Wdesk | MDU-12.31.2013-10K
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|
| | | |
| ý | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF | |
| | THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
| | | |
| | For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 | |
| | | |
| | OR | |
| | | |
| o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF | |
| | THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
For the transition period from _____________ to ______________
Commission file number 1-3480
MDU Resources Group, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
| | |
Delaware | | 41-0423660 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
1200 West Century Avenue
P.O. Box 5650
Bismarck, North Dakota 58506-5650
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(701) 530-1000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
| | |
Title of each class | | Name of each exchange on which registered |
Common Stock, par value $1.00 | | New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Preferred Stock, par value $100
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ý No o.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes o No ý.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No o.
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):
|
| | |
| Large accelerated filer x | Accelerated filer o |
| Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No ý.
State the aggregate market value of the voting common stock held by nonaffiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2013: $4,892,599,006.
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's classes of common stock, as of February 14, 2014: 189,370,016 shares.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant's 2014 Proxy Statement are incorporated by reference in Part III, Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of this Report.
Contents
Definitions
The following abbreviations and acronyms used in this Form 10-K are defined below:
Abbreviation or Acronym
|
| |
AFUDC | Allowance for funds used during construction |
Army Corps | U.S. Army Corps of Engineers |
ASC | FASB Accounting Standards Codification |
BART | Best available retrofit technology |
Bbl | Barrel |
Bcf | Billion cubic feet |
Bicent | Bicent Power LLC |
Big Stone Station | 475-MW coal-fired electric generating facility near Big Stone City, South Dakota (22.7 percent ownership) |
Black Hills Power | Black Hills Power, Inc. |
BLM | Bureau of Land Management |
BOE | One barrel of oil equivalent - determined using the ratio of one barrel of crude oil, condensate or natural gas liquids to six Mcf of natural gas |
BOPD | Barrels of oil per day |
Brazilian Transmission Lines | Company's investment in the company owning ECTE, ENTE and ERTE (ownership interests in ENTE and ERTE were sold in the fourth quarter of 2010 and portions of the ownership interest in ECTE were sold in the third quarters of 2013 and 2012 and the fourth quarters of 2011 and 2010) |
Btu | British thermal unit |
Calumet | Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. |
Cascade | Cascade Natural Gas Corporation, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of MDU Energy Capital |
CCU | Cane Creek Unit |
CEM | Colorado Energy Management, LLC, a former direct wholly owned subsidiary of Centennial Resources (sold in the third quarter of 2007) |
Centennial | Centennial Energy Holdings, Inc., a direct wholly owned subsidiary of the Company |
Centennial Capital | Centennial Holdings Capital LLC, a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Centennial |
Centennial Resources | Centennial Energy Resources LLC, a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Centennial |
CERCLA | Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act |
Clean Air Act | Federal Clean Air Act |
Clean Water Act | Federal Clean Water Act |
Colorado State District Court | Colorado Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Yuma County |
Company | MDU Resources Group, Inc. |
Coyote Creek | Coyote Creek Mining Company, LLC, a subsidiary of The North American Coal Corporation |
Coyote Station | 427-MW coal-fired electric generating facility near Beulah, North Dakota (25 percent ownership) |
Dakota Prairie Refinery | 20,000-barrel-per-day diesel topping plant being built by Dakota Prairie Refining in southwestern North Dakota |
Dakota Prairie Refining | Dakota Prairie Refining, LLC, a limited liability company jointly owned by WBI Energy and Calumet |
dk | Decatherm |
Dodd-Frank Act | Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act |
EBITDA | Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization |
|
| |
ECTE | Empresa Catarinense de Transmissão de Energia S.A. (2.5 percent ownership interest at December 31, 2013, 2.5, 2.5, 2.5 and 14.99 percent ownership interests were sold in the third quarters of 2013 and 2012 and the fourth quarters of 2011 and 2010, respectively) |
EIN | Employer Identification Number |
ENTE | Empresa Norte de Transmissão de Energia S.A. (entire 13.3 percent ownership interest sold in the fourth quarter of 2010) |
EPA | U.S. Environmental Protection Agency |
ERISA | Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
ERTE | Empresa Regional de Transmissão de Energia S.A. (entire 13.3 percent ownership interest sold in the fourth quarter of 2010) |
ESA | Endangered Species Act |
Exchange Act | Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended |
FASB | Financial Accounting Standards Board |
FERC | Federal Energy Regulatory Commission |
Fidelity | Fidelity Exploration & Production Company, a direct wholly owned subsidiary of WBI Holdings |
FIP | Funding improvement plan |
GAAP | Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America |
GHG | Greenhouse gas |
Great Plains | Great Plains Natural Gas Co., a public utility division of the Company |
GVTC | Generation Verification Test Capacity |
IBEW | International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers |
ICWU | International Chemical Workers Union |
Intermountain | Intermountain Gas Company, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of MDU Energy Capital |
IPUC | Idaho Public Utilities Commission |
Item 8 | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data |
JTL | JTL Group, Inc., an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Knife River |
Knife River | Knife River Corporation, a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Centennial |
Knife River - Northwest | Knife River Corporation - Northwest, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Knife River |
K-Plan | Company's 401(k) Retirement Plan |
kW | Kilowatts |
kWh | Kilowatt-hour |
LPP | Lea Power Partners, LLC, a former indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Centennial Resources (member interests were sold in October 2006) |
LWG | Lower Willamette Group |
MBbls | Thousands of barrels |
MBOE | Thousands of BOE |
Mcf | Thousand cubic feet |
MD&A | Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Mdk | Thousand decatherms |
MDU Brasil | MDU Brasil Ltda., an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Centennial Resources |
MDU Construction Services | MDU Construction Services Group, Inc., a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Centennial |
MDU Energy Capital | MDU Energy Capital, LLC, a direct wholly owned subsidiary of the Company |
MISO | Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc. |
MMBOE | Millions of BOE |
MMBtu | Million Btu |
|
| |
MMcf | Million cubic feet |
MMdk | Million decatherms |
MNPUC | Minnesota Public Utilities Commission |
Montana-Dakota | Montana-Dakota Utilities Co., a public utility division of the Company |
Montana DEQ | Montana Department of Environmental Quality |
Montana First Judicial District Court | Montana First Judicial District Court, Lewis and Clark County |
Montana Seventeenth Judicial District Court | Montana Seventeenth Judicial District Court, Phillips County |
MPPAA | Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980 |
MTPSC | Montana Public Service Commission |
MW | Megawatt |
NDPSC | North Dakota Public Service Commission |
NEPA | National Environmental Policy Act |
New York Supreme Court | Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York |
NGL | Natural gas liquids |
NSPS | New Source Performance Standards |
Oil | Includes crude oil and condensate |
Omimex | Omimex Canada, Ltd. |
OPUC | Oregon Public Utility Commission |
Oregon DEQ | Oregon State Department of Environmental Quality |
PCBs | Polychlorinated biphenyls |
PDP | Proved developed producing |
Prairielands | Prairielands Energy Marketing, Inc., an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of WBI Holdings |
Proxy Statement | Company's 2014 Proxy Statement |
PRP | Potentially Responsible Party |
psi | Pounds per square inch |
PUD | Proved undeveloped |
RCRA | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act |
ROD | Record of Decision |
RP | Rehabilitation plan |
Ryder Scott | Ryder Scott Company, L.P. |
SDPUC | South Dakota Public Utilities Commission |
SEC | U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission |
SEC Defined Prices | The average price of oil and natural gas during the applicable 12-month period, determined as an unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within such period, unless prices are defined by contractual arrangements, excluding escalations based upon future conditions |
Securities Act | Securities Act of 1933, as amended |
Securities Act Industry Guide 7 | Description of Property by Issuers Engaged or to be Engaged in Significant Mining Operations |
Sheridan System | A separate electric system owned by Montana-Dakota |
SMCRA | Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act |
SourceGas | SourceGas Distribution LLC |
Stock Purchase Plan | Company's Dividend Reinvestment and Direct Stock Purchase Plan |
UA | United Association of Journeyman and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of the United States and Canada |
VIE | Variable interest entity |
|
| |
WBI Energy | WBI Energy, Inc., an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of WBI Holdings |
WBI Energy Midstream | WBI Energy Midstream, LLC, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of WBI Holdings (previously Bitter Creek Pipelines, LLC, name changed effective July 1, 2012) |
WBI Energy Transmission | WBI Energy Transmission, Inc., an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of WBI Holdings (previously Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company, name changed effective July 1, 2012) |
WBI Holdings | WBI Holdings, Inc., a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Centennial |
Westmoreland | Westmoreland Coal Company |
WUTC | Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission |
Wygen III | 100-MW coal-fired electric generating facility near Gillette, Wyoming (25 percent ownership) |
WYPSC | Wyoming Public Service Commission |
ZRC | Zonal resource credit - a MW of demand equivalent assigned to generators by MISO for meeting system reliability requirements |
Part I
Forward-Looking Statements
This Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements are all statements other than statements of historical fact, including without limitation those statements that are identified by the words "anticipates," "estimates," "expects," "intends," "plans," "predicts" and similar expressions, and include statements concerning plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events or performance, and underlying assumptions (many of which are based, in turn, upon further assumptions) and other statements that are other than statements of historical facts. From time to time, the Company may publish or otherwise make available forward-looking statements of this nature, including statements contained within Item 7 - MD&A - Prospective Information.
Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those expressed. The Company's expectations, beliefs and projections are expressed in good faith and are believed by the Company to have a reasonable basis, including without limitation, management's examination of historical operating trends, data contained in the Company's records and other data available from third parties. Nonetheless, the Company's expectations, beliefs or projections may not be achieved or accomplished.
Any forward-looking statement contained in this document speaks only as of the date on which the statement is made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement or statements to reflect events or circumstances that occur after the date on which the statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for management to predict all of the factors, nor can it assess the effect of each factor on the Company's business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. All forward-looking statements, whether written or oral and whether made by or on behalf of the Company, are expressly qualified by the risk factors and cautionary statements in this Form 10-K, including statements contained within Item 1A - Risk Factors.
Items 1 and 2. Business and Properties
General
The Company is a diversified natural resource company, which was incorporated under the laws of the state of Delaware in 1924. Its principal executive offices are at 1200 West Century Avenue, P.O. Box 5650, Bismarck, North Dakota 58506-5650, telephone (701) 530-1000.
Montana-Dakota, through the electric and natural gas distribution segments, generates, transmits and distributes electricity and distributes natural gas in Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wyoming. Cascade distributes natural gas in Oregon and Washington. Intermountain distributes natural gas in Idaho. Great Plains distributes natural gas in western Minnesota and southeastern North Dakota. These operations also supply related value-added services.
The Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary, Centennial, owns WBI Holdings (comprised of the pipeline and energy services and the exploration and production segments), Knife River (construction materials and contracting segment), MDU Construction Services (construction services segment), Centennial Resources and Centennial Capital (both reflected in the Other category).
The Company's investment in ECTE is reflected in the Other category. For additional information, see Item 8 - Note 4.
As of December 31, 2013, the Company had 9,133 employees with 157 employed at MDU Resources Group, Inc., 1,010 at Montana-Dakota, 34 at Great Plains, 302 at Cascade, 219 at Intermountain, 583 at WBI Holdings, 3,071 at Knife River and 3,757 at MDU Construction Services. The number of employees at certain Company operations fluctuates during the year depending upon the number and size of construction projects. The Company considers its relations with employees to be satisfactory.
The following information regarding the number of employees represented by labor contracts is as of December 31, 2013.
At Montana-Dakota and WBI Energy Transmission, 350 and 77 employees, respectively, are represented by the IBEW. Labor contracts with such employees are in effect through April 30, 2015, and March 31, 2014, for Montana-Dakota and WBI Energy Transmission, respectively.
At Cascade, 173 employees are represented by the ICWU. The labor contract with the field operations group is effective through April 1, 2015.
At Intermountain, 116 employees are represented by the UA. Labor contracts with such employees are in effect through September 30, 2016.
Knife River operates under 43 labor contracts that represent approximately 520 of its construction materials employees. Knife River is in negotiations on 7 of its labor contracts.
MDU Construction Services has 176 labor contracts representing the majority of its employees. The majority of the labor contracts contain provisions that prohibit work stoppages or strikes and provide for binding arbitration dispute resolution in the event of an extended disagreement.
The Company's principal properties, which are of varying ages and are of different construction types, are generally in good condition, are well maintained and are generally suitable and adequate for the purposes for which they are used.
The financial results and data applicable to each of the Company's business segments, as well as their financing requirements, are set forth in Item 7 - MD&A and Item 8 - Note 15 and Supplementary Financial Information.
The operations of the Company and certain of its subsidiaries are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations providing for air, water and solid waste pollution control; state facility-siting regulations; zoning and planning regulations of certain state and local authorities; federal health and safety regulations and state hazard communication standards. The Company believes that it is in substantial compliance with these regulations, except as to what may be ultimately determined with regard to items discussed in Environmental matters in Item 8 - Note 19. There are no pending CERCLA actions for any of the Company's properties, other than the Portland, Oregon, Harbor Superfund Site and the Bremerton Gasworks Superfund Site.
The Company produces GHG emissions primarily from its fossil fuel electric generating facilities, as well as from natural gas pipeline and storage systems, operations of equipment and fleet vehicles, and oil and natural gas exploration and development activities. GHG emissions also result from customer use of natural gas for heating and other uses. As interest in reductions in GHG emissions has grown, the Company has developed renewable generation with lower or no GHG emissions. Governmental legislative and regulatory initiatives regarding environmental and energy policy are continuously evolving and could negatively impact the Company's operations and financial results. Until legislation and regulation are finalized, the impact of these measures cannot be accurately predicted. The Company will continue to monitor legislative and regulatory activity related to environmental and energy policy initiatives. Disclosure regarding specific environmental matters applicable to each of the Company's businesses is set forth under each business description later. In addition, for a discussion of the Company's risks related to environmental laws and regulations, see Item 1A - Risk Factors.
This annual report on Form 10-K, the Company's quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act are available free of charge through the Company's Web site as soon as reasonably practicable after the Company has electronically filed such reports with, or furnished such reports to, the SEC. The Company's Web site address is www.mdu.com. The information available on the Company's Web site is not part of this annual report on Form 10-K.
Electric
General Montana-Dakota provides electric service at retail, serving more than 134,000 residential, commercial, industrial and municipal customers in 177 communities and adjacent rural areas as of December 31, 2013. The principal properties owned by Montana-Dakota for use in its electric operations include interests in 10 electric generating facilities and three small portable diesel generators, as further described under System Supply, System Demand and Competition, approximately 3,100 and 4,700 miles of transmission and distribution lines, respectively, and 52 transmission and 269 distribution substations. Montana-Dakota has obtained and holds, or is in the process of renewing, valid and existing franchises authorizing it to conduct its electric operations in all of the municipalities it serves where such franchises are required. Montana-Dakota intends to protect its service area and seek renewal of all expiring franchises. At December 31, 2013, Montana-Dakota's net electric plant investment was $812.9 million.
