UNH 2012.6.30 10Q
 
 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
__________________________________________________________ 
Form 10-Q
__________________________________________________________ 
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2012
or
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM _______ TO _______
Commission file number: 1-10864
__________________________________________________________ 
    
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 __________________________________________________________ 
Minnesota
 
41-1321939
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 
 
 
UnitedHealth Group Center
9900 Bren Road East
Minnetonka, Minnesota
 
55343
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Zip Code)
(952) 936-1300
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
__________________________________________________________  
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer
x
 
Accelerated filer
o
 
Non-accelerated filer
o
 
Smaller reporting company
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes o No x
As of July 31, 2012, there were 1,032,705,691 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, $.01 par value per share, issued and outstanding.
 
 
 
 
 



UNITEDHEALTH GROUP
Table of Contents
 
 
 
Page
 
 
 
 
Item 1.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
 
 
 
 
Item 1.
Item 1A.
Item 2.
Item 6.



Table of Contents


PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION 

ITEM 1.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
UnitedHealth Group
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
(in millions, except per share data)
 
June 30,
2012
 
December 31,
2011
Assets
 
 
 
 
Current assets:
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
11,578

 
$
9,429

Short-term investments
 
2,852

 
2,577

Accounts receivable, net
 
2,648

 
2,294

Other current receivables, net
 
1,887

 
2,255

Assets under management
 
2,628

 
2,708

Deferred income taxes
 
461

 
472

Prepaid expenses and other current assets
 
673

 
615

Total current assets
 
22,727

 
20,350

Long-term investments
 
16,698

 
16,166

Property, equipment and capitalized software, net
 
2,589

 
2,515

Goodwill
 
26,191

 
23,975

Other intangible assets, net
 
3,141

 
2,795

Other assets
 
2,119

 
2,088

Total assets
 
$
73,465

 
$
67,889

Liabilities and shareholders’ equity
 
 
 
 
Current liabilities:
 
 
 
 
Medical costs payable
 
$
10,491

 
$
9,799

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
 
6,460

 
6,853

Other policy liabilities
 
5,358

 
5,063

Current maturities of long-term debt
 
1,461

 
982

Unearned revenues
 
3,853

 
1,225

Total current liabilities
 
27,623

 
23,922

Long-term debt, less current maturities
 
11,156

 
10,656

Future policy benefits
 
2,441

 
2,445

Deferred income taxes and other liabilities
 
2,870

 
2,574

Total liabilities
 
44,090

 
39,597

Commitments and contingencies (Note 9)
 
 
 


Shareholders’ equity:
 
 
 
 
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value - 10 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding
 

 

Common stock, $0.01 par value - 3,000 shares authorized;
1,024 and 1,039 issued and outstanding
 
10

 
10

Retained earnings
 
28,896

 
27,821

Accumulated other comprehensive income
 
469

 
461

Total shareholders’ equity
 
29,375

 
28,292

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
 
$
73,465

 
$
67,889


See Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

1

Table of Contents


UnitedHealth Group
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
 
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions, except per share data)
 
2012
 
2011
 
2012
 
2011
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Premiums
 
$
24,609

 
$
22,813

 
$
49,240

 
$
45,816

Services
 
1,800

 
1,656

 
3,591

 
3,254

Products
 
678

 
605

 
1,366

 
1,254

Investment and other income
 
178

 
160

 
350

 
342

Total revenues
 
27,265

 
25,234

 
54,547

 
50,666

Operating costs:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Medical costs
 
20,013

 
18,578

 
39,952

 
37,303

Operating costs
 
4,080

 
3,733

 
8,176

 
7,350

Cost of products sold
 
620

 
554

 
1,254

 
1,153

Depreciation and amortization
 
326

 
270

 
622

 
540

Total operating costs
 
25,039

 
23,135

 
50,004

 
46,346

Earnings from operations
 
2,226

 
2,099

 
4,543

 
4,320

Interest expense
 
(153
)
 
(119
)
 
(301
)
 
(237
)
Earnings before income taxes
 
2,073

 
1,980

 
4,242

 
4,083

Provision for income taxes
 
(736
)
 
(713
)
 
(1,517
)
 
(1,470
)
Net earnings
 
$
1,337

 
$
1,267

 
$
2,725

 
$
2,613

Basic net earnings per common share
 
$
1.30

 
$
1.18

 
$
2.64

 
$
2.42

Diluted net earnings per common share
 
$
1.27

 
$
1.16

 
$
2.59

 
$
2.38

Basic weighted-average number of common shares outstanding
 
1,028

 
1,075

 
1,034

 
1,079

Dilutive effect of common stock equivalents
 
21

 
19

 
20

 
17

Diluted weighted-average number of common shares outstanding
 
1,049

 
1,094

 
1,054

 
1,096

Anti-dilutive shares excluded from the calculation of dilutive effect of common stock equivalents
 
10

 
44

 
17

 
52

Cash dividends declared per common share
 
$
0.2125

 
$
0.1625

 
$
0.3750

 
$
0.2875


See Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

2

Table of Contents



UnitedHealth Group
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Unaudited)

 
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions)
 
2012
 
2011
 
2012
 
2011
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net earnings
 
$
1,337

 
$
1,267

 
$
2,725

 
$
2,613

Other comprehensive income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gross unrealized holding gains on investment securities during the period
 
81

 
198

 
111

 
161

Income tax expense
 
(35
)
 
(73
)
 
(46
)
 
(59
)
Total unrealized gains, net of tax
 
46

 
125

 
65

 
102

Gross reclassification adjustment for net realized gains included in net earnings
 
(50
)
 
(21
)
 
(89
)
 
(69
)
Income tax effect
 
19

 
8

 
33

 
25

Total reclassification adjustment, net of tax
 
(31
)
 
(13
)
 
(56
)
 
(44
)
Foreign currency translation adjustments
 
(4
)
 
13

 
(1
)
 
22

Other comprehensive income
 
11

 
125

 
8

 
80

Comprehensive income
 
$
1,348

 
$
1,392

 
$
2,733

 
$
2,693


See Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

3

Table of Contents


UnitedHealth Group
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity
(Unaudited)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Additional Paid-In Capital
 
Retained Earnings
 
 
Total Shareholders' Equity
 
 
Common Stock
 
 
 
Net Unrealized Gains on Investments
 
Foreign Currency Translation (Losses) Gains
 
(in millions)
 
Shares
 
Amount
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at January 1, 2012
 
1,039

 
$
10

 
$

 
$
27,821

 
$
476

 
$
(15
)
 
$
28,292

Net earnings
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2,725

 

 

 
2,725

Other comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
9

 
(1
)
 
8

Issuances of common stock, and related tax effects
 
18

 

 
194

 
 
 

 

 
194

Share-based compensation, and related tax benefits
 
 
 
 
 
351

 
 
 

 

 
351

Common stock repurchases
 
(33
)
 

 
(545
)
 
(1,264
)
 
 
 
 
 
(1,809
)
Common stock dividends
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(386
)
 

 

 
(386
)
Balance at June 30, 2012
 
1,024

 
$
10

 
$

 
$
28,896

 
$
485

 
$
(16
)
 
$
29,375

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 
 
Balance at January 1, 2011
 
1,086

 
$
11

 
$

 
$
25,562

 
$
280

 
$
(28
)
 
$
25,825

Net earnings
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2,613

 

 

 
2,613

Other comprehensive income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
58

 
22

 
80

Issuances of common stock, and related tax effects
 
11

 

 
153

 
 
 

 

 
153

Share-based compensation, and related tax benefits
 
 
 
 
 
256

 
 
 

 

 
256

Common stock repurchases
 
(28
)
 

 
(409
)
 
(846
)
 
 
 
 
 
(1,255
)
Common stock dividends
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(309
)
 

 

 
(309
)
Balance at June 30, 2011
 
1,069

 
$
11

 
$

 
$
27,020

 
$
338

 
$
(6
)
 
$
27,363


See Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

4

Table of Contents


UnitedHealth Group
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
 
 
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions)
 
2012
 
2011
Operating activities
 
 
 
 
Net earnings
 
$
2,725

 
$
2,613

Noncash items:
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
 
622

 
540

Deferred income taxes
 
108

 
264

Share-based compensation
 
242

 
218

Other, net
 
(163
)
 
(62
)
Net change in other operating items, net of effects from acquisitions and changes in AARP balances:
 
 
 
 
Accounts receivable
 
(188
)
 
(843
)
Other assets
 
(27
)
 
(281
)
Medical costs payable
 
298

 
120

Accounts payable and other liabilities
 
23

 
(128
)
Other policy liabilities
 
(365
)
 
37

Unearned revenues
 
2,496

 
(59
)
Cash flows from operating activities
 
5,771

 
2,419

Investing activities
 
 
 
 
Purchases of investments
 
(4,946
)
 
(4,479
)
Sales of investments
 
2,090

 
1,985

Maturities of investments
 
2,322

 
1,901

Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash assumed
 
(2,404
)
 
(827
)
Cash received from dispositions
 

 
378

Purchases of property, equipment and capitalized software
 
(465
)
 
(516
)
Cash flows used for investing activities
 
(3,403
)
 
(1,558
)
Financing activities
 
 
 
 
Common stock repurchases
 
(1,809
)
 
(1,255
)
Proceeds from common stock issuances
 
410

 
225

Dividends paid
 
(386
)
 
(309
)
Proceeds from commercial paper, net
 

 
154

Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
 
995

 
747

Repayments of long-term debt
 

 
(955
)
Customer funds administered
 
1,108

 
1,228

Checks outstanding in excess of bank deposits
 
(290
)
 
(88
)
Other, net
 
(247
)
 
44

Cash flows used for financing activities
 
(219
)
 
(209
)
Increase in cash and cash equivalents
 
2,149

 
652

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
 
9,429

 
9,123

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
 
$
11,578

 
$
9,775


See Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

5

Table of Contents


UNITEDHEALTH GROUP
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1.
Basis of Presentation
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (also referred to as “UnitedHealth Group” and the “Company”) is a diversified health and well-being company dedicated to helping people live healthier lives and making health care work better. We offer a broad spectrum of products and services through two distinct platforms: UnitedHealthcare, which provides health care coverage and benefits services; and Optum, which provides information and technology-enabled health services.
The Company has prepared the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements according to U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and has included the accounts of UnitedHealth Group and its subsidiaries. The Company has eliminated intercompany balances and transactions. The year-end condensed consolidated balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP. In accordance with the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Company has omitted certain footnote disclosures that would substantially duplicate the disclosures contained in its annual audited Consolidated Financial Statements. Therefore, these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read together with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the SEC (2011 10-K). The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include all normal recurring adjustments necessary to present the interim financial statements fairly.
Use of Estimates
These Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include certain amounts based on the Company’s best estimates and judgments. The Company’s most significant estimates relate to medical costs payable and medical costs, premium rebates and risk-sharing provisions related to revenues, valuation and impairment analysis of goodwill and other intangible assets, estimates of other policy liabilities and other current receivables, valuations of investments, income taxes and contingent liabilities. These estimates require the application of complex assumptions and judgments, often because they involve matters that are inherently uncertain and will likely change in subsequent periods. The impact of any changes in estimates is included in earnings in the period in which the estimate is adjusted.
Accounting Policies
Following is an expanded portion of the Company's revenue policy related to premium rebates. All other accounting policies disclosed in Note 2 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2011 10-K remain unchanged.
The Company's fully insured commercial premium revenues are generally subject to the minimum medical loss ratio requirements of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the associated reconciliation measure, the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Health Reform Legislation). Premium revenues are recognized based on the estimated premiums earned net of projected rebates because the Company is able to reasonably estimate the ultimate premiums of these contracts. Each period, the Company estimates premium rebates based on the expected financial performance of the applicable contracts within each defined aggregation set (e.g., by state, group size and licensed subsidiary). The most significant factors in estimating the financial performance are current and future premiums and medical claim experience, effective tax rates and expected changes in business mix. The estimated ultimate premium is revised each period to reflect current and projected experience.
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-04, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs” (ASU 2011-04). This update provides guidance on how fair value measurement should be applied where existing GAAP already requires or permits fair value measurements. In addition, ASU 2011-04 requires expanded disclosures regarding fair value measurements. ASU 2011-04 became effective for the Company's fiscal year 2012. The adoption of the measurement guidance of ASU 2011-04 did not have a material impact on the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. The new disclosures have been included with the Company's fair value disclosures in Note 3 of Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) - Presentation of Comprehensive Income” (ASU 2011-05). ASU 2011-05 requires entities to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements and eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive

6

Table of Contents


income as a part of the statement of equity. ASU 2011-05 became effective for the Company's fiscal year 2012. The Company presented separate Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, which appear consecutive to the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The Company has determined that there have been no other recently adopted or issued accounting standards that had or will have a material impact on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
2.
Investments
A summary of short-term and long-term investments is as follows:
(in millions)
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
June 30, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Debt securities - available-for-sale:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. government and agency obligations
 
$
2,474

 
$
51

 
$

 
$
2,525

State and municipal obligations
 
6,352

 
379

 
(2
)
 
6,729

Corporate obligations
 
6,109

 
226

 
(8
)
 
6,327

U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities
 
2,351

 
80

 

 
2,431

Non-U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities
 
445

 
32

 

 
477

Total debt securities - available-for-sale
 
17,731

 
768

 
(10
)
 
18,489

Equity securities - available-for-sale
 
587

 
22

 
(3
)
 
606

Debt securities - held-to-maturity:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. government and agency obligations
 
172

 
7

 

 
179

State and municipal obligations
 
26

 

 

 
26

Corporate obligations
 
257

 

 
(3
)
 
254

Total debt securities - held-to-maturity
 
455

 
7

 
(3
)
 
459

Total investments
 
$
18,773

 
$
797

 
$
(16
)
 
$
19,554

December 31, 2011
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Debt securities - available-for-sale:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. government and agency obligations
 
$
2,319

 
$
54

 
$

 
$
2,373

State and municipal obligations
 
6,363

 
403

 
(1
)
 
6,765

Corporate obligations
 
5,825

 
205

 
(23
)
 
6,007

U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities
 
2,279

 
74

 

 
2,353

Non-U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities
 
476

 
28

 

 
504

Total debt securities - available-for-sale
 
17,262

 
764

 
(24
)
 
18,002

Equity securities - available-for-sale
 
529

 
23

 
(8
)
 
544

Debt securities - held-to-maturity:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. government and agency obligations
 
166

 
7

 

 
173

State and municipal obligations
 
13

 

 

 
13

Corporate obligations
 
18

 

 

 
18

Total debt securities - held-to-maturity
 
197

 
7

 

 
204

Total investments
 
$
17,988

 
$
794

 
$
(32
)
 
$
18,750


Included in the Company’s investment portfolio were securities collateralized by sub-prime home equity lines of credit with fair values of $2 million at both June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. Also included were Alt-A securities with fair values of $7 million and $9 million at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.


