Edgar Filing: SPLUNK INC

Fair Value

Useful Life (months)

Developed technology

Other acquired intangible assets

Total intangible assets acquired

Document

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(MARK ONE)

ý QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JULY 31, 2017

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 001-35498

____________________________________________________

SPLUNK INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

_____________________________________________________



Delaware		86-1106510
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

270 Brannan Street

San Francisco, California 94107

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

(415) 848-8400

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES ý NO o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data file required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES ý NO o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):



Large accelerated filer x		Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer o		Smaller reporting company o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Emerging growth company o

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES o NO ý

There were 139,990,162 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock issued and outstanding as of August 30, 2017.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS



		Page No.

	PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)	1
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of July 31, 2017 and January 31, 2017	1
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended July 31, 2017 and 2016	2
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the Three and Six Months Ended July 31, 2017 and 2016	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended July 31, 2017 and 2016	4
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	5
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	15
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	32
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	33
	PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	35
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	35
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	57
Item 6.	Exhibits	58
	Signatures	60

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Splunk Inc.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

(Unaudited)



	July 31, 2017			January 31, 2017
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	419,810		$	421,346
Investments, current portion	663,737			662,096
Accounts receivable, net	208,082			238,281
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	49,412			38,650
Total current assets	1,341,041			1,360,373
Investments, non-current	5,000			5,000
Property and equipment, net	161,954			166,395
Intangible assets, net	34,577			37,713
Goodwill	138,681			124,642
Other assets	22,901			24,423
Total assets	$	1,704,154		$	1,718,546
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Current liabilities
Accounts payable	$	8,984		$	7,503
Accrued payroll and compensation	93,843			100,092
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	84,002			81,071
Deferred revenue, current portion	482,196			478,707
Total current liabilities	669,025			667,373
Deferred revenue, non-current	167,004			146,752
Other liabilities, non-current	100,163			99,260
Total non-current liabilities	267,167			246,012
Total liabilities	936,192			913,385
Commitments and contingencies (Note 3)
Stockholders’ equity
Common stock: $0.001 par value; 1,000,000,000 shares authorized; 139,880,265 shares issued and outstanding at July 31, 2017, and 137,169,481 shares issued and outstanding at January 31, 2017	140			137
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(1,349		)	(3,013		)
Additional paid-in capital	1,973,386			1,828,821
Accumulated deficit	(1,204,215		)	(1,020,784		)
Total stockholders’ equity	767,962			805,161
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,704,154		$	1,718,546

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Splunk Inc.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)



	Three Months Ended July 31,						Six Months Ended July 31,
	2017			2016			2017			2016
Revenues
License	$	142,851		$	115,695		$	259,577		$	216,687
Maintenance and services	137,113			97,058			262,835			182,018
Total revenues	279,964			212,753			522,412			398,705
Cost of revenues⁽¹⁾
License	3,159			2,868			6,087			5,830
Maintenance and services	56,717			41,748			111,952			78,286
Total cost of revenues	59,876			44,616			118,039			84,116
Gross profit	220,088			168,137			404,373			314,589
Operating expenses⁽¹⁾
Research and development	71,774			67,224			143,072			134,595
Sales and marketing	191,284			150,228			365,232			295,379
General and administrative	39,139			34,312			75,635			66,385
Total operating expenses	302,197			251,764			583,939			496,359
Operating loss	(82,109		)	(83,627		)	(179,566		)	(181,770		)
Interest and other income (expense), net
Interest income (expense), net	(164		)	(797		)	(692		)	(1,200		)
Other income (expense), net	(874		)	(1,063		)	(1,482		)	(2,188		)
Total interest and other income (expense), net	(1,038		)	(1,860		)	(2,174		)	(3,388		)
Loss before income taxes	(83,147		)	(85,487		)	(181,740		)	(185,158		)
Income tax provision	353			1,110			1,691			2,335
Net loss	$	(83,500	)	$	(86,597	)	$	(183,431	)	$	(187,493	)

Basic and diluted net loss per share	$	(0.60	)	$	(0.65	)	$	(1.33	)	$	(1.42	)

Weighted-average shares used in computing basic and diluted net loss per share	139,063			133,041			138,436			132,310

⁽¹⁾Amounts include stock-based compensation expense, as follows:



Cost of revenues	$	8,410	$	7,310	$	16,602	$	14,865
Research and development	25,991		27,742		52,788		56,948
Sales and marketing	42,652		39,371		83,295		79,604
General and administrative	15,314		14,440		29,737		28,816

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Splunk Inc.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)



	Three Months Ended July 31,						Six Months Ended July 31,
	2017			2016			2017			2016
Net loss	$	(83,500	)	$	(86,597	)	$	(183,431	)	$	(187,493	)
Other comprehensive loss
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments	33			17			(449		)	356
Foreign currency translation adjustments	2,207			(558		)	2,113			1,640
Total other comprehensive gain (loss)	2,240			(541		)	1,664			1,996
Comprehensive loss	$	(81,260	)	$	(87,138	)	$	(181,767	)	$	(185,497	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Splunk Inc.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)



	Six Months Ended July 31,
	2017			2016
Cash flows from operating activities
Net loss	$	(183,431	)	$	(187,493	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	19,916			14,635
Amortization of investment premiums	342			447
Stock-based compensation	182,422			180,233
Deferred income taxes	(866		)	(698		)
Excess tax benefits from employee stock plans	—			(1,027		)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisition:
Accounts receivable, net	30,199			50,403
Prepaid expenses, other current and non-current assets	(7,883		)	(3,177		)
Accounts payable	1,963			265
Accrued payroll and compensation	(6,264		)	(30,985		)
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	4,407			13,579
Deferred revenue	23,741			17,856
Net cash provided by operating activities	64,546			54,038
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchases of investments	(340,697		)	(316,528		)
Maturities of investments	338,265			290,275
Acquisition, net of cash acquired	(17,223		)	—
Purchases of property and equipment	(8,513		)	(14,250		)
Other investment activities	—			(3,500		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(28,168		)	(44,003		)
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options	1,973			5,603
Excess tax benefits from employee stock plans	—			1,027
Proceeds from employee stock purchase plan	19,282			15,183
Taxes paid related to net share settlement of equity awards	(59,109		)	(46,822		)
Repayment of financing lease obligation	(802		)	—
Net cash used in financing activities	(38,656		)	(25,009		)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	742			382
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(1,536		)	(14,592		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	421,346			424,541
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	419,810		$	409,949
Supplemental disclosures
Cash paid for income taxes	$	3,883		$	1,726
Cash paid for interest expense related to financing lease obligation	3,974			1,920
Non-cash investing and financing activities
Increase (decrease) in accrued purchases of property and equipment	26			1,016
Increase in capitalized construction costs related to build-to-suit lease	—			10,065

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

(1) Description of the Business and Significant Accounting Policies

Business

Splunk Inc. (“we,” “us,” “our”) provides innovative software solutions that enable organizations to gain real-time operational intelligence by harnessing the value of their data. Our offerings enable users to collect, index, search, explore, monitor, correlate and analyze data regardless of format or source. Our offerings address large and diverse data sets, commonly referred to as big data, and are specifically tailored for machine data. Machine data is produced by nearly every software application and electronic device and contains a definitive, time-stamped record of various activities, such as transactions, customer and user activities and security threats. Our offerings help users derive new insights from machine data that can be used to, among other things, improve service levels, reduce operational costs, mitigate security risks, demonstrate and maintain compliance, and drive better business decisions. We were incorporated in California in October 2003 and reincorporated in Delaware in May 2006.

Fiscal Year

Our fiscal year ends on January 31. References to fiscal 2018 or fiscal year 2018, for example, refer to the fiscal year ending January 31, 2018.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) and applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) regarding interim financial reporting. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in the financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The condensed consolidated balance sheet data as of January 31, 2017 was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP. Therefore, these condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2017, filed with the SEC on March 29, 2017. There have been no changes in the significant accounting policies from those that were disclosed in the audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2017 included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K.

In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all normal recurring adjustments necessary to state fairly the financial position, results of operations, comprehensive loss and cash flows for the interim periods, but are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be anticipated for the full fiscal year 2018.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods covered by the financial statements and accompanying notes. In particular, we make estimates with respect to the fair value of multiple elements in revenue recognition, uncollectible accounts receivable, the assessment of the useful life and recoverability of long-lived assets (property and equipment, goodwill and identified intangibles), stock-based compensation expense, the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed for business combinations, income taxes, leases and contingencies. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Segments

We operate our business as one operating segment: the development and marketing of software solutions that enable our customers to gain real-time operational intelligence by harnessing the value of their data. Our chief operating decision maker is our Chief Executive Officer, who reviews financial information presented on a consolidated basis for purposes of making operating decisions, assessing financial performance and allocating resources.

Principles of Consolidation

Table of Contents

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Splunk Inc. and its direct and indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation.

Strategic Investments

We hold certain non-marketable equity securities which are accounted for using the cost method of accounting. These investments are recorded at cost in "Investments, non-current" on our condensed consolidated balance sheets and are adjusted only for other-than-temporary impairments and additional investments.

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

In March 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2016-09 (Topic 718), Compensation - Stock Compensation, which has been issued as part of its Simplification Initiative. The new guidance requires companies to recognize stock-based compensation excess tax benefits, net of detriments (if any) to the condensed consolidated statements of operations, as opposed to additional paid-in capital within equity, when the awards vest or are exercised. Additionally, net excess tax benefit cash flows resulting from share-based payments are required to be reported as operating activities in the statement of cash flows. These updates are to be adopted either prospectively or retrospectively. The new guidance also allows companies to make a policy election to account for forfeitures as they occur, which, if elected, must be adopted using a modified retrospective approach with a cumulative effect adjustment recorded to opening retained earnings.

The ASU is effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within those fiscal years. We adopted this guidance during the first quarter of fiscal year 2018. Excess tax benefits on stock plans have been recorded to the condensed consolidated statements of operations rather than to additional paid-in capital within equity on a prospective basis. At April 30, 2017, we recorded $301.6 million of previously unrecognized excess tax benefits, which are fully offset by the related valuation allowance. We did not record an adjustment to our accumulated deficit as a result of adopting ASC 2016-09. We also elected to prospectively apply the change in presentation requirement wherein income tax effects of awards are classified as operating activities in the condensed consolidated statement of cash flows. Prior period classification of cash flows related to excess tax benefits have not been adjusted. We did not elect an accounting policy change to record forfeitures as they occur and we will continue to estimate forfeitures at each period.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09 (Topic 718), Scope of Modification Accounting. The new standard clarifies when changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award must be accounted for as modifications. The standard is effective for our first quarter of fiscal 2019, although early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating whether the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04 (Topic 350) Intangibles - Goodwill and Other. The new standard simplifies how companies are required to test goodwill for impairment by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Step 2 measures a goodwill impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of a reporting unit's goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. Instead, if the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss shall be recognized in an amount equal to that excess, limited to the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The standard is effective for our first quarter of fiscal 2021, although early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating whether the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01 (Topic 805) Business Combinations - Clarifying the Definition of a Business. The new standard narrows the definition of a business to assist companies with evaluating when a set of transferred assets and activities is a business. The standard is effective for our first quarter of fiscal 2019. We are currently evaluating whether the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16 (Topic 740), Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory. The new standard will require companies to recognize, as opposed to defer, the tax effects from intercompany transfers of certain assets when the transfer occurs. The standard is effective for our first quarter of fiscal 2019. We are currently evaluating whether the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13 (Topic 326), Financial Instruments - Credit Losses. The amendments in this update require a financial asset (or a group of financial assets) measured at an amortized cost basis to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. The new approach to estimating credit losses (referred to as the current expected credit losses model) applies to most financial assets measured at amortized cost and certain other instruments, including trade and other receivables, loans and held-to-maturity debt securities. The standard is effective for our first quarter of fiscal 2021, although early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating whether the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02 (Topic 842), Leases, which supersedes the lease recognition requirements in ASC Topic 840, Leases. The standard requires an entity to recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities arising from a lease for operating leases, initially measured at the present value of the lease payments on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The impact of such leases on the condensed consolidated statements of operations and cash flows will continue to be treated in a similar manner under current GAAP. The standard also requires additional qualitative and quantitative disclosures. The standard is effective for our first quarter of fiscal 2020, although early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of this standard on our condensed consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. We anticipate that most of our office leases will be recognized as lease liabilities and corresponding right-of-use assets, and will accordingly have a material impact on our condensed consolidated balance sheets upon adoption.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09 (Topic 606), Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Accounting Standards Codification 605, Revenue Recognition and establishes a new revenue standard. This ASU is based on the principle that revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The ASU also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenues and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Principal versus Agent Considerations, which clarifies the guidance in the new revenue standard on assessing whether an entity is a principal or an agent in a revenue transaction. This conclusion impacts whether an entity reports revenue on a gross or net basis. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing, which clarifies the guidance in the new revenue standard regarding an entity’s identification of its performance obligations in a contract. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-12, Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients, which amends the guidance in the new revenue standard on collectability, non-cash consideration, presentation of sales tax, and transition. In December 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-20, Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, which clarifies narrow aspects of ASC 606 or corrects unintended application of the guidance.

The new revenue standard, as amended by ASU No. 2015-14, is effective in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 and may be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented or with the cumulative effect recognized as of the date of initial application. We currently plan to adopt the standard using the cumulative effect transition method.

We are still evaluating the total impact of the new revenue standard on our condensed consolidated financial statements, accounting policies, systems and processes. We have allocated internal and external resources to assist in our implementation and evaluation of the new standard. We have also made investments in systems to assist in financial reporting under the new standard. While we cannot reasonably estimate the expected financial statement impact at this time, we believe the adoption of this new standard will have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements, including the way we account for arrangements involving a term license, deferred revenue and sales commissions. Under the new revenue standard, we would be required to recognize term license revenues upfront and the associated maintenance revenues over the contract period. Under the current revenue standard, we recognize both the term license and maintenance revenues ratably over the contract period. In addition, some deferred revenue recorded in accordance with the current revenue standard will never be recognized as revenue upon adoption of the new revenue standard and instead will be part of the cumulative effect adjustment within accumulated deficit. We have also considered the impact of the guidance in ASC 340-40, Other Assets and Deferred Costs; Contracts with Customers, under Topic 606. Under ASC 340-40, we would be required to capitalize and amortize incremental costs of obtaining a contract, such as sales commission costs. Under our current accounting policy, we do not capitalize sales commission costs but rather recognize these costs when they are incurred.

(2) Investments and Fair Value Measurements

The carrying amounts of certain of our financial instruments including cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate fair value due to their short-term maturities.

Table of Contents

Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value in the financial statements are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair value. Hierarchical levels that are directly related to the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to the valuation of these assets or liabilities are as follows:

Level 1—Observable inputs, such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2—Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3—Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires management to make judgments and consider factors specific to the asset or liability.

The following table sets forth the fair value of our financial assets and liabilities that were measured on a recurring basis as of July 31, 2017 and January 31, 2017 (in thousands):



	July 31, 2017								January 31, 2017
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets:
Money market funds	$	390,400	$	—	$	—	$	390,400	$	345,959	$	—	$	—	$	345,959
U.S. treasury securities	—		663,737		—		663,737		—		662,096		—		662,096
Other	—		—		—		—		—		—		3,000		3,000
Reported as:
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents							$	390,400							$	345,959
Investments, current portion							663,737								662,096
Investments, non-current							—								3,000
Total							$	1,054,137							$	1,011,055

Our investments in money market funds are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. These money market funds are actively traded and reported daily through a variety of sources. The fair value of the money market fund investments is classified as Level 1.

The following table represents our investments in U.S. treasury securities, which we have classified as available-for-sale investments as of July 31, 2017 (in thousands):



	July 31, 2017
	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Investments, current portion:
U.S. treasury securities	$	664,417	$	—	$	(680	)	$	663,737
Total available-for-sale investments in U.S. treasury securities	$	664,417	$	—	$	(680	)	$	663,737

As of July 31, 2017, the following marketable securities were in an unrealized loss position (in thousands):

Table of Contents



	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or Greater				Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
U.S. treasury securities	$	663,737	$	(680	)	$	—	$	—	$	663,737	$	(680	)

As of July 31, 2017, we did not consider any of our investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired.

The contractual maturities of our investments are as follows (in thousands):



	July 31, 2017
Due within one year	$	663,737
Total	$	663,737

Investments with maturities of less than 12 months from the balance sheet date are classified as current assets, which are available for use to fund current operations. Investments with maturities greater than 12 months from the balance sheet date are classified as long-term assets.

Strategic Investments

We hold strategic investments in the form of non-marketable equity securities which are recorded at cost. During the first quarter of fiscal 2018, $3.0 million of our investments in the form of convertible promissory notes in a privately-held company were automatically converted into preferred stock. As a result, these non-marketable equity securities are no longer classified as Level 3 investments measured at fair value and are now accounted for as cost method investments. As of July 31, 2017, our cost method investments totaled $5.0 million.

(3) Commitments and Contingencies

Operating Lease Commitments

We lease our office spaces under non-cancelable leases. Rent expense for our operating leases was $5.5 million and $3.5 million for the three months ended July 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $10.8 million and $6.8 million for the six months ended July 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

On August 24, 2015, we entered into an office lease for approximately 235,000 square feet located at 3098 Olsen Drive, San Jose, California for a term of 129 months. Rent expense for this lease commenced in the third quarter of fiscal 2017. Our total obligation for the base rent is approximately $120.5 million.

The following summarizes our operating lease commitments as of July 31, 2017 (in thousands):



	Payments Due by Period
	Total		Less Than 1 year		1-3 years		3-5 years		More Than 5 years
Operating lease commitments ⁽¹⁾	$	167,265	$	22,899	$	41,091	$	35,848	$	67,427

_________________________

⁽¹⁾ We entered into sublease agreements for portions of our office space and the future rental income of $5.7 million from these agreements has been included as an offset to our future minimum rental payments.

Financing Lease Obligation

On April 29, 2014, we entered into an office lease (the “Lease”) for approximately 182,000 square feet located at 270 Brannan Street, San Francisco, California (the “Premises”). The Premises is allocated between the "Initial Premises" and "Additional Premises," which are each approximately 91,000 square feet of rentable space. The term of the Additional Premises begins one year after the Initial Premises, which began in August 2015, and each have a term of 84 months. Our total obligation for the base rent is approximately $92.0 million. On May 13, 2014, we entered into an irrevocable, standby letter of credit with Silicon Valley Bank for $6.0 million to serve as a security deposit for the Lease.

Table of Contents

build-to-suit lease accounting. We have recorded project construction costs incurred by the landlord as an asset and a corresponding long-term liability in “Property and equipment, net” and “Other liabilities, non-current,” respectively, on our condensed consolidated balance sheets. We moved into the Premises in February 2016. We have determined that the lease does not meet the criteria for “sale-leaseback” treatment, due to our continuing involvement in the construction project resulting from our standby letter of credit. Accordingly, the Lease will continue to be accounted for as a financing obligation.

As of July 31, 2017, future payments on the financing lease obligation are as follows (in thousands):



Fiscal Period:
Remaining six months of fiscal 2018	$	6,105
Fiscal 2019	12,552
Fiscal 2020	12,928
Fiscal 2021	13,316
Fiscal 2022	13,715
Fiscal 2023	14,127
Fiscal 2024	8,142
Total future minimum lease payments	$	80,885

Facility Exit Costs

In fiscal 2017, we relocated certain of our corporate offices in the San Francisco Bay Area and as a result, a portion of our leased office spaces are no longer in use. Accordingly, we calculated and recorded a liability at the "cease-use" date related to those operating leases based on the difference between the present value of the estimated future sublease rental income and the present value of our remaining lease obligations, adjusted for the effects of any prepaid or deferred items. We recorded a facility exit charge of approximately $8.6 million to "General and administrative" expenses in the condensed consolidated statements of operations associated with the recognition of the liability. The short-term portion of the liability is recorded in "Accrued expenses and other liabilities" and the long-term portion of the liability is recorded in "Other liabilities, non-current," on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. As of July 31, 2017, the remaining "cease-use" liability was $6.7 million.

