UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant ☑

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  o

Check the appropriate box:

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

THE E.W. SCRIPPS COMPANY

Scripps Center
312 Walnut Street
Cincinnati, Ohio 45202

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TO BE HELD MAY 6, 2019

TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF THE E.W. SCRIPPS COMPANY

The Annual Meeting of the Shareholders (the "Annual Meeting") of The E.W. Scripps Company (the “Company”) will be held at the Scripps Center, 312 Walnut Street, 10th Floor Conference Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, on Monday, May 6, 2019, at 4:00 PM, local time, for the following purposes:

The shareholders will also transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting. The Company's board of directors (the "Board") has fixed the close of business on March 8, 2019, as the record date for the determination of shareholders who are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting and any adjournment thereof.

If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting and need special assistance because of a disability, please contact the secretary’s office at secretary@scripps.com.

We are furnishing our proxy materials to you under Securities and Exchange Commission rules that allow companies to deliver proxy materials to their shareholders on the Internet. On or about March 22, 2019, you were provided with a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (“Notice”) and were provided access to our proxy materials over the Internet. The proxy materials include the 2018 Annual Report to Shareholders and the Proxy Statement.

We encourage you to attend the Annual Meeting. However, it is important that your shares be represented whether or not you are personally able to attend. Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please vote as instructed on the Notice, via the Internet or the telephone, as promptly as possible to ensure that your vote is recorded. Alternatively, you may follow the procedures outlined in the Notice to request a paper proxy card to submit your vote by mail. If you attend the meeting and your shares are registered in your name, you may withdraw your proxy at that time and vote your shares in person.

Your proxy is being solicited by the Board.

Julie L. McGehee, Esq.
Secretary and Vice President

March 22, 2019

The E.W. Scripps Company
312 Walnut Street
Cincinnati, Ohio 45202

PROXY STATEMENT

2019 ANNUAL MEETING
May 6, 2019

This Proxy Statement is being furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the board of directors (the "Board") of The E.W. Scripps Company, an Ohio corporation (the “Company”), for use at the Company’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”), which will be held on Monday, May 6, 2019, at the Scripps Center, 312 Walnut Street, 10th Floor Conference Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, at 4:00 PM local time.

The close of business on March 8, 2019, has been fixed as the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting (the "Record Date").

INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS

We are furnishing proxy materials to our shareholders primarily via the Internet under rules adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, instead of mailing printed copies of those materials to each shareholder. On March 22, 2019, we mailed to our shareholders (other than those who previously requested electronic or paper delivery) a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials containing instructions on how to access our proxy materials, including our Proxy Statement and our Annual Report to Shareholders. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials also instructs you on how to access your proxy card to vote via the Internet or by telephone.

This process is designed to expedite shareholders’ receipt of proxy materials, lower the cost of the Annual Meeting and help conserve natural resources. If you would prefer to continue to receive printed proxy materials, please follow the instructions included in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. If you have previously elected to receive our proxy materials electronically, you will continue to receive these materials via e-mail unless you elect otherwise.

VOTING PROCEDURES

On March 8, 2019, the Company had outstanding 68,803,609 Class A Common Shares, $.01 par value per share (“Class A Common Shares”), and 11,932,722 Common Voting Shares, $.01 par value per share (“Common Voting Shares”). Holders of Class A Common Shares are entitled to elect the greater of three or one-third of the directors of the Company but are not entitled to vote on any other matters except as required by Ohio law. Holders of Common Voting Shares are entitled to elect all remaining directors and to vote on all other matters requiring a vote of shareholders. Each Class A Common Share and Common Voting Share is entitled to one vote upon matters on which such class of shares is entitled to vote.

To have a quorum necessary to conduct business at the Annual Meeting, it is necessary to have shares that represent (in person or by proxy) the holders of (i) a majority of our Class A Common Shares outstanding on the Record Date, and (ii) a majority of our Common Voting Shares outstanding on the Record Date. Shares represented in person or by proxy (including shares that abstain or do not vote with respect to a particular proposal) will be counted for the purpose of determining whether a quorum exists at the Annual Meeting for that proposal. If a quorum is not present, the Annual Meeting will be adjourned until a quorum is obtained.

If you are a shareholder of record (i.e., you directly hold your shares through an account with our transfer agent, Computershare), you can vote in person following the instructions in this Proxy Statement using one of the three methods described below. If you are a beneficial owner (i.e., you indirectly hold your shares through a nominee such as a bank or broker), you can vote in person following the instructions in this Proxy Statement using the methods provided by your nominee.

SOLICITATION OF PROXIES

The solicitation of proxies is made by, and on behalf of, the Board. The Company will pay the cost of the solicitation of proxies, including the cost of printing and mailing the notice of the Annual Meeting, the Proxy Statement and the accompanying proxy. In addition to the solicitation of proxies by mail, solicitation may be made by directors, officers and other employees of the Company by Internet (including by email, Twitter, the use of our investor relations website and other online channels of communication), telephone, facsimile and other electronic channels of communication, town hall meetings, personal interviews, press releases, and press interviews. Our directors, officers and regular employees may, without compensation other than their regular compensation and the reimbursement of expenses, solicit proxies by telephone or personal conversation. The Company has retained the services of Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. at an estimated cost of $6,000 to assist the Company in the solicitation of proxies from brokers, nominees, institutions and individuals.