The percentage of Montana-Dakota's 2013 retail electric utility operating revenues by jurisdiction is as follows: North Dakota - 62 percent; Montana - 22 percent; Wyoming - 10 percent; and South Dakota - 6 percent. Retail electric rates, service,
accounting and certain security issuances are subject to regulation by the NDPSC, MTPSC, SDPUC and WYPSC. The interstate transmission and wholesale electric power operations of Montana-Dakota also are subject to regulation by the FERC under provisions of the Federal Power Act, as are interconnections with other utilities and power generators, the issuance of securities, accounting and other matters.
Through MISO, Montana-Dakota has access to wholesale energy, ancillary services and capacity markets for its integrated system. MISO is a regional transmission organization responsible for operational control of the transmission systems of its members. MISO provides security center operations, tariff administration and operates day-ahead and real-time energy markets, ancillary services and capacity markets. As a member of MISO, Montana-Dakota's generation is sold into the MISO energy market and its energy needs are purchased from that market.
System Supply, System Demand and Competition Through an interconnected electric system, Montana-Dakota serves markets in portions of western North Dakota, including Bismarck, Mandan, Dickinson, Williston and Watford City; eastern Montana, including Sidney, Glendive and Miles City; and northern South Dakota, including Mobridge. The maximum electric peak demand experienced to date attributable to Montana-Dakota's sales to retail customers on the interconnected system was 573,587 kW in July 2012. Montana-Dakota's latest forecast for its interconnected system indicates that its annual peak will continue to occur during the summer and the sales growth rate through 2018 will approximate 5 percent annually. The interconnected system consists of nine electric generating facilities and three small portable diesel generators, which have an aggregate nameplate rating attributable to Montana-Dakota's interest of 488,905 kW and total net ZRCs of 452.5 in 2013. ZRCs are a MW of demand equivalent measure and are allocated to individual generators to meet supply obligations within MISO. For 2013, Montana-Dakota's total ZRCs, including its firm purchase power contracts, were 583.5. Montana-Dakota's peak demand supply obligation, including firm purchase power contracts, within MISO was 508.3 ZRCs for 2013. Montana-Dakota's four principal generating stations are steam-turbine generating units using coal for fuel. The nameplate rating for Montana-Dakota's ownership interest in these four stations (including interests in the Big Stone Station and the Coyote Station) is 327,758 kW. Two combustion turbine peaking stations, two wind electric generating facilities, a heat recovery electric generating facility and three small portable diesel generators supply the balance of Montana-Dakota's interconnected system electric generating capability.
Montana-Dakota has a contract for capacity of 115 MW for the period June 1, 2013 to May 31, 2014, and 120 MW for the period June 1, 2014 to May 31, 2015. On October 25, 2013, Montana-Dakota entered into a power purchase agreement with Thunder Spirit Wind, LLC, a subsidiary of Wind Works Power Corp., for approximately 107 MW of installed capacity of wind turbine generators to be located in southwest North Dakota for a 25-year period effective on the commercial operation date of the facility. The project is expected to begin commercial operation in the fourth quarter of 2015. The generation will interconnect at Montana-Dakota's substation near Hettinger, North Dakota. Energy also will be purchased as needed, or if more economical, from the MISO market. In 2013, Montana-Dakota purchased approximately 29 percent of its net kWh needs for its interconnected system through the MISO market.
Montana-Dakota is constructing an 88-MW simple-cycle natural gas turbine and associated facilities, with an estimated project cost of $77 million and a projected in-service date in the third quarter 2014. The capacity is necessary to meet the requirements of Montana-Dakota's integrated electric system customers and will be a partial replacement for third-party contract capacity expiring in 2015. Advance determination of prudence and a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity have been received from the NDPSC for construction and operation of the natural gas turbine. A Certificate of Site Compatibility was issued for the turbine by the NDPSC on December 21, 2012.
Through the Sheridan System, Montana-Dakota serves Sheridan, Wyoming, and neighboring communities. The maximum peak demand experienced to date attributable to Montana-Dakota sales to retail customers on that system was approximately 61,501 kW in July 2012. Montana-Dakota has a power supply contract with Black Hills Power to purchase up to 49,000 kW of capacity annually through December 31, 2016. Wygen III serves a portion of the needs of its Sheridan-area customers.
The following table sets forth details applicable to the Company's electric generating stations:
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Generating Station | Type | Nameplate Rating (kW) |
| 2013 ZRCs |
| (a) | 2013 Net Generation (kWh in thousands) |
| |
Interconnected System: | | | | | | |
North Dakota: | | | | | | |
Coyote (b) | Steam | 103,647 |
| 101.7 |
| | 666,431 |
| |
Heskett | Steam | 86,000 |
| 85.4 |
| | 444,867 |
| |
Glen Ullin | Heat Recovery | 7,500 |
| 4.3 |
| | 38,053 |
| |
Cedar Hills | Wind | 19,500 |
| 4.5 |
| | 54,805 |
| |
Diesel Units | Oil | 5,475 |
| 5.6 |
| | 6 |
| |
South Dakota: | | | | | | |
Big Stone (b) | Steam | 94,111 |
| 101.3 |
| | 623,380 |
| |
Montana: | | | | | | |
Lewis & Clark | Steam | 44,000 |
| 52.1 |
| | 298,969 |
| |
Glendive | Combustion Turbine | 75,522 |
| 72.9 |
| | 1,782 |
| |
Miles City | Combustion Turbine | 23,150 |
| 19.5 |
| | — |
| |
Diamond Willow | Wind | 30,000 |
| 5.2 |
| | 93,175 |
| |
| | 488,905 |
| 452.5 |
| | 2,221,468 |
| |
Sheridan System: | | |
| |
| | |
| |
Wyoming: | | | | | |
| |
Wygen III (b) | Steam | 28,000 |
| N/A |
| | 208,533 |
| |
| | 516,905 |
| 452.5 |
| | 2,430,001 |
| |
(a) Interconnected system only. MISO requires generators to obtain their summer capability through the GVTC. The GVTC is then converted to ZRCs by applying each generator's forced outage factor against its GVTC. Wind generator's ZRCs are calculated based on a wind capacity study performed annually by MISO. ZRCs are used to meet supply obligations within MISO. (b) Reflects Montana-Dakota's ownership interest. | |
Virtually all of the current fuel requirements of the Coyote, Heskett and Lewis & Clark stations are met with coal supplied by subsidiaries of Westmoreland under contracts that expire in May 2016, April 2016 and December 2017, respectively. The Coyote Station coal supply agreement provides for the purchase of coal necessary to supply the coal requirements of the Coyote Station or 30,000 tons per week, whichever may be the greater quantity at contracted pricing. The Heskett and Lewis & Clark coal supply agreements provide for the purchase of coal necessary to supply the coal requirements of these stations at contracted pricing. Montana-Dakota estimates the Heskett and Lewis & Clark coal requirement to be in the range of 450,000 to 550,000 tons and 250,000 to 350,000 tons per contract year, respectively.
Montana-Dakota has a contract with Coyote Creek for coal supply to the Coyote Station beginning May 2016 until December 2040. Montana-Dakota estimates the Coyote Station coal supply agreement to be approximately 2.5 million tons per contract year. For more information, see Item 8 - Note 19.
Montana-Dakota has coal supply agreements, which meet a portion of the Big Stone Station's fuel requirements, for the purchase of 1.0 million tons in 2014, 1.0 million tons in 2015 and 500,000 tons in 2016 from Peabody Coalsales, LLC, and 500,000 tons in 2014 from Westmoreland at contracted pricing. The remainder of the Big Stone Station fuel requirements will be secured through separate future contracts.
Montana-Dakota has a coal supply agreement with Wyodak Resources Development Corp., which provides for the purchase of coal necessary to supply the coal requirements of Wygen III at contracted pricing through June 1, 2060. Montana-Dakota estimates the maximum annual coal consumption of the facility to be 585,000 tons.
The average cost of coal purchased, including freight, at Montana-Dakota's electric generating stations (including the Big Stone, Coyote and Wygen III stations) was as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Years ended December 31, | 2013 |
| 2012 |
| 2011 |
|
Average cost of coal per MMBtu | $ | 1.73 |
| $ | 1.69 |
| $ | 1.62 |
|
Average cost of coal per ton | $ | 25.32 |
| $ | 24.77 |
| $ | 23.38 |
|
Montana-Dakota expects that it has secured adequate capacity available through existing baseload generating stations, renewable generation, turbine peaking stations, demand reduction programs and firm contracts to meet the peak customer demand requirements of its customers through mid-2016. Future capacity that is needed to replace contracts and meet system growth requirements is expected to be met by constructing new generation resources, or acquiring additional capacity through power purchase contracts or the MISO capacity auction. For additional information regarding potential power generation projects, see Item 7 - MD&A - Prospective Information - Electric and natural gas distribution.
Montana-Dakota has major interconnections with its neighboring utilities and considers these interconnections adequate for coordinated planning, emergency assistance, exchange of capacity and energy and power supply reliability.
Montana-Dakota is subject to competition in varying degrees, in certain areas, from rural electric cooperatives, on-site generators, co-generators and municipally owned systems. In addition, competition in varying degrees exists between electricity and alternative forms of energy such as natural gas.
Regulatory Matters and Revenues Subject to Refund In North Dakota, Montana-Dakota reflects monthly increases or decreases in fuel and purchased power costs (including demand charges) and is deferring those electric fuel and purchased power costs that are greater or less than amounts presently being recovered through its existing rate schedules. In Montana, a monthly Fuel and Purchased Power Tracking Adjustment mechanism allows Montana-Dakota to reflect 90 percent of the increases or decreases in fuel and purchased power costs (including demand charges) and Montana-Dakota is deferring 90 percent of costs that are greater or less than amounts presently being recovered through its existing rate schedules. A fuel adjustment clause contained in South Dakota jurisdictional electric rate schedules allows Montana-Dakota to reflect monthly increases or decreases in fuel and purchased power costs (excluding demand charges). In Wyoming, an annual Electric Power Supply Cost Adjustment mechanism allows Montana-Dakota to reflect increases or decreases in purchased power costs (including demand charges but excluding increases or decreases from base coal price) related to power supply and Montana-Dakota is deferring costs that are greater or less than amounts presently being recovered through its existing rate schedules. Such orders generally provide that these amounts are recoverable or refundable through rate adjustments within a period ranging from 14 to 25 months from the time such costs are paid. For additional information, see Item 8 - Note 6.
Environmental Matters Montana-Dakota's electric operations are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations providing for air, water and solid waste pollution control; state facility-siting regulations; zoning and planning regulations of certain state and local authorities; federal health and safety regulations; and state hazard communication standards. Montana-Dakota believes it is in substantial compliance with these regulations.
Montana-Dakota's electric generating facilities have Title V Operating Permits, under the Clean Air Act, issued by the states in which they operate. Each of these permits has a five-year life. Near the expiration of these permits, renewal applications are submitted. Permits continue in force beyond the expiration date, provided the application for renewal is submitted by the required date, usually six months prior to expiration. The Title V Operating Permit renewal application for Coyote Station was submitted to the North Dakota Department of Health in March 2013 and the Title V Operating Permit renewal application for Big Stone Station was submitted to the South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural Resources in November 2013.
State water discharge permits issued under the requirements of the Clean Water Act are maintained for power production facilities on the Yellowstone and Missouri rivers. These permits also have five-year lives. Montana-Dakota renews these permits as necessary prior to expiration. Other permits held by these facilities may include an initial siting permit, which is typically a one-time, preconstruction permit issued by the state; state permits to dispose of combustion by-products; state authorizations to withdraw water for operations; and Army Corps permits to construct water intake structures. Montana-Dakota's Army Corps permits grant one-time permission to construct and do not require renewal. Other permit terms vary and the permits are renewed as necessary.
Montana-Dakota's electric operations are conditionally exempt small-quantity hazardous waste generators and subject only to minimum regulation under the RCRA. Montana-Dakota routinely handles PCBs from its electric operations in accordance with federal requirements. PCB storage areas are registered with the EPA as required.
Montana-Dakota incurred $32.7 million of environmental capital expenditures in 2013, largely for the installation of a BART air quality control system at the Big Stone Station. Capital expenditures are estimated to be $47 million, $46 million and $8 million in 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively, to maintain environmental compliance as new emission controls are required, including the installation of a BART air quality control system, as discussed above. Projects for 2014 through 2016 will also include sulfur-dioxide, nitrogen oxide and mercury and non-mercury metals control equipment installation at electric generating stations. Montana-Dakota's capital and operational expenditures could also be affected in a variety of ways by future air and wastewater effluent discharge regulation, as well as potential new GHG legislation or regulation. In particular, such GHG legislation or regulation would likely increase capital expenditures and operational costs associated with GHG emissions compliance until carbon capture technology becomes economical, at which time capital expenditures may be necessary to incorporate such technology into existing or new generating facilities. Montana-Dakota expects that it will recover the operational and capital expenditures for GHG regulatory compliance in its rates consistent with the recovery of other reasonable costs of complying with environmental laws and regulations.
Natural Gas Distribution
General The Company's natural gas distribution operations consist of Montana-Dakota, Great Plains, Cascade and Intermountain, which sell natural gas at retail, serving over 876,000 residential, commercial and industrial customers in 334 communities and adjacent rural areas across eight states as of December 31, 2013, and provide natural gas transportation services to certain customers on their systems. These services are provided through distribution systems aggregating approximately 18,500 miles. The natural gas distribution operations have obtained and hold, or are in the process of renewing, valid and existing franchises authorizing them to conduct their natural gas operations in all of the municipalities they serve where such franchises are required. These operations intend to protect their service areas and seek renewal of all expiring franchises. At December 31, 2013, the natural gas distribution operations' net natural gas distribution plant investment was $1.1 billion.
The percentage of the natural gas distribution operations' 2013 natural gas utility operating sales revenues by jurisdiction is as follows: Idaho - 34 percent; Washington - 24 percent; North Dakota - 14 percent; Oregon - 8 percent; Montana - 8 percent; South Dakota - 6 percent; Minnesota - 4 percent; and Wyoming - 2 percent. The natural gas distribution operations are subject to regulation by the IPUC, MNPUC, MTPSC, NDPSC, OPUC, SDPUC, WUTC and WYPSC regarding retail rates, service, accounting and certain security issuances.