Legal Proceedings

We are subject to certain routine legal and regulatory proceedings, as well as demands and claims that arise in the normal course of our business. We make a provision for a liability relating to legal matters when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. These provisions are reviewed at least quarterly and adjusted to reflect the impact of negotiations, estimated settlements, legal rulings, advice of legal counsel and other information and events pertaining to a particular matter. In our opinion, resolution of any pending claims (either individually or in the aggregate) is not expected to have a material adverse impact on our condensed consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position, nor is it possible to provide an estimated amount of any such loss. However, depending on the nature and timing of any such dispute, an unfavorable resolution of a matter could materially affect our future results of operations or cash flows, or both, in a particular quarter.

Indemnification Arrangements

During the ordinary course of business, we may indemnify, hold harmless and agree to reimburse for losses suffered or incurred, our customers, vendors and each of their affiliates for certain intellectual property infringement and other claims by third parties with respect to our offerings, in connection with our commercial license arrangements or related to general business dealings with those parties.

As permitted under Delaware law, we have entered into indemnification agreements with our officers, directors and certain employees, indemnifying them for certain events or occurrences while they serve as our officers or directors or those of our direct and indirect subsidiaries.

To date, there have not been any costs incurred in connection with such indemnification obligations; therefore, there is no accrual of such amounts at July 31, 2017. We are unable to estimate the maximum potential impact of these indemnifications on our future results of operations.

(4) Property and Equipment

Table of Contents

Property and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization. These assets are depreciated and amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. Property and equipment consisted of the following (in thousands):



	As of
	July 31, 2017			January 31, 2017
Computer equipment and software	$	66,822		$	59,396
Furniture and fixtures	16,555			16,194
Leasehold and building improvements	59,440			58,569
Building ⁽¹⁾	82,250			82,250
	225,067			216,409
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization	(63,113		)	(50,014		)
Property and equipment, net	$	161,954		$	166,395

_________________________

⁽¹⁾ This relates to the capitalization of construction costs in connection with our financing lease obligation, where we are considered the owner of the asset, for accounting purposes only. There is a corresponding long-term liability for this obligation on our condensed consolidated balance sheets under “Other liabilities, non-current.” Refer to Note 3 “Commitments and Contingencies” for details.

Depreciation and amortization expense on Property and Equipment, net was $6.6 million and $5.1 million for the three months ended July 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $13.0 million and $8.4 million for the six months ended July 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

(5) Acquisition, Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Acquisition

On May 15, 2017, we acquired 100% of the voting equity interest of a privately-held Delaware corporation, which develops technology for search-driven analytics on enterprise data. This acquisition has been accounted for as a business combination. The purchase price of $17.3 million, paid in cash, was preliminarily allocated as follows: $3.8 million to identifiable intangible assets and $0.5 million to net deferred tax liability, with the excess $14.0 million of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired recorded as goodwill. Goodwill is primarily attributable to the value expected from the synergies of the combination, including developing a more intuitive search experience for our products. This goodwill is not deductible for income tax purposes. The results of operations of the acquired entity, which are not material, have been included in our condensed consolidated financial statements from the date of purchase. Pro forma and historical results of operations of the acquired entity have not been presented as we do not consider the results to have a material effect on any of the periods presented in our condensed consolidated statements of operations. We are still finalizing the allocation of the purchase price, which may be subject to change as additional information becomes available to us.

The following table sets forth the components of identifiable intangible assets acquired and their estimated useful lives as of the date of acquisition (in thousands, except useful life):

Goodwill

As of July 31, 2017, we had goodwill of $138.7 million. There were no impairments to goodwill during the three or six months ended July 31, 2017 or during prior periods. Goodwill balances are presented below (in thousands):

Table of Contents



	Carrying amount
Balance as of January 31, 2017	$	124,642
Goodwill acquired	14,039
Balance as of July 31, 2017	$	138,681

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets subject to amortization realized from acquisitions as of July 31, 2017 are as follows (in thousands, except useful life):



	Gross Fair Value		Accumulated Amortization			Net Book Value		Weighted Average Remaining Useful Life (months)
Developed technology	$	62,870	$	(28,742	)	$	34,128	45
Customer relationships	1,810		(1,752		)	58		11
Other acquired intangible assets	1,480		(1,089		)	391		27
Total intangible assets subject to amortization	$	66,160	$	(31,583	)	$	34,577

Amortization expense from acquired intangible assets was $4.2 million and $3.1 million for the three months ended July 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $6.9 million and $6.2 million for the six months ended July 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

The expected future amortization expense for acquired intangible assets as of July 31, 2017 is as follows (in thousands):



Fiscal Period:
Remaining six months of fiscal 2018	$	5,383
Fiscal 2019	9,016
Fiscal 2020	8,600
Fiscal 2021	8,283
Fiscal 2022	3,295
Total amortization expense	$	34,577

(6) Debt Financing Facilities

(7) Stock Compensation Plans

The following table summarizes the stock option, restricted stock unit (“RSU”) and performance unit (“PSU”) award activity during the six months ended July 31, 2017:

Table of Contents



			Options Outstanding							RSUs and PSUs Outstanding
	Shares Available for Grant		Shares		Weighted- Average Exercise Price Per Share		Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term	Aggregate Intrinsic Value⁽¹⁾		Shares
							(in years)	(in thousands)
Balances as of January 31, 2017	10,401,789		2,057,894		$	4.67	3.28	$	109,571	13,924,414
Additional shares authorized	6,858,474
Options exercised			(569,089	)	3.46
Options forfeited and expired	6,172		(6,172	)	50.38
RSUs and PSUs granted	(1,862,988	)								1,862,988
RSUs and PSUs vested										(2,725,292	)
Shares withheld related to net share settlement of RSUs and PSUs	993,508
RSUs and PSUs forfeited and canceled	1,005,466									(1,005,466	)
Balances as of July 31, 2017	17,402,421		1,482,633		$	4.94	2.85	$	81,650	12,056,644
Vested and expected to vest			1,482,577		$	4.94	2.85	$	81,646	11,712,148
Exercisable as of July 31, 2017			1,459,282		$	5.00	2.78	$	80,279

_________________________

⁽¹⁾ The intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying stock option award and the closing market price of our common stock as of July 31, 2017.

Under net settlement procedures applicable to our outstanding RSUs for current employees, upon each settlement date, RSUs are withheld to cover the required withholding tax, which is based on the value of the RSU on the settlement date as determined by the closing price of our common stock on the trading day of the applicable settlement date. These shares withheld by us as a result of the net settlement of RSUs are not considered issued and outstanding, thereby reducing our shares outstanding used to calculate earnings per share. These shares are returned to the reserves and are available for future issuance under our 2012 Equity Incentive Plan.

Beginning in fiscal 2016, we granted PSUs to certain executives under our 2012 Equity Incentive Plan. The number of PSUs earned and eligible to vest will be determined after a one-year performance period, based on achievement of certain company financial performance measures and the recipient's continued service with us. The number of shares of our stock to be received at vesting can range from 0% to 200% of the target amount. Compensation expense for PSUs is measured using the fair value at the date of grant and recorded over the vesting period under the graded-vesting attribution method, and may be adjusted over the vesting period based on interim estimates of performance against the pre-set objectives.

At July 31, 2017, total unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options was $1.3 million, adjusted for estimated forfeitures, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.1 years. At July 31, 2017, total unrecognized compensation cost was $507.7 million related to RSUs, adjusted for estimated forfeitures, which is expected to be recognized over the next 2.6 years. At July 31, 2017, total unrecognized compensation cost was $31.3 million related to PSUs, adjusted for estimated forfeitures, which is expected to be recognized over the next 2.9 years. Additionally, during fiscal 2016, we issued 671,782 restricted shares of our common stock (“RSAs”) and at July 31, 2017, total unrecognized compensation cost was $4.0 million related to RSAs, adjusted for estimated forfeitures, which is expected to be recognized over the next 1.4 years. At July 31, 2017, 414,943 RSAs were vested, 186,003 RSAs were forfeited and canceled and 70,836 RSAs were outstanding.

The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the six months ended July 31, 2017 was $32.8 million. The weighted-average grant date fair value of RSUs granted was $61.05 per share for the six months ended July 31, 2017. The weighted-average grant date fair value of PSUs granted was $60.25 per share for the six months ended July 31, 2017. The weighted-average grant date fair value of RSAs granted was $69.00 per share during fiscal 2016. No RSAs were granted during the six months ended July 31, 2017.

(8) Geographic Information

Table of Contents

Revenues

Revenues by geography are based on the shipping address of the customer. The following table presents our revenues by geographic region for the periods presented (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended July 31,				Six Months Ended July 31,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
United States	$	213,040	$	165,073	$	395,252	$	302,878
International	66,924		47,680		127,160		95,827
Total revenues	$	279,964	$	212,753	$	522,412	$	398,705

Other than the United States, no other individual country exceeded 10% of total revenues during any of the periods presented. One channel partner represented 28% and 25% of total revenues during the three months ended July 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and approximately 28% and 24% of total revenues during the six months ended July 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. A second channel partner represented approximately 19% and 17% of total revenues during the three months ended July 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and approximately 18% and 16% of total revenues during the six months ended July 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The revenues from these channel partners are comprised of a number of customer transactions, none of which were individually greater than 10% of total revenues for the three months or six months ended July 31, 2017 or 2016.

At July 31, 2017, one channel partner represented 31% and a second channel partner represented 14% of total accounts receivable. At January 31, 2017, one channel partner represented 30% of total accounts receivable.

Property and Equipment

The following table presents our property and equipment, net of depreciation, by geographic region for the periods presented (in thousands):



	As of
	July 31, 2017		January 31, 2017
United States	$	155,372	$	159,428
International	6,582		6,967
Total property and equipment, net	$	161,954	$	166,395

Other than the United States, no other country represented 10% or more of our total property and equipment as of July 31, 2017 or January 31, 2017.

(9) Income Taxes

For the three months ended July 31, 2017 and 2016, we recorded $0.4 million and $1.1 million in income tax expense, respectively. For the six months ended July 31, 2017 and 2016, we recorded $1.7 million and $2.3 million in income tax expense, respectively. The decrease in income tax expense for the three and six months ended July 31, 2017 was primarily due to the partial release of the valuation allowance as a result of an acquisition.

During the six months ended July 31, 2017, there were no material changes to our unrecognized tax benefits, and we do not expect to have any significant changes to unrecognized tax benefits through the end of the fiscal year. Because of our history of tax losses, all years remain open to tax audit.

(10) Net Loss Per Share

Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period, less the weighted-average unvested common stock subject to repurchase or forfeiture. Diluted net loss per share is computed by giving effect to all potential shares of common stock, including preferred stock, stock options, RSUs, PSUs and RSAs to the extent dilutive.

The following table sets forth the computation of historical basic and diluted net loss per share (in thousands, except per share data):

Table of Contents



	Three Months Ended July 31,						Six Months Ended July 31,
	2017			2016			2017			2016
Numerator:
Net loss	$	(83,500	)	$	(86,597	)	$	(183,431	)	$	(187,493	)
Denominator:
Weighted-average common shares outstanding	139,135			133,624			138,509			132,873
Less: Weighted-average unvested common shares subject to repurchase or forfeiture	(72		)	(583		)	(73		)	(563		)
Weighted-average shares used to compute net loss per share, basic and diluted	139,063			133,041			138,436			132,310
Net loss per share, basic and diluted	$	(0.60	)	$	(0.65	)	$	(1.33	)	$	(1.42	)

Since we were in a net loss position for all periods presented, basic net loss per share is the same as diluted net loss per share for all periods as the inclusion of all potentially dilutive securities outstanding would have been anti-dilutive. Potentially dilutive securities that were not included in the diluted per share calculations because they would be anti-dilutive were as follows (in thousands):



	As of July 31,
	2017	2016
Shares subject to outstanding common stock options	1,483	2,709
Shares subject to outstanding RSUs, PSUs and RSAs	12,127	14,386
Employee stock purchase plan	344	323
Total	13,954	17,418

(11) Related Party Transactions

Certain members of our board of directors serve on the board of directors of and/or are executive officers of, and, in some cases, are investors in, companies that are customers or vendors of ours. Certain of our executive officers also serve on the board of directors of companies that are customers or vendors of ours. All contracts with related parties are executed in the ordinary course of business. We recognized revenues from sales to these companies of $3.3 million and $1.2 million for the three months ended July 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $6.1 million and $2.4 million for the six months ended July 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. We recorded $0.3 million and $0.1 million in expenses related to purchases from these companies during the three months ended July 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $0.5 million and $0.2 million for the six months ended July 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. We had $1.4 million and $1.9 million of accounts receivable from these companies as of July 31, 2017 and January 31, 2017, respectively. There were no accounts payable to these companies as of July 31, 2017 or January 31, 2017.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The following discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, as well as assumptions that, if they never materialize or prove incorrect, could cause our results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Statements that are not purely historical are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Forward-looking statements are often identified by the use of words such as, but not limited to, “anticipate,” “believe,” “can,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “plan,” “project,” “seek,” “should,” “target,” “will,” “would” and similar expressions or variations intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning our market opportunity, our future financial and operating results; our planned investments, particularly in our product development efforts; our planned expansion of our sales and marketing organization; our expectation that we will continue to use acquisitions to contribute to our growth objectives; our growth and product integration strategies; our continued efforts to market and sell both domestically and internationally; our expectations about seasonal trends; our expectations regarding our revenues mix; our expectations regarding our cost of revenues and gross margin; use of non-GAAP (as defined below) financial measures; our expectations regarding our operating expenses, including increases in research and development, sales and marketing, and general and administrative expenses; our expectations regarding our capital expenditures; sufficiency of cash to meet cash needs for at least the next 12 months; exposure to interest rate changes; inflation; anticipated income tax rates; our

Table of Contents

expectations regarding our leases; exposure to exchange rate fluctuations and our ability to manage such exposure; and our expected cash flows and liquidity.

These statements are based on the beliefs and assumptions of our management based on information currently available to us. Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other important factors that could cause actual results and the timing of certain events to differ materially from future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those identified below, and those discussed in the section titled “Risk Factors” included under Part II, Item 1A below. Furthermore, such forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that occur after the date of this report.

Overview

Splunk provides innovative software solutions that enable organizations to gain real-time operational intelligence by harnessing the value of their data. Our offerings enable users to collect, index, search, explore, monitor, correlate and analyze data regardless of format or source. Our offerings address large and diverse data sets commonly referred to as big data and are specifically tailored for machine data. Machine data is produced by nearly every software application and electronic device in an organization and contains a definitive, time-stamped record of various activities, such as transactions, customer and user activities, and security threats. Beyond an organization's traditional information technology (“IT”) and security infrastructure, data from the industrial internet, including industrial control systems, sensors, SCADA systems, networks, manufacturing systems, smart meters and Internet-of-Things ("IoT"), which includes consumer-oriented systems, such as electronic wearables, mobile devices, automobiles and medical devices, are also continuously generating machine data. Our offerings help organizations gain value from all of these different sources and forms of machine data.

We believe the market for products that provide operational intelligence presents a substantial opportunity as data grows in volume and diversity, creating new risks, opportunities and challenges for organizations. Since our inception, we have invested a substantial amount of resources developing our offerings to address this market, specifically with respect to machine data.

Our offerings are designed to deliver rapid return-on-investment for our customers. They generally do not require customization, long deployment cycles or extensive professional services commonly associated with traditional enterprise software applications. Prospective users can get started with our free online sandboxes that enable our customers to immediately try and experience Splunk offerings. Users that prefer to deploy the software on-premises can take advantage of our free 60-day trial of Splunk Enterprise, which converts into a limited free perpetual license of up to 500 megabytes of data per day. Paying users can sign up for Splunk Cloud and avoid the need to provision, deploy and manage internal infrastructure. Alternatively, they can simply download and install the software, typically in a matter of hours, to connect to their relevant machine data sources. Customers can also provision a compute instance on Amazon Web Services via a pre-built Amazon Machine Image, which delivers a pre-configured virtual machine instance with our Splunk Enterprise software. In fiscal 2017, we introduced free development-test licenses for certain commercial customers, allowing users to explore new data and use cases in a non-production environment without incurring additional fees. We also offer support, training and professional services to our customers to assist in the deployment of our software.

For Splunk Enterprise, we base our license fees on the estimated daily data indexing capacity our customers require. A substantial portion of our license revenues consist of revenues from perpetual licenses, whereby we generally recognize the license fee portion of these arrangements upfront. As a result, the timing of when we enter into large perpetual licenses may lead to fluctuations in our revenues and operating results because our expenses are largely fixed in the short-term. Additionally, we license our software under term licenses, which are generally recognized ratably over the contract term. From time to time, we also enter into transactions that are designed to enable broad adoption of our software within an enterprise, referred to as enterprise adoption agreements. These agreements often include provisions that require revenue deferral and recognition over time.

Splunk Cloud delivers the core capabilities of Splunk Enterprise as a scalable, reliable cloud service. Splunk Cloud customers pay an annual subscription fee based on the combination of the volume of data indexed per day and the length of the data retention period. Splunk Light provides log search and analysis that is designed, priced and packaged for small IT environments, where a single-server log analytics solution is sufficient. Splunk Enterprise Security ("ES") addresses emerging security threats and security information and event management ("SIEM") use cases through monitoring, alerts and analytics. Splunk IT Service Intelligence ("ITSI") monitors the health and key performance indicators of critical IT and business services. Splunk User Behavior Analytics ("UBA") detects cyber-attacks and insider threats using data science, machine learning and advanced correlation.

Table of Contents

We intend to continue investing for long-term growth. We have invested and intend to continue to invest heavily in product development to deliver additional features and performance enhancements, deployment models and solutions that can address new end markets. For example, we released new versions of existing offerings such as Splunk Enterprise and introduced new offerings for the security and IT markets during fiscal 2017. In addition, we expect to continue to aggressively expand our sales and marketing organizations to market and sell our software both in the United States and internationally. We have utilized and expect to continue to utilize acquisitions to contribute to our long-term growth objectives.

Our goal is to make our software the platform for delivering operational intelligence and real-time business insights from machine data. The key elements of our growth strategy are to:


•	Extend our technological capabilities.


•	Continue to expand our direct and indirect sales organization, including our channel relationships, to increase our sales capacity and enable greater market presence.


•	Further penetrate our existing customer base and drive enterprise-wide adoption.


•	Enhance our value proposition through a focus on solutions which address core and expanded use cases.


•	Grow our user communities and partner ecosystem to increase awareness of our brand, target new use cases, drive operational leverage and deliver more targeted, higher value solutions.


•	Continue to deliver a rich developer environment to enable rapid development of enterprise applications that leverage machine data and the Splunk platform.

We believe the factors that will influence our ability to achieve our goals include, among other things, our ability to deliver new offerings as well as additional product functionality; acquire new customers across geographies and industries; cultivate incremental sales from our existing customers by driving increased use of our software within organizations; provide additional solutions that leverage our core machine data platform to help organizations understand and realize the value of their machine data in specific end markets and use cases; add additional original equipment manufacturer ("OEM") and strategic relationships to enable new sales channels for our software as well as extend our integration with third-party products; help software developers leverage the functionality of our machine data platform through software development kits ("SDKs") and application programming interfaces ("APIs"); and successfully integrate acquired businesses and technologies.

