Use these links to rapidly review the document
PROXY STATEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.          )

 

---

Table of Contents

DYNAMIC MATERIALS CORPORATION
5405 Spine Road
Boulder, Colorado 80301

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON MAY 26, 2011

        NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of DYNAMIC MATERIALS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, will be held on May 26, 2011, at 8:30 a.m. local time at the St. Julien Hotel, 900 Walnut Street, Boulder, Colorado, for the following purposes:

        1.     To elect eight directors to hold office until the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders;

        2.     To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011;

        3.     To hold a non-binding, advisory vote on executive compensation;

        4.     To hold a non-binding, advisory vote on the frequency of a non-binding, advisory vote on executive compensation; and

        5.     To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

        The foregoing items of business are more fully described in the proxy statement accompanying this notice.

        The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on April 6, 2011, as the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, this Annual Meeting and at any adjournment or postponement thereof.

        Similar to last year we will be using the "Notice and Access" method that allows companies to provide proxy materials to stockholders via the Internet. On or about April 15, 2011, we will mail to our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials which contains specific instructions on how to access Annual Meeting materials via the Internet, as well as instructions on how to request paper copies. We believe this process should provide a convenient way to access your proxy materials and vote. The Proxy Statement and the Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 are available at www.edocumentview.com/boom.

Boulder, Colorado

        ALL STOCKHOLDERS ARE CORDIALLY INVITED TO ATTEND THE MEETING IN PERSON. WHETHER OR NOT YOU EXPECT TO ATTEND THE MEETING, PLEASE FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED TO YOU AND VOTE YOUR SHARES AS PROMPTLY AS POSSIBLE IN ORDER TO ENSURE YOUR REPRESENTATION AT THE MEETING. EVEN IF YOU HAVE GIVEN YOUR PROXY, YOU MAY STILL VOTE IN PERSON IF YOU ATTEND THE MEETING. PLEASE NOTE, HOWEVER, THAT IF YOUR SHARES OF RECORD ARE HELD BY A BROKER, BANK OR OTHER NOMINEE AND YOU WISH TO VOTE AT THE MEETING, YOU MUST OBTAIN FROM SUCH RECORD HOLDER A PROXY ISSUED IN YOUR NAME.

---

Table of Contents

PROXY STATEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS

---

Table of Contents

DYNAMIC MATERIALS CORPORATION
5405 Spine Road
Boulder, Colorado 80301

---

PROXY STATEMENT
FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON MAY 26, 2011

---

INFORMATION CONCERNING THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING

General

        The Board of Directors (the "Board") of Dynamic Materials Corporation, a Delaware corporation, is soliciting proxies for use at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 26, 2011, at 8:30 a.m., local time, or at any adjournment or postponement thereof, for the purposes described in this proxy statement and in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting. The Annual Meeting will be held at the St. Julien Hotel, which is located at 900 Walnut Street, Boulder, Colorado. On or about April 15, 2011, we will mail to all stockholders entitled to vote at the meeting, a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials that contains specific instructions on how to access Annual Meeting materials via the Internet, as well as instructions on how to request paper copies. Unless the context otherwise requires, references to "the company," "we," "us" or "our" refer to Dynamic Materials Corporation.

Solicitation

        We will bear the entire cost of solicitation of proxies, including preparation, assembly, printing and mailing of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials and any additional information furnished to stockholders. Copies of solicitation materials will be furnished to banks, brokerage houses, fiduciaries, and custodians holding in their names shares of our common stock beneficially owned by others to forward to such beneficial owners. We may reimburse persons representing beneficial owners of common stock for their costs of forwarding solicitation materials to such beneficial owners. Original solicitation of proxies via the Internet may be supplemented by mail, telephone, telegram, or personal solicitation by our directors, officers, or other regular employees. No additional compensation will be paid to directors, officers, or other regular employees for such services.

Outstanding Shares and Quorum

        Only holders of record of common stock at the close of business on April 6, 2011, will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. At the close of business on April 6, 2011, we had 13,330,698 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote. Each holder of record of common stock on such date will be entitled to one vote for each share held on all matters to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting.

        A majority of the outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote represented in person or by proxy will constitute a quorum at the Annual Meeting. However, if a quorum is not represented at the Annual Meeting, the stockholders entitled to vote at the meeting, present in person or represented by proxy, have the power to adjourn the Annual Meeting from time to time, without notice other than by announcement at the Annual Meeting, until a quorum is present or represented. At any such adjourned meeting at which a quorum is present or represented, any business may be transacted that might have been transacted at the originally scheduled meeting.

1

---

Table of Contents

Voting Rights and Procedures

        Votes cast by proxy or in person will be counted by one or more persons appointed by us to act as inspectors (the "Election Inspectors") for the Annual Meeting. The Election Inspectors will treat shares represented by proxies that reflect abstentions as shares that are present and entitled to vote for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum, but not for determining the outcome of any matter submitted to the stockholders for a vote.

        Broker non-votes occur when a broker holding stock in street name votes the shares on some matters but not others. Brokers are permitted to vote on routine, non-controversial proposals in instances where they have not received voting instruction from the beneficial owner of the stock but are not permitted to vote on non-routine matters. The missing votes on non-routine matters are deemed to be "broker non-votes." The Election Inspectors will treat broker non-votes as shares that are present and entitled to vote for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum. The only "routine" proposal on our ballot this year is the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011. Therefore no broker non-votes are expected to exist in connection with that proposal. Brokers are no longer permitted to vote shares for the election of directors without customer direction and will not be permitted to vote on the non-binding, advisory vote on executive compensation or the non-binding, advisory vote on the frequency of a non-binding, advisory vote on executive compensation. Therefore, we urge you to give voting instructions to your broker on all proposals.

        Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast by the shares entitled to vote in the election at a meeting at which a quorum is present. Proxies may not be voted for a greater number of persons than there are nominees. It is intended that unless authorization to vote for one or more nominees for director is withheld, proxies will be voted for the election of all of the six nominees named in this Proxy Statement.

        The selection of our auditors will be ratified if the number of votes of authorized shares of our common stock cast in favor of the respective proposal exceeds the votes cast opposing the proposal. The non-binding advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers will be approved if the number of votes of authorized shares of our common stock cast in favor of the respective proposal exceeds the votes cast opposing the proposal. Accordingly, a majority of votes cast is required to approve these proposals.

        The frequency of a non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation receiving the greatest number of votes (every one year, every two years or every three years) will be considered the frequency recommended by stockholders.

        Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast on any of the proposals.

Revocability of Proxies

        Any person giving a proxy pursuant to this solicitation has the power to revoke it at any time prior to the Annual Meeting. It may be revoked by filing with our Secretary at our principal executive office, 5405 Spine Road, Boulder, Colorado 80301, a written notice of revocation or a duly executed proxy bearing a later date, or it may be revoked by attending the meeting and voting in person. Attendance at the meeting will not, by itself, revoke a proxy. If no direction is indicated, the shares will be voted FOR each of the proposals set forth in this proxy statement and for every THREE YEARS on the non-binding advisory vote for the frequency of a non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation. The persons named in the proxies will have discretionary authority to vote all proxies with respect to additional matters that are properly presented for action at the Annual Meeting.

2

---

Table of Contents

Stockholder Proposals

        Proposals of stockholders that are intended to be presented at our 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must be received by us not later than December 16, 2011, in order to be included in the proxy statement and proxy relating to that annual meeting.

        Notice of any stockholder proposal to be considered at our 2012 Annual Meeting, but not included in the proxy materials, must be submitted in writing and received by us not later than 60 days and not earlier than 90 days prior to the first anniversary of this year's annual meeting date; provided, however, that in the event that fewer than 70 days' notice or public announcement of the date of the meeting is given or made to stockholders, to be timely, notice by the stockholder must be received not later than the close of business of the tenth day following the day on which we first publicly announce the meeting date.

3

---

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

        There are eight nominees for election to the Board. Each director to be elected will hold office until the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. In any event, a director elected pursuant to this proxy statement will hold office until his successor is elected and is qualified, or until such director's earlier death, resignation, or removal.

        Shares represented by executed proxies will be voted, if authority to do so is not withheld, for the election of the eight nominees named below. In the event that any nominee should be unavailable for election as a result of an unexpected occurrence, such shares will be voted for the election of such substitute nominee as the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board may propose. Each person nominated for election has agreed to serve if elected, and the Board has no reason to believe that any nominee will be unable to serve.

NOMINEES

        The names of the nominees and certain information about them are set forth below. In addition, we have included information about each nominee's specific experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led our Board of Directors to conclude that the nominee should serve as a director of the Company at the time we are filing this proxy statement, in light of our business and corporate strategy.

        Dean K. Allen.    Mr. Allen has served as a director since July 1993 and Chairman of the Board since May 2006. In January 2001, Mr. Allen retired as President of Parsons Europe, Middle East and South Africa, a position he had held since February 1996. Mr. Allen was Vice President and General Manager of Raytheon Engineers and Constructors, Europe, from February 1994 to December 1995. Earlier in his career, Mr. Allen served as Executive Vice President of Fluor Corporation, where he was employed for 25 years. As Executive Vice President of Fluor Corporation, Chairman of the Engineering and Construction Group, Member of the Board of Directors and Executive Committee, he was also a member of several subsidiary boards. He also served on the board of directors of Tecnoconsult International, a multinational engineering and consulting firm focusing on energy, industrial and civil infrastructure projects. Mr. Allen is a graduate mechanical engineer, with an MBA from Wharton, and was a participant in the International Senior Managers Program at Harvard. In addition, he has participated in several continuing education programs on corporate governance and currently is a member of the Compensation Subcommittee of the Forum of Corporate Directors.