System Supply, System Demand and Competition The natural gas distribution operations serve retail natural gas markets, consisting principally of residential and firm commercial space and water heating users, in portions of Idaho, including Boise, Nampa, Twin Falls, Pocatello and Idaho Falls; western Minnesota, including Fergus Falls, Marshall and Crookston; eastern Montana, including Billings, Glendive and Miles City; North Dakota, including Bismarck, Mandan, Dickinson, Wahpeton, Williston, Watford City, Minot and Jamestown; central and eastern Oregon, including Bend, Pendleton, Ontario and Baker City; western and north-central South Dakota, including Rapid City, Pierre, Spearfish and Mobridge; western, southeastern and south-central Washington, including Bellingham, Bremerton, Longview, Aberdeen, Wenatchee/Moses Lake, Mount Vernon, Tri-Cities, Walla Walla and Yakima; and northern Wyoming, including Sheridan. These markets are highly seasonal and sales volumes depend largely on the weather, the effects of which are mitigated in certain jurisdictions by a weather normalization mechanism discussed in Regulatory Matters. In addition to the residential and commercial sales, the utilities transport natural gas for larger commercial and industrial customers who purchase their own supply of natural gas.
Competition in varying degrees exists between natural gas and other fuels and forms of energy. The natural gas distribution operations have established various natural gas transportation service rates for their distribution businesses to retain interruptible commercial and industrial loads. These services have enhanced the natural gas distribution operations' competitive posture with alternative fuels, although certain customers have bypassed the distribution systems by directly accessing transmission pipelines within close proximity. These bypasses did not have a material effect on results of operations.
The natural gas distribution operations and various distribution transportation customers obtain their system requirements directly from producers, processors and marketers. The Company's purchased natural gas is supplied by a portfolio of contracts specifying market-based pricing and is transported under transportation agreements with WBI Energy Transmission, Northwest Pipeline GP, Northern Natural Gas, Gas Transmission Northwest LLC, Northwestern Energy, Viking Gas Transmission Company and Ruby Pipeline LLC. The natural gas distribution operations have contracts for storage services to provide gas supply during the winter heating season and to meet peak day demand with various storage providers, including WBI Energy Transmission, Questar Pipeline Company, Northwest Pipeline GP and Northern Natural Gas. In addition, certain of the operations have entered into natural gas supply management agreements with various parties. Demand for natural gas, which is a widely traded commodity, has historically been sensitive to seasonal heating and industrial load requirements as well as
changes in market price. The natural gas distribution operations believe that, based on current and projected domestic and regional supplies of natural gas and the pipeline transmission network currently available through their suppliers and pipeline service providers, supplies are adequate to meet their system natural gas requirements for the next decade.
Regulatory Matters The natural gas distribution operations' retail natural gas rate schedules contain clauses permitting adjustments in rates based upon changes in natural gas commodity, transportation and storage costs. Current tariffs allow for recovery or refunds of under- or over-recovered gas costs within a period ranging from 12 to 28 months.
Montana-Dakota's North Dakota and South Dakota natural gas tariffs contain weather normalization mechanisms applicable to firm customers that adjust the distribution delivery charge revenues to reflect weather fluctuations during the November 1 through May 1 billing periods.
On March 13, 2013, the OPUC approved an extension of Cascade's decoupling mechanism until December 31, 2015. Cascade also has an earnings sharing mechanism with respect to its Oregon jurisdictional operations as required by the OPUC.
For additional information on regulatory matters, see Item 8 - Note 18.
Environmental Matters The natural gas distribution operations are subject to federal, state and local environmental, facility-siting, zoning and planning laws and regulations. The natural gas distribution operations believe they are in substantial compliance with those regulations.
The Company's natural gas distribution operations are conditionally exempt small-quantity hazardous waste generators and subject only to minimum regulation under the RCRA. Certain locations of the natural gas distribution operations routinely handle PCBs from their natural gas operations in accordance with federal requirements. PCB storage areas are registered with the EPA as required. Capital and operational expenditures for natural gas distribution operations could be affected in a variety of ways by potential new GHG legislation or regulation. In particular, such legislation or regulation would likely increase capital expenditures for energy efficiency and conservation programs and operational costs associated with GHG emissions compliance. Natural gas distribution operations expect to recover the operational and capital expenditures for GHG regulatory compliance in rates consistent with the recovery of other reasonable costs of complying with environmental laws and regulations.
The natural gas distribution operations did not incur any material environmental expenditures in 2013. Except as to what may be ultimately determined with regard to the issues described later, the natural gas distribution operations do not expect to incur any material capital expenditures related to environmental compliance with current laws and regulations through 2016.
Montana-Dakota has had an economic interest in four historic manufactured gas plants and Great Plains has had an economic interest in one historic manufactured gas plant within their service territories. Montana-Dakota is investigating a former manufactured gas plant in Montana. Montana-Dakota will seek recovery through the MTPSC in its natural gas rates charged to customers for any remediation costs incurred for this site. None of the remaining former manufactured gas plant sites of Montana-Dakota or Great Plains are being actively investigated. Cascade has had an economic interest in nine former manufactured gas plants within its service territory. Cascade has been involved in the investigation and remediation of three manufactured gas plants in Washington and Oregon. See Item 8 - Note 19 for a further discussion of these three manufactured gas plants. To the extent these claims are not covered by insurance, Cascade will seek recovery through the OPUC and WUTC of remediation costs in its natural gas rates charged to customers.
Pipeline and Energy Services
General WBI Energy owns and operates both regulated and nonregulated businesses. The regulated business of this segment, WBI Energy Transmission, owns and operates approximately 3,800 miles of transmission, gathering and storage lines in Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wyoming. Three underground storage fields in Montana and Wyoming provide storage services to local distribution companies, producers, natural gas marketers and others, and serve to enhance system deliverability. Its system is strategically located near five natural gas producing basins, making natural gas supplies available to its transportation and storage customers. The system has 13 interconnecting points with other pipeline facilities allowing for the receipt and/or delivery of natural gas to and from other regions of the country and from Canada. Under the Natural Gas Act, as amended, WBI Energy Transmission is subject to the jurisdiction of the FERC regarding certificate, rate, service and accounting matters, and at December 31, 2013, its net plant investment was $337.6 million.
The nonregulated business of this segment, owns and operates gathering facilities in Colorado, Montana and Wyoming. It also owns a 50 percent undivided interest in the Pronghorn assets located in western North Dakota that were acquired in 2012,
which include a natural gas processing plant, both oil and gas gathering pipelines, an oil storage terminal and an oil pipeline. In total, facilities include approximately 1,600 miles of operated field gathering lines, some of which interconnect with WBI Energy's regulated pipeline system. The nonregulated business provides natural gas and oil gathering services, natural gas processing and a variety of other energy-related services, including cathodic protection, water hauling, contract compression operations, measurement services, and energy efficiency product sales and installation services to large end-users.
WBI Energy, in conjunction with Calumet, formed Dakota Prairie Refining, to develop, build and operate Dakota Prairie Refinery. Construction began on the facility in late March 2013 and, when complete, it will process Bakken crude oil into diesel, which will be marketed within the Bakken region. Total project costs are estimated to be approximately $350 million, with a projected in-service date in late 2014.
This segment also includes an energy services business which provides natural gas purchase and sales services to local distribution companies, producers, other marketers and a limited number of large end-users, primarily using natural gas produced by Fidelity. Certain of the services are provided based on contracts that call for a determinable quantity of natural gas. At December 31, 2013, it has commitments to deliver fixed and determinable amounts of natural gas under these contracts of 1.9 MMdk in 2014 and the commitments to deliver natural gas for years subsequent to 2014 are immaterial. The Company currently estimates that it can adequately meet the requirements of these contracts based upon the estimated natural gas production and reserves of Fidelity.
A majority of its pipeline and energy services business is transacted in the northern Great Plains and Rocky Mountain regions of the United States.
For information regarding natural gas gathering operations litigation, see Item 8 - Note 19.
System Supply, System Demand and Competition Natural gas supplies emanate from traditional and nontraditional production activities in the region and from off-system supply sources. While certain traditional regional supply sources are in various stages of decline, incremental supply from nontraditional sources have been developed which has helped support WBI Energy Transmission's supply needs. This includes new natural gas supply associated with the continued development of the Bakken area in Montana and North Dakota. The Powder River Basin also provides a nontraditional natural gas supply to the WBI Energy Transmission system. In addition, off-system supply sources are available through the Company's interconnections with other pipeline systems. WBI Energy Transmission expects to facilitate the movement of these supplies by making available its transportation and storage services. WBI Energy Transmission will continue to look for opportunities to increase transportation, gathering and storage services through system expansion and/or other pipeline interconnections or enhancements that could provide substantial future benefits.
WBI Energy Transmission's underground natural gas storage facilities have a certificated storage capacity of approximately 353 Bcf, including 193 Bcf of working gas capacity, 85 Bcf of cushion gas and 75 Bcf of native gas. These storage facilities enable customers to purchase natural gas at more uniform daily volumes throughout the year and meet winter peak requirements.
WBI Energy Transmission competes with several pipelines for its customers' transportation, storage and gathering business and at times may discount rates in an effort to retain market share. However, the strategic location of its system near five natural gas producing basins and the availability of underground storage and gathering services, along with interconnections with other pipelines, serve to enhance its competitive position.
Although certain of WBI Energy Transmission's firm customers, including its largest firm customer Montana-Dakota, serve relatively secure residential and commercial end-users, they generally all have some price-sensitive end-users that could switch to alternate fuels.
WBI Energy Transmission transports substantially all of Montana-Dakota's natural gas, primarily utilizing firm transportation agreements, which for 2013 represented 45 percent of WBI Energy Transmission's subscribed firm transportation contract demand. The majority of the firm transportation agreements with Montana-Dakota expire in June 2017. In addition, Montana-Dakota has a contract with WBI Energy Transmission to provide firm storage services to facilitate meeting Montana-Dakota's winter peak requirements expiring in July 2015.
The nonregulated business competes with several midstream companies for existing customers, for the expansion of its systems and for the installation of new systems. Its strong position in the fields in which it operates, its focus on customer service and the variety of services it offers, along with its interconnection with various other pipelines, serve to enhance its competitive position.
Regulatory Matters For additional information on regulatory matters, see Item 8 - Note 18.
Environmental Matters The pipeline and energy services operations are generally subject to federal, state and local environmental, facility-siting, zoning and planning laws and regulations. The Company believes it is in substantial compliance with those regulations.
Ongoing operations are subject to the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the NEPA and other state and federal regulations. Administration of many provisions of these laws has been delegated to the states where WBI Energy and its subsidiaries operate. Permit terms vary and all permits carry operational compliance conditions. Some permits require annual renewal, some have terms ranging from one to five years and others have no expiration date. Permits are renewed and modified, as necessary, based on defined permit expiration dates, operational demand and/or regulatory changes.
Detailed environmental assessments and/or environmental impact statements are included in the FERC's permitting processes for both the construction and abandonment of WBI Energy Transmission's natural gas transmission pipelines, compressor stations and storage facilities.
The pipeline and energy services operations did not incur any material environmental expenditures in 2013 and do not expect to incur any material capital expenditures related to environmental compliance with current laws and regulations through 2016.
Exploration and Production
General Fidelity is involved in the acquisition, exploration, development and production of oil and natural gas resources. Fidelity continues to seek additional reserve and production growth opportunities through these activities. Future growth is dependent upon its success in these endeavors. Fidelity shares revenues and expenses from the development of specified properties in proportion to its ownership interests.
For information regarding exploration and production litigation, see Item 8 - Note 19.
Fidelity's business is focused primarily in two core regions: Rocky Mountain and Mid-Continent/Gulf States.
Rocky Mountain
Fidelity's Rocky Mountain region includes the following significant operating areas:
| |
• | Bakken areas - Oil targets in which Fidelity holds approximately 16,000 net acres in Mountrail County, North Dakota, approximately 50,000 net acres in Stark County, North Dakota, and approximately 59,000 net acres in Richland County, Montana. |
| |
• | Cedar Creek Anticline - Primarily in eastern Montana, the Company has a long-held net profits interest in this oil play. |
| |
• | Paradox Basin - The Company holds approximately 130,000 net acres located in Grand and San Juan Counties, Utah, targeting oil, including its recent acquisition of 35,000 net acres of leaseholds and has an option to earn another 20,000 acres. |
| |
• | Big Horn Basin - These interests include approximately 21,000 net acres in Wyoming, targeting oil and NGL. |
| |
• | Green River Basin - These properties were primarily natural gas targets in Wyoming and were sold at the end of 2013. |
| |
• | Baker Field - Long-held natural gas properties in which Fidelity holds approximately 98,000 net acres in southeastern Montana and southwestern North Dakota. |
| |
• | Bowdoin Field - Long-held natural gas properties in which Fidelity holds approximately 127,000 net acres in north-central Montana. |
| |
• | Other - Includes other exploratory oil projects and various non-operated positions. |
Mid-Continent/Gulf States
Fidelity's Mid-Continent/Gulf States region includes the following significant operating areas:
| |
• | South Texas - This area includes approximately 9,000 net acres in the Tabasco, Texan Gardens and Flores fields. This area has significant NGL content associated with the natural gas. |
| |
• | East Texas - Fidelity holds approximately 9,000 net acres, primarily natural gas and associated NGL. |
| |
• | Other - Includes various non-operated onshore interests, as well as offshore interests in the shallow waters off the coasts of Texas and Louisiana. |
Operating Information Annual net production by region for 2013 was as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Region | Oil (MBbls) |
| NGL (MBbls) |
| Natural Gas (MMcf) |
| Total (MBOE) |
| Percent of Total |
|
Rocky Mountain | 4,481 |
| 250 |
| 19,461 |
| 7,975 |
| 78 | % |
Mid-Continent/Gulf States | 334 |
| 531 |
| 8,547 |
| 2,289 |
| 22 |
|
Total | 4,815 |
| 781 |
| 28,008 |
| 10,264 |
| 100 | % |
Note: Bakken-Mountrail County represents 43% of total annual net oil production and is the only field that contains 15 percent or more of the Company's total proved reserves as of December 31, 2013. |
Annual net production by region for 2012 was as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Region | Oil (MBbls) |
| NGL (MBbls) |
| Natural Gas (MMcf) |
| Total (MBOE) |
| Percent of Total |
|
Rocky Mountain | 3,295 |
| 249 |
| 23,180 |
| 7,408 |
| 74 | % |
Mid-Continent/Gulf States | 399 |
| 579 |
| 10,034 |
| 2,650 |
| 26 |
|
Total | 3,694 |
| 828 |
| 33,214 |
| 10,058 |
| 100 | % |
Note: Bakken-Mountrail County represents 47% of total annual net oil production and is the only field that contains 15 percent or more of the Company's total proved reserves as of December 31, 2012. |
Annual net production by region for 2011 was as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Region | Oil (MBbls) |
| NGL (MBbls) |
| Natural Gas (MMcf) |
| Total (MBOE) |
| Percent of Total |
|
Rocky Mountain | 2,290 |
| 199 |
| 34,472 |
| 8,234 |
| 74 | % |
Mid-Continent/Gulf States | 434 |
| 577 |
| 11,126 |
| 2,865 |
| 26 |
|
Total | 2,724 |
| 776 |
| 45,598 |
| 11,099 |
| 100 | % |
Note: There are no fields that contain 15 percent or more of the Company's total proved reserves as of December 31, 2011. |
Well and Acreage Information Gross and net productive well counts and gross and net developed and undeveloped acreage related to Fidelity's interests at December 31, 2013, were as follows:
|
| | | | | | |
| Gross |
| * | Net |
| ** |
Productive wells: | | | | |
Oil | 899 |
| | 171 |
| |
Natural gas | 2,006 |
| | 1,541 |
| |
Total | 2,905 |
| | 1,712 |
| |
| | | | |
Developed acreage (000's) | 581 |
| | 347 |
| |
Undeveloped acreage set to expire in the years (000's): | | | | |
2014 | 87 |
| | 63 |
| |
2015 | 130 |
| | 81 |
| |
2016 | 22 |
| | 16 |
| |
Thereafter | 563 |
| | 277 |
| |
Total undeveloped acreage | 802 |
| | 437 |
| |
* Reflects well or acreage in which an interest is owned. | |
** Reflects Fidelity's percentage of ownership. | |
In most cases, acreage set to expire can be held through drilling operations or the Company can exercise extension options.