Financial Summary

For the three months ended July 31, 2017 and 2016, our total revenues were $280.0 million and $212.8 million, respectively. For the three months ended July 31, 2017 and 2016, approximately 24% and 22% of our total revenues, respectively, were derived from customers located outside the United States. Our customers and end-users represent the public sector and a wide variety of industries, including financial services, manufacturing, retail and technology, among others. As of July 31, 2017, we had over 14,000 customers, including over 85 of the Fortune 100 companies.

For the three months ended July 31, 2017 and 2016, our GAAP operating loss was $82.1 million and $83.6 million, respectively. Our non-GAAP operating income was $14.7 million and $8.2 million for the three months ended July 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

For the three months ended July 31, 2017 and 2016, our GAAP net loss was $83.5 million and $86.6 million, respectively. Our non-GAAP net income was $11.5 million and $6.6 million for the three months ended July 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Our quarterly results reflect seasonality in the sale of our offerings. Historically, a pattern of increased license sales in the fourth fiscal quarter as a result of industry buying patterns has positively impacted sales activity in that period, which can result in lower sequential revenues in the following first fiscal quarter. Our gross margins and operating losses have been affected by these historical trends because the majority of our expenses are relatively fixed in the short-term. The majority of our expenses are personnel-related and include salaries, stock-based compensation, benefits and incentive-based compensation plan expenses. As a result, we have not experienced significant seasonal fluctuations in the timing of expenses from period to period.

Table of Contents

Non-GAAP Financial Results

To supplement our condensed consolidated financial statements, which are prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP, we provide investors with certain non-GAAP financial measures, including non-GAAP cost of revenues, non-GAAP gross margin, non-GAAP research and development expense, non-GAAP sales and marketing expense, non-GAAP general and administrative expense, non-GAAP operating income (loss), non-GAAP operating margin, non-GAAP net income (loss) and non-GAAP net income (loss) per share (collectively the “non-GAAP financial measures”). These non-GAAP financial measures exclude all or a combination of the following (as reflected in the following reconciliation tables): stock-based compensation expense, employer payroll tax expense related to employee stock plans, amortization of acquired intangible assets, adjustments related to a financing lease obligation and the partial release of the valuation allowance due to acquisition. The adjustments for the financing lease obligation are to reflect the expense we would have recorded if our build-to-suit lease arrangement had been deemed an operating lease instead of a financing lease and is calculated as the net of actual ground lease expense, depreciation and interest expense over estimated straight-line rent expense. The non-GAAP financial measures are adjusted for our estimated tax rate on non-GAAP income (loss). To determine the annual non-GAAP tax rate, we evaluate a financial projection based on our non-GAAP results. The annual non-GAAP tax rate takes into account other factors including our current operating structure, our existing tax positions in various jurisdictions and key legislation in major jurisdictions where we operate. The annual non-GAAP tax rate applied to the three and six months ended July 31, 2017 was 27%. We will utilize this annual non-GAAP tax rate in fiscal 2018 and will provide updates to this rate on an annual basis, or more frequently if material changes occur. In addition, non-GAAP financial measures include free cash flow, which represents cash from operations less purchases of property and equipment, and billings, which represents revenues plus the change in deferred revenue during the period. The presentation of the non-GAAP financial measures is not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for, or superior to, the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP. We use these non-GAAP financial measures for financial and operational decision-making purposes and as a means to evaluate period-to-period comparisons. We believe that these non-GAAP financial measures provide useful information about our operating results, enhance the overall understanding of past financial performance and future prospects and allow for greater transparency with respect to key metrics used by management in our financial and operational decision making. In addition, these non-GAAP financial measures facilitate comparisons to competitors’ operating results.

We exclude stock-based compensation expense because it is non-cash in nature and excluding this expense provides meaningful supplemental information regarding our operational performance and allows investors the ability to make more meaningful comparisons between our operating results and those of other companies. We exclude employer payroll tax expense related to employee stock plans in order for investors to see the full effect that excluding that stock-based compensation expense had on our operating results. These expenses are tied to the exercise or vesting of underlying equity awards and the price of our common stock at the time of vesting or exercise, which may vary from period to period independent of the operating performance of our business. We also exclude amortization of acquired intangible assets, the partial release of the valuation allowance due to acquisition, and make adjustments related to a financing lease obligation from our non-GAAP financial measures because these are considered by management to be outside of our core operating results. Accordingly, we believe that excluding these expenses provides investors and management with greater visibility to the underlying performance of our business operations, facilitates comparison of our results with other periods and may also facilitate comparison with the results of other companies in our industry. We consider free cash flow to be a liquidity measure that provides useful information to management and investors about the amount of cash generated by the business that can be used for strategic opportunities, including investing in our business, making strategic acquisitions and strengthening our balance sheet. We consider billings to be a useful measure for management and investors because it provides visibility into our sales activity for a particular period, which is not necessarily reflected in our revenues given that we recognize term licenses and subscriptions for cloud services ratably.

There are limitations in using non-GAAP financial measures because the non-GAAP financial measures are not prepared in accordance with GAAP, may be different from non-GAAP financial measures used by our competitors and exclude expenses that may have a material impact upon our reported financial results. Further, stock-based compensation expense has been and will continue to be for the foreseeable future a significant recurring expense in our business and an important part of the compensation provided to our employees. The non-GAAP financial measures are meant to supplement and be viewed in conjunction with GAAP financial measures.

The following table reconciles our net cash provided by operating activities to free cash flow for the three and six months ended July 31, 2017, and 2016 (in thousands):

Table of Contents



	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	July 31,			July 31,			July 31,			July 31,
	2017			2016			2017			2016
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	23,188		$	18,349		$	64,546		$	54,038
Less purchases of property and equipment	(2,908		)	(10,541		)	(8,513		)	(14,250		)
Free cash flow (non-GAAP)	$	20,280		$	7,808		$	56,033		$	39,788
Net cash used in investing activities	$	(63,155	)	$	(30,627	)	$	(28,168	)	$	(44,003	)
Net cash used in financing activities	$	(7,364	)	$	(5,634	)	$	(38,656	)	$	(25,009	)

The following table reconciles our GAAP to Non-GAAP Financial Measures for the three months ended July 31, 2017 (in thousands, except per share amounts):



	GAAP			Stock-based compensation			Employer payroll tax on employee stock plans			Amortization of acquired intangible assets			Adjustments related to financing lease obligation					Partial release of the valuation allowance due to acquisition			Income tax effects related to non-GAAP adjustments ⁽³⁾			Non-GAAP
Cost of revenues	$	59,876		$	(8,410	)	$	(277	)	$	(2,870	)	$	309				$	—		$	—		$	48,628
Gross margin	78.6		%	3.0		%	0.1		%	1.0		%	(0.1		)%			—		%	—		%	82.6		%
Research and development	71,774			(25,991		)	(559		)	(55		)	495					—			—			45,664
Sales and marketing	191,284			(42,652		)	(1,185		)	(1,316		)	1,174					—			—			147,305
General and administrative	39,139			(15,314		)	(377		)	—			227					—			—			23,675
Operating income (loss)	(82,109		)	92,367			2,398			4,241			(2,205		)			—			—			14,692
Operating margin	(29.3		)%	32.9		%	0.9		%	1.5		%	(0.8		)%			—		%	—		%	5.2		%
Income tax provision	353			—			—			—			—					546			3,356			4,255
Net income (loss)	$	(83,500	)	$	92,367		$	2,398		$	4,241		$	(99	)	⁽²	⁾	$	(546	)	$	(3,356	)	$	11,505
Net income (loss) per share⁽¹⁾	$	(0.60	)																					$	0.08

_________________________

⁽¹⁾GAAP net loss per share calculated based on 139,063 weighted-average shares of common stock. Non-GAAP net income per share calculated based on 142,852 diluted weighted-average shares of common stock, which includes 3,789 potentially dilutive shares related to employee stock awards. GAAP to non-GAAP net income (loss) per share is not reconciled due to the difference in the number of shares used to calculate basic and diluted weighted-average shares of common stock.

⁽²⁾Includes $2.1 million of interest expense related to the financing lease obligation.

⁽³⁾ Represents the tax effect of the non-GAAP adjustments based on the estimated annual effective tax rate of 27%.

The following table reconciles our GAAP to non-GAAP Financial Measures for the three months ended July 31, 2016 (in thousands, except per share amounts):

Table of Contents



	GAAP			Stock-based compensation			Employer payroll tax on employee stock plans			Amortization of acquired intangible assets			Adjustments related to financing lease obligation				Income tax effects related to non-GAAP adjustments ⁽³⁾			Non-GAAP
Cost of revenues	$	44,616		$	(7,310	)	$	(208	)	$	(2,886	)	$	259			$	—		$	34,471
Gross margin	79.0		%	3.4		%	0.1		%	1.4		%	(0.1		)%		—		%	83.8		%
Research and development	67,224			(27,742		)	(676		)	(59		)	555				—			39,302
Sales and marketing	150,228			(39,371		)	(791		)	(151		)	1,131				—			111,046
General and administrative	34,312			(14,440		)	(388		)	—			251				—			19,735
Operating income (loss)	(83,627		)	88,863			2,063			3,096			(2,196		)		—			8,199
Operating margin	(39.3		)%	41.7		%	1.0		%	1.5		%	(1.0		)%		—		%	3.9		%
Income tax provision	1,110			—			—			—			—				651			1,761
Net income (loss)	$	(86,597	)	$	88,863		$	2,063		$	3,096		$	(147	)	⁽²⁾	$	(651	)	$	6,627
Net income (loss) per share⁽¹⁾	$	(0.65	)																	$	0.05

_________________________

⁽¹⁾ GAAP net loss per share calculated based on 133,041 weighted-average shares of common stock. Non-GAAP net income per share calculated based on 136,430 diluted weighted-average shares of common stock, which includes 3,389 potentially dilutive shares related to employee stock awards. GAAP to non-GAAP net income (loss) per share is not reconciled due to the difference in the number of shares used to calculate basic and diluted weighted-average shares of common stock.

⁽²⁾ Includes $2.0 million of interest expense related to the financing lease obligation.

⁽³⁾ For consistency, prior year non-GAAP net loss has been adjusted to reflect the tax effect of the non-GAAP adjustments based on the annual effective tax rate of 21%.

The following table reconciles our GAAP to non-GAAP Financial Measures for the six months ended July 31, 2017 (in thousands, except per share amounts):



	GAAP			Stock-based compensation			Employer payroll tax on employee stock plans			Amortization of acquired intangible assets			Adjustments related to financing lease obligation					Partial release of the valuation allowance due to acquisition			Income tax effects related to non-GAAP adjustments (3)			Non-GAAP
Cost of revenues	$	118,039		$	(16,602	)	$	(718	)	$	(5,519	)	$	615				$	—		$	—		$	95,815
Gross margin	77.4		%	3.2		%	0.1		%	1.1		%	(0.1		)%			—		%	—		%	81.7		%
Research and development	143,072			(52,788		)	(1,810		)	(83		)	1,026					—			—			89,417
Sales and marketing	365,232			(83,295		)	(2,957		)	(1,332		)	2,344					—			—			279,992
General and administrative	75,635			(29,737		)	(1,054		)	—			464					—			—			45,308
Operating income (loss)	(179,566		)	182,422			6,539			6,934			(4,449		)			—			—			11,880
Operating margin	(34.4		)%	35.0		%	1.3		%	1.3		%	(0.9		)%			—		%	—		%	2.3		%
Income tax provision	1,691			—			—			—			—					546			1,523			3,760
Net income (loss)	$	(183,431	)	$	182,422		$	6,539		$	6,934		$	(228	)	⁽²	⁾	$	(546	)	$	(1,523	)	$	10,167
Net income (loss) per share⁽¹⁾	$	(1.33	)																					$	0.07

_________________________

⁽¹⁾GAAP net loss per share calculated based on 138,436 weighted-average shares of common stock. Non-GAAP net income per share calculated based on 142,602 diluted weighted-average shares of common stock, which includes 4,166 potentially dilutive shares related to employee stock awards. GAAP to non-GAAP net income (loss) per share is not reconciled due to the difference in the number of shares used to calculate basic and diluted weighted-average shares of common stock.

⁽²⁾Includes $4.2 million of interest expense related to the financing lease obligation.

⁽³⁾ Represents the tax effect of the non-GAAP adjustments based on the estimated annual effective tax rate of 27%.

The following table reconciles our GAAP to non-GAAP Financial Measures for the six months ended July 31, 2016 (in thousands, except per share amounts):

Table of Contents



	GAAP			Stock-based compensation			Employer payroll tax on employee stock plans			Amortization of acquired intangible assets			Adjustments related to financing lease obligation				Income tax effects related to non-GAAP adjustments (3)			Non-GAAP
Cost of revenues	$	84,116		$	(14,865	)	$	(470	)	$	(5,798	)	$	285			$	—		$	63,268
Gross margin	78.9		%	3.7		%	0.1		%	1.5		%	(0.1		)%		—		%	84.1		%
Research and development	134,595			(56,948		)	(1,432		)	(130		)	613				—			76,698
Sales and marketing	295,379			(79,604		)	(1,817		)	(302		)	1,249				—			214,905
General and administrative	66,385			(28,816		)	(829		)	—			277				—			37,017
Operating income (loss)	(181,770		)	180,233			4,548			6,230			(2,424		)		—			6,817
Operating margin	(45.6		)%	45.2		%	1.1		%	1.6		%	(0.6		)%		—		%	1.7		%
Income tax provision (benefit)	2,335			—			—			—			—				(871		)	1,464
Net income (loss)	$	(187,493	)	$	180,233		$	4,548		$	6,230		$	1,117		⁽²⁾	$	871		$	5,506
Net income (loss) per share⁽¹⁾	$	(1.42	)																	$	0.04

_________________________

⁽¹⁾ GAAP net loss per share calculated based on 132,310 weighted-average shares of common stock. Non-GAAP net income per share calculated based on 135,348 diluted weighted-average shares of common stock, which includes 3,038 potentially dilutive shares related to employee stock awards. GAAP to non-GAAP net income (loss) per share is not reconciled due to the difference in the number of shares used to calculate basic and diluted weighted-average shares of common stock.

⁽²⁾ Includes $3.5 million of interest expense related to the financing lease obligation.

⁽³⁾ For consistency, prior year non-GAAP net loss has been adjusted to reflect the tax effect of the non-GAAP adjustments based on the annual effective tax rate of 21%.

The following table reconciles our total revenues to billings for the three and six months ended July 31, 2017, and 2016 (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	July 31,		July 31,		July 31,		July 31,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
Total revenues	$	279,964	$	212,753	$	522,412	$	398,705
Increase in deferred revenue	23,408		16,582		23,741		17,856
Billings (non-GAAP)	$	303,372	$	229,335	$	546,153	$	416,561

The following table reconciles our GAAP to non-GAAP Cloud gross margin for the three months ended July 31, 2017 (in thousands):



	GAAP			Stock-based compensation			Employer payroll tax on employee stock plans			Non-GAAP
Cloud revenues	$	21,323		$	—		$	—		$	21,323
Cloud cost of revenues	$	15,575		$	(742	)	$	(27	)	$	14,806
Cloud gross margin	27.0		%	3.5		%	0.1		%	30.6		%

Components of Operating Results

Revenues

License revenues. License revenues reflect the revenues recognized from sales of licenses to new customers and additional licenses to existing customers. We are focused on acquiring new customers and increasing revenues from our existing customers as they realize the value of our software by indexing higher volumes of machine data and expanding the use of our software through additional use cases and broader deployment within their organizations. A majority of our license

Table of Contents

revenues consists of revenues from perpetual licenses, under which we generally recognize the license fee portion of the arrangement upfront, assuming all revenue recognition criteria are satisfied. Customers can also purchase term license agreements, under which we recognize the license fee ratably, on a straight-line basis, over the term of the license. Due to the differing revenue recognition policies, shifts in the mix between transactions that are recognized upfront and those that are recognized ratably from quarter to quarter could produce substantial variation in revenues recognized even if our sales remain consistent. In addition, seasonal trends that contribute to increased sales activity in the fourth fiscal quarter often result in lower sequential revenues in the first fiscal quarter, and we expect this trend to continue. Comparing our revenues on a period-to-period basis may not be meaningful, and you should not rely on our past results as an indication of our future performance.

Maintenance and services revenues. Maintenance and services revenues consist of revenues from maintenance agreements and, to a lesser extent, professional services and training, as well as revenues from our cloud services. Typically, when purchasing a perpetual license, a customer also purchases one year of maintenance service for which we charge a percentage of the license fee. When a term license is purchased, maintenance service is typically bundled with the license for the term of the license period. Customers with maintenance agreements are entitled to receive support and unspecified upgrades and enhancements when and if they become available during the maintenance period. We recognize the revenues associated with maintenance agreements ratably, on a straight-line basis, over the associated maintenance period. In arrangements involving a term license, we recognize both the license and maintenance revenues over the contract period. We have a professional services organization focused on helping our customers deploy our software in highly complex operational environments and train their personnel. We recognize the revenues associated with these professional services on a time and materials basis as we deliver the services or provide the training. We expect maintenance and services revenues to become a larger percentage of our total revenues as our installed customer base grows. We generally recognize the revenues associated with our cloud services ratably, on a straight-line basis, over the associated subscription term.

Professional services and training revenues, as a percentage of total revenues, were 10% and 9% for the three months ended July 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. We have experienced continued growth in our professional services revenues primarily due to the deployment of our software with some customers that have large, highly complex IT environments.

Cost of Revenues

Cost of license revenues. Cost of license revenues includes all direct costs to deliver our products, including salaries, benefits, stock-based compensation and related expenses such as employer taxes, allocated overhead for facilities and IT and amortization of acquired intangible assets. We recognize these expenses as they are incurred.

Cost of maintenance and services revenues. Cost of maintenance and services revenues includes salaries, benefits, stock-based compensation and related expenses such as employer taxes for our maintenance and services organization, allocated overhead for depreciation of equipment, facilities and IT, amortization of acquired intangible assets and third-party hosting fees related to our cloud services. We recognize expenses related to our maintenance and services organization as they are incurred.

Operating Expenses

Our operating expenses are classified into three categories: research and development, sales and marketing and general and administrative. For each category, the largest component is personnel costs, which include salaries, employee benefit costs, bonuses, commissions as applicable, stock-based compensation and related expenses such as employer taxes. Operating expenses also include allocated overhead costs for depreciation of equipment, facilities and IT. Allocated costs for facilities include costs for compensation of our facilities personnel, leasehold improvements and rent. Our allocated costs for IT include costs for compensation of our IT personnel and costs associated with our IT infrastructure. Operating expenses are generally recognized as incurred.

Research and development. Research and development expenses primarily consist of personnel and facility-related costs attributable to our research and development personnel. We have devoted our product development efforts primarily to enhancing the functionality and expanding the capabilities of our software and services. We expect that our research and development expenses will continue to increase, in absolute dollars, as we increase our research and development headcount to further strengthen and enhance our software and services and invest in the development of our solutions and apps.

Sales and marketing. Sales and marketing expenses primarily consist of personnel and facility-related costs for our sales, marketing and business development personnel, commissions earned by our sales personnel, and the cost of marketing and business development programs. We expect that sales and marketing expenses will continue to increase, in absolute dollars, as we continue to hire additional personnel and invest in marketing programs.

Table of Contents

General and administrative. General and administrative expenses primarily consist of personnel and facility-related costs for our executive, finance, legal, human resources and administrative personnel; our legal, accounting and other professional services fees; and other corporate expenses. We anticipate continuing to incur additional expenses due to growing our operations, including higher legal, corporate insurance and accounting expenses.

Interest and other income (expense), net

Interest and other income (expense), net consists primarily of foreign exchange gains and losses, interest income on our investments and cash and cash equivalents balances, and changes in the fair value of forward exchange contracts.

