Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form N-CSR

CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED

MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES

Investment Company Act File Number: 811-21227

Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

Maureen A. Gemma

Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110

(Name and Address of Agent for Services)

(617) 482-8260

(Registrant’s Telephone Number)

September 30

Date of Fiscal Year End

September 30, 2012

Date of Reporting Period

 

 

 


Item 1. Reports to Stockholders


 

Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Funds

 

Annual Report

September 30, 2012

 

 

LOGO  

 

 

Municipal II (EIV)    •    California II (EIA)    •    Massachusetts (MAB)    •    Michigan (MIW)

New Jersey (EMJ)    •    New York II (NYH)    •    Ohio (EIO)    •    Pennsylvania (EIP)

 

LOGO


 

 

 

Fund shares are not insured by the FDIC and are not deposits or other obligations of, or guaranteed by, any depository institution. Shares are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of principal invested.


Annual Report September 30, 2012

Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Funds

Table of Contents

 

Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance

     2   

Performance and Fund Profile

  
  

Municipal Bond Fund II

     4   

California Municipal Bond Fund II

     5   

Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund

     6   

Michigan Municipal Bond Fund

     7   

New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund

     8   

New York Municipal Bond Fund II

     9   

Ohio Municipal Bond Fund

     10   

Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund

     11   
  

Endnotes and Additional Disclosures

     12   

Financial Statements

     13   

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

     64   

Federal Tax Information

     65   

Notice to Shareholders

     66   

Annual Meeting of Shareholders

     67   

Dividend Reinvestment Plan

     68   

Board of Trustees’ Contract Approval

     70   

Management and Organization

     73   

Important Notices

     76   


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Funds

September 30, 2012

 

Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance1

 

 

Economic and Market Conditions

In the early months of the period, investors appeared to worry about intensifying debt problems in Europe, high U.S. unemployment, a stagnant housing market, and the lingering Congressional deadlock that left businesses perplexed about the direction of tax and regulatory policy. The S&P 500 Index,2 which had fallen sharply in the late summer of 2011, continued to drift down through November of 2011.

Beginning in mid-December of 2011, however, an equity rally took hold and continued into early April 2012, fueled by stronger economic growth in the fourth quarter, falling unemployment, and what the markets perceived as a successful restructuring of Greek debt. Then in May 2012, the third annual mid-year economic slowdown arrived, instigated by renewed concerns in Europe, slowing growth in China, and continuing political uncertainty in the United States with the upcoming presidential election. Despite a slowdown in consumer spending and weakening employment data, however, stocks moved upward intermittently from June through the end of the period — in part because investors anticipated that worsening economic news would prompt the U.S. Federal Reserve (the Fed) to initiate another round of quantitative easing to stimulate the economy. This also drove U.S. Treasury yields to all time lows in July 2012. The Fed proved the markets right when it initiated a new, open-ended round of quantitative easing just weeks before period-end.

Against this backdrop, municipal bonds rallied during the one-year period ending September 30, 2012, led by the long end of the yield curve. The Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index — an unmanaged index of municipal bonds traded in the United States — returned 8.32% for the period, while the Funds’ benchmark, the Barclays Capital Long (22+) Municipal Bond Index (the Index), returned 12.21%. As yields on high quality bonds fell, investors moved out on the yield curve, buying longer maturity municipal bonds to potentially take advantage of higher yields. In their quest for income during a period of historically low interest rates, investors also favored lower quality, higher yielding issues over higher quality bonds. As a result, longer duration, lower credit quality bonds were the best performers in the municipals space during the period.

Municipal bonds offered higher taxable-equivalent yields than Treasuries during the period. The ratio of 30-year AAA6 municipal yields to 30-year Treasury yields — which

historically has averaged less than 100% because municipal yields are federally tax-exempt — began the period at 122.4%, making municipal bonds very attractive relative to Treasuries. Investor recognition of this anomaly was likely the main factor that drove the ratio down to 101.6% by period-end, and the increased interest in municipal bonds caused them to outperform Treasuries for the one-year period ending September 30, 2012.

Fund Performance

For the fiscal year ending September 30, 2012, all of the Funds’ shares at net asset value (NAV) outperformed the 12.21% return of the Index.

The Funds’ overall strategy is to invest primarily in higher quality bonds (rated A or higher) with maturities of ten years or more, in order to capture their generally higher yields and greater income payments at the long end of the yield curve. Management tends to hedge to various degrees against the greater potential risk of volatility at the long end of the yield curve by using Treasury futures and interest-rate swaps in seeking to provide downside protection.

The Funds’ use of leverage5 was the most significant contributor to performance versus the Index for the period. In managing these closed-end mutual funds, management employs leverage in seeking to enhance the Funds’ tax-exempt income. The use of leverage has the effect of achieving additional exposure to the municipal market. Leverage magnifies a fund’s exposure to its underlying investments in both up and down markets. During this period of strong performance by municipal bonds, leverage was a key positive contributor to the Funds’ relative performance versus the Index.

An overweighting in zero-coupon bonds, which were the best performing coupon in the Index during the period, also helped performance for all Funds.

As a risk management tactic within the overall Fund strategy mentioned above, interest rate hedging is intended to moderate performance on both the upside and the downside of the market. During this period, however, municipal bonds strongly outperformed Treasuries. As a result, the hedging strategy did not have a notable effect on relative performance versus the Index for most Funds — the exceptions being the New Jersey and Pennsylvania Funds, where hedging was a slight detractor from performance versus the Index.

 

 

See Endnotes and Additional Disclosures in this report.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value (NAV) or market price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Fund performance at market price will differ from its results at NAV due to factors such as changing perceptions about the Fund, market conditions, fluctuations in supply and demand for Fund shares, or changes in Fund distributions. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate-ate so that shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance less than one year is cumulative. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, current Fund performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.

 

  2  


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Funds

September 30, 2012

 

Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance — continued

 

 

Fund-specific Results

Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund II’s shares at NAV had a total return of 18.56%, outpacing the 12.21% return of the Index. The main drivers of outperformance versus the Index were leverage and an overweighting in zero-coupon bonds. The chief detractors from performance versus the Index were underweights in three areas that did well during the period: bonds with maturities of 20 years or longer, issues rated A and below, and California municipal issues.

Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund II’s shares at NAV returned 21.62%, surpassing the 12.21% return of the Index. In addition to leverage and an overweighting in zero-coupon bonds, contributors to performance versus the Index included an overweighting and security selection in local general obligation bonds. Underweighted positions in bonds with maturities of

20 years or longer and in issues rated A and below detracted from relative performance versus the Index. Underweighting hospital and industrial development revenue (IDR) bonds — the two strongest-performing municipal sectors during the period — hurt results versus the Index as well.

Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund’s shares at NAV returned 18.26%, outperforming the 12.21% return of the Index. Key contributors to performance versus the Index included leverage, an overweighting in zero-coupon bonds, and an overweighting and security selection in the education sector, which performed well during the period. Notable detractors from performance versus the Index included underweights in three areas: bonds with maturities of

20 years or more, bonds rated A and below, and hospital and IDR issues.

Eaton Vance Michigan Municipal Bond Fund’s shares at NAV returned 13.69%, outperforming the 12.21% return of the Index. Leverage and an overweighting in zero-coupon bonds were the major contributors to relative outperformance versus the Index. The key detractors from performance versus the Index were underweighted positions in bonds with maturities of 20 years or more, bonds rated A and below, and hospital and IDR issues.

Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund’s shares at NAV returned 17.69%, outpacing the 12.21% return of the Index. The Fund’s relative outperformance was driven primarily by leverage and an overweighting in zero-coupon bonds. Significant detractors from performance versus the Index were underweighted positions in three areas: bonds with maturities of

20 years or more, bonds rated A and below, and

hospital and IDR issues. The Fund’s hedging strategy was also a slight detractor from performance versus the Index.

Eaton Vance New York Municipal Bond Fund II’s shares at NAV returned 15.47%, outperforming the 12.21% return of the Index. Key contributors to results versus the Index included leverage, an overweighting in zero-coupon bonds, and an overweighting in IDR bonds. Relative detractors from performance versus the Index included underweighted positions in bonds with maturities of 20 years or more, in bonds rated A and below, and in hospital issues.

Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Bond Fund’s shares at NAV returned 19.50%, outperforming the 12.21% return of the Index. Leverage and an overweighting in zero-coupon bonds were the key drivers of results versus the Index. Relative underweights in three areas dragged on performance versus the Index: bonds with maturities of 20 years or more, bonds rated A and below, and hospital and IDR issues.

Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund’s shares at NAV returned 16.76%, outperforming the 12.21% return of the Index. The Fund’s relative outperformance versus the Index was driven by leverage and an overweighting in zero-coupon bonds. Detractors from performance versus the Index included an underweighting in bonds with maturities of 20 years or more and in bonds rated BBB and below. The Fund’s hedge was also a slight detractor from performance versus the Index.

 

 

See Endnotes and Additional Disclosures in this report.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value (NAV) or market price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Fund performance at market price will differ from its results at NAV due to factors such as changing perceptions about the Fund, market conditions, fluctuations in supply and demand for Fund shares, or changes in Fund distributions. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate-ate so that shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance less than one year is cumulative. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, current Fund performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.

 

  3  


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Fund II

September 30, 2012

 

Performance2,3

 

Portfolio Manager William H. Ahern, Jr., CFA

 

% Average Annual Total Returns    Inception Date      One Year      Five Years     

Since

Inception

 

Fund at NAV

     11/29/2002         18.56      4.59      6.29

Fund at Market Price

             11.59         6.67         6.70   

Barclays Capital Long (22+) Municipal Bond Index

     11/29/2002         12.21      6.20      6.07
           
% Premium/Discount to NAV                                
              3.81
           
Distributions4                                

Total Distributions per share for the period

            $ 0.874   

Distribution Rate at NAV

              5.67

Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate at NAV

              8.72

Distribution Rate at Market Price

              5.46

Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate at Market Price

              8.40
           
% Total Leverage5                                

Auction Preferred Shares (APS)

              20.19

Residual Interest Bond (RIB)

              19.38   

Fund Profile

 

 

LOGO

The above chart includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles established in connection with the RIB financing.5 Absent such securities, credit quality (% of total investments) is as follows:6

 

AAA

    9.4   

BBB

    8.0

AA

    68.1      

D

    0.8   

A

    13.7        

 

See Endnotes and Additional Disclosures in this report.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value (NAV) or market price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Fund performance at market price will differ from its results at NAV due to factors such as changing perceptions about the Fund, market conditions, fluctuations in supply and demand for Fund shares, or changes in Fund distributions. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate-ate so that shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance less than one year is cumulative. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, current Fund performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.

 

  4  


Eaton Vance

California Municipal Bond Fund II

September 30, 2012

 

Performance2,3

 

Portfolio Manager Cynthia J. Clemson

 

% Average Annual Total Returns    Inception Date      One Year      Five Years      Since
Inception
 

Fund at NAV

     11/29/2002         21.62      4.79      5.88

Fund at Market Price

             18.36         6.26         6.06   

Barclays Capital Long (22+) Municipal Bond Index

     11/29/2002         12.21      6.20      6.07
           
% Premium/Discount to NAV                                
              1.72
           
Distributions4                                

Total Distributions per share for the period

            $ 0.793   

Distribution Rate at NAV

              5.75

Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate at NAV

              9.86

Distribution Rate at Market Price

              5.66

Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate at Market Price

              9.71
           
% Total Leverage5                                

APS

              29.32

RIB

              11.28   

Fund Profile

 

 

LOGO

The above chart includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles established in connection with the RIB financing.5 Absent such securities, credit quality (% of total investments) is as follows:6

 

AAA

    16.2   

BBB

    5.3

AA

    59.9      

BB

    1.7   

A

    16.9        

 

See Endnotes and Additional Disclosures in this report.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value (NAV) or market price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Fund performance at market price will differ from its results at NAV due to factors such as changing perceptions about the Fund, market conditions, fluctuations in supply and demand for Fund shares, or changes in Fund distributions. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate-ate so that shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance less than one year is cumulative. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, current Fund performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.

 

  5  


Eaton Vance

Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund

September 30, 2012

 

Performance2,3

 

Portfolio Manager Craig R. Brandon, CFA

 

% Average Annual Total Returns    Inception Date      One Year      Five Years      Since
Inception
 

Fund at NAV

     11/29/2002         18.26      7.02      7.08

Fund at Market Price

             21.87         8.19         7.47   

Barclays Capital Long (22+) Municipal Bond Index

     11/29/2002         12.21      6.20      6.07
           
% Premium/Discount to NAV                                
              3.71
           
Distributions4                                

Total Distributions per share for the period

            $ 0.840   

Distribution Rate at NAV

              5.28

Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate at NAV

              8.58

Distribution Rate at Market Price

              5.09

Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate at Market Price

              8.27
           
% Total Leverage5                                

APS

              30.14

RIB

              7.39   

Fund Profile

 

 

LOGO

The above chart includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles established in connection with the RIB financing.5 Absent such securities, credit quality (% of total investments) is as follows:6

 

AAA

    17.6   

BBB

    4.8

AA

    44.6      

Not Rated

    6.5   

A

    26.5        

 

See Endnotes and Additional Disclosures in this report.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value (NAV) or market price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Fund performance at market price will differ from its results at NAV due to factors such as changing perceptions about the Fund, market conditions, fluctuations in supply and demand for Fund shares, or changes in Fund distributions. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate-ate so that shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance less than one year is cumulative. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, current Fund performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.

 

  6  


Eaton Vance

Michigan Municipal Bond Fund

September 30, 2012

 

Performance2,3

 

Portfolio Manager William H. Ahern, Jr., CFA

 

% Average Annual Total Returns    Inception Date      One Year      Five Years      Since
Inception
 

Fund at NAV

     11/29/2002         13.69      6.19      6.58

Fund at Market Price

             24.85         9.19         7.26   

Barclays Capital Long (22+) Municipal Bond Index

     11/29/2002         12.21      6.20      6.07
           
% Premium/Discount to NAV                                
              6.45
           
Distributions4                                

Total Distributions per share for the period

            $ 0.889   

Distribution Rate at NAV

              5.91

Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate at NAV

              9.51

Distribution Rate at Market Price

              5.56

Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate at Market Price

              8.94
           
% Total Leverage5                                

APS

              36.93

Fund Profile

 

LOGO

 

 

See Endnotes and Additional Disclosures in this report.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value (NAV) or market price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Fund performance at market price will differ from its results at NAV due to factors such as changing perceptions about the Fund, market conditions, fluctuations in supply and demand for Fund shares, or changes in Fund distributions. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate-ate so that shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance less than one year is cumulative. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, current Fund performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.

 

  7  


Eaton Vance

New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund

September 30, 2012

 

Performance2,3

 

Portfolio Manager Adam A. Weigold, CFA

 

% Average Annual Total Returns    Inception Date      One Year      Five Years      Since
Inception
 

Fund at NAV

     11/29/2002         17.69      5.55      6.79

Fund at Market Price

             19.58         7.46         7.12   

Barclays Capital Long (22+) Municipal Bond Index

     11/29/2002         12.21      6.20      6.07
           
% Premium/Discount to NAV                                
              3.07
           
Distributions4                                

Total Distributions per share for the period

            $ 0.812   

Distribution Rate at NAV

              5.33

Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate at NAV

              9.01

Distribution Rate at Market Price

              5.17

Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate at Market Price

              8.74
           
% Total Leverage5                                

APS

              31.34

RIB

              7.66   

Fund Profile

 

 

LOGO

The above chart includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles established in connection with the RIB financing.5 Absent such securities, credit quality (% of total investments) is as follows:6

AAA

    5.4   

A

    29.1

AA

    59.9      

BBB

    5.6   

 

See Endnotes and Additional Disclosures in this report.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value (NAV) or market price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Fund performance at market price will differ from its results at NAV due to factors such as changing perceptions about the Fund, market conditions, fluctuations in supply and demand for Fund shares, or changes in Fund distributions. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate-ate so that shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance less than one year is cumulative. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, current Fund performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.

 

  8  


Eaton Vance

New York Municipal Bond Fund II

September 30, 2012

 

Performance2,3

 

Portfolio Manager Craig R. Brandon, CFA

 

% Average Annual Total Returns    Inception Date      One Year      Five Years      Since
Inception
 

Fund at NAV

     11/29/2002         15.47      4.89      6.41

Fund at Market Price

             14.89         6.13         6.46   

Barclays Capital Long (22+) Municipal Bond Index

     11/29/2002         12.21      6.20      6.07
           
% Premium/Discount to NAV                                
              0.52
           
Distributions4                                

Total Distributions per share for the period

            $ 0.784   

Distribution Rate at NAV

              4.94

Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate at NAV

              8.34

Distribution Rate at Market Price

              4.92

Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate at Market Price

              8.30
           
% Total Leverage5                                

APS

              22.93

RIB

              15.36   

Fund Profile

 

 

LOGO

The above chart includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles established in connection with the RIB financing.5 Absent such securities, credit quality (% of total investments) is as follows:6

 

AAA

    19.4   

BBB

    11.8

AA

    45.4      

Not Rated

    2.4   

A

    21.0        

 

See Endnotes and Additional Disclosures in this report.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value (NAV) or market price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Fund performance at market price will differ from its results at NAV due to factors such as changing perceptions about the Fund, market conditions, fluctuations in supply and demand for Fund shares, or changes in Fund distributions. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate-ate so that shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance less than one year is cumulative. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, current Fund performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.

 

  9  


Eaton Vance

Ohio Municipal Bond Fund

September 30, 2012

 

Performance2,3

 

Portfolio Manager William H. Ahern, Jr., CFA

 

% Average Annual Total Returns    Inception Date      One Year      Five Years      Since
Inception
 

Fund at NAV

     11/29/2002         19.50      4.35      5.43

Fund at Market Price

             25.85         8.27         6.47   

Barclays Capital Long (22+) Municipal Bond Index

     11/29/2002         12.21      6.20      6.07
           
% Premium/Discount to NAV                                
              10.14
           
Distributions4                                

Total Distributions per share for the period

            $ 0.772   

Distribution Rate at NAV

              5.59

Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate at NAV

              9.14

Distribution Rate at Market Price

              5.08

Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate at Market Price

              8.31
           
% Total Leverage5                                

APS

              31.74

RIB

              2.93   

Fund Profile

 

 

LOGO

The above chart includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles established in connection with the RIB financing.5 Absent such securities, credit quality (% of total investments) is as follows:6

 

AAA

    4.9   

BBB

    8.0

AA

    59.7      

Not Rated

    1.0   

A

    26.4        

 

See Endnotes and Additional Disclosures in this report.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value (NAV) or market price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Fund performance at market price will differ from its results at NAV due to factors such as changing perceptions about the Fund, market conditions, fluctuations in supply and demand for Fund shares, or changes in Fund distributions. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate-ate so that shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance less than one year is cumulative. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, current Fund performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.

 

  10  


Eaton Vance

Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund

September 30, 2012

 

Performance2,3

 

Portfolio Manager Adam A. Weigold, CFA

 

% Average Annual Total Returns    Inception Date      One Year      Five Years      Since
Inception
 

Fund at NAV

     11/29/2002         16.76      6.21      6.76

Fund at Market Price

             28.88         9.74         7.71   

Barclays Capital Long (22+) Municipal Bond Index

     11/29/2002         12.21      6.20      6.07
           
% Premium/Discount to NAV                                
              9.13
           
Distributions4                                

Total Distributions per share for the period

            $ 0.873   

Distribution Rate at NAV

              6.04

Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate at NAV

              9.59

Distribution Rate at Market Price

              5.53

Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate at Market Price

              8.78
           
% Total Leverage5                                

APS

              32.64

RIB

              3.07   

Fund Profile

 

 

LOGO

The above chart includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles established in connection with the RIB financing.5 Absent such securities, credit quality (% of total investments) is as follows:6

 

AA

    50.6   

BBB

    5.9

A

    38.3      

Not Rated

    5.2   

 

See Endnotes and Additional Disclosures in this report.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value (NAV) or market price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Fund performance at market price will differ from its results at NAV due to factors such as changing perceptions about the Fund, market conditions, fluctuations in supply and demand for Fund shares, or changes in Fund distributions. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate-ate so that shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance less than one year is cumulative. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, current Fund performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.

 

  11  


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Funds

September 30, 2012

 

Endnotes and Additional Disclosures

 

 

1 

The views expressed in this report are those of the portfolio manager(s) and are current only through the date stated at the top of this page. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and Eaton Vance and the Fund(s) disclaim any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied upon as investment advice and, because investment decisions are based on many factors, may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance fund. This commentary may contain statements that are not historical facts, referred to as “forward looking statements”. The Fund’s actual future results may differ significantly from those stated in any forward looking statement, depending on factors such as changes in securities or financial markets or general economic conditions, the volume of sales and purchases of Fund shares, the continuation of investment advisory, administrative and service contracts, and other risks discussed from time to time in the Fund’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

2 

S&P 500 Index is an unmanaged index of large-cap stocks commonly used as a measure of U.S. stock market performance. Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index is an unmanaged index of municipal bonds traded in the U.S. Barclays Capital Long (22+) Municipal Bond Index is an unmanaged index of municipal bonds traded in the U.S. with maturities of 22 years or more. Unless otherwise stated, index returns do not reflect the effect of any applicable sales charges, commissions, expenses, taxes or leverage, as applicable. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.

 

3 

Performance results reflect the effects of leverage.

 

4 

The Distribution Rate is based on the Fund’s last regular distribution per share in the period (annualized) divided by the Fund’s NAV or market price at the end of the period. The Fund’s distributions may be composed of ordinary income, tax-exempt income, net realized capital gains and return of capital. Taxable-equivalent performance is based on the highest combined federal and state income tax rates, where applicable. Lower tax rates would result in lower tax-equivalent performance. Actual tax rates will vary depending on your income, exemptions and deductions. Rates do not include local taxes. Subsequent distributions declared, but not reflected in Fund Performance, reflect a reduction of the monthly distribution for Michigan Municipal Bond Fund.

5 

Fund employs RIB financing and/or APS leverage. The leverage created by RIB investments and APS provides an opportunity for increased income but, at the same time, creates special risks (including the likelihood of greater price volatility). The cost of leverage rises and falls with changes in short-term interest rates. See “Floating Rate Notes Issued in Conjunction with Securities Held” in the notes to the financial statements for more information about RIB financing. RIB leverage represents the amount of Floating Rate Notes outstanding at period end as a percentage of Fund net assets applicable to common shares plus APS and Floating Rate Notes. APS leverage represents the liquidation value of the Fund’s APS outstanding at period end as a percentage of Fund net assets applicable to common shares plus APS and Floating Rate Notes. The Fund is required to maintain prescribed asset coverage for its APS, which could be reduced if Fund asset values decline. Floating Rate Notes in both calculations reflect the effect of RIBs purchased in secondary market transactions, if applicable.

 

6 

Ratings are based on Moody’s, S&P or Fitch, as applicable. Credit ratings are based largely on the rating agency’s investment analysis at the time of rating and the rating assigned to any particular security is not necessarily a reflection of the issuer’s current financial condition. The rating assigned to a security by a rating agency does not necessarily reflect its assessment of the volatility of a security’s market value or of the liquidity of an investment in the security. If securities are rated differently by the rating agencies, the higher rating is applied. Ratings of BBB or higher by Standard and Poor’s or Fitch (Baa or higher by Moody’s) are considered to be investment grade quality.

   Fund profile subject to change due to active management.

 

 

  12  


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Fund II

September 30, 2012

 

Portfolio of Investments

 

 

Tax-Exempt Investments — 163.4%   
   
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Education — 12.6%

  

Connecticut Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Wesleyan University), 5.00%, 7/1/39(1)

  $ 2,200      $ 2,488,618   

Houston, TX, Higher Education Finance Corp., (William Marsh Rice University), 5.00%, 5/15/35

    1,745        2,040,359   

Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Harvard University), 5.50%, 11/15/36

    2,710        3,301,430   

New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority, (Georgian Court University), 5.25%, 7/1/37

    1,500        1,596,120   

New York Dormitory Authority, (Rockefeller University), 5.00%, 7/1/40(1)

    1,500        1,705,305   

New York Dormitory Authority, (State University Educational Facilities), 4.00%, 5/15/28

    1,175        1,303,216   

North Carolina Capital Facilities Finance Agency, (Duke University), 5.00%, 10/1/38(1)

    500        585,685   

Tennessee School Bond Authority, 5.50%, 5/1/38

    1,000        1,175,470   

University of Virginia, 5.00%, 6/1/40

    1,500        1,740,675   

Vermont Educational and Health Buildings Financing Agency, (Middlebury College), 5.00%, 11/1/40

    750        859,065   
                 
    $ 16,795,943   
                 

Electric Utilities — 1.9%

  

South Carolina Public Service Authority, (Santee Cooper), 5.50%, 1/1/38

  $ 1,420      $ 1,690,510   

Wyandotte County/Kansas City, KS, Unified Government Board of Public Utilities, 5.00%, 9/1/36

    685        777,489   
                 
    $ 2,467,999   
                 

General Obligations — 16.9%

  

Chicago Park District, IL, (Harbor Facilities), 5.25%, 1/1/37(1)

  $ 1,680      $ 1,906,581   

Delaware Valley, PA, Regional Finance Authority, 5.75%, 7/1/32

    2,500        3,052,775   

Frisco, TX, Independent School District, (PSF Guaranteed), 5.00%, 8/15/37

    1,280        1,493,990   

Hawaii, 5.00%, 12/1/29

    2,500        3,042,700   

Hawaii, 5.00%, 12/1/30

    1,000        1,211,560   

Mississippi, 5.00%, 10/1/36(1)

    1,725        2,017,077   

New York, 5.00%, 2/15/34(1)

    2,750        3,200,175   

New York, NY, 5.00%, 8/1/31

    3,500        4,193,210   

Oregon, 5.00%, 8/1/36

    1,000        1,181,090   

Pasadena, TX, Independent School District, (PSF Guaranteed), 5.00%, 2/15/35

    645        765,725   

Virginia Beach, VA, 4.00%, 4/1/27

    220        249,425   

Virginia Beach, VA, 4.00%, 4/1/28

    230        259,346   
                 
    $ 22,573,654   
                 
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Hospital — 5.1%

  

Camden County, NJ, Improvement Authority, (Cooper Health System), 5.00%, 2/15/35

  $ 900      $ 930,852   

Camden County, NJ, Improvement Authority, (Cooper Health System), 5.25%, 2/15/27

    545        569,934   

Hawaii Department of Budget and Finance, (Hawaii Pacific Health), 5.60%, 7/1/33

    500        506,185   

Highlands County, FL, Health Facilities Authority, (Adventist Health System), 5.25%, 11/15/36

    1,285        1,375,580   

Knox County, TN, Health, Educational and Housing Facilities Board, (Covenant Health), 0.00%, 1/1/38

    1,850        530,987   

Knox County, TN, Health, Educational and Housing Facilities Board, (Covenant Health), 0.00%, 1/1/39

    5,000        1,360,850   

Lehigh County, PA, General Purpose Authority, (Lehigh Valley Health Network), 5.25%, 7/1/32

    960        982,598   

Orange County, FL, Health Facilities Authority, (Orlando Health, Inc.), 5.00%, 10/1/42

    500        541,485   
                 
    $ 6,798,471   
                 

Industrial Development Revenue — 0.8%

  

St. John Baptist Parish, LA, (Marathon Oil Corp.), 5.125%, 6/1/37

  $ 1,010      $ 1,075,236   
   
    $ 1,075,236   
   

Insured – Education — 6.9%

  

Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Boston University), (XLCA), 6.00%, 5/15/59

  $ 2,500      $ 3,160,825   

Miami-Dade County, FL, Educational Facilities Authority, (University of Miami), (AMBAC), (BHAC), 5.00%, 4/1/31

    1,555        1,748,224   

University of South Alabama, (BHAC), 5.00%, 8/1/38

    3,900        4,276,623   
   
    $ 9,185,672   
   

Insured – Electric Utilities — 7.3%

  

American Municipal Power-Ohio, Inc., OH, (Prairie State Energy Campus), (AGC), 5.75%, 2/15/39

  $ 1,000      $ 1,150,750   

Chelan County, WA, Public Utility District No. 1, (Columbia River), (NPFG), 0.00%, 6/1/23

    6,335        4,512,167   

Mississippi Development Bank, (Municipal Energy), (XLCA), 5.00%, 3/1/41

    2,205        2,247,975   

South Carolina Public Service Authority, (Santee Cooper), (BHAC), 5.50%, 1/1/38

    1,595        1,912,772   
   
    $ 9,823,664   
   
 

 

  13   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Fund II

September 30, 2012

 

Portfolio of Investments — continued

 

 

Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Insured – General Obligations — 14.1%

  

Cincinnati, OH, City School District, (AGM), (FGIC), 5.25%, 12/1/30

  $ 750      $ 1,016,108   

Coast Community College District, CA, (Election of 2002), (AGM), 0.00%, 8/1/33

    17,000        5,588,070   

Goodyear, AZ, (NPFG), 3.00%, 7/1/26

    1,350        1,384,965   

Palm Springs, CA, Unified School District, (Election of 2008), (AGC), 5.00%, 8/1/33

    2,750        3,125,127   

Philadelphia, PA, (AGC), 7.00%, 7/15/28

    1,250        1,462,650   

Washington, (AGM), 5.00%, 7/1/25(1)

    5,500        6,343,975   
   
    $ 18,920,895   
   

Insured – Hospital — 22.1%

  

Arizona Health Facilities Authority, (Banner Health), (BHAC), 5.375%, 1/1/32

  $ 1,750      $ 1,931,440   

California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Sutter Health), (AGM), 5.05%, 8/15/38(1)

    1,500        1,684,275   

Centre County, PA, Hospital Authority, (Mount Nittany Medical Center), (AGC), 6.125%, 11/15/39

    1,695        1,802,955   

Centre County, PA, Hospital Authority, (Mount Nittany Medical Center), (AGC), 6.25%, 11/15/44

    450        478,746   

Colorado Health Facilities Authority, (Catholic Health), (AGM), 5.10%, 10/1/41(1)

    2,200        2,359,236   

Highlands County, FL, Health Facilities Authority, (Adventist Health System), (BHAC), 5.25%, 11/15/36(1)

    3,000        3,388,560   

Highlands County, FL, Health Facilities Authority, (Adventist Health System), (NPFG), 5.00%, 11/15/35

    1,490        1,604,208   

Illinois Finance Authority, (Children’s Memorial Hospital), (AGC), 5.25%, 8/15/47(1)

