
were performed, and based on publicly available financial data
and closing prices, as of June 9, 2010, the last trading
date prior to the delivery of Barclays opinion. The
results of this analysis are summarized below:
Selected
MLP Statistics and Multiples
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiple Range of Comparable
|
|
|
Companies of the Partnership:
|
|
|
Low
|
|
Median
|
|
High
|
|
Enterprise Value as a Multiple of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010E EBITDA
|
|
|
10.9
|
x
|
|
|
12.5
|
x
|
|
|
13.3
|
x
|
2011E EBITDA
|
|
|
9.6
|
x
|
|
|
10.8
|
x
|
|
|
11.8
|
x
|
Last Quarter Annualized Cash Distribution Yield
|
|
|
8.25
|
%
|
|
|
7.13
|
%
|
|
|
6.64
|
%
|
DCF Yield
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010E
|
|
|
9.14
|
%
|
|
|
8.74
|
%
|
|
|
7.39
|
%
|
2011E
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
|
|
9.15
|
%
|
|
|
8.21
|
%
|
Barclays reviewed and compared specific financial and operating
data relating to the Partnership with selected companies that
Barclays, based on its experience in the refined petroleum
product industry and with MLPs, deemed comparable to the
Partnership. Because of the inherent differences between the
business, operations and prospects of the Partnership and those
of the Selected MLPs, Barclays believed that it was
inappropriate to, and therefore did not, rely solely on the
quantitative results of the selected comparable company
analysis. Accordingly, Barclays also made qualitative judgments
concerning differences between the business, financial and
operating characteristics and prospects of the Partnership and
the Selected MLPs that could affect the public trading values of
each in order to provide a context in which to consider the
results of the quantitative analysis. These qualitative
judgments related primarily to the differing sizes, growth
prospects, profitability levels and degree of operational risk
between the Partnership and the companies included in the
selected company analysis. Based on these judgments, Barclays
selected enterprise value multiples of 11.0x to 13.5x 2010
EBITDA and 9.5x to 12.0x for 2011 EBITDA. Barclays selected a
distributed cash flow yield range of 8.25% to 6.75% for last
quarter annualized limited partner distributions, 9.25% to 7.50%
for 2010 limited partner distributable cash flow, and 10.00% to
8.25% for 2011 limited partner distributable cash flow. Barclays
then applied the reference ranges of these multiples to the
corresponding financial data for the Partnership, using
estimates provided by management. The resulting number, after
adjusting the enterprise value for net debt and the value of
Holdings equity value, was then divided by the number of
Partnership common units outstanding to arrive at an implied
indicative equity valuation range per Partnership LP Unit of
$38.83 to $54.37.
The comparable companies analysis of Holdings and the
Partnership implied an exchange ratio range of
0.4736x 0.8905x.
These implied exchange ratios were compared to the stated
consideration of 0.7050x in the merger.
63
Comparable
Transaction Analysis
Holdings. Barclays reviewed and compared the
purchase prices and financial multiples paid in selected other
transactions involving general partners (or interests in such
general partner) of MLPs. These transactions principally
involved publicly traded MLPs and their general partners (or the
parents of their general partners). Barclays chose such
transactions based on, among other things, the similarity of the
applicable target companies in the transactions to Holdings and
the Partnership, primarily with respect to size, structure and
other characteristics of their businesses.
Specifically, Barclays examined the following transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
Acquiror
|
|
Target
|
|
Announcement Date
|
|
Energy Transfer Equity, L.P.
|
|
Regency Energy Partners GP
|
|
May 11, 2010
|
Affiliates of Harold Hamm
|
|
Hiland Holdings GP, LP/Hiland Partners, LP
|
|
December 4, 2009
|
Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P.
|
|
Magellan Midstream Holdings, L.P.
|
|
March 3, 2009
|
Occidental Petroleum Corp.
|
|
Plains All American GP LLC
|
|
July 2, 2008
|
MarkWest Energy Partners, L.P.
|
|
MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc./10.3% interest in MarkWest Energy GP,
L.L.C.
|
|
September 5, 2007
|
GE Energy Financial Services
|
|
Regency GP LP
|
|
June 19, 2007
|
Enterprise GP Holdings L.P.
|
|
Texas Eastern Products Pipeline Company, LLC
|
|
May 7, 2007
|
ArcLight Capital Partners, LLC Kelso & Company and
Lehman Brothers holdings Inc.
|
|
Buckeye GP Holdings L.P.
|
|
April 4, 2007
|
Suburban Propane Partners, L.P.
|
|
Suburban Energy Services Group LLC
|
|
October 19, 2006
|
Plains All American Pipeline, L.P.
|
|
Pacific Energy Partners, L.P.
|
|
June 12, 2006
|
ONEOK, Inc.
|
|
General Partnership Interest in Northern Border Partners, L.P.
|
|
February 15. 2006
|
EPCO, Inc.
|
|
Texas Eastern Products Pipeline Company, LLC
|
|
February 24, 2005
|
EPCO, Inc.
|
|
Enterprise Products GP LLC
|
|
January 14, 2005
|
Valero L.P.
|
|
Kaneb Pipe Line Partners, L.P.
|
|
November 1, 2004
|
LB Pacific, L.P.
|
|
Pacific Energy GP
|
|
October 29, 2004
|
ONEOK, Inc.
|
|
Northern Plains Natural Gas Company
|
|
September 16, 2004
|
Carlyle/Riverstone Global Energy and Power Fund II,
L.P.
|
|
Glenmoor, Ltd.
|
|
March 5, 2004
|
First Reserve
|
|
Arch Coal Incs G.P. Interest in Natural Resources Partners
|
|
December 22, 2003
|
Enterprise Products Partners L.P.
|
|
GulfTerra Energy Partners, L.P.
|
|
December 15, 2003
|
Vulcan Capital
|
|
Plains Resources Inc.
|
|
November 20, 2003
|
Energy Transfer Company
|
|
U.S. Propane L.P.
|
|
November 6, 2003
|
Goldman Sachs
|
|
GulfTerra Energy Partners, L.P.
|
|
October 3, 2003
|
Madison Dearborn/Riverstone
|
|
Williams Energy Partners L.P.
|
|
April 21, 2003
|
Specifically, Barclays calculated multiples of transaction value
to distributable cash flow and distributions for the target
companies in the comparable transactions. The projected
distributable cash flow and cash distributions for Holdings were
derived from publicly available information. The following table
contains the multiples considered by Barclays:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied GP Value as a Multiple of
|
|
Minimum
|
|
Median
|
|
Maximum
|
|
LTM Distributable Cash Flow
|
|
|
2.0
|
x
|
|
|
11.6
|
x
|
|
|
145.7
|
x
|
1-Year
Forward Distributable Cash Flow
|
|
|
3.2
|
x
|
|
|
9.7
|
x
|
|
|
16.2
|
x
|
Latest Quarter Annualized Distributions
|
|
|
9.4
|
x
|
|
|
16.8
|
x
|
|
|
117.0
|
x
|
64
The reasons for and the circumstances surrounding each of the
selected comparable transactions analyzed were diverse and there
are inherent differences between the businesses, operations,
financial conditions and prospects of Holdings and the
Partnership and the companies included in the comparable
transaction analysis. Accordingly, Barclays believed that a
purely quantitative comparable transaction analysis would not be
particularly meaningful in the context of considering the
proposed merger. Barclays therefore made qualitative judgments
concerning differences between the characteristics of the
selected comparable transactions and the proposed merger that
would affect the acquisition values of the selected target
companies and Holdings and the Partnership. Based on these
judgments, Barclays selected the enterprise value multiples
ranging from 10.0x to 18.0x for the latest twelve months
distributable cash flow, 11.0x to 20.0x for the projected 2010
distributable cash flow and 12.0x to 25.0x for the latest
quarterly annualized distributions, of Holdings
(LQA) to determine the implied ranges for Holdings.
Barclays then added $4.6 million to the implied ranges to
account for the 80,000 Partnership LP units owned by Holdings
(which were excluded from the analysis) to arrive at the
preliminary implied equity value range of approximately $21.33
to $40.76 per Holdings common unit based on the benchmark
multiple ranges used in this analysis, after adjusting for
Holdings cash on hand and dividing by the number of
outstanding Holdings units.
The Partnership. Barclays reviewed the
purchase prices and financial multiples used in selected other
transactions involving MLPs. Specifically, Barclays examined the
following transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
Acquiror
|
|
Target
|
|
Announcement Date
|
|
Enterprise Products Partners L.P.
|
|
TEPPCO Partners, L.P.
|
|
June 29, 2009
|
Plains
All-American
Pipeline, L.P.
|
|
Pacific Energy Partners, L.P.
|
|
June 12, 2006
|
Valero L.P.
|
|
Kaneb Pipeline Partners, L.P.
|
|
November 1, 2004
|
Enterprise Products Partners L.P.
|
|
Gulfterra Energy Partners, L.P.
|
|
December 15, 2003
|
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P.
|
|
Santa Fe Pacific Pipeline Partners, L.P.
|
|
October 20, 1997
|
Barclays calculated multiples of transaction value to LTM EBITDA
and EBIT and equity value to distributed cash flow and net
income. The financial data regarding the comparable transactions
was derived from publicly available information. The following
table contains the mean and median multiples derived from this
analysis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Median
|
|
Mean
|
|
Enterprise Value as a Multiple of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTM EBITDA
|
|
|
13.8
|
x
|
|
|
13.9
|
x
|
LTM EBIT
|
|
|
19.5
|
x
|
|
|
18.9
|
x
|
Equity Value as a Multiple of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTM DCF
|
|
|
18.5
|
x
|
|
|
16.8
|
x
|
LTM Net Income
|
|
|
21.3
|
x
|
|
|
22.0
|
x
|
The reasons for and the circumstances surrounding each of the
selected comparable transactions analyzed were diverse and there
are inherent differences between the businesses, operations,
financial conditions and prospects of the Partnership and the
companies included in the comparable transaction analysis.
Accordingly, Barclays believed that a purely quantitative
comparable transaction analysis would not be particularly
meaningful in the context of considering the proposed merger.
Barclays therefore made qualitative judgments concerning
differences between the characteristics of the selected
comparable transactions and the proposed merger that would
affect the acquisition values of the selected target companies
and the Partnership. Based on these judgments Barclays then
selected enterprise value multiples of 13.0 to 17.0x for the
Partnerships LTM EBITDA and equity value multiples of 15.0
to 19.0x for the Partnerships LTM DCF. After adjusting the
enterprise value range for net debt outstanding as of
March 31, 2010 and the equity value of Holdings (based on
market value as of June 9, 2010), Barclays calculated an
implied equity value range of approximately $54.85 to $80.10 per
Partnership LP unit based on the benchmark multiple ranges used
in this analysis, after dividing by the number of outstanding
Partnership LP units.
65
The comparable transactions analysis of Holdings and the
Partnership implied an exchange ratio range of
0.2663x 0.7432x.
These implied exchange ratios were compared to the stated
consideration of 0.7050x in the merger.
Research
Analyst Price Targets
Barclays evaluated the publicly available price targets for
Holdings and the Partnership published by independent equity
research analysts associated with various Wall Street firms in
order to calculate the implied equity value per unit range for
Holdings and the Partnership. The independent equity research
analyst target prices evaluated ranged from $28.00 to $38.00 per
Holdings common unit and from $56.50 to $65.00 per Partnership
LP unit, implying an exchange ratio of 0.4308x to 0.6726x.
These implied exchange ratios were compared to the stated
consideration of 0.7050x in the merger.
Premiums
Paid Analysis
Barclays reviewed certain publicly available information related
to selected general partner transactions to calculate the amount
of the premiums paid by the acquirers to the acquired
companies stockholders. Barclays analyzed selected general
partner transactions announced for the period from
November 20, 2003 to January 15, 2009.
The following table sets forth the transactions analyzed to
calculate premiums paid:
|
|
|
|
|
Acquirer
|
|
Target
|
|
Announcement Date
|
|
Affiliates of Harold Hamm
|
|
Hiland Holdings GP LP/Hiland Partners LP
|
|
January 15, 2009
|
Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P.
|
|
Magellan Midstream Holdings, L.P.
|
|
March 3, 2009
|
MarkWest Energy Partners, L.P.
|
|
MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc. & 10.3%
interest in MWE GP
|
|
September 5, 2007
|
Valero L.P.
|
|
Kaneb Pipe Line Partners, L.P.
|
|
November 1, 2004
|
Vulcan Capital
|
|
Plains Resources Inc.
|
|
November 20, 2003
|
For each of precedent transactions analyzed, Barclays calculated
the premiums paid by the acquirer by comparing the per unit
purchase price in each transaction to the historical unit price
of the acquired company as of one day, five days and
30 days prior to the announcement date. Barclays compared
the premiums paid in the precedent transactions to the premium
levels in the proposed merger consideration based on closing
prices as of June 9, 2010.
The table below sets forth the summary results of the analysis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
Low
|
|
Median
|
|
High
|
|
1 Day Prior
|
|
|
21.2
|
%
|
|
|
25.0
|
%
|
|
|
37.9
|
%
|
5 Days Prior
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
|
|
22.2
|
%
|
|
|
36.2
|
%
|
30 Days Prior
|
|
|
16.5
|
%
|
|
|
20.0
|
%
|
|
|
34.6
|
%
|
The implied premiums to Holdings common units on a one trading
day prior, five trading days prior, and 30 trading days prior
were 35.8%, 36.8% and 26.3%, respectively. Barclays noted that
the implied premium paid to Holdings unitholders as of
June 9, 2010 of 35.8% was within the range of premiums
implied in recent comparable general partner transactions.
Pro
Forma Analysis
Barclays analyzed the pro forma impact of the merger on the
estimated distributable cash flow to the existing holders of
Partnership LP units on a per unit basis for the years 2011
through 2014 based on the Financial Cases described above. In
each of Case I, Case II and Case III, the
proposed merger resulted in dilution in distributable cash flow
per Partnership LP unit through 2014 and in Case IV, the
proposed merger resulted in dilution in distributable cash flow
per Partnership LP unit through 2013. Barclays also analyzed
66
the estimated required annual incremental capital, using an
assumed return, that would be required, after giving effect to
the merger, for the Partnership to break-even on a distributable
cash flow per unit basis in each of 2012, 2013 and 2014 under
the Financial Cases described above. Barclays found, among other
things, that under Case I an estimated $250 million in
annual incremental capital, using an assumed return, would be
required to break-even on a distributable cash flow per unit
basis in 2012 and an estimated $120 million would be
required to break-even in 2013.
General
Barclays is an internationally recognized investment banking
firm and, as part of its investment banking activities, is
regularly engaged in the valuation of businesses and their
securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions,
investments for passive and control purposes, negotiated
underwritings, competitive bids, secondary distributions of
listed and unlisted securities, private placements and
valuations for estate, corporate and other purposes. The
Partnership Audit Committee selected Barclays because of its
qualifications, reputation and experience in the valuation of
businesses and securities in connection with mergers and
acquisitions generally, as well as substantial experience in
transactions comparable to the proposed merger.
Barclays is acting as financial advisor to the Partnership Audit
Committee in connection with the proposed merger. Pursuant to
the terms of its engagement letter with the Partnership,
Barclays received a fee of $1 million upon the delivery of
its fairness opinion, and will receive an additional fee of
$3 million upon the closing of the merger. Barclays may
also receive up to an additional $500,000 at the sole discretion
of the Partnership Audit Committee. In addition, the Partnership
has agreed to reimburse Barclays for its expenses and indemnify
Barclays for certain liabilities that may arise out of its
engagement by the Partnership Audit Committee and the rendering
of Barclays opinion. Barclays has performed various
investment banking and financial services for the Partnership
and Holdings in the past, and has received customary fees for
such services. Specifically, in the past two years, Barclays has
performed the following investment banking and financial
services for the Partnership and Holdings: (i) acted as
Joint Bookrunner on the Partnerships offering of
$275 million aggregate principal amount of its
5.500% senior notes due 2019; (ii) committed
$40 million to the $350 million revolving credit
facility of an operating subsidiary of the Partnership;
(iii) acted as Joint Bookrunner in connection with the
Partnerships follow-on equity offering of
$108 million aggregate principal amount of Partnership LP
units and (iv) engaged in hedging and risk-management
transactions with the Partnership. In connection with the
foregoing services, Barclays has received fees of approximately
$4.6 million.
Barclays is a full service securities firm engaged in a wide
range of businesses from investment and commercial banking,
lending, asset management and other financial and non-financial
services. In the ordinary course of its business, Barclays and
affiliates may actively trade and effect transactions in the
equity, debt
and/or other
securities (and any derivatives thereof) and financial
instruments (including loans and other obligations) of the
Partnership, Holdings and certain of their respective affiliates
for its own account and for the accounts of its customers and,
accordingly, may at any time hold long or short positions and
investments in such securities and financial instruments.
Opinion
of Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC Financial
Advisor to the Holdings Board
On June 10, 2010, Credit Suisse rendered its oral opinion
to the Holdings Board (which was subsequently confirmed in
writing by delivery of Credit Suisses written opinion
dated the same date) to the effect that, as of June 10,
2010, the exchange ratio was fair, from a financial point of
view, to the unaffiliated unitholders of Holdings.
Credit Suisses opinion was directed to the Holdings Board
and only addressed the fairness, from a financial point of view,
to the unaffiliated unitholders of Holdings of the exchange
ratio and did not address any other aspect or implication of the
merger. The summary of Credit Suisses opinion in this
joint proxy statement/prospectus is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the full text of its written opinion, which is
included as Annex E to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus and sets forth the procedures followed,
assumptions made, qualifications and limitations on the review
undertaken and other matters considered by Credit Suisse in
preparing its opinion. However, neither Credit Suisses
written opinion nor the summary of its
67
opinion and the related analyses set forth in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus are intended to be, and they do not
constitute, advice or a recommendation to any holder of Holdings
units as to how such holder should vote or act with respect to
any matter relating to the merger.
In arriving at its opinion, Credit Suisse:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed a draft, dated June 9, 2010, of the merger
agreement; a draft, dated June 9, 2010, of the amended and
restated partnership agreement of the Partnership; a draft,
dated June 9, 2010, of the second amended and restated
partnership agreement of Holdings; and a draft, dated
June 7, 2010, of the support agreement to be entered into
by and among the Partnership and the holders of Holdings units
named therein;
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain publicly available business and financial
information relating to Holdings and the Partnership;
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain other information relating to Holdings and the
Partnership, including financial forecasts relating to Holdings
and the Partnership, provided to or discussed with Credit Suisse
by the management of Holdings and the Partnership responsible
for the operation and management of Holdings and the
Partnership, respectively;
|
|
|
|
met with certain members of the management of Holdings and the
Partnership to discuss the business and prospects of Holdings
and the Partnership, respectively;
|
|
|
|
considered certain financial data of Holdings and the
Partnership and certain market data for their publicly traded
securities, and Credit Suisse compared that data with similar
data for other companies with publicly traded securities in
businesses Credit Suisse deemed similar to those of Holdings and
the Partnership;
|
|
|
|
considered, to the extent publicly available, the financial
terms of certain other business combinations and other
transactions which have recently been effected; and
|
|
|
|
considered such other information, financial studies, analyses
and investigations and financial, economic and market criteria
which Credit Suisse deemed relevant.
|
In connection with its review, Credit Suisse did not
independently verify any of the foregoing information, and
Credit Suisse assumed and relied upon such information being
complete and accurate in all material respects. With respect to
the financial forecasts for Holdings and the Partnership that
Credit Suisse used in its analyses, the management of Holdings
and the Partnership advised Credit Suisse, and Credit Suisse
assumed, that such forecasts had been reasonably prepared in
good faith on bases reflecting the best currently available
estimates and judgments of the management of Holdings and the
Partnership as to the future financial performance of Holdings
and the Partnership, respectively. Credit Suisse was advised
that both Holdings and the Partnership are operated and managed
(and their respective forecasts are prepared) by employees of
Buckeye Pipe Line Services Company, which we refer to as the
Services Company, a consolidated affiliate of Holdings owned by
the ESOP and that Services Company owns approximately 3.0% of
the outstanding Partnership LP units. Credit Suisse also
assumed, with the consent of the Holdings Board, that, in the
course of obtaining any regulatory or third party consents,
approvals or agreements in connection with the merger, no delay,
limitation, restriction or condition would be imposed that would
have an adverse effect on Holdings, the Partnership or the
contemplated benefits of the merger and that the merger would be
consummated in accordance with the terms of the merger agreement
without waiver, modification or amendment of any material term,
condition or agreement thereof. Furthermore, Credit Suisse
assumed that the definitive merger agreement, the amended and
restated partnership agreement of the Partnership, the second
amended and restated partnership agreement of Holdings and the
Support Agreement would conform to the drafts reviewed by it in
all respects material to Credit Suisses analyses. Credit
Suisse did not investigate or otherwise evaluate the potential
effects of the merger on the federal, state or other taxes or
tax rates payable by Holdings, the Partnership or their
respective security holders and, with the consent of the
Holdings Board, assumed, that such taxes and tax rates would not
be affected by or after giving effect to the merger. In
addition, Credit Suisse was not requested to make, and did not
make, an independent evaluation or appraisal of the assets or
68
liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of Holdings or the
Partnership, nor was Credit Suisse furnished with any such
evaluations or appraisals.
Credit Suisses opinion addresses only the fairness, from a
financial point of view, to the unaffiliated unitholders of
Holdings of the exchange ratio and does not address any other
aspect or implication of the merger or any other agreement,
arrangement or understanding entered into in connection with the
merger or otherwise, including, without limitation, the fairness
of the amount or nature of, or any other aspect relating to, any
compensation to any officers, directors or employees of any
party to the merger, or class of such persons, relative to the
exchange ratio or otherwise. Furthermore, no opinion, counsel or
interpretation was intended regarding matters that require
legal, regulatory, accounting, insurance, tax, executive
compensation or other similar professional advice. It was
assumed that such opinions, counsel, interpretations or advice
had been or would be obtained from the appropriate professional
sources. The issuance of Credit Suisses opinion was
approved by its authorized internal committee.
Credit Suisses opinion is necessarily based upon
information made available to Credit Suisse as of the date of
its opinion and financial, economic, market and other conditions
as they exist and can be evaluated on the date of its opinion
and upon certain assumptions regarding such financial, economic,
market and other conditions that are currently subject to
unusual volatility and that, if different than assumed, could
have a material impact on Credit Suisses analyses or
opinion. In addition, as the Holdings Board was aware, the
financial projections and estimates that Credit Suisse reviewed
relating to the future financial performance of Holdings and the
Partnership reflect certain assumptions regarding the oil and
gas industry that are subject to significant volatility and
that, if different than assumed, could have a material impact on
Credit Suisses analyses and opinion. Credit Suisse did not
express any opinion as to what the value of Partnership LP units
actually would be when issued to the holders of Holdings units
pursuant to the merger or the prices at which Partnership LP
units or Holdings units would trade at any time. Credit
Suisses opinion did not address the relative merits of the
merger as compared to alternative transactions or strategies
that might be available to Holdings, nor did it address the
underlying business decision of Holdings to proceed with the
merger. Credit Suisse was not requested to, and did not solicit,
third party indications of interest in acquiring all or any part
of Holdings.
It is understood that Credit Suisses opinion was for the
information of the Holdings Board, as the board of directors of
the general partner of Holdings (solely in the Boards
capacity as such), in connection with its consideration of the
merger and does not constitute advice or a recommendation to any
securityholder of Holdings as to how such securityholder should
vote or act on any matter relating to the proposed merger.
In preparing its opinion to the Holdings Board, Credit Suisse
performed a variety of analyses, including those described
below. The summary of Credit Suisses valuation analyses is
not a complete description of the analyses underlying Credit
Suisses opinion. The preparation of a fairness opinion is
a complex process involving various quantitative and qualitative
judgments and determinations with respect to the financial,
comparative and other analytic methods employed and the
adaptation and application of those methods to the unique facts
and circumstances presented. As a consequence, neither Credit
Suisses opinion nor the analyses underlying its opinion
are readily susceptible to partial analysis or summary
description. Credit Suisse arrived at its opinion based on the
results of all analyses undertaken by it and assessed as a whole
and did not draw, in isolation, conclusions from or with regard
to any individual analysis, analytic method or factor.
Accordingly, Credit Suisse believes that its analyses must be
considered as a whole and that selecting portions of its
analyses, analytic methods and factors, without considering all
analyses and factors or the narrative description of the
analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete view of the
processes underlying its analyses and opinion.
In performing its analyses, Credit Suisse considered business,
economic, industry and market conditions, financial and
otherwise, and other matters as they existed on, and could be
evaluated as of, the date of its opinion. No company or business
used in Credit Suisses analyses for comparative purposes
is identical to Holdings, the Partnership or the proposed
transaction. While the results of each analysis were taken into
account in reaching its overall conclusion with respect to
fairness, Credit Suisse did not make separate or quantifiable
judgments regarding individual analyses. The implied exchange
ratio reference ranges indicated
69
by Credit Suisses analyses are illustrative and not
necessarily indicative of actual values nor predictive of future
results or values, which may be significantly more or less
favorable than those suggested by the analyses. In addition, any
analyses relating to the value of assets, businesses or
securities do not purport to be appraisals or to reflect the
prices at which businesses or securities actually may be sold,
which may depend on a variety of factors, many of which are
beyond Holdings control, the Partnerships control
and the control of Credit Suisse. Much of the information used
in, and accordingly the results of, Credit Suisses
analyses are inherently subject to substantial uncertainty.
Credit Suisses opinion and analyses were provided to the
Holdings Board, as the board of directors of the general partner
of Holdings, in connection with its consideration of the
proposed merger and were among many factors considered by the
Holdings Board in evaluating the proposed merger. Neither Credit
Suisses opinion nor its analyses were determinative of the
exchange ratio or of the views of the Holdings Board with
respect to the proposed merger.
The following is a summary of the material valuation analyses
performed in connection with the preparation of Credit
Suisses opinion rendered to the Holdings Board on
June 10, 2010. The analyses summarized below include
information presented in tabular format. The tables alone do not
constitute a complete description of the analyses. Considering
the data in the tables below without considering the full
narrative description of the analyses, as well as the
methodologies underlying and the assumptions, qualifications and
limitations affecting each analysis, could create a misleading
or incomplete view of Credit Suisses analyses.
For purposes of its analyses, Credit Suisse reviewed a number of
financial metrics including:
|
|
|
|
|
LP Distributed/Distributable Cash Flow Per
Unit: generally the amount of the relevant
partnerships operating cash flow for a specified time
period that is distributed/available for distribution to its
limited partners.
|
|
|
|
Implied GP Only Distributed Cash Flow Per
Unit: generally the amount of the relevant
partnerships operating cash flow derived from its general
partner interests and incentive distribution rights in the
underlying master limited partnership(s) for a specified time
period that is distributed to its limited partners.
|
Unless the context indicates otherwise, unit prices for the
selected companies used in the Selected Companies Analysis
described below were as of June 9, 2010. Estimates of
financial performance for Holdings and the Partnership for the
calendar years ending December 31, 2010 to 2011 were based
on the forecasts provided by management of Holdings and the
Partnership. Estimates of financial performance for the selected
companies listed below for the calendar year ending during
calendar years 2010 and 2011 were based on publicly available
research analyst estimates for those companies. Current yields
reflect annualized yields based on latest quarterly results.
Selected
Companies Analysis
Credit Suisse considered certain financial data for Holdings and
the Partnership and selected master limited partnerships with
publicly traded equity securities. The financial data reviewed
for Holdings included:
|
|
|
|
|
Current Implied GP Only Distributed Cash Flow Yield;
|
|
|
|
Implied GP Only Distributed Cash Flow Yield for CY
2010E; and
|
|
|
|
Implied GP Only Distributed Cash Flow Yield for CY 2011E.
|
The selected companies were selected because they are MLPs with
publicly traded equity securities and were deemed to be similar
to Holdings and the Partnership in one or more respects
including the nature of their business, size, diversification,
financial performance and geographic concentration. No specific
numeric or other similar criteria were used to select the
selected companies and all criteria were evaluated in their
entirety without application of definitive qualifications or
limitations to individual criteria. As a result, a significantly
larger or smaller company with substantially similar lines of
businesses and business focus may
70
have been included while a similarly sized company with less
similar lines of business and greater diversification may have
been excluded. Credit Suisse identified a sufficient number of
companies for purposes of its analysis but may not have included
all companies that might be deemed comparable to Holdings and
the Partnership, respectively.
The selected MLPs with publicly traded equity securities for
Holdings selected companies analysis were:
|
|
|
|
|
Energy Transfer Equity, L.P.
|
|
|
|
Enterprise GP Holdings L.P.
|
|
|
|
Alliance Holdings GP, L.P.
|
|
|
|
Inergy Holdings, L.P.
|
|
|
|
NuStar GP Holdings, LLC
|
|
|
|
Penn Virginia GP Holdings, L.P.
|
The selected companies analysis for Holdings indicated the
following high, low, mean and median multiples for the selected
MLPs with publicly traded equity securities and for Holdings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied
|
|
Multiples
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiples for
|
|
for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holdings
|
|
Holdings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on
|
|
Based on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closing
|
|
Proposed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price on
|
|
Stated
|
Multiple Description
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
Mean
|
|
Median
|
|
6/9/10
|
|
Consideration
|
|
Implied GP Only Distributed Cash Flow Yield (%)(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
9.8
|
%
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
2010E
|
|
|
10.1
|
%
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
2011E
|
|
|
13.2
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
|
|
6.4
|
%
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Based on
5-day
average market price as of June 9, 2010. |
The financial data reviewed for the Partnership included:
|
|
|
|
|
Current LP Distributed Cash Flow Yield;
|
|
|
|
LP Distributable Cash Flow Yield for CY 2010E;
|
|
|
|
LP Distributed Cash Flow Yield for CY 2010E;
|
|
|
|
LP Distributable Cash Flow Yield for CY 2011E; and
|
|
|
|
LP Distributed Cash Flow Yield for CY 2011E.
|
The selected master limited partnerships with publicly traded
equity securities for the Partnership selected companies
analysis were:
|
|
|
|
|
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P.
|
|
|
|
Plains All American Pipeline, L.P.
|
|
|
|
Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P.
|
|
|
|
NuStar Energy L.P.
|
|
|
|
Sunoco Logistics Partners L.P.
|
|
|
|
Holly Energy Partners, L.P.
|
71
The selected companies analysis for the Partnership indicated
the following high, low, mean and median multiples for the
selected MLPs with publicly traded equity securities and for the
Partnership as of June 9, 2010, the most recent date for
which stock market data was available prior to the meeting of
the Holdings Board on June 10, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiples
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partnership
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price on
|
Multiple Description
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
Mean
|
|
Median
|
|
6/9/10
|
|
LP Distributed Yield (%)(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Distributed
|
|
|
8.2
|
%
|
|
|
6.4
|
%
|
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
2010E
|
|
|
8.4
|
%
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
2011E
|
|
|
8.8
|
%
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
|
|
7.6
|
%
|
|
|
7.3
|
%
|
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
LP Distributable Yield (%)(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010E
|
|
|
8.7
|
%
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
|
|
7.6
|
%
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
2011E
|
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
7.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Based on
5-day
average market price as of June 9, 2010. |
Credit Suisse applied multiple ranges based on the selected
companies analysis to corresponding financial data for Holdings
and the Partnership based on Holdings and the
Partnerships management forecasts, respectively, to
calculate an implied exchange ratio reference range. The
selected companies analyses indicated an implied exchange ratio
reference range of 0.483 to 0.632 of a Partnership unit per
Holdings unit, as compared to the exchange ratio in the proposed
merger of 0.705 of a Partnership unit per Holdings unit.
Discounted
Cash Flow Analysis
Credit Suisse also calculated the net present value of
Holdings and the Partnerships levered free cash
flows using Holdings and the Partnerships management
forecasts, respectively. In performing this analysis, Credit
Suisse applied discount rates ranging from 7.00% to 9.25% for
Holdings and 6.50% and 8.25% for the Partnership and terminal
yield ranges of 5.0% to 6.0% for Holdings and 6.5% to 7.0% for
the Partnership based on the selected companies analysis to
calculate an implied exchange ratio reference range. The
discounted cash flow analyses indicated an implied exchange
ratio reference range of 0.557 to 0.794 of a Partnership unit
per Holdings unit, as compared to the exchange ratio in the
proposed merger of 0.705 of a Partnership unit per Holdings unit.
Selected
Transactions Analysis
Credit Suisse calculated multiples of transaction value to
certain financial data based on the purchase prices paid in
selected publicly announced transactions involving target
companies in the oil and gas industry that it deemed relevant.
The calculated multiples included:
|
|
|
|
|
Current Implied GP Only Distributed Cash Flow Yield; and
|
|
|
|
Implied GP Only Distributed Cash Flow Yield for FY +1.
|
The selected transactions were selected because the target
companies were the general partners of MLPs deemed to be similar
to Holdings in one or more respects including the nature of
their business, size, diversification, financial performance and
geographic concentration. Except for transactions with an
aggregate value of less than $100 million and transactions
involving the sale of asset by companies in financial distress,
which were excluded, no specific numeric or other similar
criteria were used to select the selected transactions and all
criteria were evaluated in their entirety without application of
definitive qualifications or limitations to individual criteria.
As a result, a transaction involving the acquisition of a
significantly larger or smaller company with substantially
similar lines of businesses and business focus may have been
included while a transaction involving the acquisition of a
similarly sized company with less similar lines of business and
72
greater diversification may have been excluded. Credit Suisse
identified a sufficient number of transactions for purposes of
its analysis, but may not have included all transactions that
might be deemed comparable to the proposed transaction. The
selected transactions were:
|
|
|
|
|
Date Announced
|
|
Acquiror
|
|
MLP
|
|
05/11/10
|
|
Energy Transfer Equity, L.P.
|
|
Regency Energy Partners LP
|
03/03/09
|
|
Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P.
|
|
Magellan Midstream Holdings, L.P.
|
09/05/07
|
|
MarkWest Energy Partners, L.P.
|
|
MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc.
|
05/08/07
|
|
Enterprise GP Holdings L.P.
|
|
TEPPCO Partners, L.P.
|
04/03/07
|
|
ArcLight Capital Partners, LLC/Kelso & Company/Lehman
Brothers Holdings Inc.
|
|
Buckeye GP Holdings L.P. (61.9%)
|
11/01/06
|
|
Energy Transfer Equity, L.P.
|
|
Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (50.0%)
|
06/12/06
|
|
Plains All American Pipeline, L.P.
|
|
Pacific Energy Partners, L.P.
|
02/24/05
|
|
EPCO, Inc.
|
|
TEPPCO Partners, L.P.
|
11/01/04
|
|
Valero L.P.
|
|
Kaneb Services LLC
|
09/16/04
|
|
ONEOK, Inc.
|
|
Northern Border Partners, L.P. (82.5%)
|
03/05/04
|
|
Carlyle/Riverstone Global Energy and Power Fund II,
L.P.
|
|
Buckeye Partners, L.P.
|
The selected transactions analysis indicated the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiple Description
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
Median
|
|
Mean
|
|
Implied GP Only Distributed Cash Flow Yield (%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
FY + 1
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
Credit Suisse applied multiple ranges based on the selected
transactions analysis to corresponding financial data for
Holdings and applied multiple ranges based on the selected
companies analysis to corresponding financial data for the
Partnership to calculate an implied exchange ratio reference
range. The selected transactions analyses indicated an implied
exchange ratio reference range of 0.542 to 0.755 of a
Partnership unit per Holdings unit, as compared to the exchange
ratio in the proposed merger of 0.705 of a Partnership unit per
Holdings unit.
Other
Considerations
Historical
Trading Price Ratios
Credit Suisse also noted the following historical average
trading price ratios as of June 10, 2010, as compared to
the trading price ratio on June 10, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Trading
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Price Ratio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading
|
|
|
as Premium/
|
|
|
|
Average Unit Price
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
(Discount) to
|
|
Unit Price as of June 10, 2010
|
|
Holdings
|
|
|
Partnership
|
|
|
Ratio(1)
|
|
|
Prior Period
|
|
|
As of June 10, 2010
|
|
$
|
30.05
|
|
|
$
|
57.90
|
|
|
|
0.519
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
5 Trading Days Prior
|
|
|
29.97
|
|
|
|
58.13
|
|
|
|
0.516
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
10 Trading Days Prior
|
|
|
30.24
|
|
|
|
57.33
|
|
|
|
0.528
|
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)%
|
20 Trading Days Prior
|
|
|
30.80
|
|
|
|
56.84
|
|
|
|
0.542
|
|
|
|
(4.2
|
)%
|
Since 4/13/10
|
|
|
32.28
|
|
|
|
58.52
|
|
|
|
0.551
|
|
|
|
(5.9
|
)%
|
3 months Prior
|
|
|
32.98
|
|
|
|
59.22
|
|
|
|
0.557
|
|
|
|
(6.8
|
)%
|
6 months Prior
|
|
|
31.56
|
|
|
|
57.73
|
|
|
|
0.546
|
|
|
|
(5.0
|
)%
|
1 year Prior
|
|
|
27.45
|
|
|
|
52.38
|
|
|
|
0.520
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
2 years Prior
|
|
|
22.12
|
|
|
|
45.32
|
|
|
|
0.479
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
%
|
3 years Prior
|
|
|
24.11
|
|
|
|
46.81
|
|
|
|
0.507
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
Since Company IPO (8/4/06)
|
|
|
22.92
|
|
|
|
46.98
|
|
|
|
0.482
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Average trading price ratio for the period based on average of
the daily trading price ratios for the period. |
73
Premiums
Paid Analysis
Credit Suisse also observed the premiums paid in selected
transactions and as compared to the implied premium for Holdings
based on the proposed exchange ratio and the average market
price of a Partnership unit for the 1-trading day, 5-trading day
and 20-trading day periods prior to the announcement of the
selected transactions and June 10, 2010 with respect to the
proposed merger. The selected transactions were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date Announced
|
|
Acquiror
|
|
Target
|
|
|
03/03/09
|
|
|
Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P.
|
|
Magellan Midstream Holdings, L.P.
|
|
09/05/07
|
|
|
MarkWest Energy Partners, L.P.
|
|
MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc.
|
|
04/03/07
|
|
|
ArcLight Capital Partners, LLC/Kelso & Company/Lehman
Brothers Holdings Inc.
|
|
Buckeye GP Holdings L.P. (61.9%)
|
|
11/01/04
|
|
|
Valero L.P.
|
|
Kaneb Services LLC
|
The premiums paid analysis indicated the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holdings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stated
|
Implied Premium
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
Median
|
|
Mean
|
|
Consideration
|
|
1-trading day
|
|
|
37.9
|
%
|
|
|
14.2
|
%
|
|
|
23.6
|
%
|
|
|
24.8
|
%
|
|
|
35.8
|
%
|
5-trading day
|
|
|
34.1
|
%
|
|
|
13.5
|
%
|
|
|
19.0
|
%
|
|
|
21.4
|
%
|
|
|
36.2
|
%
|
20-trading day
|
|
|
35.9
|
%
|
|
|
11.6
|
%
|
|
|
17.9
|
%
|
|
|
20.8
|
%
|
|
|
32.5
|
%
|
Other
Matters
Pursuant to an engagement letter dated April 8, 2010,
Holdings GP retained Credit Suisse as the financial advisor of
Holdings GP in connection with, among other things, the proposed
merger. Holdings GP engaged Credit Suisse based on Credit
Suisses qualifications, experience and reputation as an
internationally recognized investment banking and financial
advisory firm. Credit Suisse will receive an aggregate fee for
its services currently estimated to be approximately
$4.5 million, of which approximately $3.4 million is
contingent upon the consummation of the merger. Credit Suisse
also became entitled to receive a fee of $1.0 million upon
the rendering of its opinion. In addition, Holdings has agreed
to indemnify Credit Suisse and certain related parties for
certain liabilities and other items arising out of or related to
its engagement.
Credit Suisse and its affiliates have in the past provided
investment banking and other financial services to Holdings, the
Partnership and certain of their affiliates for which Credit
Suisse and its affiliates have received customary compensation.
Specifically, in the last two years Credit Suisse acted as a
co-managing underwriter of an offering of debt securities by the
Partnership. Credit Suisse and its affiliates may have provided
other financial advice and services, and may in the future
provide financial advice and services, to Holdings, the
Partnership and their respective affiliates for which Credit
Suisse and its affiliates have received, and would expect to
receive, customary compensation. Credit Suisse is a full service
securities firm engaged in securities trading and brokerage
activities as well as providing investment banking and other
financial services. In the ordinary course of business, Credit
Suisse and its affiliates may acquire, hold or sell, for Credit
Suisses and its affiliates own accounts and the accounts
of customers, equity, debt and other securities and financial
instruments (including bank loans and other obligations) of
Holdings, the Partnership and any other company that may be
involved in the merger, as well as provide investment banking
and other financial services to such companies.
74
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This joint proxy statement/prospectus, including information
included or incorporated by reference in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, contains certain forward-looking
statements with respect to the financial condition, results of
operations, plans, objectives, intentions, future performance
and business of each of the Partnership and Holdings and other
statements that are not historical facts, as well as certain
information relating to the merger, including, without
limitation:
|
|
|
|
|
statements relating to the benefits of the merger;
|
|
|
|
statements relating to the financial results of the Partnership
following the merger; and
|
|
|
|
statements preceded by, followed by or that include the words
believes, anticipates,
plans, predicts, expects,
envisions, hopes, estimates,
intends, will, continue,
may, potential, should,
confident, could or similar expressions.
|
These forward-looking statements involve certain risks and
uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those
contemplated by the forward-looking statements due to, among
others, the factors discussed under Risk Factors
beginning on page 24, as well as the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
the possibility that the Partnership and Holdings may be unable
to obtain unitholder or regulatory approvals required for the
merger;
|
|
|
|
the possibility that the businesses may suffer as a result of
uncertainty surrounding the merger;
|
|
|
|
the possibility that the industry may be subject to future
regulatory or legislative actions;
|
|
|
|
other uncertainties in the industry;
|
|
|
|
environmental risks;
|
|
|
|
competition;
|
|
|
|
the ability of the management of the Partnership GP to execute
its plans for the Partnership following the merger to meet its
goals;
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions, whether internationally, nationally
or in the regional and local market areas in which the
Partnership is doing business, may be less favorable than
expected; and
|
|
|
|
other economic, governmental, legislative, regulatory,
geopolitical and technological factors may negatively impact the
businesses, operations or pricing of the Partnership and
Holdings.
|
Additional factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those expressed in the forward-looking
statements are discussed in reports filed with the SEC by the
Partnership and Holdings. Please read Where You Can Find
More Information beginning on page 155.
Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this
joint proxy statement/prospectus or the date of any document
incorporated by reference in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. All subsequent written and oral
forward-looking statements concerning the merger or other
matters addressed in this joint proxy statement/prospectus and
attributable to the Partnership or Holdings or any person acting
on their behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the
cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section.
Except to the extent required by applicable law or regulation,
neither the Partnership nor Holdings undertakes any obligation
to update forward-looking statements to reflect events or
circumstances after the date of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus or to reflect the occurrence of
unanticipated events.
75
THE
PARTIES TO THE MERGER AGREEMENT
Buckeye
Partners, L.P.
The Partnership is a publicly traded Delaware limited
partnership. The Partnership operates and reports in five
business segments: Pipeline Operations; Terminalling &
Storage; Natural Gas Storage; Energy Services; and
Development & Logistics. The Partnerships
principal line of business is the transportation, terminalling,
and storage of refined petroleum products in the United States
for major integrated oil companies, large refined petroleum
product marketing companies and major end users of refined
petroleum products on a fee basis through facilities it owns and
operates. The Partnership also markets refined petroleum
products in certain of the geographic areas served by its
pipeline and terminalling operations. The Partnership owns a
major natural gas storage facility in northern California. In
addition, the Partnership operates and maintains approximately
2,400 miles of other pipelines under agreements with major
oil and gas, petrochemical and chemical companies, and performs
certain engineering and construction management services for
third parties.
Buckeye
GP Holdings L.P.
Holdings is a publicly traded Delaware limited partnership that
owns the Partnership GP. Holdings only cash-generating
assets are its direct and indirect partnership interests in the
Partnership, which are comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the indirect ownership of the incentive distribution rights in
the Partnership;
|
|
|
|
the indirect ownership of the general partner interests in
certain of the Partnerships operating subsidiaries
(representing an approximate 1% interest in each of such
operating subsidiaries);
|
|
|
|
the indirect ownership of the general partner interests in the
Partnership (representing 243,914 GP units), or an
approximate 0.5% interest in the Partnership; and
|
|
|
|
80,000 Partnership LP units.
|
The incentive distribution rights noted above entitle Holdings
(through its ownership of the Partnership GP) to receive amounts
equal to specified percentages of the incremental amount of cash
distributed by the Partnership to the holders of Partnership LP
units when target distribution levels for each quarter are
exceeded. The 2,573,146 Partnership LP units originally issued
to the ESOP are excluded for the purpose of calculating
incentive distributions. The target distribution levels begin at
$0.325 and increase in steps to the highest target distribution
level of $0.525 per eligible Partnership LP unit. When the
Partnership makes quarterly distributions above this level, the
incentive distributions include an amount equal to 45% of the
incremental cash distributed to each eligible unitholder for the
quarter, or approximately 30% of total incremental cash
distributed by the Partnership above $0.525 per Partnership LP
unit.
The executive offices of Holdings are located at One Greenway
Plaza, Suite 600, Houston, Texas 77046. The telephone
number is
(832) 615-8600.
Relationship
of the Parties
Holdings and the Partnership are closely related. Holdings
currently owns all of the limited liability company interests of
the Partnership GP and 80,000 Partnership LP units. The
Partnership GP currently directly owns an approximate 0.5%
general partner interest in the Partnership and all of the
Partnerships incentive distribution rights, and indirectly
owns the general partner interests in certain of the
Partnerships operating subsidiaries.
Since Holdings initial public offering in August 2006,
distributions by the Partnership have increased from $0.775 per
Partnership LP unit for the quarter ended September 30,
2006 to $0.9625 per Partnership LP unit payable for the quarter
ended June 30, 2010; and as a result, distributions from
the Partnership to Holdings (through the Partnership GP) have
increased.
76
The following table summarizes the cash Holdings received for
the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and the
six months ended June 30, 2010 as a result of its direct
and indirect ownership of partnership interests in the
Partnership (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Incentive distributions from the Partnership
|
|
$
|
29,978
|
|
|
$
|
38,895
|
|
|
$
|
45,739
|
|
|
$
|
24,918
|
|
Distributions from the
~
1% ownership in certain of the Partnerships operating
subsidiaries
|
|
|
1,292
|
|
|
|
1,131
|
|
|
|
1,955
|
|
|
|
403
|
|
Distribution from the ownership of 243,914 GP units
|
|
|
786
|
|
|
|
835
|
|
|
|
884
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
Distribution from the ownership of 80,000 Partnership LP units
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
32,314
|
|
|
$
|
41,135
|
|
|
$
|
48,868
|
|
|
$
|
25,932
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moreover, certain directors and executive officers of Holdings
GP are also directors and executive officers of the Partnership
GP. Messrs. Forrest E. Wylie, John F. Erhard and Robb E.
Turner serve as members of both the Holdings Board and the
Partnership Board. The executive officers of Holdings GP are
also executive officers of the Partnership GP.
77
INFORMATION
ABOUT THE SPECIAL MEETINGS AND VOTING
The Partnership Audit Committee is using this joint proxy
statement/prospectus to solicit proxies from the holders of
Partnership LP units for use at the Partnership special meeting.
The Holdings Board is using this joint proxy
statement/prospectus to solicit proxies from the holders of
Holdings common units for use at the Holdings special meeting.
In addition, this joint proxy statement/prospectus constitutes a
prospectus for the offering of Partnership LP units to be
received by Holdings unitholders pursuant to the merger. The
partnerships are first mailing this joint proxy
statement/prospectus and accompanying proxy to the Partnership
unitholders and Holdings unitholders on or about
September 27, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partnership Special Meeting
|
|
Holdings Special Meeting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time, Place and Date
|
|
11:00 a.m., local time, November 16, 2010 at the Four
Seasons Hotel, 1300 Lamar Street, Houston, Texas 77010.
|
|
12:00 noon, local time, November 16, 2010 at the Four
Seasons Hotel, 1300 Lamar Street, Houston, Texas 77010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Admission to Special Meetings
|
|
All Partnership unitholders are invited to attend the
Partnership special meeting. Persons who are not Partnership
unitholders may attend only if invited by the Partnership. If
you own units in street or nominee name,
you must bring proof of ownership (e.g., a current brokers
statement) in order to be admitted to the Partnership special
meeting.
|
|
All Holdings unitholders are invited to attend the Holdings
special meeting. Persons who are not Holdings unitholders may
attend only if invited by Holdings. If you own units in
street or nominee name, you must bring
proof of ownership (e.g., a current brokers statement) in
order to be admitted to the Holdings special meeting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purpose of the Special Meetings
|
|
1. To consider and vote upon the approval of the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including
the merger and the issuance of Partnership LP units pursuant to
the merger agreement;
2. To consider and vote upon the approval of the
Partnerships amended and restated partnership agreement;
and
3. To consider and vote upon any proposal to transact such other
business as may properly come before the Partnership special
meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.
|
|
1. To consider and vote upon the approval of the merger, the
merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby;
and
2. To consider and vote upon any proposal to transact such other
business as may properly come before the Holdings special
meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partnership Special Meeting
|
|
Holdings Special Meeting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recommendations of Partnership Audit Committee and the
Holdings Board
|
|
The Partnership Audit Committee, comprised of independent
directors, has considered the benefits of the merger as well as
the associated risks and has unanimously approved the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including
the merger, the issuance of Partnership LP units pursuant to the
merger agreement, and the Partnerships amended and
restated partnership agreement and unanimously recommends that
the Partnership unitholders vote FOR the proposal
to: (a) approve the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby, including the merger and the issuance of
Partnership LP units pursuant to the merger agreement; and (b)
approve the Partnerships amended and restated partnership
agreement.
|
|
The Holdings Board has considered the benefits of the merger as
well as the associated risks and has unanimously approved the
merger, the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated
thereby and unanimously recommends that Holdings unitholders
vote FOR the proposal to approve the merger, the
merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vote Necessary
|
|
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the
outstanding Partnership LP units entitled to vote as of the
record date is required to approve each of the proposals
described above.
|
|
The affirmative vote of the holders of (1) a majority of the
outstanding Holdings common units entitled to vote as of the
record date, voting as a separate class, and (2) a majority of
the outstanding Holdings units entitled to vote as of the record
date voting as a single class is required to approve the
proposal described above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Record Date
|
|
September 17, 2010
|
|
September 17, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Units Held
|
|
As of September 21, 2010, there were approximately
52 million Partnership LP units outstanding.
|
|
As of September 21, 2010, there were approximately 28
million Holdings common units outstanding and approximately 0.5
million Holdings management units outstanding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unitholders Entitled to Vote
|
|
Partnership unitholders entitled to vote at the Partnership
special meeting are Partnership unitholders of record at the
close of business on September 17, 2010. Each Partnership
LP unit is entitled to one vote.
|
|
Holdings unitholders entitled to vote at Holdings special
meeting are Holdings unitholders of record at the close of
business on September 17, 2010. Each Holdings common unit
is entitled to one vote and each Holdings management unit is
entitled to one vote.
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partnership Special Meeting
|
|
Holdings Special Meeting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quorum Requirement
|
|
A quorum of Partnership unitholders is necessary to hold a valid
special meeting. The presence in person or by proxy at the
Partnership special meeting of holders of a majority of the
Partnership LP units entitled to vote as of the record date at
the Partnership special meeting is a quorum.
Abstentions and broker non-votes count as present for
establishing a quorum. An abstention occurs when a Partnership
unitholder abstains from voting (either in person or by proxy)
on one or more of the proposals.
A broker non-vote occurs on an item when a broker is not
permitted to vote on that item without instruction from the
beneficial owner of the Partnership LP units and no instruction
by the Partnership unitholder how to vote is given.
|
|
A quorum of Holdings unitholders is necessary to hold a valid
special meeting. The presence in person or by proxy at the
Holdings special meeting of holders of a majority of the
outstanding Holdings common units, as a separate class and a
majority of the outstanding Holdings units entitled to vote as
of the record date, as a single class, at the Holdings special
meeting is a quorum as to each class.
Abstentions and broker non-votes count as present for
establishing a quorum. An abstention occurs when a Holdings
unitholder abstains from voting (either in person or by proxy)
on one or more of the proposals.
A broker non-vote occurs on an item when a broker is not
permitted to vote on that item without instruction from the
beneficial owner of Holdings units and no instruction by the
Holdings unitholder how to vote is given.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units Beneficially Owned by Directors and Executive
Officers
|
|
The directors and executive officers of the Partnership GP
beneficially owned 40,750 Partnership LP units as of
September 21, 2010. These Partnership LP units represent in
total approximately 0.1% of the total voting power of the
Partnerships voting securities. In addition, Buckeye Pipe
Line Services Company owned 1,521,045 Partnership LP units as of
September 21, 2010, representing approximately 3.0% of the
total voting power of the Partnership. The voting of these units
will be directed by the board of directors of Buckeye Pipe Line
Services Company, which is comprised of Mr. Wylie, Mr. Lasala
and Mr. Smith.
|
|
The directors and executive officers of Holdings GP beneficially
owned an aggregate of 37,257 Holdings common units and 16,843
Holdings management units of as of September 21, 2010.
These Holdings units represent in total approximately 0.2% of
the total voting power of Holdings voting securities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Support Agreement
|
|
|
|
The Major Holdings Unitholders have agreed to attend the
Holdings special meeting and to vote their Holdings units in
favor of the merger and the merger agreement pursuant to the
Support Agreement. These units constitute approximately 61% of
all outstanding Holdings common units and 97% of all outstanding
Holdings management units.
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partnership Special Meeting
|
|
Holdings Special Meeting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proxies
|
|
You may vote in person by ballot at the Partnership special
meeting or by submitting a proxy. Please submit your proxy even
if you plan to attend the Partnership special meeting. If you
attend the Partnership special meeting, you may vote by ballot,
thereby canceling any proxy previously given.
|
|
You may vote in person by ballot at the Holdings special meeting
or by submitting a proxy. Please submit your proxy even if you
plan to attend the Holdings special meeting. If you attend the
Holdings special meeting, you may vote by ballot, thereby
canceling any proxy previously given.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voting instructions are included on your proxy card. If you
properly give your proxy and submit it to the Partnership in
time for it to be voted, one of the individuals named as your
proxy will vote your Partnership LP units as you have directed.
You may vote for or against the proposals or abstain from voting.
|
|
Voting instructions are included on your proxy card. If you
properly give your proxy and submit it to the Holdings in time
for it to be voted, one of the individuals named as your proxy
will vote your Holdings common units as you have directed. You
may vote for or against the proposals or abstain from voting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
How to Submit Your Proxy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By Mail:
|
|
To submit your proxy by mail, simply mark your proxy, date and
sign it, and if you are a Partnership unitholder of record,
return it to Computershare Trust Company, N.A. in the
postage-paid envelope provided. If the envelope is missing,
please address your completed proxy card to the address on your
proxy card. If you are a beneficial owner, please refer to your
proxy card or the information provided to you by your bank,
broker, custodian or record holder.
|
|
To submit your proxy by mail, simply mark your proxy, date and
sign it, and if you are a Holdings unitholder of record, return
it to Computershare Trust Company, N.A. in the postage-paid
envelope provided. If the envelope is missing, please address
your completed proxy card to the address on your proxy card. If
you are a beneficial owner, please refer to your proxy card or
the information provided to you by your bank, broker, custodian
or record holder.
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partnership Special Meeting
|
|
Holdings Special Meeting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By Telephone:
|
|
If you are a Partnership unitholder of record, you can submit
your proxy by telephone by calling the toll-free telephone
number on your proxy card. Telephone voting is available
24 hours a day and will be accessible until 11:59 p.m.
on November 15, 2010. Easy-to-follow voice prompts allow
you to submit your proxy and confirm that your instructions have
been properly recorded. If you are a beneficial owner, please
refer to your instruction card or the information provided by
your bank, broker, custodian or record holder for information on
submitting voting instructions by telephone. If you submit
your proxy by telephone you do not need to return your proxy
card. If you are located outside the United States, Canada and
Puerto Rico, please read your proxy card or other materials for
additional instructions. If you hold Partnership LP units
through a broker or other custodian, please check the voting
form used by that firm to see if it offers telephone voting.
|
|
If you are a Holdings unitholder of record, you can submit your
proxy by telephone by calling the toll-free telephone number on
your proxy card. Telephone voting is available 24 hours a
day and will be accessible until 11:59 p.m. on
November 15, 2010. Easy-to-follow voice prompts allow you
to submit your proxy and confirm that your instructions have
been properly recorded. If you are a beneficial owner, please
refer to your instruction card or the information provided by
your bank, broker, custodian or record holder for information on
submitting your voting instructions by telephone. If you
submit your proxy by telephone you do not need to return your
proxy card. If you are located outside the United States, Canada
and Puerto Rico, please read your proxy card or other materials
for additional instructions. If you hold Holdings common units
through a broker or other custodian, please check the voting
form used by that firm to see if it offers telephone voting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
By Internet:
|
|
You can also choose to submit your proxy on the internet. If you
are a Partnership unitholder of record, the web site for
internet voting is on your proxy card. Internet voting is
available 24 hours a day and will be accessible until
11:59 p.m. on November 15, 2010. If you are a
beneficial owner, please refer to your instruction card or the
information provided by your bank, broker, custodian or record
holder for information on internet voting. As with telephone
voting, you will be given the opportunity to confirm that your
instructions have been properly recorded. If you submit your
proxy on the internet, you do not need to return your proxy
card. If you hold Partnership LP units through a broker or
other custodian, please check the voting form to see if it
offers internet voting.
|
|
You can also choose to submit your proxy on the internet. If you
are a Holdings unitholder of record, the web site for internet
voting is on your proxy card. Internet voting is available
24 hours a day and will be accessible until 11:59 p.m.
on November 15, 2010. If you are a beneficial owner, please
refer to your instruction card or the information provided by
your bank, broker, custodian or record holder for information on
internet voting. As with telephone voting, you will be given the
opportunity to confirm that your instructions have been properly
recorded. If you submit your proxy on the internet, you do
not need to return your proxy card. If you hold Holdings
common units through a broker or other custodian, please check
the voting form to see if it offers internet voting.
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partnership Special Meeting
|
|
Holdings Special Meeting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revoking Your Proxy
|
|
If you submit a completed proxy card with instructions on how to
vote your Partnership LP units and then wish to revoke your
instructions, you should submit a notice of revocation to
Computershare Trust Company, N.A. as soon as possible. You may
revoke your proxy by internet, telephone or mail at any time
before it is voted by:
|
|
If you submit a completed proxy card with instructions on how to
vote your Holdings units and then wish to revoke your
instructions, you should submit a notice of revocation to
Computershare Trust Company, N.A. as soon as possible. You may
revoke your proxy by internet, telephone or mail at any time
before it is voted by:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
timely delivery of a valid, later-dated
proxy or timely submission of a later-dated proxy by telephone
or internet;
|
|
timely delivery of a valid, later-dated
proxy or timely submission of a later-dated proxy by telephone
or internet;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
written notice to the Partnership
GPs Secretary before the Partnership special meeting that
you have revoked your proxy; or
|
|
written notice to Holdings GPs
Secretary before the Holdings special meeting that you have
revoked your proxy; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
voting by ballot at the Partnership
special meeting.
|
|
voting by ballot at the Holdings special
meeting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proxy Solicitation
|
|
In addition to this mailing, proxies may be solicited by
directors, officers or employees of the Partnership GP or its
affiliates in person or by telephone or electronic transmission.
None of the directors, officers or employees will be directly
compensated for such services. The Partnership has retained
Morrow & Co., LLC to assist in the distribution
and solicitation of proxies. The Partnership will pay
Morrow & Co., LLC a fixed fee of $8,500 plus
reasonable expenses for these services.
|
|
In addition to this mailing, proxies may be solicited by
directors, officers or employees of Holdings GP or its
affiliates in person or by telephone or electronic transmission.
None of the directors, officers or employees will be directly
compensated for such services. Holdings has retained to
Morrow & Co., LLC assist in the distribution and
solicitation of proxies. Holdings will pay
Morrow & Co., LLC a fixed fee of $8,500 plus
reasonable expenses for these services.
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partnership Special Meeting
|
|
Holdings Special Meeting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjournments
|
|
Pursuant to the Partnerships existing partnership
agreement, the Partnership GP may adjourn a meeting of the
limited partners of the Partnership without setting a new record
date, so long as the adjourned meeting is held within sixty days
of the original meeting date. If a quorum of Partnership
unitholders is not present in person or by proxy at the
Partnership special meeting, the Partnership GP may adjourn the
special meeting from time to time until a quorum is present or
represented. In addition, adjournments of the Partnership
special meeting may be made for the purpose of soliciting
additional proxies in favor of a proposal.
|
|
Pursuant to Holdings existing partnership agreement,
Holdings GP may adjourn a meeting of the limited partners of
Holdings. The number of Holdings common units and management
units owned by BGH GP constitutes a quorum, and under the
Support Agreement, BGH GP has agreed to attend the Holdings
special meeting and vote in favor of the merger, such that
Holdings GP does not expect to adjourn the Holdings special
meeting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Business
|
|
The Partnership GP board is not currently aware of any business
to be acted upon at the Partnership special meeting other than
the matters described in this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
If, however, other matters are properly brought before the
Partnership special meeting, the persons appointed as proxies
will have discretion to vote or act on those matters according
to their judgment.
|
|
The Holdings Board is not currently aware of any business to be
acted upon at the Holdings special meeting other than the
matters described in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. If,
however, other matters are properly brought before the Holdings
special meeting, the persons appointed as proxies will have
discretion to vote or act on those matters according to their
judgment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact/Assistance
|
|
Morrow & Co., LLC will be acting as the Partnerships proxy solicitation agent:
Morrow & Co., LLC 470 West Avenue 3rd Floor Stamford, CT 06902
Banks and brokers call: (203) 658-9400 Partnership unitholders call toll-free: (800) 573-4412
Email: buckeye.info@morrowco.com
|
|
Morrow & Co., LLC will be acting as Holdings proxy solicitation agent:
Morrow & Co., LLC 470 West Avenue 3rd Floor Stamford, CT 06902
Banks and brokers call: (203) 658-9400 Holdings unitholders call toll-free: (800) 573-4412
Email: buckeye.info@morrowco.com
|
84
THE
PROPOSED MERGER
The following description of the material information about
the merger, including the summary of the material terms and
provisions of the merger agreement, is qualified in its entirety
by reference to the more detailed annexes to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. We urge you to read all of the annexes to
this joint proxy statement/prospectus in their entirety.
General
The Partnership, the Partnership GP, MergerCo, Holdings and
Holdings GP have entered into the merger agreement. Under the
merger agreement, the Partnership will acquire Holdings through
a merger of MergerCo with and into Holdings, and all Holdings
units will be converted into Partnership LP units. As a result
of the merger, Holdings will be a subsidiary of the Partnership,
with the Partnership as Holdings sole limited partner and
Holdings GP remaining as the sole general partner (with a
non-economic general partner interest) of Holdings. In
connection with the merger, the incentive distribution rights
held by the Partnership GP will be canceled and the general
partner units held by the Partnership GP (representing an
approximate 0.5% general partner interest in the Partnership)
will be converted to a non-economic general partner interest in
the Partnership.
Pursuant to the merger agreement, the Partnership will issue to
the Holdings unitholders approximately 20 million
Partnership LP units in the merger. Each unitholder of Holdings
will receive 0.705 Partnership LP units per Holdings unit. This
represents a 32% premium to the closing price of Holdings common
units on June 10, 2010, the last trading day before the
public announcement of the proposed merger. Partnership
unitholders will continue to own their existing Partnership LP
units. Upon completion of the merger, the Partnership will be
owned approximately 72% by current Partnership unitholders, and
approximately 28% by former Holdings unitholders (including 17%
that will be owned by BGH GP). The Partnership LP units will
continue to be traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the
symbol BPL following the merger.
The merger agreement is attached as Annex A to this joint
proxy statement/prospectus and is incorporated into this joint
proxy statement/prospectus by reference. Please read the merger
agreement carefully and fully as it is the primary legal
document that governs the merger. For a summary of the merger
agreement, please read The Merger Agreement
beginning on page 90.
Effective
Time
As soon as practicable after the satisfaction or waiver of the
conditions to the merger, the certificate of merger will be
filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware in
accordance with the relevant provisions of Delaware law. The
merger will become effective when the certificate of merger is
filed or at such later date and time as may be set forth in the
certificate of merger.
The Partnership and Holdings anticipate that the merger will be
completed in the fourth quarter of 2010. However, the effective
time of the merger could be delayed if there is a delay in
satisfying any condition to the merger. There can be no
assurances as to whether, or when, the Partnership and Holdings
will obtain the required approvals or complete the merger. If
the merger is not completed on or before December 31, 2010,
either the Partnership or Holdings may terminate the merger
agreement, unless the failure to complete the merger by that
date is due to the failure of the party seeking to terminate the
merger agreement to fulfill any material obligations under the
merger agreement or a material breach of the merger agreement by
such party. The Partnership or Holdings may extend the
termination date to February 28, 2011 under certain
circumstances. Please read The Merger
Agreement Conditions to the Completion of the
Merger beginning on page 100.
85
Transactions
Related to the Merger
Amended
and Restated Partnership Agreement
Immediately following the effective time of the merger, the
Partnerships existing partnership agreement will be
amended and restated. Under the Partnerships amended and
restated partnership agreement (i) the general partner
interest represented by the incentive distribution rights will
be canceled and the GP units (which currently represent an
approximate 0.5% general partner interest in the Partnership)
will be converted into a non-economic general partner interest
in the Partnership; (ii) the public election provisions
will be added but will not take effect until either approval by
the CPUC and PaPUC or a determination thereof by the Partnership
Board that such approvals are not required; (iii) the
Partnership GPs right to acquire all Partnership LP units
if the Partnership GP or its affiliates own more than 90% of the
outstanding Partnership LP units will be eliminated;
(iv) certain provisions added to the existing partnership
agreement in 2004 to clarify the separateness of the Partnership
GP, the Partnership, the Partnerships operating
partnerships and Services Company from the owners of the
Partnership GP, which will become generally inapplicable once
the Partnership owns the Partnership GP, will be eliminated and
(v) certain other legacy provisions which are no longer
applicable to the Partnership, will be eliminated.
For a summary of the amended and restated partnership agreement,
please read The Amended and Restated Partnership Agreement
of the Partnership beginning on page 105.
The foregoing description of the Partnerships amended and
restated partnership agreement does not purport to be complete
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text
of the form of amended and restated partnership agreement, which
is attached as Annex B to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus and is incorporated by reference into this
joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Holdings
Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited
Partnership
Pursuant to the merger agreement, the agreement of limited
partnership of Holdings will be amended and restated. Under
Holdings amended and restated partnership agreement,
(i) Holdings purpose will be limited to owning all of
the limited liability company interests in, and being the sole
member of, the Partnership GP, and Holdings GP will be
restricted from causing Holdings to engage in any business
activity other than the ownership, and being a member, of the
Partnership GP and immaterial or administrative actions related
thereto, (ii) Holdings will be required, subject to
either approval by the CPUC and PaPUC of the public election
provisions or a determination by the Partnership Board that such
approvals are not required, to appoint some or all of the
directors to the Partnership Board at the direction of the
Partnership and up to two directors at the direction of Holdings
GP, as described elsewhere herein, (iii) Holdings GP will
be restricted from entering into any amendment to the Holdings
partnership agreement or the limited liability company agreement
of the Partnership GP without the consent of the Partnership,
(iv) the Partnership will have the ability to appoint a
special manager with the powers of Holdings GP under the
agreement if Holdings GP fails to take any action required
thereunder, (v) 100% of any distributions by Holdings will
be paid to the Partnership and (vi) Holdings and the
Partnership will, subject to certain termination rights in favor
of the Partnership, agree to indemnify Holdings GP and its
officers, directors and certain of its affiliates for any
liabilities they incur relating to the business and affairs of
Holdings.
The foregoing description of Holdings amended and restated
partnership agreement does not purport to be complete and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the
form of Holdings amended and restated partnership
agreement, which is attached as Annex C to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus and is incorporated by reference into this
joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Support
Agreement
On June 10, 2010, the Partnership entered into a support
agreement with the Major Holdings Unitholders. As of
June 10, 2010, the last trading day before the public
announcement of the proposed merger, the Major Holdings
Unitholders beneficially owned 17,004,596 Holdings common units
and 509,141 Holdings
86
management units. These units represent approximately 62% of the
total Holdings units (61% of the total Holdings common units and
97% of the total Holdings management units).
Pursuant to the support agreement, the Major Holdings
Unitholders agreed to vote their Holdings units (a) in
favor of the approval of the merger and the merger agreement,
(b) against any action or agreement that would result in a
breach of any covenant, representation or warranty of Holdings
or Holdings GP contained in the merger agreement,
(c) against any acquisition proposal (as defined in the
merger agreement) and (d) against any action, agreement or
transaction that would or would reasonably be expected to
materially impede, interfere with, delay, postpone, discourage,
frustrate the purposes of or adversely affect the merger and the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. The support
agreement may be terminated upon the written agreement of the
Partnership and the Major Holdings Unitholders, the termination
of the merger agreement or a change in recommendation by the
Holdings Board.
The foregoing description of the support agreement is qualified
in its entirety by reference to the full text of the support
agreement, which is attached as Annex D to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus and is incorporated by reference into this
joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Registration
Rights Agreement
Pursuant to the support agreement, on June 10, 2010 the
Partnership and the Major Holdings Unitholders entered into a
registration rights agreement pursuant to which the Partnership
has agreed to file a registration statement covering the
potential sale of Partnership LP units to be issued to the Major
Holdings Unitholders in the merger. In addition, the
registration rights agreement gives the Major Holdings
Unitholders piggyback registration rights under certain
circumstances.
The foregoing description of the registration rights agreement
is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of
the registration rights agreement, which is filed as an exhibit
to the registration statement of which this joint proxy
statement/prospectus is a part and is incorporated herein by
reference.
Appraisal
Rights
Neither Partnership unitholders nor Holdings unitholders have or
are entitled to exercise appraisal rights in connection with the
merger under Delaware law or either Holdings or the
Partnerships partnership agreement, as applicable.
Restrictions
on Sales of Partnership LP Units Received in the
Merger
Partnership LP units to be issued to the Holdings unitholders in
the merger may be traded freely and without restriction by those
Holdings unitholders not deemed to be affiliates (as that term
is defined under the Securities Act). Partnership LP units held
by any such affiliates may be sold only pursuant to a
registration statement or an exemption under the Securities Act.
In connection with the merger agreement, the Partnership entered
into a registration rights agreement with the Major Holdings
Unitholders and will file a registration statement to cover the
resale of Partnership LP units to be received by such
unitholders in connection with the merger agreement. Once the
registration statement is declared effective, those unitholders
will be able to freely sell the Partnership LP units they
receive in the merger so long as the registration statement
remains effective and they sell pursuant thereto. In the event
that an affiliate is not included in the registration statement
or the registration statement cannot be used, the affiliates may
sell subject to the limitations under Rule 145 under the
Securities Act. Upon the expiration of the limitations under
Rule 145, the affiliates will be able to freely sell the
Partnership LP units they receive in connection with the merger.
Upon receipt by the Partnerships designated representative
of a representation letter in a form reasonably acceptable to
the Partnership from the selling affiliates securities
broker (in the case of Partnership LP units being sold under the
registration statement filed in connection with the registration
rights agreement), indicating such selling affiliates
intent to sell a number of Partnership LP units in compliance
with the representation letter, the Partnership will deliver
87
to its transfer agent an opinion or letter of instruction
enabling the affiliate to sell its Partnership LP units in the
transaction(s) in accordance with the terms of the
representation letter.
An affiliate of Holdings is a person who directly,
or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, is
controlled by, or is under common control with, Holdings. These
restrictions are expected to apply to the directors and
executive officers of Holdings and the holders of 10% or more of
Holdings outstanding units. The same restrictions apply to the
spouses and certain relatives of those persons and any trusts,
estates, corporations or other entities in which those persons
have a 10% or greater beneficial or equity interest. The
Partnership will give stop transfer instructions to the transfer
agent with respect to the Partnership LP units to be received by
persons subject to these restrictions.
For further information on the registration rights agreement,
see Transactions Related to the
Merger Registration Rights Agreement on
page 87.
Listing
of the Partnership LP Units; Delisting and Deregistration of
Holdings Common Units
It is a condition to the merger that the Partnership LP units to
be issued in the merger be approved for listing on the New York
Stock Exchange, subject to official notice of issuance. If the
merger is completed, Holdings common units will cease to be
listed on the New York Stock Exchange and Holdings common units
will be deregistered under the Exchange Act.
Accounting
Treatment of the Merger
The merger will be accounted for in accordance with Financial
Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification
810, Consolidations Overall Changes
in Parents Ownership Interest in a Subsidiary, which
is referred to as FASB ASC 810. Holdings is considered as
the surviving consolidated entity for accounting purposes rather
than the Partnership, which is the surviving consolidated entity
for legal and reporting purposes. Therefore, the changes in
Holdings ownership interest will be accounted for as an
equity transaction and no gain or loss will be recognized as a
result of the merger.
Regulatory
Approvals
The Partnership expects to apply for all PaPUC approvals that
may be required and for CPUC approval of the public election
provisions as soon as possible, or may seek exemptions from the
regulations requiring such approvals. While it is possible that
such approvals will be obtained prior to the special meetings,
the Partnership cannot predict when, or guarantee that, such
approvals will be obtained.
