Bowater Incorporated
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR
THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED March 31, 2007.
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 |
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 1-1872
BOWATER INCORPORATED
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
62-0721803 |
|
|
|
(State of Incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
55 East Camperdown Way, P.O. Box 1028, Greenville, SC 29602
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
(864) 271-7733
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to the filing requirements for at least the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Large Accelerated Filer þ Accelerated Filer o
Non-accelerated Filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
May 1, 2007.
|
|
|
Class
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value
|
|
56,217,139 Shares |
BOWATER INCORPORATED
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page Number |
|
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. Financial Statements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity for the Three Months Ended March 31,
2007 and 2006 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
|
7 - 17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
|
18 - 32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
|
|
32 - 33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4. Controls and Procedures |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART II OTHER INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. Legal Proceedings |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1A. Risk Factors |
|
|
34 - 39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 5.
Other Information |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 6. Exhibits |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SIGNATURES |
|
|
40 |
|
BOWATER INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited, in millions of US dollars except per-share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
771.6 |
|
|
$ |
893.2 |
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales, excluding depreciation, amortization
and cost of timber harvested |
|
|
600.5 |
|
|
|
680.2 |
|
Depreciation, amortization and cost of timber harvested |
|
|
79.9 |
|
|
|
81.1 |
|
Distribution costs |
|
|
75.3 |
|
|
|
82.9 |
|
Selling and administrative expense |
|
|
48.7 |
|
|
|
38.0 |
|
Net gain on disposition of assets |
|
|
(57.9 |
) |
|
|
(28.8 |
) |
|
Operating income |
|
|
25.1 |
|
|
|
39.8 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(47.3 |
) |
|
|
(49.4 |
) |
Other (expense) income, net |
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
Loss before income taxes, minority interests and
cumulative effect of accounting
change |
|
|
(26.6 |
) |
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
(13.1 |
) |
Minority interests, net of tax |
|
|
(7.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
|
(35.4 |
) |
|
|
(16.2 |
) |
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(35.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(18.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
$ |
(0.62 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.28 |
) |
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.05 |
) |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(0.62 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.33 |
) |
|
Diluted loss per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
$ |
(0.62 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.28 |
) |
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.05 |
) |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(0.62 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.33 |
) |
|
Average number of shares outstanding (in millions): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted |
|
|
57.4 |
|
|
|
57.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
BOWATER INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited, in millions of US dollars except share and per-share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
98.3 |
|
|
$ |
98.9 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
414.5 |
|
|
|
444.5 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
376.9 |
|
|
|
349.8 |
|
Timberlands held for sale |
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
18.7 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
54.8 |
|
|
|
47.1 |
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
960.1 |
|
|
|
959.0 |
|
|
Timber and timberlands |
|
|
57.2 |
|
|
|
60.8 |
|
Fixed assets, net |
|
|
2,827.1 |
|
|
|
2,877.9 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
590.7 |
|
|
|
590.2 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
153.8 |
|
|
|
158.0 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,588.9 |
|
|
$ |
4,645.9 |
|
|
|
Liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current installments of long-term debt |
|
$ |
15.8 |
|
|
$ |
14.9 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
428.5 |
|
|
|
431.2 |
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
444.3 |
|
|
|
446.1 |
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current installments |
|
|
2,246.0 |
|
|
|
2,251.6 |
|
Pension and other postretirement benefit
obligations |
|
|
634.0 |
|
|
|
651.1 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
90.5 |
|
|
|
92.5 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
308.4 |
|
|
|
313.0 |
|
Minority interests in subsidiaries |
|
|
69.7 |
|
|
|
59.0 |
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $1 par value. Authorized
100,000,000 shares; issued
67,812,567 and 67,585,104 shares at March 31, 2007 and December 31,
2006, respectively |
|
|
67.8 |
|
|
|
67.6 |
|
Exchangeable shares, no par value. Unlimited shares
authorized; 1,202,154
and 1,423,830 outstanding at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006,
respectively |
|
|
56.8 |
|
|
|
67.6 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,645.0 |
|
|
|
1,630.1 |
|
Retained deficit |
|
|
(120.7 |
) |
|
|
(76.0 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(367.2 |
) |
|
|
(371.0 |
) |
Treasury stock at cost, 11,598,820 and 11,600,717 shares at March 31,
2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively |
|
|
(485.7 |
) |
|
|
(485.7 |
) |
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
796.0 |
|
|
|
832.6 |
|
|
Total liabilities and
shareholders equity |
|
$ |
4,588.9 |
|
|
$ |
4,645.9 |
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
BOWATER INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(Unaudited, in millions of US dollars except share and per-share amounts)
For the three months ended March 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Common |
|
Exchangeable |
|
Paid In |
|
Retained |
|
Comprehensive |
|
Treasury |
|
Shareholders |
|
|
Stock |
|
Shares |
|
Capital |
|
Deficit |
|
Loss |
|
Stock |
|
Equity |
|
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
67.6 |
|
|
$ |
67.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,630.1 |
|
|
$ |
(76.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(371.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(485.7 |
) |
|
$ |
832.6 |
|
|
Cumulative adjustment to retained deficit for
adoption of
FIN 48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
Dividends on common stock ($0.20 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.6 |
) |
|
Retraction of exchangeable shares (221,676
shares issued
and exchangeable shares retracted) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(10.8 |
) |
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation costs for equity
awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
Restricted stock units vested (5,787 shares,
net of shares
forfeited for employee withholding taxes) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
Treasury stock used for dividend reinvestment
plans and
to pay employee and director benefits
(1,897 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35.4 |
) |
Change in unrealized prior service costs,
net of tax of
$0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in actuarial gains and losses, net
of tax of $2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized gain on hedged
transactions, net
of tax of $0.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31.6 |
) |
|
Balance at March 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
67.8 |
|
|
$ |
56.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,645.0 |
|
|
$ |
(120.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(367.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(485.7 |
) |
|
$ |
796.0 |
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Common |
|
Exchangeable |
|
Paid In |
|
Retained |
|
Comprehensive |
|
Treasury |
|
Shareholders |
|
|
Stock |
|
Shares |
|
Capital |
|
Earnings |
|
Loss |
|
Stock |
|
Equity |
|
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
67.5 |
|
|
$ |
68.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,621.6 |
|
|
$ |
100.1 |
|
|
$ |
(156.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(485.8 |
) |
|
$ |
1,215.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative adjustment to retained earnings for adoption
of SAB 108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends on common stock ($0.20 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum pension liability, net of tax of
$0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized gain on hedged transactions, net
of tax of $6.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29.3 |
) |
|
Balance at March 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
67.5 |
|
|
$ |
68.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,621.6 |
|
|
$ |
78.4 |
|
|
$ |
(166.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(485.8 |
) |
|
$ |
1,183.3 |
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
BOWATER INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited, in millions of US dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(35.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(18.8 |
) |
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash (used for) provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
Depreciation, amortization and cost of timber harvested |
|
|
79.9 |
|
|
|
81.1 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
4.6 |
|
Minority interests, net of tax |
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net pension (contributions) benefit costs |
|
|
(10.5 |
) |
|
|
4.8 |
|
Net gain on disposition of assets |
|
|
(57.9 |
) |
|
|
(28.8 |
) |
Changes in working capital: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
29.9 |
|
|
|
(26.0 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(27.1 |
) |
|
|
(11.6 |
) |
Income taxes receivable and payable |
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(12.1 |
) |
|
|
6.9 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
Net cash
(used for) provided by operating activities |
|
|
(15.7 |
) |
|
|
22.0 |
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash invested in fixed assets, timber and timberlands |
|
|
(25.9 |
) |
|
|
(37.5 |
) |
Dispositions of assets, including timber and timberlands |
|
|
64.6 |
|
|
|
36.8 |
|
Direct acquisition costs related to the proposed merger with Abitibi-Consolidated Inc. |
|
|
(9.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities |
|
|
29.5 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends |
|
|
(11.3 |
) |
|
|
(11.5 |
) |
Short-term financing |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
201.7 |
|
Short-term financing repayments |
|
|
(8.0 |
) |
|
|
(209.0 |
) |
Payments of long-term debt |
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
(10.0 |
) |
|
Net cash used for financing activities |
|
|
(14.4 |
) |
|
|
(28.8 |
) |
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(7.5 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of year |
|
|
98.9 |
|
|
|
30.1 |
|
|
End of year |
|
$ |
98.3 |
|
|
$ |
22.6 |
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest, including capitalized interest of $0 and $1.3 |
|
$ |
24.4 |
|
|
$ |
26.0 |
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Bowater Incorporated
and subsidiaries (Bowater, also referred to as we or our). The consolidated balance sheet
as of March 31, 2007, and the related statements of operations,
stockholders equity accounts and cash flows
for the periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 are unaudited. In our opinion, all adjustments
(consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for fair presentation of the interim
financial statements have been made. The results of the interim period ended March 31, 2007 are
not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. These financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related
notes and critical accounting estimates included in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Certain prior-year amounts in the financial statements and the notes have been reclassified to
conform to the 2007 presentation. The reclassifications had no effect on total shareholders
equity or net loss.
On January 1, 2007, we adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income TaxesAn Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48). FIN 48 clarifies the
accounting for the uncertainty in income taxes recognized by prescribing the threshold a tax
position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. As a result
of the adoption, we recorded a $2.3 million credit to our opening retained deficit balance. The
credit represents the cumulative effect of adoption on prior periods. For additional
information regarding this adjustment, refer to Note 8, Income Taxes.
In December 2006, we adopted the provisions of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, Considering
the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year
Financial Statements (SAB 108). We elected, as allowed under SAB 108, to reflect the effect
of initially applying this guidance by adjusting the carrying amount of the impacted
liabilities as of the beginning of 2006 and recording an offsetting adjustment to the opening
balance of our retained earnings in 2006. We recorded a cumulative adjustment to increase our
retained earnings by $8.6 million for the adoption of SAB 108.
2. Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
(Unaudited, in millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
At lower of cost or market: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
82.0 |
|
|
$ |
87.7 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
21.7 |
|
|
|
20.1 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
153.1 |
|
|
|
123.0 |
|
Mill stores and other supplies |
|
|
133.5 |
|
|
|
132.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
390.3 |
|
|
|
362.8 |
|
Excess of current cost over LIFO inventory value |
|
|
(13.4 |
) |
|
|
(13.0 |
) |
|
|
|
$ |
376.9 |
|
|
$ |
349.8 |
|
|
7
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited
3. Other (Expense) Income, Net
Other (expense) income, net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations includes the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
(Unaudited, in millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Foreign exchange (loss) gain |
|
$ |
(3.1 |
) |
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
(Losses) earnings from equity method investments |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
2.3 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Miscellaneous (loss) income |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
(4.4 |
) |
|
$ |
6.5 |
|
|
4. Timberlands Held for Sale
We are currently marketing for sale approximately 67,600 acres of timberlands in the United
States and Canada. We expect sales of these assets to be completed in 2007. Timberlands held
for sale are carried on our
Consolidated Balance Sheets at cost as we expect the proceeds of the timberland sales to exceed
their individual carrying values. There are $4.2 million and $4.8 million at March 31, 2007 and
December 31, 2006, respectively, of deferred tax assets associated with these assets held for
sale included in deferred income taxes.
During the three months ended March 31, 2007, we sold approximately 52,200 acres of timberlands
and other assets for proceeds of $64.6 million. During the three months ended March 31, 2006,
we sold approximately 24,300 acres of timberlands and other assets for proceeds of $36.8
million.
5. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
The components of Accumulated other comprehensive loss in the Consolidated Balance Sheets are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
(Unaudited, in millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Unrealized prior service costs (1) |
|
$ |
(24.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(23.2 |
) |
Unrealized actuarial gains and losses (2) |
|
|
(351.0 |
) |
|
|
(358.9 |
) |
Unrealized transition obligation (3) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Foreign currency translation (4) |
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
Unrealized gain on hedging transactions (5) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
$ |
(367.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(371.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net of deferred tax benefit of $2.4 million and $1.5 million, respectively. Net of minority interest of $2.3 million and $2.4 million, respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
Net of deferred tax benefit of $107.3 million and $109.6 million, respectively. Net of minority interest of $5.0 million and $5.2 million, respectively. |
|
(3) |
|
Net of deferred tax benefit of $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively. |
|
(4) |
|
No tax effect is recorded for foreign currency translation
since the foreign net assets translated are deemed indefinitely invested. |
|
(5) |
|
Net of deferred taxes of $0.1 million and a deferred tax benefit of $0.5 million, respectively. |
8
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited
6. Loss Per Share
The information required to compute net loss per basic and diluted share is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
(Unaudited, in millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Basic weighted-average number of common shares outstanding |
|
|
57.4 |
|
|
|
57.4 |
|
Effect of potentially dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted-average number of common shares outstanding |
|
|
57.4 |
|
|
|
57.4 |
|
|
No adjustments to net loss are necessary to compute net loss per basic and diluted share. The
dilutive effect of potentially dilutive securities is calculated using the treasury stock
method. Options to purchase 4.8 million and 4.9 million shares for the three months ended March
31, 2007 and March 31, 2006, respectively, were excluded from the calculation of diluted loss
per share as the impact would have been anti-dilutive. In addition, 1.0 million restricted
stock units for the three months ended March 31, 2007 were excluded from the calculation of
diluted loss per share for the same reason.
7. Pension and Other Postretirement Expense
The components of net periodic benefit costs relating to Bowaters pension and other
postretirement plans are as follows for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Plans |
|
Other Postretirement Plans |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
(Unaudited, in millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
9.1 |
|
|
$ |
10.9 |
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
30.3 |
|
|
|
29.2 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(32.1 |
) |
|
|
(29.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost (credit) |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
Curtailments and settlements |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
Net periodic benefit cost (credit) |
|
$ |
19.7 |
|
|
$ |
25.4 |
|
|
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
|
$ |
5.3 |
|
|
Since the measurement date of our plans is 90 days prior to the end of our year, curtailment and
settlement gains and losses that arise during the year are recorded on a 90-day lag.
In October 2006, Bowater approved changes to its other postretirement plan for its U.S. salaried
employees. Benefits for employees were either eliminated or reduced depending on whether the
employee met certain age and years of service criteria. A curtailment gain of $3.2 million was
recorded in the first quarter of 2007.
In December 2006, certain employees received lump-sum payouts from two of our retirement
pension plans. Accordingly, we recorded settlement losses of $4.5 million in the first quarter of
2007.
9
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited
The curtailment loss of $4.6 million and curtailment gain of $0.2 million included in net
periodic benefit cost in the first quarter of 2006 is due to the reduction of employees at our
Thunder Bay A kraft pulp mill.
In
January and March 2007, certain employees received lump-sum payouts
from two of our retirement pension plans. As a result, we will record
settlement losses of $1.1 million in the second quarter of
2007.
In February 2007, the union members at our Thunder Bay, Ontario facility ratified a new labor
agreement. As a result of a mill-wide restructuring of this facility, 157 jobs will be
eliminated and a curtailment loss of approximately $2.9 million will be recorded in the second
quarter of 2007. This event will also result in a settlement loss at the time
the benefits are paid.
8. Income Taxes
The income tax provision attributable to loss before income taxes, minority interests and
cumulative effect of accounting change differs from the amounts computed by applying the United
States federal statutory income tax rate of 35% as a result of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
(Unaudited, in millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Loss before income taxes, minority interest and cumulative effect
of accounting change |
|
$ |
(26.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected income tax benefit |
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Increase (decrease) in income taxes resulting from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance (1) |
|
|
(13.0 |
) |
|
|
(13.5 |
) |
Foreign exchange |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
Foreign taxes |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
Income tax provision |
|
$ |
(1.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(13.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
During the first quarter of 2007 and 2006, income tax benefits of approximately $13.0
million and $13.5 million generated on our current quarter Canadian operating losses were entirely
offset by tax charges to increase our valuation allowance related to these tax benefits. |
We adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007. As a result of the implementation of FIN
48, we decreased our liability for unrecognized tax benefits by $2.3 million, which was accounted
for as a decrease to our January 1, 2007 retained deficit balance. Our liability for unrecognized
tax benefits as of January 1, 2007 is $28.3 million, which includes interest of $0.6 million. We
recognize interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits as components of
income tax expense. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect
the effective tax rate is $23.1 million, which includes $0.6 million of interest. If recognized,
these items would impact the Consolidated Statement of Operations and our effective tax rate. We
anticipate that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits will
decrease by approximately $7.0 million to $8.5 million during the next twelve months due to certain
U.S. statutes of limitations closing, primarily in the third quarter of 2007. The approximately
$7.0 million to $8.5 million of unrecognized tax benefits is attributable to various U.S. income
tax issues. We remain subject to income tax examination in Canada for tax years 2002-2006, in Korea
for tax years 2005-2006 and in the U.S. for tax years 2003-2006.
10
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited
9. Financial Instruments
Bowater utilizes certain derivative instruments to enhance its ability to manage risk relating
to cash flow exposure. Derivative instruments are entered into for periods consistent with
related underlying cash flow exposures and do not constitute positions independent of those
exposures. We do not enter into contracts for speculative purposes; however, we do, from time
to time enter into commodity and currency option contracts that are not accounted for as
accounting hedges. Counterparty risk is limited to institutions with long-term debt ratings of
A or better for North American financial institutions or ratings of AA or better for
international institutions.
For derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting (currently only the Canadian dollar forward
contracts), we designate the derivative as a cash flow hedge at the inception of the hedge. We
formally document all relationships between the hedging instruments and the hedged items, as
well as our risk-management objectives and strategies for undertaking the various hedge
transactions. We link all hedges that are designated as cash flow hedges to forecasted
transactions. Under the terms of our risk management policy, we may enter into derivative
contracts to hedge forecasted transactions for a period not to exceed two years. We also
assess, both at the inception of the hedge and on an on-going basis, whether the derivatives
that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows
of the hedged items. If it is determined that a derivative is no longer highly effective as a
hedge, we discontinue hedge accounting prospectively.
Canadian Dollar Forward Contracts
We pay a significant portion of the operating expenses of our Canadian mill sites in Canadian
dollars. To reduce our exposure to U.S. and Canadian dollar exchange rate fluctuations, we
enter into and designate Canadian dollar forward contracts to hedge certain of our forecasted
Canadian dollar cash outflows at the Canadian mill operations, which we believe are likely to
occur. Hedging contracts outstanding at March 31, 2007 have been established to hedge
forecasted transactions through the second quarter of 2007. Hedge ineffectiveness associated
with these Canadian dollar forward contracts was not material for the periods presented in our
Consolidated Financial Statements.
British Pound Sterling Forward Contracts
We have entered into sales agreements denominated in British pound sterling. Beginning in the
first quarter of 2007, we entered into currency forward contracts to attempt to partially limit
our exposure to British pound sterling-U.S. dollar exchange rate fluctuations. These currency
forward contracts, which do not currently meet the requirements for hedge accounting treatment,
have been recorded at fair value in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. As a result,
approximately $0.1 million of pre-tax gains were recognized for the three months ended March
31, 2007 for contracts that we entered into to economically hedge forecasted transactions
expected to occur through December 31, 2007.
Natural Gas Swap Agreements
Beginning in the third quarter of 2006, we entered into natural gas swap agreements under our
natural gas hedging program for the purpose of reducing the risk inherent in fluctuating
natural gas prices. Our hedged natural gas costs are billed to us based on a publicly traded
index plus a fixed amount. The
natural gas swap agreements allow us to minimize the effect of fluctuations in those indices by
contractually exchanging the publicly traded index upon which we are billed for a fixed index
of natural gas cost. The swap agreements, which do not currently meet the requirements for
hedge accounting treatment, have been recorded at fair value in the Consolidated Statement of
Operations. As a result, approximately $0.8 million of pre-tax gains were recognized for the
three months ended March 31, 2007 for contracts that we entered into in 2006 and 2007 to
economically hedge forecasted transactions expected to occur through February 2008.
11
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited
Information regarding our outstanding Canadian dollar, British pound sterling, and natural gas
swap contracts notional amount, fair market value, and range of exchange rates or natural gas
price index prices is summarized in the table below. The notional amount of these contracts
represents the amount of foreign currencies or natural gas to be purchased or sold at maturity
and does not represent our exposure on these contracts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range Of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.$/CDN$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and U.S.$/GBP$ |
|
|
Notional |
|
Asset /(Liability) |
|
Exchange Rates |
(Unaudited, in millions of U.S. dollars |
|
Amount of |
|
|
|
|
|
and Natural Gas |
except rates and prices) |
|
Derivatives |
|
Fair Market Value |
|
Index Prices |
|
As of March 31, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Exchange Agreements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in 2007 |
|
$ |
8.0 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
.8444 .8444 |
|
British pound sterling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in 2007 |
|
$ |
38.9 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
1.9553 1.9732 |
|
Natural Gas Swap Agreements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in 2007 |
|
$ |
7.7 |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
5.78 8.72 |
|
Due in 2008 |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8.45 9.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Exchange Agreements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in 2007 |
|
$ |
76.0 |
|
|
$ |
(0.4 |
) |
|
$ |
.8592 .8801 |
|
Natural Gas Swap Agreements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in 2007 |
|
$ |
9.0 |
|
|
$ |
(1.1 |
) |
|
$ |
5.87 8.98 |
|
|
The counterparties to our derivative financial instruments are substantial and creditworthy
multi-national financial institutions. The risk of counterparty nonperformance is considered to be
remote, and no individual financial institution holds more than 22% of our derivative financial
instruments.
The components of the cash flow hedges included in Accumulated other comprehensive loss are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
(Unaudited, in millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Gains (losses) reclassified on matured cash flow hedges |
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
(17.6 |
) |
Unrealized gains for change in value on outstanding cash flow hedges |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
(16.8 |
) |
Income tax (provision) benefit |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease (increase) in Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
(10.4 |
) |
|
We expect to reclassify gains of $0.2 million ($0.1 million, net of tax) from Accumulated
other comprehensive loss to the Consolidated Statement of Operations during the next twelve months
as the forecasted transactions occur.
12
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited
10. |
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
Bowater is involved in various legal proceedings relating to contracts, commercial
disputes, taxes, environmental issues, employment and workers compensation claims and
other matters. We periodically review the status of these proceedings with both inside and
outside counsel. We believe that the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition, but it could have a material adverse
effect on the results of operations in a given quarter or the year. |
|
|
|
On September 30, 2005, the Ministry of Justice of the Province of Quebec (MOJ) cited one of our
subsidiaries, Bowater Canadian Forest Products, Inc. (BCFPI), in connection with effluent water
quality of the Dolbeau mill. BCFPI settled this citation on March 29, 2007, by agreeing to pay a
fine and costs totaling CDN $158,000. The Dolbeau mill has taken steps to improve its effluent
quality and has experienced only two other exceedences since January 1, 2005. |
|
|
|
There have been no other material developments to the legal proceedings described in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K filed on March 1, 2007. |
11. |
|
Share Based Compensation |
|
|
|
We maintain incentive stock plans that provide for grants of stock options, equity
participation rights (EPRs) and restricted stock units to our directors, officers and
key employees. These plans are described more fully in our 2006 Annual Report on Form
10-K. |
|
|
|
Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123R,
Share-based Payments and related interpretations (SFAS 123R). The adoption of SFAS 123R
resulted in a charge for the cumulative effect of accounting change of $2.6 million, net of tax, (or
$0.05 per share) that we recorded in the first quarter of 2006. |
|
|
|
The following table details the share-based compensation expense (excluding the cumulative effect
of accounting change) recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations by award: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
(Unaudited, in millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Stock Options |
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Restricted Stock Units |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
EPRs |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
Share-based compensation expense (income) |
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
|
$ |
(0.9 |
) |
|
The following table details the tax (benefit) provision by award:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
(Unaudited, in millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Stock Options |
|
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Restricted Stock Units |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
EPRs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
Tax (benefit) provision |
|
$ |
(1.3 |
) |
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
13
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited
Stock Options
On
January 30, 2007, we granted 72,146 stock options. The awards cliff
vest after three years and allow for accelerated vesting upon a grantees retirement. We have
recognized compensation expense based on the requisite service period, which is less than three
years for certain employees who are eligible for retirement as of the date of the grant or become
eligible for retirement during the vesting period. No stock options were granted in the first three
months of 2006.
