UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For fiscal year ended December 31, 2011
Commission File No. 1-4018
Dover Corporation
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
Delaware
(State of Incorporation)
|
53-0257888
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
3005 Highland Parkway, Suite 200, Downers Grove, IL 60515
(Address of principal executive offices)
Telephone: (630) 541-1540
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| Title of Each Class | Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered | |
| Common Stock, par value $1 | New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.) Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
Accelerated filer o
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
Smaller reporting company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of the close of business on June 30, 2011 was $12,607,526,684. The registrant’s closing price as reported on the New York Stock Exchange-Composite Transactions for June 30, 2011 was $67.80 per share. The number of outstanding shares of the registrant’s common stock as of February 3, 2012 was 183,656,719.
Documents Incorporated by Reference: Part III — Certain Portions of the Proxy Statement for Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 3, 2012 (the “2012 Proxy Statement”).
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K, especially “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, contains “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements relate to, among other things, income, earnings, cash flows, changes in operations, operating improvements, industries in which Dover businesses operate and the U.S. and global economies. Statements in this Form 10-K that are not historical are hereby identified as “forward-looking statements” and may be indicated by words or phrases such as “anticipates,” “supports,” “indicates,” “suggests,” “will,” “plans,” “projects,” “expects,” “believes,” “should,” “would,” “could,” “hope,” “forecast,” “management is of the opinion,” use of the future tense and similar words or phrases. Forward-looking statements are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from current expectations including, but not limited to, the state of the worldwide economy and sovereign credit, especially in Europe; political events that could impact the worldwide economy; the impact of natural disasters and their effect on global supply chains and energy markets; increases in the cost of raw materials; the Company’s ability to achieve expected savings from integration, synergy and other cost-control initiatives; the ability to identify and successfully consummate value-adding acquisition opportunities; increased competition and pricing pressures in the markets served by Dover’s businesses; the ability of Dover’s businesses to expand into new geographic markets and to anticipate and meet customer demands for new products and product enhancements; the impact of loss of a single-source manufacturing facility; changes in customer demand; current economic conditions and uncertainties in the credit and capital markets; a downgrade in Dover’s credit ratings; international economic conditions including interest rate and currency exchange rate fluctuations; the relative mix of products and services which impacts margins and operating efficiencies; short-term capacity constraints; domestic and foreign governmental and public policy changes including environmental regulations and tax policies (including domestic and international export subsidy programs, R&E credits and other similar programs); unforeseen developments in contingencies such as litigation; protection and validity of patent and other intellectual property rights; the cyclical nature of some of Dover’s businesses; domestic housing industry weakness; instability in countries where Dover conducts business; and possible future terrorist threats and their effect on the worldwide economy. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.
The Company may, from time to time, post financial or other information on its Internet website, www.dovercorporation.com. The Internet address is for informational purposes only and is not intended for use as a hyperlink. The Company is not incorporating any material on its website into this report.
1
|
|
||||||
Overview
Dover Corporation is a diversified, multinational corporation that manufactures a broad range of specialized products and components and also offers related services and consumables. Dover provides its customers with outstanding products and services that reflect the company’s commitment to operational excellence, innovation and market leadership. Unless the context indicates otherwise, references herein to “Dover,” “the Company,” and such words as “we,” “us,” and “our” include Dover Corporation and its subsidiaries. Dover was incorporated in 1947 in the State of Delaware and became a publicly traded company in 1955. Dover is headquartered in Downers Grove, Illinois and currently employs approximately 34,000 people worldwide.
In the fourth quarter of 2011, we reorganized into four new business segments that are aligned with the key end-markets they serve: Communication Technologies, Energy, Engineered Systems and Printing & Identification. We believe the segment reorganization provides better alignment and focus around our end-markets, allows for better leverage of our executive leadership talent and expertise, helps improve the sharing and leveraging of resources within and between the four segments, enhances execution of business-specific strategies, and facilitates internal and external benchmarking against companies serving similar markets.
Our Communication Technologies segment is engaged in the design and manufacture of innovative products and components in the communications, life sciences, aerospace/industrial, defense, and telecommunication/other markets. Our Energy segment provides highly-engineered solutions for the safe and efficient extraction and handling of oil and gas in the drilling, production and downstream markets. Our Engineered Systems segment is comprised of two platforms, Fluid Solutions and Refrigeration & Industrial, which are industry leaders in the fluids systems, refrigeration and food equipment, and certain industrial markets. Our Printing & Identification segment provides integrated printing, coding, and testing solutions for the consumer goods, food, pharmaceutical, industrial, electronics and alternative energy markets.
The following table shows the percentage of total annual revenue generated by each of our four segments over the last three years:
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|||||
|
2011
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||
|
Communication Technologies
|
17%
|
16%
|
17%
|
||
|
Energy
|
24%
|
20%
|
19%
|
||
|
Engineered Systems
|
39%
|
42%
|
43%
|
||
|
Printing and Identification
|
20%
|
22%
|
21%
|
||
Management Philosophy
Our businesses are committed to operational excellence, and to being market leaders as measured by market share, customer service, innovation, profitability and return on invested capital. Our operating structure of four business segments and two platforms allows for focused acquisition activity, accelerates opportunities to identify and capture operating synergies, including global sourcing and supply chain integration, and advances the development of our executive talent. Our segment and executive management set strategic direction, initiatives and goals, provide oversight, allocate and manage capital, are responsible for major acquisitions, and provide other services. We foster an operating culture with high ethical standards, trust, respect and open communication, to allow individual growth and operational effectiveness.
In addition, we are committed to creating value for our customers, employees and shareholders through sustainable business practices that protect the environment and developing products that help our customers meet their sustainability goals. Our companies are increasing their focus on efficient energy usage, greenhouse gas reduction and waste management as they strive to meet the global environmental needs of today and tomorrow.
Company Goals
We are committed to driving shareholder return through three key objectives. First, we are committed to achieving annual organic sales growth over the next three years (2012 through 2014) of 7% to 9%, complemented by acquisition growth of 3% to 5% over the same periods. Secondly, we continue to focus on segment margin expansion through productivity initiatives, including supply chain activities, strategic pricing and portfolio shaping. We are targeting segment margins of approximately 19% by 2014, representing an increase of roughly 200 basis points over our 2011 segment margins. Lastly, we are committed to generating free cash flow as a percentage of sales in excess of 10% through disciplined capital allocation, strong performance, productivity improvements and active working capital management. We support these goals through (1) alignment of management compensation with financial objectives, (2) well-defined and actively managed merger and acquisition processes, and (3) talent development programs.
Business Strategy
To achieve our goals, we are focused on execution of the following three key business strategies:
Positioning ourselves for growth
We have aligned our business segments to focus on key-end markets that are well-positioned for future growth. In particular, our businesses are well-positioned to capitalize on growth trends in the areas of global energy demand, sustainability, consumer product safety, communications and emerging economies. For instance, our Communication Technologies segment is positioned to capitalize on growth in handheld communications (handsets), life sciences and aerospace, with its complement of micro audio components and communication components serving those markets. Our Energy segment is driven by a growing demand for innovative extraction technologies. The growing emerging economies, plus expanding exploration activity around the globe will provide significant opportunities for this segment. Our Engineered Systems segment combines its engineering technology, unique product advantages, and applications expertise to address market needs and requirements including sustainability, consumer product safety and growth in emerging economies, while our Printing & Identification segment is responding to the growing requirements for consumer product safety and renewable energy technologies by providing integrated printing, coding and identification solutions with a global reach, in the growing markets of fast moving consumer goods, industrial, and electronics, including alternative energy.
Capturing the benefits of common ownership
We are committed to operational excellence, and have implemented various productivity initiatives, such as supply chain management, lean manufacturing, and facility consolidations to maximize our efficiency, coupled with workplace safety initiatives to help ensure the health and welfare of our employees. We foster the sharing of best practices throughout the organization. To ensure success, our businesses place strong emphasis on continual quality improvement and new product development to better serve customers and expand into new product and geographic markets. We have also developed regional support centers and shared manufacturing centers in China, Brazil and India. We also continue to make significant investments in talent development, recognizing that the growth and development of our employees are key to our continued success.
Disciplined capital allocation
Our businesses generate annual free cash flow of approximately 10% of revenue. We are focused on the most efficient allocation of our capital to maximize investment returns. To do this, we grow and support our existing businesses, with annual investment in capital spending approximating 3% of revenue with a focus on internal projects to expand markets, develop products and boost productivity. We continue to evaluate our portfolio for strategic fit and intend to make additional acquisitions focused on our key growth spaces: communication components, energy, product ID, refrigeration and food equipment, and fluid solutions. We consistently provide shareholder returns by paying dividends, which have increased annually over each of the last 56 years. We will also continue to repurchase our shares principally to cover market dilution.
Portfolio Development
Acquisitions
Our acquisition program has two key elements. First, we seek to acquire value creating add-on businesses that enhance our existing businesses either through their global reach and customer mix, or by broadening their product mix. Second, in the right circumstances, we will strategically pursue larger, stand-alone businesses that have the potential to either complement our existing businesses or allow us to pursue innovative technologies within our key growth spaces. Over the past three years (2009 – 2011), we have spent over $1.7 billion to purchase 21 businesses that strategically fit within our business model. This included the largest acquisition in our history, that of Sound Solutions in July of 2011 for approximately $800 million. By enhancing the product offerings serving the high growth handset market, the acquisition of Sound Solutions has enabled our Communication Technologies segment to be a global leader in audio components serving this market. At the beginning of 2011, in order to build out our artificial lift portfolio within our Energy segment, we spent approximately $400 million to acquire Harbison-Fischer, a designer and manufacturer of down-hole rod pumps and related products used in artificial lift applications around the world.
For more details regarding acquisitions completed over the past two years, see Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. Our future growth depends in large part on finding and acquiring successful businesses, as a substantial number of our current businesses operate in relatively mature markets. While we expect to generate annual organic growth of 4% - 5% over a business cycle absent extraordinary economic conditions, sustained organic growth at these levels for individual businesses is difficult to achieve consistently each year. Our success is also dependent on the ability to successfully integrate our acquired businesses within our existing structure. To track post-merger integration and accountability, we utilize an internal tool kit and defined processes to ensure synergies are realized and value is created.
Dispositions
We continually review our portfolio to evaluate whether our businesses continue to be essential contributors to our long-term growth strategy. Occasionally, we may also make an opportunistic sale of one of our businesses based on specific market conditions and strategic considerations. Accordingly, in an effort to focus on our higher margin growth spaces, during the past three years (2009 - 2011) we have sold four businesses for aggregate consideration of approximately $517 million. The financial position and results of operations for these businesses have been presented as discontinued operations. For more details, see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. Over the same period, disposals of a few minor non-core divisions of our businesses generated additional proceeds of approximately $8 million.
Business Segments
As noted previously, in the fourth quarter of 2011, we reorganized our businesses into four new business segments that are aligned with the key end-markets they serve and comprise our operating and reportable segments: Communication Technologies, Energy, Engineered Systems and Printing & Identification. For financial information about our segments and geographic areas, see Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. All information set forth within this Annual Report has been recast to reflect the new segmentation.
Communication Technologies
Our Communication Technologies segment serves the following major markets: communications, life sciences, aerospace/industrial, defense and telecommunication/other.
|
·
|
Communications – Our businesses serving the communications market design, manufacture and assemble micro-acoustic audio input and output components for use principally in personal mobile handsets.
|
|
·
|
Life sciences – Our businesses serving the life sciences market manufacture advanced miniaturized receivers and electromechanical components for use in hearing aids, connectors for use in a variety of medical devices and bio processing applications, and specialized components for use in implantable devices and medical equipment.
|
|
·
|
Aerospace/Industrial – Our businesses serving the aerospace/industrial markets manufacture precision engineered components and aftermarket parts across a broad array of market applications. In the commercial aerospace market, our businesses design and manufacture specialty hydraulics, fasteners, bearings, switches and filters sold to both OEMs and as aftermarket products. Our companies also design and manufacture frequency control components, electromechanical switches, multi-layered capacitors, filters and quick disconnect couplings serving the general industrial markets.
|
|
·
|
Defense – Our businesses serving the defense market manufacture specialty hydraulics, mechanical and frequency control communication components, serving shipboard applications, strategic mission critical parts on key Airborne programs and Command and Control communications. These businesses also support key space initiatives with critical communication components.
|
|
·
|
Telecommunication/Other – Our businesses serving the telecommunication/other markets manufacture frequency control components for wired and wireless network base station communications that ensure precise signal timing and filters for non-interrupted access across high speed networks. Our businesses also serve the consumer electronic market with various audio components.
|
Communication Technologies’ products are manufactured primarily in North America, Europe and Asia and are sold globally, directly and through a network of distributors.
Energy
Our Energy segment serves the oil, gas and power generation industries, with products that promote the efficient and cost-effective drilling, extraction, storage and movement of oil and gas products, or constitute critical components for power generation equipment. This segment consists of the following lines of business:
|
·
|
Drilling – Our businesses serving the drilling market design and manufacture products that promote efficient and cost-effective drilling, including long-lasting polycrystalline diamond cutters (PDCs) for applications in down-hole drilling tools and quartz pressure transducers and hybrid electronics used in down-hole tools and monitoring devices.
|
|
·
|
Production – Our businesses serving the production market design and manufacture products and components that facilitate the extraction and movement of fuel from the ground, including steel sucker rods, down-hole rod pumps, progressive cavity pumps and drive systems, plunger lifts, and accessories used in artificial lift applications in oil and gas production; pressure, temperature and flow monitoring equipment used in oil and gas exploration and production applications; and control valves and instrumentation for oil and gas production. In addition, these businesses manufacture various compressor parts that are being used in the natural gas production, distribution and oil refining markets; and winches, hoists, gear drives, swing drives, auger drives, slewing ring bearings, hydraulic pump and electronic monitoring solutions for energy, infrastructure and recovery markets worldwide.
|
|
·
|
Downstream – Our businesses serving the downstream market produce systems and products that support efficient, safe, and environmentally-sensitive transportation and handling of fuel, hazardous liquids and dry-bulk commodities. Vehicle fuel dispensing products include conventional, vapor recovery, and clean energy (LPG, CNG, and Hydrogen) nozzles, swivels and breakaways, as well as tank pressure management systems. Products manufactured for the transportation, storage and processing of hazardous liquid and dry-bulk commodities include relief valves, loading/unloading angle valves, rupture disc devices, actuator systems, level measurement gauges, swivel joints, butterfly valves, lined ball valves, aeration systems, industrial access ports, manholes, hatches, collars, weld rings and fill covers. In addition, we offer bearings, bearing isolators, seals and remote condition monitoring systems that are used for rotating machinery applications such as turbo machinery, motors, generators and compressors used in energy, utility, marine and other industries.
|
Our Energy segment’s sales are made directly to customers and through various distribution channels. We manufacture our products primarily in North America, and our sales are concentrated in North America with an increasing level of international sales directed largely to Europe, South America and the Middle East.