The merger agreement was amended and restated to, among other
reasons, attach a new form of amended and restated partnership
agreement. Holdings GP (through Holdings) will continue to have
the right to appoint, remove and replace all of the members of
the Partnership Board until the earlier to occur of (a) the
approval by the CPUC and PaPUC of the public election provisions
or (b) a determination by the Partnership Board that such
approvals are not required. Upon the occurrence of either
(a) or (b) above, Holdings GP will have the right to
appoint up to two directors, with the number depending upon the
continued ownership of specified thresholds of Partnership LP
units by BGH GP and its affiliates, and the remaining directors
will be classified into three classes and subject to election by
the holders of Partnership LP units (other than BGH GP and its
affiliates). If the Partnership Board is not able to make the
determination described in (b) above, the Partnership GP
will be obligated under the amended and restated partnership
agreement to use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain the
approvals described in (a) above. The transaction could be
completed prior to obtaining the approvals from the CPUC and
PaPUC of the public election provisions.
88
Litigation
On August 24, 2010, the District Court of Harris County,
Texas, entered an order consolidating the three previously filed
putative class actions under the caption of Broadbased
Equities v. Forrest E. Wylie, et al and appointing
interim co-lead class counsel and interim co-liason counsel.
Plaintiff subsequently filed a consolidated amended class action
and derivative complaint on September 1, 2010. The
consolidated amended complaint purports to be a putative class
and derivative action alleging that Holdings GP and its
directors breached their fiduciary duties to Holdings
public unitholders in connection with the merger by, among other
things, accepting insufficient consideration and failing to
disclose all material facts in order that Holdings
unitholders may cast an informed vote on the merger agreement,
and that the Partnership, Partnership GP, Holdings GP, MergerCo,
BGH GP, ArcLight and Kelso aided and abetted the breaches of
fiduciary duty. The consolidated amended complaint seeks an
order certifying a class consisting of all of Holdings
public unitholders, a determination that the action is a proper
derivative action, a declaration that the defendants have
breached their fiduciary duties to Holdings and Holdings
public unitholders or aided and abetted such breaches, damages
in unspecified amounts and an award of attorneys fees and
costs.
The Partnership and Holdings do not believe that the claims
alleged in the consolidated amended complaint have any merit,
and they intend to defend the action accordingly.
89
THE
MERGER AGREEMENT
The following is a summary of the material terms of the
merger agreement. Because this is a summary, it does not contain
all information that may be important to you. You should read
the entire joint proxy statement/prospectus and all of its
annexes, including the merger agreement, carefully before you
decide how to vote.
Explanatory
Note Regarding Summary of the Merger Agreement
The summary of the terms of the merger agreement is intended to
provide information about the material terms of the merger. The
terms and information in the merger agreement should not be
relied on as disclosures about the Partnership or Holdings
without consideration to the entirety of public disclosure by
the Partnership and Holdings as set forth in all of their
respective public reports with the SEC. The terms of the merger
agreement (such as the representations and warranties) govern
the contractual rights and relationships, and allocate risks,
between the parties in relation to the merger. In particular,
the representations and warranties made by the parties to each
other in the merger agreement have been negotiated between the
parties with the principal purpose of setting forth their
respective rights with respect to their obligation to close the
merger should events or circumstances change or be different
from those stated in the representations and warranties. Matters
may change from the state of affairs contemplated by the
representations and warranties. The Partnership and Holdings
will provide additional disclosure in their public reports to
the extent that they are aware of the existence of any material
facts that are required to be disclosed under federal securities
laws and that might otherwise contradict the terms and
information contained in the merger agreement and will update
such disclosure as required by federal securities laws.
Directors
and Officers of the Partnership GP Following the
Merger
The Partnership GP will continue to manage the Partnership after
the merger. The members of Partnership GPs management team
are expected to continue in their current roles and will manage
the Partnership GP following the merger. Following the effective
time of the merger, the Partnership Board is expected to consist
of nine members. Mr. Forrest E. Wylie, the chief executive
officer of the Partnership GP and the current chairman of the
Partnership Board, as well as the three current members of the
Partnership Audit Committee are expected to continue as
directors of the Partnership GP. In addition, the three members
of the audit committee of Holdings GP are expected to be
appointed as directors of the Partnership Board following the
effective time of the merger. Holdings GP has designated Frank
J. Loverro and John F. Erhard to serve as additional members of
the Partnership Board following the effective time of the
merger. Holdings GP (as general partner of Holdings) will
continue to have the right to appoint all of the members of the
Partnership Board until the earlier to occur of (a) the
receipt of approvals from the CPUC and the PaPUC of the public
election provisions or (b) a determination by the
Partnership Board that such approvals are not required.
Following the occurrence of either (a) or (b) above,
Holdings GP will continue to have the right to designate two
members of the Partnership Board, subject to reduction if the
Major Holdings Unitholders ownership of Partnership LP units
drops below certain thresholds. The remaining directors will be
classified into three classes and be subject to election by the
holders of Partnership LP units (other than BGH GP and its
affiliates).
Closing
Matters
Closing
Unless the parties agree otherwise, the closing of the merger
will take place on the third business day after the closing
conditions in the merger agreement have been satisfied or waived
or such other time or date to which the parties agree in
writing. Please read Conditions to the
Completion of the Merger beginning on page 100 for a
more complete description of the conditions that must be
satisfied or waived prior to closing. The date on which the
closing occurs is referred to as the closing date.
The closing of the merger will take place at the offices of
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. in New York, New York at
10:00 a.m., local time, on the closing date.
90
Effective
Time
As soon as practicable after the satisfaction or waiver of the
conditions to the merger, the certificate of merger will be
filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware in
accordance with the relevant provisions of Delaware law. The
merger will become effective when the certificate of merger is
filed or at such later date and time as may be set forth in the
certificate of merger.
Merger
Consideration
General
Pursuant to the merger agreement, all of the limited liability
company interests in MergerCo outstanding immediately prior to
the effective time of the merger shall be converted into and
become a 100% limited partner interest in Holdings. The
non-economic general partner interest in Holdings issued and
outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the
merger shall remain outstanding and unchanged subject to such
changes as set forth in the second amended and restated
partnership agreement of Holdings to be adopted at the effective
time of the merger, and Holdings GP shall continue to be the
sole general partner of Holdings.
The Partnership will issue to the Holdings unitholders
approximately 20 million Partnership LP units in the
merger. Each holder of Holdings units will receive 0.705
Partnership LP units per Holdings unit. All Holdings units, when
converted in the merger, shall cease to be outstanding and shall
automatically be cancelled and cease to exist.
Exchange
Procedures
Prior to the effective time of the merger, Holdings and the
Partnership will deposit with Computershare Trust Company
N.A. (the exchange agent in connection with the merger)
sufficient cash and the LP units for the benefit of holders of
Holdings units to be converted into the stated consideration.
Promptly after the effective time of merger, the exchange agent
will send a letter of transmittal to each person who was a
holder of Holdings units at the effective time of the merger.
This letter will contain instructions on how to surrender
certificates or non-certificated units represented by book-entry
formerly representing Holdings units in exchange for the stated
consideration the holder is entitled to receive under the merger
agreement.
Distributions
with Respect to Unexchanged Holdings Units
After the effective time of the merger, former holders of
Holdings units will be entitled to (i) Partnership
distributions payable with a record date after the effective
time of the merger with respect to the number of Partnership LP
units to which they are entitled upon exchange of their Holdings
units, without interest and (ii) any distributions with
respect their Holdings units with a record date occurring prior
to the effective time of the merger that may have been declared
or made by Holdings on such Holdings units and which remain
unpaid at the effective time of the merger. However, they will
not be paid distributions on such Partnership LP units or
Holdings units, as they case may be, until they surrender the
certificates or non-certificated units represented by book-entry
formerly representing their Holdings units to the exchange agent
in accordance with the exchange agents instructions. After
the close of business on the date on which the effective time of
the merger occurs, there will be no transfers on the unit
transfer books of Holdings with respect to any Holdings units.
Fractional
Units
Fractional Partnership LP units will not be delivered pursuant
to the merger. Instead, each holder of Holdings units who would
otherwise be entitled to receive fractional Partnership LP units
pursuant to the merger will be entitled to receive a cash
payment in an amount equal to the product of (a) the
closing sale price of the Partnership LP units on the New York
Stock Exchange on the trading day immediately preceding the date
on which the effective time of the merger occurs and
(b) the fraction of a Partnership LP unit which such holder
would otherwise be entitled to receive.
91
Termination
of Exchange Fund
Any portion of the stated consideration, or distributions
payable in accordance with the merger agreement, made available
to the exchange agent that remains unclaimed by holders of
Holdings units after 180 days following the effective time
of the merger will be returned to the Partnership upon demand.
Thereafter, a holder of Holdings units must look only to the
Partnership for payment of the stated consideration, any cash in
lieu of the issuance of fractional Partnership LP units and any
distributions with respect to the Partnership LP units or
Holdings units to which the holder is entitled under the terms
of the merger agreement. Any amounts remaining unclaimed by
holders of Holdings units immediately prior to such time as such
amounts would otherwise revert to or become the property of any
governmental authority will, to the extent permitted by
applicable law, become the property of the Partnership free and
clear of any liens, claims and interests.
Lost
Unit Certificates
If a certificate formerly representing Holdings units has been
lost, stolen or destroyed, the exchange agent will issue the
consideration properly payable under the merger agreement upon
receipt of an affidavit as to that loss, theft or destruction,
and, if required by the Partnership, the posting of a bond in a
reasonable amount as indemnity.
Withholding
The Partnership, Holdings and the exchange agent will be
entitled to deduct and withhold from the stated consideration
payable to holders of Holdings units the amounts it is required
to deduct and withhold under the Internal Revenue Code or any
state, local or foreign tax law. Withheld amounts will be
treated for all purposes of the merger as having been paid to
the respective Holdings unitholders.
Anti-Dilution
Provisions
The stated consideration will be correspondingly adjusted if, at
any time between the date of the merger agreement and the
effective time of the merger, there is any change in the
outstanding Holdings units or outstanding Partnership LP units
by reason of any subdivision, reclassification,
recapitalization, split, combination, or distribution in the
form of equity interests with respect to such units.
Actions
Pending the Merger
Each of the Partnership and the Partnership GP have agreed that,
without the prior written consent of the Holdings Board, it will
not, and will cause its subsidiaries not to, during the period
from the date of the merger agreement until the effective time
of the merger or the date, if any, on which the merger agreement
is terminated, except as expressly contemplated or permitted by
the merger agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
conduct its business and the business of its subsidiaries other
than in the ordinary and usual course of business;
|
|
|
|
fail to use commercially reasonable best efforts to preserve
intact its business organization, goodwill and assets and
maintain its rights, franchises and existing relations with
customers, suppliers, employees or business associates;
|
|
|
|
take any action that would adversely affect the ability of any
party to the merger to obtain any approval required under the
Hart Scott Rodino Act (the HSR Act);
|
|
|
|
take any action that would have a material adverse effect on the
Partnership and its subsidiaries (taken as a whole);
|
|
|
|
(i) issue, sell or otherwise permit to become outstanding,
or authorize the creation of, any additional equity, any
appreciation rights or any rights or enter into any agreements
with respect to such transactions, or (ii) permit any
additional equity interests to become subject to new grants of
employee unit options, unit appreciation rights or similar
equity-based employee rights; except for any such action
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
as would not materially adversely affect the Partnerships
or Holdings ability to consummate the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
|
|
split, combine or reclassify any of its equity interests or
issue or authorize or propose the issuance of any other
securities in respect of, in lieu of or in substitution for its
equity interests;
|
|
|
|
except as contemplated by the Partnerships compensation or
benefit plans in effect on, or as required by the terms of its
securities outstanding on, the date of the merger agreement,
redeem, repurchase or otherwise acquire or permit any of its
subsidiaries to purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any
partnership interests;
|
|
|
|
merge, consolidate or enter into any other business combination
transaction with any person or make any acquisition or
disposition that would be likely to have a material adverse
effect or enter into a definitive agreement with respect to an
acquisition proposal;
|
|
|
|
implement or adopt any material change in its accounting
principles, practices or methods, except for changes required by
law or generally accepted accounting principles;
|
|
|
|
fail to use commercially reasonable best efforts to maintain
with financially responsible insurance companies, insurance in
such amounts and against such risks and losses as has been
customarily maintained by it in the past;
|
|
|
|
make or rescind any material express or deemed election relating
to taxes, including elections for any and all joint ventures,
partnerships, limited liability companies or other investments
where it has the capacity to make such binding election;
|
|
|
|
settle or compromise any material claim, action, suit,
litigation, proceeding, arbitration, investigation, audit or
controversy relating to taxes;
|
|
|
|
change in any material respect any of its methods of reporting
income or deductions for federal income tax purposes from those
employed in the preparation of its federal income tax return for
the most recent taxable year for which a return has been filed,
except as may be required by applicable law;
|
|
|
|
(i) incur any indebtedness for borrowed money or guarantee
any such indebtedness of others; (ii) enter into any
material lease (whether operating or capital); (iii) create
any lien on the property of the Partnership or its subsidiaries
in connection with any pre-existing indebtedness, new
indebtedness or lease; or (iv) make or commit to make any
capital expenditures; except for any such action as would not
materially adversely affect the Partnerships or
Holdings ability to consummate the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
authorize, recommend, propose or announce an intention to adopt
a plan of complete or partial dissolution or liquidation;
|
|
|
|
except in connection with obtaining unitholder approval of the
merger or its consideration of a acquisition proposal as
permitted under the merger agreement, knowingly take any action
that is intended or is reasonably likely to result in any of its
representations and warranties set forth in the merger agreement
being or becoming untrue in any material respect at the closing
date, any of the conditions to the merger not being satisfied,
any material delay or prevention of the consummation of the
merger or any material violation of any provision of the merger
agreement except, in each case, as may be required by
law; or
|
|
|
|
agree or commit to do any of the prohibited actions described
above.
|
Each of Holdings and Holdings GP have agreed that, without the
prior written consent of the Partnership Audit Committee, it
will not, and will cause its subsidiaries not to, during the
period from the date of the merger agreement until the effective
time of the merger or the date, if any, on which the merger
agreement is terminated, except as expressly contemplated or
permitted by the merger agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
conduct its business and the business of its subsidiaries other
than in the ordinary and usual course of business;
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
fail to use commercially reasonable best efforts to preserve
intact its business organization, goodwill and assets and
maintain its rights, franchises and existing relations with
customers, suppliers, employees or business associates;
|
|
|
|
take any action that would adversely affect the ability of any
party to obtain any approval required under the HSR Act;
|
|
|
|
take any action that would have a material adverse effect on
Holdings and its subsidiaries (taken as a whole);
|
|
|
|
issue, sell or otherwise permit to become outstanding, or
authorize the creation of, any additional equity, any
appreciation rights or any rights or enter into any agreements
with respect to such transactions or permit any additional
equity interests to become subject to new grants of employee
unit options, unit appreciation rights or similar equity-based
employee rights;
|
|
|
|
split, combine or reclassify any of its equity interests or
issue or authorize or propose the issuance of any other
securities in respect of, in lieu of or in substitution for its
equity interests;
|
|
|
|
except as contemplated by Holdings compensation or benefit
plans in effect on or as required by the terms of its securities
outstanding on the date of the merger agreement, redeem,
repurchase or otherwise acquire or permit any of its
subsidiaries to purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any
partnership interests;
|
|
|
|
sell, lease, dispose of or discontinue any portion of its
assets, business or properties, which is material to it and its
subsidiaries taken as a whole, or acquire, by merger or
otherwise, or lease (other than by way of foreclosures or
acquisitions of control in a bona fide fiduciary capacity or in
satisfaction of debts previously contracted in good faith, in
each case in the ordinary and usual course of business
consistent with past practice) any assets or all or any portion
of, the business or property of any other entity which, in
either case, is material to it, or would be likely to have a
material adverse effect;
|
|
|
|
amend the limited liability company agreement of the Partnership
GP, the existing partnership agreement of the Partnership, the
existing partnership agreement of Holdings or the limited
liability company agreement of Holdings GP other than in
accordance with the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
implement or adopt any material change in its accounting
principles, practices or methods, except for changes required by
law or generally accepted accounting principles;
|
|
|
|
fail to use commercially reasonable best efforts to maintain
with financially responsible insurance companies, insurance in
such amounts and against such risks and losses as has been
customarily maintained by it in the past;
|
|
|
|
make or rescind any material express or deemed election relating
to taxes, including elections for any and all joint ventures,
partnerships, limited liability companies or other investments
where it has the capacity to make such binding election;
|
|
|
|
settle or compromise any material claim, action, suit,
litigation, proceeding, arbitration, investigation, audit or
controversy relating to taxes;
|
|
|
|
change in any material respect any of its methods of reporting
income or deductions for federal income tax purposes from those
employed in the preparation of its federal income tax return for
the most recent taxable year for which a return has been filed,
except as may be required by applicable law;
|
|
|
|
incur any indebtedness for borrowed money or guarantee any such
indebtedness of others; enter into any material lease (whether
operating or capital); create any lien on the property of
Holdings or its subsidiaries in connection with any pre-existing
indebtedness, new indebtedness or lease; or make or commit any
capital expenditures;
|
|
|
|
authorize, recommend, propose or announce an intention to adopt
a plan of complete or partial dissolution or liquidation;
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
except in connection with obtaining unitholder approval of the
merger or its consideration of a acquisition proposal as
permitted under the merger agreement, knowingly take any action
that is intended or is reasonably likely to result in any of its
representations and warranties set forth in the merger agreement
being or becoming untrue in any material respect at the closing
date, any of the conditions to the merger not being satisfied,
any material delay or prevention of the consummation of the
merger or any material violation of any provision of the merger
agreement except, in each case, as may be required by
law; or
|
|
|
|
agree or commit to do any of the prohibited actions described
above.
|
Representations
and Warranties
The merger agreement contains representations and warranties
made by each of the parties regarding aspects of their
respective businesses, financial condition and structure, as
well as other facts pertinent to the merger. Each of Holdings
and Holdings GP on the one hand and the Partnership, the
Partnership GP and MergerCo, on the other hand, has made
representations and warranties to the other in the merger
agreement with respect to the following subject matters:
|
|
|
|
|
existence, good standing and qualification to conduct business;
|
|
|
|
capitalization, including ownership of subsidiary capital stock
and the absence of restrictions or encumbrances with respect to
capital stock of any subsidiary;
|
|
|
|
existence, ownership, good standing and qualification of
subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
power and authorization to enter into and carry out the
obligations of the merger agreement and the enforceability of
the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
compliance with laws;
|
|
|
|
defaults on contracts;
|
|
|
|
absence of any conflict or violation of organizational
documents, third party agreements or law or regulation as a
result of entering into and carrying out the obligations of the
merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
filings and reports with the SEC, and financial information;
|
|
|
|
fees payable to brokers;
|
|
|
|
tax matters;
|
|
|
|
regulatory approvals or consents required to complete the merger;
|
|
|
|
the Partnership Audit Committee recommendations;
|
|
|
|
the Holdings Board recommendations;
|
|
|
|
operations of MergerCo;
|
|
|
|
the opinion of the financial advisor to Holdings GP;
|
|
|
|
the opinion of the financial advisor to the Partnership Audit
Committee; and
|
|
|
|
no material adverse effect on the Partnership.
|
The representations and warranties contained in the merger
agreement will not survive beyond the effective time of the
merger.
Additional
Covenants
Best
Efforts
Each of Holdings and the Partnership has agreed to use its
commercially reasonable best efforts in good faith to take all
actions necessary, proper or advisable under applicable law to
consummate the merger,
95
including obtaining regulatory approvals and any other third
party approvals, having any injunction or restraining order
adversely affecting the consummation of the merger lifted or
rescinded, defending any litigation seeking to enjoin, prevent
or delay the consummation of the merger or seeking material
damages, and cooperating fully with the other party and
furnishing to the other party copies of all correspondence,
filings and communications with the regulatory authorities. In
complying with the commercially reasonable best efforts
covenant, neither the Partnership nor Holdings nor any of their
subsidiaries is required to take measures that would have a
material adverse effect on it or its subsidiaries taken as a
whole.
Equity
Holder Approvals
Each of Holdings and the Partnership has agreed to call and
convene a meeting of its unitholders. In the case of the
Holdings unitholders, the purpose of voting will be to approve
the merger, the merger agreement and any other matters required
to be approved by them for consummation of the merger. In the
case of the Partnership unitholders, the purpose of voting will
be to approve the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby, including the merger and the issuance of
Partnership LP units pursuant to the merger agreement, and the
amended and restated partnership agreement, and any other
matters required to be approved by them for consummation of the
merger. Any change in recommendation will not affect either
partys obligation to convene such a meeting, unless the
merger agreement is terminated in accordance with its terms.
Registration
Statement
Each of Holdings and the Partnership agreed to cooperate in the
preparation of the registration statement that includes this
joint proxy statement/prospectus (and other proxy solicitation
materials of the Partnership and Holdings) filed with the SEC in
connection with the special meetings.
Press
Releases
Prior to any change in recommendation, each of Holdings and the
Partnership will not, without the prior approval of the Holdings
Board in the case of Holdings and the Partnership Audit
Committee in the case of the Partnership, issue any press
release or written statement for general circulation relating to
the merger, except as otherwise required by applicable law or
regulation or the applicable stock exchange rules, in which case
it will consult with the other party before issuing any press
release or written statement.
Access;
Information
Upon reasonable notice, and subject to competition laws relating
to exchanges of information, each party and its subsidiaries
will grant the other parties and their officers, employees,
counsel, accountants and other authorized representatives,
access throughout the period prior to the effective time of the
merger, to all its properties, books, contracts and records and
to its officers, employees, accountants, counsel and other
representatives. Neither party is required to provide access to
or to disclose information where such access or disclosure would
violate or prejudice the rights of its customers, jeopardize the
attorney-client privilege or contravene any law, rule,
regulation, order, judgment, fiduciary duty or binding agreement
entered into prior to the date of the merger agreement.
Affiliate
Arrangements
Holdings must deliver to the Partnership a schedule of each
person that is, or is reasonably likely to be, deemed an
affiliate of Holdings within 15 days of the mailing of this
joint proxy statement/prospectus. Holdings must use commercially
reasonable best efforts to prevent these affiliates from selling
any Partnership LP units received in connection with the merger
in violation of the registration requirements of the Securities
Act.
No
Rights Triggered
Each of Holdings and the Partnership will take all steps
necessary to ensure that the entering into of the merger
agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated
thereby will not result in the grant
96
of any rights, including convertible securities, to any person
under their respective partnership agreements or under any
material agreement to which it or its subsidiaries is a party.
Takeover
Laws
Neither Holdings nor the Partnership will take any action that
would cause the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement to be subject to requirements imposed by any takeover
laws.
New
York Stock Exchange
The Partnership will use commercially reasonable best efforts to
list the Partnership LP units to be issued to the unitholders of
Holdings on the New York Stock Exchange prior to the effective
time of the merger.
Third
Party Approvals
Holdings and the Partnership and their respective subsidiaries
will cooperate and use their commercially reasonable best
efforts to prepare all documentation, to effect all filings and
to obtain all permits, consents, approvals and authorizations of
all third parties and all regulatory approvals necessary to
consummate the merger as expeditiously as practicable.
Indemnification;
Directors and Officers Insurance
The Partnership and Holdings, as the surviving entity from the
merger, jointly and severally, will indemnify each person who is
a director or officer of Holdings or any of its subsidiaries,
both as of the date of the merger agreement and through the
effective date of the merger, to the fullest extent permitted by
law in connection with any claim and losses or damages arising
out of or pertaining to the persons service as a director
or officer of Holdings or its subsidiaries. Both will also pay
for any expenses incurred in defending such claim or serving as
a witness relating to any claim within ten days after any
request for advancement.
The Partnership will maintain or cause Holdings to maintain, for
at least six years following the effective time of the merger,
the current policies of directors and officers
liability insurance maintained by Holdings and its subsidiaries,
except that Holdings may substitute policies of at least the
same coverage and amounts containing terms and conditions which
are not, in the aggregate, less advantageous to the directors
and officers of Holdings or Holdings GP than the existing
policy; provided, that the Partnership is not required to
pay annual premiums in excess of 300% of the last annual premium
paid by Holdings prior to the date of the merger. Such
obligation of the Partnership will be deemed to have been
satisfied if prepaid tail policies have been
obtained by Holdings with terms and carriers at least as
favorable as the current policy.
The Partnership and MergerCo also agreed that all rights to
indemnification, advancement of expenses and exculpation from
liabilities for acts or omissions occurring at or prior to the
effective time of the merger now existing in favor of existing
indemnified parties, as provided in the Holdings agreement of
limited partnership and the indemnification agreements of
Holdings or any of its subsidiaries will be assumed by Holdings,
the Partnership and the Partnership GP in the merger, without
further action, at the effective time of the merger and will
survive the merger and will continue in full force and effect in
accordance with their terms.
Notification
of Certain Matters
Holdings and the Partnership will give prompt notice to the
other of: (a) any fact, event or circumstance known to it
that is reasonably likely, individually or taken together with
other facts, events or circumstances known to it to result in
any material adverse effect or that would cause or constitute a
material breach of any of its representations, warranties,
agreements or covenants contained in the merger agreement, and
(b) any change in its condition or business or any
litigation or governmental complaints, investigations or
hearings to the extent it results in, or would reasonably be
expected to result in, a material adverse effect.
97
Section 16(b)
Matters
Holdings will take such steps as are reasonably requested by any
party to the merger agreement to cause, as applicable,
dispositions of the equity of Holdings (including derivative
securities) by the directors and executive officers of Holdings
GP pursuant to the merger agreement, to be exempt from the
short-swing profit rules under Section 16(b) of the
Exchange Act.
Amended
and Restated Partnership Agreement
Subject to receipt of the Partnership unitholders
approval, the Partnership GP will execute and make effective the
proposed amended and restated partnership agreement of the
Partnership.
The
Partnership Board Membership
Immediately following the effective time of the merger, the
Partnership Board is expected to consist of nine
(9) members. If (a) approvals from the PaPUC and CPUC
of the public election provisions are received or (b) a
determination by the Partnership Board that such approvals are
not required is made, as applicable, prior to the closing of the
merger, the merger agreement provides that the initial
Partnership Board will be comprised of the three
(3) members of the Audit Committee of the Holdings Board,
the Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership GP, the three
(3) members of the Partnership Audit Committee and two
(2) members designated by Holdings GP in its sole
discretion (currently expected to be Frank J. Loverro and John
F. Erhard). If (a) or (b) above does not occur prior to the
closing of the merger, the merger agreement does not specify who
the initial Partnership Board will be comprised of and Holdings
GP (through Holdings) will continue to have the right to appoint
all of the members of the Partnership Board until the earlier to
occur of either (a) or (b) above.
Limitation
on Partnership Acquisition Proposals
General
The Partnership and the Partnership GP have agreed that, without
the prior written consent of the Holdings Board, it will not,
and will cause its subsidiaries not to, during the period from
the date of merger agreement until the effective time of the
merger or the date, if any, on which the merger agreement is
terminated, except as expressly contemplated or permitted by the
merger agreement, enter into a definitive agreement with another
person with respect to a Partnership acquisition proposal.
Partnership Acquisition Proposal. In this
joint proxy statement/prospectus, the term Partnership
acquisition proposal means any proposal or offer from or
by any person other than Holdings and its subsidiaries relating
to (i) any direct or indirect acquisition of (a) more
than 50% of the assets of the Partnership and its subsidiaries,
taken as a whole, (b) more than 50% of the outstanding
equity securities of the Partnership or (c) a business or
businesses that constitute more than 50% of the cash flow, net
revenues, net income or assets of the Partnership and its
subsidiaries, taken as a whole; (ii) any tender offer or
exchange offer, as defined pursuant to the Exchange Act, that,
if consummated, would result in any person beneficially owning
more than 50% of the outstanding equity securities of the
Partnership; or (iii) any merger, consolidation, business
combination, recapitalization, liquidation, dissolution or
similar transaction involving the Partnership other than the
merger.
Change
in Recommendation by the Partnership Audit
Committee
The Partnership Audit Committee may withdraw, modify or qualify
its recommendation to its limited partners that they approve the
merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby if it
has concluded in good faith, after consultation with its outside
legal advisors and financial advisors, that the failure to make
a change in recommendation would be inconsistent with its
fiduciary duties under the existing partnership agreement of the
Partnership and applicable law. However, prior to making a
change in recommendation, the Partnership must give the Holdings
Board three business days prior written notice that it intends
to make a change in recommendation and specifying the reasons
for the change in reasonable detail, including, if
98
applicable, the terms and conditions of any proposed transaction
that is the basis of the proposed change in recommendation.
No
Solicitation of Other Offers by Holdings
General
None of Holdings GP, Holdings and its subsidiaries will, and
they will use their commercially reasonable best efforts to
cause their representatives not to, directly or indirectly:
|
|
|
|
|
knowingly initiate, solicit or encourage the submission of any
acquisition proposal; or
|
|
|
|
participate in any discussions or negotiations regarding, or
furnish to any person any non-public information with respect to
any acquisition proposal.
|
Acquisition Proposal. In this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, the term acquisition proposal
means: any proposal, offer or inquiry from or by any person
other than the Partnership, the Partnership GP or MergerCo
relating to (i) any direct or indirect acquisition of
(a) more than 20% of the assets of Holdings and its
subsidiaries, taken as a whole; (b) more than 20% of the
outstanding equity securities of Holdings; or (c) a
business or businesses that constitute more than 20% of the cash
flow, net revenues, net income or assets of Holdings and its
subsidiaries, taken as a whole; (ii) any tender offer or
exchange offer that, if consummated, would result in any person
beneficially owning more than 20% of the outstanding equity
securities of Holdings; or (iii) any merger, consolidation,
business combination, recapitalization, liquidation, dissolution
or similar transaction involving Holdings, other than the merger.
Provision
of Information in Connection with an Acquisition
Proposal
Upon receipt of an unsolicited written acquisition proposal that
did not result from a knowing and intentional breach of the
provisions described under General
above, Holdings may furnish information, including information
pertaining to the Partnership, to or enter into or participate
in any discussions or negotiations with the party making such
acquisition proposal if the Holdings Board, after consultation
with its outside legal advisors and financial advisors,
determines in good faith that such acquisition proposal
constitutes or is likely to result in a superior proposal and
that failure to take such action would be inconsistent with its
fiduciary duties under the existing partnership agreement of
Holdings and applicable law. Holdings will promptly provide or
make available to the Partnership any non-public information
concerning Holdings or any of its subsidiaries that is provided
or made available to any such party.
Holdings may not provide any non-public information or data
pertaining to the Partnership to the party making the
acquisition proposal unless (i) Holdings has not knowingly
and intentionally breached its obligations described under this
section No Solicitation of Other Offers by
Holdings; (ii) the Holdings Board determines, after
consultation with its outside legal advisors and financial
consultants, that the provision of such non-public information
or data pertaining to the Partnership could possibly lead to a
change in recommendation by the Holdings Board; and
(iii) Holdings has first required such party to execute a
confidentiality agreement meeting the requirements of such
agreements as set forth in the merger agreement, furnished a
copy of such confidentiality agreement to the Partnership,
notified the Partnership of the identity of such party and gives
the Partnership similar access to information. In addition, the
Partnership must provide to Holdings and to any such receiving
party any non-public information or data pertaining to the
Partnership that Holdings reasonably requests. However, Holdings
may not provide and the Partnership will not be required to
provide to any such party any information pertaining to the
Partnership where Holdings knows that the provision of such
information would jeopardize the attorney-client privilege of
the institution in possession or control of such information or
contravene any law, rule, regulation, order, judgment, decree,
fiduciary duty or binding agreement entered into prior to the
date of the merger agreement.
Change
in Recommendation by the Holdings Board
Except as provided below, the Holdings Board may not
(i) withdraw, modify or qualify in any manner adverse to
the Partnership its recommendation to Holdings unitholders;
(ii) publicly approve or recommend, or
99
publicly propose to approve or recommend, any acquisition
proposal; or (iii) approve, adopt or recommend, or publicly
propose to approve, adopt or recommend, or allow Holdings or any
of its subsidiaries to execute or enter into, any letter of
intent, memorandum of understanding, agreement in principle,
merger agreement, acquisition agreement, option agreement, joint
venture agreement, partnership agreement or other similar
contract or any tender or exchange offer providing for, with
respect to or in connection with any acquisition proposal.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time prior to obtaining
the requisite Holdings unitholder approval, the Holdings Board
may change its recommendation if it has concluded in good faith,
after consultation with its outside legal advisors and financial
advisors, that the failure to make a change in recommendation
would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under the
existing partnership agreement of Holdings and applicable law.
In the absence of a superior proposal as defined in
the merger agreement, the approval of a majority of the members
of the Holdings Audit Committee will be required prior to a
change in recommendation. Further, the Holdings Board will not
be entitled to make a change in recommendation unless Holdings
has (i) complied in all material respects with the
provisions described under this section No
Solicitation of Other Offers by Holdings,
(ii) provided the Partnership with three business days
prior written notice advising that the Holdings Board intends to
take such action and specifying the reasons therefor in
reasonable detail, including, if applicable, the terms and
conditions of any proposed transaction that is the basis of the
proposed action and the identity of the person making the
proposal and contemporaneously providing a copy of all relevant
proposed transaction documents and (iii) if applicable,
provided to the Partnership all materials and information
provided to the person making the proposal.
Conditions
to the Completion of the Merger
The completion of the merger is subject to various conditions.
While it is anticipated that all of these conditions will be
satisfied, there can be no assurance as to whether or when all
of the conditions will be satisfied or, where permissible,
waived.
Conditions to Each Partys
Obligations. Each partys obligation to
complete the merger is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of
the following conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
approval and adoption by the Holdings unitholders of the merger,
the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby;
|
|
|
|
approval by the Partnership unitholders of the merger agreement
and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger
and the issuance of the Partnership LP units pursuant to the
merger agreement, and the proposed amended and restated
partnership agreement;
|
|
|
|
any waiting period under the HSR Act has expired or been
terminated and the receipt of all consents, approvals, permits
and authorization required to be obtained prior to consummation
of the merger, except where non-receipt would not be reasonably
likely to result in a material adverse effect on the Partnership
or Holdings;
|
|
|
|
absence of any order, decree or injunction of any court or
agency and law, statute or regulation that enjoins, prohibits or
makes illegal any of the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement, and the absence of any action, proceeding or
investigation by any regulatory authority regarding the merger
or any of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
the registration statement has become effective and no stop
order suspending the effectiveness of the registration statement
has been issued and no proceedings for that purpose have been
initiated or threatened by the SEC; and
|
|
|
|
approval by the New York Stock Exchange of listing of the
Partnership LP units to be issued in the merger, subject to
official notice of issuance.
|
The merger agreement provides that the condition described in
the second bullet point above relating to the amended and
restated partnership agreement will be satisfied if the holders
of Partnership LP units approve all of the amendments other than
the deletion of Sections 7.7(d) (f) and (h)-(j)
(the Separateness
100
Provisions) from the Partnerships existing limited
partnership agreement. This joint proxy statement/prospectus
includes a vote to approve all of the amendments contained in
the amended and restated partnership agreement, including the
deletion of the Separateness Provisions, as one proposal. If
approval of the proposal to approve the amended and restated
partnership agreement is not obtained, the Partnership may seek
approval of the amendments contained in the amended and restated
partnership agreement other than the deletion of the
Separateness Provisions.
Additional Conditions to Holdings
Obligations. The obligation of Holdings to
complete the merger is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of
the following conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
accuracy of the Partnerships and the Partnership GPs
representations and warranties contained in the merger agreement
both as of the date of the merger agreement and as of the
closing date of the merger, in all material respects;
|
|
|
|
the performance in all material respects by the Partnership and
the Partnership GP of their respective obligations contained in
the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
the receipt by Holdings of a certificate signed by the Chief
Executive Officer of the Partnership GP to the effect that the
conditions set forth in the two bullet points above have been
satisfied;
|
|
|
|
the receipt by Holdings of an opinion of its counsel to the
effect that: (i) the material federal income tax
consequences to the holders of Holdings common units set forth
in this joint proxy statement/prospectus of the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement are accurately set forth;
and (ii) no gain or loss should be recognized by the
holders of Holdings units to the extent Partnership LP units are
received in exchange therefor as a result of the merger, other
than gain resulting from either (a) any decrease in
partnership liabilities pursuant to Section 752 of the
Internal Revenue Code, or (b) any cash or other property
distributions; and
|
|
|
|
there has not occurred a material adverse effect with respect to
the Partnership between the date of the merger agreement and the
closing date.
|
Additional Conditions to the Partnerships
Obligations. The obligations of the Partnership
to complete the merger are subject to the satisfaction or waiver
of the following conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
accuracy of Holdings and Holdings GPs representations and
warranties contained in the merger agreement both at and as of
the date of the merger agreement and at and as of the closing
date of the merger, in all material respects;
|
|
|
|
the performance in all material respects by Holdings and
Holdings GP of its respective obligations contained in the
merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
the receipt by the Partnership of a certificate signed by the
Chief Financial Officer of Holdings GP to the effect that the
conditions set forth in the two bullet points above have been
satisfied; and
|
|
|
|
the receipt by the Partnership of an opinion of its counsel to
the effect that: the adoption of the proposed amended and
restated partnership agreement, the merger and the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement will not result in a loss
of limited liability of any limited partner of the Partnership;
the adoption of the proposed amended and restated partnership
agreement, the merger and the transactions contemplated by the
merger agreement will not cause the Partnership or any operating
partnership to be treated as an association taxable as a
corporation or otherwise to be taxed as an entity for federal
income tax purposes; at least 90% of the current gross income of
the Partnership constitutes qualifying income under
Section 7704(d) of the Internal Revenue Code; the material
federal income tax consequences to the holders of Partnership LP
units (other than Holdings) discussed in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus are accurate; and no gain or loss should be
recognized by existing holders of Partnership LP units as a
result of the transactions (other than gain resulting from a
decrease, if any, in Partnership liabilities pursuant to Section
752 of the Internal Revenue Code).
|
101
Termination
of the Merger Agreement
The merger agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the
effective time of the merger in any of the following ways:
|
|
|
|
|
by mutual written consent of Holdings and the Partnership;
|
|
|
|
by either Holdings or the Partnership upon written notice to the
other:
|
|
|
|
|
|
if the merger is not completed on or before December 31,
2010 or the termination date, unless the failure of
the closing to occur by this date is primarily due to the
failure of the party seeking to terminate the merger agreement
to fulfill any material obligation under the merger agreement or
a material breach of the merger agreement by such party. Either
the Partnership or Holdings may, without the consent of the
other party, extend the termination date to February 28,
2011 unless a law of the United States has been adopted such
that gain or loss should be recognized by the holders of
Holdings units to the extent Partnership LP units are received
in exchange therefor as a result of the merger, with certain
exceptions;
|
|
|
|
if any regulatory authority has issued a final and nonappealable
statute, rule, order, decree or regulation or taken any other
action that permanently restrains, enjoins or prohibits the
consummation of the merger, provided that the terminating party
is not in breach of its obligation to use commercially
reasonable best efforts to complete the merger promptly;
|
|
|
|
if the Holdings unitholders fail to approve and adopt the merger
agreement by the requisite vote; but this right to terminate is
not available to Holdings if the failure to obtain the Holdings
unitholder approval was caused by a material breach by Holdings
of the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
if there has been a material breach of or any material
inaccuracy in any of the representations or warranties set forth
in the merger agreement on the part of any of the other parties,
which breach has not been cured within 30 days after
receiving notice from the terminating party, or which breach, by
its nature, cannot be cured prior to the termination date.
However, the terminating party itself must not be in material
breach of any representation, warranty, covenant or agreement.
In order for termination to take place, the breaches must be of
such nature that they would entitle the party receiving such a
representation not to carry out the merger agreement because
certain closing conditions are not met;
|
|
|
|
if there has been a material breach of any of the covenants or
agreements set forth in the merger agreement on the part of any
of the other parties, which breach has not been cured within
30 days after receiving notice from the terminating party,
or which breach, by its nature, cannot be cured prior to the
termination date. However, the terminating party itself must not
be in material breach of any representation, warranty, covenant
or agreement. In order for termination to take place, the
breaches must be of such nature that they would entitle the
party receiving the benefits of such covenants or agreements not
to carry out the merger agreement because certain closing
conditions are not met; or
|
|
|
|
if the Partnership unitholders fail to approve and adopt the
merger agreement or the proposed amended and restated
partnership agreement or approve the issuance of the LP units;
but this right to terminate is not available to the Partnership
if the failure to obtain the Partnership unitholder approval was
caused by a material breach of the merger agreement by the
Partnership.
|
|
|
|
|
|
by the Partnership if the Holdings Board makes a change in
recommendation as described under No
Solicitation of Other Offers by Holdings Change in
Recommendation by the Holdings Board beginning on
page 99;
|
|
|
|
by Holdings if:
|
|
|
|
|
|
prior to obtaining the necessary unitholder approval at the
Holdings special meeting Holdings receives a third party
acquisition proposal that the Holdings Board concludes, in good
faith, is a superior proposal; the Holdings Board makes a change
in recommendation; Holdings has not
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
knowingly and intentionally breached the no shop
provisions of the merger agreement; and Holdings concurrently
enters into an agreement for that superior proposal, and pays
the termination fee described below as described under
No Solicitation of Other Offers by
Holdings Change in Recommendation by the Holdings
Board; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
the Partnership Audit Committee makes a change in recommendation
as described under Limitation on Partnership
Acquisition Proposals Change in Recommendation by
the Partnership Audit Committee beginning on page 98.
|
Termination
Fees and Expenses
Holdings or the Partnership will be obligated to pay termination
fees (to be held by an escrow agent) upon the termination of the
merger agreement in the following circumstances:
|
|
|
|
|
Holdings will be obligated to pay a fee to the Partnership equal
to $29.0 million in cash, reduced by certain amounts paid,
if:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the merger agreement is terminated by the Partnership because
the Holdings Board effects a change in recommendation;
|
|
|
|
after an acquisition proposal for 50% or more of the assets of,
the equity interest in or businesses of Holdings has been made
to the Holdings unitholders or an intention to make such an
acquisition proposal has been made known, the merger agreement
is terminated by either the Partnership or Holdings because the
merger was not consummated by the termination date or Holdings
failed to obtain the requisite unitholder approvals or by the
Partnership because of a breach of Holdings
representations and warranties or agreements or covenants and,
in each case, within 12 months after the merger agreement
is terminated, Holdings or any of its subsidiaries enters into a
definitive agreement in respect of any acquisition proposal and
consummates the transaction contemplated by such definitive
agreement (which need not be the same acquisition proposal as
the acquisition proposal first mentioned in this
paragraph); or
|
|
|
|
the merger agreement is terminated by Holdings to enter into a
superior proposal under certain circumstances.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Partnership will be obligated to pay a fee to Holdings equal
to $29.0 million in cash if the Partnership Audit Committee
effects a change in recommendation and Holdings terminates the
merger agreement because of such change in recommendation.
|
In the event that Holdings or the Partnership is obligated to
pay the termination fee to the Partnership or Holdings,
respectively, the escrow agent will release to the Partnership
or Holdings, as applicable, a portion of the termination fee
equal to no greater than 70% of the maximum remaining amount
which, in the good faith view of the Partnership GP or Holdings
GP, as applicable, may be taken in the gross income of the
Partnership or Holdings, as the case may be without exceeding
the permissible qualifying income limits for a publicly traded
partnership based on applicable provisions of the Internal
Revenue Code. Following the year in which the initial release of
the termination fee occurs, additional amounts may be released
or a portion of the fee may be required to be returned so that
the amount released equals between 80% and 90% of the maximum
which the Partnership or Holdings, as applicable, could actually
have taken in gross income. Any amount of the termination fee
not distributed to the party to which the fee is due will be
refunded to the party that paid the fee. In addition, Holdings
has waived for itself and its affiliates, and will cause the
Partnership GP to waive, any rights to any distribution by the
Partnership of any termination fee paid to the Partnership.
To the extent that Holdings has already paid the Partnership its
expenses in connection with the termination of the merger
agreement and subsequently Holdings is obligated to pay the
termination fee to the escrow agent on the Partnerships
behalf, Holdings is only obligated to pay the escrow agent an
amount equal to the difference of the applicable termination fee
and expenses previously paid.
103
Holdings or the Partnership will be obligated to pay expenses
upon the termination of the merger agreement in the following
circumstances:
|
|
|
|
|
Holdings will be obligated to pay the Partnerships
expenses, not to exceed $6.0 million, if the merger
agreement is terminated by:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the Partnership because of a breach of Holdings or
Holdings GPs material representations and warranties or
agreements or covenants; or
|
|
|
|
the Partnership or Holdings because Holdings failed to obtain
the requisite approvals from its unitholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Partnership will obligated to pay to Holdings
expenses, not to exceed $6.0 million, if the merger
agreement is terminated by:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holdings because of a breach of the Partnerships or the
Partnership GPs material representations and warranties or
agreements or covenants; or
|
|
|
|
Holdings or the Partnership because the Partnership failed to
obtain the requisite approvals from its unitholders.
|
If the merger is consummated, the Partnership will pay the
property and transfer taxes imposed on either party in
connection with the merger. The Partnership will pay the
expenses for filing, printing, and mailing the joint proxy
statement/prospectus. Any filing fees payable pursuant to the
HSR Act or regulatory laws and other filing fees incurred in
connection with the merger agreement will be paid by the party
incurring the fee.
Waiver
and Amendment of the Merger Agreement
Prior to the closing, any provision of the merger agreement may
be waived in writing by the party benefited by the provision and
approved by the Partnership Audit Committee in the case of the
Partnership and by the Holdings Board in the case of Holdings.
Any provision of the merger agreement may be amended or modified
prior to the closing by a written agreement between the parties
approved by the Partnership Audit Committee and the Holdings
Board. Nonetheless, after the approvals of unitholders have been
obtained, no amendment may be made that requires further
unitholder approval without such approval.
Governing
Law
The merger agreement is governed by and interpreted under
Delaware law.
104
THE
AMENDED AND RESTATED PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT OF THE
PARTNERSHIP
The following is a summary of the material provisions of the
amended and restated partnership agreement of the Partnership.
The form of amended and restated partnership agreement is
attached hereto as Annex B.
Immediately following the closing of the merger, the
Partnerships existing partnership agreement will be
amended and restated. The material differences between the
existing partnership agreement and the proposed amended and
restated partnership agreement include: (i) the general
partner interest represented by the incentive distribution
rights will be canceled and the GP units will be converted into
a non-economic general partner interest in the Partnership;
(ii) the public election provisions will be added but will
not take effect until either approval by the CPUC and PaPUC or a
determination by the Partnership Board that such approvals are
not required, (iii) the Partnership GPs right to
acquire all Partnership LP units if the Partnership GP or its
affiliates own more than 90% of the outstanding Partnership LP
units will be eliminated; (iv) certain provisions added to
the existing partnership agreement in 2004 to clarify the
separateness of the Partnership GP, the Partnership, the
Partnerships operating partnerships and services company
from the owners of the Partnership GP, which will become
generally inapplicable once the Partnership owns the Partnership
GP, will be eliminated and (v) certain other legacy
provisions which are no longer applicable to the Partnership,
will be eliminated.
The following provisions of the amended and restated partnership
agreement are summarized elsewhere in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
with regard to distributions of available cash, please read
Partnership Cash Distribution Policy on
page 150;
|
|
|
|
with regard to allocations of taxable income and taxable loss,
please read Federal Income Taxation of the Partnership and
Its Unitholders beginning on page 121.
|
Organization
and Duration
The Partnership was organized on July 11, 1986 and has a
term extending until the close of business on December 31,
2086.
Purpose
The purpose of the Partnership under the amended and restated
partnership agreement is to engage in any lawful activity for
which limited partnerships may be organized under the Delaware
Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act (DRULPA).
The Partnership GP is authorized in general to perform all acts
deemed necessary to carry out the Partnerships purposes
and to conduct its business.
Power of
Attorney
Each limited partner in the Partnership grants to the
Partnership GP and, if appointed, a liquidator, a power of
attorney to, among other things, execute and file documents
required for the Partnerships qualification, continuance
or dissolution.
Limited
Liability
Assuming that a limited partner does not participate in the
control of the Partnerships business within the meaning of
the DRULPA and that it otherwise acts in conformity with the
provisions of the Partnerships amended and restated
partnership agreement, the partners liability under the
DRULPA will be limited, subject to possible exceptions, to the
amount of capital the partner is obligated to contribute to the
Partnership for the partners Partnership LP units plus the
partners share of any undistributed profits and assets and
any funds wrongfully distributed to it, as described below. If
it were determined, however, that the right, or exercise of the
right, by the Partnerships limited partners as a group:
|
|
|
|
|
to elect members of the Partnership Board;
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
to remove or replace the Partnership GP;
|
|
|
|
to approve certain amendments to the amended and restated
partnership agreement; or
|
|
|
|
to take any other action under the amended and restated
partnership agreement
|
constituted participation in the control of the
Partnerships business for the purposes of the DRULPA, then
the limited partners could be held personally liable for the
Partnerships obligations under the laws of Delaware, to
the same extent as the Partnership GP. This liability would
extend to persons who transact business with the Partnership who
reasonably believe that a limited partner is a general partner
based on the limited partners conduct. Neither the
Partnerships amended and restated partnership agreement
nor the DRULPA specifically provides for legal recourse against
the Partnership GP if a limited partner were to lose limited
liability through any fault of the Partnership GP. While this
does not mean that a limited partner could not seek legal
recourse, the Partnership knows of no precedent for this type of
a claim in Delaware case law.
Under the DRULPA, a limited partnership may not make a
distribution to a partner if, after the distribution, all
liabilities of the limited partnership, other than liabilities
to partners on account of their partnership interests and
liabilities for which the recourse of creditors is limited to
specific property of the limited partnership, would exceed the
fair value of the assets of the limited partnership. For the
purpose of determining the fair value of the assets of a limited
partnership, the DRULPA provides that the fair value of property
subject to liability for which recourse of creditors is limited
will be included in the assets of the limited partnership only
to the extent that the fair value of that property exceeds the
nonrecourse liability. The DRULPA provides that a limited
partner who receives a distribution and knew at the time of the
distribution that the distribution was in violation of the
DRULPA will be liable to the limited partnership for the amount
of the distribution for three years from the date of
distribution. Under the DRULPA, an assignee who becomes a
substituted limited partner of a limited partnership is liable
for the obligations of its assignor to make contributions to the
Partnership, excluding any obligations of the assignor with
respect to wrongful distributions, as described above, except
the assignee is not obligated for liabilities unknown to it at
the time it became a limited partner and that could not be
ascertained from the amended and restated partnership agreement.
The Partnerships subsidiaries conduct business in multiple
states. Maintenance of the Partnerships limited liability
as a limited partner or member of the Partnerships
subsidiaries formed as limited partnerships or limited liability
companies may require compliance with legal requirements in the
jurisdictions in which such subsidiaries conduct business,
including qualifying the Partnerships subsidiaries to do
business there. Limitations on the liability of a limited
partner or member for the obligations of a limited partnership
or limited liability company have not been clearly established
in many jurisdictions.
If it were determined that the Partnership was, by virtue of the
Partnerships limited partner interest or limited liability
company interest in its subsidiaries or otherwise, conducting
business in any state without compliance with the applicable
limited partnership or limited liability company statute, or
that the right or exercise of the right by the limited partners
as a group to elect members of the Partnership Board, to remove
or replace the Partnership GP, to approve certain amendments to
the Partnerships amended and restated partnership
agreement, or to take other action under the amended and
restated partnership agreement constituted participation
in the control of the Partnerships business for
purposes of the statutes of any relevant jurisdiction, then the
limited partners could be held personally liable for the
Partnerships obligations under the law of that
jurisdiction to the same extent as the Partnership GP under the
circumstances. The Partnership will operate in a manner that the
Partnership GP considers reasonable and necessary or appropriate
to preserve the limited liability of the limited partners.
106
Voting
Rights
The following matters require the Partnership unitholder vote
specified below.
|
|
|
Election of the Partnership Board
|
|
Subject to either approval by the CPUC and PaPUC of the public
election provisions or a determination by the Partnership Board
that such approvals are not required, all but up to two
directors on the Partnership Board will be elected by a
plurality of the votes cast at meetings of the limited partners.
Please read Meetings; Voting beginning
on page 110.
|
Amendment of the amended and restated partnership agreement
|
|
Certain amendments may be made by the Partnership GP without the
approval of Partnership unitholders. Certain other amendments
require the approval of a majority of outstanding Partnership LP
units. Certain other amendments require the approval of a
super-majority of outstanding Partnership LP units. Please read
Amendment of the Amended and Restated
Partnership Agreement beginning on page 107.
|
Sale of all or substantially all of the Partnerships assets
|
|
Two-thirds of outstanding Partnership LP units. Please read
Merger, Sale or Other Disposition of
Assets beginning on page 109.
|
Dissolution of the Partnership
|
|
Two-thirds of outstanding Partnership LP units. Please read
Termination and Dissolution on page 109.
|
Removal/Replacement of the Partnership GP
|
|
80% of the outstanding Partnership LP units. Please read
Withdrawal or Removal of the Partnership
GP beginning on page 109.
|
Issuance
of Additional Securities
The amended and restated partnership agreement authorizes the
Partnership GP to cause the Partnership to issue an unlimited
number of additional limited partnership interests and other
equity securities for the consideration and on the terms and
conditions established by the Partnership GP without the
approval of any limited partners. Without the prior approval of
the holders of two-thirds of the outstanding Partnership LP
units, the Partnership GP is prohibited from causing the
Partnership to issue any class or series of Partnership LP units
having preferences or other special or senior rights over the
previously outstanding Partnership LP units. Without the
approval of a majority of the holders of the outstanding
Partnership LP units, the Partnership GP is prohibited from
causing the Partnership to issue Partnership LP units to itself
or its affiliates unless the units are of a class previously
listed or admitted to trading on a national securities exchange
and property is contributed to the Partnership with a value at
least equal to the fair market value of the issued units.
It is possible that the Partnership will fund acquisitions, and
other capital requirements, through the issuance of additional
Partnership LP units or other equity securities. Holders of any
additional Partnership LP units that the Partnership issues will
be entitled to share with then-existing holders of Partnership
LP units in the Partnerships distributions of available
cash. In addition, the issuance of additional partnership
interests may dilute (i) the percentage interests of
then-existing holders of Partnership LP units in the
Partnerships net assets, and (ii) the voting rights
of then-existing holders of Partnership LP units under the
amended and restated partnership agreement.
The holders of Partnership LP units do not have preemptive
rights to acquire additional Partnership LP units or other
partnership interests.
Amendment
of the Amended and Restated Partnership Agreement
General. Amendments to the Partnerships
amended and restated partnership agreement may be proposed only
by the Partnership GP. To adopt a proposed amendment, other than
certain amendments
107
discussed below, the Partnership GP must seek written approval
of the holders of the number of units required to approve the
amendment or call a meeting of the limited partners to consider
and vote upon the proposed amendment. Except as otherwise
described below, an amendment must be approved by the limited
partners holding in the aggregate at least a majority of the
outstanding Partnership LP units, referred to as a
Majority Interest. No amendments to certain
provisions and definitions in the amended and restated
partnership agreement relating to or requiring special
approval or the approval of a majority of the members of
the Partnership Audit Committee may be made without first
obtaining such special approval.
No Unitholder Approval. The Partnership GP may
generally make amendments to the amended and restated
partnership agreement without the approval of any limited
partner or assignee to reflect:
|
|
|
|
|
a change in the Partnerships name, the location of the
Partnerships principal place of business, the
Partnerships registered agent or the Partnerships
registered office;
|
|
|
|
a change that the Partnership GP deems appropriate or necessary
for the Partnership to qualify or to continue the
Partnerships qualification as a limited partnership or a
partnership in which the limited partners have limited liability
under the laws of any state or jurisdiction or to ensure that
neither the Partnership nor any of the Partnerships
operating partnerships will be treated as an association taxable
as a corporation for federal income tax purposes;
|
|
|
|
a change that is appropriate or necessary, in the opinion of the
Partnerships counsel, to prevent the Partnership,
Holdings, the Partnership GP or any of their subsidiaries from
in any manner being subjected to the provisions of the
Investment Company Act of 1940, the Investment Advisors Act of
1940, or plan asset regulations adopted under the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, whether or not
substantially similar to plan asset regulations currently
applied or proposed; or
|
|
|
|
any other changes or events similar to any of the matters
described in the clauses above.
|
In addition, the Partnership GP may make amendments to the
Partnerships amended and restated partnership agreement
without the approval of any limited partner or assignee if those
amendments, in the discretion of the Partnership GP, reflect:
|
|
|
|
|
a change that in the good faith opinion of the Partnership GP
does not adversely affect the Partnerships limited
partners in any material respect;
|
|
|
|
a change to divide the Partnerships outstanding units into
a greater number of units, to combine the outstanding units into
a smaller number of units or to reclassify the
Partnerships units in a manner than in the good faith
opinion of the Partnership GP does not adversely affect any
class of the Partnerships limited partners in any material
respect;
|
|
|
|
a change that the Partnership GP deems appropriate or necessary
to satisfy any requirements, conditions or guidelines contained
in any order, rule or regulation of any federal or state agency
or contained in any federal or state statute; or
|
|
|
|
a change that the Partnership GP deems appropriate or necessary
to facilitate the trading of any of the Partnership LP units or
comply with any rule, regulation, requirement, condition or
guideline of any exchange on which any units are or will be
listed or admitted to trading.
|
Opinion of Counsel and Partnership Unitholder
Approval. No amendments to the amended and
restated partnership agreement will become effective without the
approval of holders of at least 80% of the Partnership LP units
unless the Partnership obtains an opinion of counsel to the
effect that the amendment will not result in the loss of limited
liability of any of the Partnerships limited partners or
cause the Partnership or any of the Partnerships operating
partnerships to be treated as an association taxable as a
corporation for federal income tax purposes.
Any amendment to the amended and restated partnership agreement
that reduces the voting percentage required to take any action
must be approved by the affirmative vote of the
Partnerships limited partners constituting not less than
the voting requirement sought to be reduced.
108
Merger,
Sale or Other Disposition of Assets
The Partnerships amended and restated partnership
agreement generally prohibits the Partnership GP, without the
prior approval of the holders of at least two-thirds of the
outstanding Partnership LP units and approval by a majority of
the members of the audit committee of the board of directors of
the Partnership GP (defined as special approval),
from causing the Partnership to, among other things, sell,
exchange or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of the
consolidated assets owned by the Partnership and its operating
partnerships. The Partnership GP may, however, mortgage, pledge,
hypothecate or grant a security interest in all or substantially
all of the Partnerships assets without special approval.
The amended and restated partnership agreement generally
prohibits the Partnership GP from causing the Partnership to
merge or consolidate with another entity without special
approval.
Withdrawal
or Removal of the Partnership GP
The Partnership GP has agreed not to withdraw voluntarily as a
general partner of the Partnership prior to the later of
December 23, 2011 or the date the ESOP loan, which is
expected to mature on March 28, 2011, is paid in full. On
or after the later of such dates, the Partnership GP may
withdraw as general partner of the Partnership by giving
90 days advance written notice, provided such
withdrawal is approved by the vote of the holders of not less
than 80% of the outstanding Partnership LP units or the
Partnership receives an opinion of counsel regarding limited
liability and tax matters.
Upon receiving notice of the withdrawal of the Partnership GP,
prior to the effective date of such withdrawal, the holders of a
majority of the outstanding Partnership LP units may select a
successor to the withdrawing general partner. If a successor is
not elected, the Partnership will be dissolved, wound up and
liquidated, unless within 90 days of that withdrawal, all
of the partners of the Partnership agree in writing to continue
the Partnerships business and to appoint a successor
general partner. Please read Termination and
Dissolution below.
The Partnership GP may not be removed unless that removal is
approved by the vote of the holders of not less than 80% of the
outstanding Partnership LP units, the Partnership receives an
opinion of counsel regarding limited liability and tax matters,
the successor general partner or an affiliate thereof agrees to
indemnify and hold harmless the Partnership GP and its
affiliates from any liability or obligation arising out of, or
causes the general partner and its affiliates to be released
from, any and all liabilities and obligations (including loan
guarantees) under fringe benefit plans sponsored by the general
partner or any of its affiliates in connection with the business
of the Partnership, except as otherwise prohibited by the
amended and restated partnership agreement, and all required
regulatory approvals for removal of the Partnership GP shall
have been obtained. Any removal of the Partnership GP is also
subject to the approval of a successor general partner by the
vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding Partnership
LP units and the agreement of the successor general partner or
one of its affiliates to indemnify the removed the general
partner against, or to cause it to be released from, certain
liabilities.
If the Partnership GP withdraws or is removed, the Partnership
is required to reimburse the departing general partner for all
amounts due the departing general partner.
Transfer
of General Partner Interest
The Partnership GP will be prohibited under the amended and
restated partnership agreement from transferring its general
partner interest.
Termination
and Dissolution
The Partnership will continue as a limited partnership until the
close of business on December 31, 2086 or until earlier
terminated under the amended and restated partnership agreement.
The Partnership will dissolve upon:
(1) the expiration of the Partnerships term on
December 31, 2086;
109
(2) the withdrawal of the Partnership GP unless a person
becomes a successor general partner prior to or on the effective
date of such withdrawal;
(3) the bankruptcy or dissolution of the Partnership GP, or
any other event that results in its ceasing to be the
Partnership GP other than by reason of a withdrawal or
removal; or
(4) the election of the Partnership GP to dissolve the
Partnership, if approved by the holders of two-thirds of the
outstanding Partnership LP units.
Upon a dissolution under clause (2) or (3) and the
failure of all partners to agree in writing to continue the
business of the Partnership and to elect a successor general
partner, the holders of Partnership LP units representing a
Majority Interest may also elect, within 180 days of such
dissolution, to reconstitute the Partnership and continue the
Partnerships business on the same terms and conditions
described in the amended and restated partnership agreement by
forming a new limited partnership on terms identical to those in
the amended and restated partnership agreement and having as
general partner a person approved by the holders of a majority
of the outstanding Partnership LP units subject to the
Partnerships receipt of an opinion of counsel to the
effect that:
(1) the action would not result in the loss of limited
liability of any limited partner; and
(2) neither the Partnership nor the reconstituted limited
partnership would be treated as an association taxable as a
corporation for federal income tax purposes.
Liquidation
and Distribution of Proceeds
Upon the Partnerships dissolution, unless the Partnership
is reconstituted and continued as a new partnership by the
holders of Partnership LP units representing a Majority
Interest, the Partnership GP or, if the Partnership GP has
withdrawn, been removed, dissolved or become bankrupt, the
liquidator authorized to wind up the Partnerships affairs
will, acting with all of the powers of the Partnership GP that
the liquidator deems appropriate or necessary in its good faith
judgment, liquidate the Partnerships assets and apply and
distribute the proceeds of the liquidation as described in
Partnership Cash Distribution Policy
Distributions upon Liquidation on page 150.
Meetings;
Voting
For purposes of determining the holders of Partnership LP units
entitled to notice of or to vote at any meeting or to give
approvals without a meeting, the Partnership GP may set a record
date, which date for purposes of notice of a meeting shall not
be less than 10 days nor more than 60 days before the
date of the meeting.
Any action that is required or permitted to be taken by
Partnership unitholders may be taken either at a meeting of
Partnership unitholders or without a meeting if consents in
writing describing the action so taken are signed by holders of
the number of units necessary to authorize or take that action
at a meeting, except that election of directors by unitholders
may only be done at a meeting. Special meetings of Partnership
unitholders may be called by the Partnership GP or by
Partnership unitholders owning at least 20% of the outstanding
Partnership LP units.
Following either (a) the receipt of approvals from the CPUC
and the PaPUC of the public election provisions or (b) a
determination by the Partnership Board that such approvals are
not required, annual meetings of limited partners for the
election of directors to the Partnership Board (as described
below), and such other matters as the Partnership Board submits
to a vote of the limited partners, will be held on the first
Tuesday in June of each year or on such other date as is fixed
by the Partnership GP. If the Partnership Board is not able to
make the determination described in (b) above, the
Partnership GP will be obligated under the amended and restated
partnership agreement to use commercially reasonable efforts to
obtain the approvals described in (a) above. If approval by
the CPUC and PaPUC of the public election provisions or a
determination by the Partnership Board that such approvals are
not required occurs after February 1 of a year, the first annual
meeting will be held in the year following such approval or
determination. Unitholders may
110
vote either in person or by proxy at meetings. The holders of a
majority of the outstanding Partnership LP units, represented in
person or by proxy, will constitute a quorum.
Except as described below with respect to the election of
directors, each record holder of a Partnership LP unit has one
vote per Partnership LP unit, although additional limited
partner interests having special voting rights could be issued.
Please read Issuance of Additional
Securities. Partnership LP units held in nominee or street
name account will be voted by the broker or other nominee in
accordance with the instruction of the beneficial owner unless
the arrangement between the beneficial owner and its nominee
provides otherwise. With respect to the election of directors,
the amended and restated partnership agreement will provide that
if, at any time, any person or group beneficially owns 20% or
more of the outstanding Partnership LP units, then all
Partnership LP units owned by such person or group in excess of
20% of the outstanding Partnership LP units may not be voted,
and in each case, the foregoing units will not be counted when
calculating the required votes for such matter and will not be
deemed to be outstanding for purposes of determining a quorum
for such meeting. Such Partnership LP units will not be treated
as a separate class for purposes of the amended and restated
partnership agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the
Partnership Board may, by action specifically referencing votes
for the election of directors, determine that the limitation
described above will not apply to a specific person or group.
For so long as Holdings GP has the right to designate any Holdco
GP Directors (as defined below), BGH GP, ArcLight and Kelso and
their affiliates will not vote their Partnership LP units in
connection with the election of Public Directors, and
Public Limited Partners will be defined as all
limited partners other than BGH GP Holdings, LLC, ArcLight and
Kelso and their affiliates. Once Holdings GP ceases to have the
right to designate any Holdco GP Directors, Public Limited
Partners will mean all limited partners.
Board of
Directors
General. The number of directors on the
Partnership Board will be not less than six and not more than
nine. Following either approval by the CPUC and the PaPUC of the
public election provisions or a determination by the Partnership
Board that such approvals are not required, any decrease in the
number of directors by the Partnership Board may not have the
effect of shortening the term of any incumbent director. The
Partnership Board must maintain at least three directors meeting
the independence and experience requirements of any national
securities exchange on which the Partnership LP units are listed
or quoted.
Public Directors. Following either approval by
the CPUC and the PaPUC of the public election provisions or a
determination by the Partnership Board that such approvals are
not required, the Public Limited Partners (as defined in the
amended and restated partnership agreement, and described above)
will be entitled to elect all members of the Partnership Board,
other than the Holdco GP Directors, as described below (such
directors elected by the Public Limited Partners are referred to
as the Public Directors). Following either approval
by the CPUC and PaPUC of the public election provisions or a
determination by the Partnership Board that such approvals are
not required, the Public Directors will be classified with
respect to their terms of office by dividing them into three
classes, each class to be as nearly equal in number as possible.
The Public Directors that are designated to Class I will
serve for an initial term that expires at the first annual
meeting, the Public Directors designated to Class II will
serve for an initial term that expires at the second annual
meeting, and the Public Directors designated to Class III
will serve for an initial term that expires at the third annual
meeting. At each annual meeting of Partnership unitholders,
directors to replace Public Directors whose terms expire at such
annual meeting will be elected to hold office until the third
succeeding annual meeting. Each Public Director will hold office
for the term for which such director is elected or until such
directors earlier death, resignation or removal. Any
vacancies may be filled by a majority of the remaining Public
Directors then in office. A Public Director may be removed only
for cause and only upon a vote of the majority of the remaining
Public Directors then in office.
Holdco GP Directors. Under the amended and
restated partnership agreement, Holdings GP (as general partner
of Holdings) will have the right to appoint all of the members
of the Partnership Board until the earlier to occur of
(a) the receipt of approvals from the CPUC and the PaPUC of
the public election provisions or (b) a determination by
the Partnership Board that such approvals are not required.
111
After approval by the CPUC and PaPUC of the public election
provisions or determination by the Partnership Board that such
approvals are not required, the amended and restated partnership
agreement will provide that Holdings GP will be entitled to
designate up to two directors to the Partnership Board. Such
directors are referred to in the amended and restated
partnership agreement as Holdco GP Directors. The
amended and restated partnership agreement will provide that
Holdings GP shall have the right to designate (a) two
directors for so long as BGH GP, ArcLight and Kelso and their
affiliates (directly and indirectly), collectively own at least
10,495,107 Partnership LP units (85% of the number they will own
after the closing of the merger) or (b) one director for so
long as they collectively own at least 5,247,554 Partnership LP
units (42.5% of the number they will own after the closing of
the merger).
Nominations of Public Directors. Nominations
of persons for election as Public Directors may be made at an
annual meeting of the limited partners only (a) by or at
the direction of the Public Directors or any committee thereof
or (b) by any Public Limited Partner who (i) was a
record holder at the time the notice provided for in the amended
and restated partnership agreement is delivered to the
Partnership GP, (ii) is entitled to vote at the meeting and
(iii) complies with the notice procedures set forth in the
amended and restated partnership agreement.
For any nominations brought before an annual meeting by a Public
Limited Partner, the limited partner must give timely notice
thereof in writing to the Partnership GP. The notice must
contain certain information as described in the amended and
restated partnership agreement. To be timely, a Public Limited
Partners notice must be delivered to the Partnership GP
not later than the close of business on the ninetieth (90th)
day, nor earlier than the close of business on the one hundred
twentieth (120th) day, prior to the first anniversary of the
preceding years annual meeting (provided, however, that in
the event that the date of the annual meeting is more than
thirty (30) days before or more than seventy (70) days
after such anniversary date, notice by the limited partner must
be so delivered not earlier than the close of business on the
one hundred twentieth (120th) day prior to such annual meeting
and not later than the close of business on the later of the
ninetieth (90th) day prior to such annual meeting or the tenth
(10th) day following the day on which public announcement of the
date of such meeting is first made by the Partnership or the
Partnership GP). For purposes of the 2011 annual meeting, if
such meeting is held, the first anniversary of the preceding
years annual meeting will be deemed to be June 1,
2011. The public announcement of an adjournment or postponement
of an annual meeting will not commence a new time period (or
extend any time period) for the giving of a limited
partners notice as described above.
In the event that the number of Public Directors is increased
effective at an annual meeting and there is no public
announcement by the Partnership or the Partnership GP naming the
nominees for the additional directorships at least one hundred
(100) days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding
years annual meeting, a Public Limited Partners
notice will also be considered timely, but only with respect to
nominees for the additional directorships, if it is delivered to
the Partnership GP not later than the close of business on the
tenth (10th) day following the day on which such public
announcement is first made by the Partnership or the Partnership
GP.
Nominations of persons for election as Public Directors also may
be made at a special meeting of limited partners at which
directors are to be elected in accordance with the provisions of
the amended and restated partnership agreement.
Only such persons who are nominated in accordance with the
procedures set forth in the amended and restated partnership
agreement will be eligible to be elected at an annual or special
meeting of limited partners to serve as Public Directors.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, unless otherwise required by law,
if the Public Limited Partner (or a qualified representative of
the limited partner) does not appear at the annual or special
meeting of limited partners to present a nomination, such
nomination will be disregarded notwithstanding that proxies in
respect of such vote may have been received by the Partnership
GP or the Partnership.
In addition to the provisions described above and in the amended
and restated partnership agreement, a Public Limited Partner
must also comply with all applicable requirements of the
Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder; provided,
however, that any references in the amended and restated
partnership agreement to the Exchange Act or the rules
promulgated thereunder are not intended to and do not limit any
112
requirements applicable to nominations pursuant to the amended
and restated partnership agreement, and compliance with the
amended and restated partnership agreement is the exclusive
means for a limited partner to make nominations.
Indemnification
The amended and restated partnership agreement, the agreements
of limited partnership of the Partnerships operating
partnerships (the Operating Partnership Agreements,
and together with the amended and restated partnership
agreement, the Partnership Agreements) and the
management agreements of the Partnerships operating
partnerships provide that the Partnership or its operating
partnerships, as the case may be, indemnify (to the extent
permitted by applicable law) certain persons (each, an
Indemnitee) against expenses (including legal fees
and expenses), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement
actually and reasonably incurred by such Indemnitee in
connection with any threatened, pending or completed claim,
demand, action, suit or proceeding (a claim) to
which the Indemnitee is or was an actual or threatened party and
which relates to the Partnership Agreements or the property,
business, affairs or management of the Partnership or any of its
operating partnership. This indemnity is available only if the
Indemnitee acted in good faith and the action or omission which
is the basis of such claim, demand, action, suit or proceeding
does not involve the gross negligence or willful misconduct of
such Indemnitee. Indemnitees include the general partner of the
Partnership, any affiliates of such general partner, any person
who is or was a director, officer, manager, member, employee or
agent of such general partner or any affiliate, or any person
who is or was serving at the request of such general partner or
any such affiliate as a director, officer, manager, member,
partner, trustee, employee or agent of another individual,
corporation, limited liability company, partnership, trust,
unincorporated organization, association or other entity; and an
Indemnitee shall be indemnified only in connection with any
claim made by reason of such Indemnitees status as such or
any action taken or omitted to be taken in the Indemnitees
capacity as such. Expenses subject to indemnity will be paid by
the Partnership to the Indemnitee in advance, subject to receipt
of an undertaking by or on behalf of the Indemnitee to repay
such amount if it is ultimately determined by a court of
competent jurisdiction that the Indemnitee is not entitled to
indemnification. The Partnership maintains a liability insurance
policy on behalf of certain of the Indemnitees.
Section 18-108
of the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act provides that,
subject to such standards and restrictions set forth in its
limited liability company agreement, a Delaware limited
liability company may indemnify and hold harmless any member or
manager or other person from and against any and all claims and
demands whatsoever. Article V of the existing limited
liability company agreement of the Partnership GP currently
provides (and Article V of the amended and restated limited
liability company agreement of the Partnership GP expected to be
entered into and effective as of the closing of the merger will
provide) for the indemnification of affiliates of the
Partnership GP and members, managers, partners, officers,
directors, employees, agents and trustees of the Partnership GP
or any affiliate of the Partnership GP and such persons who
serve at the request of the Partnership GP as members, managers,
partners, officers, directors, employees, agents, trustees and
fiduciaries of any other enterprise against certain liabilities
under certain circumstances.