A summary of option activity under our stock plans as of and for the three months ended March 31,
2007 is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Number Of |
|
Weighted |
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
Options |
|
Average |
|
Contractual |
|
|
|
|
|
Value |
(Unaudited) |
|
(000s) |
|
Exercise Price |
|
Life (years) |
|
|
|
|
|
($000) |
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
4,982 |
|
|
$ |
43.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted during the period |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
27.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised during the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled during the period |
|
|
(212 |
) |
|
|
41.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2007 |
|
|
4,842 |
|
|
$ |
43.28 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Exercisable at March 31, 2007 |
|
|
4,465 |
|
|
$ |
44.63 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
In accordance with SFAS 123R, we estimated the fair value of each stock option granted during the
three months ended March 31, 2007 on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing
formula, applying weighted-average assumptions which are consistent with the
assumptions described in Note 21 Share-Based Compensation included in our most recent Annual
Report on Form 10-K, and amortize that value to expense over the options requisite service period
using the straight-line attribution approach. The weighted-average
fair value of options granted during the three months ended
March 31, 2007 was $9.08.
During the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, all vested options had a strike price
greater than the closing price of our common stock (i.e., were
out-of-the-money), and there were no stock option exercises during the first quarter of 2007 or 2006.
As of March 31, 2007, there was $2.2 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to stock
option awards granted under our stock plans. The unrecognized cost is expected to be recognized
over a weighted-average period of 2.2 years.
14
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited
Restricted Stock Units
On
January 30, 2007, we granted 327,945 restricted stock units (RSUs),
all of which were service-based awards. The awards cliff vest after three years and allow for
accelerated vesting upon a grantees retirement. We have recognized compensation expense based on
the requisite service period, which is less than three years for certain employees who are eligible
for retirement as of the date of the grant or will become eligible for retirement during the
vesting period.
On
February 7, 2007, we granted 36,101 RSUs, all of
which were performance-based awards. These awards vest upon closing of the merger of Bowater and
Abitibi-Consolidated Inc. (Abitibi), or upon cancellation of the merger if the cancellation is
due to a failure to receive regulatory approval or Abitibis acts or failures to act. Accounting
guidance dictates that, for purposes of recognizing compensation
expense for this type of award, the
business combination is not considered probable until the date the merger is consummated. As
vesting of these awards is predicated upon close of the merger or other events related to the
business combination, no compensation expense will be recorded for these awards until consummation
of the merger. In the event of the consummation of the merger, $1.0 million of compensation expense
will be immediately recognized. These awards are included in our outstanding RSUs at the end of the
period.
On
March 23, 2007, we granted 54,200 RSUs, all of which were
performance-based awards. The vesting of these awards is contingent upon the realization of certain
synergies within two years of consummation of the AbitbiBowater merger. The key terms and
conditions of these RSUs have not been finalized; therefore a grant date for FAS 123R purposes has
not occurred. As such, no compensation expense was recorded during the three months ended March 31,
2007, nor were these awards included in our outstanding RSUs at the end of the period.
No restricted stock units were granted during the first three months of 2006.
A summary of the status of our restricted stock units as of March 31, 2007, and changes during the
three months ended March 31, 2007, is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Number Of Units |
|
Fair Value at Grant |
(Unaudited) |
|
(000s) |
|
Date |
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
665 |
|
|
$ |
26.11 |
|
Granted during the period |
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
27.85 |
|
Vested during the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.35 |
|
Forfeited during the period |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
26.59 |
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2007 |
|
|
1,025 |
|
|
$ |
26.72 |
|
|
As of
March 31, 2007, there was $14.9 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to
restricted stock units granted under our stock plans, excluding those granted on February 7, 2007
(discussed above). This unrecognized cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average
period of 1.5 years. The total fair value of restricted stock units vested during the first three
months of 2007 was minimal.
15
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited
Equity Participation Rights
EPRs confer the right to receive cash based on the appreciation of Bowaters common stock price,
but no right to acquire stock ownership. The rights have a vesting period of two years and, unless
terminated earlier in accordance with their terms, expire 10 years after the grant date. The base
price is the fair market
value of our common stock on the day of grant. The rights may be redeemed only for cash, and the
amount paid to the employee at the time of exercise is the difference between the base price and
the average high/low of our common stock on the day of settlement. There have been no grants of
EPRs since January 2003.
The EPR awards are classified as liability awards under SFAS 123R since the EPRs are cash settled.
In accordance with SFAS 123R, liability awards are remeasured at fair value at each reporting
period and the income or expense included in the consolidated statement of operations. As of March
31, 2007, the fair value of our EPRs liability is $0.1 million. The assumptions used to value the
liability are consistent with those used in the past.
Information with respect to rights granted under the EPR Plan as of March 31, 2007 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Number of |
|
Average |
|
Contractual |
|
|
|
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
Rights |
|
Exercise |
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
Value |
(Unaudited) |
|
(000s) |
|
Price |
|
(years) |
|
|
|
|
|
($000) |
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
2,010 |
|
|
$ |
47.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted during the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settled during the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled during the period |
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
38.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2007 |
|
|
1,910 |
|
|
$ |
48.14 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Exercisable at March 31, 2007 |
|
|
1,910 |
|
|
$ |
48.14 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
12. |
|
Off-Balance Sheet Debt Guarantees |
|
|
|
In connection with Bowaters 1999 land sale and note monetization, we guarantee 25% of the
outstanding investor notes principal balance of Timber Note Holdings LLC, one of our Qualified
Special Purpose Entities (QSPEs). Bowater guarantees approximately $6.8 million of the investor
notes principal balance at March 31, 2007. This guarantee is proportionately reduced by annual
principal repayments on the investor notes (annual minimum repayments of $2.0 million) through
2008. The remaining investor notes principal amount is to be repaid in 2009. Timber Note
Holdings LLC has assets of approximately $31.7 million and obligations of approximately $27.3
million, which include the investor notes. Bowater would be required to perform on the
guarantee if the QSPE were to default on the investor notes or if there were a default on the
notes receivable, neither of which has ever occurred. |
|
13. |
|
Segment Information |
|
|
|
During the third quarter of 2006, we announced that we were realigning our organizational
structure to move from a divisional organization to a functional organization that supports and
focuses on our multi-product line manufacturing and sales across our mill base. As a result of
this organizational realignment, we now manage our business based on the products that we
manufacture and sell to external customers and, therefore, our reportable segments changed. Our
new reportable segments are coated papers, specialty papers, newsprint, market pulp, and
lumber. Prior year information has been recast to the current year presentation of our
reportable segments. |
|
|
|
None of the income or loss items following Operating income in our Consolidated Statements of
Operations are allocated to our segments, since those items are reviewed separately by Bowaters
management. For the same reason, impairments, employee termination costs, gains on dispositions of
assets and other discretionary charges |
16
BOWATER INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Unaudited
or credits are not allocated to the segments. Share-based compensation expense is, however,
allocated to our segments. We also allocated depreciation expense to our segments, although the
related fixed assets are not allocated to segment assets.
Only assets which are identifiable by segment and reviewed by our management are allocated to
segment assets. Allocated assets include goodwill, trade accounts receivable, finished goods
inventory at our paper mills and all inventory at our sawmills. All other assets are not
identifiable by segment and are included in Corporate and Other.
The following tables summarize information about segment profit and loss for the three months ended
March 31, 2007 and 2006 and segment assets as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coated |
|
|
Specialty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
(Unaudited, in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Papers |
|
|
Papers |
|
|
Newsprint |
|
|
Pulp |
|
|
Lumber |
|
|
and Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
$ |
128.5 |
|
|
$ |
141.2 |
|
|
$ |
302.9 |
|
|
$ |
133.1 |
|
|
$ |
62.8 |
|
|
$ |
3.1 |
|
|
$ |
771.6 |
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
152.9 |
|
|
|
130.9 |
|
|
|
373.5 |
|
|
|
129.4 |
|
|
|
96.5 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
893.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income (loss)(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
$ |
8.6 |
|
|
$ |
(8.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.1 |
) |
|
$ |
18.7 |
|
|
$ |
(13.6 |
) |
|
$ |
24.2 |
|
|
$ |
25.1 |
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
21.7 |
|
|
|
(8.2 |
) |
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
39.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Corporate and other operating loss includes net gains from dispositions of
assets of $57.9 million and $28.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007
and 2006, respectively. |
14. |
|
Combination with Abitibi-Consolidated Inc. |
|
|
|
In January 2007, Bowater and Abitibi announced a definitive agreement to combine in
an all-stock merger of equals (the combined company is
referred to as AbitibiBowater). The definitive agreement
was amended on May 7, 2007. The combination has been approved unanimously by the Boards of Directors of both
companies, which received fairness opinions from their respective financial advisors. The
combination is subject to approval by the shareholders of both companies, regulatory
approvals, and customary closing conditions. The combination is expected to be completed in the
third quarter of 2007. Abitibi and Bowater will continue to operate separately until the
transaction closes. In connection with this announced combination, we have approved a retention
and severance program for approximately 320 Bowater employees who may be impacted by the
pending combination with Abitibi. This program provides a retention bonus for employees who
remain with Bowater through the closing of the combination or its cancellation for any reason
and an additional retention bonus for employees who remain with Bowater for a transition
period following closing of the combination. The costs associated with these programs are
expensed as incurred. Also in connection with the combination, we have incurred $12.6 million
in direct acquisition costs as of March 31, 2007. These costs have been capitalized
in our Consolidated Balance Sheet under the assumption that Bowater
will be deemed the acquirer in this combination for accounting
purposes. |
17
BOWATER INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Cautionary Statements Regarding Forward-Looking Information and Use of Third Party Data
Statements contained in this Form 10-Q that do not constitute historical financial results or other
factual information are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements include, for example, statements about
our business outlook, assessment of market conditions, strategies, future plans, future sales and
shipments, prices for our major products, inventory levels, cost reduction measures, manufacturing
performance, product mix, capital spending and tax and exchange
rates. Forward looking statements also include statements concerning
our pending combination with Abitibi-Consolidated Inc.
(Abitibi), including statements about the expected timing of
such transaction, conditions to closing and anticipated
post-closing operations and results. These forward-looking
statements are not guarantees of future performance. These statements are based on managements
expectations that involve a number of business risks and uncertainties, any of which could cause
actual results to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by the forward-looking
statements. In addition to specific factors described in connection with any particular
forward-looking statement, factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include,
but are not limited to, those described under the caption Item 1ARisk Factors in Part II of this
Form 10-Q and from time to time, in Bowaters other filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. In addition, other risks could adversely affect us, as it is not possible for us to
predict or assess all risks. We disclaim any obligation to publicly update or revise any
forward-looking statements even if our situation changes in the future.
Information
about industry or general economic conditions contained in this
report is derived from
third party sources (i.e., the Pulp and Paper Products Council; RISI, Inc.; and certain trade
publications) that Bowater believes are widely accepted and accurate; however, Bowater has not
independently verified this information and cannot provide assurances of its accuracy.
Accounting Policies and Estimates
The following discussion and analysis provides information that we believe is useful in
understanding our operating results, cash flows and financial condition on our unaudited
Consolidated Financial Statements included in this quarterly report. Our significant accounting
policies are described in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. Bowaters critical accounting estimates are
described under the caption Critical Accounting Estimates in Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles
requires us to make estimates, assumptions and judgments and rely on projections of future results
of operations and cash flows. We base our estimates and assumptions on historical data and other
assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates and assumptions
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities in our financial statements. In addition, they affect the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period.
Our judgments are based on our assessment as to the effect certain estimates, assumptions of future
trends or events may have on the financial condition and results of operations reported in our
Consolidated Financial Statements. It is important that the reader of our financial statements
understand that actual results could differ materially from these estimates, assumptions,
projections and judgments.
