First Charter Corporation
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008
OR
o TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission File Number 0-15829
FIRST CHARTER CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
North Carolina
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
56-1355866
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
10200 David Taylor Drive, Charlotte, NC
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
28262-2373
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (704) 688-4300
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ |
Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o |
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller |
|
|
|
reporting company) |
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). Yes o No þ
As of May 1, 2008, the registrant had outstanding 35,082,601 shares of common stock, no par value.
FIRST CHARTER CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
For the Quarter ended March 31, 2008
All reports filed electronically by First Charter Corporation (the Corporation) with the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC), including its annual reports on Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and current reports on Form 8-K, as well as any amendments to those
reports, are accessible at no cost on the Corporations website at www.firstcharter.com. These
filings are also accessible on the SECs website at www.sec.gov.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
First Charter Corporation
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
December 31 |
(Dollars in thousands, except share data) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
74,763 |
|
|
$ |
85,562 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
8,653 |
|
|
|
10,926 |
|
Interest-bearing bank deposits |
|
|
13,335 |
|
|
|
5,710 |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
96,751 |
|
|
|
102,198 |
|
Securities available for sale (cost of $831,036 and $863,049 at
March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively) |
|
|
821,518 |
|
|
|
860,671 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock |
|
|
52,123 |
|
|
|
48,990 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
17,544 |
|
|
|
14,145 |
|
Portfolio loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and construction |
|
|
2,219,719 |
|
|
|
2,254,354 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
587,240 |
|
|
|
582,398 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
670,829 |
|
|
|
666,255 |
|
|
Total portfolio loans |
|
|
3,477,788 |
|
|
|
3,503,007 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(45,022 |
) |
|
|
(42,414 |
) |
|
Portfolio loans, net |
|
|
3,432,766 |
|
|
|
3,460,593 |
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
110,283 |
|
|
|
110,763 |
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets |
|
|
82,599 |
|
|
|
82,871 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
182,277 |
|
|
|
182,186 |
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
4,795,861 |
|
|
$ |
4,862,417 |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing demand |
|
$ |
446,623 |
|
|
$ |
438,313 |
|
Demand |
|
|
510,604 |
|
|
|
478,186 |
|
Money market |
|
|
532,864 |
|
|
|
564,053 |
|
Savings |
|
|
104,615 |
|
|
|
101,234 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
1,346,172 |
|
|
|
1,313,482 |
|
Brokered certificates of deposit |
|
|
278,461 |
|
|
|
326,351 |
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
3,219,339 |
|
|
|
3,221,619 |
|
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under
agreements to repurchase |
|
|
208,816 |
|
|
|
268,232 |
|
Commercial paper and other short-term borrowings |
|
|
248,827 |
|
|
|
284,180 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
617,712 |
|
|
|
567,729 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
37,641 |
|
|
|
52,313 |
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
4,332,335 |
|
|
|
4,394,073 |
|
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock no par value; authorized 2,000,000 shares; no shares
issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock no par value; authorized 100,000,000 shares;
issued and outstanding 35,003,721 and 34,978,847 shares
at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively |
|
|
235,480 |
|
|
|
233,974 |
|
Common stock held in Rabbi Trust for deferred compensation |
|
|
(1,720 |
) |
|
|
(1,687 |
) |
Deferred compensation payable in common stock |
|
|
1,720 |
|
|
|
1,687 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
233,809 |
|
|
|
235,812 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax |
|
|
(5,763 |
) |
|
|
(1,442 |
) |
|
Total Shareholders Equity |
|
|
463,526 |
|
|
|
468,344 |
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
$ |
4,795,861 |
|
|
$ |
4,862,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements. |
3
First Charter Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31 |
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
57,109 |
|
|
$ |
66,118 |
|
Securities |
|
|
11,394 |
|
|
|
10,918 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
Interest-bearing bank deposits |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
68,584 |
|
|
|
77,214 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
24,751 |
|
|
|
26,540 |
|
Borrowings |
|
|
11,082 |
|
|
|
13,939 |
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
35,833 |
|
|
|
40,479 |
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
32,751 |
|
|
|
36,735 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
4,707 |
|
|
|
1,366 |
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
|
28,044 |
|
|
|
35,369 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposits |
|
|
7,365 |
|
|
|
7,390 |
|
ATM, debit, and merchant fees |
|
|
2,631 |
|
|
|
2,444 |
|
Wealth management |
|
|
779 |
|
|
|
716 |
|
Equity method investments gains, net |
|
|
627 |
|
|
|
1,127 |
|
Mortgage services |
|
|
1,012 |
|
|
|
901 |
|
Gain on sale of Small Business Administration loans |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
Brokerage services |
|
|
733 |
|
|
|
1,081 |
|
Insurance services |
|
|
4,150 |
|
|
|
3,634 |
|
Bank owned life insurance |
|
|
1,165 |
|
|
|
1,139 |
|
Property sale gains, net |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
Securities gains (losses), net |
|
|
1,229 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
Other |
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
705 |
|
|
Total noninterest income |
|
|
20,418 |
|
|
|
19,566 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
|
18,498 |
|
|
|
19,587 |
|
Occupancy and equipment |
|
|
4,725 |
|
|
|
4,612 |
|
Data processing |
|
|
1,515 |
|
|
|
1,790 |
|
Marketing |
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
1,351 |
|
Postage and supplies |
|
|
1,096 |
|
|
|
1,172 |
|
Legal and professional services |
|
|
2,700 |
|
|
|
3,586 |
|
Telecommunications |
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
671 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
Foreclosed properties |
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
153 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,219 |
|
|
|
2,775 |
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
|
33,863 |
|
|
|
35,920 |
|
|
Income before income tax expense |
|
|
14,599 |
|
|
|
19,015 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
9,057 |
|
|
|
6,659 |
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
5,542 |
|
|
$ |
12,356 |
|
Net income per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
0.16 |
|
|
|
0.35 |
|
Average common shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
34,739 |
|
|
|
34,770 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
35,121 |
|
|
|
35,085 |
|
Dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.195 |
|
|
$ |
0.195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements. |
4
First Charter Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Rabbi |
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust for |
|
Compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
Deferred |
|
Payable in |
|
Retained |
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts) |
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Compensation |
|
Common Stock |
|
Earnings |
|
Loss |
|
Total |
|
Balance, December 31, 2007 |
|
|
34,978,847 |
|
|
$ |
233,974 |
|
|
$ |
(1,687 |
) |
|
$ |
1,687 |
|
|
$ |
235,812 |
|
|
$ |
(1,442 |
) |
|
$ |
468,344 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,542 |
|
Change in unrealized gains and losses on
securities, net of reclassification
adjustment for net losses
included in net income, net of
income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,321 |
) |
|
|
(4,321 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,221 |
|
Adjustment to initially apply EITF 06-4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(680 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(680 |
) |
Common stock purchased by Rabbi Trust
for deferred compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
Deferred compensation payable
in common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
Cash dividends declared, $0.195 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,865 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,865 |
) |
Issuance of shares under stock-based
compensation plans, including related
tax effects |
|
|
24,874 |
|
|
|
1,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,506 |
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2008 |
|
|
35,003,721 |
|
|
$ |
235,480 |
|
|
$ |
(1,720 |
) |
|
$ |
1,720 |
|
|
$ |
233,809 |
|
|
$ |
(5,763 |
) |
|
$ |
463,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements. |
5
First Charter Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31 |
(In thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
5,542 |
|
|
$ |
12,356 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
4,707 |
|
|
|
1,366 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
1,959 |
|
|
|
1,814 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
Amortization of servicing rights |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
787 |
|
|
|
786 |
|
Tax benefits from stock-based compensation plans |
|
|
(212 |
) |
|
|
(116 |
) |
Premium amortization and discount accretion, net |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
Securities (gains) losses, net |
|
|
(1,229 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
Net gains on sales of other real
estate owned |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
Write-downs on other real estate owned |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
Equity method investment gains, net |
|
|
(627 |
) |
|
|
(1,127 |
) |
Gains on sales of loans held for sale |
|
|
(691 |
) |
|
|
(701 |
) |
Gains on sale of Small Business Administration loans |
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
(377 |
) |
Property sale gains, net |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
(63 |
) |
Origination of loans held for sale |
|
|
(96,990 |
) |
|
|
(67,080 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of loans held for
sale |
|
|
94,282 |
|
|
|
66,382 |
|
Change in cash surrender value of life insurance |
|
|
(1,154 |
) |
|
|
(1,158 |
) |
Change in other assets |
|
|
4,130 |
|
|
|
7,591 |
|
Change in other liabilities |
|
|
(15,184 |
) |
|
|
1,055 |
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
(4,580 |
) |
|
|
21,155 |
|
|
Investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,367 |
|
Proceeds from sales of FHLB and Federal Reserve Bank stock |
|
|
676 |
|
|
|
7,813 |
|
Proceeds from maturities, calls and paydowns of securities available for sale |
|
|
115,059 |
|
|
|
62,347 |
|
Purchases of securities available for sale |
|
|
(82,752 |
) |
|
|
(71,138 |
) |
Purchases of FHLB and Federal Reserve Bank stock |
|
|
(3,809 |
) |
|
|
(6,863 |
) |
Net change in loans |
|
|
22,512 |
|
|
|
(45,667 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of other real estate
owned |
|
|
1,248 |
|
|
|
498 |
|
Net purchases of premises and equipment |
|
|
(1,420 |
) |
|
|
(2,371 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
51,514 |
|
|
|
(38,014 |
) |
|
Financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in deposits |
|
|
(2,280 |
) |
|
|
73,238 |
|
Net change in federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase
agreements |
|
|
(59,416 |
) |
|
|
(23,923 |
) |
Net change in commercial paper and other short-term borrowings |
|
|
(35,353 |
) |
|
|
(70,530 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt and trust preferred securities |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
Retirement of long-term debt |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(110,016 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
1,294 |
|
|
|
2,813 |
|
Tax benefits from stock-based compensation plans |
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(6,821 |
) |
|
|
(6,811 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(52,381 |
) |
|
|
14,887 |
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(5,447 |
) |
|
|
(1,972 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
102,198 |
|
|
|
102,827 |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of
period |
|
$ |
96,751 |
|
|
$ |
100,855 |
|
|
Supplemental information for continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
40,894 |
|
|
$ |
40,561 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
14,770 |
|
|
|
3,200 |
|
Non-cash items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer of loans to other real
estate owned |
|
|
608 |
|
|
|
373 |
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale
(net of tax expense (benefit)
of $(2,819), and $378, respectively) |
|
|
(4,321 |
) |
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements. |
6
First Charter Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
First Charter Corporation (First Charter or the Corporation), headquartered in Charlotte, North
Carolina, is a regional financial services company with assets of $4.8 billion and is the holding
company for First Charter Bank (the Bank). As of March 31, 2008, First Charter operated 60
financial centers, four insurance offices, and 136 ATMs throughout North Carolina and Georgia.
First Charter also operates loan origination offices in Asheville, North Carolina and Reston,
Virginia. First Charter provides businesses and individuals with a broad range of financial
services, including banking, financial planning, wealth management, investments, insurance, and
mortgages. The results of operations of the Bank constitute the substantial majority of the
consolidated net income, revenue, and assets of the Corporation.
1. Accounting Policies
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Corporation and its wholly-owned
subsidiary, the Bank, and variable interest entities where the Corporation is the primary
beneficiary. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
The information contained in these interim consolidated financial statements, excluding the
consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2007, is unaudited. The information furnished has
been prepared pursuant to United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Rule 10-01 of
Regulation S-X and does not include all the information and note disclosures required to be
included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles in the United States of America.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
Corporations audited financial statements and accompanying notes in the Corporations Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, filed with the SEC on February 29, 2008.
The unaudited results of operations for the interim periods shown in these financial statements are
not necessarily indicative of operating results for the entire year. The information furnished in
this report reflects all adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to present
a fair statement of the financial condition and the results of operations for interim periods. All
such adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature.
The significant accounting policies followed by the Corporation are presented in Note 1 of the
Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. With the exception
of the Corporations adoption of certain of the accounting pronouncements discussed in Note 2,
these policies have not materially changed from the disclosure in that report.
2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Accounting
Standard (SFAS) No. 161, Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities An
Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. This standard requires companies to provide enhanced
disclosures regarding derivative instruments and hedging activities. It requires companies to
better convey the purpose of derivative use in terms of the risks that the company is intending to
manage. SFAS 161 retains the same scope as SFAS 133 and is effective for fiscal years and interim
periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The Corporation will adopt SFAS 161 beginning January
1, 2009 and is currently evaluating the impact, if any, SFAS 161 will have on the Corporations
consolidated financial statements.
In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) 140-3, Accounting for Transfers of
Financial Assets and Repurchase Financing Transactions. FSP 140-3 addresses the issue of whether
or
7
not these transactions should be viewed as two separate transactions or as one linked
transaction. The FSP includes a rebuttable presumption that presumes linkage of the two
transactions unless the presumption can be overcome by meeting certain criteria. FSP 140-3 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The Corporation will adopt this FSP
beginning January 1, 2009 and is currently evaluating the impact, if any, FSP 140-3 will have on
the Corporations consolidated financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. This standard permits an
entity to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. This
option is available to all entities. Most of the provisions in SFAS 159 are elective; however, the
amendment to SFAS 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, applies to
all entities with available-for-sale and trading securities. SFAS 159 is effective as of the
beginning of an entitys first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. The Corporation did
not elect the fair value option as of January 1, 2008 for any of its financial assets or financial
liabilities and, accordingly, the adoption of SFAS 159 did not have a material impact on the
Corporations consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements, which replaces the different
definitions of fair value in existing accounting literature with a single definition, sets out a
framework for measuring fair value, and requires additional disclosures about fair value
measurements. SFAS 157 is required to be applied whenever another financial accounting standard
requires or permits an asset or liability to be measured at fair value. The Corporation adopted the
guidance of SFAS 157 beginning January 1, 2008, and the adoption of the statement did not have a
material impact on the Corporations consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB ratified the consensus reached by the Emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF) on Issue No. 06-4, Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects
of Endorsement Split Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements. EITF 06-4 requires the recognition of a
liability and related compensation expense for endorsement split-dollar life insurance policies
that provide a benefit to an employee that extends to post-retirement periods. Under EITF 06-4,
life insurance policies purchased for the purpose of providing such benefits do not effectively
settle an entitys obligation to the employee. Accordingly, the entity must recognize a liability
and related compensation expense during the employees active service period based on the future
cost of insurance to be incurred during the employees retirement. If the entity has agreed to
provide the employee with a death benefit, then the liability for the future death benefit should
be recognized by following the guidance in SFAS 106, Employers Accounting for Postretirement
Benefits Other Than Pensions. The Corporation adopted EITF 06-4 effective as of January 1, 2008 as
a change in accounting principle, and reduced retained earnings by $0.7 million through a
cumulative-effect adjustment.
In November 2007, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 109, Written Loan Commitments
Recorded at Fair Value Through Earnings, (SAB 109). SAB 109 supersedes guidance provided by
SAB 105, Loan Commitments Accounted for as Derivative Instruments, (SAB 105) and provides
guidance on written loan commitments accounted for at fair value through earnings. Specifically,
SAB 109 addresses the inclusion of expected net future cash flows related to the associated
servicing of a loan in the measurement of all written loan commitments accounted for at fair value
through earnings. In addition, SAB 109 retains the SECs position on the exclusion of
internally-developed intangible assets as part of the fair value of a derivative loan commitment
originally established in SAB 105. The Corporation adopted SAB 109 as of January 1, 2008 and the
adoption of SAB 109 did not have a material impact on the Corporations consolidated financial
statements.
3. Proposed Merger with Fifth Third
On August 15, 2007, First Charter and Fifth Third Bancorp (Fifth Third) entered into an Agreement
and Plan of Merger, as amended by the Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated
September 14, 2007, (Merger Agreement) by and among First Charter, Fifth Third, and Fifth Third
8
Financial Corporation (Fifth Third Financial). Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, First
Charter will be merged with and into Fifth Third Financial. The Merger Agreement has been approved
by the Board of Directors of First Charter, Fifth Third and Fifth Third Financial. First Charters
shareholders have approved the Merger Agreement and the merger has been approved by all necessary
state and federal regulatory agencies. The Merger Agreement is subject to customary closing
conditions. The merger is currently anticipated to close on Friday, June 6, 2008.
In connection with the proposed merger with Fifth Third, the Corporation has incurred expenses of
approximately $0.6 million of merger-related costs, principally legal and professional services,
for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
4. Net Income Per Share
Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of
shares of the Corporations common stock outstanding for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and
2007, respectively. Diluted net income per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur
if the Corporations potential common stock equivalents and contingently issuable shares, which
consist of dilutive stock options, restricted stock, and performance shares, were issued.
A reconciliation of the basic average common shares outstanding to the diluted average common
shares outstanding follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Basic weighted-average number of common shares outstanding |
|
|
34,739,407 |
|
|
|
34,770,106 |
|
Dilutive effect arising from potential common stock issuances |
|
|
381,660 |
|
|
|
314,534 |
|
|
Diluted weighted-average number of common shares outstanding |
|
|
35,121,067 |
|
|
|
35,084,640 |
|
|
The effects of outstanding anti-dilutive stock options are excluded from the computation of diluted
net income per share. These amounts were 500 and 424,024 shares for the three months ended March
31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The Corporation declared dividends of $0.195 per share for the three months ended March 31, 2008
and 2007.
5. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The following is a summary of the gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of amortized
intangible assets and the carrying amount of unamortized intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
Carrying |
|
Accumulated |
|
Carrying |
|
Carrying |
|
Accumulated |
|
Carrying |
(In thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
Amortization |
|
Amount |
|
Amount |
|
Amortization |
|
Amount |
|
Amortized intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core deposits |
|
$ |
3,560 |
|
|
$ |
968 |
|
|
$ |
2,592 |
|
|
$ |
3,560 |
|
|
$ |
808 |
|
|
$ |
2,752 |
|
Noncompete agreements |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
Customer lists |
|
|
2,615 |
|
|
|
1,752 |
|
|
|
863 |
|
|
|
2,615 |
|
|
|
1,640 |
|
|
|
975 |
|
|
Total amortized intangible
assets |
|
|
6,265 |
|
|
|
2,810 |
|
|
|
3,455 |
|
|
|
6,265 |
|
|
|
2,538 |
|
|
|
3,727 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
79,144 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
79,144 |
|
|
|
79,144 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
79,144 |
|
|
Total goodwill and amortized
intangible assets |
|
$ |
85,409 |
|
|
$ |
2,810 |
|
|
$ |
82,599 |
|
|
$ |
85,409 |
|
|
$ |
2,538 |
|
|
$ |
82,871 |
|
|
9
Amortization expense for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 was $0.3 million and $0.2
million, respectively.
As of March 31, 2008, expected future amortization expense for intangible assets follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core |
|
Customer |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Deposits |
|
Lists |
|
Total |
|
April - December 2008 |
|
$ |
449 |
|
|
$ |
279 |
|
|
$ |
728 |
|
2009 |
|
|
531 |
|
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
794 |
|
2010 |
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
595 |
|
2011 |
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
458 |
|
2012 |
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
2013 and after |
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
535 |
|
|
Total expected future intangible asset amortization |
|
$ |
2,592 |
|
|
$ |
863 |
|
|
$ |
3,455 |
|
|
6. Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income is defined as the change in equity from all transactions other than those with
shareholders, and it includes net income and other comprehensive income (loss). The Corporations
only component of other comprehensive income is the change in unrealized gains and losses on
available-for-sale securities.
The components of comprehensive income follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31 |
(In thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
5,542 |
|
|
$ |
12,356 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, net |
|
|
(5,911 |
) |
|
|
945 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for gains (losses) included in net
income |
|
|
1,229 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
Income tax effect, net |
|
|
2,819 |
|
|
|
(378 |
) |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
(4,321 |
) |
|
|
578 |
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
$ |
1,221 |
|
|
$ |
12,934 |
|
|
10
7. Securities Available for Sale
Securities available for sale are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
U.S. government agency obligations |
|
$ |
97,257 |
|
|
$ |
560 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
97,812 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
583,797 |
|
|
|
4,325 |
|
|
|
7,881 |
|
|
|
580,241 |
|
State, county, and municipal obligations |
|
|
90,959 |
|
|
|
1,024 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
91,981 |
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
57,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,613 |
|
|
|
50,048 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
1,362 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
1,436 |
|
|
Total securities |
|
$ |
831,036 |
|
|
$ |
6,038 |
|
|
$ |
15,556 |
|
|
$ |
821,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
U.S. government agency obligations |
|
$ |
145,810 |
|
|
$ |
814 |
|
|
$ |
70 |
|
|
$ |
146,554 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
565,872 |
|
|
|
4,399 |
|
|
|
4,837 |
|
|
|
565,434 |
|
State, county, and municipal obligations |
|
|
92,324 |
|
|
|
692 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
92,938 |
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
57,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,452 |
|
|
|
54,229 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
1,362 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
1,516 |
|
|
Total securities |
|
$ |
863,049 |
|
|
$ |
6,098 |
|
|
$ |
8,476 |
|
|
$ |
860,671 |
|
|
The contractual maturity distribution and yields (computed on a taxable-equivalent basis) of the
Corporations securities portfolio at March 31, 2008, are summarized below. Actual maturities may
differ from contractual maturities shown below since borrowers may have the right to pre-pay these
obligations without pre-payment penalties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due after 1 |
|
Due after 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in 1 year |
|
through 5 |
|
through 10 |
|
Due after |
|
|
|
|
or less |
|
years |
|
years |
|
10 years |
|
Total |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
Yield |
|
Amount |
|
Yield |
|
Amount |
|
Yield |
|
Amount |
|
Yield |
|
Amount |
|
Yield |
|
Fair value of securities
available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government
agency obligations |
|
$ |
96,772 |
|
|
|
3.71 |
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
1,040 |
|
|
|
5.20 |
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
97,812 |
|
|
|
3.72 |
% |
Mortgage-backed
securities (1) |
|
|
8,952 |
|
|
|
5.65 |
|
|
|
274,670 |
|
|
|
4.82 |
|
|
|
244,123 |
|
|
|
5.46 |
|
|
|
52,496 |
|
|
|
5.67 |
|
|
|
580,241 |
|
|
|
5.18 |
|
State and municipal
obligations (2) |
|
|
32,826 |
|
|
|
6.76 |
|
|
|
20,399 |
|
|
|
5.01 |
|
|
|
4,110 |
|
|
|
5.99 |
|
|
|
34,646 |
|
|
|
2.62 |
|
|
|
91,981 |
|
|
|
4.78 |
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,136 |
|
|
|
6.99 |
|
|
|
17,520 |
|
|
|
5.03 |
|
|
|
19,392 |
|
|
|
5.46 |
|
|
|
50,048 |
|
|
|
5.70 |
|
Equity securities (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,436 |
|
|
|
6.10 |
|
|
|
1,436 |
|
|
|
6.10 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
138,550 |
|
|
|
4.56 |
% |
|
$ |
308,205 |
|
|
|
4.93 |
% |
|
$ |
266,793 |
|
|
|
5.43 |
% |
|
$ |
107,970 |
|
|
|
4.65 |
% |
|
$ |
821,518 |
|
|
|
4.99 |
% |
|
Amortized cost
of securities
available for sale |
|
$ |
137,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
309,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
271,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
112,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
831,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Maturities estimated based on average life of security. |
|
(2) |
|
Yields on tax-exempt securities are calculated on a tax-equivalent basis using the marginal
Federal income tax rate of 35 percent. |
|
(3) |
|
Although equity securities have no stated maturity, they are presented for illustrative
purposes only. The 6.10% yield represents the expected dividend yield to be earned on equity
securities. |
Securities with an aggregate carrying value of $671.4 million and $655.0 million at March 31, 2008
and December 31, 2007, respectively, were pledged to secure public deposits, trust account
deposits, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB)
borrowings.
11
Gross gains and losses recognized on the sale of securities are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31 |
(In thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Gross gains |
|
$ |
1,229 |
|
|
$ |
94 |
|
Gross losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
Securities gains (losses), net |
|
$ |
1,229 |
|
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
In March 2008, the Corporation received 51,457 Class B common shares in connection with Visa Inc.s
(Visa) initial public offering (IPO), of which 19,894 shares were redeemed as part of Visas
mandatory redemption of its Class B stock. The Corporation recognized a gain of $0.9 million
related to this redemption. The Corporation did not recognize any gain on the remaining 31,563
unredeemed Visa Class B common shares. The unredeemed Visa Class B common shares are not reflected
on the Corporations consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2008 as the Corporation has no
historical basis in these shares.
As of
March 31, 2008, there were no issues of securities available for sale (excluding
U.S. government agency obligations), which had carrying values that exceeded 10 percent of
shareholders equity of the Corporation.
The unrealized losses at March 31, 2008, shown in the following table, resulted primarily from an
increase in interest rate spreads among the various types of bond investments, market illiquidity
and macro-economic recession fears.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
12 months or longer |
|
Total |
|
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
(In thousands) |
|
Value |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Losses |
|
AAA/AA-RATED SECURITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agency
obligations |
|
$ |
29,963 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
29,963 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
156,880 |
|
|
|
4,433 |
|
|
|
107,428 |
|
|
|
3,448 |
|
|
|
264,308 |
|
|
|
7,881 |
|
|
Total AAA/AA-rated securities |
|
|
186,843 |
|
|
|
4,438 |
|
|
|
107,428 |
|
|
|
3,448 |
|
|
|
294,271 |
|
|
|
7,886 |
|
|
A/BBB-RATED SECURITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
41,833 |
|
|
|
5,826 |
|
|
|
8,215 |
|
|
|
1,787 |
|
|
|
50,048 |
|
|
|
7,613 |
|
State, county, and municipal
obligations |
|
|
1,168 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,168 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Total A/BBB-rated securities |
|
|
43,001 |
|
|
|
5,828 |
|
|
|
8,215 |
|
|
|
1,787 |
|
|
|
51,216 |
|
|
|
7,615 |
|
|
UNRATED SECURITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
Total unrated securities |
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
Total temporarily impaired
securities |
|
$ |
230,241 |
|
|
$ |
10,321 |
|
|
$ |
115,643 |
|
|
$ |
5,235 |
|
|
$ |
345,884 |
|
|
$ |
15,556 |
|
|
At March 31, 2008, investments in a gross unrealized loss position included one U.S. agency
security, 38 mortgage-backed securities, one municipal obligation, and eight other asset-backed
securities. The unrealized losses associated with these securities were not considered to be
other-than-temporary because they were primarily related to changes in interest rates and interest
rate spreads, and did not affect the expected cash flows of the underlying collateral or the
issuer. At March 31, 2008, the Corporation had the ability and the intent to hold these
investments to the recovery of par value. The Corporations available-for-sale securities
portfolio also contains one equity security in an unrealized loss
12
position. This equity security
began trading publicly in the first quarter of 2007 and the stock price has decreased, resulting in
an unrealized loss of approximately 12.2 percent as of March 31, 2008.
8. Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses
The Bank primarily makes commercial and installment loans to customers throughout its market areas.
The Corporations primary market area includes the states of North Carolina, South Carolina, and
Georgia, and predominately centers on the metropolitan regions of Charlotte and Raleigh, North
Carolina, and Atlanta, Georgia. At March 31, 2008, the majority of the total loan portfolio was to
borrowers within these regions. The real estate loan portfolio can be affected by the condition of
the local real estate markets. The diversity of the regions economic base provides a stable
lending environment. No areas of significant concentrations of credit risk have been identified due
to the diverse industrial bases in the regions.
Total portfolio loans are categorized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
December 31, 2007 |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
$ |
1,058,197 |
|
|
|
30.4 |
% |
|
$ |
1,073,983 |
|
|
|
30.7 |
% |
Commercial non real estate |
|
|
299,555 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
308,792 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
Construction |
|
|
861,967 |
|
|
|
24.8 |
|
|
|
871,579 |
|
|
|
24.9 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
587,240 |
|
|
|
16.9 |
|
|
|
582,398 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
430,781 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
413,873 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
240,048 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
252,382 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
Total portfolio loans |
|
$ |
3,477,788 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
3,503,007 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
The following is a summary of the changes in the allowance for loan losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31 |
(In thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
42,414 |
|
|
$ |
34,966 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(2,458 |
) |
|
|
(786 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
(2,099 |
) |
|
|
(478 |
) |
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
4,707 |
|
|
|
1,366 |
|
|
Balance, March 31 |
|
$ |
45,022 |
|
|
$ |
35,854 |
|
|
The table below summarizes the Corporations nonperforming assets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
December 31 |
(In thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Nonaccrual loans |
|
$ |
62,058 |
|
|
$ |
28,695 |
|
Loans 90 days or more past due and accruing interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming loans |
|
|
62,058 |
|
|
|
28,695 |
|
Other real estate |
|
|
9,481 |
|
|
|
10,056 |
|
|
Total nonperforming assets |
|
$ |
71,539 |
|
|
$ |
38,751 |
|
|
At March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, impaired loans amounted to $55.8 million and
$23.2 million, respectively. Included in the allowance for loan losses was $7.6 million and $4.4
million related to the impaired loans at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.
13
9. Servicing Rights
As of March 31, 2008, the Corporation serviced $171.3 million of mortgage loans for other parties.
The carrying value and aggregate estimated fair value of mortgage servicing rights (MSR) at
March 31, 2008 were $0.6 million and $1.5 million, respectively, compared to a carrying value and
estimated fair value of $0.6 million and $1.8 million, respectively, at December 31, 2007.
As of March 31, 2008, the Corporation serviced $34.0 million of Small Business Administration
(SBA) loans that were originated by and sold by the Bank. The carrying value and aggregate
estimated fair value of the SBA loan servicing rights (SSR) at March 31, 2008 were $0.8 million,
compared to the carrying value and estimated fair value of $0.8 million and $0.9 million,
respectively, at December 31, 2007.
Servicing rights are periodically evaluated for impairment based on their fair value. Impairment
would be recognized as a reduction to the carrying value of the asset. Fair value is estimated
based on market prices for similar assets and on the discounted estimated present value of future
net cash flows based on market consensus loan prepayment estimates, historical prepayment rates,
interest rates, and other economic factors. For purposes of impairment evaluation, the servicing
assets are stratified based on predominant risk characteristics of the underlying loans, including
loan type (conventional or government) and note rate.
The following is an analysis of capitalized servicing rights included in other assets in the
consolidated balance sheets for the three months ending
March 31, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
(In thousands) |
|
MSR |
|
SSR |
|
MSR |
|
SSR |
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
591 |
|
|
$ |
792 |
|
|
$ |
756 |
|
|
$ |
1,137 |
|
Servicing rights capitalized or acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
Amortization expense |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
Purchase accounting adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(238 |
) |
Valuation allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31 |
|
$ |
557 |
|
|
$ |
754 |
|
|
$ |
715 |
|
|
$ |
872 |
|
|
Assumptions used to value the MSR included an average conditional prepayment rate (CPR) of
15.4 percent, an average discount rate of 12.2 percent, and a weighted-average life of 3.3 years.
An increase in the prepayment rates of 10 percent and 20 percent may result in a decline in fair
value of $57,000 and $110,000, respectively. An increase in the discount rate of 10 percent and
20 percent may result in a decline in fair value of $38,000 and $74,000, respectively. Changes in
fair value based on a 10 percent variation in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because
the relationship of the change in the assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear.
Also, the effect of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value of the MSR is
calculated independently without changing any other assumption. In reality, changes in one factor
may result in changes in another (for example, changes in mortgage interest rates, which drive
changes in prepayment rate estimates, could result in changes in the discount rates), which may
magnify or counteract the sensitivities.
Assumptions used to value the SSR included a CPR of 13.0 percent, a discount rate of 10.3 percent,
and a weighted-average life of 4.1 years. An increase in the prepayment rates of 10 percent and
20 percent may result in a decline in fair value of $38,000 and $73,000, respectively. An increase
in the discount rate of 10 percent and 20 percent may result in a decline in fair value of $20,000
and $40,000, respectively.
The MSR and SSR are expected to be amortized against other noninterest income over a
weighted-average period of 3.0 years and 2.9 years, respectively. Expected future amortization
expense for these capitalized servicing rights follows:
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
MSR |
|
SSR |
|
Total |
|
April 1 - December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
101 |
|
|
$ |
132 |
|
|
$ |
233 |
|
2009 |
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
263 |
|
2010 |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
2011 |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
2012 |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
2013 and after |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
Total amortization |
|
$ |
557 |
|
|
$ |
754 |
|
|
$ |
1,311 |
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, contractual servicing fee revenue was $0.3
million and $0.4 million, respectively, and was included in the mortgage services line item of
other noninterest income.
10. Other Borrowings
The following is a schedule of other borrowings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Balance |
|
Rate |
|
Balance |
|
Rate |
|
Federal funds purchased and securities
sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
$ |
208,816 |
|
|
|
3.18 |
% |
|
$ |
268,232 |
|
|
|
4.59 |
% |
Commercial paper |
|
|
28,827 |
|
|
|
2.94 |
|
|
|
64,180 |
|
|
|
2.91 |
|
Other short-term borrowings |
|
|
220,000 |
|
|
|
3.65 |
|
|
|
220,000 |
|
|
|
5.27 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
617,712 |
|
|
|
4.77 |
|
|
|
567,729 |
|
|
|
5.26 |
|
|
Total other borrowings |
|
$ |
1,075,355 |
|
|
|
4.18 |
% |
|
$ |
1,120,141 |
|
|
|
4.97 |
% |
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase represent short-term borrowings by the banking
subsidiaries with maturities less than one year collateralized by a portion of the Corporations
securities of the United States government or its agencies, which have been delivered to a
third-party custodian for safekeeping. Securities with an aggregate carrying value of $114.1
million and $124.8 million at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, were pledged to
secure securities sold under agreements to repurchase.
Federal funds purchased represent unsecured overnight borrowings from other financial institutions.
At March 31, 2008, the Bank had available federal funds lines of credit totaling $648.0 million,
with $168.0 million outstanding, compared to similar lines of credit totaling $648.0 million, with
$233.0 million outstanding at December 31, 2007.
First Charter Corporation issues commercial paper as another source of short-term funding. It is
purchased primarily by the Banks commercial clients. Commercial paper outstanding at March 31,
2008 was $28.8 million, compared to $64.2 million at December 31, 2007.
Other short-term borrowings consist of the FHLB borrowings with an original maturity of one year or
less. FHLB borrowings are collateralized by securities from the Corporations investment portfolio,
and a blanket lien on certain qualifying commercial and single-family loans held in the
Corporations loan portfolio. At March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Bank had $220.0 million
of short-term FHLB borrowings.
15
Long-term borrowings represent FHLB borrowings with original maturities greater than one year and
subordinated debentures related to trust preferred securities. At March 31, 2008, the Bank had
$555.8 million of long-term FHLB borrowings, compared to $505.8 million at December 31, 2007. In
addition, the Corporation had $61.9 million of subordinated outstanding debentures at March 31,
2008 and December 31, 2007.
The Corporation formed First Charter Capital Trust I and First Charter Capital Trust II, in
June 2005 and September 2005, respectively; both are wholly-owned business trusts. First Charter
Capital Trust I and First Charter Capital Trust II issued $35.0 million and $25.0 million,
respectively, of trust preferred securities that were sold to third parties. The proceeds of the
sale of the trust preferred securities were used to purchase subordinated debentures (Notes) from
the Corporation, which are presented as long-term borrowings in the consolidated balance sheets and
qualify for inclusion in Tier 1 capital for regulatory capital purposes, subject to certain
limitations.