    2,500        2,690,274   

Indiana Health and Educational Facility Finance Authority, (Sisters of St. Francis Health Services), (AGM), 5.25%, 5/15/41

    1,750        1,885,362   

Indiana Health and Educational Facility Finance Authority, (Sisters of St. Francis Health Services), (AGM), 5.25%, 5/15/41(1)

    750        808,013   

Maricopa County, AZ, Industrial Development Authority, (Catholic Healthcare West), (BHAC), 5.25%, 7/1/32

    2,090        2,382,495   

New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, (Hackensack University Medical Center), (AGC), 5.25%, 1/1/36(1)

    1,000        1,084,080   

New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, (Meridian Health System), Series V, (AGC), 5.00%, 7/1/38(1)

    500        537,565   

New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, (Virtua Health), (AGC), 5.50%, 7/1/38

    2,245        2,509,439   

Washington Health Care Facilities Authority, (MultiCare Health System), (AGC), 6.00%, 8/15/39

    1,545        1,814,263   
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Insured – Hospital (continued)

  

Washington Health Care Facilities Authority, (Providence Health Care), (AGM), 5.25%, 10/1/33

  $ 2,300      $ 2,544,881   
                 
  $ 29,505,792   
                 

Insured – Industrial Development Revenue — 1.1%

  

Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, (Aqua Pennsylvania, Inc.), (BHAC), 5.00%, 10/1/39

  $ 1,340      $ 1,505,999   
                 
  $ 1,505,999   
                 

Insured – Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 5.7%

  

       

Essex County, NJ, Improvement Authority, (NPFG), 5.50%, 10/1/30

  $ 1,000      $ 1,356,800   

New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (School Facilities Construction), (AGC), 5.50%, 12/15/34

    875        1,007,501   

San Diego County, CA, Water Authority, Certificates of Participation, (AGM), 5.00%, 5/1/38(1)

    3,250        3,576,073   

Tri-Creek Middle School Building Corp., IN, (AGM), 5.25%, 1/15/34(1)

    1,500        1,656,870   
                 
  $ 7,597,244   
                 

Insured – Other Revenue — 1.5%

               

Harris County-Houston, TX, Sports Authority, (NPFG), 0.00%, 11/15/34

  $ 2,540      $ 734,898   

New York, NY, Industrial Development Agency, (Yankee Stadium), (AGC), 7.00%, 3/1/49

    1,000        1,229,320   
                 
  $ 1,964,218   
                 

Insured – Solid Waste — 1.0%

               

Palm Beach County, FL, Solid Waste Authority, (BHAC), 5.00%, 10/1/24

  $ 740      $ 878,484   

Palm Beach County, FL, Solid Waste Authority, (BHAC), 5.00%, 10/1/26

    425        499,545   
                 
  $ 1,378,029   
                 

Insured – Special Tax Revenue — 3.8%

               

Miami-Dade County, FL, Professional Sports Franchise Facilities, (AGC), 7.00%, (0.00% until 10/1/19), 10/1/39

  $ 3,000      $ 2,539,200   

Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (AMBAC), 0.00%, 8/1/54

    14,620        1,248,402   

Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), 0.00%, 8/1/45

    8,395        1,299,546   
                 
  $ 5,087,148   
                 
 

 

  14   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Fund II

September 30, 2012

 

Portfolio of Investments — continued

 

 

Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Insured – Student Loan — 1.3%

               

Maine Educational Loan Authority, (AGC), 5.625%, 12/1/27

  $ 1,565      $ 1,787,856   
                 
  $ 1,787,856   
                 

Insured – Transportation — 23.7%

               

Clark County, NV, (Las Vegas-McCarran International Airport), (AGM), 5.25%, 7/1/39

  $ 1,585      $ 1,786,786   

E-470 Public Highway Authority, CO, (NPFG), 0.00%, 9/1/22

    7,800        5,061,576   

Manchester, NH, (Manchester-Boston Regional Airport), (AGM), 5.125%, 1/1/30

    1,305        1,453,039   

Maryland Transportation Authority, (AGM), 5.00%, 7/1/41(1)

    10,000        11,269,700   

Metropolitan Washington, D.C., Airports Authority, (BHAC), 5.00%, 10/1/24

    1,000        1,164,480   

Metropolitan Washington, D.C., Airports Authority, (BHAC), 5.00%, 10/1/29

    535        608,514   

Nevada Department of Business and Industry, (Las Vegas Monorail -1st Tier), (AMBAC), 0.00%, 1/1/20(2)

    13,885        1,378,642   

New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, (AGC), 5.50%, 12/15/38

    1,040        1,186,661   

North Carolina Turnpike Authority, (Triangle Expressway System), (AGC), 5.50%, 1/1/29

    255        294,816   

North Carolina Turnpike Authority, (Triangle Expressway System), (AGC), 5.75%, 1/1/39

    290        335,092   

North Texas Tollway Authority, (BHAC), 5.75%, 1/1/48

    1,750        2,036,510   

Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, (AGM), 5.25%, 7/15/30

    2,540        3,296,818   

Texas Turnpike Authority, (Central Texas Turnpike System), (AMBAC), 5.00%, 8/15/42

    1,785        1,797,317   
                 
  $ 31,669,951   
                 

Insured – Water and Sewer — 8.7%

  

Bossier City, LA, Utilities Revenue, (BHAC), 5.25%, 10/1/26

  $ 670      $ 773,327   

Bossier City, LA, Utilities Revenue, (BHAC), 5.25%, 10/1/27

    420        482,752   

Bossier City, LA, Utilities Revenue, (BHAC), 5.50%, 10/1/38

    660        737,979   

Chicago, IL, Wastewater Transmission Revenue, (BHAC), 5.50%, 1/1/38

    1,635        1,826,066   

District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority, (AGC), 5.00%, 10/1/34(1)

    1,250        1,457,838   

Houston, TX, Utility System, (AGM), (BHAC), 5.00%, 11/15/33

    435        503,404   

Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, (AGM), 5.25%, 8/1/35

    1,000        1,367,030   

New York, NY, Municipal Water Finance Authority, (BHAC), 5.75%, 6/15/40

    2,205        2,673,982   

Pearland, TX, Waterworks and Sewer Systems, (NPFG), 3.50%, 9/1/31

    1,795        1,836,195   
                 
  $ 11,658,573   
                 
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 6.4%

  

       

New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, (Hospital Asset Transformation Program), 5.75%, 10/1/31

  $ 2,235      $ 2,630,930   

North Carolina, Capital Improvement Limited Obligation Bonds, 5.00%, 5/1/30

    5,000        5,988,750   
                 
  $ 8,619,680   
                 

Other Revenue — 1.2%

               

Oregon Department of Administrative Services, Lottery Revenue, 5.25%, 4/1/30

  $ 1,300      $ 1,601,028   
                 
  $ 1,601,028   
                 

Senior Living / Life Care — 0.2%

               

Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Charlestown Community, Inc.), 6.125%, 1/1/30

  $ 235      $ 273,855   
                 
  $ 273,855   
                 

Special Tax Revenue — 7.3%

               

Homewood, AL, City Board of Education, 5.00%, 4/1/32

  $ 1,880      $ 2,174,070   

Illinois, Sales Tax Revenue, 5.00%, 6/15/31

    425        492,031   

Illinois, Sales Tax Revenue, 5.00%, 6/15/32

    405        466,520   

Illinois, Sales Tax Revenue, 5.00%, 6/15/33

    435        498,562   

Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, Sales Tax Revenue, 5.25%, 7/1/33

    750        1,010,002   

Michigan Trunk Line Fund, 5.00%, 11/15/30

    110        130,593   

Michigan Trunk Line Fund, 5.00%, 11/15/31

    125        147,846   

Michigan Trunk Line Fund, 5.00%, 11/15/33

    105        122,987   

Michigan Trunk Line Fund, 5.00%, 11/15/36

    80        93,075   

New York, NY, Transitional Finance Authority, Future Tax Revenue, 5.50%, 11/1/35(1)(3)

    3,800        4,669,440   
                 
  $ 9,805,126   
                 

Transportation — 11.0%

               

Delaware River Port Authority of Pennsylvania and New Jersey, 5.00%, 1/1/35

  $ 1,715      $ 1,942,529   

Los Angeles, CA, Department of Airports, (Los Angeles International Airport), 5.25%, 5/15/28

    465        557,428   

Metropolitan Transportation Authority, NY, 5.25%, 11/15/38

    865        990,036   

Miami-Dade County, FL, (Miami International Airport), 5.00%, 10/1/41

    2,115        2,334,114   

New York Liberty Development Corp., (4 World Trade Center), 5.00%, 11/15/31

    1,070        1,220,956   

New York Thruway Authority, 5.00%, 1/1/37

    510        580,186   

New York Thruway Authority, 5.00%, 1/1/42

    555        627,588   
 

 

  15   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Fund II

September 30, 2012

 

Portfolio of Investments — continued

 

 

Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Transportation (continued)

  

Orlando-Orange County, FL, Expressway Authority, Series A, 5.00%, 7/1/35

  $ 420      $ 471,404   

Orlando-Orange County, FL, Expressway Authority, Series A, 5.00%, 7/1/40

    375        416,542   

Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, 4.00%, 7/15/32(1)

    1,400        1,507,506   

South Carolina Transportation Infrastructure Bank, 5.25%, 10/1/40

    1,000        1,131,470   

Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, NY, 5.00%, 11/15/37

    2,500        2,910,175   
                 
  $ 14,689,934   
                 

Water and Sewer — 2.8%

  

Chicago, IL, Water Revenue, 5.00%, 11/1/42

  $ 1,000      $ 1,146,270   

Detroit, MI, Sewage Disposal System, 5.00%, 7/1/32

    215        230,332   

Detroit, MI, Sewage Disposal System, 5.25%, 7/1/39

    355        380,599   

Marco Island, FL, Utility System, 5.00%, 10/1/34

    205        230,656   

Marco Island, FL, Utility System, 5.00%, 10/1/40

    910        1,013,685   

New York, NY, Municipal Water Finance Authority, (Water and Sewer System), 5.00%, 6/15/37

    720        789,480   
   
    $ 3,791,022   
   

Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 163.4%
(identified cost $204,144,279)

   

  $ 218,576,989   
   

Auction Preferred Shares Plus Cumulative
Unpaid Dividends — (33.4)%

   

  $ (44,702,175
   

Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (30.0)%

  

  $ (40,102,550
   

Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares — 100.0%

  

  $ 133,772,264   
   

The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets applicable to common shares.

 

AGC     Assured Guaranty Corp.
AGM     Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.
AMBAC     AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
BHAC     Berkshire Hathaway Assurance Corp.
FGIC     Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
NPFG     National Public Finance Guaranty Corp.
PSF     Permanent School Fund
XLCA     XL Capital Assurance, Inc.

At September 30, 2012, the concentration of the Fund’s investments in the various states, determined as a percentage of total investments, is as follows:

 

New York      12.6%   
Others, representing less than 10% individually      87.4%   

The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at September 30, 2012, 59.5% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 0.5% to 21.6% of total investments.

 

(1)

Security represents the municipal bond held by a trust that issues residual interest bonds (see Note 1H).

 

(2)

Defaulted security. Issuer has defaulted on the payment of interest or has filed for bankruptcy.

 

(3)

Security (or a portion thereof) has been pledged as collateral for residual interest bond transactions. The aggregate value of such collateral is $1,819,440

 

 

  16   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

California Municipal Bond Fund II

September 30, 2012

 

Portfolio of Investments

 

 

Tax-Exempt Investments — 166.8%   
   
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Education — 16.9%

  

California Educational Facilities Authority, (Claremont McKenna College), 5.00%, 1/1/39

  $ 1,370      $ 1,517,385   

California Educational Facilities Authority, (Harvey Mudd College), 5.25%, 12/1/31

    395        465,977   

California Educational Facilities Authority, (Harvey Mudd College), 5.25%, 12/1/36

    160        184,176   

California Educational Facilities Authority, (Loyola Marymount University), 5.00%, 10/1/22

    70        83,397   

California Educational Facilities Authority, (Loyola Marymount University), 5.00%, 10/1/23

    65        76,844   

California Educational Facilities Authority, (Loyola Marymount University), 5.00%, 10/1/30

    380        425,547   

California Educational Facilities Authority, (Santa Clara University), 5.00%, 2/1/29

    890        1,039,342   

California Educational Facilities Authority, (University of San Francisco), 6.125%, 10/1/36

    115        141,722   

California Educational Facilities Authority, (University of Southern California), 5.25%, 10/1/39

    1,200        1,413,060   

California Educational Facilities Authority, (University of the Pacific), 5.00%, 11/1/30

    330        376,111   

California Municipal Finance Authority, (University of San Diego), 5.00%, 10/1/31

    210        239,646   

California Municipal Finance Authority, (University of San Diego), 5.00%, 10/1/35

    145        160,912   

California Municipal Finance Authority, (University of San Diego), 5.25%, 10/1/26

    405        480,330   

California Municipal Finance Authority, (University of San Diego), 5.25%, 10/1/27

    425        501,279   

California Municipal Finance Authority, (University of San Diego), 5.25%, 10/1/28

    450        528,822   

University of California, 5.25%, 5/15/39

    1,000        1,146,310   
                 
    $ 8,780,860   
                 

Electric Utilities — 8.7%

  

       

Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, Electric System Revenue, 5.25%, 7/1/32

  $ 745      $ 878,497   

Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, 5.25%, 7/1/29

    1,050        1,093,690   

Sacramento Municipal Utility District, 5.00%, 8/15/30

    420        497,070   

Sacramento Municipal Utility District, 5.00%, 8/15/31

    125        147,466   

Southern California Public Power Authority, (Tieton Hydropower), 5.00%, 7/1/30

    1,000        1,173,350   

Vernon, Electric System Revenue, 5.125%, 8/1/21

    675        753,806   
                 
    $ 4,543,879   
                 
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

General Obligations — 14.4%

  

       

California, 5.50%, 11/1/35

  $ 1,300      $ 1,542,697   

Larkspur-Corte Madera School District, (Election of 2011), 4.00%, 8/1/32

    100        112,041   

Larkspur-Corte Madera School District, (Election of 2011), 4.00%, 8/1/33

    110        121,771   

Larkspur-Corte Madera School District, (Election of 2011), 4.00%, 8/1/34

    120        131,848   

Larkspur-Corte Madera School District, (Election of 2011), 4.25%, 8/1/35

    120        133,392   

Larkspur-Corte Madera School District, (Election of 2011), 4.25%, 8/1/36

    145        160,225   

Larkspur-Corte Madera School District, (Election of 2011), 4.50%, 8/1/39

    520        584,678   

Menlo Park City School District, 5.00%, 7/1/30

    260        318,617   

Palo Alto, (Election of 2008), 5.00%, 8/1/40

    1,850        2,136,805   

San Diego Community College District, (Election of 2002), 5.00%, 8/1/32

    720        847,289   

San Diego Community College District, (Election of 2006), 5.00%, 8/1/31

    455        537,396   

San Jose-Evergreen Community College District,
(Election of 2010), 5.00%, 8/1/33

    350        414,666   

San Jose-Evergreen Community College District,
(Election of 2010), 5.00%, 8/1/35

    410        480,368   
                 
    $ 7,521,793   
                 

Hospital — 14.7%

  

       

California Health Facilities Financing Authority, (Catholic Healthcare West), 5.625%, 7/1/32

  $ 1,330      $ 1,455,898   

California Health Facilities Financing Authority, (Cedars-Sinai Medical Center), 5.00%, 8/15/39

    1,425        1,558,751   

California Health Facilities Financing Authority, (Memorial Health Services), 5.00%, 10/1/27

    750        883,470   

California Health Facilities Financing Authority, (Stanford Hospital and Clinics), 5.00%, 8/15/51

    800        894,872   

California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Cottage Health System), 5.25%, 11/1/30

    1,000        1,147,790   

California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (John Muir Health), 5.00%, 8/15/36

    355        376,868   

Washington Township Health Care District, 5.00%, 7/1/32

    555        578,676   

Washington Township Health Care District, 5.25%, 7/1/29

    750        751,710   
                 
  $ 7,648,035   
                 

Insured – Education — 9.8%

               

California Educational Facilities Authority, (Pepperdine University), (AMBAC), 5.00%, 12/1/32

  $ 420      $ 463,819   

California Educational Facilities Authority, (Pepperdine University), (AMBAC), 5.00%, 12/1/35

    1,000        1,104,330   
 

 

  17   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

California Municipal Bond Fund II

September 30, 2012

 

Portfolio of Investments — continued

 

 

Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Insured – Education (continued)

  

California State University, (AGM), (BHAC), 5.00%, 11/1/39(1)

  $ 2,000      $ 2,185,600   

California State University, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 11/1/33

    1,335        1,340,887   
                 
  $ 5,094,636   
                 

Insured – Electric Utilities — 8.4%

               

Glendale, Electric System Revenue, (NPFG), 5.00%, 2/1/32

  $ 1,475      $ 1,495,473   

Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, Electric System Revenue, (AMBAC), (BHAC), 5.00%, 7/1/26(1)

    1,500        1,751,850   

Sacramento Municipal Utility District, (AGM), 5.00%, 8/15/27

    1,000        1,145,020   
                 
  $ 4,392,343   
                 

Insured – Escrowed / Prerefunded — 12.0%

               

California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank, (Bay Area Toll Bridges), (AMBAC), Prerefunded to 1/1/28, 5.00%, 7/1/33

  $ 1,150      $ 1,577,087   

California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank, (Bay Area Toll Bridges), (AMBAC), Prerefunded to 1/1/28, 5.00%, 7/1/36

    1,025        1,405,665   

Clovis Unified School District, (FGIC), (NPFG), Escrowed to Maturity, 0.00%, 8/1/20

    3,130        2,749,235   

Orange County Water District, Certificates of Participation, (NPFG), Escrowed to Maturity, 5.00%, 8/15/34

    395        528,293   
                 
  $ 6,260,280   
                 

Insured – General Obligations — 23.8%

               

Antelope Valley Community College District, (Election of 2004), (NPFG), 5.25%, 8/1/39

  $ 725      $ 832,329   

Arcadia Unified School District, (Election of 2006), (AGM), 0.00%, 8/1/38

    7,125        1,832,693   

Arcadia Unified School District, (Election of 2006), (AGM), 0.00%, 8/1/40

    2,525        579,967   

Carlsbad Unified School District, (Election of 2006), (NPFG), 5.25%, 8/1/32

    1,500        1,680,045   

Coast Community College District, (Election of 2002), (AGM), 0.00%, 8/1/35

    6,675        1,957,243   

El Camino Hospital District, (NPFG), 4.45%, 8/1/36

    575        598,144   

Palm Springs Unified School District, (Election of 2008), (AGC), 5.00%, 8/1/33

    1,250        1,420,513   

Riverside Community College District, (Election of 2004), (AGM), (NPFG), 5.00%, 8/1/32

    1,040        1,191,850   

Union Elementary School District, (Election of 1999), (FGIC), (NPFG), 0.00%, 9/1/22

    3,200        2,295,552   
                 
  $ 12,388,336   
                 
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Insured – Hospital — 6.4%

               

California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Kaiser Permanente), (BHAC), 5.00%, 3/1/41(1)

  $ 1,250      $ 1,357,038   

California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Sutter Health), (AGM), 5.05%, 8/15/38(1)

    1,750        1,964,987   
                 
  $ 3,322,025   
                 

Insured – Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 7.1%

  

       

Puerto Rico Public Finance Corp., (AMBAC), Escrowed to Maturity, 5.50%, 8/1/27

  $ 1,250      $ 1,745,700   

San Diego County Water Authority, Certificates of Participation, (AGM), 5.00%, 5/1/38(1)

    1,750        1,925,577   
                 
  $ 3,671,277   
                 

Insured – Special Tax Revenue — 10.7%

  

Cathedral City Public Financing Authority, (Housing Redevelopment), (NPFG), 5.00%, 8/1/33

  $ 1,400      $ 1,417,220   

Hesperia Public Financing Authority, (Redevelopment and Housing Projects), (XLCA), 5.00%, 9/1/37

    1,535        1,306,132   

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Sales Tax Revenue, (AGM), 4.50%, 7/1/27

    430        461,450   

Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (AMBAC), 0.00%, 8/1/54

    5,655        482,880   

Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), 0.00%, 8/1/45

    3,215        497,682   

Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, Sales Tax Revenue, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 4/1/32

    1,225        1,401,045   
                 
  $ 5,566,409   
                 

Insured – Transportation — 3.8%

               

San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency, (NPFG), 0.00%, 1/15/27

  $ 3,520      $ 1,635,216   

San Jose, Airport Revenue, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 3/1/33

    330        349,774   
                 
  $ 1,984,990   
                 

Insured – Water and Sewer — 8.6%

               

Calleguas Las Virgines Public Financing Authority, (Municipal Water District), (BHAC), (FGIC), 4.75%, 7/1/37

  $ 1,235      $ 1,320,524   

East Bay Municipal Utility District, Water System Revenue, (AGM), (FGIC), 5.00%, 6/1/32

    100        115,030   

East Bay Municipal Utility District, Water System Revenue, (FGIC), (NPFG), 5.00%, 6/1/32(1)

    1,600        1,840,480   

Riverside, Water System Revenue, (AGM), 5.00%, 10/1/38

    445        491,667   

Santa Clara Valley Water District, (AGM), 3.75%, 6/1/28

    665        691,739   
                 
  $ 4,459,440   
                 
 

 

  18   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

California Municipal Bond Fund II

September 30, 2012

 

Portfolio of Investments — continued

 

 

Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Special Tax Revenue — 6.3%

               

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Sales Tax Revenue, 5.00%, 7/1/31

  $ 1,490      $ 1,713,127   

San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, Sales Tax Revenue, 5.00%, 7/1/28

    1,300        1,542,476   
                 
  $ 3,255,603   
                 

Transportation — 12.9%

               

Bay Area Toll Authority, Toll Bridge Revenue, (San Francisco Bay Area), 5.25%, 4/1/29

  $ 1,190      $ 1,439,852   

Long Beach, Harbor Revenue, 5.00%, 5/15/27

    540        641,531   

Los Angeles Department of Airports, (Los Angeles International Airport), 5.00%, 5/15/35(1)(2)

    1,060        1,204,754   

Los Angeles Harbor Department, 5.00%, 8/1/25

    1,250        1,522,838   

San Francisco City and County Airport Commission, (San Francisco International Airport), 5.00%, 5/1/35

    635        707,631   

San Jose, Airport Revenue, 5.00%, 3/1/20

    1,000        1,193,470   
                 
  $ 6,710,076   
                 

Water and Sewer — 2.3%

               

Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, 5.00%, 1/1/39

  $ 1,050      $ 1,215,658   
                 
  $ 1,215,658   
                 

Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 166.8%
(identified cost $78,832,496)

    $ 86,815,640   
                 

Auction Preferred Shares Plus Cumulative Unpaid Dividends — (49.4)%

  

  $ (25,700,770
                 

Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (17.4)%

  

  $ (9,052,282
                 

Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares — 100.0%

  

  $ 52,062,588   
                 

The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets applicable to common shares.

 

AGC     Assured Guaranty Corp.
AGM     Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.
AMBAC     AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
BHAC     Berkshire Hathaway Assurance Corp.
FGIC     Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
NPFG     National Public Finance Guaranty Corp.
XLCA     XL Capital Assurance, Inc.

 

The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by California municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at September 30, 2012, 54.3% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 1.5% to 19.3% of total investments.

 

(1) 

Security represents the municipal bond held by a trust that issues residual interest bonds (see Note 1H).

 

(2) 

Security (or a portion thereof) has been pledged as collateral for residual interest bond transactions. The aggregate value of such collateral is $409,754.

 

 

  19   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund

September 30, 2012

 

Portfolio of Investments

 

 

Tax-Exempt Investments — 157.5%   
   
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Bond Bank — 6.0%

  

Massachusetts Water Pollution Abatement Trust, 5.25%, 8/1/33

  $ 585      $ 802,790   

Massachusetts Water Pollution Abatement Trust, 5.25%, 8/1/34

    640        881,433   
                 
    $ 1,684,223   
                 

Education — 26.3%

  

Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Middlesex School), 5.00%, 9/1/33

  $ 750      $ 761,603   

Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Milton Academy), 5.00%, 9/1/35

    750        857,077   

Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Harvard University), 5.00%, 10/1/38(1)

    2,000        2,342,520   

Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Massachusetts Institute of Technology), 5.50%, 7/1/36

    1,000        1,205,450   

Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Northeastern University), 5.00%, 10/1/35

    870        979,533   

Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Tufts University), 5.375%, 8/15/38

    1,025        1,248,071   
                 
    $ 7,394,254   
                 

Escrowed / Prerefunded — 4.0%

  

Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Massachusetts College of Pharmacy), Prerefunded to 7/1/13, 5.75%, 7/1/33

  $ 500      $ 525,870   

Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Western New England College), Prerefunded to 12/1/12, 6.125%, 12/1/32

    600        612,156   
                 
    $ 1,138,026   
                 

General Obligations — 12.0%

  

Boston, 4.00%, 4/1/24

  $ 200      $ 232,222   

Cambridge, 4.00%, 2/15/21

    395        472,938   

Danvers, 5.25%, 7/1/36

    565        672,073   

Plymouth, 5.00%, 5/1/26

    250        302,455   

Plymouth, 5.00%, 5/1/31

    225        267,381   

Plymouth, 5.00%, 5/1/32

    205        242,919   

Wayland, 5.00%, 2/1/33

    340        405,749   

Wayland, 5.00%, 2/1/36

    510        597,695   

Winchester, 5.00%, 4/15/36

    160        188,118   
                 
    $ 3,381,550   
                 

Hospital — 14.6%

  

Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), 5.00%, 12/1/37

  $ 775      $ 849,609   

Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Lahey Clinic Medical Center), 5.25%, 8/15/28

    400        431,232   
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Hospital (continued)

  

Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Partners Healthcare System), 5.00%, 7/1/34

  $ 500      $ 554,765   

Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Partners Healthcare System), 5.00%, 7/1/39

    750        820,215   

Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (South Shore Hospital), 5.75%, 7/1/29

    370        370,540   

Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Southcoast Health System), 5.00%, 7/1/29

    1,000        1,085,460   
                 
    $ 4,111,821   
                 

Insured – Education — 17.9%

  

Massachusetts College Building Authority, (XLCA), 5.50%, 5/1/39

  $ 700      $ 973,210   

Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Boston College), (NPFG), 5.00%, 7/1/38

    750        858,585   

Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Boston University), (XLCA), 6.00%, 5/15/59

    1,105        1,397,085   

Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (College of the Holy Cross), (AMBAC), 5.25%, 9/1/32(1)(2)

    750        1,010,512   

Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Massachusetts College of Pharmacy), (AGC), 5.00%, 7/1/35

    750        784,830   
   
    $ 5,024,222   
   

Insured – Electric Utilities — 4.4%

  

Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (NPFG), 5.25%, 7/1/23

  $ 1,095      $ 1,239,759   
   
    $ 1,239,759   
   

Insured – Escrowed / Prerefunded — 7.2%

  

Massachusetts College Building Authority, (NPFG), Escrowed to Maturity, 0.00%, 5/1/26

  $ 2,900      $ 2,040,788   
   
    $ 2,040,788   
   

Insured – General Obligations — 13.3%

  

Massachusetts, (AMBAC), 5.50%, 8/1/30

  $ 1,900      $ 2,647,593   

Revere, (AGC), 5.00%, 4/1/39

    1,000        1,094,240   
   
    $ 3,741,833   
   

Insured – Hospital — 0.9%

  

Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Cape Cod Healthcare), (AGC), 5.00%, 11/15/25

  $ 220      $ 245,432   
   
    $ 245,432   
   
 

 

  20   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund

September 30, 2012

 

Portfolio of Investments — continued

 

 

Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Insured – Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 5.0%

  

Puerto Rico Public Finance Corp., (AMBAC), Escrowed to Maturity, 5.50%, 8/1/27

  $ 1,000      $ 1,396,560   
   
    $ 1,396,560   
   

Insured – Other Revenue — 2.0%

  

Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (WGBH Educational Foundation), (AMBAC), 5.75%, 1/1/42

  $ 415      $ 551,336   
   
    $ 551,336   
   

Insured – Special Tax Revenue — 16.1%

  

Martha’s Vineyard Land Bank, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 5/1/32

  $ 1,225      $ 1,253,077   

Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, Sales Tax Revenue, (NPFG), 5.50%, 7/1/28

    400        550,120   

Massachusetts School Building Authority, Dedicated Sales Tax Revenue, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 8/15/37(1)

    1,160        1,331,204   

Massachusetts, Special Obligation, Dedicated Tax Revenue, (FGIC), (NPFG), 5.50%, 1/1/29

    750        963,428   

Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (AMBAC), 0.00%, 8/1/54

    2,595        221,587   

Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), 0.00%, 8/1/45

    1,460        226,008   
   
    $ 4,545,424   
   

Insured – Water and Sewer — 4.6%

  

Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, (AGM), 5.25%, 8/1/36

  $ 960      $ 1,308,970   
   
    $ 1,308,970   
   

Other Revenue — 3.3%

  

Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum), 5.00%, 5/1/25

  $ 320      $ 368,167   

Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum), 5.00%, 5/1/29

    490        551,480   
                 
  $ 919,647   
                 

Senior Living / Life Care — 2.6%

  

Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Berkshire Retirement Community, Inc.), 5.15%, 7/1/31

  $ 745      $ 745,030   
                 
  $ 745,030   
                 

Special Tax Revenue — 5.3%

               

Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, 5.25%, 7/1/34

  $ 95      $ 111,232   

Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, Special Tax Revenue, 5.00%, 7/1/35

    1,210        1,388,523   
                 
  $ 1,499,755   
                 
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Transportation — 8.8%

               

Massachusetts Department of Transportation, (Metropolitan Highway System), 5.00%, 1/1/32

  $ 1,000      $ 1,122,260   

Massachusetts Department of Transportation, (Metropolitan Highway System), 5.00%, 1/1/37

    500        555,635   

Massachusetts Port Authority, 5.00%, 7/1/28

    250        296,630   

Massachusetts Port Authority, 5.00%, 7/1/34

    435        501,137   
                 
  $ 2,475,662   
                 

Water and Sewer — 3.2%

               

Boston Water & Sewer Commission, 5.00%, 11/1/27

  $ 750      $ 898,447   
                 
  $ 898,447   
                 

Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 157.5%
(identified cost $38,373,002)

    $ 44,342,739   
                 

Auction Preferred Shares Plus Cumulative Unpaid Dividends — (48.2)%

  

  $ (13,575,305
                 

Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (9.3)%

  

  $ (2,629,734
                 

Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares — 100.0%

  

  $ 28,137,700   
                 

The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets applicable to common shares.