Engineered Systems
Our Engineered Systems segment combines its engineering technology, unique product advantages, and applications expertise to address market needs and requirements including sustainability, consumer product safety needs and growth in emerging economies. To better serve its end-markets, the segment manages its products and services through two core business platforms, Fluid Solutions and Refrigeration & Industrial, as described below.
Fluid Solutions
The Fluid Solutions platform designs and manufactures pumps, compressors, and chemical proportioning and dispensing products. The pumps and compressors are used to transfer liquid and bulk products and are sold to a wide variety of markets, including the refined fuels, LPG, pulp and paper, wastewater, food/sanitary, military, transportation and chemical process industries. The pumps include centrifugal, reciprocating (double diaphragm) and rotary pumps that are used in demanding and specialized fluid transfer process applications. The chemical portioning and dispensing systems are used to dilute and dispense concentrated cleaning chemicals and are sold to the food service, health care, supermarket, institutional, school, building service contractor and industrial markets. In addition, the platform manufactures copper-brazed compact heat exchangers, and designs software for heating and cooling substations. Fluid Solutions products are manufactured in the United States, South America, Asia and Europe and marketed globally through a network of distributors or via direct channels.
Refrigeration & Industrial
The Refrigeration & Industrial platform manufactures products and systems serving the refrigeration/food, waste and recycling and other niche industrial markets, as follows:
|
·
|
Refrigeration & food equipment – Our businesses manufacture refrigeration systems, refrigeration display cases, walk-in coolers and freezers, electrical distribution products and engineering services, commercial foodservice equipment, cook-chill production systems, custom food storage and preparation products, kitchen ventilation systems, conveyer systems, beverage can-making machinery, and packaging machines used for meat, poultry and other food products. The platform’s refrigeration/food related manufacturing facilities and distributing operations are principally in North America, Europe and Asia.
|
The majority of the refrigeration/food systems and machinery that are manufactured or serviced by the Refrigeration & Industrial platform are used by the supermarket industry, “big-box” retail and convenience stores, the commercial/industrial refrigeration industry, institutional and commercial foodservice and food production markets, and beverage can-making industries. The commercial foodservice cooking equipment products serve their markets worldwide through a network of dealers, distributors, national chain accounts, manufacturer representatives, and a direct sales force with the primary market being North America.
|
·
|
Waste and recycling – The business in the solid waste management market provides products and services for the refuse collection industry and for on-site processing and compaction of trash and recyclable materials. Products are sold to municipal customers, national accounts and independent waste haulers through a network of distributors and directly in certain geographic areas. The on-site waste management and recycling systems include a variety of stationary compactors, wire processing and separation machines, and balers that are manufactured and sold primarily in the United States to distribution centers, malls, stadiums, arenas, office complexes, retail stores and recycling centers.
|
|
·
|
Other industrial – We also serve the vehicle service and industrial automation markets, providing a wide range of products and services that are utilized in vehicle services, maintenance, washing, repair and modification. Vehicle lifts and collision equipment are sold through equipment distributors and directly to a wide variety of markets, including independent service and repair shops, collision repair shops, national chains and franchised service facilities, new vehicle dealers, governments, and directly to consumers via the Internet. The businesses also produce 4WD and AWD powertrain systems and accessories for off-road vehicles, which are sold to OEMs and extensive dealer networks primarily in North America. These other industrial manufacturing operations are located primarily in North and South America, Asia and Europe.
|
The businesses in the industrial automation market provide a wide range of modular automation components including manual clamps, power clamps, rotary and linear mechanical indexers, conveyors, pick and place units, glove ports and manipulators as well as end-of-arm robotic grippers, slides and end effectors. These products serve a very broad market including food processing, packaging, paper processing, medical, electronic, automotive, nuclear, and general industrial products. These products are produced in the North America, Europe and Asia and are marketed globally on a direct basis to original equipment manufacturers (“OEM”s) and through a global dealer and distribution network to industrial end users. We also provide highly engineered hydraulic cylinders and swivels to the North American markets for use in mining and resource recovery, vehicle recovery, materials handling and various other OEM applications.
Printing & Identification
Our Printing & Identification segment is a worldwide supplier of precision marking & coding, dispensing, printing, soldering, coating, inspection and testing equipment and related consumables and services. The segment serves three broad global end-markets: fast moving consumer goods, industrial, and electronics.
|
·
|
Fast Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) – Our businesses serving this market primarily design and manufacture marking & coding products used for printing variable information (such as date codes and serial numbers) on food, beverage, consumer goods, and pharmaceutical products, capitalizing on expanding food and product safety requirements and growth in emerging markets.
|
|
·
|
Industrial – Our products used by the industrial market are primarily marking & coding, bar code & portable printers, and fluid dispensing related products serving a number of industrial end markets including aerospace, cable, military, material packaging, industrial assembly, and medical devices capitalizing on growing industrial-related manufacturing in emerging markets. Additional products include broad line marking solutions leveraged for secondary packaging, such as cartons and pallets for use in warehouse logistics operations, and bar code printers and portable printers used where on demand labels/receipts are required.
|
|
·
|
Electronics – Our businesses serving the electronics market primarily design and manufacture high-speed precision material deposition machines and other related tools used in the assembly process for printed circuit boards, solar cells and other specialty electronic applications as well as precision manual soldering, de-soldering and other hand tools. The test equipment products include machines, test fixtures and related products used in testing “bare” and “loaded” electronic circuit boards and semiconductors.
|
Printing & Identification’s products are manufactured primarily in the United States, France, China, Malaysia, and Germany, and are sold throughout the world directly and through a network of distributors.
Raw Materials
We use a wide variety of raw materials, primarily metals and semi-processed or finished components, which are generally available from a number of sources. As a result, shortages or the loss of any single supplier have not had, and are not likely to have, a material impact on operating profits. While the required raw materials are generally available, commodity pricing has trended upward over the past few years, particularly for various grades of steel, copper, aluminum, select other commodities, and rare earth metals. Although some cost increases may be recovered through increased prices to customers, our operating results are exposed to such fluctuations. We attempt to control such costs through fixed-price contracts with suppliers and various other programs, such as our global supply chain activities.
Research and Development
Our businesses are encouraged to develop new products as well as to upgrade and improve existing products to satisfy customer needs, expand revenue opportunities domestically and internationally, maintain or extend competitive advantages, improve product reliability and reduce production costs. During 2011, we spent $197.0 million for research and development, including qualified engineering costs. In 2010 and 2009, research and development spending totaled $186.7 million and $172.1 million, respectively.
Our Communication Technologies and Printing & Identification segments expend significant effort in research and development because the rate of product development by their customers is often quite high. Our businesses that develop product identification and printing equipment and specialty electronic components for the consumer goods, handset, life sciences, datacom and telecom commercial markets believe that their customers expect a continuing rate of product innovation, performance improvement and reduced costs. The result has been that product life cycles in these markets generally average less than five years with meaningful sales price reductions over that time period.
Our other segments contain many businesses that are also involved in important product improvement initiatives. These businesses also concentrate on working closely with customers on specific applications, expanding product lines and market applications, and continuously improving manufacturing processes. Most of these businesses experience a much more moderate rate of change in their markets and products than is generally experienced by the Communication Technologies and Printing & Identification segments.
Intellectual Property and Intangible Assets
Our businesses own many patents, trademarks, licenses and other forms of intellectual property, which have been acquired over a number of years and, to the extent relevant, expire at various times over a number of years. A large portion of our businesses’ intellectual property consists of patents, unpatented technology and proprietary information constituting trade secrets that we seek to protect in various ways, including confidentiality agreements with employees and suppliers where appropriate. In addition, a significant portion of our intangible assets relate to customer relationships. While our intellectual property and customer relationships are important to our success, the loss or expiration of any of these rights or relationships, or any group of related rights or relationships, is not likely to materially affect our results on a consolidated basis. We believe that our commitment to continuous engineering improvements, new product development and improved manufacturing techniques, as well as strong sales, marketing and service efforts, are significant to our general leadership positions in the niche markets we serve.
Seasonality
In general, our businesses, while not strongly seasonal, tend to have stronger revenue in the second and third quarters, particularly those serving the consumer electronics, transportation, construction, waste and recycling, petroleum, commercial refrigeration and food service markets. Our businesses serving the major equipment markets, such as power generation, chemical and processing industries, have long lead times geared to seasonal, commercial or consumer demands, and tend to delay or accelerate product ordering and delivery to coincide with those market trends, which tends to moderate the aforementioned seasonality patterns.
Customers
We serve thousands of customers, no one of which accounted for more than 10% of our consolidated revenue in 2011. Similarly, within each of our four segments, no customer accounted for more than 10% of any individual segment’s revenue in 2011.
Given our diversity of served markets, customer concentrations are quite varied. Businesses supplying the waste and recycling, agricultural, defense, energy, automotive, commercial refrigeration, handset and hearing aid industries tend to deal with a few large customers that are significant within those industries. This also tends to be true for businesses supplying the power generation, aerospace and chemical industries. In the other markets served, there is usually a much lower concentration of customers, particularly where the companies provide a substantial number of products and services applicable to a broad range of end-use applications.
Certain of our businesses, particularly within the Communication Technologies segment, serve the military, space, aerospace, commercial and datacom/telecom infrastructure markets. Their customers include some of the largest operators in these markets. In addition, many of the OEM customers within the Communication Technologies segment outsource their manufacturing to Electronic Manufacturing Services (“EMS”) companies. Other customers include global cell phone and hearing aid manufacturers, many of the largest global EMS companies, particularly in China, and major printed circuit board and semiconductor manufacturers.
Backlog
Backlog is generally not a significant indicator of long-term performance, as most of our products have relatively short order-to-delivery periods. It is more relevant to our businesses that produce larger and more sophisticated machines or have long-term government contracts, primarily in the aerospace and industrial markets of our Communication Technologies segment. Our total backlog as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 was $1,446.5 million and $1,262.5 million, respectively.
Competition
Our competitive environment is complex because of the wide diversity of our products manufactured and the markets served. In general, most of our businesses are market leaders that compete with only a few companies, and the key competitive factors are customer service, product quality, price and innovation. However, as we become increasingly global, we are exposed to more competition. Certain businesses in the Communication Technologies and Printing & Identification segments compete globally against a variety of companies, primarily operating in Europe and East Asia.
International
Consistent with our strategic focus on positioning our businesses for growth, we continue to increase our expansion into international markets, particularly in developing economies in South America, Asia and Eastern Europe.
Most of our non-U.S. subsidiaries and affiliates are currently based in France, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and, with increasing emphasis, China, Malaysia, India, Mexico, Brazil and Eastern Europe.
The following table shows annual revenue derived from customers outside the U.S. as a percentage of total annual revenue for each of the last three years, by segment and in total:
|
% Non-US Revenue by Segment
|
|||||
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|||||
|
2011
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||
|
Communication Technologies
|
71%
|
63%
|
60%
|
||
|
Energy
|
32%
|
33%
|
33%
|
||
|
Engineered Systems
|
36%
|
34%
|
33%
|
||
|
Printing and Identification
|
76%
|
78%
|
74%
|
||
|
Total percentage of revenue derived from
|
|||||
|
customers outside of the United States
|
49%
|
48%
|
46%
|
||
Our international operations are subject to certain risks, such as price and exchange rate fluctuations and non-U.S. governmental restrictions, which are discussed further in “Item 1A. Risk Factors.”
For additional details regarding our non-U.S. revenue and the geographic allocation of the assets of our continuing operations, see Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Environmental Matters
Our operations are governed by a variety of international, national, state and local environmental laws. We are committed to continued compliance and believe our operations generally are in substantial compliance with these laws. In a few instances, particular plants and businesses have been the subject of administrative and legal proceedings with governmental agencies or private parties relating to the discharge or potential discharge of regulated substances. Where necessary, these matters have been addressed with specific consent orders to achieve compliance.
In 2010, we developed and implemented a process to conduct an inventory of greenhouse gas emissions. In 2011, we evaluated our climate change risks and opportunities and developed an energy and climate change strategy that includes clearly defined goals and objectives, along with prioritized programs and projects for achieving energy use and greenhouse gas emissions reductions. We have committed to reducing our overall energy and greenhouse gas intensity indexed to net revenue by 20% from 2010 to 2020. We also participated in the 2011 Carbon Disclosure Project as a respondent.
All of our segments are investigating the energy efficiencies related to their operations and the use of their products and services by customers. In some instances, our businesses may be able to help customers reduce some of their energy needs. Increased demand for energy-efficient products, based on a variety of drivers (including, but not limited to, reduction of greenhouse gas emissions) could result in increased sales for a number of our businesses.
There have been no material effects upon our earnings and competitive position resulting from compliance with laws or regulations enacted or adopted relating to the protection of the environment. We are aware of a number of existing or upcoming regulatory initiatives intended to reduce emissions in geographies where our manufacturing and warehouse/distribution facilities are located and have evaluated the potential impact of these regulations on our businesses. We anticipate that direct impacts from regulatory actions will not be significant in the short- to medium-term. We expect the regulatory impacts associated with climate change regulation would be primarily indirect and would result in “pass through” costs from energy suppliers, suppliers of raw materials and other services related to our operations.
Employees
We had approximately 34,000 employees in continuing operations as of December 31, 2011, which was an increase of 14% from the prior year end. The increase reflects the impact of recent acquisitions as well as additional headcount necessary to support the volume growth in 2011.
Other Information
We make available through the “Financial Reports” link on our Internet website, http://www.dovercorporation.com, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to these reports. We post each of these reports on the website as soon as reasonably practicable after the report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The information on our Internet website is not incorporated into this Form 10-K.
Our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows can be impacted by a number of factors which could cause our actual results to vary materially from recent results or from anticipated future results. In general, we are subject to the same general risks and uncertainties that impact many other industrial companies such as general economic, industry and/or market conditions and growth rates; the impact of natural disasters, and their effect on global energy markets; possible future terrorist threats and their effect on the worldwide economy; and changes in laws or accounting rules. The risk factors discussed in this section should be considered together with information included elsewhere in this Form 10-K and should not be considered the only risks to which we are exposed.
|
·
|
Our results for 2012 may be impacted by current domestic and international economic conditions and uncertainties.
|
In 2012, our businesses may be adversely affected by disruptions in the financial markets or declines in economic activity both domestically and internationally in those countries in which we operate. These circumstances will also impact our suppliers and customers in various ways which could have an impact on our business operations, particularly if global credit markets are not operating efficiently and effectively to support industrial commerce. Such negative changes in worldwide economic and capital market conditions are beyond our control, are highly unpredictable, and can have an adverse effect on our revenue, earnings, cash flows and cost of capital.
|
·
|
Increasing product/service and price competition by international and domestic competitors, including new entrants and our ability to introduce new and competitive products could cause our businesses to generate lower revenue, operating profits and cash flows.
|
Our competitive environment is complex because of the wide diversity of the products that our businesses manufacture and the markets they serve. In general, most of our businesses compete with only a few companies. Our ability to compete effectively depends on how successfully we anticipate and respond to various competitive factors, including new products and services that may be introduced by competitors, changes in customer preferences, and pricing pressures. If our businesses are unable to anticipate their competitors’ development of new products and services and/or identify customer needs and preferences on a timely basis or successfully introduce new products and services in response to such competitive factors, they could lose customers to competitors. If our businesses do not compete effectively, we may experience lower revenue, operating profits and cash flows.
|
·
|
Some of our businesses may not anticipate, adapt to, or capitalize on technological developments and are subject to the cyclical nature of their industries. These factors could cause these businesses to become less competitive and lead to reduced market share, revenue, operating profits and cash flows.
|
Certain of our businesses sell their products in electronic and technology-based industries that are constantly experiencing change as new technologies are developed. In order to grow and remain competitive in these industries, they must adapt to future changes in technology to enhance their existing products and introduce new products to address their customers’ changing demands. Also, a portion of the Communication Technologies and Printing & Identification segments’ revenue is derived from markets that are subject to unpredictable short-term business cycles.