        As a director of the Company for over 17 years, Mr. Allen has detailed knowledge of the Company's development, historical business cycles and customer base. Mr. Allen, from his over 49 years of experience employed by and leading significant engineering and construction companies, has a deep understanding of many of the Company's key end-use customer segments and the dynamics affecting their respective industries and business environments. Mr. Allen's past work with, and ties within, multinational companies bring to the Board valuable strategic insight and guidance for the Company's multinational operations and international customer and supplier base. With over 25 years of board experience with various

4

---

Table of Contents

multinational companies, Mr. Allen also brings extensive corporate governance experience and insight to the Board.

        Yvon Pierre Cariou.    Mr. Cariou has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer since November 2000 and as a director since May 2006. Prior to joining the Company, from 1998 to 2000, Mr. Cariou was President and Chief Executive Officer of Astrocosmos Metallurgical Inc., a division of Groupe Carbone Lorraine of France, involved in the design and fabrication of process equipment for the chemical and pharmaceutical industries. From 1991 to 1998, Mr. Cariou held executive leadership positions at Hydrodyne/FPI Inc., an aerospace propulsion components manufacturer, and MAINCO Corp., an elevator design, build and service company and a division of Nu-Swift, a public company based in the United Kingdom. Earlier in his career, Mr. Cariou served as President and Chief Executive Officer of two industrial and engineering companies. He also was employed fifteen years with Carbone Lorraine, a global industrial components manufacturer, where he held various executive positions in France and the United States, including President of Carbone USA Corp. Mr. Cariou graduated with a degree in mechanical engineering from Ecole Nationale Superieure des Arts et Metiers in Paris and obtained an MBA from Fairleigh Dickinson University.

        As our President and Chief Executive Officer for over a decade, Mr. Cariou has detailed knowledge of our operations and corporate strategy. In this role, he has primary accountability for accomplishing operational excellence and successfully achieving our strategy. He led and implemented our acquisition of DYNAenergetics in late 2007, increasing our share of the worldwide explosion cladding business as well as diversifying the Company's business into the Oilfields Products segment. Mr. Cariou has been actively overseeing the integration of this significant acquisition into the Company's operations. From his decades of leadership experience with global manufacturing companies, he brings both valuable "process" and "product" expertise and focus to the Board as well as in leading the Company.

        Robert A. Cohen.    Mr. Cohen has served as a director since February 2011. He is the managing partner of Joranel LLC, a private investment and consulting firm serving institutional clients. Prior to joining Joranel in 2005, Mr. Cohen spent four years as president and Chief Executive Officer of Korea First Bank. Previously, Mr. Cohen spent 25 years with Credit Lyonnais, including eight years as Chief Executive Officer of Credit Lyonnais USA. He taught economics and finance for 16 years at the Paris Institut Technique de Banque et Finance and the French School of Management (ESSEC). He is a graduate of Ecole Polytechnique in Paris and earned a doctorate in finance from the University Paris Dauphine.

        The Board added Mr. Cohen as a member earlier this year because of his deep financial background and his management experience with multinational companies. From his four years serving as Chief Executive Officer of one of the largest banks in Korea as well as living in Korea and working with many Korean and Asian companies, he brings rich expertise in the Korean and Asian markets. Many of the key fabricators and end-customers of the Company's cladding division are located in Korea and Asia and the Company is focusing on this region for sales growth. His management experience also increases the depth of the Board's expertise in the areas of corporate governance, finance and risk management.

        James J. Ferris.    Dr. Ferris has served as a director since July 2010. From 1994 until his retirement in 2007, he held a variety of positions, including director and president/group chief executive officer, with CH2M Hill Companies Ltd., an employee owned, global engineering and construction company. Previously, Dr. Ferris spent 18 years with the engineering and construction firm Ebasco Services Incorporated, where he was director and held various project oversight and senior and executive management positions, including president and chief executive officer of Ebasco Environmental. Dr. Ferris has more than three decades of diverse, senior and executive level experience in the worldwide engineering and construction industry. He has been a member of the G8 Renewable Energy Task Force, an active attendee at The World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, and a member of the Prince of Wales Business Leaders Forum. He has extensive corporate board experience, including his roles on audit, compensation, nominating and governance committees.

5

---

Table of Contents

        The Board added Dr. Ferris as a member in mid-2010 because of his management experience as director and president of a significant multinational company as well as his experience overseeing operations and projects in many of the geographic regions where the Company has operations or is working to expand. He brings significant strategic planning and risk management expertise to the Board, especially in light of the Company's broad geographic operations. Dr. Ferris also has strong corporate governance and compensation policy experience as well as substantial financial management skills.

        Richard P. Graff.    Mr. Graff has served as a director since June 2007. He is a retired partner of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP where he served as the audit leader in the United States for the mining industry, until his retirement on December 31, 2001. Mr. Graff began his career with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in 1973. Since his retirement, Mr. Graff has been a consultant to the mining industry and has served as a member of a Financial Accounting Standards Board task force for establishing accounting and financial reporting guidance in the mining industry. He currently serves on the board of directors of Yamana Gold Inc and Alacer Gold Corporation (formerly Anatolia Minerals Development Limited). He received his undergraduate degree in Economics from Boston College and his post-graduate degree in Accounting from Northeastern University.

        With his more than 35 years of experience in public company accounting, including as a partner with a "big four" public accounting firm and consulting on accounting policy and practice in the mining industry, Mr. Graff brings substantial insight and experience to the Company, especially with regard to accounting and financial reporting matters for a company operating worldwide. Mr. Graff has served as a director on boards of public companies since 2005, and currently serves on the board of two other multinational public companies. This experience brings insight as to best practices with respect to accounting, corporate governance and other issues for multinational public companies.

        Bernard Hueber.    Mr. Hueber rejoined the Board in June 2006; previously, he served as a director from June 2000 to June 2005 and was Chairman of the Board from June 2000 until June 2002. From 1972 to 1990, Mr. Hueber served as managing director of the explosives division of Nobel Bozel group and was therefore involved in the acquisition and development of its cladding activities in Europe. From 1990 to 2000, Mr. Hueber served as the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Nobel Explosifs France when it became a subsidiary of Groupe SNPE and as General Manager of its Industrial Explosive Division. He then participated in SNPE's acquisition of the Swedish cladding activities and in 2000 brought together SNPE cladding subsidiaries with the Company. He was nominated Chairman of the Board of the Company in 2000 to consolidate these operations. From 1975 to 2005, Mr. Hueber was deeply involved in explosives and operational safety as a Director, and from 2002 to 2005 served as Secretary General of SAFEX, an industry association with the objective to increase safety in the explosive manufacturing sites throughout the world. Following his retirement from Groupe SNPE in June 2002 and until January 2008, Mr. Hueber was the Secretary General of the Federation of European Explosives Manufacturers (FEEM). During this time, Mr. Hueber also worked as an independent consultant. From June 2003 to June 2007, Mr. Hueber served as a Director of Financiere Harle Bickford & Cie and its subsidiary Davey Bickford & Smith. These companies are involved in pyrotechnics for the explosives and automotive industries and in radio communication. Mr. Hueber is a graduate of Ecole Polytechnique in Paris and started his career by working successively with Societe Generale, a leading bank in France, and with a U.S. air conditioning firm, Trane Corp.

        Mr. Hueber has detailed knowledge of the Company's development, historical business cycles, customer base and competitive environment from his experience of nearly 10 years as a director of the Company, including two as the Company's Chairman, as well as his 30 years' prior work experience with the predecessor company to the Company's European operations. From his extensive experience in the explosives business and work with FEEM, he brings insights to the Company in regulatory, safety, operational and supplier issues facing the Company in this key area. Mr. Hueber also brings to the Board more than 40 years of management experience leading in multinational manufacturing companies.

6

---

Table of Contents

        Gerard Munera.    Mr. Munera has served as a director since September 2000. From October 1996 to the present, Mr. Munera has been General Manager of Synergex Group LLC, a personally controlled holding company with diversified investments, including real estate, securities, gold mining and high technology industries. Mr. Munera currently is also a director of public companies Mag Industries Corporation and Nevsun Resources Ltd as well as private companies. Between 1990 and 1991, Mr. Munera was Senior Vice President of Corporate Planning and Development and a member of the Executive Committee of RTZ plc, a British mining and mineral processing company. Between 1991 and 1994, Mr. Munera was President of Minorco (USA), a diversified $1.5 billion natural resources group. From 1994 to October 1996, Mr. Munera was Chairman and CEO of Latin American Gold Inc., a gold exploration and mining company. Mr. Munera is a graduate of Ecole Polytechnique and Ecole Nationale des Ponts et Chaussees, both in Paris.

        As a director of the Company for nearly a decade, Mr. Munera has detailed knowledge of the Company's development, historical business cycles and customer base. From his prior executive and director roles, he has extensive experience in the mining and metallurgical industries, a key customer base of the Company's explosion welding division. Through over four decades of successful business experience, he also brings a solid international exposure, financial literacy, extensive management experience, as well as extensive work in strategic planning and implementing corporate goals. As a director to other public companies, he brings experience and insight to the Board on corporate governance and leadership issues.