PROPOSAL 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
(Item 1 on the Proxy Card)

A board of 11 directors is to be elected, three by the holders of Class A Common Shares voting separately as a class and eight by the holders of Common Voting Shares voting separately as a class. The nominating & governance committee recommended to the Board each of the nominees set forth below. In the election, the nominees receiving the greatest number of votes will be elected. Directors are elected by the shareholders for terms of one year and hold office until their successors are elected and qualify. Each of the director nominees identified in this Proxy Statement has consented to being named as a nominee in our proxy materials and has accepted the nomination and agreed to serve as a director if elected.

Each proxy for Class A Common Shares executed and returned by a holder of such shares will be voted for the election of the three directors hereinafter shown as nominees for such class of shares, unless otherwise indicated on such proxy. Each proxy for Common Voting Shares executed and returned by a holder of such shares will be voted for the election of the eight directors hereinafter shown as nominees for such class of shares, unless otherwise indicated on such proxy. Although the Board does not contemplate that any of the nominees hereinafter named will be unavailable for election, in the event that any such nominee is unable to serve, the proxies will be voted for the remaining nominees and for such other person(s), if any, as the Board may propose.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR" EACH OF THE NOMINEES FOR WHICH YOU ARE ENTITLED TO VOTE FOR ELECTION AS A DIRECTOR.

REPORT ON THE NOMINEES FOR ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The following table sets forth certain information as to each of the nominees for election to the Board.

Nominee Qualifications

The nominees for the Board consists of 11 members who we believe are extremely well-qualified to serve on the board and represent our stockholders' best interests. The nominating & governance committee selects nominees with a view to establishing a Board that is comprised of members who:

Nominees Tenure and Diversity

Board Refreshment

We believe the Company benefits when there is a mix of experienced directors with a deep understanding of our businesses and others who bring a fresh perspective. The Board remains committed to refreshment and to seek out highly qualified women and minority candidates, as well as candidates with diverse backgrounds, skills and experiences.

REPORT ON THE SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to persons known to management to be the beneficial owners, as of January 31, 2019, unless indicated otherwise in the footnotes below, of more than 5 percent of the Company’s outstanding Class A Common Shares or Common Voting Shares. Unless otherwise indicated, the persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares shown therein as being beneficially owned by them. The percentages shown in the table are based on 68,731,963 Class A Common Shares and 11,932,722 Common Voting Shares outstanding as of January 31, 2019.

Heidt, Paul K. Scripps, Charles Kyne McCabe, Peter R. La Dow, J. Sebastian Scripps, Anne M. La Dow, Wendy E. Scripps, Elizabeth A. Logan, Cynthia J. Scripps, John P. Scripps, Mary Peirce, Megan Scripps Tagliaferri, Eva Scripps Attal, Kathy Scripps, Eaton M. Scripps, Wesley W. Scripps, Ellen M. Scripps Kaheny, Cody Dubuc, Careen Cardin, Sam D. F. Scripps, R. Michael Scagliotti, William A. Scripps, Jr., Welland H. Scripps, Kendall S. Barmonde, Charles L. Barmonde, Manuel E. Granado, Geraldine Scripps Granado, Raymundo H. Granado, Jr., Anthony S. Granado, Ellen B. Granado, Crystal Vasquez Lozano, Elizabeth Scripps, James Bryce Vasquez, John Patrick Scripps, Keon Korey Vasquez, Peggy Scripps Evans, Samuel Joseph Logan, Maxwell Christopher Logan, Savannah Brickner, Monica Holcomb, Samantha J. Brickner, Nathanial W. Heidt, Austin S. Heidt, Robert S. Heidt III, Jessica L. Scripps, Jenny Sue Scripps Mitchell, Vanessa L. Sanchez, Veronica E. Sanchez, Brittany Jean Scripps and Shannon Leigh Howard.

REPORT ON THE SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT

The following information is set forth with respect to the Company’s Class A Common Shares and Common Voting Shares beneficially owned as of January 31, 2019, by each director and each nominee for election as a director of the Company, by each named executive officer, and by all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group. As of January 31, 2019, there were 68,731,963 Class A Common Shares outstanding and 11,932,722 Common Voting Shares outstanding. Unless otherwise indicated, the persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares shown therein as being beneficially owned by them.

REPORT ON THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND ITS COMMITTEES

2018 Board Meetings

During 2018, the Board held four regularly scheduled meetings and three telephonic meetings. All directors attended at least 75 percent of the meetings of the Board and of the committees on which they served during 2018.

Executive Sessions of Directors

During 2018, executive sessions of non-management directors were held regularly. The director who presided at these meetings was the lead independent director or another director selected by the Board at the time of such meeting.

Standing Committees and Committee Charters

The Company has standing executive, audit, compensation and nominating & governance committees. The charter for each such standing committee is available for review on the Company’s website (www.scripps.com) by first clicking on "Investors" and then on “Corporate Governance.” Copies are available in print to any shareholder who requests a copy by contacting the Company’s secretary at secretary@scripps.com or by mail at 312 Walnut Street, Suite 2800, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45202.

Committees of the Board of Directors

Executive Committee. Richard A. Boehne (chair), Charles L. Barmonde, John W. Hayden, Roger L. Ogden, Adam P. Symson and Kim Williams are the members of the executive committee. This committee may exercise all of the powers of the Board in the management of the business and affairs of the Company between Board meetings except the power to fill vacancies on the Board or its committees. The executive committee meets only as necessary. During 2018, the executive committee held one meeting.