Provision for income taxes

The provision for income taxes consists of federal, state and foreign income taxes. We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which we expect the differences to reverse. We record a valuation allowance to reduce the deferred tax assets to the amount that we are more-likely-than-not to realize. Because of our history of U.S. net operating losses, we have established, in prior years, a full valuation allowance against potential future benefits for U.S. deferred tax assets including loss carry-forwards and research and development and other tax credits. We regularly assess the likelihood that our deferred income tax assets will be realized based on the realization guidance available. To the extent that we believe any amounts are not more-likely-than-not to be realized, we record a valuation allowance to reduce the deferred income tax assets. We regularly assess the need for the valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets, and to the extent that we determine that an adjustment is needed, such adjustment will be recorded in the period that the determination is made.

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

The following tables set forth our results of operations for the periods presented and as a percentage of our total revenues for those periods. The period-to-period comparison of financial results is not necessarily indicative of financial results to be achieved in future periods.



	Three Months Ended July 31,						Six Months Ended July 31,
	2017			2016			2017			2016

	(in thousands)
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:
Revenues
License	$	142,851		$	115,695		$	259,577		$	216,687
Maintenance and services	137,113			97,058			262,835			182,018
Total revenues	279,964			212,753			522,412			398,705
Cost of revenues
License	3,159			2,868			6,087			5,830
Maintenance and services	56,717			41,748			111,952			78,286
Total cost of revenues	59,876			44,616			118,039			84,116
Gross profit	220,088			168,137			404,373			314,589
Operating expenses
Research and development	71,774			67,224			143,072			134,595
Sales and marketing	191,284			150,228			365,232			295,379
General and administrative	39,139			34,312			75,635			66,385
Total operating expenses	302,197			251,764			583,939			496,359
Operating loss	(82,109		)	(83,627		)	(179,566		)	(181,770		)
Interest and other income (expense), net
Interest income (expense), net	(164		)	(797		)	(692		)	(1,200		)
Other income (expense), net	(874		)	(1,063		)	(1,482		)	(2,188		)
Total interest and other income (expense), net	(1,038		)	(1,860		)	(2,174		)	(3,388		)
Loss before income taxes	(83,147		)	(85,487		)	(181,740		)	(185,158		)
Income tax provision	353			1,110			1,691			2,335
Net loss	$	(83,500	)	$	(86,597	)	$	(183,431	)	$	(187,493	)

Table of Contents



	Three Months Ended July 31,				Six Months Ended July 31,
	2017		2016		2017		2016

	(as % of revenues)
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:
Revenues
License	51.0	%	54.4	%	49.7	%	54.3	%
Maintenance and services	49.0		45.6		50.3		45.7
Total revenues	100.0		100.0		100.0		100.0
Cost of revenues
License ⁽¹⁾	2.2		2.5		2.3		2.7
Maintenance and services⁽¹⁾	41.4		43.0		42.6		43.0
Total cost of revenues	21.4		21.0		22.6		21.1
Gross profit	78.6		79.0		77.4		78.9
Operating expenses
Research and development	25.6		31.6		27.4		33.8
Sales and marketing	68.3		70.6		69.9		74.1
General and administrative	14.0		16.1		14.5		16.7
Total operating expenses	107.9		118.3		111.8		124.6
Operating loss	(29.3	)	(39.3	)	(34.4	)	(45.6	)
Interest and other income (expense), net
Interest income (expense), net	(0.1	)	(0.4	)	(0.1	)	(0.3	)
Other income (expense), net	(0.3	)	(0.5	)	(0.3	)	(0.5	)
Total interest and other income (expense), net	(0.4	)	(0.9	)	(0.4	)	(0.8	)
Loss before income taxes	(29.7	)	(40.2	)	(34.8	)	(46.4	)
Income tax provision	0.1		0.5		0.3		0.6
Net loss	(29.8	)%	(40.7	)%	(35.1	)%	(47.0	)%

_________________________

⁽¹⁾ Calculated as a percentage of the associated revenues.

Comparison of the Three Months Ended July 31, 2017 and 2016

Revenues



	Three Months Ended July 31,
	2017			2016			% Change
	($ amounts in thousands)
Revenues
License	$	142,851		$	115,695		23.5	%
Maintenance and services	137,113			97,058			41.3	%
Total revenues	$	279,964		$	212,753		31.6	%
Percentage of revenues
License	51.0		%	54.4		%
Maintenance and services	49.0			45.6
Total	100.0		%	100.0		%

The increase in license revenues of $27.2 million was primarily driven by increases in our total number of customers, sales to existing customers and the number of large orders. For example, we had 541 and 446 orders greater than $100,000 for the three months ended July 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Our total number of customers increased from approximately 12,000 at July 31, 2016 to more than 14,000 at July 31, 2017. The increase in maintenance and services revenues of $40.1 million was due to increases in sales of maintenance agreements and sales of professional services resulting from the growth of our installed customer base, as well as increases in sales of our cloud services.

Table of Contents

Cost of Revenues and Gross Margin



	Three Months Ended July 31,
	2017			2016			% Change
	($ amounts in thousands)
Cost of revenues ⁽¹⁾
License	$	3,159		$	2,868		10.1	%
Maintenance and services	56,717			41,748			35.9	%
Total cost of revenues	$	59,876		$	44,616		34.2	%
Gross margin
License	97.8		%	97.5		%
Maintenance and services	58.6		%	57.0		%
Total gross margin	78.6		%	79.0		%

⁽¹⁾ Includes stock-based compensation expense:
Cost of revenues	$	8,410		$	7,310

Total cost of revenues increased primarily due to a $15.0 million increase in cost of maintenance and services revenues. The increase in cost of maintenance and services revenues was primarily related to a $8.8 million increase in salaries and benefits expense due to increased headcount. We also had a $2.6 million increase in expenses related to third-party consulting services and a $2.4 million increase related to third-party hosting fees to support our cloud services. Total gross margin decreased slightly due to maintenance and services revenues being a greater percentage of the overall revenue mix.

Operating Expenses



	Three Months Ended July 31,
	2017			2016			% Change
	($ amounts in thousands)
Operating expenses⁽¹⁾
Research and development	$	71,774		$	67,224		6.8	%
Sales and marketing	191,284			150,228			27.3	%
General and administrative	39,139			34,312			14.1	%
Total operating expenses	$	302,197		$	251,764		20.0	%
Percentage of revenues
Research and development	25.6		%	31.6		%
Sales and marketing	68.3			70.6
General and administrative	14.0			16.1
Total	107.9		%	118.3		%

⁽¹⁾ Includes stock-based compensation expense:
Research and development	$	25,991		$	27,742
Sales and marketing	42,652			39,371
General and administrative	15,314			14,440
Total stock-based compensation expense	$	83,957		$	81,553

Research and development expense. Research and development expense increased $4.6 million primarily due to a $1.3 million increase in salaries and benefits as we increased headcount as part of our focus on further developing and enhancing our products. Additionally, we experienced a $1.0 million increase in hosting fees to support our cloud development efforts.

Sales and marketing expense. Sales and marketing expense increased $41.1 million primarily due to a $28.6 million increase in salaries and benefits as we increased headcount to expand our field sales organization. We also had an increase of

Table of Contents

$4.3 million in other marketing-related expenses, an increase of $4.0 million related to facilities and overhead costs and an increase of $3.1 million related to third-party consulting services.

General and administrative expense. General and administrative expense increased $4.8 million due primarily to an increase of $2.0 million related to salaries and benefits as we increased headcount.

Interest and Other Income (Expense), net



	Three Months Ended July 31,
	2017			2016
	(in thousands)
Interest and other income (expense), net:
Interest income (expense), net	$	(164	)	$	(797	)
Other income (expense), net	(874		)	(1,063		)
Total interest and other income (expense), net	$	(1,038	)	$	(1,860	)

Interest and other income (expense), net reflects a net decrease in expense primarily due to an increase in interest income from our investments, partially offset by interest expense related to our financing lease obligation and foreign exchange losses.

Income Tax Provision



	Three Months Ended July 31,
	2017		2016
	(in thousands)
Income tax provision	$	353	$	1,110

For the three months ended July 31, 2017, the decrease in income tax expense was primarily due to an income tax benefit recognized from the partial release of the valuation allowance from an acquisition, partially offset by an increase in taxable income in our international jurisdictions.

Comparison of the Six Months Ended July 31, 2017 and 2016

Revenues



	Six Months Ended July 31,
	2017			2016			% Change
	($ amounts in thousands)
Revenues
License	$	259,577		$	216,687		19.8	%
Maintenance and services	262,835			182,018			44.4	%
Total revenues	$	522,412		$	398,705		31.0	%
Percentage of revenues
License	49.7		%	54.3		%
Maintenance and services	50.3			45.7
Total	100.0		%	100.0		%

The increase in license revenues of $42.9 million was primarily driven by increases in our total number of customers, sales to existing customers and an increase in the number of large orders. For example, we had 899 and 764 orders greater than $100,000 for the six months ended July 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Our total number of customers increased from approximately 12,000 at July 31, 2016 to more than 14,000 at July 31, 2017. The increase in maintenance and services revenues of $80.8 million was due to increases in sales of maintenance agreements and sales of professional services resulting from the growth of our installed customer base, as well as increases in sales of our cloud services.

Cost of Revenues and Gross Margin

Table of Contents



	Six Months Ended July 31,
	2017			2016			% Change
	($ amounts in thousands)
Cost of revenues
License	$	6,087		$	5,830		4.4	%
Maintenance and services	111,952			78,286			43.0	%
Total cost of revenues	$	118,039		$	84,116		40.3	%
Gross margin
License	97.7		%	97.3		%
Maintenance and services	57.4		%	57.0		%
Total gross margin	77.4		%	78.9		%

Total cost of revenues increased $33.9 million primarily due to a $33.7 million increase in cost of maintenance and services revenues. The $33.7 million increase in cost of maintenance and services revenues was primarily related to an increase of $16.3 million in salaries and benefits expense, an increase of $9.4 million related to third-party hosting fees to support our cloud services and an increase of $5.1 million related to third-party consulting services. Total gross margin decreased primarily due to maintenance and services revenues being a greater percentage of the overall revenue mix.

Operating Expenses



	Six Months Ended July 31,
	2017			2016			% Change
	($ amounts in thousands)
Operating expenses⁽¹⁾
Research and development	$	143,072		$	134,595		6.3	%
Sales and marketing	365,232			295,379			23.6	%
General and administrative	75,635			66,385			13.9	%
Total operating expenses	$	583,939		$	496,359		17.6	%
Percentage of revenues
Research and development	27.4		%	33.8		%
Sales and marketing	69.9			74.1
General and administrative	14.5			16.7
Total	111.8		%	124.6		%

⁽¹⁾ Includes stock-based compensation expense:
Research and development	$	52,788		$	56,948
Sales and marketing	83,295			79,604
General and administrative	29,737			28,816
Total stock-based compensation expense	$	165,820		$	165,368

Research and development expense. Research and development expense increased $8.5 million primarily due to a $2.7 million increase in salaries and benefits due to headcount growth as we focus on further developing and enhancing our products. We also had an increase of $2.3 million related to third-party consulting services.

Sales and marketing expense. Sales and marketing expense increased $69.9 million primarily due to a $45.7 million increase in salaries and benefits, as we increased headcount to expand our field sales organization and experienced higher commission expense as a result of increased customer orders. We experienced an increase of $8.1 million related to third-party consulting services, as well as an increase of $6.7 million in other marketing-related expenses. Additionally, we had an increase of $5.8 million in expenses due to increased facilities and overhead.

General and administrative expense. General and administrative expense increased $9.3 million due primarily to an increase of $3.5 million related to salaries and benefits as we increased headcount. Additionally, we experienced a $1.7 million increase in accounting and legal expenses and a $1.6 million increase in third-party consulting services.

Table of Contents

Interest and Other Income (Expense), net



	Six Months Ended July 31,
	2017			2016
	(in thousands)
Interest and other income (expense), net
Interest income (expense), net	$	(692	)	$	(1,200	)
Other income (expense), net	(1,482		)	(2,188		)
Total interest and other income (expense), net	$	(2,174	)	$	(3,388	)

Interest and other income (expense), net reflects a decrease in expense primarily due to an increase in interest income from our investments, partially offset by interest expense related to our financing lease obligation and foreign exchange losses.

Income Tax Provision



	Six Months Ended July 31,
	2017		2016
	(in thousands)
Income tax provision	$	1,691	$	2,335

For the six months ended July 31, 2017, the decrease in income tax expense was primarily due to an income tax benefit recognized from the partial release of the valuation allowance from an acquisition, partially offset by an increase in taxable income in our international jurisdictions.

Liquidity and Capital Resources



	July 31, 2017			January 31, 2017
	(in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	419,810		$	421,346

	Six Months Ended July 31,
	2017			2016
	(in thousands)
Cash provided by operating activities	$	64,546		$	54,038
Net cash used in investing activities	(28,168		)	(44,003		)
Net cash used in financing activities	(38,656		)	(25,009		)

We fund our operations primarily through cash generated from operations. At July 31, 2017, our cash and cash equivalents of $419.8 million were held for working capital purposes, a majority of which was invested in money market funds. We intend to continue to focus our capital expenditures in fiscal 2018 to support the growth in our operations and our global facility expansions. We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for at least the next 12 months. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors including our growth rate, the timing and extent of spending to support development efforts, the expansion of sales and marketing activities, the introduction of new and enhanced software and services offerings, the continuing market acceptance of our offerings and our planned investments, particularly in our product development efforts or acquisitions of complementary businesses, applications or technologies.

In the event that additional financing is required from outside sources, we may not be able to raise it on terms acceptable to us, if at all. If we are unable to raise additional capital when desired, our business, operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected.

Operating Activities

Operating activities consist of our net loss adjusted for certain non-cash items and changes in operating assets and liabilities during the year.

Table of Contents

Net cash provided by operating activities was $64.5 million for the six months ended July 31, 2017 compared to $54.0 million from the prior year. The increase in net cash provided by operating activities was primarily related to a reduction in payments for accrued payroll and compensation and an increase in deferred revenue during the six months ended July 31, 2017 as compared to the prior year. This increase was offset by a reduction in accounts receivable collections as compared to the prior year.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $54.0 million for the six months ended July 31, 2016 compared to $42.3 million from the prior year. The increase in net cash provided by operating activities was primarily related to improvements in the collections of accounts receivable for the six months ended July 31, 2016 as compared to the prior year. This increase was offset by an increase in payments for accrued payroll and compensation as compared to the prior year.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities was $28.2 million for the six months ended July 31, 2017 compared to $44.0 million from the prior year. The decrease in cash used by investing activities was primarily related to an increase of $48.0 million in maturities of investments as compared to the prior year. This inflow was partially offset by an increase of $24.2 million in the net purchases of investments and a $17.2 million increase in cash purchase price paid, net of cash acquired, for an acquisition.

Net cash used in investing activities was $44.0 million for the six months ended July 31, 2016 compared to $125.6 million from the prior year. The decrease in cash used in investing activities was primarily related to a decrease of $142.7 million in cash purchase price paid, net of cash acquired, for acquisitions, and a decrease of $43.3 million in maturities of investments as compared to the prior year. These inflows were partially offset by an increase of $97.3 million in the net purchases of investments.

Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities was $38.7 million for the six months ended July 31, 2017 compared to $25.0 million from the prior year. The increase in cash used in financing activities was primarily related to an increase of $12.3 million in taxes paid related to net share settlement of equity awards.

Net cash used in financing activities was $25.0 million for the six months ended July 31, 2016 compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $22.3 million from the prior year. The increase in cash used in financing activities was primarily related to an increase of $46.8 million in taxes paid related to net share settlement of equity awards.

Loan and Security Agreement

On May 9, 2013, we entered into a Loan Agreement with Silicon Valley Bank, which was most recently amended in May 2017. As amended, the agreement provides for a revolving line of credit facility, which expires on May 9, 2018. Under the agreement, we are able to borrow up to $25 million. Interest on any drawdown under the revolving line of credit accrues either at the prime rate (4.25% in July 2017) or the LIBOR rate plus 2.75%. As of July 31, 2017, we had no balance outstanding under this agreement. The agreement includes restrictive covenants, in each case subject to certain exceptions, that limit our ability to: sell or otherwise dispose of our business or property; change our business, liquidate or dissolve or undergo a change in control; enter into mergers, consolidations and acquisitions; incur indebtedness; create liens; pay dividends or make distributions; make investments; enter into material transactions with affiliates; pay any subordinated debt or amend certain terms thereof; or become an investment company.

In addition, the agreement contains customary financial covenants and other affirmative and negative covenants. We were in compliance with all covenants as of July 31, 2017.

Operating Lease Commitments and Purchase Obligations

Table of Contents

Purchase obligations are contractual obligations for purchase of goods or services and are defined as agreements that are enforceable and legally binding and that specify all significant terms, including: fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum, or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction.

The following summarizes our operating lease commitments and significant purchase obligations as of July 31, 2017 (in thousands):



	Payments Due by Period
	Total		Less Than 1 year		1-3 years		3-5 years		More Than 5 years
Operating lease commitments ⁽¹⁾	$	167,265	$	22,899	$	41,091	$	35,848	$	67,427
Purchase obligations ⁽²⁾	166,379		79,724		86,655		—		—
Total	$	333,644	$	102,623	$	127,746	$	35,848	$	67,427

_________________________

⁽²⁾ Purchase obligations relate primarily to IT and product infrastructure costs, enterprise subscription agreements, and sales and marketing costs.

Financing Lease Obligation

As a result of our involvement during the construction period, whereby we had certain indemnification obligations related to the construction, we were considered, for accounting purposes only, the owner of the construction project under build-to-suit lease accounting. We have recorded project construction costs incurred by the landlord as an asset and a corresponding long-term liability in “Property and equipment, net” and “Other liabilities, non-current,” respectively, on our condensed consolidated balance sheets. We moved into the Premises in February 2016. We have determined that the lease does not meet the criteria for “sale-leaseback” treatment, due to our continuing involvement in the construction project resulting from our standby letter of credit. Accordingly, the Lease will continue to be accounted for as a financing obligation.

As of July 31, 2017, future payments on the financing lease obligation are as follows (in thousands):



Fiscal Period:
Remaining six months of fiscal 2018	$	6,105
Fiscal 2019	12,552
Fiscal 2020	12,928
Fiscal 2021	13,316
Fiscal 2022	13,715
Fiscal 2023	14,127
Fiscal 2024	8,142
Total future minimum lease payments	$	80,885

Facility Exit Costs

Table of Contents

the present value of our remaining lease obligations, adjusted for the effects of any prepaid or deferred items. We recorded a facility exit charge of approximately $8.6 million to "General and administrative" expenses in the condensed consolidated statements of operations associated with the recognition of the liability. The short-term portion of the liability is recorded in "Accrued expenses and other liabilities" and the long-term portion of the liability is recorded in "Other liabilities, non-current," on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. As of July 31, 2017, the remaining "cease-use" liability was $6.7 million.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

During the three and six months ended July 31, 2017 and 2016, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated organizations or financial partnerships, such as structured finance or special purpose entities that have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.

Indemnification Arrangements

During the ordinary course of business, we may indemnify, hold harmless and agree to reimburse for losses suffered or incurred, our customers, vendors and their affiliates for certain intellectual property infringement and other claims by third parties with respect to our offerings, in connection with our commercial end-user license arrangements or related to general business dealings with those parties.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

We prepare our condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements also requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, costs and expenses and related disclosures. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ significantly from the estimates made by our management. To the extent that there are differences between our estimates and actual results, our future financial statement presentation, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows will be affected.