Our Energy segment is subject to risk due to the volatility of energy prices and regulations which impact production, although overall demand is more directly related to depletion rates and global economic conditions and related energy demands.
As a result of all the above factors, the revenue and operating performance of these businesses in any one period are not necessarily predictive of their revenue and operating performance in other periods, and these factors could have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
|
·
|
We could lose customers or generate lower revenue, operating profits and cash flows if there are significant increases in the cost of raw materials (including energy) or if we are unable to obtain raw materials.
|
We purchase raw materials, subassemblies and components for use in our manufacturing operations, which expose us to volatility in prices for certain commodities. Significant price increases for these commodities could adversely affect operating profits for certain of our businesses. While we generally attempt to mitigate the impact of increased raw material prices by hedging or passing along the increased costs to customers, there may be a time delay between the increased raw material prices and the ability to increase the prices of products, or we may be unable to increase the prices of products due to a competitor’s pricing pressure or other factors. In addition, while raw materials are generally available now, the inability to obtain necessary raw materials could affect our ability to meet customer commitments and satisfy market demand for certain products. Consequently, a significant price increase in raw materials, or their unavailability, may result in a loss of customers and adversely impact revenue, operating profits and cash flows.
|
·
|
We are subject to risks relating to our existing foreign operations and expansion into new geographical markets.
|
Approximately 49% of our revenues for 2011 and 48% of our revenues for 2010 were derived outside the United States. We continue to focus on penetrating global markets as part of our overall growth strategy and expect sales from and into foreign markets to continue to represent a significant portion of our revenues. In addition, many of our manufacturing operations and suppliers are located outside the United States. Our foreign operations and our global expansion strategy are subject to general risks related to international operations, including:
|
o
|
political, social and economic instability and disruptions;
|
|
o
|
government embargoes or trade restrictions;
|
|
o
|
the imposition of duties and tariffs and other trade barriers;
|
|
o
|
import and export controls;
|
|
o
|
limitations on ownership and on repatriation of earnings;
|
|
o
|
transportation delays and interruptions;
|
|
o
|
labor unrest and current and changing regulatory environments;
|
|
o
|
increased compliance costs including requirements for disclosure and due diligence;
|
|
o
|
the impact of loss of a single-source manufacturing facility;
|
|
o
|
difficulties in staffing and managing multi-national operations; and
|
|
o
|
limitations on our ability to enforce legal rights and remedies.
|
If we are unable to successfully manage the risks associated with expanding our global business or adequately manage operational risks of our existing international operations, the risks could have a material adverse effect on our growth strategy involving expansion into new geographical markets or our results of operations and financial position.
|
·
|
Our exposure to exchange rate fluctuations on cross-border transactions and the translation of local currency results into U.S. dollars could negatively impact our results of operations.
|
We conduct business through our subsidiaries in many different countries, and fluctuations in currency exchange rates could have a significant impact on the reported results of operations, which are presented in U.S. dollars. A significant and growing portion of our products are manufactured in lower-cost locations and sold in various countries. Cross-border transactions, both with external parties and intercompany relationships, result in increased exposure to foreign exchange effects. Accordingly, significant changes in currency exchange rates, particularly the Euro, Pound Sterling, Swiss franc, Chinese RMB (Yuan) and the Canadian dollar, could cause fluctuations in the reported results of our businesses’ operations that could negatively affect our results of operations. Additionally, the strengthening of certain currencies such as the Euro and U.S. dollar potentially exposes us to competitive threats from lower cost producers in other countries such as China. Our sales are translated into U.S. dollars for reporting purposes. The strengthening of the U.S. dollar could result in unfavorable translation effects as the results of foreign locations are translated into U.S. dollars.
|
·
|
Our operating profits and cash flows could be adversely affected if we cannot achieve projected savings and synergies.
|
We are continually evaluating our cost structure and seeking ways to capture synergies across our operations. If we are unable to reduce costs and expenses through our various programs, it could adversely affect our operating profits and cash flows.
|
·
|
Failure to attract, retain and develop personnel or to provide adequate succession plans for key management could have an adverse effect on our operating results.
|
Our growth, profitability and effectiveness in conducting our operations and executing our strategic plans depend in part on our ability to attract, retain and develop qualified personnel, align them with appropriate opportunities and maintain adequate succession plans for key management positions. If we are unsuccessful in these efforts, our operating results could be adversely affected.
|
·
|
Our businesses and their profitability and reputation could be adversely affected by domestic and foreign governmental and public policy changes (including environmental and employment regulations and tax policies such as export subsidy programs, research and experimentation credits, carbon emission regulations, and other similar programs), risks associated with emerging markets, changes in statutory tax rates and unanticipated outcomes with respect to tax audits.
|
Our businesses’ domestic and international sales and operations are subject to risks associated with changes in local government laws (including environmental and export laws), regulations and policies. Failure to comply with any of these laws could result in civil and criminal, monetary and non-monetary penalties as well as potential damage to our reputation. In addition, we cannot provide assurance that our costs of complying with new and evolving regulatory reporting requirements and current or future laws, including environmental protection, employment, and health and safety laws, will not exceed our estimates. In addition, we have invested in certain countries, including Brazil, Russia, India and China, that carry high levels of currency, political, compliance and economic risk. While these risks or the impact of these risks are difficult to predict, any one or more of them could adversely affect our businesses and reputation.
Our effective tax rate is impacted by changes in the mix among earnings in countries with differing statutory tax rates, changes in the valuation allowance of deferred tax assets or changes in tax laws. The amount of income taxes and other taxes paid can be adversely impacted by changes in statutory tax rates and laws and are subject to ongoing audits by domestic and international authorities. If these audits result in assessments different from amounts estimated, then our financial results may be adversely affected by unfavorable tax adjustments.
|
·
|
Customer requirements and new regulations may increase our expenses and impact the availability of certain raw materials, which could adversely affect our revenue and operating profits.
|
Our businesses use parts or materials that are impacted by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) requirement for disclosure of the use of “conflict minerals” mined in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and adjoining countries. Some of our businesses' customers already have announced that they will require “conflict free” metals in products they purchase.
We have begun the process of determining the country of origin of certain metals used by our businesses, as required by the Dodd-Frank Act. The supply chain due diligence and verification of sources may require several years to complete based on the current availability of smelter origin information and the number of vendors. We have begun to obtain and review the information from our suppliers. We may not be able to complete the process in the timeframe required because of the complexity of our supply chain.
Other governmental social responsibility regulations also may impact our suppliers, manufacturing operations and operating profits.
The need to find alternative sources for certain raw materials or products because of customer requirements and regulations may impact our ability to secure adequate supplies of raw materials or parts, lead to supply shortages, or adversely impact the prices at which our businesses can procure compliant goods.
|
·
|
Unforeseen developments in contingencies such as litigation could adversely affect our financial condition.
|
We and certain of our subsidiaries are, and from time to time may become, parties to a number of legal proceedings incidental to their businesses involving alleged injuries arising out of the use of their products, exposure to hazardous substances or patent infringement, employment matters and commercial disputes. The defense of these lawsuits may require significant expenses and divert management’s attention, and we may be required to pay damages that could adversely affect our financial condition. In addition, any insurance or indemnification rights that we may have may be insufficient or unavailable to protect us against potential loss exposures.
|
·
|
The indemnification provisions of acquisition agreements by which we have acquired companies may not fully protect us and may result in unexpected liabilities.
|
Certain of the acquisition agreements by which we have acquired companies require the former owners to indemnify us against certain liabilities related to the operation of the company before we acquired it. In most of these agreements, however, the liability of the former owners is limited and certain former owners may be unable to meet their indemnification responsibilities. We cannot be assured that these indemnification provisions will fully protect us, and as a result we may face unexpected liabilities that adversely affect our profitability and financial position.
|
·
|
Our revenue, operating profits and cash flows could be adversely affected if our businesses are unable to protect or obtain patent and other intellectual property rights.
|
Our businesses own patents, trademarks, licenses and other forms of intellectual property related to their products. Our businesses employ various measures to maintain and protect their intellectual property. These measures may not prevent their intellectual property from being challenged, invalidated or circumvented, particularly in countries where intellectual property rights are not highly developed or protected. Unauthorized use of these intellectual property rights could adversely impact the competitive position of our businesses and have a negative impact on our revenue, operating profits and cash flows.
|
·
|
Our growth and results of operations may be adversely affected if we are unsuccessful in our capital allocation and acquisition program.
|
We expect to continue our strategy of seeking to acquire value creating add-on businesses that broaden our existing position and global reach as well as, in the right circumstances, strategically pursue larger acquisitions that could have the potential to either complement our existing businesses or allow us to pursue a new platform. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to continue to find suitable businesses to purchase, that we will be able to acquire such businesses on acceptable terms, or that all closing conditions will be satisfied with respect to any pending acquisition. If we are unsuccessful in our acquisition efforts, then our ability to continue to grow at rates similar to prior years could be adversely affected. In addition a completed acquisition may underperform relative to expectations, may be unable to achieve synergies originally anticipated, or may expose us to unexpected liabilities. Further, if we fail to allocate our capital appropriately, in respect of either our acquisition program or organic growth in our operations, we could be overexposed in certain markets and geographies. These factors could potentially have an adverse impact on our operating profits and cash flows.
|
·
|
Our borrowing costs may be impacted by our credit ratings developed by various rating agencies.
|
Three major ratings agencies (Moody’s, Standard and Poor’s, and Fitch Ratings) evaluate our credit profile on an ongoing basis and have each assigned high ratings for our long-term debt as of December 31, 2011. Although we do not anticipate a material change in our credit ratings, if our current credit ratings deteriorate, then our borrowing costs could increase, including increased fees under our Five-Year Credit Facility, and our access to future sources of liquidity may be adversely affected.
|
·
|
Our reputation, ability to do business and results of operations may be impaired by improper conduct by any of our employees, agents or business partners.
|
We cannot provide assurance that our internal controls and compliance systems will always protect us from acts committed by our employees, agents or business partners that would violate U.S. and/or non-U.S. laws, including the laws governing payments to government officials, bribery, fraud, anti-kickback and false claims rules, competition, export and import compliance, money laundering and data privacy. Any such improper actions could subject us to civil or criminal investigations in the U.S. and in other jurisdictions, could lead to substantial civil or criminal, monetary and non-monetary penalties and related shareholder lawsuits and could damage our reputation.
Not applicable.
The number, type, location and size of our properties as of December 31, 2011 are shown in the following charts, by segment:
|
Number and Nature of Facilities
|
Square Footage (000's)
|
||||||||
|
Segment
|
Mfg.
|
Warehouse
|
Sales/ Service
|
Owned
|
Leased
|
||||
|
Communication Technologies
|
33
|
3
|
13
|
1,129
|
1,296
|
||||
|
Energy
|
60
|
46
|
28
|
3,037
|
1,016
|
||||
|
Engineered Systems
|
69
|
33
|
32
|
5,374
|
2,584
|
||||
|
Printing and Identification
|
32
|
25
|
84
|
895
|
1,248
|
||||
|
Locations
|
Leased Facilities
|
||||||||||
|
North
|
Expiration Dates (Years)
|
||||||||||
|
America
|
Europe
|
Asia
|
Other
|
Minimum
|
Maximum
|
||||||
|
Communication Technologies
|
19
|
8
|
9
|
1
|
1
|
15
|
|||||
|
Energy
|
103
|
5
|
2
|
6
|
1
|
15
|
|||||
|
Engineered Systems
|
66
|
34
|
19
|
2
|
1
|
10
|
|||||
|
Printing and Identification
|
32
|
39
|
48
|
4
|
1
|
10
|
|||||
During 2011, we increased the number of our manufacturing and warehouse facilities, generally reflecting the facilities of the nine businesses acquired during the year. We believe our facilities are well-maintained and suitable for our operations.
A few of our subsidiaries are involved in legal proceedings relating to the cleanup of waste disposal sites identified under federal and state statutes which provide for the allocation of such costs among “potentially responsible parties.” In each instance, the extent of the subsidiary’s liability appears to be very small in relation to the total projected expenditures and the number of other “potentially responsible parties” involved and it is anticipated to be immaterial to us on a consolidated basis. In addition, a few of our subsidiaries are involved in ongoing remedial activities at certain plant sites, in cooperation with regulatory agencies, and appropriate reserves have been established.
We and certain of our subsidiaries are, and from time to time may become, parties to a number of other legal proceedings incidental to our businesses. These proceedings primarily involve claims by private parties alleging injury arising out of the use of our businesses' products, exposure to hazardous substances or patent infringement, employment matters and commercial disputes. Management and legal counsel periodically review the probable outcome of such proceedings, the costs and expenses reasonably expected to be incurred, the availability and extent of insurance coverage, and established reserves. While it is not possible to predict the outcome of these legal actions or any need for additional reserves, in the opinion of management, based on these reviews, it is unlikely that the disposition of the lawsuits and the other matters mentioned above will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, cash flows or competitive position.