7

Table of Contents


The fair values of the Company’s mortgage-backed securities by credit rating (when multiple credit ratings are available for an individual security, the average of the available ratings is used) and origination as of June 30, 2012 were as follows:
(in millions)
 
AAA
 
AA
 
Non-Investment
Grade
 
Total Fair
Value
2012
 
$
15

 
$

 
$

 
$
15

2011
 
26

 

 

 
26

2010
 

 
3

 

 
3

2007
 
84

 

 
2

 
86

2006
 
155

 

 
9

 
164

Pre - 2006
 
177

 

 
6

 
183

U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities
 
2,431

 

 

 
2,431

Total
 
$
2,888

 
$
3

 
$
17

 
$
2,908

The amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale debt securities as of June 30, 2012, by contractual maturity, were as follows:
(in millions)
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Fair
Value
Due in one year or less
 
$
2,929

 
$
2,942

Due after one year through five years
 
5,906

 
6,106

Due after five years through ten years
 
4,380

 
4,693

Due after ten years
 
1,720

 
1,840

U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities
 
2,351

 
2,431

Non-U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities
 
445

 
477

Total debt securities - available-for-sale
 
$
17,731

 
$
18,489

The amortized cost and fair value of held-to-maturity debt securities as of June 30, 2012, by contractual maturity, were as follows:
(in millions)
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Fair
Value
Due in one year or less
 
$
77

 
$
77

Due after one year through five years
 
124

 
127

Due after five years through ten years
 
193

 
191

Due after ten years
 
61

 
64

Total debt securities - held-to-maturity
 
$
455

 
$
459


8

Table of Contents


The fair value of available-for-sale investments with gross unrealized losses by investment type and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position were as follows:
 
 
Less Than 12 Months
 
12 Months or Greater
 
Total
(in millions)
 
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
June 30, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Debt securities - available-for-sale:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
State and municipal obligations
 
$
448

 
$
(2
)
 
$

 
$

 
$
448

 
$
(2
)
Corporate obligations
 
1,034

 
(7
)
 
48

 
(1
)
 
1,082

 
(8
)
Total debt securities - available-for-sale
 
$
1,482

 
$
(9
)
 
$
48

 
$
(1
)
 
$
1,530

 
$
(10
)
Equity securities - available-for-sale
 
$
29

 
$
(2
)
 
$
4

 
$
(1
)
 
$
33

 
$
(3
)
December 31, 2011
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Debt securities - available-for-sale:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
State and municipal obligations
 
$
85

 
$
(1
)
 
$
21

 
$

 
$
106

 
$
(1
)
Corporate obligations
 
1,496

 
(22
)
 
28

 
(1
)
 
1,524

 
(23
)
Total debt securities - available-for-sale
 
$
1,581

 
$
(23
)
 
$
49

 
$
(1
)
 
$
1,630

 
$
(24
)
Equity securities - available-for-sale
 
$
24

 
$
(7
)
 
$
3

 
$
(1
)
 
$
27

 
$
(8
)
The unrealized losses from all securities as of June 30, 2012 were generated from 1,900 positions out of a total of 16,900 positions. The Company believes that it will collect the principal and interest due on its investments that have an amortized cost in excess of fair value. The unrealized losses were primarily caused by interest rate increases and not by unfavorable changes in the credit ratings associated with these securities. At each reporting period, the Company evaluates securities for impairment when the fair value of the investment is less than its amortized cost. The Company evaluated the underlying credit quality and credit ratings of the issuers, noting neither a significant deterioration since purchase nor other factors leading to an other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI). As of June 30, 2012, the Company did not have the intent to sell any of the securities in an unrealized loss position.
As of June 30, 2012, the Company’s holdings of non-U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities included $7 million of commercial mortgage loans in default. These loans represented less than 1% of the Company’s total mortgage-backed security holdings as of June 30, 2012.
A portion of the Company’s investments in equity securities and venture capital funds consists of investments held in various public and nonpublic companies concentrated in the areas of health care services and related information technologies. Market conditions that affect the value of health care and related technology stocks will likewise impact the value of the Company’s equity portfolio. The equity securities and venture capital funds were evaluated for severity and duration of unrealized loss, overall market volatility and other market factors.
Net realized gains included in Investment and Other Income on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations were from the following sources:
 
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions)
 
2012
 
2011
 
2012
 
2011
Total OTTI
 
$
(1
)
 
$
(2
)
 
$
(4
)
 
$
(6
)
Portion of loss recognized in other comprehensive income
 

 

 

 

Net OTTI recognized in earnings
 
(1
)
 
(2
)
 
(4
)
 
(6
)
Gross realized losses from sales
 
(2
)
 
(3
)
 
(3
)
 
(4
)
Gross realized gains from sales
 
53

 
26

 
96

 
79

Net realized gains
 
$
50

 
$
21

 
$
89

 
$
69



9

Table of Contents


3.
Fair Value
Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements or have fair values disclosed in the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. These assets and liabilities are classified into one of three levels of a hierarchy defined by GAAP. In instances in which the inputs used to measure fair value fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the fair value measurement is categorized in its entirety based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular item to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, including the consideration of inputs specific to the asset or liability.
The fair value hierarchy is summarized as follows:
Level 1 — Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets/liabilities in active markets.
Level 2 — Other observable inputs, either directly or indirectly, including:
Quoted prices for similar assets/liabilities in active markets;
Quoted prices for identical or similar assets/liabilities in non-active markets (e.g., few transactions, limited information, non-current prices, high variability over time);
Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset/liability (e.g., interest rates, yield curves, implied volatilities, credit spreads); and
Inputs that are corroborated by other observable market data.
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that cannot be corroborated by observable market data.
Transfers between levels, if any, are recorded as of the beginning of the reporting period in which the transfer occurs; there were no transfers between Levels 1, 2 or 3 of any financial assets or liabilities during 2012 or 2011.
Non-financial assets and liabilities or financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis are subject to fair value adjustments only in certain circumstances, such as when the Company records an impairment. There were no significant fair value adjustments for these assets and liabilities recorded during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value and determine the fair value hierarchy classification of each class of financial instrument included in the tables below:
Cash and Cash Equivalents. The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value as maturities are less than three months. Fair values of cash equivalent instruments that do not trade on a regular basis in active markets are classified as Level 2.
Debt and Equity Securities. Fair values of debt and equity securities are based on quoted market prices, where available. The Company obtains one price for each security primarily from a third-party pricing service (pricing service), which generally uses quoted or other observable inputs for the determination of fair value. The pricing service normally derives the security prices through recently reported trades for identical or similar securities, making adjustments through the reporting date based upon available observable market information. For securities not actively traded, the pricing service may use quoted market prices of comparable instruments or discounted cash flow analyses, incorporating inputs that are currently observable in the markets for similar securities. Inputs that are often used in the valuation methodologies include, but are not limited to, benchmark yields, credit spreads, default rates, prepayment speeds and non-binding broker quotes. As the Company is responsible for the determination of fair value, it performs quarterly analyses on the prices received from the pricing service to determine whether the prices are reasonable estimates of fair value. Specifically, the Company compares the prices received from the pricing service to a secondary pricing source, prices reported by its custodian, its investment consultant and third-party investment advisors. Additionally, the Company compares changes in the reported market values and returns to relevant market indices to test the reasonableness of the reported prices. The Company’s internal price verification procedures and reviews of fair value methodology documentation provided by independent pricing services have not historically resulted in adjustment in the prices obtained from the pricing service.
Fair values of debt securities that do not trade on a regular basis in active markets but are priced using other observable inputs are classified as Level 2.
Fair value estimates for Level 1 and Level 2 equity securities are based on quoted market prices for actively traded equity securities and/or other market data for the same or comparable instruments and transactions in establishing the prices.
The Company's Level 3 equity securities are primarily investments in venture capital securities. The fair values of Level 3 investments in venture capital portfolios are estimated using a market valuation technique that relies heavily on management assumptions and qualitative observations. Under the market approach, the fair values of the Company's various venture capital

10

Table of Contents


investments are computed using limited quantitative and qualitative observations of activity for similar companies in the current market. The Company's market modeling utilizes, as applicable, transactions for comparable companies in similar industries and having similar revenue and growth characteristics; and similar preferences in their capital structure. Key significant unobservable inputs in the market technique include implied earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) multiples and revenue multiples. Additionally, the fair value of certain of the Company's venture capital securities are based off of recent transactions in inactive markets for identical or similar securities. Significant changes in any of these inputs could result in significantly lower or higher fair value measurements.
Throughout the procedures discussed above in relation to the Company's processes for validating third party pricing information, the Company validates the understanding of assumptions and inputs used in security pricing and determines the proper classification in the hierarchy based on that understanding.
AARP Program-related Investments. AARP Program-related investments consist of debt and equity securities held to fund costs associated with the AARP Program and are priced and classified using the same methodologies as the Company’s other securities.
Interest Rate Swaps. Fair values of the Company’s interest rate swaps are estimated using the terms of the swaps and publicly available market yield curves. Because the swaps are unique and not actively traded but are valued using other observable inputs, the fair values are classified as Level 2.
Senior Unsecured Notes. The fair values of the senior unsecured notes are estimated and classified using the same methodologies as the Company's investments in debt securities.
AARP Program-related Other Liabilities. AARP Program-related other liabilities consist of liabilities that represent the amount of net investment gains and losses related to AARP Program-related investments that accrue to the benefit of the AARP policyholders.

11

Table of Contents


The following table presents a summary of fair value measurements by level and carrying values for items measured at fair value on a recurring basis in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets excluding AARP related assets and liabilities, which are discussed below:
(in millions)
 
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets
(Level 1)
 
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Total
Fair
Value
 
Total Carrying Value
June 30, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
10,193

 
$
1,385

 
$

 
$
11,578

 
$
11,578

Debt securities - available-for-sale:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. government and agency obligations
 
1,721

 
804

 

 
2,525

 
2,525

State and municipal obligations
 

 
6,729

 

 
6,729

 
6,729

Corporate obligations
 
1

 
6,326

 

 
6,327

 
6,327

U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities
 

 
2,431

 

 
2,431

 
2,431

Non-U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities
 

 
470

 
7

 
477

 
477

Total debt securities - available-for-sale
 
1,722

 
16,760

 
7

 
18,489

 
18,489

Equity securities - available-for-sale
 
376

 
2

 
228

 
606

 
606

Interest rate swap assets
 

 
12

 

 
12

 
12

Total assets at fair value

$
12,291

 
$
18,159

 
$
235

 
$
30,685

 
N/A

Percentage of total assets at fair value
 
40
%
 
59
%
 
1
%
 
100
%
 
N/A

December 31, 2011
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
8,569

 
$
860

 
$

 
$
9,429

 
$
9,429

Debt securities - available-for-sale:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. government and agency obligations
 
1,551

 
822

 

 
2,373

 
2,373

State and municipal obligations
 

 
6,750

 
15

 
6,765

 
6,765

Corporate obligations
 
16

 
5,805

 
186

 
6,007

 
6,007

U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities
 

 
2,353

 

 
2,353

 
2,353

Non-U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities
 

 
497

 
7

 
504

 
504

Total debt securities - available-for-sale
 
1,567

 
16,227

 
208

 
18,002

 
18,002

Equity securities - available-for-sale
 
333

 
2

 
209

 
544

 
544

Total assets at fair value
 
$
10,469

 
$
17,089

 
$
417

 
$
27,975

 
N/A

Percentage of total assets at fair value
 
37
%
 
61
%
 
2
%
 
100
%
 
N/A


12

Table of Contents


The following table presents a summary of fair value measurements by level and carrying values for certain financial instruments not measured at fair value on a recurring basis in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets:
(in millions)
 
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets
(Level 1)
 
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Total
Fair
Value
 
Total Carrying Value
June 30, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Debt securities - held-to-maturity:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. government and agency obligations
 