There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates as compared to the critical accounting policies and estimates described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 29, 2017.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

For information with respect to recent accounting pronouncements and the impact of these pronouncements on our condensed consolidated financial statements, see Note 1 contained in the “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements” included in Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Interest Rate Risk

We had cash and cash equivalents of $419.8 million as of July 31, 2017. We hold our cash and cash equivalents for working capital purposes. Our cash and cash equivalents are held in cash deposits and money market funds. The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal while maximizing yields without significantly increasing risk. This objective is accomplished by making diversified investments, consisting only of investment grade securities. The effect of a hypothetical 10% increase or decrease in overall interest rates would not have had a material impact on our interest income.

Any draws under our revolving credit facility bear interest at a variable rate tied to the prime rate or the LIBOR rate. As of July 31, 2017, we had no balance outstanding under this agreement.

Table of Contents

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

Our results of operations and cash flows are subject to fluctuations due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. All of our revenues are generated in U.S. dollars. Our expenses are generally denominated in the currencies in which our operations are located, which is primarily in the United States and to a lesser extent in Europe and Asia. Our results of operations and cash flows are, therefore, subject to fluctuations due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates and may be adversely affected in the future due to changes in foreign exchange rates. We seek to minimize the impact of certain foreign currency fluctuations by hedging certain balance sheet exposures with foreign currency forward contracts. Any gain or loss from settling these contracts is offset by the loss or gain derived from the underlying balance sheet exposures. We do not enter into any hedging contracts for trading or speculative purposes. The effect of a hypothetical 10% change in foreign currency exchange rates applicable to our business would not have a material impact on our historical consolidated financial statements. As our international operations grow, we will continue to reassess our approach to manage our risk relating to fluctuations in currency rates.

Inflation

We do not believe that inflation had a material effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations in the three and six months ended July 31, 2017 and 2016. If our costs were to become subject to significant inflationary pressures, we may not be able to fully offset such higher costs through price increases. Our inability or failure to do so could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of July 31, 2017. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of July 31, 2017, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(d) and 15d-15(d) of the Exchange Act that occurred during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls

Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, believes that our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and are effective at the reasonable assurance level. However, our management does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because

Table of Contents

of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

The information set forth above under Legal Proceedings in Note 3 contained in the “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements” is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Our operations and financial results are subject to various risks and uncertainties including those described below. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties that we are unaware of, or that we currently believe are not material, also may become important factors that affect us. If any of the following risks or others not specified below materialize, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In that case, the trading price of our common stock could decline.

Our future operating results may fluctuate significantly, and our recent operating results may not be a good indication of our future performance.

Our revenues and operating results could vary significantly from period to period as a result of various factors, many of which are outside of our control. For example, we have historically generated a majority of our revenues from perpetual license agreements, whereby we generally recognize the license fee portion of the arrangement upfront, assuming all revenue recognition criteria are satisfied. Our customers also have the choice of entering into agreements for term licenses and/or our cloud services for use of our software, whereby the fee is recognized ratably over the term of the agreement, and, in combination with our introduction of enterprise adoption agreements, or transactions that are designed to enable broad adoption of our software within an enterprise, we have seen the proportion of our transactions where revenues will be recognized ratably generally increase as a percentage of total transactions. While at the beginning of each quarter, we do not know the ratio between transactions that will be recognized upfront and those that will be recognized ratably that we will enter into during the quarter, we anticipate that the proportion of ratably recognized transactions will continue to generally increase over the near term. Our operating results and business model could be significantly impacted by shifts in the ratio between transactions that will be recognized upfront and those that will be recognized ratably. In addition, the size of our licenses varies greatly, and a single, large perpetual license in a given period could distort our operating results. The timing and size of large transactions are often hard to predict in any particular period. Further, a portion of revenue recognized in any given quarter is a result of ratably recognized agreements entered into during previous quarters, including maintenance and support agreements. Consequently, a decline in business from ratably recognized agreements or maintenance and support agreements in any quarter may not be reflected in our revenue results for that quarter. Any such decline, however, will negatively affect our revenues in future quarters. Accordingly, the effect of downturns in sales and market acceptance of our offerings may not be fully reflected in our results of operations until future periods. Comparing our revenues and operating results on a period-to-period basis may not be meaningful, and you should not rely on our past results as an indication of our future performance.

We may not be able to accurately predict our future revenues or results of operations. In particular, approximately 40% of the revenues we currently recognize each quarter has been attributable to sales made in that same quarter with the balance of the revenues being attributable to sales made in prior quarters in which the related revenues were not recognized upfront. As a result, our ability to forecast revenues on a quarterly or longer-term basis is extremely limited. We base our current and future expense levels on our operating plans and sales forecasts, and our operating costs are expected to be relatively fixed in the short-term. As a result, we may not be able to reduce our costs sufficiently to compensate for an unexpected shortfall in revenues, and even a small shortfall in revenues could disproportionately and adversely affect our financial results for that quarter.

In addition to other risk factors described elsewhere in this “Risk Factors” section, factors that may cause our financial results to fluctuate from quarter to quarter include:


•	the timing of our sales during the quarter, particularly because a large portion of our sales occur toward the end of the quarter, or the loss or delay of a few large contracts;


•	the mix of revenues attributable to larger transactions as opposed to smaller transactions and the impact that a change in mix may have on the overall average selling price of our offerings;

Table of Contents


•	the mix of revenues attributable to perpetual licenses and term licenses, subscriptions, enterprise adoption agreements, maintenance and professional services and training, which may impact our revenue, deferred revenue, billings, gross margins and operating income;


•	the renewal and usage rates of our customers;


•	changes in the competitive dynamics of our market;


•	changes in customers’ budgets and in the timing of their purchasing decisions;


•	customers delaying purchasing decisions in anticipation of new offerings or software enhancements by us or our competitors;


•	customer acceptance of and willingness to pay for new versions of our offerings or new solutions for specific product and end markets;


•	our ability to successfully introduce and monetize new offerings and licensing and service models for our new offerings;


•	our ability to control costs, including our operating expenses;


•	the amount and timing of our stock-based compensation expenses;


•	changes in accounting standards, particularly those related to revenue recognition;


•	the timing of satisfying revenue recognition criteria;


•	our ability to qualify and successfully compete for government contracts;


•	the collectability of receivables from customers and resellers, which may be hindered or delayed;


•	the removal of metered license enforcement via our software, which could lead to customers delaying renewal or purchasing decisions; and


•	general economic and political conditions and uncertainty, both domestically and internationally, as well as economic and political conditions and uncertainty specifically affecting industries in which our customers participate.

Many of these factors are outside our control, and the variability and unpredictability of such factors could result in our failing to meet or exceed our financial expectations for a given period. We believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our revenues, operating results and cash flows may not necessarily be indicative of our future performance.

The market for our offerings is new and unproven and may not grow.

We believe our future success will depend in large part on the growth, if any, in the market for offerings that provide operational intelligence, particularly from machine data. We market our offerings as targeted solutions for specific use cases and as an enterprise solution for machine data. In order to grow our business, we intend to expand the functionality of our offerings to increase their acceptance and use by the broader market as well as develop new offerings. It is difficult to predict customer adoption and renewal rates, customer demand for our offerings, the size and growth rate of this market, the entry of competitive products or the success of existing competitive products. Any expansion in our market depends on a number of factors, including the cost, performance and perceived value associated with our offerings. If our offerings do not achieve widespread adoption or there is a reduction in demand for products in our market caused by a lack of customer acceptance or expansion, technological challenges, decreases in accessible machine data, competing technologies and products, pricing pressure, decreases in corporate or information technology spending, weakening economic conditions, or otherwise, it could result in reduced customer orders, early terminations, reduced renewal rates or decreased revenues, any of which would adversely affect our business operations and financial results. We believe that these are inherent risks and difficulties in this new and unproven market.

We have a short operating history, which makes it difficult to evaluate our future prospects and may increase the risk that we will not be successful.

Table of Contents

We have a short operating history, which limits our ability to forecast our future operating results and subjects us to a number of uncertainties, including our ability to plan for and model future growth. We have encountered and will continue to encounter risks and uncertainties frequently experienced by growing companies in developing industries. If our assumptions regarding these uncertainties, which we use to plan our business, are incorrect or change in reaction to changes in our markets, or if we do not address these risks successfully, our operating and financial results could differ materially from our expectations and our business could suffer. Moreover, although we have experienced rapid growth historically, we may not continue to grow as rapidly in the future. Any success that we may experience in the future will depend in large part on our ability to, among other things:


•	improve the performance and capabilities of our offerings and technology and architecture through research and development;


•	continue to develop, enhance, expand adoption of and globally deliver our cloud services, including Splunk Cloud, and comply with applicable laws in each jurisdiction in which we offer such services;


•	successfully develop, introduce and expand adoption of new offerings;


•	acquire new customers and increase revenues from existing customers through increased or broader use of our offerings within their organizations;


•	successfully expand our business domestically and internationally;


•	maintain and expand our customer base and the ways in which our customers use our offerings;


•	successfully compete with other companies, open source projects and custom development efforts that are currently in, or may in the future enter, the markets for our offerings;


•	successfully provide our customers a compelling business case to purchase our offerings in a time frame that matches our and our customers’ sales and purchase cycles and at a compelling price point;

•respond timely and effectively to competitor offerings and pricing models;

•appropriately price our offerings;

•manage the costs of providing our cloud services;


•	generate leads and convert users of the trial versions of our offerings to paying customers;


•	prevent users from circumventing the terms of their licenses and subscriptions;


•	continue to invest in our platform to deliver additional enhancements and content for our offerings and to foster an ecosystem of developers and users to expand the use cases of our offerings;


•	maintain and enhance our website and cloud services infrastructure to minimize interruptions when accessing our offerings;


•	process, store and use our employees, customers’ and other third parties' data in compliance with applicable governmental regulations and other legal obligations related to data privacy, data protection, data transfer, data residency, encryption and security;


•	hire, integrate and retain world-class professional and technical talent; and


•	successfully integrate acquired businesses and technologies.

If we fail to address the risks and difficulties we face, including those described elsewhere in this “Risk Factors” section, our business will be adversely affected and our business operations and financial results will suffer.

If we fail to effectively manage our growth, our business and operating results could be adversely affected.

Table of Contents

Although our business has experienced significant growth, we cannot provide any assurance that our business will continue to grow at the same rate or at all. We have experienced and may continue to experience rapid growth in our headcount and operations, which has placed and will continue to place significant demands on our management and our operational and financial infrastructure. As of July 31, 2017, approximately 27% of our workforce had been employed by us for less than one year. As we continue to grow, we must effectively integrate, develop and motivate a large number of new employees, while maintaining the effectiveness of our business execution and the beneficial aspects of our corporate culture. In particular, we intend to continue to make directed and substantial investments to expand our research and development, sales and marketing, and general and administrative organizations, as well as our international operations.

To effectively manage growth, we must continue to improve our operational, financial and management controls, and our reporting systems and procedures by, among other things:


•	improving our key business applications, processes and IT infrastructure to support our business needs;


•	enhancing information and communication systems to ensure that our employees and offices around the world are well-coordinated and can effectively communicate with each other and our growing base of customers and channel partners;


•	enhancing our internal controls to ensure timely and accurate reporting of all of our operations and financial results; and


•	appropriately documenting our IT systems and our business processes.

These systems enhancements and improvements will require significant capital expenditures and allocation of valuable management and employee resources. If we fail to implement these improvements effectively, our ability to manage our expected growth, ensure uninterrupted operation of key business systems and comply with the rules and regulations that are applicable to public reporting companies will be impaired. Additionally, if we do not effectively manage the growth of our business and operations, the quality of our offerings could suffer, which could negatively affect our brand, financial results and overall business.

We face intense competition in our markets, and we may be unable to compete effectively for sales opportunities.

Although our offerings target the new and emerging market for software and cloud services that provide operational intelligence, we compete against a variety of large software vendors and smaller specialized companies, open source projects and custom development efforts, which provide solutions in the specific markets we address. Our principal competitors include:


•	IT departments of potential customers which have undertaken custom software development efforts to analyze and manage their machine data;


•	companies targeting the big data market by commercializing open source software, such as the various Hadoop distributions and NoSQL data stores, including Elastic;


•	security, systems management and other IT vendors, including BMC Software, CA Technologies, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, IBM, Intel, Microsoft, Dell Software and VMware;


•	business intelligence vendors, analytics and visualization vendors, including IBM and Oracle; and


•	cloud service providers, as well as small, specialized vendors that provide complementary and competitive solutions in enterprise data analytics, log aggregation and management, data warehousing and big data technologies that may compete with our offerings.

The principal competitive factors in our markets include features, performance and support, scalability and flexibility, ease of deployment and use, total cost of ownership and time to value. Some of our actual and potential competitors have advantages over us, such as longer operating histories, significantly greater financial, technical, marketing or other resources, stronger brand and business user recognition, larger intellectual property portfolios, broader global distribution and presence and more developed ecosystems of partners and skilled users. Further, competitors may be able to offer products or functionality similar to ours at a more attractive price than we can, such as by integrating or bundling their software products with their other product offerings. In addition, our industry is evolving rapidly and is becoming increasingly competitive.

Table of Contents

Larger and more established companies may focus on operational intelligence and could directly compete with us. For example, companies may commercialize open source software, such as Hadoop or Elasticsearch, in a manner that competes with our offerings or causes potential customers to believe that such product and our offerings perform the same function. If companies move a greater proportion of their data and computational needs to the cloud, new competitors may emerge that offer services comparable to ours or that are better suited for cloud-based data, and the demand for our offerings may decrease. Smaller companies could also launch new products and services that we do not offer and that could gain market acceptance quickly.

In recent years, there have been significant acquisitions and consolidation by and among our actual and potential competitors. We anticipate this trend of consolidation will continue, which will present heightened competitive challenges to our business. In particular, consolidation in our industry increases the likelihood of our competitors offering bundled or integrated products, and we believe that it may increase the competitive pressures we face with respect to our offerings. If we are unable to differentiate our offerings from the integrated or bundled products of our competitors, such as by offering enhanced functionality, performance or value, we may see decreased demand for those offerings, which would adversely affect our business operations, financial results and growth prospects. Further, it is possible that continued industry consolidation may impact customers’ perceptions of the viability of smaller or even medium-sized software firms and consequently their willingness to use software solutions from such firms. Similarly, if customers seek to concentrate their software license purchases in the product portfolios of a few large providers, we may be at a competitive disadvantage regardless of the performance and features of our offerings. We believe that in order to remain competitive at the large enterprise level, we will need to develop and expand relationships with resellers and large system integrators that provide a broad range of products and services. If we are unable to compete effectively, our business operations and financial results could be materially and adversely affected.

Because our business substantially depends on sales of licenses, maintenance and services related to one software product, failure of this offering to satisfy customer demands or to achieve increased market acceptance would adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and growth prospects.

Although we have several software and services offerings, our business substantially depends on, and we expect our business to continue to substantially depend on, sales of licenses, maintenance and services related to Splunk Enterprise. As such, the market acceptance of Splunk Enterprise is critical to our continued success. Demand for Splunk Enterprise is affected by a number of factors beyond our control, including continued market acceptance of Splunk Enterprise by referenceable accounts for existing and new use cases, the timing of development and release of new products by our competitors, technological change, and growth or contraction in our market. We expect the proliferation of machine data to lead to an increase in the data analysis demands of our customers, and our offerings may not be able to scale and perform to meet those demands or may not be chosen by users for those needs. If we are unable to continue to meet customer demands or to achieve more widespread market acceptance of Splunk Enterprise, our business operations, financial results and growth prospects will be materially and adversely affected.

We have a history of losses, and we may not be profitable in the future.

We have incurred net losses in each year since our inception. As a result, we had an accumulated deficit of $1.2 billion at July 31, 2017. Because the market for our offerings is rapidly evolving and has not yet reached widespread adoption, it is difficult for us to predict our future operating results. We expect our operating expenses to increase over the next several years as we hire additional personnel, expand and improve the effectiveness of our distribution channels, improve the performance and scalability of our technology architecture, and continue to develop features and functionality for our offerings. In addition, as we grow as a public company, we have incurred and will continue to incur significant legal, accounting and other operating expenses. If our revenues do not increase to offset these increases in our operating expenses, we may not be profitable in future periods. Our historical revenue growth has been inconsistent and should not be considered indicative of our future performance. Further, in future periods, our revenue growth could slow or our revenues could decline for a number of reasons, including slowing demand for our offerings, increasing competition, a decrease in the growth of our overall market, or our failure, for any reason, to continue to capitalize on growth opportunities. Any failure by us to achieve, sustain or increase profitability on a consistent basis could cause the value of our common stock to decline.

If customers do not expand their use of our offerings beyond the current predominant use cases, our ability to grow our business and operating results may be adversely affected.

Most of our customers currently use our offerings to support application management, IT operations, security and compliance functions. Our ability to grow our business depends in part on our ability to help enable current and future customers to increase their use of our offerings for their existing use cases and expand their use of our offerings to additional

Table of Contents

use cases, such as facilities management, supply chain management, business analytics, IoT and customer analytics. If we fail to achieve market acceptance of our offerings for these applications, or if a competitor establishes a more widely adopted solution for these applications, our ability to grow our business and financial results will be adversely affected.

We employ multiple, unique and evolving pricing models, which subject us to various pricing and licensing challenges that could make it difficult for us to derive value from our customers and may adversely affect our operating results.

We employ multiple, unique and evolving pricing models for our offerings. For example, we generally charge our customers for their use of Splunk Enterprise and Splunk Light based on their estimated peak daily indexing capacity. In addition, Splunk Cloud is generally priced based on peak daily indexing capacity and data storage and Splunk Analytics for Hadoop is priced by the number of TaskTracker Nodes (Compute Nodes in YARN) in the respective Hadoop cluster while Splunk User Behavior Analytics is priced by the number of monitored user and system accounts. We offer both perpetual and term licensing options for on-premises offerings, as well as a subscription model for cloud services, which each have different payment schedules, and depending on the mix of such licenses and subscriptions, our revenues or deferred revenues could be adversely affected. Our pricing models may ultimately result in a higher total cost to our customers generally as data volumes increase over time, or may cause our customers to limit or decrease usage in order to stay within the limits of their existing licenses or lower their costs, making it more difficult for us to compete in our markets or negatively impacting our financial results. As the amount of machine data within our customers’ organizations grows, we face downward pressure from our customers regarding our pricing, which could adversely affect our revenues and operating margins. In addition, our unique pricing models may allow competitors with different pricing models to attract customers unfamiliar or uncomfortable with our pricing models, which would cause us to lose business or modify our pricing models, both of which could adversely affect our revenues and operating margins. While we introduced enterprise adoption agreements to provide pricing predictability to our customers, we have limited experience selling this type of license and our customers may not find this type of license attractive. We may also introduce, initially in limited availability, variations to our pricing models, including but not limited to, pricing programs that provide broader usage and cost predictability as well as tiered pricing based on deployment models and customer environments. Although we believe that these pricing models will drive net new customers and customer adoption, it is possible that they will not, which could negatively impact our financial results.

Furthermore, while our offerings can measure and limit customer usage, we recently announced that we will remove metered license enforcement via our software under certain circumstances, and in other circumstances, such limitations may be improperly circumvented or otherwise bypassed by users. Similarly, we provide our customers with an encrypted license key for enabling their use of our offerings. There is no guarantee that users of our offerings will abide by the terms of these license limitations or encrypted license keys, and if they do not, we may not be able to capture the full value for the use of our offerings. For example, our enterprise license is generally meant for our customers’ internal use only. If our internal use customers improperly make our offerings available to their customers or other third parties, for example, through a cloud or managed service offering not authorized by us, it may displace our end user sales. Additionally, if an internal use customer that has received a volume discount from us improperly makes available our offerings to its end customers, we may experience price erosion and be unable to capture the appropriate value from those end customers.

Our license agreements generally provide that we can audit our customers’ use of our offerings or require them to certify their actual usage to ensure compliance with the terms of our license agreement at our request. However, a customer may resist or refuse to allow us to audit their usage, in which case we may have to pursue legal recourse to enforce our rights under the license agreement, which would require us to spend money, distract management and potentially adversely affect our relationship with our customers and users.