 

AGC     Assured Guaranty Corp.
AGM     Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.
AMBAC     AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
FGIC     Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
NPFG     National Public Finance Guaranty Corp.
XLCA     XL Capital Assurance, Inc.

The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by Massachusetts municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at September 30, 2012, 45.3% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 2.2% to 19.0% of total investments.

 

(1) 

Security represents the municipal bond held by a trust that issues residual interest bonds (see Note 1H).

 

(2) 

Security (or a portion thereof) has been pledged as collateral for residual interest bond transactions. The aggregate value of such collateral is $510,513.

 

 

  21   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Michigan Municipal Bond Fund

September 30, 2012

 

Portfolio of Investments

 

 

Tax-Exempt Investments — 155.0%   
   
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Education — 1.1%

  

Michigan Higher Education Facilities Authority, (Hillsdale College), 5.00%, 3/1/35

  $ 250      $ 254,030   
                 
    $ 254,030   
                 

Electric Utilities — 2.1%

  

Michigan Public Power Agency, 5.00%, 1/1/43

  $ 450      $ 480,375   
                 
    $ 480,375   
                 

Escrowed / Prerefunded — 9.3%

  

Michigan Hospital Finance Authority, (Chelsea Community Hospital), Prerefunded to 5/15/15, 5.00%, 5/15/30

  $ 400      $ 447,876   

Michigan Hospital Finance Authority, (Oakwood Hospital System), Prerefunded to 4/1/13, 5.75%, 4/1/32

    1,000        1,028,160   

Michigan Hospital Finance Authority, (Trinity Health Corp.), Prerefunded to 12/1/12, 5.375%, 12/1/30

    640        645,806   
                 
    $ 2,121,842   
                 

General Obligations — 9.7%

  

Comstock Park Public Schools, 5.00%, 5/1/28

  $ 170      $ 195,231   

Comstock Park Public Schools, 5.125%, 5/1/31

    205        235,346   

Comstock Park Public Schools, 5.25%, 5/1/33

    165        189,095   

Howell Public Schools, 4.50%, 5/1/29

    620        698,932   

Livingston County, 4.00%, 6/1/28

    230        252,936   

Livingston County, 4.00%, 6/1/30

    245        265,541   

St. Clair County, (Convention Center), 3.75%, 4/1/42

    375        367,125   
                 
    $ 2,204,206   
                 

Hospital — 19.5%

  

Grand Traverse Hospital, 5.375%, 7/1/35

  $ 750      $ 856,770   

Kalamazoo Hospital Finance Authority, (Bronson Health Care Group), 5.25%, 5/15/33

    500        557,375   

Kent Hospital Finance Authority, (Spectrum Health System), 5.00%, 1/15/31

    750        850,365   

Michigan Finance Authority, (Oakwood Obligated Group), 5.00%, 11/1/32

    500        560,800   

Michigan Hospital Finance Authority, (McLaren Health Care), 5.00%, 6/1/35

    750        828,975   

Michigan Hospital Finance Authority, (Trinity Health Corp.), 5.00%, 12/1/48

    700        773,885   
                 
    $ 4,428,170   
                 
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Insured – Education — 2.1%

  

Ferris State University, (AGC), 5.125%, 10/1/33

  $ 435      $ 482,572   
                 
    $ 482,572   
                 

Insured – Electric Utilities — 7.1%

  

Michigan Strategic Fund, (Detroit Edison Co.), (XLCA), 5.25%, 12/15/32

  $ 500      $ 501,765   

Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (NPFG), 5.25%, 7/1/26

    1,000        1,119,390   
                 
    $ 1,621,155   
                 

Insured – Escrowed / Prerefunded — 36.4%

  

Central Michigan University, (AMBAC), Prerefunded to 10/1/13, 5.05%, 10/1/32

  $ 750      $ 786,270   

Lansing Building Authority, (NPFG), Prerefunded to 6/1/13, 5.00%, 6/1/29

    1,500        1,548,765   

Michigan Hospital Finance Authority, (St. John Health System), (AMBAC), Escrowed to Maturity, 5.00%, 5/15/28

    1,150        1,154,347   

Michigan House of Representatives, (AMBAC), Escrowed to Maturity, 0.00%, 8/15/22

    1,750        1,391,845   

Michigan House of Representatives, (AMBAC), Escrowed to Maturity, 0.00%, 8/15/23

    2,615        2,006,777   

Reed City Public Schools, (AGM), Prerefunded to 5/1/14, 5.00%, 5/1/29

    1,300        1,398,202   
                 
  $ 8,286,206   
                 

Insured – General Obligations — 21.8%

               

Grand Rapids and Kent County Joint Building Authority, (DeVos Place), (NPFG), 0.00%, 12/1/27

  $ 1,960      $ 1,162,005   

Greenville Public Schools, (NPFG), 5.00%, 5/1/25

    375        376,354   

Okemos Public School District, (NPFG), 0.00%, 5/1/19

    1,330        1,136,392   

Pinconning Area Schools, (AGM), 5.00%, 5/1/33

    1,000        1,082,710   

Royal Oak, (AGC), 6.25%, 10/1/28

    1,000        1,200,280   
                 
  $ 4,957,741   
                 

Insured – Hospital — 6.0%

               

Michigan Hospital Finance Authority, (Mid-Michigan Obligation Group), (AMBAC), 5.00%, 4/15/32

  $ 500      $ 500,570   

Royal Oak Hospital Finance Authority, (William Beaumont Hospital), (NPFG), 5.25%, 11/15/35

    855        855,932   
                 
  $ 1,356,502   
                 
 

 

  22   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Michigan Municipal Bond Fund

September 30, 2012

 

Portfolio of Investments — continued

 

 

Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Insured – Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 7.7%

  

       

Michigan Building Authority, (AGM), (FGIC), 0.00%, 10/15/29

  $ 1,000      $ 445,720   

Michigan Building Authority, (FGIC), (NPFG), 0.00%, 10/15/30

    3,100        1,302,465   
                 
  $ 1,748,185   
                 

Insured – Special Tax Revenue — 1.9%

               

Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (AMBAC), 0.00%, 8/1/54

  $ 3,005      $ 256,597   

Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), 0.00%, 8/1/45

    1,165        180,342   
                 
  $ 436,939   
                 

Insured – Utilities — 6.8%

               

Lansing Board of Water and Light, (Water Supply, Steam and Electric Utility), (AGM), 5.00%, 7/1/25

  $ 1,000      $ 1,018,630   

Lansing Board of Water and Light, (Water Supply, Steam and Electric Utility), (AGM), 5.00%, 7/1/26

    510        519,149   
                 
  $ 1,537,779   
                 

Insured – Water and Sewer — 13.5%

               

Detroit Sewer Disposal System, (NPFG), 4.50%, 7/1/35

  $ 500      $ 491,230   

Detroit Water Supply System, (FGIC), (NPFG), 5.00%, 7/1/30

    1,425        1,425,941   

Grand Rapids Water Supply System, (AGC), 5.00%, 1/1/29

    1,000        1,148,650   
                 
  $ 3,065,821   
                 

Special Tax Revenue — 5.1%

               

Michigan Trunk Line Fund, 5.00%, 11/15/36

  $ 1,000      $ 1,163,440   
                 
  $ 1,163,440   
                 

Water and Sewer — 4.9%

               

Grand Rapids, Sanitary Sewer System, 5.00%, 1/1/28

  $ 650      $ 846,866   

Port Huron, Water Supply System, 5.25%, 10/1/31

    250        279,355   
                 
  $ 1,126,221   
                 

Total Tax – Exempt Investments — 155.0%
(identified cost $32,050,961)

   

  $ 35,271,184   
                 

Auction Preferred Shares Plus Cumulative Unpaid Dividends — (58.6)%

  

  $ (13,325,499
                 

Other Assets, Less Liabilities — 3.6%

  

  $ 813,273   
                 

Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares — 100.0%

  

  $ 22,758,958   
                 

The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets applicable to common shares.

 

AGC     Assured Guaranty Corp.
AGM     Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.
AMBAC     AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
FGIC     Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
NPFG     National Public Finance Guaranty Corp.
XLCA     XL Capital Assurance, Inc.

The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by Michigan municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at September 30, 2012, 66.6% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 1.4% to 27.2% of total investments.

 

 

  23   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund

September 30, 2012

 

Portfolio of Investments

 

 

Tax-Exempt Investments — 161.5%   
   
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Education — 6.0%

  

New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority, (Georgian Court University), 5.25%, 7/1/37

  $ 750      $ 798,060   

New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority, (Ramapo College), 4.00%, 7/1/27

    750        814,665   

New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority, (Ramapo College), 5.00%, 7/1/37

    360        408,596   

Rutgers State University, 5.00%, 5/1/39

    250        279,618   
                 
    $ 2,300,939   
                 

General Obligations — 4.4%

  

Monmouth County Improvement Authority, 5.00%, 1/15/27

  $ 1,375      $ 1,673,045   
                 
    $ 1,673,045   
                 

Hospital — 10.5%

  

Camden County Improvement Authority, (Cooper Health System), 5.00%, 2/15/35

  $ 180      $ 186,170   

Camden County Improvement Authority, (Cooper Health System), 5.75%, 2/15/34

    685        700,049   

New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, (Atlanticare Regional Medical Center), 5.00%, 7/1/37

    515        545,205   

New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, (Hunterdon Medical Center), 5.125%, 7/1/35

    250        260,373   

New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, (Meridian Health System), 5.00%, 7/1/21

    750        911,107   

New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, (South Jersey Hospital), 5.00%, 7/1/46

    1,345        1,395,895   
                 
    $ 3,998,799   
                 

Housing — 2.9%

  

New Jersey Housing and Mortgage Finance Agency, (Single Family Housing), 4.375%, 4/1/28

  $ 995      $ 1,085,465   
                 
    $ 1,085,465   
                 

Insured – Education — 6.5%

  

New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority, (Rowan University), (AGM), (FGIC), 3.00%, 7/1/27

  $ 920      $ 928,731   

New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority, (William Paterson University), (AGC), 4.75%, 7/1/34

    1,145        1,249,241   

New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority, (William Paterson University), (AGC), 5.00%, 7/1/38

    275        300,753   
                 
    $ 2,478,725   
                 
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Insured – Electric Utilities — 3.9%

  

Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), (NPFG), 5.25%, 7/1/35

  $ 335      $ 357,881   

Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (NPFG), 5.25%, 7/1/26

    1,000        1,119,390   
                 
    $ 1,477,271   
                 

Insured – Escrowed / Prerefunded — 1.5%

  

Garden State Preservation Trust, (AGM), Prerefunded to 11/1/15, 5.80%, 11/1/21

  $ 500      $ 582,120   
                 
    $ 582,120   
                 

Insured – General Obligations — 45.9%

  

Bayonne, (AGM), 0.00%, 7/1/23

  $ 2,415      $ 1,696,417   

Bayonne, (AGM), 5.50%, 7/1/39

    1,000        1,137,110   

Delaware Township, Hunterdon County, (AGC), 5.00%, 10/15/35

    320        365,312   

Delaware Township, Hunterdon County, (AGC), 5.10%, 10/15/36

    340        389,548   

Delaware Township, Hunterdon County, (AGC), 5.15%, 10/15/37

    360        412,988   

Delaware Township, Hunterdon County, (AGC), 5.20%, 10/15/38

    382        438,555   

Hudson County Improvement Authority, (Harrison Parking), (AGC), 5.25%, 1/1/39

    1,500        1,680,750   

Hudson County Improvement Authority, (Harrison Redevelopment), (NPFG), 0.00%, 12/15/38

    2,000        556,360   

Irvington Township, (AGM), 0.00%, 7/15/26

    5,235        3,188,953   

Jackson Township School District, (NPFG), 2.50%, 6/15/27

    2,370        2,341,133   

Jersey City, (AGM), 5.00%, 1/15/29

    1,000        1,127,090   

Lakewood Township, (AGC), 5.75%, 11/1/31

    700        829,010   

Monroe Township Board of Education, Middlesex County, (AGC), 4.75%, 3/1/34

    1,015        1,113,688   

Nutley School District, (NPFG), 4.75%, 7/15/30

    110        121,303   

Nutley School District, (NPFG), 4.75%, 7/15/31

    410        450,959   

West Deptford Township, (AGM), 5.00%, 7/1/26

    850        949,595   

West Deptford Township, (AGM), 5.00%, 7/1/27

    635        706,533   
                 
  $ 17,505,304   
                 

Insured – Hospital — 11.3%

               

New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, (Hackensack University Medical Center), (AGC), 5.25%, 1/1/36(1)

  $ 2,000      $ 2,168,160   

New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, (Meridian Health System), Series II, (AGC), 5.00%, 7/1/38

    170        182,772   
 

 

  24   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund

September 30, 2012

 

Portfolio of Investments — continued

 

 

Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Insured – Hospital (continued)

  

New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, (Meridian Health System), Series V, (AGC), 5.00%, 7/1/38(1)

  $ 250      $ 268,783   

New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, (Virtua Health), (AGC), 5.50%, 7/1/38

    1,500        1,676,685   
                 
  $ 4,296,400   
                 

Insured – Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 13.8%

  

       

Essex County Improvement Authority, (NPFG), 5.50%, 10/1/30

  $ 1,000      $ 1,356,800   

New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (School Facilities Construction), (AGC), 5.50%, 12/15/34

    1,300        1,496,859   

New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (School Facilities Construction), (FGIC), (NPFG), 5.50%, 9/1/28

    500        656,210   

Puerto Rico Public Finance Corp., (AMBAC), Escrowed to Maturity, 5.50%, 8/1/27

    1,250        1,745,700   
                 
  $ 5,255,569   
                 

Insured – Special Tax Revenue — 11.8%

               

Garden State Preservation Trust, (AGM), 0.00%, 11/1/21

  $ 1,000      $ 796,450   

New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (Motor Vehicle Surcharges), (BHAC), (NPFG), 5.00%, 7/1/27

    975        1,036,523   

New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (Motor Vehicle Surcharges), (XLCA), 0.00%, 7/1/26

    2,380        1,386,683   

New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (Motor Vehicle Surcharges), (XLCA), 0.00%, 7/1/27

    1,120        620,211   

Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (AMBAC), 0.00%, 8/1/54

    3,775        322,347   

Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), 0.00%, 8/1/45

    2,095        324,306   
                 
  $ 4,486,520   
                 

Insured – Transportation — 18.1%

               

New Jersey Turnpike Authority, (AGM), (BHAC), 5.25%, 1/1/29

  $ 1,500      $ 1,966,905   

Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, (AGM), 5.00%, 11/1/27(1)(2)

    3,875        3,928,483   

Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, (AGM), 5.00%, 8/15/33

    720        810,094   

South Jersey Transportation Authority, (AGC), 5.50%, 11/1/33

    180        210,868   
                 
  $ 6,916,350   
                 

Insured – Water and Sewer — 8.6%

               

Middlesex County Improvement Authority, (Perth Amboy), (AMBAC), 0.00%, 9/1/24

  $ 4,500      $ 2,815,290   

Passaic Valley Sewerage Commissioners, (FGIC), (NPFG), 2.50%, 12/1/32

    610        480,851   
   
    $ 3,296,141   
   
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 1.7%

  

New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, (Hospital Asset Transformation Program), 5.25%, 10/1/38

  $ 600      $ 656,964   
   
    $ 656,964   
   

Student Loan — 2.9%

  

New Jersey Higher Education Student Assistance Authority, 5.625%, 6/1/30

  $ 965      $ 1,098,691   
   
    $ 1,098,691   
   

Transportation — 9.5%

  

Delaware River Port Authority of Pennsylvania and New Jersey, 5.00%, 1/1/35

  $ 590      $ 668,275   

Delaware River Port Authority of Pennsylvania and New Jersey, 5.00%, 1/1/40

    210        235,240   

New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, (Transportation System), 5.50%, 6/15/31

    1,150        1,389,051   

South Jersey Port Authority, (Marine Terminal), 5.10%, 1/1/33

    1,325        1,332,433   
   
    $ 3,624,999   
   

Water and Sewer — 2.2%

  

North Hudson Sewerage Authority, 5.00%, 6/1/29

  $ 725      $ 841,000   
   
    $ 841,000   
   

Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 161.5%
(identified cost $54,601,171)

   

  $ 61,574,302   
   

Auction Preferred Shares Plus Cumulative Unpaid Dividends — (51.4)%

  

  $ (19,600,880
   

Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (10.1)%

  

  $ (3,833,460
   

Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares — 100.0%

  

  $ 38,139,962   
   

The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets applicable to common shares.

 

AGC     Assured Guaranty Corp.
AGM     Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.
AMBAC     AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
BHAC     Berkshire Hathaway Assurance Corp.
FGIC     Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
NPFG     National Public Finance Guaranty Corp.
XLCA     XL Capital Assurance, Inc.
 

 

  25   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund

September 30, 2012

 

Portfolio of Investments — continued

 

 

The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by New Jersey municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at September 30, 2012, 75.2% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 3.3% to 28.9% of total investments.

 

(1) 

Security represents the municipal bond held by a trust that issues residual interest bonds (see Note 1H).

 

(2) 

Security (or a portion thereof) has been pledged as collateral for residual interest bond transactions. The aggregate value of such collateral is $1,343,483.

 

 

  26   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

New York Municipal Bond Fund II

September 30, 2012

 

Portfolio of Investments

 

 

Tax-Exempt Investments — 160.3%   
   
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Bond Bank — 3.9%

  

New York Environmental Facilities Corp., 5.00%, 10/15/39

  $ 750      $ 867,893   

New York Environmental Facilities Corp., (New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority), 5.00%, 6/15/32

    500        515,835   
                 
    $ 1,383,728   
                 

Education — 15.9%

  

Monroe County Industrial Development Corp., (St. John Fisher College), 5.00%, 6/1/23

  $ 60      $ 68,783   

Monroe County Industrial Development Corp., (St. John Fisher College), 5.00%, 6/1/24

    35        39,774   

Monroe County Industrial Development Corp., (St. John Fisher College), 5.00%, 6/1/25

    25        28,269   

New York City Industrial Development Agency, (St. Francis College), 5.00%, 10/1/34

    350        361,574   

New York Dormitory Authority, (Columbia University), 5.00%, 10/1/41

    1,275        1,489,735   

New York Dormitory Authority, (Cornell University), 5.00%, 7/1/37(1)

    1,275        1,465,026   

New York Dormitory Authority, (Rockefeller University), 5.00%, 7/1/40

    610        693,491   

New York Dormitory Authority, (Skidmore College), 5.00%, 7/1/28

    325        379,493   

New York Dormitory Authority, (The New School), 5.50%, 7/1/40

    1,000        1,148,340   
                 
    $ 5,674,485   
                 

Electric Utilities — 1.7%

  

Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, 5.25%, 7/1/30

  $ 570      $ 592,960   
                 
    $ 592,960   
                 

Escrowed / Prerefunded — 2.1%

  

Suffolk County Industrial Development Agency, (Huntington Hospital), Prerefunded to 11/1/12, 5.875%, 11/1/32

  $ 750      $ 753,930   
                 
    $ 753,930   
                 

General Obligations — 8.1%

  

Arlington Central School District, 4.00%, 12/15/29

  $ 380      $ 419,364   

Arlington Central School District, 4.00%, 12/15/30

    375        412,099   

Long Beach City School District, 4.50%, 5/1/26

    770        877,130   

New York, 5.00%, 2/15/34(1)

    1,000        1,163,700   
                 
    $ 2,872,293   
                 
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Hospital — 6.4%

  

New York Dormitory Authority, (Highland Hospital of Rochester), 5.00%, 7/1/26

  $ 135      $ 149,664   

New York Dormitory Authority, (Highland Hospital of Rochester), 5.20%, 7/1/32

    180        200,430   

New York Dormitory Authority, (North Shore-Long Island Jewish Obligated Group), 5.00%, 5/1/20

    235        283,725   

New York Dormitory Authority, (North Shore-Long Island Jewish Obligated Group), 5.00%, 5/1/26

    335        362,111   

Suffolk County Economic Development Corp., (Catholic Health Services of Long Island Obligated Group), 5.00%, 7/1/28

    1,135        1,304,410   
                 
    $ 2,300,340   
                 

Industrial Development Revenue — 1.3%

  

New York Liberty Development Corp., (Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.), 5.25%, 10/1/35

  $ 390      $ 458,000   
                 
    $ 458,000   
                 

Insured – Education — 24.8%

  

New York Dormitory Authority, (Barnard College), (FGIC), (NPFG), 5.00%, 7/1/24

  $ 1,440      $ 1,604,606   

New York Dormitory Authority, (Fordham University), (AGC), (BHAC), 5.00%, 7/1/38(1)

    2,250        2,519,730   

New York Dormitory Authority, (Pratt Institute), (AGC), 5.00%, 7/1/34

    345        381,242   

New York Dormitory Authority, (Pratt Institute), (AGC), 5.125%, 7/1/39

    545        601,833   

New York Dormitory Authority, (Skidmore College), (FGIC), (NPFG), 5.00%, 7/1/33

    500        517,895   

New York Dormitory Authority, (St. John’s University), (NPFG), 5.25%, 7/1/37

    850        928,064   

Oneida County Industrial Development Agency, (Hamilton College), (NPFG), 0.00%, 7/1/32

    5,425        2,292,985   
                 
  $ 8,846,355   
                 

Insured – Electric Utilities — 3.4%

               

Long Island Power Authority, Electric System Revenue, (BHAC), 5.50%, 5/1/33

  $ 500      $ 588,795   

Long Island Power Authority, Electric System Revenue, (BHAC), 6.00%, 5/1/33

    500        621,010   
                 
  $ 1,209,805   
                 

Insured – Escrowed / Prerefunded — 2.5%

               

New York Dormitory Authority, (Brooklyn Law School), (XLCA), Prerefunded to 7/1/13, 5.125%, 7/1/30

  $ 855      $ 886,054   
                 
  $ 886,054   
                 
 

 

  27   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

New York Municipal Bond Fund II

September 30, 2012

 

Portfolio of Investments — continued

 

 

Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Insured – General Obligations — 14.5%

               

Brentwood Union Free School District, (AGC), 4.75%, 11/15/23

  $ 535      $ 637,163   

Brentwood Union Free School District, (AGC), 5.00%, 11/15/24

    560        673,299   

Hauppauge Union Free School District, (AGC), 4.00%, 7/15/24

    250        278,980   

Hoosic Valley Central School District, (AGC), 4.00%, 6/15/23

    250        281,815   

Longwood Central School District, Suffolk County, (AGC), 4.15%, 6/1/23

    185        205,563   

Longwood Central School District, Suffolk County, (AGC), 4.25%, 6/1/24

    190        211,204   

New York, (AGM), 5.00%, 4/1/22

    1,000        1,145,610   

Sachem Central School District, (FGIC), (NPFG), 4.25%, 10/15/28

    410        433,640   

Wantagh Union Free School District, (AGC), 4.50%, 11/15/19

    185        216,071   

Wantagh Union Free School District, (AGC), 4.50%, 11/15/20

    190        219,610   

Wantagh Union Free School District, (AGC), 4.75%, 11/15/22

    210        241,015   

Wantagh Union Free School District, (AGC), 4.75%, 11/15/23

    220        250,785   

William Floyd Union Free School District, (AGC), 4.00%, 12/15/24

    350        391,457   
                 
  $ 5,186,212   
                 

Insured – Hospital — 3.2%

               

New York City Health and Hospitals Corp., (AGM), 5.50%, 2/15/20

  $ 500      $ 599,225   

New York Dormitory Authority, (Hudson Valley Hospital Center), (AGM), (BHAC), 5.00%, 8/15/36

    500        544,240   
                 
  $ 1,143,465   
                 

Insured – Housing — 2.9%

               

New York City Housing Corp., (NPFG), 4.95%, 11/1/33

  $ 1,000      $ 1,030,560   
                 
  $ 1,030,560   
                 

Insured – Other Revenue — 9.7%

               

New York City Cultural Resource Trust, (American Museum of Natural History), (NPFG), 5.00%, 7/1/44

  $ 700      $ 746,452   

New York City Industrial Development Agency, (Yankee Stadium), (NPFG), 4.75%, 3/1/46

    1,575        1,612,532   

New York City Transitional Finance Authority, (BHAC), 5.50%, 7/15/38

    950        1,104,271   
                 
  $ 3,463,255   
                 

Insured – Special Tax Revenue — 7.2%

  

New York Thruway Authority, Miscellaneous Tax Revenue, (AMBAC), 5.50%, 4/1/20

  $ 510      $ 653,432   

Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 7/1/35

    1,700        406,487   
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Insured – Special Tax Revenue (continued)

  

Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), 0.00%, 8/1/45

  $ 2,240      $ 346,752   

Sales Tax Asset Receivables Corp., (AMBAC), 5.00%, 10/15/29

    385        417,810   

Sales Tax Asset Receivables Corp., (AMBAC), 5.00%, 10/15/32

    690        747,180   
                 
  $ 2,571,661   
                 

Insured – Transportation — 10.3%

               

Metropolitan Transportation Authority, (AGM), (NPFG), 5.00%, 11/15/31

  $ 1,000      $ 1,129,840   

Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, (AGM), 5.00%, 11/1/27(1)(2)

    2,500        2,534,619   
                 
  $ 3,664,459   
                 

Insured – Water and Sewer — 4.1%

               

Nassau County Sewer and Storm Water Finance Authority, (BHAC), 5.375%, 11/1/28

  $ 905      $ 1,077,909   

Suffolk County Water Authority, (NPFG), 4.50%, 6/1/25

    350        369,800   
                 
  $ 1,447,709   
                 

Other Revenue — 9.3%

               

Brooklyn Arena Local Development Corp., (Barclays Center), 0.00%, 7/15/31

  $ 1,100      $ 474,793   

New York Liberty Development Corp., (7 World Trade Center), 5.00%, 9/15/40

    2,500        2,855,025   
                 
  $ 3,329,818   
                 

Special Tax Revenue — 14.9%

               

New York City Transitional Finance Authority, Future Tax Revenue, 5.50%, 11/1/35(1)(2)

  $ 500      $ 614,400   

New York Dormitory Authority, Personal Income Tax Revenue, 5.00%, 6/15/31(1)

    2,750        3,326,235   

New York Dormitory Authority, Personal Income Tax Revenue, 5.00%, 3/15/33

    650        760,559   

New York Thruway Authority, Miscellaneous Tax Revenue, 5.00%, 4/1/26

    530        627,080   
                 
  $ 5,328,274   
                 

Transportation — 14.1%

               

Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 5.00%, 11/15/34

  $ 2,000      $ 2,252,040   

Nassau County Bridge Authority, 5.00%, 10/1/35

    350        389,361   

Nassau County Bridge Authority, 5.00%, 10/1/40

    65        71,973   

New York Thruway Authority, 5.00%, 1/1/37

    1,175        1,336,703   
 

 

  28   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

New York Municipal Bond Fund II

September 30, 2012

 

Portfolio of Investments — continued

 

 

Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Transportation (continued)

  

Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, 5.00%, 11/15/37

  $ 340      $ 395,784   

Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, 5.00%, 11/15/38(1)

    500        586,760   
                 
  $ 5,032,621   
                 

Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 160.3%
(identified cost $52,165,213)

    $ 57,175,984   
                 

Auction Preferred Shares Plus Cumulative Unpaid Dividends — (37.2)%

  

  $ (13,250,497
                 

Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (23.1)%

  

  $ (8,256,428
                 

Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares — 100.0%

  

  $ 35,669,059   
                 

The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets applicable to common shares.

 

AGC     Assured Guaranty Corp.
AGM     Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.
AMBAC     AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
BHAC     Berkshire Hathaway Assurance Corp.
FGIC     Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
NPFG     National Public Finance Guaranty Corp.
XLCA     XL Capital Assurance, Inc.

The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by New York municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at September 30, 2012, 51.5% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 1.5% to 19.3% of total investments.

 

(1) 

Security represents the municipal bond held by a trust that issues residual interest bonds (see Note 1H).

 

(2) 

Security (or a portion thereof) has been pledged as collateral for residual interest bond transactions. The aggregate value of such collateral is $1,109,019.

