e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended October 2, 2010
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File Number 1-6544
Sysco Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
1390 Enclave Parkway
Houston, Texas
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
74-1648137
(IRS employer
identification number)
77077-2099
(Zip Code) |
Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code:
(281) 584-1390
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
585,084,667 shares of common stock were outstanding as of October 30, 2010.
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements |
Sysco Corporation and its Consolidated Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In Thousands, Except for Share Data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
July 3, 2010 |
|
|
September 26, 2009 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
448,374 |
|
|
$ |
585,443 |
|
|
$ |
773,770 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,511 |
|
|
|
27,438 |
|
Accounts and notes receivable, less
allowances of $49,376, $36,573 and $51,089 |
|
|
2,814,958 |
|
|
|
2,617,352 |
|
|
|
2,575,293 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
1,875,242 |
|
|
|
1,771,539 |
|
|
|
1,747,773 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
74,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,262 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
76,418 |
|
|
|
70,992 |
|
|
|
69,013 |
|
Prepaid income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
5,289,411 |
|
|
|
5,076,258 |
|
|
|
5,284,549 |
|
Plant and equipment at cost, less depreciation |
|
|
3,277,583 |
|
|
|
3,203,823 |
|
|
|
3,014,341 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,577,691 |
|
|
|
1,549,815 |
|
|
|
1,529,066 |
|
Intangibles, less amortization |
|
|
110,974 |
|
|
|
106,398 |
|
|
|
116,731 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
129,532 |
|
|
|
124,488 |
|
|
|
121,755 |
|
Prepaid pension cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,750 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
270,219 |
|
|
|
252,919 |
|
|
|
237,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets |
|
|
2,088,416 |
|
|
|
2,033,620 |
|
|
|
2,053,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
10,655,410 |
|
|
$ |
10,313,701 |
|
|
$ |
10,352,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
1,998,982 |
|
|
$ |
1,953,092 |
|
|
$ |
1,883,088 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
751,640 |
|
|
|
870,114 |
|
|
|
767,742 |
|
Accrued income taxes |
|
|
337,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
345,420 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
50,561 |
|
|
|
178,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
7,837 |
|
|
|
7,970 |
|
|
|
8,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
3,146,021 |
|
|
|
3,009,198 |
|
|
|
3,004,993 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
2,486,646 |
|
|
|
2,472,662 |
|
|
|
2,468,783 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
282,836 |
|
|
|
271,512 |
|
|
|
616,142 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
758,912 |
|
|
|
732,803 |
|
|
|
548,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other liabilities |
|
|
3,528,394 |
|
|
|
3,476,977 |
|
|
|
3,633,088 |
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $1 per share
Authorized 1,500,000 shares, issued none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $1 per share
Authorized 2,000,000,000 shares, issued
765,174,900 shares |
|
|
765,175 |
|
|
|
765,175 |
|
|
|
765,175 |
|
Paid-in capital |
|
|
825,930 |
|
|
|
816,833 |
|
|
|
764,902 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
7,286,409 |
|
|
|
7,134,139 |
|
|
|
6,724,058 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(415,765 |
) |
|
|
(480,251 |
) |
|
|
(233,932 |
) |
Treasury stock at cost,178,993,904,
176,768,795 and 173,860,981 shares |
|
|
(4,480,754 |
) |
|
|
(4,408,370 |
) |
|
|
(4,305,845 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
3,980,995 |
|
|
|
3,827,526 |
|
|
|
3,714,358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
10,655,410 |
|
|
$ |
10,313,701 |
|
|
$ |
10,352,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
Sysco Corporation and its Consolidated Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(In Thousands, Except for Share and Per Share Data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13-Week Period Ended |
|
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
September 26, 2009 |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
9,751,274 |
|
|
$ |
9,081,426 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
7,919,857 |
|
|
|
7,334,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
1,831,417 |
|
|
|
1,747,359 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
1,325,177 |
|
|
|
1,250,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
506,240 |
|
|
|
497,328 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
31,101 |
|
|
|
33,800 |
|
Other expense (income), net |
|
|
(1,684 |
) |
|
|
(2,012 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes |
|
|
476,823 |
|
|
|
465,540 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
177,754 |
|
|
|
139,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
299,069 |
|
|
$ |
326,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
0.51 |
|
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average shares outstanding |
|
|
588,711,412 |
|
|
|
591,568,212 |
|
Diluted shares outstanding |
|
|
591,103,346 |
|
|
|
591,983,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
2
Sysco Corporation and its Consolidated Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (Unaudited)
(In Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13-Week Period Ended |
|
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
September 26, 2009 |
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
299,069 |
|
|
$ |
326,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
51,465 |
|
|
|
37,082 |
|
Items presented net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of cash flow hedge |
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost |
|
|
638 |
|
|
|
676 |
|
Amortization of unrecognized actuarial loss, net |
|
|
12,253 |
|
|
|
6,166 |
|
Amortization of unrecognized transition obligation |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income |
|
|
64,486 |
|
|
|
44,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
363,555 |
|
|
$ |
370,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
3
Sysco Corporation and its Consolidated Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
(In Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13-Week Period Ended |
|
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
September 26, 2009 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
299,069 |
|
|
$ |
326,205 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense |
|
|
10,148 |
|
|
|
12,748 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
101,714 |
|
|
|
93,906 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(198,900 |
) |
|
|
(207,546 |
) |
Provision for losses on receivables |
|
|
5,670 |
|
|
|
8,152 |
|
Other non-cash items |
|
|
1,973 |
|
|
|
(157 |
) |
Additional investment in certain assets and liabilities, net of effect of businesses acquired: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) in receivables |
|
|
(178,499 |
) |
|
|
(100,167 |
) |
(Increase) in inventories |
|
|
(85,649 |
) |
|
|
(86,167 |
) |
(Increase) in prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
(4,958 |
) |
|
|
(4,242 |
) |
Increase in accounts payable |
|
|
25,468 |
|
|
|
84,798 |
|
(Decrease) in accrued expenses |
|
|
(124,601 |
) |
|
|
(33,895 |
) |
Increase in accrued income taxes |
|
|
342,129 |
|
|
|
56,113 |
|
(Increase) in other assets |
|
|
(13,539 |
) |
|
|
(22,083 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in other long-term liabilities and
prepaid pension cost, net |
|
|
47,034 |
|
|
|
(85,596 |
) |
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation arrangements |
|
|
(277 |
) |
|
|
(465 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
226,782 |
|
|
|
41,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to plant and equipment |
|
|
(142,924 |
) |
|
|
(109,405 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of plant and equipment |
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
1,346 |
|
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(23,891 |
) |
|
|
(8,334 |
) |
Purchases of short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,217 |
) |
Maturities of short-term investments |
|
|
24,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) in restricted cash |
|
|
(5,044 |
) |
|
|
(27,897 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for investing activities |
|
|
(147,430 |
) |
|
|
(171,507 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other debt borrowings |
|
|
626 |
|
|
|
2,417 |
|
Other debt repayments |
|
|
(2,273 |
) |
|
|
(2,593 |
) |
Common stock reissued from treasury for share-based compensation awards |
|
|
40,834 |
|
|
|
21,907 |
|
|
Treasury stock purchases |
|
|
(116,699 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(146,868 |
) |
|
|
(141,729 |
) |
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation arrangements |
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for financing activities |
|
|
(224,103 |
) |
|
|
(119,533 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rates on cash |
|
|
7,682 |
|
|
|
4,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(137,069 |
) |
|
|
(244,881 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
585,443 |
|
|
|
1,018,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
448,374 |
|
|
$ |
773,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
54,302 |
|
|
$ |
59,509 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
35,180 |
|
|
|
334,833 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
4
Sysco Corporation and its Consolidated Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Unless this Form 10-Q indicates otherwise or the context otherwise requires, the terms we,
our, us, Sysco, or the company as used in this Form 10-Q refer to Sysco Corporation
together with its consolidated subsidiaries and divisions.
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the company, without audit, with
the exception of the July 3, 2010 consolidated balance sheet which was taken from the audited
financial statements included in the companys Fiscal 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The
financial statements include consolidated balance sheets, consolidated results of operations,
consolidated statements of comprehensive income and consolidated cash flows. In the opinion of
management, all adjustments, which consist of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present
fairly the financial position, results of operations, comprehensive income and cash flows for all
periods presented have been made.
Prior year amounts within the consolidated balance sheets and consolidated cash flows have
been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation as it relates to the presentation of
cash and accounts payable within these statements. The impact of these reclassifications was
immaterial to the prior year period.
These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements
and notes thereto included in the companys Fiscal 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
A review of the financial information herein has been made by Ernst & Young LLP, independent
auditors, in accordance with established professional standards and procedures for such a review.
A report from Ernst & Young LLP concerning their review is included as Exhibit 15.1 to this Form
10-Q.
2. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer
a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (i.e. an
exit price). The accounting guidance includes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs
to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy
are as follows:
|
|
Level 1 Unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets; |
|
|
|
Level 2 Inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and
liabilities that are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term
of the asset or liability; and |
|
|
|
Level 3 Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which include managements own
assumption about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or
liability, including assumptions about risk. |
Syscos policy is to invest in only high-quality investments. Cash equivalents primarily
include time deposits, certificates of deposit, commercial paper, high-quality money market funds
and all highly liquid instruments with original maturities of three months or less. Short-term
investments consist of commercial paper with original maturities of greater than three months but
less than one year. These investments are considered available-for-sale and are recorded at fair
value. As of each period presented below where short-term investments were held, the difference
between the fair value of the short-term investments and the original cost was not material.
Restricted cash consists of investments in high-quality money market funds.