        Rolf Rospek.    Mr. Rospek has served as Chief Executive of our DYNAenergetics subsidiary since it was acquired on November 15, 2007 and as a director since that same date. From October 2001 to November 15, 2007, Mr. Rospek was Chief Executive Officer and a managing director of DYNAenergetics Beteiligungs GmbH. From April 1993 to October 2001, Mr. Rospek was employed by Dynamit Nobel where he served in various sales, marketing and management positions, including general manager of their DYNAwell business unit from March 1998 to October 2001, and general manager of their Dynaplat business unit from March 1999 to October 2001. Prior to joining Dynamit Nobel, Mr. Rospek served as general manager of the logging department of Preussag, Erdöl und Erdgas GmbH, an oil and gas company that is now a subsidiary of Gaz de France. For several years during the 1980's, Mr. Rospek worked for Atlas Wireline Services—which is now part of Baker Hughes and operates under the name Baker Atlas—where he held various engineering and management positions in Germany, England, Italy, and Holland. Mr. Rospek graduated with a degree in Physics (Dipl. Ing. Physikalische Technik) from the Fachhochschule Lübeck in Lübeck, Germany.

        In connection with the acquisition of DYNAenergetics four and a half years ago, Mr. Rospek accepted our invitation to become a director. This acquisition expanded our explosion welding operations as well as enabled us to diversify into a new business of manufacturing and selling a range of proprietary and nonproprietary products for the global oil and gas industries. As the chief executive of this growing Oilfield Products segment and its predecessor company for the past twelve years, Mr. Rospek has detailed knowledge of this important segment's business, customer base, strategy and growth opportunities. He has successfully integrated two acquired companies into the Oilfield Products segment and is a key resource in setting strategy for this growing segment. He has extensive experience in establishing and managing sales operations in many of the world's regions in which we are operating or expanding our business.

Requisite Vote

        Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast by the shares entitled to vote in the election at a meeting at which a quorum is present. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast the proposal.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS
A VOTE "FOR" EACH NAMED NOMINEE

7

---

Table of Contents

Executive Officers

        The following individuals serve as our executive officers. Each executive officer is appointed by the Board and serves at the pleasure of the Board, subject to the terms of the employment agreement described under "Executive Compensation."

        Yvon Pierre Cariou.    Information regarding Mr. Cariou, our President and Chief Executive Officer, is provided under Proposal 1 of this proxy statement under the caption, "Nominees."

        Richard A. Santa.    Mr. Santa has served as our Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary since January 2008; our Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary from October 1996 to December 2007; and our interim Chief Financial Officer from August 1996 to October 1996. Prior to joining us in August 1996, Mr. Santa was Corporate Controller of Scott Sports Group Inc. from September 1993 to April 1996. From April 1996 to August 1996, Mr. Santa was a private investor. From June 1992 to August 1993, Mr. Santa was Chief Financial Officer of Scott USA, a sports equipment manufacturer and distributor. Earlier in his career, Mr. Santa was a senior manager of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, where he was employed for ten years.

        John G. Banker.    Mr. Banker has served as our Senior Vice President, Customers and Technology since January 2008 and our Vice President, Marketing and Sales, Clad Metal Division from June 2000 to December 2007. From June 1996 to June 2000, Mr. Banker was President of CLAD Metal Products, Inc. From June 1977 to June 1996, Mr. Banker was employed by us and served in various technical, sales and management positions. Mr. Banker held the position of Senior Vice President, Sales and New Business Development from June 1991 to July 1995.

        Rolf Rospek.    Information regarding Mr. Rospek, the Chief Executive Officer of our DYNAenergetics subsidiary, is provided under Proposal 1 of this proxy statement under the caption, "Nominees."

Board of Directors

Meeting Attendance

        Directors are encouraged to attend our Annual Meeting of Stockholders. All of our directors attended the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 26, 2010.

        During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, each of our current directors attended more than 75% of the aggregate of (i) the number of meetings of the Board held during the period in which he was a director and (ii) the number of meetings of the committees on which he served.

Director Independence

        The Board has determined that six of our eight current directors, Messrs. Allen, Cohen, Ferris, Graff, Hueber and Munera, all of whom are nominated for re-election, are "independent" directors under the rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and the applicable rules of the NASDAQ. In making its determinations of independence, in addition to consideration of the relevant SEC and NASDAQ rules, the Board considered factors for each director such as any other directorships, any employment or consulting arrangements, and any relationship with our customers or suppliers. Mr. Cariou, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. Rospek, the Chief Executive of our DYNAenergetics subsidiary, are the only Board members who are not independent based on these criteria. All members of

8

---

Table of Contents

the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee are independent directors.

        Our independent, non-executive directors hold regularly scheduled meetings in executive session, at which only independent, non-executive directors are present. The Board determined that there were no related-party transactions or other relationships that needed to be considered in evaluating whether these directors are "independent."

Board Leadership Structure

        The Company does not have a policy on whether the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer positions should be separate or combined. Currently we have separated the positions of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Our Chief Executive Officer is responsible for setting the strategic direction for the Company and the day to day leadership and performance of the Company, while our Chairman of the Board provides guidance to the Chief Executive Officer and sets the agenda for Board meetings and presides over meetings of the full Board.

Board Committees and Meetings

        During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, the Board held six meetings, including one telephonic meeting. The Board currently has an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, a Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and a Quality and Safety Committee.

The Audit Committee

        The Audit Committee meets with our independent registered public accounting firm at least four times a year to review the results of the annual audit and discuss the financial statements and receives and considers the accountants' comments as to controls, adequacy of staff and management performance and procedures in connection with audit and financial controls. The Audit Committee also appoints the independent registered public accounting firm. Messrs. Graff, Allen, Hueber and Munera were members of the Audit Committee for the full year ended December 31, 2010, with Mr. Graff serving as Chairman. On October 26, 2010, Dr. Ferris was appointed as a member of the Audit Committee. All members of the Audit Committee are non-employee directors whom the Board has determined to be "independent" as that concept is defined in Section 10A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), the rules promulgated by the SEC thereunder, and the applicable rules of the NASDAQ. The Audit Committee has determined that Mr. Graff qualifies as an "audit committee financial expert" under the rules of the SEC. The Audit Committee met five times during the 2010 fiscal year.

        In June 2000, the Board adopted a written Charter of the Audit Committee. The Charter of the Audit Committee, which was revised in April 2004, requires the Audit Committee be comprised of three or more independent directors, at least one of whom has relevant financial or accounting experience. The Charter of the Audit Committee was also revised in April 2007 to charge the Audit Committee with the responsibility of reviewing any related party transactions for potential conflicts of interest pursuant to our Related Party Transaction Policy and Procedures, which are described in more detail under, "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions." The Charter of the Audit Committee may be viewed on our website, www.dynamicmaterials.com.

The Compensation Committee

        The Compensation Committee makes recommendations concerning salaries and incentive compensation, grants equity-based awards to employees and non-employee directors under our stock incentive plan and otherwise determines compensation levels and performs such other functions regarding compensation as the Board may delegate. Messrs. Allen, Hueber and Munera were members of the Compensation Committee for the full year ended December 31, 2010, with Mr. Allen serving as the

9

---

Table of Contents

Chairman. Dr. Ferris was appointed as a member of the Compensation Committee on October 26, 2010. All members of the Compensation Committee are non-employee directors whom the Board has determined to be "independent" under SEC rules and the applicable rules of the NASDAQ. During the 2010 fiscal year, the Compensation Committee met six times, including two telephonic meetings.

        In August 2006, the Board adopted a written Charter of the Compensation Committee. The Charter of the Compensation Committee was revised in April 2007 to charge the Compensation Committee with responsibility for reviewing and discussing the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (the "CD&A") with the Company's executives and determining whether to recommend that the CD&A be included in the Company's Annual Report or proxy statement for the Annual meeting of stockholders. The Charter of the Compensation Committee may be viewed on our website, www.dynamicmaterials.com.

        The Compensation Committee is authorized to form and delegate responsibility to subcommittees of the Compensation Committee or other persons as it deems necessary or appropriate. It is unlikely the Compensation Committee will delegate responsibilities to any subcommittee unless such subcommittees shall meet all applicable independence requirements. It is also unlikely that the Committee will delegate responsibilities to persons other than independent directors any functions that are required—under applicable law, regulation or NASDAQ rules—to be performed by independent directors.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

        In June 2006, the Board established a Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and adopted a Charter for the committee. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee was composed of Messrs. Allen, Bernard and Munera, with Mr. Munera serving as Chairman. The main purposes of this Committee are (i) to identify and recommend individuals to the Board for nomination as members of the Board and its committees; (ii) to develop and recommend to the Board corporate governance principles applicable to the Company; (iii) to oversee the Board's annual evaluation of its performance; and (iv) to undertake such other duties as the Board may from time to time delegate to the Committee. Members of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee identified, selected and nominated Messrs. Ferris (in 2010) and Cohen (in 2011) for election to the Board. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee held one telephonic meeting during the 2010 fiscal year. The Charter of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee may be viewed on our website, www.dynamicmaterials.com.