Not applicable.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
All of our officers are elected annually at the first meeting of the Board of Directors following our annual meeting of shareholders, and are subject to removal at any time by the Board of Directors. Our executive officers as of February 10, 2012, and their positions with Dover (and, where relevant, prior business experience) for the past five years, are as follows:
|
Name
|
Age
|
Positions Held and Prior Business Experience
|
|||
|
Robert A. Livingston
|
58
|
Chief Executive Officer and Director (since December 2008), President (since June 2008) and Chief Operating Officer (from June 2008 to December 2008) of Dover; prior thereto Vice President of Dover and President and Chief Executive Officer of Dover Engineered Systems (from July 2007 to May 2008); prior thereto Vice President of Dover and President and Chief Executive Officer of Dover Electronics (from October 2004 to June 2007).
|
|||
|
Kevin P. Buchanan
|
56
|
Vice President, Tax (since July 2010) of Dover; prior thereto Deputy General Counsel, Tax (from November 2009 to June 2010) and Vice President, Tax (from May 2000 to October 2009) of Monsanto Company.
|
|||
|
Brad M. Cerepak
|
53
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (since May 2011) of Dover; prior thereto Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (from August 2009 to May 2011) of Dover; prior thereto Vice President, Finance (from June 2009 to August 2009) of Dover; prior thereto Vice President and Controller (from August 2005 to June 2008) of Trane.
|
|||
|
C. Anderson Fincher
|
41
|
Vice President (since May 2011) of Dover and Executive Vice President (since November 2011) of Dover Engineered Systems; prior thereto Executive Vice President (from May 2009 to November 2011) of Dover Industrial Products; prior thereto President (from January 2005 to May 2009) of Heil Trailer International.
|
|||
|
Thomas W. Giacomini
|
46
|
Vice President (since February 2008) of Dover and President and Chief Executive Officer (since November 2011) of Dover Engineered Systems; prior thereto President (from April 2009 to November 2011) and Chief Executive Officer (from July 2009 to November 2011) of Dover Industrial Products; prior thereto President (from October 2007 to July 2009) of Dover's Material Handling Platform; prior thereto President (from July 2005 to September 2007) of Warn Industries; prior thereto Chief Operating Officer (from 2000 to July 2005) of Warn Industries.
|
|||
|
Paul E. Goldberg
|
48
|
Vice President, Investor Relations (since November 2011) of Dover; prior thereto Treasurer and Director of Investor Relations (from February 2006 to November 2011) of Dover; prior thereto Assistant Treasurer (from July 2002 to February 2006) of Dover.
|
|||
|
John F. Hartner
|
49
|
Vice President (since May 2011) of Dover and President and Chief Executive Officer (since November 2011) of Dover Printing & Identification; prior thereto Executive Vice President (from April 20l1 to November 2011) of Dover Engineered Systems; prior thereto Executive Vice President (from October 2007 to April 2011) of Dover Electronic Technologies; prior thereto President (from April 2001 to October 2007) of DEK International.
|
|||
|
Jay L. Kloosterboer
|
51
|
Senior Vice President, Human Resources (since May 2011) of Dover; prior thereto Vice President, Human Resources (from January 2009 to May 2011) of Dover; prior thereto Executive Vice President - Business Excellence (from May 2005 to January 2009) of AES Corporation; prior thereto Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer (from May 2003) of AES Corporation.
|
|||
|
Raymond T. McKay, Jr.
|
58
|
Vice President (since February 2004) and Controller (since November 2002) of Dover.
|
|||
|
Brian P. Moore
|
41
|
Vice President, Treasurer (since November 2011) of Dover; prior thereto Senior Director, Investor Relations (from April 2010 to October 2011) of USG Corporation ; prior thereto Director of Credit & Accounts Receivable (from December 2008 to April 2010) of USG; prior thereto Director of Finance (from December 2007 to December 2008) at USG; prior thereto Assistant Treasurer (from October 2004 to December 2008) of USG.
|
|
Name
|
Age
|
Positions Held and Prior Business Experience
|
|||
|
James H. Moyle
|
59
|
Vice President (since 2009) of Dover and Executive Vice President (since January 2012) of Dover Engineered Systems; prior thereto Vice President, Global Sourcing and Supply Chain (from April 2009 to December 2011) of Dover; prior thereto Chief Financial Officer (from July 2007 to April 2009) of Dover Fluid Management; prior thereto Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (from November 2005 to July 2007) of Dover Diversified; prior thereto Executive Vice President (from September 2003 to November 2005) of Knowles Electronics.
|
|||
|
Jeffrey S. Niew
|
45
|
Vice President of Dover and President and Chief Executive Officer of Dover Communication Technologies (since November 2011); prior thereto President (from January 2008 to November 2011) and Chief Executive Officer (from February 2010 to November 2011) of Knowles Electronics; prior thereto Chief Operating Officer (from January 2007 to February 2010) of Knowles Electronics; prior thereto Vice President and General Manager (from September 2002 to January 2007) of Knowles Acoustics.
|
|||
|
Joseph W. Schmidt
|
65
|
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary (since May 2011) of Dover; prior thereto Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary (from January 2003 to May 2011) of Dover.
|
|||
|
Stephen R. Sellhausen
|
54
|
Senior Vice President, Corporate Development (since May 2011) of Dover; prior thereto Vice President, Corporate Development (from January 2009 to May 2011) of Dover; prior thereto Vice President, Business Development (from April 2008 to January 2009) of Dover; prior thereto investment banker with Citigroup Global Markets.
|
|||
|
Sivasankaran Somasundaram
|
46
|
Vice President (since January 2008) of Dover and Executive Vice President (since November 2011) of Dover Energy; prior thereto Executive Vice President (from January 2010 to November 2011) of Dover Fluid Management; President (from January 2008 to December 2009) of Dover's Fluid Solutions Platform; prior thereto President (from May 2006 to January 2008) of Gas Equipment Group; prior thereto President (from March 2004 to May 2006) of RPA Process Technologies.
|
|||
|
William W. Spurgeon, Jr.
|
53
|
Vice President (since October 2004) of Dover and President and Chief Executive Officer (since November 2011) of Dover Energy; prior thereto President and Chief Executive Officer (from July 2007 to November 2011) of Dover Fluid Management; prior thereto President and Chief Executive Officer (from October 2004 to July 2007) of Dover Diversified.
|
|||
|
Niclas Ytterdahl
|
47
|
Senior Vice President, Global Sourcing (since January 2012) of Dover; prior thereto Vice President, Global Strategic Sourcing (from April 2006 to December 2011) of AES Corporation; prior thereto Vice President Operations and General Manager (from January 2002 to April 2006) of Fisher Scientific.
|
|||
|
Michael Y. Zhang
|
48
|
Vice President (since May 2010) of Dover and President, Asia (since May 2011) of Dover; prior thereto Managing Director (from January 2009 to May 2011) of Dover Regional Headquarters, China; prior thereto various roles at ABB, Ltd., including Vice President, ABB Control System and Product Business (from September 2004 to March 2008).
|
Market Information and Dividends
The principal market in which Dover common stock is traded is the New York Stock Exchange. Information on the high and low sales prices of our stock and the frequency and the amount of dividends paid during the last two years is as follows:
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||||||
|
Market Prices
|
Dividends Per Share
|
Market Prices
|
Dividends Per Share
|
||||||||
|
High
|
Low
|
High
|
Low
|
||||||||
|
First Quarter
|
$68.07
|
$56.51
|
$0.275
|
$47.56
|
$40.50
|
$0.26
|
|||||
|
Second Quarter
|
69.25
|
60.57
|
0.275
|
55.50
|
41.42
|
0.26
|
|||||
|
Third Quarter
|
70.15
|
45.42
|
0.315
|
53.00
|
40.50
|
0.275
|
|||||
|
Fourth Quarter
|
59.27
|
43.64
|
0.315
|
59.20
|
51.39
|
0.275
|
|||||
|
$1.18
|
$1.07
|
||||||||||
Holders
The number of holders of record of Dover common stock as of January 27, 2012 was approximately 19,288. This figure includes participants in our domestic 401(k) program.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
Information regarding securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans is contained in Part III, Item 12 of this Form 10-K.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
None.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
During the fourth quarter, we made the following purchases of Dover shares:
|
Total Number of
Shares
Purchased (1)
|
Average Price
Paid per Share
|
Maximum Number of Shares
that May Yet Be Purchased
under the Plans or Programs
|
||||||
|
Total Number of Shares
Purchased as Part of Publicly
Announced Plans or Programs
|
||||||||
|
Period
|
||||||||
|
October 1 to October 31
|
490,458
|
$53.91
|
490,000
|
4,078,495
|
||||
|
November 1 to November 30
|
630,000
|
54.38
|
630,000
|
3,448,495
|
||||
|
December 1 to December 31
|
915,000
|
57.00
|
915,000
|
2,533,495
|
||||
|
For the Fourth Quarter 2011
|
2,035,458
|
$55.44
|
2,035,000
|
2,533,495
|
__________
|
(1)
|
In October, we acquired 458 of these shares from the holders of our employee stock options when they tendered these shares as full or partial payment of the exercise price of such options. These shares are applied against the exercise price at the market price on the date of exercise. During October, November, and December, we purchased 490,000, 630,000, and 915,000 shares, respectively, under the five-year, 10,000,000 share repurchase authorized by the Board of Directors in May 2007, leaving 2,533,495 shares available for purchase as of the end of December 2011.
|
Performance Graph
This performance graph does not constitute soliciting material, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not incorporated by reference in any of our filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date of this Form 10-K and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing, except to the extent we specifically incorporate this performance graph by reference therein.
Comparison of Five-Year Cumulative Total Return*
Dover Corporation, S&P 500 Index & Peer Group Index
Total Shareholder Returns
Data Source: Research Data Group, Inc
_______________________
*Total return assumes reinvestment of dividends.
This graph assumes $100 invested on December 31, 2006 in Dover Corporation common stock, the S&P 500 index and a peer group index.
In 2011, we changed the companies comprising our peer index in order to better reflect our current portfolio mix (our “New Peer Group”). Changes included the addition of certain technology-based companies and the removal of certain companies with cyclical exposure. Our New Peer Group index consists of the following 39 public companies selected by the Company:
|
3M Company
|
FMC Technologies
|
Regal Beloit Corp. *
|
|
Actuant Corp.
|
Gardner Denver Inc. *
|
Rockwell Automation
|
|
Ametek Inc.
|
Honeywell International
|
Roper Industries
|
|
Amphenol Corp. *
|
Hubbell Incorporated
|
Snap-On Inc. *
|
|
Cameron International
|
IDEX Corporation
|
SPX Corporation
|
|
Carlisle Companies
|
Illinois Tool Works
|
Teledyne Technologies Inc. *
|
|
Cooper Industries
|
Ingersoll-Rand PLC
|
Textron Inc. *
|
|
Corning Inc. *
|
Lennox International Inc. *
|
The Timken Company
|
|
Crane Company
|
Nordson Corp. *
|
Thomas & Betts Corp. *
|
|
Danaher Corporation
|
Pall Corporation
|
Tyco International
|
|
Eaton Corporation
|
Parker-Hannifin Corp.
|
United Technologies Corp.
|
|
Emerson Electric Co.
|
Pentair Inc.
|
Vishay Intertechnology Inc. *
|
|
Flowserve Corporation
|
Precision Castparts Corp.
|
Weatherford International
|
* These companies were added to our New Peer Group index in 2011. The following companies included in our Old Peer Group are no longer included within the New Peer Group index: ACGO Corporation, Agilent Technologies, Deere & Company, ITT Corporation, Leggett & Platt Inc., Manitowoc Co., Masco Corp., Oshkosh Corp., Terex Corporation , and Paccar Inc.
|
2011
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||||||||
|
(In thousands except per share figures)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Revenue
|
$ | 7,950,140 | $ | 6,640,191 | $ | 5,344,331 | $ | 6,808,313 | $ | 6,507,185 | ||||||||||
|
Earnings from continuing operations
|
846,365 | 690,751 | 373,423 | 649,892 | 608,987 | |||||||||||||||
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Continuing operations
|
$ | 4.55 | $ | 3.70 | $ | 2.01 | $ | 3.45 | $ | 3.02 | ||||||||||
|
Discontinued operations
|
0.26 | 0.05 | (0.09 | ) | (0.31 | ) | 0.26 | |||||||||||||
|
Net earnings
|
4.82 | 3.75 | 1.91 | 3.13 | 3.28 | |||||||||||||||
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
185,882 | 186,897 | 186,136 | 188,481 | 201,330 | |||||||||||||||
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Continuing operations
|
$ | 4.48 | $ | 3.65 | $ | 2.00 | $ | 3.43 | $ | 3.00 | ||||||||||
|
Discontinued operations
|
0.26 | 0.05 | (0.09 | ) | (0.31 | ) | 0.26 | |||||||||||||
|
Net earnings
|
4.74 | 3.70 | 1.91 | 3.12 | 3.26 | |||||||||||||||
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
188,887 | 189,170 | 186,736 | 189,269 | 202,918 | |||||||||||||||
|
Dividends per common share
|
$ | 1.18 | $ | 1.07 | $ | 1.02 | $ | 0.90 | $ | 0.77 | ||||||||||
|
Capital expenditures
|
$ | 271,809 | $ | 174,845 | $ | 112,972 | $ | 167,998 | $ | 161,673 | ||||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
303,143 | 241,969 | 231,363 | 235,081 | 214,918 | |||||||||||||||
|
Total assets
|
9,501,450 | 8,558,743 | 7,882,402 | 7,883,238 | 8,068,407 | |||||||||||||||
|
Total debt
|
2,187,252 | 1,807,476 | 1,860,884 | 2,084,173 | 2,087,652 | |||||||||||||||
All results and data in the table above reflect continuing operations, unless otherwise noted. As a result, the data presented above will not necessarily agree to previously issued financial statements. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information on disposed and discontinued operations and Note 2 for additional information regarding the impact of 2011 acquisitions.
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) is intended to help the reader understand our results of operations and financial condition for the three years ended December 31, 2011. The MD&A should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes which appear elsewhere in this Form 10-K. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those discussed elsewhere in this Form 10-K, particularly in Item 1A. “Risk Factors” and in “Special Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements” inside the front cover of this Form 10-K.
OVERVIEW AND OUTLOOK
Dover delivered a record year in 2011 in terms of revenue, earnings, and bookings. Our consolidated revenue increased $1.3 billion, or 20%, to $8.0 billion, inclusive of acquisitions, while our bookings grew by $1.2 billion, or 17%, to $8.1 billion, and our gross profit grew by $435 million, or 17%, to $3.1 billion. However, our gross profit margin as a percentage of sales decreased 100 basis points to 38.4% mainly due to product and customer mix as well as the impact of recent acquisitions, which more than offset operating leverage. Earnings from continuing operations increased 23% to $846 million.
In addition to our strong financial results, we accomplished several important strategic initiatives in 2011. We realigned our businesses into four new segments to more closely match our key end-markets. This new structure will serve to support our growth strategies and productivity initiatives as we continue to build our company. During 2011, we deployed $1.4 billion on nine acquisitions that added technology, opened new markets, and expanded geography in nearly all of our growth spaces. We also divested three businesses consistent with our strategy of focusing on our higher margin growth spaces. We received proceeds in excess of $500 million which we intend to utilize on future acquisitions or internal investments. Lastly, we generated $786 million in free cash flow, which enabled us to aggressively invest in higher growth economies and innovation, and to continue our long tradition of raising our annual dividend, now standing at 56 consecutive years.
As we concluded the fourth quarter, we encountered certain challenges, such as continued weakness in alternative energy, semi-conductor and telecom infrastructure markets and general softness within the European economy, including uncertainty around European credit markets, that may continue to impact our operations going into 2012.
Despite these challenges, given our strong financial position and the depth and resilience of our business mix, we believe that through continued execution of our strategies around positioning ourselves to capitalize on global growth trends, capturing the benefits of common ownership and disciplined capital allocation, we are well positioned for solid growth in 2012.