The following is a summary of the Corporations outstanding trust preferred securities and Notes at
March 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust |
|
Principal |
|
Stated |
|
Per Annum |
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred |
|
Amount of |
|
Maturity of |
|
Interest Rate |
|
Payment |
|
Redemption |
Issuer |
|
Issuance Date |
|
Securities |
|
the Notes |
|
the Notes |
|
of the Notes |
|
Dates |
|
Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September |
|
3 mo. LIBOR |
|
3/15, 6/15, |
|
On or after |
Capital Trust I |
|
June 2005 |
|
$ |
35,000 |
|
|
$ |
36,083 |
|
|
2035 |
|
+ 169 bps |
|
9/15, 12/15 |
|
9/15/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December |
|
3 mo. LIBOR |
|
3/15, 6/15, |
|
On or after |
Capital Trust II |
|
September 2005 |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
25,774 |
|
|
2035 |
|
+ 142 bps |
|
9/15, 12/15 |
|
12/15/2010 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
60,000 |
|
|
$ |
61,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. Income Tax
Income tax expense attributable to net income differed from the amounts computed by applying the
U.S. federal statutory income tax rate of 35 percent to pretax income as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31 |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Tax at statutory federal rate |
|
$ |
5,110 |
|
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
$ |
6,655 |
|
|
|
35.0 |
% |
Change in income taxes resulting from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-exempt income |
|
|
(307 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
(372 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
Bank-owned life insurance |
|
|
(407 |
) |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
(399 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
State income tax, net of federal |
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
Settlement with North Carolina DOR |
|
|
4,938 |
|
|
|
33.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addition to or (release of) tax reserve |
|
|
(843 |
) |
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
$ |
9,057 |
|
|
|
62.0 |
% |
|
$ |
6,659 |
|
|
|
34.9 |
% |
|
The Corporation utilizes FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. FIN 48 prescribes a
more-likely-than-not threshold for the financial statement recognition of uncertain tax positions.
The Corporation has a liability for unrecognized tax benefits relating to uncertain tax positions.
16
As a result of various tax strategies of the Corporation, the amount of unrecognized tax benefits
as of March 31, 2008 was $5.1 million, all of which would impact the Corporations effective tax
rate, if recognized. The Corporation believes its current tax reserves are adequate. A
reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits for the three months
ended March 31, 2008 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
10,833 |
|
Expiration of statute |
|
|
(731 |
) |
Reductions for tax positions of prior periods |
|
|
(4,981 |
) |
|
Balance, March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
5,121 |
|
|
Consistent with prior reporting periods, the Corporation recognizes interest accrued in connection
with unrecognized tax benefits, net of related tax benefits, and penalties in income tax expense in
the consolidated statements of income. As of March 31, 2008, the Corporation had accrued
approximately $0.1 million for the payment of interest and penalties.
The Corporation completed an examination by the North Carolina Department of Revenue (the DOR)
for tax years 1999 through 2005. On March 31, 2008, the Corporation entered into a closing
agreement with the DOR for years 1999 through and including 2006. As a result of this settlement,
the Corporation paid $15.4 million in franchise and income taxes, interest and penalties. The
closing agreement resulted in a reduction of unrecognized tax benefits of $4.2 million. The
Corporation remains subject to examination by the DOR for tax years 2007 forward.
The Corporation was also under examination by the Internal Revenue Service for the 2004 and 2005
tax years. The examination was effectively concluded by March 31, 2008. The Corporation
recognized $0.8 million of additional income tax expense in connection with the effective settlement
of this examination.
12. Share-Based Payments
The Corporation has various stock-based compensation plans under which awards, including stock
options and restricted stock, may be granted to employees and non-employee directors. These plans
and the related accounting are described in Note 18 of the Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Stock-based compensation costs totaled $0.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008,
which consisted of $43,000 related to stock options, $573,000 related to service-based nonvested
shares, and $172,000 related to performance-based nonvested shares. Stock-based compensation costs
totaled $0.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007, which consisted of $50,000 related
to stock options, $523,000 related to service-based nonvested shares, and $213,000 related to
performance-based nonvested shares.
17
The fair value of each stock option award is estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes
option-pricing model based on the following weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Expected volatility |
|
N/A |
|
|
22.4 |
% |
Expected dividend yield |
|
N/A |
|
|
3.2 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
N/A |
|
|
4.8 |
|
Expected term (in years) |
|
N/A |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
Stock option activity for the three months ended March 31, 2008, follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Contractual |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
Term |
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
Shares |
|
Price |
|
(in years) |
|
Value |
|
Outstanding, beginning of period |
|
|
882,853 |
|
|
$ |
19.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(26,688 |
) |
|
|
20.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
187,093 |
|
|
Outstanding, March 31, 2008 |
|
|
856,165 |
|
|
$ |
19.98 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
$ |
5,765,413 |
|
|
Exercisable, March 31, 2008 |
|
|
782,505 |
|
|
$ |
19.58 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
$ |
5,577,166 |
|
|
Nonvested share activity for the three months ended March 31, 2008 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service-Based |
|
Performance-Based |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
Shares |
|
Fair Value |
|
Shares |
|
Fair Value |
|
Outstanding, beginning of period |
|
|
263,168 |
|
|
$ |
24.01 |
|
|
|
90,167 |
|
|
$ |
22.31 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(5,196 |
) |
|
|
23.68 |
|
|
|
(5,967 |
) |
|
|
22.13 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
20.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, March 31, 2008 |
|
|
256,972 |
|
|
$ |
24.03 |
|
|
|
84,200 |
|
|
$ |
22.32 |
|
|
As of March 31, 2008, there was approximately $4.4 million of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to service-based nonvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the 2000
Omnibus Stock Option and Award Plan (Omnibus Plan) and the Restricted Stock Award Program. This
cost is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted-average period of 1.6 years. No
share-based awards vested during the three months ended March 31, 2008.
As of March 31, 2008, there was $0.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to
performance-based nonvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Omnibus Plan.
This cost is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted-average period of 1.3 years.
18
13. Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value
As discussed in Note 2, the Corporation adopted SFAS 157 as of January 1, 2008. The following
table presents the allocation of the Corporations assets recorded at fair value within the SFAS
157 fair value hierarchy as of March 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
active markets for |
|
Significant other |
|
unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
identical assets |
|
observable inputs |
|
inputs |
Description |
|
Fair Value |
|
(Level 1) |
|
(Level 2) |
|
(Level 3) |
|
Securities at fair value |
|
$ |
821,518 |
|
|
$ |
1,436 |
|
|
$ |
770,034 |
|
|
$ |
50,048 |
|
Loans recorded at collateral value |
|
|
48,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,246 |
|
|
The
majority of the Corporations available-for-sale securities portfolio falls into Level 2 of the
fair value hierarchy. The securities are generally priced through independent providers. In
obtaining such valuation information, the Corporation has evaluated the valuation methodologies
used to develop the fair values.
The Corporation has valued its asset-backed securities, which are trust preferred
securities, using third-party dealer determined pricing models. Significant inputs to these dealer
pricing models are not readily observable, thus the valuations of these securities are classified
as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy. The need to use unobservable inputs generally results
from the lack of market liquidity of these securities, which has resulted in diminished
observability of actual trades and observable market assumptions that would otherwise be used to
value these instruments.
Impaired loans are recorded at the fair value of the underlying collateral. The fair value of the
loans collateral is generally determined by third-party appraisals.
The
following table shows a reconciliation for the three months ending
March 31, 2008 of financial
instruments measured using significant unobservable inputs and classified as Level 3 within the
fair value hierarchy:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of |
|
Fair Value of |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Level 3 |
(In thousands) |
|
Securities |
|
Loans |
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
54,229 |
|
|
$ |
18,787 |
|
Losses included in earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,169 |
) |
Losses included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
(4,161 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net transfers |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
32,628 |
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
50,048 |
|
|
$ |
48,246 |
|
|
14. Commitments, Contingencies, and Off-Balance Sheet Risk
Commitments and Off-Balance Sheet Risk. The Corporation is party to various financial instruments
with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its
customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of
credit and involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the
amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements. Commitments to extend credit are
agreements to lend to a customer so long as there is no violation of any condition established in
the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates and may require collateral from the
borrower if deemed necessary by the Corporation. Included in loan commitments are commitments of
$83.6 million to cover customer deposit account overdrafts should they occur. Standby letters of
credit are conditional commitments
issued by the Corporation to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party up to a
stipulated
19
amount and with specified terms and conditions. Standby letters of credit are recorded
as a liability by the Corporation at the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the
guarantee. The fair value and carrying value at March 31, 2008 of standby letters of credit issued
or modified during 2008 was immaterial. Commitments to extend credit are not recorded as an asset
or liability by the Corporation until the instrument is exercised. The Corporation uses the same
credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for instruments
reflected in the consolidated financial statements. The creditworthiness of each customer is
evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
As of March 31, 2008, the Corporations maximum exposure is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timing not |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
1 year |
|
1-3 Years |
|
4-5 Years |
|
Over 5 Years |
|
determinable |
|
Total |
|
Loan commitments |
|
$ |
570,313 |
|
|
$ |
113,946 |
|
|
$ |
16,922 |
|
|
$ |
95,381 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
796,562 |
|
Lines of credit |
|
|
28,597 |
|
|
|
1,202 |
|
|
|
4,957 |
|
|
|
455,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
490,253 |
|
Standby letters of credit |
|
|
23,016 |
|
|
|
2,849 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,869 |
|
Anticipated tax settlements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,172 |
|
|
|
5,172 |
|
|
Total commitments |
|
$ |
621,926 |
|
|
$ |
117,997 |
|
|
$ |
21,883 |
|
|
$ |
550,878 |
|
|
$ |
5,172 |
|
|
$ |
1,317,856 |
|
|
Contingencies. The Corporation and the Bank are defendants in certain claims and legal actions
arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, after consultation with
legal counsel, the ultimate disposition of these matters is not expected to have a material adverse
effect on the consolidated operations, liquidity, or financial position of the Corporation or the
Bank.
During October 2007, Visa completed a restructuring and issued shares of Visa common stock to its
financial institution members in contemplation of its IPO which occurred in March 2008. After the
restructuring, member financial institutions became guarantors of certain Visa litigation
liabilities based on the members proportionate share of the membership base. On November 7, 2007,
Visa announced that it had reached a settlement in the amount of $2.065 billion to resolve certain
restraint of trade litigation brought by American Express. The Corporation, as a member of the
Visa network and a guarantor of its proportionate share of these liabilities, recognized a
litigation liability of $0.6 million related to the American Express settlement and the remaining
unsettled Discover, Interchange and Attridge litigation. Of this $0.6 million, $0.3 million is the
Corporations proportionate share of the American Express Settlement and $0.3 million is the
Corporations estimate of the fair value of the potential losses related to the remaining unsettled
litigation. Charges related to these litigation matters is included in Legal and professional
services on the Corporations consolidated statements of income.
The Corporation filed its Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2007 on November 9,
2007. As such, the Corporation should have recorded its $0.3 million proportionate share of Visas
settlement with American Express in the third quarter of 2007. Additionally, the $0.3 million
reserve related to the Discover, Interchange and Attridge litigation should have been recorded in
the fourth quarter of 2007. The Corporation evaluated the impact of these errors, considering both
qualitative and quantitative factors, and concluded the errors were immaterial to all periods
affected. As such, the Corporation corrected the errors by recording the $0.6 million litigation
reserve in the first quarter of 2008.
Visa funded an escrow account with a portion of the proceeds from the IPO. The escrow account will
be used to pay settlements of Visas restraint of trade litigation. The Corporations
proportionate share of this escrow account was $0.4 million and the Corporation recognized the
benefit from the escrow account as a partial recapture of expenses incurred to establish the Visa
litigation reserve liability. See Note 7 for further discussion
of the Visa IPO transaction.
15. Regulatory Restrictions and Capital Ratios
The Corporation and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by
bank and bank holding company regulatory agencies (regulators). Failure to meet minimum capital
requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by
regulators
20
that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Corporations financial
position and operations. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt
corrective action, the Corporation and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve
quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated
under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and classifications are also subject to
qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Corporation
and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of Total and
Tier I capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier I
capital (as defined) to adjusted average assets (as defined). Management believes, as of March 31,
2008, that the Corporation and the Bank meet all capital adequacy requirements to which they are
subject.
The Corporations and the Banks various regulators have issued regulatory capital guidelines for
U.S. banking organizations. Failure to meet the capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory
and discretionary actions by regulators that could have a material effect on the Corporations
financial statements. At March 31, 2008, the Corporation and the Bank were classified as well
capitalized under these regulatory frameworks. In the judgment of management, there have been no
events or conditions since March 31, 2008, that would change the well capitalized status of the
Corporation or the Bank.
The Corporations and the Banks actual capital amounts and ratios follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adequacy Purposes |
|
To Be Well Capitalized |
|
|
Actual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum |
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
At March 31, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leverage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Charter Corporation |
|
$ |
446,672 |
|
|
|
9.44 |
% |
|
$ |
189,249 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
None | |
|
None | |
First Charter Bank |
|
|
424,710 |
|
|
|
8.99 |
|
|
|
189,030 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
$ |
236,288 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Charter Corporation |
|
$ |
446,672 |
|
|
|
11.25 |
% |
|
$ |
158,878 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
None | |
|
None | |
First Charter Bank |
|
|
424,710 |
|
|
|
10.71 |
|
|
|
158,620 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
$ |
237,930 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Risk-Based Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Charter Corporation |
|
$ |
491,728 |
|
|
|
12.38 |
% |
|
$ |
317,757 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
% |
|
None | |
|
None | |
First Charter Bank |
|
|
469,732 |
|
|
|
11.85 |
|
|
|
317,240 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
|
|
$ |
396,550 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leverage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Charter Corporation |
|
$ |
446,890 |
|
|
|
9.43 |
% |
|
$ |
189,630 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
None | |
|
None | |
First Charter Bank |
|
|
417,979 |
|
|
|
8.83 |
|
|
|
189,252 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
$ |
236,565 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Charter Corporation |
|
$ |
446,890 |
|
|
|
11.17 |
% |
|
$ |
189,985 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
None | |
|
None | |
First Charter Bank |
|
|
417,979 |
|
|
|
10.47 |
|
|
|
159,732 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
$ |
239,598 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Risk-Based Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Charter Corporation |
|
$ |
489,389 |
|
|
|
12.24 |
% |
|
$ |
319,970 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
% |
|
None | |
|
None | |
First Charter Bank |
|
|
460,393 |
|
|
|
11.53 |
|
|
|
319,464 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
|
|
$ |
399,330 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
% |
|
Tier 1 capital consists of total equity plus qualifying capital securities and minority interests,
less unrealized gains and losses accumulated in other comprehensive income, certain intangible
assets, and
adjustments related to the valuation of servicing assets and certain equity investments in
nonfinancial companies (equity method investments).
The leverage ratio reflects Tier 1 capital divided by average total assets for the period. Average
assets used in the calculation exclude certain intangible and servicing assets.
21
Total risk-based capital is comprised of Tier 1 capital plus qualifying subordinated debt and
allowance for loan losses and a portion of unrealized gains on certain equity securities.
Both the Tier 1 and the total risk-based capital ratios are computed by dividing the respective
capital amounts by risk-weighted assets, as defined.
The Corporation from time to time is required to maintain noninterest bearing reserve balances with
the Federal Reserve Bank. The required reserve was $1.0 million at March 31, 2008.
Under current Federal Reserve regulations, a bank subsidiary is limited in the amount it may loan
to its parent company and nonbank subsidiaries. Loans to a single affiliate may not exceed
10 percent and loans to all affiliates may not exceed 20 percent of the Banks capital stock,
surplus, and undivided profits, plus the allowance for loan losses. Loans from the Bank to nonbank
affiliates, including the parent company, are also required to be collateralized. As of March 31,
2008, the Bank did not have any loans to nonbank affiliates.
The primary source of funds available to the Corporation is the payment of dividends from the Bank.
Dividends paid by a subsidiary bank to its parent company are also subject to certain legal and
regulatory limitations. As of March 31, 2008, the Corporation and the Bank were in compliance with
these limitations.
16. Business Segment Information
The Corporation operates one reportable segment, the Bank, representing the Corporations primary
banking subsidiary. The Bank provides businesses and individuals with commercial, consumer and
mortgage loans, deposit banking services, brokerage services, insurance products, and comprehensive
financial planning solutions. The results of the Banks operations constitute a substantial
majority of the consolidated net income, revenue, and assets of the Corporation. Intercompany
transactions and the Corporations revenue, expenses, assets (including cash, investment
securities, and investments in venture capital limited partnerships) and liabilities (including
commercial paper and subordinated debentures) are included in the Other category.
22
Information regarding the separate results of operations and assets for the Bank and Other follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
(In thousands) |
|
The Bank |
|
Other |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
68,564 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
68,584 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
34,600 |
|
|
|
1,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,833 |
|
|
Net interest income (expense) |
|
|
33,964 |
|
|
|
(1,213 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,751 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
4,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,707 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
19,873 |
|
|
|
545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,418 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
33,545 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,863 |
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense |
|
|
15,585 |
|
|
|
(986 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,599 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
9,402 |
|
|
|
(345 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,057 |
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
6,183 |
|
|
$ |
(641 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,542 |
|
|
Average portfolio loans |
|
$ |
3,491,712 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,491,712 |
|
Average assets |
|
|
4,805,733 |
|
|
|
571,071 |
|
|
|
(561,507 |
) |
|
|
4,815,297 |
|
Total assets, March 31, 2008 |
|
|
4,787,498 |
|
|
|
557,725 |
|
|
|
(549,362 |
) |
|
|
4,795,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
(In thousands) |
|
The Bank |
|
Other |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
77,132 |
|
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
77,214 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
39,222 |
|
|
|
1,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,479 |
|
|
Net interest income (expense) |
|
|
37,910 |
|
|
|
(1,175 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,735 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
1,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,366 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
19,458 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,566 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
35,710 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,920 |
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense |
|
|
20,292 |
|
|
|
(1,277 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,015 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
7,106 |
|
|
|
(447 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,659 |
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
13,186 |
|
|
$ |
(830 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
12,356 |
|
|
Average portfolio loans |
|
$ |
3,510,437 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,510,437 |
|
Average assets |
|
|
4,856,050 |
|
|
|
540,699 |
|
|
|
(525,666 |
) |
|
|
4,871,083 |
|
Total assets, March 31, 2007 |
|
|
4,866,281 |
|
|
|
540,302 |
|
|
|
(522,088 |
) |
|
|
4,884,495 |
|
|
23
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements of the Corporation and the notes thereto.