Delivery Commitments At December 31, 2013, Fidelity has commitments to deliver fixed and determinable amounts of oil under contracts of 452,500 Bbls in 2014 and the commitments to deliver oil for years subsequent to 2014 are immaterial. Fidelity does not have any material delivery commitments to deliver fixed and determinable amounts of natural gas at December 31, 2013.
Exploratory and Development Wells The following table reflects activities related to Fidelity's oil and natural gas wells drilled and/or tested during 2013, 2012 and 2011:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net Exploratory | Net Development | |
| Productive |
| Dry Holes |
| Total |
| Productive |
| Dry Holes |
| Total |
| Total |
|
2013 | 3 |
| 2 |
| 5 |
| 35 |
| 3 |
| 38 |
| 43 |
|
2012 | 24 |
| 3 |
| 27 |
| 39 |
| 1 |
| 40 |
| 67 |
|
2011 | 4 |
| — |
| 4 |
| 48 |
| — |
| 48 |
| 52 |
|
At December 31, 2013, there were 11 gross (5 net) wells in the process of drilling or under evaluation, all of which were development wells. These wells are not included in the previous table. Fidelity expects to complete the drilling and testing of these wells within the next 12 months.
The information in the preceding table should not be considered indicative of future performance nor should it be assumed that there is necessarily any correlation between the number of productive wells drilled and quantities of reserves found or economic value. Productive wells are those that produce commercial quantities of hydrocarbons whether or not they produce a reasonable rate of return.
Competition The exploration and production industry is highly competitive. Fidelity competes with a substantial number of major and independent exploration and production companies in acquiring producing properties and new leases for future exploration and development, and in securing the equipment, services and expertise necessary to explore, develop and operate its properties.
Environmental Matters Fidelity's operations are generally subject to federal, state and local environmental and operational laws and regulations. Fidelity believes it is in substantial compliance with these regulations.
The ongoing operations of Fidelity are subject to the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the NEPA, ESA and other state, federal and local regulations. Administration of many provisions of these laws has been delegated to the states where Fidelity operates. Permit terms vary and all permits carry operational compliance conditions. Some permits require annual renewal, some have terms ranging from one to five years and others have no expiration date. Permits are renewed and modified, as necessary, based on defined permit expiration dates, operational demand and/or regulatory changes.
Detailed environmental assessments and/or environmental impact statements under federal and state laws are required as part of the permitting process covering the conduct of drilling and production operations as well as in the abandonment and reclamation of facilities.
In connection with production operations, Fidelity has not incurred any material capital environmental expenditures in 2013 and does not expect to incur any material capital expenditures related to environmental compliance with current laws and regulations through 2016.
Proved Reserve Information Estimates of proved oil, NGL and natural gas reserves were prepared in accordance with guidelines established by the industry and the SEC. The estimates are arrived at using actual historical wellhead production trends and/or standard reservoir engineering methods utilizing available geological, geophysical, engineering and economic data. Other factors used in the proved reserve estimates are prices, market differentials, estimates of well operating and future development costs, taxes, timing of operations, and the interests owned by the Company in the properties. These estimates are refined as new information becomes available.
The proved reserve estimates are prepared by internal engineers assigned to an asset team by geographic area. Senior management reviews and approves the reserve estimates to ensure they are materially accurate. The technical person responsible for overseeing the preparation of the reserve estimates holds a bachelor of science degree in mathematics with a technical minor in petroleum engineering, has 26 years of experience in petroleum engineering and reserve estimation, and is a member of the Society of Petroleum Engineers. In addition, the Company engages an independent third party to audit its proved reserves. Ryder Scott reviewed the Company's proved reserve quantity estimates as of December 31, 2013. The technical person at Ryder Scott primarily responsible for overseeing the reserves audit is a Senior Vice President with over 30 years of experience in estimating and auditing reserves attributable to oil and gas properties, holds a bachelor of science degree in mechanical engineering, is a registered professional engineer, and is a member of multiple professional organizations.
Fidelity's proved reserves by region at December 31, 2013, are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Oil |
| NGL |
| Natural Gas |
| Total |
| Percent |
| PV-10 Value |
| * |
Region | (MBbls) |
| (MBbls) |
| (MMcf) |
| (MBOE) |
| of Total |
| (in millions) |
| |
Rocky Mountain | 38,788 |
| 2,442 |
| 128,124 |
| 62,584 |
| 78 | % | $ | 1,159.3 |
| |
Mid-Continent/Gulf States | 2,231 |
| 4,160 |
| 70,321 |
| 18,111 |
| 22 |
| 175.7 |
| |
Total proved reserves | 41,019 |
| 6,602 |
| 198,445 |
| 80,695 |
| 100 | % | 1,335.0 |
| |
Discounted future income taxes | |
| | |
| |
| |
| 321.0 |
| |
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to proved reserves | |
| | |
| |
| |
| $ | 1,014.0 |
| |
* Pre-tax PV-10 value is a non-GAAP financial measure that is derived from the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure which is the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows. The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows disclosed in Item 8 - Supplementary Financial Information, is presented after deducting discounted future income taxes, whereas the PV-10 value is presented before income taxes. Pre-tax PV-10 value is commonly used by the Company to evaluate properties that are acquired and sold and to assess the potential return on investment in the Company's oil and natural gas properties. The Company believes pre-tax PV-10 value is a useful supplemental disclosure to the standardized measure as the Company believes readers may utilize this value as a basis for comparison of the relative size and value of the Company's reserves to other companies because many factors that are unique to each individual company impact the amount of future income taxes to be paid. However, pre-tax PV-10 value is not a substitute for the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows. Neither the pre-tax PV-10 value nor the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows purports to represent the fair value of the Company's oil and natural gas properties. | |
For additional information related to oil and natural gas interests, see Item 8 - Note 1 and Supplementary Financial Information.
Construction Materials and Contracting
General Knife River operates construction materials and contracting businesses headquartered in Alaska, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Iowa, Minnesota, Montana, North Dakota, Oregon, Texas, Washington and Wyoming. These operations mine, process and sell construction aggregates (crushed stone, sand and gravel); produce and sell asphalt mix and supply ready-mixed concrete for use in most types of construction, including roads, freeways and bridges, as well as homes, schools, shopping centers, office buildings and industrial parks. Although not common to all locations, other products include the sale of cement, liquid asphalt for various commercial and roadway applications, various finished concrete products and other building materials and related contracting services.
For information regarding construction materials litigation, see Item 8 - Note 19.
The construction materials business had approximately $456 million in backlog at December 31, 2013, compared to $406 million at December 31, 2012. The Company anticipates that a significant amount of the current backlog will be completed during 2014.
Competition Knife River's construction materials products are marketed under highly competitive conditions. Price is the principal competitive force to which these products are subject, with service, quality, delivery time and proximity to the customer also being significant factors. The number and size of competitors varies in each of Knife River's principal market areas and product lines.
The demand for construction materials products is significantly influenced by the cyclical nature of the construction industry in general. In addition, construction materials activity in certain locations may be seasonal in nature due to the effects of weather. The key economic factors affecting product demand are changes in the level of local, state and federal governmental spending, general economic conditions within the market area that influence both the commercial and private sectors, and prevailing interest rates.
Knife River is not dependent on any single customer or group of customers for sales of its products and services, the loss of which would have a material adverse effect on its construction materials businesses.
Reserve Information Aggregate reserve estimates are calculated based on the best available data. This data is collected from drill holes and other subsurface investigations, as well as investigations of surface features such as mine high walls and other exposures of the aggregate reserves. Mine plans, production history and geologic data also are utilized to estimate reserve quantities. Most acquisitions are made of mature businesses with established reserves, as distinguished from exploratory-type properties.
Estimates are based on analyses of the data described above by experienced internal mining engineers, operating personnel and geologists. Property setbacks and other regulatory restrictions and limitations are identified to determine the total area available for mining. Data described previously are used to calculate the thickness of aggregate materials to be recovered. Topography associated with alluvial sand and gravel deposits is typically flat and volumes of these materials are calculated by applying the thickness of the resource over the areas available for mining. Volumes are then converted to tons by using an appropriate conversion factor. Typically, 1.5 tons per cubic yard in the ground is used for sand and gravel deposits.
Topography associated with the hard rock reserves is typically much more diverse. Therefore, using available data, a final topography map is created and computer software is utilized to compute the volumes between the existing and final topographies. Volumes are then converted to tons by using an appropriate conversion factor. Typically, 2 tons per cubic yard in the ground is used for hard rock quarries.
Estimated reserves are probable reserves as defined in Securities Act Industry Guide 7. Remaining reserves are based on estimates of volumes that can be economically extracted and sold to meet current market and product applications. The reserve estimates include only salable tonnage and thus exclude waste materials that are generated in the crushing and processing phases of the operation. Approximately 1.0 billion tons of the 1.1 billion tons of aggregate reserves are permitted reserves. The remaining reserves are on properties that are expected to be permitted for mining under current regulatory requirements. The data used to calculate the remaining reserves may require revisions in the future to account for changes in customer requirements and unknown geological occurrences. The years remaining were calculated by dividing remaining reserves by the three-year average sales from 2011 through 2013. Actual useful lives of these reserves will be subject to, among other things, fluctuations in customer demand, customer specifications, geological conditions and changes in mining plans.
The following table sets forth details applicable to the Company's aggregate reserves under ownership or lease as of December 31, 2013, and sales for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Number of Sites (Crushed Stone) | Number of Sites (Sand & Gravel) | Tons Sold (000's) | Estimated Reserves (000's tons) |
| Lease Expiration |
| Reserve Life (years) |
|
Production Area | owned |
| leased |
| owned |
| leased |
| 2013 |
| 2012 |
| 2011 |
|
Anchorage, AK | — |
| — |
| 1 |
| — |
| 1,074 |
| 110 |
| 137 |
| 18,880 |
| N/A |
| 43 |
|
Hawaii | — |
| 6 |
| — |
| — |
| 1,672 |
| 1,678 |
| 1,527 |
| 57,333 |
| 2017-2064 |
| 35 |
|
Northern CA | — |
| — |
| 9 |
| 1 |
| 1,525 |
| 1,203 |
| 1,552 |
| 45,570 |
| 2018 |
| 32 |
|
Southern CA | — |
| 2 |
| — |
| — |
| 241 |
| 784 |
| 1,134 |
| 92,110 |
| 2035 |
| Over 100 |
|
Portland, OR | 1 |
| 3 |
| 5 |
| 3 |
| 3,343 |
| 2,698 |
| 3,106 |
| 231,734 |
| 2014-2055 |
| 76 |
|
Eugene, OR | 3 |
| 4 |
| 4 |
| 1 |
| 825 |
| 847 |
| 884 |
| 168,392 |
| 2016-2046 |
| Over 100 |
|
Central OR/WA/ID | 1 |
| 2 |
| 5 |
| 4 |
| 1,045 |
| 1,131 |
| 851 |
| 123,613 |
| 2015-2077 |
| Over 100 |
|
Southwest OR | 5 |
| 4 |
| 11 |
| 5 |
| 1,465 |
| 1,613 |
| 1,604 |
| 96,768 |
| 2014-2053 |
| 62 |
|
Central MT | — |
| — |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 1,236 |
| 1,200 |
| 758 |
| 28,213 |
| 2017-2027 |
| 26 |
|
Northwest MT | — |
| — |
| 7 |
| 2 |
| 1,242 |
| 1,011 |
| 1,370 |
| 65,993 |
| 2016-2020 |
| 55 |
|
Wyoming | — |
| — |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| 983 |
| 428 |
| 461 |
| 11,571 |
| 2019 |
| 19 |
|
Central MN | — |
| 1 |
| 37 |
| 24 |
| 1,578 |
| 1,714 |
| 1,520 |
| 73,429 |
| 2014-2028 |
| 46 |
|
Northern MN | 2 |
| — |
| 16 |
| 5 |
| 349 |
| 195 |
| 355 |
| 26,782 |
| 2015-2017 |
| 89 |
|
ND/SD | — |
| — |
| 3 |
| 19 |
| 1,862 |
| 1,711 |
| 1,727 |
| 30,899 |
| 2014-2031 |
| 17 |
|
Iowa | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 305 |
| 249 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
Texas | 1 |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| — |
| 672 |
| 692 |
| 1,182 |
| 12,089 |
| 2022 |
| 14 |
|
Sales from other sources | | | | | 5,601 |
| 5,965 |
| 6,319 |
| | | |
| | | | | 24,713 |
| 23,285 |
| 24,736 |
| 1,083,376 |
| | |
The 1.1 billion tons of estimated aggregate reserves at December 31, 2013, are comprised of 494 million tons that are owned and 589 million tons that are leased. Approximately 49 percent of the tons under lease have lease expiration dates of 20 years or more. The weighted average years remaining on all leases containing estimated probable aggregate reserves is approximately 28 years, including options for renewal that are at Knife River's discretion. Based on a three-year average of sales from 2011 through 2013 of leased reserves, the average time necessary to produce remaining aggregate reserves from such leases is approximately 68 years. Some sites have leases that expire prior to the exhaustion of the estimated reserves. The estimated reserve life assumes, based on Knife River's experience, that leases will be renewed to allow sufficient time to fully recover these reserves.
