SUMMARY

This summary highlights some of the information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus. It is not complete and may not contain all of the information that you may want to consider. We urge you to read carefully this entire proxy statement/prospectus, including “Risk Factors” beginning on page 29, and the other documents we refer you to for a more complete understanding of the proposed transaction and subsequent combination. See “Where You Can Find More Information.” Certain items in this summary include a page reference directing you to a more complete description of that item. Unless otherwise indicated in this proxy statement/prospectus or the context otherwise requires, throughout this proxy statement/prospectus we generally refer to Spectrum Brands, Inc. and, where applicable, its consolidated subsidiaries as “Spectrum,” Russell Hobbs, Inc. and, where applicable, its consolidated subsidiaries as “Russell Hobbs,” Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc., a newly formed holding company, as “SB Holdings,” Battery Merger Corp., a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of SB Holdings, as “Battery Sub,” Grill Merger Corp., a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of SB Holdings, as “Grill Sub,” Harbinger Capital Partners Master Fund I, Ltd. (“Harbinger Master Fund”) and two of its affiliates, Harbinger Capital Partners Special Situations Fund, L.P. (“Harbinger Special Situations Fund”) and Global Opportunities Breakaway Ltd. (“Breakaway Fund”) as the “Harbinger Parties” and the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of February 9, 2010, by and among Spectrum, Russell Hobbs, SB Holdings, Battery Sub and Grill Sub, as amended, as the “merger agreement”.

The Companies (see page 59)

Spectrum Brands, Inc.

Six Concourse Parkway, Suite 3300

Atlanta, GA 30328

Telephone: (770) 829-6200

Spectrum, a Delaware corporation based in Atlanta, Georgia, is a global branded consumer products company with leading market positions in six major product categories: consumer batteries, pet supplies, electric shaving and grooming, electric personal care, portable lighting and home and garden control products. Spectrum is a leading worldwide manufacturer and marketer of alkaline, zinc carbon and hearing aid batteries, as well as aquariums and aquatic health supplies and a leading worldwide designer and marketer of rechargeable batteries, battery-powered lighting products, electric shavers and accessories, grooming products and hair care appliances. Spectrum’s operations also include the manufacturing and marketing of specialty pet supplies. Spectrum is also a leading North American manufacturer and marketer of herbicides, insecticides and repellents.

Spectrum sells its products in approximately 120 countries through a variety of trade channels, including retailers, wholesalers and distributors, hearing aid professionals, industrial distributors and original equipment manufacturers. Spectrum enjoys strong name recognition in our markets under the Rayovac, VARTA and Remington brands, each of which has been in existence for more than 80 years, and under the Spectracide, Cutter, Tetra, 8-in-1 and various other brands. Spectrum has manufacturing and product development facilities located in the United States, Europe, China and Latin America. Substantially all of Spectrum’s rechargeable batteries and chargers, shaving and grooming products, personal care products and portable lighting products are manufactured by third party suppliers that are primarily located in Asia.

On February 3, 2009, Spectrum and thirteen of its United States subsidiaries (collectively, the “Debtors”) filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Texas. On August 28, 2009, the Debtors’ joint plan of reorganization (the “Plan”) became effective and the Debtors emerged from Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. Pursuant to the Plan, Spectrum’s capital structure was realigned. Spectrum’s outstanding equity securities were cancelled with no distribution to holders of Spectrum’s then existing equity. Spectrum issued new common stock and 12% Senior Subordinated Toggle Notes due 2019 (“PIK Notes”) to holders of allowed claims in respect of

Spectrum’s then outstanding public senior subordinated notes. The supplemental and sub-supplemental participants in the Debtors’ debtor-in-possession credit facility also received the new common stock. Spectrum common stock has been listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol “SPB” since March 18, 2010.

Russell Hobbs, Inc.

3633 S. Flamingo Road

Miramar, FL 33027

Telephone: (954) 883-1000

In December 2007, two longstanding companies in the small household appliance business, Salton, Inc. (“Salton”) and Applica Incorporated (“Applica”), combined their businesses through a merger, as a result of which Applica became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Salton. In December 2009, the combined company (formerly known as Salton, Inc.) changed its name to Russell Hobbs, Inc.

Russell Hobbs, a Delaware corporation based in Miramar, Florida, markets and distributes a broad range of branded small household appliances, pet and pest products, water products and personal care products. Russell Hobbs has a broad portfolio of well recognized brand names, including Black & Decker, George Foreman, Russell Hobbs, Farberware, Toastmaster, Juiceman, Breadman and LitterMaid. Russell Hobbs’ customers include mass merchandisers, specialty retailers and appliance distributors primarily in North America, South America, Europe and Australia.

Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.

c/o Russell Hobbs, Inc.

3633 S. Flamingo Road

Miramar, FL 33027

Telephone: (954) 883-1000

SB Holdings is a Delaware corporation and a newly formed holding company. SB Holdings was formed solely to effect the proposed transaction and has not conducted any business, other than in connection with the merger agreement and related ancillary agreements to which SB Holdings is a party. Pursuant to the merger agreement, Spectrum and Russell Hobbs will survive as wholly owned subsidiaries of SB Holdings. It is anticipated that SB Holdings will trade on the NYSE under the symbol “SPB”.

Battery Merger Corp.

c/o Russell Hobbs, Inc.