The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities
measured at fair value.
|
|
Time deposits, certificates of deposit and commercial paper included in cash equivalents
are valued at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. These are included within cash
equivalents as a Level 2 measurement in the tables below. |
|
|
|
Commercial paper included in short-term investments is valued using broker quotes that
utilize observable market inputs. These are included as a Level 2 measurement in the tables
below. |
|
|
|
Money market funds are valued at the closing price reported by the fund sponsor from an
actively traded exchange. These are included within cash equivalents and restricted cash as
Level 1 measurements in the tables below. |
5
|
|
The interest rate swap agreements, discussed further in Note 3, Derivative Financial
Instruments, are valued using a swap valuation model that utilizes an income approach using
observable market inputs including interest rates, LIBOR swap rates and credit default swap
rates. These are included as a Level 2 measurement in the tables below. |
The following tables present the companys assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a
recurring basis as of October 2, 2010, July 3, 2010 and September 26, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets Measured at Fair Value as of October 2, 2010 |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents |
|
$ |
35,280 |
|
|
$ |
251,269 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
286,549 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
129,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,532 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value |
|
$ |
164,812 |
|
|
$ |
268,753 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
433,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets Measured at Fair Value as of July 3, 2010 |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents |
|
$ |
225,400 |
|
|
$ |
199,047 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
424,447 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,511 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
124,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124,488 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value |
|
$ |
349,888 |
|
|
$ |
233,603 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
583,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value as of September 26, 2009 |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents |
|
$ |
511,913 |
|
|
$ |
124,057 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
635,970 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,438 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
121,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value |
|
$ |
633,668 |
|
|
$ |
151,495 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
785,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreement |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
446 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
446 |
|
The carrying values of accounts receivable and accounts payable approximated their respective
fair values due to the short-term maturities of these instruments. The fair value of Syscos total
debt is estimated based on the quoted market prices for the same or similar issue or on the current
rates offered to the company for debt of the same remaining maturities. The fair value of total
debt approximated $2,853.9 million, $2,774.9 million and $2,654.5 million as of October 2, 2010,
July 3, 2010 and
6
September 26, 2009, respectively. The carrying value of total debt was $2,494.5 million, $2,480.6 million and $2,477.5 million as of October 2, 2010, July 3, 2010
and September 26, 2009, respectively.
3. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Sysco manages its debt portfolio to achieve an overall desired position of fixed and floating
rates and may employ interest rate swaps from time to time to achieve this position. The company
does not use derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
In September 2009, the company entered into an interest rate swap agreement that effectively
converted $200.0 million of fixed rate debt maturing in fiscal 2014 to floating rate debt. In
October 2009, the company entered into an interest rate swap agreement that effectively converted
$250.0 million of fixed rate debt maturing in fiscal 2013 to floating rate debt. Both transactions
were entered into with the goal of reducing overall borrowing cost and increasing floating interest
rate exposure. These transactions were designated as fair value hedges since the swaps hedge
against the changes in fair value of fixed rate debt resulting from changes in interest rates.
The location and the fair value of derivative instruments in the consolidated balance sheet as
of October 2, 2010, July 3, 2010 and September 26, 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
|
|
Location |
|
Fair Value |
|
Location |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Interest rate swap agreements |
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
Other assets |
|
$ |
17,484 |
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
July 3, 2010 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
11,045 |
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
September 26, 2009 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
$ |
446 |
|
The location and effect of derivative instruments and related hedged items on the
consolidated results of operations for the 13-week periods ended October 2, 2010 and September 26,
2009 presented on a pre-tax basis are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of (Gain) |
|
|
|
|
or Loss Recognized |
|
Amount of (Gain) or Loss |
|
|
in Income |
|
Recognized in Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13-Week Period Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
September 26, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
Fair Value Hedge Relationships: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(500 |
) |
|
$ |
133 |
|
Hedge ineffectiveness represents the difference between the changes in the fair value of
the derivative instruments and the changes in fair value of the fixed rate debt attributable to
changes in the benchmark interest rate. Hedge ineffectiveness is recorded directly in earnings
within interest expense and was immaterial for the 13-week periods ended October 2, 2010 and
September 26, 2009. The interest rate swaps do not contain credit-risk-related contingent
features.
4. DEBT
As of October 2, 2010, Sysco had uncommitted bank lines of credit which provided for unsecured
borrowings for working capital of up to $95.0 million, of which none was outstanding.
Sysco and one of its subsidiaries, Sysco International, ULC, have a revolving credit facility
supporting the companys U.S. and Canadian commercial paper programs. The facility in the amount
of $1,000.0 million expires on November 4, 2012, but is subject to extension.
7
As of October 2, 2010, there were no commercial paper issuances outstanding. During the
13-week period ended October 2, 2010, aggregate commercial paper issuances and short-term bank
borrowings ranged from zero to approximately $60.0 million.
5. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
The components of net company-sponsored benefit cost for the 13-week period presented are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
Other Postretirement Plans |
|
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
September 26, 2009 |
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
September 26, 2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
24,861 |
|
|
$ |
16,663 |
|
|
$ |
99 |
|
|
$ |
82 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
33,744 |
|
|
|
29,899 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(32,980 |
) |
|
|
(26,215 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
989 |
|
|
|
1,051 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
Recognized net actuarial loss (gain) |
|
|
19,988 |
|
|
|
10,132 |
|
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
(123 |
) |
Amortization of transition obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
46,602 |
|
|
$ |
31,530 |
|
|
$ |
218 |
|
|
$ |
184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Syscos contributions to its company-sponsored defined benefit plans were $5.0 million
and $38.8 million during the 13-week periods ended October 2, 2010 and September 26, 2009,
respectively.
The company made contributions of $140.0 million to its company-sponsored qualified pension
plan (Retirement Plan) in fiscal 2010 that would normally have been made in fiscal 2011. Additional
contributions to the Retirement Plan are not currently anticipated in fiscal 2011. The companys
contributions to the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) and other post-retirement plans
are made in the amounts needed to fund current year benefit payments. The estimated fiscal 2011
contributions to fund benefit payments for the SERP and other post-retirement plans are $22.2
million and $0.3 million, respectively.
6. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13-Week Period Ended |
|
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
September 26, 2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except for share and per share data) |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
299,069 |
|
|
$ |
326,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average basic shares outstanding |
|
|
588,711,412 |
|
|
|
591,568,212 |
|
Dilutive effect of share-based awards |
|
|
2,391,934 |
|
|
|
415,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average diluted shares outstanding |
|
|
591,103,346 |
|
|
|
591,983,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share: |
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share: |
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The number of options that were not included in the diluted earnings per share
calculation because the effect would have been anti-dilutive was approximately 47,800,000 and
66,000,000 for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively.
8
7. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
Sysco provides compensation benefits to employees and non-employee directors under several
share-based payment arrangements including various employee stock incentive plans, the Employees
Stock Purchase Plan, and various non-employee director plans. Sysco also previously provided
share-based compensation under its Management Incentive Plans.
Stock Incentive Plans
There were no share-based award grants to employees or non-employee directors during the first
quarter of fiscal 2011.
Employees Stock Purchase Plan
Plan participants purchased 411,629 shares of Sysco common stock under the Sysco Employees
Stock Purchase Plan during the first quarter of fiscal 2011.
The weighted average fair value per share of employee stock purchase rights issued pursuant to
the Employees Stock Purchase Plan was $4.29 during the first quarter of fiscal 2011. The fair
value of the stock purchase rights is estimated as the difference between the stock price and the
employee purchase price.
All Share-Based Payment Arrangements
The total share-based compensation cost that has been recognized in results of operations was
$10.1 million and $12.7 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010, respectively.
As of October 2, 2010, there was $57.1 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related
to share-based compensation arrangements. This cost is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 2.68 years.
8. INCOME TAXES
Internal Revenue Service Settlement
In the first quarter of fiscal 2010, Sysco reached a settlement with the Internal Revenue
Service (IRS) in connection with its audits of the companys 2003 through 2006 federal income tax
returns. As a result of the settlement, Sysco agreed to cease paying U.S. federal taxes related
to its affiliate Baugh Supply Chain Cooperative (BSCC) on a deferred basis and pay the amounts that
were recorded within deferred taxes related to BSCC over a three-year period as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts paid annually: |
|
(In thousands) |
Fiscal 2010 |
|
$ |
528,000 |
|
Fiscal 2011 |
|
|
212,000 |
|
Fiscal 2012 |
|
|
212,000 |
|
As
noted in the table above, $528.0 million was paid related to the settlement in fiscal
2010, of which $316.0 million was paid in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. Amounts to be paid in
fiscal 2011 and 2012 will be paid in connection with Syscos quarterly tax payments, two of which
fall in the second quarter, one in the third quarter and one in the fourth quarter. The company
believes it has access to sufficient cash on hand, cash flow from operations and current access to
capital to make payments on all of the amounts noted above. The company had previously accrued
interest for a portion of the exposure pertaining to the IRS proposed adjustments and as a result
of the settlement with the IRS, Sysco recorded an income tax benefit of approximately $29.0 million
in the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
Syscos deferred taxes were impacted by the timing of these installment payments. Sysco
reclassified amounts due within one year from deferred taxes to accrued income taxes at the
beginning of fiscal 2010 and at the beginning of fiscal 2011.
9
Uncertain Tax Positions
As of October 2, 2010, the gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits was $84.1 million and the
gross amount of accrued interest liabilities was $28.3 million. It is reasonably possible that the
amount of the unrecognized tax benefits with respect to certain of the companys unrecognized tax
positions will increase or decrease in the next twelve months either because Sysco prevails on
positions that were being challenged upon audit or because the company agrees to their
disallowance. Items that may cause changes to unrecognized tax benefits primarily include the
consideration of various filing requirements in numerous states and the allocation of income and
expense between tax jurisdictions. At this time, an estimate of the range of the reasonably
possible change cannot be made.
Effective Tax Rates
The effective tax rate of 37.28% for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 was favorably impacted
by the adjustment of the carrying values of the companys corporate-owned life insurance (COLI)
policies to their cash surrender values. The gain of $13.5 million recorded in the first quarter
of fiscal 2011 is non-taxable for income tax purposes, and had the impact of decreasing
income tax expense for the period by $5.2 million.
The effective tax rate of 29.93% for the first quarter of fiscal 2010 was favorably impacted
by three items. First, the company recorded an income tax benefit of approximately $29.0 million
resulting from the one-time reversal of previously accrued interest related to the settlement with
the IRS. Second, the gain of $21.2 million recorded to adjust the carrying value of COLI policies
to their cash surrender values in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 was non-taxable for income tax
purposes and had the impact of decreasing income tax expense for the period by $8.1 million.
Third, the company recorded a tax benefit of approximately $5.0 million for the reversal of
valuation allowances previously recorded on state net operating loss carryforwards.
Other
The determination of the companys provision for income taxes requires significant judgment,
the use of estimates and the interpretation and application of complex tax laws. The companys
provision for income taxes reflects a combination of income earned and taxed in the various U.S.
federal and state, as well as foreign, jurisdictions. Jurisdictional tax law changes, increases or
decreases in permanent differences between book and tax items, accruals or adjustments of accruals
for tax contingencies or valuation allowances, and the companys change in the mix of earnings from
these taxing jurisdictions all affect the overall effective tax rate.