We expect 2012 full year organic growth to be in the range of 4% to 7% and acquisition related growth to be approximately 3% for acquisitions completed in 2011. Based on these revenue assumptions and profitability expectations, we expect our diluted earnings per share from continuing operations for 2012 will be in the range of $4.70 to $5.00 and expect our earnings to follow a traditional seasonal pattern of being higher in the second and third quarters.
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
As discussed in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K, we are reporting three businesses that were sold during the third and fourth quarters of 2011 as discontinued operations. Therefore, we have classified the results of operations of these businesses as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
% / Point Change
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
2011
|
2010
|
2009
|
2011 versus 2010
|
2010 versus 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands except per share figures)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Revenue
|
$ | 7,950,140 | $ | 6,640,191 | $ | 5,344,331 | 20 | % | 24 | % | ||||||||||
|
Cost of goods and services
|
4,898,716 | 4,023,586 | 3,331,187 | 22 | % | 21 | % | |||||||||||||
|
Gross profit
|
3,051,424 | 2,616,605 | 2,013,144 | 17 | % | 30 | % | |||||||||||||
|
Selling and administrative expenses
|
1,840,609 | 1,607,327 | 1,422,015 | 15 | % | 13 | % | |||||||||||||
|
Restructuring - severance and exit costs
|
5,695 | 6,160 | 67,322 | -8 | % | -91 | % | |||||||||||||
|
Interest expense, net
|
115,596 | 106,422 | 100,472 | 9 | % | 6 | % | |||||||||||||
|
Other expense (income), net
|
55 | 3,652 | (3,752 | ) | - | - | ||||||||||||||
|
Earnings from continuing operations
|
846,365 | 690,751 | 373,423 | 23 | % | 85 | % | |||||||||||||
|
Net earnings
|
895,243 | 700,104 | 356,438 | 28 | % | 96 | % | |||||||||||||
|
Net earnings per common share - diluted
|
$ | 4.74 | $ | 3.70 | $ | 1.91 | 28 | % | 94 | % | ||||||||||
|
Gross profit margin
|
38.4 | % | 39.4 | % | 37.7 | % | (1.0 | ) | 1.7 | |||||||||||
|
Selling and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenue
|
23.2 | % | 24.2 | % | 26.6 | % | (1.0 | ) | (2.4 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Effective tax rate
|
22.7 | % | 23.2 | % | 24.5 | % | (0.5 | ) | (1.3 | ) | ||||||||||
Revenue
Our 2011 consolidated revenue increased $1.3 billion or 20% compared with 2010, reflecting organic growth of 11%, growth from acquisitions of 7% and a favorable impact from currency translation of 2%. The majority of our organic growth was attributed to increased volumes across all four segments driven by strength in the energy and consumer handset markets and solid growth in fluid solutions, refrigeration equipment and many of the industrial markets served by our Engineered Systems segment. Additionally, approximately 2% of our growth was generated by new products, particularly in our Communication Technologies and Printing & Identification segments. Pricing added about 1% to revenue principally driven by strategic pricing initiatives and price increases implemented to offset higher commodity costs. Revenues generated outside of the U.S. increased by 22% compared with 2010, with revenue generated in emerging economies of China and Latin America increasing 47%.
Over 70% of the revenue growth from acquisitions was generated by Harbison-Fischer and Sound Solutions, two large acquisitions that we made in 2011 to expand our operations serving the artificial lift and handset markets, respectively.
Our 2010 consolidated revenue increased $1.3 billion or 24% compared with 2009, reflecting organic revenue growth of 20%, growth from acquisitions of 4%, and a negligible unfavorable impact from foreign currency translation. The organic growth reflected volume increases across all four of our segments, driven by higher demand in the majority of our end-markets as the global economy continued to rebound in 2010 from the 2009 down cycle. Revenues generated outside of the U.S. increased by 30% compared with 2009, with much of this growth generated in emerging economies of Asia and Latin America.
Gross Profit
Our gross profit increased $434.8 million or 17% in 2011 compared with 2010, reflecting the benefit of increased sales volumes. However, gross profit margin as a percentage of revenue contracted 100 basis points in 2011 to 38.4% from 39.4% in 2010 due principally to the impact of product and customer mix, which more than offset operating leverage, as well as the impact of higher depreciation from recent acquisitions.
Gross profit increased $603.5 million or 30% in 2010 compared with 2009, reflecting the benefit of increased sales volumes. Gross profit margin as a percentage of revenue was 39.4% in 2010, a 170 basis point improvement over the 2009 gross profit margin of 37.7%, reflecting the increase in sales volumes in 2010, the impact of lower restructuring charges on a comparative basis, and benefits realized from restructuring initiatives executed in 2009 along with our productivity initiatives.
Selling and Administrative Expenses
Selling and administrative expenses increased $233.3 million or 15% in 2011 compared with 2010 due primarily to general increases across the segments in support of higher volumes. As a percentage of revenue, selling and administrative expenses declined to 23.2% in 2011 compared with 24.2% in 2010. This 100 basis point improvement is largely a result of leverage from the higher revenue levels, which more than offset higher amortization and other nonrecurring expenses related to recent acquisitions.
Selling and administrative expenses increased $185.3 million or 13% in 2010 compared with 2009 due primarily to general increases across the segments in support of higher volumes. As a percentage of revenue, selling and administrative expenses declined to 24.2% in 2010 compared with 26.6% in 2009. This 240 basis point improvement reflects the absence of significant restructuring charges in 2010 and the benefits realized from 2009 restructuring efforts, as well as leverage from the higher revenue levels partially offset by increased compensation costs.
Non-Operating Items
Interest expense, net, increased 9% to $115.6 million in 2011 due primarily to higher average outstanding borrowings during 2011 as compared with 2010. As discussed in Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K, in February of 2011 we issued $800 million in new notes, receiving net proceeds of $789 million, approximately half of which was used to repay outstanding commercial paper balances incurred to retire $400 million of notes which came due earlier that month, with the remainder used to fund first quarter acquisitions. As a result, our total borrowings were $380 million higher at the end of 2011 compared to the end of 2010. In 2010, interest expense, net, increased 6.0% to $106.4 million, primarily due to reduced interest income in 2010 resulting from lower interest rates on the Company’s short term investment balances.
Other non-operating expense (income), net of $0.1 million in 2011 includes $8.6 million of net expense from foreign currency exchange fluctuations on assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency, offset by royalty income and other miscellaneous non-operating gains, none of which are individually significant. Other non-operating expense, net of $3.7 million in 2010 reflects $6.9 million of net expense from foreign currency exchange fluctuations on assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency, coupled with a $4.3 million loss on extinguishment of debt, offset in part by royalty income and other miscellaneous non-operating gains. This compares to other non-operating income, net of $3.8 million in 2009, which reflects $6.1 million of net expense from foreign currency exchange fluctuations on assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency, which was more than offset by a favorable insurance settlement and other miscellaneous non-operating gains.
Income Taxes
The 2011 effective tax rate on continuing operations was 22.7% compared to the 2010 rate of 23.2%. The effective tax rate was impacted by net favorable discrete and other items in both years (primarily driven by favorable audit settlements for uncertain tax positions in multiple jurisdictions relating to prior periods). The effective rate for 2011 was favorably impacted by net discrete items totaling $41.3 million, principally arising from settlements with the U.S. federal taxing authority and state taxing authorities. The effective tax rate for 2010 was favorably impacted by net discrete and other items totaling $50.3 million, arising principally from settlements with the U.S. federal taxing authority, coupled with the resolution of a foreign tax matter. The effective tax rate of 24.5% in 2009 was favorably impacted by $31.6 million of net benefits recognized for discrete items. Excluding these discrete and other items (a non-GAAP measure), the effective tax rate was 26.5% in 2011, 28.8% in 2010, and 30.9% in 2009, reflecting the geographic mix of earnings, with the earnings generated in foreign markets typically taxed at lower rates than in the U.S. While we believe additional uncertain tax positions will be settled within the next twelve months, an estimate cannot be made due to the uncertainties associated with the resolution of these matters.
Net Earnings
Net earnings from continuing operations was $846.4 million in 2011, an increase of 23% compared to 2010 due mainly to the earnings on increased revenue and a lower effective tax rate. Net earnings from continuing operations were $690.8 million in 2010, an increase of 85% compared to 2009, mainly due to increased revenues, operating margin expansion and a lower effective tax rate.
Net earnings from discontinued operations increased to $48.9 million in 2011, primarily reflecting income of $53.6 million from the operations of the three businesses sold this year and adjustments to other discontinued assets and liabilities, offset in part by a net loss on the sale of these businesses of $4.7 million, inclusive of goodwill impairment. In 2010, our net earnings from discontinued operations of $9.4 million includes income of $23.6 million from the operations of the businesses sold in 2011 and adjustments to other discontinued assets and liabilities, offset in part by a net loss of approximately $14.2 million related to the sale of a business that had been reflected as a discontinued operation in a previous year. The 2009 net loss from discontinued operations of $17.0 million includes a net loss on sale of $11.2 million, mainly related to a write-down of a business held for sale, coupled with other net losses from operations totaling $5.8 million. Refer to Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on disposed and discontinued operations.
Diluted net earnings per share from continuing operations in 2011 increased 23% to $4.48 and diluted net earnings per share increased 28% to $4.74, as a result of the same factors discussed above.
Diluted net earnings per share from continuing operations in 2010 increased 83% to $3.65 and diluted net earnings per share increased 94% to $3.70, as a result of the same factors discussed above.
Restructuring Activity
We periodically undertake restructuring programs in response to prevailing business requirements and market conditions. In addition to these factors, 2009 earnings across all segments were also negatively impacted by restructuring charges, while 2011 and 2010 earnings reflect the benefits captured from the businesses’ restructuring and integration programs initiated in 2008 and 2009.
In late 2008, we launched various synergy capture programs and restructuring initiatives in response to the weakening global economic environment at the time. In 2008 and 2009, we recorded restructuring charges of $23.9 million and $67.3 million, respectively, relating to these programs. These programs were largely executed throughout 2009, and we realized incremental savings of approximately $125 million and $32 million in 2009 and 2010, respectively. During 2009, we had a net reduction in our workforce of approximately 2,950, or 9%, and a net reduction of 23 manufacturing and warehouse facilities, as a result of these strategic restructuring efforts. By 2010, we had completed the majority of the initiatives launched in 2008 and 2009.
In 2010 and 2011, our businesses were generally expanding their operations, so our restructuring activities were limited to a few targeted facility consolidations. We incurred restructuring charges of $6.2 million and $5.7 million, respectively, relating to such activities.
We do not currently anticipate significant restructuring activity in 2012, but will continue to monitor business activity across our end markets and adjust capacity as necessary depending on the economic climate and other internal business factors.
SEGMENT RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
As discussed previously, in the fourth quarter of 2011 we reorganized our businesses into four new segments to better align with our key end-markets. As such, the information herein has been recast to conform to the new segment structure for all periods presented. See Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for a reconciliation of segment revenue, earnings and operating margin to our consolidated revenue, earnings from continuing operations, and operating margin.
Communication Technologies
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
% Change
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
2011
|
2010
|
2009
|
2011 vs. 2010
|
2010 vs. 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Revenue
|
$ | 1,360,077 | $ | 1,076,012 | $ | 916,031 | 26.4 | % | 17.5 | % | ||||||||||
|
Segment earnings
|
$ | 226,382 | $ | 205,215 | $ | 142,541 | 10.3 | % | 44.0 | % | ||||||||||
|
Operating margin
|
16.6 | % | 19.1 | % | 15.6 | % | ||||||||||||||
|
Other measures:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
$ | 101,839 | $ | 72,262 | $ | 69,393 | 40.9 | % | 4.1 | % | ||||||||||
|
Bookings
|
1,344,540 | 1,128,265 | 952,346 | 19.2 | % | 18.5 | % | |||||||||||||
|
Backlog
|
437,320 | 404,374 | 337,833 | 8.1 | % | 19.7 | % | |||||||||||||
|
Components of revenue growth:
|
2011 vs. 2010
|
2010 vs. 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Organic growth
|
7.2 | % | 17.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
Acquisitions
|
18.0 | % | 0.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
Foreign currency translation
|
1.2 | % | -0.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 26.4 | % | 17.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||
2011 Versus 2010
Revenue generated by our Communication Technologies segment increased $284.1 million, or 26%, compared with 2010, with $190.2 million, or 18% of the growth, attributed principally to the 2011 acquisition of Sound Solutions, which supplements our product offerings in the growing handset market. Although there was an incremental decrease in revenue due to normal pricing concessions for our communication and telecommunication products corresponding to normal product life cycle maturities, this decrease was more than offset by revenue growth from market share gains, new product introductions and product mix.
Our organic revenue growth of 7% was largely due to continued strong demand for smart phones serving the communications market which grew significantly year over year. Our revenue in the communications market (representing 31% of 2011 segment revenue) increased $66.6 million, or 42%, excluding Sound Solutions. Our microelectronic mechanical (“MEMs”) microphones and SiSonic™ technologies were well positioned to capitalize on this market's growth as we have continued to invest in capacity to meet the growing market demands. We also experienced solid demand in the commercial aerospace market due to increased build rates of commercial aircraft by leading aircraft manufactures and increased demand for our aftermarket products globally. Our aerospace/industrial revenue (18% of 2011 segment revenue) increased $59.0 million, or 32%. This overall growth was partially offset by weakened demand in the global telecom markets, driven in part by deferred industry investment due to service provider consolidation. This contributed to a decrease of $7.2 million, or 3%, in our telecommunication/other revenue (17% of 2011 segment revenue). Revenue derived from our defense market (16% of 2011 segment revenue) declined $8.2 million, or 4%, mainly due to timing and funding of certain programs. Our life sciences revenue (18% of segment revenue) also declined by $16.4 million, or 6%, principally due to softer hearing aid demand in the first half of 2011 and overall softer medical equipment demand.
Communication Technologies 2011 earnings increased 10% compared with 2010, but operating margin declined 250 basis points. The margin decline mainly resulted from higher acquisition related costs including incremental depreciation and amortization, higher raw material costs, and lower margins from the integration of the Sound Solutions acquisition. Excluding the impact of Sound Solutions, earnings would have increased by $36.6 million, or 18%, and operating margin would have increased by 160 basis points as compared with 2010.
Bookings and backlog at the end of 2011 indicate continued strength in the handset and aerospace markets as we head into 2012, offset by continued softness in the telecommunication market.
2010 Versus 2009
Communication Technologies 2010 revenue and earnings increased 18% and 44%, respectively, compared with 2009. The increase in revenues was supported by organic revenue growth of 17% and growth from acquisitions of 1%, offset by a negligible impact from foreign currency translation. The organic revenue growth was primarily driven by strong demand for MEMs microphones, hearing aid components and telecom infrastructure related products. Earnings and operating margin in 2010 were favorably impacted by higher sales volume and production leverage, coupled with the absence of significant restructuring charges in 2010 and the benefit of 2009 restructuring programs.