Factors that May Affect Future Results
The following discussion contains certain forward-looking statements about the Corporations
financial condition and results of operations, which are subject to certain risks and uncertainties
that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking
statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements,
which reflect managements judgment only as of the date hereof. The Corporation undertakes no
obligation to publicly revise these forward-looking statements to reflect events and circumstances
that arise after the date hereof.
Factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-
looking statements, and which may be beyond the Corporations control, include, among others, the
following possibilities: (i) projected results in connection with managements implementation of,
or changes in, the Corporations business plan and strategic initiatives, including the
Corporations balance sheet initiatives; (ii) competitive pressure among financial services
companies increases significantly; (iii) costs or difficulties related to the integration of
acquisitions, including deposit attrition, customer retention and revenue loss, or expenses in
general are greater than expected; (iv) general economic conditions, in the markets in which the
Corporation does business, are less favorable than expected; (v) risks inherent in making loans,
including repayment risks and risks associated with collateral values, are greater than expected;
(vi) changes in the interest rate environment, or interest rate policies of the Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System, may reduce interest margins and affect funding sources;
(vii) changes in market rates and prices may adversely affect the value of financial products;
(viii) legislation or regulatory requirements or changes thereto, including changes in accounting
standards, may adversely affect the businesses in which the Corporation is engaged; (ix) regulatory
compliance cost increases are greater than expected; (x) the passage of future tax legislation, or
any negative regulatory, administrative or judicial position, may adversely impact the Corporation;
(xi) the Corporations competitors may have greater financial resources and may develop products
that enable them to compete more successfully in the markets in which the Corporation operates;
(xii) changes in the securities markets, including changes in interest rates, may adversely affect
the Corporations ability to raise capital from time to time; and (xiii) costs and difficulties
related to the consummation of the proposed merger with Fifth Third may be greater than expected
and the consummation remains subject to the satisfaction of various required conditions that may be
delayed or may not be satisfied at all.
Overview
First Charter Corporation (NASDAQ: FCTR) (hereinafter referred to as First Charter, the
Corporation, or the Registrant), headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina, is a regional
financial services company with assets of $4.8 billion and is the holding company for First Charter
Bank (Bank). As of March 31, 2008, First Charter operated 60 financial centers, four insurance
offices, and 136 ATMs throughout North Carolina and Georgia, and also operated loan origination
offices in Asheville, North Carolina and Reston, Virginia. First Charter provides businesses and
individuals with a broad range of financial services, including banking, financial planning, wealth
management, investments, insurance, and mortgages. The results of operations of the Bank constitute
the substantial majority of the consolidated net income, revenue, and assets of the Corporation.
The Corporations principal source of earnings is derived from net interest income. Net interest
income is the interest earned on securities, loans, and other interest-earning assets less the
interest paid for deposits and short- and long-term debt.
24
Another source of earnings for the Corporation is noninterest income. Noninterest income is
derived largely from service charges on deposit accounts and other fee or commission-based services
and products, including mortgage, wealth management, brokerage, and insurance. Other sources of
noninterest income include securities gains or losses, gains from Small Business Administration
loan sales, transactions involving bank-owned property, and income from Bank Owned Life Insurance
(BOLI) policies.
Noninterest expense is the primary component of expense for the Corporation. Noninterest expense
is primarily composed of corporate operating expenses, including salaries and benefits, occupancy
and equipment, professional fees, and other operating expense. The provisions for loan losses and
income taxes are also considered material expenses.
Proposed Merger with Fifth Third
On August 15, 2007, First Charter and Fifth Third Bancorp entered into an Agreement and Plan of
Merger, as amended by the Amended and Restated Plan of Merger, dated September 14, 2007 by and
among First Charter, Fifth Third, and Fifth Third Financial. Under the terms of the Merger
Agreement, First Charter will be merged with and into Fifth Third Financial. The Merger Agreement
has been approved by the Board of Directors of First Charter, Fifth Third and Fifth Third
Financial. First Charters shareholders approved the Merger Agreement and the Merger has been
approved by all necessary state and federal regulatory agencies. The Merger Agreement is subject
to customary closing conditions. The merger is currently anticipated
to close on Friday, June 6, 2008.
Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, at the effective time of the merger, each common share of First
Charter issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time (other than common shares
held directly or indirectly by First Charter or Fifth Third) will be converted, at the election of
the owner of the common share, into either $31.00 cash or shares of Fifth Third common stock with a
value of $31.00 per share, or both. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, approximately 30
percent of First Charter shares will be converted to cash and approximately 70 percent will be
converted to Fifth Third common stock.
The Merger Agreement contains customary representations and warranties between First Charter and
Fifth Third. The Merger Agreement also contains customary covenants and agreements, including (a)
covenants related to the conduct of First Charters business between the date of the signing of the
Merger Agreement and the closing of the merger, (b) covenants prohibiting solicitation of competing
merger proposals, and (c) agreements regarding efforts of the parties to cause the Merger Agreement
to be completed.
The Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights and provides that, upon or following the
termination of the Merger Agreement, under specified circumstances involving a competing merger
transaction, First Charter may be required to pay Fifth Third a termination fee of $32.5 million.
As previously disclosed, First Charter has been informed by Fifth Third that in February 2008 a
shareholder of Fifth Third filed a derivative suit in the Court of Common Pleas for Hamilton
County, Ohio, against the members of Fifth Thirds board of directors and, nominally, Fifth Third,
alleging breach of fiduciary duty and waste of corporates assets, among other charges, in relation
to the approval of Fifth Thirds acquisition of First Charter. The suit seeks, with respect to the
completion of the acquisition, an injunction to stop the acquisition of First Charter and an
independent valuation of First Charter as to its worth. The suit also seeks unspecified
compensatory damages to be paid to Fifth Third by its directors as well as costs and attorneys fees
to the plaintiff. The suit is in its earliest state and Fifth Third has stated that the impact of
the final disposition cannot be assessed at this time. First Charter and its legal counsel have
carefully reviewed the complaint, are monitoring developments, and intend to take such action as is
appropriate and necessary to protect First Charters interests in the Merger Agreement with Fifth
Third.
25
In connection with the proposed merger with Fifth Third, the Corporation has incurred expenses of
approximately $0.6 million of merger-related costs, principally legal and professional services,
for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
The Community-Banking Model
The Bank operates a community-banking model. The community-banking model is focused on delivering a
broad array of financial products and solutions to our clients with exceptional service and
convenience at a fair price. It emphasizes local market decision-making and management whenever
possible. Management believes this model works well against larger competitors that may have less
flexibility, as well as local competition that may not have the array of products and services nor
the number of convenient locations that the Bank offers and are challenged to provide exceptional
customer service. The Bank competes against four of the largest banks in the country, as well as
other local banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions, and finance companies.
Financial Summary
Net interest income, the difference between total interest income and total interest expense, is
the Corporations principal source of earnings. For the three months ended March 31, 2008, net
interest income was $32.8 million, a decrease of $3.9 million, or 10.8 percent, from net interest
income of $36.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007.
Income tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2008, was $9.1 million, for an effective
tax rate of 62.0 percent, compared with $6.7 million, for an effective tax rate of 35.0 percent in
the first quarter of 2007. The effective tax rate increased for the three months ended March 31,
2008 primarily as a result of the closing agreement with the North Carolina Department of Revenue
(DOR).
The Corporations first quarter 2008 net income was $5.5 million, or $0.16 per diluted share, a
$6.9 million decrease from net income of $12.4 million in first quarter 2007. Return on average
assets and return on average equity was 0.46 percent and 4.70 percent for the three months ended
March 31, 2008, respectively, compared to 1.03 percent and 11.09 percent for the first quarter
2007, respectively.
26
The table below presents the Corporations selected financial data by quarter:
Table One
Selected Financial Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31 |
|
December 31 |
|
September 30 |
|
June 30 |
|
March 31 |
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2007 |
|
2007 |
|
2007 |
|
Income statement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
68,584 |
|
|
$ |
75,660 |
|
|
$ |
78,727 |
|
|
$ |
78,291 |
|
|
$ |
77,214 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
35,833 |
|
|
|
40,284 |
|
|
|
41,496 |
|
|
|
40,747 |
|
|
|
40,479 |
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
32,751 |
|
|
|
35,376 |
|
|
|
37,231 |
|
|
|
37,544 |
|
|
|
36,735 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
4,707 |
|
|
|
6,144 |
|
|
|
3,311 |
|
|
|
9,124 |
|
|
|
1,366 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
20,418 |
|
|
|
20,120 |
|
|
|
18,427 |
|
|
|
20,141 |
|
|
|
19,566 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
33,863 |
|
|
|
35,845 |
|
|
|
35,556 |
|
|
|
35,207 |
|
|
|
35,920 |
|
|
Income before income tax expense |
|
|
14,599 |
|
|
|
13,507 |
|
|
|
16,791 |
|
|
|
13,354 |
|
|
|
19,015 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
9,057 |
|
|
|
4,576 |
|
|
|
5,724 |
|
|
|
4,404 |
|
|
|
6,659 |
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
5,542 |
|
|
$ |
8,931 |
|
|
$ |
11,067 |
|
|
$ |
8,950 |
|
|
$ |
12,356 |
|
|
Per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
0.16 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
0.32 |
|
|
|
0.26 |
|
|
|
0.35 |
|
Average shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
34,739 |
|
|
|
34,562 |
|
|
|
34,423 |
|
|
|
34,698 |
|
|
|
34,770 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
35,121 |
|
|
|
35,053 |
|
|
|
34,796 |
|
|
|
34,987 |
|
|
|
35,086 |
|
Cash dividends declared |
|
$ |
0.195 |
|
|
$ |
0.195 |
|
|
$ |
0.195 |
|
|
$ |
0.195 |
|
|
$ |
0.195 |
|
Period-end book value |
|
|
13.24 |
|
|
|
13.39 |
|
|
|
13.16 |
|
|
|
12.85 |
|
|
|
12.97 |
|
|
Ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average equity |
|
|
4.70 |
% |
|
|
7.67 |
% |
|
|
9.72 |
% |
|
|
7.86 |
% |
|
|
11.09 |
% |
Return on average assets |
|
|
0.46 |
|
|
|
0.74 |
|
|
|
0.91 |
|
|
|
0.74 |
|
|
|
1.03 |
|
Net yield on earning assets |
|
|
3.03 |
|
|
|
3.25 |
|
|
|
3.39 |
|
|
|
3.42 |
|
|
|
3.38 |
|
Average portfolio loans to average deposits |
|
|
108.41 |
|
|
|
108.72 |
|
|
|
109.37 |
|
|
|
109.50 |
|
|
|
107.98 |
|
Average equity to average assets |
|
|
9.85 |
|
|
|
9.59 |
|
|
|
9.33 |
|
|
|
9.37 |
|
|
|
9.28 |
|
Efficiency ratio (1) |
|
|
60.9 |
|
|
|
64.2 |
|
|
|
63.2 |
|
|
|
60.4 |
|
|
|
63.1 |
|
|
Selected period-end balances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio loans, net |
|
$ |
3,432,766 |
|
|
$ |
3,460,593 |
|
|
$ |
3,434,389 |
|
|
$ |
3,509,047 |
|
|
$ |
3,494,015 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
17,544 |
|
|
|
14,145 |
|
|
|
10,362 |
|
|
|
11,471 |
|
|
|
13,691 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
45,022 |
|
|
|
42,414 |
|
|
|
43,017 |
|
|
|
44,790 |
|
|
|
35,854 |
|
Investment in securities (2) |
|
|
873,641 |
|
|
|
909,661 |
|
|
|
907,608 |
|
|
|
898,528 |
|
|
|
897,762 |
|
Assets |
|
|
4,795,861 |
|
|
|
4,862,417 |
|
|
|
4,839,693 |
|
|
|
4,916,721 |
|
|
|
4,884,495 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
3,219,339 |
|
|
|
3,221,619 |
|
|
|
3,208,026 |
|
|
|
3,230,346 |
|
|
|
3,321,366 |
|
Other borrowings |
|
|
1,075,355 |
|
|
|
1,120,141 |
|
|
|
1,113,332 |
|
|
|
1,176,758 |
|
|
|
1,044,229 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
4,332,335 |
|
|
|
4,394,073 |
|
|
|
4,382,205 |
|
|
|
4,470,893 |
|
|
|
4,429,123 |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
463,526 |
|
|
|
468,344 |
|
|
|
457,488 |
|
|
|
445,828 |
|
|
|
455,372 |
|
|
Selected average balances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio loans |
|
$ |
3,491,712 |
|
|
$ |
3,488,598 |
|
|
$ |
3,514,699 |
|
|
$ |
3,532,713 |
|
|
$ |
3,510,437 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
13,373 |
|
|
|
10,028 |
|
|
|
9,345 |
|
|
|
11,127 |
|
|
|
11,431 |
|
Investment in securities (2) |
|
|
905,045 |
|
|
|
901,068 |
|
|
|
914,569 |
|
|
|
914,606 |
|
|
|
926,970 |
|
Earning assets |
|
|
4,419,298 |
|
|
|
4,412,038 |
|
|
|
4,445,923 |
|
|
|
4,467,031 |
|
|
|
4,463,161 |
|
Assets |
|
|
4,815,297 |
|
|
|
4,819,264 |
|
|
|
4,846,399 |
|
|
|
4,874,742 |
|
|
|
4,871,083 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
3,220,862 |
|
|
|
3,208,859 |
|
|
|
3,213,507 |
|
|
|
3,226,308 |
|
|
|
3,251,137 |
|
Other borrowings |
|
|
1,079,188 |
|
|
|
1,103,585 |
|
|
|
1,124,021 |
|
|
|
1,131,599 |
|
|
|
1,113,191 |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
474,114 |
|
|
|
461,972 |
|
|
|
451,946 |
|
|
|
456,634 |
|
|
|
451,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Noninterest expense less debt extinguishment expense, Visa litigation expense, tax settlement and derivative termination costs, divided by the sum of
taxable-equivalent net interest income plus noninterest income less gain (loss) on sale of securities, net. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes available for sale securities and
Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock. |
Critical Accounting Estimates and Policies
The Corporations significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 of the Corporations
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. These policies are essential in
understanding managements discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations. Some of the Corporations accounting policies require significant judgment to estimate
values of either assets or liabilities. In addition, certain accounting principles require
significant judgment with respect to their application to complicated transactions to determine the
most appropriate treatment.
The Corporation has identified four accounting policies as being critical in terms of judgments and
the extent to which estimates are used: allowance for loan losses, income taxes, marketable
securities valuation and identified intangible assets and goodwill. In many cases, there are
numerous alternative judgments that could be used in the process of estimating values of assets or
liabilities. Where alternatives exist, the Corporation has used the factors it believes represent
the most reasonable value in
27
developing the inputs for the valuation. Actual performance that differs from the Corporations
estimates of the key variables could affect net income. A summary of these four accounting
policies follows:
Allowance for Loan Losses
The Corporation considers its policy regarding the allowance for loan losses to be one of its most
critical accounting policies, as it requires some of managements most subjective and complex
judgments. The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level the Corporation believes is
adequate to absorb probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of the date of the
consolidated financial statements. The Corporation has developed appropriate policies and
procedures for assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses that reflect its evaluation
of credit risk considering all information available to it.
The determination of the level of the allowance and, correspondingly, the provision for loan
losses, rests upon various judgments and assumptions, including: (i) general economic conditions,
(ii) loan portfolio composition, (iii) prior loan loss experience, (iv) managements evaluation of
credit risk related to both individual borrowers and pools of loans and (v) observations derived
from the Corporations ongoing internal credit review and examination processes and those of its
regulators. Depending on changes in circumstances, future assessments of credit risk may yield
materially different results, which may require an increase or decrease in the allowance for loan
losses.
The Corporation employs a variety of statistical modeling and estimation tools in developing the
appropriate allowance. The following provides a description of each of the components involved in
the allowance for loan losses, the techniques the Corporation uses, and the estimates and judgments
inherent to each component.
The first component of the allowance for loan losses, the valuation allowance for impaired loans,
is computed based on documented reviews performed by the Corporations Credit Risk Management for
impaired relationships greater than $150,000. Credit Risk Management typically estimates these
valuation allowances by considering the fair value of the underlying collateral for each impaired
loan using current appraisals. The results of these estimates are updated quarterly or periodically
as circumstances change. Changes in the dollar amount of impaired loans or in the estimates of the
fair value of the underlying collateral can impact the valuation allowance on impaired loans and,
therefore, the overall allowance for loan losses.
The second component of the allowance for loan losses, the portion attributable to all other loans
without specific reserve amounts, is determined by applying reserve factors to the outstanding
balance of loans. The portfolio is segmented into two major categories: commercial loans and
consumer loans. Commercial loans are segmented further by risk grade, so that separate reserve
factors are applied to each pool of commercial loans. The reserve factors applied to the commercial
segments are determined using a migration analysis that computes current loss estimates by credit
grade using a 60-month trailing loss history. Since the migration analysis is based on trailing
data, the reserve factors are changed based on actual losses and other judgmentally determined
factors. Changes in commercial loan credit grades can also impact this component of the allowance
for loan losses from period to period. Consumer loans which include mortgage, general consumer,
consumer real estate, home equity and consumer unsecured loans are segmented by homogeneous pools
in order to apply separate reserve factors to each pool of consumer loans. The reserve factors
applied to the consumer segments are a 36-month rolling average of losses. Since the reserve
factors are based on historical loss data, the percentage loss estimates can change
period-to-period based on actual losses.
The third component of the allowance for loan losses is intended to capture the various risk
elements of the loan portfolio which may not be sufficiently captured in the historical loss rates.
These factors include intrinsic risk, operational risk, concentration risk and model risk.