3633 S. Flamingo Road

Miramar, FL 33027

Telephone: (954) 883-1000

Battery Sub is a newly formed Delaware corporation and a direct wholly owned subsidiary of SB Holdings, which was formed solely to effect the proposed transaction and has not conducted and will not conduct any business during any period of its existence. Pursuant to the merger agreement, Battery Sub will merge with and into Spectrum with Spectrum continuing as the surviving corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of SB Holdings.

Grill Merger Corp.

c/o Russell Hobbs, Inc.

3633 S. Flamingo Road

Miramar, FL 33027

Telephone: (954) 883-1000

Grill Sub is a newly formed Delaware corporation and a direct wholly owned subsidiary of SB Holdings formed solely to effect the proposed transaction and has not conducted and will not conduct any business during any period of its existence. Pursuant to the merger agreement, Grill Sub will merge with and into Russell Hobbs with Russell Hobbs continuing as the surviving corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of SB Holdings.

The Merger Agreement (Proposal No. 1) (see page 127)

The merger agreement is attached as Annex A-1 to this proxy statement/prospectus and is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. The first amendment to the merger agreement, dated as of March 1, 2010, is attached as Annex A-2 to this proxy statement/prospectus and is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. The second amendment to the merger agreement, dated as of March 26, 2010, is attached as Annex A-3 to this proxy statement/prospectus and is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. The third amendment to the merger agreement, dated as of April 30, 2010, is attached as Annex A-4 to this proxy statement/prospectus and is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. Spectrum encourages its stockholders to read the merger agreement and the three amendments thereto carefully and in their entirety, as the merger agreement is the principal legal document governing the mergers.

The Proposed Transaction (see page 76)

On February 9, 2010, Spectrum entered into the merger agreement with Russell Hobbs, SB Holdings, Battery Sub and Grill Sub. As part of the proposed transaction, Spectrum and Russell Hobbs will become subsidiaries of SB Holdings, a newly created Delaware holding corporation.

Under the merger agreement, (i) Battery Sub will merge with and into Spectrum, with Spectrum as the surviving corporation (the “Spectrum merger”), and (ii) Grill Sub will merge with and into Russell Hobbs, with Russell Hobbs as the surviving corporation (the “Russell Hobbs merger,” which, together with the Spectrum merger, are referred to herein as the “mergers”). Battery Sub and Grill Sub are both direct wholly-owned subsidiaries of SB Holdings.

Upon the consummation of the mergers, (i) Spectrum stockholders will be entitled to receive in the Spectrum merger one share of the common stock of SB Holdings (“SB Holdings common stock”) in exchange for each share they hold of Spectrum common stock (“Spectrum common stock”) and (ii) Russell Hobbs stockholders will be entitled to receive shares of SB Holdings in exchange for their shares of Russell Hobbs common stock and preferred stock (“Russell Hobbs Stock”) in accordance with the terms of the merger agreement and based on a $675 million enterprise value of Russell Hobbs, subject to various adjustments set forth in the merger agreement, and a $31.50 per share valuation of Spectrum common stock. The adjustments set forth in the merger agreement include, among other things, adjustments to reflect the amount of cash held by Russell Hobbs and Russell Hobbs’ indebtedness for borrowed money.

Based on the information set forth in Russell Hobbs’ December 31, 2009 balance sheet, the adjustments to the enterprise value of Russell Hobbs set forth in the merger agreement would have resulted in a reduction of such enterprise value from $675 million to $644 million. Furthermore, as part of the transaction, the Harbinger Parties have agreed to convert their existing approximately $158 million principal amount of Russell Hobbs’ term debt into SB Holdings common stock at a price of $31.50 per share, which is included in the $675 million

enterprise value of Russell Hobbs. The shares of SB Holdings common stock to be issued to the Harbinger Parties upon such conversion are included in the calculation of the 20,432,000 shares to be issued to Russell Hobbs’ stockholders as described herein; however, such shares are not included in the shares of SB Holdings common stock to be registered under this proxy statement/prospectus.

As a result of the mergers, the stockholders of Spectrum (other than the Harbinger Parties) are expected to own approximately 35% of SB Holdings, and the Harbinger Parties are expected to own approximately 65% of SB Holdings (assuming that the Harbinger Parties do not acquire additional shares of Spectrum common stock prior to the consummation of the mergers).

At the time of the special meeting, neither the stockholders of Spectrum nor the stockholders of Russell Hobbs will know the value of the consideration that they will receive in the merger. In addition, at the time that Spectrum stockholders vote on the adoption of the merger agreement, Spectrum stockholders will not know the number of shares of SB Holdings that will be issued pursuant to the merger agreement to the Harbinger Parties in exchange for the Harbinger Parties’ shares of Russell Hobbs common stock and preferred stock.

The following is an illustration of how the total consideration for the mergers would be calculated, based on the information set forth in Russell Hobbs’ unaudited consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009.

The actual amounts of the adjustments to the exchange ratios at the closing of the mergers will not be known until immediately prior to the closing of the mergers, and therefore, the value of the consideration and the number of shares of SB Holdings common stock to be issued in the mergers will not be known at the time that Spectrum stockholders vote on the adoption of the merger agreement.

The combination of Spectrum and Russell Hobbs, if consummated, will create a new global consumer products company with an estimated $3 billion in annual revenues, a strong balance sheet and a diverse portfolio of market-leading brands, including Remington, Rayovac, VARTA, Hot Shot, Cutter, Repel, Spectracide, Black & Decker, George Foreman, Russell Hobbs, LitterMaid, Toastmaster, Tetra, 8 in 1 and Dingo.