Audit Committee. Kim Williams (chair), Lauren Rich Fine and John W. Hayden are the members of the audit committee. The purpose of the committee is to assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibility relating to (1) the integrity of the Company’s financial statements and financial reporting process and the Company’s systems of internal accounting and financial controls; (2) the performance of the internal audit services function; (3) the annual independent audit of the Company’s financial statements, the engagement of the independent auditors and the evaluation of the independent auditors’ qualifications, independence, performance and fees; (4) the compliance by the Company with legal and regulatory requirements, including the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures; (5) the review of the Company’s enterprise risk issues including, but not limited to, financial, cybersecurity, data privacy, legal and business continuity; and (6) the fulfillment of all other responsibilities as outlined in its charter. The internal and independent auditors have unrestricted access to the audit committee. The committee meets privately with each of the independent auditors, the internal auditors and management. During 2018, the audit committee held four meetings and one telephonic meeting.

Compensation Committee. Roger L. Ogden (chair), Kelly P. Conlin and Anne M. La Dow are the members of the compensation committee. The committee is appointed by the Board to discharge the Board’s responsibilities relating to compensation of the Company’s directors and officers. The committee reviews and approves the Company’s compensation principles that apply generally to Company employees. It also reviews and approves the Company’s goals and objectives relevant to compensation of the chief executive officer and executive officers with the title of senior vice president or higher (“senior executives”) and evaluates their performance in light of those goals and objectives. Annually, the compensation committee conducts a performance review of the chief executive officer, the results of which are shared with the entire Board. With respect to senior executives, the committee reviews and approves a peer group of companies against which it compares the Company’s compensation programs and practices for senior executives and directors, and the chief executive officer makes recommendations to the committee regarding the compensation elements of his direct reports in light of their goals and objectives. The committee reviews all of the components of the chief executive officer’s and the senior executives’ compensation, including goals and objectives, employment arrangements, severance arrangements or plans, incentive plans, employee benefit plans, perquisite arrangements, the Incentive Compensation Recoupment Policy (“claw-back policy”) and stock ownership guidelines, considers the chief executive officer's recommendations for his direct reports, and makes recommendations to the Board. The committee has the authority to administer the cash-based incentive plans, severance arrangements or plans and change in control arrangements or plans covering the chief executive officer and senior executives. The committee is also responsible for reviewing the result of any shareholder advisory vote regarding the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers and making recommendations to the Board on how to respond to those votes as well as recommending to the Board whether to hold the shareholder advisory vote every one, two or three years. The committee oversees the annual review of the Company’s compensation policies and practices for all employees, including non-senior executives, to determine whether they create financial risks. The committee may delegate any of its responsibilities to a subcommittee composed of one or more members of the committee, or to one or more other directors, in each case as it deems appropriate, other than in connection with any power or authority required by law, regulation or listing standard to be exercised by the committee as a whole.

With respect to any funded employee benefit plans covering employees of the Company subject to the fiduciary responsibility provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, the committee has the definitive authority to appoint and terminate the named fiduciary or named fiduciaries of such plan(s). The committee reviews succession planning relating to positions held by senior officers of the Company and reviews director compensation and makes recommendations with respect thereto to the Board. The committee has the authority to engage outside consultants to assist in determining appropriate compensation levels for the chief executive officer, other senior managers or directors. In 2018, the committee retained Exequity, LLC to assist it in developing and reviewing our executive and director compensation strategy and programs. The committee is also responsible for producing an annual report for inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement and reviewing and approving the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and related compensation disclosures included in the Company’s proxy statement. During 2018, the compensation committee held four meetings.

Nominating & Governance Committee. John W. Hayden (chair), Charles L. Barmonde, R. Michael Scagliotti and Kim Williams are the members of the nominating & governance committee. The purpose of the committee is (1) to assist the Board by identifying individuals qualified to become Board members and to recommend director nominees to the Board; (2) to recommend to the Board corporate governance principles that might be applicable to the Company; (3) to lead the Board and its committees in the annual review of the Board and its committees performance; (4) to oversee the Company's ethics and compliance programs; and (5) to recommend to the Board nominees for each committee of the Board. During 2018, the nominating & governance committee held four meetings.

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

The Company continues to build a sturdy, high-quality portfolio of businesses that provide a strong foundation for launching innovative new journalism and media business models - businesses we believe will create shareholder value for the future. At the Company, a sustainable approach to business means evolving to meet the changing needs of our advertisers and audiences and seizing opportunities to create shareholder value in the disruption of our industry while maintaining our long-term commitment to social responsibility.

The components of Corporate Social Responsibility for the Company include:

Impactful Journalism

The Company is dedicated to fulfilling our instrumental role as the Fourth Estate in American democracy. Our objective local news coverage empowers people to make informed decisions for their own lives and for their communities, and our investigative journalism plays a crucial watchdog role.

In our Local Media markets, we take pride in giving back to the places where we live and work through social service projects, shining light on important local issues such as domestic violence and homelessness, and sponsoring or emceeing important local philanthropic, civic and business events.

In both our local and national news and information organizations, we strive to earn and maintain the trust of the public and to be fearless in our pursuit of the truth. Our journalists adhere to the highest journalism ethics practices when gathering and reporting the news and welcome an open dialogue with the public about our news-gathering processes.

Corporate Giving and The Scripps Howard Foundation

The Company gives back at the corporate level to many organizations in our corporate hometown of Cincinnati, including the United Way of Greater Cincinnati and ArtsWave. We also encourage our employees to take a paid Volunteer Day away from work every year to spend time with an organization or cause about which they are passionate.