113
COSTS
RELATED TO THE MERGER
The Partnership will pay all applicable expenses related to
filing this joint proxy statement/prospectus and related
registration statement and all related SEC and other regulatory
filing fees, excluding legal and accounting fees and expenses,
which are to be borne solely by the incurring party. All other
expenses incurred by Holdings and the Partnership in connection
with the merger will be borne solely by the incurring party.
Please read The Merger Agreement Termination
Fees and Expenses beginning on page 103.
If the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement are
consummated: (a) the Partnership following the merger will
pay any and all property or transfer taxes imposed on either
party in connection with the merger; (b) any expenses
incurred in connection with filing, printing and mailing this
joint proxy statement/prospectus will be paid by the
Partnership; and (c) all filing fees payable pursuant to
regulatory laws and other filing fees incurred in connection
with the merger agreement will be paid by the party incurring
the fees.
114
MATERIAL
FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER
General
The following is a discussion of the material U.S. federal
income tax consequences of the merger that may be relevant to
current Partnership unitholders and Holdings unitholders. Unless
otherwise noted, the description of the law and legal
conclusions set forth in the discussion relating to the
consequences of the merger to the Partnership and its
unitholders are the opinion of Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.,
counsel to the Partnership, as to the material U.S. federal
income tax consequences relating to those matters. Unless
otherwise noted, the description of the law and the legal
conclusions set forth in the discussion relating to the
consequences of the merger to Holdings and its unitholders are
the opinion of Latham & Watkins LLP, counsel to
Holdings, as to the material U.S. federal income tax
consequences relating to those matters. This discussion is based
upon the current provisions of the Internal Revenue Code,
existing and final Treasury regulations promulgated under the
Internal Revenue Code (the Treasury Regulations),
administrative rulings and judicial decisions now in effect, all
of which are subject to change, possibly with retroactive
effect. Later changes in these authorities may cause the tax
consequences to vary substantially from the consequences
described below. Neither the Partnership nor Holdings has sought
a ruling from the IRS with respect to any of the tax
consequences discussed below, and the IRS would not be precluded
from taking positions contrary to those described herein. As a
result, no assurance can be given that the IRS will agree with
all of the tax characterizations and the tax consequences
described below.
This discussion does not purport to be a complete description of
all U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger.
This discussion is limited to Partnership unitholders and
Holdings unitholders who are individual citizens or residents of
the United States and who hold the Partnership LP units and
Holdings units, as applicable, as capital assets within the
meaning of Section 1221 of the Internal Revenue Code
(generally, property held for investment). This discussion does
not apply to other types of taxpayers, including corporations,
estates or trusts, or Partnership unitholders or Holdings
unitholders that are subject to special rules under the
U.S. federal income tax laws, including, without limitation:
|
|
|
|
|
persons that are not U.S. persons for U.S. federal
income tax purposes;
|
|
|
|
partnerships, S corporations or other pass-through entities;
|
|
|
|
traders in securities that elect to mark to market;
|
|
|
|
broker-dealers or dealers in securities or currencies;
|
|
|
|
U.S. expatriates;
|
|
|
|
persons subject to the alternative minimum tax;
|
|
|
|
persons that hold Partnership LP units or Holdings units as part
of any compensatory arrangement; or
|
|
|
|
persons that hold Partnership LP units or Holdings units as a
position in a hedging transaction, straddle,
conversion transaction or other risk reduction
transaction.
|
No ruling has been or will be requested from the IRS with
respect to the tax consequences of the merger. It is a condition
to closing, however, that:
The Partnership receive an opinion of its counsel,
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P., to the effect that:
|
|
|
|
|
the adoption of the Partnerships Amended and Restated
Partnership Agreement, the merger and the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement will not result in the loss
of limited liability for a limited partner of the Partnership;
|
|
|
|
at least 90% of the current gross income of the Partnership
constitutes qualifying income within the meaning of
Section 7704(d) of the Internal Revenue Code;
|
|
|
|
the adoption of the Partnerships Amended and Restated
Partnership Agreement, the merger and the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement will not cause the
Partnership, or any operating
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
partnership of the Partnership, to be treated as an association
taxable as a corporation or otherwise to be taxed as an entity
for federal income tax purposes;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the discussion in this joint proxy statement/prospectus under
the captions Material Federal Income Tax Consequences of
the Merger and Federal Income Taxation of the
Partnership and its Unitholders, as it relates to holders
of the Partnership LP units (other than Holdings), accurately
sets forth the material federal tax consequences to the holders
of Partnership LP units (other than Holdings); and
|
|
|
|
no gain or loss should be recognized by existing holders of
Partnership LP units as a result of the merger (other than gain
resulting from any decrease in Partnership liabilities pursuant
to Section 752 of the Internal Revenue Code).
|
Holdings receive an opinion of its counsel, Latham &
Watkins LLP, to the effect that:
|
|
|
|
|
the discussion in this joint proxy statement/prospectus under
the caption Material Federal Income Tax Consequences of
the Merger, as it relates to the holders of Holdings
common units, accurately sets forth the material federal income
tax consequences to the holders of Holdings common
units; and
|
|
|
|
subject to the limitations set forth herein, such consequences
include that no gain or loss should be recognized by the holders
of Holdings units to the extent Partnership LP units are
received in exchange therefor as a result of the merger, other
than gain resulting from either (i) any decrease in
partnership liabilities pursuant to Section 752 of the Internal
Revenue Code or (ii) any cash or other property
distributions.
|
No opinions are being given with respect to any other tax
matters. Moreover, the opinions of counsel described above will
be expressly conditioned upon the merger being consummated in
the manner contemplated by, and in accordance with, the terms
set forth in the merger agreement and described in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus. In addition, the tax opinions
delivered to the Partnership and Holdings will be based on
certain facts, assumptions, representations and covenants made
by officers of the Partnership and Holdings and their respective
general partners.
Unlike a ruling, an opinion of counsel represents only that
counsels best legal judgment and does not bind the IRS or
the courts. Some tax aspects of the transactions are not certain
and no assurance can be given that the above-described opinions
and/or the
statements made in this joint proxy statement/prospectus with
respect to tax matters will be sustained by a court if contested
by the IRS. Furthermore, the tax treatment of the transactions
may be significantly modified by future legislative or
administrative changes or court decisions. Any modifications may
or may not be retroactively applied. Please read Risk
Factors Tax Risks Related to the Merger
beginning on page 28.
If either the Partnership or Holdings waives receipt of the
requisite tax opinion as a condition to closing and the changes
to the tax consequences would be material, then this joint proxy
statement/prospectus will be amended and recirculated and
approval of the unitholders of the Partnership and the
unitholders of Holdings will be resolicited.
We strongly encourage the Partnership unitholders and
Holdings unitholders to consult with their own tax advisors in
analyzing the federal, state, local and foreign consequences of
the merger in light of their own particular circumstances,
including the possible effects of changes in federal or other
tax laws.
Tax
Consequences of the Merger General
Under the merger agreement, MergerCo will merge with and into
Holdings, and all Holdings common units and management units
will be converted into Partnership LP units. Immediately
thereafter, the incentive distribution rights held by the
Partnership GP will be cancelled and the general partner
interest held by the Partnership GP (representing an approximate
0.5% general partner interest in the Partnership) will be
converted to a non-economic general partner interest in the
Partnership.
As a result of the merger, Holdings will be a subsidiary of the
Partnership, with the Partnership as Holdings sole limited
partner. After the merger, Holdings GP will own only a
non-economic general partner
116
interest of Holdings. For federal income tax purposes, the
Partnership and Holdings intend to take the position that the
merger will be treated as an assets over merger of
Holdings into the Partnership, whereby Holdings is deemed to
contribute all of its assets and liabilities to the Partnership
in exchange for newly issued Partnership LP units and liquidate
immediately thereafter, distributing all of the Partnership LP
units to the Holdings unitholders. This position depends upon
Holdings GP not being treated as a partner in Holdings for
federal income tax purposes following the merger. However, this
treatment is subject to substantial uncertainty because there is
no controlling authority addressing whether Holdings GP should
be treated as a partner in Holdings for federal income tax
purposes following the merger, and accordingly, no assurance can
be given that the IRS will agree with such treatment or that
such treatment will be respected.
The remainder of this discussion, except as otherwise noted,
assumes that the merger and the transactions contemplated
thereby will be treated for tax purposes in the manner described
above. However, where the tax consequences could be materially
different if the IRS were successful in recharacterizing the
merger as a contribution by the Holdings unitholders of their
Holdings units to the Partnership in exchange for Partnership LP
units, this discussion generally describes such alternative
consequences (see Tax Consequences of the
Merger to Holdings Common Unitholders for a discussion of
such consequences to a Holdings unitholder and see
Effect of the Transactions on the
Partnerships Ratio of Taxable Income to
Distributions for a discussion of potential increases to
the ratio of taxable income to distributions).
Tax
Consequences of the Merger to Existing Partnership
Unitholders
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. expects to provide an opinion
to the effect that no gain or loss should be recognized by the
existing Partnership unitholders as a result of the merger,
other than gain resulting from any decrease in Partnership
liabilities pursuant to Section 752 of the Internal Revenue
Code.
Potential
for Reducing Debt Shifts
As a result of the merger, the allocable share of nonrecourse
liabilities allocated to the existing Partnership unitholders
will be recalculated to take into account the Partnership LP
units issued by the Partnership in the merger. A Partnership
unitholder will not recognize taxable gain as a result of the
merger if the unitholders tax basis in its Partnership LP
units is positive without including any basis associated with
the unitholders allocable share of nonrecourse liabilities.
A Partnership unitholders initial tax basis in its
Partnership LP units consists of the amount such unitholder paid
for the Partnership LP units plus such unitholders share
of the Partnerships nonrecourse liabilities. That tax
basis is then adjusted (i) upward by a Partnership
unitholders share of the Partnerships income and by
any increases in its share of the Partnerships nonrecourse
liabilities, and (ii) downward, but not below zero, by the
amount of distributions to such unitholder from the Partnership,
by such unitholders share of the Partnerships
losses, by any decreases in such unitholders share of the
Partnerships nonrecourse liabilities and by its share of
the Partnerships expenditures that are not deductible in
computing taxable income and are not required to be capitalized.
A Partnership unitholders share of the Partnerships
nonrecourse liabilities will generally be based on its share of
the unrecognized gain with respect to the Partnerships
assets and the Partnerships profits. For these purposes,
nonrecourse liabilities are liabilities of the Partnership for
which no partner bears the economic risk of loss associated with
those liabilities. All of the liabilities of the Partnership are
considered nonrecourse liabilities. Because of the admission of
the new Partnership unitholders, the merger may reduce the
allocable share of nonrecourse liabilities of an existing
Partnership unitholder, which is referred to as a reducing
debt shift. If an existing Partnership unitholder
experiences a reduction in such unitholders share of
nonrecourse liabilities as a result of the merger, such
unitholder will be deemed to have received a cash distribution
equal to the amount of the reduction and a corresponding basis
reduction in such unitholders units.
A reducing debt shift and the resulting deemed cash distribution
may, under certain circumstances, result in the recognition of
taxable gain by a Partnership unitholder. If the resulting
deemed cash distribution exceeds such unitholders basis in
its Partnership LP units, such unitholder would recognize
taxable gain in an amount equal to such excess. However, such
unitholder will not recognize taxable gain if such
unitholders tax basis in
117
its Partnership LP units is positive without including any basis
associated with the unitholders share of nonrecourse
liabilities. It is not anticipated that an existing Partnership
unitholder will recognize a taxable gain as a result of the
reduction in such unitholders share of nonrecourse
liabilities of the Partnership. Further, if an existing
Partnership unitholder has suspended passive losses with respect
to its units, such unitholder may be able to offset any gain
resulting from a reducing debt shift with such losses. Please
read Federal Income Taxation of the Partnership and its
Unitholders Tax Consequences of the Partnership LP
Unit Ownership Limitations on Deductibility of
Losses beginning on page 124.
Tax
Consequences of the Merger to Holdings Common
Unitholders
No gain or loss should be recognized by the holders of Holdings
units solely as a result of the merger, other than gain
resulting from (i) any decrease in partnership liabilities
pursuant to Section 752 of the Internal Revenue Code and
(ii) any cash or other property distributions. To the
extent a holder of Holdings units receives cash in lieu of the
distribution of fractional Partnership LP units, such unitholder
will recognize gain or loss equal to the difference between the
cash received and the unitholders adjusted tax basis
allocable to such fractional Partnership LP units. In the event
the merger is recharacterized as a contribution by the Holdings
unitholders of their Holdings units to the Partnership in
exchange for Partnership LP units, the receipt of cash in lieu
of fractional Partnership LP units may be treated as a
distribution of cash to a Holdings unitholder, which would be
non-taxable to the extent of the Holdings unitholders
adjusted tax basis in its Holdings units.
Holdings uses the year ending December 31 as its taxable year
and the accrual method of accounting for federal income tax
purposes. As a result of the merger, Holdings taxable year
will end and Holdings will be required to file a final federal
income tax return for the taxable year ending upon the date the
transactions are effected. Each Holdings unitholder will be
required to include in income its share of income, gain, loss
and deduction for this period. In addition, a Holdings
unitholder who has a taxable year ending on a date other than
December 31 and after the date the merger closes must include
its share of income, gain, loss and deduction from Holdings in
income for its taxable year, with the result that it will be
required to include in income for its taxable year its share of
more than one year of income, gain, loss and deduction from
Holdings. In the event the merger is recharacterized as a
contribution by the Holdings unitholders of their Holdings units
to the Partnership in exchange for Partnership LP units,
Holdings will continue to be a reporting entity for federal
income tax purposes.
A Holdings unitholder will have an adjusted tax basis in the
Partnership LP units it receives in the merger equal to such
unitholders adjusted tax basis in its Holdings units
(excluding (i) any basis attributable to its share of
Holdings nonrecourse liabilities and (ii) any basis
allocable to fractional Partnership LP units if such unitholder
receives cash in lieu of the distribution of fractional
Partnership LP units in the merger), plus such unitholders
share of nonrecourse liabilities of the Partnership as
determined in accordance with Section 752 of the Internal
Revenue Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder. In the
event the merger is recharacterized as a contribution by the
Holdings unitholders of their Holdings units to the Partnership
in exchange for Partnership LP units, a Holdings
unitholders adjusted tax basis in its Partnership LP units
will generally be determined as described above, except that
such basis may be reduced by the amount of cash received in lieu
of fractional Partnership LP units, rather than the amount of
basis allocable to fractional Partnership LP units as described
in clause (ii) above. It is not anticipated that Holdings
unitholders will experience a reducing debt shift as a result of
the merger (see Tax Consequences of the Merger
to Existing Partnership Unitholders Potential for
Reducing Debt Shifts above), as it is expected that a
Holdings unitholders share of nonrecourse liabilities will
increase as a result of the merger.
Assuming the merger is respected as an assets-over merger with a
deemed liquidation of Holdings pursuant to which Partnership LP
units are distributed to Holdings unitholders (see
Tax Consequences of the Merger
General above), a Holdings unitholders holding
period for Partnership LP units received in the merger will not
be determined by reference to the holding period of the
unitholders Holdings units. Instead, a Holdings
unitholders holding period for Partnership LP units
received in the merger that are attributable to Holdings
capital assets or assets used in its business, as defined in
Section 1231 of the Internal Revenue Code, will include
Holdings holding period in those assets. In contrast, in
the event the merger does not result
118
in a deemed liquidation of Holdings, a Holdings
unitholders holding period for the Partnership LP units
received in the merger generally will be determined by reference
to the holding period of such unitholders Holdings units.
However, in either case, the holding period for the Partnership
LP units received by a Holdings unitholder attributable to
certain hot assets of Holdings, such as inventory
and receivables, will begin on the day following the merger.
Following the merger, a Holdings unitholder that receives the
Partnership LP units will be treated as a partner in the
Partnership. For a discussion of the material U.S. federal
income tax consequences of owning and disposing of the
Partnership LP units received in the merger, you should read
Federal Income Taxation of the Partnership and Its
Unitholders.
Effect of
the Transactions on the Partnerships Ratio of Taxable
Income to Distributions
If the merger is completed, the Partnership estimates it will
result in an increase in the net income (or decrease in the net
loss) allocable to most of the existing Partnership unitholders
and Holdings estimates it will result in an increase in the net
income (or decrease in the net loss) allocable to all of the
former Holdings unitholders. For the period from the closing
date of the merger through December 31, 2013, which is
referred to as the Projection Period, the
Partnership and Holdings estimate that the following additional
amounts of net income per unit described below will be allocated
to the existing Partnership unitholders and former Holdings
unitholders as a result of the merger:
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate Range of Increased Net Income
|
|
|
(or Decreased Net Loss) Allocable to Existing
|
|
|
Partnership Unitholders per LP Unit
|
Time of LP Unit Purchase
|
|
Over the Projection Period
|
|
In or prior to July 1997
|
|
Between $2.50 and $2.75
|
August 1997 through September 2004
|
|
Between $0.20 and $0.30
|
October 2004 through April 2006
|
|
Between $0.20 and $1.10
|
May 2006 through August 2006
|
|
Between $0.75 and $1.75
|
September 2006 through February 2009
|
|
Less than $0.50
|
March 2009
|
|
Less than $2.30
|
April 2009 through present
|
|
Less than $0.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate Range of Increased Net Income (or
|
|
|
Decreased Net Loss) Allocable to Former Holdings
|
Time of Holdings Unit Purchase
|
|
Unitholders per LP Unit Over the Projection Period
|
|
In or prior to July 2006
|
|
Less than $1.25
|
August 2006 through May 2008
|
|
Between $3.75 and $4.25
|
June 2008 through August 2008
|
|
Between $3.00 and $3.50
|
September 2008 through April 2009
|
|
Between $2.25 and $2.75
|
May 2009 through October 2009
|
|
Between $3.25 and $4.00
|
November 2009 through present
|
|
Between $4.00 and $4.50
|
Notwithstanding the increased net income (or decreased net loss)
allocable to existing Partnership unitholders, the Partnership
does not anticipate that Partnership unitholders who continue to
own Partnership LP units during the Projection Period will be
allocated federal taxable income for the Projection Period that
exceeds the amount of cash distributed with respect to that
period. Moreover, the Partnership estimates that a Partnership
unitholder that purchased its Partnership LP units in or after
October 2003 and owns those units during the Projection Period
will be allocated an amount of federal taxable income for that
period that will be 25% or less of the amount of cash
distributed with respect to that period. This analysis does not
consider the ability of any particular Partnership unitholder to
utilize suspended passive losses.
Notwithstanding the increased net income (or decreased net loss)
allocable to former Holdings unitholders, Holdings does not
anticipate that former Holdings unitholders that receive
Partnership LP units in the merger and own those units during
the Projection Period will be allocated federal taxable income
for the
119
Projection Period that exceeds the amount of cash distributed
with respect to that period. Holdings estimates that a Holdings
unitholder that receives Partnership LP units in the merger and
owns those units during the Projection Period will be allocated
an amount of federal taxable income for that period that will be
approximately 40% or less of the amount of cash distributed with
respect to that period. This analysis does not consider the
ability of any particular former Holdings unitholder to utilize
suspended passive losses.
The amount and effect of the increase or decrease in net income,
or increase or decrease in net loss, allocated to an existing
Partnership unitholder or a former Holdings unitholder resulting
from the merger will depend upon the unitholders
particular situation, including when the unitholder purchased
its Partnership LP units or Holdings units (and the basis
adjustment to such unitholders share of Partnership LP
units or Holdings units under Section 743(b) of the
Internal Revenue Code) and the ability of the unitholder to
utilize any suspended passive losses. Depending on these
factors, any particular unitholder may, or may not, be able to
offset all or a portion of the projected increased net income
(or decreased net loss) allocated to such unitholder.
The estimates above are based upon the assumption that the
merger will close December 31, 2010, that approximately
20 million Partnership LP units will be issued to the
unitholders of Holdings in the merger, that gross income from
operations will be approximately equal to the amount required to
make current distributions at the time of the merger, that the
merger is respected as an assets-over merger with a deemed
liquidation of Holdings (see Tax Consequences
of the Merger General above) and other
assumptions with regard to income, capital expenditures, cash
flow, net working capital and cash distributions. The estimates
above further assume that the tax impact to the purchasers of
Partnership LP units and Holdings common units after
November 30, 2009, is substantially similar to the tax
impact to purchasers of such respective units during November
2009 (which are the last groups of unitholders for which the
Partnership and Holdings have the requisite tax information to
compute such estimates).
These estimates are based on current tax law and tax reporting
positions that the Partnership has adopted or will adopt and
with which the IRS could disagree. In addition, these estimates
are subject to, among other things, numerous business, economic,
regulatory, competitive and political uncertainties over which
the Partnership has no control. Accordingly, neither the
Partnership nor Holdings can assure Partnership unitholders or
Holdings unitholders that these estimates will prove to be
correct. The actual increase or decrease to taxable income could
be higher or lower, and any such differences could be material
and could materially affect the value of a Partnership
unitholders units. For example, the federal income tax
liability of a unitholder could be increased during the
Projection Period if the merger is not respected as an
assets-over merger with a deemed liquidation of Holdings, in
which case the merger would likely result in a technical
termination of the Partnership for federal income tax purposes,
or if the Partnership makes a future offering of Partnership LP
units and uses the proceeds of the offering in a manner that
does not produce substantial additional deductions during the
Projection Period, such as to repay indebtedness currently
outstanding or to acquire property that is not eligible for
depreciation or amortization for federal income tax purposes or
that is depreciable or amortizable at a rate significantly
slower than the rate currently applicable to the
Partnerships assets.
120
FEDERAL
INCOME TAXATION OF THE PARTNERSHIP AND ITS UNITHOLDERS
This section is a summary of the material tax considerations
that may be relevant to owning the Partnership LP units received
in the merger and, unless otherwise noted in the following
discussion, is the opinion of Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.,
insofar as it relates to legal conclusions with respect to
matters of United States federal income tax law. This section is
based upon current provisions of the Internal Revenue Code,
Treasury Regulations and current administrative rulings and
court decisions, all of which are subject to change. Changes in
these authorities may cause the tax consequences to vary
substantially from the consequences described below.
The following discussion does not comment on all federal income
tax matters affecting the Partnership or its unitholders.
Moreover, the discussion focuses on Partnership unitholders who
are individual citizens or residents of the United States and
has only limited application to corporations, estates, trusts,
nonresident aliens or other unitholders subject to specialized
tax treatment, such as tax-exempt institutions, foreign persons,
individual retirement accounts (IRAs), real estate investment
trusts (REITs) or mutual funds. Accordingly, the Partnership
encourages each prospective Partnership unitholder to consult,
and depend on, its own tax advisor in analyzing the federal,
state, local and foreign tax consequences particular to it of
the ownership or disposition of Partnership LP units.
No ruling has been or will be requested from the IRS regarding
any matter affecting the Partnership or prospective Partnership
unitholders. Instead, the Partnership will rely on opinions of
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. Unlike a ruling, an opinion of
counsel represents only that counsels best legal judgment
and does not bind the IRS or the courts. Accordingly, the
opinions and statements made herein may not be sustained by a
court if contested by the IRS. Any contest of this sort with the
IRS may materially and adversely impact the market for the
Partnership LP units and the prices at which Partnership LP
units trade. In addition, the costs of any contest with the IRS,
principally legal, accounting and related fees, will result in a
reduction in cash available for distribution to the Partnership
unitholders and thus will be borne indirectly by Partnership
unitholders. Furthermore, the tax treatment of the Partnership,
or of an investment in the Partnership, may be significantly
modified by future legislative or administrative changes or
court decisions. Any modifications may or may not be
retroactively applied.
All statements as to matters of law and legal conclusions, but
not as to factual matters, contained in this section, unless
otherwise noted, are the opinion of Vinson & Elkins
L.L.P. and are based on the accuracy of the representations made
to the Partnership.
For the reasons described below, Vinson & Elkins
L.L.P. has not rendered an opinion with respect to the following
specific federal income tax issues: (1) the treatment of a
Partnership unitholder whose Partnership LP units are loaned to
a short seller to cover a short sale of units (please read
Tax Consequences of the Partnership LP Unit
Ownership Treatment of Short Sales);
(2) whether the Partnerships monthly convention for
allocating taxable income and losses is permitted by existing
Treasury Regulations (please read Disposition
of the Partnership LP Units Allocations Between
Transferors and Transferees); and (3) whether the
Partnerships method for depreciating Section 743
adjustments is sustainable in certain cases (please read
Tax Consequences of the Partnership LP Unit
Ownership Section 754 Election and
Uniformity of Units).
Partnership
Status
A partnership is not a taxable entity and incurs no federal
income tax liability. Instead, each partner of a partnership is
required to take into account its share of items of income,
gain, loss and deduction of the partnership in computing its
federal income tax liability, regardless of whether cash
distributions are made to it by the partnership. Distributions
by a partnership to a partner are generally not taxable to the
partnership or the partner, unless the amount of cash
distributed to it is in excess of the partners adjusted
basis in its partnership interest.
Section 7704 of the Internal Revenue Code provides that
publicly traded partnerships will, as a general rule, be taxed
as corporations. However, an exception, referred to as the
Qualifying Income Exception, exists with respect to
publicly traded partnerships for which 90% or more of the gross
income for every taxable year consists of qualifying
income. Qualifying income includes income and gains
derived from the transportation
121
of natural resources, including oil, gas, and products thereof.
Other types of qualifying income include interest (other than
from a financial business), dividends, gains from the sale of
real property and gains from the sale or other disposition of
capital assets held for the production of income that otherwise
constitutes qualifying income. The Partnership estimates that
less than 5% of the Partnerships current gross income is
not qualifying income; however, this estimate could change from
time to time. Based upon and subject to this estimate, the
factual representations made by the Partnership, and a review of
the applicable legal authorities, Vinson & Elkins
L.L.P. is of the opinion that at least 90% of the
Partnerships current gross income constitutes qualifying
income. The portion of the Partnerships income that is
qualifying income may change from time to time.
No ruling has been or will be sought from the IRS and the IRS
has made no determination as to the Partnerships status or
the status of the Partnerships operating partnerships for
federal income tax purposes. Instead, the Partnership will rely
on the opinion of Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. on such
matters. It is the opinion of Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
that, based upon the Internal Revenue Code, its regulations,
published revenue rulings, court decisions and the
representations described below:
(a) The Partnership will be classified as a partnership for
federal income tax purposes; and
(b) Except for Buckeye Gulf Coast Pipe Lines, L.P., each of
the Partnerships operating subsidiaries will be
disregarded as an entity separate from the Partnership or will
be treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes.
In rendering its opinion, Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. has
relied on factual representations made by the Partnership. The
representations made by the Partnership upon which
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. has relied include:
(a) Except for Buckeye Gulf Coast Pipe Lines, L.P., neither
the Partnership nor any of the Partnerships operating
subsidiaries has elected or will elect to be treated as a
corporation;
(b) For each taxable year, more than 90% of the
Partnerships gross income has been and will be income that
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. has opined or will opine is
qualifying income within the meaning of
Section 7704(d) of the Internal Revenue Code; and
(c) Each hedging transaction that the Partnership treats as
resulting in qualifying income has been and will be
appropriately identified as a hedging transaction pursuant to
applicable Treasury Regulations, and has been and will be
associated with oil, gas, or products thereof that are held or
to be held by the Partnership in activities that
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. has opined or will opine result
in qualifying income.
The Partnership believes that these representations have been
true in the past and expects that these representations will be
true in the future.
If the Partnership fails to meet the Qualifying Income
Exception, other than a failure that is determined by the IRS to
be inadvertent and that is cured within a reasonable time after
discovery (in which case the IRS may also require the
Partnership to make adjustments with respect to the Partnership
unitholders or pay other amounts), the Partnership will be
treated as if the Partnership had transferred all of the
Partnerships assets, subject to liabilities, to a newly
formed corporation, on the first day of the year in which the
Partnership fails to meet the Qualifying Income Exception, in
return for stock in that corporation and then distributed that
stock to the Partnership unitholders in liquidation of their
interests in the Partnership. This deemed contribution and
liquidation should be tax-free to the Partnership unitholders
and the Partnership so long as the Partnership, at that time,
does not have liabilities in excess of the tax basis of the
Partnerships assets. Thereafter, the Partnership would be
treated as a corporation for federal income tax purposes.
If the Partnership is treated as an association taxable as a
corporation in any taxable year, either as a result of a failure
to meet the Qualifying Income Exception or otherwise, the
Partnerships items of income, gain, loss and deduction
would be reflected only on the Partnerships tax return
rather than being passed through to the Partnership unitholders,
and the Partnerships net income would be taxed to the
Partnership at corporate rates. In addition, any distribution
made to a Partnership unitholder would be treated as taxable
dividend income to the extent of the Partnerships current
or accumulated earnings and profits, or, in the
122
absence of earnings and profits, a nontaxable return of capital
to the extent of the unitholders tax basis in its
Partnership LP units, and taxable capital gain after the
unitholders tax basis in its Partnership LP units is
reduced to zero. Accordingly, taxation as a corporation would
result in a material reduction in a Partnership
unitholders cash flow and after-tax return and thus would
likely result in a substantial reduction of the value of
Partnership LP units.
The remainder of this section is based on Vinson &
Elkins L.L.P.s opinion that the Partnership will be
classified as a partnership for federal income tax purposes.
Limited
Partner Status
Holdings unitholders who have become limited partners of the
Partnership will be treated as partners of the Partnership for
federal income tax purposes. Also:
(a) assignees who have executed and delivered transfer
applications, and are awaiting admission as limited
partners, and
(b) Partnership unitholders whose Partnership LP units are
held in street name or by a nominee and who have the right to
direct the nominee in the exercise of all substantive rights
attendant to the ownership of their units,
will be treated as partners of the Partnership for federal
income tax purposes. As there is no direct or indirect
controlling authority addressing assignees of the Partnership LP
units who are entitled to execute and deliver transfer
applications and thereby become entitled to direct the exercise
of attendant rights, but who fail to execute and deliver
transfer applications, Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.s
opinion does not extend to these persons. Furthermore, a
purchaser or other transferee of the Partnership LP units who
does not execute and deliver a transfer application may not
receive some federal income tax information or reports furnished
to record holders of Partnership LP units unless the Partnership
LP units are held in a nominee or street name account and the
nominee or broker has executed and delivered a transfer
application for those units.
A beneficial owner of Partnership LP units whose Partnership LP
units have been transferred to a short seller to complete a
short sale would appear to lose its status as a partner with
respect to those Partnership LP units for federal income tax
purposes. Please read Tax Consequences of the
Partnership LP Unit Ownership Treatment of Short
Sales.
Items of the Partnerships income, gain, loss or deduction
would not appear to be reportable by a Partnership unitholder
who is not a partner for federal income tax purposes, and any
cash distributions received by a Partnership unitholder who is
not a partner for federal income tax purposes would therefore
appear to be fully taxable as ordinary income. These unitholders
are urged to consult their own tax advisors with respect to
their tax consequences of holding Partnership LP units.
The references to Partnership unitholders in the
discussion that follows are to persons who are treated as
partners in the Partnership for federal income tax purposes.
Tax
Consequences of the Partnership LP Unit Ownership
Flow-Through
of Taxable Income
Subject to the discussion below under Entity
Level Collections, the Partnership does not pay any
federal income tax. Instead, each Partnership unitholder will be
required to report on its income tax return its share of the
Partnerships income, gains, losses and deductions without
regard to whether corresponding cash distributions are received
by it. Consequently, the Partnership may allocate income to a
Partnership unitholder even if it has not received a cash
distribution. Each Partnership unitholder will be required to
include in income its allocable share of the Partnerships
income, gain, loss and deduction for the Partnerships
taxable year or years ending with or within its taxable year.
The Partnerships taxable year ends on December 31.
123
Treatment
of Distributions
Distributions made by the Partnership to a Partnership
unitholder generally will not be taxable to the Partnership
unitholder for federal income tax purposes, except to the extent
the amount of any such cash distribution exceeds its tax basis
in its Partnership LP units immediately before the distribution.
Cash distributions made by the Partnership to a Partnership
unitholder in an amount in excess of its tax basis in its
Partnership LP units generally will be considered to be gain
from the sale or exchange of those Partnership LP units, taxable
in accordance with the rules described under
Disposition of the Partnership LP Units
beginning on page 130. To the extent that cash
distributions made by the Partnership cause a Partnership
unitholders at risk amount to be less than
zero at the end of any taxable year, it must recapture any the
Partnership losses deducted in previous years. Please read
Limitations on Deductibility of Losses
below.
Any reduction in a Partnership unitholders share of the
Partnerships liabilities for which no partner bears the
economic risk of loss, known as nonrecourse
liabilities, will be treated as a distribution by the
Partnership of cash to that Partnership unitholder. A decrease
in a Partnership unitholders percentage interest in the
Partnership because of the Partnerships issuance of
additional Partnership LP units will decrease its share of the
Partnerships nonrecourse liabilities and thus will result
in a corresponding deemed distribution of cash, which may
constitute a non-pro rata distribution. A non-pro rata
distribution of money or property may result in ordinary income
to a Partnership unitholder, regardless of its tax basis in its
Partnership LP units, if the distribution reduces the
Partnership unitholders share of the Partnerships
unrealized receivables including depreciation
recapture,
and/or
substantially appreciated inventory items, both as
defined in Section 751 of the Internal Revenue Code, and
collectively referred to as, Section 751
Assets. If the distribution reduces a Partnership
unitholders share of Section 751 Assets, it will be
treated as having received its proportionate share of the
Section 751 Assets and then having exchanged those assets
with the Partnership in return for the non-pro rata portion of
the actual distribution made to it. This latter deemed exchange
will generally result in the Partnership unitholders
realization of ordinary income. That income will equal the
excess of (1) the non-pro rata portion of that distribution
over (2) the Partnership unitholders tax basis
(generally zero) for the share of Section 751 Assets deemed
relinquished in the exchange.
Basis
of the Partnership LP Units
A former Holdings unitholders adjusted tax basis for the
Partnership LP units it receives in the merger will be equal to
the sum of such unitholders adjusted tax basis in its
Holdings units (excluding (i) any basis attributable to its
share of Holdings nonrecourse liabilities, and (ii) any
basis allocable to fractional Partnership LP units if such
unitholder receives cash in lieu of the distribution of
fractional Partnership LP units in the merger), plus such
unitholders share of nonrecourse liabilities of the
Partnership as determined in accordance with Section 752 of
the Internal Revenue Code and the regulations promulgated
thereunder. That tax basis will be increased by its share of the
Partnerships income and by any increases in its share of
the Partnerships nonrecourse liabilities. That tax basis
generally will be decreased, but not below zero, by
distributions to it from the Partnership, by its share of the
Partnerships losses, by any decreases in its share of the
Partnerships nonrecourse liabilities and by its share of
the Partnerships expenditures that are not deductible in
computing taxable income and are not required to be capitalized.
A Partnership unitholders share of the Partnerships
nonrecourse liabilities will generally be based on its share of
the Partnerships profits. Please read
Disposition of the Partnership LP
Units Recognition of Gain or Loss.
Limitations
on Deductibility of Losses
The deduction by a Partnership unitholder of its share of the
Partnerships losses will be limited to its tax basis in
its Partnership LP units and, in the case of an individual
unitholder, estate, trust or a corporate unitholder (if more
than 50% of the value of the corporate unitholders stock
is owned directly or indirectly by or for five or fewer
individuals or some tax-exempt organizations), to the amount for
which the Partnership unitholder is considered to be at
risk with respect to the Partnerships activities, if
that amount is less than its tax basis. A Partnership unitholder
subject to these limitations must recapture losses deducted in
previous years to the extent that distributions cause its
at-risk amount to be less than zero at the end of any taxable
year. Losses disallowed to a Partnership unitholder or
recaptured as a result of these limitations will carry
124
forward and will be allowable as a deduction in a later year to
the extent that its at-risk amount is subsequently increased,
provided such losses do not exceed such Partnership
unitholders tax basis in Partnership LP units. Upon the
taxable disposition of a Partnership LP unit, any gain
recognized by a Partnership unitholder can be offset by losses
that were previously suspended by the at-risk limitation but may
not be offset by losses suspended by the basis limitation. Any
loss previously suspended by the at-risk limitation in excess of
that gain would no longer be utilizable.
In general, a Partnership unitholder will be at risk to the
extent of its tax basis in Partnership LP units, excluding any
portion of that tax basis attributable to its share of the
Partnerships nonrecourse liabilities, reduced by
(i) any portion of that basis representing amounts
otherwise protected against loss because of a guarantee, stop
loss agreement or other similar arrangement and (ii) any
amount of money it borrows to acquire or hold Partnership LP
units, if the lender of those borrowed funds owns an interest in
the Partnership, is related to the Partnership unitholder or can
look only to the Partnership LP units for repayment. A
Partnership unitholders at-risk amount will increase or
decrease as the tax basis of such Partnership unitholders
Partnership LP units increases or decreases, other than tax
basis increases or decreases attributable to increases or
decreases in its share of the Partnerships nonrecourse
liabilities.
In addition to the basis and at-risk limitations on the
deductibility of losses, the passive loss limitations generally
provide that individuals, estates, trusts and some closely held
corporations and personal service corporations are permitted to
deduct losses from passive activities, which are generally
defined as trade or business activities in which the taxpayer
does not materially participate, only to the extent of the
taxpayers income from passive activities. The passive loss
limitation is applied separately with respect to each publicly
traded partnership. Consequently, any passive losses the
Partnership generates will be available to offset only the
Partnerships passive income generated in the future and
will not be available to offset income from other passive
activities or investments (including the Partnerships
investments or a Partnership unitholders investments in
other publicly traded partnerships), or a Partnership
unitholders salary or active business income. Passive
losses that are not deductible because they exceed the
Partnership unitholders share of income the Partnership
generates may be deducted by such Partnership unitholder in full
when it disposes of its entire investment in the Partnership in
a fully taxable transaction with an unrelated party. The passive
activity loss rules are applied after other applicable
limitations on deductions, including the at-risk rules and the
tax basis limitation.
A Partnership unitholders share of the Partnerships
net income may be offset by any of the Partnerships
suspended passive losses, but it may not be offset by any other
current or carryover losses from other passive activities,
including those attributable to other publicly traded
partnerships.
There is no guidance as to whether suspended passive activity
losses of Holdings units will be available to offset passive
activity income that is allocated to a former Holdings
unitholder from the Partnership after the merger. The IRS may
contend that the Partnership is not the same partnership as
Holdings and, accordingly, the passive loss limitation rules
would not allow use of such losses until such time as all of
such unitholders Partnership LP units are sold. A
Partnership unitholder may take the position, however, that the
Partnership should be deemed a continuation of Holdings for this
purpose such that any suspended Holdings losses would be
available to offset Partnership taxable income allocated to such
unitholder. Because of the lack of guidance with respect to this
issue and the application of the passive loss limitation rules
to tiered publicly traded partnerships, Vinson &
Elkins L.L.P. is unable to opine as to whether suspended passive
activity losses arising from Holdings activities will be
available to offset Partnership taxable income allocated to a
former Holdings unitholder following the merger. If you have
losses with respect to Holdings units, please consult your tax
advisor.
Limitations
on Interest Deductions
The deductibility of a non-corporate taxpayers
investment interest expense is generally limited to
the amount of that taxpayers net investment
income. Investment interest expense includes:
|
|
|
|
|
interest on indebtedness properly allocable to property held for
investment;
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
interest expense attributed to portfolio income; and
|
|
|
|
the portion of interest expense incurred to purchase or carry an
interest in a passive activity to the extent attributable to
portfolio income.
|
The computation of a Partnership unitholders investment
interest expense will take into account interest on any margin
account borrowing or other loan incurred to purchase or carry a
unit. Net investment income includes gross income from property
held for investment and amounts treated as portfolio income
under the passive loss rules, less deductible expenses, other
than interest, directly connected with the production of
investment income, but generally does not include gains
attributable to the disposition of property held for investment
or qualified dividend income. The IRS has indicated that the net
passive income earned by a publicly traded partnership will be
treated as investment income to its unitholders. In addition, a
Partnership unitholders share of the Partnerships
portfolio income will be treated as investment income.
Entity-Level Collections
If the Partnership is required or elects under applicable law to
pay any federal, state or local income tax on behalf of any
Partnership unitholder or any former Partnership unitholder, the
Partnership is authorized to pay those taxes from the
Partnerships funds. That payment, if made, will be treated
as a distribution of cash to the Partnership unitholder on whose
behalf the payment was made. If the payment is made on behalf of
a Partnership unitholder whose identity cannot be determined,
the Partnership is authorized to treat the payment as a
distribution to all current Partnership unitholders. Payments by
the Partnership as described above could give rise to an
overpayment of tax on behalf of a Partnership unitholder in
which event the Partnership unitholder would be required to file
a claim in order to obtain a credit or refund.
Allocation
of Income, Gain, Loss and Deduction
In general, if the Partnership has a net profit, the
Partnerships items of income, gain, loss and deduction
will be allocated among the Partnerships unitholders in
accordance with their percentage interests in the Partnership.
If the Partnership has a net loss, the loss will be allocated to
the Partnerships unitholders according to their percentage
interests in the Partnership to the extent of their positive
capital account balances.
Specified items of the Partnerships income, gain, loss and
deduction will be allocated under Section 704(c) of the
Internal Revenue Code to account for (i) any difference
between the tax basis and fair market value of the
Partnerships assets at the time of an offering and
(ii) any difference between the tax basis and fair market
value of any property contributed to the Partnership by the
Partnership GP and its affiliates that exists at the time of
such contribution, together, referred to in this discussion as
Contributed Property. Holders of the Partnership LP
units received by the Holdings unitholders will receive the
Section 704(c) Allocations that would otherwise have been
allocated to Holdings pursuant to Section 704(c). Please
read Material Federal Income Tax Consequences of the
Merger Effect of the Transactions on the
Partnerships Ratio of Taxable Income to
Distributions for a discussion regarding the anticipated
net impact of the merger on the projected income allocations to
Holdings unitholders.
In the event the Partnership issues additional Partnership LP
units or engages in certain other transactions in the future
Reverse Section 704(c) Allocations, similar to
the Section 704(c) Allocations described above, will be
made to all persons who are holders of Partnership LP units
immediately prior to such issuance or other transactions to
account for the difference between the book basis
for purposes of maintaining capital accounts and the fair market
value of all property held by the Partnership at the time of
such issuance or other transactions. In addition, items of
recapture income will be allocated to the extent possible to the
Partnership unitholder who was allocated the deduction giving
rise to the treatment of that gain as recapture income in order
to minimize the recognition of ordinary income by other
Partnership unitholders. Finally, although the Partnership does
not expect that the Partnerships operations will result in
the creation of negative capital accounts, if negative capital
accounts nevertheless result, items of the Partnerships
income and gain will be allocated in an amount and manner
sufficient to eliminate the negative balance as quickly as
possible.
126
An allocation of items of the Partnerships income, gain,
loss or deduction, other than an allocation required by the
Internal Revenue Code to eliminate the difference between a
partners book capital account, credited with
the fair market value of Contributed Property, and
tax capital account credited with the tax basis of
Contributed Property, referred to in this discussion as the
Book-Tax Disparity, will generally be given effect
for federal income tax purposes in determining a Partnership
unitholders share of an item of income, gain, loss or
deduction only if the allocation has substantial economic
effect. In any other case, a Partnership unitholders share
of an item will be determined on the basis of its interest in
the Partnership, which will be determined by taking into account
all the facts and circumstances, including:
|
|
|
|
|
its relative contributions to the Partnership;
|
|
|
|
the interests of all the partners in profits and losses;
|
|
|
|
the interest of all the partners in cash flow; and
|
|
|
|
the rights of all the partners to distributions of capital upon
liquidation.
|
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. is of the opinion that, with
the exception of the issues described in
Section 754 Election and
Disposition of the Partnership LP
Units Allocations Between Transferors and
Transferees, allocations under the Partnerships
limited partnership agreement will be given effect for federal
income tax purposes in determining a Partnership
unitholders share of an item of income, gain, loss or
deduction.
Treatment
of Short Sales
A Partnership unitholder whose Partnership LP units are loaned
to a short seller to cover a short sale of
Partnership LP units may be considered as having disposed of
those units. If so, it would no longer be treated for tax
purposes as a partner with respect to those Partnership LP units
during the period of the loan and may recognize gain or loss
from the disposition. As a result, during this period:
|
|
|
|
|
any of the Partnerships income, gain, loss or deduction
with respect to those Partnership LP units would not be
reportable by the Partnership unitholder;
|
|
|
|
any cash distributions received by the Partnership unitholder as
to those Partnership LP units would be fully taxable; and
|
|
|
|
all of these distributions would appear to be ordinary income.
|
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. has not rendered an opinion
regarding the treatment of a Partnership unitholder whose
Partnership LP units are loaned to a short seller. Therefore,
Partnership unitholders desiring to assure their status as
partners and avoid the risk of gain recognition from a loan to a
short seller are urged to modify any applicable brokerage
account agreements to prohibit their brokers from borrowing and
loaning their the Partnership LP units. The IRS has announced
that it is actively studying issues relating to the tax
treatment of short sales of partnership interests. Please also
read Disposition of the Partnership LP
Units Recognition of Gain or Loss.
Alternative
Minimum Tax
Each Partnership unitholder will be required to take into
account its distributive share of any items of the
Partnerships income, gain, loss or deduction for purposes
of the alternative minimum tax. The current minimum tax rate for
non-corporate taxpayers is 26% on the first $175,000 of
alternative minimum taxable income in excess of the exemption
amount and 28% on any additional alternative minimum taxable
income. Prospective Partnership unitholders are urged to consult
their tax advisors with respect to the impact of an investment
in the Partnership LP units on their liability for the
alternative minimum tax.
Tax
Rates
Under current law, the highest marginal U.S. federal income
tax rate applicable to ordinary income of individuals is 35% and
the highest marginal U.S. federal income tax rate
applicable to long-term capital gains
127
(generally, capital gains on certain assets held for more than
12 months) of individuals is 15%. However, absent new
legislation extending the current rates, beginning
January 1, 2011, the highest marginal U.S. federal
income tax rate applicable to ordinary income and long-term
capital gains of individuals will increase to 39.6% and 20%,
respectively. Moreover, these rates are subject to change by new
legislation at any time.
The recently enacted Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act
of 2010 will impose a 3.8% Medicare tax on certain investment
income earned by individuals, estates and trusts for taxable
years beginning after December 31, 2012. For these
purposes, investment income generally includes a Partnership
unitholders allocable share of the Partnerships
income and gain realized by a Partnership unitholder from a sale
of Partnership LP units. The tax will be imposed on the lesser
of (i) the Partnership unitholders net income from
all investments, and (ii) the amount by which the
Partnership unitholders adjusted gross income exceeds
$250,000 (if the unitholder is married and filing jointly) or
$200,000 (if the unitholder is unmarried).
Section 754
Election
The Partnership has made the election permitted by
Section 754 of the Internal Revenue Code. That election is
irrevocable without the consent of the IRS unless there is a
constructive termination of the Partnership. Please read
Disposition of the Partnership LP
Units Constructive Termination. That election
will generally permit the Partnership to adjust a Partnership LP
unit purchasers tax basis in the Partnerships assets
(inside basis) under Section 743(b) of the
Internal Revenue Code to reflect its purchase price. The
Section 743(b) adjustment does not apply to a person who
purchases Partnership LP units directly from the Partnership or
acquires them in the merger, and it belongs only to the
purchaser and not to other Partnership unitholders. For purposes
of this discussion, a Partnership unitholders inside basis
in the Partnerships assets will be considered to have two
components: (1) its share of the Partnerships tax
basis in the Partnerships assets (common
basis) and (2) its Section 743(b) adjustment to
that tax basis.
Where the remedial allocation method is adopted (which the
Partnership has adopted as to all of the Partnerships
properties), the Treasury Regulations under Section 743 of
the Internal Revenue Code require a portion of the
Section 743(b) adjustment that is attributable to recovery
property subject to depreciation under Section 168 of the
Internal Revenue Code whose book basis is in excess of its tax
basis to be depreciated over the remaining cost recovery period
for the propertys unamortized Book-Tax Disparity. Under
Treasury
Regulation Section 1.167(c)-1(a)(6),
a Section 743(b) adjustment attributable to property
subject to depreciation under Section 167 of the Internal
Revenue Code, rather than cost recovery deductions under
Section 168, is generally required to be depreciated using
either the straight-line method or the 150% declining balance
method. Under the Partnerships limited partnership
agreement, the Partnership is authorized to take a position to
preserve the uniformity of the Partnership LP units even if that
position is not consistent with these and any other Treasury
Regulations. Please read Uniformity of
Units.
Although Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. is unable to opine as
to the validity of this approach because there is no direct or
indirect controlling authority on this issue, the Partnership
intends to depreciate the portion of a Section 743(b)
adjustment attributable to unrealized appreciation in the value
of Contributed Property, to the extent of any unamortized
Book-Tax Disparity, using a rate of depreciation or amortization
derived from the depreciation or amortization method and useful
life applied to the propertys unamortized Book-Tax
Disparity, or treat that portion as
non-amortizable
to the extent attributable to property which is not amortizable.
This method is consistent with the methods employed by other
publicly traded partnerships but is arguably inconsistent with
Treasury
Regulation Section 1.167(c)-1(a)(6),
which is not expected to directly apply to a material portion of
the Partnerships assets, and Treasury
Regulation Section 1.197-2(g)(3).
To the extent this Section 743(b) adjustment is
attributable to appreciation in value in excess of the
unamortized Book-Tax Disparity, the Partnership will apply the
rules described in the Treasury Regulations and legislative
history. If the Partnership determines that this position cannot
reasonably be taken, the Partnership may take a depreciation or
amortization position under which all purchasers acquiring
Partnership LP units in the same month would receive
depreciation or amortization, whether attributable to common
basis or a Section 743(b) adjustment, based upon the same
applicable rate as if they had purchased a direct interest in
the Partnerships assets. This kind of aggregate approach
may result in lower annual depreciation or amortization
deductions
128
than would otherwise be allowable to some Partnership
unitholders. Please read Uniformity of
Units. A Partnership unitholders tax basis for its
Partnership LP units is reduced by its share of the
Partnerships deductions (whether or not such deductions
were claimed on an individuals income tax return) so that
any position the Partnership takes that understates deductions
will overstate a Partnership unitholders basis in its
Partnership LP units, which may cause the unitholder to
understate gain or overstate loss on any sale of such
Partnership LP units. Please read Disposition
of the Partnership LP Units Recognition of Gain or
Loss. The IRS may challenge the Partnerships
position with respect to depreciating or amortizing the
Section 743(b) adjustment the Partnership takes to preserve
the uniformity of the Partnership LP units. If such a challenge
were sustained, the gain from the sale of Partnership LP units
might be increased without the benefit of additional deductions.
A Section 754 election is advantageous if the
transferees tax basis in its Partnership LP units is
higher than the Partnership LP units share of the
aggregate tax basis of the Partnerships assets immediately
prior to the transfer. In that case, as a result of the
election, the transferee would have, among other items, a
greater amount of depreciation deductions and its share of any
gain or loss on a sale of the Partnerships assets would be
less. Conversely, a Section 754 election is disadvantageous
if the transferees tax basis in its Partnership LP units
is lower than those units share of the aggregate tax basis
of the Partnerships assets immediately prior to the
transfer. Thus, the fair market value of the Partnership LP
units may be affected either favorably or unfavorably by the
election. A tax basis adjustment is required regardless of
whether a Section 754 election is made in the case of a
transfer of an interest in the Partnership if the Partnership
has a substantial built-in loss immediately after the transfer
or if the Partnership distributes property and has a substantial
tax basis reduction. Generally a built-in loss or a tax basis
reduction is substantial if it exceeds $250,000.
The calculations involved in the Section 754 election are
complex and will be made on the basis of assumptions as to the
value of the Partnerships assets and other matters. For
example, the allocation of the Section 743(b) adjustment
among the Partnerships assets must be made in accordance
with the Internal Revenue Code. The IRS could seek to reallocate
some or all of any Section 743(b) adjustment the
Partnership allocated to its tangible assets to goodwill
instead. Goodwill, an intangible asset, is generally either
non-amortizable
or amortizable over a longer period of time or under a less
accelerated method than the Partnerships tangible assets.
The Partnership cannot assure any Partnership unitholder that
the determinations the Partnership makes will not be
successfully challenged by the IRS or that the resulting
deductions will not be reduced or disallowed altogether. Should
the IRS require a different tax basis adjustment to be made, and
should, in the Partnerships opinion, the expense of
compliance exceed the benefit of the election, the Partnership
may seek permission from the IRS to revoke the
Partnerships Section 754 election. If permission is
granted, a subsequent purchaser of Partnership LP units may be
allocated more income than it would have been allocated had the
election not been revoked.
Tax
Treatment of Operations
Accounting
Method and Taxable Year
The Partnership uses the year ending December 31 as the
Partnerships taxable year and the accrual method of
accounting for federal income tax purposes. Each Partnership
unitholder will be required to include in its income its share
of the Partnerships income, gain, loss and deduction for
the Partnerships taxable year ending within or with its
taxable year. In addition, a Partnership unitholder who has a
taxable year ending on a date other than December 31 and who
disposes of all of its Partnership LP units following the close
of the Partnerships taxable year but before the close of
its taxable year must include its share of the
Partnerships income, gain, loss and deduction in income
for its taxable year, with the result that it will be required
to include in its taxable income for its taxable year its share
of more than twelve months of the Partnerships income,
gain, loss and deduction. Please read
Disposition of the Partnership LP
Units Allocations Between Transferors and
Transferees.
129
Tax
Basis, Depreciation and Amortization
The tax basis of the Partnerships tangible assets will be
used for purposes of computing depreciation and cost recovery
deductions and, ultimately, gain or loss on the disposition of
these assets. The federal income tax burden associated with the
difference between the fair market value of the
Partnerships assets and their tax basis (a) following
the merger will be borne by the Partnership unitholders as of
such period, and (b) immediately prior to any other
offering will be borne by the Partnerships unitholders as
of that time. Please read Tax Consequences of
the Partnership LP Unit Ownership Allocation of
Income, Gain, Loss and Deduction.
To the extent allowable, the Partnership may elect to use the
depreciation and cost recovery methods that will result in the
largest deductions being taken in the early years after assets
subject to these allowances are placed in service. Please read
Uniformity of Units. Property the
Partnership subsequently acquires or constructs may be
depreciated using accelerated methods permitted by the Internal
Revenue Code.
If the Partnership disposes of depreciable property by sale,
foreclosure or otherwise, all or a portion of any gain,
determined by reference to the amount of depreciation previously
deducted and the nature of the property, may be subject to the
recapture rules and taxed as ordinary income rather than capital
gain. Similarly, a Partnership unitholder who has taken cost
recovery or depreciation deductions with respect to property the
Partnership owns will likely be required to recapture some or
all of those deductions as ordinary income upon a sale of its
interest in the Partnership. Please read Tax
Consequences of the Partnership LP Unit Ownership
Allocation of Income, Gain, Loss and Deduction and
Disposition of the Partnership LP
Units Recognition of Gain or Loss.
If the Partnership offers and sells Partnership LP units, the
costs the Partnership incurs in selling the Partnership LP units
(called syndication expenses) must be capitalized
and cannot be deducted currently, ratably or upon the
Partnerships termination. There are uncertainties
regarding the classification of costs as organization expenses,
which the Partnership may be able to amortize, and as
syndication expenses, which the Partnership may not amortize.
Any underwriting discounts and commissions the Partnership
incurs would be treated as syndication expenses.
Valuation
and Tax Basis of the Partnerships Properties
The federal income tax consequences of the ownership and
disposition of Partnership LP units will depend in part on the
Partnerships estimates of the relative fair market values
and the tax bases of the Partnerships assets. Although the
Partnership may from time to time consult with professional
appraisers regarding valuation matters, the Partnership will
make many of the relative fair market value estimates ourselves.
These estimates and determinations of basis are subject to
challenge and will not be binding on the IRS or the courts. If
the estimates of fair market value or basis are later found to
be incorrect, the character and amount of items of income, gain,
loss or deduction previously reported by the Partnership
unitholders might change, and Partnership unitholders might be
required to adjust their tax liability for prior years and incur
interest and penalties with respect to those adjustments.
Disposition
of the Partnership LP Units
Recognition
of Gain or Loss
Gain or loss will be recognized on a sale of Partnership LP
units equal to the difference between the Partnership
unitholders amount realized and the Partnership
unitholders adjusted tax basis for the units sold. A
Partnership unitholders amount realized will equal the sum
of the cash or the fair market value of other property it
receives plus its share of the Partnerships nonrecourse
liabilities. Because the amount realized includes a Partnership
unitholders share of the Partnerships nonrecourse
liabilities, the gain recognized on the sale of Partnership LP
units could result in a tax liability in excess of any cash
received from the sale.
Prior distributions from the Partnership in excess of cumulative
net taxable income for a Partnership LP unit that decreased a
Partnership unitholders tax basis in that unit will, in
effect, become taxable income if
130
that Partnership LP unit is sold at a price greater than a
Partnership unitholders tax basis in that Partnership LP
unit, even if the price received is less than its original cost.
Except as noted below, gain or loss recognized by a Partnership
unitholder, other than a dealer in the Partnership
LP units, on the sale or exchange of a Partnership LP unit will
generally be taxable as capital gain or loss. Capital gain
recognized by an individual on the sale of Partnership LP units
held more than twelve months is scheduled to be taxed at a
maximum U.S. federal income tax rate of 15% through
December 31, 2010 and 20% thereafter (absent new
legislation extending or adjusting the current rate). However, a
portion, which will likely be substantial, of this gain or loss
will be separately computed and taxed as ordinary income or loss
under Section 751 of the Internal Revenue Code to the
extent attributable to assets giving rise to unrealized
receivables or inventory items that the
Partnership owns. The term unrealized receivables
includes potential recapture items, including depreciation
recapture. Ordinary income attributable to unrealized
receivables and inventory items may exceed net taxable gain
realized on the sale of a Partnership LP unit and may be
recognized even if there is a net taxable loss realized on the
sale of a Partnership LP unit. Thus, a Partnership unitholder
may recognize both ordinary income and a capital loss upon a
sale of Partnership LP units. Net capital loss may offset
capital gains and no more than $3,000 of ordinary income, in the
case of individuals, and may be used to offset only capital
gains in the case of corporations.
The IRS has ruled that a partner who acquires interests in a
partnership in separate transactions must combine those
interests and maintain a single adjusted tax basis for all those
interests. Upon a sale or other disposition of less than all of
those interests, a portion of that tax basis must be allocated
to the interests sold using an equitable
apportionment method, which generally means that the tax
basis allocated to the interest sold equals an amount that bears
the same relation to the partners tax basis in its entire
interest in the partnership as the value of the interest sold
bears to the value of the partners entire interest in the
partnership. Treasury Regulations under Section 1223 of the
Internal Revenue Code allow a selling Partnership unitholder who
can identify Partnership LP units transferred with an
ascertainable holding period to elect to use the actual holding
period of Partnership LP units transferred. Thus, according to
the ruling, a Partnership unitholder will be unable to select
high or low basis Partnership LP units to sell as would be the
case with corporate stock, but, according to the Treasury
Regulations, may designate specific Partnership LP units sold
for purposes of determining the holding period of Partnership LP
units transferred. A Partnership unitholder electing to use the
actual holding period of Partnership LP units transferred must
consistently use that identification method for all subsequent
sales or exchanges of Partnership LP units. A Partnership
unitholder considering the purchase of additional Partnership LP
units or a sale of Partnership LP units purchased in separate
transactions is urged to consult its tax advisor as to the
possible consequences of this ruling and those Treasury
Regulations.
Specific provisions of the Internal Revenue Code affect the
taxation of some financial products and securities, including
partnership interests, by treating a taxpayer as having sold an
appreciated partnership interest, that is, one in
which gain would be recognized if it were sold, assigned or
terminated at its fair market value, if the taxpayer or related
persons enter(s) into:
|
|
|
|
|
a short sale;
|
|
|
|
an offsetting notional principal contract; or
|
|
|
|
a futures or forward contract with respect to the partnership
interest or substantially identical property.
|
Moreover, if a taxpayer has previously entered into a short
sale, an offsetting notional principal contract or a futures or
forward contract with respect to the partnership interest, the
taxpayer will be treated as having sold that position if the
taxpayer or a related person then acquires the partnership
interest or substantially identical property. The Secretary of
the Treasury is also authorized to issue regulations that treat
a taxpayer that enters into transactions or positions that have
substantially the same effect as the preceding transactions as
having constructively sold the financial position.
Allocations
Between Transferors and Transferees
In general, the Partnerships taxable income or loss will
be determined annually, will be prorated on a monthly basis and
will be subsequently apportioned among the Partnership
unitholders in proportion to the
131
number of the Partnership LP units owned by each of them as of
the opening of the applicable exchange on the first business day
of the month (the Allocation Date). However, gain or
loss realized on a sale or other disposition of the
Partnerships assets other than in the ordinary course of
business will be allocated among the Partnership unitholders on
the Allocation Date in the month in which that gain or loss is
recognized. As a result, a Partnership unitholder transferring
Partnership LP units may be allocated income, gain, loss and
deduction realized after the date of transfer.
Although simplifying conventions are contemplated by the
Internal Revenue Code and most publicly traded partnerships use
similar simplifying conventions, the use of this method may not
be permitted under existing Treasury Regulations. Recently,
however, the Department of the Treasury and the IRS issued
proposed Treasury Regulations that provide a safe harbor
pursuant to which a publicly traded partnership may use a
similar monthly simplifying convention to allocate tax items
among transferor and transferee Partnership unitholders,
although such tax items must be prorated on a daily basis.
Nonetheless, the proposed regulations do not specifically
authorize the use of the proration method the Partnership has
adopted. Existing publicly traded partnerships are entitled to
rely on these proposed Treasury Regulations; however, they are
not binding on the IRS and are subject to change until final
Treasury Regulations are issued. Accordingly, Vinson &
Elkins L.L.P. is unable to opine on the validity of this method
of allocating income and deductions between transferor and
transferee Partnership unitholders. If this method is not
allowed under the Treasury Regulations, or only applies to
transfers of less than all of the Partnership unitholders
interest, the Partnerships taxable income or losses might
be reallocated among the Partnership unitholders. The
Partnership is authorized to revise the Partnerships
method of allocation among the Partnership unitholders, as well
as among transferor and transferee Partnership unitholders whose
interests vary during a taxable year, to conform to a method
permitted under future Treasury Regulations.
A Partnership unitholder who owns Partnership LP units at any
time during a quarter and who disposes of them prior to the
record date set for a cash distribution for that quarter will be
allocated items of the Partnerships income, gain, loss and
deductions attributable to that quarter but will not be entitled
to receive that cash distribution.
Notification
Requirements
A Partnership unitholder who sells any of its Partnership LP
units is generally required to notify the Partnership in writing
of that sale within 30 days after the sale (or, if earlier,
January 15 of the year following the sale). A purchaser of the
Partnership LP units who purchases such Partnership LP units
from another Partnership unitholder is also generally required
to notify the Partnership in writing of that purchase within
30 days after the purchase. Upon receiving such
notifications, the Partnership is required to notify the IRS of
that transaction and to furnish specified information to the
transferor and transferee. Failure to notify the Partnership of
a purchase may, in some cases, lead to the imposition of
penalties. However, these reporting requirements do not apply to
a sale by an individual who is a citizen of the United States
and who effects the sale or exchange through a broker who will
satisfy such requirements.
Constructive
Termination
The Partnership will be considered to have terminated for tax
purposes if there are sales or exchanges which, in the
aggregate, constitute 50% or more of the total interests in the
Partnerships capital and profits within a twelve- month
period. For purposes of determining whether the 50% threshold
has been reached, multiple sales of the same interest are
counted only once. A constructive termination results in the
closing of the Partnerships taxable year for all
Partnership unitholders. In the case of a Partnership unitholder
reporting on a taxable year other than a fiscal year ending
December 31, the closing of the Partnerships taxable
year may result in more than twelve months of the
Partnerships taxable income or loss being includable in
its taxable income for the year of termination. A constructive
termination occurring on a date other than December 31 will
result in the Partnership filing two tax returns (and the
Partnership unitholders could receive two Schedules K-1 if the
relief discussed below is not available) for one fiscal year and
the cost of the preparation of these returns will be borne by
all the Partnership unitholders. The Partnership would also be
required to make new tax elections after a termination,
including a new election under Section 754 of the Internal
Revenue Code. A constructive
132
termination of the Partnership would result in a deferral of the
Partnerships deductions for depreciation. For a further
discussion of the effect of a constructive termination in
connection with the merger, please see Material Federal
Income Tax Consequences of the Merger Effect of the
Transactions on the Partnerships Ratio of Taxable Income
to Distributions. A termination could also result in
penalties if the Partnership was unable to determine that the
termination had occurred. Moreover, a termination might either
accelerate the application of, or subject the Partnership to,
any tax legislation enacted before the termination. The IRS has
recently announced a relief procedure whereby if a publicly
traded partnership that has technically terminated requests and
the IRS grants special relief, among other things, the
partnership will be required to provide only a single
Schedule K-1
to a Partnership unitholder for the tax years in which the
termination occurs.
Uniformity
of Units
Because the Partnership cannot match transferors and transferees
of Partnership LP units, the Partnership must maintain
uniformity of the economic and tax characteristics of
Partnership LP units to a purchaser of these Partnership LP
units. In the absence of uniformity, the Partnership may be
unable to completely comply with a number of federal income tax
requirements, both statutory and regulatory. A lack of
uniformity can result from a literal application of Treasury
Regulation Section 1.167(c)-1(a)(6).
Any non-uniformity could have a negative impact on the value of
the Partnership LP units. Please read Tax
Consequences of the Partnership LP Unit Ownership
Section 754 Election.
The Partnership intends to depreciate the portion of a
Section 743(b) adjustment attributable to unrealized
appreciation in the value of Contributed Property, to the extent
of any unamortized Book-Tax Disparity, using a rate of
depreciation or amortization derived from the depreciation or
amortization method and useful life applied to the unamortized
Book-Tax Disparity, or treat that portion as nonamortizable, to
the extent attributable to property the common basis of which is
not amortizable, consistent with the regulations under
Section 743 of the Internal Revenue Code, even though that
position may be inconsistent with Treasury
Regulation Section 1.167(c)-1(a)(6),
which is not expected to directly apply to a material portion of
the Partnerships assets , and Treasury
Regulation Section 1.197-2(g)(3).
Please read Tax Consequences of the
Partnership LP Unit Ownership Section 754
Election. To the extent that the Section 743(b)
adjustment is attributable to appreciation in value in excess of
the unamortized Book-Tax Disparity, the Partnership will apply
the rules described in the Treasury Regulations and legislative
history. If the Partnership determines that this position cannot
reasonably be taken, the Partnership may adopt a depreciation
and amortization position under which all purchasers acquiring
Partnership LP units in the same month would receive
depreciation and amortization deductions, whether attributable
to a common basis or Section 743(b) adjustment, based upon
the same applicable methods and lives as if they had purchased a
direct interest in the Partnerships property. If the
Partnership adopts this position, it may result in lower annual
depreciation and amortization deductions than would otherwise be
allowable to some Partnership unitholders and risk the loss of
depreciation and amortization deductions not taken in the year
that these deductions are otherwise allowable. The Partnership
will not adopt this position if the Partnership determines that
the loss of depreciation and amortization deductions will have a
material adverse effect on Partnership unitholders. If the
Partnership chooses not to utilize this aggregate method, the
Partnership may use any other reasonable depreciation and
amortization method to preserve the uniformity of the intrinsic
tax characteristics of any Partnership LP units that would not
have a material adverse effect on the Partnership unitholders.
The IRS may challenge any method of depreciating the
Section 743(b) adjustment described in this paragraph. If
this challenge were sustained, the uniformity of Partnership LP
units might be affected, and the gain from the sale of
Partnership LP units might be increased without the benefit of
additional deductions. Please read Disposition
of Partnership LP Units Recognition of Gain or
Loss.
Tax-Exempt
Organizations and Other Investors
Ownership of Partnership LP units by employee benefit plans,
other tax-exempt organizations, non-resident aliens,
non-U.S. corporations
and other
non-U.S. persons
raises issues unique to those investors and, as described below
to a limited extent, may have substantially adverse tax
consequences to them. If you are a
133
tax-exempt entity or a
non-U.S. person,
you should consult your tax advisor with respect to your tax
consequences of holding Partnership LP units.
Employee benefit plans and most other organizations exempt from
federal income tax, including individual retirement accounts and
other retirement plans, are subject to federal income tax on
unrelated business taxable income. Virtually all of the
Partnerships income allocated to a Partnership unitholder
that is a tax-exempt organization will be unrelated business
taxable income and will be taxable to them.
Non-resident aliens and foreign corporations, trusts or estates
that own Partnership LP units will be considered to be engaged
in business in the United States because of the ownership of
Partnership LP units. As a consequence they will be required to
file federal tax returns to report their share of the
Partnerships income, gain, loss or deduction and pay
federal income tax at regular rates on their share of the
Partnerships net income or gain. Under rules applicable to
publicly traded partnerships, distributions to
non-U.S. Partnership
unitholders are subject to withholding at the highest applicable
effective tax rate. Each
non-U.S. Partnership
unitholder must obtain a taxpayer identification number from the
IRS and submit that number to the Partnerships transfer
agent on a
Form W-8
BEN or applicable substitute form in order to obtain credit for
these withholding taxes. A change in applicable law may require
the Partnership to change these procedures.
In addition, because a foreign corporation that owns Partnership
LP units will be treated as engaged in a United States trade or
business, that corporation may be subject to the United States
branch profits tax at a rate of 30%, in addition to regular
federal income tax, on its share of the Partnerships
income and gain, as adjusted for changes in the foreign
corporations U.S. net equity, which is
effectively connected with the conduct of a United States trade
or business. That tax may be reduced or eliminated by an income
tax treaty between the United States and the country in which
the foreign corporate unitholder is a qualified
resident. In addition, this type of Partnership unitholder
is subject to special information reporting requirements under
Section 6038C of the Internal Revenue Code.
A foreign Partnership unitholder who sells or otherwise disposes
of a Partnership LP unit will be subject to U.S. federal
income tax on gain realized from the sale or disposition of that
unit to the extent the gain is effectively connected with a
U.S. trade or business of the foreign unitholder. Under a
ruling published by the IRS, interpreting the scope of
effectively connected income, a foreign unitholder
would be considered to be engaged in a trade or business in the
U.S. by virtue of the U.S. activities of the
partnership, and part or all of that unitholders gain
would be effectively connected with that unitholders
indirect U.S. trade or business. Moreover, under the
Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act
(FIRPTA), a foreign Partnership unitholder generally
will be subject to U.S. federal income tax upon the sale or
disposition of a Partnership LP unit if (i) it owned
(directly or constructively applying certain attribution rules)
more than 5% of the Partnership LP units at any time during the
five-year period ending on the date of such disposition and
(ii) 50% or more of the fair market value of all of the
Partnerships assets consisted of U.S. real property
interests at any time during the shorter of the period during
which such unitholder held Partnership LP units or the
5-year
period ending on the date of disposition. Currently, more than
50% of the Partnerships assets consist of U.S. real
property interests and the Partnership does not expect that to
change in the foreseeable future. Therefore, foreign Partnership
unitholders may be subject to U.S. federal income tax on
gain from the sale or disposition of their Partnership LP units.
Administrative
Matters
Information
Returns and Audit Procedures
The Partnership intends to furnish to each Partnership
unitholder, within 90 days after the close of each calendar
year, specific tax information, including a
Schedule K-1,
which describes its share of the Partnerships income,
gain, loss and deduction for the Partnerships preceding
taxable year. In preparing this information, which will not be
reviewed by counsel, the Partnership will take various
accounting and reporting positions, some of which have been
mentioned earlier, to determine each Partnership
unitholders share of income, gain, loss and deduction. The
Partnership cannot assure you that those positions will in all
cases yield a result that conforms to the requirements of the
Internal Revenue Code, Treasury Regulations or administrative
interpretations of the IRS. Neither the Partnership nor
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. can assure prospective
Partnership
134
unitholders that the IRS will not successfully contend in court
that those positions are impermissible. Any challenge by the IRS
could negatively affect the value of the Partnership LP units.
The IRS may audit the Partnerships federal income tax
information returns. Adjustments resulting from an IRS audit may
require each Partnership unitholder to adjust a prior
years tax liability and possibly may result in an audit of
its own return. Any audit of a Partnership unitholders
return could result in adjustments not related to the
Partnerships returns as well as those related to the
Partnerships returns.
Partnerships generally are treated as separate entities for
purposes of federal tax audits, judicial review of
administrative adjustments by the IRS and tax settlement
proceedings. The tax treatment of partnership items of income,
gain, loss and deduction are determined in a partnership
proceeding rather than in separate proceedings with the
partners. The Internal Revenue Code requires that one partner be
designated as the Tax Matters Partner for these
purposes. Under the amended and restated partnership agreement,
the Partnership Board must designate an officer of the
Partnership or the Partnership GP who is a partner in the
Partnership as the Partnerships Tax Matters Partner.
The Tax Matters Partner has made and will make some elections on
the Partnerships behalf and on behalf of the Partnership
unitholders. In addition, the Tax Matters Partner can extend the
statute of limitations for assessment of tax deficiencies
against the Partnership unitholders for items in the
Partnerships returns. The Tax Matters Partner may bind a
Partnership unitholder with less than a 1% profits interest in
the Partnership to a settlement with the IRS unless that the
Partnership unitholder elects, by filing a statement with the
IRS, not to give that authority to the Tax Matters Partner. The
Tax Matters Partner may seek judicial review, by which all the
Partnership unitholders are bound, of a final partnership
administrative adjustment and, if the Tax Matters Partner fails
to seek judicial review, judicial review may be sought by any
Partnership unitholder having at least a 1% interest in profits
or by any group of the Partnership unitholders having in the
aggregate at least a 5% interest in profits. However, only one
action for judicial review will go forward, and each Partnership
unitholder with an interest in the outcome may participate.
A Partnership unitholder must file a statement with the IRS
identifying the treatment of any item on its federal income tax
return that is not consistent with the treatment of the item on
the Partnerships return. Intentional or negligent
disregard of this consistency requirement may subject a
Partnership unitholder to substantial penalties.