Our business and growth depend substantially on customers renewing their term licenses, subscriptions for cloud services and maintenance and support agreements with us. Any decline in our customer renewals could adversely affect our future operating results.

While much of our software is sold under perpetual license agreements, all of our maintenance and support agreements are sold on a term basis. In addition, we also enter into term license agreements for our on-premises offerings and subscriptions for cloud services. In order for us to improve our operating results, it is important that our existing customers renew their term licenses, subscriptions and maintenance and support agreements when the contract term expires. Our customers have no obligation to renew their term licenses, subscriptions or maintenance and support agreements with us after the terms have expired. Our customers’ renewal rates may decline or fluctuate as a result of a number of factors, including their satisfaction or dissatisfaction with our offerings, our pricing, the effects of economic conditions, competitive offerings or alterations or reductions in our customers’ spending levels. If our customers do not renew their agreements with us or renew on terms less favorable to us, our revenues may decline.

Table of Contents

If we do not effectively expand, train and manage changes to our sales force, we may be unable to add new customers or increase sales to our existing customers, and our revenue growth and business could be adversely affected.

We continue to be substantially dependent on our sales force to effectively execute our sales strategies to obtain new customers and to drive additional use cases and adoption among our existing customers. We believe that there is significant competition for sales personnel with the skills and technical knowledge that we require. Our ability to achieve significant revenue growth will depend, in large part, on our success in recruiting, training and retaining sufficient numbers of sales personnel to support our growth. New hires require significant training and may take significant time before they achieve full productivity. Our recent hires and planned hires may not become productive as quickly as we expect, and we may be unable to hire or retain sufficient numbers of qualified individuals in the markets where we do business or plan to do business. In addition, as we continue to grow rapidly, a large percentage of our sales force is new to the company and our offerings. As our sales strategies evolve, additional training for new hires and our existing team may be required for our sales force to successfully execute on those strategies. We periodically adjust our sales organization as part of our efforts to optimize our sales operations to grow revenue. If we have not structured our sales organization or compensation for our sales organization properly, if we fail to make changes in a timely fashion or do not effectively manage changes, our revenue growth could be adversely affected. Our growth creates additional challenges and risks with respect to attracting, integrating and retaining qualified employees, particularly sales personnel. If we are unable to hire and train sufficient numbers of effective sales personnel, or the sales personnel are not successful in obtaining new customers or increasing sales to our existing customer base, our business will be adversely affected.

Our sales cycle is long and unpredictable, particularly with respect to large customers, and our sales efforts require considerable time and expense.

Our operating results may fluctuate, in part, because of the resource intensive nature of our sales efforts, the length and variability of the sales cycle of our offerings and the short-term difficulty in adjusting our operating expenses. Our operating results depend in part on sales to large customers. The length of our sales cycle, from initial evaluation to delivery of and payment for the software license, varies substantially from customer to customer. In addition, the introduction of Splunk Cloud has generated interest from our customers who are also considering purchasing and deploying Splunk Enterprise on-premises. In some cases, our customers may wish to consider a combination of these offerings, potentially further slowing our sales cycle. Our sales cycle can extend to more than a year for certain customers, particularly large customers. It is difficult to predict exactly when, or even if, we will make a sale with a potential customer or if a user of a trial version of one of our offerings will upgrade to the paid version of that offering. As a result, large individual sales have, in some cases, occurred in quarters subsequent to those we anticipated, or have not occurred at all. The loss or delay of one or more large transactions in a quarter could impact our operating results for that quarter and any future quarters for which revenues from that transaction is delayed. As a result of these factors, it is difficult for us to forecast our revenues accurately in any quarter. Because a substantial portion of our expenses are relatively fixed in the short-term, our operating results will suffer if revenues fall below our expectations in a particular quarter, which could cause the price of our common stock to decline.

Our international sales and operations subject us to additional risks and challenges that can adversely affect our business operations and financial results.

During the three months ended July 31, 2017, we derived approximately 24% of our total revenues from customers outside the United States, and we are continuing to expand our international operations as part of our growth strategy. We currently have sales personnel and sales and support operations in the United States and certain countries around the world. To the extent that we experience difficulties in recruiting, training, managing, or retaining non-U.S. staff, and specifically staff related to sales management and sales personnel, we may experience difficulties in sales productivity in, or market penetration of, non-U.S. markets. Additionally, our sales organization outside the United States is substantially smaller than our sales organization in the United States, and we rely heavily on our sales channel for non-U.S. sales. Our ability to convince customers to expand their use of our offerings or renew their maintenance and support agreements with us is directly correlated to our direct engagement with the customer. To the extent we are unable to engage with non-U.S. customers effectively with our limited sales force, professional services and support capacity or our indirect sales model, we may be unable to grow sales to existing customers to the same degree we have experienced in the United States.

Our international operations subject us to a variety of risks and challenges, including:


•	increased management, travel, infrastructure and legal compliance costs associated with having multiple international operations;


•	reliance on channel partners;

Table of Contents


•	longer payment cycles and difficulties in collecting accounts receivable or satisfying revenue recognition criteria, especially in emerging markets;


•	increased financial accounting and reporting burdens and complexities;


•	general economic conditions in each country or region;


•	economic and political uncertainty around the world, such as the 2016 U.S. presidential election and the United Kingdom’s referendum in June 2016 in which voters approved an exit from the European Union (“EU”), commonly referred to as “Brexit”;


•	compliance with multiple and changing foreign laws and regulations, including those governing employment, tax, privacy and data protection, data transfer and the risks and costs of non-compliance with such laws and regulations;

•

compliance with laws and regulations for foreign operations, including the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the United Kingdom Bribery Act, import and export control laws, tariffs, trade barriers, economic sanctions and other regulatory or contractual limitations on our ability to sell our offerings in certain foreign markets, and the risks and costs of non-compliance, including as a result of any changes in trade relations or restrictions;


•	heightened risks of unfair or corrupt business practices in certain geographies and of improper or fraudulent sales arrangements that may impact financial results and result in restatements of financial statements and irregularities in financial statements;


•	fluctuations in currency exchange rates and the related effect on our financial results;


•	difficulties in repatriating or transferring funds from or converting currencies in certain countries;


•	the need for localized software and licensing programs;


•	reduced protection for intellectual property rights in some countries and practical difficulties of enforcing intellectual property and contract rights abroad; and


•	compliance with the laws of numerous foreign taxing jurisdictions and overlapping of different tax regimes.

Any of these risks could adversely affect our international operations, reduce our international revenues or increase our operating costs, adversely affecting our business operations, financial results and growth prospects.

In addition, compliance with laws and regulations applicable to our international operations increases our cost of doing business in foreign jurisdictions. We may be unable to keep current with changes in foreign government requirements and laws as they change from time to time. Failure to comply with these regulations could have adverse effects on our business. In many foreign countries, it is common for others to engage in business practices that are prohibited by our internal policies and procedures or United States regulations applicable to us. In addition, although we have implemented policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance with these laws and policies, there can be no assurance that all of our employees, contractors, channel partners and agents will comply with these laws and policies. Violations of laws or key control policies by our employees, contractors, channel partners or agents could result in delays in revenue recognition, financial reporting misstatements, fines, penalties, or the prohibition of the importation or exportation of our offerings and could have a material adverse effect on our business operations and financial results.

If we are unable to maintain successful relationships with our channel partners, and to help our channel partners enhance their ability to independently sell and deploy our offerings, our business operations, financial results and growth prospects could be adversely affected.

In addition to our direct sales force, we use indirect channel partners, such as distributors and resellers, to license, provide professional services and support our offerings. We derive a portion of our revenues from sales of our offerings through our channel partners, particularly in the Europe, Middle East and Africa, or EMEA, and Asia Pacific, or APAC, regions and for sales to government agencies. We expect that sales through channel partners in all regions will continue to grow as a portion of our revenues for the foreseeable future. As changes in our channel strategy are implemented, including potentially emphasizing partner-sourced transactions, results from sales through our channel partners may be adversely affected.

Table of Contents

Our agreements with our channel partners are generally non-exclusive, meaning our channel partners may offer customers the products of several different companies, including products that compete with ours. If our channel partners do not effectively market and sell our offerings, choose to use greater efforts to market and sell their own products or those of our competitors, or fail to meet the needs of our customers, our ability to grow our business and sell our offerings may be adversely affected. Our channel partners may cease marketing our offerings with limited or no notice and with little or no penalty. The loss of a substantial number of our channel partners, our possible inability to replace them, or the failure to recruit additional channel partners could materially and adversely affect our results of operations. In addition, sales by channel partners are more likely than direct sales to involve collectability concerns, in particular sales by our channel partners in developing markets, and accordingly, variations in the mix between revenues attributable to sales by channel partners and revenues attributable to direct sales may result in fluctuations in our operating results.

Our ability to achieve revenue growth in the future will depend in part on our success in maintaining successful relationships with our channel partners, and to help our channel partners enhance their ability to independently sell and deploy our offerings. If we are unable to maintain our relationships with these channel partners, or otherwise develop and expand our indirect distribution channel, our business, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows could be adversely affected.

Incorrect or improper implementation or use of our software could result in customer dissatisfaction or customer data loss and negatively affect our business, operations, financial results and growth prospects.

Our software is deployed in a wide variety of technology environments. Increasingly, our software has been deployed in large scale, complex technology environments, and we believe our future success will depend on our ability to increase sales of our software licenses for use in such deployments. We often must assist our customers in achieving successful implementations for large, complex deployments. If we or our customers are unable to implement our software successfully, are unable to do so in a timely manner or if an improper implementation or change in system configuration results in errors or loss of data, customer perceptions of our company may be impaired, our reputation and brand may suffer, and customers may choose not to increase their use of our offerings. In addition, our software imposes server load and index storage requirements for implementation. If our customers do not have the server load capacity or the storage capacity required, they may not be able to effectively implement and use our software and, therefore, may not choose to increase their use of our offerings.

Our customers and third-party partners may need training in the proper use of and the variety of benefits that can be derived from our software to maximize its potential. If our software is not implemented or used correctly or as intended, inadequate performance, errors or data loss may result. Because our customers rely on our software and maintenance and support services to manage a wide range of operations, the incorrect or improper implementation or use of our software, our failure to train customers on how to efficiently and effectively use our software, or our failure to provide maintenance services to our customers, may result in negative publicity or legal claims against us. Also, as we continue to expand our customer base, any failure by us to properly provide these services will likely result in lost opportunities for follow-on sales of our offerings.

Interruptions or performance problems associated with our technology and infrastructure, and our reliance on Software-as-a-Service ("SaaS") technologies from third parties, may adversely affect our business operations and financial results.

Our continued growth depends in part on the ability of our existing and potential customers to use and access our cloud services or our website in order to download our on-premises software or encrypted access keys for our software within an acceptable amount of time. We have experienced, and may in the future experience, website and service disruptions, storage failures, outages and other performance problems due to a variety of factors, including infrastructure changes, human or software errors, capacity constraints due to an overwhelming number of users accessing our website and services simultaneously and denial of service or fraud or security attacks. In some instances, we may not be able to identify the cause or causes of these website and service performance problems within an acceptable period of time. It may become increasingly difficult to maintain and improve our website and service performance, especially during peak usage times and as our offerings become more complex and our user traffic increases. If our website or cloud services are unavailable or if our users are unable to download our software or encrypted access keys within a reasonable amount of time or at all, our business would be negatively affected. We expect to continue to make significant investments to maintain and improve website and service performance and to enable rapid releases of new features and apps for our offerings. To the extent that we do not effectively address capacity constraints, upgrade our systems as needed and continually develop our technology and network architecture to accommodate actual and anticipated changes in technology, our business and operating results may be adversely affected.

In addition, we rely heavily on hosted SaaS technologies from third parties in order to operate critical functions of our business, including enterprise resource planning services and customer relationship management services. Further, our cloud services, such as Splunk Cloud, are hosted exclusively by third parties. We currently offer a 100% uptime service level

Table of Contents

agreement (“SLA”) for Splunk Cloud. If any of these services fail or become unavailable due to extended outages, interruptions or because they are no longer available on commercially reasonable terms or prices, or if we are unable to deliver 100% uptime under our SLAs, our revenues could be reduced, our reputation could be damaged, we could be exposed to legal liability, expenses could increase, our ability to manage our finances could be interrupted and our processes for managing sales of our offerings and supporting our customers could be impaired until equivalent services, if available, are identified, obtained and implemented, all of which could adversely affect our business.

Our systems and third-party systems upon which we rely are also vulnerable to damage or interruption from catastrophic occurrences such as earthquakes, floods, fires, power loss, telecommunication failures, terrorist attacks, criminal acts, geopolitical events and similar events. Our United States corporate offices and certain of the facilities we lease to house our computer and telecommunications equipment are located in the San Francisco Bay Area, a region known for seismic activity. Despite any precautions we may take, the occurrence of a natural disaster or other unanticipated problems at our and third parties’ hosting facilities could result in interruptions, performance problems or failure of our infrastructure.

Splunk Cloud, as well as cloud services for other products, are relatively new offerings, and market adoption of these cloud services could adversely affect our business.

A cloud-based model of software deployment is one in which a software provider typically licenses an application to customers for use as a service on demand through web browser technologies. Delivering software under a cloud-based model results in higher costs and expenses when compared to sales of on-premises licenses for similar functionality. In recent years, companies have begun to expect that key software, such as customer relationship management and enterprise resource planning systems, be provided through a cloud-based model. Many of our offerings are now made available in the cloud as well as on-premises. Customers can sign up for Splunk Cloud and other services and avoid the need to provision, deploy and manage internal infrastructure. In order to provide Splunk Cloud and other services via a cloud-based deployment, we have made and will continue to make capital investments and incur substantial costs to implement and maintain this alternative business model, which could negatively affect our financial results. We expect that over time the percentage of our revenue attributable to our cloud services will increase. If our cloud services, in particular Splunk Cloud, do not garner widespread market adoption, our financial results, business model and competitive position could suffer. If we are unable to decrease the cost of providing our cloud services, our gross margins may decrease and negatively impact our overall financial results. Transitioning to a cloud-based model also impacts the way we recognize revenues, which may affect our operating results and could have an adverse effect on our business operations and financial results.

Even with these investments and costs, the cloud-based business model for Splunk Cloud and other services may not be successful, as some customers may desire only on-premises licenses to our offerings. Our cloud services may raise concerns among customers, including concerns regarding changes to pricing models, service availability, scalability, ability to use customer-developed apps, information security of a cloud-based service and hosted data and access to data while offline or once a subscription has expired. Market acceptance of our cloud services can be affected by a variety of factors, including but not limited to: security, reliability, performance, terms of service, support terms, customer preference, community engagement, customer concerns with entrusting a third party to store and manage their data, public concerns regarding data privacy and the enactment of restrictive laws or regulations in the affected jurisdictions. Moreover, sales of Splunk Cloud and other services could displace sales of our on-premises software licenses. Alternatively, subscriptions to Splunk Cloud and other services that exceed our expectations may unexpectedly increase our costs, lower our margins, lower our profits or increase our losses and otherwise negatively affect our projected financial results.

We are subject to governmental export and import controls that could impair our ability to compete in international markets or subject us to liability if we violate the controls.

Our offerings are subject to United States export controls, and we incorporate encryption technology into certain of our offerings. These encryption offerings and the underlying technology may be exported outside of the United States only with the required export authorizations, including by license.

Furthermore, our activities are subject to the U.S. economic sanctions laws and regulations that prohibit the shipment of certain products and services without the required export authorizations or export to countries, governments, and persons targeted by U.S. sanctions. While we take precautions to prevent our offerings from being exported in violation of these laws, including obtaining authorizations for our encryption offerings, implementing IP address blocking and screenings against U.S. Government and international lists of restricted and prohibited persons, we cannot guarantee that the precautions we take will prevent violations of export control and sanctions laws.

Table of Contents

We also note that if our channel partners fail to obtain appropriate import, export or re-export licenses or permits, we may also be adversely affected, through reputational harm as well as other negative consequences including government investigations and penalties. We presently incorporate export control compliance requirements in our channel partner agreements. Complying with export control and sanctions regulations for a particular sale may be time-consuming and may result in the delay or loss of sales opportunities.

Violations of U.S. sanctions or export control laws can result in fines or penalties, including civil penalties of up to $250,000 or twice the value of the transaction, whichever is greater, per violation. In the event of criminal knowing and willful violations of these laws, fines of up to $1 million per violation and possible incarceration for responsible employees and managers could be imposed.

While we have extensive procedures in place, downloads of our free software may have been made in potential violation of the export control and economic sanctions laws. We filed Initial Voluntary Self Disclosures in October 2014 with the U.S. Commerce Department’s Bureau of Industry and Security (“BIS”) and the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) and filed Final Voluntary Disclosures with BIS and OFAC in June 2015. On May 4, 2016, BIS notified us that it had completed its review of this matter and closed its review with the issuance of a Warning Letter. On August 5, 2016, OFAC notified us that it had completed its review of this matter and closed its review with the issuance of a Cautionary Letter. No monetary penalties or other sanctions were imposed by either agency in connection with their investigations.

Also, various countries, in addition to the United States, regulate the import and export of certain encryption and other technology, including import and export permitting and licensing requirements, and have enacted laws that could limit our ability to distribute our offerings or could limit our customers’ ability to implement our offerings in those countries. Changes in our offerings or future changes in export and import regulations may create delays in the introduction of our offerings in international markets, prevent our customers with international operations from deploying our offerings globally or, in some cases, prevent the export or import of our offerings to certain countries, governments, or persons altogether. Any change in export or import regulations, economic sanctions or related legislation, or change in the countries, governments, persons or technologies targeted by such regulations, could result in decreased use of our offerings by, or in our decreased ability to export or sell our offerings to, existing or potential customers with international operations. Any decreased use of our offerings or limitation on our ability to export or sell our offerings would likely adversely affect our business operations and financial results.

If our new offerings and product enhancements do not achieve sufficient market acceptance, our financial results and competitive position will suffer.

We spend substantial amounts of time and money to research and develop new offerings and enhanced versions of our existing offerings to incorporate additional features, improve functionality or other enhancements in order to meet our customers’ rapidly evolving demands. In addition, we continue to invest in solutions that can be deployed on top of our platform to target specific use cases and to cultivate our community of application developers and users. When we develop a new or enhanced version of an existing offering, we typically incur expenses and expend resources upfront to market, promote and sell the new offering. Therefore, when we develop and introduce new or enhanced offerings, they must achieve high levels of market acceptance in order to justify the amount of our investment in developing and bringing them to market. For example, if our cloud services such as Splunk Cloud do not garner widespread market adoption and implementation, our financial results and competitive position could suffer.

Further, we may make changes to our offerings that our customers do not like, find useful or agree with. We may also discontinue certain features, begin to charge for certain features that are currently free or increase fees for any of our features or usage of our offerings.

Our new offerings or product enhancements and changes to our existing offerings could fail to attain sufficient market acceptance for many reasons, including:


•	our failure to predict market demand accurately in terms of product functionality and to supply offerings that meet this demand in a timely fashion;


•	defects, errors or failures;


•	negative publicity about their performance or effectiveness;

Table of Contents


•	delays in releasing to the market our new offerings or enhancements to our existing offerings to the market;


•	introduction or anticipated introduction of competing products by our competitors;


•	poor business conditions for our end-customers, causing them to delay IT purchases; and


•	reluctance of customers to purchase products incorporating open source software.

If our new offerings or enhancements and changes do not achieve adequate acceptance in the market, our competitive position will be impaired, and our revenues will be diminished. The adverse effect on our financial results may be particularly acute because of the significant research, development, marketing, sales and other expenses we will have incurred in connection with the new offerings or enhancements.