Since 1962, the Scripps Howard Foundation ("The Foundation") has further amplified the Company’s charitable work. The Foundation, the philanthropic arm of the Company, supports journalism education that produces fair-minded, thoughtful reporters and editors; literacy that promotes a more educated populace; and basic needs social service organizations in the communities where we do business.

Diversity, Equity and Inclusion

The Company is committed to a diverse and inclusive workplace that reflects the communities we serve. Our new chief diversity officer has begun developing plans to guide the Company in creating equitable and inclusive hiring practices, vendor selection and management philosophies.

Wellbeing

Our free employee wellbeing programs take a holistic approach, covering not just good physical health, but also mental and financial wellbeing. We encourage employees to participate in these programs through team-based behavior modification challenges and financial incentives such as contributions to their Health Savings Accounts.

Environment

As a media company, our carbon footprint is reasonably light. However, we all have a role to play in environmental sustainability, and the Company is taking an active approach to lighten its impact. The Company is transitioning the lighting in all its buildings to more efficient LED bulbs. Many of the Company’s operations have undergone energy audits to identify more opportunity for efficiency. The Company uses cellular-based backpacks for transmitting video signals to local television stations, helping it avoid the need for fleets of less-fuel efficient trucks. The Company also runs recycling programs at many of its local and national media office locations.

For more information on the Company’s Corporate Social Responsibility plan, please visit www.scripps.com.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The Board is committed to good corporate governance, good business practices and transparency in financial reporting. The nominating & governance committee annually reviews the Company’s corporate governance principles, a copy of which is available on the Company’s website (www.scripps.com) by first clicking on "Investors" and then on “Corporate Governance.” Copies are available in print to any shareholder who requests a copy by contacting the Company’s secretary at secretary@scripps.com or at 312 Walnut Street, Suite 2800, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45202.

Board Leadership

Richard A. Boehne, the Company’s former President and Chief Executive Officer, serves as chairman of the Board. Ms. Williams serves as the lead independent director.

Charitable Contributions

The Company has not made any charitable contributions, where the amount exceeded $1 million, or 2 percent of such charity’s consolidated gross revenues, to any charitable organization of which a director is an executive officer.

Code of Conduct

The Company demonstrates its commitment to operate at the highest ethical standards by enforcing the principles in its Code of Conduct, which is applicable to all employees. The Company’s chief ethics officer is responsible for implementation and oversight of the ethics program and reports to the nominating & governance committee on quarterly activity. Additionally, the Company has in place a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer and the Senior Financial and Accounting Officers. It is the responsibility of the nominating & governance committee and the chief financial officer to make sure that this policy is operative and has effective reporting and enforcement mechanisms. Both the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers and the Code of Conduct are available for review on the Company’s website at www.scripps.com (click on "Investors" and then on “Corporate Governance”) and to any shareholder who requests a printed copy from the Company’s secretary at secretary@scripps.com or at 312 Walnut Street, Suite 2800, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202.

The Company believes it has an obligation to provide employees with the guidance and support needed to ensure that lawful and ethical choices are made at work. To support this commitment, the Company requires all employees to take an online code of conduct learning module annually to ensure that employees understand the Code of Conduct and the importance that the Company places on ethical behavior and compliance with the law. In addition, the Company has established a means for employees to submit confidential and anonymous reports of suspected or actual violations of the Company’s Code of Ethics relating, among other things, to: accounting and auditing matters; antitrust activity; confidentiality and misappropriation; conflict of interest; discrimination or harassment; diverting of product or business activity; embezzlement; employee relations; falsification of contracts, reports or records; gifts or entertainment; improper supplier or contractor activity; leadership or management issues; securities law violations; sexual harassment; substance abuse; theft; or unsafe working conditions. To submit a report, an employee may call a toll-free number that is answered by a trained professional of EthicsPoint, an independent firm. This number (888-397-4911) is operational 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Employees may also raise questions online through the Internet (www.ethicspoint.com) or by a direct phone line to the Company’s chief ethics officer.

Communications with Directors

Shareholders and other interested parties wishing to communicate with the Board may do so by addressing letters to the secretary of the Company at secretary@scripps.com or by mail at 312 Walnut Street, Suite 2800, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45202. The Board has instructed the secretary to review all communications so received (via e-mail or regular mail), and to exercise her discretion not to forward to the directors correspondence that is not germane to the business affairs of the Company. Correspondence not forwarded will be retained for one year, and any director may request the secretary to forward any and all such communications to the directors.

Communications with Shareholders

The Company recognizes the importance of regular and transparent communication with our shareholders. Each year, we continually engage with a significant portion of shareholders that include our top institutional investors. In 2018, we held meetings and conference calls with investors representing approximately 88% of our outstanding shares. We engaged with these shareholders on a variety of topics, including strategy, corporate governance practices, board composition, executive compensation programs, and other matters of shareholder interest.

Director Attendance at Annual Meeting of Shareholders

The Company does not have a policy with regard to attendance by Board members at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. All Board members attended the Company’s 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Director Education

New directors attend an orientation session that introduces them to the Company’s operations and to the members of management. In addition, each new committee member receives an orientation specific to the committee on which they will serve. Thereafter, directors are informed on a regular basis of various director educational programs offered by governance and director organizations. The Company pays for the continuing education of its directors. The director orientation policy is reviewed by the nominating & governance committee annually.