9. ACQUISITIONS
During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, in the aggregate, the company paid cash of $23.9
million for an acquisition made during fiscal 2011 and for contingent consideration related to
operations acquired in previous fiscal years. Acquisitions in the
first quarter of fiscal 2011 were
immaterial to the consolidated financial statements.
Certain acquisitions involve contingent consideration typically payable over periods up to
five years only in the event that certain operating results are attained or certain outstanding
contingencies are resolved. As of October 2, 2010, aggregate contingent consideration amounts
outstanding relating to acquisitions was $52.7 million, of which $50.7 million could result in the
recording of additional goodwill.
10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Sysco is engaged in various legal proceedings which have arisen but have not been fully
adjudicated. These proceedings, in the opinion of management, will not have a material adverse
effect upon the consolidated financial position or results of operations of the company when
ultimately concluded.
Multi-Employer Pension Plans
Sysco contributes to several multi-employer defined benefit pension plans based on obligations
arising under collective bargaining agreements covering union-represented employees. Sysco does
not directly manage these multi-employer plans, which are generally managed by boards of trustees,
half of whom are appointed by the unions and the other half by other employers contributing to the
plan. Based upon the information available from plan administrators, management believes that
10
several of these multi-employer plans are underfunded. In addition, pension-related
legislation requires underfunded pension plans to improve their funding ratios within prescribed
intervals based on the level of their underfunding. As a result, Sysco expects its contributions
to these plans to increase in the future.
Under current law regarding multi-employer defined benefit plans, a plans termination,
Syscos voluntary withdrawal, or the mass withdrawal of all contributing employers from any
underfunded multi-employer defined benefit plan would require Sysco to make payments to the plan
for Syscos proportionate share of the multi-employer plans unfunded vested liabilities.
Generally, Sysco does not have the greatest share of liability among the participants in any of
these plans. Based on the information available from plan administrators, which has valuation
dates ranging from January 31, 2008 to December 31, 2009, Sysco estimates its share of withdrawal
liability on most of the multi-employer plans in which it participates could have been as much as
$190.0 million as of October 2, 2010, based on a voluntary withdrawal. The majority of the plans
we participate in have a valuation date of calendar year-end. As such, the majority of the
estimated withdrawal liability results from plans for which the valuation date was December 31,
2008; therefore, the companys estimated liability reflects the asset losses incurred by the
financial markets as of that date. In general, the financial markets have improved since December
31, 2008; therefore, management believes Syscos current share of the withdrawal liability could
differ from this estimate. In addition, if a multi-employer defined benefit plan fails to satisfy
certain minimum funding requirements, the IRS may impose a nondeductible excise tax of 5% on the
amount of the accumulated funding deficiency for those employers contributing to the fund. As of
October 2, 2010, Sysco had approximately $6.3 million in liabilities recorded related to certain
multi-employer defined benefit plans for which Syscos voluntary withdrawal had already occurred.
Fuel Commitments
From time to time, Sysco may enter into forward purchase commitments for a portion of its
projected diesel fuel requirements. As of October 2, 2010, outstanding forward diesel fuel
purchase commitments totaled approximately $80.0 million at a fixed price through October 2011.
11. BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION
The company has aggregated its operating companies into a number of segments, of which only
Broadline and SYGMA are reportable segments as defined in the accounting literature related to
disclosures about segments of an enterprise. The Broadline reportable segment is an aggregation of
the companys United States, Canadian and European Broadline segments. Broadline operating
companies distribute a full line of food products and a wide variety of non-food products to their
customers. SYGMA operating companies distribute a full line of food products and a wide variety of
non-food products to certain chain restaurant customer locations. Other financial information is
attributable to the companys other operating segments, including the companys specialty produce,
custom-cut meat and lodging industry segments and a company that distributes to international
customers.
The accounting policies for the segments are the same as those disclosed by Sysco for its
consolidated financial statements. Intersegment sales represent specialty produce and meat company
products distributed by the Broadline and SYGMA operating companies. The segment results include
certain centrally incurred costs for shared services that are charged to our segments. These
centrally incurred costs are charged based upon the relative level of service used by each
operating company consistent with how Syscos management views the performance of its operating
segments. Management evaluates the performance of each of our operating segments based on its
respective operating income results, which include the allocation of certain centrally incurred
costs.
Included in corporate expenses, among other items, are:
|
|
|
Gains and losses recorded to adjust COLI policies to their cash surrender values; |
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense; |
|
|
|
|
Expenses related to the companys business transformation project; and |
|
|
|
|
Corporate-level depreciation and amortization expense. |
11
The following tables set forth certain financial information for Syscos business segments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13-Week Period Ended |
|
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
September 26, 2009 |
|
Sales (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broadline |
|
$ |
7,791,274 |
|
|
$ |
7,308,706 |
|
SYGMA |
|
|
1,319,496 |
|
|
|
1,150,861 |
|
Other |
|
|
786,925 |
|
|
|
742,877 |
|
Intersegment sales |
|
|
(146,421 |
) |
|
|
(121,018 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
9,751,274 |
|
|
$ |
9,081,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13-Week Period Ended |
|
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
September 26, 2009 |
|
Operating income (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broadline |
|
$ |
535,757 |
|
|
$ |
509,024 |
|
SYGMA |
|
|
14,570 |
|
|
|
5,838 |
|
Other |
|
|
26,875 |
|
|
|
25,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segments |
|
|
577,202 |
|
|
|
540,676 |
|
Corporate expenses |
|
|
(70,962 |
) |
|
|
(43,348 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income |
|
|
506,240 |
|
|
|
497,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
31,101 |
|
|
|
33,800 |
|
Other expense (income), net |
|
|
(1,684 |
) |
|
|
(2,012 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes |
|
$ |
476,823 |
|
|
$ |
465,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
July 3, 2010 |
|
|
September 26, 2009 |
|
Assets (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broadline |
|
$ |
6,533,318 |
|
|
$ |
6,218,985 |
|
|
$ |
5,966,216 |
|
SYGMA |
|
|
385,487 |
|
|
|
392,883 |
|
|
|
347,854 |
|
Other |
|
|
949,072 |
|
|
|
937,605 |
|
|
|
904,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segments |
|
|
7,867,877 |
|
|
|
7,549,473 |
|
|
|
7,219,020 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
2,787,533 |
|
|
|
2,764,228 |
|
|
|
3,133,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
10,655,410 |
|
|
$ |
10,313,701 |
|
|
$ |
10,352,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
12. SUPPLEMENTAL GUARANTOR INFORMATION
Sysco International, ULC is an unlimited liability company organized under the laws of the
Province of British Columbia, Canada and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sysco. In May 2002, Sysco
International, Co. issued, in a private offering, $200.0 million of 6.10% notes due in 2012. These
notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Sysco.
The following condensed consolidating financial statements present separately the financial
position, results of operations and cash flows of the parent guarantor (Sysco), the subsidiary
issuer (Sysco International) and all other non-guarantor subsidiaries of Sysco (Other Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries) on a combined basis with eliminating entries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet |
|
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sysco |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Sysco |
|
|
International |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Totals |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
219,678 |
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
5,069,712 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,289,411 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
15,352,365 |
|
|
|
493,563 |
|
|
|
130,477 |
|
|
|
(15,976,405 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Plant and equipment, net |
|
|
471,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,805,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,277,583 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
386,531 |
|
|
|
543 |
|
|
|
1,701,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,088,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
16,430,521 |
|
|
$ |
494,127 |
|
|
$ |
9,707,167 |
|
|
$ |
(15,976,405 |
) |
|
$ |
10,655,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
$ |
369,160 |
|
|
$ |
4,165 |
|
|
$ |
2,772,696 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,146,021 |
|
Intercompany payables (receivables) |
|
|
9,514,740 |
|
|
|
84,075 |
|
|
|
(9,598,815 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
2,233,383 |
|
|
|
199,897 |
|
|
|
53,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,486,646 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
513,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
528,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,041,748 |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
3,799,996 |
|
|
|
205,990 |
|
|
|
15,951,414 |
|
|
|
(15,976,405 |
) |
|
|
3,980,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
16,430,521 |
|
|
$ |
494,127 |
|
|
$ |
9,707,167 |
|
|
$ |
(15,976,405 |
) |
|
$ |
10,655,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet |
|
|
|
July 3, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sysco |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Sysco |
|
|
International |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Totals |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
417,336 |
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
4,658,889 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,076,258 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
14,979,871 |
|
|
|
465,641 |
|
|
|
142,925 |
|
|
|
(15,588,437 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Plant and equipment, net |
|
|
425,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,778,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,203,823 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
362,658 |
|
|
|
597 |
|
|
|
1,670,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,033,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
16,185,144 |
|
|
$ |
466,271 |
|
|
$ |
9,250,723 |
|
|
$ |
(15,588,437 |
) |
|
$ |
10,313,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
$ |
444,274 |
|
|
$ |
1,114 |
|
|
$ |
2,563,810 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,009,198 |
|
Intercompany payables (receivables) |
|
|
9,405,317 |
|
|
|
73,124 |
|
|
|
(9,478,441 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
2,225,781 |
|
|
|
199,881 |
|
|
|
47,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,472,662 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
411,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
592,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,004,315 |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
3,697,991 |
|
|
|
192,152 |
|
|
|
15,525,820 |
|
|
|
(15,588,437 |
) |
|
|
3,827,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
16,185,144 |
|
|
$ |
466,271 |
|
|
$ |
9,250,723 |
|
|
$ |
(15,588,437 |
) |
|
$ |
10,313,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet |
|
|
|
September 26, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sysco |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Sysco |
|
|
International |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Totals |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
678,541 |
|
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
$ |
4,605,984 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,284,549 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
13,735,447 |
|
|
|
432,460 |
|
|
|
149,296 |
|
|
|
(14,317,203 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Plant and equipment, net |
|
|
277,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,737,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,014,341 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
422,235 |
|
|
|
805 |
|
|
|
1,630,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,053,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
15,113,440 |
|
|
$ |
433,289 |
|
|
$ |
9,122,913 |
|
|
$ |
(14,317,203 |
) |
|
$ |
10,352,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
$ |
363,660 |
|
|
$ |
4,056 |
|
|
$ |
2,637,277 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,004,993 |
|
Intercompany payables (receivables) |
|
|
8,527,393 |
|
|
|
69,303 |
|
|
|
(8,596,696 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
2,219,338 |
|
|
|
199,832 |
|
|
|
49,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,468,783 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
405,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
758,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,164,305 |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
3,597,714 |
|
|
|
160,098 |
|
|
|
14,273,749 |
|
|
|
(14,317,203 |
) |
|
|
3,714,358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
15,113,440 |
|
|
$ |
433,289 |
|
|
$ |
9,122,913 |
|
|
$ |
(14,317,203 |
) |
|
$ |
10,352,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidating Results of Operations |
|
|
|
For the 13-Week Period Ended October 2, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sysco |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Sysco |
|
|
International |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Totals |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,751,274 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,751,274 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,919,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,919,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,831,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,831,417 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