        The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee does not have a formal policy with regard to the consideration of any director nominees recommended by its stockholders because historically we have not received recommendations from our stockholders and the costs of establishing and maintaining procedures for the consideration of stockholder nominations would have been unduly burdensome. However, any recommendations received from stockholders will be evaluated in the same manner that potential nominees recommended by Board members, management or other parties are evaluated. Stockholders may nominate persons for election to the Board of Directors in accordance with our Bylaws. Any stockholder nominations proposed for Board consideration should include the nominee's name and qualifications for Board membership and should be mailed to Dynamic Materials Corporation, c/o Corporate Secretary, 5405 Spine Road, Boulder, Colorado 80301, or faxed to (303) 604-1897. We do not intend to treat stockholder recommendations in any manner differently from other recommendations. No such suggestions were received during 2010.

        Qualifications for consideration as a director nominee may vary according to the particular area of expertise being sought as a complement to the existing Board composition. However, in making its nominations, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee considers, among other things, an individual's business experience, industry experience, financial background, breadth of knowledge about issues affecting our business, time available for meetings and consultation, integrity, independence, diversity of experience, leadership and other particular skills and experience possessed by the individual.

10

---

Table of Contents

Diversity is considered in the nominating process as described above and in our Governance and Nominating Committee Charter, which provides that we develop and recommend to the Board the criteria for Board membership, including, among other things, integrity, independence, diversity of experience, leadership and he ability to exercise sound judgment. We do not have a separate Board diversity policy.

        We do not currently employ an executive search firm or pay a fee to any other third party to locate qualified candidates for director positions.

Director Leadership of Quality and Safety Committee

        In June 2009, at the direction of the Board, the Company established a Quality and Safety Committee comprised of the Company's Chief Executive Officer, two independent directors and up to three Company managers. Mr. Hueber serves as the Chairman of this Committee. Messrs. Allen and Cariou are also members of this Committee, together with managers of some of the Company's U.S. and European operating divisions. The purpose of this Committee is to review, at least annually, the Company's performance in meeting its quality and safety objectives established by management and to facilitate the Board's oversight of these critical operational issues. The Quality and Safety Committee met once during the 2010 fiscal year as it inspected the Company's Dynaplat manufacturing facilities over several days.

Risk Oversight

        Our senior management manages the risks facing the Company under the oversight and supervision of the Board. While the full Board is ultimately responsible for risk oversight at our Company, two of our Board committees assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight function in certain areas of risk. The Audit Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to risk in the areas of financial reporting and internal controls. The Quality and Safety Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the management of risks related to operations and safety. Other general business risks such as economic and regulatory risks are monitored by the full Board. Risk management and assessment reports are regularly provided by management to these committees and the full Board.

Compensation Risk Assessment

        Our Compensation Committee considered whether our compensation program encouraged excessive risk taking by employees at the expense of long-term Company value. Based upon its assessment, the Compensation Committee does not believe that our compensation program encourages excessive or inappropriate risk-taking. The Compensation Committee believes that the design of our compensation program, which includes a mix of annual and long-term incentives, cash and equity awards and retention incentives, is balanced and does not motivate imprudent risk-taking.

Communications with the Board

        The Board believes that it is important for stockholders to have a process to send communications to the Board. Accordingly, stockholders desiring to send a communication to the Board, or to a specific director, may do so by delivering a letter to our Secretary at Dynamic Materials Corporation, c/o Corporate Secretary, 5405 Spine Road, Boulder, Colorado 80301 or fax to (303) 604-1897. The mailing envelope or fax cover sheet must contain a clear notation indicating that the enclosed letter is a "Stockholder-Board Communication" or "Stockholder-Director Communication." All such letters must identify the author as a stockholder and clearly state whether the intended recipients of the letter are all members of the Board or certain specified individual directors. The Secretary will open such communications and make copies and then circulate them to the appropriate director or directors.

11

---

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 2—RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

        The Audit Committee of the Board has selected Ernst & Young LLP ("E&Y") as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011. E&Y has been so engaged since July 18, 2002.

        Ratification of the selection of E&Y by stockholders is not required by law. However, as a matter of internal policy and good corporate governance, such selection is being submitted to the stockholders for ratification at the Annual Meeting and it is the present intention of the Board to continue this policy. If the stockholders do not ratify this appointment, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether to retain E&Y. If the selection of E&Y is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time it decides that such a change would be in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders.

        A representative of E&Y will be present at the annual meeting and will be available to respond to appropriate questions. We do not anticipate that the representative will make a prepared statement at the meeting; however, he or she will have the opportunity to do so if he or she so desires.

        The Company paid the following fees to E&Y for the audit of the consolidated financial statements and for other services provided in the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

        In accordance with the SEC's rules requiring the Audit Committee to pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided by our independent auditor, the Audit Committee has adopted a formal policy on auditor independence requiring the approval by the Audit Committee of all professional services rendered by our independent auditor prior to the commencement of the specified services. The Audit Committee approved all services performed by E&Y in fiscal year 2010 in accordance with our formal policy on auditor independence.

Requisite Vote

        The selection of our auditors will be ratified if the number of votes of authorized shares of our common stock cast in favor of the proposal exceeds the votes cast opposing the proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast on the proposal.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS
A VOTE "FOR" PROPOSAL 2.

12

---

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 3—ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

        The recently enacted Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, or the Dodd-Frank Act, enables our stockholders to vote to approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement in accordance with SEC rules.

        As described under the heading "Compensation Discussion and Analysis," our executive compensation program is designed to (i) attract, motivate and retain high-caliber managerial talent; (ii) provide competitive compensation opportunities; (iii) create incentives to achieve both short-term performance measures and long-term strategic goals; and (iv) provide incentive programs that are linked to stockholder value. For additional information about our executive compensation program, please read the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" beginning on page 17.

        We are asking our stockholders to indicate their support for the compensation of our named executive officers, as described in this proxy statement. This proposal, commonly known as a "say-on-pay" proposal, gives our stockholders the opportunity to express their views on the compensation of our named executive officers. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers and the philosophy, objectives and practices described in this proxy statement. Accordingly, we are asking our stockholders to vote "FOR" the following resolution at our 2011 annual meeting:

        "RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company's named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion is hereby APPROVED."

Requisite Vote

        The advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers will be approved if the number of votes of authorized shares of our common stock cast in favor of this proposal exceeds the votes cast opposing this proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast on the proposal. However, this say-on-pay vote is advisory, and therefore not binding on the Company, the Compensation Committee or our Board. Our Board and our Compensation Committee value the opinions of our stockholders and will consider the outcome of the vote when considering future decisions on the compensation of our named executive officers.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS
A VOTE "FOR" PROPOSAL 3.

13

---

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 4—ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF
AN ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

        The Dodd-Frank Act also enables our stockholders to vote, on an advisory or non-binding basis, on how frequently we should seek an advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the SEC's compensation disclosure rules, such as Proposal 3 above. The enclosed proxy card gives our stockholders four choices for voting on this Proposal 4. You can choose whether the say-on-pay vote should be conducted every year, every two years, or every three years. You may also abstain from casting a vote.

        Our Board has discussed and carefully considered the alternatives regarding the frequency of say-on-pay proposals in an effort to determine the approach that would best serve the Company and our stockholders. After careful consideration, our Board believes that conducting an advisory vote on executive compensation every three years is appropriate for us and our stockholders at this time for a number of reasons, including:

•

our compensation programs are fairly consistent and do not change significantly from year to year;



•

a longer frequency is consistent with long-term compensation objectives; and



•

the largest variable portion of our executive compensation is a contractually-based formula related to our net income.

        When you vote in response to the resolution below, you may cast your vote on your preferred voting frequency by choosing among the following four options: every one year, every two years, or every three years, or you may abstain from voting.

"RESOLVED, that the Company hold a stockholder advisory vote to approve the compensation of the Company's named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, with a frequency of once every year, every two years or every three years, whichever receives the highest number of votes cast with respect to this resolution."

Requisite Vote

        The frequency of the advisory vote on executive compensation receiving the greatest number of votes—every one year, every two years or every three years—will be considered the frequency recommended by stockholders. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast on the proposal. This vote is advisory and, therefore, not binding, and the Board may decide in the future that it is in the best interests of our stockholders and the Company to hold an advisory vote on executive compensation more or less frequently than the option approved by our stockholders.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS
A VOTE FOR "EVERY THREE YEARS" AS THE FREQUENCY
FOR ADVISORY VOTES ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

14

---

Table of Contents

        Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of our filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), or the Exchange Act, that might incorporate future filings, including this proxy statement, in whole or in part, the following Audit Committee Report and the Compensation Committee Report shall not be deemed to be "Soliciting Material," and are not deemed "filed" with the SEC and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filings under the Securities Act or Exchange Act whether made before or after the date of this proxy statement and irrespective of any general incorporation language in such filings.

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

        As of December 31, 2010, the Audit Committee of Dynamic Materials Corporation (the "Company") was comprised of Messrs. Richard P. Graff (Chairman), Dean K. Allen, James J. Ferris, Bernard Hueber, and Gerard Munera, each of whom the Board of Directors of the Company has determined to be independent as that concept is defined in Section 10A of the Exchange Act, the rules promulgated by the SEC thereunder; and the applicable rules of the NASDAQ. As required by the revised written Charter of the Audit Committee adopted by the Board of Directors in April 2004, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the Company's audited financial statements with the Company's management. The Audit Committee has also discussed with Ernst & Young LLP ("E&Y"), the Company's independent registered public accounting firm, the matters required to be discussed by the Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended. The Audit Committee has received from E&Y the written disclosures and the letter required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant's communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and the Audit Committee has discussed with E&Y that firm's independence. Based upon these discussions and the Audit Committee's review, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Company include the audited financial statements in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

15

---

Table of Contents

COMPENSATION PROCEDURES

        Our executive compensation program is administered by our Compensation Committee. Below is a discussion of the process and procedures followed by the Compensation Committee in determining the 2010 compensation for our named executive officers as well as setting the 2011 compensation levels and frame work for 2011 performance bonuses.