Overview of Financial Performance
We manage our business based on the products that we manufacture and sell to external customers.
Our primary product lines includecoated papers, specialty papers, newsprint, market pulp, and
lumber.
Our net loss for the first quarter of 2007 was $35.4 million, or $0.62 per diluted share, as
compared to a net loss of $18.8 million, or $0.33 per diluted share, for the same period in 2006.
Our sales in the first quarter of 2007 were $771.6 million, a decrease of $121.6 million from the
first
quarter of 2006 sales of $893.2 million. Average transaction prices decreased for all of our major
products except market pulp, and shipments decreased for all of our major products except specialty
papers. The increase in the shipments of specialty
18
BOWATER INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
papers was due primarily to the conversion of a newsprint machine at our Calhoun facility in July
2006 to produce a lightly coated freesheet hybrid product. Shipments of newsprint were
significantly lower in the first quarter of 2007 compared to the first quarter of 2006 due to the
curtailment of paper production at our Thunder Bay, Ontario facility beginning in September 2006
and at our Gatineau, Quebec facility and at a number of other locations beginning in March 2007 in
response to a decreased demand for our product along with an increase in production costs due to
the rising costs of energy and recycled fiber. We will resume operation of one of the idled paper
machines at our Thunder Bay, Ontario facility during May 2007. We believe this facilitys quality
assets and multiple fiber furnishes, combined with current initiatives to create a significantly
improved cost structure, makes it well positioned to produce lightweight specialty grades. Shipments of
market pulp decreased in the first quarter of 2007 compared to the same time period in 2006 due to
the permanent closure of our Thunder Bay A kraft pulp mill in May 2006 and increased internal
consumption of pulp. Shipments of lumber were lower in the first quarter of 2007 as compared to the
first quarter of 2006 due to weak demand in the housing construction market, the sale of our Baker
Brook and Degelis sawmills in 2006, and the impact of quotas imposed by the Softwood Lumber
Agreement in January 2007.
Our costs decreased $79.7 million during the first quarter of 2007 as compared to the same time
period in 2006, primarily due to lower volumes, lower labor, energy, and maintenance costs, a
weaker Canadian dollar (which decreased from an average rate of US$0.8664 to US$0.8533), and the
benefits of our cost reduction initiatives. These lower costs were partially offset by reduced
benefits from our Canadian dollar hedging program, higher wood costs, particularly recycled fiber
costs, and higher chemical costs. Additional information regarding the changes in our manufacturing
and other costs is included below in the section Consolidated Results of Operations. In addition,
we recorded a net gain on the disposition of assets of
$57.9 million in the first quarter of 2007, primarily associated with our
ongoing land sales program.
Business Strategy and Outlook
We continue to focus on improving our product mix. North American newsprint demand declined during
the first quarter of 2007 and there is no indication of whether, or at what level, demand may
stabilize. As a result of the changes in customer demand, we indefinitely idled paper machine no. 3
at our Gatineau, Quebec facility and curtailed production at various other facilities in March
2007. We will continue to evaluate our production options and focus on increasing production of our
more profitable product lines. For example, we recently announced that paper machine no. 4 at our
Thunder Bay, Ontario facility, which was idled in September 2006, will resume operation in May 2007
to produce specialty papers. As a result of the reduced newsprint demand, we took approximately
63,000 metric tons of downtime in the first quarter of 2007, including approximately 10,000 metric
tons as a result of a major rebuild of a paper machine at our Calhoun mill. We believe our
operations are positioned to deliver quality products and that capital reinvestment in the business
can be held to appropriate levels.
We expect to spend approximately $125 million on capital projects during the remaining nine months
of 2007. Spending in 2007 is expected to be $75 million lower than in 2006. This reduction in
capital spending reflects our disciplined approach to limit capital expenditures to those that are
expected to achieve the highest return on our assets.
We have rigorously evaluated our strategic options. This evaluation resulted in our announcement,
on January 29, 2007, that we have entered into an agreement to combine with Abitibi in a merger of equals. The combination, if completed, would have a material impact
on our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity going
forward. Management believes that, as a result of
the merger, the combined company would be operationally and financially stronger and better able to
meet changing customer needs while competing more effectively in the global marketplace. We expect
that the combination would generate approximately $250 million of cost synergies from improved
efficiencies in such areas as production, selling, administrative, distribution and procurement
costs. We expect to complete the combination in the third quarter of 2007, subject to the
conditions described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended 2006. In connection with
this announced merger, we have approved a retention and severance program for approximately 320
Bowater employees who may be impacted by the pending merger with Abitibi. This program provides a
retention bonus for employees who remain with Bowater through the closing of the merger or its
cancellation and an additional retention bonus for employees who remain with Bowater for a
transition period following closing of the merger.
19
BOWATER INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Business and Financial Review
Consolidated Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(In millions) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
771.6 |
|
|
$ |
893.2 |
|
|
$ |
(121.6 |
) |
Operating income |
|
|
25.1 |
|
|
|
39.8 |
|
|
|
(14.7 |
) |
|
|
Significant items that improved (lowered) operating income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product pricing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(13.5 |
) |
Shipment volume |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(108.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in total sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(121.6 |
) |
Manufacturing costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83.7 |
|
Employee termination costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in total manufacturing costs
and depreciation, amortization, and cost of
timber harvested |
|
|
80.9 |
|
Distribution costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.7 |
) |
Gain on disposition of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(14.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2007 versus March 31, 2006 |
Sales decreased in the first quarter of 2007 as compared to the first quarter of 2006 due primarily
to lower transaction prices for coated papers, specialty papers, newsprint and lumber and decreased
shipments of coated papers, newsprint, market pulp and lumber, partially offset by higher
transaction prices for market pulp and higher shipments of specialty papers as further noted in the
Segment Results of Operations section.
Operating income decreased in the first quarter of 2007 as compared to the first quarter of 2006.
The above table analyzes the major items that decreased operating income. A brief explanation of
these major items follows:
Product pricing for our coated papers, specialty papers, newsprint, and lumber product groups
was lower in the first quarter of 2007 as compared to the first quarter of 2006. Please refer
to the discussion of Segment Results of Operations for a more detailed analysis of product
pricing.
Shipment volume for our coated papers, newsprint, market pulp and lumber product groups was
lower in the first quarter of 2007 as compared to the first quarter of 2006. Please refer to
the discussion of Segment Results of Operations for a more detailed analysis of shipments.
Manufacturing costs were lower in the first quarter of 2007 as compared to the first quarter of
2006
resulting primarily from lower volumes ($61.2 million), lower labor ($12.6 million), energy
($8.9 million), and maintenance costs ($7.0 million), a weaker Canadian dollar ($4.0 million)
and the benefits of our cost reduction initiatives, partially offset by reduced benefits from
our Canadian dollar hedging program ($18.8 million), higher wood costs ($8.6 million), and
higher chemical costs ($1.2 million).
Employee termination costs were higher in the first quarter of 2007 due to severance and
pension settlement losses that exceeded the pension curtailment losses recorded in the first
quarter of 2006. Please refer to the discussion of Corporate and Other for a more detailed
analysis of employee termination costs.
20
BOWATER INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Distribution costs were lower in the first quarter of 2007 as compared to the first quarter of
2006, primarily as a result of the reduced shipments of product and reduced lumber duties.
Gain on disposition of assets relates primarily to land sales. The increase is due to higher land
sales in the first quarter of 2007 compared to the first quarter of 2006.
Segment Results of Operations
During the third quarter of 2006, we announced that we had realigned our organizational structure
to move from a divisional organization to a functional organization that supports and focuses on
our multi-line manufacturing and sales across our mill base. As a result of this organizational
realignment, our reportable segments have been changed to reflect how we internally manage our
business. This Managements Discussion and Analysis reflects our new reportable segments which are
coated papers, specialty papers, newsprint, market pulp, and lumber. Prior year information has
been recast to the current year presentation.
In general, our products are globally traded commodities. Pricing and the level of shipments of
these products will continue to be influenced by the balance between supply and demand as affected
by global economic conditions, changes in consumption and capacity, the level of customer and
producer inventories and fluctuations in currency exchange rates.
21
BOWATER INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Coated Papers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 vs. 2006 |
|
|
Average price (per short ton) |
|
$ |
710 |
|
|
$ |
795 |
|
|
$ |
(85 |
) |
Shipments (thousands of short tons) |
|
|
181.1 |
|
|
|
192.4 |
|
|
|
(11.3 |
) |
Downtime (thousands of short tons) |
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
16.8 |
|
|
|
(6.7 |
) |
Inventory at end of the quarter (thousands of short tons) |
|
|
50.5 |
|
|
|
46.3 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
128.5 |
|
|
$ |
152.9 |
|
|
$ |
(24.4 |
) |
Segment income |
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
21.7 |
|
|
|
(13.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant items that improved (lowered) segment income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product pricing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(14.8 |
) |
Shipment volume |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in total sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24.4 |
) |
Manufacturing costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
Distribution costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(13.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2007 versus March 31, 2006
Sales decreased in the first quarter of 2007 as compared to the first quarter of 2006 primarily as
a result of decreased product pricing in coated papers and slightly lower shipments. Our average
transaction price decreased 10.7% and our coated mechanical papers shipments decreased 5.9% in the
first quarter of 2007 as compared to the first quarter of 2006. North American demand for coated
mechanical papers was down significantly in January, but we saw slight demand increases in February
and March. The demand increases in February and March only partially offset the decline in January.
The upcoming postal rate increase in May 2007 is expected to have a negative impact on demand for
coated mechanical grades for a short period of time. Typically, customers adopt cost-containment
measures such as shifting to different basis weights or grades of paper such as supercalendered
grades following a postal rate increase.
Segment income decreased in the first quarter of 2007 as compared to the first quarter of 2006
primarily as a result of lower sales, as noted above. These declines were partially offset by lower
manufacturing costs including lower volumes ($6.3 million), lower maintenance ($1.6 million),
energy ($0.7 million) and chemical costs ($0.6 million) and lower depreciation ($0.9 million).
These decreased manufacturing costs were partially offset by higher labor ($1.3 million) and wood
costs ($0.4 million).
Coated Papers Third Party Data: U.S. consumer magazine advertising pages increased
1.0% in the three months ended March 31, 2007 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2006.
North American demand for coated mechanical papers decreased 0.6 % in the three months ended March
31, 2007 compared to the same period in 2006.
22
BOWATER INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Specialty
Papers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 vs. 2006 |
|
|
Average price (per short ton) |
|
$ |
653 |
|
|
$ |
655 |
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
Shipments (thousands of short tons) |
|
|
216.3 |
|
|
|
199.8 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
Downtime (thousands of short tons) |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
Inventory at end of the quarter (thousands of short tons) |
|
|
56.5 |
|
|
|
34.9 |
|
|
|
21.6 |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
141.2 |
|
|
$ |
130.9 |
|
|
$ |
10.3 |
|
Segment loss |
|
|
(8.7 |
) |
|
|
(8.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant items that improved (lowered) segment loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product pricing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.7 |
) |
Shipment volume |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in total sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
Manufacturing costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.1 |
) |
Distribution costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2007 versus March 31, 2006
Sales increased in the first quarter of 2007 as compared to the first quarter of 2006 primarily as
a result of an 8.3% increase in shipments of specialty papers partially offset by a slight decrease
in product pricing. We continue to shift machine capacity from newsprint to specialty papers. We
announced that paper machine No. 4 at our Thunder Bay, Ontario facility will resume operation in
May 2007. The quality assets and unique multiple fiber furnishes available at this mill provide us
with the opportunity to produce a variety of specialty grades. As discussed in the Coated Papers
section, we expect the postal rate increase in May to have a short-term impact on demand for our
specialty products as customers adopt cost-containment measures such
as shifting to different basis weights
or grades of paper such as supercalendered grades following a postal rate increase.
Segment loss increased in the first quarter of 2007 as compared to the first quarter of
2006 primarily as a result of higher manufacturing costs and higher distribution costs, partially
offset by increased sales discussed above. The higher manufacturing costs consisted of higher wood
and fiber costs ($4.5 million), reduced benefits from our Canadian dollar hedging program ($4.1
million), higher volumes ($3.6 million), and higher depreciation ($3.0 million), partially offset
by lower energy costs ($5.5 million) and a weaker Canadian dollar ($1.2 million).