Nominee
Reporting
Persons who hold an interest in the Partnership as a nominee for
another person are required to furnish to the Partnership:
(a) the name, address and taxpayer identification number of
the beneficial owner and the nominee;
(b) whether the beneficial owner is:
1. a person that is not a United States person;
2. a foreign government, an international organization or
any wholly owned agency or instrumentality of either of the
foregoing; or
3. a tax-exempt entity;
(c) the amount and description of Partnership LP units
held, acquired or transferred for the beneficial owner; and
(d) specific information including the dates of
acquisitions and transfers, means of acquisitions and transfers,
and acquisition cost for purchases, as well as the amount of net
proceeds from sales.
Brokers and financial institutions are required to furnish
additional information, including whether they are
U.S. persons and specific information on Partnership LP
units they acquire, hold or transfer for their own account. A
penalty of $50 per failure, up to a maximum of $100,000 per
calendar year, is imposed by the Internal Revenue Code for
failure to report that information to the Partnership. The
nominee is required to supply the beneficial owner of the
Partnership LP units with the information furnished to the
Partnership.
135
Accuracy-Related
Penalties
An additional tax equal to 20% of the amount of any portion of
an underpayment of tax that is attributable to one or more
specified causes, including negligence or disregard of rules or
regulations, substantial understatements of income tax and
substantial valuation misstatements, is imposed by the Internal
Revenue Code. No penalty will be imposed, however, for any
portion of an underpayment if it is shown that there was a
reasonable cause for that portion and that the taxpayer acted in
good faith regarding that portion.
For individuals, a substantial understatement of income tax in
any taxable year exists if the amount of the understatement
exceeds the greater of 10% of the tax required to be shown on
the return for the taxable year or $5,000 ($10,000 for most
corporations). The amount of any understatement subject to
penalty generally is reduced if any portion is attributable to a
position adopted on the return:
(a) for which there is, or was, substantial
authority; or
(b) as to which there is a reasonable basis and the
pertinent facts of that position are disclosed on the return.
If any item of income, gain, loss or deduction included in the
distributive shares of the Partnership unitholders could result
in that kind of an understatement of income for
which no substantial authority exists, the
Partnership would be required to disclose the pertinent facts on
the Partnerships return. In addition, the Partnership will
make a reasonable effort to furnish sufficient information for
Partnership unitholders to make adequate disclosure on their
returns and to take other actions as may be appropriate to
permit Partnership unitholders to avoid liability for this
penalty. More stringent rules apply to tax shelters,
which the Partnership does not believe includes it, or any of
its investments, plans or arrangements.
A substantial valuation misstatement exists if (a) the
value of any property, or the tax basis of any property, claimed
on a tax return is 150% or more of the amount determined to be
the correct amount of the valuation or tax basis , (b) the
price for any property or services (or for the use of property)
claimed on any such return with respect to any transaction
between persons described in Internal Revenue Code
Section 482 is 200% or more (or 50% or less) of the amount
determined under Section 482 to be the correct amount of
such price, or (c) the net Internal Revenue Code
Section 482 transfer price adjustment for the taxable year
exceeds the lesser of $5 million or 10% of the
taxpayers gross receipts. No penalty is imposed unless the
portion of the underpayment attributable to a substantial
valuation misstatement exceeds $5,000 ($10,000 for most
corporations). The penalty is increased to 40% in the event of a
gross valuation misstatement. The Partnership does not
anticipate making any valuation misstatements.
Reportable
Transactions
If the Partnership engages in a reportable
transaction, the Partnership (and possibly the Partnership
unitholders and others) would be required to make a detailed
disclosure of the transaction to the IRS. A transaction may be a
reportable transaction based upon any of several factors,
including the fact that it is a type of tax avoidance
transaction publicly identified by the IRS as a listed
transaction or that it produces certain kinds of losses
for partnerships, individuals, S corporations, and trusts
of at least $2.0 million in any single year, or
$4.0 million in any combination of 6 successive tax years.
The Partnerships participation in a reportable transaction
could increase the likelihood that the Partnerships
federal income tax information return (and possibly a
Partnership unitholders tax return) is audited by the IRS.
Please read Information Returns and Audit
Procedures above.
Moreover, if the Partnership were to participate in a reportable
transaction with a significant purpose to avoid or evade tax, or
in any listed transaction, the Partnership unitholders could be
subject to the following provisions of the American Jobs
Creation Act of 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
accuracy-related penalties with a broader scope, significantly
narrower exceptions, and potentially greater amounts than
described above at Accuracy-Related
Penalties;
|
136
|
|
|
|
|
for those persons otherwise entitled to deduct interest on
federal tax deficiencies, nondeductibility of interest on any
resulting tax liability; and
|
|
|
|
in the case of a listed transaction, an extended statute of
limitations.
|
The Partnership does not expect to engage in any
reportable transactions.
State,
Local and Other Tax Considerations
In addition to federal income taxes, the Partnership unitholders
will be subject to other taxes, including state and local income
taxes, unincorporated business taxes, and estate, inheritance or
intangibles taxes that may be imposed by the various
jurisdictions in which the Partnership conducts business or owns
property or in which the unitholder is a resident. The
Partnership currently conducts business or owns property in many
states, most of which impose personal income taxes. Most of
these states also impose an income tax on corporations and other
entities. Moreover, the Partnership may also own property or do
business in other states in the future that impose income or
similar taxes on nonresident individuals. Although an analysis
of those various taxes is not presented here, each prospective
Partnership unitholder should consider their potential impact on
its investment in the Partnership. A Partnership unitholder may
be required to file state income tax returns and to pay state
income taxes in any state in which the Partnership does business
or owns property, and such Partnership unitholder may be subject
to penalties for failure to comply with those requirements. In
some states, tax losses may not produce a tax benefit in the
year incurred and also may not be available to offset income in
subsequent taxable years. Some of the states may require the
Partnership, or it may elect, to withhold a percentage of income
from amounts to be distributed to a Partnership unitholder who
is not a resident of the state. Withholding, the amount of which
may be greater or less than a particular Partnership
unitholders income tax liability to the state, generally
does not relieve a nonresident Partnership unitholder from the
obligation to file an income tax return. Amounts withheld may be
treated as if distributed to Partnership unitholders for
purposes of determining the amounts distributed by the
Partnership. Please read Tax Consequences of
the Partnership LP Unit Ownership
Entity-Level Collections on page 126. Based on
current law and the Partnerships estimate of the
Partnerships future operations, the Partnership
anticipates that any amounts required to be withheld will not be
material.
It is the responsibility of each Partnership unitholder to
investigate the legal and tax consequences, under the laws of
pertinent states and localities, of its investment in the
Partnership. Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. has not rendered
an opinion on the state, local, or foreign tax consequences of
an investment in the Partnership. The Partnership strongly
recommends that each prospective Partnership unitholder consult,
and depend on, its own tax counsel or other advisor with regard
to those matters. It is the responsibility of each Partnership
unitholder to file all tax returns that may be required
of it.
137
INTERESTS
OF CERTAIN PERSONS IN THE MERGER
Interests
of the Executive Officers and Directors in the Merger
In considering the recommendations of the Partnership Audit
Committee and the Holdings Board, the Partnership unitholders
and Holdings unitholders should be aware that some of the
executive officers and directors of the Partnership GP and
Holdings GP have interests in the merger that may differ from,
or may be in addition to, the interests of the holders of
Partnership LP units or Holdings units generally. These
interests may present such executive officers and directors with
actual or potential conflicts of interests, and these interests,
to the extent material, are described below:
|
|
|
|
|
Holdings and Partnership Units. Some of the
executive officers and directors of the Partnership GP and
Holdings GP currently own Holdings units and will be receiving
Partnership LP units as a result of the merger. Holdings units
held by the directors and executive officers will be converted
into Partnership LP units at a ratio of 0.705 Partnership LP
units per Holdings unit. This is the same ratio as that
applicable to all other holders of Holdings units. In addition,
certain directors and officers of the Partnership GP and
Holdings GP currently own Partnership LP units.
|
|
|
|
Indemnification and Insurance. The merger
agreement provides for indemnification by the Partnership and
Holdings of each person who was, as of the date of the merger
agreement, or is at any time from the date of the merger
agreement through the effective date, an officer or director of
Holdings or any of its subsidiaries or acting as a fiduciary
under or with respect to any employee benefit plan of Holdings
and for the maintenance of directors and officers
liability insurance covering directors and executive officers of
Holdings GP for a period of six years following the merger. The
Partnership and MergerCo also agreed that all rights to
indemnification now existing in favor of indemnified parties as
provided in the Holdings agreement of limited partnership (or,
as applicable, the charter, bylaws, partnership agreement,
limited liability company agreement, or other organizational
documents of any of Holdings subsidiaries) and the
indemnification agreements of Holdings or any of its
subsidiaries will be assumed by Holdings, the Partnership and
the Partnership GP in the merger, without further action, at the
effective time of the merger and will survive the merger and
will continue in full force and effect in accordance with their
terms.
|
|
|
|
Director and Executive Officer
Interlock. Certain of Holdings GPs
directors and all of Holdings GPs executive officers are
currently directors and executive officers of the Partnership
GP, respectively, and are expected to remain directors and
executive officers of the Partnership GP following the merger.
Messrs. Wylie, Smith, St.Clair and Schmidt are officers of
BGH GP. Mr. Wylie is a director of BGH GP. After the
effective time, the Partnership Board is expected to consist of
nine members, three of whom are expected to be the existing
members of the Partnership Audit Committee, one of whom is
expected to be the existing chief executive officer of the
Partnership GP and three of whom are expected to be the three
existing members of the audit committee of the Holdings Board.
The amended and restated partnership agreement of the
Partnership will provide that, following (a) the receipt of
approvals from the CPUC and the PaPUC of the public election
provisions or (b) a determination by the Partnership Board
that such approvals are not required, Holdings GP shall have the
right to designate (a) two directors for so long as BGH GP,
ArcLight and Kelso and their affiliates (directly and
indirectly) own at least 10,495,107 Partnership LP units (85% of
the number they will own after the closing of the merger) or
(b) one director for so long as they own at least 5,247,554
Partnership LP units (42.5% of the number they will own after
the closing of the merger).
|
|
|
|
Interests in BGH GP. In addition, all of the
executive officers and certain of the directors of the
Partnership GP and Holdings GP have limited liability company
interests in BGH GP, which owns approximately 61% of the total
Holdings common units and 97% of the total Holdings management
units and has entered into a support agreement and registration
rights agreement. For more information on the support agreement
and registration rights agreement, please read The
Proposed Merger Transactions Related to the
Merger.
|
138
Senior management of the Partnership GP and Holdings GP prepared
projections with respect to the Partnerships future
financial and operating performance. These projections were
provided to Barclays and Credit Suisse for use in connection
with the preparation of their opinions to the Partnership Audit
Committee and the Holdings Board, respectively, and related
financial advisory services. The projections were also provided
to the Partnership Audit Committee and the Holdings Board.
Each of the Partnership Audit Committee and the Holdings Board
are aware of these different
and/or
additional interests and considered them, among other matters,
in their respective evaluations and negotiations of the merger
agreement.
Ownership
Interests of Directors and Executive Officers
The following table sets forth, as of September 21, 2010
for each of Holdings GPs and the Partnership GPs
directors and executive officers: (a) the number of
Holdings units such person owns of record; (b) the total
number of Partnership LP units (and vested options relating
thereto) that such director or executive officer will own of
record after the merger; and (c) the number of Partnership
LP units (and vested options relating thereto) each such person
owns of record.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holdings
|
|
|
|
Partnership
|
|
|
Common Units and
|
|
Partnership
|
|
LP units after
|
|
|
Management Units
|
|
LP units
|
|
the Merger
|
|
Directors of the Partnership GP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forrest E. Wylie
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
Irvin K. Culpepper, Jr.
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
John F. Erhard
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Michael B. Goldberg
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
C. Scott Hobbs
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
Mark C. McKinley
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
Oliver G. Rick Richard, III
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3,750
|
|
|
|
3,750
|
|
Robb E. Turner
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Directors of Holdings GP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forrest E. Wylie
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
Christopher L. Collins
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
John F. Erhard
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Joseph A. LaSala, Jr.
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Frank J. Loverro
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Frank S. Sowinski
|
|
|
8,100
|
|
|
|
8,500
|
|
|
|
14,210
|
|
Robb E. Turner
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Martin A. White
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Executive Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forrest E. Wylie
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
Keith E. St.Clair
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Clark C. Smith
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
(1)
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Robert A. Malecky
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
25,200
|
(2)
|
|
|
65,625
|
|
Khalid A. Muslih
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
William H. Schmidt
|
|
|
1,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
5,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
5,705
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mr. Smith owns the 3,000 Partnership LP units jointly with
his wife. |
|
(2) |
|
Mr. Malecky owns the 9,500 Partnership LP units jointly
with his wife. Total amount shown also includes 15,700
Partnership LP units issuable upon exercise of outstanding
options. |
|
(3) |
|
Total amount shown also includes 3,000 Partnership LP units
issuable upon exercise of outstanding options. Mr. Schmidt
owns 2,000 Partnership LP units and 1,000 Holdings units
jointly with his wife. |
139
Indemnification;
Directors and Officers Insurance
The Partnership and Holdings will indemnify, hold harmless and
advance expenses to each person who was as of the date of the
merger agreement or is at any time from the date of the merger
agreement through the effective date of the merger, an officer
or director of Holdings or any of its subsidiaries or acting as
a fiduciary under or with respect to any employee benefit plan
to the fullest extent authorized or permitted by law.
The Partnership will maintain or will cause Holdings to maintain
for at least six years following the effective date of the
merger, the current policies of directors and
officers liability insurance maintained by Holdings and
its subsidiaries, except that Holdings may substitute policies
of at least the same coverage and amounts containing terms and
conditions which are not less advantageous to the directors and
officers of Holdings GP than the existing policy; provided, that
the Partnership is not required to pay annual premiums in excess
of 300% of the last annual premium paid by Holdings prior to the
date of the merger agreement. Such obligation of the Partnership
will be deemed to have been satisfied if prepaid
tail policies have been obtained by Holdings.
The Partnership and MergerCo also agree that all rights to
indemnification, advancement of expenses and exculpation from
liabilities for acts or omissions occurring at or prior to the
effective time of the merger now existing in favor of already
existing indemnified parties, as provided in the Holdings
agreement of limited partnership and the indemnification
agreements of Holdings will be assumed by Holdings, the
Partnership and the Partnership GP in the merger, without
further action, at the effective time of the merger and will
survive the merger and will continue in full force and effect in
accordance with their terms.
Director
and Executive Officer Interlock
After the effective time of the merger the Partnership Board is
expected to consist of nine members, three of whom are expected
to be the existing members of the Partnership Audit Committee,
one of whom is expected to be the existing chief executive
officer of the Partnership GP, two of whom will be appointed by
BGH GP and three of whom are expected to be the existing members
of the audit committee of the board of Holdings GP. The
Partnership GPs and Holdings GPs executive officers
are expected to remain executive officers of the Partnership GP
following the merger.
Support
Agreement
Contemporaneously with the execution and delivery of the merger
agreement the Major Holdings Unitholders entered into a support
agreement with the Partnership (a copy of which is attached as
Annex D to this joint proxy statement/prospectus). Pursuant
to the support agreement, the Major Holdings Unitholders have
each agreed to vote, and granted certain officers of the
Partnership an irrevocable proxy to vote, the Holdings units
beneficially owned by them in the following manner:
|
|
|
|
|
in favor of the approval and adoption of the merger agreement
and the approval of the merger;
|
|
|
|
against any action or agreement that would result in a breach of
any covenant, representation or warranty or any other obligation
or agreement of Holdings or Holdings GP contained in the merger
agreement;
|
|
|
|
against any acquisition proposal, which includes any
proposal or offer from or by any person other than the
Partnership, the Partnership GP, and MergerCo relating to
(a) any direct or indirect acquisition of more than 20% of
the assets of Holdings and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole,
more than 20% of the outstanding equity securities of Holdings
or a business or businesses that constitute more than 20% of the
cash flow, net revenues, net income or assets of Holdings and
its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, (b) any tender offer or
exchange offer, that, if consummated, would result in any Person
beneficially owning more than 20% of the outstanding equity
securities of Holdings, or (c) any merger, consolidation,
business combination, recapitalization, liquidation, dissolution
or similar transaction involving Holdings, other than the
merger; and
|
140
|
|
|
|
|
against any action, agreement or transaction that would or would
reasonably be expected to materially impede, interfere with,
delay, postpone, discourage, frustrate the purposes of or
adversely affect the merger or the other transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement.
|
Under the support agreement, the Major Holdings Unitholders have
agreed not to sell, transfer, assign, pledge, encumber,
hypothecate or otherwise dispose of, or enter into any contract,
option or other arrangement or understanding with respect to the
voting of or sale, transfer, assignment, pledge, encumbrance,
hypothecation or other disposition of, the Holdings units held
by them.
In addition, under the support agreement ArcLight Energy
Partners Fund III, L.P., ArcLight Energy Partners
Fund IV, L.P., Kelso Investment Associates VII, L.P., and
KEP VI, LLC have agreed that, prior to the earlier of
(a) the date of refinancing or termination of that certain
Credit Agreement by and among the Partnership, the several banks
and other financial institutions party thereto and the
administrative agent, dated as of November 13, 2006, as
amended, supplemented and modified from time to time or
(ii) August 14, 2013, they will not to dissolve or
liquidate BGH GP or sell, transfer, assign, pledge, encumber,
hypothecate or otherwise dispose of, or enter into any contract,
option or other arrangement or understanding with respect to the
voting of or sale, transfer, assignment, pledge, encumbrance,
hypothecation or other disposition of, their ownership interests
in, beneficial ownership of or any other interest in, BGH GP if
doing so would cause them to cease to collectively own,
beneficially or of record, directly or indirectly, at least 35%
of the outstanding equity interests of BGH GP.
Further, the Major Holdings Unitholders each agree not to:
(a) knowingly solicit, initiate or encourage the submission
of any acquisition proposal or the making or consummation
thereof; (b) participate in any discussions or negotiations
regarding, or furnish to any person any nonpublic information
about Holdings or the Partnership in connection with, or
otherwise cooperate with any acquisition proposal; (c) make
or participate in, directly or indirectly, a solicitation of
proxies or powers of attorney or similar rights to vote, or seek
to advise or influence any person with respect to the voting of,
any Holdings units in connection with any vote or other action
on any matter, other than to recommend that the holders of
Holdings units vote in favor of the approval and adoption of the
merger and merger agreement; or (d) agree or publicly
propose to do any of the foregoing.
However, the voting and other obligations of the Major Holdings
Unitholders pursuant to the support agreement terminate upon the
earliest to occur of: (a) the effective time of the merger,
(b) a change in recommendation by the Holdings Board,
(c) the termination of the merger agreement or (d) the
mutual agreement of the parties thereto.
The foregoing description of the support agreement is qualified
in its entirety by reference to the full text of the support
agreement, which is attached as Annex D to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus and is incorporated into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus by reference.
141
DIRECTORS
AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF
THE PARTNERSHIP GP FOLLOWING THE MERGER
In connection with the closing of the merger, the Limited
Liability Company Agreement of the Partnership GP, which governs
the conduct of the Partnership GPs business, will be
amended and restated. The amended and restated agreement will,
subject to (a) the receipt of approvals from the CPUC and
the PaPUC of the public election provisions or (b) a
determination by the Partnership Board that such approvals are
not required, provide (i) for the director nomination and
election rights of the holders of Partnership LP units and
(ii) that the Partnership GPs business will be
exclusively managed and controlled by the Partnership Board, and
not by Holdings, which is the sole member of the Partnership GP.
Holdings GP (through Holdings) will have the right to appoint
all of the members of the Partnership Board until the earlier to
occur of (a) or (b) above. Please see The
Amended and Restated Partnership Agreement of the
Partnership Board of Directors for more
information on the nomination and election of the directors of
the Partnership GP.
The following table shows information for the individuals
expected to serve as directors and executive officers of the
Partnership GP following the merger. Executive officers are
appointed by the directors. After approval by the CPUC and PaPUC
of the public election provisions or determination by the
Partnership Board that such approvals are not required, the
terms of the Public Directors will be staggered and such
directors will be divided into three classes. At each annual
meeting, only one class of Public Directors will be elected and,
upon election, directors in that class will serve for a term
that ends at the third succeeding annual meeting, subject to a
directors earlier death, resignation or removal. Following
the merger, the Partnership Board is expected to be comprised of
nine individuals: the three current members of the Partnership
Audit Committee, the three current members of the audit
committee of the Holdings Board, the Chief Executive Officer of
the Partnership GP and Holdings GP, and Frank J. Loverro and
John F. Erhard.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Age
|
|
Position with the Partnership GP
|
|
Forrest E. Wylie
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer
|
John F. Erhard
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
Director
|
C. Scott Hobbs
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
Director
|
Joseph A. LaSala, Jr.
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
Director
|
Frank J. Loverro
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
Director
|
Mark C. McKinley
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
Director
|
Oliver G. Rick Richard, III
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
Director
|
Frank S. Sowinski
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
Director
|
Martin A. White
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
Director
|
Robert A. Malecky
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
Vice President, Customer Services
|
Khalid A. Muslih
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
Vice President, Corporate Development
|
William H. Schmidt, Jr.
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
|
Clark C. Smith
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
President and Chief Operating Officer
|
Keith E. St.Clair
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
Mr. Wylie, 47, was named Chairman of the Board, CEO
and a director of the Partnership GP on June 25, 2007.
Mr. Wylie was also named Chairman of the Board, CEO and a
director of Holdings GP on June 25, 2007. Mr. Wylie
was also the President of the Partnership GP and Holdings GP
from June 25, 2007 until he resigned, solely from such
position, on October 25, 2007. Prior to his appointment, he
served as Vice Chairman of Pacific Energy Management LLC, an
entity affiliated with Pacific Energy Partners, L.P., a refined
product and crude oil pipeline and terminal partnership, from
March 2005 until Pacific Energy Partners, L.P. merged with
Plains All American, L.P. in November 2006. Mr. Wylie was
President and CFO of NuCoastal
142
Corporation, a midstream energy company, from May 2002 until
February 2005. From November 2006 to June 25, 2007,
Mr. Wylie was a private investor. Mr. Wylie currently
serves on the board of directors and the Audit Committee of
Coastal Energy Company, a publicly traded entity. We believe the
breadth of Mr. Wylies experience in the energy
industry, through his current position as the Partnerships
CEO and the past employment described above, as well as his
current board of director positions, have given him valuable
knowledge about the Partnerships business and the
Partnerships industry that make him an asset to the
Partnership Board. Furthermore, Mr. Wylies leadership
abilities and communication skills make him particularly
qualified to be the Partnership GPs Chairman.
Mr. Erhard, 36, became a director of the Partnership
GP on March 20, 2008 and has been designated by the
Holdings Board to serve as a director of the Partnership GP
following the effective time. He has served ArcLight Capital
Partners, LLC (ArcLight) since 2001, initially as an
associate and currently as a principal. He also serves as a
director of the general partner of Holdings GP. In addition,
Mr. Erhard serves as a director of Patriot Coal Corporation
(NYSE: PCX). Through his positions with ArcLight described
above, Mr. Erhard has gained valuable experience in
evaluating the financial performance and operations of companies
in the Partnerships industry, which makes him a valuable
member of the Partnership Board.
Mr. Hobbs, 56, became a director of the Partnership
GP on October 1, 2007. Since April 2006, he has been the
managing member of Energy Capital Advisors, LLC, an energy
industry consulting firm. Energy Capital Advisors provides
consulting and advisory services to clients evaluating major
projects, acquisitions and divestitures principally involving
oil and gas pipelines and storage facilities, processing plants,
power plants and gas distribution assets. From January 2005
through March 2006, Mr. Hobbs was Executive Chairman and a
director of Optigas, Inc., a private midstream gas company, and,
from January 2004 through February 2005, he was President and
Chief Operating Officer of KFX, Inc. (now Evergreen Energy,
Inc.), a public company that developed clean coal technologies.
From 1977 to 2001, Mr. Hobbs worked for the Coastal
Corporation where his last position was Chief Operating Officer
of Colorado Interstate Gas Co. and its Rocky Mountain
affiliates. He received a B.S. in Business Administration from
Louisiana State University and is a certified public accountant.
Mr. Hobbs is currently a director of American Oil and Gas
Inc. where he serves on the Audit, Compensation and Governance
committees. He is also a director of CVR Energy, Inc, where he
serves on the Audit Committee. Mr. Hobbs has worked for
many years with energy companies across a broad spectrum of
sectors. This experience has given him a broader perspective on
the Partnerships operations, and, coupled with his
extensive financial and accounting training and practice, has
made him a valuable member of the Partnership Board.
Mr. LaSala, 55, became a director of Holdings GP on
July 26, 2007 and has been designated by the Holdings Board
to serve as a director of the Partnership GP following the
effective time. Prior to such date, he was a director of the
Partnership GP. Since January 2008, he has served as Senior
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of
Discovery Communications, Inc. From July 2001 to January 2008,
Mr. LaSala previously served as Vice President, General
Counsel and Secretary of Novell, Inc. From April 2001 until July
2007, Mr. LaSala served as director of the Partnership GP.
Mr. LaSalas breadth of experience serving as general
counsel to public companies has given him valuable knowledge and
insights with respect to SEC reporting, establishing and
maintaining internal control and implementing appropriate
corporate governance practices. Coupled with
Mr. LaSalas past experience in the energy industry,
these attributes uniquely qualify him to serve on the
Partnership Board.
Mr. Loverro, 41, has served as a director of
Holdings GP since June 25, 2007 and has been designated by
the Holdings Board to serve as a director of the Partnership GP
following the effective time. Mr. Loverro joined Kelso in
1993 and has been a Managing Director since 2004.
Mr. Loverro also serves as a director of Oceana
Therapeutics, LLC and Poseidon Containers LLC. Mr. Loverro
has gained valuable experience in evaluating the financial
performance and operations of companies in the industry in which
the Partnership operates through his experience with Kelso.
Furthermore, Mr. Loverros past experiences serving on
the board of directors of the following public companies RHI
Entertainment, Inc, Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Eagle Bulk
Shipping Inc. enhances the functioning of the Partnership Board
and its deliberations. These attributes uniquely qualify him to
serve on the Partnership Board.
143
Mr. McKinley, 54, became a director of the
Partnership GP on October 1, 2007. He has served as
Managing Partner of MK Resources, a private oil and gas
development company specializing in the recovery and production
of crude oil and the development of unconventional resource
projects, for the past six years. Mr. McKinley is a
director of Merrymac McKinley Foundation and is President and a
director of Labrador Oil Company. The operational and business
skills Mr. McKinley developed through his past experience
in oil and gas development make him an important voice as an
independent director on the Partnership Board.
Mr. Richard, 57, became a director of the
Partnership GP on February 17, 2009. He is currently
Chairman of Cleanfuel USA, an alternative vehicular fuel
company, and for the past five years, he has been the owner and
president of Empire of the Seed LLC, a private consulting firm
in the energy and management industries, as well as the private
investments industry. Mr. Richard served as Chairman,
President and CEO of Columbia Energy Group (Columbia
Energy) from April 1995 until Columbia Energy was acquired
by NiSource Inc. in November 2000. Mr. Richard was
appointed by President Reagan and confirmed by the United States
Senate to the FERC, serving from 1982 to 1985. Mr. Richard
also served as a director of Holdings GP from April 2008 until
April 2009. Mr. Richards breadth of experience in the
energy sector, including being the chairman, president and CEO
of a Fortune 500 company and commissioner of the FERC, have
given him leadership and communication skills that make him
exceptionally well-qualified to serve on the Partnership Board.
Mr. Sowinski, 54, became a director of Holdings GP
on August 4, 2006 and has been designated by the Holdings
Board to serve as a director of the Partnership GP following the
effective time. Prior to such date, he was a director of the
Partnership GP. Since January 2006, he has been a Management
Affiliate of MidOcean Partners, a private equity investor. From
October 2004 to January 2006, Mr. Sowinski was a private
investor and prior thereto, he served as Executive Vice
President of Liz Claiborne, Inc. from January 2004 until October
2004. Mr. Sowinski served as Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of PWC Consulting, a systems integrator
company, from May 2002 to October 2002. Mr. Sowinski also
serves as Vice Chairman of Allant Group, a marketing services
group and a portfolio company of MidOcean Partners. The
operational and business skills Mr. Sowinski developed
through his past experience in information services, consulting
and retail apparel make him an important voice as an independent
director on the Holdings Board and makes him well-qualified to
serve in a similar capacity at the Partnership GP.
Mr. White, 69, became a director of Holdings GP on
April 30, 2009 and has been designated by the Holdings
Board to serve as a director of the Partnership GP following the
effective time. Since August 2006, Mr. White has been a
private investor. Prior thereto, Mr. White was employed for
15 years by MDU Resources Group, Inc. (MDU), a
company which operates in three core lines of business: energy,
utility resources and construction materials and that is
publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange. From August 1997
until his retirement in August 2006, Mr. White served as
President and Chief Executive Officer of MDU. Mr. White was
also the Chairman of the board of directors of MDU from February
2001 until his retirement. Mr. White was an employee of
Montana Power Company from 1966 until 1991, with his last
position being President and Chief Executive Officer of Entech,
Inc., a non-utility subsidiary of Montana Power Company.
Mr. White also serves as a director of Plum Creek Timber
Company, Inc. and First Interstate BancSystem, Inc.
Mr. Whites breadth of experience in the energy
sector, including being the chairman, president and chief
executive officer of a Fortune 500 company, have given him
leadership and communication skills that more than qualify him
to serve on the Partnership Board.
Mr. Smith, 56, became President and Chief Operating
Officer of the Partnership GP on February 17, 2009 and has
served Holdings GP in the same capacity since February 17,
2009. Mr. Smith served on the Partnership Board from
October 1, 2007 until February 17, 2009.
Mr. Smith was a private investor between July 2007 and
October 2007. From June 2004 through June 2007, Mr. Smith
served as Managing Director of Engage Investments, L.P., a
private company established to provide consulting services to,
and to make equity investments in, energy-related businesses.
Mr. Smith was Executive Vice President of El Paso
Corporation and President of El Paso Merchant Energy Group,
a division of El Paso Corporation, from August 2000 until
May 2003, and a private investor from May 2003 to June 2004.
Mr. St.Clair, 53, became Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership GP on
November 10, 2008 and has served Holdings GP in the same
capacity since November 10, 2008. Prior to his
144
appointment, he served as Executive Vice President and CFO of
Magnum Coal Company, one of the largest coal producers in
Central Appalachia, from January 2006 until its sale to Patriot
Coal Corporation in July 2008, after which he continued as an
independent financial consultant to Patriot through October
2008. Mr. St.Clair was Senior Vice President and CFO of
Trade-Ranger, Inc. (Trade-Ranger), a global
business-to-business
marketplace for electronic procurement and supply chain
management for the oil and gas industry from March 2002 until
its sale in May 2005, after which he continued as an independent
financial consultant to Trade-Ranger until January 2006.
Mr. Malecky, 47, was named Vice President, Customer
Services of the Partnership GP and Holdings GP in February 2010.
Mr. Malecky has held the same position with Services
Company since July 2009. From July 2000 to July 2009,
Mr. Malecky served as Vice President, Marketing of Services
Company.
Mr. Muslih, 39, was named Vice President, Corporate
Development of the Partnership GP and Holdings GP in February
2010. Mr. Muslih has also been the President of the Buckeye
Development and Logistics segment since May 2009.
Mr. Muslih has held the Vice President, Corporate
Development position with Services Company since June 2007. From
November 2006 through June 2007, Mr. Muslih was a private
investor. Mr. Muslih served as Vice President, Corporate
Development of Pacific Energy Management LLC, an entity
affiliated with Pacific Energy Partners, L.P., from March 2005
until Pacific Energy Partners, L.P. merged with Plains All
American, L.P. in November 2006. Mr. Muslih served as
Commercial Officer, Mergers & Acquisitions of
NuCoastal Corporation from July 2002 until March 2005.
Mr. Schmidt, 37, became Vice President, General
Counsel and Secretary of the Partnership GP on November 4,
2007 and President of Lodi Gas Storage, L.L.C. on August 3,
2009. He has served as the Vice President, General Counsel and
Secretary of Holdings GP since November 4, 2007. Prior to
that date, Mr. Schmidt had served as Vice President and
General Counsel of Services Company since February 1, 2007
and as Associate General Counsel of Services Company since
September 13, 2004. Mr. Schmidt practiced law at
Chadbourne & Parke LLP, an international law firm,
before joining the Partnership.
145
COMPARISON
OF PARTNERSHIP UNITHOLDER RIGHTS
AND HOLDINGS UNITHOLDER RIGHTS
The rights of Partnership unitholders are currently governed by
the Partnerships existing partnership agreement and the
DRULPA. The rights of Holdings unitholders are currently
governed by Holdings existing partnership agreement and
the DRULPA. After the merger, the rights of Partnership
unitholders and the former Holdings unitholders will be governed
by the DRULPA and the Partnerships proposed amended and
restated partnership agreement. Please read The Amended
and Restated Partnership Agreement of the Partnership,
beginning on page 105, for a summary of the terms of the
Partnerships proposed amended and restated partnership
agreement.
Immediately following the closing of the merger, the
Partnerships existing partnership agreement will be
amended and restated. Under the Partnerships amended and
restated partnership agreement, (i) the general partner
interest represented by the incentive distribution rights will
be canceled and the GP units (which currently represent an
approximate 0.5% general partner interest in the Partnership)
will be converted into a non-economic general partner interest
in the Partnership; (ii) the public election provision,
subject to either approval by the CPUC and PaPUC thereof or a
determination by the Partnership Board that such approvals are
not required, will be added; (iii) the Partnership
GPs right to acquire all Partnership LP units if the
Partnership GP or its affiliates own more than 90% of the
outstanding Partnership LP units will be eliminated;
(iv) certain provisions added to the existing partnership
agreement in 2004 to clarify the separateness of the Partnership
GP, the Partnership, the Partnerships operating
partnerships and Services Company from the owners of the
Partnership GP, which will become generally inapplicable once
the Partnership owns the Partnership GP, will be eliminated and
(v) certain other legacy provisions, which are no longer
applicable to the Partnership, will be eliminated.
Set forth below is a discussion of the material differences
between the rights of a holder of Partnership LP units under the
Partnerships proposed amended and restated partnership
agreement that will be in effect following the merger and the
DRULPA, on the one hand, and the rights of a holder of Holdings
units under Holdings existing partnership agreement and
the DRULPA, on the other hand.
This summary does not purport to be a complete discussion of,
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the DRULPA and
the constituent documents of the Partnership and Holdings. We
urge you to read the Partnerships proposed amended and
restated partnership agreement, Holdings existing
partnership agreement and the DRULPA carefully and in their
entirety.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Partnership
|
|
Holdings
|
|
Distributions
|
|
The Partnership has historically made quarterly distributions to
its partners of its cash, less certain reserves for expenses and
other uses of cash, including reimbursement of expenses owed to
its general partner.
|
|
Holdings pays its unitholders quarterly distributions equal to
the cash it receives from its Partnership distributions, less
certain reserves for expenses and other uses of cash. Holdings
GP owns a non-economic general partner interest, but owns common
units equal to a 0.01% economic interest in Holdings and is
entitled to receive 0.01% of any distributions from Holdings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxation of Entity
|
|
The Partnership is a flow-through entity that is not subject to
an entity-level federal income tax.
|
|
Similarly, Holdings is a flow-through entity that is not subject
to an entity-level federal income tax.
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Partnership
|
|
Holdings
|
|
Taxation of the Unitholders
|
|
The Partnerships unitholders receive Schedule K-1s from
the Partnership reflecting the unitholders share of the
Partnerships items of income, gain, loss and deduction at
the end of each fiscal year.
|
|
Similarly, holders of Holdings units also receive Schedule
K-1s from Holdings reflecting the unitholders share of
Holdings items of income, gain, loss and deduction at the
end of each fiscal year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source of Cash Flow
|
|
The Partnership may, generally, engage in acquisition and
development activities that expand its business and operations.
|
|
Holdings cash-generating assets consist of its general
partner interests in the Partnership and Holdings currently has
no independent operations. Accordingly, Holdings financial
performance and its ability to pay cash distributions to its
unitholders is directly dependent upon the performance of the
Partnership.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limitation on Issuance of Additional Units
|
|
The Partnership may issue an unlimited number of additional
partnership interests and other equity securities without
obtaining its unitholders approval. Without the prior
approval of the holders of two-thirds of the outstanding
Partnership LP units, the Partnership GP is prohibited from
causing the Partnership to issue any class or series of limited
partnership units having preferences or other special or senior
rights over the previously outstanding Partnership LP units.
|
|
Holdings may issue an unlimited number of additional partnership
interests and other equity securities without obtaining its
unitholders approval.
|
Voting
|
|
Certain significant decisions require approval by a Majority Interest, which may be cast either in person or by proxy. These significant decisions include, among other things, certain amendments to the Partnerships partnership agreement. A sale of substantially all of the Partnerships assets would require the approval of two-thirds of the outstanding Partnership LP units.
For more information, please read The Amended and Restated Partnership Agreement of the Partnership Meetings; Voting.
|
|
Certain decisions only require the approval of Holdings common
units, voting as a separate class. Certain significant decisions
require approval by a majority of outstanding Holdings units,
voting as a single class, which may be voted either in person or
by proxy. These significant decisions include, among other
things: merger of Holdings or the sale of all or substantially
all of its assets and certain amendments to Holdings
partnership agreement.
|
147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Partnership
|
|
Holdings
|
|
Election, Appointment and Removal of General Partner and
Directors
|
|
Subject to either approval by the CPUC and PaPUC of the public election provisions or a determination by the Partnership Board that such approvals are not required, all but up to two directors of the Partnership Board will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast at meetings of the limited partners.
The Partnership GP may not be removed unless that removal is approved by the vote of the holders of not less than 80% of the outstanding Partnership LP units, the Partnership receives an opinion of counsel regarding limited liability and tax matters, a successor general partner is approved by a majority of the outstanding Partnership LP units, the successor general partner or an affiliate agrees to indemnify the removed general partner, or to cause it to be released from, certain liabilities, and all required regulatory approvals are obtained.
|
|
Holdings unitholders do not elect the directors of Holdings general partner. Instead, these directors are appointed by BGH GP, the sole member of Holdings general partner.
Holdings general partner may not be removed unless that removal is approved by the vote of the holders of not less than 80% of Holdings outstanding units, including units held by Holdings general partner and its affiliates, Holdings receives an opinion of counsel regarding limited liability and tax matters and a successor general partner is elected by a majority of outstanding Holdings units.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preemptive Rights to Acquire Securities
|
|
The Partnerships limited partners do not have preemptive
rights.
|
|
Similarly, Holdings unitholders do not have preemptive rights.
|
Liquidation
|
|
The Partnership will dissolve upon any of the following:
|
|
Holdings will dissolve upon any of the following:
|
|
|
expiration of the term of the
Partnership, which is scheduled to occur December 31, 2086;
|
|
the election of Holdings
general partner to dissolve Holdings, if approved by the holders
of not less than
662/3%
of its units;
|
|
|
the election of the Partnership GP
to dissolve the Partnership, if approved by the holders of not
less than
662/3%
of the Partnership LP units;
|
|
the entry of a decree of judicial
dissolution of Holdings;
|
|
|
the withdrawal of the Partnership
GP unless a successor is appointed prior to such withdrawal;
|
|
the withdrawal or removal of
Holdings general partner or any other event that results
in its ceasing to be Holdings general partner other than
by reason of a transfer of its general partner interest in
accordance with Holdings partnership agreement or
withdrawal or removal following approval and admission of a
successor; and
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Partnership
|
|
Holdings
|
|
|
|
bankruptcy or dissolution of the
Partnership GP or any other event that results in its ceasing to
be the Partnerships general partner other than by reason
of its withdrawal or removal; and
|
|
at any time there are no limited
partners of Holdings, unless Holdings is continued without
dissolution in accordance with the DRULPA.
|
|
|
though there is no provision in
the Partnerships existing partnership agreement, under
DRULPA, the entry of a decree of judicial dissolution of the
Partnership or at any time there are not limited partners of the
Partnership, unless the Partnership is continued without
dissolution in accordance with the DRULPA.
|
|
|
149
PARTNERSHIP
CASH DISTRIBUTION POLICY
General
The Partnerships amended and restated partnership
agreement will not require distributions to be made quarterly.
Under the amended and restated partnership agreement, the
Partnership GP, from time to time and not less than quarterly,
is required to review the Partnerships accounts to
determine whether distributions are appropriate. The Partnership
GP will be permitted to make such distributions as it may
determine, without being limited to current or accumulated
income or gains. Cash distributions may be made from any of the
Partnerships funds, including, without limitation,
revenues, capital contributions or borrowed funds. The general
partner may also distribute other Partnership property,
additional Partnership LP units, or other securities of the
Partnership or other entities. Distributions will be made
concurrently to all record holders on the record date set for
purposes of such distributions.
Distributions
upon Liquidation
If the Partnership dissolves in accordance with its amended and
restated partnership agreement, it will sell or otherwise
dispose of its assets in a process called a liquidation. The
Partnership will first apply the proceeds of liquidation to the
payment of its creditors, including by way of a reserve of cash
or other assets of the Partnership for contingent liabilities.
The Partnership will distribute any remaining proceeds to
unitholders, in accordance with their capital account balances,
as adjusted to reflect any gain or loss upon the sale or other
disposition of its assets in liquidation.
If the sale of the Partnerships assets in liquidation
would be impracticable or would cause undue loss, the sale may
be deferred for a reasonable amount of time or the assets
(except those necessary to satisfy liabilities) may be
distributed to the limited partners in lieu of cash in the same
manner as cash or proceeds of a sale would have been distributed.
Incentive
Distribution Rights
The incentive distribution rights will be cancelled as a result
of the merger and the adoption of the Partnerships amended
and restated partnership agreement.
150
DESCRIPTION
OF PARTNERSHIP LP UNITS
Partnership
LP Units
The Partnership LP units represent limited partner interests in
the Partnership. The holders of Partnership LP units are
entitled to receive distributions, if made, in accordance with
the Partnerships amended and restated partnership
agreement and exercise the rights or privileges available to
limited partners thereunder. For a description of the rights and
privileges of holders of Partnership LP units in and to
partnership distributions, please read The Partnership
Cash Distribution Policy above. For a description of the
rights and privileges of limited partners under the amended and
restated partnership agreement, including voting rights, please
read The Amended and Restated Partnership Agreement of the
Partnership.
Transfer
Agent and Registrar
The transfer agent and registrar for the Partnership LP units is
Computershare Trust Company N.A. You may contact them at
the following address: 525 Washington Boulevard, Jersey City,
New Jersey 07310.
151
LEGAL
MATTERS
The validity of the Partnership LP units to be received as a
result of the merger pursuant to the merger agreement will be
passed upon for the Partnership by Vinson & Elkins
L.L.P, New York, New York. Certain tax matters relating to the
merger will be passed upon by Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.,
New York, New York and Latham & Watkins LLP, Houston,
Texas.
152
EXPERTS
Buckeye
Partners, L.P.
The consolidated financial statements, incorporated in this
Registration Statement by reference from the Buckeye Partners,
L.P. Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009, and the effectiveness
of Buckeye Partners, L.P. and subsidiaries internal
control over financial reporting have been audited by
Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered
public accounting firm, as stated in their reports, which are
incorporated herein by reference (which reports,
(1) express an unqualified opinion on the consolidated
financial statements and include an explanatory paragraph
referring to the change in method of accounting for
noncontrolling interests in 2009 and (2) express an
unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting). Such consolidated financial
statements have been so incorporated by reference in reliance
upon the reports of such firm given upon their authority as
experts in accounting and auditing.
Buckeye
GP Holdings L.P.
The consolidated financial statements, incorporated in this
Registration Statement by reference from the Buckeye GP
Holdings, L.P. Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009, and the effectiveness
of Buckeye GP Holdings, L.P. and subsidiaries internal
control over financial reporting have been audited by
Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered
public accounting firm, as stated in their reports, which are
incorporated herein by reference (which reports,
(1) express an unqualified opinion on the consolidated
financial statements and include an explanatory paragraph
referring to the change in method of accounting for
noncontrolling interests in 2009 and (2) express an
unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting). Such consolidated financial
statements have been so incorporated by reference in reliance
upon the reports of such firm given upon their authority as
experts in accounting and auditing.
153
ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION FOR UNITHOLDERS;
FUTURE UNITHOLDER PROPOSALS
Buckeye
Partners, L.P. 2011 Annual Unitholder Meeting and Unitholder
Proposals
If (i) the merger is completed and (ii) (a) the
approval of the public election provisions by the CPUC and PaPUC
is received or (b) a determination by the Partnership Board
that such approvals are not required is made, as applicable, on
or before February 1, 2011, the Partnership will hold a
2011 annual meeting of unitholders. If such meeting is held, in
order to nominate a person for election to the Partnership
Board, notice must be received at the principal executive
offices of the Partnership GP no later than April 2, 2011.
Such unitholder proposals must also be otherwise eligible for
inclusion, and the Partnerships amended and restated
partnership agreement contains additional provisions generally
requiring proper written notice not less than 10 nor more than
60 days prior to the meeting.
Any matter to be voted on at an annual meeting of the
Partnerships limited partners that is not related to the
nomination of persons for election to the Partnership Board can
only be proposed by the Partnership GP. A special meeting of the
Partnerships limited partners may only be called by the
Partnership GP or by limited partners owning 20% or more of the
outstanding Partnership LP units.
154
WHERE YOU
CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
The Partnership has filed with the SEC a registration statement
under the Securities Act that registers the Partnership LP units
to be received by the Holdings unitholders as a result of the
merger. The registration statement, including the attached
exhibits and schedules, contains additional relevant information
about the Partnership and the Partnership LP units in the
Partnership. The rules and regulations of the SEC allow the
Partnership and Holdings to omit certain information included in
the registration statement from this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
The Partnership and Holdings also file reports, proxy statements
and other information with the SEC under the Exchange Act. You
may read and copy this information at the Public Reference Room
of the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the
operation of the SECs Public Reference Room by calling the
SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
The SEC also maintains an internet site that contains reports,
proxy statements and other information about issuers, including
the Partnership and Holdings, who file electronically with the
SEC. The address of that site is
http://www.sec.gov.
You can also inspect reports, proxy statements and other
information about the Partnership and Holdings at the offices of
the New York Stock Exchange, 20 Broad Street, New York, New
York 10005.
The SEC allows the Partnership and Holdings to incorporate by
reference certain information into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. This means that the Partnership and
Holdings can disclose important information to you by referring
you to another document filed separately with the SEC. The
information incorporated by reference is considered to be a part
of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, except for any
information that is superseded by information that is included
directly in this joint proxy statement/prospectus or in other
later-filed documents that are incorporated by reference. The
information incorporated by reference contains important
information about the Partnership and Holdings and their
respective financial conditions.
The following documents filed with the SEC by the Partnership
and Holdings are incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
The
Partnership Filings with the SEC (File
No. 001-09356)
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed on
February 26, 2010, as amended by the Annual Report on Form
10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed on August 26,
2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, filed on May 7,
2010, as amended by the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the
quarter ended March 31, 2010, filed on August 26, 2010, and
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2010, filed on August 6, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Reports on
Form 8-K
filed on June 11, 2010, July 1, 2010, August 11,
2010 and August 20, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The description of the Partnership LP units contained in the
Partnerships registration statement on
Form 8-A
filed on August 9, 2005, including any amendment or report
filed for the purpose of updating such description.
|
Holdings
Filings with the SEC (File
No. 001-32963)
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed on
March 2, 2010, as amended by the Annual Report on Form
10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed on August 26,
2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, filed on May 7,
2010, as amended by the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the
quarter ended March 31, 2010, filed on August 26, 2010, and
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2010, filed on August 6, 2010.
|
155
|
|
|
|
|
Current Reports on
Form 8-K
filed on June 11, 2010 and August 20, 2010.
|
All documents and reports filed by the Partnership and Holdings
with the SEC pursuant to Section 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d)
of the Exchange Act between the date of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus and the date of the special meetings are
incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus; provided, however, that the Partnership
and Holdings are not incorporating by reference any documents,
portions of documents, exhibits or other information that is
deemed to have been furnished to and not
filed with the SEC.
Documents incorporated by reference are available from the
Partnership or Holdings without charge. You can obtain documents
incorporated by reference in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus by requesting them in writing or by
telephone from the Partnership or Holdings at the following
addresses and telephone numbers:
|
|
|
Buckeye Partners, L.P.
One Greenway Plaza
Suite 600
Houston, Texas 77046
(832) 615-8600
Attention: Investor Relations
|
|
Buckeye GP Holdings L.P.
One Greenway Plaza
Suite 600
Houston, Texas 77046
(832) 615-8600
Attention: Investor Relations
|
Please note that copies of the documents provided to you will
not include exhibits, unless the exhibits are specifically
incorporated by reference into the documents or this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
You may obtain certain of these documents at the
Partnerships website, www.buckeye.com, by selecting
Investor Center and then selecting SEC
Filings, or at Holdings website, www.buckeyegp.com,
by selecting Investor Center and then selecting
SEC Filings. Information contained on the
Partnerships and Holdings websites is expressly not
incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
In order to receive timely delivery of the documents in advance
of the Partnership special meeting or Holdings special meeting,
as applicable, your request should be received no later than
November 5, 2010.
156
BUCKEYE
PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Buckeye Partners, L.P. (the Partnership), Buckeye GP
Holdings L.P. (Holdings), and their respective
general partners have entered into the First Amended and
Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of
August 18, 2010 (the merger agreement).
Pursuant to the merger agreement, all Holdings units will be
converted into the Partnerships limited partner units
(LP units). The Partnerships existing
partnership agreement will be amended and restated to provide
for the cancellation of the incentive distribution rights and
the approximate 0.5% general partner interest in the Partnership
owned, directly and indirectly, by the Partnerships
general partner will be converted into a non-economic general
partner interest in the Partnership.
Currently, the Partnership, a publicly traded limited
partnership, is a consolidated subsidiary of Holdings, which is
also a publicly traded limited partnership. If the merger and
merger agreement as described in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus are approved by the unitholders of both
Holdings and the Partnership and all other conditions set forth
in the merger agreement are met, Holdings will become a
subsidiary of the Partnership, with the Partnership as the sole
limited partner of Holdings and the general partner of Holdings
continuing as the non-economic general partner of Holdings. In
addition, the incentive distribution agreement (also referred to
as the incentive distribution rights) held by the
Partnerships general partner will be cancelled and the
general partner units held by the Partnerships general
partner (representing an approximate 0.5% general partner
interest in the Partnership) will be converted to a non-economic
interest in the Partnership. For accounting purposes, Holdings
is considered the accounting acquirer of the Partnerships
non-controlling interest. The changes in Holdings
ownership interest in the Partnerships general partner
will be accounted for as an equity transaction and no gain or
loss will be recognized as a result of the merger.
The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated balance sheet
combines the historical balance sheets of the Partnership and
Holdings, giving effect to the merger as if it had occurred on
June 30, 2010, and the unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated statements of operations for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 and the twelve months ended December 31,
2009 give effect to the merger as if it had occurred on
January 1, 2009. The historical consolidated financial
information has been adjusted to give effect to pro forma events
that are directly attributable to the merger and are factually
supportable.
These unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the historical
audited consolidated financial information and accompanying
notes of Holdings and the Partnership, which have been
incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. These unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated financial statements do not reflect the effects of
any cost savings or other synergies that may be achieved as a
result of this transaction, are based on assumptions that the
Partnership and Holdings believe are reasonable under the
circumstances and are intended for informational purposes only.
These statements do not necessarily reflect the results of
operations or financial position of the Partnership that would
have resulted had the transaction actually been consummated as
of the indicated dates, and are not necessarily indicative of
the future results of operations or the future financial
position of the Partnership.
F-2
BUCKEYE
PARTNERS, L.P.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buckeye GP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buckeye
|
|
|
|
Holdings L.P.
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Partners, L.P.
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
15,497
|
|
|
$
|
(14,000
|
)(a)
|
|
$
|
15,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,000
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables, net
|
|
|
113,576
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,576
|
|
Construction and pipeline relocation receivables
|
|
|
11,626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,626
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
275,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
275,174
|
|
Derivative assets
|
|
|
10,093
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,093
|
|
Prepaid and other current assets
|
|
|
68,574
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,574
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
494,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
494,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
2,237,598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,237,598
|
|
Equity investments
|
|
|
98,568
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,568
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
432,124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
432,124
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
42,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,931
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
38,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,343,879
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,343,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line of credit
|
|
$
|
194,179
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
194,179
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
4,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,599
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
64,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,352
|
|
Derivative liabilities
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
367
|
|
Accrued and other current liabilities
|
|
|
127,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
390,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
390,588
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,421,181
|
|
|
|
14,000
|
(a)
|
|
|
1,435,181
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
128,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,940,049
|
|
|
|
14,000
|
|
|
|
1,954,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PARTNERS CAPITAL
|
Partners capital
|
|
|
240,003
|
|
|
|
(14,000
|
)(a)
|
|
|
1,371,339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,145,336
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
1,163,827
|
|
|
|
(1,145,336
|
)(b)
|
|
|
18,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total partners capital
|
|
|
1,403,830
|
|
|
|
(14,000
|
)
|
|
|
1,389,830
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and partners capital
|
|
$
|
3,343,879
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,343,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements.
F-3
BUCKEYE
PARTNERS, L.P.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
Buckeye
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buckeye
|
|
|
Buckeye
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buckeye
|
|
|
|
GP Holdings
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners,
|
|
|
GP Holdings
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners,
|
|
|
|
L.P.
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
L.P.
|
|
|
L.P.
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
L.P.
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per unit amounts)
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product sales
|
|
$
|
1,125,653
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,125,653
|
|
|
$
|
1,069,914
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,069,914
|
|
Transportation and other services
|
|
|
644,719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
644,719
|
|
|
|
328,536
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
328,536
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
1,770,372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,770,372
|
|
|
|
1,398,450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,398,450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product sales and natural gas storage services
|
|
|
1,103,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,103,015
|
|
|
|
1,068,382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,068,382
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
275,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
275,930
|
|
|
|
135,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,352
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
54,699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,699
|
|
|
|
29,197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,197
|
|
Asset impairment expense
|
|
|
59,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
41,147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,147
|
|
|
|
24,089
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,089
|
|
Reorganization expense
|
|
|
32,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
1,566,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,566,572
|
|
|
|
1,257,020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,257,020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
203,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203,800
|
|
|
|
141,430
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141,430
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income
|
|
|
453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
453
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
Interest and debt expense
|
|
|
(75,147
|
)
|
|
|
(92
|
)(a)
|
|
|
(75,239
|
)
|
|
|
(43,006
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)(a)
|
|
|
(43,052
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense
|
|
|
(74,694
|
)
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
(74,786
|
)
|
|
|
(42,766
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(42,812
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before earnings from equity investments
|
|
|
129,106
|
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
129,014
|
|
|
|
98,664
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
98,618
|
|
Earnings from equity investments
|
|
|
12,531
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,531
|
|
|
|
5,416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
141,637
|
|
|
$
|
(92
|
)
|
|
$
|
141,545
|
|
|
$
|
104,080
|
|
|
$
|
(46
|
)
|
|
$
|
104,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of net income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
$
|
92,043
|
|
|
$
|
(87,841
|
)(c)
|
|
$
|
4,202
|
|
|
$
|
81,303
|
|
|
$
|
(78,792
|
)(c)
|
|
$
|
2,511
|
|
Limited partners interests
|
|
|
49,594
|
|
|
|
87,841
|
(c)
|
|
|
137,343
|
|
|
|
22,777
|
|
|
|
78,792
|
(c)
|
|
|
101,523
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(92
|
)(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
141,637
|
|
|
$
|
(92
|
)
|
|
$
|
141,545
|
|
|
$
|
104,080
|
|
|
$
|
(46
|
)
|
|
$
|
104,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per LP unit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.95
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.94
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of LP units outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
28,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,572
|
(d)
|
|
|
28,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,444
|
(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
28,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,615
|
(e)
|
|
|
28,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,625
|
(e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements.
F-4
BUCKEYE
PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
Note 1.
|
Basis of
Presentation
|
These unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial
statements and underlying pro forma adjustments are based upon
currently available information and certain estimates and
assumptions made by the management of the Partnership and
Holdings; therefore, actual results could differ materially from
the pro forma information. However, management believes the
assumptions provide a reasonable basis for presenting the
significant effects of the merger. The Partnership and Holdings
believe the pro forma adjustments give appropriate effect to
those assumptions and are properly applied in the pro forma
information.
As described in the section titled The Proposed
Merger Accounting Treatment of the Merger on
page 88 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, the
merger results in Holdings being considered the surviving
consolidated entity for accounting purposes rather than the
Partnership, which is the surviving consolidated entity for
legal and reporting purposes. As a result, the merger will be
accounted for in Holdings consolidated financial
statements as an equity transaction in accordance with Financial
Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification
810-10-45,
Consolidation Overall Changes in
Parents Ownership Interest in a Subsidiary (FASB
ASC 810). As a result, non-controlling owners
interest will be eliminated and replaced with an equal amount of
owners equity on the balance sheet. Consequently, no fair
value adjustment will be made to the assets or liabilities of
Holdings and no gain or loss will be recognized in
Holdings net income. In addition, costs incurred to
complete the merger will be charged to partners capital
during the year ended December 31, 2010. Because the
Partnership is the surviving entity for legal purposes, the pro
forma condensed consolidated balance sheet and statements of
operations are entitled Buckeye Partners, L.P. Pro
Forma.
The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial
information reflects the issuance of approximately
20 million LP units using an exchange ratio of 0.705 LP
units per Holdings unit.
|
|
Note 2.
|
Pro Forma
Adjustments
|
The pro forma adjustments included in the unaudited pro forma
condensed consolidated financial statements are as follows:
(a) To reflect the amount borrowed for, and the payment of,
the estimated incremental costs associated with completing the
merger including the payment of legal fees, opinion fees and
other professional fees and expenses, and the interest costs
associated with the incremental borrowings.
(b) To reclassify to partners capital the
non-controlling owners interests in consolidated
subsidiaries previously reported by Holdings related primarily
to the Partnerships public limited partner unitholders.
(c) To reclassify to limited partners interest the
net income previously allocated to noncontrolling owners
interest in consolidated subsidiaries previously reported by
Holdings related primarily to the Partnerships public
limited partner unitholders.
(d) The Partnerships pro forma basic weighted average
number of LP units outstanding was calculated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Basic weighted average number of LP units
outstanding as reported
|
|
|
50,620
|
|
|
|
51,492
|
|
Partnerships LP units issued in exchange for Holdings units
|
|
|
19,952
|
|
|
|
19,952
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma basic weighted average number of LP units outstanding
|
|
|
70,572
|
|
|
|
71,444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
BUCKEYE
PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED
PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(e) The Partnerships pro forma diluted weighted
average number of LP units outstanding was calculated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average number of LP units
outstanding as reported
|
|
|
50,663
|
|
|
|
51,673
|
|
Partnerships LP units issued in exchange for Holdings units
|
|
|
19,952
|
|
|
|
19,952
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma diluted weighted average number of LP units outstanding
|
|
|
70,615
|
|
|
|
71,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE I
CERTAIN DEFINITIONS
|
|
Section 1.1
|
|
|
Certain Definitions
|
|
|
A-2
|
|
|
ARTICLE II
THE MERGER; EFFECTS OF THE MERGER
|
|
Section 2.1
|
|
|
The Merger
|
|
|
A-8
|
|
|
Section 2.2
|
|
|
Closing
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
|
ARTICLE III
MERGER CONSIDERATION; EXCHANGE PROCEDURES
|
|
Section 3.1
|
|
|
Merger Consideration
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
|
Section 3.2
|
|
|
Rights As Unitholders; Unit Transfers
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
|
Section 3.3
|
|
|
Exchange of Certificates
|
|
|
A-10
|
|
|
Section 3.4
|
|
|
Anti-Dilution Provisions
|
|
|
A-12
|
|
|
Section 3.5
|
|
|
Tax Treatment
|
|
|
A-12
|
|
|
ARTICLE IV
ACTIONS PENDING MERGER
|
|
Section 4.1
|
|
|
Ordinary Course
|
|
|
A-12
|
|
|
Section 4.2
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
A-12
|
|
|
Section 4.3
|
|
|
Equity Changes
|
|
|
A-13
|
|
|
Section 4.4
|
|
|
Acquisitions and Dispositions
|
|
|
A-13
|
|
|
Section 4.5
|
|
|
Amendments
|
|
|
A-13
|
|
|
Section 4.6
|
|
|
Accounting Methods
|
|
|
A-13
|
|
|
Section 4.7
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
A-13
|
|
|
Section 4.8
|
|
|
Taxes
|
|
|
A-13
|
|
|
Section 4.9
|
|
|
Debt, Capital Expenditures and the Like
|
|
|
A-13
|
|
|
Section 4.10
|
|
|
No Dissolution
|
|
|
A-13
|
|
|
Section 4.11
|
|
|
Adverse Actions
|
|
|
A-14
|
|
|
Section 4.12
|
|
|
Agreements
|
|
|
A-14
|
|
|
ARTICLE V
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
|
|
Section 5.1
|
|
|
Disclosure Schedule
|
|
|
A-14
|
|
|
Section 5.2
|
|
|
Representations and Warranties
|
|
|
A-14
|
|
A-i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE VI
COVENANTS
|
|
Section 6.1
|
|
|
Best Efforts
|
|
|
A-18
|
|
|
Section 6.2
|
|
|
Equityholder Approvals
|
|
|
A-18
|
|
|
Section 6.3
|
|
|
Registration Statement
|
|
|
A-19
|
|
|
Section 6.4
|
|
|
Press Releases
|
|
|
A-20
|
|
|
Section 6.5
|
|
|
Access; Information
|
|
|
A-20
|
|
|
Section 6.6
|
|
|
Acquisition Proposals; Change in Recommendation
|
|
|
A-20
|
|
|
Section 6.7
|
|
|
Affiliate Arrangements
|
|
|
A-22
|
|
|
Section 6.8
|
|
|
Takeover Laws
|
|
|
A-22
|
|
|
Section 6.9
|
|
|
No Rights Triggered
|
|
|
A-22
|
|
|
Section 6.10
|
|
|
New LP Units Listed
|
|
|
A-22
|
|
|
Section 6.11
|
|
|
Third Party Approvals
|
|
|
A-22
|
|
|
Section 6.12
|
|
|
Indemnification; Directors and Officers Insurance
|
|
|
A-23
|
|
|
Section 6.13
|
|
|
[Reserved]
|
|
|
A-25
|
|
|
Section 6.14
|
|
|
Notification of Certain Matters
|
|
|
A-25
|
|
|
Section 6.15
|
|
|
Rule 16b-3
|
|
|
A-25
|
|
|
Section 6.16
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Partnership Agreement of Partners
|
|
|
A-25
|
|
|
Section 6.17
|
|
|
Partners GP Board Membership
|
|
|
A-25
|
|
|
Section 6.18
|
|
|
Partners GP Board
|
|
|
A-25
|
|
|
Section 6.19
|
|
|
Senior Administrative Charge
|
|
|
A-25
|
|
|
Section 6.20
|
|
|
CPUC and PPUC Approval
|
|
|
A-25
|
|
|
ARTICLE VII
CONDITIONS TO CONSUMMATION OF THE MERGER
|
|
Section 7.1
|
|
|
Unitholder Vote
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
|
Section 7.2
|
|
|
Governmental Approvals
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
|
Section 7.3
|
|
|
No Injunction
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
|
Section 7.4
|
|
|
Representations, Warranties and Covenants of Partners and
Partners GP
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
|
Section 7.5
|
|
|
Representations, Warranties and Covenants of Holdings and
Holdings GP
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
|
Section 7.6
|
|
|
Effective Registration Statement
|
|
|
A-27
|
|
|
Section 7.7
|
|
|
Opinion of Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
|
|
|
A-27
|
|
|
Section 7.8
|
|
|
Opinion of Latham & Watkins LLP
|
|
|
A-27
|
|
|
Section 7.9
|
|
|
NYSE Listing
|
|
|
A-27
|
|
|
Section 7.10
|
|
|
Partners Amended and Restated Partnership Agreement
|
|
|
A-28
|
|
|
Section 7.11
|
|
|
[Reserved]
|
|
|
A-28
|
|
|
Section 7.12
|
|
|
No Partners Material Adverse Effect
|
|
|
A-28
|
|
|
ARTICLE VIII
TERMINATION
|
|
Section 8.1
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
A-28
|
|
|
Section 8.2
|
|
|
Effect of Termination
|
|
|
A-29
|
|
A-ii
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE IX
MISCELLANEOUS
|
|
Section 9.1
|
|
|
Fees and Expenses
|
|
|
A-29
|
|
|
Section 9.2
|
|
|
Waiver; Amendment
|
|
|
A-31
|
|
|
Section 9.3
|
|
|
Counterparts
|
|
|
A-32
|
|
|
Section 9.4
|
|
|
Governing Law
|
|
|
A-32
|
|
|
Section 9.5
|
|
|
Confidentiality
|
|
|
A-32
|
|
|
Section 9.6
|
|
|
Notices
|
|
|
A-32
|
|
|
Section 9.7
|
|
|
Entire Understanding; No Third Party Beneficiaries
|
|
|
A-33
|
|
|
Section 9.8
|
|
|
Severability
|
|
|
A-33
|
|
|
Section 9.9
|
|
|
Headings
|
|
|
A-33
|
|
|
Section 9.10
|
|
|
Jurisdiction
|
|
|
A-33
|
|
|
Section 9.11
|
|
|
Waiver of Jury Trial
|
|
|
A-33
|
|
|
Section 9.12
|
|
|
Specific Performance
|
|
|
A-33
|
|
|
Section 9.13
|
|
|
Survival
|
|
|
A-33
|
|
|
Section 9.14
|
|
|
No Act or Failure to Act
|
|
|
A-33
|
|
ANNEXES
|
|
|
Annex A
|
|
Form of Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited
Partnership of Holdings
|
Annex B
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of
Partners
|
Annex C
|
|
Form of Standstill Provision
|
DISCLOSURE
SCHEDULES
|
|
|
Schedule A
|
|
Partners Disclosure Schedule
|
Schedule B
|
|
Holdings Disclosure Schedule
|
A-iii
FIRST
AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
This FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER,
dated as of August 18, 2010 (this Agreement),
is entered into by and among Buckeye Partners, L.P., a Delaware
limited partnership (Partners), Buckeye GP LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company and the general partner of
Partners (Partners GP), Grand Ohio, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Partners (MergerCo), Buckeye GP Holdings L.P., a
Delaware limited partnership (Holdings), and
MainLine Management LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
and the general partner of Holdings (Holdings GP).
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, on June 10, 2010, Partners, Partners GP, MergerCo,
Holdings and Holdings GP entered into an Agreement and Plan of
Merger (the Original Agreement);
WHEREAS, the Holdings GP Board (as defined herein), and the
Partners Audit Committee (as defined herein) of Partners GP,
have determined that the business combination provided for
herein pursuant to which MergerCo will, subject to the terms and
conditions set forth herein, merge with and into Holdings, with
Holdings surviving (the Merger), such that following
the Merger, Partners will be the sole limited partner of
Holdings, is fair and reasonable to, and in the best interests
of, Holdings and its limited partners, and Partners and its
limited partners, respectively;
WHEREAS, as a condition and inducement to Partners, Partners GP,
and MergerCo entering into the Original Agreement, Partners and
BGH GP Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the
Holdings Unitholder) and the holder of approximately
61.2% of outstanding Common Units (as defined herein) and
approximately 96.8% of outstanding Management Units (as defined
herein), and the PE Investors (as defined herein) entered into
the Holdings Unitholder Support Agreement (as defined herein),
pursuant to which, among other things, Holdings Unitholder and
the PE Investors have agreed, subject to the terms and
conditions set forth therein, to vote all of their Common Units
and their Management Units in favor of the Merger and the
approval and adoption of the Original Agreement, as the same may
be amended, supplemented, restated or otherwise modified from
time to time, and the transactions contemplated thereby; and
WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend and restate the Original
Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the
respective representations, warranties, covenants, agreements
and conditions contained herein, the parties hereto do hereby
amend and restate the Original Agreement as follows:
ARTICLE I
CERTAIN
DEFINITIONS
Section 1.1 Certain
Definitions. As used in this Agreement, the
following terms shall have the meanings set forth below:
Acquisition Proposal means: any proposal or
offer from or by any Person other than Partners, Partners GP,
and MergerCo relating to (i) any direct or indirect
acquisition of (A) more than 20% of the assets of Holdings
and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, (B) more than 20%
of the outstanding equity securities of Holdings or (C) a
business or businesses that constitute more than 20% of the cash
flow, net revenues, net income or assets of Holdings and its
Subsidiaries, taken as a whole; (ii) any tender offer or
exchange offer, as defined pursuant to the Exchange Act, that,
if consummated, would result in any Person beneficially owning
more than 20% of the outstanding equity securities of Holdings;
or (iii) any merger, consolidation, business combination,
recapitalization, liquidation, dissolution or similar
transaction involving Holdings, other than the Merger.
Action shall have the meaning set forth in
Section 6.12(a).
A-2
Affiliate has the meaning set forth in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act, unless otherwise expressly
stated herein.
Agreement shall have the meaning set forth in
the introductory paragraph to this Agreement.
Book-Entry Units shall have the meaning set
forth in Section 3.1(d).
Business Day shall mean any day which is not
a Saturday, Sunday or other day on which banks are authorized or
required to be closed in the City of New York.
Certificate shall have the meaning set forth
in Section 3.1(d).
Certificate of Merger shall have the meaning
set forth in Section 2.1(b).
Claim shall have the meaning set forth in
Section 6.12(a).
Closing shall have the meaning set forth in
Section 2.2.
Closing Date shall have the meaning set forth
in Section 2.2.
Code shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended.
Common Units or Holdings Common
Units shall mean the common units representing limited
partner interests of Holdings having the rights and obligations
specified with respect to Common Units in the Holdings
Partnership Agreement.
Compensation and Benefit Plans shall mean all
material bonus, vacation, deferred compensation, pension,
retirement, profit-sharing, thrift, savings, employee unit
ownership, unit bonus, unit purchase, restricted unit and unit
option plans, all employment or severance contracts, all
medical, dental, disability, health and life insurance plans,
all other employee benefit and fringe benefit plans, contracts
or arrangements and any applicable change of control
or similar provisions in any plan, contract or arrangement
maintained or contributed to for the benefit of officers, former
officers, employees, former employees, directors, former
directors, or the beneficiaries of any of the foregoing,
including all employee benefit plans as defined in
ERISA Section 3(3).
Confidentiality Agreement shall mean a
confidentiality agreement of the nature generally used in
similar circumstances, as determined by Holdings in its
reasonable business judgment; provided, however,
that such Confidentiality Agreement shall (i) have a term
of not less than one year, (ii) provide that all non-public
information pertaining to Partners be protected as confidential
information thereunder, subject to customary exceptions,
(iii) contain a provision relating to a
standstill with respect to the Partners LP Units
that is no less favorable to Partners than the form of
standstill provision contained in Annex C hereto and
(iv) provide that Partners is a third party beneficiary
with respect to any breach thereof other than breaches relating
to standstill provisions solely involving Holdings or solely
involving the Holdings Common Units or information relating
solely to Holdings and its Subsidiaries; provided
further, that Holdings may amend or waive the terms of such
Confidentiality Agreement in its discretion, except that
Partners shall have the right to approve or consent to any
amendment or waiver (a) of the one-year term of the
Confidentiality Agreement, (b) that would have the effect
of causing any non-public information pertaining to Partners
that is protected as confidential information under the
Confidentiality Agreement not to be protected as confidential
information under the Confidentiality Agreement, (c) of the
provision described in (iii) above or (d) of
Partners ability to enforce its rights as a third party
beneficiary to such Confidentiality Agreement.
CPUC shall mean the California Public
Utilities Commission.
Disclosure Schedule shall have the meaning
set forth in Section 5.1.
DLLCA shall mean the Delaware Limited
Liability Company Act, 6 Del.C. § 18-101 et seq.
DRULPA shall mean the Delaware Revised
Uniform Limited Partnership Act, 6 Del.C.
§ 17-101 et seq.
A-3
Effective Time shall have the meaning set
forth in Section 2.1(b).
ERISA shall mean the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.
Escrow Agent shall mean the Holdings Escrow
Agent or Partners Escrow Agent, as applicable.
Escrow Fund shall have the meaning set forth
in Section 9.1(g).
Exchange Act shall mean the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations
thereunder.
Exchange Agent shall mean such entity as may
be selected by Partners subject to the reasonable approval of
Holdings.
Exchange Fund shall have the meaning set
forth in Section 3.3(a).
Expenses shall have the meaning set forth in
Section 9.1(f).
Governmental Authority means any national,
state, local, county, parish or municipal government, domestic
or foreign, any agency, board, bureau, commission, court,
tribunal, subdivision, department or other governmental or
regulatory authority or instrumentality, or any arbitrator in
any case that has jurisdiction over Holdings or Partners, as the
case may be, or any of their respective properties or assets.
Holdings shall have the meaning set forth in
the introductory paragraph of this Agreement.
Holdings Amended and Restated Partnership
Agreement shall mean the Second Amended and Restated
Agreement of Limited Partnership of Holdings substantially in
the form attached hereto as Annex A.
Holdings Audit Committee shall mean the Audit
Committee of the Holdings GP Board, consisting (as of the date
hereof) of Joseph A. LaSala, Jr., Frank S. Sowinski and
Martin A. White.
Holdings Certificate of Limited Partnership
means the certificate of limited partnership of Holdings as
filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on March 27,
2006.
Holdings Change in Recommendation shall have
the meaning set forth in Section 6.6(c).
Holdings Disclosure Schedule shall mean the
Disclosure Schedule delivered by Holdings pursuant to
Section 5.1.
Holdings Escrow Agent shall mean an escrow
agent as appointed by Holdings and Partners, in their reasonable
discretion, for the benefit of Holdings for certain payments
under Article IX.
Holdings GP has the meaning set forth in the
introductory paragraph to this Agreement.