If the proposed transaction is consummated, SB Holdings, operating under the “Spectrum Brands” name, will continue to be managed by Spectrum’s senior management team, with the addition of Terry L. Polistina, current Chief Executive Officer of Russell Hobbs, to lead a fourth reporting segment made up of the existing Russell Hobbs’ portfolio of small household appliance brands. Spectrum’s current reporting segments, Global Batteries and Personal Care, Global Pet Supplies and Home and Garden, will remain autonomous and will continue to operate under their current management structures. Including Russell Hobbs’ $800 million in annual revenues, SB Holdings is expected to be approximately $3 billion in annual revenues with $430 million to $440 million of adjusted EBITDA in fiscal 2010. Anticipated synergies of $25 million to $30 million are expected to be realized within 36 months following the consummation of the mergers.

Financing the Proposed Transaction (see page 115)

Commitments for $1.8 billion in financing have been obtained from three financial institutions to be provided through a combination of new term loans, new senior notes and a new $300 million ABL revolving facility. Proceeds from the financing (of which $1.532 billion in proceeds is anticipated to be received at closing) will be used to refinance substantially all of existing Spectrum and Russell Hobbs debt, other than Spectrum’s PIK Notes which are expected to remain outstanding after the mergers, and to pay transaction fees and expenses.

The proposed transaction is expected to improve Spectrum’s leverage ratio, calculated as total debt less cash divided by adjusted EBITDA. Spectrum’s leverage ratio was 4.7x for the quarter ended January 3, 2010. The leverage ratio declines to 4.0x pro forma for the transaction. The leverage ratio is projected to decline to 3.8x for fiscal 2010. Compared to Spectrum’s existing capital structure, the new capital structure will provide longer maturities and additional liquidity for the combined company.

What Stockholders Will Be Entitled To Receive (see page 76)

Upon the consummation of the mergers, (i) stockholders of Spectrum will be entitled to receive in the Spectrum merger one share of SB Holdings common stock in exchange for each share they hold of Spectrum common stock and (ii) Russell Hobbs stockholders will be entitled to receive shares of SB Holdings in exchange for their shares of Russell Hobbs Stock in accordance with the terms of the merger agreement and based on a

$675 million enterprise value of Russell Hobbs, subject to various adjustments set forth in the merger agreement, and a $31.50 per share valuation of Spectrum common stock.

Ownership of SB Holdings After the Proposed Transaction (see page 115)

After consummation of the mergers, the stockholders of Spectrum (other than the Harbinger Parties) are expected to own approximately 35% of SB Holdings and the Harbinger Parties are expected to own approximately 65% of SB Holdings (assuming that the Harbinger Parties do not acquire additional shares of Spectrum common stock prior to the consummation of the mergers). Specifically, the Russell Hobbs Stock will convert into SB Holdings common stock in accordance with the terms of the merger agreement and is based on a $675 million enterprise value of Russell Hobbs, subject to various adjustments set forth in the merger agreement, and a $31.50 per share valuation of Spectrum common stock. Furthermore, as part of the proposed transaction, the Harbinger Parties have agreed to convert their existing approximately $158 million aggregate principal amount of Russell Hobbs’ term debt into SB Holdings common stock at a price of $31.50 per share, which is included in the $675 million enterprise value of Russell Hobbs. The shares of SB Holdings common stock to be issued to the Harbinger Parties upon such conversion are included in the calculation of the 20,432,000 shares to be issued to Russell Hobbs’ stockholders as described herein; however, such shares are not included in the shares of SB Holdings common stock to be registered under this proxy statement/prospectus.

Directors and Executive Officers of SB Holdings After the Proposed Transaction (see page 173)

Immediately following the mergers, the board of directors of SB Holdings will be divided into three classes and will be comprised of ten individuals. Initially, six directors will be designated by Russell Hobbs, three will be designated by Spectrum and one will be the Chief Executive Officer of SB Holdings. The Chief Executive Officer of Spectrum will be the initial Chief Executive Officer of SB Holdings. In addition to the Chief Executive Officer, Spectrum’s current management team will be the initial management team of SB Holdings. The Chief Executive Officer of Russell Hobbs will be added to Spectrum’s management team to lead a fourth reporting segment made up of the existing Russell Hobbs’ portfolio of home appliance brands.

Recommendation to Spectrum’s Stockholders (see page 76)

The Spectrum Board (consistent with the recommendation of the Committee to the Spectrum Board) believes the merger agreement and the proposed transaction are advisable and in the best interests of Spectrum’s stockholders (other than the Harbinger Parties) and recommends that you vote “FOR” the proposal to adopt the merger agreement. The Spectrum Board also recommends that you vote “FOR” the proposal to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary, to permit further solicitation of proxies on the proposal to adopt the merger agreement. When you consider the Spectrum Board’s recommendation, you should be aware that Spectrum’s directors may have interests in the transaction that may be different from, or in addition to, your interests. These interests are described in “The Proposed Transaction—Interests of Certain Persons in the Spectrum Merger.”