Inventory levels were higher at the end of the first quarter of 2007 as compared to the first
quarter of 2006 due to increased capacity and a weaker market.
Specialty Papers Third Party Data: North American demand for supercalendered high gloss papers was
up 6.0%; for lightweight or directory grades was up 5.3%; and for standard uncoated mechanical
papers was down 5.1 % in the three months ended March 31, 2007 compared to the same period in
2006.
23
BOWATER INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Newsprint
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 vs. 2006 |
|
|
Average price (per metric ton) |
|
$ |
618 |
|
|
$ |
622 |
|
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
Shipments (thousands of metric tons) |
|
|
489.9 |
|
|
|
600.4 |
|
|
|
(110.5 |
) |
Downtime (thousands of metric tons) |
|
|
63.0 |
|
|
|
42.1 |
|
|
|
20.9 |
|
Inventory at end of the quarter (thousands of metric tons) |
|
|
93.5 |
|
|
|
75.7 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
302.9 |
|
|
$ |
373.5 |
|
|
$ |
(70.6 |
) |
Segment (loss) income |
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
(21.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant items that improved (lowered) segment (loss) income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product pricing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1.2 |
) |
Shipment volume |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(69.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in total sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70.6 |
) |
Manufacturing costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44.1 |
|
Distribution costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(21.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2007 versus March 31, 2006
Sales decreased in the first quarter of 2007 as compared to the first quarter of 2006 primarily as
a result of slightly lower product pricing and lower shipments of newsprint. Our average newsprint
transaction price for all markets was slightly lower in the first quarter of 2007 compared to the
first quarter of 2006. The slight decrease reflects a $30 per metric ton reduction in North
American newsprint pricing, offset by modest increases in the international markets. Newsprint
shipments were 18.4% lower in the first quarter of 2007 when compared to the first quarter of 2006
as we continue to match production to our orders and continue the shift of machine capacity from
newsprint to specialties. Additionally, we temporarily curtailed production at our Gatineau and
other facilities in the first quarter of 2007 due to weak demand of newsprint. In the first quarter
of 2007, we had total downtime of 63,000 metric tons, including 10,000 metric tons of
maintenance downtime primarily related to a major machine rebuild at one of our sites. We will
continue to match production to our orders.
Segment income decreased to a segment loss in the first quarter of 2007 as compared to the first
quarter of 2006 primarily as a result of lower sales noted above, partially offset by lower
manufacturing and distribution costs. Manufacturing costs were lower as a result of lower volumes
($39.9 million), lower labor ($6.3 million) and maintenance costs ($4.6 million), lower
depreciation expense ($3.3 million), and a weaker Canadian dollar ($1.4 million), partially offset
by higher wood costs, particularly increased recycled fiber costs ($9.5 million), reduced benefits
from our Canadian dollar hedging program ($7.5
million), and higher chemical costs ($1.4 million).
Inventory levels increased 23.5% at the end of the first quarter of 2007 as compared to the same
period in 2006 due to higher mill and export warehouse inventory levels.
Newsprint Third Party Data: In the three months ended March 31, 2007, total U.S. demand and
consumption of newsprint decreased 12.6% and 12.2%, respectively, as compared to the same period
last year. North American net exports of newsprint were 4.3% higher than 2006 levels. Total
inventories (North American mills and users) at
24
BOWATER INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
March 31, 2007 were 1.3 million metric tons, or 4.2%, higher than March, 31 2006. At March 31, 2007
and 2006, the days of supply at the U.S. daily newspapers was 42 days. The North American operating
rate was 94% for the three months ended March 31, 2007. Newspaper advertising linage declined 6.3%
when compared to the first quarter of 2006.
Market Pulp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 vs. 2006 |
|
|
Average price (per metric ton) |
|
$ |
629 |
|
|
$ |
523 |
|
|
$ |
106 |
|
Shipments (thousands of metric tons) |
|
|
211.7 |
|
|
|
247.4 |
|
|
|
(35.7 |
) |
Downtime (thousands of metric tons) |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Inventory at end of the quarter (thousands of metric tons) |
|
|
54.6 |
|
|
|
86.3 |
|
|
|
(31.7 |
) |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
133.1 |
|
|
$ |
129.4 |
|
|
$ |
3.7 |
|
Segment income |
|
|
18.7 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant items that improved (lowered) segment income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product pricing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21.5 |
|
Shipment volume |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in total sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
Manufacturing costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
Distribution costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
18.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2007 versus March 31, 2006
Sales of market pulp increased in the first quarter of 2007 as compared to the same period in 2006
as a result of higher product pricing which was partially offset by lower shipments. Our average
price for market pulp was 20.3% higher in the first quarter of 2007 compared to same time period in
2006. This increase reflects improved North American demand. Our shipments decreased 14.4% and our
inventories decreased 36.7% compared to 2006, due to reduced production from our Thunder Bay
facility as a result of the permanent shut of our A kraft pulp mill at this site in May 2006.
Mill inventories remain at very low levels, particularly in softwood grades, and consumer
inventories are near record lows. Currently, softwood grades have better market dynamics than
hardwood grades, and we are shifting more of our production to softwood.
Segment income increased in the first quarter of 2007 as compared to the same period in 2006
primarily as a result of higher product pricing, as noted above, and lower manufacturing costs. The
lower manufacturing costs consisted of lower volumes ($8.6 million), lower labor ($3.5 million),
energy, primarily as a result of an energy rebate at our Thunder Bay, Ontario facility ($3.2
million), and wood costs ($1.1 million) and a weaker Canadian dollar ($0.6 million), partially
offset by reduced benefits from our
Canadian dollar hedging program ($4.5 million).
The $20 per metric ton price increased in softwood and a $30 per metric ton fluff pulp increase
announced in January 2007 have been in effect for our North American customers since April 1, 2007.
25
BOWATER INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Market Pulp Third Party Data: World demand for market pulp decreased 1.0 % in the three months
ended March 31, 2007 compared to the same period last year. World producers shipped at 91% of
capacity during the three months ended March 31, 2007 compared to 97 % during the same period in
2006.
Lumber
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 vs. 2006 |
|
|
Average price (per mbf) |
|
$ |
273 |
|
|
$ |
351 |
|
|
$ |
(78 |
) |
Shipments (millions of mbf) |
|
|
229.8 |
|
|
|
275.0 |
|
|
|
(45.2 |
) |
Downtime (millions of mbf) |
|
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
57.9 |
|
|
|
(32.9 |
) |
Inventory at end of the quarter (millions of mbf) |
|
|
50.2 |
|
|
|
62.0 |
|
|
|
(11.8 |
) |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
62.8 |
|
|
$ |
96.5 |
|
|
$ |
(33.7 |
) |
Segment (loss) income |
|
|
(13.6 |
) |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
(14.9 |
) |
|
Significant items that improved (lowered) segment (loss) income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product pricing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
18.3 |
) |
Shipment volume |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in total sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33.7 |
) |
Manufacturing costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
Distribution costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(14.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2007 versus March 31, 2006
Sales decreased in the first quarter of 2007 as compared to the same period in 2006 as a result of
a 22.2% lumber price decrease due primarily to a weaker U.S. housing market. Our lumber shipments
decreased 16.4% in the first quarter of 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 mainly as a result
of sawmills that were sold in the second quarter of 2006 and the restrictions imposed by quotas
under the Softwood Lumber Agreement between the U.S. and Canada. Inventory was lower at the end of
the first quarter of 2007 as compared to the first quarter of 2006 due to the sale of two of our
sawmills in 2006 and reduced production.
Segment income decreased to a segment loss in the first quarter of 2007 as compared to the same
period in 2006 as a result of lower sales discussed above, partially offset by lower distribution
and manufacturing costs. The lower distribution costs are primarily due to a reduction in lumber
duties paid to the U.S. Department of Commerce in the first quarter of 2007 with the agreement that
was reached in October 2006 regarding Canadian softwood lumber exports to the U.S. The decrease in
manufacturing costs consisted of lower volumes ($8.0 million), lower wood ($4.6 million) and
maintenance costs ($0.9 million), and a weaker Canadian dollar ($0.9 million), partially offset by
reduced benefits from our Canadian dollar hedging program ($2.6 million).
Lumber Third Party Data: U.S. housing starts decreased 23.0% in the first quarter of 2007 as
compared to the same period last year.
26
BOWATER INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Corporate and Other
We exclude the gain on disposition of assets and employee termination costs from our internal
review of product line results. Also excluded from our product line review are corporate and other
items which include timber sales and general and administrative expenses. These items are analyzed
separately from our product line results. The following table is included in order to facilitate
the reconciliation of our product line sales and segment income (loss) to our total sales and
operating income on our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
(In millions) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
Corporate and Other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
3.1 |
|
|
$ |
10.0 |
|
|
$ |
(6.9 |
) |
Operating (loss) income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain on disposition of assets |
|
$ |
57.9 |
|
|
$ |
28.8 |
|
|
$ |
29.1 |
|
Employee termination costs |
|
|
(7.2 |
) |
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
Corporate and other |
|
|
(26.5 |
) |
|
|
(17.5 |
) |
|
|
(9.0 |
) |
Net gain on disposition of assets: During the three months ended March 31, 2007, Bowater recorded a
net pre-tax gain of $57.9 million related primarily to the sale of timberlands. During the first
quarter of 2007, we completed the sale of approximately 52,200 acres of timberlands and other
assets for proceeds of $64.6 million. During the first three months of 2006, we sold approximately
24,300 acres of timberlands and other assets for proceeds of $36.8 million.
Employee termination costs: During the first quarter of 2007, we recorded $7.2 million of employee
termination costs, primarily as a result of a $4.5 million settlement loss associated with lump sum
payments made to terminated employees. The balance of the charge is related to severance for a
number of employees during the first quarter of 2007. During the first quarter of 2006, we recorded
$4.4 million of net curtailment losses related to the termination of employees upon the permanent
closure of our Thunder Bay A kraft pulp mill.
Corporate and other: The decrease in sales for the three months of 2007 as compared to the same
period in the prior year is due to lower timber sales as a result of our timberland sales. The
increase in operating loss during the three months ended March 31, 2007 is primarily due to
increased share-based compensation expense ($3.4 million) and merger related costs ($2.3 million).
Interest Expense
Interest expense decreased $2.1 million from $49.4 million for the first quarter of 2006 to $47.3
million for the first quarter of 2007. This decrease is primarily attributable to lower average
debt balances during the 2007 period.
Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate, which resulted in the recording of a tax provision on a pre-tax loss, was
(6.4)% for the first quarter of 2007 as compared to (422.6)% during the same period last year. We
established a valuation allowance against our Canadian deferred tax assets in 2005. Our Canadian
operations have continued to experience operating losses since then. Consequently, income tax
benefits and tax credits of $13.0 million and $13.5 million which arose primarily from operating
losses at certain Canadian operations during the first three months of 2007 and 2006, respectively,
were entirely offset by tax charges to increase our tax valuation allowance.
Our effective tax rate varies frequently and substantially from the weighted-average effect of both
domestic and foreign statutory tax rates primarily as a result of the tax treatment on foreign
currency gains and losses. We have a number of foreign subsidiaries whose unconsolidated foreign
currency gains and losses are taxed in Canada. Upon consolidation, such income and gains are
eliminated, but we are still liable for the Canadian taxes. Due to the variability and volatility
of foreign exchange rates, we are unable to estimate the impact of future changes in
27
BOWATER INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
exchange rates on our effective tax rate. Additionally, we will probably not be recording income
tax benefits on any 2007 operating losses generated in Canada, which would have the impact of
increasing our overall effective income tax rate in future periods. To the extent that our Canadian
operations become profitable, the impact of this valuation allowance would lessen or reverse and
positively impact our effective tax rate in those periods.