        With the recent growth of our DYNAenergetics subsidiary and Oilfield Products segment, we have determined that Rolf Rospek, the chief executive officer of DYNAenergetics, should be treated as a named executive officer in 2010. Since the time of his joining the Company as a director in 2007 in connection with our acquisition of DYNAenergetics we have reported his compensation in the section on Director Compensation. Most of his 2010 compensation was contractually specified in his employment agreement executed in connection with the DYNAenergetics acquisition. The Compensation Committee approved the amount of restricted stock granted to him in connection with his 2010 service as well as the terms of his new employment agreement, effective as of January 1, 2011. Going forward, the Compensation Committee plans to set and approve Mr. Rospek's compensation together with that of the other named executive officers.

Roles of the Parties Involved in Executive Compensation Decisions

        Role of Compensation Committee.    As provided in the Compensation Committee Charter, the Compensation Committee is composed of at least three non-employee directors who are also "independent directors," as defined under the applicable corporate governance rules of NASDAQ, and operates pursuant to its charter. The Compensation Committee determines the compensation arrangements of our named executive officers and recommends to the Board for its consideration and approval, the aggregate amount of equity-based compensation for our other employees. The Compensation Committee seeks to ensure that our compensation policies and practices are consistent with our values and pay philosophy and support the successful recruitment, development and retention of executive talent who are focused on achieving our business objectives and optimizing our long-term financial returns to stockholders. Additional information regarding the Compensation Committee is contained in the section of this proxy statement entitled, "Board of Directors—Board Committees and Meetings—The Compensation Committee."

        Role of Outside Compensation Consultant.    Since early 2006, the Compensation Committee has used an outside compensation consultant to assist the Compensation Committee in making compensation decisions with respect to the named executive officers. The Compensation Committee has engaged Harlon Group since mid-2009 as its compensation consultant. Harlon Group is an independent firm that provides consultation services to boards of directors and their compensation committees and does not provide any other services to us. The Compensation Committee engaged Harlon Group to review the Company's overall executive officer and director compensation in comparison to other comparably sized public companies in industries similar to the Company's, to help the Compensation Committee identify the appropriate mix of compensation components for compensating our executive officers and to facilitate the Compensation Committee's determination of our executive officers' performance bonus payments.

        Role of Chief Executive Officer in Compensation Decisions.    Our Chief Executive Officer confers with the chairman of the Compensation Committee in determining the base salary compensation for the executive officers other than himself. In 2011 our Chief Executive Officer will also propose recommendations to the Compensation Committee as to the 2011 performance bonus for each of the named executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer.

Meetings of Compensation Committee

        The 2010 salary and framework for performance bonuses for Messrs. Cariou, Santa and Banker were set by the Compensation Committee at its December 2009 meeting. The formula for the incentive bonus

16

---

Table of Contents

for Messrs. Cariou, Santa and Banker that was earned for 2010 is contained in the Company's Performance-Based Plan that was approved by stockholders at the 2009 annual stockholders meeting. The Compensation Committee had six meetings in 2010 and one meeting in January 2011 to determine 2010 performance bonuses for Messrs. Cariou, Santa and Banker and 2010 equity grants for all of the named executive officers as well as to set compensation for 2011. The Compensation Committee also reviewed and refined its philosophy on compensating our executive officers at each of the meetings at which it set compensation for 2010 and 2011.

        At the direction of the Compensation Committee, Harlon Group prepared various materials and analysis to assist the Compensation Committee in its review and determination of compensation for the named executive officers. The Compensation Committee members reviewed a draft report prior to their October 2009 meeting and requested additional information for a subsequent draft report presented prior to their January 2010 meeting.

Comparator Group Research

        At the direction of the Compensation Committee, Harlon Group researched market compensation levels and trends. This research focused on all aspects of compensation for our named executive officers. Harlon Group gathered research data from several different data sources, including various executive compensation surveys of companies in metal fabrication and advanced metals industries with comparable annual revenues. Data for those few competing companies in our primary industry is not available. Our competitors are either privately held, foreign-owned and/or are wholly-owned subsidiaries or divisions of larger companies and no applicable compensation information is publicly available. Rather, we have reviewed the executive compensation packages of a "comparator group" of similarly-sized, public companies that operate in metal fabrication and advanced metals industries: Altra Holdings, Inc.; AZZ Incorporated; Cabot Microelectronics Corp.; CARBO Ceramics, Inc.; Chart Industries Inc.; Gorman-Rupp Company; Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation; Haynes International Inc.; Houston Wire & Cable Company; Insteel Industries, Inc.; L.B. Foster Company; LMI Aerospace, Inc.; McGrath RentCorp; Preformed Line Products; RTI International Metals, Inc.; Sun Hydraulics Corporation; T-3 Energy Services, Inc.; Universal Stainless & Alloy Products, Inc. Though not an exact match to our Company, we believe these metal fabrication and advanced metals industries companies are the closest relevant comparators.

        The research included identifying compensation levels by executive position, with a break-out by salary, bonuses and equity grants. Among other things, the research also identified the proportion of total pay that is based on performance as well as the compensation for various executive officer positions relative to one another. The research compared the Company's historic levels of executive compensation to that of the median and mean of the comparator group.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Philosophy and Objectives of Our Executive Compensation Program

        Our compensation philosophy is to (i) provide a compensation program that attracts, motivates, and retains high-caliber managerial talent; (ii) offer compensation opportunities that are competitive with those provided by other comparable U.S. public companies as determined by our market research; (iii) create incentive compensation opportunities that emphasize the importance of achieving both short-term performance measures (i.e., annual) and long-term strategic goals; and (iv) sponsor incentive pay programs which are linked to stockholder value. The principal forms of executive compensation are base salary, an annual incentive bonus based on the net income of the Company, an annual performance bonus based on achievement of non-objective criteria and equity grants of restricted stock.

17

---

Table of Contents

        Below is a brief summary of the objectives of our executive compensation program:

1.

Linkage to Performance.    Our executive compensation program strives to link executive compensation to the Company's performance as well as the individual executive's performance. To this end, a sizable portion of each named executive officer's total compensation package is linked to accomplishing specific and measurable goals, including growing revenue profitably and increasing stockholder value. We believe net income should be used as the primary metric in determining performance levels for the award of incentive bonuses. We believe equity awards should take into account the increase or decrease in the trading price of our common stock over a period of years.

We believe that the interests of our named executive officers should be closely aligned with those of our stockholders. We have historically granted of stock options and shares of restricted stock to our executive officers to reinforce a long-term focus on delivering value to stockholders. We also granted retirement compensation in 2008 in the form of shares of restricted stock, the restrictions of which lapse five years from grant. The Compensation Committee believes that our incentive bonuses and equity awards provide benefit opportunities that are driven by the Company's performance.

2.

Stock Ownership Guidelines.    Our Compensation Committee and Board strongly believe that the best way to strengthen the link between our named executive officers (and directors) and stockholders is to require these individuals to own a significant amount of our common stock. Within three years of the commencement of the program on January 1, 2007, the following levels are expected to be attained: our Chief Executive Officer must hold common stock with a value that is at least five times his salary; the Chief Financial Officer and the Senior Vice President, Customers and Technology must hold stock worth at least three times their respective salaries; and within three years of their election non-employee directors must hold stock worth at least five times their annual cash fees from serving as a director. Restricted stock and stock options are not counted for purposes of these guidelines.



3.

Pay Mix.    We strive for a pay mix that reflects our compensation philosophy and performance-based compensation culture. A high proportion of total pay for our named executive officers is based on incentive and performance bonuses and equity awards that tie compensation to the Company's performance as well as the performance of the executive. On average, about two-thirds or more of the total compensation packages for our named executive officers is intended to be delivered through non-salary, short-term and long-term incentives.



4.

Competitive Compensation Levels.    We operate in a competitive business environment; therefore, our compensation programs are intended to support our goal of attracting and retaining highly talented employees. We believe our named executive officers should be compensated relative to the market median of comparable companies and consistent with the Company's performance.

During 2010, we compared the compensation of our named executive officers to market data gathered by our compensation consultant to help establish compensation levels for each executive. See "Compensation Procedures—Comparator Group Research" above. We selected median as the targeted level of compensation as we do not intend to pay compensation at levels significantly below or above the midpoint of our competitive market, taking into account the Company's performance compared to that of the comparator group. Our philosophy on annual and long-term incentive compensation is that it should vary with our performance, relative to budgets, goals and expectations.

5.

Perquisites.    We provide few perquisites to our named executive officers. In 2010, named executive officers received certain supplemental disability and life insurance benefits. Coverage under the supplemental life insurance policies for 2010 was $750,000 for our Chief Executive

18

---

Table of Contents

Officer, $415,000 for each of the other two U.S.-based named executive officers, our Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President, Customers and Technology and Euro 250,000 ($331,973) for the Chief Executive Officer of our DYNAenergetics subsidiary. Also in 2010 we leased automobiles for the full year for our four named executive officers. We also paid all operating expenses associated with the leased automobiles.

6.