Holdings GP Board means the Board of
Directors of Holdings GP.
Holdings GP LLC Agreement means the Third
Amended & Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement
of Holdings GP, as amended from time to time, dated
August 9, 2006.
Holdings Meeting shall have the meaning set
forth in Section 6.2.
Holdings Partnership Agreement shall mean the
Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of
Holdings, dated as of August 9, 2006, as amended from time
to time.
Holdings Recommendation shall have the
meaning set forth in Section 6.2.
Holdings Termination Fee shall mean an amount
equal to $29 million in cash.
Holdings Unitholder shall have the meaning
set forth in the recitals to this Agreement.
Holdings Unitholder Approval shall have the
meaning set forth in Section 7.1.
Holdings Unitholder Director Designees shall
have the meaning set forth in Section 6.17.
A-4
Holdings Unitholder Support Agreement shall
mean the Support Agreement dated as of June 10, 2010 by and
among Partners, the Holdings Unitholder, and the PE Investors.
HSR shall mean the
Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, and the rules
and regulations thereunder.
Incentive Compensation Agreement has the
meaning set forth in the Partners Partnership Agreement.
Indemnification Expenses shall have the
meaning set forth in Section 6.12(a).
Indemnified Party shall have the meaning set
forth in Section 6.12(a).
Indemnitees shall have the meaning set forth
in the Holdings Partnership Agreement.
Joint Proxy Statement shall have the meaning
set forth in Section 6.3(a).
Law shall mean any law, rule, regulation,
directive, ordinance, code, governmental determination,
guideline, judgment, order, treaty, convention, governmental
certification requirement or other legally enforceable
requirement, U.S. or
non-U.S., of
any Governmental Authority.
Lien shall mean any charge, mortgage, pledge,
security interest, restriction, claim, lien, or encumbrance.
LP Units or Partners LP Units
shall mean the units representing limited partner interests
of Partners having the rights and obligations specified with
respect to LP Units in the Partners Partnership Agreement.
Management Units shall mean the management
units representing limited partner interests of Holdings having
the rights and obligations specified with respect to Management
Units in the Holdings Partnership Agreement.
Material Adverse Effect shall mean, with
respect to either Holdings or Partners, any effect that
(x) is or could reasonably be expected to be material and
adverse to the financial position, results of operations,
business, assets or prospects of Holdings and its Subsidiaries
taken as a whole, or Partners and its Subsidiaries taken as a
whole, respectively, or (y) materially impairs or could
reasonably be expected to materially impair the ability of
Holdings or Partners, respectively, to perform its obligations
under this Agreement or otherwise materially threaten or
materially impede the consummation of the Merger and the other
transactions contemplated by this Agreement; provided,
however, that Material Adverse Effect shall not be deemed
to include any of the following or the impact thereof:
(a) circumstances affecting petroleum product and natural
gas transportation, terminalling, storage and distribution
companies generally, or in any region in which Partners
operates, (b) the petroleum product transportation,
terminalling, storage and distribution industry generally
(including the price of petroleum products and the costs
associated with the transportation, terminalling, storage and
distribution thereof), or in any region in which Partners
operates, (c) any general market, economic, financial or
political conditions, or outbreak or hostilities or war, in the
United States or elsewhere, (d) changes in Law (other than
a change in Tax Law that would make the transactions
contemplated hereby taxable to the holders of Common Units),
(e) earthquakes, hurricanes, floods, or other natural
disasters, (f) any failure of Holdings or Partners to meet
any internal or external projections, forecasts or estimates of
revenue or earnings for any period, (g) changes in the
market price or trading volume of Common Units or LP Units,
(h) the announcement or pendency of this Agreement or the
matters contemplated thereby or the compliance by either party
with the provisions of this Agreement, or (i) with respect
to Holdings only, any effect to the extent resulting from a
fact, event or circumstance that has a Material Adverse Effect
with respect to Partners under clause (x) of this
definition; provided, that, in the case of clauses (a),
(b), (c), (d), or (e), the impact on Holdings or Partners is not
disproportionately adverse as compared to others in the industry.
Meeting shall have the meaning set forth in
Section 6.2.
A-5
Merger shall have the meaning set forth in
the recitals to this Agreement.
Merger Consideration shall have the meaning
set forth in Section 3.1(c).
MergerCo shall have the meaning set forth in
the introductory paragraph in this Agreement.
Merger Transactions shall have the meaning
set forth in Section 5.2(l).
New LP Unit Issuance shall mean the issuance
of the LP Units as part of the Merger Consideration pursuant to
this Agreement.
New LP Units shall have the meaning set forth
in Section 3.1(c).
Non-Qualifying Income Cushion shall have the
meaning set forth in Section 9.1(g).
Notice of Proposed Recommendation Change
shall have the meaning set forth in Section 6.6(c).
NYSE shall mean the New York Stock Exchange.
Original Agreement shall have the meaning set
forth in the recitals to this Agreement.
PPUC shall mean the Pennsylvania Public
Utility Commission.
Partners shall have the meaning set forth in
the introductory paragraph to this Agreement.
Partners Acquisition Proposal means: any
proposal or offer from or by any Person other than Holdings and
its Subsidiaries relating to (i) any direct or indirect
acquisition of (A) more than 50% of the assets of Partners
and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, (B) more than 50%
of the outstanding equity securities of Partners or (C) a
business or businesses that constitute more than 50% of the cash
flow, net revenues, net income or assets of Partners and its
Subsidiaries, taken as a whole; (ii) any tender offer or
exchange offer, as defined pursuant to the Exchange Act, that,
if consummated, would result in any Person beneficially owning
more than 50% of the outstanding equity securities of Partners;
or (iii) any merger, consolidation, business combination,
recapitalization, liquidation, dissolution or similar
transaction involving Partners other than the Merger.
Partners Amended and Restated Partnership
Agreement shall mean the Amended and Restated
Agreement of Limited Partnership of Partners substantially in
the form attached hereto as Annex B;
provided, that if the holders of a majority of the LP
Units outstanding and entitled to vote at the Partners Meeting
do not approve the deletion of Sections 7.7(d)
(f) and (h)-(j), Partners Amended and Restated Partnership
Agreement shall mean the Amended and Restated Agreement of
Limited Partnership of Partners substantially in the form
attached hereto as Annex B, with
Sections 7.7(d) (f) and (h)-(j) from the
Partners Partnership Agreement reinstated.
Partners Audit Committee shall mean the Audit
Committee of the Board of Directors of Partners GP, consisting
(as of the date hereof) of C. Scott Hobbs, Mark C. McKinley and
Oliver G. Rick Richard, III.
Partners Change in Recommendation shall have
the meaning set forth in Section 6.2.
Partners Disclosure Schedule shall mean the
Disclosure Schedule delivered by Partners pursuant to
Section 5.1.
Partners Escrow Agent shall mean an escrow
agent as appointed by Partners and Holdings, in their reasonable
discretion, for the benefit of Partners for certain payments
under Article IX.
Partners GP shall have the meaning set forth
in the introductory paragraph to this Agreement.
Partners GP Board shall mean the board of
directors of Partners GP.
Partners GP LLC Agreement shall mean the
Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of
Partners GP, as amended from time to time, dated as of
August 9, 2006.
A-6
Partners GP Units shall mean the general
partner units representing a general partner interest in
Partners having the rights and obligations specified with
respect to GP Units in the Partners Partnership Agreement.
Partners Meeting shall have the meaning set
forth in Section 6.2.
Partners Non-Public Information shall have
the meaning set forth in Section 6.6(b).
Partners Partnership Agreement shall mean the
Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of
Partners, dated as of April 14, 2008 and effective as of
January 1, 2007, as amended from time to time.
Partners Recommendation shall have the
meaning set forth in Section 6.2.
Partners Termination Fee shall mean an amount
equal to $29 million in cash.
Partners Unaffiliated Unitholders means the
holders of LP Units other than Partners GP and Holdings and
their respective Affiliates, officers and directors.
Partners Unitholder Approval shall have the
meaning set forth in Section 7.1.
PE Investors means ArcLight Capital Partners
LLC and certain of their affiliates and Kelso &
Company and certain of their affiliates.
Person or person shall
mean any individual, bank, corporation, partnership, limited
liability company, association, joint-stock company, business
trust or unincorporated organization.
Public Limited Partners shall have the
meaning ascribed to such term in the Partners Amended and
Restated Partnership Agreement.
Receiving Party shall have the meaning set
forth in Section 6.6(a).
Registration Statement shall have the meaning
set forth in Section 6.3(a).
Regulatory Authorities shall mean any federal
or state governmental agency or court or authority or other body.
Regulatory Trigger Date shall mean the
earlier of (a) obtaining the approval from the CPUC and
PPUC of the right of the Public Limited Partners to elect
members of the Partners GP Board or (b) a determination by
the Partners GP Board, based on the advice of counsel, that the
right of the Public Limited Partners to elect members of the
Partners GP Board does not require any such approval that has
not been obtained.
Representatives shall mean with respect to a
Person, its directors, officers, employees, agents and
representatives, including any investment banker, financial
advisor, attorney, accountant or other advisor, agent or
representative.
Rights shall mean, with respect to any
person, securities or obligations convertible into or
exchangeable for, or giving any person any right to subscribe
for or acquire, or any options, calls or commitments relating
to, equity securities of such person.
Rule 145 Affiliate shall have the
meaning set forth in Section 6.7(a).
SEC shall mean the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
SEC Documents shall have the meaning set
forth in Section 5.2(g).
Securities Act shall mean the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, and the rules and regulations thereunder.
Subsidiary shall have the meaning ascribed to
such term in
Rule 1-02
of
Regulation S-X
under the Securities Act, except, in the case of Holdings,
Partners GP and its Subsidiaries (including, for the
A-7
sake of clarity, Partners) shall not be deemed to be
Subsidiaries of Holdings (unless otherwise specifically provided
in this Agreement).
Superior Proposal means any bona fide
Acquisition Proposal (except that references to 20% within the
definition of Acquisition Proposal shall be replaced
by 50%) made by a third party on terms that the
Holdings GP Board determines, in its good faith judgment and
after consulting with Holdings financial advisor and
outside legal counsel, and taking into account the financial,
legal, regulatory and other aspects of the Acquisition Proposal
(including, without limitation, any conditions to and the
expected timing of consummation and any risks of
non-consummation), to be more favorable to the holders of Common
Units and Management Units, from a financial point of view than
the Merger (taking into account any revised proposal by the
Partners Audit Committee on behalf of Partners to amend the
terms of this Agreement), provided, that, to the extent
any Acquisition Proposal includes a Partners Acquisition
Proposal, it shall not be a Superior Proposal without the
consent of the Partners Audit Committee.
Surviving Entity shall have the meaning set
forth in Section 2.1(a).
Takeover Law means any fair
price, moratorium, control share
acquisition, business combination or any other
anti-takeover statute or similar statute enacted under state or
federal law.
Taxes shall mean all taxes, charges, fees,
levies or other assessments, including, without limitation, all
net income, gross income, gross receipts, sales, use, ad
valorem, goods and services, capital, transfer, franchise,
profits, license, withholding, payroll, employment, employer
health, excise, estimated, severance, stamp, occupation,
property or other taxes, custom duties, fees, assessments or
charges of any kind whatsoever, together with any interest and
any penalties, additions to tax or additional amounts imposed by
any taxing authority, whether disputed or not.
Tax Returns shall have the meaning set forth
in Section 5.2(i).
Termination Date shall have the meaning set
forth in Section 8.1(b)(i).
ARTICLE II
THE MERGER;
EFFECTS OF THE MERGER
Section 2.1 The
Merger.
(a) The Surviving Entity. Subject to the
terms and conditions of this Agreement, at the Effective Time,
MergerCo shall merge with and into Holdings, the separate
existence of MergerCo shall cease and Holdings shall survive and
continue to exist as a Delaware limited partnership (Holdings,
as the surviving entity in the Merger, sometimes being referred
to herein as the Surviving Entity), such that
following the Merger, Partners will be the sole limited partner
of Holdings and Holdings GP will be the sole general partner of
Holdings.
(b) Effectiveness and Effects of the
Merger. Subject to the satisfaction or waiver of
the conditions set forth in Article VII in accordance with
this Agreement, the Merger shall become effective upon the later
to occur of the filing in the office of the Secretary of State
of the State of Delaware of a properly executed certificate of
merger (the Certificate of Merger) or such later
date and time as may be set forth in the Certificate of Merger
(the Effective Time), in accordance with the DRULPA
and the DLLCA. The Merger shall have the effects prescribed in
the DRULPA and the DLLCA.
(c) Holdings Certificate of Limited Partnership and
Holdings Partnership Agreement. At the Effective
Time, the Holdings Certificate of Limited Partnership shall
remain unchanged and shall be the certificate of limited
partnership of the Surviving Entity, until duly amended in
accordance with applicable Law. At the Effective Time, the
Holdings Partnership Agreement shall be amended and restated in
its entirety to read as set forth in Annex A, and as
so amended and restated shall be the partnership agreement of
the Surviving Entity until duly amended in accordance with the
terms thereof and applicable Law.
A-8
Section 2.2 Closing. Subject
to the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions as set forth in
Article VII in accordance with this Agreement, the Merger
and the other transactions contemplated hereby (the
Closing) shall occur on (a) the third Business
Day after the day on which the last of the conditions set forth
in Article VII shall have been satisfied or waived in
accordance with the terms of this Agreement or (b) such
other date to which the parties may agree in writing. The date
on which the Closing occurs is referred to as the Closing
Date. The Closing of the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement shall take place at the offices of Vinson &
Elkins LLP, 666 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY at
10:00 a.m. Eastern Standard Time on the Closing Date.
ARTICLE III
MERGER
CONSIDERATION; EXCHANGE PROCEDURES
Section 3.1 Merger
Consideration. Subject to the provisions of this
Agreement, at the Effective Time, by virtue of the Merger and
without any action on the part of Partners, Holdings or any
holder of Common Units or Management Units:
(a) All of the limited liability company interests in
MergerCo outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time
shall be converted into and become a 100% limited partner
interest in Holdings, which limited partner interest shall be
duly authorized and validly issued, fully paid and
non-assessable (except to the extent such non-assessability may
be affected by
Sections 17-303,
17-607 and
17-804 of
the DRULPA), and Partners, as the holder of such limited partner
interest, shall be admitted as the sole limited partner of
Holdings.
(b) The general partner interest in Holdings issued and
outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time shall remain
outstanding and unchanged subject to such changes as set forth
in the Holdings Amended and Restated Partnership Agreement, and
Holdings GP shall continue to be the sole general partner of
Holdings.
(c) Each Common Unit and Management Unit issued and
outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (other than
Common Units held by Partners or its Subsidiaries) shall be
converted into the right to receive 0.705 LP Units (the
Merger Consideration) which LP Units shall be duly
authorized and validly issued in accordance with applicable Laws
and the Partners Partnership Agreement and the Partners Amended
and Restated Partnership Agreement, as applicable, fully paid
(to the extent required under the Partners Partnership Agreement
and the Partners Amended and Restated Partnership Agreement, as
applicable) and non-assessable (except to the extent such
non-assessability may be affected by
Sections 17-303,
17-607 and
17-804 of
the DRULPA) (such LP Units described in this clause (c)
shall be referred to herein as the New LP Units).
(d) All Common Units and Management Units, when converted
in the Merger, shall cease to be outstanding and shall
automatically be canceled and cease to exist. At the Effective
Time, each holder of a certificate representing Common Units or
Management Units (a Certificate) and each holder of
non-certificated Common Units or Management Units represented by
book-entry (Book-Entry Units) shall cease to have
any rights with respect thereto, except the right to receive
(i) the Merger Consideration, (ii) any cash to be paid
in lieu of any fractional New LP Unit in accordance with
Section 3.3(e) and (iii) any distributions in
accordance with Section 3.3(c), and in each case to be
issued or paid in consideration therefor in accordance with
Section 3.3.
Section 3.2 Rights
As Unitholders; Unit Transfers. At the Effective
Time, holders of Common Units and Management Units shall cease
to be, and shall have no rights as, unitholders of Holdings,
other than to receive (a) any distribution with respect to
such Common Units and Management Units with a record date
occurring prior to the Effective Time that may have been
declared or made by Holdings on such Common Units and Management
Units in accordance with the terms of this Agreement or prior to
the date hereof and which remains unpaid at the Effective Time
and (b) the consideration provided under this
Article III. After the Effective Time, there shall be no
transfers on the unit transfer books of Holdings with respect to
the Common Units or Management Units.
A-9
Section 3.3 Exchange
of Certificates.
(a) Exchange Agent. Partners shall
deposit or shall cause to be deposited with the Exchange Agent
for the benefit of the holders of Common Units and Management
Units, for exchange in accordance with this Article III,
through the Exchange Agent, the New LP Units and cash as
required by this Article III. Partners agrees to make
available to the Exchange Agent, from time to time as needed,
cash sufficient to pay any distributions pursuant to
Section 3.2(a) and Section 3.3(c) and to make payments
in lieu of any fractional New LP Units pursuant to
Section 3.3(e). Any cash and New LP Units deposited with
the Exchange Agent (including as payment for any fractional New
LP Units in accordance with Section 3.3(e) and any
distributions in accordance with Section 3.3(c)) shall
hereinafter be referred to as the Exchange Fund. The
Exchange Agent shall, pursuant to irrevocable instructions,
deliver the Merger Consideration contemplated to be paid for
Common Units or Management Units pursuant to this Agreement out
of the Exchange Fund. Except as contemplated by
Sections 3.3(c) and 3.3(e), the Exchange Fund shall not be
used for any other purpose.
(b) Exchange Procedures. Promptly after
the Effective Time, Partners shall instruct the Exchange Agent
to mail to each record holder of Common Units or Management
Units (i) a letter of transmittal (which shall specify that
in respect of certificated units, delivery shall be effected,
and risk of loss and title to the Certificates shall pass, only
upon proper delivery of the Certificates to the Exchange Agent,
and shall be in customary form and agreed to by Partners and
Holdings prior to the Effective Time) and (ii) instructions
for use in effecting the surrender of the Certificates or
Book-Entry Units in exchange for the Merger Consideration
payable in respect of the Common Units or Management Units
represented by such Certificates or Book-Entry Units. Promptly
after the Effective Time, upon surrender of Certificates, if
any, for cancellation to the Exchange Agent together with such
letters of transmittal, properly completed and duly executed,
and such other documents (including in respect of Book-Entry
Units) as may be required pursuant to such instructions, the
holders of Common Units or Management Units shall be entitled to
receive in exchange therefor (A) New LP Units
representing, in the aggregate, the whole number of New LP Units
that such holder has the right to receive pursuant to this
Article III (after taking into account all Common Units and
Management Units then held by such holder) and (B) a check
in the amount equal to the aggregate amount of cash that such
holder has the right to receive pursuant to this
Article III, including cash payable in lieu of any
fractional New LP Units pursuant to Section 3.3(e) and
distributions pursuant to Section 3.3(c). No interest shall
be paid or accrued on any Merger Consideration or on any unpaid
distributions payable to holders of Certificates or Book-Entry
Units. In the event of a transfer of ownership of Common Units
or Management Units that is not registered in the transfer
records of Holdings, the Merger Consideration payable in respect
of such Common Units or Management Units may be paid to a
transferee, if the Certificate representing such Common Units or
Management Units or evidence of ownership of the Book-Entry
Units are presented to the Exchange Agent, and in the case of
both certificated and book-entry Common Units or Management
Units, accompanied by all documents required to evidence and
effect such transfer and the Person requesting such exchange
shall pay to the Exchange Agent in advance any transfer or other
Taxes required by reason of the delivery of the Merger
Consideration in any name other than that of the record holder
of such Common Units or Management Units, or shall establish to
the satisfaction of the Exchange Agent that such Taxes have been
paid or are not payable. Until the required documentation has
been delivered and Certificates, if any, have been surrendered,
as contemplated by this Section 3.3, each Certificate or
Book-Entry Unit shall be deemed at any time after the Effective
Time to represent only the right to receive upon such surrender
the Merger Consideration payable in respect of the Common Units
or Management Units and any distributions to which such holder
is entitled pursuant to Section 3.2.
(c) Distributions with Respect to Unexchanged Common
Units. No distributions declared or made with
respect to LP Units with a record date after the Effective Time
shall be paid to the holder of any Common Units or Management
Units with respect to the New LP Units that such holder would be
entitled to receive in accordance herewith and no cash payment
in lieu of fractional New LP Units shall be paid to any such
holder until such holder shall deliver the required
documentation and surrender any Certificate as contemplated by
this Section 3.3. Subject to applicable Law, following
compliance with the requirements of Section 3.3(b), there
shall be paid to such holder of the New LP Units issuable in
exchange therefor, without interest, (i) promptly after the
time of such compliance, the amount of any cash payable in lieu
of fractional New LP
A-10
Units to which such holder is entitled pursuant to
Section 3.3(e) and the amount of distributions with a
record date after the Effective Time theretofore paid with
respect to the New LP Units and payable with respect to such New
LP Units, and (ii) at the appropriate payment date, the
amount of distributions with a record date after the Effective
Time but prior to such surrender and a payment date subsequent
to such compliance payable with respect to such New LP Units.
(d) Further Rights in Holdings Units. The
Merger Consideration issued upon conversion of a Common Unit or
Management Unit in accordance with the terms hereof (including
any cash paid pursuant to Section 3.2, Section 3.3(c)
or Section 3.3(e)) shall be deemed to have been issued in
full satisfaction of all rights pertaining to such Common Unit
or Management Unit, respectively.
(e) Fractional LP Units. No certificates
or scrip of the New LP Units representing fractional New LP
Units or book entry credit of the same shall be issued upon the
exchange of Common Units or Management Units in accordance with
Section 3.3(b), and such fractional interests will not
entitle the owner thereof to vote or to have any rights as a
holder of any New LP Units. Notwithstanding any other provision
of this Agreement, each holder of Common Units or Management
Units exchanged in the Merger who would otherwise have been
entitled to receive a fraction of a New LP Unit (after taking
into account all Common Units or Management Units exchanged by
such holder) shall receive, in lieu thereof, cash (without
interest rounded up to the nearest whole cent) in an amount
equal to the product of (i) the closing sale price of the
LP Units on the NYSE as reported by The Wall Street Journal
on the trading day immediately preceding the date on which
the Effective Time shall occur and (ii) the fraction of a
New LP Unit that such holder would otherwise be entitled to
receive pursuant to this Article III. As promptly as
practicable after the determination of the amount of cash, if
any, to be paid to holders of fractional interests, the Exchange
Agent shall so notify Partners, and Partners shall, or shall
cause the Surviving Entity to, deposit such amount with the
Exchange Agent and shall cause the Exchange Agent to forward
payments to such holders of fractional interests subject to and
in accordance with the terms hereof.
(f) Termination of Exchange Fund. Any
portion of the Exchange Fund constituting New LP Units or cash
that remains undistributed to the holders of Common
Units or Management Units after 180 days following the
Effective Time shall be delivered to Partners upon demand and,
from and after such delivery, any former holders of Common Units
or Management Units who have not theretofore complied with this
Article III shall thereafter look only to Partners for the
Merger Consideration payable in respect of such Common Units or
Management Units, any cash in lieu of fractional New LP Units to
which they are entitled pursuant to Section 3.3(e) and any
distributions with respect to the New LP Units to which they are
entitled pursuant to Section 3.3(c), in each case, without
any interest thereon. Any amounts remaining unclaimed by holders
of Common Units or Management Units immediately prior to such
time as such amounts would otherwise escheat to or become the
property of any governmental entity shall, to the extent
permitted by applicable Law, become the property of Partners,
free and clear of any Liens, claims or interest of any Person
previously entitled thereto.
(g) No Liability. Neither Partners,
Holdings, nor the Surviving Entity shall be liable to any holder
of Common Units or Management Units for any LP Units (or
distributions with respect thereto) or cash from the Exchange
Fund delivered to a public official pursuant to any abandoned
property, escheat or similar Law.
(h) Lost Certificates. If any Certificate
shall have been lost, stolen or destroyed, upon the making of an
affidavit of that fact by the Person claiming such Certificate
to be lost, stolen or destroyed and, if required by Partners,
the posting by such Person of a bond, in such reasonable amount
as Partners may direct, as indemnity against any claim that may
be made against it with respect to such Certificate, the
Exchange Agent shall pay in exchange for such lost, stolen or
destroyed Certificate the Merger Consideration payable in
respect of the Common Units or Management Units represented by
such Certificate and any distributions to which the holders
thereof are entitled pursuant to Section 3.2.
(i) Withholding. Each of Partners, the
Surviving Entity and the Exchange Agent shall be entitled to
deduct and withhold from the consideration otherwise payable
pursuant to this Agreement to any holder of Common Units or
Management Units such amounts as Partners, the Surviving Entity
or the Exchange Agent is required to deduct and withhold under
the Code or any provision of state, local, or foreign Tax Law,
with
A-11
respect to the making of such payment; provided, however, that
Partners, the Surviving Entity or the Exchange Agent, as the
case may be, shall provide reasonable notice to the applicable
holders of Common Units or Management Units prior to withholding
any amounts pursuant to this Section 3.3(i). To the extent
that amounts are so deducted and withheld by Partners, the
Surviving Entity or the Exchange Agent, such amounts shall be
treated for all purposes of this Agreement as having been paid
to the holder of Common Units or Management Units in respect of
whom such deduction and withholding was made by Partners, the
Surviving Entity or the Exchange Agent, as the case may be.
(j) Book Entry and Admission of Holders of New LP Units
as Additional Limited Partners of Partners. All
New LP Units to be issued in the Merger shall be issued in book
entry form, without physical certificates. Upon the issuance of
New LP Units to the holders of Common Units or Management Units
in accordance with this Section 3.3 and the compliance by
such holders with the requirements of Section 12.4 of the
Partners Amended and Restated Partnership Agreement, Partners GP
shall consent to the admission of such holders as limited
partners of Partners and reflect such admission on the books and
records of Partners.
Section 3.4 Anti-Dilution
Provisions. In the event of any subdivisions,
reclassifications, recapitalizations, splits, combinations or
distributions in the form of equity interests with respect to
the Common Units, Management Units and the LP Units (in each
case, as permitted pursuant to Section 4.3), the number of
New LP Units to be issued in the Merger and the average closing
sales prices of the LP Units determined in accordance with
Section 3.3(e) will be correspondingly adjusted.
Section 3.5 Tax
Treatment. For federal income tax purposes,
Partners, Partners GP, Holdings and Holdings GP intend to take
the position that the Merger will constitute an
assets-over partnership merger within the meaning of
Treasury Regulations
Section 1.708-1(c)(3)(i),
and, as a result, (i) the receipt of cash in lieu of the
receipt of fractional New LP Units in exchange for Common Units
or Management Units in connection with the Merger shall be
treated as a sale of such Common Units or Management Units by
the holder and a purchase of such Common Units or Management
Units by the Partnership for the cash so paid under the terms of
this Agreement in accordance with Treasury Regulations
Section 1.708-1(c)(4),
and (ii) upon the receipt of the Holdings Unitholder
Approval, each such holder of Common Units or Management Units
who accepts cash shall agree and consent to the treatment
described in clause (i) as a condition to receiving such
consideration, in accordance with Treasury Regulations
Section 1.708-1(c)(4).
ARTICLE IV
ACTIONS
PENDING MERGER
From the date hereof until the Effective Time, except as
expressly contemplated by this Agreement or as set forth on
Schedule 4, (a) without the prior written
consent of the Partners Audit Committee (which consent shall not
be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned), Holdings and
Holdings GP will not, and will cause each of its Subsidiaries
not to, and (b) without the prior written consent of the
Holdings GP Board (which consent shall not be unreasonably
withheld, delayed or conditioned), Partners and Partners GP will
not, and will cause each of its Subsidiaries not to:
Section 4.1 Ordinary
Course. Conduct the business of it and its
Subsidiaries other than in the ordinary and usual course or, to
the extent consistent therewith, fail to use commercially
reasonable best efforts to preserve intact its business
organizations, goodwill and assets and maintain its rights,
franchises and existing relations with customers, suppliers,
employees and business associates, or take any action that would
(a) adversely affect the ability of any party to obtain any
approvals required under the HSR for the transactions
contemplated hereby or (b) have a Material Adverse Effect.
Section 4.2 Equity. In
the case of Holdings and its Subsidiaries, (a) issue, sell
or otherwise permit to become outstanding, or authorize the
creation of, any additional equity, any appreciation rights or
any Rights, (b) enter into any agreement with respect to
the foregoing or (c) permit any additional equity interests
to become subject to new grants of employee unit options, unit
appreciation rights or similar equity-based employee rights. In
the case of Partners, Partners will not, and Partners will cause
its Subsidiaries not to take
A-12
any action described in clause (a), (b) or (c) above,
which would materially adversely affect its or Holdings
ability to consummate the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement.
Section 4.3 Equity
Changes.
(a) Split, combine or reclassify any of its equity
interests or issue or authorize or propose the issuance of any
other securities in respect of, in lieu of or in substitution
for its equity interests; or
(b) Repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire, or permit any
of its Subsidiaries to purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any
partnership interests, except as required by the terms of its
securities outstanding on the date hereof or as contemplated by
any existing Compensation and Benefit Plan.
Section 4.4 Acquisitions
and Dispositions. In the case of Holdings and its
Subsidiaries, sell, lease, dispose of or discontinue any portion
of its assets, business or properties, which is material to it
and such Subsidiaries taken as a whole, or acquire, by merger or
otherwise, or lease (other than by way of foreclosures or
acquisitions of control in a bona fide fiduciary capacity
or in satisfaction of debts previously contracted in good faith,
in each case in the ordinary and usual course of business
consistent with past practice) any assets or all or any portion
of, the business or property of any other entity which, in
either case, is material to it and such Subsidiaries taken as a
whole, or would be likely to have a Material Adverse Effect. In
the case of Partners, Partners will not, and will cause its
Subsidiaries not to, (i) merge, consolidate or enter into
any other business combination transaction with any Person or
make any acquisition or disposition that would be likely to have
a Material Adverse Effect or (ii) enter into a definitive
agreement with respect to a Partners Acquisition Proposal.
Section 4.5 Amendments. In
the case of Holdings GP and Holdings, amend the Partners GP LLC
Agreement, the Partners Partnership Agreement, the Holdings
Partnership Agreement or the Holdings GP LLC Agreement other
than in accordance with this Agreement.
Section 4.6 Accounting
Methods. Implement or adopt any material change
in its accounting principles, practices or methods, other than
as may be required by Law or generally accepted accounting
principles.
Section 4.7 Insurance. Fail
to use commercially reasonable best efforts to maintain with
financially responsible insurance companies, insurance in such
amounts and against such risks and losses as has been
customarily maintained by it in the past.
Section 4.8 Taxes.
(a) Make or rescind any material express or deemed
elections relating to Taxes, including elections for any and all
joint ventures, partnerships, limited liability companies or
other investments where it has the capacity to make such binding
election;
(b) settle or compromise any material claim, action, suit,
litigation, proceeding, arbitration, investigation, audit or
controversy relating to Taxes; or
(c) change in any material respect any of its methods of
reporting income or deductions for federal income tax purposes
from those employed in the preparation of its federal income tax
return for the most recent taxable year for which a return has
been filed, except as may be required by applicable Law.
Section 4.9 Debt,
Capital Expenditures and the Like. In the case of
Holdings and its Subsidiaries, (a) incur any indebtedness
for borrowed money or guarantee any such indebtedness of others,
(b) enter into any material lease (whether operating or
capital), (c) create any Lien on its property or the
property of its Subsidiaries in connection with any pre-existing
indebtedness, new indebtedness or lease, or (d) make or
commit to make any capital expenditures. In the case of
Partners, Partners will not, and Partners will cause its
Subsidiaries not to take any action described in clauses (a),
(b), (c) or (d) above which would materially adversely
affect its or Holdings ability to consummate the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
Section 4.10 No
Dissolution. Authorize, recommend, propose or
announce an intention to adopt a plan of complete or partial
dissolution or liquidation.
A-13
Section 4.11 Adverse
Actions. Except as permitted by Sections 6.2
and 6.6, knowingly take any action that is intended or is
reasonably likely to result in (a) any of its
representations and warranties set forth in this Agreement being
or becoming untrue in any material respect at the Closing Date,
(b) any of the conditions set forth in Article VII not
being satisfied, (c) any material delay or prevention of
the consummation of the Merger or (d) a material violation
of any provision of this Agreement except, in each case, as may
be required by applicable Law.
Section 4.12 Agreements. Agree
or commit to do anything prohibited by Sections 4.1 through
4.11.
ARTICLE V
REPRESENTATIONS
AND WARRANTIES
Section 5.1 Disclosure
Schedule. On or prior to the date hereof,
Partners has delivered to Holdings and Holdings has delivered to
Partners a schedule (respectively, its Disclosure
Schedule) setting forth, among other things, items the
disclosure of which is necessary or appropriate in relation to
any or all of its representations and warranties;
provided, however, that (a) no such item is
required to be set forth in a Disclosure Schedule as an
exception to a representation or warranty if its absence is not
reasonably likely to result in the related representation or
warranty being deemed untrue or incorrect in any material
respect, and (b) the mere inclusion of an item in a
Disclosure Schedule shall not be deemed an admission by a party
that such item represents a material exception or fact, event or
circumstance or that such item is reasonably likely to result in
a Material Adverse Effect.
Section 5.2 Representations
and Warranties. Subject to Section 5.1 and
except as set forth in its Disclosure Schedule or (other than
with respect to Sections 5.2(a) and (b)) as set forth in
its SEC Documents filed and publicly available prior to the date
hereof (excluding any disclosures included therein to the extent
they are cautionary, predictive or forward-looking in nature,
including those in any risk factor section of such documents),
Holdings hereby represents and warrants (and to the extent
necessary with respect to any representations by Holdings
herein, Holdings GP also represents and warrants) to Partners,
and Partners and MergerCo hereby represent and warrant (and to
the extent necessary with respect to any representations by
Partners and MergerCo herein, Partners GP also represents and
warrants) to Holdings, to the extent applicable, in each case
with respect to itself and its Subsidiaries, as follows:
(a) Organization, Standing and
Authority. Such party is a limited partnership or
limited liability company, duly organized, validly existing and
in good standing under the Laws of the jurisdiction of its
organization. Such party (i) is duly qualified to do
business and is in good standing in the states of the United
States where its ownership or leasing of property or the conduct
of its business requires it to be so qualified and (ii) has
in effect all federal, state, local, and foreign governmental
authorizations and permits necessary for it to own or lease its
properties and assets and to carry on its business as it is now
conducted.
(b) Capitalization.
(i) In the case of Holdings, as of the date of the Original
Agreement, there are 27,774,016 Common Units and 525,984
Management Units issued and outstanding, and all such Common
Units and Management Units and the limited partner interests
represented thereby were duly authorized and are validly issued
in accordance with the Holdings Partnership Agreement and are
fully paid (to the extent required under the Holdings
Partnership Agreement) and nonassessable (except as such
nonassessability may be affected by
Sections 17-303,
17-607 and
17-804 of
the DRULPA), and are not subject to any preemptive or similar
rights (and were not issued in violation of any preemptive or
similar rights). As of the date of the Original Agreement,
Holdings GP owns a non-economic (0.0%) general partner interest
in Holdings, and such general partner interest was duly
authorized and validly issued in accordance with the Holdings
Partnership Agreement. The limited partner interest in Holdings
to be issued to Partners in accordance with this Agreement will
be duly authorized and validly issued in accordance with the
Holdings Amended and Restated Partnership Agreement and will be
fully paid (to the extent required under the Holdings Amended
and Restated
A-14
Partnership Agreement) and nonassessable (except as such
nonassessability may be affected by
Sections 17-303,
17-607 and
17-804 of
the DRULPA).
(ii) In the case of Partners, as of the date of the
Original Agreement, there are 51,519,271 LP Units issued and
outstanding, and all of such LP Units and the limited partner
interests represented thereby were duly authorized and validly
issued in accordance with the Partners Partnership Agreement and
are fully paid (to the extent required under the Partners
Partnership Agreement) and nonassessable (except as such
nonassessability may be affected by
Sections 17-303,
17-607 and
17-804 of
the DRULPA). As of the date of the Original Agreement, Partners
GP owns 243,914 Partners GP Units and the general partner
interests evidenced by the Incentive Compensation Agreement, and
such GP Units and general partner interests evidenced by the
Incentive Compensation Agreement were duly authorized and
validly issued in accordance with the Partners Partnership
Agreement. The New LP Units will be duly authorized and validly
issued in accordance with the Partners Partnership Agreement and
the Partners Amended and Restated Partnership Agreement, as
applicable, and will be fully paid (to the extent required under
the Partners Partnership Agreement and the Partners Amended and
Restated Partnership Agreement, as applicable) and nonassessable
(except as such nonassessability may be affected by
Sections 17-303,
17-607 and
17-804 of
the DRULPA).
(iii) As of the date of the Original Agreement, except as
set forth in Schedule 5.2(b) of a partys Disclosure
Schedule, there are no interests of such partys equity
securities authorized and reserved for issuance, such party does
not have any Rights issued or outstanding with respect to its
equity securities, and such party does not have any commitment
to authorize, issue or sell any such equity securities or
Rights, except pursuant to this Agreement.
(iv) The number of LP Units that are issuable upon exercise
of any employee or director options to purchase LP Units as of
the date of the Original Agreement are set forth in
Schedule 5.2(b) of Partners Disclosure Schedule.
(c) Subsidiaries.
(i) (A) Such party has set forth in
Schedule 5.2(c) of its Disclosure Schedule a list of
all of its Subsidiaries together with the jurisdiction of
organization of each such Subsidiary, (B) it owns, directly
or indirectly, all of the equity interests of each of its
Subsidiaries, except as set forth in Schedule 5.2(c)
of such partys Disclosure Schedule, (C) no equity
interests of any of its Subsidiaries are or may become required
to be issued by reason of any Rights, (D) there are no
contracts, commitments, understandings or arrangements by which
any of such Subsidiaries is or may be bound to sell or otherwise
transfer any equity interests of any such Subsidiaries,
(E) there are no contracts, commitments, understandings, or
arrangements relating to its rights to vote or to dispose of
such equity interests, and (F) all of the equity interests
of each such Subsidiary held by it or its Subsidiaries are fully
paid and nonassessable and are owned by it or its Subsidiaries
free and clear of any Liens.
(ii) In the case of the representations and warranties of
Holdings, other than ownership of its Subsidiaries, Holdings
does not own beneficially, directly or indirectly, any equity
securities or similar interests of any person, or any interest
in a partnership or joint venture of any kind.
(iii) Each of such partys Subsidiaries has been duly
organized and is validly existing in good standing under the
Laws of the jurisdiction of its organization and (A) is
duly qualified to do business and in good standing in the
jurisdictions where its ownership or leasing of property or the
conduct of its business requires it to be so qualified and
(B) has in effect all federal, state, local, and foreign
governmental authorizations and permits necessary for it to own
or lease its properties and assets and to carry on its business
as it is now conducted.
(d) Partnership or Limited Liability Company
Power. Such party and each of its Subsidiaries
has the partnership or limited liability company power and
authority to carry on its business as it is now being conducted
and to own all its properties and assets; and it has the
partnership or limited liability
A-15
company power and authority to execute, deliver and perform its
obligations under this Agreement and to consummate the
transactions contemplated hereby.
(e) Authority. Subject to Partners
Unitholder Approval, in the case of Partners, and to Holdings
Unitholder Approval, in the case of Holdings, this Agreement and
the transactions contemplated hereby have been authorized by all
necessary (partnership or limited liability company, as
applicable) action, and this Agreement has been duly executed
and delivered and is a legal, valid and binding agreement of it,
enforceable in accordance with its terms (except as such
enforceability may be limited by applicable bankruptcy,
insolvency, reorganization, moratorium, fraudulent transfer and
similar Laws of general applicability relating to or affecting
creditors rights or by general equity principles).
(f) No Defaults. Subject to the
declaration of effectiveness of the Registration Statement,
required filings under federal and state securities laws and the
NYSE, and the approvals contemplated by Article VII, the
execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement and the
consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby do not and
will not (i) constitute a breach or violation of, or result
in a default (or an event that, with notice or lapse of time or
both, would become a default) under, or result in the
termination or in a right of termination or cancellation of, or
accelerate the performance required by, any note, bond,
mortgage, indenture, deed of trust, license, franchise, lease,
contract, agreement, joint venture or other instrument or
obligation to which it or any of its Subsidiaries is a party or
by which it or any of its Subsidiaries or properties is subject
or bound, (ii) constitute a breach or violation of, or a
default under, in the case of Holdings, the Holdings Partnership
Agreement or Holdings Certificate of Limited Partnership, and in
the case of Partners, the Partners Partnership Agreement or
Partners Certificate of Limited Partnership,
(iii) contravene or conflict with or constitute a violation
of any provision of any Law binding upon or applicable to it or
any of its Subsidiaries, (iv) result in the creation of any
Lien on any of its assets or its Subsidiaries assets other
than in connection with any indebtedness obtained in connection
with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, or
(v) cause the transactions contemplated by this Agreement
to be subject to Takeover Laws.
(g) Financial Reports and SEC
Documents. Its annual report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, and all other
reports, registration statements, definitive proxy statements or
information statements filed or to be filed by it or any of its
Subsidiaries subsequent to December 31, 2009 under the
Securities Act, or under Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14 and
15(d) of the Exchange Act, in the form filed, or to be filed
(collectively, its SEC Documents), with the SEC
(i) complied or will comply in all material respects as to
form with the applicable requirements under the Securities Act
or the Exchange Act, as the case may be, and (ii) did not
and will not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact required to be stated therein or
necessary to make the statements made therein, in light of the
circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; and
each of the balance sheets contained in or incorporated by
reference into any such SEC Document (including the related
notes and schedules thereto) fairly presents the financial
position of the entity or entities to which it relates as of its
date, and each of the statements of income and changes in
partners equity and cash flows or equivalent statements in
the case of Partners in such SEC Documents (including any
related notes and schedules thereto) fairly presents the results
of operations, changes in partners equity and changes in
cash flows, as the case may be, of the entity or entities to
which it relates for the periods to which it relates, in each
case in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
consistently applied during the periods involved, except in each
case as may be noted therein, subject to normal year-end audit
adjustments in the case of unaudited statements. Except as and
to the extent set forth on its balance sheet as of
December 31, 2009, as of such date, neither it nor any of
its Subsidiaries had any liabilities or obligations of any
nature (whether accrued, absolute, contingent or otherwise) that
would be required to be reflected on, or reserved against in, a
balance sheet or in the notes thereto prepared in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles consistently
applied.
(h) No Brokers. No action has been taken
by it that would give rise to any valid claim against any party
hereto for a brokerage commission, finders fee or other
like payment with respect to the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement, excluding, in the case of Holdings, fees to be
paid to Credit
A-16
Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, and, in the case of Partners, fees
to be paid to Barclays Capital Inc., in every case pursuant to
letter agreements which have been heretofore disclosed to the
other party.
(i) Tax Matters.
(i) All material returns, declarations, reports, estimates,
information returns and statements required to be filed under
federal, state, local or any foreign Tax Laws (Tax
Returns) with respect to it or any of its Subsidiaries,
have been timely filed, or requests for extensions have been
timely filed and have not expired;
(ii) all Tax Returns filed by it are complete and accurate
in all material respects;
(iii) all Taxes shown to be due on such Tax Returns and all
other Taxes, if any, required to be paid by it or its
Subsidiaries for all periods ending through the date hereof have
been paid or adequate reserves have in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles been established for the payment
of such Taxes; and
(iv) no material (A) audit or examination or
(B) refund litigation with respect to any Tax Return is
pending. As of the date of the Original Agreement, neither it
nor any of its Subsidiaries (x) has granted any requests,
agreements, consents or waivers to extend the statutory period
of limitations applicable to the assessment of any Taxes with
respect to any Tax Returns or (y) is a party to any Tax
sharing or Tax indemnity agreement.
(j) Regulatory Approvals. Except as set
forth in Schedule 5.2(j) of a partys
Disclosure Schedule, no approval of any governmental agency is
necessary to consummate the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement (other than filings under the Securities Act). As of
the date of the Original Agreement, neither Holdings nor
Partners is aware of any reason why the approvals under the HSR
will not be received if required.
(k) The Holdings GP Board
Recommendations. At a meeting duly called and
held, the Holdings GP Board determined that the Merger, this
Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby are fair and
reasonable to, and in the best interests of, Holdings and the
holders of Common Units and Management Units, and approved and
declared the advisability of the Merger and this Agreement, and
resolved to recommend that the holders of Common Units and
Management Units approve the Merger, this Agreement and the
transactions contemplated hereby.
(l) The Partners GP Audit Committee
Recommendations. The Partners GP Board, by
written consent, delegated to the Partners Audit Committee the
full authority of the Partners GP Board to consider, review,
evaluate, analyze and approve this Agreement and the
transactions contemplated hereby. The Partners Audit Committee
has determined that this Agreement and the transactions
contemplated hereby, including the Merger, the New LP Unit
Issuance and the adoption of the Partners Amended and Restated
Partnership Agreement (collectively, the Merger
Transactions) are fair and reasonable to, and in the best
interests of, Partners and the Partners Unaffiliated
Unitholders, and has approved and declared the advisability of
this Agreement and the Merger Transactions, and resolved to
recommend that the holders of LP Units approve this Agreement
and the Merger Transactions, and such action by the Partners
Audit Committee constituted Special Approval (as defined in the
Partners Partnership Agreement) of this Agreement and the Merger
Transactions.
(m) Operations of MergerCo. In the case
of Partners, MergerCo was formed solely for the purpose of
engaging in the transactions contemplated by this Agreement and
has engaged in no business other than in connection with
entering into this Agreement and engaging in the transactions
contemplated hereby.
(n) Holdings Fairness Opinion. Credit
Suisse Securities (USA) LLC has delivered to the Holdings GP
Board its opinion to the effect that, as of the date the
Holdings GP Board approved the Original Agreement and subject to
certain assumptions, qualifications, limitations and other
matters, the Merger Consideration is fair, from a financial
point of view, to the Holdings Unitholders other than BGH GP
A-17
Holdings, LLC and its Affiliates, it being agreed that none of
BGH GP Holdings, LLC, Partners, Partners GP nor MergerCo may
rely upon such opinion.
(o) Partners Fairness Opinion. Barclays
Capital Inc. has delivered to the Partners Audit Committee its
written opinion dated June 10, 2010, that as of such date,
the Merger Consideration to be paid is fair, from a financial
point of view, to Partners and accordingly, the holders of
Partners LP Units (other than Holdings, Partners GP, Arclight
Capital Partners LLC and certain of its affiliates and
Kelso & Company LP and certain of its affiliates).
(p) No Partners Material Adverse
Effect. In the case of Partners, there has not
occurred a Material Adverse Effect between January 1, 2010
and the date of this Agreement.
ARTICLE VI
COVENANTS
Holdings hereby covenants to and agrees with Partners, and
Partners hereby covenants to and agrees with Holdings, that:
Section 6.1 Best
Efforts. Subject to the terms and conditions of
this Agreement, it shall use its commercially reasonable best
efforts in good faith to take, or cause to be taken, all
actions, and to do, or cause to be done, all things necessary,
proper, desirable or advisable under applicable Laws, so as to
permit consummation of the Merger promptly and otherwise to
enable consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby,
including, without limitation, obtaining (and cooperating with
the other party hereto to obtain) any third party approval that
is required to be obtained by Holdings or Partners or any of
their respective Subsidiaries in connection with the Merger and
the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement, and using
commercially reasonable best efforts to lift or rescind any
injunction or restraining order or other order adversely
affecting the ability of the parties to consummate the
transactions contemplated hereby, and using commercially
reasonable best efforts to defend any litigation seeking to
enjoin, prevent or delay the consummation of the transactions
contemplated hereby or seeking material damages, and each shall
cooperate fully with the other parties hereto to that end, and
shall furnish to the other party copies of all correspondence,
filings and communications between it and its Affiliates and any
Regulatory Authority with respect to the transactions
contemplated hereby. In complying with the foregoing, neither it
nor its Subsidiaries shall be required to take measures that
would have a Material Adverse Effect on it and such Subsidiaries
taken as a whole.
Section 6.2 Equityholder
Approvals. Subject to the terms and conditions of
this Agreement, each of them shall take, in accordance with
applicable Law, applicable stock exchange rules and the Holdings
Partnership Agreement, in the case of Holdings, and the Partners
Partnership Agreement, in the case of Partners, all action
necessary to call, hold and convene, respectively, an
appropriate meeting of the holders of Common Units and
Management Units of Holdings to consider and vote upon the
approval of the Merger, the approval and adoption of this
Agreement, and any other matters required to be approved by
Holdings unitholders for consummation of the Merger
(including any adjournment or postponement, the Holdings
Meeting) and an appropriate meeting of the holders of the
LP Units of Partners to consider and vote upon the approval of
this Agreement and the Merger Transactions and any other matters
required to be approved by them for consummation of the Merger
(including any adjournment or postponement, the Partners
Meeting; and each of the Holdings Meeting and Partners
Meeting, a Meeting), respectively, promptly after
the date hereof. Subject to Section 6.6(c), the Holdings GP
Board shall recommend approval of the Merger, this Agreement and
the transactions contemplated hereby to the holders of Common
Units and Management Units (the Holdings
Recommendation), and Holdings shall take all reasonable
lawful action to solicit such approval by the holders of Common
Units and Management Units. The Partners Audit Committee shall
recommend approval of this Agreement and the Merger Transactions
to the holders of LP Units (the Partners
Recommendation), and the Partners Audit Committee shall
take all reasonable lawful action to solicit such approval of
the holders of the LP Units. Notwithstanding the foregoing, at
any time prior to obtaining Partners Unitholder Approval, the
Partners Audit Committee may withdraw, modify or qualify in any
manner adverse
A-18
to Holdings the Partners Recommendation (any such action being
referred to as a Partners Change in Recommendation)
if it has concluded in good faith, after consultation with, its
outside legal counsel and financial advisors, that a failure to
make a Partners Change in Recommendation would be inconsistent
with its fiduciary duties under the Partners Partnership
Agreement and applicable Law; provided, however, that the
Partners Audit Committee shall not be entitled to exercise its
rights to make a Partners Change in Recommendation pursuant to
this sentence unless Partners has provided to Holdings three
(3) Business Days prior written notice advising Holdings
that the Partners Audit Committee intends to take such action
and specifying the reasons therefor in reasonable detail,
including, if applicable, the terms and conditions of any
proposed transaction that is the basis of the proposed action.
Any Partners Change in Recommendation shall not change the
approval of this Agreement or any other approval of the Partners
Audit Committee, including in any respect that would have the
effect of causing any state (including Delaware) takeover
statute or other similar statute to be applicable to the matters
contemplated hereby. The obligation of Partners to call, hold
and convene the Partners Meeting shall not be affected by a
Partners Change in Recommendation and the obligation of Holdings
to call, hold and convene the Holdings Meeting shall not be
affected by a Holdings Change in Recommendation.
Section 6.3 Registration
Statement.
(a) Each of Partners and Holdings agrees to cooperate in
the preparation of a registration statement on
Form S-4
(the Registration Statement) (including the joint
proxy statement and prospectus and other proxy solicitation
materials of Partners and Holdings constituting a part thereof
(the Joint Proxy Statement) and all related
documents) to be filed by Partners with the SEC in connection
with the issuance of New LP Units in the Merger as contemplated
by this Agreement. Provided Holdings has cooperated as required
above, Partners agrees to file the Registration Statement with
the SEC as promptly as practicable. Each of Holdings and
Partners agrees to use all commercially reasonable best efforts
to cause the Registration Statement to be declared effective
under the Securities Act as promptly as practicable after filing
thereof. Partners also agrees to use commercially reasonable
best efforts to obtain all necessary state securities law or
Blue Sky permits and approvals required to carry out
the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. Each of
Partners and Holdings agrees to furnish to the other party all
information concerning Partners, Partners GP and its
Subsidiaries or Holdings, Holdings GP and its Subsidiaries, as
applicable, and the officers, directors and unitholders of
Partners and Holdings and any applicable Affiliates, as
applicable, and to take such other action as may be reasonably
requested in connection with the foregoing.
(b) Each of Holdings and Partners agrees, as to itself and
its Subsidiaries, that (i) none of the information supplied
or to be supplied by it for inclusion or incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statement will, at the time the
Registration Statement and each amendment or supplement thereto,
if any, becomes effective under the Securities Act, contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any
material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make
the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under
which they were made, not misleading, and (ii) the Joint
Proxy Statement and any amendment or supplement thereto will, at
the date of mailing to unitholders and at the times of the
Partners Meeting and Holdings Meeting, not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact
required to be stated therein or necessary to make the
statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which
they were made, not misleading. Each of Holdings and Partners
further agrees that if it shall become aware prior to the
Closing Date of any information that would cause any of the
statements in the Registration Statement to be false or
misleading with respect to any material fact, or omit to state
any material fact necessary to make the statements therein, in
light of the circumstances under which they were made, not false
or misleading, it will promptly inform the other party thereof
and take the necessary steps to correct such information in an
amendment or supplement to the Registration Statement.
(c) Partners will advise Holdings, promptly after Partners
receives notice thereof, of the time when the Registration
Statement has become effective or any supplement or amendment
has been filed, of the issuance of any stop order or the
suspension of the qualification of the New LP Units for offering
or sale in any jurisdiction, of the initiation or threat of any
proceeding for any such purpose, or of any request by the SEC
for the amendment or supplement of the Registration Statement or
for additional information.
A-19
(d) Each of Partners and Holdings will use its commercially
reasonable best efforts to cause the Joint Proxy Statement to be
mailed to its unitholders as soon as practicable after the
effective date of the Registration Statement.
Section 6.4 Press
Releases. Prior to a (a) Holdings Change in
Recommendation, if any, or (b) Partners Change in
Recommendation, if any, each of Holdings and Partners will not,
without the prior approval of the Holdings GP Board in the case
of Holdings and the Partners Audit Committee in the case of
Partners, issue any press release or written statement for
general circulation relating to the transactions contemplated
hereby, except as otherwise required by applicable Law or the
rules of the NYSE, in which case it will consult with the other
party before issuing any such press release or written statement.
Section 6.5 Access;
Information.
(a) Upon reasonable notice and subject to applicable Laws
relating to the exchange of information, each party shall, and
shall cause its Subsidiaries to, afford the other parties and
their officers, employees, counsel, accountants and other
authorized representatives, access, during normal business hours
throughout the period prior to the Effective Time, to all of its
properties, books, contracts, commitments and records, and to
its officers, employees, accountants, counsel or other
representatives, and, during such period, it shall, and shall
cause its Subsidiaries to, furnish promptly to such Person and
its representatives (i) a copy of each material report,
schedule and other document filed by it pursuant to the
requirements of federal or state securities law (other than
reports or documents that Holdings or Partners or their
respective Subsidiaries, as the case may be, are not permitted
to disclose under applicable Law) and (ii) all other
information concerning the business, properties and personnel of
it as the other may reasonably request. Neither Holdings nor
Partners nor any of their respective Subsidiaries shall be
required to provide access to or to disclose information where
such access or disclosure would jeopardize the attorney-client
privilege of the institution in possession or control of such
information or contravene any Law, fiduciary duty or binding
agreement entered into prior to the date of this Agreement. The
parties hereto will make appropriate substitute disclosure
arrangements under the circumstances in which the restrictions
of the preceding sentence apply.
(b) Partners and Holdings, respectively, will not use any
information obtained pursuant to this Section 6.5 (to which
it was not entitled under Law or any agreement other than this
Agreement) for any purpose unrelated to (i) the
consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement
or (ii) the matters contemplated by Section 6.6 in
accordance with the terms thereof, and will hold all information
and documents obtained pursuant to this Section 6.5 in
confidence. No investigation by either party of the business and
affairs of the other shall affect or be deemed to modify or
waive any representation, warranty, covenant or agreement in
this Agreement, or the conditions to either partys
obligation to consummate the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement.
Section 6.6 Acquisition
Proposals; Change in Recommendation.
(a) None of Holdings GP, Holdings and its Subsidiaries
shall, and they shall use their commercially reasonable best
efforts to cause their Representatives not to, directly or
indirectly, (i) knowingly initiate, solicit or encourage
the submission of any Acquisition Proposal, or
(ii) participate in any discussions or negotiations
regarding, or furnish to any person any non-public information
with respect to, any Acquisition Proposal. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, but subject to the limitations in
Section 6.6(b), nothing contained in this Agreement shall
prohibit Holdings from furnishing any information to, including
information pertaining to Partners, or entering into or
participating in discussions or negotiations with, any person
that makes an unsolicited written Acquisition Proposal that did
not result from a knowing and intentional breach of this
Section 6.6 (a Receiving Party), if
(i) the Holdings GP Board, after consultation with its
outside legal counsel and financial advisors, determines in good
faith (A) that such Acquisition Proposal constitutes or is
likely to result in a Superior Proposal, and (B) that
failure to take such action would be inconsistent with its
fiduciary duties under the Holdings Partnership Agreement and
applicable Law and (ii) prior to furnishing any such
non-public information to such Receiving Party, Holdings
receives from such Receiving Party an executed Confidentiality
Agreement, provided, however, that if Holdings receives
an Acquisition Proposal that includes a Partners Acquisition
Proposal, Holdings may, in its discretion, respond to a
Receiving Party to indicate that Holdings cannot entertain an
Acquisition Proposal that includes a Partners Acquisition
Proposal.
A-20
(b) Holdings may provide any Receiving Party with any
non-public information or data pertaining to Partners (the
Partners Non-Public Information) only if Holdings
has not knowingly and intentionally breached this
Section 6.6 and then only if (i) the Holdings GP Board
determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside
legal counsel and financial advisors that the provision of such
Partners Non-Public Information to the Receiving Party could
possibly lead to a Holdings Change in Recommendation and
(ii) Holdings shall have first (A) required the
Receiving Party to execute a Confidentiality Agreement,
(B) furnished a copy of such Confidentiality Agreement to
Partners and (C) notified Partners of the identity of such
Receiving Party. Holdings shall promptly provide or make
available to Partners any non-public information concerning
Holdings or any of its Subsidiaries that is provided or made
available to any Receiving Party pursuant to this
Section 6.6 which was not previously provided or made
available to Partners. Partners shall provide to Holdings and
any Receiving Party that has executed a Confidentiality
Agreement any Partners Non-Public Information that Holdings
reasonably requests in exercising its rights under this
Section 6.6. Holdings shall not provide to any Receiving
Party, and Partners shall not be required to provide to any
Receiving Party, in each case pursuant to this Section 6.6,
any information pertaining to Partners where Holdings knows that
the provision of such information would (x) jeopardize the
attorney-client privilege of the institution in possession or
control of such information or (y) contravene any Law or
binding agreement entered into prior to the date of this
Agreement.
(c) Except as otherwise provided in this
Section 6.6(c), the Holdings GP Board shall not (1)
(a) withdraw, modify or qualify in any manner adverse to
Partners the Holdings Recommendation or (b) publicly
approve or recommend, or publicly propose to approve or
recommend, any Acquisition Proposal (any action described in
this clause (1) being referred to as a Holdings
Change in Recommendation); or (2) approve, adopt or
recommend, or publicly propose to approve, adopt or recommend,
or allow Holdings or any of its Subsidiaries to execute or enter
into, any letter of intent, memorandum of understanding,
agreement in principle, merger agreement, acquisition agreement,
option agreement, joint venture agreement, partnership
agreement, or other similar contract or any tender or exchange
offer providing for, with respect to, or in connection with, any
Acquisition Proposal. Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time
prior to obtaining the Holdings Unitholder Approval, the
Holdings GP Board (including, in the absence of a Superior
Proposal, a majority of the members of the Holdings Audit
Committee) may make a Holdings Change in Recommendation if it
has concluded in good faith, after consultation with its outside
legal counsel and financial advisors, that failure to make a
Holdings Change in Recommendation would be inconsistent with its
fiduciary duties under the Holdings Partnership Agreement and
applicable Law; provided, however, that the Holdings GP
Board shall not be entitled to exercise its right to make a
Holdings Change in Recommendation pursuant to this sentence
unless Holdings and Holdings GP have: (x) complied in all
material respects with this Section 6.6, (y) provided
to Partners and the Partners Audit Committee three
(3) Business Days prior written notice (such notice, a
Notice of Proposed Recommendation Change) advising
Partners that the Holdings GP Board intends to take such action
and specifying the reasons therefor in reasonable detail,
including, if applicable, the terms and conditions of any
Superior Proposal that is the basis of the proposed action and
the identity of the Person making the proposal and
contemporaneously providing a copy of all relevant proposed
transaction documents for such Superior Proposal (it being
understood and agreed that any amendment to the terms of any
such Superior Proposal shall require a new Notice of Proposed
Recommendation Change and an additional three (3) Business
Day period), and (z) if applicable, provided to Partners
all materials and information delivered or made available to the
Person or group of persons making any Superior Proposal in
connection with such Superior Proposal (to the extent not
previously provided). Any Holdings Change in Recommendation
shall not change the approval of this Agreement or any other
approval of the Holdings GP Board, including in any respect that
would have the effect of causing any state (including Delaware)
corporate takeover statute or other similar statute to be
applicable to the transactions contemplated hereby or thereby,
including the Merger. Notwithstanding any provision in this
Agreement to the contrary, Partners and Partners GP shall
maintain, and cause their Representatives to maintain, the
confidentiality of all information received from Holdings
pursuant to this Section 6.6, subject to the exceptions
contained in the Confidentiality Agreement.
(d) In addition to the obligations of Holdings set forth in
this Section 6.6, Holdings shall as promptly as practicable
(and in any event within 24 hours after receipt) advise
Partners orally and in writing of any Acquisition Proposal or
any matter giving rise to a Holdings Change in Recommendation
and the material
A-21
terms and conditions of any such Acquisition Proposal or any
matter giving rise to a Holdings Change in Recommendation
(including any changes thereto) and the identity of the Person
making any such Acquisition Proposal. Holdings shall keep
Partners informed on a reasonably current basis of material
developments with respect to any such Acquisition Proposal or
any matter giving rise to a Holdings Change in Recommendation.
(e) Nothing contained in this Agreement shall prevent
Holdings or the Holdings GP Board from taking and disclosing to
the holders of Common Units a position contemplated by
Rule 14d-9
and
Rule 14e-2(a)
promulgated under the Exchange Act (or any similar communication
to limited partners) or from making any legally required
disclosure to unitholders. Any stop-look-and-listen
communication by Holdings or the Holdings GP Board to the
limited partners of Holdings pursuant to
Rule 14d-9(f)
promulgated under the Exchange Act (or any similar communication
to the limited partners of Holdings) shall not be considered a
failure to make, or a withdrawal, modification or change in any
manner adverse to Partners of, all or a portion of the Holdings
Recommendation.
Section 6.7 Affiliate
Arrangements.
(a) Not later than the 15th day after the mailing of
the Joint Proxy Statement, Holdings shall deliver to Partners a
schedule of each person that, to the best of its knowledge, is
or is reasonably likely to be, as of the date of the relevant
Meeting, deemed to be an affiliate of Holdings (a
Rule 145 Affiliate) as that term is used in
Rule 145 under the Securities Act.
(b) Holdings shall use its commercially reasonable best
efforts to cause its Rule 145 Affiliates not to sell any
securities received under the Merger in violation of the
registration requirements of the Securities Act, including
Rule 145 thereunder.
Section 6.8 Takeover
Laws. Neither party shall take any action that
would cause the transactions contemplated by this Agreement to
be subject to requirements imposed by any Takeover Laws, and
each of them shall take all necessary steps within its control
to exempt (or ensure the continued exemption of) the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement from, or if
necessary challenge the validity or applicability of, any rights
plan adopted by such party or any applicable Takeover Law, as
now or hereafter in effect, including, without limitation,
Takeover Laws of any state that purport to apply to this
Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby.
Section 6.9 No
Rights Triggered. Each of Holdings and Partners
shall take all steps necessary to ensure that the entering into
of this Agreement and the consummation of the transactions
contemplated hereby and any other action or combination of
actions, or any other transactions contemplated hereby, do not
and will not result in the grant of any Rights to any person
(a) in the case of Holdings under the Holdings Partnership
Agreement, and in the case of Partners under the Partners
Partnership Agreement or (b) under any material agreement
to which it or any of its Subsidiaries is a party.
Section 6.10 New
LP Units Listed. In the case of Partners,
Partners shall use its commercially reasonable best efforts to
list, prior to the Closing, on the NYSE, upon official notice of
issuance, the New LP Units.
Section 6.11 Third
Party Approvals.
(a) Partners and Holdings and their respective Subsidiaries
shall cooperate and use their respective commercially reasonable
best efforts to prepare all documentation, to effect all
filings, to obtain all permits, consents, approvals and
authorizations of all third parties necessary to consummate the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement and to comply with
the terms and conditions of such permits, consents, approvals
and authorizations and to cause the Merger to be consummated and
the Partners Amended and Restated Partnership Agreement to be
effective as expeditiously as practicable. Each of Partners and
Holdings shall have the right to review in advance, and to the
extent practicable each will consult with the other, in each
case subject to applicable Laws relating to the exchange of
information, with respect to, all material written information
submitted to any third party or any Regulatory Authorities in
connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
In exercising the foregoing right, each of the parties hereto
agrees to act reasonably and promptly. Each party hereto agrees
that it will consult with the other parties hereto with respect
A-22
to the obtaining of all material permits, consents, approvals
and authorizations of all third parties and Regulatory
Authorities necessary or advisable to consummate the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement, and each party will
keep the other parties apprised of the status of material
matters relating to completion of the transactions contemplated
hereby.
(b) Each party agrees, upon request, to furnish the other
party with all information concerning itself, its Subsidiaries,
directors, officers and unitholders and such other matters as
may be reasonably necessary or advisable in connection with the
Registration Statement, the Joint Proxy Statement or any filing,
notice or application made by or on behalf of such other party
or any of such Subsidiaries to any Regulatory Authority in
connection with the transactions contemplated hereby.
Section 6.12 Indemnification;
Directors and Officers Insurance.
(a) Without limiting any additional rights that any
director, officer, trustee, employee, agent, or fiduciary may
have under any employment or indemnification agreement or under
the Holdings Partnership Agreement, the limited liability
company agreement of Holdings GP, or this Agreement or, if
applicable, similar organizational documents or agreements of
any of Holdings Subsidiaries, from and after the Effective
Time, Partners and the Surviving Entity, jointly and severally,
shall: (i) indemnify and hold harmless each person who is
at the date hereof or during the period from the date hereof
through the date of the Effective Time serving as a director or
officer of Holdings or any of its Subsidiaries or as a fiduciary
under or with respect to any employee benefit plan (within the
meaning of Section 3(3) of ERISA) (collectively, the
Indemnified Parties) to the fullest extent
authorized or permitted by applicable Law, as now or hereafter
in effect, in connection with any Claim and any losses, claims,
damages, liabilities, costs, Indemnification Expenses,
judgments, fines, penalties and amounts paid in settlement
(including all interest, assessments and other charges paid or
payable in connection with or in respect of any thereof)
resulting therefrom; and (ii) promptly pay on behalf of or,
within ten (10) days after any request for advancement,
advance to each of the Indemnified Parties, any Indemnification
Expenses incurred in defending, serving as a witness with
respect to or otherwise participating with respect to any Claim
in advance of the final disposition of such Claim, including
payment on behalf of or advancement to the Indemnified Party of
any Indemnification Expenses incurred by such Indemnified Party
in connection with enforcing any rights with respect to such
indemnification
and/or
advancement, in each case without the requirement of any bond or
other security). The indemnification and advancement obligations
of Partners and the Surviving Entity pursuant to this
Section 6.12(a) shall extend to acts or omissions occurring
at or before the Effective Time and any Claim relating thereto
(including with respect to any acts or omissions occurring in
connection with the approval of this Agreement and the
consummation of the Merger and the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement, including the consideration and approval thereof
and the process undertaken in connection therewith and any Claim
relating thereto), and all rights to indemnification and
advancement conferred hereunder shall continue as to a person
who has ceased to be a director or officer of Holdings or any of
its Subsidiaries or as a fiduciary under or with respect to any
employee benefit plan (within the meaning of Section 3(3)
of ERISA) after the date hereof and shall inure to the benefit
of such persons heirs, executors and personal and legal
representatives. As used in this Section 6.12(a):
(x) the term Claim means any threatened,
asserted, pending or completed action, whether instituted by any
party hereto, any Governmental Authority or any other person,
that any Indemnified Party in good faith believes might lead to
the institution of any action or proceeding, whether civil,
criminal, administrative, investigative or other, including any
arbitration or other alternative dispute resolution mechanism
(Action), arising out of or pertaining to matters
that relate to such Indemnified Partys duties or service
as a director or officer of Holdings, any of its Subsidiaries,
or as a fiduciary under or with respect to any employee benefit
plan (within the meaning of Section 3(3) of ERISA)
maintained by any of the foregoing at or prior to the Effective
Time; and (y) the term Indemnification Expenses
means reasonable attorneys fees and all other reasonable
costs, expenses and obligations (including experts fees,
travel expenses, court costs, retainers, transcript fees,
duplicating, printing and binding costs, as well as
telecommunications, postage and courier charges) paid or
incurred in connection with investigating, defending, being a
witness in or participating in (including on appeal), or
preparing to investigate, defend, be a witness in or participate
in, any Claim for which indemnification is authorized pursuant
to this Section 6.12(a), including any Action relating to a
claim for indemnification or advancement brought by an
Indemnified Party. Neither
A-23
Partners nor the Surviving Entity shall settle, compromise or
consent to the entry of any judgment in any actual or threatened
Action in respect of which indemnification has been or could be
sought by such Indemnified Party hereunder unless such
settlement, compromise or judgment includes an unconditional
release of such Indemnified Party from all liability arising out
of such Action without admission or finding of wrongdoing, or
such Indemnified Party otherwise consents thereto.
(b) Without limiting the foregoing, Partners and MergerCo
agree that all rights to indemnification, advancement of
expenses and exculpation from liabilities for acts or omissions
occurring at or prior to the Effective Time now existing in
favor of the Indemnitees as provided in the Holdings Partnership
Agreement (or, as applicable, the charter, bylaws, partnership
agreement, limited liability company agreement, or other
organizational documents of any of Holdings Subsidiaries)
and indemnification agreements of Holdings or any of its
Subsidiaries shall be assumed by the Surviving Entity, Partners
and Partners GP in the Merger, without further action, at the
Effective Time and shall survive the Merger and shall continue
in full force and effect in accordance with their terms.
(c) For a period of six (6) years from the Effective
Time, the Holdings Amended and Restated Partnership Agreement
shall contain provisions no less favorable with respect to
indemnification, advancement of expenses and limitations on
liability of directors and officers than are set forth in the
Holdings Partnership Agreement, which provisions shall not be
amended, repealed or otherwise modified for a period of six
(6) years from the Effective Time in any manner that would
affect adversely the rights thereunder of individuals who, at or
prior to the Effective Time, were Indemnified Parties, unless
such modification shall be required by Law and then only to the
minimum extent required by Law.
(d) Partners shall, or shall cause the Surviving Entity to,
maintain for a period of at least six (6) years following
the Effective Time, the current policies of directors and
officers liability insurance maintained by Holdings and
its Subsidiaries (provided, that the Surviving Entity may
substitute therefor policies of at least the same coverage and
amounts containing terms and conditions which are not less
advantageous to such directors and officers of Holdings than the
terms and conditions of such existing policy from carriers with
the same or better rating as the carrier under the existing
policy provided that such substitution shall not result in gaps
or lapses of coverage with respect to matters occurring before
the Effective Time) with respect to claims arising from facts or
events that occurred on or before the Effective Time, including
in respect of the Merger and the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement; provided, that Partners shall not be
required to pay annual premiums in excess of 300% of the last
annual premium paid by Holdings prior to the date hereof but in
such case shall purchase as much coverage as reasonably
practicable for such amount.
(e) The provisions of Section 6.12(d) shall be deemed
to have been satisfied if prepaid tail policies have
been obtained by the Surviving Entity for purposes of this
Section 6.12 from carriers with the same or better rating
as the carrier of such insurances as of the date of the Original
Agreement, which policies provide such directors and officers
with the coverage described in Section 6.12(d) for an
aggregate period of not less than six (6) years with
respect to claims arising from facts or events that occurred on
or before the Effective Time, including, in respect of the
Merger and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
(f) If Partners, Partners GP, the Surviving Entity or any
of their respective successors or assigns (i) consolidates
with or merges with or into any other person and shall not be
the continuing or surviving corporation, partnership or other
entity of such consolidation or merger or (ii) transfers or
conveys all or substantially all of its properties and assets to
any person, then, and in each such case, proper provision shall
be made so that the successors and assigns of Partners, Partners
GP and the Surviving Entity assume the obligations set forth in
this Section 6.12.
(g) Partners and Partners GP shall cause the Surviving
Entity to perform all of the obligations of the Surviving Entity
under this Section 6.12.
(h) This Section 6.12 shall survive the consummation
of the Merger and is intended to be for the benefit of, and
shall be enforceable by, the Indemnified Parties and the
Indemnitees and their respective heirs and personal
representatives, and shall be binding on Partners, Partners GP,
the Surviving Entity and their respective successors and assigns.
A-24
Section 6.13 [Reserved]
Section 6.14 Notification
of Certain Matters. Each of Holdings and Partners
shall give prompt notice to the other of (a) any fact,
event or circumstance known to it that (i) is reasonably
likely, individually or taken together with all other facts,
events and circumstances known to it, to result in any Material
Adverse Effect with respect to it or (ii) would cause or
constitute a material breach of any of its representations,
warranties, covenants or agreements contained herein, and
(b) any change in its condition (financial or otherwise) or
business or any litigation or governmental complaints,
investigations or hearings, in each case to the extent such
change, litigation, complaints, investigations, or hearings
results in, or would reasonably be expected to result in, a
Material Adverse Effect.
Section 6.15 Rule 16b-3. Prior
to the Effective Time, Holdings shall take such steps as may be
reasonably requested by any party hereto to cause dispositions
of Holdings equity securities (including derivative securities)
pursuant to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement by
each individual who is a director or officer of Holdings to be
exempt under
Rule 16b-3
promulgated under the Exchange Act in accordance with that
certain No-Action Letter dated January 12, 1999 issued by
the SEC regarding such matters.