Spectrum’s Reasons for the Proposed Transaction (see page 91)

In evaluating the proposed transaction, the Committee consulted its legal and financial advisors and, in making its recommendation, the Committee considered a number of factors, including those factors described under “The Proposed Transaction—Background of the Proposed Transaction” and “The Proposed Transaction—Recommendation of the Committee and the Spectrum Board of Directors; Reasons for the Transaction.” In the course of reaching its decision, the Spectrum Board considered, among other factors, the unanimous recommendation of the Committee. See “The Proposed Transaction” and “The Proposed Transaction—Background of the Proposed Transaction—Recommendation of the Committee and the Spectrum Board of Directors; Reasons for the Transaction—The Spectrum Board of Directors.”

Opinion of the Committee’s Financial Advisor (see page 100)

In connection with the transaction, the Committee received the written opinion, dated February 8, 2010, of its financial advisor, Barclays Capital Inc. (“Barclays Capital”), as to the fairness, from a financial point of view and as of the date of such opinion, to holders of Spectrum common stock (other than the Harbinger Parties and their respective affiliates) of the Spectrum Exchange Ratio. The full text of Barclays Capital’s written opinion is attached as Annex B to this proxy statement/prospectus and is incorporated herein by reference. Barclays Capital’s written opinion sets forth, among other things, the assumptions made, procedures followed, factors considered and limitations on the review undertaken by Barclays Capital in rendering its opinion. Barclays Capital’s opinion is addressed to the Committee (solely in its capacity as such) and relates only to the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the Spectrum Exchange Ratio. Barclays Capital’s opinion does not in any manner address Spectrum’s underlying business decision to proceed with or effect the proposed transaction, the likelihood of consummation of the proposed transaction or the terms of any related financing and does not constitute a recommendation to any stockholder as to how such stockholder should vote or act with respect to the proposed transaction.

Risks Relating to the Proposed Transaction (page 32)

You should understand that the following important factors, in addition to those discussed in “Risk Factors” below and elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus, and in the documents which are incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/prospectus, could affect the future results of Russell Hobbs and Spectrum, and of SB Holdings after the consummation of the proposed transaction, and could cause those results or other outcomes to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements:

Spectrum Stockholder Vote Required (see page 109)

Adoption of the merger agreement requires an affirmative votes of the holders of (i) a majority of the outstanding shares of Spectrum common stock entitled to vote (including the shares of the Harbinger Parties) and (ii) a majority of the outstanding shares of Spectrum common stock entitled to vote (excluding the shares of the Harbinger Parties (except any shares of Spectrum common stock acquired by the Harbinger Parties after March 1, 2010)). Approval of the proposal to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary, to permit further solicitation of proxies if adoption of the merger agreement is not obtained at the special meeting, requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares represented at the special meeting and entitled to vote on the matter.

Treatment of Spectrum Restricted Stock (see page 130)

Prior to and contingent upon the consummation of the mergers, the Spectrum Board (or the appropriate committee thereof) will take any actions necessary to cause each share of restricted stock with respect to Spectrum common stock to be converted into a share of restricted stock with respect to SB Holdings common stock at the exchange ratio for the conversion of Spectrum common stock, as may be adjusted, without change in

the vesting schedule and other terms and conditions of the restricted stock. At the effective time of the mergers, the Spectrum 2009 Incentive Plan will be assumed by SB Holdings.

Conditions to the Consummation of the Mergers (see page 136)

Consummation of the mergers is subject to certain conditions, including, among others, closing of the new financing, adoption of the merger agreement by the requisite affirmative votes of the Spectrum stockholders, customary regulatory approvals, no material adverse change in Spectrum or Russell Hobbs and other customary closing conditions. All regulatory approvals necessary to consummate the mergers have been received.

Termination of the Merger Agreement (see page 143)

The merger agreement may be terminated due to any of the following:

The Spectrum Board (consistent with the recommendation of the Committee to the Spectrum Board) may withdraw or change its recommendation to the Spectrum stockholders with respect to the Spectrum merger if the Spectrum Board determines that to do otherwise would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties because of the existence of an Intervening Event or a Superior Proposal (each as defined in the merger agreement). In addition, subject to certain procedural requirements (including the ability of Russell Hobbs to revise its offer) and payment of the termination fee and expense reimbursement discussed below, Spectrum may terminate the merger agreement and enter into an agreement with a third party which makes a Superior Proposal.

Termination Fees and Expenses (see page 145)

In connection with the termination of the merger agreement under specified circumstances generally related to a change in the recommendation by the Spectrum Board or a termination in connection with a Superior Proposal, Spectrum may be required to pay Russell Hobbs a termination fee of $1 million (or $10 million in specified circumstances) and reimburse Russell Hobbs for certain expenses related to the merger agreement up to an aggregate amount of $10 million (or in some cases expense reimbursement will not be subject to this $10 million limit). In connection with the termination of the merger agreement due to the failure to obtain the debt financing, Russell Hobbs may be required to pay Spectrum a reverse termination fee of $1 million and reimburse Spectrum Brands for certain expenses related to the merger agreement up to an aggregate amount of $10 million.

Prior to any termination of the merger agreement, the only remedy that either party may pursue is specific performance. Following termination, the parties’ sole remedy will be the termination fees described above (if payable), except in the case of a willful and material breach, in which case the aggregate amount of damages of either party may not exceed $50 million. Money damages payable by the Harbinger Parties and their affiliates

under the merger agreement and the other transaction documents following a termination of the merger agreement are limited to $50 million in the aggregate.