Retirement Benefits.    Through the end of 2010, we did not sponsor any retirement plan for executives that would provide a pension benefit above the level provided to our other employees. We provide all eligible employees, including the U.S.-based named executive officers, with a 401(k) savings plan to which we make matching contributions. The 401(k) savings plan allows eligible employees to defer a percentage of their eligible compensation on a pre-tax basis, subject to the applicable dollar limit set by the Internal Revenue Service. We make a matching contribution of 100% of an employee's contribution up to 3% of eligible compensation and 50% of an employee's contribution on the next 2% of eligible compensation. Under the terms of the employment agreement for our European-based named executive officer, we made payments of $74,586 under a retirement insurance policy. As described below, in 2008, we granted each of the named executive officers supplemental retirement plan compensation in the form of a restricted stock grant that vests five years from date of grant.



7.

Employment Contracts and Severance Protection.    Our named executive officers have employment agreements with us with a term ending December 31, 2012. The primary purpose of the employment agreements is to set forth with clarity the terms and conditions of the executive's employment, to protect us from certain business risks (e.g., disclosure of trade secrets and improper competitive conduct), and to specify our right to terminate the employment relationship under various conditions. The employment agreements also protect the executive from certain risks, including termination of employment without cause. They do not, however, provide any special terms pertaining to a change in control of the Company. A summary of the provisions of the employment agreements for our named executive officers can be found below under "Employment Agreements."

Primary Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program

        Our philosophy regarding each element of our executive compensation program is as follows:

1.

Base salary is what we pay our named executive officers for their efforts for doing their job, given their scope of responsibility and their accountability for results that impact our success;



2.

An annual incentive bonus is what we pay our named executive officers for the short-term results of their efforts, measured by the net income of the Company.



3.

An annual performance bonus is what we pay our named executive officers for the results of their efforts judged by the Compensation Committee by reference to specified individual non-objective performance goals; and



4.

Long-term/stock incentive compensation is what we pay executives as incentives to promote long-term results for their efforts, for growing the value of the enterprise, and for enhancing value for stockholders.

        Base Salary.    When establishing base salaries for our named executive officers, the Compensation Committee considers compensation paid for similar positions at comparable companies included in compensation surveys. Using this information, it establishes salary guidelines that reflect the responsibilities of the executive in relation to similar positions in comparable companies. The Compensation Committee considers the named executive officer's performance against certain corporate objectives, such as successful execution of our strategies; comparisons of budgeted amounts to actual amounts; and our overall profitability. Other factors, such as specific job responsibilities, length of time in

19

---

Table of Contents

their current position, and the potential for future advancement influence the Compensation Committee's final determination of salaries for the named executive officers.

        Annual Incentive Bonus.    Pursuant to our Performance-Based Plan approved by our stockholders, we provide annual incentive bonus awards for our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President, Customers and Technology to promote the achievement of our short-term (i.e., annual) business objectives, which are also tied to shareholder value. The amount of the incentive bonus is based on the net income of the Company recognized for that fiscal year. The annual incentive bonus is paid in cash following completion of the audited financial statements of the Company for that year and certification, pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, by the Compensation Committee. Under the terms of his employment agreement, we provide a similar annual incentive bonus award for the Chief Executive Officer of our DYNAenergetics subsidiary, the amount of which is based in part on the net income of the Company and in part on the operating income of our Oilfield Products segment recognized for that fiscal year.

        Annual Performance Bonus.    We provide annual performance bonus awards for our named executive officers to promote individual performance in meeting or exceeding objectives contained in the Company's strategy. This strategy and the performance objectives are updated and reviewed annually. The amount of the performance bonus award varies by the extent to which the named executive officer's target objectives are achieved. The total amount of performance bonus that may be awarded is set at a percentage of the named executive officer's base salary as provided in their respective employment agreements. At the start of each fiscal year, the Compensation Committee reviews and approves our non-objective performance goals for the named executive officers. Our objectives consist of operating, strategic, and financial goals that are considered critical to our fundamental long-term goal of building stockholder value.

        After the end of the fiscal year, the Compensation Committee evaluates the performance of each named executive officer in meeting these target objectives. Awards are paid in cash following the determination of the award amounts.

        Long-Term Incentives and Retirement Benefits.    We currently provide long-term incentive awards to our named executive officers through our 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, which permits a broad range of types of equity grants. The purpose of the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan is to enable us to attract, retain and motivate our named executive officers and to align a significant portion of executive compensation with the long-term interests of our stockholders.

        In January 2011, we made grants of restricted stock to our named executive officers as compensation for their work in 2010. These grants vest in equal installments over three years, subject to continued employment with us. The purposes of the restricted stock grants are to retain the executive over a long timeframe and further strengthen the link between the named executive officer's compensation and the goal of building long-term value for stockholders. To the extent that dividends are declared and paid by the Company, any such dividends are paid on shares of restricted stock held by our named executive officers both prior to and after their vesting dates.

        In January 2008, we established a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan ("SERP") to provide additional retirement benefits to our named executive officers based upon their salary levels, ages and years of service with the Company. The SERP benefit consists of shares of restricted stock granted under the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan. The Compensation Committee used the principles of a "defined benefit" pension plan to determine the number of shares of restricted stock to be granted to each of the executives. The shares of restricted stock vest upon the completion, from date of grant, of five additional years of service with the Company. The shares will vest immediately upon the occurrence of a change in control of the Company, death or disability, termination without cause, or termination of employment by the executive for good reason. The Compensation Committee reviews annually the current value of the

20

---

Table of Contents

restricted stock granted in 2008 to provide the SERP benefit as it considers the over-all long-term incentives and retirement benefit portion of compensation for the named executive officers.

Compensation Decisions For Our Named Executive Officers

        Compensation of Chief Executive Officer.    In determining the compensation of Mr. Cariou, our President and Chief Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee focused on (i) competitive levels of compensation for chief executive officers who are leading a company of similar size and complexity and (ii) the importance of retaining a chief executive officer with the strategic, financial and leadership skills to ensure our continued growth and success. The Compensation Committee also considered our management's decision to generally hold 2010 salaries at the 2009 level for substantially all of our employees. Harlon Group has advised us that Mr. Cariou's base salary, annual incentive target opportunity, and equity-based compensation for 2010 are consistent with reasonable, and competitive practices for high-performing chief executive officers.

        During 2010, Mr. Cariou continued to demonstrate strong leadership and vision for us, to implement key strategic initiatives that strengthen us and increase long-term stockholder value, and to enhance our competitiveness. Despite the difficult economic and market challenges facing the Company in 2010, we believe Mr. Cariou's leadership has been exceptional in enabling the Company to maintain the level of sales and margins it achieved in 2010 while wisely using Company resources in furthering opportunities for the Company's growth.

        Base Salary.    For 2010, Mr. Cariou's base salary was $455,400, a 0% increase from 2009 as management decided to keep salaries for all Company employees at their 2009 level. The Compensation Committee determined to increase Mr. Cariou's base salary to $469,075 for 2011 (an increase of approximately 3%).

        Annual Bonus.     We paid Mr. Cariou a total bonus of $234,090 for his performance in 2010. This bonus was comprised of two components: an incentive bonus pursuant to the Company's Performance-Based Plan and a performance bonus determined at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. Mr. Cariou's 2010 annual incentive bonus was $131,625, which is 2.5% of our annual consolidated net income for the year. The performance bonus was $102,465, which represented 22.5% (out of a possible 25% maximum target) of Mr. Cariou's salary. The Compensation Committee determined the amount of this performance bonus based on how well the Committee believed Mr. Cariou achieved important non-objective corporate goals related to corporate growth, budget performance, operations excellence, investor relations, development of management, enterprise-wide planning initiatives and risk management.

        Pursuant to the Performance-Based Plan, Mr. Cariou's annual incentive bonus opportunity for 2011 is an amount equal to 2.5% of our annual consolidated net income for the year up to an amount equal to 175% of Mr. Cariou's base salary and thereafter 1.0% of the Company's annual consolidated net income. Mr. Cariou is eligible in 2011 for a performance bonus of up to another 25% of salary if, in the opinion of the Compensation Committee and in its sole discretion, he achieves certain other important non-objective corporate goals, as described above.

        Long-Term Incentives.     We granted Mr. Cariou a restricted stock award of 30,000 shares effective January 13, 2010 for his performance in 2009. We granted Mr. Cariou a restricted stock award of 26,000 shares effective January 19, 2011 for his performance in 2010. These shares of restricted stock are scheduled to vest annually in equal installments over three years from the grant date. The grant reflects (i) our view of the value of Mr. Cariou's long-term contribution to, and leadership of the Company and the long-term benefits realized by our stockholders, (ii) the Compensation Committee's and the Board's desire to retain Mr. Cariou and foster his desire to exceed our expectations, and (iii) competitive market practices. On January 19, 2011, the Compensation Committee also granted Mr. Cariou an additional 5,000 shares of restricted stock which are scheduled to vest in full upon the earlier of the fifth anniversary of the grant or his retirement from the Company's employment.

21

---

Table of Contents

Compensation of the Other Named Executive Officers.

        Richard A. Santa—Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary.

        Base Salary.     For 2010, Mr. Santa's base salary was $284,625, a 0% increase from 2009 as management decided to keep salaries for all Company employees at their 2009 level. The Compensation Committee determined to increase Mr. Santa's base salary to $293,175 for 2011 (an increase of approximately 3%).