 

 

  29   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Ohio Municipal Bond Fund

September 30, 2012

 

Portfolio of Investments

 

 

Tax-Exempt Investments — 147.3%   
   
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Bond Bank — 13.8%

               

Cuyahoga County Port Authority, (Garfield Heights),
5.25%, 5/15/23

  $ 1,060      $ 1,060,000   

Ohio Economic Development, (Ohio Enterprise Bond Fund), 6.00%, 12/1/34

    700        826,994   

Ohio Water Development Authority, Water Pollution Control, (Water Quality), 5.00%, 6/1/30

    1,250        1,495,950   

Rickenbacker Port Authority, (OASBO Expanded Asset Pooled Financing Program), 5.375%, 1/1/32

    1,140        1,435,739   
                 
    $ 4,818,683   
                 

Education — 7.6%

               

Ohio Higher Educational Facility Commission, (Kenyon College), 5.00%, 7/1/44

  $ 305      $ 329,269   

Ohio State University, 5.00%, 12/1/30

    1,325        1,750,259   

Wright State University, 5.00%, 5/1/31

    500        566,120   
                 
    $ 2,645,648   
                 

Electric Utilities — 1.6%

               

Ohio Air Quality Development Authority, (Buckeye Power, Inc.), 6.00%, 12/1/40

  $ 500      $ 570,795   
                 
    $ 570,795   
                 

General Obligations — 7.8%

               

Beavercreek City School District, 5.00%, 12/1/30

  $ 900      $ 1,032,435   

County of Franklin, 5.00%, 12/1/27

    500        580,025   

Napoleon City School District, (School Facilities, Construction and Improvement), 5.00%, 12/1/36

    500        567,450   

South-Western City School District Franklin and Pickaway County, (School Facilities, Construction and Improvement), 4.50%, 12/1/31

    500        558,770   
                 
    $ 2,738,680   
                 

Hospital — 8.6%

               

Miami County, (Upper Valley Medical Center), 5.25%, 5/15/26

  $ 500      $ 533,875   

Middleburg Heights, (Southwest General Health Center),
5.25%, 8/1/36

    500        555,775   

Middleburg Heights, (Southwest General Health Center),
5.25%, 8/1/41

    755        832,644   

Ohio Higher Educational Facility Commission, (Summa Health System), 5.75%, 11/15/40

    460        519,400   

Ohio Hospital Facility Revenue, (Cleveland Clinic Health System), 5.00%, 1/1/32

    500        565,030   
                 
    $ 3,006,724   
                 
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Insured – Education — 19.1%

               

Kent State University, (AGC), 5.00%, 5/1/26

  $ 1,000      $ 1,163,710   

Kent State University, (AGC), 5.00%, 5/1/29

    360        413,078   

Miami University, (AMBAC), (AGM), 3.25%, 9/1/26

    2,000        2,045,280   

Ohio University, (AGM), 5.00%, 12/1/33

    500        547,840   

University of Akron, Series B, (AGM), 5.00%, 1/1/38

    1,000        1,079,650   

University of Cincinnati, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 6/1/31

    315        317,073   

Youngstown State University, (AGC), 5.50%, 12/15/33

    1,000        1,127,290   
                 
    $ 6,693,921   
                 

Insured – Electric Utilities — 19.9%

               

American Municipal Power-Ohio, Inc., (Prairie State Energy Campus), (AGC), 5.25%, 2/15/33

  $ 700      $ 782,306   

Cleveland Public Power System, (NPFG), 0.00%, 11/15/27

    2,750        1,465,145   

Cleveland Public Power System, (NPFG), 0.00%, 11/15/38

    1,000        286,970   

Ohio Municipal Electric Generation Agency, (NPFG),
0.00%, 2/15/25

    1,635        1,026,044   

Ohio Municipal Electric Generation Agency, (NPFG),
0.00%, 2/15/27

    5,000        2,842,900   

Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (NPFG), 5.25%, 7/1/26

    500        559,695   
                 
    $ 6,963,060   
                 

Insured – Escrowed / Prerefunded — 9.6%

               

Cincinnati Technical and Community College, (AMBAC), Prerefunded to 10/1/13, 5.00%, 10/1/28

  $ 500      $ 523,410   

Cuyahoga Community College District, (AMBAC), Prerefunded to 12/1/12, 5.00%, 12/1/32

    1,575        1,603,996   

Ohio University, (AGM), Prerefunded to 12/1/13,
5.25%, 12/1/23

    1,170        1,238,655   
                 
    $ 3,366,061   
                 

Insured – General Obligations — 30.4%

               

Brookfield Local School District, (AGM), 5.00%, 1/15/30

  $ 200      $ 220,840   

Cincinnati City School District, (AGM), (FGIC), 5.25%, 12/1/30

    500        677,405   

Cleveland Municipal School District, (AGM), 5.00%, 12/1/27

    1,000        1,039,150   

Milford Exempt Village School District, (AGC), 5.25%, 12/1/36

    1,000        1,108,380   

Olentangy Local School District, (AGC), 5.00%, 12/1/36

    1,400        1,587,068   

Plain School District, (FGIC), (NPFG), 0.00%, 12/1/27

    2,400        1,338,528   

St. Marys City School District, (AGM), 5.00%, 12/1/35

    750        816,472   

Sylvania City School District, (AGC), 5.00%, 12/1/26

    500        551,700   

Sylvania City School District, (AGC), 5.00%, 12/1/32

    1,000        1,085,000   

Wapakoneta City School District, (AGM), 4.75%, 12/1/35

    2,000        2,199,060   
                 
    $ 10,623,603   
                 
 

 

  30   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Ohio Municipal Bond Fund

September 30, 2012

 

Portfolio of Investments — continued

 

 

Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Insured – Hospital — 7.4%

               

Hamilton County, (Cincinnati Children’s Hospital), (FGIC), (NPFG), 5.00%, 5/15/32

  $ 425      $ 434,155   

Hamilton County, (Cincinnati Children’s Hospital), (FGIC), (NPFG), 5.125%, 5/15/28

    1,500        1,533,810   

Lorain County, (Catholic Healthcare Partners), (AGM), 17.943%, 2/1/29(1)(2)(3)

    440        605,739   
                 
    $ 2,573,704   
                 

Insured – Special Tax Revenue — 10.3%

               

Hamilton County Sales Tax, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 12/1/23

  $ 1,245      $ 807,768   

Hamilton County Sales Tax, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 12/1/24

    3,665        2,267,755   

Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (AMBAC),
0.00%, 8/1/54

    4,145        353,942   

Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), 0.00%, 8/1/45

    1,070        165,636   
                 
    $ 3,595,101   
                 

Insured – Transportation — 3.1%

               

Cleveland, Airport System Revenue, (AGM), 5.00%, 1/1/30

  $ 480      $ 539,117   

Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (AGC), (CIFG), 5.25%, 7/1/41(4)(5)

    500        546,855   
                 
    $ 1,085,972   
                 

Other Revenue — 1.1%

               

Summit County Port Authority, 5.00%, 12/1/31

  $ 350      $ 403,508   
                 
    $ 403,508   
                 

Special Tax Revenue — 1.3%

               

Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority, (Reference & Capital Improvement), 5.00%, 12/1/31

  $ 380      $ 446,375   
                 
    $ 446,375   
                 

Transportation — 3.3%

               

Ohio Turnpike Commission, 5.00%, 2/15/31

  $ 1,000      $ 1,149,700   
                 
    $ 1,149,700   
                 
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Water and Sewer — 2.4%

               

Hamilton County, Sewer System, 5.00%, 12/1/32

  $ 750      $ 858,443   
                 
  $ 858,443   
                 

Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 147.3%
(identified cost $45,576,053)

   

  $ 51,539,978   
                 

Auction Preferred Shares Plus Cumulative Unpaid Dividends — (48.6)%

  

  $ (17,001,145
                 

Other Assets, Less Liabilities — 1.3%

  

  $ 446,037   
                 

Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares — 100.0%

    $ 34,984,870   
                 

The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets applicable to common shares.

 

AGC     Assured Guaranty Corp.
AGM     Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.
AMBAC     AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
CIFG     CIFG Assurance North America, Inc.
FGIC     Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
NPFG     National Public Finance Guaranty Corp.

The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by Ohio municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at September 30, 2012, 67.7% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 1.1% to 21.4% of total investments.

 

(1) 

Security exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in certain transactions (normally to qualified institutional buyers) and remain exempt from registration. At September 30, 2012, the aggregate value of these securities is $605,739 or 1.7% of the Fund’s net assets applicable to common shares.

 

(2) 

Security has been issued as a leveraged residual interest bond with a variable interest rate. The stated interest rate represents the rate in effect at September 30, 2012.

 

(3) 

Security is subject to a shortfall agreement which may require the Fund to pay amounts to a counterparty in the event of a significant decline in the market value of the security held by the trust that issued the residual interest bond. In case of a shortfall, the maximum potential amount of payments the Fund could ultimately be required to make under the agreement is $1,320,000. However, such shortfall payment would be reduced by the proceeds from the sale of the security held by the trust that issued the residual interest bond.

 

(4) 

Security represents the municipal bond held by a trust that issues residual interest bonds (see Note 1H).

 

(5) 

Security (or a portion thereof) has been pledged as collateral for residual interest bond transactions. The aggregate value of such collateral is $296,855.

 

 

  31   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund

September 30, 2012

 

Portfolio of Investments

 

 

Tax-Exempt Investments — 153.9%   
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Education — 24.3%

  

Allegheny County Higher Education Building Authority, (Duquesne University), 5.50%, 3/1/31

  $ 1,050      $ 1,215,743   

General Authority of South Central Pennsylvania, (York College of Pennsylvania), 5.50%, 11/1/31

    1,500        1,759,170   

Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Saint Joseph’s University), 5.00%, 11/1/40

    440        486,961   

Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Thomas Jefferson University), 5.00%, 3/1/40

    925        1,029,396   

Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (University of Pennsylvania), 4.75%, 7/15/35

    2,900        3,141,802   

Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Ursinus College), 5.00%, 1/1/29

    560        631,814   

State Public School Building Authority, (Northampton County Area Community College), 5.50%, 3/1/31

    750        877,395   

University of Pittsburgh, 5.25%, 9/15/29

    500        607,100   

Washington County Industrial Development Authority, (Washington and Jefferson College), 5.25%, 11/1/30

    575        648,709   
                 
    $ 10,398,090   
                 

Electric Utilities — 1.2%

  

Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, 5.00%, 7/1/29

  $ 500      $ 515,350   
                 
    $ 515,350   
                 

General Obligations — 2.9%

  

Delaware Valley Regional Finance Authority, 5.75%, 7/1/32

  $ 1,000      $ 1,221,110   
                 
    $ 1,221,110   
                 

Hospital — 17.6%

  

Chester County Health and Education Facilities Authority, (Jefferson Health System), 5.00%, 5/15/40

  $ 750      $ 829,762   

Dauphin County General Authority, (Pinnacle Health System Project), 5.00%, 6/1/42

    600        648,966   

Franklin County Industrial Development Authority, (The Chambersburg Hospital), 5.375%, 7/1/42

    1,000        1,096,110   

Lehigh County General Purpose Authority, (Lehigh Valley Health Network), 5.25%, 7/1/32

    1,455        1,489,251   

Monroe County Hospital Authority, (Pocono Medical Center), 5.125%, 1/1/37

    1,250        1,300,762   

Northampton County General Purpose Authority, (Saint Luke’s Hospital), 5.50%, 8/15/33

    250        273,620   

Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (UPMC Health System), 5.00%, 5/15/31

    675        749,662   

Philadelphia Hospitals and Higher Education Facilities Authority, 5.00%, 7/1/32

    750        876,390   

South Fork Municipal Authority, (Conemaugh Health System), 5.50%, 7/1/29

    250        276,278   
                 
    $ 7,540,801   
                 
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Insured – Education — 16.8%

  

Chester County Industrial Development Authority, Educational Facility, (Westtown School), (AMBAC), 5.00%, 1/1/31

  $ 1,000      $ 1,001,540   

Lycoming County Authority, (Pennsylvania College of Technology), (AGC), 5.50%, 10/1/37

    500        550,890   

Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Drexel University), (NPFG), 5.00%, 5/1/37

    1,665        1,797,018   

Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Temple University), (NPFG), 4.50%, 4/1/36

    1,305        1,352,319   

Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (University of the Sciences in Philadelphia), (AGC), 5.00%, 11/1/37

    500        545,535   

State Public School Building Authority, (Delaware County Community College), (AGM), 5.00%, 10/1/27

    500        559,500   

State Public School Building Authority, (Delaware County Community College), (AGM), 5.00%, 10/1/29

    375        416,134   

State Public School Building Authority, (Delaware County Community College), (AGM), 5.00%, 10/1/32

    875        959,752   
                 
    $ 7,182,688   
                 

Insured – Electric Utilities — 1.9%

  

Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), (NPFG),
5.25%, 7/1/35

  $ 750      $ 801,225   
                 
    $ 801,225   
                 

Insured – General Obligations — 27.7%

  

Bethlehem Area School District, (AGM), 5.25%, 1/15/25

  $ 1,250      $ 1,449,287   

Centennial School District, (AGM), 5.25%, 12/15/37

    660        774,035   

Central Greene School District, (AGM), 5.00%, 2/15/35

    1,350        1,468,152   

Erie School District, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 9/1/30

    1,000        459,540   

Harrisburg School District, (AGC), 5.00%, 11/15/33

    500        551,325   

McKeesport School District, (NPFG), 0.00%, 10/1/21

    2,555        1,777,309   

Norwin School District, (AGM), 3.25%, 4/1/27

    1,500        1,521,585   

Reading School District, (AGM), 5.00%, 3/1/35

    1,500        1,643,370   

Scranton School District, (AGM), 5.00%, 7/15/38

    1,000        1,083,220   

Shaler Area School District, (XLCA), 0.00%, 9/1/33

    2,550        1,128,273   
                 
    $ 11,856,096   
                 

Insured – Hospital — 8.1%

  

Allegheny County Hospital Development Authority, (UPMC Health System), (NPFG), 6.00%, 7/1/24

  $ 250      $ 331,590   

Centre County Hospital Authority, (Mount Nittany Medical Center), (AGC), 6.25%, 11/15/44

    500        531,940   

Lehigh County General Purpose Authority, (Lehigh Valley Health Network), (AGM), 5.00%, 7/1/35

    1,620        1,754,071   

Washington County Hospital Authority, (Washington Hospital), (AMBAC), 5.125%, 7/1/28

    865        865,623   
                 
    $ 3,483,224   
                 
 

 

  32   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund

September 30, 2012

 

Portfolio of Investments — continued

 

 

Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Insured – Industrial Development Revenue — 2.6%

  

Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, (Aqua Pennsylvania, Inc. Project), (BHAC),
5.00%, 10/1/39
(1)

  $ 1,000      $ 1,123,880   
                 
    $ 1,123,880   
                 

Insured – Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 4.5%

  

Commonwealth Financing Authority, (AGC), 5.00%, 6/1/31

  $ 500      $ 564,095   

Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development, (One Benjamin Franklin), (AGM), 4.75%, 2/15/27

    1,215        1,340,461   
                 
    $ 1,904,556   
                 

Insured – Special Tax Revenue — 3.0%

  

Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (AMBAC),
0.00%, 8/1/54

  $ 10,835      $ 925,201   

Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), 0.00%, 8/1/45

    2,450        379,260   
                 
    $ 1,304,461   
                 

Insured – Transportation — 8.8%

  

Philadelphia, Airport Revenue, (AGC), 5.375%, 6/15/29

  $ 295      $ 327,695   

Pittsburgh and Allegheny County Sports and Exhibition Authority, (AGM), 5.00%, 2/1/31

    1,000        1,135,420   

Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (AGC), (CIFG), 5.25%, 7/1/41(1)(2)

    2,100        2,296,791   
                 
    $ 3,759,906   
                 

Insured – Utilities — 2.2%

  

Philadelphia Gas Works, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 10/1/37

  $ 890      $ 928,181   
                 
    $ 928,181   
                 

Insured – Water and Sewer — 13.1%

  

Allegheny County Sanitation Authority, (BHAC), (FGIC),
5.00%, 12/1/32

  $ 300      $ 336,717   

Allegheny County Sanitation Authority, (BHAC), (NPFG),
5.00%, 12/1/22

    1,500        1,681,965   

Bucks County Water and Sewer Authority, (AGM),
5.00%, 12/1/35

    500        565,610   

Erie Sewer Authority, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 12/1/26

    1,920        964,685   

Erie Sewer Authority, Series A, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 12/1/25

    1,430        759,301   

Erie Sewer Authority, Series B, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 12/1/25

    2,155        1,144,262   

Saxonburg Water and Sewer Authority, (AGC), 5.00%, 3/1/35

    150        158,614   
                 
    $ 5,611,154   
                 

Other Revenue — 2.5%

  

Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, Federal Grant Receipts, 5.00%, 6/1/27

  $ 900      $ 1,050,390   
                 
    $ 1,050,390   
                 
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Senior Living / Life Care — 0.5%

  

Montgomery County Industrial Development Authority, (Foulkeways at Gwynedd), 5.00%, 12/1/24

  $ 200      $ 208,708   
                 
    $ 208,708   
                 

Special Tax Revenue — 0.3%

  

Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, 6.75%, 10/1/37

  $ 110      $ 130,456   
                 
    $ 130,456   
                 

Transportation — 12.6%

  

Allegheny County Port Authority, 5.75%, 3/1/29

  $ 1,500      $ 1,799,475   

Delaware River Port Authority of Pennsylvania and New Jersey, 5.00%, 1/1/35

    465        526,691   

Delaware River Port Authority of Pennsylvania and New Jersey, 5.00%, 1/1/40

    730        817,739   

Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, 1.00%, 12/1/30

    500        490,450   

Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, 5.25%, 12/1/31

    1,000        1,171,810   

Philadelphia Airport, 5.25%, 6/15/27

    500        578,615   
                 
    $ 5,384,780   
                 

Water and Sewer — 3.3%

  

Philadelphia, Water and Wastewater Revenue, 5.00%, 1/1/36

  $ 500      $ 565,805   

Philadelphia, Water and Wastewater Revenue, 5.25%, 1/1/32

    765        865,544   
                 
    $ 1,431,349   
                 

Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 153.9%
(identified cost $60,408,829)

   

  $ 65,836,405   
                 

Auction Preferred Shares Plus Cumulative Unpaid Dividends — (50.8)%

  

  $ (21,725,490
                 

Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (3.1)%

  

  $ (1,319,904
                 

Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares — 100.0%

  

  $ 42,791,011   
                 

The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets applicable to common shares.

 

AGC     Assured Guaranty Corp.
AGM     Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.
AMBAC     AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
BHAC     Berkshire Hathaway Assurance Corp.
CIFG     CIFG Assurance North America, Inc.
FGIC     Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
NPFG     National Public Finance Guaranty Corp.
XLCA     XL Capital Assurance, Inc.
 

 

  33   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund

September 30, 2012

 

Portfolio of Investments — continued

 

 

The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by Pennsylvania municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at September 30, 2012, 57.7% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 1.7% to 22.3% of total investments.

 

(1) 

Security represents the municipal bond held by a trust that issues residual interest bonds (see Note 1H).

 

(2) 

Security (or a portion thereof) has been pledged as collateral for residual interest bond transactions. The aggregate value of such collateral is $1,246,791.

 

 

  34   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Funds

September 30, 2012

 

Statements of Assets and Liabilities

 

 

    September 30, 2012  
Assets   Municipal Fund II     California Fund II     Massachusetts Fund     Michigan Fund  

Investments —

       

Identified cost

  $ 204,144,279      $ 78,832,496      $ 38,373,002      $ 32,050,961   

Unrealized appreciation

    14,432,710        7,983,144        5,969,737        3,220,223   

Investments, at value

  $ 218,576,989      $ 86,815,640      $ 44,342,739      $ 35,271,184   

Cash

  $ 79,544      $      $ 224,291      $ 413,500   

Restricted cash*

    217,000        130,000        50,000        19,000   

Interest receivable

    2,705,240        881,100        498,480        443,139   

Receivable for investments sold

    15,288                        

Receivable for variation margin on open financial futures contracts

    7,250        3,890        1,750        375   

Receivable from the transfer agent

    15,509        3,457        2,834        1,170   

Deferred debt issuance costs

    51,954        20,281        3,231          

Total assets

  $ 221,668,774      $ 87,854,368      $ 45,123,325      $ 36,148,368   
Liabilities                                

Payable for floating rate notes issued

  $ 42,905,000      $ 9,885,000      $ 3,330,000      $   

Due to custodian

           81,896                 

Payable to affiliates:

       

Investment adviser fee

    100,271        38,397        19,504        16,189   

Interest expense and fees payable

    87,316        20,574        8,293          

Accrued expenses

    101,748        65,143        52,523        47,722   

Total liabilities

  $ 43,194,335      $ 10,091,010      $ 3,410,320      $ 63,911   

Auction preferred shares at liquidation value plus cumulative
unpaid dividends

  $ 44,702,175      $ 25,700,770      $ 13,575,305      $ 13,325,499   

Net assets applicable to common shares

  $ 133,772,264      $ 52,062,588      $ 28,137,700      $ 22,758,958   
Sources of Net Assets                                

Common shares, $0.01 par value, unlimited number of shares authorized

  $ 100,074      $ 38,837      $ 17,678      $ 15,139   

Additional paid-in capital

    141,764,108        54,996,711        25,047,268        21,443,350   

Accumulated net realized loss

    (22,433,809     (11,057,287     (2,978,119     (1,977,455

Accumulated undistributed (distributions in excess of) net investment income

    (83,533     109,944        76,021        62,300   

Net unrealized appreciation

    14,425,424        7,974,383        5,974,852        3,215,624   

Net assets applicable to common shares

  $ 133,772,264      $ 52,062,588      $ 28,137,700      $ 22,758,958   
Auction Preferred Shares Issued and Outstanding
(Liquidation preference of $25,000 per share)
    1,788 (1)      1,028        543        533   
Common Shares Outstanding     10,007,361        3,883,713        1,767,822        1,513,921   
Net Asset Value Per Common Share                                

Net assets applicable to common shares ÷ common shares issued
and outstanding

  $ 13.37      $ 13.41      $ 15.92      $ 15.03   

 

* Represents restricted cash on deposit at the broker for open financial futures contracts.

 

(1) 

Comprised of 894 Series A shares and 894 Series B shares.

 

  35   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Funds

September 30, 2012

 

Statements of Assets and Liabilities — continued

 

 

    September 30, 2012  
Assets   New Jersey Fund     New York Fund II     Ohio Fund     Pennsylvania Fund  

Investments —

       

Identified cost

  $ 54,601,171      $ 52,165,213      $ 45,576,053      $ 60,408,829   

Unrealized appreciation

    6,973,131        5,010,771        5,963,925        5,427,576   

Investments, at value

  $ 61,574,302      $ 57,175,984      $ 51,539,978      $ 65,836,405   

Cash

  $ 163,485      $      $      $   

Restricted cash*

    240,000        80,000        68,000        185,000   

Interest receivable

    618,303        728,964        560,460        736,420   

Receivable for investments sold

    5,000               211,568          

Receivable for variation margin on open financial futures contracts

    9,375        2,750        2,000        7,500   

Receivable from the transfer agent

    12,488        2,585        3,336        3,553   

Deferred debt issuance costs

    6,808        4,184                 

Total assets

  $ 62,629,761      $ 57,994,467      $ 52,385,342      $ 66,768,878   
Liabilities                                

Payable for floating rate notes issued

  $ 4,790,000      $ 8,875,000      $ 250,000      $ 2,040,000   

Due to custodian

           95,588        68,950        119,053   

Payable to affiliates:

       

Investment adviser fee

    27,160        25,305        23,330        29,824   

Interest expense and fees payable

    15,144        18,959        627        6,244   

Accrued expenses

    56,615        60,059        56,420        57,256   

Total liabilities

  $ 4,888,919      $ 9,074,911      $ 399,327      $ 2,252,377   

Auction preferred shares at liquidation value plus cumulative
unpaid dividends

  $ 19,600,880      $ 13,250,497      $ 17,001,145      $ 21,725,490   

Net assets applicable to common shares

  $ 38,139,962      $ 35,669,059      $ 34,984,870      $ 42,791,011   
Sources of Net Assets                                

Common shares, $0.01 par value, unlimited number of shares authorized

  $ 26,057      $ 25,662      $ 25,349      $ 29,586   

Additional paid-in capital

    36,906,519        36,344,495        35,878,381        41,911,061   

Accumulated net realized loss

    (5,884,604     (5,768,439     (6,990,707     (4,804,041

Accumulated undistributed net investment income

    91,457        48,532        102,076        204,908   

Net unrealized appreciation

    7,000,533        5,018,809        5,969,771        5,449,497   

Net assets applicable to common shares

  $ 38,139,962      $ 35,669,059      $ 34,984,870      $ 42,791,011   
Auction Preferred Shares Issued and Outstanding
(Liquidation preference of $25,000 per share)
    784        530        680        869   
Common Shares Outstanding     2,605,694        2,566,181        2,534,904        2,958,606   
Net Asset Value Per Common Share                                

Net assets applicable to common shares ÷ common shares issued
and outstanding

  $ 14.64      $ 13.90      $ 13.80      $ 14.46   

 

* Represents restricted cash on deposit at the broker for open financial futures contracts.

 

  36   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Funds

September 30, 2012

 

Statements of Operations

 

 

    Year Ended September 30, 2012  
Investment Income   Municipal Fund II     California Fund II     Massachusetts Fund     Michigan Fund  

Interest

  $ 9,864,738      $ 3,751,679      $ 1,862,116      $ 1,645,379   

Total investment income

  $ 9,864,738      $ 3,751,679      $ 1,862,116      $ 1,645,379   
Expenses                                

Investment adviser fee

  $ 1,177,000      $ 454,721      $ 231,560      $ 194,754   

Trustees' fees and expenses

    9,007        3,787        2,174        1,912   

Custodian fee

    109,728        53,913        34,899        33,397   

Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees

    19,032        18,952        18,917        18,957   

Legal and accounting services

    263,497        45,144        38,240        33,804   

Printing and postage

    26,648        12,127        9,749        9,679   

Interest expense and fees

    350,226        68,183        25,246          

Preferred shares service fee

    67,311        38,701        20,441        20,064   

Miscellaneous

    65,391        37,622        31,054        28,188   

Total expenses

  $ 2,087,840      $ 733,150      $ 412,280      $ 340,755   

Deduct —

       

Reduction of custodian fee

  $ 722      $ 233      $ 195      $ 167   

Total expense reductions

  $ 722      $ 233      $ 195      $ 167   

Net expenses

  $ 2,087,118      $ 732,917      $ 412,085      $ 340,588   

Net investment income

  $ 7,777,620      $ 3,018,762      $ 1,450,031      $ 1,304,791   
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss)                                

Net realized gain (loss) —

       

Investment transactions

  $ 952,223      $ (268,458   $ (128,884   $ (75,554

Extinguishment of debt

    (18,589                     

Financial futures contracts

    (1,133,236     (602,058     (166,145     (87,118

Swap contracts

    (92,995     (56,184     (26,736     (20,924

Net realized loss

  $ (292,597   $ (926,700   $ (321,765   $ (183,596

Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) —

       

Investments

  $ 13,910,576      $ 7,123,212      $ 3,228,304      $ 1,690,371   

Financial futures contracts

    337,421        214,211        30,942        (4,599

Swap contracts

    352,540        212,993        101,355        79,322   

Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)

  $ 14,600,537      $ 7,550,416      $ 3,360,601      $ 1,765,094   

Net realized and unrealized gain

  $ 14,307,940      $ 6,623,716      $ 3,038,836      $ 1,581,498   

Distributions to preferred shareholders —

                               

From net investment income

  $ (108,522   $ (62,425   $ (32,805   $ (32,152

Net increase in net assets from operations

  $ 21,977,038      $ 9,580,053      $ 4,456,062      $ 2,854,137   

 

  37   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Funds

September 30, 2012

 

Statements of Operations — continued

 

 

    Year Ended September 30, 2012  
Investment Income   New Jersey Fund     New York Fund II     Ohio Fund     Pennsylvania Fund  

Interest

  $ 2,679,039      $ 2,550,377      $ 2,380,088      $ 3,011,344   

Total investment income

  $ 2,679,039      $ 2,550,377      $ 2,380,088      $ 3,011,344   
Expenses                                

Investment adviser fee

  $ 323,389      $ 310,900      $ 276,591      $ 355,709   

Trustees' fees and expenses

    2,832        2,762        2,497        3,072   

Custodian fee

    44,517        43,035        39,740        44,652   

Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees

    18,957        19,002        19,003        19,173   

Legal and accounting services

    39,507        45,547        40,696        41,492   

Printing and postage

    10,988        10,679        12,022        12,927   

Interest expense and fees

    44,453        75,275        2,543        17,474   

Preferred shares service fee

    29,514        19,951        25,598        32,713   

Miscellaneous

    33,592        35,652        32,377        33,961   

Total expenses

  $ 547,749      $ 562,803      $ 451,067      $ 561,173   

Deduct —

       

Reduction of custodian fee

  $ 311      $ 170      $ 208      $ 321   

Total expense reductions

  $ 311      $ 170      $ 208      $ 321   

Net expenses

  $ 547,438      $ 562,633      $ 450,859      $ 560,852   

Net investment income

  $ 2,131,601      $ 1,987,744      $ 1,929,229      $ 2,450,492   
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss)                                

Net realized gain (loss) —

       

Investment transactions

  $ (5,318   $ 632,533      $ (180,680   $ (529,341

Financial futures contracts

    (1,146,334     (262,031     (325,977     (366,195

Swap contracts

    (38,748     (61,996     (23,249     (30,998

Net realized gain (loss)

  $ (1,190,400   $ 308,506      $ (529,906   $ (926,534

Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) —

       

Investments

  $ 4,328,756      $ 2,386,304      $ 4,431,360      $ 4,813,722   

Financial futures contracts

    540,567        49,361        86,273        (38,190

Swap contracts

    146,892        235,027        88,135        117,513   

Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)

  $ 5,016,215      $ 2,670,692      $ 4,605,768      $ 4,893,045   

Net realized and unrealized gain

  $ 3,825,815      $ 2,979,198      $ 4,075,862      $ 3,966,511   

Distributions to preferred shareholders —

                               

From net investment income

  $ (48,133   $ (32,137   $ (41,252   $ (52,771

Net increase in net assets from operations

  $ 5,909,283      $ 4,934,805      $ 5,963,839      $ 6,364,232   

 

  38   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Funds

September 30, 2012

 

Statements of Changes in Net Assets

 

 

    Year Ended September 30, 2012  
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets   Municipal Fund II     California Fund II     Massachusetts Fund     Michigan Fund  

From operations —

       

Net investment income

  $ 7,777,620      $ 3,018,762      $ 1,450,031      $ 1,304,791   

Net realized loss from investment transactions, extinguishment of debt, financial futures contracts and swap contracts

    (292,597     (926,700     (321,765     (183,596

Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments, financial futures contracts and swap contracts

    14,600,537        7,550,416        3,360,601        1,765,094   

Distributions to preferred shareholders —

       

From net investment income

    (108,522     (62,425     (32,805     (32,152

Net increase in net assets from operations

  $ 21,977,038      $ 9,580,053      $ 4,456,062      $ 2,854,137   

Distributions to common shareholders —

       

From net investment income

  $ (8,740,049   $ (3,080,987   $ (1,483,981   $ (1,345,340

Total distributions to common shareholders

  $ (8,740,049   $ (3,080,987   $ (1,483,981   $ (1,345,340

Capital share transactions —

       

Reinvestment of distributions to common shareholders

  $ 227,531      $ 28,782      $ 31,194      $ 17,365   

Net increase in net assets from capital share transactions

  $ 227,531      $ 28,782      $ 31,194      $ 17,365   

Net increase in net assets

  $ 13,464,520      $ 6,527,848      $ 3,003,275      $ 1,526,162   
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares   

At beginning of year

  $ 120,307,744      $ 45,534,740      $ 25,134,425      $ 21,232,796   

At end of year

  $ 133,772,264      $ 52,062,588      $ 28,137,700      $ 22,758,958   
Accumulated undistributed (distributions in excess of) net investment income
included in net assets applicable to common shares
   

At end of year

  $ (83,533   $ 109,944      $ 76,021      $ 62,300   

 

  39   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Funds

September 30, 2012

 

Statements of Changes in Net Assets — continued

 

 

    Year Ended September 30, 2012  
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets   New Jersey Fund     New York Fund II     Ohio Fund     Pennsylvania Fund  

From operations —

       

Net investment income

  $ 2,131,601      $ 1,987,744      $ 1,929,229      $ 2,450,492   

Net realized gain (loss) from investment transactions, financial futures contracts and swap contracts

    (1,190,400     308,506        (529,906     (926,534

Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments, financial futures contracts and swap contracts

    5,016,215        2,670,692        4,605,768        4,893,045   

Distributions to preferred shareholders —

       