67,695 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
1,257,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,325,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(67,695 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
573,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
506,240 |
|
Interest expense (income) |
|
|
130,989 |
|
|
|
2,576 |
|
|
|
(102,464 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,101 |
|
Other expense (income), net |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,601 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,684 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (losses) before income taxes |
|
|
(198,601 |
) |
|
|
(2,609 |
) |
|
|
678,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
476,823 |
|
Income tax (benefit) provision |
|
|
(74,036 |
) |
|
|
(973 |
) |
|
|
252,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177,754 |
|
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries |
|
|
423,634 |
|
|
|
15,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(439,108 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
299,069 |
|
|
$ |
13,838 |
|
|
$ |
425,270 |
|
|
$ |
(439,108 |
) |
|
$ |
299,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidating Results of Operations |
|
|
|
For the 13-Week Period Ended September 26, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sysco |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Sysco |
|
|
International |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Totals |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,081,426 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,081,426 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,334,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,334,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,747,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,747,359 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
45,062 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
1,204,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,250,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(45,062 |
) |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
542,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
497,328 |
|
Interest expense (income) |
|
|
120,564 |
|
|
|
2,490 |
|
|
|
(89,254 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,800 |
|
Other expense (income), net |
|
|
(354 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,658 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,012 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (losses) before income taxes |
|
|
(165,272 |
) |
|
|
(2,524 |
) |
|
|
633,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
465,540 |
|
Income tax (benefit) provision |
|
|
(49,465 |
) |
|
|
(755 |
) |
|
|
189,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139,335 |
|
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries |
|
|
442,012 |
|
|
|
13,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(455,205 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
326,205 |
|
|
$ |
11,424 |
|
|
$ |
443,781 |
|
|
$ |
(455,205 |
) |
|
$ |
326,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidating Cash Flows |
|
|
|
For the 13-Week Period Ended October 2, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sysco |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Sysco |
|
|
International |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Totals |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Net cash provided by (used for): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
(83,996 |
) |
|
$ |
16,971 |
|
|
$ |
293,807 |
|
|
$ |
226,782 |
|
Investing activities |
|
|
(59,502 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(87,928 |
) |
|
|
(147,430 |
) |
Financing activities |
|
|
(222,242 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,861 |
) |
|
|
(224,103 |
) |
Effect of
exchange rates on cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,682 |
|
|
|
7,682 |
|
Intercompany activity |
|
|
162,988 |
|
|
|
(16,971 |
) |
|
|
(146,017 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash |
|
|
(202,752 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,683 |
|
|
|
(137,069 |
) |
Cash at the beginning of the period |
|
|
373,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211,920 |
|
|
|
585,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at the end of the period |
|
$ |
170,771 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
277,603 |
|
|
$ |
448,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidating Cash Flows |
|
|
|
For the 13-Week Period Ended September 26, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sysco |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Sysco |
|
|
International |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Totals |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Net cash provided by (used for): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
(92,458 |
) |
|
$ |
14,579 |
|
|
$ |
119,483 |
|
|
$ |
41,604 |
|
Investing activities |
|
|
(49,771 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(121,736 |
) |
|
|
(171,507 |
) |
Financing activities |
|
|
(120,591 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,058 |
|
|
|
(119,533 |
) |
Effect of
exchange rates on cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,555 |
|
|
|
4,555 |
|
Intercompany activity |
|
|
(356 |
) |
|
|
(14,579 |
) |
|
|
14,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash |
|
|
(263,176 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,295 |
|
|
|
(244,881 |
) |
Cash at the beginning of the period |
|
|
899,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,456 |
|
|
|
1,018,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at the end of the period |
|
$ |
636,019 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
137,751 |
|
|
$ |
773,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements as of
July 3, 2010, and the fiscal year then ended, and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, both contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended July 3, 2010.
Highlights
A slow economic recovery in the United States and Canada combined with lower consumer
confidence contributed to a challenging environment in the first quarter of fiscal 2011. However,
we were able to increase sales and improve productivity to achieve growth in operating income in
the first quarter of fiscal 2011. We also recorded gains on corporate-owned life insurance (COLI)
policies, which positively impacted net earnings and earnings per share.
|
|
Sales increased 7.4% in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 from the comparable prior year
period to $9.8 billion primarily due to improving case volumes and increased prices due to
inflation. Inflation, as measured by changes in our product costs, was an estimated 3.3%
during the first quarter of fiscal 2011. Sales from acquisitions within the last 12 months
favorably impacted sales by 0.6%, and the exchange rates used to translate our foreign sales
into U.S. dollars positively impacted sales by 0.5%. |
|
|
|
Operating income increased to $506.2 million, a 1.8% increase over the comparable prior
year period, primarily driven by the increase in sales and improved productivity. Gross margin
dollars increased 4.8% in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 from the first quarter of fiscal
2010 but declined as a percentage of sales primarily due to strategic pricing initiatives and
impact of significant inflation in certain product categories. Operating expenses increased
6.0% primarily due to increased pay-related expense related to increased sales, an increase in
net company-sponsored pension costs and an unfavorable year-over-year comparison on the
amounts recorded to adjust the carrying value of COLI policies to their cash surrender values. |
|
|
|
Net earnings decreased to $299.1 million, an 8.3% decrease from the comparable prior year
period, primarily due to an increase in the effective tax rate. The effective tax rate for
the first quarter of fiscal 2011 was 37.28%, compared to an effective tax rate of 29.93% for
the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The difference between the tax rates for the two periods
resulted largely from the one-time reversal of interest accruals for tax contingencies related
to our settlement with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in the first quarter of fiscal 2010
and greater non-taxable gains recorded on COLI policies in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. |
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 were both $0.51, a
decrease of 7.3% from the comparable prior year period primarily due to the factors discussed
above. Both basic and diluted earnings per share were favorably impacted by $0.02 per share
in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 due to the gains recorded on the adjustment of the
carrying value of COLI policies to their cash surrender values. This compares to a $0.09 per
share favorable impact to earnings per share in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 from the
one-time reversal of a previously accrued liability related to the settlement of an
outstanding tax matter with the IRS of $0.05 per share and the gains recorded on the
adjustment of the carrying value of COLI policies to their cash surrender values of $0.04 per
share. |
Overview
Sysco distributes food and related products to restaurants, healthcare and educational
facilities, lodging establishments and other foodservice customers. Our primary operations are
located throughout the United States, Canada and Ireland and include broadline companies, specialty
produce companies, custom-cut meat operations, hotel supply operations, SYGMA (our chain restaurant
distribution subsidiary) and a company that distributes to international customers.
We consider our primary market to be the foodservice market in the United States and Canada
and estimate that we serve about 17% of this approximately $210 billion annual market as measured
at the at the end of fiscal 2010. According to industry sources, the foodservice, or
food-away-from-home, market represents approximately half of the total dollars spent on food
purchases made at the consumer level in the United States.
General economic conditions and consumer confidence can affect the frequency of purchases and
amounts spent by consumers for food-away-from-home and, in turn, can impact our customers and our
sales. We believe the current general economic conditions, including pressure on consumer
disposable income, have contributed to a decline in the foodservice
16
market and a slow rate of recovery is anticipated. Historically, we have grown at a faster
rate than the overall industry and have grown our market share in this fragmented industry.
Strategy
We continue to invest in our core business to expand our market share and grow earnings. We
will continue to use our strategies to leverage our market leadership position to continuously
improve how we buy, handle and market products for our customers. These strategies include: growing
our sales, our Business Transformation Project, achieving productivity gains and lowering
procurement costs. These strategies are described in Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended July 3, 2010.
Our primary focus is on growing and optimizing our core foodservice distribution business in
North America; however, we will continue to explore and identify opportunities to grow in new
international markets and in other areas of business that complement our core foodservice
distribution service. As a part of our ongoing strategic analysis, we regularly evaluate business
opportunities, including potential acquisitions and sales of assets and businesses.
Business Transformation Project
We have substantially completed the design phase of our Business Transformation Project and we
are currently building and testing the underlying Enterprise Resource Planning system and
processes. Our pilot implementation is anticipated to begin with our first operating company
location and the shared services center in the second half of fiscal 2011. Implementation is
anticipated to occur across the majority of our Broadline and SYGMA operating companies by the end
of fiscal 2013. Although we expect the investment in the business transformation project to
provide meaningful benefits to the company over the long-term, the costs will exceed the benefits
during the early stages of implementation, including fiscal 2011.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth the components of the Results of Operations expressed as a
percentage of sales for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13-Week Period Ended |
|
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
|
September 26, 2009 |
|
Sales |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of sales |
|
|
81.2 |
|
|
|
80.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
18.8 |
|
|
|
19.2 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Other expense (income), net |
|
|
(0.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
The following table sets forth the change in the components of the Results of Operations
expressed as a percentage increase or decrease over the comparable period in the prior year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13-Week
Period |
Sales |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
Cost of sales |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
4.8 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
1.8 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(8.0 |
) |
Other expense (income), net |
|
|
(16.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes |
|
|
2.4 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
27.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
(8.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
|
(7.3 |
)% |
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
(7.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Average shares outstanding |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
Diluted shares outstanding |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Sales
Sales were 7.4% higher in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 than the comparable period of the
prior year. Improving case volumes combined with product cost inflation, and the resulting
increase in selling prices, had an impact on sales in the first quarter of fiscal 2011. Changes in
product costs, an internal measure of inflation or deflation, were estimated as inflation of 3.3%
during the first quarter of fiscal 2011, as compared to deflation of 3.4% during the first quarter
of fiscal 2010. Sales from acquisitions within the last 12 months favorably impacted sales by 0.6%
for the first quarter of fiscal 2011. The exchange rates used to translate our foreign sales into
U.S. dollars positively impacted sales by 0.5% in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the
first quarter fiscal 2010.
Our sequential quarterly sales trend declined each quarter from fiscal 2008 to the second
quarter of fiscal 2010. Our sales trend turned positive in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 and
continued in the first quarter of fiscal 2011. We believe the slow economic recovery continues to
place pressure on consumer disposable income and has constricted growth in the foodservice market.