Energy
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
% Change
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
2011
|
2010
|
2009
|
2011 vs. 2010
|
2010 vs. 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Revenue
|
$ | 1,900,749 | $ | 1,303,507 | $ | 998,272 | 45.8 | % | 30.6 | % | ||||||||||
|
Segment earnings
|
$ | 450,637 | $ | 316,113 | $ | 211,962 | 42.6 | % | 49.1 | % | ||||||||||
|
Operating margin
|
23.7 | % | 24.3 | % | 21.2 | % | ||||||||||||||
|
Other measures:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Segment depreciation and amortization
|
$ | 77,819 | $ | 48,842 | $ | 40,349 | 59.3 | % | 21.0 | % | ||||||||||
|
Bookings
|
1,985,405 | 1,319,015 | 974,886 | 50.5 | % | 35.3 | % | |||||||||||||
|
Backlog
|
246,351 | 152,183 | 123,367 | 61.9 | % | 23.4 | % | |||||||||||||
|
Components of revenue growth:
|
2011 vs. 2010
|
2010 vs. 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Organic growth
|
26.2 | % | 24.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
Acquisitions
|
18.5 | % | 4.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
Foreign currency translation
|
1.1 | % | 1.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 45.8 | % | 30.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||
2011 Versus 2010
Our Energy segment posted record organic revenue, earnings and bookings in 2011. Revenue and earnings were up 46% and 43%, respectively, due to continued strength in the drilling, production and downstream energy markets served by the segment. Recent acquisitions generated revenue growth of 19% and contributed to the segment’s record results. Sales outside of North America grew 35% driven by significantly higher sales to Central and South America, the Middle East and Russia. Pricing actions, generally undertaken to offset commodity inflation, accounted for a marginal portion of the revenue increase. Production sector revenue (representing 51% of 2011 segment revenue) increased 72%, with 35% due to organic growth and 37% from acquisitions. The organic growth was driven by higher drilling and well completion activity, increased international sales, and higher demand for winch products serving the energy, infrastructure and recovery markets. Drilling sector revenue (21% of 2011 segment revenue) grew 34% due to increased exploration activity, pricing, and market share increases. Our revenues in the drilling and production sectors are impacted by changes in the number of active North American drilling rigs. The average North American drilling rig count in 2011 was up 21% over the prior year, driven by strong oil prices. Downstream sector revenue (28% of 2011 segment revenue) was up 20%, with 14% from organic revenue growth and the balance from recent acquisitions. The organic growth reflects continued strong demand for products in the power generation, rail, cargo tank and chemical/industrial markets, as well as nozzles and hanging hardware for retail fueling stations.
Energy earnings increased $134.5 million, or 43%, from the higher organic and acquisition volumes. Energy operating margin declined 60 basis points compared to the prior year, due to the impact of acquisition-related costs, including higher depreciation and amortization, and higher material costs, partially offset by improved operating leverage associated with the higher volumes, strategic pricing and productivity gains.
Both bookings and backlog at the end of December increased significantly compared to the prior year, and we expect market conditions in 2012 to continue to be favorable for the Energy segment. The market compression of natural gas prices should not have a significant impact to our operations, as we expect the effects of the migration away from dry gas to be offset by increased oil and liquid rich gas activity.
2010 Versus 2009
Our Energy segment’s 2010 revenue and earnings increased 31% and 49%, respectively, compared with 2009. Organic revenue growth of 25% was driven by a significant increase in active North American drilling rigs and market share gains in our drilling sector businesses. Increased drilling activity also favorably impacted our businesses in the production sector, particularly demand for sucker rods. The average North American drilling rig count in 2010 was up 45% compared to 2009. The 2009 Inpro/Seal acquisition contributed revenue growth of approximately 5%, and foreign currency translation favorably impacted revenue by 1%. The increase in earnings is the result of higher sales volume and benefits from productivity improvements and 2009 restructuring initiatives.
Engineered Systems
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
% Change
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
2011
|
2010
|
2009
|
2011 vs. 2010
|
2010 vs. 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Revenue
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Refrigeration & Industrial
|
$ | 2,424,638 | $ | 2,219,844 | $ | 1,807,283 | 9.2 | % | 22.8 | % | ||||||||||
|
Fluid Solutions
|
677,621 | 567,914 | 492,191 | 19.3 | % | 15.4 | % | |||||||||||||
|
Eliminations
|
(1,524 | ) | (1,316 | ) | (893 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| $ | 3,100,735 | $ | 2,786,442 | $ | 2,298,581 | 11.3 | % | 21.2 | % | |||||||||||
|
Segment earnings
|
$ | 445,186 | $ | 382,644 | $ | 280,346 | 16.3 | % | 36.5 | % | ||||||||||
|
Operating margin
|
14.4 | % | 13.7 | % | 12.2 | % | ||||||||||||||
|
Other measures:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Segment depreciation and amortization
|
$ | 74,776 | $ | 72,526 | $ | 68,992 | 3.1 | % | 5.1 | % | ||||||||||
|
Bookings
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Refrigeration & Industrial
|
$ | 2,512,706 | $ | 2,291,896 | $ | 1,757,916 | 9.6 | % | 30.4 | % | ||||||||||
|
Fluid Solutions
|
682,832 | 573,886 | 481,149 | 19.0 | % | 19.3 | % | |||||||||||||
|
Eliminations
|
(2,816 | ) | (2,412 | ) | (1,109 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| $ | 3,192,722 | $ | 2,863,370 | $ | 2,237,956 | 11.5 | % | 27.9 | % | |||||||||||
|
Backlog
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Refrigeration & Industrial
|
$ | 528,118 | $ | 446,267 | $ | 373,938 | 18.3 | % | 19.3 | % | ||||||||||
|
Fluid Solutions
|
54,194 | 47,123 | 41,496 | 15.0 | % | 13.6 | % | |||||||||||||
|
Eliminations
|
(177 | ) | (315 | ) | (115 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| $ | 582,135 | $ | 493,075 | $ | 415,319 | 18.1 | % | 18.7 | % | |||||||||||
|
Components of revenue growth:
|
2011 vs. 2010
|
2010 vs. 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Organic growth
|
9.4 | % | 15.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
Acquisitions and divestitures, net
|
0.6 | % | 6.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
Foreign currency translation
|
1.3 | % | -0.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 11.3 | % | 21.2 | % | |||||||||||||||||
2011 Versus 2010
Engineered Systems 2011 revenue increased 11%, driven by organic revenue growth of 9%, favorable foreign currency of 1% and a negligible impact from recent acquisitions. Revenue of our refrigeration & industrial platform, which serves our refrigeration and food equipment, waste and recycling, and other industrial end-markets, increased $205 million, or 9%. Revenue from refrigeration and food equipment (representing 35% of 2011 segment revenue) increased $91 million, or 9%, reflecting strong demand for refrigeration systems fueled by remodel activity at major retail chains. Performance by our businesses serving the waste and recycling and other industrial markets (43% of 2011 segment revenue) was driven by increased global demand for industrial automation machinery, improving demand for vehicle services in the important Asian markets and a market rebound in hydraulic equipment due in part to strength in the mining sector, partially offset by a double-digit decline in waste and recycling revenue given continued constraints on municipal spending. These factors combined to increase other industrial revenue by $114 million, or 9%.
Revenue of our fluid solutions platform (22% of 2011 segment revenue) increased by $110 million, or 19%, reflecting strong demand for pumps in the chemical, transport and hygienic markets and increasing demand for heat exchange systems, coupled with the benefits from geographic expansion, particularly in Asia, and price increases necessary to cover rising commodity costs.
Engineered Systems segment earnings increased $62.5 million, or 16%, on the strength of increased volume. Operating margin expanded by 70 basis points, as a result of positive pricing actions and productivity savings, which more than offset cost escalation and unfavorable product mix.
Bookings and backlog at the end of 2011 have increased compared to 2010 levels, driven by higher refrigeration, pump and heat exchange orders. We continue to invest in market leading technologies to better serve the refrigeration market, as we expect more economies to propose and pass carbon-limiting legislation in the coming years. An example of this is our fourth quarter acquisition of Advansor A/S, which manufactures energy efficient transcritical CO2 systems used in refrigeration systems.
2010 Versus 2009
Our Engineered Systems’ 2010 revenue and earnings increased by 21% and 37%, respectively, as compared with 2009. Organic revenue growth of 16% was driven by higher sales volumes in refrigeration systems and vehicle service offerings, offset in part by softness in waste and recycling markets. Earnings and margin were favorably impacted by increased volumes in high margin businesses, the absence of restructuring charges and the benefits associated with 2009 restructuring initiatives.
Printing & Identification
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
% Change
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
2011
|
2010
|
2009
|
2011 vs. 2010
|
2010 vs. 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Revenue
|
$ | 1,592,964 | $ | 1,476,830 | $ | 1,133,499 | 7.9 | % | 30.3 | % | ||||||||||
|
Segment earnings
|
$ | 226,534 | $ | 237,368 | $ | 78,026 | -4.6 | % | 204.2 | % | ||||||||||
|
Operating margin
|
14.2 | % | 16.1 | % | 6.9 | % | ||||||||||||||
|
Other measures:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Segment depreciation and amortization
|
$ | 46,148 | $ | 46,302 | $ | 51,532 | -0.3 | % | -10.1 | % | ||||||||||
|
Bookings
|
1,562,719 | 1,573,044 | 1,157,242 | -0.7 | % | 35.9 | % | |||||||||||||
|
Backlog
|
180,871 | 213,589 | 117,734 | -15.3 | % | 81.4 | % | |||||||||||||
|
Components of revenue growth:
|
2011 vs. 2010
|
2010 vs. 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Organic growth
|
4.8 | % | 30.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
Acquisitions
|
0.0 | % | 0.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
Foreign currency translation
|
3.1 | % | -1.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| 7.9 | % | 30.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||
2011 Versus 2010
Our Printing & Identification segment’s 2011 revenue increased 8% compared with 2010, with 5% of the increase attributed to higher organic and new product volumes and 3% from favorable foreign currency impacts. Price was slightly favorable, offsetting commodity inflation. Electronics revenue (representing 42% of 2011 segment revenue) was up 11% versus the prior year, with strong first half growth of 50% driven by strong demand in the alternative energy and semiconductor markets, partially offset by a revenue decline in the second half of 17% as demand weakened in these same electronic markets. Additionally, we realized volume growth in our fast moving consumer goods (FMCG) (35% of 2011 segment revenue) and industrial products (23% of 2011 segment revenue), with combined 6% revenue growth year over year, driven by successful new product introductions that gained traction as the year progressed.
Printing & Identification earnings declined $11 million in 2011, resulting in an operating margin decline of 190 basis points. The margin decline is primarily attributed to the second half reduction in alternative energy and semiconductor revenues which are typically higher margin activity, coupled with unfavorable regional mix due to weaker European markets for our FMCG, and key strategic investments for growth directed toward our FMCG, industrial and electronics end markets. We expect these investments to continue into 2012 as we consider these end markets integral to our longer-term revenue growth focus. We also completed several small employee reduction in force programs across targeted businesses to streamline operations and to align more closely with our growth in geographic end markets. Costs related to these programs were not significant.
Year-end 2011 bookings and backlog levels are down from the prior year, primarily due to the slowdown in electronics end markets, particularly alternative energy and semiconductor. We currently expect these market conditions to continue through the first half of 2012.
2010 Versus 2009
Our Printing & Identification segment’s 2010 revenue increased by 30% compared with 2009, substantially driven by increased demand in all of its major product categories, including marking and coding and electronic assembly and board test equipment. Demand was fueled by the economic recovery, increased semiconductor handling business, and growth in solar/alternative energy products. Earnings in 2010 increased over 200% compared with 2009 primarily due to the favorable impact of product and geographic mix, the absence of restructuring charges and the benefits of 2009 restructuring initiatives.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
We assess our liquidity in terms of our ability to generate cash to fund operating, investing and financing activities. Significant factors affecting liquidity are: cash flows generated from operating activities, capital expenditures, acquisitions, dispositions, dividends, repurchases of outstanding shares, adequacy of available commercial paper and bank lines of credit, and the ability to attract long-term capital with satisfactory terms. We generate substantial cash from the operations of our businesses and remain in a strong financial position, with sufficient liquidity available for reinvestment in existing businesses and strategic acquisitions, while managing our capital structure on a short and long-term basis.
Cash Flow Summary
The following table is derived from our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:
|
Years Ended Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
Cash Flows from Continuing Operations (in thousands)
|
2011
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||
|
Net Cash Flows Provided By (Used In):
|
||||||||||||
|
Operating activities
|
$ | 1,058,229 | $ | 901,862 | $ | 743,381 | ||||||
|
Investing activities
|
(1,020,940 | ) | (171,518 | ) | (252,184 | ) | ||||||
|
Financing activities
|
(50,501 | ) | (304,788 | ) | (388,453 | ) | ||||||
Operating Activities
Cash provided by operating activities in 2011 increased $156.4 million, primarily due to increased net earnings in 2011 and reduced investment in working capital relative to 2010. Higher sales volume increased 2011 net earnings before depreciation and amortization by $256 million as compared with 2010. Our investment in working capital was $151 million lower than in 2010, at which time a working capital build-up was necessary to support revenue levels recovering from the 2009 declines. These increases in cash flow were partially offset by $178 million of higher income tax payments resulting from our higher earnings and 2011 tax settlement activity, as well as higher employee incentive compensation payments and reductions in deferred revenue.
Cash provided by operating activities in 2010 increased $158.5 million from 2009. Higher sales volume increased 2010 net earnings before depreciation and amortization by $354 million as compared with 2009. This was offset by a $220 million increase in working capital necessary to support the increase in 2010 order and revenue levels, compared to a $179 million decrease in working capital in the 2009 period when sales levels had declined. Other factors contributing to the 2010 increase in operating cash flows included $49 million less in restructuring payments, $21 million less of post-retirement plan contributions, and a $54 million increase in deferred revenue due to additional sales activity in the 2010 period.
Postretirement costs relating to pension and other employee-related defined benefit plans affect results in all segments. We recorded net periodic benefit cost of $40 million, $33 million and $37 million in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, relating to our benefit plans (including our defined benefit, supplemental and post-retirement plans). The main drivers of expense from year to year are assumptions in formulating our long-term estimates, including expected returns on plan assets, the service cost and the interest cost. In 2011, the actual return on U.S. plan assets increased, while returns on our non-U.S. plan assets declined, as a result of the different mix of investments in the plans. In 2010, the actual return on plan assets increased, consistent with increased returns within the global equity markets. In 2012, we expect our net periodic benefit cost to be approximately $48 million, with the increase compared to 2011 being attributed to higher amortization relating to unrecognized losses.
