SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Date of Report: August 19, 2002
|
Exact Name of |
|
|
_____________ |
_____________ |
_____________ |
_____________ |
1-12609 1-2348 |
PG&E Corporation Pacific Gas and |
California California |
94-3234914 94-0742640
|
Pacific Gas and Electric Company |
PG&E Corporation |
||
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) |
|||
|
|||
Pacific Gas and Electric Company |
PG&E Corporation |
||
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code) |
|||
In addition, during the term of the waiver, PG&E Corporation may not make any investment, capital expenditure, or other payment to any of its subsidiaries, in an amount that in the aggregate exceeds $15 million, except as may be required under applicable law or by conditions established by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) in decisions approving the formation of PG&E Corporation to hold the stock of Pacific Gas and Electric Company (Utility). The terms of the waiver also require PG&E Corporation to maintain cash held in two interest reserve accounts under the Credit Agreement sufficient to cover interest payable on the $1.02 billion in term loans outstanding under the Credit Agreement for a two-year period, increased from a one-year period; provided, however, that the aggregate amount required to be held in the interest reserve accounts shall not exceed 15 percent of the then outstanding principal amount of the loans. The waiver agreement also provides that, during the term of the waiver, proceeds that PG&E NEG receives from certain PG&E NEG transactions may only be reinvested in specified projects.
As previously disclosed, subject to their respective rights as set forth in the Intercreditor and Subordination Agreement, dated as of June 25, 2002, by and between the GE Lenders and certain other parties thereto, the GE Lenders would, upon expiration of the waiver, have the right to declare all amounts outstanding under the Credit Agreement to be immediately due and payable. The failure of PG&E Corporation to repay this accelerated indebtedness would entitle the GE Lenders, subject to the Intercreditor Agreement, to exercise certain remedies, including their rights as secured parties with respect to their collateral, i.e., the pledged interests of PG&E Corporation in PG&E National Energy Group, LLC (NEG, LLC), NEG LLC's pledged interests in PG&E NEG, and a pledged interest in an interest reserve account, which will increase from approximately $65 million to $153 million as a result of the waiver agreement.
As previously disclosed, in March 2001, the CPUC adopted a decision which retroactively restated the way in which the Utility’s generation–related transition costs are deemed recovered. This retroactive change had the effect of extending the statutory electric retail rate freeze and reducing the amount of past wholesale power costs that could be eligible for recovery from customers. The CPUC denied the Utility's application for rehearing of this retroactive accounting change. The Utility’s petition for a writ of review filed with the California Court of Appeal also was denied. On August 14, 2002, the California Supreme Court denied the Utility’s petition to review the appellate court action.
Although the California Supreme Court’s action had the effect of denying the Utility’s state law arguments challenging the CPUC’s accounting order, the action by the California Supreme Court has no effect on the Utility’s federal claims raised in the Utility’s “filed rate case” pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. In the filed rate case, filed in November 2000 and refiled in August 2001, the Utility is asking the court to declare that, under federal preemption principles, the federally tariffed wholesale power and transmission costs that the Utility has incurred to serve its customers are recoverable in retail rates. The case also asserts several constitutional claims. The filed rate case has been deemed a related case to the Utility's pending appeal of the Bankruptcy Court's denial of the Utility's request for injunctive and declaratory relief against the CPUC’s retroactive accounting order. Both matters are pending before the same District Court judge, who has ruled that the filed rate case will proceed before the bankruptcy appeal will be heard.
A case management conference was held on August 16, 2002, at which the court set a new trial date in this matter of June 9, 2003. Neither PG&E Corporation nor the Utility can predict what the outcome of the filed rate case will be.
Exhibit No. Description of Exhibit
99.1 Waiver and Amendment Agreement, dated August 16, 2002, by and among PG&E Corporation, PG&E National Energy Group, LLC, Lehman Commercial Paper Inc., as administrative agent, and the lenders party to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of June 25, 2002
SIGNATURE |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrants have duly caused this report to be signed on their behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
PG&E CORPORATION |
|
By /s/ CHRISTOPHER P. JOHNS |
|
|
|
CHRISTOPHER P.JOHNS Senior Vice President and
Controller |
|
|
|
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY |
|
By: /s/ LINDA Y.H. CHENG |
|
|
|
LINDA Y.H. CHENG |
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No. Description of Exhibit
99.1 Waiver and Amendment Agreement, dated August 16, 2002, by and among PG&E Corporation, PG&E National Energy Group, LLC, Lehman Commercial Paper Inc., as administrative agent, and the lenders party to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of June 25, 2002