While economic conditions are showing signs of improvement, we believe consumer disposable income
will remain under pressure, which could affect sales.
We believe that our continued focus on the use of business reviews and business development
activities, commitment to quality, investment in customer contact personnel and the efforts of our
marketing associates and sales support personnel are key drivers to strengthening customer
relationships and growing sales with new and existing customers. We also believe these activities
help our customers in this challenging economic environment.
Operating Income
Cost of sales primarily includes our product costs, net of vendor consideration, and includes
in-bound freight. Operating expenses include the costs of facilities, product handling, delivery,
selling and general and administrative activities. Fuel surcharges are reflected within sales and
gross margins; fuel costs are reflected within operating expenses.
Operating income increased 1.8% in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 from the first quarter of
fiscal 2010 to $506.2 million, and as a percentage of sales, declined to 5.2% of sales. This
increase in operating income was primarily due to increased sales and improved productivity. Gross
margin dollars increased 4.8% in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 from the first quarter of fiscal
2010, while operating expenses increased 6.0% in the first quarter of fiscal 2011. Productivity
improvements occurred within our warehouse and delivery functions by increasing cases handled per
employee and cases delivered on each truck route.
18
Gross margin dollars increased in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 as compared to the first
quarter of fiscal 2010 primarily due to increased sales. Gross margin, as a percentage of sales,
was 18.78% in the first quarter of fiscal 2011, a decline of 46 from the gross margin percentage of
19.24% in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. This decline in gross margin percentage was primarily
the result of three factors. First, certain ongoing strategic pricing initiatives largely lowered
our prices to our customers in order to increase sales volumes in specific product categories.
This contributed to the reduction of gross margin as a percentage of sales. Second, while Syscos
overall level of product cost inflation for the period was a modest 3.3%, we experienced higher
levels of inflation in the dairy, meat and seafood product categories ranging from 8% to 11%.
While we are generally able to pass through modest levels of inflation to our customers on a timely
basis, we were unable to fully pass on these higher levels of inflation in these product categories
on a timely basis without negatively impacting our customers business. Prolonged periods of high
inflation, either overall or in certain product categories, can have a negative impact on our
customers, as high food costs can reduce consumer spending in the food-away-from-home market, and
may negatively impact our sales, gross margins and earnings. Third, to a lesser extent, case
volumes increased at a greater rate within our SYGMA segment which generally receives lower pricing
for higher volume.
Operating expenses for the first quarter fiscal 2011 were higher than in the comparable prior
year period primarily due to increased pay-related expense related to increased sales, an increase
in net company-sponsored pension costs and an unfavorable year-over-year comparison on the amounts
recorded to adjust the carrying value of COLI policies to their cash surrender values.
Pay-related expense, excluding labor costs associated with our Business Transformation
Project, increased by $44.4 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 from the comparable prior
year period primarily due to our increased sales, including both sales incentive compensation and
delivery personnel costs. Portions of our pay-related expense are variable in nature and are
expected to increase when sales increase.
Net company-sponsored pension costs in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 were $15.1 million
higher than in the comparable prior year period, due primarily to a decrease in discount rates used
to calculate our projected benefit obligation and related pension expense, partially offset by
reduced amortization of our net actuarial loss resulting from actuarial gains from higher returns
on assets of Syscos Retirement Plan during fiscal 2010. Net company-sponsored pension costs for
each fiscal year are determined as of the previous fiscal year ends plan measurement date and
therefore the rate of increase for each quarter is known at that time.
We adjust the carrying values of our COLI policies to their cash surrender values on an
ongoing basis. The cash surrender values of these policies are partially based on the values of
underlying investments, which include equity securities. As a result, the cash surrender values of
these policies will fluctuate with changes in the market value of such securities. The changes in
the financial markets resulted in gains for these policies of $13.5 million in the first quarter of
fiscal 2011. These gains compared to the recognition of gains of $21.2 million in the first quarter
of fiscal 2010. The performance of the financial markets will continue to influence the cash
surrender values of our COLI policies, which could cause volatility in operating income, net
earnings and earnings per share.
Net Earnings
Net earnings decreased 8.3% in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 from the comparable period of
the prior year due primarily to the impact of changes in income taxes, as well as the factors
discussed above. The difference between the tax rates for the two periods, as discussed below,
resulted largely from the one-time reversal of interest accruals for tax contingencies related to
our settlement with the IRS in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 and greater non-taxable gains
recorded on COLI policies in the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
The effective tax rate of 37.28% for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 was favorably impacted
by the adjustment of the carrying values of our COLI policies to their cash surrender values. The
gain of $13.5 million recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 is non-taxable for income tax
purposes, and had the impact of decreasing income tax expense for the period by $5.2 million.
The effective tax rate of 29.93% for the first quarter of fiscal 2010 was favorably impacted
by three items. First, we recorded an income tax benefit of approximately $29.0 million resulting
from the one-time reversal of previously accrued interest related to the settlement with the IRS
(see Other Considerations for additional discussion). Second, the gain of $21.2 million recorded
to adjust the carrying value of COLI policies to their cash surrender values in the first quarter
of fiscal 2010 was non-taxable for income tax purposes and had the impact of decreasing income tax
expense for the period by $8.1 million.
19
Third, we recorded a tax benefit of approximately $5.0 million for the reversal of valuation allowances previously recorded on state net operating loss
carryforwards.
Earnings Per Share
Basic and diluted earnings per share decreased 7.3% in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 from
the comparable period of the prior year. The decrease was primarily the result of factors
discussed above, as well as a small net reduction in shares outstanding. The net reduction in both
average and diluted shares outstanding was primarily due to share repurchases.
Both basic and diluted earnings per share were favorably impacted by $0.02 per share in the
first quarter of fiscal 2011 due to the gains recorded on the adjustment of the carrying value of
COLI policies to their cash surrender values. This compares to a $0.09 per share favorable impact
to earnings per share in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 from the one-time reversal on interest
accruals for the tax contingencies related to IRS settlement of $0.05 per share and the gain
recorded on the adjustment of the COLI policies to their cash surrender values of $0.04 per share.
Segment Results
We have aggregated our operating companies into a number of segments, of which only Broadline
and SYGMA are reportable segments as defined in the accounting literature related to disclosures
about segments of an enterprise. The accounting policies for the segments are the same as those
disclosed by Sysco for our consolidated financial statements. Intersegment sales generally
represent specialty produce and meat company products distributed by the Broadline and SYGMA
operating companies. The segment results include certain centrally incurred costs for shared
services that are charged to our segments. These centrally incurred costs are charged based upon
the relative level of service used by each operating company consistent with how management views
the performance of its operating segments.
Management evaluates the performance of each of our operating segments based on its respective
operating income results, which include the allocation of certain centrally incurred costs. While a
segments operating income may be impacted in the short term by increases or decreases in margins,
expenses, or a combination thereof, over the long term each business segment is expected to
increase its operating income at a greater rate than sales growth. This is consistent with our
long-term goal of leveraging earnings growth at a greater rate than sales growth.
Included in corporate expenses, among other items, are:
|
|
|
Gains and losses recorded to adjust COLI policies to their cash surrender values; |
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense; |
|
|
|
|
Expenses related to our Business Transformation Project; and |
|
|
|
|
Corporate-level depreciation and amortization expense. |
The following table sets forth the operating income of each of our reportable segments and the
other segment expressed as a percentage of each segments sales for each period reported and should
be read in conjunction with Note 11, Business Segment Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income as a |
|
|
Percentage of Sales |
|
|
13-Week Period |
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
September 26, 2009 |
Broadline |
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
7.0 |
% |
SYGMA |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Other |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
20
The following table sets forth the change in the selected financial data of each of our
reportable segments and the other segment expressed as a percentage increase or decrease over the
comparable period in the prior year and should be read in conjunction with Note 11, Business
Segment Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13-Week Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
Sales |
|
Income |
Broadline |
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
5.3 |
% |
SYGMA |
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
|
149.6 |
|
Other |
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
The following tables set forth sales and operating income of each of our reportable segments,
the other segment, and intersegment sales, expressed as a percentage of aggregate segment sales,
including intersegment sales, and operating income, respectively. For purposes of these
statistical tables, operating income of our segments excludes corporate expenses of $71.0 million
in the first quarter of fiscal 2011, as compared to $43.3 million in the first quarter of fiscal
2010, that is not charged to our segments. This information should be read in conjunction with
Note 11, Business Segment Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13-Week Period Ended |
|
|
October 2, 2010 |
|
September 26, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Operating |
|
|
Sales |
|
Income |
|
Sales |
|
Income |
Broadline |
|
|
79.9 |
% |
|
|
92.8 |
% |
|
|
80.5 |
% |
|
|
94.1 |
% |
SYGMA |
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Other |
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
Intersegment sales |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broadline Segment
Broadline operating companies distribute a full line of food products and a wide variety of
non-food products to both traditional and chain restaurant customers. In the first quarter of
fiscal 2011, the Broadline operating results represented approximately 79.9% of Syscos overall
sales and 92.8% of the aggregated operating income of Syscos segments, which excludes corporate
expenses and consolidated adjustments.
Sales
Sales were 6.6% greater in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 than in the comparable period of
the prior year. Case volume improvement combined with product cost inflation, and the resulting
increase in selling prices, contributed to the increase in sales in the first quarter of fiscal
2011. Changes in product costs, an internal measure of inflation or deflation, were estimated as
inflation of 3.5% during the first quarter of fiscal 2011, as compared to deflation of 3.6% during
the first quarter of fiscal 2010. Sales from acquisitions within the last 12 months favorably
impacted sales by 0.7% for the first quarter of fiscal 2011. The exchange rates used to translate
our foreign sales into U.S. dollars positively impacted sales by 0.6% in the first quarter of
fiscal 2011 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
Operating Income
Operating income increased 5.3% in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 due to increased sales and
improved productivity. Gross margin dollars increased 4.4% while operating expenses increased 4.0%
in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 as compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2010. Productivity
improvements occurred within our warehouse and delivery functions by increasing cases handled per
employee and cases delivered on each truck route.