On January 1, 2007, we adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109
(FIN48). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an
enterprises financial statement in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes recognized by prescribing the threshold a
tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. The adoption
of FIN 48 resulted in a cumulative effect adjustment to credit our opening retained deficit balance
by $2.3 million.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary sources of liquidity and capital resources are cash provided from operations and
available borrowings under our credit facilities, which are discussed in more detail below. We
periodically review timberland holdings and sell timberlands. In the first three months of 2007,
the sale of timberlands and other assets generating proceeds of $64.6 million has been a
significant source of liquidity. Since late 2005, we have generated approximately $440 million of
proceeds and expect over $100 million in proceeds from this program by the end of 2007. We believe
that cash from operations and access to our credit facilities will be sufficient to provide for our
anticipated requirements for working capital, contractual obligations, capital expenditures and
dividend payments on a stand-alone basis for the next twelve months.
Cash (Used for) Provided by Operations
During the first three months of 2007 and 2006, Bowater had a net loss of $35.4 million and $18.8
million, respectively. Cash used for operating activities totaled
$15.7 million in the first three
months of 2007 compared to cash provided by operating activities of $22.0 million during the same
period of 2006. The decrease in cash provided by operations was primarily related to lower sales
for most of our products. As noted in the discussion of our segment results of operations,
transaction prices and shipments were lower for the majority of our products and newsprint
production has been curtailed as a result of the lowered newsprint demand.
Working capital negatively impacted our cash flows from operations in the first three months of
2007 through an increase in inventories, which resulted primarily from a
decrease in shipments of our products, and a decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities
due to the timing of payments. These working capital changes were partially offset by a decrease in
accounts receivable which was primarily due to lower sales.
Cash Provided by (Used for) Investing Activities
Cash
provided by investing activities totaled $29.5 million for the first three months of 2007, and
cash used for investing activities totaled $0.7 million for the first three months of 2006. The
increase in cash provided by investing activities during the first three months of 2007 is due
primarily to increased proceeds from land sales as well as decreased investment in our capital
assets. Capital expenditures include compliance, maintenance and return-based projects. We expect
to spend approximately $125 million on similar capital projects during the remaining nine months of
2007. In connection with the combination with Abitibi, we spent
$9.2 million for direct acquisition costs during the first three
months of 2007.
Cash Used for Financing Activities
Cash used for financing activities totaled $14.4 million and $28.8 million for the first three
months of 2007 and 2006, respectively. Bowater paid cash dividends of $11.3 million and made net
payments of $3.1 million on its long-term debt during the first three months of 2007.
28
BOWATER INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Short-term Financing
As of March 31, 2007, we had available borrowings under our credit facilities as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Commitment |
|
Termination |
|
Interest |
Short-Term Bank Debt |
|
Commitment |
|
Outstanding |
|
Available (1) |
|
Date |
|
Rate (2) |
|
|
(in millions except for dates and interest rates) |
U.S. Credit Agreement |
|
$ |
415.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
347.5 |
|
|
|
05/11 |
|
|
|
8.75 |
% |
Canadian Credit Agreement |
|
|
165.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132.1 |
|
|
|
05/08 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
$ |
580.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
479.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The commitment available under each of the revolving credit facilities is subject to
collateral requirements and covenant restrictions as described below and is reduced by outstanding
letters of credit of $67.5 million for the U.S. and $32.9 million for Canada. Commitment fees for
unused portions of the U.S. and Canadian facilities are 50 basis points and 25 basis points,
respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
Borrowings under the revolving credit facilities incur interest based, at our option, on
specified market interest rates plus a margin. We had borrowings under our U.S. credit agreement
during the first quarter of 2007. These borrowings were fully repaid during the quarter. We had no
outstanding borrowings under our Canadian credit agreement during the first quarter of 2007. |
Financial covenants under both our U.S. Credit Agreement and our Canadian Credit Agreement are
based upon our consolidated financial results and consist of the following two ratios:
|
i. |
|
a maximum ratio of senior secured indebtedness (including all advances and letters of credit
under the U.S. and Canadian facilities, and any other indebtedness secured by assets of Bowater and its subsidiaries)
to EBITDA (generally defined as net income, excluding extraordinary, non-recurring or non-cash
items and gains (or losses) on asset dispositions, plus income taxes plus depreciation plus
interest expense) of 1.25 to 1; and |
|
|
ii. |
|
a minimum ratio of EBITDA (defined as EBITDA, plus gains
(or minus losses) from asset dispositions) to interest expense of 2.00 to 1. |
We believe we are in compliance with all of our covenants and other requirements set forth in our
credit facilities.
Employees
As of
March 31, 2007, Bowater employed approximately 7,000 people, of whom approximately 4,700 were
represented by bargaining units. Our unionized employees in the U.S. are represented predominantly
by the United Steelworkers Union and in Canada predominantly by the Communications, Energy and
Paper Union. Labor agreements covering approximately 390 employees in the U.S. paper mills expire
in 2007. A labor agreement covering approximately 150 employees at our Mokpo facility expires in
2007.
During the second quarter of 2006, labor agreements covering approximately 100 employees at our
Saint-Félicien sawmill facility expired. Discussions between Bowater and the unions are continuing,
and we can provide no assurance regarding the outcomes or the timing of these negotiations or their
effect on our operations. Any protracted work stoppage at any of our facilities could result in a
disruption of our operations, which could negatively impact our ability to timely deliver certain
products to our customers and thus adversely affect our results.
On February 21, 2007, the union members at our Thunder Bay, Ontario facility ratified an agreement
that is expected to result in approximately CDN$16.0 million in annual labor savings. This plan was
one of the cost reduction measures considered in making the decision to resume operation of a paper
machine at our Thunder Bay facility in May 2007. As a result of a mill-wide restructuring of this
facility, 157 jobs will be eliminated. This reduction in jobs is partially offset by the recall of
40 previously laid-off employees as a result of the restart of one of the paper machines at this
facility in May 2007.
29
BOWATER INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
At our Gatineau, Quebec mill approximately 180 jobs will be eliminated in a mill-wide restructure
to improve the cost competitiveness of the mill. One of the three machines is temporarily idled due
to a combination of elevated costs for recycled fiber and insufficient demand for our newsprint
product. In the event the idled machine is restarted, a portion of these employees would be
recalled back to work.
Exchange Rate Fluctuation Effect on Earnings
Canadian Dollar
Nearly half of our manufacturing costs and certain financial liabilities are denominated in
Canadian dollars. Sales are denominated in the currency of the country in which they occur.
Accordingly, changes in the Canadian-U.S. dollar exchange rate may significantly impact our
revenues and costs. The magnitude and direction of this impact primarily depends on our production
and sales volume, the proportion of our production and sales that occur in Canada, the proportion
of our tax and other financial liabilities denominated in Canadian dollars, our hedging levels, and
the magnitude, direction and duration of changes in the Canadian-U.S. dollar exchange rate.
Increases in the value of the Canadian dollar versus the U.S. dollar would reduce our earnings,
which are reported in U.S. dollar terms. The impact of a one-cent
increase in the Canadian dollar exchange rate on our operating
income is discussed below in Exchange Rate Hedging Programs
Canadian Dollar Forward Contracts.
British Pound Sterling
We have entered into sales agreements denominated in British pound sterling, representing less than
5% of our first quarter 2007 sales. Accordingly, changes in the British pound sterling-U.S. dollar
exchange rate impact the amount of revenues we recognize. The magnitude and direction of the impact
primarily depends on our sales volume under these sales agreements, our hedging levels, and the
magnitude, direction and duration of changes in the British pound sterling-U.S. dollar exchange
rate. Decreases in the value of the British pound sterling versus the U.S. dollar would reduce our
sales, which are reported in U.S. dollar terms.
Exchange Rate Hedging Programs
Canadian Dollars Forward Contracts
We attempt to partially limit our exposure to Canadian-U.S. dollar exchange rate fluctuations
through hedging transactions. Under the exchange rates, hedging levels and operating conditions
that existed at March 31, 2007, for every one-cent increase in the Canadian-U.S. dollar exchange
rate, our operating income, before currency hedging, for the three months ended March 31, 2007
would have been reduced by approximately $3.4 million. We expect exchange rate fluctuations to
continue to impact costs and revenues; however, we cannot predict the magnitude or direction of
this effect for any quarter, and
there can be no assurance that the future effect will be similar to that set forth above. Based on
exchange rates, hedging levels and operating conditions projected for 2007, we project that a
one-cent increase in the Canadian dollar exchange rate would reduce our operating income for the
year ended December 31, 2007, before currency hedging, by approximately $14.9 million.
At March 31, 2007, we had approximately $0.2 million of unrealized gains recorded on our Canadian
dollar hedging program compared to approximately $0.4 million of unrealized losses at December 31,
2006. Hedging contracts outstanding at March 31, 2007 have been established to hedge forecasted
transactions through the second quarter of 2007. As of March 31, 2007, the fair value of our
outstanding Canadian dollar forward contracts, which have a notional value of $8.0 million, is an
asset of $0.2 million. Recently, we have been entering into short-term hedging contracts that
extend out only a few months at a time. For a description of our hedging activities, see Note 9 to
our Consolidated Financial Statements.
British Pound Sterling Forward Contracts
Beginning in the first quarter of 2007, we entered into currency forward contracts to attempt to
partially limit our exposure to British pound sterling-U.S. dollar exchange rate fluctuations. We
expect exchange rate fluctuations to continue to impact revenues; however, we cannot predict the
magnitude or direction of this effect for any quarter, and there can be no assurance that the
future effect will be similar to that set forth above. All of the existing contracts will
30
BOWATER INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
mature on or before December 2007. Based on exchange rates, hedging levels and operating conditions
projected for 2007, we project that a one-cent increase in the British pound sterling exchange rate
would reduce our sales for the year ended December 31, 2007, before currency hedging, by
approximately $0.5 million.
These contracts do not currently qualify for hedge accounting treatment and have been adjusted to
fair value through the Consolidated Statement of Operations. Approximately $0.1 million of pre-tax
gains were recognized for the three months ended March 31, 2007 for contracts that we purchased to
economically hedge forecasted sales expected to occur in 2007. Hedging contracts outstanding at
March 31, 2007 have been established to hedge forecasted transactions through the fourth quarter of
2007. As of March 31, 2007, the fair value of our outstanding British pound sterling forward
contracts, which have a notional value of $38.9 million, is an asset of $0.1 million. For a
description of our hedging activities, see Note 9 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Commodity Hedging Program
Natural Gas Swap Agreements
Beginning in the third quarter of 2006, we entered into natural gas swap agreements under our
natural gas hedging program for the purpose of reducing the risk inherent in fluctuating natural
gas prices. Our hedged natural gas costs are billed to us based on a publicly traded index plus a
fixed amount. The natural gas swap agreements allow us to minimize the effect of fluctuations in
those indices by contractually exchanging the publicly traded index upon which we are billed for a
fixed index of natural gas cost. The swap agreements, which did not qualify for hedge accounting
treatment during the first quarter of 2007, have been adjusted to fair value through the
Consolidated Statement of Operations. As a result, approximately $0.8 million of pre-tax gains were
recognized for the three months ended March 31, 2007 for
contracts that we purchased to economically
hedge forecasted transactions expected to occur in 2007 and 2008. For a description of our natural
gas hedging activities, see Note 9 to our Consolidated Financial
Statements. As of March 31, 2007, the fair value of our outstanding natural gas swap agreements,
which have a notional amount of $7.8 million, is an asset of $0.8 million. For a description of our
hedging activities, see Note 9 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Fair Value Measurements
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157). SFAS
157 provides enhanced guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. SFAS 157
also responds to investors requests for expanded information about the extent to which companies
measure assets and liabilities at fair value, the information used to measure fair value, and the
effect of fair value measurements on earnings. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework
for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about
fair value measurements. SFAS 157 applies to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit
fair value measurements and is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently evaluating
the impact of this statement on our results of operations and financial position.
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets
and Financial Liabilities (SFAS 159) which permits entities to choose to measure many financial
instruments and certain other items at fair value. The fair value option established by SFAS 159
permits all companies to choose to measure eligible items at fair value at specified election
dates. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected will
be reported in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. The decision to elect the fair value
option may be applied on an instrument by
instrument basis, with a few exceptions, is irrevocable, unless a new election date occurs, and is
applied to entire instruments only, not to portions of instruments. SFAS 159 is effective for
fiscal years beginning after November 1, 2007. We are currently evaluating the impact of this
statement on our results of operations and financial position.