Intrinsic risk relates to the impact of current economic conditions on the Corporations borrower
base, the effects of which may not be realized by the Corporation in the form of charge-offs for
several periods. The Corporation monitors and documents various local, regional and national
economic data, and makes subjective estimates of the
28
impact of changes in economic conditions on the allowance for loan losses. Operational risk
includes factors such as the likelihood of loss on a loan due to procedural error. Historically,
the Corporation has made additional loss estimates for certain types of loans that were either
acquired from other institutions in mergers or were underwritten using policies that are no longer
in effect at the Corporation. These identified loans are considered to have higher risk of loss
than currently reflected in historical loss rates of the Corporation, so additional estimates of
loss are made by management. Concentration risk includes the risk of loss due to extensions of
credit to a particular industry, loan type or borrower that may be troubled. The Corporation
monitors its portfolio for any excessive concentrations of loans during each period, and if any
excessive concentrations are noted, additional estimates of loss are made. Model risk reflects the
inherent uncertainty of estimates within the allowance for loan losses model. Changes in the
allowance for loan losses for these subjective factors can arise from changes in the balance and
types of outstanding loans, as well as changes in the underlying conditions which drive a change in
the percentage used. As more fully discussed below, the Corporation continually monitors the
portfolio in an effort to identify any other factors which may have an impact on loss estimates
within the portfolio.
All estimates of the loan portfolio risk, including the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses,
are subject to general and local economic conditions, among other factors, which are unpredictable
and beyond the Corporations control. Since a significant portion of the loan portfolio is
comprised of real estate loans and loans to area businesses, the Corporation is subject to
continued risk that the real estate market and economic conditions in general could change and
therefore result in additional losses and require increases in the provision for loan losses. If
management had made different assumptions about probable loan losses, the Corporations financial
position and results of operations could have differed materially.
As previously disclosed, the Corporation has recorded a provision for loan losses related to
Penland. The Corporation continues to evaluate the Penland lot loan portfolio.
Income Taxes
Calculating the Corporations income tax expense requires significant judgment and the use of
estimates. The Corporation periodically assesses its tax positions based on current tax
developments, including enacted statutory, judicial and regulatory guidance. In analyzing the
Corporations overall tax position, consideration is given to the amount and timing of recognizing
income tax liabilities and benefits. In applying the tax and accounting guidance to the facts and
circumstances, income tax balances are adjusted appropriately through the income tax provision.
Reserves for income tax uncertainties are determined using a two-step process in accordance with
FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainties in Income Taxes, and requires significant
management judgment. In the first step of the process, the Corporation determines whether it is
more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination based on the technical
merits of the position. If the Corporation determines that a tax position has met the
more-likely-than-not threshold, the Corporation then determines the amount that would be recognized
in its financial statements. In calculating the amount recognized in the financial statements, the
Corporation considers the amounts and probabilities that could be recognized upon ultimate
settlement using the facts, circumstances, and information available at the reporting date.
Marketable Securities Valuation
The Corporation holds fixed income and equity securities and substantially all of these assets are
reflected at fair value on the Corporations consolidated balance sheets. SFAS 157, Fair Value
Measurements, defines fair value and specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether
those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data
obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Corporations market
assumptions. These two types of inputs create the following fair value hierarchy:
29
|
|
|
Level 1 Quoted market prices for identical instruments in active markets. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for
identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived
valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in
active markets. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant
inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable. |
When available, the Corporation uses quoted market prices to determine fair value and classifies
such items within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. If quoted market prices are not available,
fair value is generally determined by using quoted prices for similar instruments or valuations
using observable market inputs. If fair values can not be determined using active market data, a
matrix pricing model is used. The matrix pricing model, which is classified as Level 2 within the
fair value hierarchy, is populated using yield curve and other market data.
The recent credit crisis has caused some markets to be illiquid, thus reducing the availability of
certain market data. As a result, the Corporation has valued its trust preferred
securities using dealer determined prices. Significant inputs to these dealer pricing models are
not readily observable, thus the valuations of these securities are classified as Level 3 within
the fair value hierarchy. When or if the liquidity returns to these markets, the valuations of
these securities will revert to using the related observable market inputs in determining fair
value.
At the end of each reporting period, the Corporation reviews its securities portfolio for
impairment. If a decline in the fair value of a security below its cost or amortized cost is
judged by management to be other-than-temporary, the cost basis of the security is written down to
fair value and the amount of the write down is included in noninterest income.
Identified Intangible Assets and Goodwill
The Corporation records all assets and liabilities acquired in purchase acquisitions, including
goodwill, indefinite-lived intangibles, and other intangibles, at fair value as required by
SFAS 141, Business Combinations. The initial recording of goodwill and other intangibles requires
subjective judgments concerning estimates of the fair value of the acquired assets and liabilities.
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized but are subject to annual tests
for impairment or more often if events or circumstances indicate they may be impaired. Other
identified intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives and are subject to
impairment if events or circumstances indicate a possible inability to realize the carrying amount.
The ongoing value of goodwill is ultimately supported by revenue from the Corporations businesses
and its ability to deliver cost-effective services over future periods. Any decline in revenue
resulting from a lack of growth or the inability to effectively provide services could potentially
create an impairment of goodwill.
Earnings Performance
Net Interest Income and Margin
Net interest income, the difference between total interest income and total interest expense, is
the Corporations principal source of earnings. An analysis of the Corporations net interest
income on a taxable-equivalent basis and average balance sheets for three months ended March 31,
2008 and 2007 is presented in Table Two. Net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis is a
non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) performance measure used by management in
operating the business which management believes provides investors with a more accurate picture of
the interest margin for comparative purposes. The changes in net interest income, on a
taxable-equivalent basis, for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 are analyzed in Table
Three. The discussion below is based on net interest income computed under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
30
For the three months ended March 31, 2008, net interest income was $32.8 million, a decrease of
$3.9 million, or 10.8 percent, from net interest income of $36.7 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2007. The net interest margin (taxable-equivalent net interest income divided by average
earning assets) for the first quarter of 2008 decreased 35 basis points to 3.03 percent compared to
3.38 percent for the first quarter of 2007.
Compared to first quarter 2007, earning-asset yields decreased 76 basis points to 6.29 percent.
Loan yields decreased 105 basis points to 6.57 percent. This decrease is primarily the result of a
reduction in the prime lending rate that followed the Federal Reserve lowering the federal funds
rate by 300 basis points from September 2007 through March 2008. Loan yields were also negatively
impacted by an increase in non accrual loans. The decrease in loan yields was partially offset by
an increase in yields on the securities portfolio. Securities yields increased 28 basis points to
5.23 percent as maturities from lower yielding securities were reinvested in similar duration
securities at higher yields. In addition, the percentage of investment security average balances
(which, on average, have lower yields than loans) to total earning asset average balances fell from
20.8 percent to 20.4 percent over the past year. Earning-asset average balances decreased to $4.4
billion at March 31, 2008, compared to $4.5 billion at March 31, 2007.
On the liability side of the balance sheet, the cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreased 48
basis points, compared to March 31, 2007. This decrease was comprised of a 28 basis point decrease
in interest-bearing deposit costs to 3.55 percent, while other borrowing costs decreased 95 basis
points to 4.13 percent. While the Federal Reserve lowered the federal funds rate by 300 basis
points from September 2007 through March 2008, the decline in rates on interest bearing liabilities
trailed loan yields due to the short term fixed rate nature of CDs and external market liquidity
concerns which kept deposit rates comparatively high.
31
Net interest income and yields on earning-asset average balances and interest expense and rates
paid on interest-bearing liability average balances, and the net interest margin follow:
Table Two
Average Balances and Net Interest Income Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31 |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
Daily |
|
Interest |
|
Average |
|
Daily |
|
Interest |
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
Income/ |
|
Yield/Rate |
|
Average |
|
Income/ |
|
Yield/Rate |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Balance |
|
Expense |
|
Paid (6) |
|
Balance |
|
Expense |
|
Paid (6) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and loans held for sale (1) (2) (3) (4) |
|
$ |
3,505,085 |
|
|
$ |
57,298 |
|
|
|
6.57 |
% |
|
$ |
3,521,868 |
|
|
$ |
66,239 |
|
|
|
7.62 |
% |
Investment securities taxable (4) (5) |
|
|
811,973 |
|
|
|
10,631 |
|
|
|
5.27 |
|
|
|
826,337 |
|
|
|
9,949 |
|
|
|
4.83 |
|
Investment securities tax-exempt |
|
|
91,610 |
|
|
|
1,174 |
|
|
|
5.13 |
|
|
|
100,633 |
|
|
|
1,491 |
|
|
|
5.92 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
7,056 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
3.19 |
|
|
|
9,073 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
5.70 |
|
Interest-bearing bank deposits |
|
|
3,574 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
2.93 |
|
|
|
5,250 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
3.90 |
|
|
Total earning assets |
|
|
4,419,298 |
|
|
$ |
69,184 |
|
|
|
6.29 |
% |
|
|
4,463,161 |
|
|
$ |
77,857 |
|
|
|
7.05 |
% |
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
70,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
325,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
328,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,815,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,871,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits |
|
$ |
477,360 |
|
|
$ |
1,468 |
|
|
|
1.24 |
% |
|
$ |
399,557 |
|
|
$ |
1,058 |
|
|
|
1.07 |
% |
Money market accounts |
|
|
541,779 |
|
|
|
3,456 |
|
|
|
2.57 |
|
|
|
642,383 |
|
|
|
5,551 |
|
|
|
3.50 |
|
Savings deposits |
|
|
101,894 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
0.21 |
|
|
|
112,988 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
1,679,341 |
|
|
|
19,774 |
|
|
|
4.74 |
|
|
|
1,649,408 |
|
|
|
19,865 |
|
|
|
4.88 |
|
Retail other borrowings |
|
|
76,270 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
2.64 |
|
|
|
92,090 |
|
|
|
662 |
|
|
|
2.92 |
|
Wholesale other borrowings |
|
|
1,002,918 |
|
|
|
10,582 |
|
|
|
4.24 |
|
|
|
1,021,101 |
|
|
|
13,276 |
|
|
|
5.27 |
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
3,879,562 |
|
|
|
35,833 |
|
|
|
3.71 |
% |
|
|
3,917,527 |
|
|
|
40,479 |
|
|
|
4.19 |
% |
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
|
|
420,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
446,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
41,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
474,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
451,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
shareholders equity |
|
$ |
4,815,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,871,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.58 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.86 |
% |
Contribution of noninterest bearing sources |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.52 |
|
|
Net interest income/
yield on earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
33,351 |
|
|
|
3.03 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
37,378 |
|
|
|
3.38 |
% |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The preceding analysis takes into consideration the principal amount of nonaccruing loans and only income actually collected and
recognized on such loans. |
|
(2) |
|
Average loan balances are shown net of unearned income. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes amortization of deferred loan fees of $960, and $829 for the three months ended March 2008 and 2007, respectively. |
|
(4) |
|
Yields on tax-exempt securities and loans are stated on a taxable-equivalent basis, assuming a Federal tax rate of 35 percent and
applicable state taxes for 2008 and 2007. The adjustments made to convert to a taxable-equivalent basis were $600 and $643 for the three
months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. |
|
(5) |
|
Includes available for sale securities and Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock. |
|
(6) |
|
Annualized. |
The following table shows changes in tax-equivalent interest income, interest expense, and
tax-equivalent net interest income arising from volume and rate changes for major categories of
earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The change in interest not solely due to changes
in volume or rate has been allocated in proportion to the absolute dollar amounts of the change in
each.
32
Table Three
Volume and Rate Variance Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31 |
|
|
2008 vs 2007 |
|
|
Due to Change in |
|
Net |
(In thousands) |
|
Volume |
|
Rate |
|
Change |
|
Increase (decrease) in tax-equivalent
interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and loans held for sale (1) |
|
$ |
(297 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,644 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,941 |
) |
Investment securities taxable (1) (2) |
|
|
(181 |
) |
|
|
863 |
|
|
|
682 |
|
Investment securities tax-exempt |
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
(317 |
) |
Federal funds sold |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
(73 |
) |
Interest-bearing bank deposits |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
(643 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,030 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,673 |
) |
|
Increase (decrease) in interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand |
|
$ |
227 |
|
|
$ |
183 |
|
|
$ |
410 |
|
Money market |
|
|
(769 |
) |
|
|
(1,326 |
) |
|
|
(2,095 |
) |
Savings |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
(504 |
) |
|
|
(91 |
) |
Retail other borrowings |
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
(162 |
) |
Wholesale other borrowings |
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
(2,471 |
) |
|
|
(2,694 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
(463 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,183 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,646 |
) |
|
Increase
in tax-equivalent net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(4,027 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Income on tax-exempt securities and loans are stated on a taxable-equivalent
basis. Refer to Table Two for further details. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes available for sale securities and Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal
Reserve Bank stock. |
Noninterest Income
The major components of noninterest income are derived from service charges on deposit accounts,
ATM, debit and merchant fees, and mortgage, brokerage, insurance, and wealth management revenue. In
addition, the Corporation realizes gains and losses on securities, equity investments, Small
Business Administration (SBA) loan sales, bank-owned property sales, and income from its BOLI
policies.
33
Details of noninterest income follow:
Table Four
Noninterest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
Increase / (Decrease) |
(In thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
Service charges on deposits |
|
$ |
7,365 |
|
|
$ |
7,390 |
|
|
$ |
(25 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
)% |
ATM, debit, and merchant fees |
|
|
2,631 |
|
|
|
2,444 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
Wealth management |
|
|
779 |
|
|
|
716 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
Equity method investment gains, net |
|
|
627 |
|
|
|
1,127 |
|
|
|
(500 |
) |
|
|
(44.4 |
) |
Mortgage services |
|
|
1,012 |
|
|
|
901 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
Gain on sale of Small Business Administration loans |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
(279 |
) |
|
|
(74.0 |
) |
Brokerage services |
|
|
733 |
|
|
|
1,081 |
|
|
|
(348 |
) |
|
|
(32.2 |
) |
Insurance services |
|
|
4,150 |
|
|
|
3,634 |
|
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
Bank owned life insurance |
|
|
1,165 |
|
|
|
1,139 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
Property sale gains, net |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(6.3 |
) |
Securities gains (losses), net |
|
|
1,229 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
1,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
705 |
|
|
|
(135 |
) |
|
|
(19.1 |
) |
|
Total noninterest income |
|
$ |
20,418 |
|
|
$ |
19,566 |
|
|
$ |
852 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
Selected items included in noninterest income follow:
Table Five
Selected Items Included in Noninterest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31 |
(In thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Equity method investment gains, net |
|
$ |
627 |
|
|
$ |
1,127 |
|
Securities gains (losses), net |
|
|
1,229 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
Noninterest income for the three months ended March 31, 2008 was $20.4 million, an increase of $0.8
million, or 4.4 percent, from $19.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007.
The largest increase in noninterest income for the three months ended March 31, 2008 was from the
gain recognized related to the redemption of Visa Inc. (Visa) common stock. In March 2008, the
Corporation received 51,457 Visa Class B common shares in connection with Visas initial public
offering (IPO), of which 19,894 shares were redeemed as part of Visas mandatory redemption of
its Class B stock. The Corporation recognized a gain of $0.9 million related to this redemption.
The Corporation did not recognize any gain on the remaining 31,563 unredeemed Visa Class B common
shares.
Other factors for the increase in noninterest income included were:
|
|
|
Insurance service revenue increased $0.5 million due to greater contingency revenue
recognized in the first quarter of 2008 compared with the first quarter of 2007. |
|
|
|
|
ATM, debit and merchant card services revenue was $0.2 million higher, reflecting
increased transactions. |
34
These increases were partially offset by the following items:
|
|
|
Equity method investment gains were $0.5 million lower for the three months ended March
31, 2008 as compared with the same period of 2007. The returns on the equity method
investments vary from period to period and income is recorded when earned. |
|
|
|
|
Brokerage revenue decreased $0.3 million
from first quarter 2007 due to fewer brokers compared to prior year, in addition the
recent uncertainty in the U.S. equity markets resulted in lower transaction volume. |
|
|
|
|
Gains on SBA loan sales were $0.3 million lower for the three months ended March 31,
2008 compared to the same period in 2007 due to lower production and decreased spreads. |
Noninterest Expense
Details of noninterest expense follow:
Table Six
Noninterest Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
Increase / (Decrease) |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
$ |
18,498 |
|
|
$ |
19,587 |
|
|
$ |
(1,089 |
) |
|
|
(5.6 |
)% |
Occupancy and equipment |
|
|
4,725 |
|
|
|
4,612 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
Data processing |
|
|
1,515 |
|
|
|
1,790 |
|
|
|
(275 |
) |
|
|
(15.4 |
) |
Marketing |
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
1,351 |
|
|
|
(897 |
) |
|
|
(66.4 |
) |
Postage and supplies |
|
|
1,096 |
|
|
|
1,172 |
|
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
(6.5 |
) |
Legal and professional services |
|
|
2,700 |
|
|
|
3,586 |
|
|
|
(886 |
) |
|
|
(24.7 |
) |
Telecommunications |
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(6.9 |
) |
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
(28.7 |
) |
Foreclosed properties |
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
(281 |
) |
|
|
(183.7 |
) |
Other |
|
|
4,219 |
|
|
|
2,775 |
|
|
|
1,444 |
|
|
|
52.0 |
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
$ |
33,863 |
|
|
$ |
35,920 |
|
|
$ |
(2,057 |
) |
|
|
(5.7 |
)% |
|
Full-time equivalent employees |
|
|
1,035 |
|
|
|
1,105 |
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
(6.3 |
)% |
|
Efficiency ratio (1) |
|
|
60.9 |
% |
|
|
63.1 |
% |
|
|
(2.2 |
)% |
|
|
(3.5 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Noninterest expense, less Visa litigation and tax settlements, divided by the sum of taxable-equivalent net interest
income plus noninterest income less securities gains (losses), net. |
Selected items included in noninterest expense follow:
Table Seven
Selected Items Included in Noninterest Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31 |
(In thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Separation agreements |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
58 |
|
Merger-related costs |
|
|
607 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
Visa litigation costs |
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax settlement costs |
|
|
1,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense for the first quarter of 2008 was $33.9 million, a $2.0 million, or 5.7 percent
decrease from $35.9 million for the first quarter of 2007.