Gross margin dollars increased in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 primarily due to increased
sales; however, gross margin dollars increased at a lower rate than sales. This slower growth in
gross margin dollars was primarily the result of two factors. First, certain ongoing strategic
pricing initiatives largely lowered our prices to our customers in order to increase sales volumes
in specific product categories. This contributed to the reduction of gross margin as a percentage
of sales. Second, while the
21
Broadline segments overall level of product cost inflation for the
period was a modest 3.5%, we experienced higher levels of inflation in the dairy, meat and seafood
product categories ranging from 8% to 11%. While we are generally able to pass through modest
levels of inflation to our customers on a timely basis, we were unable to fully pass on these
higher levels of inflation in these product categories on a timely basis without negatively
impacting our customers business. The expense increase in fiscal 2011 was driven largely by an
increase in pay-related expenses relating to the sales increase, including both sales incentive
compensation and delivery personnel costs. Portions of our pay-related expense are variable in
nature and are expected to increase when sales increase.
SYGMA Segment
SYGMA operating companies distribute a full line of food products and a wide variety of
non-food products to certain chain restaurant customer locations.
Sales
Sales were 14.7% greater in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 than in the comparable period of
the prior year primarily due to case volume improvement. The case growth was largely attributable
to new customers. Also contributing to the case growth to a lesser extent was an increase in
volume from certain existing customers. However, sales to other existing customers were affected
by the weak economic environment which applied continued pressure to consumer discretionary
spending and negatively impacted overall restaurant traffic counts.
Operating Income
Operating income increased $8.7 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 over the
comparable period of the prior year due to increased sales and improved productivity. Gross margin
dollars increased 15.8% while operating expenses increased 7.3% in the first quarter of fiscal 2011
from the first quarter of fiscal 2010. Contributing to the gross margin increase in the first
quarter were increased sales and an increase of approximately $1.2 million in the fuel surcharges
charged to customers in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 from the comparable period of the prior
year due to higher fuel prices in fiscal 2011. The increase in operating expenses was largely
driven by increased delivery personnel payroll costs resulting from increased sales. Productivity
improvements occurred within our warehouse, delivery and administrative functions.
Other Segment
Other financial information is attributable to our other operating segments, including our
specialty produce, custom-cut meat and lodging industry products and a company that distributes to
international customers. These operating segments are discussed on an aggregate basis as they do
not represent reportable segments under segment accounting literature.
Operating income increased 4.1% for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 from the comparable
period of the prior year. The increase in operating income for the first quarter of fiscal 2011
was caused primarily by increased sales and favorable expense management in the specialty produce
and meat segments.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Syscos strategic objectives require continuing investment and our financial resources include
cash provided by operations and access to capital from financial markets. Our operations
historically have produced significant cash flow. Cash generated from operations is generally allocated to working capital requirements; investments in
facilities, systems, fleet, other equipment and technology; acquisitions compatible with our
overall growth strategy; and cash dividends. Any remaining cash generated from operations may be
invested in high-quality, short-term instruments or applied toward the cost of the share repurchase
program. As a part of our ongoing strategic analysis, we regularly evaluate business
opportunities, including potential acquisitions and sales of assets and businesses, and our overall
capital structure. Any transactions resulting from these evaluations may materially impact our
liquidity, borrowing capacity, leverage ratios and capital availability.
We believe that our cash flows from operations, the availability of additional capital under
our existing commercial paper programs and bank lines of credit and our ability to access capital
from financial markets, including issuances of debt securities, either privately or under our shelf
registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), will be sufficient
to meet our anticipated cash requirements for the next twelve months and beyond, while maintaining
sufficient liquidity for normal operating purposes. We have continued to maintain the highest
credit rating available for U.S.
22
commercial paper. We believe that we will continue to be able to
access the commercial paper market effectively as well as the long-term capital markets, if
necessary.
Operating Activities
We generated $226.8 million in cash flow from operations in the first quarter of fiscal 2011,
as compared to $41.6 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The increase of $185.2 million
between the two periods was driven largely by $316.0 million of payments made in relation to the
IRS settlement in the first quarter of fiscal 2010, together with several less significant items as
described in more detail below.
Cash flow from operations in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 was primarily generated by an
increase in accrued income taxes, net income and non-cash depreciation and amortization expense.
These increases were partially offset by changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities, an
increase in accounts receivable balances, a decrease in accrued expenses and an increase in
inventory balances. Cash flow from operations in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 was primarily
generated by net income, non-cash depreciation and amortization expense and an increase in accounts
payable balances. These increases were partially offset by changes in deferred tax assets and
liabilities, increases in account receivable balances and inventory balances and a decrease in
other long-term liabilities and prepaid pension cost.
The increase in accounts receivable balances for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 was
primarily due to the increase in sales in the first quarter as well as a seasonal change in volume
and customer mix. The increase in accounts receivable balances for the first quarter of fiscal
2010 was primarily due to a seasonal change in volume and customer mix, partially offset by the
sales decline. Due to normal seasonal patterns, sales to multi-unit customers and school districts
represented a larger percentage of our sales at the end of each first quarter as compared to the
end of each prior fiscal year. Payment terms for these types of customers are traditionally longer
than average.
The increase in inventory balances for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 was primarily due to
the increase in sales in the quarter. The increase in inventory balances for the first quarter of
fiscal 2010 was related to the seasonal change in volume and customer mix discussed above.
The increases in accounts payable balances for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 and fiscal
2010 were primarily due to the growth in inventory discussed above. In addition, accounts payable
balances are impacted by many factors, including changes in product mix, cash discount terms and
changes in payment terms with vendors.
Cash flow from operations was negatively impacted by decreases in accrued expenses of $124.6
million for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 and $33.9 million for the first quarter of fiscal
2010. The decreases in both periods were primarily due to the payment of the respective prior year
annual incentive bonuses, partially offset by accruals for current year compensation incentives. A
decrease in accrued interest also contributed to the overall decrease for the first quarter of
fiscal 2011. The remainder of the decrease for the first quarter of fiscal 2010 was composed of
multiple offsetting changes in various other accruals, of which no change was individually
significant.
Cash flow from operations for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 was positively impacted by an
increase in accrued income taxes of $342.1 million, partially offset by changes in deferred tax
assets and liabilities of $198.9 million. There were no payments related to the IRS settlement in
the first quarter of fiscal 2011. Cash flow from operations for the first quarter of fiscal 2010
was negatively impacted by changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities of $207.5 million,
partially offset by an increase in accrued income taxes of $56.1 million. The main factor
affecting both of these items, as well as cash taxes paid, was the IRS settlement, which resulted in the payment of taxes of $316.0 million in the first
quarter of fiscal 2010. Total cash taxes paid were $35.2 million and $334.8 million in the first
quarter of fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively. The changes in both the first quarter of fiscal
2011 and the first quarter of fiscal 2010 were also impacted by the current tax provision.
Other long-term liabilities increased $47.0 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2011
primarily as a result of net company sponsored pension costs exceeding contributions to our
company-sponsored pension plans during the period.
The net balances of other long-term liabilities and prepaid pension cost decreased $85.6
million during the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The decrease was primarily attributable to three
items. First, our liability for uncertain tax positions decreased as a result of the settlement
with the IRS. Second, our liability for deferred incentive compensation decreased due to
accelerated distributions taken by plan participants during the first quarter of fiscal 2010 of all
or a portion of their vested balances pursuant
23
to certain transitional relief under the provisions of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue
Code. Third, pension contributions to our company-sponsored plans exceeded net company-sponsored
pension costs.
We recorded net company-sponsored pension costs of $46.6 million and $31.5 million in the
first quarter of fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010, respectively. Our contributions to our
company-sponsored defined benefit plans were $5.0 million and $38.8 million in the first quarter of
fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010, respectively. The difference in the level of contributions in the
first quarter of fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010 is due to the timing and amount of our contributions
to the Retirement Plan. In fiscal 2010, we contributed $35.0 million per quarter to the Retirement
Plan and made an additional contribution of $140.0 million in the fourth quarter that would
normally have been made in fiscal 2011. Additional contributions to the Retirement Plan are not
currently anticipated in fiscal 2011.
Investing Activities
Capital expenditures in both the first quarter of fiscal 2011 and the first quarter of fiscal
2010 primarily included facility replacements and expansions, fleet replacements and investments
in technology including our Business Transformation Project.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, we paid cash of $23.9 million for operations
acquired during fiscal 2011 and for contingent consideration related to operations acquired in
previous years.
Financing Activities
During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, a total of 4,000,000 shares were repurchased at a
cost of $116.7 million. There were no shares repurchased in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. On
August 27, 2010, the Board of Directors approved a new share repurchase program covering an
additional 20,000,000 shares. An additional 1,600,000 shares were repurchased at a cost of $46.5
million through October 30, 2010, resulting in a remaining authorization by our Board of Directors
to repurchase up to 17,786,600 shares, based on the trades made through that date.
Dividends paid in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 were $146.9 million, or $0.25 per share, as
compared to $141.7 million, or $0.24 per share, in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. In August
2010, we declared our regular quarterly dividend for the second quarter of fiscal 2011 of $0.25 per
share, which was paid in October 2010.
We have uncommitted bank lines of credit, which provide for unsecured borrowings for working
capital of up to $95.0 million, of which none was outstanding as of October 2, 2010. Such
borrowings were $1.2 million as of October 30, 2010.
Sysco and one of our subsidiaries, Sysco International, ULC, have a revolving credit facility
supporting our U.S. and Canadian commercial paper programs. The facility, in the amount of $1.0
billion, expires on November 4, 2012, but is subject to extension.
There were no commercial paper issuances outstanding as of October 2, 2010 or October 30,
2010. During the 13-week period ended October 2, 2010, aggregate commercial paper issuances and
short-term bank borrowings ranged from zero to approximately $60.0 million.
Other Considerations
Multi-Employer Pension Plans
As discussed in Note 10, Commitments and Contingencies, we contribute to several
multi-employer defined benefit pension plans based on obligations arising under collective
bargaining agreements covering union-represented employees.
Under current law regarding multi-employer defined benefit plans, a plans termination, our
voluntary withdrawal or the mass withdrawal of all contributing employers from any underfunded
multi-employer defined benefit plan would require us to make payments to the plan for our
proportionate share of the multi-employer plans unfunded vested liabilities. Generally, Sysco does
not have the greatest share of liability among the participants in any of these plans. Based on the
information available from plan administrators, which has valuation dates ranging from January 31,
2008 to December 31, 2009, we estimate our share of withdrawal liability on most of the
multi-employer plans in which we participate could have been as much
24
as $190.0 million as of October 2, 2010 based on a voluntary withdrawal. The majority of the
plans we participate in have a valuation date of calendar year-end. As such, the majority of our
estimated withdrawal liability results from plans for which the valuation date was December 31,
2008; therefore, our estimated liability reflects the asset losses incurred by the financial
markets as of that date. In general, the financial markets improved during calendar year 2009;
therefore, we believe our current share of the withdrawal liability could differ from this
estimate. In addition, if a multi-employer defined benefit plan fails to satisfy certain minimum
funding requirements, the IRS may impose a non-deductible excise tax of 5% on the amount of the
accumulated funding deficiency for those employers contributing to the fund. As of October 2,
2010, we have approximately $6.3 million in liabilities recorded related to certain multi-employer
defined benefit plans for which our voluntary withdrawal had already occurred.