The changes in Knife River's aggregate reserves for the years ended December 31 are as follows:
|
| | | | | | |
| 2013 |
| 2012 |
| 2011 |
|
| (000's of tons) |
Aggregate reserves: | | | |
Beginning of year | 1,088,236 |
| 1,088,833 |
| 1,107,396 |
|
Acquisitions | 22,682 |
| 950 |
| 1,200 |
|
Sales volumes* | (19,112 | ) | (17,320 | ) | (18,417 | ) |
Other** | (8,430 | ) | 15,773 |
| (1,346 | ) |
End of year | 1,083,376 |
| 1,088,236 |
| 1,088,833 |
|
* Excludes sales from other sources. |
** Includes property sales and revisions of previous estimates. |
Environmental Matters Knife River's construction materials and contracting operations are subject to regulation customary for such operations, including federal, state and local environmental compliance and reclamation regulations. Except as to the issues described later, Knife River believes it is in substantial compliance with these regulations. Individual permits applicable to Knife River's various operations are managed largely by local operations, particularly as they relate to application, modification, renewal, compliance and reporting procedures.
Knife River's asphalt and ready-mixed concrete manufacturing plants and aggregate processing plants are subject to Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act requirements for controlling air emissions and water discharges. Some mining and construction activities also are subject to these laws. In most of the states where Knife River operates, these regulatory programs have been delegated to state and local regulatory authorities. Knife River's facilities also are subject to RCRA as it applies to the management of hazardous wastes and underground storage tank systems. These programs also have generally been delegated to the state and local authorities in the states where Knife River operates. Knife River's facilities must comply with requirements for managing wastes and underground storage tank systems.
Some Knife River activities are directly regulated by federal agencies. For example, certain in-water mining operations are subject to provisions of the Clean Water Act that are administered by the Army Corps. Knife River operates several such operations, including gravel bar skimming and dredging operations, and Knife River has the associated permits as required. The expiration dates of these permits vary, with five years generally being the longest term.
Knife River's operations also are occasionally subject to the ESA. For example, land use regulations often require environmental studies, including wildlife studies, before a permit may be granted for a new or expanded mining facility or an asphalt or concrete plant. If endangered species or their habitats are identified, ESA requirements for protection, mitigation or avoidance apply. Endangered species protection requirements are usually included as part of land use permit conditions. Typical conditions include avoidance, setbacks, restrictions on operations during certain times of the breeding or rearing season, and construction or purchase of mitigation habitat. Knife River's operations also are subject to state and federal cultural resources protection laws when new areas are disturbed for mining operations or processing plants. Land use permit applications generally require that areas proposed for mining or other surface disturbances be surveyed for cultural resources. If any are identified, they must be protected or managed in accordance with regulatory agency requirements.
The most comprehensive environmental permit requirements are usually associated with new mining operations, although requirements vary widely from state to state and even within states. In some areas, land use regulations and associated permitting requirements are minimal. However, some states and local jurisdictions have very demanding requirements for permitting new mines. Environmental impact reports are sometimes required before a mining permit application can even be considered for approval. These reports can take up to several years to complete. The report can include projected impacts of the proposed project on air and water quality, wildlife, noise levels, traffic, scenic vistas and other environmental factors. The reports generally include suggested actions to mitigate the projected adverse impacts.
Provisions for public hearings and public comments are usually included in land use permit application review procedures in the counties where Knife River operates. After taking into account environmental, mine plan and reclamation information provided by the permittee as well as comments from the public and other regulatory agencies, the local authority approves or denies the permit application. Denial is rare, but land use permits often include conditions that must be addressed by the permittee. Conditions may include property line setbacks, reclamation requirements, environmental monitoring and reporting, operating hour restrictions, financial guarantees for reclamation, and other requirements intended to protect the environment or address concerns submitted by the public or other regulatory agencies.
Knife River has been successful in obtaining mining and other land use permit approvals so that sufficient permitted reserves are available to support its operations. For mining operations, this often requires considerable advanced planning to ensure sufficient time is available to complete the permitting process before the newly permitted aggregate reserve is needed to support Knife River's operations.
Knife River's Gascoyne surface coal mine last produced coal in 1995 but continues to be subject to reclamation requirements of the SMCRA, as well as the North Dakota Surface Mining Act. Portions of the Gascoyne Mine remain under reclamation bond until the 10-year revegetation liability period has expired. A portion of the original permit has been released from bond and additional areas are currently in the process of having the bond released. Knife River's intention is to request bond release as soon as it is deemed possible with all final bond release applications being filed by 2016.
Knife River did not incur any material environmental expenditures in 2013 and, except as to what may be ultimately determined with regard to the issues described later, Knife River does not expect to incur any material expenditures related to environmental compliance with current laws and regulations through 2016.
In December 2000, Knife River - Northwest was named by the EPA as a PRP in connection with the cleanup of a commercial property site, acquired by Knife River - Northwest in 1999, and part of the Portland, Oregon, Harbor Superfund Site. For additional information, see Item 8 - Note 19.
Mine Safety The Dodd-Frank Act requires disclosure of certain mine safety information. For additional information, see Item 4 - Mine Safety Disclosures.
Construction Services
General MDU Construction Services specializes in constructing and maintaining electric and communication lines, gas pipelines, fire suppression systems, and external lighting and traffic signalization equipment. This segment also provides utility excavation services and inside electrical wiring, cabling and mechanical services, sells and distributes electrical materials, and manufactures and distributes specialty equipment. These services are provided to utilities and large manufacturing, commercial, industrial, institutional and government customers.
Construction and maintenance crews are active year round. However, activity in certain locations may be seasonal in nature due to the effects of weather.
MDU Construction Services operates a fleet of owned and leased trucks and trailers, support vehicles and specialty construction equipment, such as backhoes, excavators, trenchers, generators, boring machines and cranes. In addition, as of December 31, 2013, MDU Construction Services owned or leased facilities in 16 states. This space is used for offices, equipment yards, warehousing, storage and vehicle shops.
MDU Construction Services' backlog is comprised of the uncompleted portion of services to be performed under job-specific contracts. The backlog at December 31, 2013, was approximately $459 million compared to $325 million at December 31, 2012. MDU Construction Services expects to complete a significant amount of this backlog during 2014. Due to the nature of its contractual arrangements, in many instances MDU Construction Services' customers are not committed to the specific volumes of services to be purchased under a contract, but rather MDU Construction Services is committed to perform these services if and to the extent requested by the customer. Therefore, there can be no assurance as to the customers' requirements during a particular period or that such estimates at any point in time are predictive of future revenues.
MDU Construction Services works with the National Electrical Contractors Association, the IBEW and other trade associations on hiring and recruiting a qualified workforce.
Competition MDU Construction Services operates in a highly competitive business environment. Most of MDU Construction Services' work is obtained on the basis of competitive bids or by negotiation of either cost-plus or fixed-price contracts. The workforce and equipment are highly mobile, providing greater flexibility in the size and location of MDU Construction Services' market area. Competition is based primarily on price and reputation for quality, safety and reliability. The size and location of the services provided, as well as the state of the economy, will be factors in the number of competitors that MDU Construction Services will encounter on any particular project. MDU Construction Services believes that the diversification of the services it provides, the markets it serves throughout the United States and the management of its workforce will enable it to effectively operate in this competitive environment.
Utilities and independent contractors represent the largest customer base for this segment. Accordingly, utility and subcontract work accounts for a significant portion of the work performed by MDU Construction Services and the amount of construction contracts is dependent to a certain extent on the level and timing of maintenance and construction programs undertaken by customers. MDU Construction Services relies on repeat customers and strives to maintain successful long-term relationships with these customers.
Environmental Matters MDU Construction Services' operations are subject to regulation customary for the industry, including federal, state and local environmental compliance. MDU Construction Services believes it is in substantial compliance with these regulations.
The nature of MDU Construction Services' operations is such that few, if any, environmental permits are required. Operational convenience supports the use of petroleum storage tanks in several locations, which are permitted under state programs authorized by the EPA. MDU Construction Services has no ongoing remediation related to releases from petroleum storage tanks. MDU Construction Services' operations are conditionally exempt small-quantity waste generators, subject to minimal regulation under the RCRA. Federal permits for specific construction and maintenance jobs that may require these permits are typically obtained by the hiring entity, and not by MDU Construction Services.
MDU Construction Services did not incur any material environmental expenditures in 2013 and does not expect to incur any material capital expenditures related to environmental compliance with current laws and regulations through 2016.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The Company's business and financial results are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including those set forth below and in other documents that it files with the SEC. The factors and the other matters discussed herein are important factors that could cause actual results or outcomes for the Company to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements included elsewhere in this document.
Economic Risks
The Company's exploration and production and pipeline and energy services businesses are dependent on factors, including commodity prices and commodity price basis differentials, that are subject to various external influences that cannot be controlled.
These factors include: fluctuations in oil, NGL and natural gas production and prices; fluctuations in commodity price basis differentials; availability of economic supplies of natural gas; drilling successes in oil and natural gas operations; the timely receipt of necessary permits and approvals; the ability to contract for or to secure necessary drilling rig and service contracts and to retain employees to identify, drill for and develop reserves; the ability to acquire oil and natural gas properties; and other risks incidental to the development and operations of oil and natural gas wells, processing plants and pipeline systems. Volatility in oil, NGL and natural gas prices could negatively affect the results of operations, cash flows and asset values of the Company's exploration and production and pipeline and energy services businesses.
The regulatory approval, permitting, construction, startup and/or operation of power generation facilities and Dakota Prairie Refinery may involve unanticipated events or delays that could negatively impact the Company's business and its results of operations and cash flows.
The construction, startup and operation of power generation facilities and Dakota Prairie Refinery involve many risks, which may include: delays; breakdown or failure of equipment; inability to obtain required governmental permits and approvals; inability to complete financing; inability to negotiate acceptable equipment acquisition, construction, fuel and crude oil supply, off-take, transmission, transportation or other material agreements; changes in markets and market prices for power, crude oil and refined products; cost increases; as well as the risk of performance below expected levels of output or efficiency. Such unanticipated events could negatively impact the Company's business, its results of operations and cash flows.
Economic volatility affects the Company's operations, as well as the demand for its products and services and the value of its investments and investment returns including its pension and other postretirement benefit plans, and may have a negative impact on the Company's future revenues and cash flows.
The global demand for natural resources, interest rate changes, governmental budget constraints and the ongoing threat of terrorism can create volatility in the financial markets. Unfavorable economic conditions can negatively affect the level of public and private expenditures on projects and the timing of these projects which, in turn, can negatively affect the demand for
the Company's products and services, primarily at the Company's construction businesses. The level of demand for construction products and services could be adversely impacted by the economic conditions in the industries the Company serves, as well as in the economy in general. State and federal budget issues may negatively affect the funding available for infrastructure spending. This economic volatility could have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations, cash flows and asset values.
Changing market conditions could negatively affect the market value of assets held in the Company's pension and other postretirement benefit plans and may increase the amount and accelerate the timing of required funding contributions.
The Company relies on financing sources and capital markets. Access to these markets may be adversely affected by factors beyond the Company's control. If the Company is unable to obtain economic financing in the future, the Company's ability to execute its business plans, make capital expenditures or pursue acquisitions that the Company may otherwise rely on for future growth could be impaired. As a result, the market value of the Company's common stock may be adversely affected. If the Company issues a substantial amount of common stock it could have a dilutive effect on its existing shareholders.
The Company relies on access to both short-term borrowings, including the issuance of commercial paper, and long-term capital markets as sources of liquidity for capital requirements not satisfied by its cash flow from operations. If the Company is not able to access capital at competitive rates, the ability to implement its business plans may be adversely affected. Market disruptions or a downgrade of the Company's credit ratings may increase the cost of borrowing or adversely affect its ability to access one or more financial markets. Such disruptions could include:
| |
• | A severe prolonged economic downturn |
| |
• | The bankruptcy of unrelated industry leaders in the same line of business |
| |
• | Deterioration in capital market conditions |
| |
• | Turmoil in the financial services industry |
| |
• | Volatility in commodity prices |
Economic turmoil, market disruptions and volatility in the securities trading markets, as well as other factors including changes in the Company's results of operations, financial position and prospects, may adversely affect the market price of the Company's common stock.
The Company currently has a shelf registration statement on file with the SEC, under which the Company may issue and sell any combination of common stock and debt securities. The issuance of a substantial amount of the Company's common stock, whether sold pursuant to the registration statement, issued in connection with an acquisition or otherwise issued, or the perception that such an issuance could occur, may adversely affect the market price of the Company's common stock.
The Company is exposed to credit risk and the risk of loss resulting from the nonpayment and/or nonperformance by the Company's customers and counterparties.
If the Company's customers or counterparties were to experience financial difficulties or file for bankruptcy, the Company could experience difficulty in collecting receivables. The nonpayment and/or nonperformance by the Company's customers and counterparties could have a negative impact on the Company's results of operations and cash flows.
The backlogs at the Company's construction materials and contracting and construction services businesses are subject to delay or cancellation and may not be realized.
Backlog consists of the uncompleted portion of services to be performed under job-specific contracts. Contracts are subject to delay, default or cancellation and the contracts in the Company's backlog are subject to changes in the scope of services to be provided as well as adjustments to the costs relating to the applicable contracts. Backlog may also be affected by project delays or cancellations resulting from weather conditions, external market factors and economic factors beyond the Company's control, including the current economic slowdown. Accordingly, there is no assurance that backlog will be realized.
Actual quantities of recoverable oil, NGL and natural gas reserves and discounted future net cash flows from those reserves may vary significantly from estimated amounts. There is a risk that changes in estimates of proved reserve quantities or other factors including downward movements in prices, could result in additional future noncash write-downs of the Company's oil and natural gas properties.
The process of estimating oil, NGL and natural gas reserves is complex. Reserve estimates are based on assumptions relating to oil, NGL and natural gas pricing, drilling and operating expenses, capital expenditures, taxes, timing of operations, and the percentage of interest owned by the Company in the properties. The proved reserve estimates are prepared for each of the Company's properties by internal engineers assigned to an asset team by geographic area. The internal engineers analyze available geological, geophysical, engineering and economic data for each geographic area. The internal engineers make various assumptions regarding this data. The extent, quality and reliability of this data can vary. Although the Company has prepared its proved reserve estimates in accordance with guidelines established by the industry and the SEC, significant changes to the proved reserve estimates may occur based on actual results of production, drilling, costs and pricing.