During October 2007, Visa completed a restructuring and issued shares of Visa common stock to its
financial institution members in contemplation of its IPO which occurred in March 2008. After the
35
restructuring, member financial institutions became guarantors of certain Visas litigation
liabilities based on the members proportionate share of the membership base. On November 7, 2007,
Visa announced that it had reached a settlement in the amount of $2.065 billion to resolve certain
restraint of trade litigation brought by American Express. The Corporation recognized a litigation
liability of $0.6 million related to the American Express settlement and the remaining unsettled
Discover, Interchange and Attridge litigation. Of this $0.6 million, $0.3 million is the
Corporations proportionate share of the American Express Settlement and $0.3 million is the
Corporations estimate of the fair value of the potential losses related to the remaining unsettled
litigation. Charges related to these litigation matters is included in Legal and professional
services on the Corporations consolidated statements of income.
Additionally, Visa funded an escrow account with a portion of the proceeds from the IPO. The
escrow account will be used to pay settlements of Visas restraint of trade litigation. The
Corporations proportionate share of this escrow account was $0.4 million and the Corporation
recognized the benefit from the escrow account as a partial recapture of expenses incurred to
establish the Visa litigation reserve liability.
For the
three months ended March 31, 2008, other noninterest expense
increased $1.4 million. Other noninterest expense includes $1.6 million of expenses related to the payment of franchise taxes resulting from
the North Carolina tax settlement.
The above increases were offset by the following decreases in expenses:
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits expense for the three months ended March 31, 2008 was
$18.5 million, a $1.1 million decrease compared to the same period of 2007. The decrease in
salaries and benefits expense was primarily due to a lower number of full-time equivalent
employees. |
|
|
|
|
Legal and professional services expense decreased $0.9 million compared to the same
period of 2007. The first quarter of 2007 included the additional costs related to the
delayed filing of the Corporations 2006 Form 10-K. The results for the three months ended
March 31, 2008 included $0.6 million of legal costs related to the pending Fifth Third
merger, compared to $0.2 million of legal costs related to the Gwinnett Banking Company
(GBC) merger for the same period in 2007. As discussed above, legal and professional
services include $0.2 million of net legal expense related to the establishment of the Visa
reserves in 2008. |
|
|
|
|
Data processing expense decreased $0.3 million as a result of improved vendor pricing. |
|
|
|
|
Marketing expense decreased $0.9 million due to decreased spending in the first quarter
of 2008. |
The efficiency ratio, equal to noninterest expense as a percentage of tax-equivalent net interest
income and total noninterest income, was 60.9 percent for the three months ended March 31, 2008,
compared to 63.1 percent for the three months ended March 31, 2007. The calculation of the
efficiency ratio excludes the impact of Visa transactions, North Carolina tax settlement expense
and securities gains (losses).
Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2008, was $9.1 million, for an effective
tax rate of 62.0 percent, compared with $6.7 million, for an effective tax rate of 35.0 percent in
the first quarter of 2007. The effective tax rate increased for the three months ended March 31,
2008 primarily as a result of the closing agreement with the DOR. This closing agreement is discussed below and in Note 11 of the consolidated financial
statements.
The Corporation, through its subsidiaries, participates in two entities classified as captive REITs
from which the Corporation has historically received dividends eligible for certain tax benefits
within the Corporations tax returns and consolidated financial statements. These entities were
the primary focus of the examination of the Corporation by the DOR for tax years 1999 through and
including 2005. On March 31, 2008,
36
the Corporation entered into a closing agreement with the DOR
for tax years 1999 through 2006. The Corporation remains subject to examination by the DOR for tax
years 2007 forward.
The Corporation effectively settled the Internal Revenue Service examination of the 2004 and 2005
tax years during the quarter ended March 31, 2008. The Corporations tax years 2006 forward
continue to be subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service. For additional information
regarding these examinations refer to Note 11 of the consolidated financial statements.
A
reconciliation for the three months ending March 3, 2008 of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
Table Eight
Unrecognized Tax Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
10,833 |
|
Expiration of statute |
|
|
(731 |
) |
Addition for tax positions of prior periods |
|
|
|
|
Reductions for tax positions of prior periods |
|
|
(4,981 |
) |
|
Balance, March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
5,121 |
|
|
Balance Sheet Analysis
Securities Available for Sale
The securities portfolio, all of which is classified as available-for-sale, is a component of the
Corporations Asset Liability Management (ALM) strategy. The decision to purchase or sell
securities is based upon liquidity needs, changes in interest rates, changes in the Banks risk
tolerance, the composition of the rest of the balance sheet, and other factors. Securities
available-for-sale are accounted for at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses recorded net
of tax as a component of other comprehensive income in shareholders equity, unless the unrealized
losses are considered other-than-temporary.
The fair value of the securities portfolio is determined by various third-party sources. The
valuation is determined as of a date within close proximity to the end of the reporting period
based on available quoted market prices, quoted market prices for similar securities, or valuation
models.
At March 31, 2008, securities available for sale were $821.5 million, compared to $860.7 million at
December 31, 2007. Pretax unrealized net losses on securities available for sale were $9.5 million
at March 31, 2008, compared to pretax unrealized net losses of $2.4 million at December 31, 2007.
The increase in unrealized losses resulted primarily from an increase
in credit spreads
among the various types of bond investments, market illiquidity and recession fears.
During the first quarter of 2008, proceeds from the maturities, paydowns, and calls of $115.1
million of securities were used to purchase $82.8 million of securities, principally
mortgage-backed and U.S. government agency securities.
In March 2008, the Corporation received 51,457 Class B common shares in connection with the Visa
IPO, of which 19,894 shares were redeemed as part of Visas mandatory redemption of its Class B
stock. The Corporation recognized a gain of approximately $0.9 million related to this redemption.
The Corporation did not recognize any gain on the remaining 31,563 unredeemed Visa Class B common
shares and the unconverted Visa Class B common shares are not reflected on the Corporations
consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2008 as the Corporation has no historical basis in these
shares.
37
The following table shows the carrying value of (i) U.S. government agency obligations,
(ii) mortgage-backed securities, (iii) state, county, and municipal obligations, (iv) asset-backed
securities, and (v) equity securities.
Table Nine
Investment Portfolio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
December 31 |
(In thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
U.S. government agency obligations |
|
$ |
97,812 |
|
|
$ |
146,554 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
580,241 |
|
|
|
565,434 |
|
State, county, and municipal obligations |
|
|
91,981 |
|
|
|
92,938 |
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
50,048 |
|
|
|
54,229 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
1,436 |
|
|
|
1,516 |
|
|
Total Securities Available for Sale |
|
$ |
821,518 |
|
|
$ |
860,671 |
|
|
The following is a summary of the credit ratings of the Corporations mortgage-backed securities as
of March 31, 2008:
Table Ten
Mortgage-backed Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
AAA+ to |
|
AA or |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
AAA- |
|
below |
|
Government agency mortgages |
|
$ |
437,040 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
Prime mortgages |
|
|
92,339 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Alt-A mortgages |
|
|
54,418 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Subprime mortgages |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Mortgage Backed Securities |
|
$ |
583,797 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
The following is a summary of
the Corporations state, county and municipal bond credit ratings,
considering the effects with and without bond insurance as of March 31, 2008:
Table Eleven
Municipal Bond Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With Bond |
|
Without Bond |
(In thousands) |
|
Insurance |
|
Insurance |
|
AAA |
|
$ |
56,510 |
|
|
|
62.1 |
% |
|
$ |
37,451 |
|
|
|
41.2 |
% |
AA |
|
|
11,977 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
18,899 |
|
|
|
20.8 |
|
A |
|
|
20,435 |
|
|
|
22.5 |
|
|
|
28,104 |
|
|
|
30.9 |
|
BBB |
|
|
1,715 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
2,834 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
Below |
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
3,671 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
Total Municipal Bond Obligations |
|
$ |
90,959 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
90,959 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
Industry exposure of the Corporations asset-backed securities is comprised of 63.9 percent bank,
35.0 percent insurance, and 1.1 percent REIT trust preferred securities. The following is a
summary of the components and credit ratings of the Corporations asset-backed securities as of
March 31, 2008:
38
Table Twelve
Asset-backed Securities Ratings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
A |
|
BBB |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Rated |
|
Rated |
|
Bank only trust preferred securities |
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Insurance only trust preferred securities |
|
|
10,002 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
REIT only trust preferred securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank and insurance trust preferred securities |
|
|
23,744 |
|
|
|
42.1 |
|
|
|
57.9 |
|
Bank, insurance and REIT trust preferred securities |
|
|
18,915 |
|
|
|
52.9 |
|
|
|
47.1 |
|
|
Total Asset Backed Securities |
|
$ |
57,661 |
|
|
|
52.0 |
% |
|
|
48.0 |
% |
|
Loan Portfolio
The Corporations loan portfolio at March 31, 2008, consisted of six major categories: Commercial
Real Estate, Commercial Non Real Estate, Construction, Mortgage, Consumer, and Home Equity.
Pricing is driven by quality, loan size, loan tenor, prepayment risk, the Corporations
relationship with the customer, competition, and other factors. The Corporation is primarily a
secured lender in all of these loan categories. The terms of the Corporations loans are generally
five years or less with the exception of home equity lines and residential mortgages, for which the
terms can range out to 30 years. In addition, the Corporation has a program in which it buys and
sells portions of loans (primarily originated in the Southeastern region of the United States),
both participations and syndications, from key strategic partner financial institutions with which
the Corporation has established relationships. This strategic partners portfolio includes
commercial real estate, commercial non real estate, and construction loans. This program enables
the Corporation to diversify both its geographic risk and its total exposure risk. From time to
time, the Corporation also sources commercial real estate, commercial non real estate,
construction, and consumer loans through correspondent relationships. As of March 31, 2008, the
Corporations total loan portfolio included $232.3 million of loans originated through the
strategic partners program and correspondent relationships.
A summary of the loan portfolio follows:
Table Thirteen
Loan Portfolio Composition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
Percent of |
|
December 31 |
|
Percent of |
(In thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
Total Loans |
|
2007 |
|
Total Loans |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
$ |
1,058,197 |
|
|
|
30.4 |
% |
|
$ |
1,073,983 |
|
|
|
30.7 |
% |
Commercial non real estate |
|
|
299,555 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
308,792 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
Construction |
|
|
861,967 |
|
|
|
24.8 |
|
|
|
871,579 |
|
|
|
24.9 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
587,240 |
|
|
|
16.9 |
|
|
|
582,398 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
430,781 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
413,873 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
240,048 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
252,382 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
Total portfolio loans |
|
|
3,477,788 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
3,503,007 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(45,022 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42,414 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio loans, net |
|
$ |
3,432,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,460,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
Deposits
A summary of deposits follows:
Table Fourteen
Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
December 31 |
(In thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Noninterest bearing demand |
|
$ |
446,623 |
|
|
$ |
438,313 |
|
Interest bearing demand |
|
|
510,604 |
|
|
|
478,186 |
|
Money market accounts |
|
|
532,864 |
|
|
|
564,053 |
|
Savings deposits |
|
|
104,615 |
|
|
|
101,234 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
1,346,172 |
|
|
|
1,313,482 |
|
Brokered certificates of deposit |
|
|
278,461 |
|
|
|
326,351 |
|
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
3,219,339 |
|
|
$ |
3,221,619 |
|
|
Deposits totaled $3.2 billion at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007. Compared to March 31, 2007,
deposits decreased $102.0 million from $3.3 billion, primarily as a result of a decline in money
market balances and brokered certificates of deposits, partially offset by an increase in interest
bearing demand accounts, certificates of deposit, and savings deposits.
For first quarter 2008, average core deposit balances (demand, money market and savings) decreased
$67.5 million, or 4.2 percent, from the fourth quarter 2007. Growth in interest bearing checking of
$37.0 million, or 8.4 percent was offset with a seasonal decline in noninterest bearing demand of
$32.5 million, or 7.2 percent, driven by businesses holding fewer balances in these accounts.
Average money market balances fell $70.5 million, or 11.5 percent, as customer preferences
continued to migrate to certificates of deposits from money market deposits. This change in
customer preferences is associated with the continued decline in interest rates during the first
quarter of 2008. Average certificates of deposit increased $131.8 million, or 10.7 percent while
average brokered certificates of deposits decreased $52.3 million, or 14.1 percent. Brokered
certificates of deposits were lower due to unfavorable pricing of these deposits relative to other
available funding sources.
Other Borrowings
Other borrowings consist of federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreement to repurchase,
commercial paper, and other short- and long-term borrowings. Federal funds purchased represent
unsecured overnight borrowings from other financial institutions by the Bank. At March 31, 2008,
the Bank had federal funds back-up lines of credit totaling $648.0 million with $168.0 million
outstanding, compared to similar lines of credit totaling $648.0 million with $233.0 million
outstanding at December 31, 2007.
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase represent short-term borrowings by the banking
subsidiaries with maturities less than one year collateralized by a portion of the Corporations
United States government or agency securities. Securities with an aggregate carrying value of
$114.1 million and $124.8 million at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, were
pledged to secure
securities sold under agreements to repurchase. These borrowings are an important source of funding
to the Corporation. Access to alternative short-term funding sources allows the Corporation to meet
funding needs without relying on increasing deposits on a short-term basis.
40
First Charter Corporation issues commercial paper as another source of short-term funding. It is
purchased primarily by the Banks commercial deposit clients. Commercial paper outstanding at March
31, 2008 was $28.8 million, compared to $64.2 million at December 31, 2007.
Other short-term borrowings consist of the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) borrowings with an
original maturity of one year or less. FHLB borrowings are collateralized by securities from the
Corporations investment portfolio and a blanket lien on certain qualifying commercial and
single-family loans held in the Corporations loan portfolio. In addition, the Bank had $220.0
million of short-term FHLB borrowings at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007. The Corporation, in
its overall management of interest-rate risk, is opportunistic in evaluating alternative funding
sources. While balancing the funding needs of the Corporation, management considers the duration
of available maturities, the relative attractiveness of funding costs, and the diversification of
funding sources, among other factors, in order to maintain flexibility in the nature of deposits
and borrowings the Corporation holds at any given time.
Long-term borrowings represent FHLB borrowings with original maturities greater than one year and
subordinated debentures related to trust preferred securities. At March 31, 2008, the Bank had
$555.8 million of long-term FHLB borrowings, compared to $505.8 million at December 31, 2007. In
addition, the Corporation had $61.9 million of subordinated debentures at March 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2007.
The Corporation formed First Charter Capital Trust I and First Charter Capital Trust II, in June
2005 and September 2005, respectively; both are wholly-owned business trusts. First Charter Capital
Trust I and First Charter Capital Trust II issued $35.0 million and $25.0 million, respectively, of
trust preferred securities that were sold to third parties. The proceeds of the sale of the trust
preferred securities were used to purchase subordinated debentures from the Corporation, which are
presented as long-term borrowings in the consolidated balance sheets and qualify for inclusion in
Tier 1 Capital for regulatory capital purposes, subject to certain limitations.
Credit Risk Management
The Corporations credit risk policy and procedures are centralized for every loan type. In
addition, all mortgage, consumer, and home equity loans are centrally decisioned. All loans
generally flow through an independent closing unit to ensure proper documentation. Loans originated
by the Corporations Atlanta-based lenders are currently being prepared and closed independently
from the Corporations centralized credit structure. Finally, all known collection or problem loans
are centrally managed by experienced workout personnel. To monitor the effectiveness of policies
and procedures, management maintains a set of asset quality standards for past due, nonaccrual, and
watchlist loans and monitors the trends of these standards over time. These standards are approved
by the Board of Directors and reviewed quarterly with the Board of Directors for compliance.
Loan Administration and Underwriting
The Banks Chief Risk Officer is responsible for the continuous assessment of the Banks risk
profile as well as making any necessary adjustments to policies and procedures. Commercial loan
relationships of less than $750,000 may be approved by experienced commercial loan officers, within
their loan authority. Commercial and commercial real estate loans are approved by signature
authority requiring at least two experienced officers for relationships greater than $750,000. The
exceptions to this include City Executives and certain Senior Loan Officers who are authorized to
approve relationships up to $1.0 million. An independent Risk Manager is involved in the approval
of commercial and commercial real estate relationships that exceed $1.0 million. All relationships
greater than $2.0 million receive a comprehensive annual review by either the senior credit
analysts or lending officers of the Bank, which is then reviewed by the independent Risk Managers
and/or the final approval officer with the appropriate signature authority. Relationships totaling
$5.0 million or more are further reviewed by senior lending officers of the Bank, the Chief Risk
Officer, and the Credit Risk Management Committee comprised of certain executive and senior
41
management. In addition, relationships totaling $10.0 million or more are reviewed by the Board of
Directors Credit and Compliance Committee. These oversight committees
provide policy, process, product and specific relationship direction to the lending personnel. As
March 31, 2008, the Corporation had a legal lending limit of $70.5 million and a general
target-lending limit of $10.0 million per relationship.
The Corporations loan portfolio consists of loans made for a variety of commercial and consumer
purposes. Because commercial loans are made based to a great extent on the Corporations assessment
of a borrowers income, cash flow, character and ability to repay, such loans are viewed as
involving a higher degree of credit risk than is the case with residential mortgage loans or
consumer loans. To manage this risk, the Corporations commercial loan portfolio is managed under a
defined process which includes underwriting standards and risk assessment, procedures for loan
approvals, loan grading, ongoing identification and management of credit deterioration and
portfolio reviews to assess loss exposure and to ascertain compliance with the Corporations credit
policies and procedures.
The Corporation utilizes a consumer loan platform for servicing of its customers by providing loan
officers with tools and real-time access to credit bureau information at the time of loan
application. This platform also delivers reporting capabilities and credit risk management by
having the Corporations policies embedded into the decision process while also managing approval
authority limits for credit exposure and reporting.
In general, consumer loans (including mortgage and home equity) have a lower risk profile than
commercial loans. Commercial loans (including commercial real estate, commercial non real estate
and construction loans) are generally larger in size and more complex than consumer loans.