Section 6.16 Amended
and Restated Partnership Agreement of
Partners. Subject to receipt of the Partners
Unitholder Approval, Partners GP shall execute and make
effective the Partners Amended and Restated Partnership
Agreement.
Section 6.17 Partners
GP Board Membership.
(a) Immediately following the Effective Time, the Partners
GP Board shall consist of nine (9) members.
(b) If the Regulatory Trigger Date occurs prior to the
Effective Time, then Holdings Unitholder shall designate in its
sole discretion two (2) members (the Holdings
Unitholder Director Designees) to serve as members of the
Partners GP Board following the Effective Time the three
(3) members of the Holdings Audit Committee shall serve as
members of the Partners GP Board following the Effective Time
and the Chief Executive Officer of Partners GP and the three
(3) members of the Partners Audit Committee shall continue
to serve as members of the Partners GP Board following the
Effective Time. Subject to Section 6.17(a), Partners GP
shall take such action as is necessary to cause each director
designated pursuant to this Section 6.17(b) to be appointed
to the Partners GP Board effective as of the Effective Time, to
serve until the earlier of such individuals resignation or
removal or until his successor is duly elected and qualified.
Section 6.18 Partners
GP Board. If the Regulatory Trigger Date occurs
prior to the Effective Time, then immediately following the
Effective Time Holdings shall cause the members of the Partners
GP Board who are not continuing as directors of Partners GP
pursuant to Section 6.17 to execute and deliver their
resignation or shall cause their removal from such Board
effective as of the Effective Time.
Section 6.19 Senior
Administrative Charge. Holdings GP and Partners
GP shall terminate or cause to be terminated, effective as of
the Effective Time, the Amended and Restated Management
Agreement, dated as of December 15, 2004, among Partners GP
and Holdings GP (as assignee of MainLine Sub LLC).
Section 6.20 CPUC
and PPUC Approval. Until the Regulatory Trigger
Date, Holdings GP shall use, and shall cause Holdings to use,
and Partners GP shall use, and shall cause Partners to use,
commercially reasonable efforts to obtain approval from the CPUC
and PPUC of the right of the Public Limited Partners to elect
members of the Partners GP Board or to obtain reasonable
assurances sufficient for the Partners GP Board to make a
determination that such approval is not required. This
Section 6.20 shall survive the Closing.
A-25
ARTICLE VII
CONDITIONS
TO CONSUMMATION OF THE MERGER
The obligations of each of the parties to consummate the Merger
are conditioned upon the satisfaction at or prior to the Closing
of each of the following:
Section 7.1 Unitholder
Vote. This Agreement and the Merger Transactions
shall have been approved and adopted by the affirmative vote of
the holders of a majority of the LP Units outstanding and
entitled to vote at the Partners Meeting (Partners
Unitholder Approval); provided, that this condition
shall be satisfied if such holders approve all of the Merger
Transactions other than the deletion of
Sections 7.7(d) (f) and
(h)-(j) from
the Partners Partnership Agreement; and the Merger, this
Agreement and the other transactions contemplated hereby shall
have been approved and adopted by (a) the affirmative vote
of holders of a majority of Common Units, voting as a separate
class, outstanding and entitled to vote at the Holdings Meeting,
and (b) the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of
the Common Units and Management Units, voting together as a
single class, outstanding and entitled to vote at the Holdings
Meeting (collectively, Holdings Unitholder Approval).
Section 7.2 Governmental
Approvals. Any waiting period (including any
extended waiting period arising as a result of a request for
additional information by the Federal Trade Commission or the
U.S. Department of Justice) under the HSR shall have
expired or been terminated. All other filings required to be
made prior to the Effective Time with, and all other consents,
approvals, permits and authorizations required to be obtained
prior to the Effective Time from, any Regulatory Authority in
connection with the execution and delivery of this Agreement and
the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby by the
parties hereto or their Affiliates shall have been made or
obtained, except where the failure to obtain such consents,
approvals, permits and authorizations would not be reasonably
likely to result in a Material Adverse Effect on Partners or
Holdings.
Section 7.3 No
Injunction. No order, decree or injunction of any
court or agency of competent jurisdiction shall be in effect,
and no Law shall have been enacted or adopted, that enjoins,
prohibits or makes illegal consummation of any of the
transactions contemplated hereby, and no action, proceeding or
investigation by any Regulatory Authority with respect to the
Merger or the other transactions contemplated hereby shall be
pending that seeks to restrain, enjoin, prohibit or delay
consummation of the Merger or such other transaction or to
impose any material restrictions or requirements thereon or on
Partners or Holdings with respect thereto; provided,
however, that prior to invoking this condition, each
party shall have complied fully with its obligations under
Section 6.1.
Section 7.4 Representations,
Warranties and Covenants of Partners and Partners
GP. In the case of Holdings obligation to
consummate the Merger:
(a) each of the representations and warranties contained
herein of Partners and Partners GP shall be true and correct as
of the date of the Original Agreement and upon the Closing Date
with the same effect as though all such representations and
warranties had been made on the Closing Date, except for any
such representations and warranties made as of a specified date,
which shall be true and correct as of such date, in any case, in
all material respects.
(b) each and all of the agreements and covenants of
Partners and Partners GP to be performed and complied with
pursuant to this Agreement on or prior to the Closing Date shall
have been duly performed and complied with in all material
respects; and
(c) Holdings shall have received a certificate signed by
the Chief Executive Officer of the Partners GP, dated the
Closing Date, to the effect set forth in Section 7.4(a) and
Section 7.4(b).
Section 7.5 Representations,
Warranties and Covenants of Holdings and Holdings
GP. In the case of Partners obligation to
consummate the Merger:
(a) each of the representations and warranties contained
herein of Holdings and Holdings GP shall be true and correct as
of the date of the Original Agreement and upon the Closing Date
with the same
A-26
effect as though all such representations and warranties had
been made on the Closing Date, except for any such
representations and warranties made as of a specified date,
which shall be true and correct as of such date, in any case, in
all material respects.
(b) each and all of the agreements and covenants of
Holdings and Holdings GP to be performed and complied with
pursuant to this Agreement on or prior to the Closing Date shall
have been duly performed and complied with in all material
respects; and
(c) Partners shall have received a certificate signed by
the Chief Financial Officer of Holdings GP, dated the Closing
Date, to the effect set forth in Section 7.5(a) and
Section 7.5(b).
Section 7.6 Effective
Registration Statement. The Registration
Statement shall have become effective under the Securities Act
and no stop order suspending the effectiveness of the
Registration Statement shall have been issued and no proceedings
for that purpose shall have been initiated or threatened by the
SEC.
Section 7.7 Opinion
of Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. In the case
of Partners obligation to consummate the Merger, Partners
shall have received an opinion from Vinson & Elkins
L.L.P., counsel to Partners, to the effect that:
(a) the adoption of the Partners Amended and Restated
Partnership Agreement, the Merger and the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement will not result in the loss of
limited liability of any limited partner of Partners;
(b) the adoption of the Partners Amended and Restated
Partnership Agreement, the Merger and the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement will not cause Partners or any
Operating Partnership (as defined in the Partners Partnership
Agreement) to be treated as an association taxable as a
corporation or otherwise to be taxed as an entity for federal
income tax purposes;
(c) at least 90% of the current gross income of Partners
constitutes qualifying income within the meaning of
Section 7704(d) of the Code;
(d) the Registration Statement accurately sets forth the
material federal tax consequences to the holders of Partners LP
Units (other than Holdings); and
(e) no gain or loss should be recognized by existing
holders of Partners LP Units as a result of the matters
contemplated by this Agreement (other than gain resulting from
any decrease in partnership liabilities pursuant to
Section 752 of the Code).
In rendering such opinions, Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. may
require and rely upon representations and covenants including
those contained in certificates of officers of the General
Partner and others and opinions of Delaware counsel, reasonably
satisfactory in form and substance to Vinson & Elkins
L.L.P.
Section 7.8 Opinion
of Latham & Watkins LLP. In the case of
Holdings obligation to consummate the Merger, Holdings
shall have received an opinion from Latham & Watkins
LLP, counsel to Holdings, to the effect that the Registration
Statement accurately sets forth the material federal income tax
consequences to the holders of the Holdings Common Units of the
transactions contemplated hereby, which subject to the
limitations stated therein shall include that no gain or loss
should be recognized by the holders of Holdings Common Units or
Management Units to the extent LP Units are received in exchange
therefor as a result of the Merger (other than gain resulting
from either (i) any decrease in partnership liabilities
pursuant to Section 752 of the Code or (ii) any cash
or other property distributions).
In rendering such opinion, Latham & Watkins LLP may
require and rely upon representations and covenants including
those contained in certificates of officers of Holdings and
others and opinions of Delaware counsel reasonably satisfactory
in form and substance to Latham & Watkins LLP.
Section 7.9 NYSE
Listing. The New LP Units shall have been
approved for listing on the NYSE, subject to official notice of
issuance.
A-27
Section 7.10 Partners
Amended and Restated Partnership Agreement. In
the case of Holdings obligation to consummate the Merger,
Partners GP shall have executed and made effective the Partners
Amended and Restated Partnership Agreement.
Section 7.11 [Reserved]
Section 7.12 No
Partners Material Adverse Effect. In the case of
Holdings obligation to consummate the Merger, there shall
not have occurred a Material Adverse Effect with respect to
Partners between the date of this Agreement and the Closing Date.
ARTICLE VIII
TERMINATION
Section 8.1 Termination. Notwithstanding
anything herein to the contrary, this Agreement may be
terminated and the Merger may be abandoned at any time prior to
the Effective Time whether before or after unitholder approval
of this Agreement:
(a) By the mutual consent of Partners and Holdings in a
written instrument.
(b) By either Partners or Holdings upon written notice to
the other, if:
(i) the Merger has not been consummated on or before
December 31, 2010 (the Termination Date);
provided that either Partners or Holdings may, without
the consent of the other party, extend the Termination Date to
February 28, 2011 unless a Law of the U.S. has been
adopted such that gain or loss should be recognized by the
holders of Holdings Common Units or Management Units to the
extent LP Units are received in exchange therefor as a result of
the Merger (other than gain resulting from either (i) any
decrease in partnership liabilities pursuant to Section 752
of the Code or (ii) any cash or other property
distributions); provided further, that the right to
terminate this Agreement pursuant to this Section 8.1(b)(i)
shall not be available to a party whose failure to fulfill any
material obligation under this Agreement or other material
breach of this Agreement has been the primary cause of, or
resulted in, the failure of the Merger to have been consummated
on or before such date;
(ii) any Regulatory Authority has issued a statute, rule,
order, decree or regulation or taken any other action, in each
case permanently restraining, enjoining or otherwise prohibiting
the consummation of the Merger or making the Merger illegal and
such statute, rule, order, decree, regulation or other action
shall have become final and nonappealable (provided that
the terminating party is not then in breach of Section 6.1);
(iii) Holdings fails to obtain the Holdings Unitholder
Approval at the Holdings Meeting; provided, however, that
the right to terminate this Agreement under this Section
8.1(b)(iii) shall not be available to Holdings where the failure
to obtain the Holdings Unitholder Approval shall have been
caused by the action or failure to act of Holdings and such
action or failure to act constitutes a material breach by
Holdings of this Agreement;
(iv) there has been a material breach of or any material
inaccuracy in any of the representations or warranties set forth
in this Agreement on the part of any of the other parties
(treating Partners and Partners GP as one party for the purposes
of this Section 8.1 and treating Holdings and Holdings GP
as one party for the purposes of this Section 8.1), which
breach is not cured within 30 days following receipt by the
breaching party of written notice of such breach from the
terminating party, or which breach, by its nature, cannot be
cured prior to the Termination Date (provided in any such
case that the terminating party is not then in material breach
of any representation, warranty, covenant or other agreement
contained herein); provided, however, that no
party shall have the right to terminate this Agreement pursuant
to this Section 8.1(b)(iv) unless the breach of a
representation or warranty, together with all other such
breaches, would entitle the party receiving such representation
not to consummate the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement under Section 7.4 (in the
A-28
case of a breach of representation or warranty by Partners or
Partners GP) or Section 7.5 (in the case of a breach of
representation or warranty by Holdings or Holdings GP);
(v) if there has been a material breach of any of the
covenants or agreements set forth in this Agreement on the part
of any of the other parties, which breach has not have been
cured within 30 days following receipt by the breaching
party of written notice of such breach from the terminating
party, or which breach, by its nature, cannot be cured prior to
the Termination Date (provided in any such case that the
terminating party is not then in material breach of any
representation, warranty, covenant or other agreement contained
herein); provided, however, that no party shall
have the right to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this
Section 8.1(b)(v) unless the breach of covenants or
agreements, together with all other such breaches, would entitle
the party receiving the benefit of such covenants or agreements
not to consummate the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement under Section 7.4. (in the case of a breach of
covenants or agreements by Partners or Partners GP) or
Section 7.5. (in the case of a breach of covenants or
agreements by Holdings or Holdings GP); or
(vi) Partners fails to obtain the Partners Unitholder
Approval at the Partners Meeting; provided, however, that
the right to terminate this Agreement under this
Section 8.1(b)(vi) shall not be available to Partners where
the failure to obtain the Partners Unitholder Approval shall
have been caused by the action or failure to act of Partners and
such action or failure to act constitutes a material breach by
Partners of this Agreement.
(c) By Partners, upon written notice to Holdings, in the
event that a Holdings Change in Recommendation has occurred.
(d) By Holdings, upon written notice to Partners, in the
event that if, (i) at any time after the date of this
Agreement and prior to obtaining the Holdings Unitholder
Approval, Holdings receives an Acquisition Proposal and the
Holdings GP Board shall have concluded in good faith that such
Acquisition Proposal constitutes a Superior Proposal, the
Holdings GP Board shall have made a Holdings Change in
Recommendation pursuant to Section 6.6(c) with respect to
such Superior Proposal, Holdings has not knowingly and
intentionally breached Section 6.6 of this Agreement, and
the Holdings GP Board concurrently approves, and Holdings
concurrently enters into, a definitive agreement with respect to
such Superior Proposal and has paid the Holdings Termination Fee
pursuant to Section 9.1(b), or (ii) a Partners Change
in Recommendation has occurred.
Section 8.2 Effect
of Termination. In the event of the termination
of this Agreement as provided in Section 8.1, written
notice thereof shall forthwith be given by the terminating party
to the other parties specifying the provision of this Agreement
pursuant to which such termination is made, and except as
provided in this Section 8.2, this Agreement (other than
Article IX) shall forthwith become null and void after
the expiration of any applicable period following such notice.
In the event of such termination, there shall be no liability on
the part of Partners, MergerCo or Holdings, except as set forth
in Section 9.1 of this Agreement and except with respect to
the requirement to comply with the Confidentiality Agreement;
provided that nothing herein shall relieve any party from
any liability or obligation with respect to any fraud or
intentional breach of this Agreement.
ARTICLE IX
MISCELLANEOUS
Section 9.1 Fees
and Expenses.
(a) Whether or not the Merger is consummated, all costs and
expenses incurred in connection with this Agreement and the
transactions contemplated hereby shall be paid by the party
incurring such costs or expenses, except as provided in
Section 9.1(b), 9.1(c), 9.1(d) and 9.1(f).
(b) If this Agreement is terminated by Partners pursuant to
Section 8.1(c) or by Holdings pursuant to
Section 8.1(d)(i), then Holdings shall pay to the Escrow
Agent for the benefit of Partners the Holdings
A-29
Termination Fee. If this Agreement is terminated by Holdings
pursuant to Section 8.1(d)(ii), then Partners shall pay to
the Escrow Agent for the benefit of Holdings the Partners
Termination Fee. If this Agreement is terminated by Partners
pursuant to Section 8.1(b)(iv) or Section 8.1(b)(v) or
by Holdings or Partners pursuant to Section 8.1(b)(iii),
then Holdings shall pay to Partners the Expenses of Partners.
(c) In the event that (i) an Acquisition Proposal with
respect to Holdings has been proposed by any Person (meaning,
for the purpose of this Section 9.1(c), a Person other than
Partners, Partners GP and MergerCo) or any Person has publicly
announced its intention (whether or not conditional) to make
such an Acquisition Proposal or such an Acquisition Proposal or
such intention has otherwise become publicly known to
Holdings unitholders generally and in any event such
proposal or intention is not subsequently withdrawn prior to the
termination of this Agreement, (ii) thereafter this
Agreement is terminated by either Holdings or Partners pursuant
to Section 8.1(b)(i) or Section 8.1(b)(iii) or by
Partners pursuant to Section 8.1(b)(iv) or
Section 8.1(b)(v) and (iii) within 12 months
after the termination of this Agreement, Holdings or any of its
Subsidiaries enters into any definitive agreement providing for
an Acquisition Proposal, or an Acquisition Proposal with respect
to Holdings or any of its Subsidiaries is consummated, then
Holdings shall pay to the Escrow Agent for the benefit of
Partners, if and when consummation of such Acquisition Proposal
occurs, the Holdings Termination Fee less all Expenses of
Partners previously paid to Partners; provided that for
purposes of this Section 9.1(c), 50% shall be
substituted for 20% in the definition of Acquisition
Proposal.
(d) If this Agreement is (i) terminated by Holdings or
Partners pursuant to Section 8.1(b)(vi), or
(ii) terminated by Holdings pursuant to
Section 8.1(b)(iv) or Section 8.1(b)(v), then Partners
shall pay to Holdings the Expenses of Holdings.
(e) Except as otherwise provided herein, any payment of the
Holdings Termination Fee or the Partners Termination Fee or
Expenses pursuant to this Section 9.1 shall be made by wire
transfer of immediately available funds to an account of the
Partners Escrow Agent designated by Partners or an account of
the Holdings Escrow Agent designated by Holdings, as applicable,
within one Business Day after such payment becomes payable;
provided, however, that any payment of the Holdings
Termination Fee by Holdings as a result of termination under
Section 8.1(d)(i) shall be made prior to or concurrently
with termination of this Agreement; provided, however,
that any payment of the Holdings Termination Fee pursuant to
Section 9.1(c) shall be made contemporaneously with the
consummation of the Acquisition Proposal as provided in
clause (iii) of Section 9.1(c). The parties
acknowledge that the agreements contained in this
Section 9.1 are an integral part of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement, and that, without these
agreements, none of the parties would enter into this Agreement.
(f) (i) If the Merger is consummated, Partners shall
pay, or cause to be paid, any and all property or transfer taxes
imposed on either party in connection with the Merger,
(ii) expenses incurred in connection with filing, printing
and mailing the Joint Proxy Statement and the Registration
Statement shall be paid by Partners and (iii) any filing
fees payable pursuant to the HSR, regulatory Laws and other
filing fees incurred in connection with this Agreement shall be
paid by the party incurring the fees. As used in this agreement,
Expenses includes all
out-of-pocket
expenses (including all fees and expenses of counsel,
accountants, investment bankers, experts and consultants to a
party hereto and its affiliates) incurred by a party or on its
behalf in connection with or related to the authorization,
preparation, negotiation, execution and performance of this
Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby, including
the preparation, printing, filing and mailing of the Joint Proxy
Statement and the Registration Statement and the solicitation of
unitholder approvals and all other matters related to the
transactions contemplated hereby; provided that the
amount of Expenses payable by one party to another under this
Section 9.1 shall not exceed $6 million.
(g) Any amounts paid to the Escrow Agent pursuant to this
Article IX, together with interest thereon (the
Escrow Fund), shall be released by the Escrow Agent
to Partners or to Holdings, as applicable, as follows:
(i) Prior to the end of the calendar year in which the
payment was made to the Escrow Agent, Partners or Holdings, as
applicable, shall submit to the Escrow Agent a certificate
demanding a portion of the Escrow Fund equal to no greater than
70% of the maximum remaining amount which, in the good faith
view of the Partners GP or Holdings GP, as applicable, may still
be taken into the gross income of Partners or Holdings, as
applicable, without exceeding the permissible qualifying income
(as defined in
A-30
Section 7704 of the Code) limits for a publicly traded
partnership, after taking into consideration all other sources
of non-qualifying income (such maximum remaining amount, the
Non-Qualifying Income Cushion), and the Escrow Agent
shall within one Business Day thereafter, pay Partners or
Holdings, as applicable, the amount demanded, by wire transfer
of immediately available funds to an account designated by
Partners or Holdings, as applicable;
(ii) During the calendar year following the date that the
payment was made to the Escrow Agent but prior to the passage of
30 Business Days following the filing of the IRS Form 1065
for the prior year, Partners or Holdings, as applicable, shall
submit to the Escrow Agent a certificate identifying the actual
Non-Qualifying Income Cushion from the prior year. If the
payment contemplated by clause (i) above was (A) less
than 80% of the actual Non-Qualifying Income Cushion, then
Partners or Holdings, as applicable, shall submit to the Escrow
Agent a certificate demanding a portion of the Escrow Fund equal
to an amount which, when combined with the payment contemplated
by clause (i) will equal 90% of the actual Non-Qualifying
Income Cushion, and the Escrow Agent shall within one Business
Day thereafter, pay Partners or Holdings, as applicable, the
amount demanded, (B) greater than or equal to 80%, but less
than or equal to 90% of the actual Non-Qualifying Income
Cushion, then Partners or Holdings, as applicable, shall notify
the Escrow Agent that it will not demand any additional payments
from the Escrow Account, and (C) greater than 90% of the
actual Non-Qualifying Income Cushion, then Partners or Holdings,
as applicable, shall deliver a certificate to such effect to the
Escrow Agent and return to the Escrow Fund an amount equal to
the excess of the payment contemplated by clause (i) over
80% of the Non-Qualifying Income Cushion. Any payment under this
clause (ii) shall be made by the Escrow Agent, or by
Partners or Holdings, as applicable, as the case may be, by wire
transfer of immediately available funds to an account designated
by Partners or Holdings, as applicable, or the Escrow Agent, as
the case may be; and
(iii) Within one Business Day following the earlier of
(A) completion of the procedures as contemplated by
Section 9.1(g)(ii) above and (B) the passage of
30 days following the filing of the IRS Form 1065 for
the prior year, the Escrow Agent shall pay Holdings or Partners,
as applicable, the remainder, if any, of the Escrow Fund, by
wire transfer of immediately available funds to an account
designated by Holdings or Partners, as applicable.
Each of Holdings and Partners, as applicable, acknowledges and
agrees that (x) the amount of a payment, if any, pursuant
to Section 9.1(g)(ii) above is uncertain, and that
depending on the amount of the demands made by Partners or
Holdings, as applicable, pursuant to Section 9.1(g)(ii)
above, the Escrow Fund may be insufficient to permit payments to
Holdings or Partners, as applicable, pursuant to
Section 9.1(g)(ii) above, and (y) it shall have no
rights to any amounts in the Escrow Fund (other than as
contemplated by this subsection (g)) or to audit or inquire into
the amounts demanded by or paid to Partners or Holdings, as
applicable.
(h) Holdings agrees that, notwithstanding any right that it
or Partners GP may otherwise have, including pursuant to the
Partners Partnership Agreement, the Partners Amended and
Restated Partnership Agreement, or otherwise, it hereby waives
and renounces for itself and its Affiliates, and shall cause
Partners GP to waive and renounce, any distribution by Partners
to its partners of any amount paid to Partners by the Escrow
Agent, together with an income allocation associated with such
distribution, it being understood that following payment to
Partners from the Escrow Agent, Partners will make a
distribution to the holders of LP Units who are unaffiliated
with Holdings.
(i) This Section 9.1 shall survive any termination of
this Agreement.
Section 9.2 Waiver;
Amendment. Subject to compliance with applicable
Law, prior to the Closing, any provision of this Agreement may
be (a) waived in writing by the party benefited by the
provision and approved by the Partners Audit Committee in the
case of Partners and by the Holdings GP Board in the case of
Holdings and executed in the same manner as this Agreement, or
(b) amended or modified at any time, whether before or
after the Holdings Unitholder Approval or before or after the
Partners Unitholder Approval, by an agreement in writing between
the parties hereto approved by the Partners Audit Committee in
the case of Partners and by the Holdings GP Board in the case of
Holdings and executed in the same manner as this Agreement,
provided, that after the Holdings Unitholder Approval, no
amendment shall be made that requires
A-31
further Holdings Unitholder Approval without such approval, and
after the Partners Unitholder Approval, no amendment shall be
made that requires further Partners Unitholder Approval without
such approval.
Section 9.3 Counterparts. This
Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of
which shall be deemed to constitute an original.
Section 9.4 Governing
Law. This Agreement shall be governed by, and
interpreted in accordance with, the Laws of the State of
Delaware, without regard to the conflict of law principles
thereof (except to the extent that mandatory provisions of
federal or Delaware law govern).
Section 9.5 Confidentiality. Each
of the parties hereto and their respective agents, attorneys and
accountants will maintain the confidentiality of all information
provided in connection herewith to the extent required by, and
subject to the limitations of, Section 6.5(b).
Section 9.6 Notices. All
notices, requests and other communications hereunder to a party
shall be in writing and shall be deemed given if personally
delivered, telecopied (with confirmation) or mailed by
registered or certified mail (return receipt requested) to such
party at its address set forth below or such other address as
such party may specify by notice to the parties hereto.
If to Partners, to:
Buckeye Partners, L.P.
One Greenway Plaza, Suite 600
Houston, TX 77046
Attention: General Counsel
With copies to:
Buckeye Partners, L.P.
One Greenway Plaza, Suite 600
Houston, TX 77046
Attention: Chairman of the Audit Committee
and
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
Attn: Michael Swidler, Esq.
666 Fifth Avenue, 25th Floor
New York, NY 10103
Fax:
(212) 237-0100
and
Prickett, Jones & Elliott, P.A.
1310 King Street
Wilmington, DE 19801
Tel: 302.888.6500
Fax: 302.658.8111
Attention: John H. Small, Esq.
If to Holdings, to:
Buckeye GP Holdings L.P.
Attn: John F. Erhard
c/o ArcLight
Capital Partners, LLC
200 Clarendon Street, 55th Floor
Boston, Massachusetts 02117
Fax:
(617) 687-4698
A-32
With copies to:
Latham & Watkins LLP
Attn: William N. Finnegan IV, Esq.
Sean T. Wheeler, Esq.
717 Texas Avenue, Suite 1600
Houston, Texas 77002
Fax:
(713) 546-5401
Section 9.7 Entire
Understanding; No Third Party Beneficiaries. This
Agreement represents the entire understanding of the parties
hereto with reference to the transactions contemplated hereby
and supersedes any and all other oral or written agreements
heretofore made. Except as contemplated by Section 6.12,
nothing in this Agreement, expressed or implied, is intended to
confer upon any person, other than the parties hereto or their
respective successors, any rights, remedies, obligations or
liabilities under or by reason of this Agreement.
Section 9.8 Severability. Any
provision of this Agreement which is invalid, illegal or
unenforceable in any jurisdiction shall, as to that
jurisdiction, be ineffective to the extent of such invalidity,
illegality or unenforceability, without affecting in any way the
remaining provisions hereof in such jurisdiction or rendering
that or any other provision of this Agreement invalid, illegal
or unenforceable in any other jurisdiction.
Section 9.9 Headings. The
headings contained in this Agreement are for reference purposes
only and are not part of this Agreement.
Section 9.10 Jurisdiction. The
parties hereto agree that any suit, action or proceeding seeking
to enforce any provision of, or based on any matter arising out
of or in connection with, this Agreement or the transactions
contemplated hereby shall be brought in any federal court
located in the State of Delaware or the Delaware Court of
Chancery, and each of the parties hereby irrevocably consents to
the jurisdiction of such courts (and of the appropriate
appellate courts therefrom) in any such suit, action or
proceeding and irrevocably waives, to the fullest extent
permitted by Law, any objection that it may now or hereafter
have to the laying of the venue of any such suit, action or
proceeding in any such court or that any such suit, action or
proceeding brought in any such court has been brought in an
inconvenient forum. Process in any such suit, action or
proceeding may be served on any party anywhere in the world,
whether within or without the jurisdiction of any such court.
Without limiting the foregoing, each party agrees that service
of process on such party as provided in Section 9.6 shall
be deemed effective service of process on such party.
Section 9.11 Waiver
of Jury Trial. EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO HEREBY
IRREVOCABLY WAIVES ANY AND ALL RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY
LEGAL PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR
THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED HEREBY.
Section 9.12 Specific
Performance. The parties agree that irreparable
damage would occur if any provision of this Agreement were not
performed in accordance with the terms hereof and, accordingly,
that the parties shall be entitled to an injunction or
injunctions to prevent breaches of this Agreement or to enforce
specifically the performance of the terms and provisions hereof
in any federal court located in the State of Delaware or in the
Delaware Court of Chancery, in addition to any other remedy to
which they are entitled at law or in equity.
Section 9.13 Survival. All
representations, warranties, agreements and covenants contained
in this Agreement shall not survive the Closing or the
termination of this Agreement if this Agreement is terminated
prior to the Closing; provided, however, that if the
Closing occurs, the agreements of the parties in
Sections 3.3, 6.12 and Article IX shall survive the
Closing, and if this Agreement is terminated prior to the
Closing, the agreements of the parties in Section 6.5(b),
8.2, and Article IX shall survive such termination.
Section 9.14 No
Act or Failure to Act. No act or failure to act
by the Partners GP Board shall constitute a breach by Partners
or Partners GP of this Agreement unless such act or failure to
act is expressly approved by the Partners Audit Committee.
[Remainder
of this page is intentionally left blank.]
A-33
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this
Agreement to be executed in counterparts by their duly
authorized officers, all as of the day and year first above
written.
BUCKEYE GP HOLDINGS L.P.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
MainLine Management LLC, its
general partner
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Forrest
E. Wylie
Name: Forrest
E. Wylie
Title: Chief Executive Officer
|
MAINLINE MANAGEMENT LLC
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Forrest
E. Wylie
Name: Forrest
E. Wylie
Title: Chief Executive Officer
|
BUCKEYE PARTNERS, L.P.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
Buckeye GP LLC, its general partner
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Keith
E. St.Clair
Name: Keith
E. St.Clair
Title: Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
|
BUCKEYE GP LLC
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Keith
E. St.Clair
Name: Keith
E. St.Clair
Title: Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
|
GRAND OHIO, LLC
|
|
|
|
By:
|
Buckeye Partners, L.P., its sole member
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
Buckeye GP LLC, its general partner
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Keith
E. St.Clair
Name: Keith
E. St.Clair
Title: Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
|
Signature
Page to First Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of
Merger
A-34
ANNEX A
to the
Merger Agreement
AMENDED AND RESTATED PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT OF HOLDINGS
A-A
ANNEX B
to the
Merger Agreement
AMENDED AND RESTATED PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT OF PARTNERS
A-B
ANNEX C
to the
Merger Agreement
FORM OF STANDSTILL PROVISION
Each party to such Confidentiality Agreement (a Proposing
Party) agrees that without the prior written consent of
the Audit Committee of Partners GP, for a period of two years
from the date of the Confidentiality Agreement, it will not, and
will cause each of its affiliates not to, directly or
indirectly, alone or in concert with other Persons:
(i) make, or in any way participate in, any
solicitation of proxies (as such terms
are used in the proxy rules of the SEC) with respect to Partners
LP Units, or advise or seek to influence any Person with respect
to the voting of, or giving of consents with respect to, any
Partners LP Units, or form, join, or in any way participate in,
a group (within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3)
of the Exchange Act) with respect to the Partners LP Units,
(ii) acquire or offer or agree to acquire, directly or
indirectly, by purchase or otherwise: (a) any Partners LP
Units, (b) any option, warrant, convertible security, unit
appreciation right or other right with an exercise or conversion
privilege or a settlement payment or mechanism at a price
related to the Partners LP Units or with a value derived from
the Partners, whether or not such instrument or right shall be
subject to settlement in Partners LP Units (a Derivative
Instrument), (c) any short interest in the Partners
LP Units whereby such Proposing Party or any of its affiliates,
directly or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement,
understanding, relationship or otherwise, has the opportunity to
profit or share in any profit derived from a decrease in the
value of the Partners LP Units, (d) any rights to
distributions on the Partners LP Units that are separated or
separable from the Partners LP Units, (e) any
performance-related payments based on any increase or decrease
in the value of the Partners LP Units or Derivative Instruments
or (f) any assets of Partners or any of its subsidiaries
(other than products or services of Partners acquired in the
ordinary course of business, or in connection with any
bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding involving Partners or any of
such subsidiaries) (except that the Proposing Party and its
affiliates may acquire through brokerage, investment, asset
management and trading activities in the ordinary course up to
aggregate ownership of 4.99% of the outstanding Partners LP
Units directly or derivatively, including through options,
warrants, convertible securities, unit appreciation rights or
other rights, short interests, rights to distributions, or
performance related payments described in clauses (b)
through (e) and shall have the right to vote such
securities, in each case so long as such Proposing Party shall
not have used any Confidential Information in connection
therewith in violation of the Confidentiality Agreement),
(iii) otherwise seek to influence or control, in any manner
whatsoever, the management or policies of Partners (other than
in connection with a potential acquisition of Holdings),
(iv) assist, advise or otherwise encourage any other Person
to do any of the foregoing, or (v) make any request to
waive, terminate, or amend any portion of this provision
(including this clause (v)).
A-C
ANNEX
B
FORM
OF
AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT
OF
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
OF
BUCKEYE PARTNERS, L.P.
(As Amended and Restated
on ,
2010)
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE I
DEFINITIONS
|
|
ARTICLE II
ORGANIZATIONAL MATTERS
|
|
Section 2.1
|
|
|
Continuation
|
|
|
B-6
|
|
|
Section 2.2
|
|
|
Name
|
|
|
B-6
|
|
|
Section 2.3
|
|
|
Principal Office; Registered Office
|
|
|
B-6
|
|
|
Section 2.4
|
|
|
Power of Attorney
|
|
|
B-6
|
|
|
Section 2.5
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
B-7
|
|
|
Section 2.6
|
|
|
Organizational Certificate
|
|
|
B-7
|
|
|
ARTICLE III
PURPOSE
|
|
Section 3.1
|
|
|
Purpose
|
|
|
B-7
|
|
|
ARTICLE IV
CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS; PURCHASES PURSUANT
TO PURCHASE AGREEMENTS; ADDITIONAL ISSUANCES
|
|
Section 4.1
|
|
|
Conversion of the General Partner Interest
|
|
|
B-8
|
|
|
Section 4.2
|
|
|
Limited Partner Contributions
|
|
|
B-8
|
|
|
Section 4.3
|
|
|
Issuances of Additional LP Units and Other Securities
|
|
|
B-8
|
|
|
Section 4.4
|
|
|
No Preemptive Rights
|
|
|
B-8
|
|
|
Section 4.5
|
|
|
No Interest
|
|
|
B-9
|
|
|
Section 4.6
|
|
|
Loans from Partners
|
|
|
B-9
|
|
|
Section 4.7
|
|
|
No Withdrawal
|
|
|
B-9
|
|
|
ARTICLE V
CAPITAL ACCOUNTS; DISTRIBUTIONS
|
|
Section 5.1
|
|
|
Capital Accounts
|
|
|
B-9
|
|
|
Section 5.2
|
|
|
Distributions in Respect of Partnership Interests
|
|
|
B-11
|
|
|
ARTICLE VI
INCOME TAX MATTERS
|
|
Section 6.1
|
|
|
Tax Allocations
|
|
|
B-11
|
|
|
Section 6.2
|
|
|
Preparation of Tax Returns
|
|
|
B-12
|
|
|
Section 6.3
|
|
|
Tax Elections
|
|
|
B-12
|
|
|
Section 6.4
|
|
|
Tax Controversies
|
|
|
B-12
|
|
|
Section 6.5
|
|
|
Withholding
|
|
|
B-12
|
|
B-i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE VII
MANAGEMENT AND OPERATION OF BUSINESS; INDEMNIFICATION
|
|
Section 7.1
|
|
|
Powers of General Partner
|
|
|
B-12
|
|
|
Section 7.2
|
|
|
Duties of General Partner
|
|
|
B-13
|
|
|
Section 7.3
|
|
|
Reliance by Third Parties
|
|
|
B-14
|
|
|
Section 7.4
|
|
|
Compensation and Reimbursement of the General Partner
|
|
|
B-14
|
|
|
Section 7.5
|
|
|
Purchase or Sale of LP Units and Other Partnership Securities
|
|
|
B-14
|
|
|
Section 7.6
|
|
|
[Reserved]
|
|
|
B-14
|
|
|
Section 7.7
|
|
|
Outside Activities; Contracts with Affiliates; Loans to or from
Affiliates
|
|
|
B-14
|
|
|
Section 7.8
|
|
|
Tax Basis and Value Determinations
|
|
|
B-15
|
|
|
Section 7.9
|
|
|
Resolution of Conflicts of Interest; Standard of Care
|
|
|
B-15
|
|
|
Section 7.10
|
|
|
CPUC and PPUC Approval
|
|
|
B-16
|
|
|
Section 7.11
|
|
|
Other Matters Concerning the General Partner
|
|
|
B-16
|
|
|
Section 7.12
|
|
|
Limited Liability; Indemnification
|
|
|
B-16
|
|
|
ARTICLE VIII
RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF LIMITED PARTNERS
|
|
Section 8.1
|
|
|
Limitation of Liability
|
|
|
B-18
|
|
|
Section 8.2
|
|
|
Management of Business
|
|
|
B-18
|
|
|
Section 8.3
|
|
|
Outside Activities
|
|
|
B-18
|
|
|
Section 8.4
|
|
|
Return of Capital
|
|
|
B-18
|
|
|
Section 8.5
|
|
|
Rights of Limited Partners Relating to the Partnership
|
|
|
B-18
|
|
|
ARTICLE IX
BOOKS, RECORDS, ACCOUNTING AND REPORTS
|
|
Section 9.1
|
|
|
Books, Records and Accounting
|
|
|
B-19
|
|
|
Section 9.2
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
B-19
|
|
|
Section 9.3
|
|
|
Reports
|
|
|
B-19
|
|
|
ARTICLE X
ISSUANCE OF LP CERTIFICATES; TRANSFER AND EXCHANGE OF LP UNITS
|
|
Section 10.1
|
|
|
Initial Issuance of LP Certificates
|
|
|
B-20
|
|
|
Section 10.2
|
|
|
Registration, Registration of Transfer and Exchange
|
|
|
B-20
|
|
|
Section 10.3
|
|
|
Mutilated, Destroyed, Lost or Stolen LP Certificates
|
|
|
B-20
|
|
|
Section 10.4
|
|
|
Persons Deemed Owners
|
|
|
B-21
|
|
|
Section 10.5
|
|
|
Prohibited Transfers
|
|
|
B-21
|
|
|
ARTICLE XI
[RESERVED]
|
|
ARTICLE XII
ADMISSION OF SUBSTITUTED AND ADDITIONAL LIMITED PARTNERS
|
|
Section 12.1
|
|
|
[Reserved]
|
|
|
B-21
|
|
|
Section 12.2
|
|
|
Admission of Substituted Limited Partners
|
|
|
B-21
|
|
|
Section 12.3
|
|
|
Admission of Successor General Partner
|
|
|
B-21
|
|
|
Section 12.4
|
|
|
Admission of Additional Limited Partners
|
|
|
B-21
|
|
|
Section 12.5
|
|
|
Amendment of Agreement and Certificate of Limited Partnership
|
|
|
B-22
|
|
B-ii
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE XIII
WITHDRAWAL OR REMOVAL OF THE GENERAL PARTNER
|
|
Section 13.1
|
|
|
Withdrawal or Removal of the General Partner
|
|
|
B-22
|
|
|
Section 13.2
|
|
|
Sale of Former General Partners Interest
|
|
|
B-22
|
|
|
ARTICLE XIV
DISSOLUTION AND LIQUIDATION
|
|
Section 14.1
|
|
|
Dissolution
|
|
|
B-23
|
|
|
Section 14.2
|
|
|
Reconstitution
|
|
|
B-23
|
|
|
Section 14.3
|
|
|
Liquidation
|
|
|
B-24
|
|
|
Section 14.4
|
|
|
Distribution in Kind
|
|
|
B-24
|
|
|
Section 14.5
|
|
|
Cancellation of Certificate of Limited Partnership
|
|
|
B-24
|
|
|
Section 14.6
|
|
|
Return of Capital
|
|
|
B-25
|
|
|
Section 14.7
|
|
|
Waiver of Partition
|
|
|
B-25
|
|
|
Section 14.8
|
|
|
Certain Prohibited Acts
|
|
|
B-25
|
|
|
ARTICLE XV
AMENDMENT OF PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
|
|
Section 15.1
|
|
|
Amendments Which May be Adopted Solely by the General Partner
|
|
|
B-25
|
|
|
Section 15.2
|
|
|
Other Amendments
|
|
|
B-26
|
|
|
Section 15.3
|
|
|
Amendment Requirements
|
|
|
B-26
|
|
|
ARTICLE XVI
MEETINGS
|
|
Section 16.1
|
|
|
Meetings
|
|
|
B-26
|
|
|
Section 16.2
|
|
|
Record Date
|
|
|
B-31
|
|
|
Section 16.3
|
|
|
Conduct of Meeting
|
|
|
B-31
|
|
|
Section 16.4
|
|
|
Action Without a Meeting
|
|
|
B-31
|
|
|
ARTICLE XVII
CERTAIN RESTRICTIONS
|
|
Section 17.1
|
|
|
Additional Units
|
|
|
B-32
|
|
|
Section 17.2
|
|
|
Certain Amendments
|
|
|
B-32
|
|
|
Section 17.3
|
|
|
Sale of Assets
|
|
|
B-32
|
|
|
ARTICLE XVIII
[RESERVED]
|
|
ARTICLE XIX
GENERAL PROVISIONS
|
|
Section 19.1
|
|
|
Opinions Regarding Taxation as a Partnership
|
|
|
B-32
|
|
|
Section 19.2
|
|
|
Personal Property
|
|
|
B-32
|
|
|
Section 19.3
|
|
|
Addresses and Notices
|
|
|
B-33
|
|
|
Section 19.4
|
|
|
Headings
|
|
|
B-33
|
|
|
Section 19.5
|
|
|
Binding Effect
|
|
|
B-33
|
|
|
Section 19.6
|
|
|
Integration
|
|
|
B-33
|
|
|
Section 19.7
|
|
|
Waiver
|
|
|
B-33
|
|
|
Section 19.8
|
|
|
Counterparts
|
|
|
B-33
|
|
|
Section 19.9
|
|
|
Severability
|
|
|
B-33
|
|
|
Section 19.10
|
|
|
Applicable Law
|
|
|
B-33
|
|
B-iii
THIS AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
dated as
of ,
20 and effective immediately following the Effective
Time (as defined below) (the Agreement), is entered
into by and among Buckeye GP LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company (together with any successor in its capacity as general
partner of the Partnership, the General Partner),
and the additional Persons that are or become Partners of the
Partnership as provided herein.
BACKGROUND
On April 14, 2008, the General Partner amended and restated
the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the
Partnership, effective as of January 1, 2007 (as amended
and restated, the 2007 Agreement).
On June 10, 2010, the Partnership, the General Partner,
Grand Ohio, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
(MergerCo), Buckeye GP Holdings L.P., a Delaware
limited partnership (Holdco), and MainLine
Management LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
(Holdco GP), entered into an Agreement and Plan of
Merger, as the same may be amended, supplemented, restated or
otherwise modified from time to time (the Merger
Agreement), providing for, among other things, the merger
of MergerCo with and into Holdco (the Merger), with
Holdco surviving the Merger, and each Common Unit and Management
Unit of Holdco being converted into 0.705 LP Units (as defined
herein) (the New LP Units).
On ,
20 , the limited partners of the Partnership approved
the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby,
including the Merger, the issuance of the New LP Units and the
entry into this Agreement.
This Agreement amends the 2007 Agreement, effective immediately
following the Effective Time (as defined in the Merger
Agreement), to reflect, among other things, the conversion of
the GP Units (as defined in the 2007 Agreement) into the GP
Interest (as defined herein) and the cancellation of the
Incentive Compensation Agreement (as defined herein) and to set
forth the rights, preferences and privileges of the LP Units and
the GP Interest.
ARTICLE I
DEFINITIONS
The following definitions shall for all purposes, unless
otherwise clearly indicated to the contrary, apply to the terms
used in this Agreement:
2007 Agreement has the meaning specified
in the Background.
Affiliate means, with respect to any Person,
any other Person that directly or indirectly controls, is
controlled by, or is under common control with the Person in
question; provided, however, that, except as expressly provided
herein to the contrary, Holdco GP and its controlling Affiliates
shall be deemed to not be Affiliates of the General Partner. As
used herein, the term control means the possession, directly or
indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the
management and policies of a Person, whether through ownership
of voting securities, by contract or otherwise.
Agent has the meaning specified in
Section 2.4
Agreed Value of any Contributed Property
means the fair market value of such property as of the time of
contribution (or, in the case of cash, the amount thereof), as
determined by the General Partner using such reasonable method
of valuation as it may adopt.
B-1
Agreement means this amended and restated
agreement of limited partnership, as amended or amended and
restated from time to time.
Audit Committee means a committee of the
Board of Directors composed entirely of three or more directors
who meet the independence, qualification and experience
requirements of the New York Stock Exchange.
BGH GP Holdings means BGH GP Holdings, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company, and the sole member of
Holdco GP.
Board of Directors means the Board of
Directors of the General Partner (or comparable governing body
of any successor to the General Partner).
Business Day means any day other than a
Saturday, a Sunday, or a legal holiday recognized as such by the
Government of the United States or the State of New York.
Capital Accounts mean the capital accounts
maintained with respect to Partnership Interests pursuant to
Section 5.1(a).
Capital Contribution means any Contributed
Property which a Partner contributes to the Partnership.
Carrying Value means (a) with respect to
Contributed Property, the Agreed Value of such property reduced
as of the time of determination (but not below zero) by
(i) all depreciation, cost recovery and amortization
deductions charged to the Capital Accounts pursuant to
Section 5.1(a) with respect to such property and
(ii) an appropriate amount to reflect any sales,
retirements and other dispositions of assets included in such
property, and (b) with respect to any other property, the
adjusted basis of such property for federal income tax purposes
as of the time of determination, in any case as may be adjusted
from time to time pursuant to Section 5.1(e).
Certificate of Limited Partnership means the
Amended and Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership filed
with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware as
described in the first sentence of Section 2.6, as amended
or restated from time to time.
Code means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended from time to time.
Contributed Property means any cash, property
or other consideration (in such form as may be permitted under
the Delaware Act) contributed to the Partnership.
Contributing Partner means any Partner
contributing Contributed Property to the Partnership in exchange
for Units (or any transferee of such Units).
CPUC shall mean the California Public
Utilities Commission.
Delaware Act means the Delaware Revised
Uniform Limited Partnership Act, as amended from time to time,
and any successor to such Act.
Designated Expenses mean all costs and
expenses (direct or indirect) incurred by the General Partner
which are directly or indirectly related to the formation,
capitalization, business or activities of the Partnership Group;
provided, however, that Designated Expenses shall not include
(a) any cost or expense for which the General Partner is
not entitled to be reimbursed by reason of the proviso at the
end of Section 7.12(b) or (b) severance costs not
permitted to be reimbursed pursuant to the Management Agreements
in connection with the withdrawal of the General Partner.
Directors shall mean the members of the Board
of Directors.
Effective Time has the meaning specified in
the Merger Agreement.
Eighty Percent Interest means Limited
Partners holding an aggregate of at least 80% of the outstanding
LP Units.
B-2
ESOP means the Buckeye Pipe Line Services
Company Employee Stock Ownership Plan Trust, as amended.
ESOP Loan means the loan to the ESOP due
March 28, 2011 in the original principal amount of
$44,133,600, and shall include any loans refinancing such loan.
Exchange Act means the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended from time to time, and any successor to
such statute.
General Partner has the meaning specified in
the first paragraph.
General Partner Agreement means the Second
Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of the
General Partner, dated as of the date hereof, as amended from
time to time.
GP Interest means the management interest of
the General Partner in the Partnership in its capacity as the
general partner of the Partnership. The GP Interest does not
have any rights to ownership or profit of the Partnership or any
rights to receive any distributions from the operation or
liquidation of the Partnership.
Group Member means a member of the
Partnership Group.
Holdco has the meaning specified in the
Background.
Holdco GP has the meaning specified in the
Background.
Holdco GP Directors means (a) on and
prior to the Regulatory Trigger Date, the two (or fewer)
Directors designated by Holdco GP as Holdco GP
Directors (such designation may be changed by Holdco GP in
its sole discretion, through and including the Regulatory
Trigger Date) and (b) after the Regulatory Trigger Date,
the Directors appointed by Holdco GP pursuant to
Section 16.1(b)(iv)(B) or Section 16.1(b)(iv)(C).
Holdco Partnership Agreement means the Second
Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Holdco,
dated as of the date hereof and adopted pursuant to
Section 2.1(c) of the Merger Agreement, as amended from
time to time.
Incentive Compensation Agreement means the
Fifth Amended and Restated Incentive Compensation Agreement,
dated as of August 9, 2006 between the Partnership and the
General Partner.
Indemnitee means the General Partner, any
Affiliate of the General Partner, any Person who is or was a
director, officer, manager, member, employee or agent of the
General Partner or any such Affiliate, or any Person who is or
was serving at the request of the General Partner or any such
Affiliate as a director, officer, manager, member, partner,
trustee, employee or agent of another Person (including any
Person serving in such a role at Services Company).
Issue Price means the price at which a Unit
is purchased from the Partnership.
Limited Partner means any limited partner of
the Partnership, in its capacity as such.
Liquidator has the meaning specified in
Section 14.3.
LP Certificate means a certificate issued by
the Partnership, substantially in the form of Annex A to
this Agreement, evidencing ownership of one or more LP Units.
LP Unit means a Partnership Interest issued
pursuant to Sections 4.2 or 4.3 and representing a limited
partners interest in the Partnership.
Majority Interest means Limited Partners
holding an aggregate of more than 50% of the outstanding LP
Units.
Management Agreements mean the amended and
restated management agreements, dated as of August 9, 2006
pursuant to which the OLP GP manages the Operating Partnerships,
in each case as amended or restated from time to time.
B-3
MergerCo has the meaning specified in the
Background.
Merger has the meaning specified in the
Background.
Merger Agreement has the meaning specified in
the Background.
National Securities Exchange means an
exchange registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission
under Section 6(a) of the Exchange Act.
New LP Units has the meaning specified in the
Background.
Net Agreed Value means (a) in the case
of any Contributed Property, the Agreed Value of such
Contributed Property reduced by any indebtedness either assumed
by the Partnership upon contribution of such Contributed
Property or to which such Contributed Property is subject when
contributed, (b) in the case of any property distributed to
a Partner pursuant to Sections 5.2, 14.3 or 14.4, the fair
market value of such property at the time of such distribution
reduced by any indebtedness either assumed by such Partner upon
such distribution or to which such property is subject at the
time of distribution.
OLP GP means MainLine L.P., in its capacity
as the general partner of the Operating Partnerships and in its
capacity as manager of the Operating Partnerships pursuant to
the Management Agreements, and any successors to MainLine L.P.
as such general partner and manager.
Operating Partnership Agreements mean the
amended and restated agreements of limited partnership, dated as
of August 9, 2006, governing the rights and obligations of
the partners of the Operating Partnerships and certain related
matters, as amended or restated from time to time.
Operating Partnerships means, collectively,
Buckeye Pipe Line Company, L.P., Buckeye Pipe Line Holdings,
L.P., Everglades Pipe Line Company, L.P. and Laurel Pipe Line
Company, L.P., each a Delaware limited partnership, and each
other current or future subsidiary of the Partnership which is
managed by the General Partner or the OLP GP pursuant to its
organizational documents or any other contractual arrangement
with the General Partner or the OLP GP.
Opinion of Counsel means a written opinion of
counsel (who may be regular counsel of the General Partner or
any of its Affiliates) acceptable to the General Partner.
PPUC means the Pennsylvania Public Utility
Commission.
Partner means the General Partner or a
Limited Partner.
Partnership means Buckeye Partners, L.P., a
Delaware limited partnership.
Partnership Group means the Partnership,
Holdco, the General Partner and any subsidiary of any such
entity (including MainLine GP, Inc., OLP GP and the Operating
Partnerships), treated as a single consolidated entity.
Partnership Interest means the GP Interest or
a limited partners interest in the Partnership.
Partnership Securities has the meaning
specified in Section 4.3.
Percentage Interest means, with respect to
any Partner, the number of Units held by such Partner divided by
the number of Units outstanding. The Percentage Interest of the
General Partner and the Percentage Interest with respect to the
GP Interest shall each at all times be zero.
Person means an individual, a corporation, a
limited liability company, a partnership, a trust, an
unincorporated organization, an association or any other entity.
Public Directors means all of the Directors
as of the Regulatory Trigger Date (other than the Directors
designated as Holdco GP Directors), the Directors elected by the
Public Limited Partners pursuant to Section 16.1(b)(iv),
and any Directors appointed by the Public Directors to fill
vacancies among the Public Directors (including, without
limitation, any vacancy caused by an increase in the number of
Directors on the Board of Directors).
B-4
Public Limited Partners means (A) prior
to the Regulatory Trigger Date, all Limited Partners other than
BGH GP Holdings, ArcLight Capital Partners, LLC and
Kelso & Company and their Affiliates and (B) on
and after the Regulatory Trigger Date, (i) for so long as
Holdco GP has the right to designate one or more Holdco GP
Directors, as described in Section 16.1(b)(iv), all Limited
Partners other than BGH GP Holdings, ArcLight Capital Partners,
LLC and Kelso & Company and their Affiliates and
(ii) after such time as Holdco GP ceases to have the right
to designate one or more Holdco GP Directors, as described in
Section 16.1(b)(iv), all Limited Partners.
Recapture Income means any gain recognized by
the Partnership upon the disposition of any asset of the
Partnership that is not a capital gain due to the recapture of
certain deductions previously taken with respect to such asset.
Record Date means the date established by the
General Partner for determining the identity of Limited Partners
entitled (a) to notice of or to vote at any meeting of
Limited Partners, to vote by ballot or approve Partnership
action in writing without a meeting or to exercise rights in
respect of any other lawful action of Limited Partners, or
(b) to receive any report or distribution.
Record Holder or Holder of
any LP Unit means the Person in whose name such Unit is
registered in the Units Register.
Regulatory Trigger Date means the earlier of
(a) obtaining the approval from the CPUC and PPUC of the
right of the Public Limited Partners to elect members of the
Board of Directors or (b) a determination by the Board of
Directors, based on the advice of counsel, that the right of the
Public Limited Partners to elect Public Directors does not
require any such approval that has not been obtained.
Securities Act means the Securities Act of
1933, as amended from time to time, and any successor to such
statute.
Services Agreement means the Services
Agreement, dated as of December 15, 2004, between the
Partnership, the Operating Partnerships, Wood River Pipe Lines
LLC, Buckeye Terminals, LLC and Services Company, as amended or
supplemented from time to time.
Services Company means Buckeye Pipe Line
Services Company, a Pennsylvania corporation.
Special Approval means approval by a majority
of the members of the Audit Committee.
Time of Delivery means December 23, 1986.
Transfer Agent means the bank, trust company
or other Person appointed from time to time by the Partnership
to act as successor transfer agent and registrar for LP Units.
Two-Thirds Interest means Limited Partners
holding an aggregate of at least two-thirds of the outstanding
LP Units.
Unit means an LP Unit. The term
Unit does not include the GP Interest.
Unit Price of a Unit means, as of any date of
determination, (a) if such Unit is one of a class of Units
listed or admitted to trading on a National Securities Exchange,
the average of the last reported sales prices per Unit regular
way or, in case no such reported sale takes place on any such
day, the average of the last reported bid and asked prices per
Unit regular way, in either case on the principal National
Securities Exchange on which such class of Units is listed or
admitted to trading (or, if such class of Units is listed or
admitted to trading on the New York Stock Exchange, on the New
York Stock Exchange Composite Tape), for the five trading days
immediately preceding the date of determination; or (b) if
such Unit is not of a class of Units listed or admitted to
trading on a National Securities Exchange, an amount equal to
the fair market value of such Unit as of such date of
determination, as determined by the General Partner using any
reasonable method of valuation it may select.
Units Register has the meaning specified in
Section 10.2.
B-5
Unrealized Gain attributable to a Partnership
property means, as of any date of determination, the excess, if
any, of the fair market value of such property as of such date
of determination over the Carrying Value of such property as of
such date of determination (prior to any adjustment to be made
pursuant to Section 5.1(e) as of such date).
Unrealized Loss attributable to a Partnership
property means, as of any date of determination, the excess, if
any, of the Carrying Value of such property as of such date of
determination (prior to any adjustment to be made pursuant to
Section 5.1(e) as of such date) over the fair market value
of such property as of such date of determination.
ARTICLE II
ORGANIZATIONAL
MATTERS
Section 2.1 Continuation
The parties hereto, pursuant to the authority contained in
Article XV of the 2007 Agreement, do hereby amend and
restate the 2007 Agreement in its entirety, effective
immediately following the Effective Time, to continue the
Partnership as a limited partnership pursuant to the provisions
of the Delaware Act and to set forth the rights and obligations
of the Partners and certain matters related thereto. Except as
expressly provided herein to the contrary, the rights and
obligations of the Partners and the administration, dissolution
and termination of the Partnership shall be governed by the
Delaware Act.
Section 2.2 Name
The name of the Partnership shall be, and the business of the
Partnership shall be conducted under the name of, Buckeye
Partners, L.P.; provided, however, that (a) the
Partnerships business may be conducted under any other
name or names deemed advisable by the General Partner,
(b) the General Partner may change the name of the
Partnership at any time and from time to time and (c) the
name under which the Partnership conducts business shall include
Ltd. or Limited Partnership (or similar
words or letters) where necessary for purposes of maintaining
the limited liability status of each Limited Partner or
otherwise complying with the laws of any jurisdiction that so
requires.
Section 2.3 Principal
Office; Registered Office
(a) The principal office of the Partnership shall be One
Greenway Plaza, Suite 600, Houston, TX, or such other place
as the General Partner may from time to time designate. The
Partnership may maintain offices at such other places as the
General Partner deems advisable.
(b) The address of the Partnerships registered office
in the State of Delaware shall be 2711 Centerville Road,
Suite 400, Wilmington, Delaware 19808, and the name of the
Partnerships registered agent for service of process at
such address shall be Corporation Service Company.
Section 2.4 Power
of Attorney
(a) Each Limited Partner hereby constitutes and appoints
the General Partner or, if a Liquidator shall have been selected
pursuant to Section 14.3, the Liquidator, with full power
of substitution, as such Limited Partners true and lawful
agent and attorney-in-fact (Agent), with full power
and authority in such Limited Partners name, place and
stead to:
(i) execute, swear to, acknowledge, deliver, file and
record in the appropriate public offices (A) all
certificates, documents and other instruments (including,
without limitation, this Agreement and the Certificate of
Limited Partnership and any amendments or restatements thereof)
which the Agent deems appropriate or necessary to form or
qualify, or continue the existence or qualification of, the
Partnership as a limited partnership (or a partnership in which
the Limited Partners have limited liability) under the laws of
any state or jurisdiction; (B) all certificates, documents
and other instruments which the Agent deems appropriate or
necessary to reflect any amendments, changes or modifications of
this Agreement in accordance with its terms; (C) all
conveyances and other documents or instruments which the Agent
B-6
deems appropriate or necessary to reflect the dissolution and
liquidation of the Partnership pursuant to the terms of this
Agreement; (D) all certificates, documents and other
instruments relating to the admission, substitution, withdrawal
or removal of any Partner pursuant to Articles XII, XIII or
XIV and other events described in Articles XII, XIII or
XIV; and (E) all certificates, documents and other
instruments (including, without limitation, this Agreement and
the Certificate of Limited Partnership and any amendments or
restatements thereof) relating to the determination of the
rights, preferences and privileges of any class or series of
Units issued pursuant to Section 4.4; and
(ii) execute, swear to, acknowledge and file all ballots,
consents, approvals, waivers, certificates, documents and other
instruments which the Agent deems appropriate or necessary in
order to make, evidence, give, confirm or ratify any vote,
consent, approval, agreement or other action which is made or
given by the Partners hereunder, is deemed to be made or given
by the Partners hereunder, is consistent with the terms of this
Agreement or is deemed by the Agent to be appropriate or
necessary to effectuate the terms or intent of this Agreement or
the purposes of the Partnership; provided, however, that, if any
vote or approval of Limited Partners is specifically required
for an action by any provision of this Agreement, the Agent may
exercise the power of attorney made in this subsection (ii)
to take such action only after such vote or approval is obtained.
(b) The foregoing power of attorney is hereby declared to
be irrevocable and a power coupled with an interest, and it
shall survive and not be affected by the subsequent death,
incompetency, disability, incapacity, dissolution, bankruptcy or
termination of any Limited Partner and the transfer of all or
any portion of such Limited Partners Units and shall
extend to such Limited Partners heirs, transferees,
successors, assigns and personal representatives. Each Limited
Partner hereby agrees to be bound by any representations made by
the Agent acting in good faith pursuant to such power of
attorney; and each Limited Partner hereby waives any and all
defenses which may be available to contest, negate or disaffirm
the action of the Agent taken in good faith pursuant to such
power of attorney. Each Limited Partner shall execute and
deliver to the Agent, within 15 days after receipt of the
Agents request therefor, such further designations, powers
of attorney and other instruments as the Agent deems appropriate
or necessary to effectuate the terms or intent of this Agreement
or the purposes of the Partnership.
Section 2.5 Term
The Partnership shall continue in existence until the close of
Partnership business on December 31, 2086 or until the
earlier termination of the Partnership in accordance with the
provisions of Article XIV.
Section 2.6 Organizational
Certificate
The General Partner shall cause to be filed such certificates or
documents as may be required for the formation, operation and
qualification of a limited partnership in Delaware and any other
state in which the Partnership may elect to do business. The
General Partner shall thereafter file any necessary amendments
to the Certificate of Limited Partnership and any such other
certificates and documents and do all things requisite to the
maintenance of the Partnership as a limited partnership (or as a
partnership in which the Limited Partners have limited
liability) under the laws of Delaware and any other state in
which the Partnership may elect to do business. Subject to
applicable law, the General Partner may omit from the
Certificate of Limited Partnership and any such other
certificates and documents, and from all amendments thereto, the
names and addresses of the Limited Partners and information
relating to the Capital Contributions and shares of profits and
compensation of the Limited Partners, or state such information
in the aggregate rather than with respect to each individual
Limited Partner.
ARTICLE III
PURPOSE
Section 3.1 Purpose
The purpose and business of the Partnership shall be to engage
in any lawful activity for which limited partnerships may be
organized under the Delaware Act.
B-7
ARTICLE IV
CAPITAL
CONTRIBUTIONS; PURCHASES PURSUANT
TO PURCHASE
AGREEMENTS; ADDITIONAL ISSUANCES
Section 4.1 Conversion
of the General Partner Interest
The GP Units (as defined in the 2007 Agreement) in the
Partnership that existed immediately prior to the date hereof
are, effective immediately following the Effective Time, hereby
converted into a non-economic GP Interest in the Partnership.
From the date hereof, the GP Interest shall only represent a
non-economic management interest of the General Partner in the
Partnership. Buckeye GP LLC hereby continues as general partner
of the Partnership and the Partnership is continued without
dissolution. Effective immediately following the Effective Time,
the Incentive Compensation Agreement is hereby terminated and
the Partnership Interest evidenced by the Incentive Compensation
Agreement is hereby cancelled.
Section 4.2 Limited
Partner Contributions
At and as of the Time of Delivery, each underwriting firm which
entered into an underwriting agreement with the Partnership
contributed to the Partnership, in exchange for the number of LP
Units specified therein an amount in cash equal to the Issue
Price for such LP Units (as specified in such underwriting
agreement) multiplied by the number of LP Units being so
purchased.
Section 4.3 Issuances
of Additional LP Units and Other Securities
(a) The General Partner is hereby authorized to cause the
Partnership to issue additional LP Units, or classes or series
thereof, or options, rights, warrants or appreciation rights
relating thereto or any other type of equity security that the
Partnership may lawfully issue, any secured or unsecured debt
obligations of the Partnership, or debt obligations of the
Partnership convertible into any class or series of equity
securities of the Partnership (collectively, Partnership
Securities), for any Partnership purpose, at any time or
from time to time, to Partners or to other Persons (including,
without limitation, to employee benefit plans sponsored by the
Group Members or Services Company), for such consideration and
on such terms and conditions, and entitling the holders thereof
to such relative rights and powers, as shall be established by
the General Partner, all without the approval of any Limited
Partners, except as provided in Section 17.1.
(b) Without limiting the generality of the foregoing (but
subject to the provisions of Section 17.1), the additional
Partnership Securities to be issued by the Partnership under
this Section 4.3 may contain provisions with respect to
(i) the allocation of items of Partnership income, gain,
loss, deduction and credit; (ii) the right to share in
Partnership distributions; (iii) rights upon dissolution
and liquidation of the Partnership; (iv) whether any such
issue of Partnership Securities may be acquired by the
Partnership, by purchase, redemption or otherwise, and if so,
the price at which, and the terms and conditions upon which,
such Partnership Securities may be purchased, redeemed or
otherwise acquired by the Partnership; (v) the conversion
rights applicable to any such issue of Partnership Securities,
and if so, the rate at which, and the terms and conditions upon
which, such Partnership Securities may be converted into any
other class or series of Partnership Securities; (vi) the
terms and conditions upon which any such Partnership Securities
will be issued, assigned, or transferred; and (vii) the
right, if any, of the holders of any such issue of Partnership
Securities to vote on Partnership matters.
(c) The General Partner is hereby authorized and directed
to do all acts which it deems appropriate or necessary in
connection with each issuance of Units or other securities by
the Partnership and to amend this Agreement in any manner which
it deems appropriate or necessary to provide for each such
issuance, to admit additional limited partners in connection
therewith and to specify the relative rights, powers and duties
of the holders of the Units or other securities being so issued,
all without the approval of any Limited Partners, except as
provided in Section 17.1.
Section 4.4 No
Preemptive Rights
No Partner shall have any preemptive right with respect to the
issuance or sale of Units or other securities that may be issued
by the Partnership.
B-8
Section 4.5 No
Interest
No interest shall be paid by the Partnership on Capital
Contributions.
Section 4.6 Loans
from Partners
Loans or other advances by a Partner to or for the account of
the Partnership shall not be considered Capital Contributions.
Section 4.7 No
Withdrawal
No Partner shall be entitled to withdraw any part of its Capital
Contributions or its Capital Account or to receive any
distributions from the Partnership except as provided in this
Agreement.
ARTICLE V
CAPITAL
ACCOUNTS; DISTRIBUTIONS
Section 5.1 Capital
Accounts
(a) The Partnership shall maintain for each Partner a
separate Capital Account with respect to its Partnership
Interests in accordance with the regulations issued pursuant to
Section 704 of the Code. The Capital Account of any Partner
shall be increased by (i) the Net Agreed Value of all
Capital Contributions made by such Partner in exchange for its
Partnership Interest and (ii) all items of income and gain
computed in accordance with Section 5.1(b) and allocated to
such Partner pursuant to Section 5.1(c) and reduced by
(iii) the Net Agreed Value of all distributions of cash or
property made to such Partner with respect to its Partnership
Interest and (iv) all items of deduction and loss computed
in accordance with Section 5.1(b) and allocated to such
Partner pursuant to Section 5.1(c).
(b) For purposes of computing the amount of each item of
income, gain, loss or deduction to be reflected in the Capital
Accounts, the determination, recognition and classification of
such item shall be the same as its determination, recognition
and classification for federal income tax purposes, provided
that:
(i) Any deductions for depreciation, cost recovery or
amortization attributable to any Partnership property shall be
determined as if the adjusted basis of such property was equal
to the Carrying Value of such property. Upon an adjustment to
the Carrying Value of any Partnership property subject to
depreciation, cost recovery or amortization pursuant to
Sections 5.1(e) or 7.8, any further deductions for such
depreciation, cost recovery or amortization attributable to such
property shall be determined as if the adjusted basis of such
property was equal to the Carrying Value of such property
immediately following such adjustment.
(ii) If the Partnerships adjusted basis in property
subject to depreciation, cost recovery or amortization is
reduced for federal income tax purposes pursuant to Section
48(q)(1) of the Code, the amount of such reduction shall be
deemed to be an additional item of deduction in the year such
property is placed in service. Any restoration of such basis
pursuant to Section 48(q)(2) of the Code shall be deemed to
be an additional item of income in the year of restoration.
(iii) Any income, gain or loss attributable to the taxable
disposition of any Partnership property shall be determined by
the Partnership as if the adjusted basis of such property as of
such date of disposition was equal in amount to the Carrying
Value of such property as of such date.
(iv) All fees and other expenses incurred by the
Partnership to promote the sale of (or to sell) a Partnership
Interest that can neither be deducted nor amortized under
Section 709 of the Code shall be treated as items of
deduction.
(v) The computation of all items of income, gain, loss and
deduction shall be made without regard to any election under
Section 754 of the Code which may be made by the
Partnership and, as to those items described in
Section 705(a)(1)(B) or Section 705(a)(2)(B) of the
Code, without regard to the fact
B-9
that such items are not includible in gross income or are
neither currently deductible nor capitalizable for federal
income tax purposes.
(c) (i) After giving effect to the special allocations
set forth in
Section 5.1(c)(ii)-(iv)
for purposes of maintaining the Capital Accounts, each item of
income, gain, loss and deduction (computed in accordance with
Section 5.1(b)) shall be allocated to the Partners in
accordance with their respective Percentage Interests.
(ii) If any Partner unexpectedly receives any adjustment
allocation or distribution described in Treasury
Regulation Sections 1.704-1(b)(2)(ii)(d)(4),
1.704-1 (b)(2)(ii)(d)(5), or 1.704-1(b)(2)(ii)(d)(6), items of
Partnership income and gain shall be specially allocated to such
Partner in an amount and manner sufficient to eliminate a
deficit in its Capital Account created by such adjustment,
allocation or distribution as quickly as possible.
(iii) To preserve uniformity of Units, the General Partner
may make special allocations of income or deduction pursuant to
Section 6.1(c) that do not have a material adverse effect
on the Limited Partners and are consistent with the principles
of Section 704 of the Code.
(iv) If there is a net decrease in Partnership minimum
gain, within the meaning of Treasury
Regulation Section 1.704-1(b)
(4) (iv), during a Partnership taxable year, all Partners with
deficit balances in their Capital Accounts, computed as
described in Treasury
Regulation Section 1.704-1(b)(4)(iv)(c)
at the end of such year, will be allocated items of Partnership
income and gain for such year (and, if necessary, subsequent
years) in the amounts and in the proportions needed to eliminate
such deficits as quickly as possible, before any other
allocations are made under Section 704(b) of the Code.
(v) (A) In the event the Carrying Value of Partnership
property is adjusted pursuant to Section 5.1(e), this
Section 5.1(c)(v) is intended to cause the respective
Capital Accounts of the Partners to return to, over time, the
relative proportionality of the Capital Account balances of the
Partners if the prior adjustment to the Carrying Value of
Partnership property had not occurred. To effectuate the intent
of this Section 5.1(c)(v)(A), the General Partner may
allocate that portion of the deductions, cost recovery or
amortization attributable to an adjustment to the Carrying Value
of a Partnership property pursuant to Section 5.1(e) in the
same manner that the Unrealized Gain or Unrealized Loss
attributable to such property is allocated pursuant to
Section 5.1(e).
(B) In making the allocations required under this
Section 5.1(c)(v), including the allocations that may
result from the sale or other taxable disposition of any
Partnership property that has been subject to an adjustment to
the Carrying Value of such Partnership property, the General
Partner may apply whatever conventions or other methodology it
determines will satisfy the purpose of this
Section 5.1(c)(v).
(d) (i) Except as otherwise provided in this
Section 5.1(d), a transferee of LP Units shall, upon
becoming a Limited Partner, succeed to the portion of the
transferors Capital Account maintained with respect to the
Units transferred.
(ii) If a transfer of Units causes a termination of the
Partnership under Section 708(b)(1)(B) of the Code, the
Partnership properties shall be deemed to have been distributed
in liquidation of the Partnership to the Partners (including the
transferee of the Units) pursuant to Sections 14.4 and 14.5
and recontributed by such Partners and transferees in
reconstitution of the Partnership. The Capital Accounts of such
reconstituted Partnership shall be maintained in accordance with
this Article V.
(e) If any additional LP Units (or other Partnership
Interests) are to be issued pursuant to Section 4.3, or if
any Partnership Property is to be distributed, the Capital
Accounts of the Partners (and the Carrying Values of all
Partnership properties) shall, immediately prior to such
issuance or distribution, be adjusted (consistent with the
provisions hereof and of Section 704(b) of the Code)
upwards or downwards to reflect any Unrealized Gain or
Unrealized Loss attributable to all Partnership properties (as
if such Unrealized Gain or Unrealized Loss had been recognized
upon an actual sale of such properties immediately prior to such
issuance). In determining such Unrealized Gain or Unrealized
Loss, the fair market value of Partnership properties, as of any
date of determination, (i) shall, in the case of the
issuance of additional LP Units, be deemed to be equal to
(A) the number of Units outstanding, as of the date of
determination, times the Issue Price for which such
B-10
additional LP Units are so issued, plus (B) the fair market
value of any Partnership Interests not otherwise valued pursuant
to Section 5.1(e)(i)(A) and (C) the amount of any
Partnership indebtedness outstanding as of the date of
determination, (ii) shall, in the case of an issuance of
other Partnership Interests, be deemed to be equal to
(A) the number of Units outstanding, as of the date of
determination, times the last reported sales price per LP Unit
on the principal National Securities Exchange on which such LP
Units are listed, plus (B) the fair market value of any
Partnership Interests not otherwise valued pursuant to
Section 5.1(e)(ii)(A) and (C) the amount of any
Partnership indebtedness outstanding as of the date of
determination, and (iii) shall, in the case of the
distribution of Partnership property, be determined in the
manner provided in Section 14.3.