From net investment income

    (48,133     (32,137     (41,252     (52,771

Net increase in net assets from operations

  $ 5,909,283      $ 4,934,805      $ 5,963,839      $ 6,364,232   

Distributions to common shareholders —

       

From net investment income

  $ (2,110,164   $ (2,011,158   $ (1,955,405   $ (2,581,543

Total distributions to common shareholders

  $ (2,110,164   $ (2,011,158   $ (1,955,405   $ (2,581,543

Capital share transactions —

       

Reinvestment of distributions to common shareholders

  $ 154,738      $ 28,780      $ 54,834      $ 36,125   

Net increase in net assets from capital share transactions

  $ 154,738      $ 28,780      $ 54,834      $ 36,125   

Net increase in net assets

  $ 3,953,857      $ 2,952,427      $ 4,063,268      $ 3,818,814   
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares   

At beginning of year

  $ 34,186,105      $ 32,716,632      $ 30,921,602      $ 38,972,197   

At end of year

  $ 38,139,962      $ 35,669,059      $ 34,984,870      $ 42,791,011   
Accumulated undistributed net investment income
included in net assets applicable to common shares
   

At end of year

  $ 91,457      $ 48,532      $ 102,076      $ 204,908   

 

  40   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Funds

September 30, 2012

 

Statements of Changes in Net Assets — continued

 

 

    Year Ended September 30, 2011  
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets   Municipal Fund II     California Fund II     Massachusetts Fund     Michigan Fund  

From operations —

       

Net investment income

  $ 9,266,701      $ 3,314,138      $ 1,546,235      $ 1,381,043   

Net realized loss from investment transactions, extinguishment of debt, financial futures contracts and swap contracts

    (6,577,476     (4,047,797     (1,120,707     (371,914

Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments, financial futures contracts and swap contracts

    255,940        1,097,057        274,726        (378,552

Distributions to preferred shareholders —

       

From net investment income

    (153,850     (87,975     (46,254     (45,419

Net increase in net assets from operations

  $ 2,791,315      $ 275,423      $ 654,000      $ 585,158   

Distributions to common shareholders —

       

From net investment income

  $ (9,538,162   $ (3,338,981   $ (1,481,919   $ (1,342,118

Total distributions to common shareholders

  $ (9,538,162   $ (3,338,981   $ (1,481,919   $ (1,342,118

Capital share transactions —

       

Reinvestment of distributions to common shareholders

  $ 240,533      $ 68,979      $ 42,595      $ 4,962   

Net increase in net assets from capital share transactions

  $ 240,533      $ 68,979      $ 42,595      $ 4,962   

Net decrease in net assets

  $ (6,506,314   $ (2,994,579   $ (785,324   $ (751,998
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares   

At beginning of year

  $ 126,814,058      $ 48,529,319      $ 25,919,749      $ 21,984,794   

At end of year

  $ 120,307,744      $ 45,534,740      $ 25,134,425      $ 21,232,796   
Accumulated undistributed net investment income
included in net assets applicable to common shares
   

At end of year

  $ 993,508      $ 244,156      $ 149,686      $ 145,749   

 

  41   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Funds

September 30, 2012

 

Statements of Changes in Net Assets — continued

 

 

    Year Ended September 30, 2011  
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets   New Jersey Fund     New York Fund II     Ohio Fund     Pennsylvania Fund  

From operations —

       

Net investment income

  $ 2,315,111      $ 2,225,131      $ 2,058,345      $ 2,636,633   

Net realized loss from investment transactions, extinguishment of debt, financial futures contracts and swap contracts

    (913,795     (1,555,448     (578,575     (1,067,018

Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments, financial futures contracts and swap contracts

    (2,139,373     (43,377     (1,329,984     (268,752

Distributions to preferred shareholders —

       

From net investment income

    (67,619     (45,630     (58,829     (73,587

Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations

  $ (805,676   $ 580,676      $ 90,957      $ 1,227,276   

Distributions to common shareholders —

       

From net investment income

  $ (2,381,054   $ (2,226,059   $ (1,951,904   $ (2,564,189

Total distributions to common shareholders

  $ (2,381,054   $ (2,226,059   $ (1,951,904   $ (2,564,189

Capital share transactions —

       

Reinvestment of distributions to common shareholders

  $ 150,425      $ 33,998      $ 56,745      $ 52,778   

Net increase in net assets from capital share transactions

  $ 150,425      $ 33,998      $ 56,745      $ 52,778   

Net decrease in net assets

  $ (3,036,305   $ (1,611,385   $ (1,804,202   $ (1,284,135
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares   

At beginning of year

  $ 37,222,410      $ 34,328,017      $ 32,725,804      $ 40,256,332   

At end of year

  $ 34,186,105      $ 32,716,632      $ 30,921,602      $ 38,972,197   
Accumulated undistributed net investment income
included in net assets applicable to common shares
   

At end of year

  $ 130,194      $ 118,562      $ 215,700      $ 409,982   

 

  42   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Funds

September 30, 2012

 

Statements of Cash Flows*

 

 

    Year Ended September 30, 2012  
Cash Flows From Operating Activities   Municipal Fund II     California Fund II     New York Fund II  

Net increase in net assets from operations

  $ 21,977,038      $ 9,580,053      $ 4,934,805   

Distributions to preferred shareholders

    108,522        62,425        32,137   

Net increase in net assets from operations excluding distributions to preferred shareholders

  $ 22,085,560      $ 9,642,478      $ 4,966,942   

Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets from operations to net cash provided by operating activities:

     

Investments purchased

    (34,339,474     (14,398,705     (10,423,471

Investments sold

    45,665,502        13,207,810        13,273,681   

Net amortization/accretion of premium (discount)

    (842,413     (441,067     (140,569

Amortization of deferred debt issuance costs

    13,463        2,510        3,099   

Increase in restricted cash

    (217,000     (130,000     (80,000

Decrease (increase) in interest receivable

    (11,886     (43,005     75,815   

Increase in receivable for variation margin on open financial futures contracts

    (7,250     (3,890     (2,750

Decrease (increase) in receivable from the transfer agent

    6,127        2,056        (46

Decrease in payable for variation margin on open financial futures contracts

    (27,203     (17,610     (4,375

Decrease in payable for open swap contracts

    (352,540     (212,993     (235,027

Increase in payable to affiliate for investment adviser fee

    6,727        2,756        402   

Increase (decrease) in interest expense and fees payable

    (18,269     3,058        (3,568

Increase in accrued expenses

    11,194        6,110        8,557   

Net change in unrealized (appreciation) depreciation from investments

    (13,910,576     (7,123,212     (2,386,304

Net realized (gain) loss from investments

    (952,223     268,458        (632,533

Net realized loss on extinguishment of debt

    18,589                 

Net cash provided by operating activities

  $ 17,128,328      $ 764,754      $ 4,419,853   
Cash Flows From Financing Activities                        

Distributions paid to common shareholders, net of reinvestments

  $ (8,512,518   $ (3,052,205   $ (1,982,378

Cash distributions paid to preferred shareholders

    (107,756     (61,998     (31,906

Proceeds from secured borrowings

    2,500,000               2,200,000   

Repayment of secured borrowings

    (14,590,000            (5,145,000

Increase in due to custodian

           81,896        95,588   

Net cash used in financing activities

  $ (20,710,274   $ (3,032,307   $ (4,863,696

Net decrease in cash

  $ (3,581,946   $ (2,267,553   $ (443,843

Cash at beginning of year

  $ 3,661,490      $ 2,267,553      $ 443,843   

Cash at end of year

  $ 79,544      $      $   
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:   

Noncash financing activities not included herein consist of:

     

Reinvestment of dividends and distributions

  $ 227,531      $ 28,782      $ 28,780   

Cash paid for interest and fees

    355,032        62,615        75,744   

 

* Statement of Cash Flows is not required for Massachusetts Fund, Michigan Fund, New Jersey Fund, Ohio Fund and Pennsylvania Fund.

 

  43   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Funds

September 30, 2012

 

Financial Highlights

 

Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated

 

    Municipal Fund II  
    Year Ended September 30,  
    2012     2011     2010     2009     2008  

Net asset value — Beginning of year (Common shares)

  $ 12.040      $ 12.720      $ 12.880      $ 11.030      $ 15.470   
Income (Loss) From Operations                                        

Net investment income(1)

  $ 0.778      $ 0.929      $ 0.961      $ 0.943      $ 1.037   

Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)

    1.437        (0.638     (0.164     1.813        (4.159

Distributions to preferred shareholders(1)

         

From net investment income

    (0.011     (0.015     (0.018     (0.058     (0.168

From net realized gain

                                (0.117

Total income (loss) from operations

  $ 2.204      $ 0.276      $ 0.779      $ 2.698      $ (3.407
Less Distributions to Common Shareholders                                        

From net investment income

  $ (0.874   $ (0.956   $ (0.939   $ (0.848   $ (0.747

From net realized gain

                                (0.286

Total distributions to common shareholders

  $ (0.874   $ (0.956   $ (0.939   $ (0.848   $ (1.033

Net asset value — End of year (Common shares)

  $ 13.370      $ 12.040      $ 12.720      $ 12.880      $ 11.030   

Market value — End of year (Common shares)

  $ 13.880      $ 13.280      $ 14.010      $ 13.370      $ 11.650   

Total Investment Return on Net Asset Value(2)

    18.56     2.45     6.26     26.08     (23.08 )% 

Total Investment Return on Market Value(2)

    11.59     2.60     12.78     23.88     (13.61 )% 
Ratios/Supplemental Data                                        

Net assets applicable to common shares, end of year (000’s omitted)

  $ 133,772      $ 120,308      $ 126,814      $ 128,150      $ 109,648   

Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets applicable to common shares):(3)

         

Expenses excluding interest and fees

    1.37     1.50     1.22     1.28     1.09

Interest and fee expense(4)

    0.28     0.35     0.38     0.87     0.93

Total expenses before custodian fee reduction

    1.65     1.85     1.60     2.15     2.02

Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees

    1.37     1.49     1.22     1.27     1.05

Net investment income

    6.14     8.23     7.86     9.05     7.40

Portfolio Turnover

    16     12     13     22     54

The ratios reported above are based on net assets applicable to common shares. The ratios based on net assets, including amounts related to preferred shares, are as follows:

   

Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets applicable to common shares and preferred shares):(3)

         

Expenses excluding interest and fees

    1.02     1.07     0.89     0.89     0.69

Interest and fee expense(4)

    0.20     0.25     0.28     0.61     0.60

Total expenses before custodian fee reduction

    1.22     1.32     1.17     1.50     1.29

Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees

    1.02     1.07     0.89     0.89     0.67

Net investment income

    4.54     5.89     5.75     6.32     4.73

Senior Securities:

         

Total preferred shares outstanding

    1,788        1,788        1,788        1,788        1,788   

Asset coverage per preferred share(5)

  $ 99,818      $ 92,287      $ 95,926      $ 96,674      $ 86,356   

Involuntary liquidation preference per preferred share(6)

  $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000   

Approximate market value per preferred share(6)

  $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000   

 

(1) 

Computed using average common shares outstanding.

 

(2) 

Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market value with all distributions reinvested.

 

(3) 

Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to preferred shareholders.

 

(4) 

Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with residual interest bond transactions (see Note 1H).

 

(5) 

Calculated by subtracting the Fund’s total liabilities (not including the preferred shares) from the Fund’s total assets, and dividing the result by the number of preferred shares outstanding.

 

(6) 

Plus accumulated and unpaid dividends.

 

  44   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Funds

September 30, 2012

 

Financial Highlights — continued

 

Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated

 

    California Fund II  
    Year Ended September 30,  
    2012     2011     2010     2009     2008  

Net asset value — Beginning of year (Common shares)

  $ 11.730      $ 12.520      $ 12.940      $ 11.310      $ 15.020   
Income (Loss) From Operations                                        

Net investment income(1)

  $ 0.777      $ 0.855      $ 0.898      $ 0.877      $ 0.983   

Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)

    1.712        (0.761     (0.433     1.601        (3.583

Distributions to preferred shareholders(1)

         

From net investment income

    (0.016     (0.023     (0.027     (0.084     (0.233

From net realized gain

                                (0.053

Total income (loss) from operations

  $ 2.473      $ 0.071      $ 0.438      $ 2.394      $ (2.886
Less Distributions to Common Shareholders                                        

From net investment income

  $ (0.793   $ (0.861   $ (0.858   $ (0.764   $ (0.693

From net realized gain

                                (0.131

Total distributions to common shareholders

  $ (0.793   $ (0.861   $ (0.858   $ (0.764   $ (0.824

Net asset value — End of year (Common shares)

  $ 13.410      $ 11.730      $ 12.520      $ 12.940      $ 11.310   

Market value — End of year (Common shares)

  $ 13.630      $ 12.260      $ 13.250      $ 12.500      $ 10.250   

Total Investment Return on Net Asset Value(2)

    21.62     1.31     3.93     23.06     (19.81 )% 

Total Investment Return on Market Value(2)

    18.36     0.06     13.86     31.17     (23.40 )% 
Ratios/Supplemental Data                                        

Net assets applicable to common shares, end of year (000’s omitted)

  $ 52,063      $ 45,535      $ 48,529      $ 50,080      $ 43,718   

Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets applicable to common shares):(3)

         

Expenses excluding interest and fees

    1.36     1.47     1.39     1.51     1.23

Interest and fee expense(4)

    0.14     0.15     0.16     0.37     0.42

Total expenses before custodian fee reduction

    1.50     1.62     1.55     1.88     1.65

Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees

    1.36     1.47     1.38     1.50     1.19

Net investment income

    6.16     7.75     7.47     8.23     7.11

Portfolio Turnover

    15     34     17     17     22

The ratios reported above are based on net assets applicable to common shares. The ratios based on net assets, including amounts related to preferred shares, are as follows:

   

Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets applicable to common shares and preferred shares):(3)

         

Expenses excluding interest and fees

    0.89     0.92     0.89     0.93     0.76

Interest and fee expense(4)

    0.09     0.09     0.11     0.23     0.26

Total expenses before custodian fee reduction

    0.98     1.01     1.00     1.16     1.02

Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees

    0.89     0.92     0.89     0.93     0.74

Net investment income

    4.04     4.84     4.81     5.07     4.42

Senior Securities:

         

Total preferred shares outstanding

    1,028        1,028        1,028        1,028        1,028   

Asset coverage per preferred share(5)

  $ 75,645      $ 69,295      $ 72,208      $ 73,719      $ 67,578   

Involuntary liquidation preference per preferred share(6)

  $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000   

Approximate market value per preferred share(6)

  $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000   

 

(1) 

Computed using average common shares outstanding.

 

(2) 

Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market value with all distributions reinvested.

 

(3) 

Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to preferred shareholders.

 

(4) 

Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with residual interest bond transactions (see Note 1H).

 

(5) 

Calculated by subtracting the Fund’s total liabilities (not including the preferred shares) from the Fund’s total assets, and dividing the result by the number of preferred shares outstanding.

 

(6) 

Plus accumulated and unpaid dividends.

 

  45   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Funds

September 30, 2012

 

Financial Highlights — continued

 

Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated

 

    Massachusetts Fund  
    Year Ended September 30,  
    2012     2011     2010     2009     2008  

Net asset value — Beginning of year (Common shares)

  $ 14.230      $ 14.710      $ 14.660      $ 12.130      $ 15.090   
Income (Loss) From Operations                                        

Net investment income(1)

  $ 0.821      $ 0.876      $ 0.882      $ 0.901      $ 0.981   

Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)

    1.728        (0.490     0.036        2.486        (2.981

Distributions to preferred shareholders(1)

         

From net investment income

    (0.019     (0.026     (0.031     (0.099     (0.289

Total income (loss) from operations

  $ 2.530      $ 0.360      $ 0.887      $ 3.288      $ (2.289
Less Distributions to Common Shareholders                                        

From net investment income

  $ (0.840   $ (0.840   $ (0.837   $ (0.758   $ (0.671

Total distributions to common shareholders

  $ (0.840   $ (0.840   $ (0.837   $ (0.758   $ (0.671

Net asset value — End of year (Common shares)

  $ 15.920      $ 14.230      $ 14.710      $ 14.660      $ 12.130   

Market value — End of year (Common shares)

  $ 16.510      $ 14.320      $ 15.160      $ 15.250      $ 13.780   

Total Investment Return on Net Asset Value(2)

    18.26     3.06     6.43     28.42     (15.70 )% 

Total Investment Return on Market Value(2)

    21.87     0.64     5.44     17.59     (2.46 )% 
Ratios/Supplemental Data                                        

Net assets applicable to common shares, end of year (000’s omitted)

  $ 28,138      $ 25,134      $ 25,920      $ 25,771      $ 21,311   

Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets applicable to common shares):(3)

         

Expenses excluding interest and fees

    1.46     1.54     1.45     1.69     1.41

Interest and fee expense(4)

    0.09     0.11     0.09     0.23     0.71

Total expenses before custodian fee reduction

    1.55     1.65     1.54     1.92     2.12

Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees

    1.46     1.54     1.45     1.68     1.38

Net investment income

    5.44     6.60     6.29     7.41     6.83

Portfolio Turnover

    2     27     27     43     12

The ratios reported above are based on net assets applicable to common shares. The ratios based on net assets, including amounts related to preferred shares, are as follows:

   

Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets applicable to common shares and preferred shares):(3)

         

Expenses excluding interest and fees

    0.97     0.97     0.94     1.03     0.88

Interest and fee expense(4)

    0.06     0.07     0.05     0.14     0.45

Total expenses before custodian fee reduction

    1.03     1.04     0.99     1.17     1.33

Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees

    0.97     0.97     0.94     1.03     0.87

Net investment income

    3.61     4.18     4.06     4.53     4.27

Senior Securities:

         

Total preferred shares outstanding

    543        543        543        543        543   

Asset coverage per preferred share(5)

  $ 76,820      $ 71,288      $ 72,737      $ 72,462      $ 64,287   

Involuntary liquidation preference per preferred share(6)

  $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000   

Approximate market value per preferred share(6)

  $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000   

 

(1) 

Computed using average common shares outstanding.

 

(2) 

Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market value with all distributions reinvested.

 

(3) 

Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to preferred shareholders.

 

(4) 

Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with residual interest bond transactions (see Note 1H).

 

(5) 

Calculated by subtracting the Fund’s total liabilities (not including the preferred shares) from the Fund’s total assets, and dividing the result by the number of preferred shares outstanding.

 

(6) 

Plus accumulated and unpaid dividends.

 

  46   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Funds

September 30, 2012

 

Financial Highlights — continued

 

Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated

 

    Michigan Fund  
    Year Ended September 30,  
    2012     2011     2010     2009     2008  

Net asset value — Beginning of year (Common shares)

  $ 14.040      $ 14.540      $ 14.730      $ 12.570      $ 15.150   
Income (Loss) From Operations                                        

Net investment income(1)

  $ 0.862      $ 0.913      $ 0.928      $ 0.925      $ 0.975   

Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)

    1.038        (0.496     (0.208     2.110        (2.590

Distributions to preferred shareholders(1)

         

From net investment income

    (0.021     (0.030     (0.036     (0.113     (0.295

Total income (loss) from operations

  $ 1.879      $ 0.387      $ 0.684      $ 2.922      $ (1.910
Less Distributions to Common Shareholders                                        

From net investment income

  $ (0.889   $ (0.887   $ (0.874   $ (0.762   $ (0.670

Total distributions to common shareholders

  $ (0.889   $ (0.887   $ (0.874   $ (0.762   $ (0.670

Net asset value — End of year (Common shares)

  $ 15.030      $ 14.040      $ 14.540      $ 14.730      $ 12.570   

Market value — End of year (Common shares)

  $ 16.000      $ 13.610      $ 14.430      $ 13.900      $ 10.400   

Total Investment Return on Net Asset Value(2)

    13.69     3.25     5.16     25.29     (12.66 )%(3) 

Total Investment Return on Market Value(2)

    24.85     0.85     10.60     42.90     (21.97 )%(3) 
Ratios/Supplemental Data                                        

Net assets applicable to common shares, end of year (000’s omitted)

  $ 22,759      $ 21,233      $ 21,985      $ 22,276      $ 19,007   

Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets applicable to common shares):(4)

         

Expenses excluding interest and fees

    1.54     1.58     1.49     1.70     1.49

Interest and fee expense(5)

                                0.54

Total expenses before custodian fee reduction

    1.54     1.58     1.49     1.70     2.03

Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees

    1.54     1.58     1.49     1.69     1.48

Net investment income

    5.90     6.76     6.55     7.30     6.72

Portfolio Turnover

    19     5     2     9     11

The ratios reported above are based on net assets applicable to common shares. The ratios based on net assets, including amounts related to preferred shares, are as follows:

   

Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets applicable to common shares and preferred shares):(4)

         

Expenses excluding interest and fees

    0.96     0.96     0.92     1.00     0.93

Interest and fee expense(5)

                                0.33

Total expenses before custodian fee reduction

    0.96     0.96     0.92     1.00     1.26

Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees

    0.96     0.96     0.92     1.00     0.92

Net investment income

    3.68     4.09     4.04     4.30     4.16

Senior Securities:

         

Total preferred shares outstanding

    533        533        533        533        540   

Asset coverage per preferred share(6)

  $ 67,701      $ 64,837      $ 66,248      $ 66,794      $ 60,199   

Involuntary liquidation preference per preferred share(7)

  $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000   

Approximate market value per preferred share(7)

  $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000   

 

(1) 

Computed using average common shares outstanding.

 

(2) 

Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market value with all distributions reinvested.

 

(3) 

During the year ended September 30, 2008, the investment adviser fully reimbursed the Fund for a realized loss on the disposal of an investment security which did not meet investment guidelines. The loss had no effect on total return.

 

(4) 

Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to preferred shareholders.

 

(5) 

Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with residual interest bond transactions (see Note 1H).

 

(6) 

Calculated by subtracting the Fund’s total liabilities (not including the preferred shares) from the Fund’s total assets, and dividing the result by the number of preferred shares outstanding.

 

(7) 

Plus accumulated and unpaid dividends.

 

  47   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Funds

September 30, 2012

 

Financial Highlights — continued

 

Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated

 

    New Jersey Fund  
    Year Ended September 30,  
    2012     2011     2010     2009     2008  

Net asset value — Beginning of year (Common shares)

  $ 13.180      $ 14.410      $ 14.620      $ 11.980      $ 15.690   
Income (Loss) From Operations                                        

Net investment income(1)

  $ 0.820      $ 0.895      $ 0.943      $ 0.926      $ 0.982   

Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)

    1.471        (1.179     (0.207     2.740        (3.393

Distributions to preferred shareholders(1)

         

From net investment income

    (0.019     (0.026     (0.031     (0.088     (0.196

From net realized gain

                         (0.016     (0.114

Total income (loss) from operations

  $ 2.272      $ (0.310   $ 0.705      $ 3.562      $ (2.721
Less Distributions to Common Shareholders                                        

From net investment income

  $ (0.812   $ (0.920   $ (0.915   $ (0.819   $ (0.706

From net realized gain

                         (0.103     (0.283

Total distributions to common shareholders

  $ (0.812   $ (0.920   $ (0.915   $ (0.922   $ (0.989

Net asset value — End of year (Common shares)

  $ 14.640      $ 13.180      $ 14.410      $ 14.620      $ 11.980   

Market value — End of year (Common shares)

  $ 15.090      $ 13.370      $ 15.350      $ 14.730      $ 11.880   

Total Investment Return on Net Asset Value(2)

    17.69     (1.80 )%      5.10     31.84     (18.15 )% 

Total Investment Return on Market Value(2)

    19.58     (6.49 )%      11.12     33.95     (13.88 )% 
Ratios/Supplemental Data                                        

Net assets applicable to common shares, end of year (000’s omitted)

  $ 38,140      $ 34,186      $ 37,222      $ 37,628      $ 30,776   

Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets applicable to common shares):(3)

         

Expenses excluding interest and fees

    1.39     1.42     1.36     1.53     1.33

Interest and fee expense(4)

    0.12     0.15     0.17     0.46     1.16

Total expenses before custodian fee reduction

    1.51     1.57     1.53     1.99     2.49

Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees

    1.39     1.41     1.36     1.52     1.28

Net investment income

    5.87     6.96     6.79     7.81     6.72

Portfolio Turnover

    16     4     8     39     48

The ratios reported above are based on net assets applicable to common shares. The ratios based on net assets, including amounts related to preferred shares, are as follows:

   

Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets applicable to common shares and preferred shares):(3)

         

Expenses excluding interest and fees

    0.90     0.90     0.88     0.93     0.84

Interest and fee expense(4)

    0.08     0.09     0.11     0.28     0.73

Total expenses before custodian fee reduction

    0.98     0.99     0.99     1.21     1.57

Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees

    0.90     0.89     0.88     0.92     0.81

Net investment income

    3.81     4.38     4.39     4.75     4.24

Senior Securities:

         

Total preferred shares outstanding

    784        784        784        784        812   

Asset coverage per preferred share(5)

  $ 73,649      $ 68,605      $ 72,478      $ 72,996      $ 62,907   

Involuntary liquidation preference per preferred share(6)

  $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000   

Approximate market value per preferred share(6)

  $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000   

 

(1) 

Computed using average common shares outstanding.

 

(2) 

Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market value with all distributions reinvested.

 

(3) 

Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to preferred shareholders.

 

(4) 

Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with residual interest bond transactions (see Note 1H).

 

(5) 

Calculated by subtracting the Fund’s total liabilities (not including the preferred shares) from the Fund’s total assets, and dividing the result by the number of preferred shares outstanding.

 

(6) 

Plus accumulated and unpaid dividends.

 

  48   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Funds

September 30, 2012

 

Financial Highlights — continued

 

Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated

 

    New York Fund II  
    Year Ended September 30,  
    2012     2011     2010     2009     2008  

Net asset value — Beginning of year (Common shares)

  $ 12.760      $ 13.400      $ 13.620      $ 11.530      $ 15.240   
Income (Loss) From Operations                                        

Net investment income(1)

  $ 0.775      $ 0.868      $ 0.847      $ 0.857      $ 0.938   

Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)

    1.162        (0.621     (0.167     2.087        (3.483

Distributions to preferred shareholders(1)

         

From net investment income

    (0.013     (0.018     (0.021     (0.066     (0.237

From net realized gain

                                (0.049

Total income (loss) from operations

  $ 1.924      $ 0.229      $ 0.659      $ 2.878      $ (2.831
Less Distributions to Common Shareholders                                        

From net investment income

  $ (0.784   $ (0.869   $ (0.879   $ (0.788   $ (0.699

From net realized gain

                                (0.180

Total distributions to common shareholders

  $ (0.784   $ (0.869   $ (0.879   $ (0.788   $ (0.879

Net asset value — End of year (Common shares)

  $ 13.900      $ 12.760      $ 13.400      $ 13.620      $ 11.530   

Market value — End of year (Common shares)

  $ 13.970      $ 12.890      $ 14.000      $ 13.610      $ 10.580   

Total Investment Return on Net Asset Value(2)

    15.47     2.16     5.20     26.71     (19.25 )% 

Total Investment Return on Market Value(2)

    14.89     (1.21 )%      9.99     37.98     (21.80 )% 
Ratios/Supplemental Data                                        

Net assets applicable to common shares, end of year (000’s omitted)

  $ 35,669      $ 32,717      $ 34,328      $ 34,847      $ 29,459   

Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets applicable to common shares):(3)

         

Expenses excluding interest and fees

    1.42     1.47     1.41     1.51     1.33

Interest and fee expense(4)

    0.22     0.28     0.28     0.63     0.46

Total expenses before custodian fee reduction

    1.64     1.75     1.69     2.14     1.79

Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees

    1.42     1.46     1.41     1.50     1.28

Net investment income

    5.80     7.07     6.49     7.67     6.67

Portfolio Turnover

    18     17     13     30     44

The ratios reported above are based on net assets applicable to common shares. The ratios based on net assets, including amounts related to preferred shares, are as follows:

   

Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets applicable to common shares and preferred shares):(3)

         

Expenses excluding interest and fees

    1.02     1.03     1.01     1.03     0.83

Interest and fee expense(4)

    0.16     0.20     0.20     0.43     0.29

Total expenses before custodian fee reduction

    1.18     1.23     1.21     1.46     1.12

Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees

    1.02     1.02     1.01     1.02     0.80

Net investment income

    4.18     4.98     4.65     5.24     4.17

Senior Securities:

         

Total preferred shares outstanding

    530        530        530        530        530   

Asset coverage per preferred share(5)

  $ 92,301      $ 86,730      $ 89,770      $ 90,749      $ 80,583   

Involuntary liquidation preference per preferred share(6)

  $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000   

Approximate market value per preferred share(6)

  $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000   

 

(1) 

Computed using average common shares outstanding.

 

(2) 

Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market value with all distributions reinvested.

 

(3) 

Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to preferred shareholders.

 

(4) 

Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with residual interest bond transactions (see Note 1H).

 

(5) 

Calculated by subtracting the Fund’s total liabilities (not including the preferred shares) from the Fund’s total assets, and dividing the result by the number of preferred shares outstanding.

 

(6) 

Plus accumulated and unpaid dividends.