$
179

 
$

 
$

 
$
179

 
$
172

State and municipal obligations
 

 
2

 
24

 
26

 
26

Corporate obligations
 
9

 
12

 
233

 
254

 
257

Total debt securities - held-to-maturity
 
$
188

 
$
14

 
$
257

 
$
459

 
$
455

Senior unsecured notes
 
$

 
$
14,490

 
$

 
$
14,490

 
$
12,617

December 31, 2011
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Debt securities - held-to-maturity:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. government and agency obligations
 
$
173

 
$

 
$

 
$
173

 
$
166

State and municipal obligations
 

 
1

 
12

 
13

 
13

Corporate obligations
 
9

 
9

 

 
18

 
18

Total debt securities - held-to-maturity
 
$
182

 
$
10

 
$
12

 
$
204

 
$
197

Senior unsecured notes
 
$

 
$
13,149

 
$

 
$
13,149

 
$
11,638

The carrying amounts reported in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets for accounts and other current receivables, unearned revenues, commercial paper, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate fair value because of their short-term nature. These assets and liabilities are not listed in the table above.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using Level 3 inputs is as follows:
 
 
Three Months Ended
 
Six Months Ended
(in millions)
 
Debt
Securities
 
Equity
Securities
 
Total
 
Debt
Securities
 
Equity
Securities
 
Total
June 30, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at beginning of period
 
$
7

 
$
204

 
$
211

 
$
208

 
$
209

 
$
417

Purchases
 

 
33

 
33

 

 
51

 
51

Sales
 

 
(7
)
 
(7
)
 

 
(9
)
 
(9
)
Net unrealized losses in accumulated other comprehensive income
 

 
(3
)
 
(3
)
 

 
(3
)
 
(3
)
Net realized gains in investment and other income
 

 
1

 
1

 

 
1

 
1

Transfers to held-to-maturity
 

 

 

 
(201
)
 
(21
)
 
(222
)
Balance at end of period
 
$
7

 
$
228

 
$
235

 
$
7

 
$
228

 
$
235

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
June 30, 2011
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at beginning of period
 
$
135

 
$
201

 
$
336

 
$
141

 
$
208

 
$
349

Purchases
 
9

 
27

 
36

 
9

 
31

 
40

Sales
 

 
(5
)
 
(5
)
 

 
(14
)
 
(14
)
Settlements
 
(4
)
 

 
(4
)
 
(10
)
 

 
(10
)
Net unrealized losses in accumulated other comprehensive income
 

 
(1
)
 
(1
)
 

 
(3
)
 
(3
)
Balance at end of period
 
$
140

 
$
222

 
$
362

 
$
140

 
$
222


$
362


13

Table of Contents


The following table presents quantitative information regarding unobservable inputs that were significant to the valuation of assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using Level 3 inputs:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Range
(in millions)
 
Fair Value
 
Valuation Technique
 
Unobservable Input
 
Low
 
High
June 30, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity securities - available-for-sale
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Venture capital portfolios
 
$
199

 
Market approach - comparable companies
 
Revenue multiple
 
1.0
 
10.0
 
 
 
 
 
 
EBITDA multiple
 
8.0
 
10.0
 
 
29

 
Market approach - recent transactions
 
Inactive market transactions
 
N/A
 
N/A
Total equity securities
     available-for-sale
 
$
228

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Also included in the Company's assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using Level 3 inputs were $7 million of available-for-sale debt securities at June 30, 2012, which were not significant.
The Company provides health insurance products and services to members of AARP under a Supplemental Health Insurance Program (the AARP Program). The Company elected to measure the entirety of the AARP Assets Under Management at fair value pursuant to the fair value option. See Note 2 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s 2011 10-K for further detail on AARP. The following table presents fair value information about the AARP Program-related financial assets and liabilities:
(in millions)
 
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets
(Level 1)
 
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Total
Fair
Value
June 30, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
116

 
$
10

 
$

 
$
126

Debt securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. government and agency obligations
 
544

 
251

 

 
795

State and municipal obligations
 

 
43

 

 
43

Corporate obligations
 

 
1,086

 

 
1,086

U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities
 

 
430

 

 
430

Non-U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities
 

 
146

 

 
146

Total debt securities
 
544

 
1,956

 

 
2,500

Equity securities - available-for-sale
 

 
2

 

 
2

Total assets at fair value
 
$
660

 
$
1,968

 
$

 
$
2,628

Other liabilities
 
$
27

 
$
54

 
$

 
$
81

Total liabilities at fair value
 
$
27

 
$
54

 
$

 
$
81

December 31, 2011
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
257

 
$
10

 
$

 
$
267

Debt securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. government and agency obligations
 
566

 
214

 

 
780

State and municipal obligations
 

 
25

 

 
25

Corporate obligations
 

 
1,048

 

 
1,048

U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities
 

 
436

 

 
436

Non-U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities
 

 
150

 

 
150

Total debt securities
 
566

 
1,873

 

 
2,439

Equity securities - available-for-sale
 

 
2

 

 
2

Total assets at fair value
 
$
823

 
$
1,885

 
$

 
$
2,708

Other liabilities
 
$
27

 
$
49

 
$

 
$
76

Total liabilities at fair value
 
$
27

 
$
49

 
$

 
$
76


14

Table of Contents


4.
CMS Prepayments and Medicare Part D Pharmacy Benefits

CMS Prepayments

On June 29, 2012, the Company received approximately $2.7 billion for its July monthly premium payment and approximately $500 million for the Catastrophic Reinsurance and Low-Income Member Cost Sharing Subsidies (Subsidies) and drug discount from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). CMS generally pays on the first calendar day of the applicable month. If the first calendar day of the month falls on a weekend or a holiday, CMS has typically paid the Company on the last business day of the preceding calendar month. The Company recorded the premium payment as unearned revenues in both its Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The treatment of the Subsidies and drug discount is described below.
Medicare Part D Pharmacy Benefits Contract
The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets include the following amounts associated with the Medicare Part D program:
 
 
June 30, 2012
 
December 31, 2011
(in millions)
 
Subsidies
 
Drug Discount
 
Risk-Share
 
Subsidies
 
Drug Discount
 
Risk-Share
Other current receivables
 
$

 
$
159

 
$

 
$

 
$
509

 
$

Other policy liabilities
 
824

 
383

 
2

 
70

 
649

 
170

The Subsidies and drug discount represent cost reimbursements under the Medicare Part D program. The Company is fully reimbursed by CMS for costs incurred for these contract elements and, accordingly, there is no insurance risk to the Company. Amounts received for these Subsidies are not reflected as premium revenues, but rather are accounted for as a reduction of receivables and/or increase in deposit liabilities. The drug discount is ultimately funded by the pharmaceutical manufacturers. CMS provides prospective payments, which the Company records as liabilities when received. The Company bills the pharmaceutical manufacturers for claims under the program, which are recorded as receivables. Related cash flows are presented as customer funds administered within financing activities in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Premiums from CMS are subject to risk-sharing provisions based on a comparison of the Company’s annual bid estimates of prescription drug costs and the actual costs incurred. Variances may result in CMS making additional payments to the Company or require the Company to remit funds to CMS subsequent to the end of the year. The Company records risk-share adjustments to premium revenue and other current receivables or other policy liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

5.
Medical Costs and Medical Costs Payable
The following table provides details of the Company's net favorable medical cost development:
 
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions)
 
2012
 
2011
 
2012
 
2011
Related to Prior Years
 
$
90

 
$
120

 
$
620

 
$
560

Related to Current Year
 
120

 
60

 
N/A

 
N/A

The favorable development for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 was driven by lower than expected health system utilization levels and other factors that were immaterial.
The favorable development for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 was primarily driven by changes in previous estimates related to lower than expected health system utilization levels and continued efficiencies in claims submission, handling and processing, which resulted in higher completion factors.

15

Table of Contents



6.
Commercial Paper and Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt consisted of the following:
 
 
June 30, 2012
 
December 31, 2011
(in millions)
 
Par
Value
 
Carrying
Value
 
Fair
Value
 
Par
Value
 
Carrying
Value
 
Fair
Value
5.500% senior unsecured notes due November 2012
 
$
352

 
$
357

 
$
358

 
$
352

 
$
363

 
$
366

4.875% senior unsecured notes due February 2013
 
534

 
537

 
547

 
534

 
540

 
556

4.875% senior unsecured notes due April 2013
 
409

 
416

 
421

 
409

 
421

 
427

4.750% senior unsecured notes due February 2014
 
172

 
181

 
183

 
172

 
184

 
185

5.000% senior unsecured notes due August 2014
 
389

 
417

 
422

 
389

 
423

 
424

4.875% senior unsecured notes due March 2015
 
416

 
452

 
455

 
416

 
458

 
460

5.375% senior unsecured notes due March 2016
 
601

 
669

 
689

 
601

 
678

 
689

1.875% senior unsecured notes due November 2016
 
400

 
397

 
410

 
400

 
397

 
400

5.360% senior unsecured notes due November 2016
 
95

 
95

 
110

 
95

 
95

 
110

6.000% senior unsecured notes due June 2017
 
441

 
494

 
531

 
441

 
499

 
518

6.000% senior unsecured notes due November 2017
 
156

 
172

 
191

 
156

 
173

 
183

6.000% senior unsecured notes due February 2018
 
1,100

 
1,121

 
1,331

 
1,100

 
1,123

 
1,308

3.875% senior unsecured notes due October 2020
 
450

 
442

 
490

 
450

 
442

 
478

4.700% senior unsecured notes due February 2021
 
400

 
418

 
461

 
400

 
419

 
450

3.375% senior unsecured notes due November 2021
 
500

 
510

 
526

 
500

 
497

 
517

2.875% senior unsecured notes due March 2022
 
600

 
596

 
606

 

 

 

Zero coupon senior unsecured notes due November 2022
 
1,095

 
636

 
765

 
1,095

 
619

 
696

5.800% senior unsecured notes due March 2036
 
850

 
845

 
1,049

 
850

 
844

 
1,017

6.500% senior unsecured notes due June 2037
 
500

 
495

 
663

 
500

 
495

 
636

6.625% senior unsecured notes due November 2037
 
650

 
645

 
870

 
650

 
645

 
834

6.875% senior unsecured notes due February 2038
 
1,100

 
1,084

 
1,529

 
1,100

 
1,084

 
1,475

5.700% senior unsecured notes due October 2040
 
300

 
298

 
370

 
300

 
298

 
359

5.950% senior unsecured notes due February 2041
 
350

 
348

 
449

 
350

 
348

 
430

4.625% senior unsecured notes due November 2041
 
600

 
593

 
645

 
600

 
593

 
631

4.375% senior unsecured notes due March 2042
 
400

 
399

 
419

 

 

 

Total long-term debt
 
$
12,860

 
$
12,617

 
$
14,490

 
$
11,860

 
$
11,638

 
$
13,149


In August 2012, the Company completed an exchange of $1,080 million of its zero coupon senior unsecured notes due November of 2022 for $500 million additional issuance of its 2.875% notes due in 2022 and $102 million additional issuance of its 4.375% notes due 2042, as well as $138 million in cash.  Reflecting lower market rates, the additional note issuance was at a premium to the existing notes to yield 2.568% on the new 10-year notes, and 3.881% on the new 30-year notes.  The transaction was undertaken to increase financial flexibility and reduce interest expense.  As a result of this exchange, $485 million of the zero coupon senior unsecured notes, which historically were classified within current liabilities, were reclassified to Long-Term Debt, net of Current Maturities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2012.
Commercial Paper and Bank Credit Facility
Commercial paper, when issued, consists of short-duration, senior unsecured debt privately placed on a discount basis through broker-dealers.
The Company has a $3.0 billion five-year revolving bank credit facility with 21 banks, which will mature in December 2016. This facility supports the Company’s commercial paper program and is available for general corporate purposes. There were no amounts outstanding under this facility as of June 30, 2012 or December 31, 2011. The interest rate on borrowings is variable

16

Table of Contents


based on term and amount and is calculated based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus a credit spread based on the Company’s senior unsecured credit ratings. As of June 30, 2012, the annual interest rate on this facility, had it been drawn, would have ranged from 1.2% to 1.6%.
Debt Covenants
The Company’s bank credit facility contains various covenants including requiring the Company to maintain a debt to debt-plus-equity ratio below 50%. The Company was in compliance with its debt covenants as of June 30, 2012.
Interest Rate Swap Contracts
In March 2012, the Company entered into interest rate swap contracts to convert a portion of its interest rate exposure from fixed rates to floating rates to more closely align interest expense with interest income received on its cash equivalent and investment balances. The floating rates are benchmarked to LIBOR. The swaps are designated as fair value hedges on the Company's fixed-rate debt issue maturing November 2021 and have a notional amount of $500 million. Since the critical terms of the swaps match those of the debt being hedged, they are assumed to be highly effective hedges and all changes in fair value of the swaps are recorded as an adjustment to the carrying value of the related debt with no net impact recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of June 30, 2012 the fair value of the interest rate swap asset was $12 million, which was recorded in other long-term assets in the Company's Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
7.
Shareholders' Equity
Share Repurchase Program
Under its Board of Directors’ authorization, the Company maintains a share repurchase program. The objectives of the share repurchase program are to optimize the Company’s capital structure and cost of capital, thereby improving returns to shareholders, as well as to offset the dilutive impact of share-based awards. Repurchases may be made from time to time in open market purchases or other types of transactions (including prepaid or structured share repurchase programs), subject to certain Board restrictions. In June 2012, the Board renewed and expanded the Company’s share repurchase program with an authorization to repurchase up to 110 million shares of its common stock. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company repurchased 33 million shares at an average price of $55.03 per share and an aggregate cost of $1.8 billion. As of June 30, 2012, the Company had Board authorization to purchase up to an additional 109 million shares of its common stock.
Dividends
In June 2012, the Company’s Board of Directors increased the Company’s cash dividend to shareholders to an annual dividend rate of $0.85 per share, paid quarterly. Since May 2011, the Company had paid an annual dividend of $0.65 per share, paid quarterly. Declaration and payment of future quarterly dividends is at the discretion of the Board and may be adjusted as business needs or market conditions change.
The following table provides details of the Company’s dividend payments:
Payment Date
 
Amount per Share
 
Total Amount Paid
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
3/19/2012
 
$
0.1625

 
$
168

6/22/2012
 
0.2125

 
218

 
8.
Share-Based Compensation
As of June 30, 2012, the Company had 45 million shares available for future grants of share-based awards under its share-based compensation plan, including, but not limited to, incentive or non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights (SARs) and up to 17 million of awards in restricted stock and restricted stock units (restricted shares). The Company’s outstanding share-based awards consist mainly of non-qualified stock options, SARs and restricted shares.