Regulatory Matters (see page 117)

Consummation of the mergers is subject to prior receipt of those approvals and consents required to be obtained from applicable governmental and regulatory authorities, including under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act (“HSR Act”) and by the applicable governmental authorities of Canada, Germany and Spain (except those the failure of which to be made or obtained does not have and would not reasonably be likely to have, individually or in the aggregate, an RH Material Adverse Effect and/or a Battery Material Adverse Effect (as each is defined in the merger agreement)).

Spectrum has submitted the required notices to the applicable antitrust regulatory authorities in the United States, Canada, Germany and Spain, and the antitrust regulatory authorities of each country other than the United States have issued a ruling in favor of the mergers and, in the case of the United States, the waiting period under the HSR Act has expired.

Except for the competition law approvals described above, Spectrum, Russell Hobbs and SB Holdings are not aware of any governmental approvals or compliance with applicable laws and regulations that are required for the mergers to become effective other than filings with the NYSE regarding the listing of SB Holdings’ shares and filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) regarding this proxy statement/prospectus. Spectrum, Russell Hobbs and SB Holdings intend to seek any other approvals required to consummate the mergers. There can be no assurance, however, that any such approvals will be obtained.

No Appraisal Rights (see page 74)

Spectrum stockholders are not entitled to appraisal rights under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (“DGCL”) in connection with the mergers.

Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences (see page 149)

The obligation of Spectrum to consummate the Spectrum merger is conditioned on the receipt by Spectrum of an opinion of Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP, counsel to Spectrum, dated the date of the effective time of the Spectrum merger, to the effect that for U.S. federal income tax purposes the Spectrum merger will constitute a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code and/or the mergers, taken together, will constitute exchanges described in Section 351 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Interests of Certain Persons in the Spectrum Merger (see page 109)

When Spectrum stockholders consider the Spectrum Board’s recommendation that they vote in favor of the adoption of the merger agreement, Spectrum stockholders should be aware that Spectrum executive officers and directors may have interests in the Spectrum merger that may be different from, or in addition to, their interests.

As of April 28, 2010, Spectrum directors and named executive officers have been granted restricted stock which represents approximately 2% of the outstanding shares of Spectrum common stock. They will be entitled to receive the same consideration for their shares of Spectrum common stock in the Spectrum merger as the other holders of Spectrum common stock. The named executive officers hold restricted stock, which vests 75% on October 1, 2010, and 25% on October 1, 2011, and the directors hold restricted stock which vests 100% on October 1, 2010, if the executive officer is employed by (or the director is serving as a director of) Spectrum on such date. If the executive officer terminates employment (or the director ceases to serve as a director) before

such date under certain circumstances, vesting of the restricted stock may be accelerated or may continue as if such executive officer remained employed by Spectrum. Under the merger agreement, the Spectrum equity awards will be converted, based on the exchange ratio for the conversion of Spectrum common stock specified in the merger agreement, into comparable equity awards with respect to SB Holdings common stock at the effective time of the mergers (see “The Merger Agreement (Proposal No. 1)—Merger Consideration”). The mergers will not cause the accelerated vesting of any Spectrum equity awards.

There are 26.4 million outstanding Russell Hobbs Restricted Stock Units (“RSU”) which will vest on the earlier to occur of (i) a change in control of Russell Hobbs (as defined below), (ii) the first anniversary of a “significant corporate event” (as defined below), or (iii) the termination of the RSU holder’s employment with Russell Hobbs without “cause” or by the employee for “good reason” after the occurrence of a significant corporate event. Under the merger agreement, the Russell Hobbs equity awards will be converted based on the RH Common Exchange Ratio (as defined in the merger agreement) into comparable equity awards with respect to SB Holdings common stock at the effective time of the mergers.

Spectrum has entered into employment agreements with certain of its executive officers. Under these employment agreements, Spectrum’s executive officers would have been entitled to significant payments in connection with their termination of employment or a change in control of Spectrum. However, in connection with the mergers, such executive officers have waived the right to assert that the Spectrum merger is a change in control and have waived the right to receive any compensation or benefits due solely as a result of the Spectrum merger, to the extent such benefits were triggered, pursuant to signed Change in Control Waivers and Releases, each effective as of February 8, 2010. For the avoidance of doubt, the named executive officers have not waived their contractual rights, if any, under their employment agreements to receive compensation or benefits if their employment is terminated without regard to whether a change in control has occurred.

On February 8, 2010, Spectrum entered into an amendment to the employment agreement of David R. Lumley, Spectrum’s then Co-Chief Operating Officer and President of its Global Batteries and Personal Care and Home and Garden segments. This amendment provided that, in the event that Spectrum’s then Chief Executive Officer, Kent J. Hussey, no longer served as the sole Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Lumley would succeed Mr. Hussey as the sole Chief Executive Officer of Spectrum and the sole Chief Executive Officer of the business group of which Spectrum is a part. On April 13, 2010, Mr. Hussey retired as Chief Executive Officer of Spectrum, and Mr. Lumley was appointed to succeed him as Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Hussey will continue to serve as Chairman of the Board of Spectrum until the earlier of August 12, 2010 or the closing date of the mergers. In connection with Mr. Hussey’s retirement, Spectrum entered into a separation agreement with Mr. Hussey, which is further described under “The Proposed Transaction—Interests of Certain Persons in the Spectrum Merger—Hussey Separation Agreement.” In connection with such change of position, SB Holdings and Mr. Lumley are expected to enter into a new employment agreement providing for compensation and benefits commensurate with such position, which terms shall not be less favorable than the compensation and benefits currently in effect for Mr. Lumley.