The funded status of our qualified defined benefit pension plans is dependent upon many factors, including returns on invested assets and the level of market interest rates. We contribute cash to our plans at our discretion, subject to applicable regulations and minimum contribution requirements. At December 31, 2011, the projected benefit obligations of our qualified defined benefit plans reflected underfunding by $75 million, which includes $12 million relating to the U.S. Dover Corporate Pension Plan and $63 million relating to our significant international pension plans, some in locations where it is not economically advantageous to pre-fund the plans due to local regulations. The majority of the international obligations relate to defined pension plans operated by our businesses in Germany, the United Kingdom and Switzerland. Cash contributions to qualified defined benefit pension plans in 2011, 2010 and 2009 totaled $49 million, $38 million and $51 million, respectively. In 2012, we expect to contribute $20 to $40 million to our qualified defined benefit plans. See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further discussion regarding our post-retirement plans.
Adjusted Working Capital
In 2011, Adjusted Working Capital (a non-GAAP measure calculated as accounts receivable, plus inventory, less accounts payable) increased from 2010 by $207 million, or 17%, to $1.4 billion, which reflected an increase in receivables of $167 million, an increase in net inventory of $145 million and an increase in accounts payable of $105 million, generally due to additional working capital investment necessary to support the increased revenue levels and the impact of 2011 acquisitions. Excluding acquisitions and the effects of foreign exchange translation of $16 million, Adjusted Working Capital would have increased by $63 million, or 5%.
Investing Activities
We used cash for investing activities of $1.0 billion in 2011 and $171.5 million in 2010, mainly for capital spending and acquisitions, partially offset by proceeds from the sale of businesses. In 2011, our use of cash for investing activities also included a net payment of $18 million on the settlement of foreign exchange forward contracts which had served as hedges of a portion of our euro-denominated net investment.
Acquisitions. In 2011, we used cash of $1.4 billion to acquire nine businesses, including $401 million for Harbison-Fischer in the first quarter and $824 million for Sound Solutions in the third quarter. In comparison, we used $104 million to acquire six businesses in 2010.
Capital spending. Capital expenditures, primarily to support capacity expansion, innovation and cost savings, were $271 million in 2011 and $175 million in 2010. The increase in 2011 capital spending reflects investment in capacity expansion within our businesses principally serving the high-growth energy drilling and handset markets. In 2011, our capital expenditures as a percentage of revenue were approximately 3.4%. We expect capital expenditures as a percentage of revenue in 2012 to increase slightly, driven by capacity expansion to support our high-growth, high-demand energy and handset markets.
Proceeds from sales of businesses. We generated cash of $517 million in 2011, primarily from the sale of Paladin Brands, Crenlo and Heil Trailer International, three businesses that had operated in our Engineered Systems segment. This compares to net proceeds of $4.5 million generated by the sale of Triton in 2010.
Short-term investments. We typically invest cash in excess of near-term requirements in short-term investments. In 2011, we generated net proceeds of $124 million from the sale of short-term investments, which were used to fund a portion of the Sound Solutions acquisition. In 2010, our short-term investment activity generated net proceeds of $87 million.
We anticipate that capital expenditures and any acquisitions we make in 2012 will be funded from available cash and internally generated funds, and if necessary, through the issuance of commercial paper or through public debt markets.
Financing Activities
We used cash for financing activities of $50.5 million in 2011 and $304.8 million in 2010, mainly for purchase of our common stock and payment of dividends, largely offset by net borrowing activity and proceeds from exercise of stock options.
Long-term and short-term debt. In 2011, we realized net proceeds of $789 million from the 4.3% 10-year Notes due 2021 and 5.375% 30-year Notes due 2041 issued in February, approximately half of which was used to repay $400 million of other borrowings, principally commercial paper used to repay the 6.50% 10-year Notes which came due earlier in February 2011 and to fund acquisitions made in the first quarter.
Treasury purchases. We historically repurchase shares of our common stock in an amount at least equal to the number of shares issued under our equity compensation arrangements, and expect to continue with this policy. We used $242 million for share repurchases in 2011 compared with $124 million in 2010. During 2011, we repurchased approximately 4.0 million shares of our common stock in the open market, pursuant to the 10,000,000 share repurchase program authorized by the Board of Directors in May 2007. In 2010, we purchased approximately 2.3 million shares under the same program. Approximately 2.5 million shares remain authorized for repurchase under this 10,000,000 five year authorization as of December 31, 2011.
Dividend payments. Total dividend payments to common shareholders were $219 million in 2011 and $200 million in 2010. Our dividends per common share increased 10% to $1.18 per share in 2011 compared to $1.07 per share in 2010. This represents the 56th consecutive year that our dividend has increased.
Proceeds from exercise of stock options. We received $40 million from employee exercises of stock options in 2011, compared to $80 million in 2010. Since 2006, we have issued only stock-settled appreciation rights (“SARs”), and a greater portion of our 2011 exercise activity was related to SARs which do not require cash settlement.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Free Cash Flow
In addition to measuring our cash flow generation and usage based upon the operating, investing and financing classifications included in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, we also measure free cash flow (a non-GAAP measure). We believe that free cash flow is an important measure of operating performance because it provides management and investors a measurement of cash generated from operations that is available to repay debt, pay dividends, fund acquisitions and repurchase our common stock. For further information, see the Non-GAAP Disclosures at the end of this Item 7.
The following table reconciles our free cash flow to cash flow provided by operating activities:
|
Years Ended Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
Free Cash Flow (dollars in thousands)
|
2011
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||
|
Cash flow provided by operating activities
|
$ | 1,058,229 | $ | 901,862 | $ | 743,381 | ||||||
|
Less: Capital expenditures
|
(271,809 | ) | (174,845 | ) | (112,972 | ) | ||||||
|
Free cash flow
|
$ | 786,420 | $ | 727,017 | $ | 630,409 | ||||||
|
Free cash flow as a percentage of revenue
|
9.9 | % | 10.9 | % | 11.8 | % | ||||||
For 2011, we generated free cash flow of $786.4 million, representing 9.9% of revenue and 92.9% of earnings from continuing operations, while continuing to make investments necessary to support our growth. Free cash flow in 2010 was $727.0 million or 10.9% of revenue, compared to $630.4 million or 11.8% of revenue in 2009. The full year increase in 2011 free cash flow reflects higher earnings from continuing operations before depreciation and amortization and lower investment in working capital, partially offset by higher tax payments in 2011. In 2011, we made tax payments of approximately $281 million compared to $103 million in the prior year, with the 2011 increase resulting from the higher level of earnings, the timing of estimated payments, and the impact of certain changes in federal tax regulations. Free cash flow is also impacted by higher capital expenditures in 2011 necessary to fund expansion in our high-growth businesses. We expect to generate free cash flow in 2012 of approximately 10% of revenue, consistent with our historical performance.
The 2010 increase in free cash flow compared to 2009 reflects higher earnings from continuing operations offset by investment in working capital and an increase in capital expenditures. The 90 basis point decline in free cash flow as a percentage of revenue was the result of the significant reduction in working capital realized in 2009 coupled with lower revenue levels.
Net Debt to Net Capitalization
We utilize the net debt to net capitalization calculation (a non-GAAP measure) to assess our overall financial leverage and capacity and believe the calculation is useful to investors for the same reason. The following table provides a reconciliation of net debt to net capitalization to the most directly comparable GAAP measures:
|
At December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
Net Debt to Net Capitalization Ratio (dollars in thousands)
|
2011
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
$ | 1,022 | $ | 1,590 | $ | 35,624 | ||||||
|
Commercial paper
|
- | 15,000 | - | |||||||||
|
Long-term debt
|
2,186,230 | 1,790,886 | 1,825,260 | |||||||||
|
Total debt
|
2,187,252 | 1,807,476 | 1,860,884 | |||||||||
|
Less: Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments
|
(1,206,755 | ) | (1,310,813 | ) | (940,245 | ) | ||||||
|
Net debt
|
980,497 | 496,663 | 920,639 | |||||||||
|
Add: Stockholders' equity
|
4,930,555 | 4,526,562 | 4,083,608 | |||||||||
|
Net capitalization
|
$ | 5,911,052 | $ | 5,023,225 | $ | 5,004,247 | ||||||
|
Net debt to net capitalization
|
16.6 | % | 9.9 | % | 18.4 | % | ||||||
Our net debt to net capitalization ratio increased at December 31, 2011 primarily due to the use of cash and debt to fund acquisitions totaling $1.4 billion during the year. Total borrowings increased by $380 million during 2011, primarily due to $789 million net proceeds received from the 4.3% 10-year Notes due 2021 and 5.375% 30-year Notes due 2041 issued in February, approximately half of which was used to repay outstanding commercial paper balances incurred to retire $400 million of notes which came due earlier in February 2011. In 2011, we also received cash proceeds of $517 million, primarily from the sale of three businesses.
At December 31, 2011, our cash and cash equivalents totaled $1.2 billion, representing a decrease of $104 million, as compared with the 2010 balance including short-term investments. Cash equivalents are invested in highly liquid investment grade money market instruments with maturities of three months or less. We regularly invest cash in excess of near-term requirements in short-term investments, which consist of investment grade time deposits with original maturity dates at the time of purchase greater than three months, up to twelve months. We held no short-term investments at December 31, 2011. At December 31, 2011, our total cash and cash equivalents included $600 million held outside of the United States.
We use commercial paper borrowings for general corporate purposes, including the funding of acquisitions and the repurchase of our common stock. In November of 2011, we entered into a new unsecured revolving credit facility with a syndicate of banks to replace our existing facility that was set to expire in November 2012. Our new facility permits borrowings up to $1 billion, which is consistent with the facility we replaced, and expires on November 10, 2016. This facility is used primarily as liquidity back-up for our commercial paper program. We have not drawn down any loans under this facility nor do we anticipate doing so. If we were to draw down a loan, at our election, the loan would bear interest at a Eurodollar or Sterling rate based on LIBOR, plus an applicable margin ranging from 0.565% to 1.225% (subject to adjustment based on the rating accorded our senior unsecured debt by S&P and Moody’s) or at a base rate pursuant to a formula defined in the facility. Under this facility, we are required to maintain an interest coverage ratio of EBITDA to consolidated net interest expense of not less than 3.0 to 1. We were in compliance with this covenant and our other long-term debt covenants at December 31, 2011 and had a coverage ratio of 14.3 to 1. We are not aware of any potential impairment to our liquidity and expect to remain in compliance with all of our debt covenants.
We also have a current shelf registration statement filed with the SEC with remaining capacity of $1 billion that allows for the issuance of additional debt securities that may be utilized in one or more offerings on terms to be determined at the time of the offering. Net proceeds of any offering would be used for general corporate purposes, including repayment of existing indebtedness, capital expenditures and acquisitions.
At December 31, 2011, we have an outstanding floating-to-floating cross currency swap agreement for a total notional amount of $50 million in exchange for CHF 65.1 million. In February 2011, we amended and restated the terms of the arrangement to extend its maturity date to October 15, 2015. This transaction continues to hedge a portion of our net investment in CHF-denominated operations. The agreement qualifies as a net investment hedge and the effective portion of the change in fair value is reported within the cumulative translation adjustment section of other comprehensive earnings. The fair value at December 31, 2011 reflected a loss of $21.7 million due to the strengthening of the Swiss franc relative to the U.S. dollar over the term of this arrangement.
In January 2011, we entered into foreign currency forward contracts to purchase $350 million for €258.7 million, which were designated as hedging an equivalent amount of our euro denominated net investment. The agreements qualified as net investment hedges with the changes in fair value being reported within the cumulative translation adjustment section of other comprehensive earnings. These arrangements were settled on April 4, 2011, at which time we realized a loss of $18.2 million, which is reported within the cumulative translation adjustment.
Our ability to obtain debt financing at comparable risk-based interest rates is partly a function of our existing cash-flow-to-debt and debt-to-capitalization levels as well as our current credit standing. Our credit ratings, which are independently developed by the respective rating agencies, were as follows as of December 31, 2011:
|
Short Term Rating
|
Long Term Rating
|
Outlook
|
|||
|
Moody's
|
P-1
|
A2
|
Stable
|
||
|
Standard & Poor's
|
A-1
|
A
|
Stable
|
||
|
Fitch
|
F1
|
A
|
Stable
|
We believe that existing sources of liquidity are adequate to meet anticipated funding needs at comparable risk-based interest rates for the foreseeable future. Acquisition spending and/or share repurchases could potentially increase our debt. Operating cash flow and access to capital markets are expected to satisfy our various cash flow requirements, including acquisitions and capital expenditures.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations
As of December 31, 2011, we had approximately $59.9 million outstanding in letters of credit with financial institutions, which expire at various dates in 2012 through 2016. These letters of credit are primarily maintained as security for insurance, warranty and other performance obligations. In general, we would only be liable for the amount of these guarantees in the event of default in the performance of our obligations, the probability of which we believe is remote.
We have also provided typical indemnities in connection with sales of certain businesses and assets, including representations and warranties and related indemnities for environmental, health and safety, tax and employment matters. We do not have any material liabilities recorded for these indemnifications and are not aware of any claims or other information that would give rise to material payments under such indemnities.