31
BOWATER INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Foreign Exchange Risk
We have manufacturing operations in the United States, Canada and Korea and sales offices located
throughout the world. As a result, we are exposed to movements in foreign currency exchange rates
in countries outside the United States. Our most significant foreign currency exposure relates to
Canada. Approximately 40% of our pulp and paper production capacity and a significant portion of
our lumber production are in Canada, with manufacturing costs primarily denominated in Canadian
dollars. Also, certain other assets and liabilities are denominated in Canadian dollars and are
exposed to foreign currency movements. As a result, our earnings are affected by increases or
decreases in the value of the Canadian dollar. Increases in the value of the Canadian dollar versus
the United States dollar will tend to reduce reported earnings, and decreases in the value of the
Canadian dollar will tend to increase reported earnings. See the information set forth under Item
1A Risks Factors Currency fluctuations may adversely affect our results of operations and
financial condition and changes in foreign currency exchange rates can affect our competitive
position, selling prices and manufacturing costs in Part II of this Form 10-Q and under section
Exchange Rate Fluctuation Effect on Earnings for further information on foreign exchange risks
related to our sales and operating costs. To reduce our exposure to differences in Canadian dollar
and British pound sterling exchange rate fluctuations, we periodically enter into and designate
Canadian dollar forward contracts and British pound sterling forward contracts to hedge certain of
our forecasted Canadian dollar cash outflows and British pound sterling cash inflows, respectively.
We estimate the monthly forecasted Canadian dollar outflows on a rolling 24-month basis and,
depending on the level of the Canadian dollar, hedge the first monthly Canadian dollar outflows of
manufacturing costs up to 90% of such monthly forecasts in each of the first twelve months and up
to 80% in the following twelve months of total forecasted Canadian dollar outflows. At March 31,
2007, we had a notional amount of $8.0 million of Canadian dollar forward contracts outstanding.
We are not currently entering into new hedging agreements beyond
the next three months. We estimate the monthly forecasted British pound sterling inflows on an
annual basis and, depending on the level of the British pound sterling, hedge the first monthly
British pound sterling inflows of sales up to 50% of such monthly forecasts of British pound
sterling inflows. At March 31, 2007, we had a notional amount of
$38.9 million of British pound
sterling contracts outstanding. Information regarding the carrying value and fair market value of
the outstanding contracts is set forth in Note 9 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to interest rate risk on our fixed-rate and variable-rate long-term debt and our
short-term variable-rate bank debt. Our objective is to manage the impact of interest rate changes
on earnings and cash flows and on the market value of our borrowings. We have a mix of fixed-rate
and variable-rate borrowings. At March 31, 2007, we had $1,993.9 million of fixed-rate long-term
debt and $267.9 million of short- and long-term variable-rate debt. The fixed-rate long-term debt
is exposed to fluctuations in fair value resulting from changes in market interest rates, but not
earnings or cash flows. Our variable-rate short- and long-term debt approximates fair value as it
bears interest rates that approximate market, but changes in interest rates do affect future
earnings and cash flows. Based on our outstanding short and long-term variable-rate debt, a 100
basis-point increase in interest rates would have increased our quarterly interest expense in the
first quarter of 2007 by approximately $0.7 million.
Commodity Price Risk
We purchase significant amounts of energy, chemicals, wood fiber and recovered paper to supply our
manufacturing facilities. These raw materials are market-priced commodities and, as such, are
subject to fluctuations in market prices. Increases in the prices of these commodities will tend to
reduce our reported earnings and decreases will tend to increase our reported earnings. From time
to time, we may enter into contracts aimed at securing a stable source of supply for commodities
such as timber, wood fiber, energy, chemicals and recovered paper. These contracts typically
require us to pay the market price at the time of purchase. Thus under these contracts we generally
remain subject to market fluctuations in commodity prices. In order to offset some of this inherent
risk for energy, we have also entered into natural gas swap arrangements. The natural gas swap
agreements allow us to minimize the effect of fluctuations
32
BOWATER INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
in those indices by contractually exchanging the publicly traded index upon which we are billed for
a fixed index of natural gas cost.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
(a) |
|
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures: |
We have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures as of March 31, 2007. Based on that evaluation, the Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures are effective in recording, processing, summarizing, and timely reporting information
required to be disclosed in our reports to the Securities and Exchange Commission.
(b) |
|
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting: |
In connection with the evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, there were no
changes during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
33
BOWATER INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
a. |
|
Bowater is involved in various legal proceedings relating to contracts, commercial
disputes, taxes, environmental issues, employment and workers compensation claims and other
matters. We periodically review the status of these proceedings with both inside and outside
counsel. We believe that the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition, but it could have a material adverse effect on the results of
operations in a given quarter or the year. |
|
b. |
|
On September 30, 2005, the Ministry of Justice of the Province of Quebec (MOJ) cited
one of our subsidiaries, Bowater Canadian Forest Products, Inc. (BCFPI), in connection with
effluent water quality of the Dolbeau mill. BCFPI settled this citation on March 29, 2007, by
agreeing to pay a fine and costs totaling CDN $158,000 (approximately
US $136,000). The Dolbeau mill has taken steps to improve
its effluent quality and has experienced only two other exceedences since January 1, 2005. |
|
c. |
|
There have been no other material developments to the legal proceedings described in
our annual report on Form
10-K filed on March 1, 2007. |
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
The
following risk factors are intended to update the risk
factors set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2006.
We face intense competition in the forest products industry and the failure to compete
effectively would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
We compete with numerous forest products companies, some of which have greater financial
resources than we have. There has been a continued trend towards consolidation in the forest
products industry, leading to new global producers. These global producers are typically large,
well-capitalized companies that may have greater flexibility in pricing and financial resources for
marketing, investment and expansion than we have. The markets for our products are all highly
competitive. Actions by competitors can affect our ability to sell our products and can affect the
volatility of the prices at which our products are sold. While the principal basis for competition
is price, we also compete on the basis of customer service, quality and product type. There has
also been an increasing trend toward consolidation among our customers. With fewer customers in the
market for our products, our negotiation position with these customers could be weakened.
In addition, our industry is capital intensive, which leads to high fixed costs. Some of
our competitors may be lower-cost producers in some of the businesses in which we operate. Global
newsprint capacity, particularly Chinese and European newsprint capacity, has been increasing,
which is expected to result in lower prices, lower volumes or both for our exported products. We
believe that new hardwood pulp capacity at South American pulp mills has unit costs that are
significantly below those of our hardwood kraft pulp mills. Other actions by competitors, such as
reducing costs or adding low-cost capacity, may adversely affect our competitive position in the
products we manufacture and, consequently, our sales, operating income and cash flows. We may not
be able to compete effectively and achieve adequate levels of sales and product margins. If we are
unable to compete effectively, such failure would have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
34
BOWATER INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Our
substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our financial health, and our efforts to
reduce this indebtedness may not be successful.
As of March 31, 2007, we had outstanding total debt of $2,261.8 million, none of which is
secured debt, and shareholders equity of $796.0 million. Our substantial amount of debt could have
important negative consequences. For example, it could:
|
|
|
limit our ability to obtain additional financing, if needed, for
working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, debt service requirements or
other purposes; |
|
|
|
|
increase our vulnerability to adverse economic and industry conditions; |
|
|
|
|
require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flows from operations to
make payments on our debt; |
|
|
|
|
reduce funds available for operations, future business opportunities or other purposes; |
|
|
|
|
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business
and our industry; and |
|
|
|
|
place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less
debt. |
Our credit facilities, the indentures governing our various notes, debentures and
other debt securities and the terms and conditions of our other indebtedness may permit us or our
subsidiaries to incur or guarantee additional indebtedness, including secured indebtedness in some
circumstances. To the extent we incur additional indebtedness, some or all of the risks discussed
above will increase.
Developments in alternative media could continue to adversely affect the demand for our
products.
Trends in advertising, electronic data transmission and storage and the Internet could
have further adverse effects on traditional print media, including our products and those of our
customers, but neither the timing nor the extent of those trends can be predicted with certainty.
Our newspaper, magazine and catalog publishing customers may increasingly use, and compete with
businesses that use, other forms of media and advertising and electronic data transmission and
storage, including television and the Internet, instead of newsprint, coated paper, uncoated
specialty papers or other products made by us. The North American and global economies and the
demand for certain of our products weakened significantly over the course of the last several
years. For example, industry statistics indicate that North American newsprint consumption has been
declining. We believe that this decline in demand could continue due to conservation measures taken
by publishers, reduced North American newspaper circulation, less space devoted to advertising and
substitution to other uncoated mechanical grades. As a result of such competition, we have
experienced decreased demand for some of our existing pulp and paper products in North America. As
the use of these alternatives grows, demand for pulp and paper products is likely to further
decline in North America.
These changing industry conditions could influence us to idle or permanently close
individual machines or entire mills and incur impairment charges. We continue to curtail newsprint
production at our Thunder Bay, Ontario; Gatineau, Quebec and other mills. If market conditions
continue to worsen, it may be necessary to curtail production or permanently shut down machines or
facilities. Curtailments or shutdowns could result in goodwill or asset write-downs at the affected
facilities and could negatively impact our cash flows and materially affect our results of
operations and financial condition.
The forest product industry is highly cyclical. Fluctuations in the prices of and the demand
for our products could result in smaller profit margins and lower sales volumes.
The forest product industry is highly cyclical. Historically, economic and market shifts,
fluctuations in capacity and changes in foreign currency exchange rates have created cyclical
changes in prices, sales volume and margins for our products. Most of
our paper products are
commodities that are widely available from other producers and even our commercial printing paper
is susceptible to these fluctuations. Because our commodity products have few
distinguishing qualities from producer to producer, competition for these products is based
primarily on price, which is determined by supply relative to demand. The overall levels of demand
for the products we manufacture and distribute and, consequently, our sales and profitability,
reflect fluctuations in levels of end-user demand, which depend in part on general economic
conditions in North America and worldwide, as well as competition from electronic substitution.
35
BOWATER INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Our manufacturing businesses may have difficulty obtaining fiber at favorable prices, or at all.
Fiber is the principal raw material used by us, comprising, for the first quarter 2007,
approximately 10.6% of cost of sales, excluding depreciation, amortization and cost of timber
harvested. We use both virgin fiber (wood chips and logs) and recycled fiber (old newspapers
and magazines) as fiber sources for our paper mills. Wood fiber is a commodity and prices
historically have been cyclical. The primary source for wood fiber is timber. Environmental
litigation and regulatory developments have caused, and may cause in the future, significant
reductions in the amount of timber available for commercial harvest in the United States and
Canada. In addition, future domestic or foreign legislation, litigation advanced by aboriginal
groups and litigation concerning the use of timberlands, the protection of endangered species, the
promotion of forest health and the response to and prevention of catastrophic wildfires could also
affect timber supplies. Availability of harvested timber may further be limited by fire and fire
prevention, insect infestation, disease, ice storms, wind storms, flooding and other natural and
man-made causes, thereby reducing supply and increasing prices. Wood fiber pricing is subject to
market influences and our cost of wood fiber may increase in particular regions due to market
shifts. Pricing of recycled fiber has recently been increasing. For example, prices of old
newspapers have increased from an average of $90 per ton in December of 2006 to $100 per ton on
February 1, 2007, and to $130 per ton on March 1, 2007. We believe
that these price increases are related to expanding paper and packaging capacity in Asia, as
well as strong North American demand, and that prices may remain at elevated levels. Any sustained
increase in fiber prices would increase our operating costs and we may be unable to increase prices
for our products in response.
Although we believe that the balance of fiber supply between our internal sources and the
open market is adequate to support our current wood products and paper and pulp production
requirements, there is no assurance that access to fiber will continue at the same levels achieved
in the past. The cost of softwood fiber and the availability of wood chips may be affected. If our
cutting rights pursuant to the forest licenses or forest management agreements are reduced or if
any third-party supplier of wood fiber stops selling or is unable to sell wood fiber to us, our
financial condition and operating results would suffer.