Required contributions to multi-employer plans could increase in the future as these plans
strive to improve their funding levels. In addition, pension-related legislation requires
underfunded pension plans to improve their funding ratios within prescribed intervals based on the
level of their underfunding. We believe that any requirements to pay such increased contributions,
withdrawal liability and excise taxes would be funded through cash flow from operations, borrowing
capacity or a combination of these items.
BSCC Cooperative Structure
In the first quarter of fiscal 2010, Sysco reached a settlement with the IRS in connection
with its audits of our 2003 through 2006 federal income tax returns. As a result of the
settlement, we agreed to cease paying U.S. federal taxes related to its affiliate Baugh Supply
Chain Cooperative (BSCC) on a deferred basis and pay the amounts that were recorded within deferred
taxes related to BSCC over a three-year period as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts paid annually: |
|
(In thousands) |
Fiscal 2010 |
|
$ |
528,000 |
|
Fiscal 2011 |
|
|
212,000 |
|
Fiscal 2012 |
|
|
212,000 |
|
As noted in the table above, $528.0 million was paid related to the settlement in fiscal 2010,
of which $316.0 million was paid in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. Amounts to be paid in fiscal
2011 and 2012 will be paid in connection with our quarterly tax payments, two of which fall in the
second quarter, one in the third quarter and one in the fourth quarter. We believe we have access
to sufficient cash on hand, cash flow from operations and current access to capital to make
payments on all of the amounts noted above.
Contractual Obligations
Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 3, 2010 contains a table that
summarizes our obligations and commitments to make contractual future cash payments as of July 3,
2010. Since July 3, 2010, there have been no material changes to our contractual obligations.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Critical accounting policies and estimates are those that are most important to the portrayal
of our financial position and results of operations. These policies require our most subjective or
complex judgments, often employing the use of estimates about the effect of matters that are
inherently uncertain. Syscos most critical accounting policies and estimates include those that
pertain to the allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, self-insurance programs, pension plans,
income taxes, vendor consideration, accounting for business combinations and share-based
compensation, which are described in Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
July 3, 2010.
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements made herein that look forward in time or express managements expectations
or beliefs with respect to the occurrence of future events are forward-looking statements under the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. They include statements about:
|
|
|
Syscos ability to increase its sales and market share and grow earnings; |
|
|
|
|
the continuing impact of economic conditions on consumer confidence and our business; |
|
|
|
|
the expected implementation, benefits and costs of our business transformation project; |
25
|
|
|
sales and operating income trends; |
|
|
|
|
anticipated multi-employer pension-related liabilities and contributions to various
multi-employer pension plans, and the source of funds for any such contributions; |
|
|
|
|
source and adequacy of funds for required payments under the IRS settlement; |
|
|
|
|
the impact of ongoing legal proceedings; |
|
|
|
|
anticipated company-sponsored pension plan contributions; |
|
|
|
|
expectations regarding unrecognized tax benefits; |
|
|
|
|
our plan to continue to explore and identify opportunities to grow in international
markets and complimentary lines of business; |
|
|
|
|
Syscos ability to meet future cash requirements, including the ability to access debt
markets effectively, and remain profitable; |
|
|
|
|
the impact of the financial markets on the cash surrender values of our COLI policies; |
|
|
|
|
our expectations regarding trends in pay-related expense; |
|
|
|
|
fuel costs and expectations regarding the use of fuel surcharges; and |
|
|
|
|
expectations regarding operating income and sales for our business segments. |
These statements are based on managements current expectations and estimates; actual results
may differ materially due in part to the risk factors set forth below and those discussed in Item
1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 3, 2010:
|
|
|
risks relating to difficult economic conditions and heightened uncertainty in the
financial markets and their effect on consumer confidence; |
|
|
|
|
periods of significant or prolonged inflation or deflation and their impact on our
product costs and profitability; |
|
|
|
|
risks related to our Business Transformation Project, including the risk that the
project may not be successfully implemented, may not prove cost effective and may have a
material adverse effect on our liquidity and results of operations; |
|
|
|
|
the risk that we may not be able to compensate for increases in fuel costs; |
|
|
|
|
the risk of interruption of supplies due to lack of long-term contracts, severe weather
or more prolonged climate change, work stoppages or otherwise; |
|
|
|
|
Syscos leverage and debt risks, capital and borrowing needs and changes in interest
rates; |
|
|
|
|
the potential impact of product liability claims and adverse publicity; |
|
|
|
|
difficulties in successfully entering and operating in international markets and
complimentary lines of business; |
|
|
|
|
the successful completion of acquisitions and integration of acquired companies, as well
as the risk that acquisitions could require additional debt or equity financing and
negatively impact our stock price or operating results; |
|
|
|
|
our dependence on technology and the reliability of our technology network; |
|
|
|
|
the risk that other sponsors of our multi-employer pension plans will withdraw or become
insolvent; |
|
|
|
|
that the IRS may impose an excise tax on the unfunded portion of our multi-employer
pension plans or that the Pension Protection Act could require that we make additional
pension contributions; |
|
|
|
|
the impact of financial market changes on the cash surrender values of our COLI policies
and on the assets held by our company-sponsored Retirement Plan and by the multi-employer
pension plans in which we participate; |
|
|
|
|
labor issues, including the renegotiation of union contracts and shortage of qualified
labor; and |
|
|
|
|
the risk that the anti-takeover benefits provided by our preferred stock may not be
viewed as beneficial to stockholders. |
For a more detailed discussion of factors that could cause actual results to differ from those
contained in the forward-looking statements, see the risk factors discussion contained in Item 1A
of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 3, 2010.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Our market risks consist of interest rate risk, foreign currency exchange rate risk, fuel
price risk and investment risk. For a discussion on our exposure to market risk, see Part II, Item
7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks in our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended July 3, 2010. There have been no significant changes to our market risks
since July 3, 2010 except as noted below.
26
Interest Rate Risk
At October 2, 2010, we had no commercial paper issuances outstanding. Our long-term debt
obligations at October 2, 2010 were $2.5 billion, of which approximately 81% were at fixed rates of
interest, including the impact of our interest rate swap agreements.
In fiscal 2010, we entered into two interest rate swap agreements that effectively converted
$200 million of fixed rate debt maturing in fiscal 2014 (the fiscal 2014 swap) and $250 million of
fixed rate debt maturing in fiscal 2013 (the fiscal 2013 swap) to floating rate debt. Both
transactions were entered into with the goal of reducing overall borrowing cost. The major risks
from interest rate derivatives include changes in interest rates affecting the fair value of such
instruments, potential increases in interest expense due to market increases in floating interest
rates and the creditworthiness of the counterparties in such transactions. These transactions were
designated as fair value hedges since the swaps hedge against the changes in fair value of fixed
rate debt resulting from changes in interest rates.
As of October 2, 2010, the fiscal 2014 swap was recognized as an asset within the consolidated
balance sheet at fair value within other assets of $9.4 million. The fixed interest rate on the
hedged debt is 4.6% and the floating interest rate on the swap is three-month LIBOR which resets
quarterly. As of October 2, 2010, the fiscal 2013 swap was recognized as an asset within the
consolidated balance sheet at fair value within other assets of $8.1 million. The fixed interest
rate on the hedged debt is 4.2% and the floating interest rate on the swap is three-month LIBOR
which resets quarterly.
Fuel Price Risk
Due to the nature of our distribution business, we are exposed to potential volatility in fuel
prices. During the first quarter of fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010, fuel costs related to outbound
deliveries represented approximately 0.6% and 0.7% of sales, respectively. From time to time, we
will enter into forward purchase commitments for a portion of our projected monthly diesel fuel
requirements. These commitments will result in either additional fuel costs or avoided fuel costs
based on the comparison of the prices on the fixed price contracts and market prices for the
respective periods. In the first quarter of fiscal 2011, our forward fuel purchase commitments
resulted in an estimated $2.4 million of avoided fuel costs as the fixed prices on the contracts
were lower than market prices for the contracted volumes. In the first quarter of fiscal 2010, our
forward purchase commitments resulted in an estimated $11.4 million of additional fuel costs as the
fixed price contracts were higher than market prices for the contracted volumes. As of October 2,
2010, we had forward diesel fuel commitments totaling approximately $80.0 million through October
2011. These contracts will lock in the price of approximately 30% to 35% of our fuel purchase
needs for the contracted periods at prices slightly lower than the current market price for diesel.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Syscos management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial
officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of October 2,
2010. The term disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
under the Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or
submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time
periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without
limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by
a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and
communicated to the companys management, including its principal executive and principal financial
officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding the required disclosure. Management
recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide
only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its
judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on
the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of October 2, 2010, our chief executive
officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of such date, Syscos disclosure controls
and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the fiscal quarter ended October 2, 2010 that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
27
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
We are engaged in various legal proceedings which have arisen but have not been fully
adjudicated. These proceedings, in the opinion of management, will not have a material adverse
effect upon the consolidated financial statements of Sysco when ultimately concluded.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The information set forth in this report should be read in conjunction with the risk factors
discussed in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 3, 2010, which could
materially impact our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing the company. Additional risks and
uncertainties not currently known by the company or that are currently deemed to be immaterial also
may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
We made the following share repurchases during the first quarter of fiscal 2011:
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Total Number of |
|
(d) Maximum Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as Part |
|
Shares that May Yet Be |
|
|
(a) Total Number of |
|
(b) Average Price |
|
of Publicly Announced |
|
Purchased Under the Plans or |
Period |
|
Shares Purchased(1) |
|
Paid per Share |
|
Plans or Programs |
|
Programs |
Month #1
July 4 July 31 |
|
|
696,424 |
|
|
$ |
29.89 |
|
|
|
673,627 |
|
|
|
2,712,973 |
|
Month #2
August 1 August 28 |
|
|
793,549 |
|
|
|
30.03 |
|
|
|
742,700 |
|
|
|
21,970,273 |
|
Month #3
August 29 October 2 |
|
|
2,654,630 |
|
|
|
28.73 |
|
|
|
2,583,673 |
|
|
|
19,386,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
4 ,144,603 |
|
|
$ |
29.18 |
|
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
|
|
19,386,600 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The total number of shares purchased includes 22,797, 50,849 and 70,957 shares
tendered by individuals in connection with stock option exercises in Month #1, Month #2 and
Month #3, respectively. All other shares were purchased pursuant to the publicly announced
program described below. |
On September 22, 2008, we announced that the Board of Directors approved the repurchase of
20,000,000 shares. Pursuant to this repurchase program, shares may be acquired in the open market
or in privately negotiated transactions at the companys discretion, subject to market conditions
and other factors. On August 27, 2010, the Board of Directors approved a new share repurchase
program covering 20,000,000 shares.