The Company bases the estimated discounted future net cash flows from proved reserves on prices and current costs in accordance with SEC requirements. Actual future prices and costs may be significantly different. There is risk that lower SEC Defined Prices, market differentials, changes in estimates of proved reserve quantities, unsuccessful results of exploration and development efforts or changes in operating and development costs could result in additional future noncash write-downs of the Company's oil and natural gas properties.
Environmental and Regulatory Risks
The Company's operations are subject to environmental laws and regulations that may increase costs of operations, impact or limit business plans, or expose the Company to environmental liabilities.
The Company is subject to environmental laws and regulations affecting many aspects of its present and future operations, including air quality, water quality, waste management and other environmental considerations. These laws and regulations can result in increased capital, operating and other costs, cause delays as a result of litigation and administrative proceedings, and create compliance, remediation, containment, monitoring and reporting obligations, particularly with regard to laws relating to electric generation operations and oil and natural gas development and processing. These laws and regulations generally require the Company to obtain and comply with a wide variety of environmental licenses, permits, inspections and other approvals. Although the Company strives to comply with all applicable environmental laws and regulations, public and private entities, as well as private individuals, may seek injunctive relief or other remedies to enforce applicable environmental laws and regulations with which they have differing interpretations of the Company's legal or regulatory compliance. The Company cannot predict the outcome (financial or operational) of any related litigation or administrative proceedings that may arise.
Existing environmental laws and regulations may be revised and new laws and regulations seeking to protect the environment may be adopted or become applicable to the Company. These laws and regulations could require the Company to limit the use or output of certain facilities, restrict the use of certain fuels, install pollution controls, remediate environmental contamination, remove or reduce environmental hazards, or prevent or limit the development of resources. Revised or additional laws and regulations that result in increased compliance costs or additional operating restrictions, particularly if those costs are not fully recoverable from customers, could have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations and cash flows.
The EPA has issued draft regulations that outline several possible approaches for coal combustion residuals management under the RCRA. One approach, designating coal ash as a hazardous waste, would significantly change the manner and increase the costs of managing coal ash at five plants that supply electricity to customers of Montana-Dakota. This designation also could significantly increase costs for Knife River, which beneficially uses fly ash as a cement replacement in ready-mixed concrete and road base applications.
In December 2011, the EPA finalized the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards rules that will require reductions in mercury and other air emissions from coal- and oil-fired electric utility steam generating units. Montana-Dakota evaluated the pollution control technologies needed at its electric generation resources to comply with this final rule and determined that additional particulate matter control is required to control non-mercury metal emissions at the Lewis & Clark Station near Sidney, Montana. On October 9, 2013, Montana-Dakota received an order from the NDPSC approving Montana-Dakota's request for advance determination of prudence to install a baghouse at Lewis & Clark Station. Controls must be installed by April 16, 2015, or April 16, 2016, if a one-year extension is granted for installation.
Hydraulic fracturing is an important common practice used by Fidelity that involves injecting water; sand; guar, a water thickening agent; and trace amounts of chemicals under pressure into rock formations to stimulate oil, NGL and natural gas
production. Fidelity is following state regulations for well drilling and completion, including regulations related to hydraulic fracturing and disposing of recovered fluids. Fracturing fluid constituents are reported on state or national websites. The EPA is developing a study to review the potential effects of hydraulic fracturing on underground sources of drinking water; the results of that study could impact future legislation or regulation. The BLM has released draft well stimulation regulations for hydraulic fracturing operations. If implemented, the BLM regulations would only affect Fidelity's operations on BLM-administered lands. If adopted as proposed, the BLM regulations, along with other legislative initiatives and regulatory studies, proceedings or initiatives at federal or state agencies that focus on the hydraulic fracturing process, could result in additional compliance, reporting and disclosure requirements. Future legislation or regulation could increase compliance and operating costs, as well as delay or inhibit the Company's ability to develop its oil, NGL and natural gas reserves.
On August 16, 2012, the EPA published a final NSPS rule for the oil and natural gas industry. The NSPS rule phases in over two years. The first phase was effective October 15, 2012, and primarily covers natural gas wells that are hydraulically fractured. Under the new rule, gas vapors or emissions from the natural gas wells must be captured or combusted utilizing a high efficiency device. Additional reporting requirements and control devices covering oil and natural gas production equipment will be phased in for certain new oil and gas facilities with a final effective date of January 1, 2015. This new rule's impacts on Fidelity, WBI Energy Transmission and WBI Energy Midstream are not expected to be material and are likely to include implementation of recordkeeping, reporting and testing requirements and the acquisition and installation of required equipment.
Initiatives to reduce GHG emissions could adversely impact the Company's operations.
Concern that GHG emissions are contributing to global climate change has led to international, federal and state legislative and regulatory proposals to reduce or mitigate the effects of GHG emissions. On June 25, 2013, President Obama released his Climate Action Plan for the U.S. in which he stated his goal to reduce GHG emissions "in the range of 17 percent" below 2005 levels by 2020. The president issued a memorandum to the EPA on the same day, instructing the EPA to re-propose the GHG NSPS rule for new electric generation units. The EPA released the re-proposed rule on January 8, 2014, in the Federal Register, which takes the place of the rule proposed in 2012 for new electric generation units that the EPA did not finalize. This rule applies to new fossil fuel-fired electric generation units, including coal-fired units, natural gas-fired combined-cycle units and natural gas-fired simple cycle peaking units. The EPA's 1,100 pounds of carbon dioxide per MW hour emissions standard for coal-fired units does not allow for any new coal-fired electric generation to be constructed unless carbon dioxide is captured and sequestered. The EPA has not applied this new standard to existing fossil fuel-fired units or existing units that make modifications, therefore no impacts to Montana-Dakota's existing electric generating facilities are expected. However, it is not clear that the EPA will always exempt required future pollution control project modifications from GHG NSPS. If the EPA does not clearly exempt these projects, the Company's electric generation operations could be adversely impacted.
The president also directed the EPA to develop a GHG NSPS standard for existing fossil fuel-fired electric generation units by June 1, 2014, with finalization by June 1, 2015. The president did not specify a GHG standard or the format of the standard.
The primary GHG emitted from the Company's operations is carbon dioxide from combustion of fossil fuels at Montana-Dakota's electric generating facilities, particularly its coal-fired facilities. Approximately 70 percent of Montana-Dakota's owned generating capacity and more than 90 percent of the electricity it generates is from coal-fired facilities.
Montana-Dakota's existing electric generating facilities are expected to be subject to GHG laws or regulations within the next few years through a GHG NSPS for existing and modified units. Implementation of treaties, legislation or regulations to reduce GHG emissions could affect Montana-Dakota's electric utility operations by requiring expanded energy conservation efforts or increased development of renewable energy sources, as well as other mandates that could significantly increase capital expenditures and operating costs. If Montana-Dakota does not receive timely and full recovery of GHG emission compliance costs from its customers, then such costs could have an adverse impact on the results of its operations.
In addition to Montana-Dakota's electric generation operations, the GHG emissions from the Company's other operations are monitored, analyzed and reported as required in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. The Company monitors the development of GHG regulations and the potential for GHG regulations to impact all existing and future operations.
Due to the uncertain availability of technologies to control GHG emissions and the unknown obligations that potential GHG emission legislation or regulations may create, the Company cannot determine the potential financial impact on its operations.
The Company is subject to government regulations that may delay and/or have a negative impact on its business and its results of operations and cash flows. Statutory and regulatory requirements also may limit another party's ability to acquire the Company.
The Company is subject to regulation or governmental actions by federal, state and local regulatory agencies with respect to, among other things, allowed rates of return and recovery of investment and cost, financing, industry rate structures, health care legislation, tax legislation and recovery of purchased power and purchased gas costs. These governmental regulations significantly influence the Company's operating environment and may affect its ability to recover costs from its customers. The Company is unable to predict the impact on operating results from the future regulatory activities of any of these agencies. Changes in regulations or the imposition of additional regulations could have an adverse impact on the Company's results of operations and cash flows. Approval from a number of federal and state regulatory agencies would need to be obtained by any potential acquirer of the Company. The approval process could be lengthy and the outcome uncertain.
Other Risks
Weather conditions can adversely affect the Company's operations, and revenues and cash flows.
The Company's results of operations can be affected by changes in the weather. Weather conditions influence the demand for electricity and natural gas, affect the price of energy commodities, affect the ability to perform services at the construction materials and contracting and construction services businesses and affect ongoing operation and maintenance and construction and drilling activities for the pipeline and energy services and exploration and production businesses. In addition, severe weather can be destructive, causing outages, reduced oil and natural gas production, and/or property damage, which could require additional costs to be incurred. As a result, adverse weather conditions could negatively affect the Company's results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Competition is increasing in all of the Company's businesses.
All of the Company's businesses are subject to increased competition. Construction services' competition is based primarily on price and reputation for quality, safety and reliability. Construction materials products are marketed under highly competitive conditions and are subject to such competitive forces as price, service, delivery time and proximity to the customer. The electric utility and natural gas industries also are experiencing increased competitive pressures as a result of consumer demands, technological advances, volatility in natural gas prices and other factors. The pipeline and energy services business competes with several pipelines for access to natural gas supplies and gathering, transportation and storage business. The exploration and production business is subject to competition in the acquisition and development of oil and natural gas properties. The increase in competition could negatively affect the Company's results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
The Company could be subject to limitations on its ability to pay dividends.
The Company depends on earnings from its divisions and dividends from its subsidiaries to pay dividends on its common stock. Regulatory, contractual and legal limitations, as well as capital requirements and the Company's financial performance or cash flows, could limit the earnings of the Company's divisions and subsidiaries which, in turn, could restrict the Company's ability to pay dividends on its common stock and adversely affect the Company's stock price.
An increase in costs related to obligations under multiemployer pension plans could have a material negative effect on the Company's results of operations and cash flows.
Various operating subsidiaries of the Company participate in approximately 80 multiemployer pension plans for employees represented by certain unions. The Company is required to make contributions to these plans in amounts established under numerous collective bargaining agreements between the operating subsidiaries and those unions.
The Company may be obligated to increase its contributions to underfunded plans that are classified as being in endangered, seriously endangered or critical status as defined by the Pension Protection Act of 2006. Plans classified as being in one of these statuses are required to adopt RPs or FIPs to improve their funded status through increased contributions, reduced benefits or a combination of the two. Based on available information, the Company believes that approximately 45 percent of the multiemployer plans to which it contributes are currently in endangered, seriously endangered or critical status.
The Company may also be required to increase its contributions to multiemployer plans where the other participating employers in such plans withdraw from the plan and are not able to contribute an amount sufficient to fund the unfunded liabilities associated with their participants in the plans. The amount and timing of any increase in the Company's required
contributions to multiemployer pension plans may also depend upon one or more of the following factors including the outcome of collective bargaining, actions taken by trustees who manage the plans, actions taken by the plans' other participating employers, the industry for which contributions are made, future determinations that additional plans reach endangered, seriously endangered or critical status, government regulations and the actual return on assets held in the plans, among others. The Company may experience increased operating expenses as a result of the required contributions to multiemployer pension plans, which may have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
In addition, pursuant to ERISA, as amended by MPPAA, the Company could incur a partial or complete withdrawal liability upon withdrawing from a plan, exiting a market in which it does business with a union workforce or upon termination of a plan to the extent these plans are underfunded.
The Company's operations may be negatively impacted by cyber attacks or acts of terrorism.
The Company operates in industries that require continual operation of sophisticated information technology systems and network infrastructure. While the Company has developed procedures and processes that are designed to protect these systems, they may be vulnerable to failures or unauthorized access due to hacking, viruses, acts of terrorism or other causes. If the technology systems were to fail or be breached and these systems were not recovered in a timely manner, the Company's operational systems and infrastructure, such as the Company's electric generation, transmission and distribution facilities and its oil and natural gas production, storage and pipeline systems, may be unable to fulfill critical business functions. Any such disruption could result in a decrease in the Company's revenues and/or significant remediation costs which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations, financial position and cash flows. Additionally, because generation, transmission systems and gas pipelines are part of an interconnected system, a disruption elsewhere in the system could negatively impact the Company's business.
The Company's business requires access to sensitive customer data in the ordinary course of business. Despite the Company's implementation of security measures, a failure or breach of a security system could compromise sensitive and confidential information and data. Such an event could result in negative publicity, remediation costs and possible legal claims and fines which could adversely affect the Company's financial results. The Company's third party service providers that perform critical business functions or have access to sensitive and confidential information and data may also be vulnerable to security breaches and other risks that could have an adverse effect on the Company.
Other factors that could impact the Company's businesses.
The following are other factors that should be considered for a better understanding of the financial condition of the Company. These other factors may impact the Company's financial results in future periods.
| |
• | Acquisition, disposal and impairments of assets or facilities |
| |
• | Changes in operation, performance and construction of plant facilities or other assets |
| |
• | Changes in present or prospective generation |
| |
• | The ability to obtain adequate and timely cost recovery for the Company's regulated operations through regulatory proceedings |
| |
• | The availability of economic expansion or development opportunities |
| |
• | Population growth rates and demographic patterns |
| |
• | Market demand for, available supplies of, and/or costs of, energy- and construction-related products and services |
| |
• | The cyclical nature of large construction projects at certain operations |
| |
• | Changes in tax rates or policies |
| |
• | Unanticipated project delays or changes in project costs, including related energy costs |
| |
• | Unanticipated changes in operating expenses or capital expenditures |
| |
• | Labor negotiations or disputes |
| |
• | Inability of the various contract counterparties to meet their contractual obligations |
| |
• | Changes in accounting principles and/or the application of such principles to the Company |
| |
• | Changes in legal or regulatory proceedings |
| |
• | The ability to effectively integrate the operations and the internal controls of acquired companies |
| |
• | The ability to attract and retain skilled labor and key personnel |
| |
• | Increases in employee and retiree benefit costs and funding requirements |
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
The Company has no unresolved comments with the SEC.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
For information regarding legal proceedings, see Item 8 - Note 19, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
For information regarding mine safety violations or other regulatory matters required by Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act and Item 104 of Regulation S-K, see Exhibit 95 to this Form 10-K, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Part II
| |
Item 5. | Market for the Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
The Company's common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "MDU." The price range of the Company's common stock as reported by The Wall Street Journal composite tape during 2013 and 2012 and dividends declared thereon were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Common Stock Price (High) |
| Common Stock Price (Low) |
| Common Stock Dividends Declared Per Share |
|
2013 | | | |
First quarter |
| $25.00 |
|
| $21.50 |
|
| $.1725 |
|
Second quarter | 27.14 |
| 23.37 |
| .1725 |
|
Third quarter | 30.21 |
| 25.94 |
| .1725 |
|
Fourth quarter | 30.97 |
| 27.53 |
| .1775 |
|
| | |
| $.6950 |
|
2012 | | | |
First quarter |
| $22.50 |
|
| $21.14 |
|
| $.1675 |
|
Second quarter | 23.21 |
| 20.76 |
| .1675 |
|
Third quarter | 23.11 |
| 21.42 |
| .1675 |
|
Fourth quarter | 22.23 |
| 19.59 |
| .1725 |
|
| | |
| $.6750 |
|
As of December 31, 2013, the Company's common stock was held by approximately 13,900 stockholders of record.