Our business depends, in part, on sales to the public sector, and significant changes in the contracting or fiscal policies of the public sector could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We derive a portion of our revenues from contracts with federal, state, local and foreign governments, and we believe that the success and growth of our business will continue to depend on our successful procurement of government contracts. Factors that could impede our ability to maintain or increase the amount of revenues derived from government contracts, include:


•	changes in fiscal or contracting policies;


•	decreases in available government funding;


•	changes in government programs or applicable requirements;


•	the adoption of new laws or regulations or changes to existing laws or regulations;


•	potential delays or changes in the government appropriations or other funding authorization processes; and


•	delays in the payment of our invoices by government payment offices.

The occurrence of any of the foregoing could cause governments and governmental agencies to delay or refrain from purchasing licenses of our offerings in the future or otherwise have an adverse effect on our business operations and financial results.

Failure to comply with laws or regulations applicable to our business could cause us to lose customers in the public sector, subject us to fines and penalties, or negatively impact our ability to contract with the public sector.

We must comply with laws and regulations relating to the formation, administration and performance of contracts with the public sector, including United States federal, state and local governmental bodies, which affect how our channel partners and how we do business with governmental agencies. These laws and regulations may impose added costs on our business, and failure to comply with these or other applicable regulations and requirements, including non-compliance in the past, could lead to claims for damages or other relief, penalties, termination of contracts, loss of exclusive rights in our intellectual property, and temporary suspension or permanent debarment from government contracting. Any such damages, penalties, disruptions or limitations in our ability to do business with the public sector could have a material adverse effect on our business operations and financial results.

Real or perceived errors, failures or bugs in our offerings could adversely affect our financial results and growth prospects.

Because our offerings are complex, undetected errors, failures or bugs may occur, especially when new offerings, versions or updates are released. Our on-premises software is often installed and used in large-scale computing environments with different operating systems, system management software, and equipment and networking configurations, which may cause errors or failures of our software or other aspects of the computing environment into which it is deployed. In addition, deployment of our software into complicated, large-scale computing environments may expose undetected errors, failures or bugs in our software. Despite testing by us, errors, failures or bugs may not be found in our offerings until they are released to our customers. In the past, we have discovered errors, failures and bugs in some of our offerings after their introduction. Real or perceived errors, failures or bugs in our offerings could result in negative publicity, loss of or delay in market acceptance of

Table of Contents

our offerings, loss of competitive position or claims by customers for losses sustained by them. In such an event, we may be required, or may choose, for customer relations or other reasons, to expend additional resources in order to help correct the problem.

In addition, if an actual or perceived failure of our software occurs in a customer’s deployment or in our cloud services, regardless of whether the failure is attributable to our software, the market perception of the effectiveness of our offerings could be adversely affected. Alleviating any of these problems could require significant expenditures of our capital and other resources and could cause interruptions, delays or cessation of our licensing, which could cause us to lose existing or potential customers and could adversely affect our financial results and growth prospects.

Failure to protect our intellectual property rights could adversely affect our business.

Our success depends, in part, on our ability to protect proprietary methods and technologies that we develop under patent and other intellectual property laws of the United States and other jurisdictions outside of the United States so that we can prevent others from using our inventions and proprietary information. If we fail to protect our intellectual property rights adequately, our competitors might gain access to our technology, and our business might be adversely affected. However, defending our intellectual property rights might entail significant expenses. Any of our patent rights, copyrights, trademarks or other intellectual property rights may be challenged by others or invalidated through administrative process or litigation. Our issued patents and any patents issued in the future may not provide us with any competitive advantages, and our patent applications may never be granted. Additionally, the process of obtaining patent protection is expensive and time-consuming, and we may not be able to file and prosecute all necessary or desirable patent applications, or we may not be able to do so at a reasonable cost or in a timely manner. Even if issued, there can be no assurance that these patents will adequately protect our intellectual property, as the legal standards relating to the infringement, validity, enforceability and scope of protection of patent and other intellectual property rights are complex and often uncertain.

Any patents that are issued may subsequently be invalidated or otherwise limited, allowing other companies to develop offerings that compete with ours, which could adversely affect our competitive business position, business prospects and financial condition. In addition, issuance of a patent does not guarantee that we have a right to practice the patented invention. Patent applications in the United States are typically not published until 18 months after filing or, in some cases, not at all, and publications of discoveries in industry-related literature lag behind actual discoveries. We cannot be certain that we were the first to use the inventions claimed in our issued patents or pending patent applications or otherwise used in our offerings, that we were the first to file patent applications, or that third parties do not have blocking patents that could be used to prevent us from marketing or practicing our offerings or technology. Effective patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret protection may not be available to us in every country in which our offerings are available. The laws of some foreign countries may not be as protective of intellectual property rights as those in the United States (in particular, some foreign jurisdictions do not permit patent protection for software), and mechanisms for enforcement of intellectual property rights may be inadequate. Additional uncertainty may result from recent and future changes to intellectual property legislation in the United States (including the “America Invents Act”) and other countries and from interpretations of the intellectual property laws of the United States and other countries by applicable courts and agencies. Accordingly, despite our efforts, we may be unable to prevent third parties from infringing upon or misappropriating our intellectual property.

We rely in part on trade secrets, proprietary know-how and other confidential information to maintain our competitive position. We generally enter into confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants, vendors and customers, and generally limit access to and distribution of our proprietary information. Although we endeavor to enter into non-disclosure agreements with our employees, licensees and others who may have access to this information, we cannot assure you that these agreements or other steps we have taken will prevent unauthorized use, disclosure or reverse engineering of our technology. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect our proprietary rights to as great an extent as the laws of the United States, and many foreign countries do not enforce these laws as diligently as government agencies and private parties in the United States. Moreover, third parties may independently develop technologies or products that compete with ours, and we may be unable to prevent this competition.

We might be required to spend significant resources to monitor and protect our intellectual property rights. We may initiate claims or litigation against third parties for infringement of our proprietary rights or to establish the validity of our proprietary rights. Litigation also puts our patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly. Additionally, we may provoke third parties to assert counterclaims against us. We may not prevail in any lawsuits that we initiate, and the damages or other remedies awarded, if any, may not be adequate to compensate us for the harm suffered. Any litigation, whether or not it is resolved in our favor, could result in significant expense to us and divert the efforts of our technical and management personnel, which may adversely affect our business operations or financial results.

Table of Contents

We have been, and may in the future be, subject to intellectual property rights claims by third parties, which are extremely costly to defend, could require us to pay significant damages and could limit our ability to use certain technologies.

Companies in the software and technology industries, including some of our current and potential competitors, own large numbers of patents, copyrights, trademarks and trade secrets and frequently enter into litigation based on allegations of infringement or other violations of intellectual property rights. In addition, many of these companies have the capability to dedicate substantially greater resources to enforce their intellectual property rights and to defend claims that may be brought against them. The litigation may involve patent holding companies or other adverse patent owners that have no relevant product revenues and against which our patents may therefore provide little or no deterrence. From time-to-time, third parties, including certain of these leading companies, have asserted and may assert patent, copyright, trademark or other intellectual property rights against us, our channel partners, our technology partners or our customers. We have received, and may in the future receive, notices that claim we have misappropriated, misused, or infringed other parties’ intellectual property rights, and, to the extent we gain greater market visibility, we face a higher risk of being the subject of intellectual property infringement claims, which is not uncommon with respect to the enterprise software market.

There may be third-party intellectual property rights, including issued or pending patents, that cover significant aspects of our technologies or business methods. We may be exposed to increased risk of being the subject of intellectual property infringement claims as a result of acquisitions, as, among other things, we have a lower level of visibility into the development process with respect to such technology or the care taken to safeguard against infringement risks. Any intellectual property claims, with or without merit, could be very time-consuming, could be expensive to settle or litigate and could divert our management’s attention and other resources. These claims could also subject us to significant liability for damages, potentially including treble damages if we are found to have willfully infringed patents or copyrights. These claims could also result in our having to stop using technology found to be in violation of a third party’s rights. We might be required to seek a license for the intellectual property, which may not be available on reasonable terms or at all. Even if a license were available, we could be required to pay significant royalties, which would increase our operating expenses. As a result, we may be required to develop alternative non-infringing technology, which could require significant effort and expense. If we cannot license or develop technology for any infringing aspect of our business, we would be forced to limit or stop sales of our offerings and may be unable to compete effectively. Any of these results would adversely affect our business operations and financial results.

We offer free trials, trial-to-buy and other next-generation go-to-market strategies, and we may not be able to realize the benefits of these strategies.

We offer trial version licenses, including online sandboxes, of certain of our offerings to users free of charge as part of our overall strategy of developing the market for offerings that provides operational intelligence and promoting additional penetration of our offerings in the markets in which we compete. Some users never convert from the trial version to the paid version. In fiscal 2017, we introduced free development-test licenses for certain commercial customers as part of our strategy to help enable such customers to expand their use of our offerings to additional use cases. In fiscal 2018, we began selling our cloud services through a cloud vendor marketplace. To the extent that users of our trial version do not become paying customers, our current customers do not expand their use of our offerings beyond the current predominant use cases, or we are unsuccessful in building effective go-to-market strategies for our offerings, we will not realize the intended benefits of these marketing strategies and our ability to grow our revenues will be adversely affected.

If we are not able to maintain and enhance our brand, our business and operating results may be adversely affected.

We believe that maintaining and enhancing the “Splunk” brand identity is critical to our relationships with our customers and channel partners and to our ability to attract new customers and channel partners. The successful promotion of our brand will depend largely upon our marketing efforts, our ability to continue to offer high-quality offerings and our ability to successfully differentiate our offerings from those of our competitors. Our brand promotion activities may not be successful or yield increased revenues. In addition, independent industry analysts often provide reviews of our offerings, as well as those of our competitors, and perception of our offerings in the marketplace may be significantly influenced by these reviews. If these reviews are negative, or less positive as compared to those of our competitors’ products and services, our brand may be adversely affected.

Moreover, it may be difficult to maintain and enhance our brand in connection with sales through channel or strategic partners. The promotion of our brand requires us to make substantial expenditures, and we anticipate that the expenditures will increase as our market becomes more competitive, as we expand into new markets and as more sales are generated through our channel partners. To the extent that these activities yield increased revenues, these revenues may not offset the increased expenses we incur. If we do not successfully maintain and enhance our brand, our business may not grow, we may have

Table of Contents

reduced pricing power relative to competitors with stronger brands, and we could lose customers and channel partners, all of which would adversely affect our business operations and financial results.

Our future performance depends in part on proper use of our community website, Splunkbase, and support from third-party software developers.

Our offerings enable third-party software developers to build apps on top of our platform. We operate a community website, Splunkbase, for sharing these third-party apps, including add-ons and extensions. While we expect Splunkbase to support our sales and marketing efforts, it also presents certain risks to our business, including:


•	third-party developers may not continue developing or supporting the software apps that they share on Splunkbase;


•	we cannot provide any assurance that these apps meet the same quality standards that we apply to our own development efforts, and, to the extent they contain bugs or defects, they may create disruptions in our customers’ use of our offerings or negatively affect our brand;


•	we do not currently provide support for software apps developed by third-party software developers, and users may be left without support and potentially cease using our offerings if the third-party software developers do not provide support for these apps;


•	these third-party software developers may not possess the appropriate intellectual property rights to develop and share their apps; and


•	some of these developers may use the insight they gain using our offerings and from documentation publicly available on our website to develop competing products.

Many of these risks are not within our control to prevent, and our brand may be damaged if these apps, add-ons and extensions do not perform to our customers’ satisfaction and that dissatisfaction is attributed to us.

Our use of “open source” software could negatively affect our ability to sell our offerings and subject us to possible litigation.

We use open source software in our offerings and expect to continue to use open source software in the future. We may face claims from others alleging infringement of intellectual property rights in what we believe to be licensed open source software, or seeking to enforce the terms of an open source license, including by demanding release of our proprietary source code that was developed using or linked with such open source software. These claims could also result in litigation, require us to purchase a costly license or require us to devote additional research and development resources to change our offerings, any of which would have a negative effect on our business and operating results. In addition, if the license terms for the open source code change, we may be forced to re-engineer our offerings or incur additional costs to find alternative tools. In addition to risks related to license requirements, usage of open source software can lead to greater risks than use of third-party commercial software, as open source licensors generally do not provide warranties, support, indemnity or assurance of title or controls on origin of the software. Further, some open source projects have known vulnerabilities and architectural instabilities and are provided on an “as-is” basis. Many of these risks associated with usage of open source software, such as the lack of warranties, support or assurances of title, cannot be eliminated, and could, if not properly addressed, negatively affect the performance of our offerings and our business. While we have established processes to help alleviate these risks, we cannot assure that these measures will reduce or completely shield us from these risks.

If we or our third-party service providers experience a security breach or unauthorized parties otherwise obtain access to our customers' data, our data, or our cloud services, our offerings may be perceived as not being secure, our reputation may be harmed, demand for our offerings may be reduced, and we may incur significant liabilities.

Our offerings involve the storage and transmission of data, and security breaches could result in the loss of this information, litigation, indemnity obligations and other liability. While we have taken steps to protect the confidential information that we have access to, including confidential information we may obtain through our customer support services or customer usage of our cloud services, our security measures could be breached. In addition, we do not directly control content that customers store in our offerings. If customers use our offerings for the transmission or storage of personally identifiable information and our security measures are or are believed to have been breached as a result of third-party action, employee error, malfeasance or otherwise, our reputation could be damaged, our business may suffer, and we could incur significant liability.

Table of Contents

We also process, store and transmit our own data as part of our business and operations. This data may include personally identifiable, confidential or proprietary information. There can be no assurance that any security measures that we or our third-party service providers have implemented will be effective against current or future security threats. While we have taken steps to protect the integrity, confidentiality and security of our data, our security measures could fail and result in unauthorized access to or disclosure, modification, misuse, loss or destruction of such data.

Because there are many different security breach techniques and such techniques continue to evolve, we may be unable to anticipate attempted security breaches and implement adequate preventative measures. Third parties may also conduct attacks designed to temporarily deny customers access to our cloud services. Any security breach could result in a loss of customer confidence in the security of our offerings and damage to our brand, reduce the demand for our offerings, disrupt normal business operations, require us to spend material resources to investigate or correct the breach, expose us to legal liabilities, including litigation, regulatory enforcement, and indemnity obligations, and adversely affect our revenues and operating results. These risks may increase as we continue to grow the number and scale of our cloud services, and process, store, and transmit increasingly large amounts of data.

We use third-party technology and systems for a variety of reasons, including, without limitation, encryption and authentication technology, employee email, content delivery to customers, back-office support, credit card processing and other functions. Although we have developed systems and processes that are designed to protect customer information and prevent data loss and other security breaches, including systems and processes designed to reduce the impact of a security breach at a third-party vendor, such measures cannot provide absolute security.

We are subject to a number of legal requirements, contractual obligations and industry standards regarding security, data protection, and privacy and any failure to comply with these requirements, obligations or standards could have an adverse effect on our reputation, business, financial condition and operating results.

Privacy and data information security have become a significant issue in the United States and in many other countries where we have employees and operations and where we offer licenses or subscriptions to our offerings. The regulatory framework for privacy and personal information security issues worldwide is rapidly evolving and is likely to remain uncertain for the foreseeable future. The U.S. federal and various state and foreign government bodies and agencies have adopted or are considering adopting laws and regulations limiting, or laws and regulations regarding the collection, distribution, use, disclosure, storage, and security of personal information. Some of these requirements include obligations of companies to notify individuals of security breaches involving particular personal information, which could result from breaches experienced by us or our service providers. Even though we may have contractual protections with our service providers, a security breach could impact our reputation, harm our customer confidence, hurt our sales and expansion into new markets or cause us to lose existing customers, and could expose us to potential liability or require us to expend significant resources on data security and in responding to such breach.

Internationally, virtually every jurisdiction in which we operate has established its own data security and privacy legal framework with which we or our customers must comply. Laws and regulations in these jurisdictions apply broadly to the collection, use, storage, disclosure and security of data that identifies or may be used to identify or locate an individual, such as names, email addresses and, in some jurisdictions, Internet Protocol (“IP”) addresses. These laws and regulations often are more restrictive than those in the United States and are rapidly evolving. For example, in 2016, a new EU data protection regime, the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) was adopted, and we self-certified to the U.S.-EU Privacy Shield developed by the U.S. Department of Commerce and the European Commission to provide U.S. companies with a valid data transfer mechanism under EU law to permit them to transfer personal data from the European Union to the United States. The U.S.-EU Privacy Shield is subject to annual review and may be challenged, suspended or invalidated. Complying with the GDPR or other new data protection laws and regulations may cause us to incur substantial operational costs or require us to modify our data handling practices. Non-compliance could result in proceedings against us by governmental entities or others and may otherwise adversely impact our business, financial condition and operating results.

In addition to government regulation, privacy advocates and industry groups may propose new and different self-regulatory standards that either legally or contractually apply to us. We also expect that there will continue to be new proposed laws and regulations concerning privacy, data protection and information security, and we cannot yet determine the impact such future laws, regulations and standards may have on our business. New laws, amendments to or re-interpretations of existing laws and regulations, industry standards, contractual obligations and other obligations may require us to incur additional costs and restrict our business operations. Because the interpretation and application of laws and other obligations relating to privacy and data protection are still uncertain, it is possible that these laws and other obligations may be interpreted and applied in a manner that is inconsistent with our existing data management practices or the features of our offerings. If so, in addition to the

Table of Contents

possibility of fines, lawsuits and other claims, we could be required to fundamentally change our business activities and practices or modify our offerings, which could have an adverse effect on our business. We may be unable to make such changes and modifications in a commercially reasonable manner or at all, and our ability to develop new offerings and features could be limited. Any inability to adequately address privacy concerns, even if unfounded, or comply with applicable privacy or data protection laws, regulations and policies, could result in additional cost and liability to us, damage our reputation, inhibit sales and adversely affect our business.

Furthermore, the costs of compliance with, and other burdens imposed by, the laws, regulations, and policies that are applicable to the businesses of our customers may limit the use and adoption of, and reduce the overall demand for, our offerings. For example, as a service provider to our customers, we may collect and use personally identifiable information, including protected health information, which may subject us to a number of data protection, security, privacy and other government- and industry-specific requirements, including those that require companies to notify individuals of data security incidents involving certain types of personal data, such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”). Privacy and personal information security concerns, whether valid or not valid, may inhibit market adoption of our offerings particularly in certain industries and foreign countries.

If we are unable to attract and retain leadership and key personnel, our business could be adversely affected.

We depend on the continued contributions of our leadership, senior management and other key personnel, the loss of whom could adversely affect our business. With any change in leadership, there is a risk to organizational effectiveness and employee retention as well as the potential for disruption to our business. All of our executive officers and key employees are at-will employees, which means they may terminate their employment relationship with us at any time. We do not maintain a key-person life insurance policy on any of our officers or other employees.

Our future success also depends on our ability to identify, attract and retain highly skilled technical, managerial, finance and other personnel, particularly in our sales and marketing, research and development, general and administrative, and professional service departments. We face intense competition for qualified individuals from numerous software and other technology companies.

In addition, competition for qualified personnel, particularly software engineers, is particularly intense in the San Francisco Bay Area, where our headquarters are located. We may incur significant costs to attract and retain them, and we may lose new employees to our competitors or other technology companies before we realize the benefit of our investment in recruiting and training them. As we move into new geographies, we will need to attract and recruit skilled personnel in those areas. If we are unable to attract and retain suitably qualified individuals who are capable of meeting our growing technical, operational and managerial requirements, on a timely basis or at all, our business will be adversely affected.