Section 5.2 Distributions
in Respect of Partnership Interests
(a) From time to time, not less often than quarterly, the
General Partner shall review the Partnerships accounts to
determine whether distributions are appropriate. The General
Partner may make such cash distributions as it may determine,
without being limited to current or accumulated income or gains,
from any Partnership funds, including, without limitation,
Partnership revenues, Capital Contributions or borrowed funds.
The General Partner may also distribute to the Partners other
Partnership property, additional Units or other securities of
the Partnership or other entities.
All distributions in respect of Units shall be made concurrently
to all Record Holders on the Record Date set for purposes of
such distribution and shall be prorated in accordance with such
Record Holders respective Percentage Interests as of such
Record Date.
(b) Amounts paid pursuant to Section 7.4, any
Management Agreement or any Operating Partnership Agreement
shall not be deemed to be distributions with respect to a
Partnership Interest for purposes of this Agreement.
ARTICLE VI
INCOME TAX
MATTERS
Section 6.1 Tax
Allocations
(a) Except as otherwise provided herein, for federal income
tax purposes, each item of income, gain, loss, deduction and
credit of the Partnership shall be allocated among the Partners
in the manner in which the correlative item of book
income, gain, loss or deduction is computed in accordance with
Section 5.1(b) and allocated pursuant to
Section 5.1(c), except that the General Partner shall have
the authority to make such other allocations as are necessary
and appropriate to comply with Section 704 of the Code and
the regulations issued pursuant thereto.
(b) Gain resulting from the sale or other taxable
disposition of Partnership assets and allocated to (or
recognized by) a Partner (or its successor in interest) for
federal income tax purposes shall be deemed to be Recapture
Income to the extent such Partner has been allocated or has
claimed any deduction directly or indirectly giving rise to the
treatment of such gain as Recapture Income.
(c) To preserve uniformity of LP Units, the General Partner
may (i) adopt such conventions as it deems appropriate or
necessary in determining the amount of depreciation and cost
recovery deductions; (ii) make special allocations of
income or deduction and (iii) amend the provisions of this
Agreement as appropriate (x) to reflect the proposal or
promulgation of regulations under Section 704(c) of the
Code or (y) otherwise to preserve the uniformity of Units
issued or sold from time to time. The General Partner may adopt
such conventions and make such allocations and amendments only
if they would not have a material adverse effect on the Limited
Partners and are consistent with the principles of
Section 704 of the Code.
(d) Items of Partnership income, gain, loss, deduction and
credit shall, for federal income tax purposes, be determined on
a monthly basis (or other basis, as required or permitted by
Section 706 of the Code) and shall be allocated to the
Persons who are Record Holders of Units as of the close of
business on the first day of such month; provided, however, that
gain or loss on a sale or other disposition of all or a
substantial portion
B-11
of the assets of the Partnership shall be allocated to the
Persons who are Record Holders of Units as of the close of
business on the date of sale.
(e) Pursuant to Section 704(c) of the Code, items of
income, gain, loss, deduction and credit attributable to
Contributed Property shall be allocated in such a manner as to
take into account the variation between the basis of such
property to the Partnership and its Carrying Value.
Section 6.2 Preparation
of Tax Returns
The General Partner shall arrange for the preparation and timely
filing of all returns of Partnership income, gains, losses,
deductions, credits and other items necessary for federal and
state income tax purposes and shall use all reasonable efforts
to furnish to the Limited Partners within 90 days after the
close of the taxable year the tax information reasonably
required for federal and state income tax reporting purposes.
The classification, realization and recognition of income,
gains, losses, deductions, credits and other items shall be on
the accrual method of accounting for federal income tax
purposes, unless the General Partner shall determine otherwise.
Section 6.3 Tax
Elections
Except as otherwise provided herein, the General Partner shall
determine whether to make any available election. The General
Partner shall elect under Section 754 of the Code to cause
the basis of Partnership property to be adjusted for federal
income tax purposes as provided by Sections 734 and 743 of
the Code, but the General Partner may seek to revoke this
election if the General Partner determines that such revocation
is in the best interests of the Limited Partners.
Section 6.4 Tax
Controversies
Subject to the provisions hereof, the Board of Directors shall
designate one officer of the Partnership or the General Partner
who is a Partner as the Tax Matters Partner (as defined in the
Code) and is authorized and required to represent the
Partnership (at the Partnerships expense) in connection
with all examinations of the Partnerships affairs by tax
authorities, including resulting administrative and judicial
proceedings, and to expend Partnership funds for professional
services and costs associated therewith. Each Partner agrees to
cooperate with the Tax Matters Partner and to do or refrain from
doing any or all things reasonably required by the Tax Matters
Partner to conduct such proceedings.
Section 6.5 Withholding
The General Partner is authorized to take any action necessary
to comply with any withholding requirements established by
applicable law, including, without limitation, with regard to
(a) the sale of United States real property interests,
(b) the distributions of cash or property to any Partner
which is a foreign Person, and (c) the transfer of Units.
ARTICLE VII
MANAGEMENT
AND OPERATION OF BUSINESS; INDEMNIFICATION
Section 7.1 Powers
of General Partner
Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, all
powers to control and manage the business and affairs of the
Partnership shall be exclusively vested in the General Partner,
and no Limited Partner shall have any power to control or manage
the business and affairs of the Partnership.
In addition to the powers now or hereafter granted a general
partner of a limited partnership under applicable law or which
are granted to the General Partner under any other provisions of
this Agreement, the General Partner is hereby authorized and
empowered, in the name of and on behalf of the Partnership, to
do
B-12
and perform any and all acts and things which it deems
appropriate or necessary in the conduct of the business and
affairs of the Partnership, including, without limitation, the
following:
(a) to lend or borrow money, to assume, guarantee or
otherwise become liable for indebtedness and other liabilities
and to issue evidences of indebtedness;
(b) to buy, lease (as lessor or lessee), sell, mortgage,
encumber or otherwise acquire or dispose of any or all of the
assets of the Partnership;
(c) to own, use and invest the assets of the Partnership;
(d) to purchase or sell products, services and supplies;
(e) to make tax, regulatory and other filings, and to
render periodic and other reports, to governmental agencies or
bodies having jurisdiction over the assets or business of the
Partnership;
(f) to open, maintain and close bank accounts and to draw
checks and other orders for the payment of money;
(g) to negotiate, execute and perform any contracts,
conveyances or other instruments;
(h) to distribute Partnership cash;
(i) to utilize the services of officers and employees of
the General Partner or of any other Persons and to select and
dismiss employees (if any) and outside attorneys, accountants,
consultants and contractors;
(j) to maintain insurance for the benefit of the
Partnership, the Partners and the Indemnitees;
(k) to form, participate in or contribute or loan cash or
property to limited or general partnerships, joint ventures,
limited liability companies, corporations or similar
arrangements;
(l) to expand the business activities in which the
Partnership is engaged or engage in new business activities by
acquisition or internal development;
(m) to conduct litigation and incur legal expenses and
otherwise deal with or settle claims or disputes;
(n) to purchase, sell or otherwise acquire or dispose of
Units; and
(o) to take any action in connection with the
Partnerships ownership and operation of any Group Member
(including Holdco);
in each case at such times and upon such terms and conditions as
the General Partner deems appropriate or necessary, and subject
to any express restrictions contained elsewhere in this
Agreement.
Section 7.2 Duties
of General Partner
The General Partner shall manage the business and affairs of the
Partnership in the manner the General Partner deems appropriate
or necessary. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing,
the General Partners duties shall include the following:
(a) to take possession of the assets of the Partnership;
(b) to staff and operate the business of the Partnership
with the officers and employees of the General Partner or of
other Persons;
(c) to render or cause to be rendered engineering,
environmental and other technical services and perform or cause
to be performed financial, accounting, logistical and other
administrative functions for the Partnership;
(d) to render such reports and make such periodic and other
filings as may be required under applicable federal, state and
local laws, rules and regulations;
B-13
(e) to provide or cause to be provided purchasing,
procurement, repair and other services for the
Partnership; and
(f) to conduct the business of the Partnership in
accordance with this Agreement and all applicable laws, rules
and regulations;
in each case in such a manner as the General Partner deems
appropriate or necessary.
Section 7.3 Reliance
by Third Parties
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, any
Person dealing with the Partnership shall be entitled to assume
that the General Partner has full power and authority to
encumber, sell or otherwise use in any manner any and all assets
of the Partnership and to enter into any contracts on behalf of
the Partnership, and such Person shall be entitled to deal with
the General Partner as if it were the Partnerships sole
party in interest, both legally and beneficially. Each Limited
Partner hereby waives any and all defenses or other remedies
which may be available against such Person to contest, negate or
disaffirm any action of the General Partner in connection with
any such dealing. In no event shall any Person dealing with the
General Partner or its representatives be obligated to ascertain
that the terms of this Agreement have been complied with or to
inquire into the necessity or expedience of any act or action of
the General Partner or its representatives. Each and every
certificate, document or other instrument executed on behalf of
the Partnership by the General Partner or its representatives
shall be conclusive evidence in favor of any and every Person
relying thereon or claiming thereunder that (a) at the time
of the execution and delivery of such certificate, document or
instrument, this Agreement was in full force and effect,
(b) the Person executing and delivering such certificate,
document or instrument was duly authorized and empowered to do
so for and on behalf of the Partnership and (c) such
certificate, document or instrument was duly executed and
delivered in accordance with the terms and provisions of this
Agreement and is binding upon the Partnership.
Section 7.4 Compensation
and Reimbursement of the General Partner
(a) Except as provided in this Section 7.4 or
elsewhere in this Agreement or any other agreement contemplated
or permitted hereby or thereby, the General Partner shall not be
compensated for its services as General Partner to the
Partnership.
(b) The General Partner shall be promptly reimbursed for
all Designated Expenses, in addition to any reimbursement as a
result of indemnification in accordance with Section 7.12.
The General Partner shall determine such Designated Expenses in
any reasonable manner determined by it.
(c) The General Partner may propose and adopt, without the
approval of the Limited Partners, fringe benefit plans,
including, without limitation, plans comparable to those that
covered employees employed by the predecessors to the Operating
Partnerships and plans involving the issuance of Units, for the
benefit of employees of the Partnership Group and Services
Company in respect of services performed, or obligated to be
performed, directly or indirectly, for the benefit of the
Partnership Group.
Section 7.5 Purchase
or Sale of LP Units and Other Partnership Securities
The General Partner may, on behalf of the Partnership, purchase
or otherwise acquire or sell or otherwise dispose of LP Units
and other Partnership Securities. As long as LP Units are held
by any member of the Partnership Group, such LP Units or other
Partnership Securities shall not be considered outstanding for
any purpose.
Section 7.6 [Reserved]
Section 7.7 Outside
Activities; Contracts with Affiliates; Loans to or from
Affiliates
(a) The General Partner shall not have any business
interests or engage in any business activities except for those
relating to the Partnership and the Operating Partnerships.
(b) Any Affiliate of the General Partner and any director,
officer, manager, member, partner or employee of the General
Partner or any of its Affiliates shall be entitled to and may
have business interests and engage in business activities in
addition to those relating to the Partnership, including
business interests and activities
B-14
in direct competition with the Partnership Group, for their own
account and for the account of others, without having or
incurring any obligation to offer any interest in such
businesses or activities to the Partnership Group or any
Partner. No member of the Partnership Group nor any of the
Partners shall have any rights by virtue of this Agreement or
the partnership relationship governed hereby in any such
business interests.
(c) Each of the Limited Partners hereby approves, ratifies
and confirms the execution, delivery and performance of the
Operating Partnership Agreements, and the Management Agreements
and agrees that the General Partner is authorized to execute,
deliver and perform the other agreements, acts, transactions and
matters described therein on behalf of the Partnership without
the approval or vote of any Limited Partners, notwithstanding
any other provision of this Agreement or the Operating
Partnership Agreements.
(d) The Partnership may lend or contribute to any Group
Member, and any Group Member may borrow from the Partnership,
funds on terms and conditions established by the General
Partner; provided, however, that the Partnership may not charge
the Group Member interest at a rate less than the rate that
would be charged to the Group Member (without reference to the
Group Members financial abilities or guarantees) by
unrelated lenders on comparable loans. The foregoing authority
shall be exercised by the General Partner shall not create any
right or benefit in favor of any Group Member or any other
Person.
Section 7.8 Tax
Basis and Value Determinations
To the extent that the General Partner is required pursuant to
the provisions of this Agreement to establish fair market values
or allocate amounts realized, tax basis, Agreed Values or Net
Agreed Values, the General Partner shall establish such values
and make such allocations in a manner that is reasonable and
fair to the Limited Partners, taking into account all applicable
laws, governmental regulations, rulings and decisions. The
General Partner may modify or revise such allocations in order
to comply with such laws, governmental regulations, rulings or
decisions or to the extent it otherwise deems such modification
or revision appropriate or necessary. The General Partner is
authorized, to the extent deemed by it to be appropriate or
necessary, to utilize the services of an independent appraiser
in establishing such values or allocations and the General
Partner shall in such cases be entitled to rely on the values or
allocations established by such independent appraiser.
Section 7.9 Resolution
of Conflicts of Interest; Standard of Care
(a) Unless otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement
or any other agreement contemplated hereby, whenever a conflict
of interest exists or arises between the General Partner or any
of its Affiliates, on the one hand, and the Partnership or any
Limited Partner, on the other hand, any resolution or course of
action by the General Partner or such Affiliate in respect of
such conflict of interest shall be permitted and deemed approved
by all Partners, and shall not constitute a breach of this
Agreement or of any agreement contemplated hereby, or of a duty
stated or implied by law or equity, if the resolution or course
of action is, or by operation of this Agreement is deemed to be,
fair and reasonable to the Partnership; provided that any
conflict of interest and any resolution of such conflict of
interest shall be conclusively deemed fair and reasonable to the
Partnership if such conflict of interest or resolution is
(i) approved by Special Approval (as long as the material
facts known to the officers and directors of the General Partner
regarding any proposed transaction were disclosed to the Audit
Committee at the time of its approval), (ii) on terms
objectively demonstrable to be no less favorable to the
Partnership than those generally being provided to or available
from unrelated third parties, or (iii) fair to the
Partnership, taking into account the totality of the
relationships among the parties involved (including other
transactions that may be particularly favorable or advantageous
to the Partnership). For the avoidance of doubt, in connection
with its resolution of a conflict of interest the General
Partner is authorized but not required to seek Special Approval
and may adopt a resolution or course of action that has not
received Special Approval. In connection with the determination
by the General Partner (or the Audit Committee in connection
with Special Approval, as applicable) of what is fair and
reasonable to the Partnership in connection with its resolution
of a conflict of interest, the General Partner (or the Audit
Committee) shall be authorized to consider (A) the relative
interests of each party to such conflict, agreement, transaction
or situation, and the benefits and burdens relating to such
interests; (B) any customary or accepted industry
practices, and any customary or historical dealings with a
particular Person; (C) any applicable generally accepted
accounting or engineering practices or principles; and
(D) such additional factors as the Audit
B-15
Committee determines to be relevant, reasonable or appropriate
under the circumstances. Nothing contained in this Agreement,
however, is intended to, nor shall it be construed to require
the General Partner (or the Audit Committee) to consider the
interests of any Person other than the Partnership. In the
absence of bad faith by the General Partner, the resolution,
action or terms so made, taken or provided by the General
Partner in compliance with this Section 7.9 shall not
constitute a breach of this Agreement or any other agreement
contemplated hereby or a breach of any standard of care or duty
imposed hereby or under the Delaware Act or any other applicable
law, rule or regulation.
(b) Whenever a particular transaction, arrangement or
resolution of a conflict of interest is required under this
Agreement or any agreement contemplated hereby to be fair
and/or
reasonable to any Person, the fair
and/or
reasonable nature of such transaction, arrangement or resolution
shall be considered in the context of similar or related
transactions.
(c) Whenever the General Partner makes a determination or
takes or declines to take any other action, whether under this
Agreement, or any other agreement contemplated hereby or
otherwise, then unless another express standard is provided for
in this Agreement, the General Partner shall make such
determination or take or decline to take such other action in
good faith and shall not be subject to any other or different
standards imposed by this Agreement, any other agreement
contemplated hereby or under the Delaware Act or any other law,
rule or regulation or at equity. In order for a determination or
other action to be in good faith for purposes of
this Agreement, the Person or Persons making such determination
or taking or declining to take such other action must believe
that the determination or other action is in the best interests
of the Partnership.
Section 7.10 CPUC
and PPUC Approval
Until the Regulatory Trigger Date, the General Partner shall,
and shall cause the Partnership to, use its commercially
reasonable efforts to obtain the approval from the CPUC and PPUC
of the right of the Public Limited Partners to elect Public
Directors or to obtain reasonable assurances sufficient for the
Board of Directors to make a determination that such approval is
not required.
Section 7.11 Other
Matters Concerning the General Partner
(a) The General Partner (including the Audit Committee) may
rely and shall be protected in acting or refraining from acting
upon any certificate, document or other instrument believed by
it to be genuine and to have been signed or presented by the
proper party or parties.
(b) The General Partner (including the Audit Committee) may
consult with legal counsel, accountants, appraisers, management
consultants, investment bankers and other consultants and
advisors selected by it and shall be fully protected in relying
on any opinion or advice of any such Person as to matters which
the General Partner (including the Audit Committee) believes to
be within such Persons professional or expert competence
in connection with any action taken or suffered or omitted by
the General Partner (including the Audit Committee) hereunder in
good faith and in accordance with such opinion or advice.
(c) The General Partner (including the Audit Committee) may
exercise any of the powers granted to it by this Agreement and
perform any of the duties imposed upon it hereunder either
directly or by or through its agents, and the General Partner
(including the Audit Committee) shall not be responsible for any
misconduct or negligence on the part of any such agent appointed
by the General Partner in good faith.
Section 7.12 Limited
Liability; Indemnification
(a) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this
Agreement, and except to the extent required by applicable law,
no Indemnitee shall be liable to the Partnership or any Partner
for any action taken or omitted to be taken by such Indemnitee
in its capacity as a person of the type described in the
definition of the term, Indemnitee, provided that
such Indemnitee acted in good faith and such action or omission
does not involve the gross negligence or willful misconduct of
such Indemnitee. The termination of any action, suit or
proceeding by judgment, order, settlement, conviction or upon a
plea of nolo contendere, or its equivalent, shall not, of
itself, create a presumption that an Indemnitee did not act in
good faith or that an action or omission involves gross
negligence or willful misconduct.
B-16
(b) The Partnership shall, to the extent permitted by
applicable law, indemnify each Indemnitee against expenses
(including legal fees and expenses), judgments, fines and
amounts paid in settlement, actually and reasonably incurred by
such Indemnitee, in connection with any threatened, pending or
completed claim, demand, action, suit or proceeding to which
such Indemnitee was or is a party or is threatened to be made a
party, by reason of (i) such Indemnitees status as a
General Partner, any Affiliate of the General Partner, any
Person who is or was a director, officer, manager, member,
employee or agent of the General Partner or any such Affiliate,
or any Person who is or was serving at the request of the
General Partner or any such Affiliate as a director, officer,
manager, member, partner, trustee, employee or agent of another
Person (including any Person serving in such a role at Services
Company) or (ii) any action taken or omitted to be taken by
such Indemnitee in any capacity referred to in clause (i)
of this Section 7.12(b), relating to this Agreement or the
property, business, affairs or management of the Partnership
Group or Services Company (provided that the Indemnitee acted in
good faith and the act or omission which is the basis of such
claim, demand, action, suit or proceeding does not involve the
gross negligence or willful misconduct of such Indemnitee).
(c) Expenses (including legal fees and expenses) incurred
in defending any claim, demand, action, suit or proceeding
subject to Section 7.12(b) shall be paid by the Partnership
in advance of the final disposition of such claim, demand,
action, suit or proceeding upon receipt of an undertaking (which
need not be secured) by or on behalf of the Indemnitee to repay
such amount if it shall ultimately be determined, by a court of
competent jurisdiction, that the Indemnitee is not entitled to
be indemnified by the Partnership as authorized hereunder.
(d) The indemnification provided by Section 7.12(b)
shall be in addition to any other rights to which an Indemnitee
may be entitled, and shall continue as to an Indemnitee who has
ceased to serve in a capacity for which the Indemnitee is
entitled to indemnification and shall inure to the benefit of
the heirs, successors, assigns, administrators and personal
representatives of the Indemnitee.
(e) To the extent commercially reasonable, the Partnership
shall purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of the
Indemnitees against any liability which may be asserted against
or expense which may be incurred by an Indemnitee in connection
with the Partnership Groups activities, whether or not the
Partnership would have the power to indemnify an Indemnitee
against such liability under the provisions of this Agreement.
(f) An Indemnitee shall not be denied indemnification in
whole or in part under Section 7.12(b) because the
Indemnitee had an interest in the transaction with respect to
which the indemnification applies if the transaction was
otherwise permitted by the terms of this Agreement or any
predecessor agreement thereto, including a transaction involving
the General Partner, any Affiliate thereof or any member,
partner, officer, director, employee, agent, manager, or trustee
of any Group Member, Services Company, the General Partner or
any Affiliate of any Group Member.
(g) The provisions of this Section 7.12 are for the
benefit of the Indemnitees and the heirs, successors, assigns,
administrators and personal representatives of the Indemnitees
and shall not be deemed to create any rights for the benefit of
any other Persons.
(h) For purposes of this Section 7.12, the Partnership
shall be deemed to have requested an Indemnitee to serve as
fiduciary of an employee benefit plan whenever the performance
of duties by such Indemnitee for the Partnership also imposes
duties on, or otherwise involves services by, such Indemnitee to
the plan or participants or beneficiaries of the plan; excise
taxes assessed on an Indemnitee with respect to an employee
benefit plan pursuant to applicable law shall constitute
fines within the meaning of Section 7.12(b);
and action taken or omitted by an Indemnitee with respect to any
employee benefit plan in the performance of duties by such
Indemnitee for a purpose reasonably believed by such Indemnitee
to be in the interest of the participants and beneficiaries of
the plan shall be deemed to be for a purpose which does not
involve gross negligence or willful misconduct.
(i) In no event may an Indemnitee subject the Limited
Partners to personal liability by reason of the indemnification
provisions set forth in this Agreement.
B-17
(j) No amendment, modification or repeal of this
Section 7.12 or any provision hereof shall in any manner
terminate, reduce or impair the right of any past, present or
future Indemnitee to be indemnified by the Partnership, nor the
obligations of the Partnership to indemnify any such Indemnitee
under and in accordance with the provisions of this
Section 7.12, or any predecessor thereto, however numbered,
as in effect immediately prior to such amendment, modification
or repeal with respect to claims arising from or relating to
matters occurring, in whole or in part, prior to such amendment,
modification or repeal, regardless of when such claims may arise
or be asserted and provided that such Person became an
Indemnitee hereunder prior to such amendment, modification or
repeal.
ARTICLE VIII
RIGHTS AND
OBLIGATIONS OF LIMITED PARTNERS
Section 8.1 Limitation
of Liability
The Limited Partners shall have no liability under this
Agreement (including, without limitation, liability under
Section 7.12).
Section 8.2 Management
of Business
No Limited Partner shall, in its capacity as a Limited Partner,
take part in the operation, management or control (within the
meaning of the Delaware Act) of the Partnerships business,
transact any business in the Partnerships name or have the
power to sign documents for or otherwise bind the Partnership.
The transaction of any such business by a director, officer,
manager, member, employee or agent of the General Partner or an
Affiliate of the General Partner in such Persons capacity
as such (whether or not such Person is also a Limited Partner)
shall not affect, impair or eliminate the limitations on the
liability of the Limited Partners under this Agreement.
Section 8.3 Outside
Activities
Limited Partners shall be entitled to and may have business
interests and engage in business activities in addition to those
relating to the Partnership, including business interests and
activities in direct competition with the Partnership Group. No
member of the Partnership Group nor any of the other Partners
shall have any rights by virtue of this Agreement or the
partnership relationship created hereby in any business ventures
of any Limited Partner.
Section 8.4 Return
of Capital
No Limited Partner shall be entitled to the withdrawal or return
of its Capital Contribution, except to the extent, if any, that
distributions made pursuant to this Agreement or upon
termination of the Partnership may be considered as such by law
and then only to the extent provided for in this Agreement.
Section 8.5 Rights
of Limited Partners Relating to the Partnership
In addition to other rights provided by this Agreement or by
applicable law, each Limited Partner shall have the right for a
proper purpose reasonably related to such Limited Partners
interest in the Partnership, upon reasonable demand and at such
Limited Partners own expense:
(a) to obtain true and full information regarding the
status of the business and financial condition of the
Partnership;
(b) promptly after becoming available, to obtain a copy of
the Partnerships federal and state income tax returns for
each year;
(c) to obtain a current list of the name and address of
each Partner as set forth in the Units Register;
(d) to obtain a description and statement of the Net Agreed
Value of any Capital Contribution made or agreed to be made by
each Partner, and the date on which such Partner became a
Partner;
B-18
(e) to obtain a copy of this Agreement and the Certificate
of Limited Partnership and all amendments thereto, together with
executed copies of any powers of attorney pursuant to which this
Agreement, the Certificate of Limited Partnership and all
amendments thereto have been executed; and
(f) to obtain such other information regarding the affairs
of the Partnership as may be just and reasonable;
provided, however, that the General Partner may keep
confidential from the Limited Partners, for such period of time
as the General Partner deems reasonable, any information which
the General Partner reasonably believes to be in the nature of
trade secrets or other information the disclosure of which the
General Partner in good faith believes could damage the
Partnership or its business or be in violation of applicable
law, including, without limitation, federal securities law, or
which the Partnership is required by agreements with third
parties to keep confidential.
ARTICLE IX
BOOKS,
RECORDS, ACCOUNTING AND REPORTS
Section 9.1 Books,
Records and Accounting
The General Partner shall keep or cause to be kept books and
records with respect to the Partnerships business, which
books and records shall at all times be kept at the principal
office of the Partnership. Any books and records maintained by
the Partnership in the regular course of its business, including
the Units Register, books of account and records of Partnership
proceedings, may be kept on, or be in the form of, punch cards,
disks, magnetic tape, photographs, micrographics or any other
information storage device, provided that the records so kept
are convertible into clearly legible written form within a
reasonable period of time. The books of the Partnership shall be
maintained, for financial reporting purposes, on the accrual
basis, or on a cash basis adjusted periodically to an accrual
basis, as the General Partner shall determine, in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles and applicable law.
Section 9.2 Fiscal
Year
The fiscal year of the Partnership for financial reporting
purposes shall be the calendar year, unless the General Partner
shall determine otherwise.
Section 9.3 Reports
(a) As soon as practicable, but in no event later than
90 days after the close of each fiscal year, the General
Partner shall cause to be mailed or made available, by any
reasonable means, to each Record Holder of LP Units as of the
last day of that fiscal year reports containing financial
statements of the Partnership for the fiscal year, presented in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,
including a balance sheet, statement of income, statement of
Partners capital and statement of changes in financial
position, such statements to be audited by a nationally
recognized firm of independent public accountants selected by
the General Partner.
(b) As soon as practicable, but in no event later than
45 days after the close of each calendar quarter, except
the last calendar quarter of each fiscal year, the General
Partner shall cause the Partnership to electronically file with
the Securities and Exchange Commission a quarterly report for
the calendar quarter containing such financial and other
information as the General Partner deems appropriate.
(c) Such reports shall present the consolidated financial
position of the Partnership Group, together with Services
Company and such other Persons as may be required by generally
accepted accounting principles.
(d) The General Partner shall be deemed to have made a
report available to each Record Holder as required by this
Section 9.3 if it has either (i) electronically filed
such report with the Securities and Exchange Commission via its
Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis and Retrieval system and
such report is publicly available on such system or
(ii) made such report available on any publicly available
website maintained by the Partnership.
B-19
ARTICLE X
ISSUANCE OF
LP CERTIFICATES; TRANSFER AND EXCHANGE OF LP UNITS
Section 10.1 Initial
Issuance of LP Certificates
Upon the issuance of LP Units to any Person, the Partnership may
(and will upon request of an owner of LP Units) issue one or
more LP Certificates in the name of such Person evidencing the
number of such LP Units being so issued. LP Certificates shall
be executed on behalf of the Partnership by the General Partner.
No LP Certificate shall be valid for any purpose until manually
countersigned by the Transfer Agent.
Section 10.2 Registration,
Registration of Transfer and Exchange
(a) The Partnership will cause to be kept a register (the
Units Register) in which, subject to such reasonable
regulations as it may prescribe and subject to the provisions of
Section 10.2(b), the Partnership will provide for the
registration of LP Units and of transfers of such LP Units. The
Transfer Agent is hereby appointed registrar for the purpose of
registering LP Units and transfers of such LP Units as herein
provided.
Upon surrender for registration of transfer or exchange of any
LP Certificate, and subject to the provisions of
Section 10.2(b), the General Partner on behalf of the
Partnership will execute, and the Transfer Agent will
countersign and deliver, in the name of the holder or the
designated transferee or transferees, as required pursuant to
the holders instructions, one or more new LP Certificates
evidencing the same aggregate number of LP Units as did the LP
Certificate so surrendered.
(b) Every LP Certificate surrendered for registration of
transfer or exchange shall be duly endorsed on the reverse side
thereof, or be accompanied by a written instrument of transfer
in form satisfactory to the General Partner or the Transfer
Agent, as the case may be, duly executed, in either case by the
holder thereof or such holders attorney duly authorized in
writing. Every LP Certificate surrendered for registration of
transfer shall be duly accepted on the reverse side thereof, or
be accompanied by a written instrument of acceptance to the same
effect in form satisfactory to the General Partner or the
Transfer Agent, as the case may be, duly executed, in either
case by the transferee or such transferees attorney duly
authorized in writing. As a condition to the issuance of any new
LP Certificate under this Section 10.2, the General Partner
may require the payment of a sum sufficient to cover any tax or
other governmental charge that may be imposed in relation
thereto.
Section 10.3 Mutilated,
Destroyed, Lost or Stolen LP Certificates
(a) If any mutilated LP Certificate is surrendered to the
Transfer Agent, the General Partner on behalf of the Partnership
shall execute and the Transfer Agent shall countersign and
deliver in exchange therefor a new LP Certificate evidencing the
same number of LP Units as did the LP Certificate so surrendered.
(b) If there shall be delivered to the General Partner and
the Transfer Agent (i) evidence to their satisfaction of
the destruction, loss or theft of any LP Certificate and
(ii) such security or indemnity as may be required by them
to save each of them and any of their agents harmless, then, in
the absence of notice to the General Partner or the Transfer
Agent that such LP Certificate has been acquired by a bona fide
purchaser, the General Partner on behalf of the Partnership
shall execute and upon its request the Transfer Agent shall
countersign and deliver, in lieu of any such destroyed, lost or
stolen Certificate, a new LP Certificate evidencing the same
number of LP Units as did the LP Certificate so destroyed, lost
or stolen.
(c) As a condition to the issuance of any new LP
Certificate under this Section 10.3, the General Partner
may require the payment of a sum sufficient to cover any tax or
other governmental charge that may be imposed in relation
thereto and any other expenses (including the fees and expenses
of the Transfer Agent) connected therewith.
(d) Every new LP Certificate issued pursuant to this
Section 10.3 in lieu of any destroyed, lost or stolen LP
Certificate shall evidence an original additional Partnership
Interest in the Partnership, whether or not the destroyed, lost
or stolen LP Certificate shall be at any time enforceable by
anyone, and shall be entitled to all the benefits of this
Agreement equally and proportionately with any and all other LP
Units duly issued hereunder.
B-20
Section 10.4 Persons
Deemed Owners
Prior to due presentment of an LP Certificate for registration
of transfer and satisfaction of the requirements of
Section 10.2(b) with respect thereto, (a) the
Partnership, the General Partner, the Transfer Agent and any
agent of any of the foregoing may deem and treat the Record
Holder as the absolute owner thereof and of the LP Units
evidenced thereby for all purposes whatsoever and (b) a
transferee shall not be entitled to distributions or allocations
or any other rights in respect of the LP Units evidenced thereby
other than the right to further transfer such LP Units.
Section 10.5 Prohibited
Transfers
Subject to Section 13.2, neither the Partnership nor any of
its Affiliates shall transfer any or all of the limited
liability company interests of the General Partner and the
General Partner shall not transfer the GP Interest to any Person
whatsoever.
ARTICLE XI
[RESERVED]
ARTICLE XII
ADMISSION OF
SUBSTITUTED AND ADDITIONAL LIMITED PARTNERS
Section 12.1 [Reserved]
Section 12.2 Admission
of Substituted Limited Partners
A transferee of LP Units shall automatically be admitted to the
Partnership as a Limited Partner (and the transferor of such LP
Units shall, if such transferor is assigning all of such
transferors LP Units, automatically cease to be a Limited
Partner) at and as of the time the transfer is registered on the
Units Register pursuant to Section 10.2.
Section 12.3 Admission
of Successor General Partner
A successor General Partner approved pursuant to
Section 13.1 or the proviso to Section 14.1 shall be
admitted to the Partnership as the successor General Partner,
effective as of the date an amendment or restatement of the
Certificate of Limited Partnership is filed with the Secretary
of State of the State of Delaware effecting such substitution;
provided, however, that no such successor shall be so admitted
to the Partnership until it has agreed in writing to assume the
former General Partners obligations hereunder. This
Agreement and the Certificate of Limited Partnership shall be
amended as appropriate to reflect the termination of the former
General Partner as a general partner, if applicable, and the
admission of the successor General Partner.
Section 12.4 Admission
of Additional Limited Partners
By acceptance of the transfer of any LP Units in accordance with
this Agreement or the issuance of any LP Units pursuant to this
Agreement (including in connection with a merger or
consolidation), each transferee of an LP Unit and each Person
who is issued LP Units pursuant to this Agreement (including in
connection with a merger or consolidation) (including any
nominee holder or an agent or representative acquiring LP Units
for the account of another Person) (i) shall be admitted to
the Partnership as a Limited Partner with respect to the LP
Units so transferred or issued to such Person when any such
transfer, issuance or admission is reflected in the books and
records of the Partnership, with or without execution of this
Agreement, (ii) shall become bound by the terms of, and
shall be deemed to have executed, this Agreement,
(iii) shall become the Record Holder of the LP Units so
transferred or issued, (iv) represents that the transferee
or Person being issued such LP Units has the capacity, power and
authority to enter into this Agreement, (v) grants the
powers of attorney set forth in this Agreement and
(vi) makes the consents and waivers contained in this
Agreement. The transfer of any LP Units, the issuance of any LP
Units pursuant to this Agreement, and the admission of any new
Limited Partner shall not constitute an amendment to this
Agreement. A Person may be admitted as a Limited Partner or
become a record holder of LP Units without the consent or
approval of any of the Partners.
B-21
Section 12.5 Amendment
of Agreement and Certificate of Limited Partnership
The General Partner shall take all steps necessary and
appropriate under the Delaware Act to amend the records of the
Partnership and, if necessary, this Agreement and the
Certificate of Limited Partnership to reflect the admission of
any Partner.
ARTICLE XIII
WITHDRAWAL
OR REMOVAL OF THE GENERAL PARTNER
Section 13.1 Withdrawal
or Removal of the General Partner
(a) Buckeye GP LLC agrees to act as General Partner of the
Partnership until the later of (i) the date which is
twenty-five years after the Time of Delivery or (ii) the
date the ESOP Loan is paid in full. At any time after the later
of (i) the date which is twenty-five years after the Time
of Delivery or (ii) the date the ESOP Loan is paid in full,
the General Partner may withdraw from the Partnership effective
upon at least 90 days advance written notice to the
Limited Partners, such withdrawal to take effect on the date
specified in such notice, provided that such withdrawal is
approved by an Eighty Percent Interest or the Partnership has
received an Opinion of Counsel that such withdrawal would not
result in the loss of limited liability of any Limited Partner
or result in the Partnership or any Operating Partnership being
treated as an association taxable as a corporation for federal
income tax purposes. Any such withdrawal shall also constitute
the withdrawal of the OLP GP from the Operating Partnerships, as
provided in the Operating Partnership Agreements. If the General
Partner gives a notice of withdrawal, a Majority Interest may,
prior to the effective date of such withdrawal, approve a
successor General Partner. The Person so approved (or its
designated Affiliates) shall become the successor general
partner or partners of the Operating Partnerships, as provided
in the Operating Partnership Agreements. If no successor General
Partner is so approved, the Partnership shall be dissolved
pursuant to Section 14.1. Buckeye GP LLC further agrees
that it shall not cause the OLP GP to withdraw as general
partner of any Operating Partnership, except in connection with
Buckeye GP LLCs withdrawal as General Partner.
(b) The General Partner may be removed only by an Eighty
Percent Interest, and only if (i) in connection therewith,
a successor General Partner is approved by a Majority Interest,
(ii) the Partnership shall have received an Opinion of
Counsel that the removal of the General Partner and the approval
of a successor General Partner will not result in the loss of
limited liability of any Limited Partner or cause the
Partnership or any of the Operating Partnerships to be treated
as an association taxable as a corporation for federal income
tax purposes, (iii) the successor General Partner or an
Affiliate thereof agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the
General Partner and its Affiliates from any liability or
obligation arising out of, or causes the General Partner and its
Affiliates to be released from, any and all liabilities and
obligations (including loan guarantees) under fringe benefit
plans sponsored by the General Partner or any of its Affiliates
in connection with the business of the Partnership Group, except
as otherwise prohibited by this Agreement, and (iv) all
required regulatory approvals for removal of the General Partner
shall have been obtained. Such removal shall be effective upon
the admission of the successor General Partner pursuant to
Section 12.3. The Person so approved (or its designated
Affiliates) shall become the successor general partner or
partners of the Operating Partnerships, as provided in the
Operating Partnership Agreements.
Section 13.2 Sale
of Former General Partners Interest
If a successor General Partner is approved pursuant to
Sections 13.1 or 14.2 or the proviso to Section 14.1,
such successor shall purchase the GP Interest of the former
General Partner for an amount in cash equal to the fair market
value thereof, determined as of the date the successor General
Partner is admitted pursuant to Section 12.3. The fair
market value of the GP Interest shall include the value of all
rights associated with being the General Partner. The value of
the GP Interest shall be reduced by the value of the assumption
by the successor General Partner or its Affiliate of the
obligations of the General Partner and its Affiliates pursuant
to Section 13.1(b)(iii). Such fair market value shall be
determined by agreement between the former General Partner and
its successor or, failing agreement within 30 days after
the date the successor General Partner is so admitted, by a firm
of independent appraisers jointly selected by the former General
Partner and its successor
B-22
(or, if the former General Partner and its successor cannot
agree on the selection of such a firm within 45 days after
the date the successor General Partner is so admitted, by a firm
of independent appraisers selected by two firms, one of which
will be selected by the former General Partner and the other of
which will be selected by the successor).
ARTICLE XIV
DISSOLUTION
AND LIQUIDATION
Section 14.1 Dissolution
The Partnership shall be dissolved, and its affairs shall be
wound up, upon:
(a) expiration of the term as provided in Section 2.5;
(b) withdrawal of the General Partner pursuant to
Section 13.1 (unless a Person becomes a successor General
Partner prior to or on the effective date of such withdrawal);
(c) bankruptcy or dissolution of the General Partner, or
any other event that results in the General Partner ceasing to
be a general partner in the Partnership (other than by reason of
a withdrawal or removal pursuant to Section 13.1); or
(d) an election by the General Partner to dissolve the
Partnership which is approved by a Two-Thirds Interest;
provided, however, that the Partnership shall not be dissolved
upon an event described in Sections 14.1(b) or 14.1(c) if,
within 90 days of such event, all Partners agree in writing
to continue the business of the Partnership and to the
appointment of a successor General Partner.
For purposes of this Section 14.1, bankruptcy of the
General Partner shall be deemed to have occurred when
(i) it commences a voluntary proceeding seeking
liquidation, reorganization or other relief under any
bankruptcy, insolvency or other similar law now or hereafter in
effect, (ii) it seeks, consents to or acquiesces in the
appointment of a trustee, receiver or liquidator for it or for
all or any substantial part of its properties, (iii) it is
adjudged a bankrupt or insolvent, or has entered against it a
final and nonappealable order for relief, under any bankruptcy,
insolvency or similar law now or hereafter in effect,
(iv) it executes and delivers a general assignment for the
benefit of its creditors, (v) it files an answer or other
pleading admitting or failing to contest the material
allegations of a petition filed against it in any involuntary
proceeding of the nature described in clause (i) above, or
(vi) (1) any involuntary proceeding of the nature described
in clause (i) above has not been dismissed 120 days
after the commencement thereof, (2) the appointment without
its consent or acquiescence of a trustee, receiver or liquidator
for it or for all or any substantial part of its properties has
not been vacated or stayed within 90 days of such
appointment, or (3) such appointment has been stayed but is
not vacated within 90 days after the expiration of any such
stay.
Section 14.2 Reconstitution
Upon dissolution of the Partnership in accordance with
Sections 14.1(b) or 14.1(c), and a failure of all Partners
to agree to continue the business of the Partnership and to the
appointment of a successor General Partner as provided in the
proviso to Section 14.1, then within 180 days after
the event described in Sections 14.1(b) or 14.1(c), a
Majority Interest may elect to reconstitute the Partnership and
continue its business by forming a new partnership on terms
identical to those set forth in this Agreement and having as a
general partner a Person approved by a Majority Interest. Upon
any such election by a Majority Interest, all Partners shall be
bound thereby and shall be deemed to have consented thereto.
Unless such an election is made within such
180-day
period, the Partnership shall conduct only activities necessary
to wind up its affairs. If such an election is made within such
180-day
period, then (a) the reconstituted partnership shall
continue until the end of the term set forth in Section 2.5
unless earlier dissolved in accordance with this
Article XIV and (b) all necessary steps shall be taken
to cancel this Agreement and the Certificate of Limited
Partnership and to enter into a new partnership agreement and
certificate of limited partnership, and the successor general
partner may for this purpose exercise the powers of attorney
granted the General Partner pursuant to this
B-23
Agreement; provided that the right of a Majority Interest to
reconstitute and to continue the business of the Partnership
shall not exist and may not be exercised unless the Partnership
has received an Opinion of Counsel that (i) the exercise of
the right would not result in the loss of limited liability of
any Limited Partner and (ii) neither the Partnership nor
the reconstituted partnership would be treated as an association
taxable as a corporation for federal income tax purposes.
Section 14.3 Liquidation
Upon dissolution of the Partnership, unless the Partnership is
reconstituted pursuant to Section 14.2, the General
Partner, or in the event the General Partner has withdrawn from
the Partnership, been removed or dissolved or become bankrupt
(as defined in Section 14.1), a liquidator or liquidating
committee approved by a Majority Interest shall be the
liquidator of the Partnership (the Liquidator). The
Liquidator (if other than the General Partner) shall be entitled
to receive such compensation for its services as may be approved
by a Majority Interest. The Liquidator shall agree not to resign
at any time without 15 days prior written notice and
(if other than the General Partner) may be removed at any time,
with or without cause, by notice of removal approved by a
Majority Interest. Upon dissolution, resignation or removal of
the Liquidator, a successor and substitute Liquidator (who shall
have and succeed to all rights, powers and obligations of the
original Liquidator) shall, within 30 days thereafter, be
approved by a Majority Interest. Except as expressly provided in
this Article XIV, the Liquidator approved in the manner
provided herein shall have and may exercise, without further
authorization or approval of any of the parties hereto, all of
the powers conferred upon the General Partner under the terms of
this Agreement (but subject to all of the applicable
limitations, contractual and otherwise, upon the exercise of
such powers, other than the restrictions set forth in
Article XVII) to the extent appropriate or necessary
in the good faith judgment of the Liquidator to carry out the
duties and functions of the Liquidator hereunder for and during
such period of time as shall be reasonably required in the good
faith judgment of the Liquidator to complete the
winding-up
and liquidation of the Partnership as provided for herein. The
Liquidator shall liquidate the assets of the Partnership and
apply and distribute the proceeds of such liquidation in the
following order of priority, unless otherwise required by
mandatory provisions of applicable law:
(a) to creditors of the Partnership (including
Partners); and
(b) to the Partners, in proportion to and to the extent of
the positive balances in their respective Capital Accounts;
provided, however, that the Liquidator may place in escrow a
reserve of cash or other assets of the Partnership for
contingent liabilities in an amount determined by the Liquidator
to be appropriate for such purposes.
Section 14.4 Distribution
in Kind
Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 14.3 requiring
the liquidation of the assets of the Partnership, but subject to
the order of priorities set forth therein, if on dissolution of
the Partnership the Liquidator determines that an immediate sale
of part or all of the Partnerships assets would be
impractical or would cause undue loss to the Partners, the
Liquidator may, in its sole discretion, defer for a reasonable
time the liquidation of any assets except those necessary to
satisfy liabilities of the Partnership and may, in its sole
discretion, distribute to the Partners, or to specific classes
of Partners, as tenants in common, in lieu of cash, and as their
interests may appear in accordance with the provisions of
Section 14.3(b), undivided interests in such Partnership
assets as the Liquidator deems not suitable for liquidation. Any
distributions in kind shall be subject to such conditions
relating to the disposition and management thereof as the
Liquidator deems reasonable and equitable and to any joint
ownership agreements or other agreements governing the ownership
and operation of such properties at such time. The Liquidator
shall determine the fair market value of any property
distributed in kind using such reasonable method of valuation as
it may adopt.
Section 14.5 Cancellation
of Certificate of Limited Partnership
Upon the completion of the distribution of Partnership property
pursuant to Sections 14.3 and 14.4, the Partnership shall
be terminated, and the Liquidator (or the Limited Partners if
necessary) shall cause the cancellation of the Certificate of
Limited Partnership and all qualifications of the Partnership as
a foreign
B-24
limited partnership in jurisdictions other than the State of
Delaware and shall take such other actions as may be necessary
to terminate the Partnership.
Section 14.6 Return
of Capital
The General Partner shall not be personally liable for the
return of the Capital Contributions of the Limited Partners, or
any portion thereof, it being expressly understood that any such
return shall be made solely from Partnership assets.
Section 14.7 Waiver
of Partition
Each Partner hereby waives any rights to partition of the
Partnership property.
Section 14.8 Certain
Prohibited Acts
Without obtaining Special Approval, the General Partner shall
not take any action to cause the Partnership to (i) make or
consent to a general assignment for the benefit of the
Partnerships creditors; (ii) file or consent to the
filing of any bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization petition
for relief under the United States Bankruptcy Code naming the
Partnership or otherwise seek, with respect to the Partnership,
relief from debts or protection from creditors generally;
(iii) file or consent to the filing of a petition or answer
seeking for the Partnership a liquidation, dissolution,
arrangement, or similar relief under any law; (iv) file an
answer or other pleading admitting or failing to contest the
material allegations of a petition filed against the Partnership
in a proceeding of the type described in clauses (i)
(iii) of this Section 14.8; (v) seek, consent to
or acquiesce in the appointment of a receiver, liquidator,
conservator, assignee, trustee, sequestrator, custodian or any
similar official for the Partnership or for all or any
substantial portion of its properties; (vi) sell all or
substantially all of its assets, except in accordance with
Section 17.3; (vii) dissolve or liquidate, except in
accordance with this Article XIV; or (viii) merge or
consolidate.
ARTICLE XV
AMENDMENT OF
PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
Section 15.1 Amendments
Which May be Adopted Solely by the General Partner
Subject to Section 15.3, the General Partner may amend any
provision of this Agreement without the consent of any Limited
Partner, and may execute, swear to, acknowledge, deliver, file
and record whatever documents may be required in connection
therewith, to reflect:
(a) a change in the name of the Partnership, in the
location of the principal place of business of the Partnership
or in the registered office or registered agent of the
Partnership;
(b) a change that the General Partner deems appropriate or
necessary to (i) qualify, or continue the qualification of,
the Partnership as a limited partnership (or a partnership in
which the Limited Partners have limited liability) under the
laws of any state or jurisdiction or (ii) ensure that
neither the Partnership nor any of the Operating Partnerships
will be treated as an association taxable as a corporation for
federal income tax purposes;
(c) a change to divide outstanding Units into a greater
number of Units, to combine outstanding Units into a smaller
number of Units or to reclassify Units in a manner that in the
good faith opinion of the General Partner, does not adversely
affect any class of Limited Partners in any material respect;
(d) a change that the General Partner deems appropriate or
necessary to (i) satisfy any requirements, conditions or
guidelines contained in any order, rule or regulation of any
federal or state agency or contained in any federal or state
statute or (ii) facilitate the trading of any Units or
comply with any rule, regulation, requirement, condition or
guideline of any National Securities Exchange on which any Units
are or will be listed or admitted to trading;
(e) a change that is appropriate or necessary, as stated in
an Opinion of Counsel, to prevent the Group Members and their
respective directors and officers from in any manner being
subjected to the
B-25
provisions of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended,
the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended, or plan
asset regulations adopted under the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, whether or not
substantially similar to plan asset regulations currently
applied or proposed by the United States Department of Labor;
(f) a change that is required or contemplated by any
provision of this Agreement, including, without limitation,
Sections 4.3, 12.3 and 12.5;
(g) a change that in the good faith opinion of the General
Partner does not adversely affect the Limited Partners in any
material respect; or
(h) any changes or events similar to the foregoing.
Section 15.2 Other
Amendments
Amendments to this Agreement may be proposed only by the General
Partner. Subject to Section 15.3, a proposed amendment
(other than amendments adopted pursuant to Section 15.1)
shall be effective only when approved by a Majority Interest.
Notwithstanding the provisions of Sections 15.1 and 15.3,
no amendment of (i) the definitions of Audit
Committee, or Special Approval,
(ii) Section 7.6, (iii) Section 17.3,
(iv) Section 7.9(a), (v) Section 14.8, or
(vi) any other provision of this Agreement requiring that
Special Approval be obtained as a condition to any action, shall
be effective without first obtaining Special Approval.
Section 15.3 Amendment
Requirements
Notwithstanding the provisions of Sections 15.1 and 15.2,
(i) the approval of an Eighty Percent Interest shall be
required for any amendment unless the Partnership has received
an Opinion of Counsel that such amendment would not result in
the loss of limited liability of any Limited Partner or result
in the Partnership or any Operating Partnership being treated as
an association taxable as a corporation for federal income tax
purposes, (ii) no provision of this Agreement which
establishes a percentage of the Limited Partners required to
take or approve any action shall be amended in any respect which
would have the affect of reducing the voting requirement, unless
such amendment is approved by at least such percentage of
Limited Partners, and (iii) this Section 15.3 shall be
amended only with the approval of an Eighty Percent Interest.
ARTICLE XVI
MEETINGS
Section 16.1 Meetings
(a) Special meetings of Limited Partners may be called by
the General Partner or by Limited Partners holding an aggregate
of at least 20% of the outstanding LP Units. Within 60 days
after receipt by the General Partner of a written proposal to
call a meeting signed by Limited Partners holding the requisite
number of LP Units and indicating the purpose for which the
meeting is to be called (or such longer period as shall be
reasonably required by the General Partner in order to prepare
documents required therefor), the General Partner shall cause a
notice of the meeting to be given to each Limited Partner. A
special meeting shall be held at a time and place determined by
the General Partner within 60 days after the giving of
notice of the meeting.
(b) (i) After the Regulatory Trigger Date, an annual
meeting of the Limited Partners for the election of Public
Directors by the Public Limited Partners and such other matters
as the Board of Directors shall submit to a vote of the Limited
Partners shall be held on the first Tuesday in June of each year
(provided that if the Regulatory Trigger Date occurs after
February 1 of any year, no annual meeting will be held in
that year) or at such other date and time as may be fixed from
time to time by the General Partner at such place within or
without the State of Delaware as may be fixed from time to time
by the General Partner and all as stated in the notice of the
meeting. Notice of the annual meeting shall be given in
accordance with Section 16.2 not less than 10 days nor
more than 60 days prior to the date of such meeting.
B-26
(ii) After the Regulatory Trigger Date, the Public Limited
Partners shall have the right to vote for the election of Public
Directors. The Public Limited Partners entitled to vote shall
elect by a plurality of the votes cast at such meeting (not
counting abstentions) persons to serve as Public Directors on
the Board of Directors who are nominated in accordance with the
provisions of this Section 16.1(b). The exercise by a
Limited Partner of the right to elect the Public Directors and
any other rights afforded to a Limited Partner under this
Section 16.1(b) shall be in such Limited Partners
capacity as a limited partner of the Partnership and shall not
cause a Limited Partner to be deemed to be taking part in the
management and control of the business and affairs of the
Partnership so as to jeopardize such Limited Partners
limited liability under the Delaware Act or the law of any other
state in which the Partnership is qualified to do business.
(iii) After the Regulatory Trigger Date, each Limited
Partner shall be entitled to one vote for each LP Unit that is
registered in the name of such Limited Partner on the record
date for such meeting.
(iv) After the Effective Time, and after giving effect to
the Merger, the adoption of the Holdco Partnership Agreement
(and the Holdco Partnership Agreement shall also provide as
follows) and after the Regulatory Trigger Date:
(A) on an ongoing basis, the Public Limited Partners have
the right to elect all of the Directors other than the Holdco GP
Directors;
(B) for so long as BGH GP Holdings, ArcLight Capital
Partners, LLC and Kelso & Company and their Affiliates
(directly and indirectly), collectively, own 85.0% or more of
the number of LP Units owned by such Persons immediately after
the Effective Time, Holdco GP shall have the right to appoint
two Directors;
(C) for so long as BGH GP Holdings, ArcLight Capital
Partners, LLC and Kelso & Company and their Affiliates
(directly and indirectly), collectively, own 42.5% or more of
the number of LP Units owned by such Persons immediately after
the Effective Time, but less than 85.0% of the number of LP
Units owned by such Persons immediately after the Effective
Time, Holdco GP shall have the right to appoint one Director;
(D) upon BGH GP Holdings, ArcLight Capital Partners, LLC
and Kelso & Company and their Affiliates (directly and
indirectly), collectively, ceasing to own 85.0% or more of the
number of LP Units owned by such Persons immediately after the
Effective Time, Holdco GP shall designate one of the two Holdco
GP Directors to be removed, and Holdco shall cause such Holdco
GP Director to resign or be removed from the Board of
Directors; and
(E) upon BGH GP Holdings, ArcLight Capital Partners, LLC
and Kelso & Company and their Affiliates (directly and
indirectly), collectively, ceasing to own 42.5% or more of the
number of LP Units owned by such Persons immediately after the
Effective Time, Holdco shall cause any remaining Holdco GP
Director(s) to resign or be removed from the Board of Directors,
and thereafter the Board of Directors shall consist only of
Public Directors.
(v) With respect to the election of Directors to the Board
of Directors after the Regulatory Trigger Date, if at any time
any Person or group (as defined for purposes of
Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act) beneficially owns 20%
or more of the outstanding LP Units, then all LP Units owned by
such Person or group in excess of 20% of the outstanding LP
Units shall not be voted, and in each case, the foregoing LP
Units shall not be counted when calculating the required votes
for such matter and shall not be deemed to be outstanding for
purposes of determining a quorum for such meeting (but such LP
Units shall not, however, be treated as a separate class of
Partnership Securities for purposes of this Agreement).
Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence, the Board of Directors
may, by action specifically referencing votes for the election
of Directors under this Section 16.1(b), determine that the
limitation set forth in the preceding sentence shall not apply
to a specific Person or group.
(vi) Prior to the Regulatory Trigger Date, Holdco GP shall
have the right to appoint and remove the Directors in its sole
discretion. The number of Directors that shall constitute the
whole Board of Directors shall not be less than six and not more
than nine as shall be established from time to time by a
resolution
B-27
adopted by a majority of the Directors. The Public Directors
shall be divided into three classes, Class I,
Class II, and Class III by majority vote of the Public
Directors on or promptly after the Regulatory Trigger Date;
provided, however, that if the Regulatory Trigger
Date precedes the Effective Time or if the Effective Time occurs
on the Regulatory Trigger Date, such vote of the Public
Directors shall occur promptly following the Effective Time. The
number of Public Directors in each class shall be the whole
number contained in the quotient arrived at by dividing the
authorized number of Public Directors by three, and if a
fraction is also contained in such quotient, then if such
fraction is one-third, the extra director shall be a member of
Class I and if the fraction is two-thirds, one of the extra
directors shall be a member of Class I and the other shall
be a member of Class II. Each Public Director shall serve
for a term ending as provided herein; provided, however, that
the Public Directors designated to Class I shall serve for
an initial term that expires at the first annual meeting of
Limited Partners following the Regulatory Trigger Date, the
Public Directors designated to Class II shall serve for an
initial term that expires at the second annual meeting of
Limited Partners following the Regulatory Trigger Date, and the
Public Directors designated to Class III shall serve for an
initial term that expires at the third annual meeting of Limited
Partners following the Regulatory Trigger Date. At each annual
meeting of Limited Partners successors to the class of Public
Directors whose term expires at that annual meeting shall be
elected for a three-year term.
(vii) After the Regulatory Trigger Date, if the number of
Directors is changed, any increase or decrease shall be
apportioned among the classes of Public Directors so as to
maintain the number of Public Directors in each class as nearly
equal as possible and any additional Public Director of any
class elected to fill a vacancy resulting from an increase in
such class shall hold office for a term that shall coincide with
the remaining term of that class, but in no case will a decrease
in the number of Directors shorten the term of any incumbent
Director and no decrease in the number of Holdco GP Directors
shall be made except as described in Section 16.1(b)(iv).
After the Regulatory Trigger Date, if a Holdco GP Director is
removed or resigns pursuant to Section 16.1(b)(iv)(D) or
(E), the number of Directors that shall constitute the whole
Board of Directors shall automatically be reduced appropriately.
A Public Director shall hold office until the annual meeting of
the Limited Partners of the year in which his term expires and
until his successor shall be elected and shall qualify, subject,
however, to death, resignation or removal from office. Any
vacancy among the Public Directors (including, without
limitation, any vacancy caused by an increase in the number of
Directors on the Board of Directors) may only be filled by a
majority of the Public Directors then in office, even if less
than a quorum, or by a sole remaining Public Director. Any
Public Director elected to fill a vacancy not resulting from an
increase in the number of Directors shall have the same
remaining term as that of his predecessor. A Public Director may
be removed only for cause and only upon a vote of the majority
of the remaining Public Directors then in office.
(viii) (A) (1) Nominations of persons for election as
Public Directors may be made at an annual meeting of the Limited
Partners only (a) by or at the direction of the Public
Directors or any committee thereof or (b) by any Public
Limited Partner who was a Record Holder at the time the notice
provided for in this Section 16.1(b)(viii) is delivered to
the General Partner, who is entitled to vote at the meeting and
who complies with the notice procedures set forth in this
Section 16.1(b)(viii).
(2) For any nominations brought before an annual meeting by
a Public Limited Partner pursuant to clause (b) of
paragraph (A)(1) of this Section 16.1(b)(viii), the Public
Limited Partner must have given timely notice thereof in writing
to the General Partner. To be timely, a Public Limited
Partners notice shall be delivered to the General Partner
not later than the close of business on the ninetieth (90th)
day, nor earlier than the close of business on the one hundred
twentieth (120th) day, prior to the first anniversary of the
preceding years annual meeting (provided, however, that in
the event that the date of the annual meeting is more than
thirty (30) days before or more than seventy (70) days
after such anniversary date, notice by the Public Limited
Partner must be so delivered not earlier than the close of
business on the one hundred twentieth (120th) day prior to such
annual meeting and not later than the close of business on the
later of the ninetieth (90th) day prior to such annual meeting
or the tenth (10th) day following the day on which public
announcement of the date of such meeting is first made by the
Partnership or the General Partner). For purposes of the first
annual meeting following the Regulatory Trigger Date, the first
anniversary of the preceding years annual meeting shall be
deemed to be the first Tuesday in June of the year in which such
B-28
annual meeting is held. In no event shall the public
announcement of an adjournment or postponement of an annual
meeting commence a new time period (or extend any time period)
for the giving of a Public Limited Partners notice as
described above. Such Public Limited Partners notice shall
set forth: (a) as to each person whom the Public Limited
Partner proposes to nominate for election as a Public Director
(i) all information relating to such person that is
required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for
election of directors in an election contest, or is otherwise
required, in each case pursuant to and in accordance with
Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act and (ii) such
persons written consent to being named in the proxy
statement as a nominee and to serving as a Public Director if
elected; and (b) as to the Public Limited Partner giving
the notice and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the
nomination is made (i) the name and address of such Public
Limited Partner, as they appear on the Partnerships books
and records, and of such beneficial owner, (ii) the number
of LP Units which are owned beneficially and of record by such
Public Limited Partner and such beneficial owner, (iii) a
description of any agreement, arrangement or understanding with
respect to the nomination between or among such Public Limited
Partner and such beneficial owner, any of their respective
Affiliates or associates, and any others acting in concert with
any of the foregoing, (iv) a description of any agreement,
arrangement or understanding (including any derivative or short
positions, profit interests, options, warrants, stock
appreciation or similar rights, hedging transactions, and
borrowed or loaned LP Units) that has been entered into as of
the date of the Public Limited Partners notice by, or on
behalf of, such Public Limited Partner and such beneficial
owners, the effect or intent of which is to mitigate loss to,
manage risk or benefit of LP Unit price changes for, or increase
or decrease the voting power of, such Public Limited Partner and
such beneficial owner, with respect to LP Units, (v) a
representation that the Public Limited Partner is a Record
Holder entitled to vote at such meeting and intends to appear in
person or by proxy at the meeting to propose such nomination,
and (vi) a representation whether the Public Limited
Partner or the beneficial owner, if any, intends or is part of a
group which intends (a) to deliver a proxy statement
and/or form
of proxy to holders of at least the percentage of the
Partnerships LP Units required to elect the nominee
and/or
(b) otherwise to solicit proxies from Public Limited
Partners in support of such nomination. The General Partner may
require any proposed nominee to furnish such other information
as it may reasonably require to determine the eligibility of
such proposed nominee to serve as a Public Director.
(3) Notwithstanding anything in the second sentence of
paragraph (A)(2) of this Section 16.1(b)(viii) to the
contrary, in the event that the number of Public Directors to be
elected is increased effective at the annual meeting and there
is no public announcement by the Partnership or the General
Partner naming the nominees for the additional directorships at
least one hundred (100) days prior to the first anniversary
of the preceding years annual meeting, a Public Limited
Partners notice required by this
Section 16.1(b)(viii) shall also be considered timely, but
only with respect to nominees for the additional directorships,
if it shall be delivered to the General Partner not later than
the close of business on the tenth (10th) day following the day
on which such public announcement is first made by the
Partnership or the General Partner.
(B) After the Regulatory Trigger Date, nominations of
persons for election as Public Directors may be made at a
special meeting of Limited Partners at which Public Directors
are to be elected pursuant to the General Partners notice
of meeting (1) by or at the direction of the Public
Directors or any committee thereof or (2) provided that the
Directors or the Limited Partners pursuant to
Section 16.1(a) hereof have determined that Public
Directors shall be elected at such meeting, by any Public
Limited Partner who is a Record Holder at the time the notice
provided for in this Section 16.1(b)(viii) is delivered to
the General Partner, who is entitled to vote at the meeting and
upon such election and who complies with the notice procedures
set forth in this Section 16.1(b)(viii). In the event the
General Partner calls a special meeting of Public Limited
Partners for the purpose of electing one or more Public
Directors, any Public Limited Partner entitled to vote in such
election of Public Directors may nominate a person or persons
(as the case may be) for election to such position(s) as
specified in the General Partners notice of meeting, if
the Public Limited Partners notice required by paragraph
(A)(2) of this Section 16.1(b)(viii) shall be delivered to
the General Partner not earlier than the close of business on
the one hundred twentieth (120th) day prior to such special
meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of
the ninetieth (90th) day prior to such special meeting or the
tenth (10th) day following the day on which public announcement
is first made of the date of the special meeting and of the
nominees proposed by the Public Directors to be elected at such
meeting. In no event shall the
B-29
public announcement of an adjournment or postponement of a
special meeting commence a new time period (or extend any time
period) for the giving of a Public Limited Partners notice
as described above.
(C) (1) Only such persons who are nominated in
accordance with the procedures set forth in this
Section 16.1(b)(viii) shall be eligible to be elected at an
annual or special meeting of Public Limited Partners to serve as
Public Directors. Except as otherwise provided by law, the
chairman designated by the General Partner pursuant to
Section 16.3 shall have the power and duty (a) to
determine whether a nomination was made in accordance with the
procedures set forth in this Section 16.1(b)(viii)
(including whether the Public Limited Partner or beneficial
owner, if any, on whose behalf the nomination is made solicited
(or is part of a group which solicited) or did not so solicit,
as the case may be, proxies in support of such Public Limited
Partners nominee in compliance with such Public Limited
Partners representation as required by clause
(A)(2)(b)(vi) of this Section 16.1(b)(viii)) and (b) if any
proposed nomination was not made in compliance with this
Section 16.1(b)(viii), to declare that such nomination
shall be disregarded. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions
of this Section 16.1(b)(viii) unless otherwise required by
law, if the Public Limited Partner (or a qualified
representative of the Public Limited Partner) does not appear at
the annual or special meeting of Public Limited Partners to
present a nomination, such nomination shall be disregarded
notwithstanding that proxies in respect of such vote may have
been received by the General Partner or the Partnership. For
purposes of this Section 16.1(b)(viii), to be considered a
qualified representative of the Public Limited Partner, a person
must be a duly authorized officer, manager or partner of such
Public Limited Partner or must be authorized by a writing
executed by such Public Limited Partner or an electronic
transmission delivered by such Public Limited Partner to act for
such Public Limited Partner as proxy at the meeting of Public
Limited Partners and such person must produce such writing or
electronic transmission, or a reliable reproduction of the
writing or electronic transmission, at the meeting of Limited
Partners.
(2) For purposes of this Section 16.1(b)(viii),
public announcement shall include disclosure in a
press release reported by the Dow Jones News Service, Associated
Press or other national news service or in a document publicly
filed by the Partnership or the General Partner with the
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13,
14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act.
(3) Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this
Section 16.1(b)(viii), a Public Limited Partner shall also
comply with all applicable requirements of the Exchange Act and
the rules and regulations thereunder with respect to the matters
set forth in this Section 16.1(b)(viii); provided however,
that any references in this Agreement to the Exchange Act or the
rules promulgated thereunder are not intended to and shall not
limit any requirements applicable to nominations pursuant to
this Section 16.1(b)(viii) (including
paragraphs A(1)(c) and B hereof), and compliance with
paragraphs A(1)(c) and B of this Section 16.1(b)(viii)
shall be the exclusive means for a Public Limited Partner to
make nominations.
(ix) This Section 16.1(b) shall not be deemed in any
way to limit or impair the ability of the Board of Directors to
adopt a poison pill or unitholder or other similar
rights plan with respect to the Partnership, whether such poison
pill or plan contains dead hand provisions, no
hand provisions or other provisions relating to the
redemption of the poison pill or plan, in each case as such
terms are used under Delaware common law.
(x) The Partnership and General Partner shall use their
commercially reasonable best efforts to take such action as
shall be necessary or appropriate to give effect to and
implement the provisions of this Section 16.1(b),
including, without limitation, amending the General Partner
Agreement and Holdco Partnership Agreement such that at all
times the General Partner Agreement and Holdco Partnership
Agreement shall provide (i) that the Public Directors shall
be elected in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, and
(ii) terms consistent with this Section 16.1(b).
(xi) If the General Partner delegates to an existing or
newly formed wholly-owned subsidiary the power and authority to
manage and control the business and affairs of the Partnership
Group, the foregoing provisions of this Section 16.1(b)
shall be applicable with respect to the board of directors or
other governing body of such subsidiary.
B-30
(c) The Limited Partners owning a majority of the LP Units
entitled to vote at a meeting, represented in person or by
proxy, shall constitute a quorum at a meeting of the Limited
Partners. At any meeting of the Limited Partners duly called and
held in accordance with this Agreement at which a quorum is
present, the act of Limited Partners owning LP Units that in the
aggregate represent a majority of the outstanding LP Units
present in person or by proxy at such meeting and entitled to
vote shall constitute the act of all Limited Partners, unless a
greater or different percentage is required with respect to such
action under the provisions of this Agreement, in which case the
act of the Limited Partners owning LP Units that in the
aggregate represent at least such greater or different
percentage shall be required.
Section 16.2 Record
Date
(a) For purposes of determining the Limited Partners
entitled to notice of or to vote at any meeting or to give
approvals without a meeting as provided in Section 16.4,
the General Partner may set a Record Date, which date for
purposes of notice of a meeting shall not be less than
10 days nor more than 60 days before the date of the
meeting.
(b) When a meeting is adjourned to another time or place,
notice need not be given of the adjourned meeting and a new
Record Date need not be fixed, if the time and place thereof are
announced at the meeting at which the adjournment is taken,
unless such adjournment (together with any prior adjournments in
connection with which a new Record Date was not fixed) shall be
for more than 60 days. At the adjourned meeting, the
Partnership may transact any business that might have been
transacted at the original meeting. If the adjournment(s) are
for more than 60 days or if a new Record Date is fixed for
the adjourned meeting, a notice of the adjourned meeting and, if
applicable, the new Record Date shall be given in accordance
with this Article XVI.
Section 16.3 Conduct
of Meeting
The General Partner shall have full power and authority
concerning the manner of conducting any meeting of Limited
Partners or the solicitation of proxies or consents in writing,
including, without limitation, the determination of Persons
entitled to vote, the existence of a quorum, the conduct of
voting, the validity and effect of any proxies, and the
determination of any controversies, votes or challenges arising
in connection with or during the meeting or voting. The General
Partner shall designate an individual to serve as chairman of
any meeting and shall further designate an individual to take
the minutes of any meeting, which individuals may be directors
or officers of the General Partner. All minutes shall be kept
with the records of the Partnership maintained by the General
Partner.
Section 16.4 Action
Without a Meeting
Any action that may be taken at a meeting of the Limited
Partners, other than the election of Public Directors, may be
taken without a meeting if approvals in writing setting forth
the action so taken are signed by Limited Partners holding in
the aggregate at least the minimum number of LP Units that would
be necessary to authorize or take such action at a meeting at
which all the Limited Partners were present and voted. Prompt
notice of the taking of action without a meeting shall be given
to the Limited Partners who have not approved in writing. If
approvals to the taking of any action by the Limited Partners is
solicited by any Person other than by or on behalf of the
General Partner, the approvals shall have no force and effect
unless and until (a) they are deposited with the
Partnership in care of the General Partner, (b) approvals
sufficient to take the action proposed are dated as of a date
not more than 90 days prior to the date sufficient consents
are deposited with the Partnership, and (c) the Partnership
receives an Opinion of Counsel that giving effect to such
approvals would not result in the loss of limited liability of
any Limited Partner or cause the Partnership or any of the
Operating Partnerships to be treated as an association taxable
as a corporation for federal income tax purposes.
B-31
ARTICLE XVII
CERTAIN
RESTRICTIONS
Section 17.1 Additional
Units
(a) Without the prior approval of a Two-Thirds Interest,
the General Partner shall not cause the Partnership to issue any
class or series of LP Units having preferences or other special
or senior rights over the LP Units issued pursuant to
Section 4.2.
(b) The General Partner shall not cause the Partnership to
issue Units to the General Partner or any of its Affiliates
unless (i) the Units are of a class which is, prior to such
issuance, listed or admitted to trading on a National Securities
Exchange and the Net Agreed Value of the Contributed Property
being contributed in exchange for such Units is at least equal
to the number of Units being so issued times the Unit Price of
such Units or (ii) such issuance is approved by a Majority
Interest.
Section 17.2 Certain
Amendments
(a) Without the prior approval of a Two-Thirds Interest,
the Partnership shall not amend, and the General Partner shall
not permit the Partnership or any Operating Partnership to
amend, any compensation arrangement for the General Partner,
unless, in any case, such amendment does not, in the good faith
opinion of the General Partner, in its capacity as general
partner of the Partnership or the indirect owner of the general
partner of the Operating Partnerships, as applicable, adversely
affect the Limited Partners in any material respect.
(b) The General Partner shall not cause the Partnership to
approve any amendment to an Operating Partnership Agreement
pursuant to Section 13.2 thereof unless such amendment is
approved by a Majority Interest.
Section 17.3 Sale
of Assets
Without the prior approval of a Two-Thirds Interest, the General
Partner may not sell, exchange or otherwise dispose of all or
substantially all of the consolidated assets owned by the
Partnership and the Operating Partnerships; provided, however,
that in the event that less than 80% of the LP Units are held by
the General Partner and its Affiliates, prior Special Approval
shall also be required.
ARTICLE XVIII
[RESERVED]
ARTICLE XIX
GENERAL
PROVISIONS
Section 19.1 Opinions
Regarding Taxation as a Partnership
Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement, the
requirement, as a condition to any action proposed to be taken
under this Agreement, that the Partnership receive an Opinion of
Counsel that the proposed action would not result in the
Partnership or any of the Operating Partnerships being treated
as an association taxable as a corporation for federal income
tax purposes (a) shall not be applicable to the extent that
the Partnership or any of the Operating Partnerships is at such
time treated in all material respects as an association taxable
as a corporation for federal income tax purposes and
(b) shall be deemed satisfied by an Opinion of Counsel
containing conditions, limitations and qualifications which are
acceptable to the General Partner.
Section 19.2 Personal
Property
The Partnership Interest of any Partner shall be personal
property for all purposes.
B-32
Section 19.3 Addresses
and Notices
Any notice, demand, request, payment or report required or
permitted to be given or made to a Limited Partner under this
Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed given or made
when delivered in person or when sent by first class mail or by
other means of written communication to the Limited Partner at
such Limited Partners address as shown on the Units
Register. Any notice to the Partnership or the General Partner
shall be deemed given if received in writing by the General
Partner at the principal office of the Partnership designated
pursuant to Section 2.3.
Section 19.4 Headings
All article or section headings in this Agreement are for
convenience only and shall not be deemed to control or affect
the meaning or construction of any of the provisions hereof.
Section 19.5 Binding
Effect
This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of
the parties hereto (including the additional Persons that become
Limited Partners as provided herein) and their heirs, executors,
administrators, successors, legal representatives and assigns.
Section 19.6 Integration
This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement among the
parties pertaining to the subject matter hereof and supersedes
all prior agreements and understandings pertaining thereto.