 

  49   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Funds

September 30, 2012

 

Financial Highlights — continued

 

Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated

 

    Ohio Fund  
    Year Ended September 30,  
    2012     2011     2010     2009     2008  

Net asset value — Beginning of year (Common shares)

  $ 12.220      $ 12.960      $ 12.980      $ 11.330      $ 14.970   
Income (Loss) From Operations                                        

Net investment income(1)

  $ 0.762      $ 0.814      $ 0.828      $ 0.846      $ 0.948   

Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)

    1.606        (0.759     (0.058     1.592        (3.665

Distributions to preferred shareholders(1)

         

From net investment income

    (0.016     (0.023     (0.028     (0.101     (0.298

Total income (loss) from operations

  $ 2.352      $ 0.032      $ 0.742      $ 2.337      $ (3.015
Less Distributions to Common Shareholders                                        

From net investment income

  $ (0.772   $ (0.772   $ (0.762   $ (0.687   $ (0.625

Total distributions to common shareholders

  $ (0.772   $ (0.772   $ (0.762   $ (0.687   $ (0.625

Net asset value — End of year (Common shares)

  $ 13.800      $ 12.220      $ 12.960      $ 12.980      $ 11.330   

Market value — End of year (Common shares)

  $ 15.200      $ 12.780      $ 14.100      $ 13.250      $ 11.250   

Total Investment Return on Net Asset Value(2)

    19.50     0.65     6.04     22.05     (20.51 )% 

Total Investment Return on Market Value(2)

    25.85     (3.25 )%      13.01     25.48     (13.81 )% 
Ratios/Supplemental Data                                        

Net assets applicable to common shares, end of year (000’s omitted)

  $ 34,985      $ 30,922      $ 32,726      $ 32,710      $ 28,495   

Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets applicable to common shares):(3)

         

Expenses excluding interest and fees

    1.35     1.42     1.36     1.57     1.35

Interest and fee expense(4)

    0.01     0.02     0.02     0.10     0.29

Total expenses before custodian fee reduction

    1.36     1.44     1.38     1.67     1.64

Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees

    1.35     1.42     1.36     1.57     1.33

Net investment income

    5.83     6.98     6.61     7.87     6.82

Portfolio Turnover

    12     10     11     18     22

The ratios reported above are based on net assets applicable to common shares. The ratios based on net assets, including amounts related to preferred shares, are as follows:

   

Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets applicable to common shares and preferred shares):(3)

         

Expenses excluding interest and fees

    0.89     0.90     0.88     0.95     0.83

Interest and fee expense(4)

    0.01     0.01     0.01     0.06     0.18

Total expenses before custodian fee reduction

    0.90     0.91     0.89     1.01     1.01

Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees

    0.89     0.90     0.88     0.95     0.82

Net investment income

    3.85     4.43     4.30     4.77     4.19

Senior Securities:

         

Total preferred shares outstanding

    680        680        680        680        875   

Asset coverage per preferred share(5)

  $ 76,450      $ 70,474      $ 73,128      $ 73,104      $ 57,579   

Involuntary liquidation preference per preferred share(6)

  $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000   

Approximate market value per preferred share(6)

  $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000   

 

(1) 

Computed using average common shares outstanding.

 

(2) 

Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market value with all distributions reinvested.

 

(3) 

Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to preferred shareholders.

 

(4) 

Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with residual interest bond transactions (see Note 1H).

 

(5) 

Calculated by subtracting the Fund’s total liabilities (not including the preferred shares) from the Fund’s total assets, and dividing the result by the number of preferred shares outstanding.

 

(6) 

Plus accumulated and unpaid dividends.

 

  50   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Funds

September 30, 2012

 

Financial Highlights — continued

 

Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated

 

    Pennsylvania Fund  
    Year Ended September 30,  
    2012     2011     2010     2009     2008  

Net asset value — Beginning of year (Common shares)

  $ 13.180      $ 13.640      $ 13.900      $ 12.030      $ 15.270   
Income (Loss) From Operations                                        

Net investment income(1)

  $ 0.829      $ 0.893      $ 0.878      $ 0.889      $ 0.995   

Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)

    1.342        (0.460     (0.270     2.123        (3.047

Distributions to preferred shareholders(1)

         

From net investment income

    (0.018     (0.025     (0.030     (0.071     (0.236

From net realized gain

                         (0.045     (0.076

Total income (loss) from operations

  $ 2.153      $ 0.408      $ 0.578      $ 2.896      $ (2.364
Less Distributions to Common Shareholders                                        

From net investment income

  $ (0.873   $ (0.868   $ (0.838   $ (0.753   $ (0.693

From net realized gain

                         (0.273     (0.183

Total distributions to common shareholders

  $ (0.873   $ (0.868   $ (0.838   $ (1.026   $ (0.876

Net asset value — End of year (Common shares)

  $ 14.460      $ 13.180      $ 13.640      $ 13.900      $ 12.030   

Market value — End of year (Common shares)

  $ 15.780      $ 13.030      $ 14.230      $ 14.600      $ 13.400   

Total Investment Return on Net Asset Value(2)

    16.76     3.63     4.53     27.36     (16.07 )% 

Total Investment Return on Market Value(2)

    28.88     (1.79 )%      3.82     20.09     0.88
Ratios/Supplemental Data                                        

Net assets applicable to common shares, end of year (000’s omitted)

  $ 42,791      $ 38,972      $ 40,256      $ 40,956      $ 35,413   

Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets applicable to common shares):(3)

         

Expenses excluding interest and fees

    1.33     1.41     1.36     1.52     1.30

Interest and fee expense(4)

    0.04     0.08     0.07     0.17     1.03

Total expenses before custodian fee reduction

    1.37     1.49     1.43     1.69     2.33

Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees

    1.33     1.40     1.36     1.51     1.28

Net investment income

    5.98     7.19     6.67     7.80     6.86

Portfolio Turnover

    11     12     19     8     28

The ratios reported above are based on net assets applicable to common shares. The ratios based on net assets, including amounts related to preferred shares, are as follows:

   

Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets applicable to common shares and preferred shares):(3)

         

Expenses excluding interest and fees

    0.87     0.88     0.87     0.91     0.81

Interest and fee expense(4)

    0.03     0.05     0.05     0.10     0.64

Total expenses before custodian fee reduction

    0.90     0.93     0.92     1.01     1.45

Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees

    0.87     0.88     0.87     0.90     0.80

Net investment income

    3.91     4.51     4.28     4.68     4.26

Senior Securities:

         

Total preferred shares outstanding

    869        869        869        869        1,040   

Asset coverage per preferred share(5)

  $ 74,242      $ 69,847      $ 71,327      $ 72,133      $ 59,091   

Involuntary liquidation preference per preferred share(6)

  $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000   

Approximate market value per preferred share(6)

  $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000      $ 25,000   

 

(1) 

Computed using average common shares outstanding.

 

(2) 

Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market value with all distributions reinvested.

 

(3) 

Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to preferred shareholders.

 

(4) 

Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with residual interest bond transactions (see Note 1H).

 

(5) 

Calculated by subtracting the Fund’s total liabilities (not including the preferred shares) from the Fund’s total assets, and dividing the result by the number of preferred shares outstanding.

 

(6) 

Plus accumulated and unpaid dividends.

 

  51   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Funds

September 30, 2012

 

Notes to Financial Statements

 

 

1  Significant Accounting Policies

Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund II (Municipal Fund II), Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund II (California Fund II), Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund (Massachusetts Fund), Eaton Vance Michigan Municipal Bond Fund (Michigan Fund), Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund (New Jersey Fund), Eaton Vance New York Municipal Bond Fund II (New York Fund II), Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Bond Fund (Ohio Fund) and Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund (Pennsylvania Fund), (each individually referred to as the Fund, and collectively, the Funds), are Massachusetts business trusts registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as non-diversified, closed-end management investment companies, except for Municipal Fund II, which is a diversified, closed-end management investment company. Each Fund seeks to provide current income exempt from regular federal income tax, including alternative minimum tax, and, in state specific funds, taxes in its specified state.

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Funds. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

A  Investment Valuation — Debt obligations (including short-term obligations with a remaining maturity of more than sixty days) are generally valued on the basis of valuations provided by third party pricing services, as derived from such services’ pricing models. Inputs to the models may include, but are not limited to, reported trades, executable bid and asked prices, broker/dealer quotations, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, benchmark curves or information pertaining to the issuer, as well as industry and economic events. The pricing services may use a matrix approach, which considers information regarding securities with similar characteristics to determine the valuation for a security. Short-term obligations purchased with a remaining maturity of sixty days or less are generally valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Financial futures contracts are valued at the closing settlement price established by the board of trade or exchange on which they are traded. Interest rate swaps are normally valued using valuations provided by a third party pricing service. Such pricing service valuations are based on the present value of fixed and projected floating rate cash flows over the term of the swap contract. Future cash flows are discounted to their present value using swap rates provided by electronic data services or by broker/dealers. Investments for which valuations or market quotations are not readily available or are deemed unreliable are valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees of a Fund in a manner that fairly reflects the security’s value, or the amount that the Fund might reasonably expect to receive for the security upon its current sale in the ordinary course. Each such determination is based on a consideration of relevant factors, which are likely to vary from one pricing context to another. These factors may include, but are not limited to, the type of security, the existence of any contractual restrictions on the security’s disposition, the price and extent of public trading in similar securities of the issuer or of comparable entities, quotations or relevant information obtained from broker/dealers or other market participants, information obtained from the issuer, analysts, and/or the appropriate stock exchange (for exchange-traded securities), an analysis of the entity’s financial condition, and an evaluation of the forces that influence the issuer and the market(s) in which the security is purchased and sold.

B  Investment Transactions and Related Income — Investment transactions for financial statement purposes are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses on investments sold are determined on the basis of identified cost. Interest income is recorded on the basis of interest accrued, adjusted for amortization of premium or accretion of discount.

C  Federal Taxes — Each Fund’s policy is to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its taxable, if any, and tax-exempt net investment income, and all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains. Accordingly, no provision for federal income or excise tax is necessary. Each Fund intends to satisfy conditions which will enable it to designate distributions from the interest income generated by its investments in municipal obligations, which are exempt from regular federal income tax when received by each Fund, as exempt-interest dividends.

At September 30, 2012, the following Funds, for federal income tax purposes, had capital loss carryforwards and current year deferred capital losses which will reduce the respective Fund’s taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investment transactions, if any, to the extent permitted by the Internal Revenue Code, and thus will reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders, which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Funds of any liability for federal income or excise tax. The current year deferred capital losses are treated as arising on the first day of the Funds’ next taxable year and are treated as realized prior to the utilization of the capital loss carryforward. The amounts and expiration dates of the capital loss carryforwards and the amounts of the current year deferred capital losses are as follows:

 

Expiration Date   Municipal
Fund II
     California
Fund II
     Massachusetts
Fund
     Michigan
Fund
 

September 30, 2013

  $       $       $ 179,329       $ 384,407   

September 30, 2016

    658,427         52,500                 1,883   

September 30, 2017

    2,011,041         1,365,711         94,578           

September 30, 2018

    11,539,291         3,330,399         1,054,999         579,696   

September 30, 2019

    1,277,303         1,539,887         225,669         515,704   

Total capital loss carryforward

  $ 15,486,062       $ 6,288,497       $ 1,554,575       $ 1,481,690   

Current year deferred capital losses

  $ 7,301,218       $ 4,990,165       $ 1,439,462       $ 573,761   

 

  52  


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Funds

September 30, 2012

 

Notes to Financial Statements — continued

 

 

Expiration Date   New Jersey
Fund
     New York
Fund II
     Ohio
Fund
     Pennsylvania
Fund
 

September 30, 2013

  $       $       $ 321,978       $   

September 30, 2016

            41,818         83,319           

September 30, 2017

    244,927         1,233,356         1,620,085           

September 30, 2018

    2,060,337         1,545,637         3,381,936         1,949,047   

September 30, 2019

    1,369,694         1,548,104         669,118         925,899   

Total capital loss carryforward

  $ 3,674,958       $ 4,368,915       $ 6,076,436       $ 2,874,946   

Current year deferred capital losses

  $ 2,266,743       $ 1,493,090       $ 1,081,868       $ 2,071,926   

As of September 30, 2012, the Funds had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each Fund files a U.S. federal income tax return annually after its fiscal year-end, which is subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service for a period of three years from the date of filing.

D  Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Funds. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance each Fund maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce each Fund’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statements of Operations.

E  Legal Fees — Legal fees and other related expenses incurred as part of negotiations of the terms and requirement of capital infusions, or that are expected to result in the restructuring of, or a plan of reorganization for, an investment are recorded as realized losses. Ongoing expenditures to protect or enhance an investment are treated as operating expenses.

F  Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

G  Indemnifications — Under each Fund’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to each Fund. Under Massachusetts law, if certain conditions prevail, shareholders of a Massachusetts business trust (such as a Fund) could be deemed to have personal liability for the obligations of the Fund. However, each Fund’s Declaration of Trust contains an express disclaimer of liability on the part of Fund shareholders and the By-laws provide that the Fund shall assume the defense on behalf of any Fund shareholders. Moreover, the By-laws also provide for indemnification out of Fund property of any shareholder held personally liable solely by reason of being or having been a shareholder for all loss or expense arising from such liability. Additionally, in the normal course of business, each Fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. Each Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against each Fund that have not yet occurred.

H  Floating Rate Notes Issued in Conjunction with Securities Held — The Funds may invest in residual interest bonds, also referred to as inverse floating rate securities, whereby a Fund may sell a variable or fixed rate bond to a broker for cash. At the same time, the Fund buys a residual interest in the assets and cash flows of a Special-Purpose Vehicle (the SPV), (which is generally organized as a trust), set up by the broker. The broker deposits a bond into the SPV with the same CUSIP number as the bond sold to the broker by the Fund, and which may have been, but is not required to be, the bond purchased from the Fund (the Bond). The SPV also issues floating rate notes (Floating Rate Notes) which are sold to third-parties. The residual interest bond held by a Fund gives the Fund the right (1) to cause the holders of the Floating Rate Notes to generally tender their notes at par, and (2) to have the broker transfer the Bond held by the SPV to the Fund, thereby terminating the SPV. Should the Fund exercise such right, it would generally pay the broker the par amount due on the Floating Rate Notes and exchange the residual interest bond for the underlying Bond. Pursuant to generally accepted accounting principles for transfers and servicing of financial assets and extinguishment of liabilities, the Funds account for the transaction described above as a secured borrowing by including the Bond in their Portfolio of Investments and the Floating Rate Notes as a liability under the caption “Payable for floating rate notes issued” in their Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The Floating Rate Notes have interest rates that generally reset weekly and their holders have the option to tender their notes to the broker for redemption at par at each reset date. Accordingly, the fair value of the payable for floating rate notes issued approximates its carrying value. If measured at fair value, the payable for floating rate notes would have been considered as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy (see Note 10) at September 30, 2012. Interest expense related to the Funds’ liability with respect to Floating Rate Notes is recorded as incurred. The SPV may be terminated by the Fund, as noted above, or by the broker upon the occurrence of certain termination events as defined in the trust agreement, such as a downgrade in the credit quality of the underlying Bond, bankruptcy of or payment failure by the issuer of the underlying Bond, the inability to remarket Floating Rate Notes that have been tendered due to insufficient buyers in the market, or the failure by the SPV to obtain renewal of the liquidity agreement under which liquidity support is provided for the Floating Rate Notes up to one year. Structuring fees paid to the liquidity provider upon the creation of an SPV have been recorded as debt issuance costs and are being amortized as interest expense to the expected maturity of the related trust.

 

  53  


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Funds

September 30, 2012

 

Notes to Financial Statements — continued

 

 

Unamortized structuring fees related to a terminated SPV are recorded as a realized loss on extinguishment of debt. At September 30, 2012, the amounts of the Funds’ Floating Rate Notes and related interest rates and collateral were as follows:

 

     Municipal
Fund II
     California
Fund II
     Massachusetts
Fund
 

Floating Rate Notes Outstanding

  $ 42,905,000       $ 9,885,000       $ 3,330,000   

Interest Rate or Range of Interest Rates (%)

    0.18 - 0.43         0.18 - 0.23         0.18 - 0.25   

Collateral for Floating Rate Notes Outstanding

  $ 54,936,846       $ 12,230,286       $ 4,684,236   

 

     New Jersey
Fund
     New York
Fund II
    

Ohio

Fund

     Pennsylvania
Fund
 

Floating Rate Notes Outstanding

  $ 4,790,000       $ 8,875,000       $ 250,000       $ 2,040,000   

Interest Rate or Range of Interest Rates (%)

    0.25 - 0.38         0.18 - 0.25         0.21 - 0.25         0.19 - 0.25   

Collateral for Floating Rate Notes Outstanding

  $ 6,365,426       $ 12,210,470       $ 546,855       $ 3,420,671   

For the year ended September 30, 2012, the Funds’ average Floating Rate Notes outstanding and the average interest rate including fees and amortization of deferred debt issuance costs were as follows:

 

     Municipal
Fund II
     California
Fund II
     Massachusetts
Fund
 

Average Floating Rate Notes Outstanding

  $ 48,599,413       $ 9,885,000       $ 3,330,000   

Average Interest Rate

    0.72      0.69      0.76

 

     New Jersey
Fund
     New York
Fund II
     Ohio
Fund
     Pennsylvania
Fund
 

Average Floating Rate Notes Outstanding

  $ 4,790,000       $ 10,350,041       $ 250,000       $ 2,040,000   

Average Interest Rate

    0.93      0.73      1.02      0.86

The Funds may enter into shortfall and forbearance agreements with the broker by which a Fund agrees to reimburse the broker, in certain circumstances, for the difference between the liquidation value of the Bond held by the SPV and the liquidation value of the Floating Rate Notes, as well as any shortfalls in interest cash flows. The Funds had no shortfalls as of September 30, 2012.

The Funds may also purchase residual interest bonds from brokers in a secondary market transaction without first owning the underlying bond. Such transactions are not required to be treated as secured borrowings. Shortfall agreements, if any, related to residual interest bonds purchased in a secondary market transaction are disclosed in the Portfolio of Investments.

The Funds’ investment policies and restrictions expressly permit investments in residual interest bonds. Such bonds typically offer the potential for yields exceeding the yields available on fixed rate bonds with comparable credit quality and maturity. These securities tend to underperform the market for fixed rate bonds in a rising long-term interest rate environment, but tend to outperform the market for fixed rate bonds when long-term interest rates decline. The value and income of residual interest bonds are generally more volatile than that of a fixed rate bond. The Funds’ investment policies do not allow the Funds to borrow money except as permitted by the 1940 Act. Management believes that the Funds’ restrictions on borrowing money and issuing senior securities (other than as specifically permitted) do not apply to Floating Rate Notes issued by the SPV and included as a liability in the Funds’ Statement of Assets and Liabilities. As secured indebtedness issued by an SPV, Floating Rate Notes are distinct from the borrowings and senior securities to which the Funds’ restrictions apply. Residual interest bonds held by the Funds are securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933.

I  Financial Futures Contracts — Upon entering into a financial futures contract, a Fund is required to deposit with the broker, either in cash or securities, an amount equal to a certain percentage of the purchase price (initial margin). Subsequent payments, known as variation margin, are made or received by the Fund each business day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the value of the underlying security, and are recorded as unrealized gains or losses by the Fund. Gains (losses) are realized upon the expiration or closing of the financial futures contracts. Should market conditions change unexpectedly, the

 

  54  


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Funds

September 30, 2012

 

Notes to Financial Statements — continued

 

 

Fund may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the financial futures contracts and may realize a loss. Futures contracts have minimal counterparty risk as they are exchange traded and the clearinghouse for the exchange is substituted as the counterparty, guaranteeing counterparty performance.

J  Interest Rate Swaps — Pursuant to interest rate swap agreements, a Fund makes periodic payments at a fixed interest rate and, in exchange, receives payments based on the interest rate of a benchmark industry index. Payments received or made are recorded as realized gains or losses. During the term of the outstanding swap agreement, changes in the underlying value of the swap are recorded as unrealized gains or losses. The value of the swap is determined by changes in the relationship between two rates of interest. A Fund is exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the swap counterparty. Risk may also arise from movements in interest rates.

K  When-Issued Securities and Delayed Delivery Transactions — The Funds may purchase or sell securities on a delayed delivery or when-issued basis. Payment and delivery may take place after the customary settlement period for that security. At the time the transaction is negotiated, the price of the security that will be delivered is fixed. The Funds maintain security positions for these commitments such that sufficient liquid assets will be available to make payments upon settlement. Securities purchased on a delayed delivery or when-issued basis are marked-to-market daily and begin earning interest on settlement date. Losses may arise due to changes in the market value of the underlying securities or if the counterparty does not perform under the contract.

L  Statement of Cash Flows — The cash amount shown in the Statement of Cash Flows of a Fund is the amount included in the Fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities and represents the cash on hand at its custodian and does not include any short-term investments.

2  Auction Preferred Shares

Each Fund issued Auction Preferred Shares (APS) on January 15, 2003 in a public offering. The underwriting discounts and other offering costs incurred in connection with the offering were recorded as a reduction of the paid-in capital of the common shares of each respective Fund. Dividends on the APS, which accrue daily, are cumulative at rates which are reset every seven days by an auction, unless a special dividend period has been set. If the APS auctions do not successfully clear, the dividend payment rate over the next period for the APS holders is set at a specified maximum applicable rate until such time as the APS auctions are successful. The maximum applicable rate on the APS is 110% (150% for taxable distributions) of the greater of the 1) “AA” Financial Composite Commercial Paper Rate or 2) Taxable Equivalent of the Short-Term Municipal Obligation Rate on the date of the auction. The stated spread over the reference benchmark rate is determined based on the credit rating of the APS. Series of APS are identical in all respects except for the reset dates of the dividend rates.

The APS are redeemable at the option of each Fund at a redemption price equal to $25,000 per share, plus accumulated and unpaid dividends, on any dividend payment date. The APS are also subject to mandatory redemption at a redemption price equal to $25,000 per share, plus accumulated and unpaid dividends, if a Fund is in default for an extended period on its asset maintenance requirements with respect to the APS. If the dividends on the APS remain unpaid in an amount equal to two full years’ dividends, the holders of the APS as a class have the right to elect a majority of the Board of Trustees. In general, the holders of the APS and the common shares have equal voting rights of one vote per share, except that the holders of the APS, as a separate class, have the right to elect at least two members of the Board of Trustees. The APS have a liquidation preference of $25,000 per share, plus accumulated and unpaid dividends. Each Fund is required to maintain certain asset coverage with respect to the APS as defined in the Funds’ By-laws and the 1940 Act. Each Fund pays an annual fee up to 0.15% of the liquidation value of the APS to broker/dealers as a service fee if the auctions are unsuccessful; otherwise, the annual fee is 0.25%.

3  Distributions to Shareholders

Each Fund intends to make monthly distributions of net investment income to common shareholders, after payment of any dividends on any outstanding APS. In addition, at least annually, each Fund intends to distribute all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains (reduced by available capital loss carryforwards from prior years, if any). Distributions to common shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions to preferred shareholders are recorded daily and are payable at the end of each dividend period. The dividend rates for APS at September 30, 2012, and the amount of dividends accrued (including capital gains, if any) to APS shareholders, average APS dividend rates, and dividend rate ranges for the year then ended were as follows:

 

    

Municipal
Fund II

(Series A)

    

Municipal
Fund II

(Series B)

     California
Fund II
     Massachusetts
Fund
     Michigan
Fund
 

APS Dividend Rates at September 30, 2012

    0.27      0.27      0.27      0.27      0.27

Dividends Accrued to APS Shareholders

  $ 54,288       $ 54,234       $ 62,425       $ 32,805       $ 32,152   

Average APS Dividend Rates

    0.24      0.24      0.24      0.24      0.24

Dividend Rate Ranges (%)

    0.11 - 0.40         0.11 - 0.40         0.11 - 0.40         0.11 - 0.40         0.11 - 0.38   

 

  55  


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Funds

September 30, 2012

 

Notes to Financial Statements — continued

 

 

 

     New Jersey
Fund
     New York
Fund II
     Ohio
Fund
     Pennsylvania
Fund
 

APS Dividend Rates at September 30, 2012

    0.27      0.27      0.27      0.27

Dividends Accrued to APS Shareholders

  $ 48,133       $ 32,137       $ 41,252       $ 52,771   

Average APS Dividend Rates

    0.25      0.24      0.24      0.24

Dividend Rate Ranges (%)

    0.11 - 0.38         0.11 - 0.38         0.11 - 0.40         0.11 - 0.40   

Beginning February 13, 2008 and consistent with the patterns in the broader market for auction-rate securities, the Funds’ APS auctions were unsuccessful in clearing due to an imbalance of sell orders over bids to buy the APS. As a result, the dividend rates of the APS were reset to the maximum applicable rates. The table above reflects such maximum dividend rates for each series as of September 30, 2012.

The Funds distinguish between distributions on a tax basis and a financial reporting basis. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that only distributions in excess of tax basis earnings and profits be reported in the financial statements as a return of capital. Permanent differences between book and tax accounting relating to distributions are reclassified to paid-in capital. For tax purposes, distributions from short-term capital gains are considered to be from ordinary income.

The tax character of distributions declared for the years ended September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011 was as follows:

 

    Year Ended September 30, 2012  
     Municipal
Fund II
     California
Fund II
     Massachusetts
Fund
     Michigan
Fund
 

Distributions declared from:

  

        

Tax-exempt income

  $ 8,837,775       $ 3,139,020       $ 1,516,786       $ 1,377,492   

Ordinary income

  $ 10,796       $ 4,392       $       $   

 

    Year Ended September 30, 2012  
     New Jersey
Fund
     New York
Fund II
     Ohio
Fund
     Pennsylvania
Fund
 

Distributions declared from:

  

        

Tax-exempt income

  $ 2,158,297       $ 2,042,548       $ 1,996,065       $ 2,634,314   

Ordinary income

  $       $ 747       $ 592       $   

 

    Year Ended September 30, 2011  
     Municipal
Fund II
     California
Fund II
     Massachusetts
Fund
     Michigan
Fund
 

Distributions declared from:

  

        

Tax-exempt income

  $ 9,690,853       $ 3,412,033       $ 1,528,173       $ 1,387,537   

Ordinary income

  $ 1,159       $ 14,923       $       $   

 

    Year Ended September 30, 2011  
     New Jersey
Fund
     New York
Fund II
     Ohio
Fund
     Pennsylvania
Fund
 

Distributions declared from:

  

        

Tax-exempt income

  $ 2,431,398       $ 2,260,691       $ 2,009,397       $ 2,598,732   

Ordinary income

  $ 17,275       $ 10,998       $ 1,336       $ 39,044   

 

  56  


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Funds

September 30, 2012

 

Notes to Financial Statements — continued

 

 

During the year ended September 30, 2012, the following amounts were reclassified due to differences between book and tax accounting, primarily for accretion of market discount.

 

     Municipal
Fund II
     California
Fund II
     Massachusetts
Fund
     Michigan
Fund
 

Change in:

          

Accumulated net realized loss

  $ 6,090       $ 9,562       $ 6,910       $ 10,748   

Accumulated undistributed (distributions in excess of) net investment income

  $ (6,090    $ (9,562    $ (6,910    $ (10,748

 

     New Jersey
Fund
     New York
Fund II
     Ohio
Fund
     Pennsylvania
Fund
 

Change in:

          

Accumulated net realized loss

  $ 12,041       $ 14,479       $ 46,196       $ 21,252   

Accumulated undistributed net investment income

  $ (12,041    $ (14,479    $ (46,196    $ (21,252

These reclassifications had no effect on the net assets or net asset value per share of the Funds.

As of September 30, 2012, the components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on a tax basis were as follows:

 

     Municipal
Fund II
     California
Fund II
     Massachusetts
Fund
     Michigan
Fund
 

Undistributed tax-exempt income

  $ 358,161       $ 110,714       $ 76,326       $ 62,799   

Capital loss carryforward and deferred capital losses

  $ (22,787,280    $ (11,278,662    $ (2,994,037    $ (2,055,451

Net unrealized appreciation

  $ 14,339,376       $ 8,195,758       $ 5,990,770       $ 3,293,620   

Other temporary differences

  $ (2,175    $ (770    $ (305    $ (499

 

     New Jersey
Fund
     New York
Fund II
     Ohio
Fund
     Pennsylvania
Fund
 

Undistributed tax-exempt income

  $ 92,337       $ 49,029       $ 103,221       $ 205,398   

Capital loss carryforward and deferred capital losses

  $ (5,941,701    $ (5,862,005    $ (7,158,304    $ (4,946,872

Net unrealized appreciation

  $ 7,057,630       $ 5,112,375       $ 6,137,368       $ 5,592,328   

Other temporary differences

  $ (880    $ (497    $ (1,145    $ (490

The differences between components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) on a tax basis and the amounts reflected in the Statements of Assets and Liabilities are primarily due to wash sales, the timing of recognizing distributions to shareholders, futures contracts, accretion of market discount, expenditures on defaulted bonds and residual interest bonds.

4  Investment Adviser Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates

The investment adviser fee is earned by Eaton Vance Management (EVM) as compensation for investment advisory services rendered to each Fund. The fee is computed at an annual rate of 0.55% of each Fund’s average weekly gross assets and is payable monthly. Average weekly gross assets include the principal amount of any indebtedness for money borrowed, including debt securities issued by a Fund, and the amount of any outstanding APS issued by the Fund. Pursuant to a fee reduction agreement with EVM, average weekly gross assets are calculated by adding to net assets the liquidation value of a Fund’s APS then outstanding and the amount payable by the Fund to floating rate note holders, such adjustment being limited to the value of the APS

 

  57  


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Funds

September 30, 2012

 

Notes to Financial Statements — continued

 

 

outstanding prior to any APS redemptions by the Fund. EVM also serves as the administrator of each Fund, but receives no compensation. For the year ended September 30, 2012, the investment adviser fees were as follows:

 

     Municipal
Fund II
     California
Fund II
     Massachusetts
Fund
     Michigan
Fund
 

Investment Adviser Fee

  $ 1,177,000       $ 454,721       $ 231,560       $ 194,754   

 

     New Jersey
Fund
     New York
Fund II
     Ohio
Fund
     Pennsylvania
Fund
 

Investment Adviser Fee

  $ 323,389       $ 310,900       $ 276,591       $ 355,709   

Officers and Trustees of the Funds who are members of EVM’s organization receive remuneration for their services to the Funds out of the investment adviser fee. Trustees of the Funds who are not affiliated with the investment adviser may elect to defer receipt of all or a percentage of their annual fees in accordance with the terms of the Trustees Deferred Compensation Plan. For the year ended September 30, 2012, no significant amounts have been deferred. Certain officers and Trustees of the Funds are officers of EVM.