17

Table of Contents


Stock Options and SARs
Stock options and SARs vest ratably over four to six years and may be exercised up to 10 years from the date of grant. Compensation expense related to stock options and SARs is based on the fair value at date of grant. Stock option and SAR activity for the six months ended June 30, 2012 is summarized in the table below:
 
Shares
 
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
 
(in millions)
 
 
 
(in years)
 
(in millions)
Outstanding at beginning of period
91

 
$
42

 
 
 
 
Granted
1

 
55

 
 
 
 
Exercised
(21
)
 
37

 
 
 
 
Forfeited
(1
)
 
42

 
 
 
 
Outstanding at end of period
70

 
44

 
4.3

 
$
1,052

Exercisable at end of period
61

 
45

 
3.9

 
836

Vested and expected to vest end of period
70

 
44

 
4.3

 
1,043

Restricted Shares
Restricted shares vest ratably, primarily over three to four years. Compensation expense related to restricted shares is based on the share price on date of grant. Restricted share activity for the six months ended June 30, 2012 is summarized in the table below:
(shares in millions)
 
Shares
 
Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
per Share
Nonvested at beginning of period
 
17

 
$
36

Granted
 
7

 
52

Vested
 
(7
)
 
34

Forfeited
 
(1
)
 
42

Nonvested at end of period
 
16

 
43

Other Share-Based Compensation Data
(in millions, except per share amounts)
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2012
 
2011
 
2012
 
2011
Stock Options and SARs
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted-average grant date fair value of shares granted, per share
 
$
19

 
$
17

 
$
19

 
$
15

Total intrinsic value of stock options and SARs exercised
 
178

 
107

 
398

 
174

Restricted Shares
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted-average grant date fair value of shares granted, per share
 
56

 
48

 
52

 
42

Total fair value of restricted shares vested
 
61

 
39

 
352

 
108

Share-Based Compensation Items
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Share-based compensation expense, before tax
 
102

 
95

 
242

 
218

Share-based compensation expense, net of tax effects
 
72

 
70

 
160

 
154

Income tax benefit realized from share-based award exercises
 
87

 
59

 
274

 
116


18

Table of Contents


(in millions, except years)
 
June 30, 2012
Unrecognized compensation expense related to share awards
 
$
448

Weighted-average years to recognize compensation expense
 
1.1

Share-Based Compensation Recognition
The Company recognizes compensation expense for share-based awards, including stock options, SARs and restricted shares, on a straight-line basis over the related service period (generally the vesting period) of the award, or to an employee’s eligible retirement date under the award agreement, if earlier. Share-based compensation expense is recognized in operating costs in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
To determine compensation expense related to the Company’s stock options and SARs, the fair value of each award is estimated on the date of grant using a binomial option-pricing model. The principal assumptions the Company used in applying the option-pricing model were as follows:
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2012
 
2011
 
2012
 
2011
Risk free interest rate
0.7%
 
1.8%
 
0.7% - 0.9%
 
1.8% - 2.3%
Expected volatility
44.0%
 
44.3%
 
43.4% - 44.0%
 
44.3%
Expected dividend yield
1.2%
 
1.0%
 
1.2% - 1.3%
 
1.0% - 1.2%
Forfeiture rate
5.0%
 
5.0%
 
5.0%
 
5.0%
Expected life in years
5.3
 
4.9
 
5.3 - 5.6
 
4.9
Risk-free interest rates are based on U.S. Treasury yields in effect at the time of grant. Expected volatilities are based on the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock and the implied volatility from exchange-traded options on the Company’s common stock. Expected dividend yields are based on the per share dividend declared by the Company's Board of Directors. The Company uses historical data to estimate option and SAR exercises and forfeitures within the valuation model. The expected lives of options and SARs granted represents the period of time that the awards granted are expected to be outstanding based on historical exercise patterns.
9.
Commitments and Contingencies

Legal Matters
Because of the nature of its businesses, the Company is frequently made party to a variety of legal actions and regulatory inquiries, including class actions and suits brought by members, providers, customers and regulators, relating to the Company’s management and administration of health benefit plans. These matters include medical malpractice, employment, intellectual property, antitrust, privacy and contract claims, and claims related to health care benefits coverage and other business practices.
The Company records liabilities for its estimates of probable costs resulting from these matters where appropriate. Estimates of probable costs resulting from legal and regulatory matters involving the Company are inherently difficult to predict, particularly where the matters: involve indeterminate claims for monetary damages or may involve fines, penalties or punitive damages; present novel legal theories or represent a shift in regulatory policy; involve a large number of claimants or regulatory bodies; are in the early stages of the proceedings; or could result in a change in business practices. Accordingly, the Company is often unable to estimate the losses or ranges of losses for those matters where there is a reasonable possibility or it is probable that a loss may be incurred.
Litigation Matters
Out-of-Network Reimbursement Litigation. In 2000, a group of plaintiffs including the American Medical Association filed a lawsuit against the Company asserting a variety of claims challenging the Company’s determination of reimbursement amounts for non-network health care services based on the Company’s use of a database previously maintained by Ingenix, Inc. (now known as OptumInsight). The parties entered into a settlement agreement in 2009 and this class action lawsuit, along with a related industry-wide investigation by the New York Attorney General, is now resolved. The Company remains a party to a number of other lawsuits challenging the determination of out-of-network reimbursement amounts based on use of the same database, including putative class actions and multidistrict litigation brought on behalf of members of Aetna and WellPoint. The Company was dismissed as a party from a similar lawsuit involving Cigna and its members. These suits allege, among other things, that the database licensed to these companies by Ingenix was flawed and that Ingenix conspired with these companies to

19

Table of Contents


underpay their members’ claims and seek unspecified damages and treble damages, injunctive and declaratory relief, interest, costs and attorneys fees. The Company is vigorously defending these suits. The Company cannot reasonably estimate the range of loss, if any, that may result from these matters due to the procedural status of the cases, motions to dismiss that are pending in several of the cases, the absence of class certification in any of the cases, the lack of a formal demand on the Company by the plaintiffs, and the involvement of other insurance companies as defendants.
California Claims Processing Matter. In 2007, the California Department of Insurance (CDI) examined the Company’s PacifiCare health insurance plan in California. The examination findings related to the timeliness and accuracy of claims processing, interest payments, provider contract implementation, provider dispute resolution and other related matters. On January 25, 2008, the CDI issued an Order to Show Cause to PacifiCare Life and Health Insurance Company, a subsidiary of the Company, alleging violations of certain insurance statutes and regulations in connection with the CDI’s examination findings. On June 3, 2009, the Company filed a Notice of Defense to the Order to Show Cause denying all material allegations and asserting certain defenses. The matter has been the subject of an administrative hearing before a California administrative law judge since December 2009. CDI amended its Order to Show Cause three times in 2010 to allege a total of 992,936 violations, the large majority of which relate to an alleged failure to include certain language in standard claims correspondence during a four month period in 2007. Although we believe that CDI has never issued an aggregate penalty in excess of $8 million, CDI has previously alleged in press reports and releases that the Company could theoretically be subject to penalties of up to $10,000 per violation. In October 2011, CDI stated that it is seeking an average penalty of approximately $326 per alleged violation. CDI has since reduced the number of alleged violations to 908,654 but has indicated that it is still seeking an aggregate penalty of approximately $325 million. The Company is vigorously defending against the claims in this matter and believes that the penalty requested by CDI is excessive and without merit. After the administrative law judge issues a ruling at the conclusion of the administrative proceeding, expected no earlier than November 2012, the California Insurance Commissioner may accept, reject or modify the administrative law judge's ruling, issue his own decision, and impose a fine or penalty. The Commissioner's decision is subject to challenge in court. The Company cannot reasonably estimate the range of loss, if any, that may result from this matter given the procedural status of the dispute, the novel legal issues presented (including the legal basis for the majority of the alleged violations), the inherent difficulty in predicting regulatory fines and penalties, and the various remedies and levels of judicial review available to the Company in the event a fine or penalty is assessed.
Government Regulation
The Company’s business is regulated at federal, state, local and international levels. The laws and rules governing the Company’s business and interpretations of those laws and rules are subject to frequent change. Broad latitude is given to the agencies administering those regulations. Further, the Company must obtain and maintain regulatory approvals to market and sell many of its products.
The Company has been and is currently involved in various governmental investigations, audits and reviews. These include routine, regular and special investigations, audits and reviews by CMS, state insurance and health and welfare departments, state attorneys general, the Office of Inspector General (OIG), the Office of Personnel Management, the Office of Civil Rights, the Federal Trade Commission, U.S. Congressional committees, the U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Attorneys, the SEC, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and other governmental authorities.
Government actions can result in assessment of damages, civil or criminal fines or penalties, or other sanctions, including loss of licensure or exclusion from participation in government programs and could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Risk Adjustment Data Validation Audits. CMS adjusts capitation payments to Medicare Advantage plans and Medicare Part D plans according to the predicted health status of each beneficiary as supported by data from health care providers. The Company collects claim and encounter data from providers, who the Company generally relies on to appropriately code their claim submissions and document their medical records. CMS then determines the risk score and payment amount for each enrolled member based on the health care data submitted and member demographic information.
In 2008, CMS announced that it would perform RADV audits of selected Medicare Advantage health plans each year to validate the coding practices of and supporting documentation maintained by health care providers. These audits involve a review of medical records maintained by providers and may result in retrospective adjustments to payments made to health plans.
In February 2012, CMS announced a revised, final RADV audit and payment adjustment methodology. Under the final methodology, CMS will conduct RADV audits beginning with the 2011 payment year. CMS has not communicated how the

20

Table of Contents


final payment adjustment under its methodology will be implemented, nor has the Company been notified of specific health plans that will be selected for audit. Accordingly, the Company cannot reasonably estimate the range of loss, if any, that may result from future RADV audits. However, potential payment adjustments could have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
The OIG for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has audited the Company's risk adjustment data for two local plans and has published its findings for one of the plans. While the Company does not believe the OIG has governing authority to directly impose payment adjustments for risk adjustment audits of Medicare health plans operated under the regulatory authority of CMS, the OIG can recommend to CMS a proposed payment adjustment. The published OIG findings included recommendations to CMS regarding payment adjustments. The Company is unable to predict the ultimate outcome of this audit process.
Guaranty Fund Assessments. Under state guaranty assessment laws, certain insurance companies (and health maintenance organizations in some states), including those issuing health (which includes long-term care), life and accident insurance policies, doing business in those states can be assessed (up to prescribed limits) for certain obligations to the policyholders and claimants of insolvent insurance companies that write the same line or lines of business. Assessments are generally based on premiums in the state compared to the premiums of other insurers, and could be spread out over a period of years. Some states permit member insurers to recover assessments paid through full or partial premium tax offsets.
The Pennsylvania Insurance Commissioner has placed Penn Treaty Network America Insurance Company and its subsidiary (Penn Treaty), neither of which are affiliated with the Company, in rehabilitation, an intermediate action before insolvency, and has petitioned a state court for liquidation. On May 3, 2012, the court denied the petition for liquidation. While a motion for reconsideration is currently pending before the court, we are unable to predict the outcome of this process or its timing.
10.
Segment Financial Information
Factors used to determine the Company’s reportable segments include the nature of operating activities, economic characteristics, existence of separate senior management teams and the type of information presented to the Company’s chief operating decision maker to evaluate its results of operations. Reportable segments with similar economic characteristics are combined.
The following is a description of the types of products and services from which each of the Company's four reportable segments derives its revenues:

UnitedHealthcare includes the combined results of operations of UnitedHealthcare Employer & Individual, UnitedHealthcare Medicare & Retirement and UnitedHealthcare Community & State because they have similar economic characteristics, products and services, customers, distribution methods and operational processes and operate in a similar regulatory environment. These businesses also share significant common assets, including a contracted network of physicians, health care professionals, hospitals and other facilities, information technology infrastructure and other resources. UnitedHealthcare Employer & Individual offers an array of consumer-oriented health benefit plans and services for large national employers, public sector employers, mid-sized employers, small businesses and individuals nationwide. UnitedHealthcare Medicare & Retirement provides health and well-being services to individuals age 50 and older, addressing their unique needs for preventive and acute health care services as well as services dealing with chronic disease and other specialized issues for older individuals. UnitedHealthcare Community & State provides health plans and care programs to beneficiaries of acute and long-term care Medicaid plans, the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), Special Needs Plans and other federal and state health care programs.
OptumHealth serves the physical, emotional and financial needs of individuals, enabling consumer health management and integrated care delivery through programs offered by employers, payers, government entities and directly with the care delivery system. OptumHealth offers personalized health management services, decision support services, access to networks of care provider specialists, well-being solutions, behavioral health management solutions, financial services and clinical services.
OptumInsight is a health information, technology, services and consulting company providing software and information products, advisory consulting services, and business process outsourcing to participants in the health care industry. Hospitals, physicians, commercial health plans, government agencies, life sciences companies and other organizations within the health care system work with OptumInsight to reduce costs, meet compliance mandates, improve clinical performance and adapt to the changing health system landscape.
OptumRx offers a multitude of pharmacy benefit management services including providing prescribed medications, patient support and clinical programs. OptumRx also provides claims processing, retail network contracting, rebate contracting and management and clinical programs, such as step therapy, formulary management and disease/drug

21

Table of Contents


therapy management programs to achieve a low-cost, high-quality pharmacy benefit.
Transactions between reportable segments principally consist of sales of pharmacy benefit products and services to UnitedHealthcare customers by OptumRx, certain product offerings and clinical services sold to UnitedHealthcare by OptumHealth, and health information and technology solutions, consulting and other services sold to UnitedHealthcare by OptumInsight. These transactions are recorded at management’s estimate of fair value. Intersegment transactions are eliminated in consolidation.
Goodwill at the UnitedHealthcare reportable segment increased over the first six months of 2012 by $2.2 billion to $20.1 billion as of June 30, 2012, as a result of 2012 acquisitions.
Corporate and intersegment elimination amounts are presented to reconcile the reportable segment results to the consolidated results. The following table presents the reportable segment financial information:
 
 
 
 
Optum
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
 
UnitedHealthcare
 
OptumHealth
 
OptumInsight
 
OptumRx
 
Total Optum
 
Corporate and
Intersegment
Eliminations
 
Consolidated
Three Months Ended June 30, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenues - external customers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Premiums
 
$
24,184

 
$
425

 
$

 
$

 
$
425

 
$

 
$
24,609

Services
 
1,184

 
187

 
410

 
19

 
616

 

 
1,800

Products
 

 
6

 
10

 
662

 
678

 

 
678

Total revenues - external customers
 
25,368

 
618

 
420

 
681

 
1,719

 

 
27,087

Total revenues - intersegment
 

 
1,377

 
251

 
3,924

 
5,552

 
(5,552
)
 

Investment and other income
 
148

 
30

 

 

 
30

 

 
178

Total revenues
 
$
25,516

 
$
2,025

 
$
671

 
$
4,605

 
$
7,301

 
$
(5,552
)
 
$
27,265

Earnings from operations
 
$
1,906

 
$
123

 
$
95

 
$
102

 
$
320

 
$

 
$
2,226

Interest expense
 

 

 

 

 

 
(153
)
 
(153
)
Earnings before income taxes
 
$
1,906

 
$
123

 
$
95

 
$
102

 
$
320

 
$
(153
)
 
$
2,073

Three Months Ended June 30, 2011
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenues - external customers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Premiums
 
$
22,438

 
$
375

 
$

 
$

 
$
375

 
$

 
$
22,813

Services
 
1,080

 
137

 
421

 
18

 
576

 

 
1,656

Products
 

 
6

 
11

 
588

 
605

 

 
605

Total revenues - external customers
 
23,518

 
518

 
432

 
606

 
1,556

 

 
25,074

Total revenues - intersegment
 

 
1,127

 
226

 
4,082

 
5,435

 
(5,435
)
 

Investment and other income
 
135

 
25

 

 

 
25

 

 
160

Total revenues
 
$
23,653

 
$
1,670

 
$
658

 
$
4,688

 
$
7,016

 
$
(5,435
)
 
$
25,234

Earnings from operations
 
$
1,759

 
$
135

 
$
87

 
$
118

 
$
340

 
$

 
$
2,099

Interest expense
 

 

 

 

 

 
(119
)
 
(119
)
Earnings before income taxes
 
$
1,759

 
$
135

 
$
87

 
$
118

 
$
340

 
$
(119
)
 
$
1,980


22

Table of Contents


 
 
 
 
Optum
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
 
UnitedHealthcare
 
OptumHealth
 
OptumInsight
 
OptumRx
 
Total Optum
 
Corporate and
Intersegment
Eliminations
 
Consolidated
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenues - external customers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Premiums
 
$
48,395

 
$
845

 
$

 
$

 
$
845

 
$

 
$
49,240

Services
 
2,362

 
389

 
800

 
40

 
1,229

 

 
3,591

Products
 

 
13

 
27

 
1,326

 
1,366

 

 
1,366

Total revenues - external customers
 
50,757

 
1,247

 
827

 
1,366

 
3,440

 

 
54,197

Total revenues - intersegment
 

 
2,659

 
515

 
7,960

 
11,134

 
(11,134
)
 

Investment and other income
 
292

 
58

 

 

 
58

 

 
350

Total revenues
 
$
51,049

 
$
3,964

 
$
1,342

 
$
9,326

 
$
14,632

 
$
(11,134
)
 
$
54,547

Earnings from operations
 
$
3,971

 
$
215

 
$
184

 
$
173

 
$
572

 
$

 
$
4,543

Interest expense
 

 

 

 

 

 
(301
)
 
(301
)
Earnings before income taxes
 
$
3,971

 
$
215

 
$
184

 
$
173

 
$
572

 
$
(301
)
 
$
4,242

Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenues - external customers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Premiums
 
$
45,094

 
$
722

 
$

 
$

 
$
722

 
$

 
$
45,816

Services
 
2,136

 
224

 
857

 
37

 
1,118

 

 
3,254

Products
 

 
12

 
27

 
1,215

 
1,254

 

 
1,254

Total revenues - external customers
 
47,230

 
958

 
884

 
1,252

 
3,094

 

 
50,324

Total revenues - intersegment
 

 
2,174

 
445

 
8,068

 
10,687

 
(10,687
)
 

Investment and other income
 
297

 
45

 

 

 
45

 

 
342

Total revenues
 
$
47,527

 
$
3,177

 
$
1,329

 
$
9,320

 
$
13,826

 
$
(10,687
)
 
$
50,666

Earnings from operations
 
$
3,658

 
$
244

 
$
170

 
$
248

 
$
662

 
$

 
$
4,320

Interest expense
 

 

 

 

 

 
(237
)
 
(237
)
Earnings before income taxes
 
$
3,658

 
$
244

 
$
170

 
$
248

 
$
662

 
$
(237
)
 
$
4,083



23

Table of Contents


ITEM  2.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read together with the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes. References to the terms “UnitedHealth Group,” “we,” “our” or “us” used throughout this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations refer to UnitedHealth Group Incorporated and its subsidiaries.
EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW
General
UnitedHealth Group is a diversified health and well-being company dedicated to helping people live healthier lives and making health care work better. We offer a broad spectrum of products and services through two distinct platforms: UnitedHealthcare, which provides health care coverage and benefits services; and Optum, which provides information and technology-enabled health services.
Business Trends
Our businesses participate in the U.S. health economy, which comprises approximately 18% of U.S. gross domestic product and has grown consistently for many years. We expect overall spending on health care in the U.S. to continue to grow in the future, due to inflation, medical technology and pharmaceutical advancement, regulatory requirements, demographic trends in the U.S. population and national interest in health and well-being. The rate of market growth may be affected by a variety of factors, including macro-economic conditions and enacted health care reforms, which could also impact our results of operations.
Consistent with historical periods, we expect increasing unit costs to continue to be the primary cost driver of medical cost trends. Utilization in 2012 continues to increase modestly and we project steadily increasing medical system utilization throughout the remainder of the year. We also have experienced and expect to continue to experience an increase in prescription drug costs compared to 2011. We will continue to work to manage medical and pharmacy cost trends through care management programs, affordable network relationships, pay-for-performance reimbursement programs for care providers, and targeted clinical management programs and initiatives focused on improving quality and affordability.
Care providers are facing market pressures to change from fee-for-service models to new delivery models focused on the holistic health of the consumer, integrated care across care providers and pay-for-performance payment structures. This is creating the need for health management services that can coordinate care around the primary care physician and for investment in new clinical and administrative information and management systems. We expect that the portion of our costs that is tied to incentive contracts that reward providers for outcome-based results and improved cost efficiencies will continue to increase, and we expect these trends to provide growth opportunities for our Optum business platform.
We seek to price our products consistent with anticipated underlying medical trends, while balancing growth, margins, competitive dynamics and premium rebates at the local market level. We work to sustain a stable medical care ratio for an equivalent mix of business. Changes in business mix, such as expanding participation in comparatively higher medical care ratio government-sponsored public sector programs and Health Reform Legislation, may impact our premiums, medical costs and medical care ratio. Further, we continue to expect reimbursements to be under pressure through government payment rates and continued market competition in commercial products. In the commercial market segment, we expect pricing to continue to be highly competitive into 2013. We plan to hold to our pricing disciplines and, accordingly, expect continued pressure on our risk-based product membership. In government programs, we are also seeing rate pressures intensifying, and rates for some Medicaid programs are slightly negative. Unlike in prior years, the current Medicaid reductions have generally not been mitigated by corresponding benefit reductions or provider fee schedule reductions by the state sponsor. We continue to take a prudent, market-sustainable posture for both new bids and maintenance of existing Medicaid contracts. Medicare funding is similarly pressured, see further discussion below in “Regulatory Trends and Uncertainties.”
The government, as a benefit sponsor, has been increasingly relying on private sector solutions. We expect this trend to continue as we believe the private sector provides a more flexible, better managed, higher quality health care experience than do traditional passive indemnity programs.

24

Table of Contents


Regulatory Trends and Uncertainties
In the first quarter of 2010, the Health Reform Legislation was signed into law. The Health Reform Legislation expands access to coverage and modifies aspects of the commercial insurance market, the Medicaid and Medicare programs, CHIP and other aspects of the health care system. Although the HHS, DOL, IRS and the Treasury Department have issued or proposed regulations on a number of aspects of the Health Reform Legislation, final rules and interim guidance on other key aspects of the Health Reform Legislation, all of which have a variety of effective dates, remain pending.
Following is a summary of management's view of the trends and uncertainties related to some of the key provisions of the Health Reform Legislation and other regulatory items.
Medical Loss Ratio and Premium Rebates - Effective in 2011, commercial health plans with medical loss ratios on fully insured products that fall below certain targets are required to rebate ratable portions of their premiums annually.
In response to the Health Reform Legislation, minimum medical loss ratios and premium rebates are considered in the pricing of our products. We have also made changes to reduce our product distribution costs, including reducing producer commissions, and are continuing to implement changes to distribution in the large group insured market segment. Our results in 2012 and 2011 include the effects of our estimates of the premium rebates. The 2011 rebate is payable in the third quarter of 2012. Estimated 2012 rebates payable in 2013 are recorded throughout 2012 as a reduction in premium revenue.

In addition, beginning in 2014, Medicare Advantage plans will be required to have a minimum medical loss ratio of 85%. CMS has not yet issued guidance as to how this requirement will be calculated for Medicare Advantage plans.
Commercial Rate Increase Review - The Health Reform Legislation also requires HHS to maintain an annual review of “unreasonable” increases in premium rates for commercial health plans. HHS established a review threshold of annual premium rate increases generally at or above 10% (with state-specific thresholds to be applicable commencing September 2012) and clarified that HHS review will not supersede existing state review and approval procedures. Premium rate review legislation (ranging from new or enhanced rate filing requirements to prior approval requirements) has been introduced or passed in more than half of the states as of the date of this report.
The competitive forces common in our markets do not support unjustifiable rate increases. We have experienced and expect to continue to experience a tight, competitive commercial pricing environment. Further, our rates and rate filings are developed using methods consistent with the standards of actuarial practices. We anticipate requesting rate increases above 10% in a number of markets due to the combination of medical cost trends and the incremental costs of health care reform. We have begun to experience greater regulatory challenges to appropriate premium rate increases in several states, including California, New York and Rhode Island. Depending on the level of scrutiny by the states, there is a broad range of potential business impacts. For example, it may become more difficult to price our commercial risk business consistent with expected underlying cost trends, leading to the risk of operating margin compression in the commercial health benefits business.
Medicare Advantage Rates - Beginning in 2012, additional cuts from 2011 to Medicare Advantage benchmarks have taken effect (benchmarks will ultimately range from 95% of Medicare fee-for-service rates in high cost areas to 115% in low cost areas), with changes being phased-in over two to six years, depending on the level of benchmark reduction in a county. Additionally, Congress passed the Budget Control Act of 2011, which following a failure of the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction to cut the federal deficit by $1.2 trillion, triggers automatic across-the-board budget cuts (sequestration), including Medicare spending cuts averaging 2% of total program costs for nine years, starting in 2013.
A significant portion of our network contracts are tied to Medicare reimbursement levels. However, future Medicare Advantage rates may be outpaced by underlying medical cost trends, placing continued importance on effective medical management and ongoing improvements in administrative costs. There are a number of annual adjustments we can and are making to our operations, which may partially offset any impact from these rate reductions. For example, we seek to intensify our medical and operating cost management, adjust members' benefits and decide on a county-by-county basis in which geographies to participate. Additionally, achieving high quality scores from CMS for improving upon certain clinical and operational performance standards will impact future quality bonuses that may offset these anticipated rate reductions. CMS made certain changes to quality definitions after the quality score measurement period was completed that will adversely impact many Medicare Advantage market participants in 2013, including UnitedHealthcare.
We also may be able to mitigate the effects of reduced funding by increasing enrollment due, in part, to the increasing number of people eligible for Medicare in coming years. Compared to second quarter of 2011, our Medicare Advantage membership has increased by 395,000 consumers, or 18%, including acquisitions. Longer term, market wide decreases in the availability or relative quality of Medicare Advantage products may increase demand for other senior health benefits products such as our Medicare Part D and Medicare Supplement insurance offerings.