Volatility or lack of performance in our stock price may also affect our ability to attract and retain our key employees. Many of our senior management personnel and other key employees have become, or will soon become, vested in a substantial amount of stock, restricted stock units or stock options. Employees may be more likely to leave us if the shares they own or the shares underlying their vested restricted stock units or options have significantly appreciated in value relative to the original purchase prices of the shares or the exercise prices of the options, or, conversely, if the exercise prices of the options that they hold are significantly above the market price of our common stock. If we are unable to retain our employees, or if we need to increase our compensation expenses to retain our employees, our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows would be adversely affected.

If poor advice or misinformation is spread through our community website, Splunk Answers, users of our offerings may experience unsatisfactory results from using our offerings, which could adversely affect our reputation and our ability to grow our business.

We host Splunk Answers for sharing knowledge about how to perform certain functions with our offerings. Our users are increasingly turning to Splunk Answers for support in connection with their use of our offerings. We do not review or test the information that non-Splunk employees post on Splunk Answers to ensure its accuracy or efficacy in resolving technical issues. Therefore, we cannot ensure that all the information listed on Splunk Answers is accurate or that it will not adversely affect the performance of our offerings. Furthermore, users who post such information on Splunk Answers may not have adequate rights to the information to share it publicly, and we could be the subject of intellectual property claims based on our hosting of such information. If poor advice or misinformation is spread among users of Splunk Answers, our customers or other users of our offerings may experience unsatisfactory results from using our offerings, which could adversely affect our reputation and our ability to grow our business.

Table of Contents

Prolonged economic uncertainties or downturns could materially adversely affect our business.

Current or future economic downturns or uncertainty could adversely affect our business operations or financial results. Negative conditions in the general economy both in the United States and abroad, including conditions resulting from financial and credit market fluctuations, trade uncertainty and terrorist attacks on the United States, Europe, Asia Pacific or elsewhere, could cause a decrease in corporate spending on enterprise software in general and negatively affect the rate of growth of our business.

General worldwide economic conditions have experienced a significant downturn and continue to remain unstable. These conditions make it extremely difficult for our customers and us to forecast and plan future business activities accurately, and they could cause our customers to reevaluate their decision to purchase our offerings, which could delay and lengthen our sales cycles or result in cancellations of planned purchases. Furthermore, during challenging economic times our customers may face issues in gaining timely access to sufficient credit, which could result in an impairment of their ability to make timely payments to us. If that were to occur, we may be required to increase our allowance for doubtful accounts, which would adversely affect our financial results.

We have a significant number of customers in the business services, energy, financial services, healthcare and pharmaceuticals, technology, manufacturing, media and entertainment, online services, retail, telecommunications and travel and transportation industries. A substantial downturn in any of these industries may cause firms to react to worsening conditions by reducing their capital expenditures in general or by specifically reducing their spending on information technology. Customers in these industries may delay or cancel information technology projects or seek to lower their costs by renegotiating vendor contracts. To the extent purchases of our offerings are perceived by customers and potential customers to be discretionary, our revenues may be disproportionately affected by delays or reductions in general information technology spending. Also, customers may choose to develop in-house software as an alternative to using our offerings. Moreover, competitors may respond to market conditions by lowering prices and attempting to lure away our customers. In addition, the increased pace of consolidation in certain industries may result in reduced overall spending on our offerings.

We cannot predict the timing, strength or duration of any economic slowdown, instability or recovery, generally or within any particular industry or geography. If the economic conditions of the general economy or industries in which we operate worsen from present levels, our business operations and financial results could be adversely affected.

We may require additional capital to support business growth, and this capital might not be available on acceptable terms, if at all.

We intend to continue to make investments to support our business growth and may require additional funds to respond to business challenges, including the need to develop new features or enhance our offerings, improve our operating infrastructure or acquire complementary businesses and technologies. Accordingly, we may need to engage in equity or debt financings to secure additional funds. If we raise additional funds through future issuances of equity or convertible debt securities, our existing stockholders could suffer significant dilution, and any new equity securities we issue could have rights, preferences and privileges superior to those of holders of our common stock. Any debt financing that we may secure in the future could involve restrictive covenants relating to our capital raising activities and other financial and operational matters, which may make it more difficult for us to obtain additional capital and to pursue business opportunities, including potential acquisitions. We may not be able to obtain additional financing on terms favorable to us, if at all. If we are unable to obtain adequate financing or financing on terms satisfactory to us when we require it, our ability to continue to support our business growth and to respond to business challenges could be significantly impaired, and our business may be adversely affected.

We have in the past made and may in the future make acquisitions that could prove difficult to integrate and/or adversely affect our business operations and financial results.

From time to time, we may choose to expand by making acquisitions that could be material to our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. Our ability as an organization to successfully acquire and integrate technologies or businesses is unproven. Acquisitions involve many risks, including the following:

•

an acquisition may negatively affect our financial results because it may require us to incur charges or assume substantial debt or other liabilities, may cause adverse tax consequences or unfavorable accounting treatment, may expose us to claims and disputes by third parties, including intellectual property claims and disputes, or may not generate sufficient financial return to offset additional costs and expenses related to the acquisition;


•	potential goodwill impairment charges related to acquisitions;

Table of Contents


•	costs and potential difficulties associated with the requirement to test and assimilate the internal control processes of the acquired business;


•	we may encounter difficulties or unforeseen expenditures in integrating the business, technologies, products, personnel or operations of any company that we acquire, particularly if key personnel of the acquired company decide not to work for us or if we are unable to retain key personnel;


•	we may not realize the expected benefits of the acquisition;


•	an acquisition may disrupt our ongoing business, divert resources, increase our expenses and distract our management;


•	an acquisition may result in a delay or reduction of customer purchases for both us and the company acquired due to customer uncertainty about continuity and effectiveness of service from either company;


•	the potential impact on relationships with existing customers, vendors and distributors as business partners as a result of acquiring another company or business that competes with or otherwise is incompatible with those existing relationships;


•	the potential that our due diligence of the acquired company or business does not identify significant problems or liabilities;


•	exposure to litigation or other claims in connection with, or inheritance of claims or litigation risk as a result of, an acquisition, including but not limited to claims from former employees, customers or other third parties;


•	we may encounter difficulties in, or may be unable to, successfully sell any acquired products;


•	an acquisition may involve the entry into geographic or business markets in which we have little or no prior experience or where competitors have stronger market positions;


•	an acquisition may require us to comply with additional laws and regulations or result in liabilities resulting from the acquired company’s pre-acquisition failure to comply with applicable laws;


•	our use of cash to pay for an acquisition would limit other potential uses for our cash;


•	if we incur debt to fund such acquisition, such debt may subject us to material restrictions on our ability to conduct our business as well as financial maintenance covenants; and


•	to the extent that we issue a significant amount of equity securities in connection with future acquisitions, existing stockholders may be diluted and earnings per share may decrease.

The occurrence of any of these risks could have a material adverse effect on our business operations and financial results.

If currency exchange rates fluctuate substantially in the future, our financial results, which are reported in U.S. dollars, could be adversely affected.

As we continue to expand our international operations, we become more exposed to the effects of fluctuations in currency exchange rates. Although our sales contracts are denominated in U.S. dollars, and therefore our revenues are not subject to foreign currency risk, a strengthening of the U.S. dollar could increase the real cost of our offerings to our customers outside of the United States, adversely affecting our business operations and financial results. We incur expenses for employee compensation and other operating expenses at our non-U.S. locations in the local currency. Fluctuations in the exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and other currencies could result in the dollar equivalent of such expenses being higher. This could have a negative impact on our reported operating results. Although we engage in limited hedging strategies, any such strategies, such as forward contracts, options and foreign exchange swaps, related to transaction exposures that we may implement to mitigate this risk may not eliminate our exposure to foreign exchange fluctuations.

The enactment of legislation implementing changes in the United States of taxation of international business activities or the adoption of other tax reform policies could materially impact our financial position and results of operations.

Table of Contents

Recent changes to United States tax laws, including limitations on the ability of taxpayers to claim and utilize foreign tax credits and the deferral of certain tax deductions until earnings outside of the United States are repatriated to the United States, as well as changes to United States tax laws that may be enacted in the future, could impact the tax treatment of our foreign earnings. Due to expansion of our international business activities, any changes in the United States taxation of such activities may increase our worldwide effective tax rate and adversely affect our financial position and results of operations.

Our ability to use our net operating losses to offset future taxable income may be subject to certain limitations.

In general, under Section 382 of the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, a corporation that undergoes an “ownership change” is subject to limitations on its ability to utilize its pre-change net operating losses, or NOLs, to offset future taxable income. If our existing NOLs are subject to limitations arising from previous ownership changes, our ability to utilize NOLs could be limited by Section 382 of the Code. Future changes in our stock ownership, some of which are outside of our control, could result in an ownership change under Section 382 of the Code. Furthermore, our ability to utilize NOLs of companies that we may acquire in the future may be subject to limitations. There is also a risk that either under existing regulations or due to regulatory changes, such as suspensions on the use of NOLs, or other unforeseen reasons, our existing NOLs could expire or otherwise be unavailable to offset future income tax liabilities. For these reasons, we may not be able to utilize a portion of the NOLs reflected on our balance sheet, even if we attain profitability.

Taxing authorities may successfully assert that we should have collected or in the future should collect sales and use, value added or similar taxes, and we could be subject to liability with respect to past or future sales, which could adversely affect our financial results.

We do not collect sales and use, value added and similar taxes in all jurisdictions in which we have sales, based on our belief that such taxes are not applicable. Sales and use, value added and similar tax laws and rates vary greatly by jurisdiction. Certain jurisdictions in which we do not collect such taxes may assert that such taxes are applicable, which could result in tax assessments, penalties and interest, and we may be required to collect such taxes in the future. Such tax assessments, penalties and interest or future requirements may adversely affect our financial results.

Our international operations subject us to potentially adverse tax consequences.

We generally conduct our international operations through wholly owned subsidiaries, branches and representative offices and report our taxable income in various jurisdictions worldwide based upon our business operations in those jurisdictions. We are in the process of organizing our corporate structure to more closely align with the international nature of our business activities. Our intercompany relationships are subject to complex transfer pricing regulations administered by taxing authorities in various jurisdictions. The relevant taxing authorities may disagree with our determinations as to the income and expenses attributable to specific jurisdictions. If such a disagreement were to occur, and our position were not sustained, we could be required to pay additional taxes, interest and penalties, which could result in one-time tax charges, higher effective tax rates, reduced cash flows and lower overall profitability of our operations. We believe that our financial statements reflect adequate reserves to cover such a contingency, but there can be no assurances in that regard.

We could be subject to additional tax liabilities.

We are subject to federal, state and local taxes in the United States and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in evaluating our tax positions and our worldwide provision for taxes. During the ordinary course of business, there are many activities and transactions for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. We previously discovered that we have not complied with various tax rules and regulations in certain foreign jurisdictions. We are working to resolve these matters. In addition, our tax obligations and effective tax rates could be adversely affected by changes in the relevant tax, accounting and other laws, regulations, principles and interpretations, including those relating to income tax nexus, by our earnings being lower than anticipated in jurisdictions where we have lower statutory rates and higher than anticipated in jurisdictions where we have higher statutory rates, by changes in foreign currency exchange rates, or by changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities. We may be audited in various jurisdictions, and such jurisdictions may assess additional taxes against us. Although we believe our tax estimates are reasonable, the final determination of any tax audits or litigation could be materially different from our historical tax provisions and accruals, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results or cash flows in the period or periods for which a determination is made.

Our financial results may be adversely affected by changes in accounting principles applicable to us.

Table of Contents

Generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) are subject to interpretation by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), the SEC, and other various bodies formed to promulgate and interpret appropriate accounting principles. For example, in May 2014, the FASB issued accounting standards update No. 2014-09 (Topic 606), Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under U.S. GAAP. We will be required to implement this new revenue standard, as amended by accounting standards update No. 2015-14, in the first quarter of fiscal 2019. While we are still evaluating the total impact of the new revenue standard, we believe the adoption of this new standard will have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements, including the way we account for arrangements involving a term license, deferred revenue and sales commissions. In addition, some deferred revenue recorded in accordance with the current revenue standard will never be recognized as revenue upon adoption of the new revenue standard and instead will be part of the cumulative effect adjustment within accumulated deficit. These or other changes in accounting principles could adversely affect our financial results. Any difficulties in implementing these pronouncements could cause us to fail to meet our financial reporting obligations, which could result in regulatory discipline and harm investors’ confidence in us.

Our stock price has been volatile, may continue to be volatile and may decline regardless of our financial performance.

The trading prices of the securities of technology companies have been highly volatile. The market price of our common stock has fluctuated significantly and may continue to fluctuate significantly in response to numerous factors, many of which are beyond our control, including:


•	actual or anticipated fluctuations in our financial results;


•	the financial projections we provide to the public, any changes in these projections or our failure to meet or exceed these projections;


•	failure of securities analysts to initiate or maintain coverage of our company, changes in financial estimates by any securities analysts who follow our company, or our failure to meet these estimates or the expectations of investors;


•	ratings changes by any securities analysts who follow our company;


•	announcements by us or our competitors of significant technical innovations, acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments;


•	changes in operating performance and stock market valuations of other technology companies generally, or those in our industry in particular;


•	price and volume fluctuations in certain categories of companies or the overall stock market, including as a result of trends in the global economy;


•	any major change in our board of directors or management;


•	lawsuits threatened or filed against us; and


•	other events or factors, including those resulting from war, incidents of terrorism or responses to these events.

In addition, the stock markets, and in particular the market on which our common stock is listed, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have affected and continue to affect the market prices of equity securities of many technology companies. Stock prices of many technology companies have fluctuated in a manner unrelated or disproportionate to the financial performance of those companies. In the past, stockholders have instituted securities class action litigation following periods of market volatility. If we were to become involved in securities litigation, it could subject us to substantial costs, divert resources and the attention of management from our business and adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, or publish negative reports about our business, our share price and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our common stock depends in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business, our market and our competitors. We do not have any control over these analysts. If

Table of Contents

one or more of the analysts who cover us downgrade our shares or change their opinion of our shares, our share price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of our company or fail to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which could cause our share price or trading volume to decline.

Substantial future sales of shares of our common stock could cause the market price of our common stock to decline.

The market price of shares of our common stock could decline as a result of substantial sales of our common stock, particularly sales by our directors, executive officers, employees and significant stockholders, a large number of shares of our common stock becoming available for sale, or the perception in the market that holders of a large number of shares intend to sell their shares. As of July 31, 2017, we had outstanding approximately 139.9 million shares of our common stock. We have also registered shares of common stock that we may issue under our employee equity incentive plans. These shares will be able to be sold freely in the public market upon issuance.

The requirements of being a public company may strain our resources, divert management’s attention and affect our ability to attract and retain executive management and qualified board members.

As a public company, we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Dodd-Frank Act, the listing requirements of The NASDAQ Stock Market and other applicable securities rules and regulations. Compliance with these rules and regulations has increased our legal and financial compliance costs, made some activities more difficult, time-consuming or costly and increased and will continue to increase demand on our systems and resources. The Exchange Act requires, among other things, that we file annual, quarterly and current reports with respect to our business and operating results. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. In order to maintain and, if required, improve our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting to meet this standard, significant resources and management oversight may be required. As a result, management’s attention may be diverted from other business concerns, which could adversely affect our business and operating results. Although we have already hired additional employees to comply with these requirements, we may need to hire more employees in the future or engage outside consultants, which will increase our costs and expenses.

In addition, changing laws, regulations, standards and practices relating to corporate governance and public disclosure are creating uncertainty for public companies, increasing legal and financial compliance costs and making some activities more time consuming. These laws, regulations, standards and practices are subject to varying interpretations, in many cases due to their lack of specificity, and, as a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as regulatory and governing bodies provide new guidance or as market practices develop. This could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices. We will continue to invest resources to comply with evolving laws, regulations and standards and keeping abreast of current practices, and this investment may result in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management’s time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance and corporate governance activities. If our efforts to comply with new laws, regulations and standards differ from the activities intended by regulatory or governing bodies due to ambiguities related to their application and practice, regulatory authorities may initiate legal proceedings against us and our business may be adversely affected.

As a result of disclosure of information as a public company, our business and financial condition have become more visible, which we believe may result in threatened or actual litigation, including by competitors and other third parties. If such claims are successful, our business operations and financial results could be adversely affected, and even if the claims do not result in litigation or are resolved in our favor, these claims, and the time and resources necessary to resolve them, could divert the resources of our management and adversely affect our business operations and financial results. From time to time, public companies are subject to campaigns by investors seeking to increase short-term stockholder value through actions such as financial restructuring, increased debt, special dividends, stock repurchases or sales of assets or the entire company. If stockholders attempt to effect such changes or acquire control over us, responding to such actions would be costly, time-consuming and disruptive, which could adversely affect our results of operations, financial results and the value of our common stock. These factors could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified employees, executive officers and members of our board of directors.

We are obligated to develop and maintain proper and effective internal control over financial reporting. These internal controls may not be determined to be effective, which may adversely affect investor confidence in our company and, as a result, the value of our common stock.

We are required, pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, to furnish a report by management on, among other things, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. This assessment includes disclosure of any

Table of Contents

material weaknesses identified by our management in our internal control over financial reporting. We are also required to have our independent registered public accounting firm issue an opinion on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting on an annual basis. During the evaluation and testing process, if we identify one or more material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, we will be unable to assert that our internal controls are effective.

If we are unable to assert that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, or if our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to express an opinion on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, we could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which would cause the price of our common stock to decline, and we may be subject to investigation or sanctions by the SEC.

We do not intend to pay dividends for the foreseeable future.

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock and do not intend to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. We anticipate that we will retain all of our future earnings for use in the development of our business and for general corporate purposes. Any determination to pay dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our board of directors. Accordingly, price appreciation of our common stock, which may never occur, may be the only way our stockholders realize any future gains on their investments.

Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents and under Delaware law could make an acquisition of our company more difficult, limit attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management and limit the market price of our common stock.

Provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control or changes in our management. Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws include provisions that:


•	authorize our board of directors to issue, without further action by the stockholders, shares of undesignated preferred stock with terms, rights and preferences determined by our board of directors;


•	require that any action to be taken by our stockholders be effected at a duly called annual or special meeting and not by written consent;


•	specify that special meetings of our stockholders can be called only by our board of directors, the Chairman of our board of directors, or our Chief Executive Officer;


•	establish an advance notice procedure for stockholder proposals to be brought before an annual meeting, including proposed nominations of persons for election to our board of directors;


•	establish that our board of directors is divided into three classes, Class I, Class II and Class III, with each class serving three-year staggered terms;


•	prohibit cumulative voting in the election of directors;


•	provide that our directors may be removed only for cause;


•	provide that vacancies on our board of directors may be filled only by a majority of directors then in office, even though less than a quorum; and


•	require the approval of our board of directors or the holders of a supermajority of our outstanding shares of capital stock to amend our bylaws and certain provisions of our certificate of incorporation.

These provisions may frustrate or prevent any attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management by making it more difficult for stockholders to replace members of our board of directors, which is responsible for appointing the members of our management. In addition, because we are incorporated in Delaware, we are governed by the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which generally prohibits a Delaware corporation from engaging in any of a broad range of business combinations with any “interested” stockholder for a period of three years following the date on which the stockholder became an “interested” stockholder.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Table of Contents

Not applicable.

Item 6. Exhibits.

The exhibits listed in the accompanying Exhibit Index are filed or incorporated by reference as part of this Quarterly Report.

Table of Contents

EXHIBIT

INDEX



Exhibit Number		Description

31.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer Required Under Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

31.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer Required Under Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

32.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Required Under Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. §1350.

101.INS		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Schema Linkbase Document

101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Labels Linkbase Document

101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



Date: September 6, 2017


	SPLUNK INC.


	By:	/s/ David F. Conte
		David F. Conte
		Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)