5  Purchases and Sales of Investments

Purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term obligations, for the year ended September 30, 2012 were as follows:

 

     Municipal
Fund II
     California
Fund II
     Massachusetts
Fund
     Michigan
Fund
 

Purchases

  $ 34,339,474       $ 12,216,245       $ 898,229       $ 6,642,469   

Sales

  $ 45,573,815       $ 12,348,238       $ 692,906       $ 6,721,003   

 

     New Jersey
Fund
     New York
Fund II
     Ohio
Fund
     Pennsylvania
Fund
 

Purchases

  $ 11,830,394       $ 10,423,471       $ 5,891,845       $ 6,683,193   

Sales

  $ 9,473,583       $ 13,245,990       $ 6,311,274       $ 7,469,361   

6  Common Shares of Beneficial Interest

Common shares issued pursuant to the Funds’ dividend reinvestment plan for the years ended September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011 were as follows:

 

     Municipal
Fund II
     California
Fund II
     Massachusetts
Fund
     Michigan
Fund
 

Year Ended September 30, 2012

    17,109         2,340         2,043         1,181   

Year Ended September 30, 2011

    19,997         6,283         3,205         372   

 

     New Jersey
Fund
     New York
Fund II
     Ohio
Fund
     Pennsylvania
Fund
 

Year Ended September 30, 2012

    11,044         2,145         4,058         2,539   

Year Ended September 30, 2011

    11,653         2,773         4,815         4,284   

 

  58  


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Funds

September 30, 2012

 

Notes to Financial Statements — continued

 

 

7  Federal Income Tax Basis of Investments

The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments of each Fund at September 30, 2012, as determined on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:

 

     Municipal
Fund II
     California
Fund II
     Massachusetts
Fund
     Michigan
Fund
 

Aggregate cost

  $ 161,332,613       $ 68,734,882       $ 35,021,969       $ 31,977,564   

Gross unrealized appreciation

  $ 23,264,575       $ 9,217,963       $ 6,147,425       $ 3,514,045   

Gross unrealized depreciation

    (8,925,199      (1,022,205      (156,655      (220,425

Net unrealized appreciation

  $ 14,339,376       $ 8,195,758       $ 5,990,770       $ 3,293,620   

 

     New Jersey
Fund
     New York
Fund II
     Ohio
Fund
     Pennsylvania
Fund
 

Aggregate cost

  $ 49,726,672       $ 43,188,609       $ 45,152,610       $ 58,204,077   

Gross unrealized appreciation

  $ 7,369,639       $ 5,526,073       $ 6,738,763       $ 6,533,314   

Gross unrealized depreciation

    (312,009      (413,698      (601,395      (940,986

Net unrealized appreciation

  $ 7,057,630       $ 5,112,375       $ 6,137,368       $ 5,592,328   

8  Overdraft Advances

Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT may, in its discretion, advance funds to the Funds to make properly authorized payments. When such payments result in an overdraft, the Funds are obligated to repay SSBT at the current rate of interest charged by SSBT for secured loans (currently, the Federal Funds rate plus 2%). This obligation is payable on demand to SSBT. SSBT has a lien on a Fund’s assets to the extent of any overdraft. At September 30, 2012, California Fund II, New York Fund II, Ohio Fund and Pennsylvania Fund had payments due to SSBT pursuant to the foregoing arrangement of $81,896, $95,588, $68,950 and $119,053, respectively. Based on the short-term nature of these payments and the variable interest rate, the carrying value of the overdraft advances approximated its fair value at September 30, 2012. If measured at fair value, overdraft advances would have been considered as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy (see Note 10) at September 30, 2012. The Funds’ average overdraft advances during the year ended September 30, 2012 were not significant.

9  Financial Instruments

The Funds may trade in financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of their investing activities. These financial instruments may include financial futures contracts and interest rate swaps and may involve, to a varying degree, elements of risk in excess of the amounts recognized for financial statement purposes. The notional or contractual amounts of these instruments represent the investment a Fund has in particular classes of financial instruments and do not necessarily represent the amounts potentially subject to risk. The measurement of the risks associated with these instruments is meaningful only when all related and offsetting transactions are considered.

 

  59  


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Funds

September 30, 2012

 

Notes to Financial Statements — continued

 

 

A summary of obligations under these financial instruments at September 30, 2012 is as follows:

 

Futures Contracts  
Fund   Expiration
Month/Year
     Contracts    Position    Aggregate
Cost
     Value      Net Unrealized
Appreciation
(Depreciation)
 
Municipal II     12/12       58
U.S. 30-Year Treasury Bond
   Short    $ (8,656,464    $ (8,663,750    $ (7,286
California II     12/12       25
U.S. 10-Year Treasury Note
   Short    $ (3,318,118    $ (3,337,109    $ (18,991
      12/12       28
U.S. 30-Year Treasury Bond
   Short      (4,192,730      (4,182,500      10,230   
Massachusetts     12/12       14
U.S. 30-Year Treasury Bond
   Short    $ (2,096,365    $ (2,091,250    $ 5,115   
Michigan     12/12       3
U.S. 30-Year Treasury Bond
   Short    $ (443,526    $ (448,125    $ (4,599
New Jersey     12/12       75
U.S. 30-Year Treasury Bond
   Short    $ (11,230,527    $ (11,203,125    $ 27,402   
New York II     12/12       22
U.S. 30-Year Treasury Bond
   Short    $ (3,294,288    $ (3,286,250    $ 8,038   
Ohio     12/12       16
U.S. 30-Year Treasury Bond
   Short    $ (2,395,846    $ (2,390,000    $ 5,846   
Pennsylvania     12/12       60
U.S. 30-Year Treasury Bond
   Short    $ (8,984,421    $ (8,962,500    $ 21,921   

At September 30, 2012, the Funds had sufficient cash and/or securities to cover commitments under these contracts.

Each Fund is subject to interest rate risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objective. Because the Funds hold fixed-rate bonds, the value of these bonds may decrease if interest rates rise. To hedge against this risk, the Funds entered into interest rate swap contracts. The Funds also purchase and sell U.S. Treasury futures contracts to hedge against changes in interest rates.

The fair values of open derivative instruments (not considered to be hedging instruments for accounting disclosure purposes) and whose primary underlying risk exposure is interest rate risk at September 30, 2012 were as follows:

 

     Municipal
Fund II
     California
Fund II
     Massachusetts
Fund
     Michigan
Fund
 

Asset Derivative:

          

Futures Contracts

  $       $ 10,230 (1)     $ 5,115 (1)     $   

Total

  $       $ 10,230       $ 5,115       $   

Liability Derivative:

          

Futures Contracts

  $ (7,286 )(1)     $ (18,991 )(1)     $       $ (4,599 )(1) 

Total

  $ (7,286    $ (18,991    $       $ (4,599

 

  60  


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Funds

September 30, 2012

 

Notes to Financial Statements — continued

 

 

 

     New Jersey
Fund
     New York
Fund II
     Ohio
Fund
     Pennsylvania
Fund
 

Asset Derivative:

          

Futures Contracts

  $ 27,402 (1)     $ 8,038 (1)     $ 5,846 (1)     $ 21,921 (1) 

Total

  $ 27,402       $ 8,038       $ 5,846       $ 21,921   

 

(1) 

Amount represents cumulative unrealized appreciation or (depreciation) on futures contracts in the Futures Contracts table above. Only the current day’s variation margin on open futures contracts is reported within the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as Receivable or Payable for variation margin, as applicable.

The effect of derivative instruments (not considered to be hedging instruments for accounting disclosure purposes) on the Statement of Operations and whose primary underlying risk exposure is interest rate risk for the year ended September 30, 2012 was as follows:

 

     Municipal
Fund II
     California
Fund II
     Massachusetts
Fund
     Michigan
Fund
 

Realized Gain (Loss) on Derivatives Recognized in Income

  $ (1,226,231 )(1)     $ (658,242 )(1)     $ (192,881 )(1)     $ (108,042 )(1) 

Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) on Derivatives Recognized in Income

  $ 689,961 (2)     $ 427,204 (2)     $ 132,297 (2)     $ 74,723 (2) 

 

     New Jersey
Fund
     New York
Fund II
     Ohio
Fund
     Pennsylvania
Fund
 

Realized Gain (Loss) on Derivatives Recognized in Income

  $ (1,185,082 )(1)     $ (324,027 )(1)     $ (349,226 )(1)     $ (397,193 )(1) 

Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) on Derivatives Recognized in Income

  $ 687,459 (2)     $ 284,388 (2)     $ 174,408 (2)     $ 79,323 (2) 

 

(1)

Statement of Operations location: Net realized gain (loss) – Financial futures contracts and Swap contracts.

 

(2) 

Statement of Operations location: Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) – Financial futures contracts and Swap contracts.

The average notional amounts of futures contracts and interest rate swaps outstanding during the year ended September 30, 2012, which are indicative of the volume of these derivative types, were approximately as follows:

 

     Municipal
Fund II
     California
Fund II
     Massachusetts
Fund
     Michigan
Fund
 

Average Notional Amount:

          

Futures Contracts

  $ 9,046,000       $ 5,300,000       $ 1,654,000       $ 569,000   

Interest Rate Swaps

  $ 231,000       $ 139,000       $ 66,000       $ 52,000   

 

     New Jersey
Fund
     New York
Fund II
     Ohio
Fund
     Pennsylvania
Fund
 

Average Notional Amount:

          

Futures Contracts

  $ 7,500,000       $ 2,615,000       $ 2,438,000       $ 4,385,000   

Interest Rate Swaps

  $ 96,000       $ 154,000       $ 58,000       $ 77,000   

 

  61  


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Funds

September 30, 2012

 

Notes to Financial Statements — continued

 

 

10   Fair Value Measurements

Under generally accepted accounting principles for fair value measurements, a three-tier hierarchy to prioritize the assumptions, referred to as inputs, is used in valuation techniques to measure fair value. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.

 

Ÿ  

Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical investments

 

Ÿ  

Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)

 

Ÿ  

Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)

In cases where the inputs used to measure fair value fall in different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level disclosed is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.

At September 30, 2012, the hierarchy of inputs used in valuing the Funds’ investments and open derivative instruments, which are carried at value, were as follows:

 

Municipal Fund II

 
Asset Description   Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Total  

Tax-Exempt Investments

  $       $ 218,576,989       $         —       $ 218,576,989   

Total Investments

  $       $ 218,576,989       $       $ 218,576,989   

Liability Description

                                  

Futures Contracts

  $ (7,286    $       $       $ (7,286

Total

  $ (7,286    $       $       $ (7,286
          

California Fund II

 
Asset Description   Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Total  

Tax-Exempt Investments

  $       $ 86,815,640       $       $ 86,815,640   

Total Investments

  $       $ 86,815,640       $       $ 86,815,640   

Futures Contracts

  $ 10,230       $       $       $ 10,230   

Total

  $ 10,230       $ 86,815,640       $       $ 86,825,870   

Liability Description

                                  

Futures Contracts

  $ (18,991    $       $       $ (18,991

Total

  $ (18,991    $       $       $ (18,991
          

Massachusetts Fund

 
Asset Description   Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Total  

Tax-Exempt Investments

  $       $ 44,342,739       $         —       $ 44,342,739   

Total Investments

  $       $ 44,342,739       $       $ 44,342,739   

Futures Contracts

  $ 5,115       $       $       $ 5,115   

Total

  $ 5,115       $ 44,342,739       $       $ 44,347,854   
          

 

  62  


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Funds

September 30, 2012

 

Notes to Financial Statements — continued

 

 

Michigan Fund

 
Asset Description   Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Total  

Tax-Exempt Investments

  $       $ 35,271,184       $         —       $ 35,271,184   

Total Investments

  $       $ 35,271,184       $       $ 35,271,184   

Liability Description

                                  

Futures Contracts

  $ (4,599    $       $       $ (4,599

Total

  $ (4,599    $       $       $ (4,599
          

New Jersey Fund

 
Asset Description   Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Total  

Tax-Exempt Investments

  $       $ 61,574,302       $         —       $ 61,574,302   

Total Investments

  $       $ 61,574,302       $       $ 61,574,302   

Futures Contracts

  $ 27,402       $       $       $ 27,402   

Total

  $ 27,402       $ 61,574,302       $       $ 61,601,704   
          

New York Fund II

 
Asset Description   Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Total  

Tax-Exempt Investments

  $       $ 57,175,984       $         —       $ 57,175,984   

Total Investments

  $       $ 57,175,984       $       $ 57,175,984   

Futures Contracts

  $ 8,038       $       $       $ 8,038   

Total

  $ 8,038       $ 57,175,984       $       $ 57,184,022   
          

Ohio Fund

 
Asset Description   Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Total  

Tax-Exempt Investments

  $       $ 51,539,978       $         —       $ 51,539,978   

Total Investments

  $       $ 51,539,978       $       $ 51,539,978   

Futures Contracts

  $ 5,846       $       $       $ 5,846   

Total

  $ 5,846       $ 51,539,978       $       $ 51,545,824   
          

Pennsylvania Fund

 
Asset Description   Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Total  

Tax-Exempt Investments

  $       $ 65,836,405       $         —       $ 65,836,405   

Total Investments

  $       $ 65,836,405       $       $ 65,836,405   

Futures Contracts

  $ 21,921       $       $       $ 21,921   

Total

  $ 21,921       $ 65,836,405       $       $ 65,858,326   

The Funds held no investments or other financial instruments as of September 30, 2011 whose fair value was determined using Level 3 inputs. At September 30, 2012, there were no investments transferred between Level 1 and Level 2 during the year then ended.

 

  63  


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Funds

September 30, 2012

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

 

To the Trustees and Shareholders of Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund II, Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund II, Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund, Eaton Vance Michigan Municipal Bond Fund, Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund, Eaton Vance New York Municipal Bond Fund II, Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Bond Fund, and Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund:

We have audited the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities of Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund II, Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund II, Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund, Eaton Vance Michigan Municipal Bond Fund, Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund, Eaton Vance New York Municipal Bond Fund II, Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Bond Fund, and Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund (collectively, the “Funds”), including the portfolios of investments, as of September 30, 2012, and the related statements of operations for the year then ended, the statements of cash flows of Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund II, Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund II, and Eaton Vance New York Municipal Bond Fund II for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Funds’ management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Funds are not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of their internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Funds’ internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of September 30, 2012, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers; where replies were not received from brokers, we performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial positions of Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund II, Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund II, Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund, Eaton Vance Michigan Municipal Bond Fund, Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund, Eaton Vance New York Municipal Bond Fund II, Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Bond Fund, and Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund as of September 30, 2012, the results of their operations for the year then ended, the cash flows of Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund II, Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund II, and Eaton Vance New York Municipal Bond Fund II for the year then ended, the changes in their net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Boston, Massachusetts

November 16, 2012

 

  64  


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Funds

September 30, 2012

 

Federal Tax Information (Unaudited)

 

 

The Form 1099-DIV you receive in January 2013 will show the tax status of all distributions paid to your account in calendar year 2012. Shareholders are advised to consult their own tax adviser with respect to the tax consequences of their investment in the Funds. As required by the Internal Revenue Code and/or regulations, shareholders must be notified regarding exempt-interest dividends.

Exempt-Interest Dividends.  The Funds designate the following percentages of dividends from net investment income as exempt-interest dividends:

 

Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund II

    99.88

Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund II

    99.86

Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund

    100.00

Eaton Vance Michigan Municipal Bond Fund

    100.00

Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund

    100.00

Eaton Vance New York Municipal Bond Fund II

    99.96

Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Bond Fund

    99.97

Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund

    100.00

 

  65  


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Funds

September 30, 2012

 

Notice to Shareholders (Unaudited)

 

 

At the August 8, 2011 Board Meeting, the Trustees approved the following defensive investing policy: “During unusual market conditions, the Funds may invest up to 100% of assets in cash or cash equivalents temporarily, which may be inconsistent with a Fund’s investment objective(s) and other policies.”

 

  66  


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Funds

September 30, 2012

 

Annual Meeting of Shareholders (Unaudited)

 

 

The Funds held their Annual Meeting of Shareholders on July 20, 2012. The following action was taken by the shareholders:

Item 1:  The election of William H. Park, Lynn A. Stout and Ralph F. Verni as Class I Trustees of each Fund for a three-year term expiring in 2015, Scott E. Eston as a Class II Trustee of each Fund for a one-year term expiring in 2013 and Harriett Tee Taggart as a Class III Trustee of each Fund for a two-year term expiring in 2014. Mr. Verni was elected solely by APS shareholders.

 

Fund  

Nominee for

Class I Trustee

Elected by All
Shareholders:

William H. Park

    

Nominee for

Class I Trustee

Elected by All
Shareholders:

Lynn A. Stout

    

Nominee for

Class I Trustee
Elected by APS
Shareholders:

Ralph F. Verni

    

Nominee for

Class II Trustee

Elected by All

Shareholders:

Scott E. Eston

    

Nominee for

Class III Trustee

Elected by All

Shareholders:

Harriett Tee Taggart

 

Municipal Fund II

             

For

    9,207,685         9,167,292         1,170         9,193,491         9,191,959   

Withheld

    343,201         383,594         49         357,395         358,927   

California Fund II

             

For

    3,452,421         3,432,375         624         3,452,421         3,452,421   

Withheld

    240,212         260,258         51         240,212         240,212   

Massachusetts Fund

             

For

    1,671,433         1,671,433         452         1,671,433         1,669,940   

Withheld

    23,929         23,929         32         23,929         25,422   

Michigan Fund

             

For

    1,452,043         1,444,060         413         1,451,182         1,450,751   

Withheld

    12,778         20,761         1         13,639         14,070   

New Jersey Fund

             

For

    2,467,970         2,463,762         548         2,467,970         2,467,970   

Withheld

    82,783         86,991         13         82,783         82,783   

New York Fund II

             

For

    2,322,749         2,354,398         292         2,322,749         2,355,064   

Withheld

    119,297         87,648         25         119,297         86,982   

Ohio Fund

             

For

    2,397,294         2,392,866         492         2,398,387         2,324,022   

Withheld

    35,335         39,763         17         34,242         108,607   

Pennsylvania Fund

             

For

    2,771,442         2,766,658         657         2,775,101         2,769,173   

Withheld

    74,287         79,071         4         70,628         76,556   

 

  67  


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Funds

September 30, 2012

 

Dividend Reinvestment Plan

 

 

Each Fund offers a dividend reinvestment plan (Plan) pursuant to which shareholders may elect to have distributions automatically reinvested in common shares (Shares) of the Fund. You may elect to participate in the Plan by completing the Dividend Reinvestment Plan Application Form. If you do not participate, you will receive all distributions in cash paid by check mailed directly to you by American Stock Transfer & Trust Company (AST) as dividend paying agent. On the distribution payment date, if the NAV per Share is equal to or less than the market price per Share plus estimated brokerage commissions, then new Shares will be issued. The number of Shares shall be determined by the greater of the NAV per Share or 95% of the market price. Otherwise, Shares generally will be purchased on the open market by AST, the Plan agent (Agent). Distributions subject to income tax (if any) are taxable whether or not Shares are reinvested.

If your Shares are in the name of a brokerage firm, bank, or other nominee, you can ask the firm or nominee to participate in the Plan on your behalf. If the nominee does not offer the Plan, you will need to request that the Fund’s transfer agent re-register your Shares in your name or you will not be able to participate.

The Agent’s service fee for handling distributions will be paid by the Fund. Plan participants will be charged their pro rata share of brokerage commissions on all open-market purchases.

Plan participants may withdraw from the Plan at any time by writing to the Agent at the address noted on the following page. If you withdraw, you will receive Shares in your name for all Shares credited to your account under the Plan. If a participant elects by written notice to the Agent to sell part or all of his or her Shares and remit the proceeds, the Agent is authorized to deduct a $5.00 fee plus brokerage commissions from the proceeds.

If you wish to participate in the Plan and your Shares are held in your own name, you may complete the form on the following page and deliver it to the Agent. Any inquiries regarding the Plan can be directed to the Agent at 1-866-439-6787.

 

  68  


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Funds

September 30, 2012

 

Application for Participation in Dividend Reinvestment Plan

 

 

 

This form is for shareholders who hold their common shares in their own names. If your common shares are held in the name of a brokerage firm, bank, or other nominee, you should contact your nominee to see if it will participate in the Plan on your behalf. If you wish to participate in the Plan, but your brokerage firm, bank, or nominee is unable to participate on your behalf, you should request that your common shares be re-registered in your own name which will enable your participation in the Plan.

The following authorization and appointment is given with the understanding that I may terminate it at any time by terminating my participation in the Plan as provided in the terms and conditions of the Plan.

 

 

Please print exact name on account

 

Shareholder signature                                                           Date

 

Shareholder signature                                                           Date

Please sign exactly as your common shares are registered. All persons whose names appear on the share certificate must sign.

YOU SHOULD NOT RETURN THIS FORM IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE YOUR DISTRIBUTIONS IN CASH. THIS IS NOT A PROXY.

This authorization form, when signed, should be mailed to the following address:

Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds

c/o American Stock Transfer & Trust Company

P.O. Box 922

Wall Street Station

New York, NY 10269-0560

 

 

Number of Employees

Each Fund is organized as a Massachusetts business trust and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as a closed-end management investment company, and has no employees.

Number of Shareholders

As of September 30, 2012, Fund records indicate that there are 67, 25, 18, 25, 22, 37, 48 and 101 registered shareholders for Municipal Fund II, California Fund II, Massachusetts Fund, Michigan Fund, New Jersey Fund, New York Fund II, Ohio Fund and Pennsylvania Fund, respectively, and approximately 4,301, 1,271, 797, 823, 1,124, 1,061, 1,317 and 1,529 shareholders owning the Fund shares in street name, such as through brokers, banks and financial intermediaries for Municipal Fund II, California Fund II, Massachusetts Fund, Michigan Fund, New Jersey Fund, New York Fund II, Ohio Fund and Pennsylvania Fund, respectively.

If you are a street name shareholder and wish to receive Fund reports directly, which contain important information about a Fund, please write or call:

Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.

Two International Place

Boston, MA 02110

1-800-262-1122

NYSE MKT symbols

 

Municipal Bond Fund II    EIV
California Municipal Bond Fund II    EIA
Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund    MAB
Michigan Municipal Bond Fund    MIW
New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund    EMJ
New York Municipal Bond Fund II    NYH
Ohio Municipal Bond Fund    EIO
Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund    EIP
 

 

  69  


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Funds

September 30, 2012

 

Board of Trustees’ Contract Approval

 

 

Overview of the Contract Review Process

The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), provides, in substance, that each investment advisory agreement between a fund and its investment adviser will continue in effect from year to year only if its continuation is approved at least annually by the fund’s board of trustees, including by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not “interested persons” of the fund (“Independent Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of considering such approval.

At a meeting of the Boards of Trustees (each a “Board”) of the Eaton Vance group of mutual funds (the “Eaton Vance Funds”) held on April 23, 2012, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of existing advisory and sub-advisory agreements for the Eaton Vance Funds for an additional one-year period. In voting its approval, the Board relied upon the affirmative recommendation of the Contract Review Committee of the Board, which is a committee comprised exclusively of Independent Trustees. Prior to making its recommendation, the Contract Review Committee reviewed information furnished by each adviser to the Eaton Vance Funds (including information specifically requested by the Board) for a series of meetings of the Contract Review Committee held between February and April 2012, as well as information considered during prior meetings of the committee. Such information included, among other things, the following:

Information about Fees, Performance and Expenses

 

Ÿ  

An independent report comparing the advisory and related fees paid by each fund with fees paid by comparable funds;

 

Ÿ  

An independent report comparing each fund’s total expense ratio and its components to comparable funds;

 

Ÿ  

An independent report comparing the investment performance of each fund (including, where relevant, yield data, Sharpe ratios and information ratios) to the investment performance of comparable funds over various time periods;

 

Ÿ  

Data regarding investment performance in comparison to benchmark indices and customized peer groups, in each case as approved by the Board with respect to the funds;

 

Ÿ  

For each fund, comparative information concerning the fees charged and the services provided by each adviser in managing other accounts (including mutual funds, other collective investment funds and institutional accounts) using investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing such fund;

 

Ÿ  

Profitability analyses for each adviser with respect to each fund;

Information about Portfolio Management and Trading

 

Ÿ  

Descriptions of the investment management services provided to each fund, including the investment strategies and processes employed, and any changes in portfolio management processes and personnel;

 

Ÿ  

Information about the allocation of brokerage and the benefits received by each adviser as a result of brokerage allocation, including information concerning the acquisition of research through client commission arrangements and the fund’s policies with respect to “soft dollar” arrangements;

 

Ÿ  

Data relating to portfolio turnover rates of each fund;

 

Ÿ  

The procedures and processes used to determine the fair value of fund assets and actions taken to monitor and test the effectiveness of such procedures and processes;

 

Ÿ  

Information about each adviser’s processes for monitoring best execution of portfolio transactions, and other policies and practices of each adviser with respect to trading;

Information about each Adviser

 

Ÿ  

Reports detailing the financial results and condition of each adviser;

 

 

Ÿ  

Descriptions of the qualifications, education and experience of the individual investment professionals whose responsibilities include portfolio management and investment research for the funds, and information relating to their compensation and responsibilities with respect to managing other mutual funds and investment accounts;

 

Ÿ  

Copies of the Codes of Ethics of each adviser and its affiliates, together with information relating to compliance with and the administration of such codes;

 

Ÿ  

Copies of or descriptions of each adviser’s policies and procedures relating to proxy voting, the handling of corporate actions and class actions;

 

Ÿ  

Information concerning the resources devoted to compliance efforts undertaken by each adviser and its affiliates on behalf of the funds (including descriptions of various compliance programs) and their record of compliance with investment policies and restrictions, including policies with respect to market-timing, late trading and selective portfolio disclosure, and with policies on personal securities transactions;

 

Ÿ  

Descriptions of the business continuity and disaster recovery plans of each adviser and its affiliates;

 

Ÿ  

A description of Eaton Vance Management’s procedures for overseeing third party advisers and sub-advisers, including with respect to regulatory and compliance issues, investment management and other matters;

 

  70  


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Funds

September 30, 2012

 

Board of Trustees’ Contract Approval — continued

 

 

Other Relevant Information

 

Ÿ  

Information concerning the nature, cost and character of the administrative and other non-investment management services provided by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates;

 

Ÿ  

Information concerning management of the relationship with the custodian, subcustodians and fund accountants by each adviser or the funds’ administrator; and

 

Ÿ  

The terms of each advisory agreement.

In addition to the information identified above, the Contract Review Committee considered information provided from time to time by each adviser throughout the year at meetings of the Board and its committees. Over the course of the twelve-month period ended April 30, 2012, with respect to one or more funds, the Board met ten times and the Contract Review Committee, the Audit Committee, the Governance Committee, the Portfolio Management Committee and the Compliance Reports and Regulatory Matters Committee, each of which is a Committee comprised solely of Independent Trustees, met ten, nineteen, seven, eight and fourteen times respectively. At such meetings, the Trustees participated in investment and performance reviews with the portfolio managers and other investment professionals of each adviser relating to each fund. The Board and its Committees considered the investment and trading strategies used in pursuing each fund’s investment objective, including, where relevant, the use of derivative instruments, as well as risk management techniques. The Board and its Committees also evaluated issues pertaining to industry and regulatory developments, compliance procedures, fund governance and other issues with respect to the funds, and received and participated in reports and presentations provided by Eaton Vance Management and other fund advisers with respect to such matters.

For funds that invest through one or more underlying portfolios, the Board considered similar information about the portfolio(s) when considering the approval of advisory agreements. In addition, in cases where the fund’s investment adviser has engaged a sub-adviser, the Board considered similar information about the sub-adviser when considering the approval of any sub-advisory agreement.

The Contract Review Committee was assisted throughout the contract review process by Goodwin Procter LLP, legal counsel for the Independent Trustees. The members of the Contract Review Committee relied upon the advice of such counsel and their own business judgment in determining the material factors to be considered in evaluating each advisory and sub-advisory agreement and the weight to be given to each such factor. The conclusions reached with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement were based on a comprehensive evaluation of all the information provided and not any single factor. Moreover, each member of the Contract Review Committee may have placed varying emphasis on particular factors in reaching conclusions with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement.

Results of the Process

Based on its consideration of the foregoing, and such other information as it deemed relevant, including the factors and conclusions described below, the Contract Review Committee concluded that the continuation of the investment advisory agreements of the following funds:

 

Ÿ  

Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund II

 

Ÿ  

Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund II

 

Ÿ  

Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund

 

Ÿ  

Eaton Vance Michigan Municipal Bond Fund

 

Ÿ  

Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund

 

Ÿ  

Eaton Vance New York Municipal Bond Fund II

 

Ÿ  

Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Bond Fund

 

Ÿ  

Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund

(the “Funds”), each with Eaton Vance Management (the “Adviser”), including their fee structures, is in the interests of shareholders and, therefore, the Contract Review Committee recommended to the Board approval of each agreement. The Board accepted the recommendation of the Contract Review Committee as well as the factors considered and conclusions reached by the Contract Review Committee with respect to each agreement. Accordingly, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of the investment advisory agreement for each Fund.

Nature, Extent and Quality of Services

In considering whether to approve the investment advisory agreements of the Funds, the Board evaluated the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Adviser.

The Board considered the Adviser’s management capabilities and investment process with respect to the types of investments held by each Fund, including the education, experience and number of its investment professionals and other personnel who provide portfolio management, investment research, and similar services to the Funds. In particular, the Board considered, where relevant, the abilities and experience of such investment personnel in analyzing factors such as credit risk, tax efficiency, and special considerations relevant to investing in municipal bonds. The Board considered the Adviser’s large municipal bond team, which includes portfolio managers and credit specialists who provide services to the Funds. The Board also took into account the resources dedicated to portfolio management and other services, including the compensation methods of the Adviser to recruit and retain investment personnel, and the time and attention devoted to each Fund by senior management.

 

  71  


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Funds

September 30, 2012

 

Board of Trustees’ Contract Approval — continued

 

 

The Board reviewed the compliance programs of the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof. Among other matters, the Board considered compliance and reporting matters relating to personal trading by investment personnel, selective disclosure of portfolio holdings, late trading, frequent trading, portfolio valuation, business continuity and the allocation of investment opportunities. The Board also evaluated the responses of the Adviser and its affiliates to requests in recent years from regulatory authorities such as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.

The Board considered shareholder and other administrative services provided or managed by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates, including transfer agency and accounting services. The Board evaluated the benefits to shareholders of investing in a fund that is a part of a large family of funds.

After consideration of the foregoing factors, among others, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Adviser, taken as a whole, are appropriate and consistent with the terms of the investment advisory agreements.

Fund Performance

The Board compared each Fund’s investment performance to a relevant universe of similarly managed funds identified by an independent data provider and appropriate benchmark indices and, where relevant, a peer group of similarly managed funds, and assessed each Fund’s performance on the basis of total return and current income return. The Board’s review included comparative performance data for the one-, three-, five- and ten-year periods ended September 30, 2011 for each Fund. The Board considered the impact of extraordinary market conditions in recent years on each Fund’s performance relative to its peer universe in light of, among other things, the Adviser’s efforts to generate competitive levels of tax exempt current income over time through investments in higher quality municipal bonds with longer maturities. The Board noted that the Adviser had taken action to restructure each Fund’s portfolio as part of a long-term strategy for managing interest rate risk, consistent with each Fund’s objective of providing current income, and that performance had improved relative to peer funds over recent periods. The Board concluded that each Fund’s performance had been satisfactory on the basis of current income return, and that it was appropriate to continue to monitor the effectiveness of the actions taken by the Adviser to improve Fund performance on the basis of total return, which it noted had improved for periods ended as of December 31, 2011.