Commercial real estate loans are deemed less risky than commercial non real estate and construction
loans, because the collateral value of real estate generally maintains its value better than non
real estate or construction collateral. Consumer loans, which are smaller in size and more
geographically diverse across the Corporations entire primary market area, provide risk diversity
across the portfolio. Because mortgage loans are secured by first liens on the consumers
residential real estate, they are the Corporations lowest risk profile loan type. Home equity
loans are deemed less risky than unsecured consumer loans, as home equity loans and lines are
secured by first or second deeds of trust on the borrowers residential real estate. A centralized
decision-making process is in place to control the risk of the consumer, home equity, and mortgage
loan portfolio. The consumer real estate appraisal process is also centralized relative to
appraisal engagement, appraisal review, and appraiser quality assessment. These processes are
detailed in the underwriting guidelines, which cover each retail loan product type from
underwriting, servicing, compliance issues and closing procedures.
At March 31, 2008, the substantial majority of the total loan portfolio, including the commercial
and real estate portfolio, represented loans to borrowers within the Charlotte and Raleigh, North
Carolina and Atlanta, Georgia metropolitan regions. The diverse economic base of these regions
tends to provide a stable lending environment; however, an economic downturn in the Charlotte
region, the Corporations primary market area, could adversely affect its business.
Additionally, the Corporations loan portfolio consists of certain non-traditional loan products.
Some of these products include interest-only loans, loans with initial interest rates that are
below the market interest rate for the initial period of the loan-term and may increase when that
period ends, and loans with a high loan-to-value ratio. Based on the Corporations assessment,
these products do not give rise to a concentration of credit risk.
As disclosed in the Corporations 2007 Form 10-K, certain of the Corporations construction and
real estate loans were originated through HomeBanc Corporation (HomeBanc). HomeBanc serviced the
loans it originated on behalf of First Charter. On August 1, 2007, HomeBanc declared bankruptcy
and, as a result, First Charter began servicing its loans that had been originated through
HomeBanc. As of March 31, 2008, the Corporations balance of HomeBanc originated loans was $64.1
million. As of March 31, 2008, seven loans, approximating $2.9 million, were in dispute as a
result of the HomeBanc bankruptcy.
42
Based on the advice of counsel, the Corporation expects to be
successful in resolving its dispute with HomeBanc and a secured lender to HomeBanc.
Derivatives
The Corporation enters into interest rate swap agreements or other derivative transactions as
business conditions warrant. As of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Corporation had no
interest rate swap agreements or other derivative transactions outstanding.
Nonperforming Assets
Nonperforming assets are comprised of nonaccrual loans and other real estate owned (OREO). The
nonaccrual status is determined after a loan is 90 days past due or when deemed not collectible in
full as to principal or interest, unless in managements opinion collection of both principal and
interest is assured by way of collateralization, guarantees, or other security and the loan is in
the process of collection. OREO represents real estate acquired through foreclosure or deed in lieu
thereof and is generally carried at the lower of cost or fair value, less estimated costs to sell.
In managements opinion, for any loan greater than 90 days past due, collection of all principal
and interest is not probable. As such, these loans greater than 90 days past due are placed on
nonaccrual status. Loans are returned to accrual status when management determines, based on an
evaluation of the underlying collateral together with the borrowers payment record and financial
condition, that the borrower has the ability and intent to meet the contractual obligations of the
loan agreement. As of March 31, 2008, no loans were 90 days or more past due and still accruing
interest.
A summary of nonperforming assets follows:
Table Fifteen
Nonperforming Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
December 31 |
|
September 30 |
|
June 30 |
|
March 31 |
(In thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2007 |
|
2007 |
|
2007 |
|
Nonaccrual loans |
|
$ |
62,058 |
|
|
$ |
28,695 |
|
|
$ |
22,712 |
|
|
$ |
17,387 |
|
|
$ |
10,943 |
|
Loans 90 days or more past due accruing interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming loans |
|
|
62,058 |
|
|
|
28,695 |
|
|
|
22,712 |
|
|
|
17,387 |
|
|
|
10,943 |
|
Other real estate |
|
|
9,481 |
|
|
|
10,056 |
|
|
|
9,134 |
|
|
|
2,726 |
|
|
|
6,330 |
|
|
Nonperforming assets |
|
$ |
71,539 |
|
|
$ |
38,751 |
|
|
$ |
31,846 |
|
|
$ |
20,113 |
|
|
$ |
17,273 |
|
|
Nonaccrual loans as a percentage of total portfolio loans |
|
|
1.78 |
% |
|
|
0.82 |
% |
|
|
0.65 |
% |
|
|
0.49 |
% |
|
|
0.31 |
% |
Nonperforming assets as a percentage of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
1.49 |
|
|
|
0.80 |
|
|
|
0.66 |
|
|
|
0.41 |
|
|
|
0.35 |
|
Total portfolio loans and other real estate owned |
|
|
2.05 |
|
|
|
1.10 |
|
|
|
0.91 |
|
|
|
0.57 |
|
|
|
0.49 |
|
Net charge-offs to average portfolio loans |
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
0.36 |
|
|
|
0.57 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
Allowance for loan losses to portfolio loans |
|
|
1.29 |
|
|
|
1.21 |
|
|
|
1.24 |
|
|
|
1.26 |
|
|
|
1.02 |
|
Allowance for loan losses to net charge-offs |
|
|
5.33 |
x |
|
|
3.39 |
x |
|
|
2.13 |
x |
|
|
59.40 |
x |
|
|
18.50 |
x |
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans |
|
|
0.73 |
|
|
|
1.48 |
|
|
|
1.89 |
|
|
|
2.58 |
|
|
|
3.28 |
|
|
Nonaccrual loans totaled $62.1 million, or 1.78 percent of total portfolio loans, at March 31,
2008. This represents a $33.4 million increase from $28.7 million, or 0.82 percent of total
portfolio loans at December 31, 2007, and a $51.2 million increase from $10.9 million, or 0.31
percent, of total portfolio loans at March 31, 2007. Nonperforming assets as a percentage of total
loans and other real estate owned increased to 2.05 percent at March 31, 2008, compared to 1.10
percent at December 31, 2007 and 0.49 percent at March 31, 2007.
The linked-quarter increase in nonaccrual loans was primarily driven by four residential
condominium loans totaling $24.8 million, three of which were disclosed in the Corporations 2007
Form 10-K as potential problem loans. These loans are part of the
Corporations strategic partner portfolio which buys and sells portions of loans (primarily
originated in the Southeastern region of the United States) from key strategic partner financial
institutions and are included in the Corporations
43
construction loan portfolio. The remainder of
the increase came from loans secured by residential real estate in the Raleigh, Charlotte, and
Atlanta markets.
A summary of nonaccrual loans by loan group as of March 31, 2008 follows:
Table Sixteen
Nonaccrual Loans by Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans/ |
|
Nonaccrual |
|
|
Portfolio |
|
Nonaccrual |
|
Portfolio |
|
Loans/ Total |
(In thousands) |
|
Loans |
|
Loans |
|
Loans |
|
Nonaccruals |
|
Commercial non real estate |
|
$ |
299,555 |
|
|
$ |
2,498 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
Commercial real estate |
|
|
1,058,197 |
|
|
|
2,572 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Construction |
|
|
861,967 |
|
|
|
46,314 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
74.6 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
587,240 |
|
|
|
5,398 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
430,781 |
|
|
|
890 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
240,048 |
|
|
|
4,386 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,477,788 |
|
|
$ |
62,058 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
There were no other significant geographic or market segment concentrations. Nonaccrual loans
primarily consisted of loans secured by real estate, including single-family residential and
development construction loans. Nonaccrual loans as a percentage of loans may increase or decrease
as economic conditions change. Management takes current and prospective economic conditions into
consideration when estimating the allowance for loans losses. See Allowance for Loan Losses for a
more detailed discussion.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The Corporations allowance for loan losses consists of three components: (i) valuation allowances
computed on impaired loans in accordance with SFAS 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a
Loan an Amendment to FASB Statements No. 5 and No. 15; (ii) valuation allowances determined by
applying historical loss rates to those loans not specifically identified as impaired; and (iii)
valuation allowances for factors which management believes are not reflected in the historical loss
rates or that otherwise need to be considered when estimating the allowance for loan losses. These
three components are estimated at least quarterly and, along with a narrative analysis, comprise
the Corporations allowance for loan losses model. The resulting components are used by management
to determine the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.
All estimates of loan portfolio risk, including the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, are
subject to general and local economic conditions, among other factors, which are unpredictable and
beyond the Corporations control. Because a significant portion of the loan portfolio is comprised
of real estate loans and loans to area businesses, the Corporation is subject to risk in the real
estate market and changes in the economic conditions in its primary market areas. Changes in these
areas can increase or decrease the provision for loan losses.
The Corporation monitors its loss estimate percentage attributable to economic factors in its
allowance for loan loss model. As a part of its quarterly assessment of the allowance for loan
losses, the Corporation reviews key local, regional and national economic information and assesses
its impact on the allowance for loan losses. Given the recent trends in the national and local
economic environment, including a slow-down in the national and local housing markets and moderate
increases in the unemployment rate, the Corporation has increased its estimated loss percentages
for economic factors for the quarter ended March 31, 2008.
44
The Corporation continuously reviews its portfolio for any concentrations of loans to any one
borrower or industry. To analyze its concentrations, the Corporation prepares various reports
showing total risk concentrations to borrowers by industry, as well as reports showing total risk
concentrations to one borrower. At the present time, the Corporation does not believe it has
concentrations of risk in any one industry or specific borrower and, therefore, has made no
allocations of allowances for loan losses for this factor for any of the periods presented.
The Corporation also monitors the amount of operational risk that exists in the portfolio. This
would include the front-end underwriting, documentation and closing processes associated with the
lending decision. During the quarter ended March 31, 2008, the Corporation increased its
allocation for operational risk factors due to increased portfolio risks associated with areas
exposed to residential real estate development and heightened potential employee attrition risks
associated with the proposed merger with Fifth Third.
Changes in the allowance for loan losses follow:
Table Seventeen
Allowance For Loan Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31 |
(In thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
42,414 |
|
|
$ |
34,966 |
|
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial non real estate |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Construction |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
2,102 |
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
Total charge-offs |
|
|
2,458 |
|
|
|
786 |
|
|
Recoveries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial non real estate |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
Total recoveries |
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
2,099 |
|
|
|
478 |
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
4,707 |
|
|
|
1,366 |
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
45,022 |
|
|
$ |
35,854 |
|
|
Average portfolio loans |
|
$ |
3,491,712 |
|
|
$ |
3,510,437 |
|
Net charge-offs to average portfolio loans
(annualized) |
|
|
0.24 |
% |
|
|
0.06 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses to portfolio loans |
|
|
1.29 |
|
|
|
1.02 |
|
|
The Corporations charge-off policy meets or exceeds regulatory minimums. Past-due status is based
on contractual payment date. Losses on unsecured consumer debt are recognized at 90 days past due,
compared to the regulatory loss criteria of 120 days. Secured consumer loans, including residential
real estate, are typically charged-off between 120 and 180 days to the estimated collateral fair
value, depending on the collateral type, in compliance with the Federal Financial Institutions
Examination Council guidelines. Losses on commercial loans are recognized promptly upon
determination that all or a portion of any loan balance is uncollectible. Any deficiency that
exists after liquidation of collateral will be taken as a charge-off. Subsequent payment received
will be treated as a recovery when collected.
45
The allowance for loan losses was $45.0 million, or 1.29 percent of portfolio loans, at March 31,
2008, compared to $42.4 million, or 1.21 percent of portfolio loans, at December 31, 2007. The
Corporations credit migration trends and an increase in economic and operational risk factors led
to the higher allowance for loan loss ratio in 2008.
Management considers the allowance for loan losses adequate to cover inherent losses in the
Corporations loan portfolio as of the date of the consolidated financial statements. Management
believes it has established the allowance in consideration of the current and expected future
economic environment. While management uses the best information available to make evaluations,
future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary based on changes in economic and other
conditions. Additionally, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination
process, periodically review the Corporations allowances for loan losses. Such agencies may
require the recognition of adjustments to the allowance based on their judgment of information
available to them at the time of their examinations.
Provision for Loan Losses
The provision for loan losses is the amount charged to earnings, which is necessary to maintain an
adequate and appropriate allowance for loan losses. Accordingly, the factors, which influence
changes in the allowance for loan losses, have a direct effect on the provision for loan losses.
The allowance for loan losses changes from period to period as a result of a number of factors, the
most significant of which for the Corporation include the following: (i) changes in the amounts of
loans outstanding, which are used to estimate current probable loan losses; (ii) current
charge-offs and recoveries of loans; (iii) changes in impaired loan valuation allowances; (iv)
changes in credit grades within the portfolio, which arise from a deterioration or an improvement
in the performance of the borrower; (v) changes in loss percentages; and (vi) changes in the mix of
types of loans. In addition, the Corporation considers other, more subjective factors, which
impact the credit quality of the portfolio as a whole and estimates allocations of allowance for
loan losses for these factors, as well. These factors include loan concentrations, economic
conditions, operational risks, and model risk. Changes in these components of the allowance can arise from
fluctuations in the underlying percentages used as related loss estimates for these factors, as
well as variations in the portfolio balances to which they are applied. Changes in these factors
provided approximately an additional $0.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008. The
net change in the components of the allowance for loan losses results in the provision for loan
losses. For a more detailed discussion of the Corporations process for estimating the allowance
for loan losses, see Allowance for Loan Losses.
For the three months ended March 31, 2008, the provision for loan losses was $4.7 million, while
net charge-offs were $2.1 million, or 0.24 percent of average portfolio loans. For the three
months ended March 31, 2007, the provision for loan losses was $1.4 million and net charge-offs
were $0.5 million, or 0.06 percent of average portfolio loans.
Market Risk Management
Asset-Liability Management and Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk is the exposure of earnings and capital to changes in interest rates. The
objective of Asset-Liability Management (ALM) is to quantify and manage the change in interest
rate risk associated with the Corporations balance sheet. The management of the ALM program
includes oversight from the Board of Directors Asset and Liability Committee (Board ALCO) and
the Management Asset and Liability Committee (Management ALCO). Two primary metrics used in
analyzing interest rate risk are earnings at risk (EAR) and economic value of equity (EVE). The
Board of Directors has established limits on the EAR and EVE risk measures. Management ALCO,
comprised of select members of executive and senior management, is charged with measuring
performance relative to those limits and reporting the Banks performance to Board ALCO. Interest
rate risk is measured and monitored through simulation modeling. The process is validated regularly
by an independent third party.
46
Both the EAR and the EVE risk measures were within policy guidelines as of March 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2007.
Management considers EAR to be the best measure of short-term interest rate risk. This measure
reflects the amount of net interest income that will be impacted by a change in interest rates over
a 12- month time frame. A simulation model is used to run immediate and parallel changes in
interest rates (rate shocks) from a base scenario using implied forward rates. At a minimum, rate
shock scenarios are run at plus and minus 100, 200, and 300 basis points. From time to time,
additional simulations are run to assess risk from changes in the slope of the yield curve. The
simulation model projects the net interest income over the next 12 months for each scenario using
consistent balance sheet growth projections and calculates the percentage change from the base
scenario. Board ALCO has approved a policy limit for the change in EAR over a 12-month period of
minus 10 percent to a plus or minus 200 basis point shock to interest rates. At March 31, 2008, the
estimated EAR to a 200 basis point increase in rates was plus 3.3 percent while the estimated EAR
to a 200 basis point decrease in rates was minus 4.6 percent. This compares with plus 2.1 percent
and minus 4.7 percent, respectively, at December 31, 2007.
Management considers EVE to be the best measure of long-term interest rate risk. This measure
reflects the amount of net equity that will be impacted by changes in interest rates. Through
simulation modeling, the Corporation estimates the economic value of assets and the economic value
of liabilities. The difference between these two measures is the EVE. The EVE is calculated for a
series of scenarios in which current rates are shocked up and down by 100, 200, and 300 basis
points and compared to a base scenario using the current yield curve. Board ALCO has approved a
policy limit for the percentage change in EVE of minus 15 percent to a plus or minus 200 basis
point shock to interest rates. At March 31, 2008, the estimated change in EVE to a 200 basis point
increase in rates was minus 6.7 percent, while the estimated change in EVE to a 200 basis point
decrease in rates was minus 3.6 percent. This compares with minus 10.9 percent and plus 0.3
percent, respectively at December 31, 2007. The variation in EVE risk from December 31, 2007 to
March 31, 2008 is primarily attributable to the sharp decline in rates.
The result of any simulation is inherently uncertain and will not precisely estimate the impact of
changes in rates on net interest income or the economic value of assets and liabilities. Actual
results may differ from simulated results due to, but not limited to, the timing and magnitude of
the change in interest rates, changes in management strategies, and changes in market conditions.
Table Eighteen summarizes, as of March 31, 2008, the expected maturities and weighted average
effective yields and rates associated with certain of the Corporations significant non-trading
financial instruments. Cash and cash equivalents, federal funds sold, and noninterest-bearing bank
deposits are excluded from Table Eighteen as their respective carrying values approximate fair
value. These financial instruments generally expose the Corporation to insignificant market risk
as they have either no stated maturities or an average maturity of less than 30 days and interest
rates that approximate market rates. However, these financial instruments could expose the
Corporation to interest rate risk by requiring more or less reliance on alternative funding
sources, such as long-term debt. The mortgage-backed securities are shown at their
weighted-average expected life, obtained from an independent evaluation of the average remaining
life of each security based on expected prepayment speeds of the underlying mortgages at March 31,
2008. These expected maturities, weighted-average effective yields, and fair
values would change if interest rates change. Expected maturities for indeterminate demand, money
market and savings deposits are estimated based on historical average lives.