Director Independence

The Board has determined that, with the exception of Richard A. Boehne, former President and Chief Executive Officer, and Adam P. Symson, current President and Chief Executive Officer, all of the directors and nominees for director are independent under the standards established by Nasdaq. All of the members of the nominating & governance committee, audit committee and compensation committee are independent under such standards.

Director Independence — Audit Committee

The Board has determined that none of the current members of the audit committee has any relationship with the Company that could interfere with his or her exercise of independence from management and the Company. Each of the members satisfies the definitions of independence set forth in the rules promulgated under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and in the listing standards of Nasdaq. The Board determined that each member of the committee meets the experience and expertise requirements of Nasdaq and that Ms. Williams is an audit committee financial expert as defined in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules adopted under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

Director Independence — Controlled Company Status

Nasdaq requires listed companies to have a majority of independent directors on their boards and to ensure that their audit committee, compensation committee and nominating & governance committee are composed entirely of independent directors as well. A company that qualifies as a “controlled company” does not have to comply with these independence rules so long as it discloses to shareholders that the company qualifies as a “controlled company” and that it is relying on this exemption in not having a majority of independent directors on the Board or not having audit, compensation, and nominating & governance committees comprised entirely of independent directors. A “controlled company” is a listed company of which more than 50 percent of the voting power is held by an individual, a group, or another company. The Signatories to the Scripps Family Agreement hold a majority of the Company’s outstanding Common Voting Shares. As such, the Company qualifies as a “controlled company” and may rely on the Nasdaq exemption. The Company is not relying at present on that exemption.

Director Nominations

The nominating & governance committee will consider any candidate recommended by the shareholders of the Company in light of the committee’s criteria for selection of new directors. If a shareholder wishes to recommend a candidate, he or she should send the recommendation, with a description of the candidate’s qualifications, to: Chair, Nominating & Governance Committee, c/o Ms. Julie L. McGehee, The E.W. Scripps Company, 312 Walnut Street, Suite 2800, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 or at secretary@scripps.com. In the past, the committee has hired an independent consultant to assist with the identification and evaluation of director nominees and may do so in the future.

Director Qualifications and Diversity

When selecting director nominees, the nominating & governance committee considers requirements of applicable law and listing standards, as well as the director qualification standards highlighted in the Company’s corporate governance principles. The committee is responsible for reviewing with the Board the requisite skills and characteristics of Board candidates as well as the diversity and composition of the Board as a whole. A person considered for nomination to the Board must be a person of high integrity. Other factors considered are independence, age, gender, skills, industry knowledge and experience in the context of the needs of the Board. The Board does not have a formal diversity policy. The nominating & governance committee makes recommendations to the Board regarding the selection of director nominees.

For each director nominated for election at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the Board considered each of the factors highlighted in the preceding paragraph, and the nominees’ biographical information and work experience and determined that, if elected, the nominees would enable the Board as a whole to perform its duties in an efficient and effective manner. Among other things, all of the nominees bring integrity and good business judgment to Board discussions. More specifically, Mr. Ogden, Ms. Williams, Mr. Boehne, Mr. Conlin, Mr. Symson, Ms. Fine and Ms. Lucas bring a working knowledge of the industry or have direct television or digital experience; Mr. Hayden is a retired chief executive officer; and Mr. Barmonde (Scripps family member), Ms. La Dow (Scripps family member and former employee of a subsidiary (from January 1989 to January 1995) of the Company) and Mr. Scagliotti (Scripps family member) bring to the Board institutional knowledge and a thorough understanding of the Company’s history and vision.

The Company maintains a general retirement age for directors who are not signatories to the Scripps Family Agreement of 72 as of the nomination date with two optional, one-year extensions, with approval from the full Board.

Board and Committee Self-Assessments

Each year, the Board and the Board’s audit, nominating & governance and compensation committees conduct self-assessments to evaluate their effectiveness and to identify opportunities for improvement. This self-assessment may be conducted in the form of written or oral questionnaires administered by Board members, management or third parties. Directors respond to questions designed to elicit information to be used in improving Board and committee effectiveness. The self-assessment is designed to gather suggestions to improve Board effectiveness and solicit additional feedback on Board operations, composition, and priority agenda topics. This process also allows the Board to identify opportunities for Board succession and skills.

The evaluation process was led by the nominating & governance committee in 2018 and will be led by a third-party firm in 2019 to bring an outside perspective to the evaluation process.

Director Service on Other Audit Committees

None of the Company’s directors currently serves on the audit committees of more than three public companies.

Risk Oversight — the Board’s Role

Risk oversight is a key responsibility of the Board, the fulfillment of which is of primary importance to the Company. Through its periodic review of the Company’s business strategies, the Board assesses management’s perception of and tolerance for risk and advises on the appropriate level of risk for the Company. The audit committee of the Board reviews and discusses the Company’s risk assessment and risk management policies with management on a quarterly basis. The Company’s governance, enterprise risk management and compliance (“GRC”) committee reports quarterly to the audit committee, and the committee’s written risk management report is included in the Board’s quarterly meeting materials. The GRC committee is chaired by the Company’s General Counsel (chief compliance officer), who reports directly to the audit committee on compliance matters, and its members are division leaders and heads of key functional areas such as finance, human resources and information technology.

The Board monitors cybersecurity and technology risks through the audit committee. The audit committee receives quarterly updates on the status of the Company’s cybersecurity program from the Chief Information Security Officer ("CISO") as well as intermittent updates when certain situations arise. Additionally, the CISO reviews the Company’s cybersecurity strategy with the audit committee on an annual basis.

AUDIT COMMITTEE MATTERS

Responsibilities

The audit committee is comprised solely of independent directors and, among other things, is responsible for the following reviews, approvals and processes.

In discharging its oversight responsibility as to the audit process, the audit committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2018, with the Company’s management, including a discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles; the reasonableness of significant judgments; and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements. The committee also discussed with the Company’s internal auditor, and with Deloitte & Touche LLP, and its subsidiaries and affiliates (“Deloitte”), the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended December 31, 2018, the overall scope and plan for their respective audits. The committee meets with the internal auditor and Deloitte, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examination, their evaluation of the Company’s internal controls, and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting.

Independence of the External Auditors

The audit committee has established a pre-approval policy and procedures for audit, audit-related and tax services that can be performed by the independent auditors without specific authorization from the committee subject to certain restrictions. The policy sets out the specific services pre-approved by the committee and the applicable limitations, while ensuring the independence of the independent auditors to audit the Company’s financial statements is not impaired.

Service Fees Paid to the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The following table sets forth fees for all professional services rendered by Deloitte to the Company for the years ended December 31, 2018, and December 31, 2017.

Services Provided by Deloitte

All services provided by Deloitte are permissible under applicable laws and regulations. The Company has adopted policies and procedures for pre-approval of services by Deloitte. The fees paid to Deloitte shown in the table above were all pre-approved in accordance with these procedures and include:

Audit Fees — These are fees for professional services performed by Deloitte for the audit of the Company and certain subsidiary companies, review of financial statements included in the Company’s quarterly 10-Q filings, and services that are normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

Audit-Related Fees — These are fees for assurance and related services performed by Deloitte that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s financial statements. This includes: employee benefit and compensation plan audits; due diligence related to mergers and acquisitions; audits and reviews associated with registration statements related to mergers and acquisitions; other attestations by Deloitte, including those that are required by statute, regulation or contract; and consulting on financial accounting/reporting standards and controls.

Tax Fees — These are fees for professional services performed by Deloitte with respect to tax compliance and tax returns. This includes review of original and amended tax returns for the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries; refund claims, payment planning/tax audit assistance; tax compliance for employee benefit plans; and tax work stemming from “Audit-Related” items.

These services are actively monitored (both spending level and work content) by the audit committee to maintain the appropriate objectivity and independence in Deloitte’s core work, which is the audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The committee concluded that Deloitte’s provision of audit and non-audit services to the Company and its affiliates is compatible with Deloitte’s independence.

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

In connection with the financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, the audit committee has:

Based upon these reviews and discussions, the audit committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Audit Committee

Kim Williams, Chair
Lauren Rich Fine
John W. Hayden

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board (collectively, the “Committee”) has submitted the following report for inclusion in this Proxy Statement:

Our Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this Proxy Statement with management. Based on our Committee’s review of and the discussions with management with respect to the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, our Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The foregoing report is provided by the following directors, who constitute the Committee:

The Compensation Committee

Roger L. Ogden, Chair
Kelly P. Conlin
Anne M. La Dow

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis explains the Company’s compensation program for our named executive officers. The Company’s named executive officers for 2018 were:

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

2018 Compensation Highlights

We operate in highly competitive and rapidly changing industries, serving audiences and businesses through a growing portfolio of local and national media brands. In light of the above, the Committee made the following changes to our executive compensation program during 2018:

Objectives of our Compensation Program

Our Compensation Policies and Practices

The Committee has implemented certain compensation policies and practices that are intended to promote the compensation objectives listed above and align our compensation with industry practices.

Variable and Equity Based Compensation

A meaningful portion of our named executive officers’ compensation consists of short-term incentives (“STI”) and long-term incentives (“LTI”). Our STI opportunities are provided under an annual incentive program, the payout of which is dependent on corporate and/or divisional performance. In 2018, our LTI opportunities were provided through time-based and performance-based restricted share units (“RSUs”) that vest over four years.

The charts below illustrate the elements of the target total direct compensation opportunities provided to our named executive officers. As evidenced by the charts, a significant portion of our target total direct compensation consisted of STI and LTI opportunities.

CORE COMPENSATION ELEMENTS

The following is a brief summary of each element of the core compensation program for our named executive officers.

Base Salary

We provide competitive base salaries to attract and retain key executive talent. During the annual performance review process in 2018, base salaries for our named executive officers were increased, effective January 1, 2018, for the reasons set forth in the Executive Summary.

Mr. Lyons received a base salary increase in November 2017, therefore, the Committee elected not to adjust his base salary at its February 2018 meeting.

Annual Incentive

The Company maintains an annual incentive program, under which our named executive officers are eligible to receive annual cash payments based on the extent to which certain operational goals are achieved.

The 2018 target annual incentive opportunities for the named executives remained unchanged from 2017 levels.

2018 Annual Incentive Plan

In February 2018, the Committee established an annual incentive program for the year for the named executive officers. This program was based on the free cash flow and revenue goals set forth in our business plan. Our free cash flow and revenue targets depend in part on anticipated advertising levels for the year. Advertising revenues increase significantly during even-numbered years when local, state and federal elections occur. In addition, every four years, political spending typically is elevated due to the presidential election. Because of these political election cycles, we usually see a significant difference in our operating results when comparing performance in even-numbered years to odd-numbered years.

Consistent with past practice, our free cash flow and revenue targets for 2018 (an even-numbered year) were set above actual results for 2017 (an odd-numbered year) to reflect the nature of political spending.