In addition, the merger agreement requires SB Holdings to (x) either maintain Spectrum’s and Russell Hobbs’ current directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policies for a period of six years from the effective time of the mergers or (y) obtain substitute policies or purchase a “tail” policy with a claims period of at least six years from the effective time of the mergers, in each case that provides coverage for events occurring on or before the effective time of mergers. The terms of the insurance policies will be no less favorable than Spectrum’s and Russell Hobbs’ respective existing policies, unless the annual premiums of the policies would exceed 300% of the current policies’ premiums as of the date of the merger agreement, in which case the coverage will be the greatest amount of coverage available for a premium amount not exceeding 300% of such current premiums.

The Harbinger Parties currently own approximately 40% of the outstanding Spectrum common stock and own 100% of the outstanding Russell Hobbs Stock. As of April 30, 2010, the Harbinger Parties owned approximately $93 million of Spectrum’s PIK Notes. The Harbinger Parties may have interests that differ from those of the other Spectrum stockholders due to their 100% ownership of Russell Hobbs. As a result of the mergers, the Harbinger Parties will reduce their ownership of Russell Hobbs from 100% direct ownership to approximately 65% indirect ownership, and they will increase their ownership of Spectrum from approximately 40% direct ownership to approximately 65% indirect ownership (assuming that the Harbinger Parties do not acquire additional shares of Spectrum common stock prior to the consummation of the mergers).

Material Support and Ancillary Agreements in Connection with the Proposed Transaction (see page 118)

Stockholder Agreement

In connection with the proposed transaction, the Harbinger Parties and SB Holdings entered into a stockholder agreement, dated February 9, 2010 (the “Stockholder Agreement”), which will be effective as of the effective time of the mergers, to provide for certain protective provisions in favor of minority stockholders, including selection of three independent directors by a special nominating committee, preemptive rights for certain eligible stockholders, limitations on transactions with affiliates of significant stockholders, limitations on going private transactions and tag along rights.

Support Agreements

Harbinger Support Agreement and Letter Agreement

On February 9, 2010, Spectrum entered into a support agreement with the Harbinger Parties (the “Harbinger Support Agreement”). Under the Harbinger Support Agreement, the Harbinger Parties agree to vote their shares of Spectrum common stock acquired before the date of the merger agreement in favor of the mergers and against any Alternative Proposal that would impede the mergers.

In the event that the merger agreement is terminated by Spectrum in connection with a Superior Proposal, which requires the approval of the Spectrum stockholders to be effective and which involves all or substantially all of Spectrum’s assets or stock, before its stockholders adopt the merger agreement, the Harbinger Parties have agreed to vote sufficient shares of their Spectrum common stock acquired before the date of the merger agreement to cause such Superior Proposal to be approved, if such Superior Proposal values the Spectrum common stock at no less than $34.65 per share and assuming at least two-thirds of the Spectrum common stock not held by the Harbinger Parties or their affiliates (except Letter Agreement Shares (defined below)) are voted in favor of, or tendered in connection with, such Superior Proposal.

On March 1, 2010, Spectrum and the Harbinger Parties entered into a letter agreement (the “Letter Agreement”) amending the Harbinger Support Agreement to permit the Harbinger Parties to purchase up to 100,000 shares of Spectrum common stock per week prior to the consummation of the mergers, up to an aggregate maximum of two million shares (the “Letter Agreement Shares”), in order to provide additional liquidity to Spectrum’s stockholders. The Harbinger Support Agreement otherwise would in general have prohibited the Harbinger Parties from acquiring additional shares of Spectrum common stock until the termination of the merger agreement. As of April 28, 2010 the Harbinger Parties have purchased a total of 348,379 Letter Agreement Shares for an aggregate purchase price of $10.4 million.

Pursuant to the terms of the Letter Agreement, the Harbinger Parties have generally agreed to vote any such newly acquired shares of Spectrum common stock proportionately with the votes of the holders of Spectrum common stock (other than the Harbinger Parties and the Avenue Parties (defined below)) with respect to the merger agreement and the mergers, except that the Harbinger Parties will vote any shares purchased from

Avenue International Master, L.P. and certain of its affiliates that own Spectrum common stock (the “Avenue Parties”) in accordance with the Avenue Parties’ voting obligations under the support agreement, dated as of February 9, 2010, by and among Spectrum and the Avenue Parties (the “Avenue Support Agreement”). If the Avenue Support Agreement is terminated or suspended, any shares purchased by the Harbinger Parties from the Avenue Parties will be voted proportionately with the votes of the holders of Spectrum common stock (other than the Harbinger Parties and the Avenue Parties). The Harbinger Parties have also agreed to vote their shares of Spectrum common stock acquired after March 1, 2010 pursuant to the Letter Agreement proportionately with the votes of the other holders of Spectrum common stock with respect to a Superior Proposal (regardless of the price offered for Spectrum common stock under such Superior Proposal).

Avenue Support Agreement

On February 9, 2010, Spectrum entered into the Avenue Support Agreement. Under the Avenue Support Agreement, the Avenue Parties agree to vote their shares of Spectrum common stock in favor of the mergers and against any Alternative Proposal that would impede the mergers. The obligation of the Avenue Parties to so support the mergers will terminate on the first to occur of (i) the consummation of the mergers, (ii) the date on which the merger agreement is terminated, (iii) 15 business days following the date on which the Spectrum Board changes its recommendation of the mergers or the Committee recommends to the Spectrum Board that it change such recommendation, and (iv) August 12, 2010.