The Company depends on earnings from its divisions and dividends from its subsidiaries to pay dividends on common stock. The declaration and payment of dividends is at the sole discretion of the board of directors, subject to limitations imposed by the Company's credit agreements, federal and state laws, and applicable regulatory limitations. For more information on factors that may limit the Company's ability to pay dividends, see Item 8 - Note 12.
The following table includes information with respect to the Company's purchase of equity securities:
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
| | | | | | | |
Period | (a) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased (1) |
| (b) Average Price Paid per Share (or Unit) |
| (c) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (2) | (d) Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (2) |
October 1 through October 31, 2013 | — |
| | | |
November 1 through November 30, 2013 | 33,027 |
|
| $30.53 |
| | |
December 1 through December 31, 2013 | 3,686 |
| 29.83 |
| | |
Total | 36,713 |
| |
| | |
(1) Represents shares of common stock purchased on the open market in connection with annual stock grants made to the Company's non-employee directors and for those directors who elected to receive additional shares of common stock in lieu of a portion of their cash retainer. (2) Not applicable. The Company does not currently have in place any publicly announced plans or programs to purchase equity securities. |
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2013 |
| 2012 |
| (a) | 2011 |
| 2010 |
| 2009 |
| (b) | 2008 |
| (c) |
Selected Financial Data | | | | |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
Operating revenues (000's): | | | | |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
Electric | $ | 257,260 |
| $ | 236,895 |
| | $ | 225,468 |
| $ | 211,544 |
| $ | 196,171 |
| | $ | 208,326 |
| |
Natural gas distribution | 851,945 |
| 754,848 |
| | 907,400 |
| 892,708 |
| 1,072,776 |
| | 1,036,109 |
| |
Pipeline and energy services | 202,068 |
| 193,157 |
| | 278,343 |
| 329,809 |
| 307,827 |
| | 532,153 |
| |
Exploration and production | 536,023 |
| 448,617 |
| | 453,586 |
| 434,354 |
| 439,655 |
| | 712,279 |
| |
Construction materials and contracting | 1,712,137 |
| 1,617,425 |
| | 1,510,010 |
| 1,445,148 |
| 1,515,122 |
| | 1,640,683 |
| |
Construction services | 1,039,839 |
| 938,558 |
| | 854,389 |
| 789,100 |
| 819,064 |
| | 1,257,319 |
| |
Other | 9,620 |
| 10,370 |
| | 11,446 |
| 7,727 |
| 9,487 |
| | 10,501 |
| |
Intersegment eliminations | (146,488 | ) | (124,439 | ) | | (190,150 | ) | (200,695 | ) | (183,601 | ) | | (394,092 | ) | |
| $ | 4,462,404 |
| $ | 4,075,431 |
| | $ | 4,050,492 |
| $ | 3,909,695 |
| $ | 4,176,501 |
| | $ | 5,003,278 |
| |
Operating income (loss) (000's): | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
Electric | $ | 54,274 |
| $ | 49,852 |
| | $ | 49,096 |
| $ | 48,296 |
| $ | 36,709 |
| | $ | 35,415 |
| |
Natural gas distribution | 78,829 |
| 67,579 |
| | 82,856 |
| 75,697 |
| 76,899 |
| | 76,887 |
| |
Pipeline and energy services | 20,046 |
| 49,139 |
| | 45,365 |
| 46,310 |
| 69,388 |
| | 49,560 |
| |
Exploration and production | 161,402 |
| (276,642 | ) | | 133,790 |
| 143,169 |
| (473,399 | ) | | 202,954 |
| |
Construction materials and contracting | 93,629 |
| 57,864 |
| | 51,092 |
| 63,045 |
| 93,270 |
| | 62,849 |
| |
Construction services | 85,246 |
| 66,531 |
| | 39,144 |
| 33,352 |
| 44,255 |
| | 81,485 |
| |
Other | 6,649 |
| 4,884 |
| | 5,024 |
| 858 |
| (219 | ) | | 2,887 |
| |
Intersegment eliminations | (7,176 | ) | — |
| | — |
| — |
| — |
| | — |
| |
| $ | 492,899 |
| $ | 19,207 |
| | $ | 406,367 |
| $ | 410,727 |
| $ | (153,097 | ) | | $ | 512,037 |
| |
Earnings (loss) on common stock (000's): | | | | |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
Electric | $ | 34,837 |
| $ | 30,634 |
| | $ | 29,258 |
| $ | 28,908 |
| $ | 24,099 |
| | $ | 18,755 |
| |
Natural gas distribution | 37,656 |
| 29,409 |
| | 38,398 |
| 36,944 |
| 30,796 |
| | 34,774 |
| |
Pipeline and energy services | 7,629 |
| 26,588 |
| | 23,082 |
| 23,208 |
| 37,845 |
| | 26,367 |
| |
Exploration and production | 94,450 |
| (177,283 | ) | | 80,282 |
| 85,638 |
| (296,730 | ) | | 122,326 |
| |
Construction materials and contracting | 50,946 |
| 32,420 |
| | 26,430 |
| 29,609 |
| 47,085 |
| | 30,172 |
| |
Construction services | 52,213 |
| 38,429 |
| | 21,627 |
| 17,982 |
| 25,589 |
| | 49,782 |
| |
Other | 5,136 |
| 4,797 |
| | 6,190 |
| 21,046 |
| 7,357 |
| | 10,812 |
| |
Intersegment eliminations | (4,307 | ) | — |
| | — |
| — |
| — |
| | — |
| |
Earnings (loss) on common stock before income (loss) from discontinued operations | 278,560 |
| (15,006 | ) | | 225,267 |
| 243,335 |
| (123,959 | ) | | 292,988 |
| |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax | (312 | ) | 13,567 |
| | (12,926 | ) | (3,361 | ) | — |
| | — |
| |
| $ | 278,248 |
| $ | (1,439 | ) | | $ | 212,341 |
| $ | 239,974 |
| $ | (123,959 | ) | | $ | 292,988 |
| |
| | | | | | | | | |
Earnings (loss) per common share before discontinued operations - diluted | $ | 1.47 |
| $ | (.08 | ) | | $ | 1.19 |
| $ | 1.29 |
| $ | (.67 | ) | | $ | 1.59 |
| |
Discontinued operations, net of tax | — |
| .07 |
| | (.07 | ) | (.02 | ) | — |
| | — |
| |
| $ | 1.47 |
| $ | (.01 | ) | | $ | 1.12 |
| $ | 1.27 |
| $ | (.67 | ) | | $ | 1.59 |
| |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2013 |
| 2012 |
| (a) | 2011 |
| 2010 |
| 2009 |
| (b) | 2008 |
| (c) |
Common Stock Statistics | | | | |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted (000's) | 189,693 |
| 188,826 |
| | 188,905 |
| 188,229 |
| 185,175 |
| | 183,807 |
| |
Dividends declared per common share | $ | .6950 |
| $ | .6750 |
| | $ | .6550 |
| $ | .6350 |
| $ | .6225 |
| | $ | .6000 |
| |
Book value per common share | $ | 15.01 |
| $ | 13.95 |
| | $ | 14.62 |
| $ | 14.22 |
| $ | 13.61 |
| | $ | 14.95 |
| |
Market price per common share (year end) | $ | 30.55 |
| $ | 21.24 |
| | $ | 21.46 |
| $ | 20.27 |
| $ | 23.60 |
| | $ | 21.58 |
| |
Market price ratios: |
|
| | | | |
| |
| | |
| |
Dividend payout | 47 | % | (d) |
| | 58 | % | 50 | % | (d) |
| | 38 | % | |
Yield | 2.3 | % | 3.2 | % | | 3.1 | % | 3.2 | % | 2.7 | % | | 2.9 | % | |
Market value as a percent of book value | 203.5 | % | 152.3 | % | | 146.8 | % | 142.5 | % | 173.4 | % | | 144.3 | % | |
(a) Reflects $246.8 million of after-tax noncash write-downs of oil and natural gas properties.
(b) Reflects a $384.4 million after-tax noncash write-down of oil and natural gas properties.
(c) Reflects an $84.2 million after-tax noncash write-down of oil and natural gas properties.
(d) Not meaningful due to effects of the after-tax noncash write-down(s), as previously discussed.
Note: Intermountain, a natural gas distribution business, was acquired on October 1, 2008.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2013 |
| 2012 |
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| 2009 |
| 2008 |
|
General | | | | | | |
Total assets (000's) | $ | 7,061,332 |
| $ | 6,682,491 |
| $ | 6,556,125 |
| $ | 6,303,549 |
| $ | 5,990,952 |
| $ | 6,587,845 |
|
Total long-term debt (000's) | $ | 1,854,563 |
| $ | 1,744,975 |
| $ | 1,424,678 |
| $ | 1,506,752 |
| $ | 1,499,306 |
| $ | 1,647,302 |
|
Capitalization ratios: | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
|
Common equity | 60 | % | 60 | % | 66 | % | 64 | % | 63 | % | 61 | % |
Total debt | 40 |
| 40 |
| 34 |
| 36 |
| 37 |
| 39 |
|
| 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % |
Electric | | | | | | |
Retail sales (thousand kWh) | 3,173,086 |
| 2,996,528 |
| 2,878,852 |
| 2,785,710 |
| 2,663,560 |
| 2,663,452 |
|
Electric system summer and firm purchase contract ZRCs (Interconnected system) | 583.5 |
| 552.8 |
| 572.8 |
| 553.3 |
| (a) |
| (a) |
|
Electric system peak demand obligation, including firm purchase contracts, ZRCs (Interconnected system) | 508.3 |
| 550.7 |
| 524.2 |
| 529.5 |
| (a) |
| (a) |
|
Demand peak - kW (Interconnected system) | 573,587 |
| 573,587 |
| 535,761 |
| 525,643 |
| 525,643 |
| 525,643 |
|
Electricity produced (thousand kWh) | 2,430,001 |
| 2,299,686 |
| 2,488,337 |
| 2,472,288 |
| 2,203,665 |
| 2,538,439 |
|
Electricity purchased (thousand kWh) | 971,261 |
| 870,516 |
| 645,567 |
| 521,156 |
| 682,152 |
| 516,654 |
|
Average cost of fuel and purchased power per kWh | $ | .025 |
| $ | .023 |
| $ | .021 |
| $ | .021 |
| $ | .023 |
| $ | .025 |
|
Natural Gas Distribution (b) | | | | |
| |
| |
|
Sales (Mdk) | 108,260 |
| 93,810 |
| 103,237 |
| 95,480 |
| 102,670 |
| 87,924 |
|
Transportation (Mdk) | 149,490 |
| 132,010 |
| 124,227 |
| 135,823 |
| 132,689 |
| 103,504 |
|
Degree days (% of normal) | | | | |
| |
| |
|
Montana-Dakota/Great Plains | 105 | % | 84 | % | 101 | % | 98 | % | 104 | % | 103 | % |
Cascade | 98 | % | 96 | % | 103 | % | 96 | % | 105 | % | 108 | % |
Intermountain | 110 | % | 91 | % | 107 | % | 100 | % | 107 | % | 90 | % |
Pipeline and Energy Services | | | | |
| |
| |
|
Transportation (Mdk) | 178,598 |
| 137,720 |
| 113,217 |
| 140,528 |
| 163,283 |
| 138,003 |
|
Gathering (Mdk) | 40,737 |
| 47,084 |
| 66,500 |
| 77,154 |
| 92,598 |
| 102,064 |
|
Customer natural gas storage balance (Mdk) | 26,693 |
| 43,731 |
| 36,021 |
| 58,784 |
| 61,506 |
| 30,598 |
|
Exploration and Production | | | | |
| |
| |
|
Production: | | | | |
| |
| |
|
Oil (MBbls) | 4,815 |
| 3,694 |
| 2,724 |
| 2,767 |
| 2,557 |
| 2,232 |
|
NGL (MBbls) | 781 |
| 828 |
| 776 |
| 495 |
| 554 |
| 576 |
|
Natural gas (MMcf) | 28,008 |
| 33,214 |
| 45,598 |
| 50,391 |
| 56,632 |
| 65,457 |
|
Total production (MBOE) | 10,264 |
| 10,058 |
| 11,099 |
| 11,661 |
| 12,550 |
| 13,717 |
|
Average realized prices (excluding realized and unrealized gain/loss on commodity derivatives): | | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Oil (per Bbl) | $ | 89.70 |
| $ | 84.84 |
| $ | 91.62 |
| $ | 70.61 |
| $ | 53.57 |
| $ | 89.41 |
|
NGL (per Bbl) | $ | 37.39 |
| $ | 39.81 |
| $ | 54.06 |
| $ | 44.93 |
| $ | 32.18 |
| $ | 54.65 |
|
Natural gas (per Mcf) | $ | 2.89 |
| $ | 2.08 |
| $ | 3.30 |
| $ | 3.57 |
| $ | 2.99 |
| $ | 7.29 |
|
Average realized prices (including realized gain/loss on commodity derivatives): | | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Oil (per Bbl) | $ | 89.35 |
| $ | 86.54 |
| $ | 86.20 |
| $ | 69.59 |
| $ | 50.67 |
| $ | 88.66 |
|
NGL (per Bbl) | $ | 37.39 |
| $ | 39.81 |
| $ | 54.06 |
| $ | 44.93 |
| $ | 32.18 |
| $ | 54.65 |
|
Natural gas (per Mcf) | $ | 2.96 |
| $ | 2.91 |
| $ | 3.84 |
| $ | 4.36 |
| $ | 5.16 |
| $ | 7.38 |
|
Proved reserves: | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
Oil (MBbls) | 41,019 |
| 33,453 |
| 27,005 |
| 25,666 |
| 25,930 |
| 25,238 |
|
NGL (MBbls) | 6,602 |
| 7,153 |
| 7,342 |
| 7,201 |
| 8,286 |
| 9,110 |
|
Natural gas (MMcf) | 198,445 |
| 239,278 |
| 379,827 |
| 448,397 |
| 448,425 |
| 604,282 |
|
Total proved reserves (MBOE) | 80,695 |
| 80,486 |
| 97,651 |
| 107,599 |
| 108,954 |
| 135,062 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2013 |
| 2012 |
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| 2009 |
| 2008 |
|
Construction Materials and Contracting | | | | |
| |
| |
|
Sales (000's): | | | | |
| |
| |
|
Aggregates (tons) | 24,713 |
| 23,285 |
| 24,736 |
| 23,349 |
| 23,995 |
| 31,107 |
|
Asphalt (tons) | 6,228 |
| 5,988 |
| 6,709 |
| 6,279 |
| 6,360 |
| 5,846 |
|
Ready-mixed concrete (cubic yards) | 3,223 |
| 3,157 |
| 2,864 |
| 2,764 |
| 3,042 |
| 3,729 |
|
Aggregate reserves (000's tons) | 1,083,376 |
| 1,088,236 |
| 1,088,833 |
| 1,107,396 |
| 1,125,491 |
| 1,145,161 |
|
(a) Information not available for periods prior to 2010. (b) Intermountain was acquired on October 1, 2008. |
| |
Item 7. | Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Overview
The Company's strategy is to apply its expertise in energy and transportation infrastructure industries to increase market share, increase profitability and enhance shareholder value through:
| |
• | Organic growth as well as a continued disciplined approach to the acquisition of well-managed companies and properties |
| |
• | The elimination of system-wide cost redundancies through increased focus on integration of operations and standardization and consolidation of various support services and functions across companies within the organization |
| |
• | The development of projects that are accretive to earnings per share and return on invested capital |
The Company has capabilities to fund its growth and operations through various sources, including internally generated funds, commercial paper facilities, revolving credit facilities and the issuance from time to time of debt and equity securities. For more information on the Company's net capital expenditures, see Liquidity and Capital Commitments.
