OMB APPROVAL | ||
OMB Number: 3235-0058 |
||
Expires: April 30, 2009 |
||
Estimated average burden
hours per response ... 2.50 |
||
SEC FILE NUMBER | ||
001-09338 |
||
CUSIP NUMBER | ||
594087108 |
||
(Check one): | o Form 10-K o Form 20-F o Form 11-K þ Form 10-Q o Form 10-D o Form N-SAR o Form N-CSR | |||||
For Period Ended: | April 29, 2006 | |||||
o Transition Report on Form 10-K | ||||||
o Transition Report on Form 20-F | ||||||
o Transition Report on Form 11-K | ||||||
o Transition Report on Form 10-Q | ||||||
o Transition Report on Form N-SAR | ||||||
For the Transition Period Ended: | ||||||
þ |
|||||
(a) | The reason described in reasonable detail in Part III of this form could not be eliminated without unreasonable effort or expense | ||||
(b) | The subject annual report, semi-annual report, transition report on Form 10-K, Form 20-F, Form 11-K, Form N-SAR or Form N-CSR, or portion thereof, will be filed on or before the fifteenth calendar day following the prescribed due date; or the subject quarterly report or transition report on Form 10-Q or subject distribution report on Form 10-D, or portion thereof, will be filed on or before the fifth calendar day following the prescribed due date; and | ||||
(c) | The accountants statement or other exhibit required by Rule 12b-25(c) has been attached if applicable. |
Due to the volume of data subject to this review, the Company has been unable to complete and file by the prescribed due date its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 29, 2006. The Company is working diligently to file its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q by the fifth calendar day following the required filing date as permitted by Rule 12b-25. At this time, the Company is unable to determine whether any accounting adjustment to non-cash stock-based compensation expense might be required, the final amount of any such accounting adjustment, if required, or whether such an adjustment will require a restatement of prior period financial statements or will be reflected in its fiscal 2006 results of operations. The Company is also evaluating whether previously deducted compensation related to exercised stock options might be non-deductible under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, which could result in additional taxes and interest related to the prior deductions and the loss of
2
The internal review is focused principally upon the period from 1990 to 2001. Since October 2001, the Company has utilized pre-determined effective grant dates and generally pre-determined grant levels for its stock option program. Stock option grants from October 2001 to the present have consistently followed these processes.
Prior to October 2001, the Company granted stock options principally utilizing a process in which an authorized committee of the Board would approve stock option grants from time to time through unanimous consent resolutions with specified effective dates that generally preceded the date on which the consents were executed by members of the applicable committee. The Company has historically considered the effective date specified in the written consents by the applicable option committee as the accounting measurement date for determining stock-based compensation expense under APB 25.
SEC 1344 (03-05) | Persons who are to respond to the collection of information contained in this form are not required to respond unless the form displays a currently valid OMB control number. |
(1) | Name and telephone number of person to contact in regard to this notification |
Lisa K. Klinger | (972) | 409-1528 | ||
(Name) |
(Area Code) | (Telephone Number) |
(2) | Have all other periodic reports required under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or Section 30 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 during the preceding 12 months or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such report(s) been filed? If answer is no, identify report(s). | |
Yes þ No o | ||
(3) | Is it anticipated that any significant change in results of operations from the corresponding period for the last fiscal year will be reflected by the earnings statements to be included in the subject report or portion thereof? | |
Yes o No o | ||
If so, attach an explanation of the anticipated change, both narratively and quantitatively, and, if appropriate, state the reasons why a reasonable estimate of the results cannot be made. | ||
Due to the early stage of its
Audit Committees internal review, the Company has not yet determined
whether its Audit Committees
internal review will result in any significant impact on the
Companys financial statements.
|
3
Certain matters discussed in this Notification of Late Filing on Form 12b-25, including the timing of the filing of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 29, 2006, constitute forward looking statements. Actual results or events could differ materially from those stated or implied in these forward-looking statements, including as a result of additional actions or findings resulting from our Audit Committees internal review or as a result of other factors as set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2006 and in our other Securities and Exchange Commission filings. There can be no assurance as to the final results of our Audit Committees internal review or the timing of the filing of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 29, 2006. We intend these forward-looking statements to speak only as of the time of this Notification of Late Filing on Form 12b-25 and do not undertake to update or revise them as more information becomes available.
4
Date
|
June 8, 2006 | By | /s/ Jeffrey N. Boyer | |||
Jeffrey N. Boyer President and Chief Financial Officer |
5