Ancillary Agreements

Harbinger Limited Guarantee and Indemnification Agreement

Harbinger Master Fund has agreed, among other things and subject to the terms and conditions set forth therein, to guarantee the obligations of Russell Hobbs to pay (i) a reverse termination fee to Spectrum under the merger agreement and (ii) monetary damages awarded to Spectrum in connection with any willful and material breach by Russell Hobbs of the merger agreement. The maximum amount payable by Harbinger Master Fund under such guarantee is $50 million less any amounts paid by Russell Hobbs or the Harbinger Parties, or any of their respective affiliates as damages under any documents related to the proposed transaction. Harbinger Master Fund has also agreed to indemnify Russell Hobbs, SB Holdings and their subsidiaries for out-of-pocket costs and expenses above $3 million in the aggregate that become payable after the consummation of the mergers and that relate to the litigation arising out of the Applica transaction.

Registration Rights Agreement

In connection with the merger agreement, the Harbinger Parties, the Avenue Parties and SB Holdings entered into a registration rights agreement, dated as of February 9, 2010 (the “Registration Rights Agreement”), pursuant to which, after the consummation of the mergers, the Harbinger Parties and the Avenue Parties will, among other things and subject to the terms and conditions set forth therein, have certain demand and so-called “piggy back” registration rights with respect to their shares of SB Holdings common stock.

Under the Registration Rights Agreement, after the consummation of the mergers, any of the Harbinger Parties and the Avenue Parties may demand that SB Holdings register all or a portion of such Harbinger Party’s or Avenue Party’s SB Holdings common stock for sale under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), so long as the anticipated aggregate offering amount of the securities to be offered to the public (based on the average of the daily closing price of the securities for the 30 immediately preceding trading days) is (i) at least $30 million if registration is to be effected pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-1 or a similar “long-form” registration or (ii) at least $5 million if registration is to be effected pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-3 or a similar “short-form” registration.

Amendment of Certain Provisions of PIK Notes

The merger agreement required Spectrum to commence a consent solicitation to seek the consent of the holders of the PIK Notes to modify certain provisions of the indenture governing the PIK Notes, dated August 31, 2009 (the “PIK Notes Indenture”) such that the mergers will not constitute a “change of control” under the PIK Notes Indenture and to provide more accommodative debt incurrence covenants for the combined business of Spectrum and Russell Hobbs. The Spectrum Consent Solicitation (as defined below) was initiated on March 1, 2010 and expired at 5:00 p.m. New York City time on March 9, 2010. Spectrum has obtained the requisite consents of holders representing a majority in aggregate principal amount of the PIK Notes outstanding (excluding PIK Notes owned by affiliates of Spectrum) necessary to amend the PIK Notes Indenture and the amendment has been executed and delivered by the parties thereto.

First Amendment to Merger Agreement

The parties to the merger agreement entered into an amendment to the merger agreement, dated as of March 1, 2010, (the “first amendment”), which extended the “go-shop” period under the merger agreement by 15 days to April 9, 2010. In addition, as discussed below, because the parties to the merger agreement agreed to permit the Harbinger Parties to purchase additional shares of Spectrum common stock prior to the consummation of the mergers, the first amendment also changed the stockholder approval requirement so that the merger agreement and the proposed transaction must be approved by the affirmative votes of the holders of (i) a majority of the outstanding shares of Spectrum common stock entitled to vote (including the shares of the Harbinger Parties) and (ii) a majority of the outstanding shares of Spectrum common stock entitled to vote (excluding the shares of the Harbinger Parties (other than any shares of Spectrum common stock acquired by the Harbinger Parties after March 1, 2010)). The purpose of this change is to ensure that any shares acquired by the Harbinger Parties pursuant to the Letter Agreement are counted for purposes of obtaining the adoption of the merger agreement by a majority of the outstanding shares of Spectrum common stock entitled to vote other than shares held by the Harbinger Parties as of the date of the merger agreement.

Second Amendment to Merger Agreement

The parties to the merger agreement entered into a second amendment to the merger agreement dated as of March 26, 2010 (the “second amendment”). The second amendment was executed to incorporate several technical revisions to the SB Holdings certificate of incorporation and bylaws to be effective at the closing of the mergers. In addition, the second amendment clarified that Spectrum stockholder approval is required only for the adoption of the merger agreement and not any other aspects of the proposed transaction.

Third Amendment to the Merger Agreement

The parties to the merger agreement entered into a third amendment to the merger agreement dated as of April 30, 2010 (the “third amendment”). The third amendment was executed to incorporate further clarifying revisions to the SB Holdings certificate of incorporation to be effective at or prior to the closing of the mergers.

Comparison of SB Holdings and Spectrum Stockholder Rights (see page 206)

The rights of Spectrum stockholders are currently governed by the DGCL and Spectrum’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws. Upon consummation of the mergers, Spectrum stockholders and Russell Hobbs stockholders that receive SB Holdings common stock pursuant to the mergers will become stockholders of SB Holdings, and their rights will be governed by the DGCL and SB Holdings’ restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws.

SPECTRUM SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The following table sets forth selected historical consolidated financial information of Spectrum for the periods presented. The selected financial information, as of September 30, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005 and for each of the five fiscal years then ended has been derived from Spectrum’s audited consolidated financial statements. The selected financial information, as of January 3, 2010 and for the quarterly period then ended, has been derived from Spectrum’ unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements which include, in the opinion of Spectrum’s management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the results of operations and financial position of Spectrum for the period and date presented.