The key strategies for each of the Company's business segments and certain related business challenges are summarized below. For a summary of the Company's business segments, see Item 8 - Note 15.
Key Strategies and Challenges
Electric and Natural Gas Distribution
Strategy Provide safe and reliable competitively priced energy and related services to customers. The electric and natural gas distribution segments continually seek opportunities to retain, grow and expand their customer base through extensions of existing operations, including building and upgrading electric generation and transmission and natural gas systems, and through selected acquisitions of companies and properties at prices that will provide stable cash flows and an opportunity for the Company to earn a competitive return on investment.
Challenges Both segments are subject to extensive regulation in the state jurisdictions where they conduct operations with respect to costs and permitted returns on investment as well as subject to certain operational, system integrity and environmental regulations. These regulations can require substantial investment to upgrade facilities. The ability of these segments to grow through acquisitions is subject to significant competition. In addition, the ability of both segments to grow service territory and customer base is affected by the economic environment of the markets served and competition from other energy providers and fuels. The construction of any new electric generating facilities, transmission lines and other service facilities are subject to increasing cost and lead time, extensive permitting procedures, and federal and state legislative and regulatory initiatives, which will necessitate increases in electric energy prices. Legislative and regulatory initiatives to increase renewable energy resources and reduce GHG emissions could impact the price and demand for electricity and natural gas.
Pipeline and Energy Services
Strategy Utilize the segment's existing expertise in energy infrastructure and related services to increase market share and profitability through optimization of existing operations, internal growth, investments in and acquisitions of energy-related assets and companies. Incremental and new growth opportunities include: access to new energy sources for storage, gathering and transportation services; expansion of existing gathering, transmission and storage facilities; incremental expansion of pipeline capacity; expansion of midstream business to include liquid pipelines and processing/refining activities; and expansion of related energy services.
Challenges Challenges for this segment include: energy price volatility; natural gas basis differentials; environmental and regulatory requirements; recruitment and retention of a skilled workforce; and competition from other pipeline and energy services companies.
Exploration and Production
Strategy Apply technology and utilize existing exploration and production expertise, with a focus on operated properties, to increase production and reserves from existing leaseholds, and to seek additional reserves and production opportunities both in new and existing areas to further expand the segment's asset base. By optimizing existing operations and taking advantage of new and incremental growth opportunities, this segment is focused on balancing the oil and natural gas commodity mix to maximize profitability with its goal to add value by increasing both reserves and production over the long term so as to generate competitive returns on investment.
Challenges Volatility in natural gas and oil prices; timely receipt of necessary permits and approvals; environmental and regulatory requirements; recruitment and retention of a skilled workforce; availability of drilling rigs, materials, auxiliary equipment and industry-related field services; inflationary pressure on development and operating costs; and competition from other exploration and production companies are ongoing challenges for this segment.
Construction Materials and Contracting
Strategy Focus on high-growth strategic markets located near major transportation corridors and desirable mid-sized metropolitan areas; strengthen long-term, strategic aggregate reserve position through purchase and/or lease opportunities; enhance profitability through cost containment, margin discipline and vertical integration of the segment's operations; develop and recruit talented employees; and continue growth through organic and acquisition opportunities. Vertical integration allows the segment to manage operations from aggregate mining to final lay-down of concrete and asphalt, with control of and access to permitted aggregate reserves being significant. A key element of the Company's long-term strategy for this business is to further expand its market presence in the higher-margin materials business (rock, sand, gravel, liquid asphalt, asphalt concrete, ready-mixed concrete and related products), complementing and expanding on the Company's expertise.
Challenges Recruitment and retention of key personnel and volatility in the cost of raw materials such as diesel, gasoline, liquid asphalt, cement and steel, continue to be a concern. This business unit expects to continue cost containment efforts, positioning its operations for the resurgence in the private market, while continuing the emphasis on industrial, energy and public works projects.
Construction Services
Strategy Provide a superior return on investment by: building new and strengthening existing customer relationships; effectively controlling costs; retaining, developing and recruiting talented employees; and focusing our efforts on projects that will permit higher margins while properly managing risk.
Challenges This segment operates in highly competitive markets with many jobs subject to competitive bidding. Maintenance of effective operational and cost controls, retention of key personnel, managing through downturns in the economy and effective management of working capital are ongoing challenges.
For more information on the risks and challenges the Company faces as it pursues its growth strategies and other factors that should be considered for a better understanding of the Company's financial condition, see Item 1A - Risk Factors. For more information on each segment's key growth strategies, projections and certain assumptions, see Prospective Information.
For information pertinent to various commitments and contingencies, see Item 8 - Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Earnings Overview
The following table summarizes the contribution to consolidated earnings (loss) by each of the Company's businesses.
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Years ended December 31, | 2013 |
| 2012 |
| 2011 |
|
| (Dollars in millions, where applicable) |
Electric | $ | 34.8 |
| $ | 30.6 |
| $ | 29.2 |
|
Natural gas distribution | 37.7 |
| 29.4 |
| 38.4 |
|
Pipeline and energy services | 7.6 |
| 26.6 |
| 23.1 |
|
Exploration and production | 94.5 |
| (177.2 | ) | 80.3 |
|
Construction materials and contracting | 50.9 |
| 32.4 |
| 26.4 |
|
Construction services | 52.2 |
| 38.4 |
| 21.6 |
|
Other | 5.1 |
| 4.8 |
| 6.2 |
|
Intersegment eliminations | (4.3 | ) | — |
| — |
|
Earnings (loss) before discontinued operations | 278.5 |
| (15.0 | ) | 225.2 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax | (.3 | ) | 13.6 |
| (12.9 | ) |
Earnings (loss) on common stock | $ | 278.2 |
| $ | (1.4 | ) | $ | 212.3 |
|
Earnings (loss) per common share - basic: | |
| |
| |
|
Earnings (loss) before discontinued operations | $ | 1.47 |
| $ | (.08 | ) | $ | 1.19 |
|
Discontinued operations, net of tax | — |
| .07 |
| (.07 | ) |
Earnings (loss) per common share - basic | $ | 1.47 |
| $ | (.01 | ) | $ | 1.12 |
|
Earnings (loss) per common share - diluted: | |
| |
| |
|
Earnings (loss) before discontinued operations | $ | 1.47 |
| $ | (.08 | ) | $ | 1.19 |
|
Discontinued operations, net of tax | — |
| .07 |
| (.07 | ) |
Earnings (loss) per common share - diluted | $ | 1.47 |
| $ | (.01 | ) | $ | 1.12 |
|
2013 compared to 2012 Consolidated earnings for 2013 increased $279.6 million from the prior year. This increase was due to:
| |
• | Absence of the write-downs of oil and natural gas properties of $246.8 million (after tax), as discussed in Item 8 - Note 1, increased oil production and higher average realized natural gas and oil prices, partially offset by a lower realized gain on commodity derivatives of $21.1 million (after tax), higher depreciation, depletion and amortization expense, decreased natural gas production, higher production taxes, as well as higher general and administrative expense at the exploration and production business |
| |
• | Higher asphalt and aggregate margins and volumes at the construction materials and contracting business |
| |
• | Higher workloads and margins in the Western and Central regions, as well as higher equipment sales and rental revenue and margins at the construction services business |
| |
• | Increased retail sales volumes and a gain on the sale of a nonregulated appliance service and repair business, partially offset by higher operation and maintenance expense, as well as higher depreciation, depletion and amortization expense at the natural gas distribution business |
Partially offsetting these increases were:
| |
• | A net benefit in 2013 of $1.5 million (after tax) compared to $15.0 million (after tax) in 2012, related to the natural gas gathering operations litigation, as discussed in Item 8 - Note 19, as well as an impairment of coalbed natural gas gathering assets of $9.0 million (after tax) in 2013 compared to an impairment of $1.7 million (after tax) in 2012, as discussed in Item 8 - Note 1, at the pipeline and energy services business |
| |
• | Loss from discontinued operations of $300,000 (after tax) in 2013, compared to income from discontinued operations of $13.6 million (after tax) in 2012, primarily due to the absence in 2013 of a net benefit in 2012 related to the reversal of an arbitration charge resulting from a favorable court ruling, as discussed in Item 8 - Note 3 |
2012 compared to 2011 Consolidated earnings for 2012 decreased $213.7 million from the prior year. This decrease was due to:
| |
• | Noncash write-downs of oil and natural gas properties of $246.8 million (after tax), lower average realized natural gas prices, decreased natural gas production, as well as higher depreciation, depletion and amortization expense, partially offset by increased oil production at the exploration and production business |
| |
• | Decreased retail sales volumes at the natural gas distribution business, largely resulting from warmer weather than last year |
Partially offsetting these decreases were:
| |
• | Income from discontinued operations of $13.6 million (after tax), largely related to a benefit from an arbitration charge reversal resulting from a favorable court ruling, as discussed in Item 8 - Note 3 |
| |
• | Higher workloads and margins in the Central and Western regions, higher equipment sales and rental margins, as well as higher margins in the Mountain region, partially offset by higher general and administrative expense at the construction services business |
| |
• | Higher ready-mixed concrete and other product line margins and volumes, increased construction margins, as well as higher liquid asphalt oil margins and volumes, partially offset by lower gains from the sale of property, plant and equipment and lower aggregate and asphalt margins and volumes at the construction materials and contracting business |
| |
• | Lower operation and maintenance expense from existing operations largely related to a $15.0 million (after tax) net benefit related to the natural gas gathering operations litigation, as discussed in Item 8 - Note 19, partially offset by lower natural gas gathering volumes from existing operations at the pipeline and energy services business |
Financial and Operating Data
Below are key financial and operating data for each of the Company's businesses.
Electric
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Years ended December 31, | 2013 |
| 2012 |
| 2011 |
|
| (Dollars in millions, where applicable) |
Operating revenues | $ | 257.3 |
| $ | 236.9 |
| $ | 225.5 |
|
Operating expenses: | | | |
|
Fuel and purchased power | 83.5 |
| 72.4 |
| 64.5 |
|
Operation and maintenance | 76.5 |
| 71.8 |
| 70.3 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization | 32.8 |
| 32.5 |
| 32.2 |
|
Taxes, other than income | 10.2 |
| 10.3 |
| 9.4 |
|
| 203.0 |
| 187.0 |
| 176.4 |
|
Operating income | 54.3 |
| 49.9 |
| 49.1 |
|
Earnings | $ | 34.8 |
| $ | 30.6 |
| $ | 29.2 |
|
Retail sales (million kWh) | 3,173.1 |
| 2,996.5 |
| 2,878.9 |
|
Average cost of fuel and purchased power per kWh | $ | .025 |
| $ | .023 |
| $ | .021 |
|
2013 compared to 2012 Electric earnings increased $4.2 million (14 percent) compared to the prior year due to:
| |
• | Higher electric retail sales margins, including the result of 6 percent higher volumes, primarily to residential, commercial and industrial customers due to increased residential customer growth and weather variances from last year |
| |
• | Higher other income, largely higher allowance for funds used during construction of $800,000 (after tax) |
These increases were partially offset by higher operation and maintenance expense, which includes $2.3 million (after tax) largely related to higher payroll-related costs and increased contract services, offset in part by lower benefit-related costs.
2012 compared to 2011 Electric earnings increased $1.4 million (5 percent) compared to the prior year due to:
| |
• | Higher retail sales volumes of 4 percent, primarily to small commercial and industrial and residential customers, reflecting increased demand due to warmer summer weather than last year, as well as increased customer growth, offset in part by decreased volumes to large commercial and industrial customers |
| |
• | Higher other income, largely higher allowance for funds used during construction of $900,000 (after tax) |
| |
• | Lower net interest expense, which includes $900,000 (after tax) due in part to higher capitalized interest |
Partially offsetting these increases were:
| |
• | Higher income taxes, including $1.4 million which is partially related to the absence of an income tax benefit related to favorable resolutions of certain income tax matters in 2011 |
| |
• | Increased taxes other than income of $600,000 (after tax), primarily related to higher property taxes |
| |
• | Higher operation and maintenance expense, which includes $500,000 (after tax) largely related to increased contract services at certain of the Company's electric generation stations, as well as higher payroll-related costs, partially offset by lower benefit-related costs |
Natural Gas Distribution
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Years ended December 31, | 2013 |
| 2012 |
| 2011 |
|
| (Dollars in millions, where applicable) |
Operating revenues | $ | 851.9 |
| $ | 754.8 |
| $ | 907.4 |
|
Operating expenses: | | | |
|
Purchased natural gas sold | 534.8 |
| 457.4 |
| 594.6 |
|
Operation and maintenance | 142.3 |
| 139.4 |
| 137.3 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization | 50.0 |
| 45.7 |
| 44.6 |
|
Taxes, other than income | 46.0 |
| 44.7 |
| 48.0 |
|
| 773.1 |
| 687.2 |
| 824.5 |
|
Operating income | 78.8 |
| 67.6 |
| 82.9 |
|
Earnings | $ | 37.7 |
| $ | 29.4 |
| $ | 38.4 |
|
Volumes (MMdk): | | | |
|
Sales | 108.3 |
| 93.8 |
| 103.3 |
|
Transportation | 149.5 |
| 132.0 |
| 124.2 | |