        Annual Bonus.     We paid Mr. Santa a total bonus of $103,883 for his performance in 2010. This bonus was comprised of two components: an incentive bonus pursuant to the Company's Performance-Based Plan and a performance bonus determined at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. Mr. Santa's 2010 annual incentive bonus was $52,650, which is 1.0% of our annual consolidated net income for the year. The Compensation Committee awarded a performance bonus of $51,233, which represented 18% (out of a possible 20% maximum target) of Mr. Santa's salary. The Compensation Committee determined the amount of this performance bonus based on how well the Committee believed Mr. Santa achieved important non-objective corporate goals related to enterprise-wide planning and other information technology initiatives, quality of financial and management reporting and analysis and management of the Company's various operations in addition to management development, investor relations and risk management.

        Mr. Santa's annual incentive bonus opportunity for 2011 is an amount equal to 1.0% of our annual consolidated net income for the year up to an amount equal to 125% of Mr. Santa's base salary and thereafter 0.5% of the Company's annual net income. Mr. Santa is eligible in 2011 for a performance bonus of up to another 20% of salary if, in the opinion of the Compensation Committee and at its sole discretion, he achieves certain other important non-objective corporate goals, as described above.

        Long-Term Incentives.     We granted Mr. Santa a restricted stock award of 12,000 shares effective January 13, 2010 for his performance in 2009. We granted Mr. Santa a restricted stock award of 11,000 shares effective January 19, 2011 for his performance in 2010. These shares of restricted stock are scheduled to vest annually in equal installments over three years. The grant reflects (i) our view of the value of Mr. Santa's long-term contribution to, and leadership of, the Company and the long-term benefits realized by our stockholders, (ii) the Compensation Committee's and the Board's desire to retain Mr. Santa and foster his desire to exceed their expectations, and (iii) competitive marketplace practices. On January 19, 2011, the Compensation Committee also granted Mr. Santa an additional 3,000 shares of restricted stock which are scheduled to vest in full upon the earlier of the fifth anniversary of the grant or the retirement from the Company's employment.

        John G. Banker—Senior Vice President, Customers and Technology.

        Base Salary.     For 2010, Mr. Banker's base salary was $284,625, a 0% increase from 2009 as management decided to keep salaries for all Company employees at their 2009 level. The Compensation Committee determined to increase Mr. Banker's base salary to $293,175 for 2011 (an increase of approximately 3%).

        Annual Bonus.     We paid Mr. Banker a total bonus of $103,883 for his performance in 2010. This bonus was comprised of two components: an incentive bonus pursuant to the Company's Performance-Based Plan and a performance bonus determined at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. Mr. Banker's 2010 annual incentive bonus was $52,650, which is 1.0% of our annual consolidated net income for the year. The Compensation Committee awarded a performance bonus of $51,233, which represented 18% (out of a possible 20% maximum target) of Mr. Banker's salary. The Compensation Committee determined the amount of this performance bonus based on how well the Committee believed Mr. Banker achieved important non-objective corporate goals related to sales

22

---

Table of Contents

performance, risk management and enterprise-wide planning initiatives as well as management development and succession planning.

        Mr. Banker's annual incentive bonus opportunity for 2011 is an amount equal to 1.0% of our annual consolidated net income for the year up to an amount equal to 125% of Mr. Banker's base salary and thereafter 0.5% of the Company's annual net income. Mr. Banker is eligible in 2011 for a performance bonus of up to another 20% of salary if, in the opinion of the Compensation Committee and in its sole discretion, he achieves certain other important non-objective corporate goals cited above.

        Long-Term Incentives.     We granted Mr. Banker a restricted stock award of 12,000 shares effective January 13, 2010 for his performance in 2009. We granted Mr. Banker a restricted stock award of 11,000 shares effective January 19, 2011 for his performance in 2010. These shares of restricted stock are scheduled to vest annually in equal installments over three years. The grant reflects (i) our view of the value of Mr. Banker's long-term contribution to, and leadership of, the Company and the long-term benefits realized by our stockholders, (ii) the Compensation Committee's and the Board's desire to retain Mr. Banker and foster his desire to exceed their expectations, and (iii) competitive marketplace practices. On January 19, 2011, the Compensation Committee also granted Mr. Banker an additional 3,000 shares of restricted stock which are scheduled to vest in full upon the earlier of the fifth anniversary of the grant or the retirement from the Company's employment.

        Rolf Rospek—DYNAenergetics Chief Executivel Officer.    

        Base Salary.     For 2010, Mr. Rospek's base salary was $236,254. The Compensation Committee determined to increase Mr. Rospek's base salary to €190,000 ($252,299 based on the average exchange rate for 2010) for 2011 (an increase of approximately 7%).

        Annual Bonus.     We paid Mr. Rospek a total bonus of $58,161 for his performance in 2010, as provided in his prior employment agreement. The Compensation Committee changed the annual bonus structure in Mr. Rospek's new employment agreement to match the structure of that provided to the other named executive officers. Mr. Rospek's annual incentive bonus opportunity for 2011 is an amount equal to the (A) the sum of (1) 0.5% of the Company's annual net income and (2) 1.0% of the annual operating income of the oilfield products segment of the Company, until such time as he has received total payments under this non-discretionary annual bonus with respect to such year equal to 125% of that year's salary (the "Initial Bonus Limit"), plus (B) following such time as Mr. Rospek has received the Initial Bonus Limit, (1) 0.25% of the Company's annual net income and (2) 0.5% of the annual operating income of the oilfield products segment of the Company. Mr. Rospek is eligible in 2011 for a performance bonus of up to another 20% of salary if, in the opinion of the Compensation Committee and at its sole discretion, he achieves certain other important non-objective corporate goals.

        Long-Term Incentives.     We granted Mr. Rospek a restricted stock award of 9,000 shares effective January 13, 2010 for his work in 2009. We granted Mr. Rospek a restricted stock award of 9,000 shares effective January 19, 2011 for his work in 2010. These shares of restricted stock vest annually in equal installments over three years. The grant reflects (i) our view of the value of Mr. Rospek's long-term contribution to, and leadership of, the Company and the long-term benefits realized by our stockholders, (ii) the Compensation Committee's and the Board's desire to retain Mr. Rospek and foster his desire to exceed their expectations, and (iii) competitive marketplace practices.

        Note on Currency Translation.     Mr. Rospek's compensation is paid to him in Euros. All amounts described in U.S. Dollars were converted using an average exchange rate for 2010.

23

---

Table of Contents

Extension of Term of Employment Agreements

        In January 2010, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the Board extended the term of the employment agreements for each of Messrs. Cariou, Santa and Banker for three years. The Board believed it was important to secure the services of these senior executives on a longer-term basis than the one-year terms of the existing agreements. In 2011, we executed an employment agreement with Mr. Rospek, the term of which will expire on December 31, 2012, the termination date of the employment agreements with the other named executive officers.

Impact of Regulatory Requirements

        Income Tax Considerations.    Under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, unless various conditions are met that enable compensation to qualify as "performance-based," the annual compensation paid to each of our three U.S.-based named executive officers who are covered employees will be tax-deductible only to the extent that it does not exceed $1,000,000. The 2006 Stock Incentive Plan as well as the Performance Based Plan have been designed to permit the Compensation Committee to grant awards that generally qualify as performance-based compensation for purposes of satisfying the conditions of Section 162(m) of the Code, thereby permitting us to receive a federal income tax deduction in connection with such awards even if they exceed $1,000,000. The Compensation Committee generally intends that compensation paid by us will be tax-deductible. However, it may choose to pay nondeductible compensation if it deems it necessary or desirable to attract, retain and reward the executive talent necessary for our success. For example, the restricted stock awards issued under the SERP in 2008 do not satisfy the conditions of Section 162(m) of the Code, and we anticipate that amounts payable under the SERP at the end of the five year period that, together with other compensation paid in that year, exceed $1,000,000 will not deductible for federal income tax purposes.

        Accounting Considerations.    We are required to treat stock options and restricted stock as an expense under FASB ASC Topic 718, "Share-Based Payments." The Compensation Committee takes this requirement into account in setting the awards under the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan and the vesting schedule that attaches to those awards.

Summary

        The Compensation Committee and the Board set executive compensation policy and pay opportunities for our named executive officers by keeping in mind competitive practice for a company like Dynamic Materials Corporation, the importance of incentivizing performance, and the continuing need to align the executives' interests with those of stockholders.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

        The Compensation Committee of Dynamic Materials Corporation has reviewed and discussed the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" for the 2010 fiscal year with management. Based on these reviews and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" be included in the Proxy Statement for the 2011 annual meeting of stockholders and incorporated by reference into the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

24

---

Table of Contents

(1)

Amounts in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Assumptions used to determine the amounts in this column are the same as those used in the valuation of compensation expense for our audited financial statements. This column was prepared assuming none of the awards will be forfeited. The grant date fair values of restricted stock awards were based on the market price of our stock on the grant dates. For additional information about these restricted stock awards, refer to Note 6 of our consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

(2)

Includes restricted stock awards in the amount of $738,300 granted on January 9, 2008 for 2007 performance, $395,750 for restricted stock awards granted on December 10, 2008 for 2008 performance and $1,722,700 for restricted stock awards granted on January 9, 2008 in connection with the SERP.

(3)

Includes restricted stock awards in the amount of $295,320 granted on January 9, 2008 for 2007 performance, $158,300 for restricted stock awards granted on December 10, 2008 for 2008 performance and $1,230,500 for restricted stock awards granted on January 9, 2008 in connection with the SERP.