47
Table Eighteen
Market Risk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected Maturity |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Total |
|
1 Year |
|
2 Years |
|
3 Years |
|
4 Years |
|
5 Years |
|
Thereafter |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
$ |
526,565 |
|
|
$ |
241,927 |
|
|
$ |
108,189 |
|
|
$ |
73,876 |
|
|
$ |
45,457 |
|
|
$ |
28,080 |
|
|
$ |
29,036 |
|
Weighted-average effective yield |
|
|
4.77 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
$ |
523,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
$ |
304,471 |
|
|
|
55,779 |
|
|
|
45,509 |
|
|
|
35,904 |
|
|
|
26,239 |
|
|
|
20,538 |
|
|
|
120,502 |
|
Weighted-average effective yield |
|
|
4.91 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
$ |
298,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and loans held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value |
|
$ |
1,025,009 |
|
|
|
343,149 |
|
|
|
228,139 |
|
|
|
170,370 |
|
|
|
98,408 |
|
|
|
93,006 |
|
|
|
91,937 |
|
Weighted-average effective yield |
|
|
6.79 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
$ |
1,062,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value |
|
$ |
2,425,301 |
|
|
|
1,286,405 |
|
|
|
276,252 |
|
|
|
187,282 |
|
|
|
101,463 |
|
|
|
76,327 |
|
|
|
497,572 |
|
Weighted-average effective yield |
|
|
5.83 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
$ |
2,458,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value |
|
$ |
1,624,633 |
|
|
|
1,557,179 |
|
|
|
42,616 |
|
|
|
14,098 |
|
|
|
3,963 |
|
|
|
5,330 |
|
|
|
1,447 |
|
Weighted-average effective yield |
|
|
4.36 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
$ |
1,638,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value |
|
$ |
1,148,083 |
|
|
|
277,025 |
|
|
|
276,774 |
|
|
|
276,496 |
|
|
|
136,268 |
|
|
|
84,919 |
|
|
|
96,601 |
|
Weighted-average effective yield |
|
|
1.71 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
$ |
1,110,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value |
|
$ |
195,855 |
|
|
|
70,054 |
|
|
|
75,057 |
|
|
|
50,070 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
631 |
|
Weighted-average effective yield |
|
|
4.79 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
$ |
199,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value |
|
$ |
421,857 |
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
|
165,000 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,857 |
|
Weighted-average effective yield |
|
|
4.18 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
$ |
429,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Balance-Sheet Risk
The Corporation is party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course
of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include
commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. These instruments involve, to varying
degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the
consolidated financial statements. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a
customer so long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments
generally have fixed expiration dates and may require collateral from the borrower if deemed
necessary by the Corporation. Included in loan commitments are commitments of $83.6 million to
cover customer deposit account overdrafts should they occur. Standby letters of credit are
conditional commitments issued by the Corporation to guarantee the performance of a customer to a
third party up to a stipulated amount and with specified terms and conditions. Standby letters of
credit are recorded as a liability by the Corporation at the fair value of the obligation
undertaken in issuing the guarantee. Commitments to extend credit are not recorded as an asset or
liability by the Corporation until the instrument is exercised. Refer to Note 14 of the
consolidated financial statements for further discussion of commitments. The Corporation does not
have any off-balance-sheet financing arrangements, other than Trust Securities, refer to Note 10 of
the consolidated financial statements.
48
The following table presents aggregated information and expected maturities of commitments as of
March 31, 2008.
Table Nineteen
Commitments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timing not |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
1 year |
|
1-3 Years |
|
4-5 Years |
|
Over 5 Years |
|
determinable |
|
Total |
|
Loan commitments |
|
$ |
570,313 |
|
|
$ |
113,946 |
|
|
$ |
16,922 |
|
|
$ |
95,381 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
796,562 |
|
Lines of credit |
|
|
28,597 |
|
|
|
1,202 |
|
|
|
4,957 |
|
|
|
455,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
490,253 |
|
Standby letters of credit |
|
|
23,016 |
|
|
|
2,849 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,869 |
|
Anticipated tax settlements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,172 |
|
|
|
5,172 |
|
|
Total commitments |
|
$ |
621,926 |
|
|
$ |
117,997 |
|
|
$ |
21,883 |
|
|
$ |
550,878 |
|
|
$ |
5,172 |
|
|
$ |
1,317,856 |
|
|
Commitments to extend credit, including loan commitments, standby letters of credit, and commercial
letters of credit do not necessarily represent future cash requirements, in that these commitments
often expire without being drawn upon.
Liquidity Risk
Liquidity is the ability to maintain cash flows adequate to fund operations and meet obligations
and other commitments on a timely and cost-effective basis. Liquidity is provided by the ability to
attract retail deposits, by current earnings, and by a strong capital base that enables the
Corporation to use alternative
funding sources that complement normal sources. The Corporations asset-liability management
objectives include optimizing net interest income while continuing to provide adequate liquidity to
meet continuing loan demand and deposit withdrawal requirements and to service normal operating
expenses.
Liquidity is managed at two levels. The first is the liquidity of the Corporation. The second is
the liquidity of the Bank. The management of liquidity at both levels is essential, because the
Corporation and the Bank have different funding needs and sources, and each are subject to certain
regulatory guidelines and requirements.
The primary source of funding for the Corporation includes dividends received from the Bank and
proceeds from the issuance of common stock. In addition, the Corporation had commercial paper
outstanding of $28.8 million at March 31, 2008. Primary uses of funds for the Corporation include
repayment of commercial paper, share repurchases, and dividends paid to shareholders. During 2005,
the Corporation issued trust preferred securities through specially formed trusts. These securities
are presented as long-term borrowings in the consolidated balance sheets and are includable in Tier
1 Capital for regulatory capital purposes, subject to certain limitations.
Primary sources of funding for the Bank include customer deposits, wholesale deposits, other
borrowings, loan repayments, and available-for-sale securities. The Bank has access to federal
funds lines from various banks and borrowings from the Federal Reserve discount window. In addition
to these sources, the Bank is a member of the FHLB, which provides access to FHLB lending sources.
At March 31, 2008, the Bank had an available line of credit with the FHLB totaling $1.5 billion,
with $775.9 million outstanding. At March 31, 2008, the Bank also had $648.0 million of federal
funds lines of credit, with $168.0 million outstanding.
Management believes the Corporations and the Banks sources of liquidity are adequate to meet loan
demand, operating needs, and deposit withdrawal requirements.
49
Capital Management
The Corporation views capital as its most valuable and most expensive funding source. The objective
of effective capital management is to generate above-market returns on equity to the Corporations
shareholders while maintaining adequate regulatory capital ratios. Some of the Corporations
primary uses of capital include funding growth, asset acquisition, dividend payments, and common
stock repurchases.
Select capital measures follow:
Table Twenty
Capital Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
December 31 |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Total equity/total assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Charter Corporation |
|
$ |
463,526 |
|
|
|
9.66 |
% |
|
$ |
468,344 |
|
|
|
9.63 |
% |
First Charter Bank |
|
|
501,540 |
|
|
|
10.48 |
|
|
|
499,322 |
|
|
|
10.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible equity/tangible assets (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Charter Corporation |
|
$ |
380,927 |
|
|
|
8.08 |
% |
|
$ |
385,473 |
|
|
|
8.07 |
% |
First Charter Bank |
|
|
418,941 |
|
|
|
8.90 |
|
|
|
416,450 |
|
|
|
8.74 |
|
|
(1) The tangible equity ratio excludes goodwill and other intangible assets from both the numerator and the denominator. |
Shareholders equity at March 31, 2008 decreased to $463.5 million, representing 9.7 percent of
period-end total assets, compared to $468.3 million, or 9.6 percent, of period-end total assets at
December 31, 2007. This decrease in shareholders equity resulted from a $0.7 million adjustment
to initially apply EITF 06-4, Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit
Aspects of Endorsement Split Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements, and cash dividends of $0.195 per
common share, which resulted in cash dividend declarations of $6.9 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2008. Additionally, accumulated other comprehensive loss (after-tax unrealized
losses on available-for-sale securities) decreased $4.4 million to $5.8 million at March 31, 2008,
compared to $1.4 million at December 31, 2007. This was partially offset with net income of $5.5
million.
The Corporation has remaining authority to repurchase 1.1 million shares of its common stock. The
Corporation does not anticipate repurchasing any additional shares due to the proposed merger with
Fifth Third.
During 2005, the Corporation issued trust preferred securities through specially formed trusts in
an aggregate amount of $60.0 million. The proceeds from the sale of the trust preferred securities
were used to purchase $61.9 million of subordinated debentures from the Corporation (Notes). The
Notes are presented as long-term borrowings in the consolidated balance sheets and are includable
in Tier 1 Capital for regulatory capital purposes, subject to certain limitations.
The Corporations and the Banks various regulators have issued regulatory capital guidelines for
U.S. banking organizations. Failure to meet the capital requirements can initiate certain
mandatory and discretionary actions by regulators that could have a material effect on the
Corporations financial position and results of operations. At March 31, 2008 the Corporation and
the Bank were classified as well capitalized under these regulatory frameworks.
50
The principal asset of the Corporation is its investment in the Bank. Thus, the Corporation derives
its principal source of income through dividends from the Bank. Certain regulatory and other
requirements restrict the lending of funds by the subsidiary bank to the Corporation and the amount
of dividends which can be paid to the Corporation. In addition, certain regulatory agencies may
prohibit the payment of dividends by the Bank if they determine that such payment would constitute
an unsafe or unsound practice. See Business Government Supervision and Regulation, Business
Capital and Operational Requirements and Note 15 of notes to consolidated financial statements for
additional discussion of these restrictions.
The Corporation and the Bank must comply with regulatory capital requirements established by the
applicable federal regulatory agencies. Under the standards of the Federal Reserve Board, the
Corporation and the Bank must maintain a minimum ratio of Tier I Capital (as defined) to total
risk-weighted assets of 4.00 percent and a minimum ratio of Total Capital (as defined) to
risk-weighted assets of 8.00 percent. Tier 1 Capital includes common shareholders equity, trust
preferred securities, minority interests and qualifying preferred stock, less goodwill and other
adjustments. Total Capital is comprised of Tier I Capital plus certain adjustments, the largest of
which for the Corporation is the allowance for loan losses (up to 1.25 percent of risk-weighted
assets).Total Capital must consist of at least 50 percent of Tier 1 Capital. Risk-weighted assets
refer to the on- and off-balance sheet exposures of the Corporation adjusted for their related risk
levels using amounts set forth in Federal Reserve standards.
In addition to the aforementioned risk-based capital requirements, the Corporation is subject to a
leverage capital requirement, requiring a minimum ratio of Tier I Capital (as defined previously)
to total adjusted average assets of 3.00 percent to 5.00 percent.
The Bank also has similar regulatory capital requirements imposed by the Federal Reserve Board. See
Business Government Supervision and Regulation, Business Capital and Operational Requirements
and Note 15 of notes to consolidated financial statements for additional discussion of these
requirements.
At March 31, 2008, the Corporation and the Bank were in compliance with all existing capital
requirements and were classified as well capitalized under regulatory capital guidelines. In the
judgment of management, there have been no events or conditions since March 31, 2008, that would
change the well capitalized status of the Corporation or the Bank. It is managements intention
for both the Corporation and the Bank to continue to be well capitalized for the foreseeable
future. The capital requirements of the Corporation and the Bank are summarized in the table below
as of March 31, 2008:
Table Twenty-One
Capital Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adequacy Purposes |
|
To Be Well Capitalized |
|
|
Actual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum |
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Leverage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Charter Corporation |
|
$ |
446,672 |
|
|
|
9.44 |
% |
|
$ |
189,249 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
None | |
|
None | |
First Charter Bank |
|
|
424,710 |
|
|
|
8.99 |
|
|
|
189,030 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
$ |
236,288 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Charter Corporation |
|
$ |
446,672 |
|
|
|
11.25 |
% |
|
$ |
158,878 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
None | |
|
None | |
First Charter Bank |
|
|
424,710 |
|
|
|
10.71 |
|
|
|
158,620 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
$ |
237,930 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Risk-Based Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Charter Corporation |
|
$ |
491,728 |
|
|
|
12.38 |
% |
|
$ |
317,757 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
% |
|
None | |
|
None | |
First Charter Bank |
|
|
469,732 |
|
|
|
11.85 |
|
|
|
317,240 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
|
|
$ |
396,550 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
% |
|
Tier 1 Capital consists of total equity plus qualifying capital securities and minority interests,
less unrealized gains and losses accumulated in other comprehensive income, certain intangible
assets, and
51
adjustments related to the valuation of servicing assets and certain equity investments
in nonfinancial companies (principal investments).
The leverage ratio reflects Tier 1 Capital divided by average total assets for the period. Average
assets used in the calculation exclude certain intangible and servicing assets.
Total Risk-Based Capital is comprised of Tier 1 Capital plus qualifying subordinated debt and
allowance for loan losses and a portion of unrealized gains on certain equity securities.
Both the Tier 1 Capital and the Total Risk-Based Capital ratios are computed by dividing the
respective capital amounts by risk-weighted assets, as defined.
Regulatory Recommendations
The Corporation and the Bank are subject to federal and state banking regulatory reviews from time
to time. As a result of these reviews, the Corporation and the Bank receive various observations
and recommendations from their respective regulators. Observations are matters that are
informative, advisory, or that suggest a means of improving the performance or management of the
operations of the Corporation. Recommendations are provided to enhance oversight of, or to improve
or strengthen, the Corporations or the Banks processes. The Corporation does not believe that
these observations and recommendations are material to the Corporation. In addition, neither the
Corporation nor the Bank is currently subject to any formal or informal corrective action with
respect to any of their regulators.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements discusses new accounting pronouncements adopted by
the Corporation during 2008 and other recently issued pronouncements that have not yet been adopted
by the Corporation. To the extent the adoption of new accounting pronouncements materially affects
financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity, the effects are discussed in the
applicable section of Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
From time to time, the FASB issues exposure drafts for proposed statements of financial accounting
standards. Such exposure drafts are subject to comment from the public, to revisions by the FASB
and to final issuance by the FASB as statements of financial accounting standards. Management
considers the effect of the proposed statements on the consolidated financial statements of the
Corporation and monitors the status of changes to and proposed effective dates of exposure drafts.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Market
Risk Management Asset-Liability Management and Interest Rate
Risk sections of this Report on Form
10-Q for Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of March 31, 2008, the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, an
evaluation of the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the Exchange Act)) was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the
Registrants management, including the Chief Executive Officer and principal financial officer.
Based on that evaluation, the
52
Registrants Chief Executive Officer and principal financial officer
have concluded that the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure
that information required to be disclosed by the Registrant in its reports that it files or submits
under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the Securities Exchange Commission rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and
communicated to the Registrants management, including the Chief Executive Officer and principal
financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
During the Registrants first fiscal quarter, there has been no change in the Registrants internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated under the
Exchange Act) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Registrants internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The Corporation and its subsidiaries are defendants in certain claims and legal actions arising in
the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, after consultation with legal
counsel, the ultimate disposition of these matters is not expected to have a material adverse
effect on the consolidated operations, liquidity, or financial position of the Corporation or its
subsidiaries.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes from those risk factors previously disclosed in Item 1A Risk
Factors of Part I of the Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(c) Issuer Repurchases of Equity Securities
The following table summarizes the Corporations repurchases of its common stock during the quarter
ended March 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Maximum Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased |
|
of Shares |
|
|
Total Number |
|
Average Price |
|
as Part of |
|
That May Yet be |
|
|
of Shares |
|
Paid |
|
Publicly-Announced |
|
Purchased under |
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
Per Share |
|
Plans or Programs |
|
the Plans or Programs |
|
January 1, 2008 - January 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,125,400 |
|
February 1, 2008 - February 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,125,400 |
|
March 1, 2008 - March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,125,400 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,125,400 |
|
|
On October 24, 2003, the Corporations Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase plan to
acquire up to an additional 1.5 million shares of the Corporations common stock from time to time.
As of March 31, 2008, the Corporation had repurchased 374,600 shares under this authorization.
There were no shares of the Corporations common stock repurchased during the three months ended
March 31, 2008. The maximum number of shares that may yet be repurchased under the plans or
programs was 1,125,400 at March 31, 2008. The stock repurchase authorization has no set expiration
or termination date. The Corporation does not anticipate repurchasing any additional shares due to
the proposed merger with Fifth Third.
53
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
(a) First Charter Corporations Special Meeting of Shareholders was held on January 18, 2008.
(c) The following are the voting results on each matter (exclusive of procedural matters) submitted
to the shareholders:
1. To approve the merger of First Charter with and into Fifth Third Financial Corporation,
substantially on the terms set forth in the Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger dated
as of September 14, 2007 by and among First Charter, Fifth Third Bancorp and Fifth Third Financial
Corporation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Votes |
|
For |
|
|
29,519,980 |
|
Against |
|
|
202,324 |
|
Abstain |
|
|
68,223 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
29,790,527 |
|
|
2. To approve the adjournment or postponement of the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate,
to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes at the time of the special meeting to
adopt the merger agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Votes |
|
For |
|
|
29,117,289 |
|
Against |
|
|
542,115 |
|
Abstain |
|
|
131,123 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
29,790,527 |
|
|
Item 5. Other Information
As discussed within this Form 10-Q, on August 15, 2007 the Corporation and Fifth Third entered into
the Merger Agreement by and among the Corporation, Fifth Third, and Fifth Third Financial. Under
the terms of the Merger Agreement, the Corporation will be merged with and into Fifth Third
Financial. The Merger Agreement has been approved by the Board of Directors of the Corporation,
Fifth Third, and Fifth Third Financial. The Corporations shareholders approved the Merger
Agreement and the merger has been approved by all necessary state and federal regulatory agencies.
The merger remains subject to customary closing conditions. The
merger is currently anticipated to close on
Friday, June 6, 2008. Pursuant to this plan, the Corporation does not intend to hold a 2008 annual
meeting of shareholders. If First Charter
were to schedule an annual meeting of shareholders, First Charter will provide notice of the date
fixed for the annual meeting, as well as the deadline for submitting proposals for such meeting and
have shareholder proposals included in the Corporations proxy statement.
54
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description of Exhibits |
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of the principal financial officer pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
55
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
FIRST CHARTER CORPORATION
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: May 6, 2008 |
/s/ Sheila A. Stoke
|
|
|
Sheila A. Stoke |
|
|
Senior Vice President,
Corporate Controller
(Principal Financial Officer duly
authorized to sign on behalf of the
Registrant) |
|
|
56