25

Table of Contents


Industry Fees - The Health Reform Legislation includes an annual, non-deductible insurance industry assessment to be levied proportionally across the insurance industry. The amount of the annual fee is $8 billion in 2014, $11.3 billion for 2015 and 2016, $13.9 billion in 2017 and $14.3 billion in 2018. For 2019 and beyond, the amount will be equal to the annual fee for the preceding year increased by the rate of premium growth for the preceding year. The annual fee will be allocated based on the ratio of an entity's net premiums written during the preceding calendar year to the total health insurance industry's net premiums written for any U.S. health risk during the preceding calendar year, subject to certain exceptions. This fee will be first paid and expensed in 2014. As a result of the non-deductibility of these fees, our effective income tax rate will increase significantly in 2014.
With the introduction of state health insurance exchanges in 2014, the Health Reform Legislation includes three programs designed to stabilize the health insurance markets. These programs are: a transitional Reinsurance Program; a temporary Risk Corridors Program; and a permanent Risk Adjustment Program. The transitional Reinsurance Program is a temporary program which will be funded on a per capita basis from all commercial lines of business including insured and self-funded arrangements ($25 billion over a three-year period beginning in 2014; $20 billion (subject to increases based on state decisions) of which funds the state reinsurance pools and $5 billion funds the U.S. Treasury). While the final HHS regulations have been released, the terms of the specific reinsurance programs to be used in each state are not yet known.
It is our intention to pass these fees on to customers through increases in rates and/or decreases in benefits, subject to regulatory approval.
State-Based Exchanges and Coverage Expansion - Effective in 2014, state-based exchanges are required to be established for individuals and small employers. The Health Reform Legislation also provides for expanded Medicaid coverage effective in January 2014. These measures remain subject to implementation at the state level.
Court Proceedings and Legislative/Regulatory Actions - The United States Supreme Court issued its opinion on June 28, 2012 declaring the Health Reform Legislation constitutional, with the exception of the provision that would have permitted Congress to withhold existing Medicaid funds from states choosing not to participate in Medicaid expansion. With the Court's ruling, the focus turns to potential regulatory or legislative action. For example, Congress may attempt to withhold the funding necessary to implement the Health Reform Legislation, or may attempt to replace the legislation with amended provisions or repeal it altogether. Any partial or complete repeal or amendment, or uncertainty regarding such events, could materially and adversely impact our results of operations, financial position, cash flows and our ability to capitalize on the opportunities presented by the Health Reform Legislation or may cause us to incur additional costs of compliance or reversing some of the changes we have already implemented. The potential for regulatory or legislative actions that impact implementation creates additional uncertainties with respect to the law.
For additional information regarding the Health Reform Legislation and Regulatory Trends and Uncertainties, see Item 1, “Business - Government Regulation,” Item 1A, “Risk Factors” and Item 7, “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Regulatory Trends and Uncertainties” in our 2011 10-K.



26

Table of Contents


RESULTS SUMMARY
 
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Increase/(Decrease)
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
Increase/(Decrease)
(in millions, except percentages and per share data)
 
2012
 
2011
 
2012 vs. 2011
 
2012
 
2011
 
2012 vs. 2011
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Premiums
 
$
24,609

 
$
22,813

 
$
1,796

 
8
%
 
$
49,240

 
$
45,816

 
$
3,424

 
7
%
Services
 
1,800

 
1,656

 
144

 
9

 
3,591

 
3,254

 
337

 
10

Products
 
678

 
605

 
73

 
12

 
1,366

 
1,254

 
112

 
9

Investment and other income
 
178

 
160

 
18

 
11

 
350

 
342

 
8

 
2

Total revenues
 
27,265

 
25,234

 
2,031

 
8

 
54,547

 
50,666

 
3,881

 
8

Operating costs:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Medical costs
 
20,013

 
18,578

 
1,435

 
8

 
39,952

 
37,303

 
2,649

 
7

Operating costs
 
4,080

 
3,733

 
347

 
9

 
8,176

 
7,350

 
826

 
11

Cost of products sold
 
620

 
554

 
66

 
12

 
1,254

 
1,153

 
101

 
9

Depreciation and amortization
 
326

 
270

 
56

 
21

 
622

 
540

 
82

 
15

Total operating costs
 
25,039

 
23,135

 
1,904

 
8

 
50,004

 
46,346

 
3,658

 
8

Earnings from operations
 
2,226

 
2,099

 
127

 
6

 
4,543

 
4,320

 
223

 
5

Interest expense
 
(153
)
 
(119
)
 
34

 
29

 
(301
)
 
(237
)
 
64

 
27

Earnings before income taxes
 
2,073

 
1,980

 
93

 
5

 
4,242

 
4,083

 
159

 
4

Provision for income taxes
 
(736
)
 
(713
)
 
23

 
3

 
(1,517
)
 
(1,470
)
 
47

 
3

Net earnings
 
$
1,337

 
$
1,267

 
$
70

 
6
%
 
$
2,725

 
$
2,613

 
$
112

 
4
%
Diluted net earnings per common share
 
$
1.27

 
$
1.16

 
$
0.11

 
9
%
 
$
2.59

 
$
2.38

 
$
0.21

 
9
%
Medical care ratio (a)
 
81.3
%
 
81.4
%
 
(0.1
)%
 


 
81.1
%
 
81.4
%
 
(0.3
)%
 
 
Operating cost ratio
 
15.0

 
14.8

 
0.2

 


 
15.0

 
14.5

 
0.5

 
 
Operating margin
 
8.2

 
8.3

 
(0.1
)
 


 
8.3

 
8.5

 
(0.2
)
 
 
Tax rate
 
35.5

 
36.0

 
(0.5
)
 


 
35.8

 
36.0

 
(0.2
)
 
 
Net margin
 
4.9

 
5.0

 
(0.1
)
 


 
5.0

 
5.2

 
(0.2
)
 
 
Return on equity (b)
 
18.4
%
 
18.8
%
 
(0.4
)%
 
 
 
18.9
%
 
19.7
%
 
(0.8
)%
 
 
(a)
Medical care ratio is calculated as medical costs divided by premium revenue.
(b)
Return on equity is calculated as annualized net earnings divided by average equity. Average equity is calculated using the equity balance at the end of the preceding year and the equity balances at the end of each of the quarters in the periods presented.
SELECTED OPERATING PERFORMANCE AND OTHER SIGNIFICANT ITEMS
The following represents a summary of selected second quarter 2012 year-over-year operating comparisons to the second quarter 2011 and other significant items.
Consolidated total revenues of $27.3 billion increased 8%.
UnitedHealthcare revenues of $25.5 billion rose 8%.
Optum revenues of $7.3 billion increased 4%.
UnitedHealthcare medical enrollment grew by 1.7 million people; Medicare Part D stand-alone membership decreased by 0.6 million people.
The consolidated medical care ratio of 81.3% decreased 10 basis points.
Net earnings of $1.3 billion and diluted earnings per share of $1.27 increased 6% and 9%, respectively.
Liquidity:
$1.0 billion in cash was held by non-regulated entities as of June 30, 2012.
2012 debt offering raised new debt totaling $1.0 billion.
June 30, 2012 debt to debt-plus-equity ratio increased 90 basis points to 30.0% from 29.1% as of December 31, 2011.
Cash paid for acquisitions in the first half of 2012, net of cash assumed, totaled $2.4 billion.
In July 2012, the Government Accountability Office affirmed the Defense Department’s award of the TRICARE West region Managed Care Support Contract to UnitedHealthcare.

27

Table of Contents


2012 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS COMPARED TO 2011 RESULTS
Consolidated Financial Results
Revenues
The increases in revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 were driven by growth in the number of individuals served and premium rate increases in our UnitedHealthcare businesses and overall growth in our OptumHealth business at Optum.
Medical Costs
Medical costs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 increased due to risk-based membership growth in our public and senior markets businesses, unit cost inflation across all businesses and continued moderate increases in health system use, partially offset by an increase in net favorable medical cost development. Unit cost increases represented the majority of the increases in our medical cost trend, with the largest contributor being price increases to hospitals.
Operating Costs
The increases in our operating costs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 were due to business growth, including an increase in fee-based benefits, services and product revenues, which carry comparatively higher operating costs, as well as investments in the pharmacy management services business.
Reportable Segments
We have four reportable segments across our two business platforms, UnitedHealthcare and Optum:
UnitedHealthcare, which includes UnitedHealthcare Employer & Individual, UnitedHealthcare Medicare & Retirement and UnitedHealthcare Community & State;
OptumHealth;
OptumInsight; and
OptumRx.
See Note 10 of Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Item 1, “Business” in our 2011 10-K for a description of how each of our reportable segments derives its revenues.
Transactions between reportable segments principally consist of sales of pharmacy benefit products and services to UnitedHealthcare customers by OptumRx, certain product offerings and clinical services sold to UnitedHealthcare by OptumHealth, and health information and technology solutions, consulting and other services sold to UnitedHealthcare by OptumInsight. These transactions are recorded at management’s estimate of fair value. Intersegment transactions are eliminated in consolidation.

28

Table of Contents


The following table presents reportable segment financial information:
 
 
Three Months Ended
June 30,
 
Increase/(Decrease)
 
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
Increase/(Decrease)
(in millions, except percentages)
 
2012
 
2011
 
2012 vs. 2011
 
2012
 
2011
 
2012 vs. 2011
Revenues
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
UnitedHealthcare
 
$
25,516

 
$
23,653

 
$
1,863

 
8
%
 
$
51,049

 
$
47,527

 
$
3,522

 
7
%
OptumHealth
 
2,025

 
1,670

 
355

 
21

 
3,964

 
3,177

 
787

 
25

OptumInsight
 
671

 
658

 
13

 
2

 
1,342

 
1,329

 
13

 
1

OptumRx
 
4,605

 
4,688

 
(83
)
 
(2
)
 
9,326

 
9,320

 
6

 

Total Optum
 
7,301

 
7,016

 
285

 
4

 
14,632

 
13,826

 
806

 
6

Eliminations
 
(5,552
)
 
(5,435
)
 
117

 
2

 
(11,134
)
 
(10,687
)
 
447

 
4

Consolidated revenues
 
$
27,265

 
$
25,234

 
$
2,031

 
8
%
 
$
54,547

 
$
50,666

 
$
3,881

 
8
%
Earnings from operations
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
UnitedHealthcare
 
$
1,906

 
$
1,759

 
$
147

 
8
 %
 
$
3,971

 
$
3,658

 
$
313

 
9
 %
OptumHealth
 
123

 
135

 
(12
)
 
(9
)
 
215

 
244

 
(29
)
 
(12
)
OptumInsight
 
95

 
87

 
8

 
9

 
184

 
170

 
14

 
8

OptumRx
 
102

 
118

 
(16
)
 
(14
)
 
173

 
248

 
(75
)
 
(30
)
Total Optum
 
320

 
340

 
(20
)
 
(6
)
 
572

 
662

 
(90
)
 
(14
)
Consolidated earnings from operations
 
$
2,226

 
$
2,099

 
$
127

 
6
 %
 
$
4,543

 
$
4,320

 
$
223

 
5
 %
Operating margin
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
UnitedHealthcare
 
7.5
%
 
7.4
%
 
0.1
 %
 


 
7.8
%
 
7.7
%
 
0.1
 %
 
 
OptumHealth
 
6.1

 
8.1

 
(2.0
)
 


 
5.4

 
7.7

 
(2.3
)
 
 
OptumInsight
 
14.2

 
13.2

 
1.0

 


 
13.7

 
12.8

 
0.9

 
 
OptumRx
 
2.2

 
2.5

 
(0.3
)
 


 
1.9

 
2.7

 
(0.8
)
 
 
Total Optum
 
4.4

 
4.8

 
(0.4
)
 


 
3.9

 
4.8

 
(0.9
)
 
 
Consolidated operating margin
 
8.2
%
 
8.3
%
 
(0.1
)%
 


 
8.3
%
 
8.5
%
 
(0.2
)%
 
 
UnitedHealthcare
The following table summarizes UnitedHealthcare revenue by business:
 
 
Three Months Ended
June 30,
 
Increase/(Decrease)
 
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
Increase/(Decrease)
(in millions, except percentages)
 