(4)

Includes restricted stock awards in the amount of $295,320 granted on January 9, 2008 for 2007 performance, $158,300 for restricted stock awards granted on December 10, 2008 for 2008 performance and $1,476,600 for restricted stock awards granted on January 9, 2008 in connection with the SERP.

(5)

Includes expenses relating to a company-leased automobile that was provided to Mr. Cariou ($18,588 in 2010, $16,004 in 2009 and $15,445 in 2008), matching contributions under the company's 401(k) plan ($9,800 in 2010 and 2009 and $9,200 in 2008), life insurance premium payments ($4,804 in 2010, $4,823 in 2009 and $3,300 in 2008), and $5,000 in 2010, 2009 and 2008 for the reimbursement of professional fees for financial planning advisory services. Automobile expenses include monthly lease payments and all operating expenses (gas, maintenance, insurance, etc.).

(6)

Includes expenses relating to a company-leased automobile that was provided to Mr. Santa ($15,475 in 2010, $14,307 in 2009 and $14,710 in 2008), matching contributions under the company's 401(k) plan ($9,800 in 2010 and 2009 and $9,200 in 2008), life insurance premium payments ($7,053 in 2010, $6,315 in 2009 and $3,269 in 2008), and $5,000 in 2010, 2009 and 2008 for the reimbursement of professional fees for financial planning advisory services. Automobile expenses include monthly lease payments and all operating expenses (gas, maintenance, insurance, etc.).

(7)

Includes expenses relating to a company-leased automobile that was provided to Mr. Banker ($10,723 in 2010, $11,062 in 2009 and $11,011 in 2008), matching contributions under the company's 401(k) plan ($9,800 in 2010 and 2009 and $9,200 in 2008), life insurance premium payments ($3,686 in 2010, $3,275 in 2009 and $2,876 in 2008), and $5,000 in 2010 and 2009 and $2,176 in 2008 for the reimbursement of professional fees for financial planning advisory services. Automobile expenses include monthly lease payments and all operating expenses (gas, maintenance, insurance, etc.).

(8)

Includes $16,253 of expenses relating to a company-leased automobile that was provided to Mr. Rospek, pension plan payments of $3,944, and life insurance premium payments of $74,586.

(1)

Mr. Cariou's non-equity incentive plan award for 2010 was calculated by a formula specified in the Performance-Based Plan that provided an annual incentive equal to 2.5% of the Company's 2010 net income up to an amount equal to 175% of Mr. Cariou's salary and thereafter 1.0% of the Company's 2010 net income. Non-equity incentive plan awards for Mr. Santa and Mr. Banker were calculated by a formula specified in the Performance-Based Plan that provided annual incentives equal to 1% of the Company's 2010 net income for each executive up to an amount equal to 125% of such executive's salary and thereafter 0.5% of the Company's 2010 net income. The target award for each of the named executive officers reflects the incentive that was paid. Since the formula in the Performance-Based Plan contains no thresholds or maximums, these columns have been deleted.

(2)

Awards granted to all named executive officers were in the form of shares of restricted stock granted under the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, which are scheduled to vest one-third on each of the first three anniversary dates. In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, the grants reflects the grant date fair value of the awards based upon the quoted closing market price of $20.99 per share of our common stock on January 13, 2010. Dividends of $0.12 per share were paid on these shares in 2010.

There were no outstanding options for the named executive officers at December 31, 2010.

(1)

These restricted stock awards were granted on January 9, 2008 and are scheduled to vest one-third on each of the first three anniversary dates. The shares qualify for dividends if and when the Company declares dividend payments. Dividends of $0.16 per share were paid on these shares in 2010.

(2)

These restricted stock awards were granted on January 9, 2008 under the SERP and are scheduled to vest five years from the date of grant, January 9, 2013. The shares qualify for dividends if and when the Company declares dividend payments. Dividends of $0.16 per share were paid on these shares in 2010.

(3)

These restricted stock awards were granted on December 10, 2008 and are scheduled to vest one-third on each of the first three anniversary dates. The shares qualify for dividends if and when the Company declares dividend payments. Dividends of $0.16 per share were paid on these shares in 2010.

(4)

These restricted stock awards were granted on January 13, 2010 and are scheduled to vest one-third on each of the first three anniversary dates. The shares qualify for dividends if and when the Company declares dividend payments. Dividends of $0.12 per share were paid on these shares in 2010.

(5)

The fair market value is calculated as the product of the closing price on the last business day of 2010, or $22.57 per share, and the number of unvested shares.

(1)

There were no options exercised during 2010 by our named executive officers.

(2)

Represents the number of shares vested multiplied by the per share market price of our common stock on the vesting dates.

(1)

Includes involuntary termination without cause resulting from a change in control.

(2)

The only compensation payable to named executive officers in the event of death, disability or retirement, is the accelerated vesting of restricted stock awards and a pro-rated bonus for the portion of the fiscal year prior to his death, disability or retirement.

(3)

Equals two times the base salary of $455,400 for Mr. Cariou.

(4)

Equals two times the base salary of $284,625 for Mr. Santa.

(5)

Equals two times the base salary of $284,625 for Mr. Banker.

(6)

Equals two times the base salary of €190,000 for Mr. Rospek converted at the average exchange rate for the 2010.

(7)

Equals three month's salary that is payable to Mr. Rospek's estate in the event of his death.

(8)

Equals two times the average bonus for 2009 and 2010 for Mr. Cariou.

(9)

Equals Mr. Cariou's 2010 bonus that was paid in 2011.

(10)

Equals two times the average bonus for 2009 and 2010 for Mr. Santa.

(11)

Equals Mr. Santa's 2010 bonus that was paid in 2011.

(12)

Equals two times the average bonus for 2009 and 2010 for Mr. Banker.

(13)

Equals Mr. Banker's 2010 bonus that was paid in 2011.

(14)

Equals two times the pro forma bonus that would have been paid to Mr. Rospek in 2010 under his new employment agreement.

(15)

Equals Mr. Rospek's 2010 bonus that was paid in 201l plus an additional three month's bonus that is due in the event of Mr. Rospek's death.

(16)

The value of the restricted stock is based on the closing market price of our common stock on December 31, 2010, $22.57 per share.

(1)

Mr. Cariou and Mr. Rospek have been omitted from the table because they do not receive any compensation for serving on our Board, beyond their compensation as employees of the Company. See the "Summary Compensation Table" for Mr. Cariou's and Mr. Rospek's compensation. Mr. Cohen became a director in 2011.

(2)

The annual fees for each member of the Board and fees related to the applicable Board member's serving on committees are paid quarterly.

(3)

Amounts shown in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. See Note 6 of the consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 regarding assumptions underlying valuation of equity awards. The grant date fair value of the restricted stock awarded to each director, with the exception of Dr. Ferris, on May 26, 2010 was $46,860 for the 3,000 shares granted to each independent director. The grant date fair value of the restricted stock awarded to Dr. Ferris on July 15, 2010 was $47,640 for the 3,000 shares granted to him following him joining the board. The 2010 restricted stock awards vest 100% on the later of the first annual stockholders meeting following the date of grant or one year from the date of grant. Restricted stock awards are forfeited for no consideration if a director's service is terminated for any reason. As of December 31, 2010, Messrs. Allen, Ferris, Graff and Hueber each had no outstanding options and 3,000 shares of restricted stock and Mr. Munera had 10,000 options outstanding and 3,000 shares of restricted stock. During 2010, aggregate dividends of $0.16 per share were paid on shares of restricted stock.

(1)

Includes 31,460 shares issuable with respect to outstanding rights under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan as of December 31, 2010, in addition to shares available for issuance under our 2006 Stock Incentive Plan.

---

*

Less than 1%

(1)

This table is based upon information supplied by officers and directors as well as filings made pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act with the SEC. Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes to this table and subject to community property laws where applicable, we believe that each of the stockholders named in this table has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares indicated as beneficially owned. Applicable percentages are based on 13,330,698 shares of common stock outstanding on April 6, 2011, adjusted as required by rules promulgated by the SEC.

(2)

Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each beneficial owner is c/o Dynamic Materials Corporation, 5405 Spine Road, Boulder, Colorado 80301.

(3)

Includes 10,000 shares that may be acquired upon exercise of currently exercisable stock options. Shares of common stock subject to options that are exercisable within 60 days of April 6, 2011, are deemed to be beneficially owned by the person holding those options for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of the person but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing any other person's percentage ownership.

---

(1)

This table is based upon information supplied by the principal stockholders on the Statement of Beneficial Ownership filed on Schedule 13G with the SEC. Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes to this table and subject to community property laws where applicable, we believe that each of the stockholders named in this table has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares indicated as beneficially owned. Applicable percentages are based on 13,330,698 shares outstanding on April 6, 2011.

(2)

Based on the Statement of Beneficial Ownership filed on Schedule 13G/A on February 7, 2011, by Brown Capital Management, LLC, in its capacity as an investment advisor for shares owned by its clients. Brown Capital Management has the sole power to vote or direct the vote for 997,665 shares, and the sole power to dispose or direct the disposition of 1,893,659 shares.

(3)

Based the Statement of Beneficial Ownership filed on Schedule 13G/A on February 4, 2011, by BlackRock, Inc., in its capacity as an investment advisor for shares owned by its clients. BlackRock Inc. has the sole power to vote or direct the vote for 844,102 shares, and the sole power to dispose or direct the disposition of 844,102 shares.