In July 2004, the Board of Directors authorized us to enter into agreements from time to time
to extend our ongoing repurchase program to include repurchases during company announced blackout
periods of such securities in compliance with Rule 10b5-1 promulgated under the Exchange Act.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None
Item 5. Other Information
None
28
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(a) to Form
10-K for the year ended June 28, 1997 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation increasing authorized shares,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(d) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 1,
2000 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
Certificate of Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation increasing authorized
shares, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(e) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
December 27, 2003 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
Form of Amended Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of Series A Junior
Participating Preferred Stock, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(c) to Form 10-K
for the year ended June 29, 1996 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Sysco Corporation dated July 18, 2008, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.5 to Form 8-K filed on July 23, 2008 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
Senior Debt Indenture, dated as of June 15, 1995, between Sysco Corporation and First
Union National Bank of North Carolina, Trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4(a) to Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed June 6, 1995 (File No. 33-60023). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 27, 1998 between Sysco Corporation and
First Union National Bank, Trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(h) to Form
10-K for the year ended June 27, 1998 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
Seventh Supplemental Indenture, including form of Note, dated March 5, 2004 between
Sysco Corporation, as Issuer, and Wachovia Bank, National Association (formerly First
Union National Bank of North Carolina), as Trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4(j) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 27, 2004 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
Eighth Supplemental Indenture, including form of Note, dated September 22, 2005 between
Sysco Corporation, as Issuer, and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Trustee,
incorporated by reference to Exhibits 4.1 and 4.2 to Form 8-K filed on September 20,
2005 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
Ninth Supplemental Indenture, including form of Note, dated February 12, 2008 between
Sysco Corporation, as Issuer, and the Trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1
to Form 8-K filed on February 12, 2008 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
Tenth Supplemental Indenture, including form of Note, dated February 12, 2008 between
Sysco Corporation, as Issuer, and the Trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3
to Form 8-K filed on February 12, 2008 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
Form of Eleventh Supplemental Indenture, including form of Note, dated March 17, 2009
between Sysco Corporation, as Issuer, and the Trustee, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on March 13, 2009 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
Form of Twelfth Supplemental Indenture, including form of Note, dated March 17, 2009
between Sysco Corporation, as Issuer, and the Trustee, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K filed on March 13, 2009 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
Agreement of Resignation, Appointment and Acceptance, dated February 13, 2007, by and
among Sysco Corporation and Sysco International Co., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sysco
Corporation, U.S. Bank National Association and The Bank of New York Trust Company,
N.A., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(h) to Registration Statement on Form S-3
filed on February 6, 2008 (File No. 333-149086). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.10
|
|
|
|
Indenture dated May 23, 2002 between Sysco International, Co., Sysco Corporation and
Wachovia Bank, National Association, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed August 21, 2002 (File No. 333-98489). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.11
|
|
|
|
Letter Regarding Appointment of New Trustee from Sysco Corporation to U.S. Bank National
Association, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
December 29, 2007 filed on February 5, 2008 (File No. 1-6544). |
29
|
|
|
|
|
4.12
|
|
|
|
Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 1, dated July 2, 2010, between Sysco International,
ULC, as successor by conversion and name change to Sysco International Co., Sysco
Corporation, as Guarantor, and the Trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.12 to
Form 10-K for the year ended July 3, 2010 filed on August 31, 2010 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.1#
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to Fiscal 2011 Management Incentive Plan Bonus Agreement between Sysco
Corporation and William J. DeLaney dated September 3, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2#
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to Offer Letter Dated September 1, 2009 between Sysco Corporation and
Robert C. Kreidler dated September 24, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.3#
|
|
|
|
Sixth Amended and Restated Sysco Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation Plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.4#
|
|
|
|
Tenth Amended and Restated Sysco Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
15.1#
|
|
|
|
Report from Ernst & Young LLP dated November 9, 2010, re: unaudited financial statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
15.2#
|
|
|
|
Acknowledgement letter from Ernst & Young LLP. |
|
|
|
|
|
31.1#
|
|
|
|
CEO Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
31.2#
|
|
|
|
CFO Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
32.1#
|
|
|
|
CEO Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
32.2#
|
|
|
|
CFO Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.1#
|
|
|
|
The following financial information from Sysco Corporations Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended October 2, 2010 filed with the SEC on November 9, 2010,
formatted in XBRL includes: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of October 2, 2010, July
3, 2010 and September 26, 2009, (ii) Consolidated Results of Operations for the thirteen
week periods ended October 2, 2010 and September 26, 2009, (iii) Consolidated Statements
of Comprehensive Income for the thirteen week periods ended October 2, 2010 and
September 26, 2009, (iv) Consolidated Cash Flows for the thirteen week periods ended
October 2, 2010 and September 26, 2009, and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements. |
30
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sysco Corporation
(Registrant)
|
|
|
By |
/s/ WILLIAM J. DELANEY
|
|
|
|
William J. DeLaney |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
Date: November 9, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By |
/s/ ROBERT C. KREIDLER
|
|
|
|
Robert C. Kreidler |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
Date: November 9, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By |
/s/ G. MITCHELL ELMER
|
|
|
|
G. Mitchell Elmer |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Controller and
Chief Accounting Officer |
|
|
Date: November 9, 2010
31
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibits.
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(a) to Form
10-K for the year ended June 28, 1997 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation increasing authorized shares,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(d) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 1,
2000 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
Certificate of Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation increasing authorized
shares, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(e) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
December 27, 2003 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
Form of Amended Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of Series A Junior
Participating Preferred Stock, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(c) to Form 10-K
for the year ended June 29, 1996 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Sysco Corporation dated July 18, 2008, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.5 to Form 8-K filed on July 23, 2008 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
Senior Debt Indenture, dated as of June 15, 1995, between Sysco Corporation and First
Union National Bank of North Carolina, Trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4(a) to Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed June 6, 1995 (File No. 33-60023). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 27, 1998 between Sysco Corporation and
First Union National Bank, Trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(h) to Form
10-K for the year ended June 27, 1998 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
Seventh Supplemental Indenture, including form of Note, dated March 5, 2004 between
Sysco Corporation, as Issuer, and Wachovia Bank, National Association (formerly First
Union National Bank of North Carolina), as Trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4(j) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 27, 2004 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
Eighth Supplemental Indenture, including form of Note, dated September 22, 2005 between
Sysco Corporation, as Issuer, and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Trustee,
incorporated by reference to Exhibits 4.1 and 4.2 to Form 8-K filed on September 20,
2005 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
Ninth Supplemental Indenture, including form of Note, dated February 12, 2008 between
Sysco Corporation, as Issuer, and the Trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1
to Form 8-K filed on February 12, 2008 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
Tenth Supplemental Indenture, including form of Note, dated February 12, 2008 between
Sysco Corporation, as Issuer, and the Trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3
to Form 8-K filed on February 12, 2008 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
Form of Eleventh Supplemental Indenture, including form of Note, dated March 17, 2009
between Sysco Corporation, as Issuer, and the Trustee, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on March 13, 2009 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
Form of Twelfth Supplemental Indenture, including form of Note, dated March 17, 2009
between Sysco Corporation, as Issuer, and the Trustee, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K filed on March 13, 2009 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
Agreement of Resignation, Appointment and Acceptance, dated February 13, 2007, by and
among Sysco Corporation and Sysco International Co., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sysco
Corporation, U.S. Bank National Association and The Bank of New York Trust Company,
N.A., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(h) to Registration Statement on Form S-3
filed on February 6, 2008 (File No. 333-149086). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.10
|
|
|
|
Indenture dated May 23, 2002 between Sysco International, Co., Sysco Corporation and
Wachovia Bank, National Association, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed August 21, 2002 (File No. 333-98489). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.11
|
|
|
|
Letter Regarding Appointment of New Trustee from Sysco Corporation to U.S. Bank National
Association, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
December 29, 2007 filed on February 5, 2008 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.12
|
|
|
|
Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 1, dated July 2, 2010, between Sysco International,
ULC, as successor by conversion and name change to Sysco International Co., Sysco
Corporation, as Guarantor, and the Trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.12 to
Form 10-K for the year ended July 3, 2010 filed on August 31, 2010 (File No. 1-6544). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.1#
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to Fiscal 2011 Management Incentive Plan Bonus Agreement between Sysco
Corporation and William J. DeLaney dated September 3, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2#
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to Offer Letter Dated September 1, 2009 between Sysco Corporation and
Robert C. Kreidler dated September 24, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.3#
|
|
|
|
Sixth Amended and Restated Sysco Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation Plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.4#
|
|
|
|
Tenth Amended and Restated Sysco Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
15.1#
|
|
|
|
Report from Ernst & Young LLP dated November 9, 2010, re: unaudited financial statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
15.2#
|
|
|
|
Acknowledgement letter from Ernst & Young LLP. |
|
|
|
|
|
31.1#
|
|
|
|
CEO Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
31.2#
|
|
|
|
CFO Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
32.1#
|
|
|
|
CEO Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
32.2#
|
|
|
|
CFO Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.1#
|
|
|
|
The following financial information from Sysco Corporations Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended October 2, 2010 filed with the SEC on November 9, 2010,
formatted in XBRL includes: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of October 2, 2010, July
3, 2010 and September 26, 2009, (ii) Consolidated Results of Operations for the thirteen
week periods ended October 2, 2010 and September 26, 2009, (iii) Consolidated Statements
of Comprehensive Income for the thirteen week periods ended October 2, 2010 and
September 26, 2009, (iv) Consolidated Cash Flows for the thirteen week periods ended
October 2, 2010 and September 26, 2009, and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements. |