2012
 
2011
 
2012 vs. 2011
 
2012
 
2011
 
2012 vs. 2011
UnitedHealthcare Employer & Individual
 
$
11,616

 
$
11,307

 
$
309

 
3
%
 
$
23,293

 
$
22,449

 
$
844

 
4
%
UnitedHealthcare Medicare & Retirement
 
10,098

 
9,015

 
1,083

 
12

 
20,311

 
18,427

 
1,884

 
10

UnitedHealthcare Community & State
 
3,802

 
3,331

 
471

 
14

 
7,445

 
6,651

 
794

 
12

Total UnitedHealthcare revenue
 
$
25,516

 
$
23,653

 
$
1,863

 
8
%
 
$
51,049

 
$
47,527

 
$
3,522

 
7
%

29

Table of Contents


The following table summarizes the number of individuals served by our UnitedHealthcare businesses, by major market segment and funding arrangement:
 
 
June 30,
 
Increase/(Decrease)
(in thousands, except percentages)
 
2012
 
2011
 
2012 vs. 2011
Commercial risk-based
 
9,345

 
9,495

 
(150
)
 
(2
)%
Commercial fee-based
 
17,075

 
16,205

 
870

 
5

Total commercial
 
26,420

 
25,700

 
720

 
3

Medicare Advantage
 
2,580

 
2,185

 
395

 
18

Medicaid
 
3,800

 
3,430

 
370

 
11

Medicare Supplement
 
3,075

 
2,860

 
215

 
8

Total public and senior (a)
 
9,455

 
8,475

 
980

 
12

Total UnitedHealthcare - medical
 
35,875

 
34,175

 
1,700

 
5
 %
Supplemental Data:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Medicare Part D stand-alone
 
4,230

 
4,780

 
(550
)
 
(12
)%
(a) Excludes pre-standardized Medicare Supplement and other AARP products.
Commercial risk-based membership decreased due to a competitive market environment, conversions to fee-based products by large public sector clients that we retained and other decreases in the public sector. In fee-based commercial products the increase was due to strong customer retention and a number of new business awards. Medicare Advantage increased due to strengthened execution in product design, marketing and local engagement combined with the addition of 185,000 Medicare Advantage members from 2012 acquisitions. Medicaid growth was due to a combination of winning new state accounts and growth within existing state customers. Medicare Supplement growth was due to strong retention and new sales. In our Medicare Part D stand-alone business, membership decreased primarily as a result of the first quarter 2012 loss of approximately 470,000 auto-assigned low-income subsidy Medicare Part D beneficiaries, due to pricing benchmarks for the government-subsidized low income Medicare Part D market coming in below our bids in a number of regions.
UnitedHealthcare's revenue growth for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 was primarily due to growth in the number of individuals served and commercial premium rate increases due to expected underlying medical cost trends.
UnitedHealthcare's earnings from operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 increased compared to the prior year primarily due to the factors that increased revenues combined with an improvement in the medical care ratio. The six month increase in earnings from operations included the benefit of $140 million as a result of updating estimates for the calculations of 2011 premium rebates payable.
In March 2012, UnitedHealthcare was awarded the TRICARE West Region Managed Care Support Contract. The contract, for health care operations, includes a transition period and five one-year renewals at the government's option. The first year of operations is anticipated to begin April 1, 2013. The base administrative services contract is expected to generate $1.4 billion in revenues over the five years. In 2012, we expect to incur startup costs that will not have a material effect on our financial statements.
Optum. Total revenue for Optum businesses increased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 due to business growth and 2011 acquisitions at OptumHealth.
Optum’s earnings from operations and operating margin for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 decreased compared to 2011 due to investments across the Optum business infrastructure (primarily to support scaling pharmacy management services) and the reduction in Medicare Part D pharmacy membership and related prescription volumes.
The results by segment were as follows:
OptumHealth
The increases in revenues at OptumHealth for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 were primarily due to market expansion, including 2011 acquisitions in integrated care delivery, and strong growth in wellness and network-based health programs.
Earnings from operations and operating margin for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 decreased compared to 2011, driven by business mix, primarily a higher revenue base and comparatively lower margins in integrated care delivery and investments to expand and develop the business.

30

Table of Contents


OptumInsight
Revenues at OptumInsight for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 increased slightly, as the impact of organic growth was mostly offset by the divestiture of the clinical trials services business in June 2011.
The increases in earnings from operations and operating margins for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 reflect an improved mix of services.
OptumRx
The decrease in OptumRx revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2012 was driven by the reduction in UnitedHealthcare Medicare Part D plan participants. OptumRx revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2012 were flat as net growth in customers and an increase in high revenue specialty pharmacy scripts offset the reduction in UnitedHealthcare Medicare Part D plan participants. Intersegment revenues eliminated in consolidation were $3.9 billion and $8.0 billion for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and $4.1 billion and $8.1 billion for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011.
OptumRx earnings from operations and operating margins for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 decreased as investments to support growth initiatives, including the in-sourcing of our commercial pharmacy benefit programs, and decreased prescription volume in the Medicare Part D business, more than offset the earnings contribution from specialty pharmacy growth and greater use of generic medications.
LIQUIDITY, FINANCIAL CONDITION AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Liquidity
Introduction
We manage our liquidity and financial position in the context of our overall business strategy. We continually forecast and manage our cash, investments, working capital balances and capital structure to meet the short- and long-term obligations of our businesses while seeking to maintain liquidity and financial flexibility. Cash flows generated from operating activities are principally from earnings before non-cash expenses.
Our regulated subsidiaries generate significant cash flows from operations and are subject to financial regulations and standards in their respective states of domicile. Most of these regulations and standards conform to those established by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners. These standards, among other things, require these subsidiaries to maintain specified levels of statutory capital, as defined by each state, and restrict the timing and amount of dividends and other distributions that may be paid to their parent companies. Except in the case of extraordinary dividends, these standards generally permit dividends to be paid from statutory unassigned surplus of the regulated subsidiary and are limited based on the regulated subsidiary’s level of statutory net income and statutory capital and surplus. These dividends are referred to as “ordinary dividends” and generally can be paid without prior regulatory approval. If the dividend, together with other dividends paid within the preceding twelve months, exceeds a specified statutory limit or is paid from sources other than earned surplus, the entire dividend is generally considered an “extraordinary dividend” and must receive prior regulatory approval.
In 2012, based on the 2011 statutory net income and statutory capital and surplus levels, the maximum amount of ordinary dividends that can be paid by our regulated subsidiaries to their parent companies is $4.6 billion. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, our regulated subsidiaries paid their parent companies dividends of $2.1 billion, including $393 million of extraordinary dividends. For the year ended December 31, 2011, our regulated subsidiaries paid their parent companies dividends of $4.5 billion, including $1.1 billion of extraordinary dividends.
Our non-regulated businesses also generate cash flows from operations for general corporate use. Cash flows generated by these entities, combined with dividends from our regulated entities and financing through the issuance of long term debt as well as issuance of commercial paper or drawings under our committed credit facility, further strengthen our operating and financial flexibility. We use these cash flows to expand our businesses through acquisitions, reinvest in our businesses through capital expenditures, repay debt, and return capital to our shareholders through shareholder dividends and/or repurchases of our common stock, depending on market conditions.

31

Table of Contents


Summary of our Major Sources and Uses of Cash
 
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions)
 
2012
 
2011
Sources of cash:
 
 
 
 
Cash provided by operating activities
 
$
5,771

 
$
2,419

Proceeds from customer funds administered
 
1,108

 
1,228

Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
 
995

 

Other
 

 
269

Total sources of cash
 
7,874

 
3,916

Uses of cash:
 
 
 
 
Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash assumed
 
(2,404
)
 
(449
)
Common stock repurchases
 
(1,809
)
 
(1,255
)
Purchases of property, equipment and capitalized software
 
(465
)
 
(516
)
Purchases of investments, net of sales and maturities
 
(534
)
 
(593
)
Dividends paid
 
(386
)
 
(309
)
Repayments of long-term debt and commercial paper, net of issuances
 

 
(54
)
Other
 
(127
)
 
(88
)
Total uses of cash
 
(5,725
)
 
(3,264
)
Net increase in cash
 
$
2,149

 
$
652

2012 Cash Flows Compared to 2011 Cash Flows
Cash flows from operating activities increased $3.4 billion, from 2011. The increased cash flows were primarily driven by an approximately $2.7 billion increase in unearned premiums due to the early receipt of the July CMS payment and a decrease in accounts receivable also attributed to the July CMS payment. See Note 4 of Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further detail on the July CMS payment. We anticipate lower year over year cash flows from operations in 2012, which will include payments in the third quarter for 2011 premium rebate obligations.
Cash flows used for investing activities increased $1.8 billion, or 118%, primarily due to increased investments in acquisitions in 2012.
Cash flows used for financing activities increased $10 million, or 5%, primarily due to an increase in share repurchases partially offset by increased net borrowings.
Financial Condition
As of June 30, 2012, our cash, cash equivalent and available-for-sale investment balances of $30.7 billion included $11.6 billion of cash and cash equivalents (of which $1.0 billion was held by non-regulated entities), $18.5 billion of debt securities and $606 million of investments in equity securities and venture capital funds. Given the significant portion of our portfolio held in cash equivalents, we do not anticipate fluctuations in the aggregate fair value of our financial assets to have a material impact on our liquidity or capital position. The use of different market assumptions or valuation methodologies, especially those used in valuing our $235 million of available-for-sale Level 3 securities (those securities priced using significant unobservable inputs), may have an effect on the estimated fair value amounts of our investments. Due to the subjective nature of these assumptions, the estimates may not be indicative of the actual exit price if we had sold the investment at the measurement date. Other sources of liquidity, primarily from operating cash flows and our commercial paper program, which is supported by our $3.0 billion bank credit facility, reduce the need to sell investments during adverse market conditions. See Note 3 of Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further detail of our fair value measurements.
Our cash equivalent and investment portfolio has a weighted-average duration of 1.9 years and a weighted-average credit rating of “AA” as of June 30, 2012. Included in the debt securities balance are $2.1 billion of state and municipal obligations that are guaranteed by a number of third parties. Due to the high underlying credit ratings of the issuers, the weighted-average credit rating of these securities with and without the guarantee was “AA” as of June 30, 2012. We do not have any significant exposure to any single guarantor (neither indirect through the guarantees, nor direct through investment in the guarantor). When multiple credit ratings are available for an individual security, the average of the available ratings is used to determine the weighted-average credit rating.

32

Table of Contents


Capital Resources and Uses of Liquidity
In addition to cash flow from operations and cash and cash equivalent balances available for general corporate use, our capital resources and uses of liquidity are as follows:
Commercial Paper. We maintain a commercial paper borrowing program, which facilitates the private placement of unsecured debt through third-party broker-dealers. The commercial paper program is supported by the bank credit facility described below. As of June 30, 2012, we had no commercial paper outstanding.
Bank Credit Facility. We have a $3.0 billion five-year revolving bank credit facility with 21 banks, which will mature in December 2016. This facility supports our commercial paper program and is available for general corporate purposes. There were no amounts outstanding under this facility as of June 30, 2012. The interest rate on borrowings is variable based on term and amount and is calculated based on the LIBOR plus a credit spread based on our senior unsecured credit ratings. As of June 30, 2012, the annual interest rate on this facility, had it been drawn, would have ranged from 1.2% to 1.6%.
Our bank credit facility contains various covenants, including requiring us to maintain a debt to debt-plus-equity ratio below 50%. Our debt to debt-plus-equity ratio, calculated as the sum of debt divided by the sum of debt and shareholders’ equity, which approximates the actual covenant ratio, was 30.0% and 29.1% as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. We were in compliance with our debt covenants as of June 30, 2012.
Long-term debt. Periodically, we access capital markets and issue long-term debt for general corporate purposes and the funds may be used, for example, to meet our working capital requirements, to refinance debt, to finance acquisitions, for share repurchases or for other general corporate purposes.
In March 2012, we issued $1 billion in senior unsecured notes. The issuance included $600 million of 2.875% fixed-rate notes due March 2022 and $400 million of 4.375% fixed-rate notes due March 2042.
Credit Ratings. Our credit ratings at June 30, 2012 were as follows:
  
Moody’s
  
Standard & Poor’s
  
Fitch
  
A.M. Best
 
Ratings
  
Outlook
  
Ratings
  
Outlook
  
Ratings
  
Outlook
  
Ratings
  
Outlook
Senior unsecured debt
A3
  
Stable
  
A-
  
Positive
  
A-
  
Stable
  
bbb+
  
Stable
Commercial paper
P-2
  
n/a
  
A-2
  
n/a
  
F1
  
n/a
  
AMB-2
  
n/a
 
The availability of financing in the form of debt or equity is influenced by many factors, including our profitability, operating cash flows, debt levels, credit ratings, debt covenants and other contractual restrictions, regulatory requirements and economic and market conditions. For example, a significant downgrade in our credit ratings or conditions in the capital markets may increase the cost of borrowing for us or limit our access to capital. We have adopted strategies and actions toward maintaining financial flexibility to mitigate the impact of such factors on our ability to raise capital.
Share Repurchase Program. Under our Board of Directors’ authorization, we maintain a share repurchase program. Repurchases may be made from time to time in open market purchases or other types of transactions (including prepaid or structured share repurchase programs), subject to certain Board restrictions. In June 2012, our Board renewed and expanded the Company’s share repurchase program with an authorization to repurchase up to 110 million shares of our common stock. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, we repurchased 33 million shares at an average price of $55.03 per share and an aggregate cost of $1.8 billion. As of June 30, 2012, we had Board authorization to purchase up to an additional 109 million shares of our common stock.
Dividends. In June 2012, our Board of Directors increased our cash dividend to shareholders to an annual dividend rate of $0.85 per share, paid quarterly. Since May 2011, we had paid an annual dividend of $0.65 per share, paid quarterly. Declaration and payment of future quarterly dividends is at the discretion of the Board and may be adjusted as business needs or market conditions change.