Management Fees and Expenses

The Board reviewed contractual investment advisory fee rates payable by each Fund (referred to as “management fees”). As part of its review, the Board considered the management fees and each Fund’s total expense ratio for the year ended September 30, 2011, as compared to a group of similarly managed funds selected by an independent data provider. The Board also considered factors that had an impact on Fund expense ratios, as identified by management in response to inquiries from the Contract Review Committee, as well as actions taken by management in recent years to reduce expenses at the Eaton Vance fund complex level, including the negotiation of reduced fees for transfer agency and custody services.

After reviewing the foregoing information, and in light of the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, the Board concluded that the management fees charged for advisory and related services are reasonable.

Profitability

The Board reviewed the level of profits realized by the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof in providing investment advisory and administrative services to each Fund and to all Eaton Vance Funds as a group. The Board considered the level of profits realized without regard to revenue sharing or other payments by the Adviser and its affiliates to third parties in respect of distribution services. The Board also considered other direct or indirect benefits received by the Adviser and its affiliates in connection with their relationships with the Funds, including the benefits of research services that may be available to the Adviser as a result of securities transactions effected for the Funds and other investment advisory clients.

The Board concluded that, in light of the foregoing factors and the nature, extent and quality of the services rendered, the profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates are reasonable.

Economies of Scale

In reviewing management fees and profitability, the Board also considered the extent to which the Adviser and its affiliates, on the one hand, and each Fund, on the other hand, can expect to realize benefits from economies of scale as the assets of each Fund increase. The Board acknowledged the difficulty in accurately measuring the benefits resulting from the economies of scale with respect to the management of any specific fund or group of funds. The Board reviewed data summarizing the increases and decreases in the assets of each Fund and of all Eaton Vance Funds as a group over various time periods, and evaluated the extent to which the total expense ratio of each Fund and the profitability of the Adviser and its affiliates may have been affected by such increases or decreases. Based upon the foregoing, the Board concluded that each Fund currently shares in the benefits from economies of scale. The Board also considered the fact that the Funds are not continuously offered and concluded that, in light of the level of the Adviser’s profits with respect to each Fund, the implementation of breakpoints in each Fund’s advisory fee schedule is not appropriate at this time.

 

  72  


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Funds

September 30, 2012

 

Management and Organization

 

 

Fund Management.  The Trustees and officers of Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund II (EIV), Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund II (EIA), Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund (MAB), Eaton Vance Michigan Municipal Bond Fund (MIW), Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund (EMJ), Eaton Vance New York Municipal Bond Fund II (NYH), Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Bond Fund (EIO), and Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund (EIP) (the Funds) are responsible for the overall management and supervision of the Funds’ affairs. The Trustees and Officers of the Funds are listed below. Except as indicated, each individual has held the office shown or other offices in the same company for the last five years. The “Noninterested Trustees” consist of those Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Trust, as that term is defined under the 1940 Act. The business address of each Trustee and officer is Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110. As used below, “EVC” refers to Eaton Vance Corp., “EV” refers to Eaton Vance, Inc., “EVM” refers to Eaton Vance Management, “BMR” refers to Boston Management and Research and “EVD” refers to Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. EVC and EV are the corporate parent and trustee, respectively, of EVM and BMR. EVD is a wholly-owned subsidiary of EVC. Each officer affiliated with Eaton Vance may hold a position with other Eaton Vance affiliates that is comparable to his or her position with EVM listed below. Each Trustee oversees 186 portfolios in the Eaton Vance Complex (including all master and feeder funds in a master feeder structure). Each officer serves as an officer of certain other Eaton Vance funds. Each Trustee serves for a three year term. Each officer serves until his or her successor is elected.

 

Name and Year of Birth   

Position(s)

with the
Funds

    

Term of Office;

Length of
Service

    

Principal Occupation(s) and Directorships

During Past Five Years and Other Relevant Experience

Interested Trustee

            

Thomas E. Faust Jr.

1958

  

Class II

Trustee

    

Until 2013.

3 years.

Trustee
since 2007.

    

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVC, Director and President of EV, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVM and BMR, and Director of EVD. Trustee and/or officer of 186 registered investment companies. Mr. Faust is an interested person because of his positions with EVM, BMR, EVD, EVC and EV, which are affiliates of the Funds.

Directorships in the Last Five Years.(1) Director of EVC and Hexavest Inc.

            

Noninterested Trustees

            

Scott E. Eston

1956

  

Class II

Trustee

    

Until 2013.

1 year.

Trustee
since 2011.

    

Private investor. Formerly held various positions at Grantham, Mayo, Van Otterloo and Co., L.L.C. (investment management firm) (1997-2009), including Chief Operating Officer (2002-2009), Chief Financial Officer (1997-2009) and Chairman of the Executive Committee (2002-2008); President and Principal Executive Officer, GMO Trust (open-end registered investment company) (2006-2009). Former Partner, Coopers and Lybrand L.L.P. (now PricewaterhouseCoopers) (public accounting firm) (1987-1997).

Directorships in the Last Five Years. None.

Benjamin C. Esty(A)

1963

   Class II Trustee     

Until 2013.

3 years.

Trustee
since 2005.

    

Roy and Elizabeth Simmons Professor of Business Administration and Finance Unit Head, Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration.

Directorships in the Last Five Years.(1) None.

Allen R. Freedman

1940

   Class II Trustee     

Until 2013.

3 years.

Trustee
since 2007.

    

Private Investor. Former Chairman (2002-2004) and a Director (1983-2004) of Systems & Computer Technology Corp. (provider of software to higher education). Formerly, a Director of Loring Ward International (fund distributor) (2005-2007). Former Chairman and a Director of Indus International, Inc. (provider of enterprise management software to the power generating industry) (2005-2007). Former Chief Executive Officer of Assurant, Inc. (insurance provider) (1979-2000).

Directorships in the Last Five Years.(1) Director of Stonemor Partners, L.P. (owner and operator of cemeteries). Formerly, Director of Assurant, Inc. (insurance provider) (1979-2011).

William H. Park

1947

  

Class I

Trustee

    

Until 2015.

3 years.

Trustee
since 2003.

    

Consultant and private investor. Formerly, Chief Financial Officer, Aveon Group L.P. (investment management firm) (2010-2011). Formerly, Vice Chairman, Commercial Industrial Finance Corp. (specialty finance company) (2006-2010). Formerly, President and Chief Executive Officer, Prizm Capital Management, LLC (investment management firm) (2002-2005). Formerly, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, United Asset Management Corporation (investment management firm) (1982-2001). Formerly, Senior Manager, Price Waterhouse (now PricewaterhouseCoopers) (an independent registered public accounting firm) (1972-1981).

Directorships in the Last Five Years.(1) None.

 

  73  


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Funds

September 30, 2012

 

Management and Organization — continued

 

 

Name and Year of Birth   

Position(s)

with the
Funds

    

Term of Office;

Length of
Service

    

Principal Occupation(s) and Directorships

During Past Five Years and Other Relevant Experience

Noninterested Trustees (continued)

Ronald A. Pearlman

1940

  

Class III

Trustee

    

Until 2014.

3 years.

Trustee
since 2003.

    

Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center. Formerly, Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax Policy) and Assistant Secretary (Tax Policy), U.S. Department of the Treasury (1983-1985). Formerly, Chief of Staff, Joint Committee on Taxation, U.S. Congress (1988-1990).

Directorships in the Last Five Years.(1) None.

Helen Frame Peters

1948

  

Class III

Trustee

    

Until 2014.

3 years.

Trustee
since 2008.

    

Professor of Finance, Carroll School of Management, Boston College. Formerly, Dean, Carroll School of Management, Boston College (2000-2002). Formerly, Chief Investment Officer, Fixed Income, Scudder Kemper Investments (investment management firm) (1998-1999). Formerly, Chief Investment Officer, Equity and Fixed Income, Colonial Management Associates (investment management firm) (1991-1998).

Directorships in the Last Five Years.(1) Formerly, Director of BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc. (wholesale club retailer) (2004-2011). Formerly, Trustee of SPDR Index Shares Funds and SPDR Series Trust (exchange traded funds) (2000-2009). Formerly, Director of Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston (a bank for banks) (2007-2009).

Lynn A. Stout

1957

  

Class I

Trustee

    

Until 2015.

3 years.

Trustee
since 2002.

    

Distinguished Professor of Corporate and Business Law, Jack G. Clarke Business Law Institute, Cornell University Law School. Formerly, the Paul Hastings Professor of Corporate and Securities Law (2006-2012) and Professor of Law (2001-2006), University of California at Los Angeles School of Law.

Directorships in the Last Five Years.(1) None.

Harriett Tee Taggart

1948

  

Class III

Trustee

    

Until 2014.

2 years.

Trustee
since 2011.

    

Managing Director, Taggart Associates (a professional practice firm). Formerly, Partner and Senior Vice President, Wellington Management Company, LLP (investment management firm) (1983-2006).

Directorships in the Last Five Years. Director of Albemarle Corporation (chemicals manufacturer) (since 2007) and The Hanover Group (specialty property and casualty insurance company) (since 2009). Formerly, Director of Lubrizol Corporation (specialty chemicals) (2007-2011).

Ralph F. Verni(A)

1943

  

Chairman of the Board and

Class I Trustee

    

Until 2015.

3 years.

Chairman of the Board since 2007 and Trustee
since 2005.

    

Consultant and private investor. Formerly, Chief Investment Officer (1982-1992), Chief Financial Officer (1988-1990) and Director (1982-1992), New England Life. Formerly, Chairperson, New England Mutual Funds (1982-1992). Formerly, President and Chief Executive Officer, State Street Management & Research (1992-2000). Formerly, Chairperson, State Street Research Mutual Funds (1992-2000). Formerly, Director, W.P. Carey, LLC (1998-2004) and First Pioneer Farm Credit Corp. (2002-2006).

Directorships in the Last Five Years.(1) None.

Principal Officers who are not Trustees

    
Name and Year of Birth    Position(s)
with the
Funds
    

Length of

Service

    

Principal Occupation(s)

During Past Five Years

Cynthia J. Clemson

1963

   President of EIA, MIW, NYH, EIO and EIP      Since 2005      Vice President of EVM and BMR.

Thomas M. Metzold

1958

  

President of MAB, EIV

and EMJ

     Since 2010      Vice President of EVM and BMR.

Payson F. Swaffield

1956

   Vice President      Since 2011      Vice President and Chief Income Investment Officer of EVM and BMR.

Barbara E. Campbell

1957

   Treasurer      Since 2005      Vice President of EVM and BMR.

 

  74  


Eaton Vance

Municipal Bond Funds

September 30, 2012

 

Management and Organization — continued

 

 

Name and Year of Birth    Position(s)
with the
Funds
    

Length of

Service

    

Principal Occupation(s)

During Past Five Years

Principal Officers who are not Trustees (continued)

Maureen A. Gemma

1960

   Vice President, Secretary and Chief Legal Officer      Vice President since 2011, Secretary since 2007 and Chief Legal Officer since 2008      Vice President of EVM and BMR.

Paul M. O’Neil

1953

   Chief Compliance Officer      Since 2004      Vice President of EVM and BMR.

 

(1) 

During their respective tenures, the Trustees (except Mr. Eston and Ms. Taggart) also served as trustees of one or more of the following Eaton Vance funds (which operated in the years noted): Eaton Vance Credit Opportunities Fund (launched in 2005 and terminated in 2010); Eaton Vance Insured Florida Plus Municipal Bond Fund (launched in 2002 and terminated in 2009); and Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Trust (launched in 1998 and terminated in 2009).

(A) 

APS Trustee.

 

  75  


Eaton Vance Funds

 

IMPORTANT NOTICES

 

 

Privacy.  The Eaton Vance organization is committed to ensuring your financial privacy. Each of the financial institutions identified below has in effect the following policy (“Privacy Policy”) with respect to nonpublic personal information about its customers:

 

Ÿ  

Only such information received from you, through application forms or otherwise, and information about your Eaton Vance fund transactions will be collected. This may include information such as name, address, social security number, tax status, account balances and transactions.

 

Ÿ  

None of such information about you (or former customers) will be disclosed to anyone, except as permitted by law (which includes disclosure to employees necessary to service your account). In the normal course of servicing a customer’s account, Eaton Vance may share information with unaffiliated third parties that perform various required services such as transfer agents, custodians and broker-dealers.

 

Ÿ  

Policies and procedures (including physical, electronic and procedural safeguards) are in place that are designed to protect the confidentiality of such information.

 

Ÿ  

We reserve the right to change our Privacy Policy at any time upon proper notification to you. Customers may want to review our Privacy Policy periodically for changes by accessing the link on our homepage: www.eatonvance.com.

Our pledge of privacy applies to the following entities within the Eaton Vance organization: the Eaton Vance Family of Funds, Eaton Vance Management, Eaton Vance Investment Counsel, Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc., Eaton Vance Trust Company, Eaton Vance Management’s Real Estate Investment Group and Boston Management and Research. In addition, our Privacy Policy applies only to those Eaton Vance customers who are individuals and who have a direct relationship with us. If a customer’s account (i.e., fund shares) is held in the name of a third-party financial advisor/broker-dealer, it is likely that only such advisor’s privacy policies apply to the customer. This notice supersedes all previously issued privacy disclosures. For more information about Eaton Vance’s Privacy Policy, please call 1-800-262-1122.

Delivery of Shareholder Documents.  The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) permits funds to deliver only one copy of shareholder documents, including prospectuses, proxy statements and shareholder reports, to fund investors with multiple accounts at the same residential or post office box address. This practice is often called “householding” and it helps eliminate duplicate mailings to shareholders. Eaton Vance, or your financial advisor, may household the mailing of your documents indefinitely unless you instruct Eaton Vance, or your financial advisor, otherwise. If you would prefer that your Eaton Vance documents not be householded, please contact Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122, or contact your financial advisor. Your instructions that householding not apply to delivery of your Eaton Vance documents will be effective within 30 days of receipt by Eaton Vance or your financial advisor.

Portfolio Holdings.  Each Eaton Vance Fund and its underlying Portfolio(s) (if applicable) will file a schedule of portfolio holdings on Form N-Q with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year. The Form N-Q will be available on the Eaton Vance website at www.eatonvance.com, by calling Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122 or in the EDGAR database on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Form N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s public reference room in Washington, D.C. (call 1-800-732-0330 for information on the operation of the public reference room).

Proxy Voting.  From time to time, funds are required to vote proxies related to the securities held by the funds. The Eaton Vance Funds or their underlying Portfolios (if applicable) vote proxies according to a set of policies and procedures approved by the Funds’ and Portfolios’ Boards. You may obtain a description of these policies and procedures and information on how the Funds or Portfolios voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-262-1122 and by accessing the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

Additional Notice to Shareholders.  A Fund also may purchase shares of its common stock in the open market when they trade at a discount to net asset value or at other times if the Fund determines such purchases are advisable. There can be no assurance that a Fund will take such action or that such purchases would reduce the discount. If applicable, a Fund may also redeem or purchase its outstanding auction preferred shares (APS) in order to maintain compliance with regulatory requirements, borrowing or rating agency requirements or for other purposes as it deems appropriate or necessary.

Closed-End Fund Information.  The Eaton Vance closed-end funds make certain fund performance data and information about portfolio characteristics (such as top holdings and asset allocation) available on the Eaton Vance website after the end of each month. Certain fund performance data for the funds, including total returns, are posted to the website shortly after the end of each month. Portfolio holdings for the most recent month-end are also posted to the website approximately 30 days following the end of the month. This information is available at www.eatonvance.com on the fund information pages under “Individual Investors — Closed-End Funds”.

 

  76  


Investment Adviser and Administrator

Eaton Vance Management

Two International Place

Boston, MA 02110

Custodian

State Street Bank and Trust Company

200 Clarendon Street

Boston, MA 02116

Transfer Agent

American Stock Transfer & Trust Company

59 Maiden Lane

Plaza Level

New York, NY 10038

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Deloitte & Touche LLP

200 Berkeley Street

Boston, MA 02116-5022

Fund Offices

Two International Place

Boston, MA 02110

 


LOGO

1557-11/12 CE-8IMBIISRC


Item 2. Code of Ethics

Not required in this filing.

Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert

The registrant’s Board has designated William H. Park, an independent trustee, as its audit committee financial expert. Mr. Park is a certified public accountant who is a consultant and private investor. Previously, he served as the Chief Financial Officer of Aveon Group, L.P. (an investment management firm), as the Vice Chairman of Commercial Industrial Finance Corp. (specialty finance company), as President and Chief Executive Officer of Prizm Capital Management, LLC (investment management firm), as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of United Asset Management Corporation (an institutional investment management firm) and as a Senior Manager at Price Waterhouse (now PricewaterhouseCoopers) (an independent registered public accounting firm).


Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

(a) –(d)

The following table presents the aggregate fees billed to the registrant for the registrant’s fiscal years ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2012 by the registrant’s principal accountant, Deloitte & Touche LLP (“D&T”), for professional services rendered for the audit of the registrant’s annual financial statements and fees billed for other services rendered by D&T during such periods.

 

Fiscal Years Ended

   9/30/11      9/30/12  

Audit Fees

   $ 25,610       $ 28,130   

Audit-Related Fees(1)

   $ 3,915       $ 3,915   

Tax Fees(2)

   $ 8,500       $ 8,700   

All Other Fees(3)

   $ 300       $ 310   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 38,325       $ 41,055   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1) 

Audit-related fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the registrant’s financial statements and are not reported under the category of audit fees and specifically include fees for the performance of certain agreed-upon procedures relating to the registrant’s auction preferred shares.

(2) 

Tax fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by the principal accountant relating to tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning and specifically include fees for tax return preparation.

(3) 

All other fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for products and services provided by the registrant’s principal accountant other than audit, audit-related, and tax services.

(e)(1) The registrant’s audit committee has adopted policies and procedures relating to the pre-approval of services provided by the registrant’s principal accountant (the “Pre-Approval Policies”). The Pre-Approval Policies establish a framework intended to assist the audit committee in the proper discharge of its pre-approval responsibilities. As a general matter, the Pre-Approval Policies (i) specify certain types of audit, audit-related, tax, and other services determined to be pre-approved by the audit committee; and (ii) delineate specific procedures governing the mechanics of the pre-approval process, including the approval and monitoring of audit and non-audit service fees. Unless a service is specifically pre-approved under the Pre-Approval Policies, it must be separately pre-approved by the audit committee.

The Pre-Approval Policies and the types of audit and non-audit services pre-approved therein must be reviewed and ratified by the registrant’s audit committee at least annually. The registrant’s audit committee maintains full responsibility for the appointment, compensation, and oversight of the work of the registrant’s principal accountant.

(e)(2) No services described in paragraphs (b)-(d) above were approved by the registrant’s audit committee pursuant to the “de minimis exception” set forth in Rule 2-01 (c)(7)(i)(C) of Regulation S-X.

(f) Not applicable.


(g) The following table presents (i) the aggregate non-audit fees (i.e., fees for audit-related, tax, and other services) billed to the registrant by D&T for the registrant’s fiscal years ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2012; and (ii) the aggregate non-audit fees (i.e., fees for audit-related, tax, and other services) billed to the Eaton Vance organization by D&T for the same time periods.

 

Fiscal Years Ended

   9/30/11      9/30/12  

Registrant

   $ 12,715       $ 9,010   

Eaton Vance(1)

   $ 226,431       $ 606,619   

 

(1) 

The investment adviser to the registrant, as well as any of its affiliates that provide ongoing services to the registrant, are subsidiaries of Eaton Vance Corp.

(h) The registrant’s audit committee has considered whether the provision by the registrant’s principal accountant of non-audit services to the registrant’s investment adviser and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant that were not pre-approved pursuant to Rule 2-01(c)(7)(ii) of Regulation S-X is compatible with maintaining the principal accountant’s independence.

Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants

The registrant has a separately-designated standing audit committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. William H. Park (Chair), Scott E. Eston, Helen Frame Peters, Lynn A. Stout and Ralph F. Verni are the members of the registrant’s audit committee.

Item 6. Schedule of Investments

Please see schedule of investments contained in the Report to Stockholders included under Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.

Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies

The Board of Trustees of the Trust has adopted a proxy voting policy and procedure (the “Fund Policy”), pursuant to which the Trustees have delegated proxy voting responsibility to the Fund’s investment adviser and adopted the investment adviser’s proxy voting policies and procedures (the “Policies”) which are described below. The Trustees will review the Fund’s proxy voting records from time to time and will annually consider approving the Policies for the upcoming year. In the event that a conflict of interest arises between the Fund’s shareholders and the investment adviser, the administrator, or any of their affiliates or any affiliate of the Fund, the investment adviser will generally refrain from voting the proxies related to the companies giving rise to such conflict until it consults with the Board’s Special Committee except as contemplated under the Fund Policy. The Board’s Special Committee will instruct the investment adviser on the appropriate course of action.

The Policies are designed to promote accountability of a company’s management to its shareholders and to align the interests of management with those shareholders. An independent proxy voting service (“Agent”), currently Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc., has been retained to assist in the voting of proxies through the provision of vote analysis, implementation and recordkeeping and disclosure services. The investment adviser will generally vote proxies through the Agent. The Agent is required to vote all proxies and/or refer them back to the investment adviser pursuant to the Policies. It is


generally the policy of the investment adviser to vote in accordance with the recommendation of the Agent. The Agent shall refer to the investment adviser proxies relating to mergers and restructurings, and the disposition of assets, termination, liquidation and mergers contained in mutual fund proxies. The investment adviser will normally vote against anti-takeover measures and other proposals designed to limit the ability of shareholders to act on possible transactions, except in the case of closed-end management investment companies. The investment adviser generally supports management on social and environmental proposals. The investment adviser may abstain from voting from time to time where it determines that the costs associated with voting a proxy outweighs the benefits derived from exercising the right to vote or the economic effect on shareholders interests or the value of the portfolio holding is indeterminable or insignificant.

In addition, the investment adviser will monitor situations that may result in a conflict of interest between the Fund’s shareholders and the investment adviser, the administrator, or any of their affiliates or any affiliate of the Fund by maintaining a list of significant existing and prospective corporate clients. The investment adviser’s personnel responsible for reviewing and voting proxies on behalf of the Fund will report any proxy received or expected to be received from a company included on that list to the personnel of the investment adviser identified in the Policies. If such personnel expects to instruct the Agent to vote such proxies in a manner inconsistent with the guidelines of the Policies or the recommendation of the Agent, the personnel will consult with members of senior management of the investment adviser to determine if a material conflict of interests exists. If it is determined that a material conflict does exist, the investment adviser will seek instruction on how to vote from the Special Committee.

Information on how the Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12 month period ended June 30 is available (1) without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-262-1122, and (2) on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov.

Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies

Portfolio Management

Cynthia J. Clemson, portfolio manager of Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund II, William H. Ahern, Jr., portfolio manager of Eaton Vance Michigan Municipal Bond Fund, Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund II and Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Bond Fund, Craig R. Brandon, portfolio manager of Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund and Eaton Vance New York Municipal Bond Fund II and Adam A. Weigold, portfolio manager of Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund and Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund are responsible for the overall and day-to-day management of each Fund’s investments.

Ms. Clemson has been an Eaton Vance portfolio manager since 1991 and is a Vice President of Eaton Vance Management (“EVM”) and Boston Management and Research (“BMR”). Mr. Ahern has been an Eaton Vance portfolio manager since 1993 and is a Vice President of EVM and BMR. Mr. Brandon has been an Eaton Vance analyst since 1998 and a portfolio manager since 2004, and is a Vice President of EVM and BMR. Mr. Weigold has been a credit analyst with Eaton Vance since 1991 and a portfolio manager since 2007, and is a Vice President of EVM and BMR. This information is provided as of the date of filing of this report.

The following tables show, as of each Fund’s most recent fiscal year end, the number of accounts each portfolio manager managed in each of the listed categories and the total assets (in millions of dollars) in the accounts managed within each category. The table also shows the number of accounts with respect to which the advisory fee is based on the performance of the account, if any, and the total assets (in millions of dollars) in those accounts.


     Number
of All
Accounts
     Total Assets of
All Accounts
     Number of
Accounts

Paying a
Performance Fee
     Total Assets of
Accounts Paying a
Performance Fee
 

Cynthia J. Clemson

           

Registered Investment Companies

     10       $ 2,411.7         0       $ 0   

Other Pooled Investment Vehicles

     0       $ 0         0       $ 0   

Other Accounts

     0       $ 0         0       $ 0   

William H. Ahern, Jr.

           

Registered Investment Companies

     13       $ 2,513.2         0       $ 0   

Other Pooled Investment Vehicles

     0       $ 0         0       $ 0   

Other Accounts

     1       $ 23.2         0       $ 0   

Craig R. Brandon

           

Registered Investment Companies

     13       $ 1,452.1         0       $ 0   

Other Pooled Investment Vehicles

     0       $ 0         0       $ 0   

Other Accounts

     0       $ 0         0       $ 0   

Adam A. Weigold

           

Registered Investment Companies

     13       $ 1,091.8         0       $ 0   

Other Pooled Investment Vehicles

     0       $ 0         0       $ 0   

Other Accounts

     1       $ 23.2         0       $ 0   


The following table shows the dollar range of Fund shares beneficially owned by each portfolio manager as of each Fund’s most recent fiscal year end.

 

     Dollar Range of
Equity Securities
Owned in the Fund

California Municipal Bond Fund II

  

Cynthia J. Clemson

   None

Michigan Municipal Bond Fund

  

Municipal Bond Fund II

  

Ohio Municipal Bond Fund

  

William H. Ahern, Jr.

   None

Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund

  

New York Municipal Bond Fund II

  

Craig R. Brandon

   None

New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund

  

Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund

  

Adam A. Weigold

   None

Potential for Conflicts of Interest. It is possible that conflicts of interest may arise in connection with a portfolio manager’s management of a Fund’s investments on the one hand and investments of other accounts for which a portfolio manager is responsible on the other. For example, a portfolio manager may have conflicts of interest in allocating management time, resources and investment opportunities among the Fund and other accounts he or she advises. In addition, due to differences in the investment strategies or restrictions between a Fund and the other accounts, a portfolio manager may take action with respect to another account that differs from the action taken with respect to the Fund. In some cases, another account managed by a portfolio manager may compensate the investment adviser based on the performance of the securities held by that account. The existence of such a performance based fee may create additional conflicts of interest for a portfolio manager in the allocation of management time, resources and investment opportunities. Whenever conflicts of interest arise, a portfolio manager will endeavor to exercise his or her discretion in a manner that he or she believes is equitable to all interested persons. EVM has adopted several policies and procedures designed to address these potential conflicts including a code of ethics and policies which govern the investment adviser’s trading practices, including among other things the aggregation and allocation of trades among clients, brokerage allocation, cross trades and best execution.

Compensation Structure for EVM

Compensation of EVM’s portfolio managers and other investment professionals has three primary components: (1) a base salary, (2) an annual cash bonus, and (3) annual stock-based compensation consisting of options to purchase shares of EVC’s nonvoting common stock and/or restricted shares of EVC’s nonvoting common stock. EVM’s investment professionals also receive certain retirement, insurance and other benefits that are broadly available to EVM’s employees. Compensation of EVM’s investment professionals is reviewed primarily on an annual basis. Cash bonuses, stock-based compensation awards, and adjustments in base salary are typically paid or put into effect at or shortly after the October 31st fiscal year end of EVC.


Method to Determine Compensation. EVM compensates its portfolio managers based primarily on the scale and complexity of their portfolio responsibilities and the total return performance of managed funds and accounts versus the benchmark(s) stated in the prospectus, as well as an appropriate peer group (as described below). In addition to rankings within peer groups of funds on the basis of absolute performance, consideration may also be given to relative risk-adjusted performance. Risk-adjusted performance measures include, but are not limited to, the Sharpe Ratio. Performance is normally based on periods ending on the September 30th preceding fiscal year end. Fund performance is normally evaluated primarily versus peer groups of funds as determined by Lipper Inc. and/or Morningstar, Inc. When a fund’s peer group as determined by Lipper or Morningstar is deemed by EVM’s management not to provide a fair comparison, performance may instead be evaluated primarily against a custom peer group. In evaluating the performance of a fund and its manager, primary emphasis is normally placed on three-year performance, with secondary consideration of performance over longer and shorter periods. For funds that are tax-managed or otherwise have an objective of after-tax returns, performance is measured net of taxes. For other funds, performance is evaluated on a pre-tax basis. For funds with an investment objective other than total return (such as current income), consideration will also be given to the fund’s success in achieving its objective. For managers responsible for multiple funds and accounts, investment performance is evaluated on an aggregate basis, based on averages or weighted averages among managed funds and accounts. Funds and accounts that have performance-based advisory fees are not accorded disproportionate weightings in measuring aggregate portfolio manager performance.

The compensation of portfolio managers with other job responsibilities (such as heading an investment group or providing analytical support to other portfolios) will include consideration of the scope of such responsibilities and the managers’ performance in meeting them.

EVM seeks to compensate portfolio managers commensurate with their responsibilities and performance, and competitive with other firms within the investment management industry. EVM participates in investment-industry compensation surveys and utilizes survey data as a factor in determining salary, bonus and stock-based compensation levels for portfolio managers and other investment professionals. Salaries, bonuses and stock-based compensation are also influenced by the operating performance of EVM and its parent company. The overall annual cash bonus pool is based on a substantially fixed percentage of pre-bonus operating income. While the salaries of EVM’s portfolio managers are comparatively fixed, cash bonuses and stock-based compensation may fluctuate significantly from year to year, based on changes in manager performance and other factors as described herein. For a high performing portfolio manager, cash bonuses and stock-based compensation may represent a substantial portion of total compensation.

Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers

No such purchases this period.

Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

No Material Changes.

Item 11. Controls and Procedures

(a) It is the conclusion of the registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer that the effectiveness of the registrant’s current disclosure controls and procedures (such disclosure controls and procedures having been evaluated within 90 days of the date of this filing) provide reasonable


assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the registrant has been recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in the Commission’s rules and forms and that the information required to be disclosed by the registrant has been accumulated and communicated to the registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer in order to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

(b) There have been no changes in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item 12. Exhibits

 

(a)(1)    Registrant’s Code of Ethics – Not applicable (please see Item 2).
(a)(2)(i)    Treasurer’s Section 302 certification.
(a)(2)(ii)    President’s Section 302 certification.
(b)    Combined Section 906 certification.


Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund

 

By:  

/s/ Cynthia J. Clemson

  Cynthia J. Clemson
  President
Date:   November 9, 2012

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

By:  

/s/ Barbara E. Campbell

  Barbara E. Campbell
  Treasurer
Date:   November 9, 2012
By:  

/s/ Cynthia J. Clemson

  Cynthia J. Clemson
  President
Date:   November 9, 2012