The following tables set forth the free cash flow and revenue targets for 2018 and the related achievement levels.

The 2018 annual incentive program payouts for the performance period for all named executives are calculated as follows:

*Straight line interpolation is used for performance between threshold, target, and maximum levels.

*Straight line interpolation is used for performance between threshold, target, and maximum levels.

Based on the performance results as outlined in the tables immediately above, the payout level for each named executive officer under the 2018 annual incentive program was as follows:

For more information on the 2018 annual incentive opportunities for our named executive officers, please refer to the “2018 Grants of Plan-Based Awards” section of this Proxy Statement. The amount of the annual incentive earned for 2018 is set forth in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the “2018 Summary Compensation Table” of this Proxy Statement.

Long-Term Incentive

The Committee believes that a competitive long-term incentive program is an important component of total compensation because it: (i) enhances the retentive value of our compensation; (ii) rewards executives for increasing our stock price and developing long-term value; and (iii) provides executives with an opportunity for stock ownership to align their interests with those of our shareholders.

Long-Term Incentive Opportunities

In 2018, the long-term incentive opportunities for Mr. Symson, Ms. Knutson, Mr. Lawlor, Mr. Appleton and Mr. Lyons were increased for the reasons set forth in the Executive Summary.

Under the 2018 long-term incentive program, the incentive opportunities were provided in the form of time-based RSUs and performance-based RSUs as follows:

The performance and payout scale for performance-based RSUs is the same as the scale used under the annual incentive program for Company-wide free cash flow. Our actual Company-wide free cash flow for 2018 was $221.7 million (compared to a target of $191.5 million) or a 116% achievement level, meaning that 126% of the performance-based restricted share units for our named executive officers were earned, subject to the applicable service-based vesting requirements.

The long-term incentive grants are intended to foster employee stock ownership, align the interests of management with those of our shareholders, and enhance our retention program. Moreover, the time-based awards, combined with the Company’s stock ownership requirements, are intended to provide a direct incentive for our management to build sustained, long-term shareholder value.

Equity Grant Practices

The Committee typically approves annual equity awards at its February meeting, the date of which is usually set two years in advance. The annual equity awards for 2018 were granted on March 8, 2018.

In order to mitigate the impact of fluctuations in our stock price, award values are converted into a number of shares by dividing the applicable dollar value of the long-term incentive opportunity by the average of the closing per-share price of our Class A Common Shares for the 30 trading days immediately preceding and including the grant date of the equity award. The Committee does not grant equity compensation awards in anticipation of the release of material, nonpublic information. Similarly, the Company does not time the release of material, nonpublic information to coincide with equity award grant dates.

Additional Information

For more information on the equity awards granted to our named executive officers in 2018, please refer to the “2018 Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table in this Proxy Statement. For information about the total number of equity awards outstanding as of the end of 2018 with respect to each named executive officer, please refer to the “2018 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End” table of this Proxy Statement.

ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION POLICIES AND PRACTICES

In addition to the core compensation program described above, we utilize several other compensation policies and practices that further our strategic objectives, promote sound governance practices, and deliver pay-for-performance.

Incentive Compensation Recoupment Policy

We have adopted a clawback policy in order to support the accuracy of our financial statements and align our executives’ long-term interests with those of our shareholders. Under this policy, each officer must repay, as directed by the Board, any annual incentive or other performance-based award received by him or her, if (i) the payment of such compensation was based on the achievement of financial results that were later the subject of a restatement of our financial statements; and (ii) the Committee determines that the officer’s fraud or misconduct caused or contributed to the need for the restatement.

Stock Ownership Requirements

The Committee maintains stock ownership targets for our named executive officers to achieve. For this purpose, the shares may be owned directly, in trust, or through any unvested time-based or earned performance-based restricted share units. The ownership guidelines were implemented to encourage named executive officers to maintain a meaningful equity interest in the Company and a shared commitment to value creation. We believe the equity ownership interests that result from our stock ownership guidelines will enhance the motivation of our executives. All of our named executive officers meet their required level of ownership.

Post-Employment Benefits

The Committee believes it is important to provide the executive officers, including named executive officers, with benefits that are in addition to those generally provided to its employees. As a result:

Health, Welfare and Other Personal Benefits

The named executive officers are entitled to participate in all health, welfare, fringe benefit and other arrangements generally available to other employees. The Company may also provide its officers, including its named executive officers, with limited additional perquisites and other personal benefits. For example, named executive officers are provided a financial planning benefit. Additionally, the named executive officers are eligible for an annual executive physical. Typically, the majority of the cost associated with this benefit is covered under the established health care plans; however, if certain tests or procedures are not covered, the Company will pay the difference.

For more information about the perquisites provided in 2018 to each named executive officer, please refer to the “All Other Compensation” column of the “2018 Summary Compensation Table” of this proxy statement.

Employment Agreements, Executive Severance Plan and Change in Control Plan

The Committee believes severance protections convey the Company’s commitment to each named executive officer while offering flexibility for any potential changes in compensation or duties. Accordingly, the Company provides severance protections for named executive officers under an employment agreement (for Mr. Symson only), the Executive Severance Plan and the Change in Control Plan.

Employment Agreement

We maintain an employment agreement with Mr. Symson that expires on August 8, 2020, subject to successive automatic one-year renewals unless notice of non-renewal is provided by either party. The term will be extended two years in the event of a change in control of the Company. The agreement provides for severance benefits in the event of an involuntary termination of employment without “cause” or a termination for “good reason,” death or disability, as more fully described in the “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” section of this Proxy Statement.