33

Table of Contents


The following table provides details of our dividend payments in 2012:
Payment Date
 
Amount per Share
 
Total Amount Paid
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
3/19/2012
 
$
0.1625

 
$
168

6/22/2012
 
$
0.2125

 
218

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS
A summary of future obligations under our various contractual obligations and commitments as of December 31, 2011 was disclosed in our 2011 10-K. During the six months ended June 30, 2012 there were no material changes to this previously-filed information outside the ordinary course of business. However, we continually evaluate opportunities to expand our operations, including internal development of new products, programs and technology applications and acquisitions.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
We have determined that there have been no recently issued, but not yet adopted, accounting standards that will have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
We prepared our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP. In preparing these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, we are required to make judgments, assumptions and estimates, which we believe are reasonable and prudent based on the available facts and circumstances. These judgments, assumptions and estimates affect certain of our revenues and expenses and their related balance sheet accounts and disclosure of our contingent liabilities. We base our assumptions and estimates primarily on historical experience and trends and factor in known and projected trends. On an on-going basis, we re-evaluate our selection of assumptions and the method of calculating our estimates. Actual results, however, may materially differ from our calculated estimates and this difference would be reported in our current operations.
Our critical accounting estimates include medical costs, revenues, goodwill and intangible assets, investments, income taxes and contingent liabilities. For a detailed description of our critical accounting estimates, see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II of our 2011 10-K. As of June 30, 2012, our critical accounting policies have not changed from those described in our 2011 10-K. For a detailed discussion of our significant accounting policies, see Note 2 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2011 10-K.
CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK
Investments in financial instruments such as marketable securities and accounts receivable may subject us to concentrations of credit risk. Our investments in marketable securities are managed under an investment policy authorized by our Board of Directors. This policy limits the amounts that may be invested in any one issuer and generally limits our investments to U.S. government and agency securities, state and municipal securities and corporate debt obligations that are investment grade. Concentrations of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable are limited due to the large number of employer groups and other customers that constitute our client base. As of June 30, 2012, we had an aggregate $1.9 billion reinsurance receivable resulting from the sale of our Golden Rule Financial Corporation life and annuity business in 2005. We regularly evaluate the financial condition of the reinsurer and only record the reinsurance receivable to the extent that the amounts are deemed probable of recovery. Currently, the reinsurer is rated by A.M. Best as “A+.” As of June 30, 2012, there were no other significant concentrations of credit risk.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The statements, estimates, projections, guidance or outlook contained in this report include “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PSLRA). These statements are intended to take advantage of the “safe harbor” provisions of the PSLRA. Generally the words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “project,” “should” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements, which generally are not historical in nature. These statements may contain information about financial prospects, economic conditions and trends and involve risks and uncertainties. We caution that actual results could differ materially from those that management expects, depending on the outcome of certain factors.
Some factors that could cause results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements include: our ability to effectively estimate, price for and manage our medical costs, including the impact of any new coverage requirements; the potential impact

34

Table of Contents


that new laws or regulations, or changes in existing laws or regulations, or their enforcement or application could have on our results of operations, financial position and cash flows, including as a result of increases in medical, administrative, technology or other costs or decreases in enrollment resulting from federal, state, local and international regulations affecting the health care industry; the impact of any potential assessments for insolvent payers under state guaranty fund laws, including any that could arise out of the potential liquidation of Penn Treaty Network America Insurance Company; the ultimate impact of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations, financial position and cash flows through reduced revenues, increased costs, new taxes and expanded liability, or require changes to the ways in which we conduct business or put us at risk for loss of business; potential reductions in revenue received from Medicare and Medicaid programs; uncertainties regarding changes in Medicare, including potential changes in risk adjustment data validation audit and payment adjustment methodology; failure to comply with patient privacy and data security regulations; regulatory and other risks and uncertainties associated with the pharmacy benefits management industry and our ability to successfully repatriate our pharmacy benefits management business; competitive pressures, which could affect our ability to maintain or increase our market share; the impact of challenges to our public sector contract awards; our ability to execute contracts on competitive terms with physicians, hospitals and other service professionals; our ability to attract, retain and provide support to a network of independent producers (i.e., brokers and agents) and consultants; events that may adversely affect our relationship with AARP; increases in costs and other liabilities associated with increased litigation, government investigations, audits or reviews; the potential impact of adverse economic conditions on our revenues (including decreases in enrollment resulting from increases in the unemployment rate and commercial attrition) and results of operations; the performance of our investment portfolio; possible impairment of the value of our goodwill and intangible assets in connection with dispositions or if estimated future results do not adequately support goodwill and intangible assets recorded for our existing businesses or the businesses that we acquire; increases in health care costs resulting from large-scale medical emergencies; failure to maintain effective and efficient information systems or if our technology products otherwise do not operate as intended; misappropriation of our proprietary technology; our ability to obtain sufficient funds from our regulated subsidiaries to fund our obligations, to maintain our quarterly dividend payment cycle or to continue repurchasing shares of our common stock; failure to complete or receive anticipated benefits of acquisitions and other strategic transactions; potential downgrades in our credit ratings; and failure to achieve targeted operating cost productivity improvements, including savings resulting from technology enhancement and administrative modernization.
This list of important factors is not intended to be exhaustive. We discuss certain of these matters more fully, as well as certain risk factors that may affect our business operations, financial condition and results of operations, in our other periodic and current filings with the SEC, including our 2011 10-K. Any or all forward-looking statements we make may turn out to be wrong. They can be affected by inaccurate assumptions we might make or by known or unknown risks and uncertainties. By their nature, forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance or results and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict or quantify. Actual future results may vary materially from expectations expressed in this report or any of our prior communications. You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date they are made. We do not undertake to update or revise any forward-looking statements.
ITEM 3.    QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Our primary market risks are exposures to (a) changes in interest rates that impact our investment income and interest expense and the fair value of certain of our fixed-rate investments and debt and (b) changes in equity prices that impact the value of our equity investments.
As of June 30, 2012, we had $12.5 billion of investments on which the interest rates received vary with market interest rates, which may materially impact our investment income. Also, $2.1 billion of our debt and deposit liabilities as of June 30, 2012 were at interest rates that vary with market rates, either directly or through the use of related interest rate swap contracts.
The fair value of certain of our fixed-rate investments and debt also varies with market interest rates. As of June 30, 2012, $18.9 billion of our investments were fixed-rate debt securities and $12.1 billion of our debt was non-swapped fixed-rate term debt. An increase in market interest rates decreases the market value of fixed-rate investments and fixed-rate debt. Conversely, a decrease in market interest rates increases the market value of fixed-rate investments and fixed-rate debt.
We manage exposure to market interest rates by diversifying investments across different fixed income market sectors and debt across maturities, as well as endeavoring to match our floating-rate assets and liabilities over time, either directly or periodically through the use of interest rate swap contracts.

35

Table of Contents


The following table summarizes the impact of hypothetical changes in market interest rates across the entire yield curve by 1% or 2% as of June 30, 2012 on our investment income and interest expense per annum, and the fair value of our investments and debt (in millions, except percentages):
 
 
June 30, 2012
Increase (Decrease) in Market Interest Rate
 
Investment
Income Per
Annum (a)
 
Interest
Expense Per
Annum (a)
 
Fair Value of
Investments (b)
 
Fair Value of
Debt
2 %
 
$
249

 
$
42

 
$
(1,253
)
 
$
(2,095
)
1
 
125

 
21

 
(628
)
 
(1,133
)
(1)
 
(24
)
 
(5
)
 
465

 
1,263

(2)
 
nm

 
nm

 
587

 
2,570

nm = not meaningful
(a)
Given the low absolute level of short-term market rates on our floating-rate assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2012 and 2011, the assumed hypothetical change in interest rates does not reflect the full 100 basis point reduction in interest income or interest expense as the rate cannot fall below zero and thus the 200 basis point reduction is not meaningful.
(b)
As of June 30, 2012, some of our investments had interest rates below 2% so the assumed hypothetical change in the fair value of investments does not reflect the full 200 basis point reduction.
As of June 30, 2012, we had $606 million of investments in equity securities and venture capital funds, a portion of which were invested in various public and non-public companies concentrated in the areas of health care delivery and related information technologies. Market conditions that affect the value of health care or technology stocks will impact the value of our equity investments.
ITEM 4.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms; and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
In connection with the filing of this Form 10-Q, management evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2012. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level as of June 30, 2012.
CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. 

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM  1.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
A description of our legal proceedings is included in and incorporated by reference to Note 9 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Part I, Item 1 of this report.
ITEM 1A.
RISK FACTORS

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item
1A, “Risk Factors” of our 2011 10-K, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks
described in our 2011 10-K are not the only risks facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that
we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating
results.

There have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in our 2011 10-K.


36

Table of Contents


ITEM  2.    UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities (a)
Second Quarter 2012
For the Month Ended
 
Total Number
of Shares
Purchased
 
Average Price
Paid per Share
 
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs
 
Maximum Number
of Shares That May
Yet Be Purchased
Under The Plans or
Programs
 
 
(in millions)
 
 
 
(in millions)
 
(in millions)
April 30, 2012
 
6

 
$
58.35

 
6

 
40

May 31, 2012
 
7

 
55.49

 
7

 
33

June 30, 2012
 
1

 
57.88

 
1

 
109

Total
 
14

  
$
57.00

 
14

 
 
 
(a)
In November 1997, our Board of Directors adopted a share repurchase program, which the Board evaluates periodically. In June 2012, the Board renewed and expanded our share repurchase program with an authorization to repurchase up to 110 million shares of our common stock in open market purchases or other types of transactions (including prepaid or structured repurchase programs). There is no established expiration date for the program.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS *
The following exhibits are filed in response to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.
3.1

 
Third Restated Articles of Incorporation of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 29, 2007)
3.2

 
Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 23, 2009)
4.1

 
Senior Indenture, dated as of November 15, 1998, between United HealthCare Corporation and The Bank of New York (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-3/A, SEC File Number 333-66013, filed on January 11, 1999)
4.2

 
Amendment, dated as of November 6, 2000, to Senior Indenture, dated as of November 15, 1998, between the UnitedHealth Group Incorporated and The Bank of New York (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001)
4.3

 
Instrument of Resignation, Appointment and Acceptance of Trustee, dated January 8, 2007, pursuant to the Senior Indenture, dated November 15, 1998, amended November 6, 2000, among UnitedHealth Group Incorporated, The Bank of New York and Wilmington Trust Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007)
4.4

 
Indenture, dated as of February 4, 2008, between UnitedHealth Group Incorporated and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-3, SEC File Number 333-149031, filed on February 4, 2008)
  12.1

 
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
  31.1

 
Certifications pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  32.1

 
Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  101

 
The following materials from UnitedHealth Group Incorporated's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 filed on August 7, 2012, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity, (v) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (vi) Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
 ________________
*
 
Pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, copies of instruments defining the rights of certain holders of long-term debt are not filed. The Company will furnish copies thereof to the SEC upon request.


37

Table of Contents


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED
 
/s/    STEPHEN J. HEMSLEY
 
President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
Dated:
August 7, 2012
Stephen J. Hemsley
 
  
 
 
 
 
/s/    DAVID S. WICHMANN
 
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of UnitedHealth Group and President of UnitedHealth Group Operations
(principal financial officer)
Dated:
August 7, 2012
David S. Wichmann
 
  
 
 
 
 
/S/    ERIC S. RANGEN
 
Senior Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer
(principal accounting officer)
Dated:
August 7, 2012
Eric S. Rangen
 
  
 


38

Table of Contents


EXHIBIT INDEX*
 
3.1

 
Third Restated Articles of Incorporation of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 29, 2007)
3.2

 
Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 23, 2009)
4.1

 
Senior Indenture, dated as of November 15, 1998, between United HealthCare Corporation and The Bank of New York (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-3/A, SEC File Number 333-66013, filed on January 11, 1999)
4.2

 
Amendment, dated as of November 6, 2000, to Senior Indenture, dated as of November 15, 1998, between the UnitedHealth Group Incorporated and The Bank of New York (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001)
4.3

 
Instrument of Resignation, Appointment and Acceptance of Trustee, dated January 8, 2007, pursuant to the Senior Indenture, dated November 15, 1998, amended November 6, 2000, among UnitedHealth Group Incorporated, The Bank of New York and Wilmington Trust Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007)
4.4

 
Indenture, dated as of February 4, 2008, between UnitedHealth Group Incorporated and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-3, SEC File Number 333-149031, filed on February 4, 2008)
  12.1

 
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
  31.1

 
Certifications pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  32.1

 
Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  101

 
The following materials from UnitedHealth Group Incorporated's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 filed on August 7, 2012, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity, (v) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (vi) Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
 ________________
*
 
Pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, copies of instruments defining the rights of certain holders of long-term debt are not filed. The Company will furnish copies thereof to the SEC upon request.


39