Section 19.7 Waiver
No failure by any party to insist upon the strict performance of
any covenant, duty, agreement or condition of this Agreement or
to exercise any right or remedy consequent upon a breach thereof
shall constitute a waiver of any such breach or of any other
covenant, duty, agreement or condition.
Section 19.8 Counterparts
This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts,
all of which together shall constitute one agreement binding on
the parties hereto (including the additional Persons that become
Limited Partners as provided herein).
Section 19.9 Severability
If any provision of this Agreement is or becomes invalid,
illegal or unenforceable in any respect, the validity, legality
and enforceability of the remaining provisions hereof, or of
such provision in other respects, shall not be affected thereby.
Section 19.10 Applicable
Law
This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced
in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware.
B-33
In Witness Whereof, this Agreement has been duly executed by the
General Partner, as of the date first above written.
Buckeye GP LLC,
as General Partner
Name:
Title:
[Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of
Buckeye Partners, L.P.]
B-34
Annex A
to the
Form of Partnership
Agreement
Specimen
LP Certificate
[Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of
Buckeye Partners, L.P.]
B-A
ANNEX C
FORM
OF
SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED
AGREEMENT OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
OF
BUCKEYE GP HOLDINGS L.P.
This SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT OF LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP OF BUCKEYE GP HOLDINGS L.P. (this
Agreement), dated as of
[ ],
20 and effective at the Effective Time (as defined
below) is entered into by and between MainLine Management LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company, as general partner (the
General Partner), and Buckeye
Partners, L.P., as the limited partner (the Limited
Partner).
BACKGROUND
Buckeye GP Holdings L.P. (the
Partnership) was formed as of
March 27, 2006 as a limited partnership pursuant to the
provisions of the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership
Act, as amended from time to time (the
Act). On August 9, 2006, the
General Partner and limited partners as of such date adopted an
Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the
Partnership (the Prior Agreement).
Pursuant to (A) the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as
of June 10, 2010, as may be amended, supplemented, restated
or otherwise modified from time to time (the Merger
Agreement), by and among the Limited Partner,
Buckeye GP LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and the
general partner of the Limited Partner (Partners
GP), Grand Ohio, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Limited Partner,
the Partnership, and the General Partner, and
(B) Sections 14.2(e) and 14.5 of the Prior Agreement,
the Prior Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its
entirety as follows.
1. Name. The name of Partnership is
Buckeye GP Holdings L.P.
2. Purpose. The purpose and nature of the
business to be conducted by the Partnership shall be to own all
of the limited liability company interests in, and be the sole
member of, Partners GP, which is the general partner of the
Limited Partner and indirectly owns the general partner interest
in certain partnership subsidiaries of the Limited Partner. The
General Partner shall cause the Partnership not to engage,
directly or indirectly, in any business activity other than the
ownership, and being a member, of Partners GP and immaterial or
administrative actions related thereto, without the prior
consent of the Limited Partner.
3. Registered Office. The registered
office of the Partnership in the State of Delaware is
c/o Corporation
Service Company, 2711 Centerville Road, Suite 400,
Wilmington, Delaware 19808.
4. Registered Agent. The name and address
of the registered agent of the Partnership for service of
process on the Partnership in the State of Delaware is
Corporation Service Company, 2711 Centerville Road,
Suite 400, Wilmington, Delaware 19808.
5. Partners. At the Effective Time, the
Limited Partner was admitted as the sole limited partner of the
Partnership and was issued a 100% limited partner interest in
the Partnership, such 100% partnership interest being duly
authorized, validly issued, fully paid and, subject to
applicable law, non-assessable. The names, percentage interests
and the business, residence or mailing addresses of the General
Partner and the Limited Partner are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
General Partner:
|
|
Percentage Interest:
|
|
MainLine Management LLC
One Greenway Plaza
Suite 600
Houston, Texas 77046
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
C-1
|
|
|
|
|
Limited Partner:
|
|
Percentage Interest:
|
|
Buckeye Partners, L.P.
One Greenway Plaza
Suite 600
Houston, Texas 77046
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
6. Nature of General Partner
Interest. The General Partners interest in
the Partnership is a non-economic interest, and is thus
comprised solely of the management interest of the General
Partner in the Partnership pursuant to this Agreement and the
Act.
7. Powers. The Partnership shall be
managed by the General Partner, and the powers of the General
Partner include all powers, statutory and otherwise, possessed
by general partners under the laws of the State of Delaware. The
General Partner shall not consent to any amendment to this
Agreement or to the Limited Liability Company Agreement of
Partners GP without the consent of the Limited Partner. The
Limited Partner may, in its sole discretion, designate one or
more individuals to serve as Special Managers of the
Partnership. Such Special Managers shall constitute delegates of
the General Partner, with all powers, statutory and otherwise,
possessed by the General Partner, if the General Partner fails
to cause the Partnership to take any action required by this
Agreement. The General Partner shall not cause the Partnership
to take any action without the prior consent of the Limited
Partner unless otherwise expressly permitted by this Agreement
to be taken without such prior consent
8. Dissolution. The Partnership shall
dissolve, and its affairs shall be wound up if (a) all of
the partners of the Partnership approve in writing, (b) an
event of withdrawal of the General Partner has occurred under
the Act unless there is a remaining general partner who is
hereby authorized to, and shall, carry on the business of the
Partnership without dissolution or the business of the
Partnership is continued in accordance with the Act,
(c) there are no limited partners of the Partnership unless
the business of the Partnership is continued in accordance with
the Act, or (d) an entry of a decree of judicial
dissolution of the Partnership has occurred under
§ 17-802 of the Act.
9. Additional Contributions. No partner
of the Partnership is required to make any additional capital
contribution to the Partnership.
10. Distributions. To the extent the
Partnership receives any cash or other property in excess of its
expected liabilities and expenses, the General Partner shall
cause the Partnership to distribute 100% of such cash or other
property promptly to the Limited Partner. Notwithstanding any
other provision of this Agreement, neither the Partnership, nor
the General Partner on behalf of the Partnership, shall be
required to make a distribution to a partner of the Partnership
on account of its interest in the Partnership if such
distribution would violate the Act or other applicable law.
11. Taxes. The General Partner shall
prepare and timely file (on behalf of the Partnership) all state
and local tax returns, if any, required to be filed by the
Partnership. The Partnership and the partners acknowledge that
for federal income tax purposes, the Partnership will be
disregarded as an entity separate from the Limited Partner
pursuant to Treasury Regulation § 301.7701-3.
12. Assignments.
(a) The Limited Partner may assign all or any part of its
partnership interest in the Partnership and may withdraw from
the Partnership only with the consent of the General Partner.
(b) The General Partner may assign all or any part of its
partnership interest in the Partnership and may withdraw from
the Partnership only with the consent of the Limited Partner.
13. Withdrawal. The General Partner
agrees not to withdraw from the Partnership without the prior
consent of the Limited Partner. Upon the withdrawal of the
General Partner from the Partnership or any event that causes
the General Partner to cease to be a general partner of the
Partnership, whether or not permitted by this Agreement,
(a) the withdrawing General Partner shall cease to have any
rights or powers under this Agreement and shall not be entitled
to any payment or distribution in connection with its interest
in the Partnership, and (b) the Limited Partner shall have
the right to designate a successor General Partner and cause
C-2
such successor General Partner to be admitted to the Partnership
as a general partner effective immediately prior to the
withdrawal of the prior General Partner.
14. Admission of Additional or Substitute Partners.
(a) One (1) or more additional or substitute limited
partners of the Partnership may be admitted to the Partnership
with only the consent of the General Partner and the Limited
Partner.
(b) One (1) or more additional or substitute general
partners of the Partnership may be admitted to the Partnership
with only the consent of the Limited Partner and the General
Partner.
15. Liability of Limited Partner. The
Limited Partner shall not have any liability for the obligations
or liabilities of the Partnership except to the extent required
by the Act.
16. Appointment of Board of Directors of Partners GP.
(a) Prior to the Regulatory Trigger Date, the General
Partner, acting in its capacity as the general partner of the
Partnership, shall have the right to cause the Partnership, to
exercise its rights as the sole member of Partners GP to
appoint, replace or remove the Directors in its sole discretion.
(b) After the Effective Time and the Regulatory Trigger
Date:
(i) On an ongoing basis, the Public Limited Partners shall
have the right to elect all of the Directors other than the
Holdco GP Directors.
(ii) All Public Directors shall be nominated, elected or
appointed, and any vacancies in the Public Directors shall be
filled, in accordance with the terms of the MLP Agreement.
Except in accordance with the terms of the MLP Agreement,
neither the General Partner nor the Partnership shall remove any
Public Director from the Board of Directors.
(c) The General Partner shall not take, and shall not have
the power to take, any action inconsistent with the terms of
this Section 16. The General Partner shall take all action
necessary to give effect to the terms of this Section 16,
including causing the Public Directors to be elected, appointed
and removed in accordance with this Section 16 and the MLP
Agreement.
(d) The General Partner shall cause the Partnership to,
with the consent of the Limited Partner as to the form of the
agreement, amend the limited liability company agreement of
Partners GP as soon as practicable after the Effective Time, in
order to conform to the terms of the MLP Agreement and this
Section 16.
17. Indemnification.
(a) To the fullest extent permitted by law but subject to
the limitations expressly provided in this Agreement, all
Indemnitees shall be indemnified and held harmless by the
Partnership from and against any and all losses, claims,
damages, liabilities, joint or several, expenses (including
legal fees and expenses), judgments, fines, penalties, interest,
settlements or other amounts arising from any and all claims,
demands, actions, suits or proceedings, whether civil, criminal,
administrative or investigative, in which any Indemnitee may be
involved, or is threatened to be involved, as a party or
otherwise, by reason of its status as an Indemnitee and relating
to the business and affairs of the Partnership; provided, that
the Indemnitee shall not be indemnified and held harmless if
there has been a final and non-appealable judgment entered by a
court of competent jurisdiction determining that, in respect of
the matter for which the Indemnitee is seeking indemnification
pursuant to this Section 17, the Indemnitee acted in bad
faith or engaged in fraud, willful misconduct, or in the case of
a criminal matter, acted with knowledge that the
Indemnitees conduct was unlawful. Any indemnification
pursuant to this Section 17 shall be made only out of the
assets of the Partnership, it being agreed that the General
Partner shall not be personally liable for such indemnification
and shall have no obligation to contribute or loan any monies or
property to the Partnership to enable it to effectuate such
indemnification.
(b) To the fullest extent permitted by law, expenses
(including legal fees and expenses) incurred by an Indemnitee
who is indemnified pursuant to Section 17(a) in defending
any claim, demand, action, suit or proceeding shall, from time
to time, be advanced by the Partnership prior to a determination
that the
C-3
Indemnitee is not entitled to be indemnified upon receipt by the
Partnership of any undertaking by or on behalf of the Indemnitee
to repay such amount if it shall be determined that the
Indemnitee is not entitled to be indemnified as authorized in
this Section 17.
(c) The indemnification provided by this Section 17
shall be in addition to any other rights to which an Indemnitee
may be entitled under any agreement, pursuant to any vote of the
Limited Partner, as a matter of law or otherwise, both as to
actions in the Indemnitees capacity as an Indemnitee and
as to actions in any other capacity, and shall continue as to an
Indemnitee who has ceased to serve in such capacity and shall
inure to the benefit of the heirs, successors, assigns and
administrators of the Indemnitee.
(d) For purposes of this Section 17, the Partnership
shall be deemed to have requested an Indemnitee to serve as
fiduciary of an employee benefit plan whenever the performance
by it of its duties to the Partnership also imposes duties on,
or otherwise involves services by, it to the plan or
participants or beneficiaries of the plan; excise taxes assessed
on an Indemnitee with respect to an employee benefit plan
pursuant to applicable law shall constitute
fines within the meaning of
Section 17(a); and action taken or omitted by it with
respect to any employee benefit plan in the performance of its
duties for a purpose reasonably believed by it to be in the best
interest of the participants and beneficiaries of the plan shall
be deemed to be for a purpose that is in the best interests of
the Partnership.
(e) An Indemnitee shall not be denied indemnification in
whole or in part under this Section 17 because the
Indemnitee had an interest in the transaction with respect to
which the indemnification applies if the transaction was
otherwise permitted by the terms of this Agreement.
(f) The provisions of this Section 17 are for the
benefit of the Indemnitees, their heirs, successors, assigns and
administrators and shall not be deemed to create any rights for
the benefit of any other Persons.
(g) No amendment, modification or repeal of this
Section 17 or any provision hereof shall in any manner
terminate, reduce or impair the right of any past, present or
future Indemnitee to be indemnified by the Partnership, nor the
obligations of the Partnership to indemnify any such Indemnitee
under and in accordance with the provisions of this
Section 17 as in effect immediately prior to such
amendment, modification or repeal with respect to claims arising
from or relating to matters occurring, in whole or-in part,
prior to such amendment, modification or repeal, regardless of
when such claims may arise or be asserted.
(h) Subject to the rights of the Indemnitees in
Section 17(g), which shall remain in full force and effect,
the Limited Partner may, by 14 days notice to the General
Partner, terminate this Section 17 (together with its
guarantee thereof) on a prospective basis only, following the
later of (a) the date the General Partner no longer has the
right to cause the Partnership to appoint at least one Director
and (b) the Applicable Date (as defined in the Support
Agreement, dated as of June 10, 2010, by and among the
Limited Partner, BGH GP Holdings, and certain other parties).
Notwithstanding Section 13, prior to the effective date of
such termination, the General Partner shall have the right to
require the Limited Partner (or a wholly owned Subsidiary of the
Limited Partner designated by the Limited Partner) to purchase
the interests of the General Partner in the Partnership for
$1,000, effective as of the date of termination of this
Section 17.
18. Liability of Indemnitees.
(a) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in
this Agreement, no Indemnitee shall be liable for monetary
damages to the Partnership, the Limited Partner or any other
Persons who have acquired interests in the Partnership, for
losses sustained or liabilities incurred as a result of any act
or omission of an Indemnitee unless there has been a final and
non-appealable judgment entered by a court of competent
jurisdiction determining that, in respect of the matter in
question, the Indemnitee acted in bad faith or engaged in fraud,
willful misconduct or, in the case of a criminal matter, acted
with knowledge that the Indemnitees conduct was criminal.
(b) The General Partner shall not be responsible for any
misconduct or negligence on the part of any agent which
exercised the powers granted to the General Partner pursuant to
the Prior Agreement and appointed by the General Partner in good
faith.
C-4
(c) To the extent that, at law or in equity, an Indemnitee
has duties (including fiduciary duties) and liabilities relating
thereto to the Partnership or to the Partners, the General
Partner and any other Indemnitee acting in connection with the
Partnerships business or affairs shall not be liable to
the Partnership or to any Partner for its good faith reliance on
the provisions of this Agreement.
(d) Any amendment, modification or repeal of this
Section 18 or any provision hereof shall be prospective
only and shall not in any way affect the limitations on the
liability of the Indemnitees under this Section 18 as in
effect immediately prior to such amendment, modification or
repeal with respect to claims arising from or relating to
matters occurring, in whole or in part, prior to such amendment,
modification or repeal, regardless of when such claims may arise
or be asserted, and provided such Person became an Indemnitee
hereunder prior to such amendment, modification or repeal.
19. Governing Law. This Agreement shall
be governed by, and construed under, the laws of the State of
Delaware, without regard to the principles of conflicts of law.
20. Third Party Beneficiaries. Each
partner agrees that any Indemnitee shall be entitled to assert
rights and remedies hereunder as a third-party beneficiary
hereto with respect to those provisions of this Agreement
affording a right, benefit or privilege to such Indemnitee.
21. Defined Terms. The following
definitions shall for all purposes, unless otherwise clearly
indicated to the contrary, apply to the terms used in this
Agreement:
(a) Act has the meaning set forth
in the Background to this Agreement.
(b) Affiliate means, with respect
to any Person, any other Person that directly or indirectly
through one or more intermediaries controls, is controlled by or
is under common control with, the Person in question. As used
herein, the term control means the possession,
direct or indirect, of the power to direct or cause the
direction of the management and policies of a Person, whether
through ownership of voting securities, by contract or otherwise.
(c) Agreement has the meaning set
forth in the preamble to this Agreement.
(d) BGH GP Holdings has the
meaning set forth in the MLP Agreement.
(e) Board of Directors has the
meaning set forth in the MLP Agreement.
(f) Directors has the meaning set
forth in the MLP Agreement.
(g) Departing General Partner
means any former general partner of the Partnership, from and
after the effective date of such general partners
withdrawal or removal.
(h) Effective Time has the
meaning specified in the Merger Agreement.
(i) General Partner has the
meaning set forth in the preamble to this Agreement.
(j) Holdco GP Directors has the
meaning set forth in the MLP Agreement.
(k) Indemnitee means (a) the
General Partner, (b) a Departing General Partner,
(c) any Person who is or was an Affiliate of the General
Partner or any Departing General Partner, (d) any Person
who is or was a member, partner, officer, director, employee,
agent, fiduciary or trustee of the Partnership or any of its
Subsidiaries, the General Partner or any Departing General
Partner or any Affiliate of the Partnership or any of its
Subsidiaries, the General Partner or any Departing General
Partner, and (e) any Person who is or was serving at the
request of the General Partner or any Departing General Partner
or any Affiliate of the General Partner or any Departing General
Partner as an officer, director, employee, member, partner,
agent, fiduciary or trustee of another Person; provided, that a
Person shall not be an Indemnitee by reason of providing, on a
fee-for-services
basis, trustee, fiduciary or custodial services. For the
avoidance of doubt, ArcLight Capital Partners, LLC and
Kelso & Company and their Affiliates shall be
Indemnitees under this Agreement.
(l) Limited Partner has the
meaning set forth in the preamble to this Agreement.
C-5
(m) LP Units has the meaning set
forth in the MLP Agreement.
(n) Merger Agreement has the
meaning set forth in the Background to this Agreement.
(o) MLP Agreement means the
Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the
Limited Partner, as it may be amended, supplemented or restated
from time to time.
(p) Partners GP has the meaning
set forth in the Background to this Agreement.
(q) Partnership has the meaning
set forth in the Background to this Agreement.
(r) Person means an individual, a
corporation, a limited liability company, a partnership, a
trust, an unincorporated organization, an association or any
other entity.
(s) Prior Agreement has the
meaning set forth in the Background to this Agreement.
(t) Public Directors has the
meaning set forth in the MLP Agreement.
(u) Public Limited Partners has
the meaning set forth in the MLP Agreement.
(v) Regulatory Trigger Date has
the meaning set forth in the MLP Agreement.
(w) Subsidiary means, with
respect to any Person, (a) a corporation of which more than
50% of the voting power of shares entitled (without regard to
the occurrence of any contingency) to vote in the election of
directors or other governing body of such corporation is owned,
directly or indirectly, at the date of determination, by such
Person, by one or more Subsidiaries of such Person or a
combination thereof, (b) a partnership (whether general or
limited) in which such Person or a Subsidiary of such Person is,
at the date of determination, a general or limited partner of
such partnership, but only if more than 50% of the partnership
interests of such partnership (considering all of the
partnership interests of the partnership as a single class) is
owned, directly or indirectly, at the date of determination, by
such Person, by one or more Subsidiaries of such Person, or a
combination thereof, or (c) any other Person (other than a
corporation or a partnership) in which such Person, one or more
Subsidiaries of such Person, or a combination thereof, directly
or indirectly, at the date of determination, has (i) at
least a majority ownership interest or (ii) the power to
elect or direct the election of a majority of the directors or
other governing body of such Person.
C-6
In Witness Whereof, this Agreement has been duly executed by the
General Partner as of the date first above written.
MainLine Management LLC,
as General Partner
Name:
Title:
The Limited Partner hereby guarantees the performance and
payment of the Partnerships obligations under
Section 17 of this Agreement.
Buckeye Partners, L.P.
By: Buckeye GP LLC, its General Partner
Name:
Title:
C-7
ANNEX D
SUPPORT
AGREEMENT
BY AND AMONG
BUCKEYE PARTNERS, L.P.
AND
BGH GP HOLDINGS, LLC
ARCLIGHT ENERGY PARTNERS FUND III, L.P.
ARCLIGHT ENERGY PARTNERS FUND IV, L.P.
KELSO INVESTMENT ASSOCIATES VII, L.P.
KEP VI, LLC
DATED AS OF JUNE 10, 2010
Table of
Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
ARTICLE I GENERAL
|
|
|
D-1
|
|
1.1 Defined Terms
|
|
|
D-1
|
|
ARTICLE II VOTING
|
|
|
D-2
|
|
2.1 Agreement to Vote
|
|
|
D-2
|
|
2.2 No Inconsistent Agreements
|
|
|
D-2
|
|
2.3 Proxy
|
|
|
D-2
|
|
ARTICLE III REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
|
|
|
D-3
|
|
3.1 Representations and Warranties of the
Unitholders
|
|
|
D-3
|
|
3.2 Representations and Warranties of
Partners
|
|
|
D-4
|
|
ARTICLE IV OTHER COVENANTS
|
|
|
D-4
|
|
4.1 Prohibition on Transfers, Other
Actions
|
|
|
D-4
|
|
4.2 Distributions, etc
|
|
|
D-4
|
|
4.3 No Solicitation
|
|
|
D-4
|
|
4.4 Notice of Proposals Regarding
Prohibited Transactions
|
|
|
D-5
|
|
4.5 Further Assurances
|
|
|
D-5
|
|
4.6 Unitholder Capacity
|
|
|
D-5
|
|
4.7 Continued Ownership of Holdings GP
and General Partner Interest in Holdings
|
|
|
D-5
|
|
4.8 Registration Rights
|
|
|
D-5
|
|
ARTICLE V MISCELLANEOUS
|
|
|
D-6
|
|
5.1 Termination
|
|
|
D-6
|
|
5.2 No Ownership Interest
|
|
|
D-6
|
|
5.3 Publicity
|
|
|
D-6
|
|
5.4 Notices
|
|
|
D-6
|
|
5.5 Interpretation
|
|
|
D-7
|
|
5.6 Counterparts
|
|
|
D-7
|
|
5.7 Entire Agreement
|
|
|
D-8
|
|
5.8 Governing Law; Consent to
Jurisdiction; Waiver of Jury Trial
|
|
|
D-8
|
|
5.9 Amendment; Waiver
|
|
|
D-8
|
|
5.10 Remedies
|
|
|
D-8
|
|
5.11 Severability
|
|
|
D-9
|
|
5.12 Action by Partners
|
|
|
D-9
|
|
5.13 Successors and Assigns; Third Party Beneficiaries
|
|
|
D-9
|
|
D-i
SUPPORT
AGREEMENT
SUPPORT AGREEMENT, dated as of June 10, 2010 (this
Agreement), by and among Buckeye
Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
(Partners), and BGH GP Holdings, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company (Holdings
Unitholder), ArcLight Energy Partners
Fund III, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, ArcLight
Energy Partners Fund IV, L.P., a Delaware limited
partnership, Kelso Investment Associates VII, L.P., a Delaware
limited partnership, and KEP VI, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company (collectively, the
Unitholders and, individually, a
Unitholder).
W I T N E
S S E T H:
Whereas,
concurrently with the execution of this Agreement, Partners,
Buckeye GP LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
(Partners GP), Buckeye GP Holdings
L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
(Holdings), MainLine Management LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company (Holdings
GP), and Grand Ohio, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company (MergerCo), are
entering into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of the
date hereof (as amended, supplemented, restated or otherwise
modified from time to time, the Merger
Agreement) pursuant to which, among other things,
MergerCo will merge with and into Holdings and each outstanding
Common Unit and Management Unit of Holdings will be converted
into the right to receive the merger consideration specified
therein;
Whereas, as
of the date hereof, each Unitholder is the record
and/or
beneficial owner, in the aggregate, of the number of Common
Units and Management Units set forth opposite such
Unitholders name on Schedule I hereto (the
Existing Units); and
Whereas, as
a material inducement to Partners entering into the Merger
Agreement, Partners has required that the Unitholders agree, and
the Unitholders have agreed, to enter into this Agreement and
abide by the covenants and obligations with respect to the
Existing Units set forth herein.
Now
Therefore, in consideration of the foregoing and the
mutual representations, warranties, covenants and agreements
herein contained, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the
parties hereto agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
GENERAL
1.1 Defined Terms. The following
capitalized terms, as used in this Agreement, shall have the
meanings set forth below. Capitalized terms used but not
otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed
thereto in the Merger Agreement.
Affiliate has the meaning set forth in
Rule 405 of the rules and regulations under the Securities
Act, unless otherwise expressly stated herein. For purposes of
this Agreement, with respect to each Unitholder or other Person,
Affiliate shall not include Holdings or any Person that is
directly or indirectly, through one or more intermediaries,
controlled by Holdings. For the avoidance of doubt, no officer
or director of Holdings, Holdings GP, Partners, Partners GP or
any of their controlled Affiliates shall be deemed to be an
Affiliate of a Unitholder or other Person by virtue of his or
her status as a director or officer of Holdings, Holdings GP,
Partners, Partners GP or any of their controlled Affiliates.
Beneficial Ownership by a Person of any
securities includes ownership by any Person who, directly or
indirectly, including through any contract, arrangement,
understanding, relationship or otherwise, has or shares
(i) voting power which includes the power to vote, or to
direct the voting of, such security;
and/or
(ii) investment power which includes the power to dispose,
or to direct the disposition, of such security; and shall
otherwise be interpreted in accordance with the term
beneficial ownership as defined in
Rule 13d-3
adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the
Exchange Act; provided that for purposes of determining
Beneficial Ownership, a Person shall be deemed to be the
Beneficial Owner of any securities which such Person has, at any
time during the term of this Agreement, the right to acquire
pursuant to any
D-1
agreement, arrangement or understanding or upon the exercise of
conversion rights, exchange rights, warrants or options, or
otherwise (irrespective of whether the right to acquire such
securities is exercisable immediately or only after the passage
of time, including the passage of time in excess of
60 days, the satisfaction of any conditions, the occurrence
of any event or any combination of the foregoing). The terms
Beneficially Own and
Beneficially Owned shall have a
correlative meaning.
Transfer means, directly or indirectly, to
sell, transfer, assign, pledge, encumber, hypothecate or
similarly dispose of (by merger (including by conversion into
securities or other consideration), by tendering into any tender
or exchange offer, by testamentary disposition, by operation of
law or otherwise), either voluntarily or involuntarily, or to
enter into any contract, option or other arrangement or
understanding with respect to the voting of or sale, transfer,
assignment, pledge, encumbrance, hypothecation or similar
disposition of (by merger, by tendering into any tender or
exchange offer, by testamentary disposition, by operation of law
or otherwise).
ARTICLE II
VOTING
2.1 Agreement to Vote. Each Unitholder
hereby irrevocably and unconditionally agrees that, during the
term of this Agreement, at the Holdings Meeting and at any other
meeting of the unitholders of Holdings, however called,
including any adjournment or postponement thereof, and in
connection with any written consent of the unitholders of
Holdings relating to the Merger or an Acquisition Proposal, such
Unitholder shall to the fullest extent that the Existing Units
are entitled to vote thereon or consent thereto:
(a) appear at each such meeting or otherwise cause its
Existing Units to be counted as present thereat for purposes of
calculating a quorum; and
(b) vote (or cause to be voted), in person or by proxy, or
deliver (or cause to be delivered) a written consent covering
all of the Existing Units (i) in favor of the approval and
adoption of the Merger Agreement, the approval of the Merger and
any other action required in furtherance thereof submitted for
the vote or written consent of unitholders; (ii) against
any action or agreement that would result in a breach of any
covenant, representation or warranty or any other obligation or
agreement of Holdings or Holdings GP contained in the Merger
Agreement; (iii) against any Acquisition Proposal; and
(iv) against any action, agreement or transaction that
would or would reasonably be expected to materially impede,
interfere with, delay, postpone, discourage, frustrate the
purposes of or adversely affect the Merger or the other
transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement.
2.2 No Inconsistent Agreements. Each
Unitholder hereby covenants and agrees that, except for this
Agreement, such Unitholder (a) has not entered into, and
shall not enter into at any time while this Agreement remains in
effect, any voting agreement or voting trust with respect to its
Existing Units, (b) has not granted, and shall not grant at
any time while this Agreement remains in effect, a proxy,
consent or power of attorney with respect to its Existing Units
(other than a proxy or proxies to vote its Existing Units in a
manner consistent with this Agreement) and (c) shall not
knowingly take any action at any time while this Agreement
remains in effect that would make any representation or warranty
of such Unitholder contained herein untrue or incorrect in any
material respect or have the effect of preventing or disabling
such Unitholder from performing any of its obligations under
this Agreement in any material respect.
2.3 Proxy. In order to secure the
obligations set forth herein, Unitholder hereby irrevocably
appoints during the term of this Agreement as its proxy and
attorney-in-fact, as the case may be Keith St.Clair and William
Schmidt, in their respective capacities as officers of Partners
or Partners GP, and any individual who shall hereafter succeed
to any such officer of Partners or Partners GP, as the case may
be, and any other Person designated in writing by Partners or
Partners GP (collectively, the
Grantees), each of them individually,
with full power of substitution, to vote or execute written
consents with respect to the Existing Units in accordance with
Section 2.1 and, in the discretion of the Grantees, with
respect to any proposed postponements or adjournments of any
annual or special meeting of the Unitholders of Holdings at
which any of the matters described in Section 2.1(b) are to
be considered; provided that any exercise of this proxy by
D-2
such Grantees shall be subject to the approval of such exercise
by the Partners Audit Committee. To the fullest extent permitted
by law, this proxy is coupled with an interest and shall be
irrevocable, and each Unitholder will take such further action
or execute such other instruments as may be necessary to
effectuate the intent of this proxy and hereby revokes any proxy
previously granted by such Unitholder with respect to the
Existing Units to the extent that such proxy is inconsistent
with the provisions of this Agreement. Partners may terminate
this proxy with respect to any Unitholder at any time at its
sole election by written notice provided to such Unitholder.
ARTICLE III
REPRESENTATIONS
AND WARRANTIES
3.1 Representations and Warranties of Each
Unitholder. Each Unitholder hereby severally but
not jointly represents and warrants to Partners as follows:
(a) Organization; Authorization; Validity of Agreement;
Necessary Action. Such Unitholder has the
requisite power and authority to execute and deliver this
Agreement, to carry out its obligations hereunder and to
consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. The execution
and delivery by such Unitholder of this Agreement, the
performance by it of the obligations hereunder and the
consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby have been
duly and validly authorized by such Unitholder, and no other
actions or proceedings on the part of such Unitholder are
necessary to authorize the execution and delivery of this
Agreement, the performance by such Unitholder of its obligations
hereunder or the consummation of the transactions contemplated
hereby. This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by
such Unitholder and, assuming the due authorization, execution
and delivery of this Agreement by Partners, constitutes a legal,
valid and binding agreement of such Unitholder, enforceable
against it in accordance with its terms, subject to bankruptcy,
insolvency, fraudulent transfer, reorganization, moratorium and
similar laws of general applicability relating to or affecting
creditors rights and to general equitable principles.
(b) Ownership. Such Unitholders
Existing Units are Beneficially Owned by such Unitholder as set
forth on Schedule I hereto. Holdings Unitholder has good
and marketable title to the Existing Units, free and clear of
any Lien. Holdings Unitholder has and will have at all times
through the Closing Date sole voting power (including the right
to control such vote as contemplated herein), sole power of
disposition, sole power to issue instructions with respect to
the matters set forth in Article II hereof, and sole power
to agree to all of the matters set forth in this Agreement, in
each case with respect to all of Holdings Unitholders
Existing Units.
(c) No Violation. Neither the execution
and delivery of this Agreement by such Unitholder nor the
performance by such Unitholder of its obligations under this
Agreement will (i) result in a violation or breach of or
conflict with any provisions of, or constitute a default (or an
event which, with notice or lapse of time or both, would
constitute a default) under, or result in the termination,
cancellation of, or give rise to a right of purchase under, or
accelerate the performance required by, or result in a right of
termination or acceleration under, or result in the creation of
any Lien upon any of the Existing Units or result in being
declared void, voidable, or without further binding effect, or
otherwise result in a material detriment to such Unitholder
under, any note, bond, mortgage, indenture, deed of trust,
license, contract, lease, agreement or other instrument or
obligation of any kind to which such Unitholder is a party or by
which such Unitholder or any of its respective properties,
rights or assets may be bound or (ii) violate any
judgments, decrees, injunctions, rulings, awards, settlements,
stipulations, orders (collectively,
Orders) or laws applicable to such
Unitholder or any of its material properties, rights or assets
or result in a violation or breach of or conflict with its
certificate of incorporation or bylaws, partnership agreement,
or limited liability company agreement (as applicable).
(d) Consents and Approvals. No consent,
approval, Order or authorization of, or registration,
declaration or filing with, any governmental authority is
necessary to be obtained or made by such Unitholder in
connection with such Unitholders execution, delivery and
performance of this Agreement
D-3
or the consummation by such Unitholder of the transactions
contemplated hereby, except (i) for any reports under
Sections 13(d) and 16 of the Exchange Act as may be
required in connection with this Agreement and the transactions
contemplated hereby, (ii) as set forth in the Merger
Agreement or (iii) as would not reasonably be expected to
prevent, materially delay or otherwise materially impair such
Unitholders ability to perform its obligations hereunder.
(e) Absence of Litigation. There is no
action, litigation or proceeding pending and no Order of any
governmental authority outstanding nor, to the knowledge of such
Unitholder, is any such action, litigation, proceeding or Order
threatened, against such Unitholder or its Existing Units which
may prevent or materially delay such Unitholder from performing
its obligations under this Agreement or consummating the
transactions contemplated hereby.
(f) Reliance by Partners. Such Unitholder
understands and acknowledges that Partners is entering into the
Merger Agreement in reliance upon such Unitholders
execution and delivery of this Agreement and the representations
and warranties of such Unitholder contained herein.
3.2 Representations and Warranties of
Partners. Partners hereby represents and warrants
to each Unitholder that the execution and delivery of this
Agreement by Partners and the consummation of the transactions
contemplated hereby have been duly authorized by all necessary
action on the part of Partners.
ARTICLE IV
OTHER
COVENANTS
4.1 Prohibition on Transfers, Other
Actions. Each Unitholder hereby agrees not to
(i) acquire any additional Common Units or Management Units
or other voting equity interests of Holdings or any securities
convertible into or exchangeable for Common Units or other
voting equity interests of Holdings (other than the acquisition
of additional Common Units upon conversion of Management Units
outstanding as of the date hereof), (ii) Transfer any of
the Existing Units, Beneficial Ownership thereof or any other
interest therein; (iii) enter into any agreement,
arrangement or understanding with any Person, or take any other
action, that violates or conflicts with or would reasonably be
expected to violate or conflict with, or result in or give rise
to a violation of or conflict with, Unitholders
representations, warranties, covenants and obligations under
this Agreement; or (iv) take any action that could restrict
or otherwise affect Unitholders legal power, authority and
right to comply with and perform its covenants and obligations
under this Agreement. Any Transfer in violation of this
provision shall be null and void.
4.2 Distributions, etc. In the event of a
unit split, unit distribution, or any change in the Common Units
and/or
Management Units by reason of any
split-up,
reverse unit split, recapitalization, combination,
reclassification, exchange of units or the like, the term
Existing Units shall be deemed to refer to and
include such units as well as all such unit distributions and
any securities into which or for which any or all of such units
may be changed or exchanged or which are received in such
transaction.
4.3 No Solicitation. Subject to
Section 4.6, each Unitholder agrees that it will not, and
shall use its reasonable best efforts to cause its
Representatives not to, directly or indirectly through another
Person, (i) knowingly solicit, initiate or encourage the
submission of any Acquisition Proposal or the making or
consummation thereof, (ii) participate in any discussions
or negotiations regarding, or furnish to any Person any
nonpublic information about Holdings or Partners in connection
with, or otherwise cooperate in any way with, any Acquisition
Proposal, (iii) make or participate in, directly or
indirectly, a soliciation of proxies (as
such terms are used in the rules of the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission) or powers of attorney or similar rights to
vote, or seek to advise or influence any Person with respect to
the voting of, any Common Units or Management Units in
connection with any vote or other action on any matter, other
than to recommend that holders of Common Units and Management
Units vote in favor of the approval and adoption of the Merger
and the Merger Agreement and as otherwise expressly provided in
this Agreement, or (iv) agree or publicly propose to do any
of the foregoing. Each Unitholder hereby represents that, as of
the date hereof, such Unitholder is not engaged in any
discussions or negotiations with respect to any Acquisition
Proposal and shall use its reasonable best efforts to cause such
Unitholders Representatives to immediately cease and cause
D-4
to be terminated all existing discussions or negotiations with
any Person conducted heretofore with respect to any Acquisition
Proposal and request the prompt return or destruction of all
confidential information previously furnished and will take
commercially reasonable steps to inform its Representatives of
the obligations undertaken by such Unitholder pursuant to this
Agreement, including this Section 4.3.
4.4 Notice of Proposals Regarding Prohibited
Transactions. Each Unitholder hereby agrees to
notify Partners as promptly as practicable (and in any event
within 48 hours after receipt) in writing of any written
inquiries or proposals which are received by, or any written
requests for information from, or any written request to
initiate negotiations or discussions with, Unitholder or any of
its Affiliates (other than its Representatives acting in their
capacity as an officer or director of Holdings GP) with respect
to any Acquisition Proposal (including the material terms
thereof and the identity of such person(s) making such inquiry
or proposal, requesting such information or seeking to initiate
such negotiations or discussions, as the case may be).
4.5 Further Assurances. From time to
time, at Partners request and without further
consideration, each Unitholder shall execute and deliver such
additional documents and take all such further action as may be
reasonably necessary or advisable to effect the actions and
consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
4.6 Unitholder Capacity. Each Unitholder
has entered into this Agreement solely in its capacity as a
Beneficial Owner of Existing Units. Notwithstanding anything to
the contrary contained in this Agreement: (i) none of the
provisions of this Agreement shall be construed to prohibit,
limit or restrict any Representative of a Unitholder who is an
officer of Holdings GP or Partners GP or a member of the
Partners GP Board or Holdings GP Board from exercising his or
her fiduciary duties to Holdings or Partners by voting or taking
any other action whatsoever in his or her capacity as an officer
or director, including with respect to the Merger Agreement and
the transactions contemplated thereby; and (ii) no action
taken by Holdings or Partners in respect of any Acquisition
Proposal shall serve as the basis of a claim that a Unitholder
is in breach of its obligations hereunder notwithstanding the
fact that such Unitholders Representative, in his or her
capacity as an officer or director of Holdings GP or Partners
GP, has provided advice or assistance to Holdings or Partners in
connection therewith.
4.7 Continued Ownership of Holdings GP and General
Partner Interest in Holdings.
(a) Each of the Unitholders agrees not to Transfer its
ownership interest in Holdings Unitholder, or Beneficial
Ownership thereof or any other interest therein, and to cause
Holdings Unitholder not to dissolve or liquidate, prior to the
earlier of (i) the date of refinancing or termination of
that certain Credit Agreement by and among Partners, the several
banks and other financial institutions party thereto and the
administrative agent, dated as of November 13, 2006, as
amended, supplemented and modified from time to time or
(ii) August 14, 2013, in one or more Transfers that
would cause them to cease to collectively own, beneficially or
of record, directly or indirectly at least 35% of the
outstanding equity interests of Holdings Unitholder (such
earlier date, the Applicable Date).
(b) Holdings Unitholder agrees not to Transfer its
ownership interest in Holdings GP, or Beneficial Ownership
thereof or any other interest therein, and to cause Holdings GP
not to dissolve or liquidate, prior to the Applicable Date.
(c) Each of the Unitholders agrees to cause Holdings GP not
to transfer its general partner interest in Holdings, or
Beneficial Ownership thereof or any other interest therein,
prior to the Applicable Date.
4.8 Registration Rights. At the Effective
Time, Partners and the Unitholders shall enter into a
Registration Rights Agreement substantially in the form attached
hereto as Annex A.
D-5
ARTICLE V
MISCELLANEOUS
5.1 Termination. This Agreement shall
remain in effect until the earliest to occur of (i) the
Effective Time; (ii) a Holdings Change in Recommendation,
(iii) the termination of the Merger Agreement in accordance
with its terms; or (iv) the written agreement of the
Unitholders and Partners to terminate this Agreement. After the
occurrence of such applicable event, this Agreement shall
terminate and be of no further force and effect;
provided, that, notwithstanding termination of this
Agreement upon the Effective Time under clause (i) above,
Section 4.7 shall remain in full force and effect until the
Applicable Date and this Article V (except
Sections 5.2 and 5.3) shall remain in full force and effect
until the Applicable Date. Nothing in this Section 5.1 and
no termination of this Agreement shall relieve or otherwise
limit any party of liability for any breach of this Agreement
occurring prior to such termination.
5.2 No Ownership Interest. Nothing
contained in this Agreement shall be deemed to vest in Partners
any direct or indirect ownership or incidence of ownership of or
with respect to any Existing Units. All rights, ownership and
economic benefit relating to the Existing Units shall remain
vested in and belong to each Unitholder, and Partners shall have
no authority to direct such Unitholder in the voting (except as
otherwise provided herein) or disposition of any of the Existing
Units.
5.3 Publicity. Each Unitholder hereby
permits Partners and Holdings to include and disclose in the
Registration Statement, the Joint Proxy Statement and in such
other schedules, certificates, applications, agreements or
documents as such entities reasonably determine to be necessary
or appropriate in connection with the consummation of the Merger
and the transaction contemplated in the Merger Agreement such
Unitholders identity and ownership of the Existing Units
and the nature of such Unitholders commitments,
arrangements and understandings pursuant to this Agreement.
5.4 Notices. All notices and other
communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed
given (1) on the date of delivery, if delivered personally,
(2) on the first Business Day following the date of
dispatch if delivered by a recognized next day courier service
and (3) on the fifth Business Day following the date of
mailing if delivered by registered or certified mail, return
receipt requested, postage prepaid. All notices hereunder shall
be delivered as set forth below or pursuant to such other
instructions as may be designated in writing by the party to
receive such notice:
If to Partners, to:
Buckeye Partners, L.P.
One Greenway Plaza, Suite 600
Houston, TX 77046
Attention: General Counsel
With copies to:
Buckeye Partners, L.P.
One Greenway Plaza, Suite 600
Houston, TX 77046
Attention: Chairman of the Audit Committee
and
Prickett, Jones & Elliott, P.A.
1310 King Street
Wilmington, DE 19801
Tel: 302.888.6500
Fax: 302.658.8111
Attention: John H. Small, Esq.
D-6
and
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
666 Fifth Avenue, 26th Floor
New York, NY 10103
Tel: 212.237.0000
Attention: Michael J. Swidler, Esq.
If to a Unitholder, to:
ArcLight Capital Partners, LLC
Attn: John A. Tisdale
200 Clarendon Street, 55th Floor
John Hancock Tower
Boston, MA 02117
Fax:
(617) 867-4698
and
Kelso & Company
Attn: Jim Connors
320 Park Ave., 24th Floor
New York, New York. 10022
Fax:
(212) 223-2379
and
BGH GP Holdings, LLC
C/o ArcLight Capital Partners, LLC
Attn: John A. Tisdale
200 Clarendon Street, 55th Floor
John Hancock Tower
Boston, MA 02117
Fax:
(617) 867-4698
with a copy to:
Latham & Watkins LLP
Attn: William N. Finnegan IV, Esq.
Sean T. Wheeler, Esq.
717 Texas Avenue, Suite 1600
Houston, Texas 77002
Fax:
(713) 546-5401
5.5 Interpretation. The words
hereof, herein and hereunder
and words of similar import when used in this Agreement shall
refer to this Agreement as a whole and not to any particular
provision of this Agreement, and Section references are to this
Agreement unless otherwise specified. Whenever the words
include, includes or
including are used in this Agreement, they shall be
deemed to be followed by the words without
limitation. The meanings given to terms defined herein
shall be equally applicable to both the singular and plural
forms of such terms. The table of contents and headings
contained in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and
shall not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of
this Agreement. This Agreement is the product of negotiation by
the parties having the assistance of counsel and other advisers.
It is the intention of the parties that this Agreement not be
construed more strictly with regard to one party than with
regard to the others.
5.6 Counterparts. This Agreement may be
executed by facsimile and in counterparts, all of which shall be
considered one and the same agreement and shall become effective
when counterparts have been signed by each of the parties and
delivered to the other parties, it being understood that all
parties need not sign the same counterpart.
D-7
5.7 Entire Agreement. This Agreement,
together with the schedule annexed hereto, and, solely to the
extent of the defined terms referenced herein and as provided in
Section 4.3 hereof, the Merger Agreement embodies the
complete agreement and understanding among the parties hereto
with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersede and
preempt any prior understandings, agreements or representations
by or among the parties, written and oral, that may have related
to the subject matter hereof in any way.
5.8 Governing Law; Consent to Jurisdiction; Waiver of
Jury Trial.
(a) This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, regardless of
the laws that might otherwise govern under applicable principles
of conflicts of laws thereof. The parties agree that irreparable
damage would occur and that the parties would not have any
adequate remedy at law in the event that any of the provisions
of this Agreement were not performed in accordance with their
specific terms or were otherwise breached. It is accordingly
agreed that the parties shall be entitled to an injunction or
injunctions to prevent breaches of this Agreement and to enforce
specifically the terms and provisions of this Agreement in the
Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (and any appellate
court of the State of Delaware) and the Federal courts of the
United States of America located in the State of Delaware, this
being in addition to any other remedy to which they are entitled
at law or in equity. In addition, each of the parties hereto
(i) consents to submit itself to the personal jurisdiction
of the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (and any
appellate court of the State of Delaware) and the Federal courts
of the United States of America located in the State of Delaware
in the event any dispute arises out of this Agreement or the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement, (ii) agrees
that it will not attempt to deny or defeat such personal
jurisdiction by motion or other request for leave from any such
court and (iii) agrees that it will not bring any action
relating to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement in any court other than the Court of Chancery of
the State of Delaware or a Federal court of the United States of
America located in the State of Delaware. Without limiting the
foregoing, each party agrees that service of process on such
party as provided in Section 5.4 shall be deemed effective
service of process on such party.
(b) EACH PARTY HERETO HEREBY WAIVES, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT
PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, ANY RIGHT IT MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY
JURY IN RESPECT OF ANY SUIT, ACTION OR OTHER PROCEEDING ARISING
OUT OF THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED HEREBY.
EACH PARTY HERETO (I) CERTIFIES THAT NO REPRESENTATIVE,
AGENT OR ATTORNEY OF ANY OTHER PARTY HAS REPRESENTED, EXPRESSLY
OR OTHERWISE, THAT SUCH PARTY WOULD NOT, IN THE EVENT OF ANY
ACTION, SUIT OR PROCEEDING, SEEK TO ENFORCE THE FOREGOING WAIVER
AND (II) ACKNOWLEDGES THAT IT AND THE OTHER PARTIES HERETO
HAVE BEEN INDUCED TO ENTER INTO THIS AGREEMENT, BY, AMONG OTHER
THINGS, THE MUTUAL WAIVER AND CERTIFICATIONS IN THIS
SECTION 5.8.
5.9 Amendment; Waiver. This Agreement may
not be amended except by an instrument in writing signed by
Partners and each Unitholder. Each party may waive any right of
such party hereunder by an instrument in writing signed by such
party and delivered to Partners and the Unitholders.
5.10 Remedies.
(a) Each party hereto acknowledges that monetary damages
would not be an adequate remedy in the event that any covenant
or agreement in this Agreement is not performed in accordance
with its terms, and it is therefore agreed that, in addition to
and without limiting any other remedy or right it may have, the
non-breaching party will have the right to an injunction,
temporary restraining order or other equitable relief in any
court of competent jurisdiction enjoining any such breach and
enforcing specifically the terms and provisions hereof. Each
party hereto agrees not to oppose the granting of such relief in
the event a court determines that such a breach has occurred,
and to waive any requirement for the securing or posting of any
bond in connection with such remedy.
(b) All rights, powers and remedies provided under this
Agreement or otherwise available in respect hereof at law or in
equity shall be cumulative and not alternative, and the exercise
or beginning of the exercise of any thereof by any party shall
not preclude the simultaneous or later exercise of any other
such right, power or remedy by such party.
D-8
5.11 Severability. Any term or provision
of this Agreement which is determined by a court of competent
jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable in any jurisdiction
shall, as to that jurisdiction, be ineffective to the extent of
such invalidity or unenforceability without rendering invalid or
unenforceable the remaining terms and provisions of this
Agreement or affecting the validity or enforceability of any of
the terms or provisions of this Agreement in any other
jurisdiction, and if any provision of this Agreement is
determined to be so broad as to be unenforceable, the provision
shall be interpreted to be only so broad as is enforceable, in
all cases so long as neither the economic nor legal substance of
the transactions contemplated hereby is affected in any manner
adverse to any party or its equityholders. Upon any such
determination, the parties shall negotiate in good faith in an
effort to agree upon a suitable and equitable substitute
provision to effect the original intent of the parties as
closely as possible and to the end that the transactions
contemplated hereby shall be fulfilled to the maximum extent
possible.
5.12 Action by Partners. No waiver,
consent or other action by or on behalf of Partners pursuant to
or as contemplated by this Agreement shall have any effect
unless such waiver, consent or other action is expressly
approved by the Partners Audit Committee. No act or failure to
act by the Partner GP Board shall constitute a breach by
Partners or Partners GP of this Agreement unless such act or
failure to act is expressly approved by the Partners Audit
Committee.
5.13 Successors and Assigns; Third Party
Beneficiaries. Neither this Agreement nor any of
the rights or obligations of any party under this Agreement
shall be assigned, in whole or in part (by operation of law or
otherwise), by any party without the prior written consent of
the other parties hereto. Subject to the foregoing, this
Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of and be
enforceable by the parties hereto and their respective
successors and permitted assigns. Nothing in this Agreement,
express or implied, is intended to confer on any Person other
than (a) the parties hereto or (b) the parties
respective successors and permitted assigns any rights,
remedies, obligations or liabilities under or by reason of this
Agreement.
[Remainder of this page intentionally left blank]
D-9
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this
Agreement to be signed (where applicable, by their respective
officers or other authorized Person thereunto duly authorized)
as of the date first written above.
BUCKEYE PARTNERS, L.P.
By: Buckeye GP LLC, its General Partner
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Keith
E. St.Clair
|
Name: Keith E. St.Clair
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Senior Vice President and Chief
|
Financial Officer
BGH GP HOLDINGS, LLC
Name: Frank Loverro
ARCLIGHT ENERGY PARTNERS FUND III, L.P.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
ArcLight PEF GP III, LLC,
|
Its General Partner
|
|
|
|
By:
|
ArcLight Capital Holdings, LLC
|
Its Manager
Name: Daniel R. Revers
ARCLIGHT ENERGY PARTNERS FUND IV, L.P.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
ArcLight PEF GP IV, LLC,
|
Its General Partner
|
|
|
|
By:
|
ArcLight Capital Holdings, LLC
|
Its Manager
Name: Daniel R. Revers
D-10
|
|
|
|
|
KELSO INVESTMENT ASSOCIATES VII, L.P.
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
Kelso GP VII, L.P. , its general partner
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
Kelso GP VII, LLC, its general partner
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Christopher
L. Collins
|
Name: Christopher L. Collins
KEP VI, LLC
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Christopher
L. Collins
|
Name: Christopher L. Collins
D-11
Schedule I
UNITHOLDER INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Existing Units
|
|
|
|
Common Units
|
|
|
Management Units
|
|
|
|
Record
|
|
|
Beneficial
|
|
|
Record
|
|
|
Beneficial
|
|
Name
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
BGH GP Holdings, LLC
|
|
|
17,001,766
|
|
|
|
17,004,596
|
|
|
|
509,141
|
|
|
|
509,141
|
|
ArcLight Energy Partners Fund III, L.P.
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
ArcLight Energy Partners Fund IV, L.P.
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Kelso Investment Associates VII, L.P.
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
KEP VI, LLC
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
D-I
Annex A
FORM OF REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT
D-A
ANNEX E
|
|
|
|
|
745 Seventh Avenue
New York, NY 10019
United States
|
June 10,
2010
Buckeye GP LLC
One Greenway Plaza, Suite 600
Houston, TX 77094
Audit Committee of Buckeye GP LLC:
We understand that Buckeye Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited
partnership (Partners), Buckeye GP LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company and the general partner of Partners
(Partners GP), Grand Ohio, LLC, a newly formed
Delaware limited liability company and wholly owned subsidiary
of Partners (MergerCo), Buckeye GP Holdings L.P. a
Delaware limited partnership (Holdings), and
MainLine Management LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
and the general partner of Holdings (Holdings GP)
intend to enter into a transaction (the Proposed
Transaction) pursuant to which (i) MergerCo will,
subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement
and Plan of Merger dated June 10, 2010, by and among
Partners, Partners GP, MergerCo, Holdings and Holdings GP (the
Merger Agreement), merge with and into Holdings,
with Holdings surviving such merger and with Partners as the
sole limited partner (with a 100% economic interest) of Holdings
and (ii) each issued and outstanding (a) common unit
of Holdings (Holdings Common Units) and
(b) management unit of Holdings (the Holdings
Management Units) shall be converted into the right to
receive 0.705 (the Exchange Ratio) units
representing limited partnership interests of Partners (the
Partners LP Units), which Partners LP Units shall be
duly authorized and validly issued in accordance with applicable
laws and the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited
Partnership of Partners as in effect on the date hereof (the
Partnership Agreement). We further understand that
Arclight Capital Partners LLC and certain of its affiliates
(Arclight) and Kelso & Company, LP and
certain of its affiliates (Kelso and together with
Arclight, the Affiliated Unitholders), who
collectively indirectly own approximately 62% of Holdings
through the Affiliated Unitholders majority ownership of
BGH GP Holdings, LLC, and BGH GP Holdings LLC individually, have
agreed with Partners to vote for the transaction pursuant to a
Support Agreement, dated June 10, 2010 by and among the
Affiliated Unitholders, BGH GP Holdings, LLC and Partners, (the
Support Agreement and, collectively with the Merger
Agreement and the Partnership Agreement, the
Agreements). The summary of the Proposed Transaction
set forth above is qualified in its entirety by the terms of the
Agreements.
We have been requested by the Audit Committee of Partners GP to
render our opinion with respect to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, to Partners and accordingly, the
holders of the Partners LP Units (other than Holdings, Partners
GP, and the Affiliated Unitholders), of the Exchange Ratio to be
paid by Partners in the Proposed Transaction. We have not been
requested to opine as to, and our opinion does not in any manner
address (i) the underlying business decision to proceed
with or effect the Proposed Transaction, (ii) any of the
tax or other consequences of the Proposed Transaction to the
holders of the Partners LP Units, (iii) the prices at which
the Partners LP Units and the Holdings Common Units will trade
at any time following the announcement of the Proposed
Transaction or the prices at which the Partners LP Units will
trade at any time following the consummation of the Proposed
Transaction or (iv) the likelihood of the consummation of
the Proposed Transaction. In addition, we express no opinion on,
and our opinion does not in any manner address, the fairness of
the amount or the nature of any compensation to any officers,
directors or employees of any parties to the Proposed
Transaction, or any class of such persons, relative to the
Exchange Ratio paid in the Proposed Transaction or otherwise.
In arriving at our opinion, we reviewed and analyzed:
(1) the Agreements and the specific terms of the Proposed
Transaction; (2) publicly available information concerning
Partners and Holdings that we believe to
E-1
Page 2
of 3
be relevant to our analysis, including their Annual Reports on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 and Quarterly
Reports on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010;
(3) financial and operating information with respect to the
business, operations and prospects of Partners and Holdings
furnished to us by the management of Partners, including
financial projections of Partners and Holdings prepared by
management of Partners (the Partners Projections);
(4) a trading history of the Partners LP Units and the
Holdings Common Units from August 4, 2006 to June 9,
2010; (5) a comparison of the historical financial results
and present financial condition of Partners and Holdings with
each other and with those of other companies that we deemed
relevant; (6) a comparison of the financial terms of the
Proposed Transaction with the financial terms of certain other
transactions that we deemed relevant; (7) the potential pro
forma impact of the Proposed Transaction on the future financial
performance of the combined company; (8) published
estimates of independent research analysts with respect to the
future financial performance and trading price targets of
Partners and Holdings and (9) the relative trading
liquidity of Partners LP Units and Holdings Common Units. In
addition, we have had discussions with the management of
Partners and Holdings concerning their respective businesses,
operations, assets, liabilities, financial condition and
prospects and have undertaken such other studies, analyses and
investigations as we deemed appropriate.
In arriving at our opinion, we have assumed and relied upon the
accuracy and completeness of the financial and other information
used by us without any independent verification of such
information, and have further relied upon the assurances of the
management of Partners that they are not aware of any facts or
circumstances that would make such information inaccurate or
misleading. With respect to the Partners Projections, upon the
advice of Partners, we have assumed that the Partners
Projections have been reasonably prepared on a basis reflecting
the best currently available estimates and judgments of the
management of Partners as to the future financial performance of
Partners and Holdings on a standalone basis, and we have relied
on such projections in arriving at our opinion. In addition, for
purposes of our analysis, we also have considered other
assumptions and estimates which resulted in certain adjustments
to the Partners Projections (the Adjusted
Projections). We have discussed the Adjusted Projections
with the Audit Committee of Partners GP and it is our
understanding that they have agreed with the appropriateness of
the use of the Adjusted Projections in performing our analysis,
and we have also relied on such Adjusted Projections in arriving
at our opinion. In arriving at our opinion, we have not
conducted a physical inspection of the properties and facilities
of Partners or Holdings and have not made or obtained any
evaluations or appraisals of the assets or liabilities of
Partners or Holdings. Our opinion necessarily is based upon
market, economic and other conditions as they exist on, and can
be evaluated as of, the date of this letter. We assume no
responsibility for updating or revising our opinion based on
events or circumstances that may occur after the date of this
letter.
We have assumed the accuracy of the representations and
warranties contained in the Agreements and all agreements
related thereto. We have also assumed, upon the advice of
Partners, that all material governmental, regulatory and third
party approvals, consents and releases for the Proposed
Transaction will be obtained within the constraints contemplated
by the Agreements and that the Proposed Transaction will be
consummated in accordance with the terms of the Agreements
without waiver, modification or amendment of any material term,
condition or agreement thereof. We do not express any opinion as
to any tax or other consequences that might result from the
Proposed Transaction, nor does our opinion address any legal,
tax, regulatory or accounting matters, as to which we understand
that Partners has obtained such advice as it deemed necessary
from qualified professionals.
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion
as of the date hereof that, from a financial point of view, the
Exchange Ratio to be paid by Partners in the Proposed
Transaction is fair to Partners and accordingly, the holders of
the Partners LP Units (other than Holdings, Partners GP, and the
Affiliated Unitholders).
E-2
Page 3
of 3
We have acted as financial advisor to the Audit Committee of
Partners GP in connection with the Proposed Transaction and will
receive a fee for our services, a portion of which is payable
upon rendering this opinion and a substantial portion of which
is contingent upon the consummation of the Proposed Transaction.
In addition, Partners has agreed to reimburse our expenses and
indemnify us for certain liabilities that may arise out of our
engagement. We have performed various investment banking and
financial services for Partners and Holdings and certain of
their respective affiliates in the past, and expect to perform
such services in the future, and have received, and expect to
receive, customary fees for such services. Specifically, in the
past two years, we have performed the following investment
banking and financial services: (i) acted as Joint
Bookrunner on Partners $275 million
10-year
Senior Notes offering, which priced on August 11, 2009,
(ii) committed $75 million to the $250 million
revolving credit facility of Partners operating subsidiary,
Buckeye Energy Services LLC, which closed on August 12,
2009, (iii) acted as Joint Bookrunner on Partners
$108 million follow-on equity offering, which priced on
March 26, 2009 and had the option to sell additional units
exercised by the bookrunners on April 24, 2009 and
(iv) engaged in hedging and risk management transactions
with Partners.
Barclays Capital Inc. and its affiliates engage in a wide range
of businesses from investment and commercial banking, lending,
asset management and other financial and non-financial services.
In the ordinary course of our business, we and our affiliates
may actively trade and effect transactions in the equity, debt
and/or other
securities (and any derivatives thereof) and financial
instruments (including loans and other obligations) of Partners,
Holdings and certain of their respective affiliates for our own
account and for the accounts of our customers and, accordingly,
may at any time hold long or short positions and investments in
such securities and financial instruments.
This opinion, the issuance of which has been approved by our
Fairness Opinion Committee, is for the use and benefit of the
Audit Committee of Partners GP and is rendered in connection
with its consideration of the Proposed Transaction. This opinion
is not intended to be and does not constitute a recommendation
to any unitholder of Partners as to how such unitholder should
vote or act with respect to the Proposed Transaction or any
related matter.
Very truly yours,
/s/ BARCLAYS
CAPITAL INC.
BARCLAYS CAPITAL INC.
E-3
ANNEX
F
June 10, 2010
Board of Directors
MainLine Management LLC, as general partner of Buckeye GP
Holdings L.P.
One Greenway Plaza, Suite 600
Houston, Texas 77046
Members of the Board of Directors:
You have asked us to advise you in your capacity as the Board of
Directors of the general partner of Buckeye GP Holdings L.P.
(the Company), with respect to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, to the holders of common Units
(Common Units) and management units
(Management Units and, together with the Common
Units, Company Units) each representing limited
partner interests in the Company, other than BGH GP Holdings,
LLC (BGH Holdings) and its affiliates (collectively,
the Excluded Persons), of the Exchange Ratio (as
defined below) set forth in the Agreement and Plan of Merger
(the Merger Agreement) to be entered into by and
among Buckeye Partners, L.P. (the Acquiror), Buckeye
GP LLC, the general partner of the Acquiror and a wholly owned
subsidiary of the Company (the Acquiror GP), Grand
Ohio, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Acquiror
(Merger Sub), and the Company and MainLine
Management LLC, the general partner of the Company (the
Company GP). The Merger Agreement provides for,
among other things, the merger (the Merger) of the
Company with Merger Sub pursuant to which the Company will
become a wholly owned subsidiary of the Acquiror and each
outstanding Company Unit will be converted into the right to
receive 0.705 units (the Exchange Ratio)
representing limited partner interests of the Acquiror
(Acquiror Units). We understand that BGH Holdings
owns a majority of the outstanding Company Units and all of the
outstanding equity interests in the Company GP. We further
understand that, pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the general
partnership interest in the Company shall remain outstanding and
continue to be owned by the Company GP, as a wholly owned
subsidiary of BGH Holdings. The holders of Company Units other
than the Excluded Persons are referred to herein as the
Unaffiliated Unit Holders. We further understand
that Management Units are convertible into Common Units, at the
election of the holder thereof, on a
one-for-one
basis and, at your direction, we have, for purposes of our
analyses and this opinion treated all outstanding Management
Units as if so converted.
In arriving at our opinion, we have reviewed a draft, dated
June 9, 2010, of the Merger Agreement; a draft, dated
June 9, 2010 (the Acquiror Partnership
Agreement), of the Amended and Restated Partnership
Agreement of the Acquiror; a draft, dated June 9, 2010 (the
Company Partnership Agreement), of the Second
Amended and Restated Partnership Agreement of the Company; and a
draft, dated June 7, 2010, of the Support Agreement (the
Support Agreement) to be entered into by and among
the Acquiror and the holders of Company Units named therein and
certain publicly available business and financial information
relating to the Company and the Acquiror. We have also reviewed
certain other information relating to the Company and the
Acquiror, including financial forecasts relating to the Company
and the Acquiror, provided to or discussed with us by the
management of the Company and the Acquiror responsible for the
operation and management of the Company and the Acquiror,
respectively, and have met with certain members of the
management of the Company and the Acquiror to discuss the
business and prospects of the Company and the Acquiror,
respectively. We understand that both the Company and the
Acquiror are operated and managed (and their respective
forecasts are prepared) by employees of Buckeye Pipe Line
Services Company (Services Company), a consolidated
affiliate of the Company which is owned by the Buckeye Pipe Line
Services Company Employee Stock Ownership Plan and that Services
Company owns approximately 3.2% of the outstanding Acquiror
Units. We have also considered certain financial data of the
Company and the Acquiror
F-1
and certain market data for their publicly traded securities,
and we have compared that data with similar data for other
companies with publicly traded securities in businesses we
deemed similar to those of the Company and the Acquiror and we
have considered, to the extent publicly available, the financial
terms of certain other business combinations and other
transactions which have recently been effected. We also
considered such other information, financial studies, analyses
and investigations and financial, economic and market criteria
which we deemed relevant.
In connection with our review, we have not independently
verified any of the foregoing information and we have assumed
and relied upon such information being complete and accurate in
all material respects. With respect to the financial forecasts
for the Company and the Acquiror that we have used in our
analyses, the management of the Company and the Acquiror have
advised us, and we have assumed, that such forecasts have been
reasonably prepared in good faith on bases reflecting the best
currently available estimates and judgments of the management of
the Company and the Acquiror as to the future financial
performance of the Company and the Acquiror, respectively. We
also have assumed, with your consent, that, in the course of
obtaining any regulatory or third party consents, approvals or
agreements in connection with the Merger, no delay, limitation,
restriction or condition will be imposed that would have an
adverse effect on the Company, the Acquiror or the contemplated
benefits of the Merger and that the Merger will be consummated
in accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement without
waiver, modification or amendment of any material term,
condition or agreement thereof. Furthermore, we have assumed
that the definitive Merger Agreement, the Acquiror Partnership
Agreement, the Company Partnership Agreement and the Support
Agreement will conform to the drafts reviewed by us in all
respects material to our analyses. We have not investigated or
otherwise evaluated the potential effects of the Merger on the
federal, state or other taxes or tax rates payable by the
Company, the Acquiror or their respective security holders and,
with your consent, have assumed, that such taxes and tax rates
will not be affected by or after giving effect to the Merger. In
addition, we have not been requested to make, and have not made,
an independent evaluation or appraisal of the assets or
liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of the Company or the
Acquiror, nor have we been furnished with any such evaluations
or appraisals.
Our opinion addresses only the fairness, from a financial point
of view, to the Unaffiliated Unit Holders of the Exchange Ratio
and does not address any other aspect or implication of the
Merger or any other agreement, arrangement or understanding
entered into in connection with the Merger or otherwise,
including, without limitation, the fairness of the amount or
nature of, or any other aspect relating to, any compensation to
any officers, directors or employees of any party to the Merger,
or class of such persons, relative to the Exchange Ratio or
otherwise. Furthermore, no opinion, counsel or interpretation is
intended regarding matters that require legal, regulatory,
accounting, insurance, tax, executive compensation or other
similar professional advice. It is assumed that such opinions,
counsel, interpretations or advice have been or will be obtained
from the appropriate professional sources. The issuance of this
opinion was approved by our authorized internal committee.
Our opinion is necessarily based upon information made available
to us as of the date hereof and financial, economic, market and
other conditions as they exist and can be evaluated on the date
hereof and upon certain assumptions regarding such financial,
economic, market and other conditions that are currently subject
to unusual volatility and that, if different than assumed, could
have a material impact on our analyses or opinion. In addition,
as you are aware, the financial projections and estimates that
we have reviewed relating to the future financial performance of
the Company and the Acquiror reflect certain assumptions
regarding the oil and gas industry that are subject to
significant volatility and that, if different than assumed,
could have a material impact on our analyses and opinion. We are
not expressing any opinion as to what the value of Acquiror
Units actually will be when issued to the holders of Company
Units pursuant to the Merger or the prices at which Acquiror
Units or Company Units will trade at any time. Our opinion does
not address the relative merits of the Merger as compared to
alternative transactions or strategies that might be available
to the Company, nor does it address the underlying business
decision of the Company to proceed with the Merger. We were not
requested to, and did not solicit third party indications of
interest in acquiring all or any part of the Company.
F-2
We have acted as financial advisor to Company in connection with
the Merger and will receive a fee for our services, a
significant portion of which is contingent upon the consummation
of the Merger. We also will become entitled to receive a fee
upon the delivery of this opinion. In addition, the Company has
agreed to reimburse our expenses and to indemnify us and certain
related parties for certain liabilities and other items arising
out of or related to our engagement. We and our affiliates have
in the past provided investment banking and other financial
services to the Company, the Acquiror and certain of their
affiliates for which we and our affiliates have received
compensation, including, during the last two years, having acted
as a co-managing underwriter of an offering of debt securities
by the Acquiror. We and our affiliates may have provided other
financial advice and services, and may in the future provide
financial advice and services, to the Company, the Acquiror and
their respective affiliates for which we and our affiliates have
received, and would expect to receive, compensation. We are a
full service securities firm engaged in securities trading and
brokerage activities as well as providing investment banking and
other financial services. In the ordinary course of business, we
and our affiliates may acquire, hold or sell, for our and our
affiliates own accounts and the accounts of customers, equity,
debt and other securities and financial instruments (including
bank loans and other obligations) of the Company, the Acquiror
and any other company that may be involved in the Merger, as
well as provide investment banking and other financial services
to such companies.
It is understood that this letter is for the information of the
Board of Directors of the Company GP, as general partner of the
Company (solely in the Boards capacity as such), in
connection with its consideration of the Merger and does not
constitute advice or a recommendation to any securityholder of
the Company as to how such securityholder should vote or act on
any matter relating to the proposed Merger.
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, it is our opinion that,
as of the date hereof, the Exchange Ratio is fair, from a
financial point of view, to the Unaffiliated Unit Holders.
Very truly yours,
/s/ CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES (USA) LLC
CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES (USA) LLC
F-3
BUCKEYE GP HOLDINGS L.P.
Electronic Voting Instructions
You can vote by Internet or telephone! Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week!
Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the two voting methods outlined below to vote
your proxy. VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR.
Proxies submitted by the Internet or telephone must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time, on
November 15, 2010.
Vote by Internet
Log on to the Internet and go to www.envisionreports.com/BGH
Follow the steps outlined on the secured website.
Vote by telephone
Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories & Canada any time on a touch
tone telephone. There is NO CHARGE to you for the call.
Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in X Follow the instructions provided
by the recorded message. this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas.
Special Meeting of Unitholders of Buckeye GP Holdings L.P. 1234 5678 9012 345
IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN
THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
A PROPOSALS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE GENERAL PARTNER OF BUCKEYE GP HOLDINGS L.P. RECOMMENDS A
VOTE FOR PROPOSAL 1.
For Against Abstain +
1. To consider and vote upon the approval of (a) the First Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan
of Merger by and among Buckeye Partners, L.P. (the Partnership), Buckeye GP LLC, the general
partner of the Partnership, Grand Ohio, LLC (MergerCo), Buckeye GP Holdings L.P. (Holdings) and
MainLine Management LLC, the general partner of Holdings (Holdings GP), dated as of August 18,
2010, as such agreement may be amended from time to time, pursuant to which (i) MergerCo will merge
with and into Holdings and Holdings will survive as a subsidiary of the Partnership with the
Partnership as Holdings sole limited partner and Holdings GP remaining as the sole general partner
of Holdings (the merger) and (ii) all common units and management units of Holdings will be
converted into limited partner interests of the Partnership represented by limited partnership
units, (b) the merger and (c) the transactions contemplated thereby.
This Proxy is revocable and, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein by
the undersigned unitholder. If any other matters properly come before the meeting, the persons
named in this proxy will vote in their discretion. If no direction is made, the Proxy will be voted
FOR the above item and in the discretion of the persons named in this proxy for all other matters
that properly come before the meeting.
B Non-Voting Items
Change of Address Please print new address below.
C Authorized Signatures This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. Date and
Sign Below
Please sign exactly as name appears hereon. Jointly owned units will be voted as directed if one
owner signs unless another owner instructs the contrary, in which case the units will not be voted.
If signing in a representative capacity, please indicate title and authority. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
Please print date below. Signature 1 Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 Please
keep signature within the box.
1 U P X 1 0 1 5 4 0 1 +
018DVJ |
Proxy for Holders of Buckeye GP Holdings L.P. Common Units
Dear Unitholder:
Your vote is important and we encourage you to submit your proxy electronically via the Internet or
by telephone, both of which are available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
To submit your proxy electronically via the Internet, go to the website: envisionreports.com/BGH
and follow the prompts. You must use the control number printed in the box on the reverse side of
this card.
To submit your proxy by telephone, you need to use a touch-tone telephone and use the control
number printed in the box on the reverse side of this card. Also, if you need technical assistance
in voting, please call Computershare Trust Company, N.A. toll free at 800-519-3111. Unitholders
calling from outside the U.S. and Canada can call collect at 781-575-2879.
Your vote is important. Thank you for voting.
Proxy card must be signed and dated on the reverse side.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE GENERAL PARTNER OF BUCKEYE GP HOLDINGS L.P. RECOMMENDS A VOTE IN
FAVOR OF THE PROPOSAL.
IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN
THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
Proxy BUCKEYE GP HOLDINGS L.P.
ONE GREENWAY PLAZA, SUITE 600 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77046
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF MAINLINE MANAGEMENT LLC
The undersigned unitholder(s) of Buckeye GP Holdings L.P. (Holdings), having duly received the
Notice of Special Meeting of Holdings and Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus dated September 24,
2010, hereby appoint(s) Keith E. St. Clair and William H. Schmidt, Jr. each or any of them, with
full power of substitution and revocation, as proxies to represent the undersigned and to vote, as
designated, and otherwise act in such proxyholders sole discretion as to any other matter properly
raised in respect of all common units or management units of Holdings, as applicable, which the
undersigned may be entitled to vote at the Special Meeting of Unitholders of Holdings to be held on
November 16, 2010, at 12:00 noon local time at the Four Seasons Hotel, 1300 Lamar Street, Houston,
Texas 77010, and at any and all adjournments or postponements thereof, with all the rights and
powers the undersigned would possess if personally present. Proxies are instructed to vote as
specified on the reverse side or in such proxyholders sole discretion as to any other matter that
may properly come before the Special Meeting.
THIS PROXY IS CONTINUED ON THE OTHER SIDE
PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND MAIL THIS PROXY IN THE ENCLOSED ADDRESSED ENVELOPE, WHICH REQUIRES NO POSTAGE
IF MAILED IN THE U.S. |