Executive Severance Plan

Each of the named executive officers, other than Mr. Symson, participates in the Executive Severance Plan. Upon an involuntary termination without “cause,” the covered executives are entitled to: (i) a pro-rated annual incentive, based on actual performance for the entire year; (ii) a severance payment equal to one times base salary and target annual incentive; (iii) accelerated vesting of Company equity awards (with performance-based awards paying out based on actual performance results for the entire performance period); and (iv) continued payment of monthly health care premiums for up to one year (subject to reduction if the participant becomes re-employed). The Company may amend or terminate the plan at any time, without notice or participant consent.

Change in Control Plan

Each of the named executive officers is provided change in control protections under the Senior Executive Change in Control Plan (the “Change in Control Plan”). This plan provides benefits on a “double trigger,” meaning the cash severance benefits are due only if the Company terminates the executive’s employment without “cause” or the executive terminates his employment for “good reason,” in either case within a two-year period following a change in control. Participating named executive officers would be entitled to a tax gross-up for any excise taxes imposed on the severance benefits.

The Committee believes that the occurrence, or potential occurrence, of a change in control transaction will create uncertainty regarding the continued employment of our named executive officers. The Change in Control Plan allows our named executive officers to focus on the Company’s business and objectively evaluate any proposals during potential change in control transactions without being distracted by potential job loss. It also enhances retention following a change in control, as the severance benefits are payable only if the executive incurs a qualifying termination within a certain period following a change in control, rather than merely as a result of the change in control.

All equity awards held by our named executive officers would immediately vest upon a change in control. Unlike the cash severance described above, the accelerated vesting is not contingent upon a qualifying termination of employment within a certain period following a change in control. This “single trigger” is appropriate because the Company’s equity may change in the event of a change in control and the Committee believes our named executive officers should have the same opportunity to realize value in a change in control transaction as public shareholders.

Additional Information

Please refer to the “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” section of this proxy statement for information regarding potential payments and benefits, if any, that each named executive officer is entitled to receive upon certain terminations of employment or in connection with a change in control.

COMPENSATION CONSULTANT AND PEER GROUP

Independent Compensation Consultant

For purposes of developing and reviewing our 2018 executive compensation strategy and programs, the Committee directly retained Exequity, LLP (“Exequity”). Exequity reported directly to the Committee and served at the sole discretion of the Committee. It did not perform any other services for the Company. The Committee assessed the independence of Exequity pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission rules and concluded that no conflict of interest existed that would prevent Exequity from independently advising the Committee.

We believe that our compensation program should remain competitive in order to attract and retain key executive talent. Therefore, as part of its engagement, Exequity provided information to the Committee about the target market compensation levels, pay mix and overall design for the components of total direct compensation based on the pay practices of companies in our compensation peer group.

Compensation Peer Group

Our compensation peer group consists of broadcast and other media companies identified through a quantitative analysis as being comparable across a range of operational and market-based performance measures. We review our compensation peer group annually based on the Company’s current strategic direction, size and market for competitive talent. The 2018 peer group, used in conjunction with 2018 compensation decisions, consisted of the following companies:

COMPENSATION PEER GROUP
Revenue Comparison*
(in millions)

*Revenue values are based on 2016 revenues (most current annual revenue data available when 2018 compensation decisions were made).

SAY-ON-PAY-VOTE

As in previous years, our holders of Common Voting Shares continued to show strong support for our executive compensation program by approving the compensation of our named executive officers at our 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The Committee views the support of our holders of Common Voting Shares as a strong endorsement of our compensation program and our emphasis on a pay-for-performance culture.

TAX IMPLICATIONS

In structuring our executive compensation program, the Committee takes into account the tax treatment of our compensation arrangements. For example, the Committee reviews and considers the deductibility of executive compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (“Section 162(m)”). Prior to 2018, Section 162(m) generally provided that the Company may not deduct compensation paid to a “covered employee” (generally our named executive officers serving on the last day of the year other than the chief financial officer) to the extent it exceeds $1 million. Qualified performance-based compensation paid pursuant to shareholder approved plans generally was not subject to the $1 million deduction limit, provided that certain requirements were satisfied.

In making compensation decisions in 2017 and prior years, the Committee often sought to structure our annual incentive program and performance-based restricted shares with the intention that they would be exempt from the $1 million deduction limit as “qualified performance-based compensation.” However, the Committee has never adopted a policy that would require all compensation to be deductible, because the Committee wants to preserve the ability to pay compensation to our executives in appropriate circumstances, even if such compensation would not be deductible under Section 162(m).

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which was enacted on December 22, 2017, includes a number of significant changes to Section 162(m), such as the repeal of the qualified performance-based compensation exemption and the expansion of the definition of “covered employees” (for example, by including the chief financial officer and certain former named executive officers as covered employees). As a result of these changes, except as otherwise provided in the transition relief provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, compensation paid to any of our covered employees generally will not be deductible in 2018 or future years, to the extent that it exceeds $1 million.

2018 Summary Compensation Table

The following Summary Compensation Table provides information regarding the compensation earned in 2018, 2017 and 2016 by our named executive officers.

2018 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table sets forth information for each named executive officer regarding annual incentive and restricted share unit awards granted during 2018.

2018 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following tables set forth information for each named executive officer with respect to each award of time-based restricted share units that had not vested and remained outstanding as of December 31, 2018.