An increase in the cost of our purchased energy, chemicals and other raw materials would lead
to higher manufacturing costs, thereby reducing our margins.
Our operations consume substantial amounts of energy such as electricity, natural gas,
fuel oil, coal and wood waste. We buy energy and raw materials, including chemicals, wood,
recovered paper and other raw materials, primarily on the open market. The prices for raw materials
and energy are volatile and may change rapidly, directly affecting our results of operations. The
availability of raw materials and energy may also be disrupted by many factors outside our control,
adversely affecting our operations. Energy comprised approximately 15.5% of cost of sales,
excluding depreciation, amortization and cost of timber harvested for our business during the first
quarter of 2007. Energy prices, particularly for electricity, natural gas and fuel oil, have been
volatile in recent years and prices for 2005 and 2006 exceeded historical averages. As a result,
fluctuations in energy prices impact our manufacturing costs and contribute to earnings
volatility. Additionally, we are a major user of renewable natural resources such as water and
wood. Accordingly, significant changes in regional climate (e.g., drought) and agricultural
diseases or infestation could affect our financial condition and results of operations. The volume
and value of timber that we can harvest or purchase may be limited by factors such as fire and fire
prevention, insect infestation, disease, ice storms, wind storms, flooding, other weather
conditions and other causes. As is typical in the industry, we do not maintain insurance for any
loss to our standing timber from natural disasters or other causes. Also, we can provide no
assurance that we will be able to maintain our rights to utilize water or to renew them at
conditions comparable to those currently in effect.
For our commodity products, the relationship between industry supply and demand for these
products, rather than changes in the cost of raw materials, determines our ability to increase
prices. Consequently, we may be unable to pass along increases in our operating costs to our
customers. Any sustained increase in energy, chemical or raw material prices without any
corresponding increase in product pricing would reduce our operating margins and potentially
require us to limit or cease operations of one or more of our machines.
Currency fluctuations may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition
and changes in foreign currency exchange rates can affect our competitive position, selling prices
and manufacturing costs.
36
BOWATER INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
We compete with North American, European and Asian producers in most of our product lines. Our
products are sold and denominated in U.S. dollars, Canadian dollars and selected foreign
currencies. In addition to the impact of product supply and demand, changes in the relative
strength or weakness of the U.S. dollar may also affect international trade flows of these
products. A stronger U.S. dollar may attract imports into North America from foreign producers,
increase supply and have a downward effect on prices, while a weaker U.S. dollar may encourage U.S.
exports and increase manufacturing costs that are in Canadian dollars or other foreign currencies.
Variations in the exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and other currencies, particularly the
Euro and the currencies of Canada, Sweden, Finland and certain Asian countries, will significantly
affect our competitive position compared to many of our competitors. Also, if the Canadian dollar
remains strong for an extended period of time, it could influence the foreign exchange
rate assumptions that we use in our evaluation of goodwill impairment and, consequently,
result in goodwill impairment charges.
We are particularly sensitive to changes in the value of the Canadian dollar versus the
U.S. dollar. The impact of these changes depends primarily on our production and sales volume,
the proportion of our production and sales that occur in Canada, the proportion of our financial
assets and liabilities denominated in Canadian dollars, our hedging levels and the magnitude,
direction and duration of changes in the exchange rate. We expect exchange rate fluctuations to
continue to impact costs and revenues; however, we cannot predict the magnitude or direction of
this effect for any quarter, and there can be no assurance of any future effects.
We could experience disruptions in operations and/or increased labor costs due to labor
disputes.
We are one of the largest employers in the Canadian pulp and paper sector and have one of
the sectors largest representation by unions. A significant number of our collective bargaining
agreements with respect to our newsprint and commercial printing paper operations in Eastern Canada
will expire on the same date in 2009. While relationships with the various unions generally have
been good, as is the case with any negotiation, we may not be able to negotiate acceptable new
agreements, which could result in strikes or work stoppages by affected employees. Renewal of
collective bargaining agreements could also result in higher wage or benefit costs. Therefore, we
could experience a disruption of our operations or higher ongoing labor costs which could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Our operations require substantial capital and we may not have adequate capital resources to
provide for all of our capital requirements.
Our business is capital intensive and requires that we regularly incur capital
expenditures in order to maintain our equipment, increase our operating efficiency and comply with
environmental laws. If our available cash resources and cash generated from operations are not
sufficient to fund our operating needs and capital expenditures, we would have to obtain additional
funds from borrowings or other available sources or reduce or delay our capital expenditures. In
addition, our debt service obligations will reduce our available cash flows. If we cannot maintain
or upgrade our equipment as we require, we may become unable to manufacture products that compete
effectively in one or more of our product lines.
We
are exposed to changes in banking and capital markets and changes in interest rates.
We require both short-term and long-term financing to fund our operations, including
capital expenditures. Changes in banking or capital markets, or to our credit rating, could affect
the cost or availability of financing. In addition, we are exposed to changes in interest rates
with respect to (i) our floating rate debt and (ii) the interest rate of any new debt issues.
Changes in the capital markets or prevailing interest rates can increase or decrease the cost or
availability of financing.
Our proposed combination with Abitibi may not be consummated or may be delayed, which may
adversely affect our anticipated results of operations and financial condition, or both.
Our proposed combination with Abitibi may not be consummated due to several factors, including
without limitation, the ability to obtain required governmental consents without material
concessions, the failure of Abitibi or Bowater shareholders to approve the combination and the
exercise by a material percentage of Abitibi shareholders of their dissent rights. Required
governmental approvals include the expiration of any applicable waiting periods under
37
BOWATER INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 and expiration of any applicable waiting
periods and approval by the Commissioner of Competition under the Competition Act of Canada. We can
provide no assurance that all such approvals will be obtained or that the failure to receive any of
these consents or approvals will not result in the abandonment of the transaction.
In addition to the required approvals, the combination is subject to a number of other
conditions, many of which are beyond our control, that may prevent, delay or otherwise materially
adversely affect its completion. We cannot predict whether and when these other conditions will be
satisfied. Further, the requirements for obtaining the necessary approvals could delay the
completion of the combination for a significant period of time or prevent it from occurring at all.
Any delay in completing the combination could prevent us from realizing some or all of the
synergies (such as cost savings and revenue enhancements) and other benefits that we expect to
achieve if the combination is not successfully completed within its expected timeframe and on our
expected terms.
We may fail to realize the anticipated synergies and other benefits expected from our proposed
combination with Abitibi, which could adversely affect the value of shares in the combined company
after the transaction.
Even if the combination is consummated, the businesses of Bowater and Abitibi may not be
integrated successfully; the cost savings, revenue enhancements and other expected synergies from
the transaction may not be fully realized or may take longer to realize than expected; and,
disruptions from the transaction may make it more difficult to maintain relationships with
customers, employees or suppliers. Should any of these risks transpire, the results of operations
and financial condition of the combined company may be materially and adversely affected.
Changes in laws and regulations could adversely affect our results of operations.
We are subject to a variety of foreign, federal, state, provincial and local laws and
regulations dealing with trade, employees, transportation, taxes, timber and water rights and the
environment. Changes in these laws or regulations, or their interpretations or enforcement, have
required in the past, and could require in the future, substantial expenditures by us and adversely
affect our results of operations. For example, changes in environmental laws and regulations have
in the past, and could in the future, require us to spend substantial amounts to comply with
restrictions on air emissions, wastewater discharge, waste management and landfill sites, including
remediation costs. Environmental laws are becoming increasingly stringent. Consequently, our
compliance and remediation costs could increase materially.
Changes in the political or economic conditions in Canada, the United States or other countries in
which our products are manufactured or sold could adversely affect our results of operations.
We manufacture products in Canada, the United States and South Korea and sell products
throughout the world. Paper prices are tied to the health of the economies of North and South
America, Asia and Europe, as well as to paper inventory levels in these regions. The economic and
political climate of each region has a significant impact on our costs and the prices of, and
demand for, our products. Changes in regional economies or political instability, including acts of
war or terrorist activities, can affect the cost of manufacturing and distributing our products,
pricing and sales volume, directly affecting our results of operations. Such changes could also
affect the availability or cost of insurance.
We may be subject to environmental liabilities.
We are subject to a wide range of general and industry-specific laws and regulations relating
to the protection of the environment, including those governing air emissions, wastewater
discharges, harvesting, the storage, management and disposal of hazardous substances and waste, the
clean-up of contaminated sites, landfill operation and closure obligations, forestry operations and
endangered species habitat and health and safety matters. As an owner and operator of real estate
and manufacturing and processing facilities, we may be liable under environmental laws for cleanup
and other costs and damages, including tort liability and damages to natural resources, resulting
from past or present spills or releases of hazardous or toxic substances on or from our current or
former properties. We may incur liability under these laws without regard to whether we knew of,
were responsible for, or owned the property at the time of, any spill or release of hazardous or
toxic substances on or from our property, or at properties where we arranged for
the disposal of regulated materials. Claims may arise out of currently unknown environmental
conditions or aggressive enforcement efforts by governmental or private parties.
38
BOWATER INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
We have net liabilities with respect to our pension plans and the actual cost of our pension plan
obligations could exceed current provisions.
As of March 31, 2007, our defined benefit pension plans were under-funded by an aggregate
of $443.8 million on a financial accounting basis. Our future funding obligations for the defined
benefit pension plans depend upon changes to the level of benefits provided by the plans, the
future performance of assets set aside in trusts for these plans, the level of interest rates used
to determine minimum funding levels, actuarial data and experience and any changes in government
laws and regulations. Any adverse change to any of these factors may require us to increase our
cash contributions to our pension plans and those additional contributions could have a material
adverse effect on our cash flows and results of operations.
Item 5. Other Information.
On May 7, 2007, the parties to the Combination Agreement and Agreement and Plan of
Merger, dated as of January 29, 2007 among AbitibiBowater Inc., Abitibi-Consolidated Inc., Bowater
Incorporated, Alpha-Bravo Merger Sub Inc. and Bowater Canada Inc., entered into a First Amendment
to such combination agreement (the First Amendment). As amended, the combination agreement limits the number of exchangeable
shares that may be issued to an amount that, when combined with exchangeable shares of a Canadian
subsidiary of Bowater, is less than 20% of the total voting power of AbitibiBowater. The limit is
established as a precaution to ensure that the combination remains tax deferred for U.S. resident
holders of Abitibi shares. In the event that eligible Abitibi shareholders elect to receive more
exchangeable shares than are available pursuant to the limit, the remainder of their shares will be
exchanged for shares of AbitibiBowater common stock pro rata to their shareholdings. The First
Amendment is attached hereto as Exhibit 10.1.
On May 8, 2007, Bowater issued a press release announcing the execution of the First
Amendment, which press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1.
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibits (numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K):
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
First Amendment, dated as of
May 7, 2007, to the Combination Agreement and Agreement and Plan of Merger
dated as of January 29, 2007 among AbitibiBowater Inc., Abitibi-Consolidated Inc., Bowater
Incorporated, Alpha-Bravo Merger Sub Inc. and Bowater Canada Inc. (the First Amendment).
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
Statement regarding Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of CEO Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of CFO Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of CEO Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of CFO Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
99.1
|
|
Press Release, issued May 8, 2007, announcing the execution of the First Amendment.
|
39
BOWATER INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BOWATER INCORPORATED |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ William G. Harvey |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William G. Harvey |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ Joseph B. Johnson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph B. Johnson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vice President and Controller |
|
|
Dated:
May 10, 2007
40
BOWATER INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
First Amendment, dated as of
May 7, 2007, to the Combination Agreement and Agreement and Plan of Merger
dated as of January 29, 2007 among AbitibiBowater Inc., Abitibi-Consolidated Inc., Bowater
Incorporated, Alpha-Bravo Merger Sub Inc. and Bowater Canada Inc. (the First Amendment).
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
Statement regarding Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of CEO Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of CFO Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of CEO Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of CFO Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
99.1
|
|
Press Release, issued May 8, 2007, announcing the execution of the First Amendment.
|