A summary of our consolidated contractual obligations and commitments as of December 31, 2011 and the years when these obligations are expected to be due is as follows:
|
Payments Due by Period
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
Total
|
Less Than 1 Year
|
1-3 Years
|
3-5 Years
|
More than 5 Years
|
Other (4)
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Long-term debt (1)
|
$ | 2,187,252 | $ | 1,022 | $ | 523 | $ | 299,248 | $ | 1,886,459 | $ | - | ||||||||||||
|
Interest expense (2)
|
1,934,370 | 117,788 | 235,575 | 217,903 | 1,363,104 | - | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Rental commitments
|
245,077 | 62,948 | 80,939 | 39,845 | 61,345 | - | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Purchase obligations
|
57,202 | 46,853 | 9,788 | 561 | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Capital leases
|
5,345 | 1,606 | 1,796 | 904 | 1,039 | - | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Supplemental & post-retirement benefits (3)
|
167,580 | 19,992 | 21,469 | 48,389 | 77,730 | - | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Uncertain tax positions (4)
|
184,467 | 1,576 | - | - | - | 182,891 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Total obligations
|
$ | 4,781,293 | $ | 251,785 | $ | 350,090 | $ | 606,850 | $ | 3,389,677 | $ | 182,891 | ||||||||||||
_________
|
(1)
|
See Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Amounts represent total long-term debt, including current maturities.
|
|
(2)
|
Amounts represent estimate of future interest payments on long-term debt using the interest rates in effect at December 31, 2011.
|
|
(3)
|
Amounts represent estimated benefit payments under our supplemental and post-retirement benefit plans. See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. We also expect to contribute approximately $20 to $40 million to our qualified defined benefit plans in 2012, which amount is not reflected in the above table.
|
|
(4)
|
Due to the uncertainty of the potential settlement of future uncertain tax positions, we are unable to estimate the timing of the related payments, if any, that will be made subsequent to 2012. These amounts do not include the potential indirect benefits resulting from deductions or credits for payments made to other jurisdictions.
|
Critical Accounting Policies
Our consolidated financial statements and related public financial information are based on the application of generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”). GAAP requires the use of estimates, assumptions, judgments and subjective interpretations of accounting principles that have an impact on the assets, liabilities, revenue and expense amounts we report. These estimates can also affect supplemental information contained in our public disclosures, including information regarding contingencies, risk and our financial condition. The significant accounting policies used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements are discussed in Note 1. The accounting assumptions and estimates discussed in the section below are those that we consider most critical to an understanding of our financial statements because they inherently involve significant judgments and estimates. We believe our use of estimates and underlying accounting assumptions conforms to GAAP and is consistently applied. We review valuations based on estimates for reasonableness on a consistent basis.
|
·
|
Revenue is recognized when all of the following circumstances are satisfied: a) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, b) price is fixed or determinable, c) collectability is reasonably assured, and d) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered. The majority of our revenue is generated through the manufacture and sale of a broad range of specialized products and components, with revenue recognized upon transfer of title and risk of loss, which is generally upon shipment. Service revenue represents less than 10% of our total revenue and is recognized as the services are performed. In limited cases, our revenue arrangements with customers require delivery, installation, testing, certification or other acceptance provisions to be satisfied before revenue is recognized. We do not have significant multiple deliverable arrangements.
|
|
·
|
Inventory for the majority of our subsidiaries, including all international subsidiaries, are stated at the lower of cost, determined on the first-in, first-out (FIFO) basis, or market. Other domestic inventory is stated at cost, determined on the last-in, first-out (LIFO) basis, which is less than market value. Under certain market conditions, estimates and judgments regarding the valuation of inventory are employed by us to properly value inventory. Businesses within our Communication Technologies and Printing & Identification segments tend to experience somewhat higher levels of inventory value fluctuations, particularly given the relatively high rate of product obsolescence over relatively short periods of time.
|
|
·
|
We have significant tangible and intangible assets on our balance sheet that include goodwill and other intangibles related to acquisitions. The valuation and classification of these assets and the assignment of useful depreciation and amortization lives involve significant judgments and the use of estimates. The testing of these intangibles under established accounting guidelines for impairment also requires significant use of judgment and assumptions, particularly as it relates to the identification of reporting units and the determination of fair market value. Our assets and reporting units are tested and reviewed for impairment on an annual basis during the fourth quarter or, when indicators of impairment exist, such as a significant sustained change in the business climate, or when a significant portion of a reporting unit is to be reclassified to discontinued operations, during the interim periods. We estimate fair value using discounted cash flow analyses (i.e. an income approach) which incorporate management assumptions relating to future growth and profitability. Changes in business or market conditions could impact the future cash flows used in such analyses. We believe that our use of estimates and assumptions are reasonable and comply with generally accepted accounting principles. No goodwill impairment was indicated by the testing of our 17 identified reporting units in the fourth quarter of 2011, and the fair value of each of the reporting units exceeded the carrying value by at least 30% and, in most cases, significantly more. If the fair value of each of the reporting units was decreased by 10%, the resulting fair value would still have exceeded the carrying value and no impairment would have been recognized.
|
|
·
|
The valuation of our pension and other post-retirement plans requires the use of assumptions and estimates that are used to develop actuarial valuations of expenses and assets/liabilities. Inherent in these valuations are key assumptions, including discount rates, investment returns, projected salary increases and benefits, and mortality rates. Annually, we review the actuarial assumptions used in our pension reporting and compare them with external benchmarks to ensure that they accurately account for our future pension obligations. Changes in assumptions and future investment returns could potentially have a material impact on our pension expense and related funding requirements. Our expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is reviewed annually based on actual returns, economic trends and portfolio allocation. Our discount rate assumption is determined by developing a yield curve based on high quality corporate bonds with maturities matching the plans’ expected benefit payment streams. The plans’ expected cash flows are then discounted by the resulting year-by-year spot rates. As disclosed in Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the 2011 weighted-average discount rates used to measure our qualified defined benefit, supplemental and other post-retirement obligations ranged from 4.45% to 4.85%, reduced from the 2010 rates, which ranged from 5.04% to 5.50%. The reduced discount rates are reflective of the decline in global market interest rates over these periods. A 25 basis point decrease in the discount rates used for these plans would have increased the post retirement benefit obligations by approximately $32.3 million from the amount recorded in the financial statements at December 31, 2011. Our pension expense is also sensitive to changes in the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets. A decrease of 25 basis points in the expected long-term rate of return on assets would have increased our defined benefit pension expense by approximately $1.5 million.
|
|
·
|
We have significant amounts of deferred tax assets that are reviewed for recoverability and valued accordingly. These assets are evaluated by using estimates of future taxable income streams and the impact of tax planning strategies. Reserves are also estimated, using more likely than not criteria, for ongoing audits regarding federal, state and international issues that are currently unresolved. We routinely monitor the potential impact of these situations and believe that we have established the proper reserves. Reserves related to tax accruals and valuations related to deferred tax assets can be impacted by changes in accounting regulations, changes in tax codes and rulings, changes in statutory tax rates, and our future taxable income levels. The provision for uncertain tax positions provides a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for financial statement tax benefits taken or expected to be taken in a tax return and disclosure requirements regarding uncertainties in income tax positions. The tax position is measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. We record interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of our provision for income taxes.
|
|
·
|
We have significant accruals and reserves related to the self-insured portion of our risk management program. These accruals require the use of estimates and judgment with regard to risk exposure and ultimate liability. We estimate losses under these programs using actuarial assumptions, our experience and relevant industry data. We review these factors quarterly and consider the current level of accruals and reserves adequate relative to current market conditions and experience.
|
|
·
|
We have established liabilities for environmental and legal contingencies at both the business and corporate levels. A significant amount of judgment and the use of estimates are required to quantify our ultimate exposure in these matters. The valuation of liabilities for these contingencies is reviewed on a quarterly basis to ensure that we have accrued the proper level of expense. The liability balances are adjusted to account for changes in circumstances for ongoing issues and the establishment of additional liabilities for emerging issues. While we believe that the amount accrued to-date is adequate, future changes in circumstances could impact these determinations.
|
|
·
|
Occasionally, we will establish liabilities for restructuring activities at an operation, in accordance with appropriate accounting principles. These liabilities, for both severance and exit costs, require the use of estimates. Though we believe that these estimates accurately reflect the anticipated costs, actual results may be different than the estimated amounts.
|
|
·
|
We will from time to time discontinue certain operations for various reasons. Estimates are used to adjust, if necessary, the assets and liabilities of discontinued operations, including goodwill, to their estimated fair market value. These estimates include assumptions relating to the proceeds anticipated as a result of the sale. Fair value is established using internal valuation calculations along with market analysis of similar-type entities. The adjustments to fair market value of these operations provide the basis for the gain or loss when sold. Changes in business conditions or the inability to sell an operation could potentially require future adjustments to these estimates.
|
|
·
|
We are required to recognize in our consolidated statements of earnings the expense associated with all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors, including stock options, stock appreciation rights (SARs), restricted stock and performance share awards. We use the Black-Scholes valuation model to estimate the fair value of SARs and stock options granted to employees. The model requires that we estimate the expected life of the SAR or option, expected forfeitures and the volatility of our stock using historical data. We use the Monte Carlo simulation model to estimate fair value of performance share awards which also require us to estimate the volatility of our stock and the volatility of returns on the stock of our peer group as well as the correlation of the returns between the companies in the peer group. For additional information related to the assumptions used, see Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
|
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2009-13, which amended existing guidance for identifying separate deliverables in a revenue-generating transaction where multiple deliverables exist and requires that arrangement consideration be allocated at the inception of an arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method. We adopted the multiple element guidance of ASU 2009-13 effective January 1, 2011. We do not have significant multiple deliverable arrangements, so the adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-14 which eliminates tangible products containing both software and non-software components that operate together to deliver a product’s functionality from the scope of then-current generally accepted accounting principles for software. We adopted ASU 2009-14 on a prospective basis, effective January 1, 2011. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05 which provides new guidance on the presentation of comprehensive income. ASU 2011-05 eliminates the option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity and instead requires an entity to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement or in two separate but consecutive statements. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this ASU only requires a change in the format of the current presentation. We adopted this guidance for our 2011 year-end reporting, presenting other comprehensive earnings in a separate statement following the statement of earnings.
In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-09 which requires enhanced disclosures around an employer’s participation in multiemployer pension plans. The standard is intended to provide more information about an employer’s financial obligations to a multiemployer pension plan to help financial statement users better understand the financial health of the significant plans in which the employer participates. This guidance became effective for our fiscal 2011 year-end reporting. Its adoption did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04 which was issued to provide a consistent definition of fair value and ensure that the fair value measurement and disclosure requirements are similar between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. ASU 2011-04 changes certain fair value measurement principles and enhances the disclosure requirements particularly for Level 3 fair value measurements. This guidance is effective for us beginning on January 1, 2012. Its adoption is not expected to significantly impact our consolidated financial statements.
In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08 which provides an entity the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the current two-step test for goodwill impairment. If an entity believes, as a result of its qualitative assessment, that it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, the quantitative impairment test is required. Otherwise, no further testing is required. The revised standard is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. However, an entity can choose to early adopt even if its annual test date is before the issuance of the final standard, provided that the entity has not yet performed its 2011 annual impairment test or issued its financial statements. The adoption of this ASU is not expected to significantly impact our consolidated financial statements.
Non-GAAP Disclosures
In an effort to provide investors with additional information regarding our results as determined by generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), we also disclose non-GAAP information which we believe provides useful information to investors. Free cash flow, net debt, total debt, net capitalization, the net debt to net capitalization ratio, adjusted working capital, earnings adjusted for non-recurring items, effective tax rate adjusted for discrete and other items, revenue excluding the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates and organic revenue growth are not financial measures under GAAP and should not be considered as a substitute for cash flows from operating activities, debt or equity, earnings, revenue or working capital as determined in accordance with GAAP, and they may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies. We believe the (1) net debt to net capitalization ratio and (2) free cash flow are important measures of operating performance and liquidity. Net debt to net capitalization is helpful in evaluating our capital structure and the amount of leverage we employ. Free cash flow provides both management and investors a measurement of cash generated from operations that is available to fund acquisitions, pay dividends, repay debt and repurchase our common stock. Reconciliations of free cash flow, total debt and net debt can be found above in this Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation. We believe that reporting our effective tax rate adjusted for discrete and other items is useful to management and investors as it facilitates comparisons of our ongoing tax rate to prior and future periods and our peers. We believe that reporting adjusted working capital (also sometimes called “working capital”), which is calculated as accounts receivable, plus inventory, less accounts payable, provides a meaningful measure of our operational results by showing the changes caused solely by revenue. We believe that reporting adjusted working capital and revenues at constant currency, which excludes the positive or negative impact of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, provides a meaningful measure of our operational changes, given the global nature of our businesses. We believe that reporting organic or core revenue growth, which excludes the impact of foreign currency exchange rates and the impact of acquisitions, provides a useful comparison of our revenue performance and trends between periods.
The diverse nature of our businesses’ activities necessitates the management of various financial and market risks, including those related to changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices. We periodically use derivative financial instruments to manage some of these risks. We do not hold or issue derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes. We are exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to our financial instrument contracts; however, nonperformance by these counterparties is considered unlikely as our policy is to contract with highly-rated, diversified counterparties.
Interest Rate Exposure
We may from time to time enter into interest rate swap agreements to manage our exposure to interest rate changes. As of December 31, 2011, we did not have any open interest rate swap contracts. We issue commercial paper, which exposes us to changes in variable interest rates; however, maturities are typically three months or less so a change in rates over this period would have an immaterial impact on our pre-tax earnings.
We consider our current risk related to market fluctuations in interest rates to be minimal since our debt is largely long-term and fixed-rate in nature. Generally, the fair market value of fixed-interest rate debt will increase as interest rates fall and decrease as interest rates rise. A 100 basis point increase in market interest rates would decrease the fair value of our long-term debt by approximately $260 million. However, since we have no plans to repurchase our outstanding fixed-rate instruments before their maturities, the impact of market interest rate fluctuations on our long-term debt does not affect our results of operations or financial position.
Foreign Currency Exposure
We conduct business in various non-U.S. countries, primarily in Canada, Mexico, substantially all of the European countries, Brazil, Argentina, Malaysia, China, India and other Asian countries. Therefore, we have a significant volume of foreign currency exposures that result from our international sales, purchases, investments, borrowings and other international transactions. Changes in the value of the currencies of these countries affect our financial position and cash flows when translated into U.S. dollars.
We have generally accepted the exposure to exchange rate movements relative to our investment in non-U.S. operations. We may, from time to time, for a specific exposure, enter into fair value hedges. At December 31, 2011, we had one outstanding floating-to-floating cross currency swap agreement for a total notional amount of $50 million in exchange for CHF 65.1 million, which matures on October 15, 2015. This transaction hedges a portion of our net investment in non-U.S. operations. The agreement qualifies as a net investment hedge and changes in the fair value are reported within the cumulative translation adjustment section of other comprehensive earnings, with any hedge ineffectiveness being recognized in current earnings. The fair values at December 31, 2011 and 2010 reflected losses of $21.7 million and $19.8 million, respectively, due to the strengthening of the Swiss franc relative to the U.S. dollar over the term of this arrangement.
Certain individual operating subsidiaries that have foreign exchange exposure have established formal policies to mitigate risk in this area by using fair value and/or cash flow hedging programs. We have mitigated and will continue to mitigate a portion of our currency exposure through operation of non-U.S. operating companies in which the majority of all costs are local-currency based. A change of 5% or less in the value of all foreign currencies would not have a material effect on the translation of our balance sheet or statement of earnings.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
|
Page
|
||
(All other schedules are not required and have been omitted)
The management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f).
The Company’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011. In making this assessment, the Company’s management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control — Integrated Framework.
Based on its assessment under the criteria set forth in Internal Control — Integrated Framework, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2011, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
In making its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, management has excluded Harbison-Fischer Inc., Sound Solutions and Oil Lift, three companies acquired in purchase business combinations during 2011. These companies are wholly-owned by the Company and their revenue for the year ended December 31, 2011 represents approximately 4.7% of the Company’s consolidated total revenue for the same period and their excluded assets represent approximately 3.7% of the Company’s consolidated assets as of December 31, 2011.
The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their attestation report which appears herein.
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Dover Corporation:
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Dover Corporation and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying index presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011 based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements and financial statement schedule, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, appearing under Item 8. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements, on the financial statement schedule, and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
As described in Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, management has excluded Harbison-Fischer Inc., Sound Solutions and Oil Lift from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011 because they were acquired by the Company in purchase business combinations during 2011. We have also excluded Harbison-Fischer Inc., Sound Solutions and Oil Lift from our audit of internal control over financial reporting. These companies are wholly-owned by the Company and their excluded assets and revenue represent approximately 3.7% and 4.7%, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011.
|
|
|
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP | |
| Chicago, Illinois | |||
| February 10, 2012 | |||
DOVER CORPORATION
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
|
2011
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||||||
|
Revenue
|
$ | 7,950,140 | ||||||||||