On November 5, 2008, the Spectrum Board committed to the shutdown of the growing products portion of Spectrum’s Home and Garden Business, which includes the manufacturing and marketing of fertilizers, enriched soils, mulch and grass seed, following an evaluation of the historical lack of profitability and the projected input costs and significant working capital demands for the growing products portion of the Home and Garden Business during fiscal 2009. During the second quarter of fiscal 2009, Spectrum completed the shutdown of the growing products portion of the Home and Garden Business and, accordingly, began reporting the results of operations of the growing products portion of the Home and Garden Business as discontinued operations. As of October 1, 2005, Spectrum began reporting the results of operations of the Nu-Gro Pro and Tech division of the Home and Garden Business as discontinued operations. Spectrum also began reporting the results of operations of the Canadian division of the Home and Garden Business as discontinued operations as of October 1, 2006, which business was sold on November 1, 2007. Therefore, the presentation of all historical continuing operations has been changed to exclude the growing products portion of the Home and Garden Business, the Nu-Gro Pro and Tech and the Canadian divisions of the Home and Garden Business but to include the remaining control products portion of the Home and Garden Business.

The financial information indicated may not be indicative of future performance. This financial information and other data should be read in conjunction with the respective audited and unaudited consolidated financial statements of Spectrum, including the notes thereto, and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” incorporated in this proxy statement/prospectus by reference. See “The Companies—Information About Spectrum” This information should also be read in conjunction with the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements. References to “Successor Company” in the financial statements contained herein refer to Spectrum after it emerged from chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, and references to the “Predecessor Company” in the financial statements refer to Spectrum prior to that time.

The eleven month Predecessor Company includes a non-cash charge of $104 million related to the tax effects of the fresh-start adjustments. In addition, Predecessor Company includes the tax effect on the gain on the cancellation of debt from the extinguishment of the senior subordinated notes as well as the modification of the senior term credit facility resulting in approximately $124 million reduction in the U.S. net deferred tax asset exclusive of indefinite lived intangibles. Due to the Company’s full valuation allowance position as of August 30, 2009 on the U.S. net deferred tax asset exclusive of indefinite lived intangibles, the tax effect of the gain on the cancellation of debt and the modification of the senior secured credit facility is offset by a corresponding adjustment to the valuation allowance of $124 million. The tax effect of the fresh-start adjustments, the gain on the cancellation of debt and the modification of the senior secured credit facility, net of corresponding adjustments to the valuation allowance, are netted against reorganization items.

RUSSELL HOBBS SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Merger of Salton and Applica. In December 2007, two longstanding companies in the small household appliance business, Salton and Applica, combined their businesses through a merger of SFP Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned direct subsidiary of Salton, with and into APN Holding Company, Inc., the parent of Applica Incorporated. As a result of the merger, Applica became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Salton. In December 2009, the combined company (formerly known as Salton, Inc.) changed its name to Russell Hobbs, Inc.

Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 141 “Business Combinations” requires the use of the purchase method of accounting for business combinations. In applying the purchase method, it is necessary to identify both the accounting acquiree and the accounting acquiror. In a business combination effected through an exchange of equity interests, such as the merger of Applica and Salton, the entity that issues the interests (Salton in this case) is normally the acquiring entity. However, in identifying the acquiring entity in a combination effected through an exchange of equity interests, all pertinent facts and circumstances must be considered, including the following:

While Salton, Inc. was the legal acquiror and surviving registrant in the merger, Applica was deemed to be the accounting acquiror based on the facts and circumstances outlined above. Accordingly, for accounting and financial statement purposes, the merger was treated as a reverse acquisition of Salton by Applica under the purchase method of accounting.

Harbinger Master Fund’s and Harbinger Special Situations Fund’s Acquisition of Applica. In January 2007 (prior to the merger of Applica and Salton), Applica was acquired by Harbinger Master Fund and Harbinger Special Situations Fund. For purposes of financial reporting, the acquisition was deemed to have occurred on January 1, 2007. References to “Successor Company” in the financial statements contained herein refer to reporting dates on or after January 1, 2007 and references to “Predecessor Company” in the financial statements refer to reporting dates through December 31, 2006. This is to indicate two different bases of accounting presented: (1) the period prior to the acquisition (January 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006, labeled “Predecessor Company”) and (2) the period after the acquisition, including, the acquisition date (January 1, 2007 – June 30, 2008, labeled “Successor Company”).

The following table sets forth selected historical consolidated financial information of Russell Hobbs for the periods presented. The selected financial information as of June 30, 2009, June 30, 2008, June 30, 2007, December 31, 2006, December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 and for each of the five fiscal years then ended, has been derived from Russell Hobbs’ audited consolidated financial statements. The selected financial data as of December 31, 2009, December 31, 2008, and June 30, 2006, and for each of the periods then ended, has been derived from Russell Hobbs’ unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements which include, in the opinion of Russell Hobbs’ management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the results of operations and financial position of Russell Hobbs for the periods and dates presented.

The results of operations for an interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year or any other interim period. This financial information and other data should be read in conjunction with the respective audited and unaudited consolidated financial statements of Russell Hobbs, including the notes thereto, and “Russell Hobbs Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus. This information should also be read in conjunction with the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements.