x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 |
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to |
Virginia | 54-1497771 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
1100 Boulders Parkway, Richmond, Virginia | 23225 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Title of Each Class | Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered | |
Common Stock | New York Stock Exchange | |
Preferred Stock Purchase Rights | New York Stock Exchange |
Large accelerated filer | x | Accelerated filer | ¨ |
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
* | In determining this figure, an aggregate of 7,369,210 shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by Floyd D. Gottwald, Jr., John D. Gottwald, William M. Gottwald and the members of their immediate families has been excluded because the shares are deemed to be held by affiliates. The aggregate market value has been computed based on the closing price in the New York Stock Exchange on June 30, 2015. |
Page | |||
Part I | |||
Item 1. | Business | 1-4 | |
Item 1A. | Risk Factors | 5-9 | |
Item 1B. | Unresolved Staff Comments | ||
Item 2. | Properties | ||
Item 3. | Legal Proceedings | ||
Item 4. | Mine Safety Disclosures | ||
Part II | |||
Item 5. | Market for Tredegar’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities | 11-12 | |
Item 6. | Selected Financial Data | ||
Item 7. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | ||
Item 7A. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | ||
Item 8. | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data | ||
Item 9. | Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure | ||
Item 9A. | Controls and Procedures | ||
Item 9B. | Other Information | ||
Part III | |||
Item 10. | Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance* | ||
Item 11. | Executive Compensation | ||
Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters* | ||
Item 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence | ||
Item 14. | Principal Accounting Fees and Services | ||
Part IV | |||
Item 15. | Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules |
*Items | 11, 13 and 14 and portions of Items 10 and 12 are incorporated by reference from the Proxy Statement. |
Item 1. | BUSINESS |
• | Apertured film and laminate materials for use as topsheet in feminine hygiene products, baby diapers and adult incontinence products (including materials sold under the ComfortAire™, ComfortFeel™ and FreshFeel™ brand names); |
• | Breathable, embossed and elastic materials for use as components for baby diapers, adult incontinence products and feminine hygiene products (including elastic components sold under the ExtraFlex™, FabriFlex™, FlexAire™ and FlexFeel™ brand names); |
• | Absorbent transfer layers for baby diapers and adult incontinence products sold under the AquiDry® and AquiDry Plus™ brand names; |
• | Thin-gauge films that are readily printable and convertible on conventional processing equipment for overwrap for bathroom tissue and paper towels; and |
• | Polypropylene films for various industrial applications, including tape and automotive protection. |
% of PE Films Net Sales by Market Segment * | ||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||
Personal care materials | 75 | % | 79 | % | 81 | % | ||
Surface protection films | 23 | % | 19 | % | 18 | % | ||
Engineered polymer solutions | 2 | % | 2 | % | 1 | % | ||
Total | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | ||
* See previous discussion by market segment for comparison of net sales to the Company’s consolidated net sales (sales less freight) from continuing operations for significant market segments for each of the years presented. |
Major Markets | End-Uses | |
Building & construction -nonresidential | Commercial windows and doors, curtain walls, storefronts and entrances, walkway covers, ducts, louvers and vents, office wall panels, partitions and interior enclosures, acoustical walls and ceilings, point of purchase displays and pre-engineered structures | |
Building & construction -residential | Shower and tub enclosures, railing and support systems, venetian blinds, swimming pools and storm shutters | |
Consumer durables | Furniture, pleasure boats, refrigerators and freezers, appliances and sporting goods | |
Machinery & equipment | Material handling equipment, conveyors and conveying systems, industrial modular assemblies and medical equipment | |
Automotive | Automotive and light truck structural components, spare parts, after-market automotive accessories, travel trailers and recreation vehicles | |
Distribution (metal service centers specializing in stock and release programs and custom fabrications to small manufacturers) | Various custom profiles including storm shutters, pleasure boat accessories, theater set structures and various standard profiles (including rod, bar, tube and pipe) | |
Electrical | Lighting fixtures, solar panels, electronic apparatus and rigid and flexible conduits |
% of Aluminum Extrusions Sales Volume by Market Segment (Continuing Operations) | |||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||
Building and construction: | |||||||||
Nonresidential | 58 | % | 59 | % | 60 | % | |||
Residential | 6 | % | 6 | % | 7 | % | |||
Specialty: | |||||||||
Consumer durables | 10 | % | 12 | % | 12 | % | |||
Machinery & equipment | 7 | % | 7 | % | 7 | % | |||
Distribution | 5 | % | 5 | % | 4 | % | |||
Electrical | 4 | % | 4 | % | 4 | % | |||
Automotive | 10 | % | 7 | % | 6 | % | |||
Total | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | |||
Item 1A. | RISK FACTORS |
• | Tredegar has an underfunded defined benefit (pension) plan. Tredegar sponsors a pension plan that covers certain hourly and salaried employees in the U.S. The plan was substantially frozen to new participants in 2007, and frozen to benefit accruals for active participants in 2014. As of December 31, 2015, the plan was underfunded under U.S. GAAP measures by $93.2 million. Tredegar expects that it will be required to make a cash contribution of approximately $6.1 million to its underfunded pension plan in 2016, and may be required to make higher cash contributions in future periods depending on the level of interest rates and investment returns on plan assets. |
• | U.S. and global economic conditions could have an adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of some or all of Tredegar’s operations. As a global entity, the consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for Tredegar could become more sensitive to changes in macroeconomic conditions, including fluctuations in exchange rates. Sales associated with new products and regions tend to more closely follow the cycles within the economy. Cost reductions and productivity improvements may not be sufficient to offset the adverse effects on profitability from lower customer demand in an economic downturn. Therefore, as such product offerings become a greater part of the Company’s business, its consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows may be adversely impacted by seasonal slowdowns, cyclical downturns in the economy or changes in foreign currency rates. |
• | Noncompliance with any of the covenants in the Company’s $350 million credit facility could result in all debt under the agreement outstanding at such time becoming due and limiting its borrowing capacity, which could have a material adverse effect on consolidated financial condition and liquidity. The credit agreement governing Tredegar’s revolving credit facility contains restrictions and financial covenants that could restrict the Company’s operational and financial flexibility. Failure to comply with these covenants could result in an event of default, which if not cured or waived, would result in all outstanding debt under the credit facility at such time becoming due, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial condition and liquidity. Renegotiation of the covenant(s) through an amendment to the revolving credit facility may effectively cure the noncompliance, but may have a negative effect on the Company’s consolidated financial condition or liquidity depending upon how the amended covenant is renegotiated. |
• | Tredegar’s performance is influenced by costs incurred by its operating companies, including, for example, the cost of raw materials and energy. These costs include, without limitation, the cost of resin (the raw material on which PE Films primarily depends), PTA and MEG (the raw materials on which Flexible Packaging Films primarily depends), aluminum (the raw material on which Aluminum Extrusions primarily depends), natural gas (the principal fuel necessary for Aluminum Extrusions’ plants to operate), electricity and diesel fuel. Resin, aluminum and natural gas prices are extremely volatile as shown in the charts in the Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures section on pages 36-37. The Company attempts to mitigate the effects of increased costs through price increases and contractual pass-through provisions, but there are no assurances that higher prices can effectively be passed through to customers or that Tredegar will be able to offset fully or on a timely basis the effects of higher raw material and energy costs through price increases or pass-through arrangements. Further, the Company’s cost control efforts may not be sufficient to offset any additional future declines in revenue or increases in raw material, energy or other costs. |
• | Substantial international operations subject the Company to risks of doing business in countries outside the U.S., which could adversely affect its consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Risks inherent in international operations include the following, by way of example: changes in general economic conditions or governmental policies, potential difficulty enforcing agreements and intellectual property rights, modifications in foreign tax laws and incentives, staffing and managing widespread operations and the challenges of complying with a wide variety of laws and regulations, restrictions on international trade or investment, restrictions on the repatriation of income, imposition of additional taxes on income generated outside the U.S., nationalization of private enterprises, unexpected adverse changes in international laws and regulatory requirements and fluctuations in exchange rates. In the countries where Tredegar conducts its operations, significant fluctuations in the foreign currencies relative to the U.S. dollar could have a material impact on its consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In addition, while expanding operations into emerging markets provides greater opportunities for growth, there are certain operating risks, as previously noted. |
• | Tredegar may not be able to successfully identify, complete or integrate strategic acquisitions. From time to time, the Company evaluates acquisition candidates that fit its business objectives. Acquisitions involve special risks, including, without limitation, meeting revenue, margin, working capital and capital expenditure expectations that substantially drive valuation, diversion of management’s time and attention from existing businesses, the potential assumption of unanticipated liabilities and contingencies and potential difficulties in integrating acquired businesses and achieving anticipated operational improvements. Acquired businesses may not achieve expected results. |
• | Failure to continue to attract, develop and retain certain senior executive officers, operating company management or other key employees could adversely affect Tredegar’s businesses. The Company depends on its senior executive officers, operating company management and other key personnel to run the businesses. The loss of key personnel could have a material adverse effect on operations. Competition for qualified employees among companies that rely heavily on engineering and technology expertise is intense, and the loss of qualified employees or an inability to attract, retain and motivate highly skilled employees required for the operation and expansion of Tredegar’s businesses could hinder its ability to improve manufacturing operations, conduct research activities successfully and develop marketable products. |
• | Tredegar is subject to various environmental laws and regulations and could become exposed to material liabilities and costs associated with such laws. The Company is subject to various environmental obligations and could become subject to additional obligations in the future. In the case of known potential liabilities, it is management’s judgment that the resolution of ongoing and/or pending environmental remediation obligations is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial condition or liquidity. In any given period(s), however, it is possible such obligations or matters could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations. Changes in environmental laws and regulations, or their application, including, but not limited to, those relating to global climate change, could subject Tredegar to significant additional capital expenditures and operating expenses. Moreover, future developments in federal, state, local and international environmental laws and regulations are difficult to predict. Environmental laws have become and are expected to continue to become increasingly strict. As a result, Tredegar expects to be subject to new environmental laws and regulations. However, any such changes are uncertain and, therefore, it is not possible for the Company to predict with certainty the amount of additional capital expenditures or operating expenses that could be necessary for compliance with respect to any such changes. See Government Regulation on page 4 for a further discussion of this risk factor. |
• | Material disruptions at one of the Company’s major manufacturing facilities could negatively impact financial results. Tredegar believes its facilities are operated in compliance with applicable local laws and regulations and that the Company has implemented measures to minimize the risks of disruption at its facilities. Such a disruption could be a result of any number of events, including but not limited to: an equipment failure with repairs requiring long lead times, labor stoppages or shortages, utility disruptions, constraints on the supply or delivery of critical raw materials, and severe weather conditions. A material disruption in one of the Company’s operating locations could negatively impact production and its consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. |
• | An information technology system failure may adversely affect the business. Tredegar relies on information technology systems to help manage business processes, collect and interpret business data and communicate internally and externally with employees, investors, suppliers, customers and others. Some of these information systems are managed by third-party service providers. The Company has backup systems and business continuity plans in place, and takes care to protect its systems and data from unauthorized access. To date, interruptions of our information systems have been infrequent and have not had a material impact on our operations. Nevertheless, an information technology system failure due to computer viruses, internal or external security breaches, power interruptions, hardware failures, fire, natural disasters, human error, or other causes could disrupt operations and prevent the Company from being able to process transactions with its customers, operate its manufacturing facilities, and properly report those transactions in a timely manner. A significant, protracted information technology system failure or cyber attacks or security breaches by parties intent on extracting or corrupting information or otherwise disrupting business processes may result in the loss of revenue, assets or personal or other sensitive data, cause damage to the reputation of the Company and result in legal challenges and significant remediation and other costs to the Company. |
• | Tredegar is subject to credit risk that is inherent with efforts to increase market share as the Company attempts to broaden its customer base. In the event of the deterioration of operating cash flows or diminished borrowing capacity of Tredegar’s customers, the collection of trade receivable balances may be delayed or deemed unlikely. The Company’s credit risk exposure could increase as business is expanded, including on export sales which have payment terms in excess of domestic sales. In addition, the operations of the customers for Aluminum Extrusions generally follow the cycles within the economy, resulting in greater credit risk from diminished operating cash flows and higher bankruptcy rates when the economy is deteriorating or in recession. |
• | An inability to renegotiate the Company’s collective bargaining agreements could adversely impact its consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Some of the Company’s employees are represented by labor unions under various collective bargaining agreements with varying durations and expiration dates. Tredegar may not be able to satisfactorily renegotiate collective bargaining agreements when they expire, which could result in strikes or work stoppages or higher labor costs. In addition, existing collective bargaining agreements may not prevent a strike or work stoppage at the Company’s facilities in the future. Any such work stoppages (or potential work stoppages) could negatively impact Tredegar’s ability to manufacture its products and adversely affect its consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. |
• | Tredegar’s valuation of its $7.5 million cost-basis investment in kaléo is volatile and uncertain. Tredegar uses the fair value method to account for its 19% ownership interest and investment in kaleo, Inc. (“kaléo”), a private specialty pharmaceutical company. There is no active secondary market for buying or selling ownership interests in kaléo. The Company’s fair value estimates can fluctuate materially between reporting periods, primarily due to variances in performance versus expectations, and kaléo’s ability to meet developmental and commercialization milestones within an anticipated time frame. Commercial sales of kaléo’s first licensed product, an epinephrine auto-injector, commenced in the first quarter of 2013, and commercial sales of its second product, a naloxone auto-injector, commenced in the third quarter of 2014. |
• | PE Films is highly dependent on sales associated with its top five customers, the largest of which is P&G. PE Films’ top five customers comprised approximately 32%, 38% and 44% of Tredegar’s consolidated net sales (sales less freight) from continuing operations, in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, with net sales to P&G alone comprising approximately 19%, 24% and 28% in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The loss or significant reduction of sales associated with one or more of these customers could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business. Other factors that could adversely affect the business include, by way of example, (i) failure by a key customer to achieve success or maintain share in markets in which they sell products containing PE Films’ materials, (ii) key customers rolling out products utilizing technologies developed by others that replace PE Films’ business with such customer, (iii) delays in a key customer rolling out products utilizing new technologies developed by PE Films and (iv) operational decisions by a key customer that result in component substitution, inventory reductions and similar changes. While PE Films has undertaken efforts to expand its customer base, there can be no assurance that such efforts will be successful, or that they will offset any delay or loss of sales and profits associated with these large customers. |
• | PE Films and its customers operate in highly competitive markets. PE Films competes on product innovation, quality, price and service, and its businesses and their customers operate in highly competitive markets. Global market conditions continue to exacerbate the Company’s exposure to margin compression due to competitive forces, especially as certain products move into the later stages of their product life cycles. While PE Films continually works to identify new business opportunities with existing and new customers, primarily through the development of new products with improved performance and/or cost characteristics, there can be no assurances that such efforts will be successful, or that they will offset business lost from competitive dynamics or customer product transitions. |
• | Growth of PE Films depends on its ability to develop and deliver new products at competitive prices. Personal care materials, surface protection films and engineered polymer solutions applications are now being made with a variety of new innovative materials and the overall cycle for bringing new films products to market has accelerated. While PE Films has substantial technological resources, there can be no assurance that its new products can be brought to market successfully, or if brought to market successfully, at the same level of profitability and market share of replaced films. A shift in customer preferences away from PE Films’ technologies, its inability to develop and deliver new profitable products, or delayed acceptance of its new products in domestic or foreign markets, could have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In the long term, growth will depend on PE Films’ ability to provide innovative products at a price that meets the customers’ needs. |
• | Failure of PE Films’ customers, who are subject to cyclical downturns, to achieve success or maintain market share could adversely impact its sales and operating margins. PE Films’ plastic films serve as components for various consumer products sold worldwide. A customer’s ability to successfully develop, manufacture and market their products is integral to PE Films’ success. In addition, many customers are in industries that are cyclical in nature and sensitive to changes in general economic conditions. During weak economic cycles, consumers of premium products made with or using PE Films’ components may shift to less premium, less expensive products, reducing the demand for PE Films’ plastic films. Cycle downturns may negatively affect businesses that use PE Films’ plastic film products, which could adversely affect sales and operating margins. |
• | The Company’s inability to protect its intellectual property rights or its infringement of the intellectual property rights of others could have a material adverse impact on PE Films. PE Films operates in an industry where its significant customers and competitors have substantial intellectual property portfolios. The continued success of its business depends on its ability not only to protect its own technologies and trade secrets, but also to develop and sell new products that do not infringe upon existing patents or threaten existing customer relationships. Intellectual property litigation is very costly and could result in substantial expense and diversions of Company resources, both of which could adversely affect its consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In addition, there may be no effective legal recourse against infringement of the Company’s intellectual property by third parties, whether due to limitations on enforcement of rights in foreign jurisdictions or as a result of other factors. An unfavorable outcome in any intellectual property litigation or similar proceeding could have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of PE Films. |
• | An unstable economic environment could have a disruptive impact on PE Films’ supply chain. Certain raw materials used in manufacturing PE Films’ products are sourced from single suppliers, and PE Films may not be able to quickly or inexpensively re-source from other suppliers. The risk of damage or disruption to its supply chain may increase if and when different suppliers consolidate their product portfolios or experience financial distress. Failure to take adequate steps to effectively manage such events, which are intensified when a product is procured from a single supplier or location, could adversely affect PE Films’ consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, as well as require additional resources to restore its supply chain. |
• | Uncertain economic conditions in Brazil could adversely impact the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Flexible Packaging Films. Flexible Packaging Films and its customers operate in a highly competitive global market for PET films. In addition, its operations have been adversely impacted by ongoing unfavorable economic conditions in Brazil, its primary market, which accounted for approximately 46% of its overall sales in 2015. These combined factors have resulted in significant competitive pricing pressures and margin compression. Tredegar has attempted to mitigate these impacts through new product offerings, cost saving measures and manufacturing efficiency initiatives, but these efforts to-date have not been sufficient, resulting in a significant decline in the operating profit for Flexible Packaging Films since its acquisition in October 2011 and further efforts may not be successful, which could adversely impact Flexible Packaging Films’ financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. |
• | Governmental failure to extend anti-dumping duties in Brazil on imported products or prevent competitors from circumventing such duties could adversely impact Flexible Packaging Films. In recent years, excess global capacity in the industry has led to increased competitive pressures from imports into Brazil, the Company’s primary market for flexible packaging films. The Company believes that these conditions have shifted the competitive environment from a regional to a global landscape and have driven price convergence and lower product margins for Flexible Packaging Films. In addition to previous actions taken against UAE, Mexico and Turkey, the Brazilian government recently extended anti-dumping duties on PET films imported from China, Egypt and India, and authorities have initiated new investigations of dumping against Peru and Bahrain. Competitors not currently subject to anti-dumping duties may choose to utilize their excess capacity by selling product in Brazil, which may result in pricing pressures thereby creating margin compression that Flexible Packaging Films may not be able to offset with cost savings measures and/or manufacturing efficiency initiatives. |
• | Sales volume and profitability of Aluminum Extrusions is seasonal and cyclical and highly dependent on economic conditions of end-use markets in the U.S., particularly in the construction sector. Aluminum Extrusions’ end-use markets can be subject to seasonality as well as large cyclical swings in volume. Because of capital intensive nature and level of fixed costs inherent in the aluminum extrusions business, the percentage drop in operating profits in a cyclical downturn will likely exceed the percentage drop in volume. Any benefits associated with cost reductions and productivity improvements may not be sufficient to offset the adverse effects on profitability from pricing and margin pressure and higher bad debts (including a greater chance of loss associated with customers defaulting on fixed-price forward sales contracts) that usually accompany a downturn. In addition, higher energy costs can further reduce profits unless offset by price increases or cost reductions and productivity improvements. |
• | The markets for Aluminum Extrusions’ products are highly competitive with product quality, service, delivery performance and price being the principal competitive factors. Aluminum Extrusions has approximately 1,500 customers that are in a variety of end-use markets within the broad categories of building and construction, distribution, automotive and other transportation, machinery and equipment, electrical and consumer durables. No single customer exceeds 3% of Aluminum Extrusions’ net sales. Future success and prospects depend on its ability to provide superior service and high quality products to retain existing customers and participate in overall industry cross-cycle growth. In recent years, increased demand, primarily from the nonresidential building and construction sector, has pushed Aluminum Extrusions’ average capacity utilization in excess of 90%. Aluminum Extrusions’ ability to grow and service existing customers is closely tied to having sufficient capacity. |
• | Aluminum Extrusions’ efforts to expand the Company’s presence in the automotive market may not be successful. Aluminum Extrusions has made significant capital investments in recent years to increase sales to automotive and light truck tier suppliers. Efforts to expand product offerings and broaden the customer base are tied to successfully substituting the Company’s aluminum extrusions for current market alternatives. New Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards requiring material improvements in the automotive and light truck MPG (miles per gallon) by 2025, are expected to increase demand for lighter materials used in the vehicle’s body, some of which can be supplied by Aluminum Extrusions. If the demand does not increase and/or the alternative products offered by Aluminum Extrusions are not accepted by its customers, Aluminum Extrusions may not generate expected returns on its capital investments, which could have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. |
• | Failure to extend duties on imported products or prevent competitors from circumventing such duties could adversely impact Aluminum Extrusions. In previous years, imports into the U.S., primarily from China, represented an increasing portion of the U.S. aluminum extrusion market. However, due to an affirmative determination by the U.S. International Trade Commission in April 2011 that asserted that dumped and subsidized imports of aluminum extrusion from China unfairly and negatively impacted the domestic industry, the U.S. Department of Commerce has applied duties to these imported products. As a result, aluminum extrusion imports from China have decreased significantly. While the risk to the domestic industry has been abated for the time being, these protective duties are scheduled to expire in 2016. There are ongoing efforts within the U.S. aluminum extrusions industry to extend these protective duties. An unfavorable outcome could have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Aluminum Extrusions. |
Item 1B. | UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS |
Item 2. | PROPERTIES |
Locations in the U.S. | Locations Outside the U.S. | Principal Operations | ||
Lake Zurich, Illinois Durham, North Carolina (technical center and production facility) (leased) Pottsville, Pennsylvania Richmond, Virginia (technical center) (leased) Terre Haute, Indiana (technical center and production facility) | Guangzhou, China Kerkrade, The Netherlands Pune, India Rétság, Hungary São Paulo, Brazil Shanghai, China | Production of plastic films and laminate materials |
Locations in the U.S. | Locations Outside the U.S. | Principal Operations | ||
Bloomfield, New York (technical center and production facility) | Cabo de Santo Agostinho, Brazil | Production of polyester films |
Locations in the U.S. | Principal Operations | |||
Carthage, Tennessee Elkhart, Indiana Newnan, Georgia Niles, Michigan | Production of aluminum extrusions, fabrication and finishing | |||
Item 3. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
Item 4. | MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES |
Item 5. | MARKET FOR TREDEGAR’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES |
2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||||||
High | Low | High | Low | ||||||||||||
First quarter | $ | 23.07 | $ | 18.87 | $ | 28.45 | $ | 22.48 | |||||||
Second quarter | 23.16 | 19.75 | 25.08 | 19.65 | |||||||||||
Third quarter | 23.76 | 12.63 | 24.07 | 18.41 | |||||||||||
Fourth quarter | 16.17 | 13.09 | 22.49 | 16.76 |
*$100 invested on 12/31/10 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends. Fiscal year ending December 31. Copyright© 2016 S&P, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. All rights reserved. Copyright© 2016 Russell Investment Group. All rights reserved. |
Item 6. | SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA |
Years Ended December 31 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||
(In Thousands, Except Per-Share Data) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Results of Operations (g): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales | $ | 896,177 | $ | 951,826 | $ | 959,346 | $ | 882,188 | $ | 794,420 | ||||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net | (20,113 | ) | (b) | (6,697 | ) | (c) | 1,776 | (d) | 18,119 | (e) | 3,213 | (f) | ||||||||||||
876,064 | 945,129 | 961,122 | 900,307 | 797,633 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold | 725,459 | (b) | 778,113 | (c) | 784,675 | (d) | 712,660 | (e) | 654,087 | (f) | ||||||||||||||
Freight | 29,838 | 28,793 | 28,625 | 24,846 | 18,488 | |||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general & administrative expenses | 71,911 | (b) | 69,526 | (c) | 71,195 | (d) | 73,717 | (e) | 67,808 | (f) | ||||||||||||||
Research and development expenses | 16,173 | 12,147 | 12,669 | 13,162 | 13,219 | |||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangibles | 4,073 | 5,395 | 6,744 | 5,806 | 1,399 | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | 3,502 | 2,713 | 2,870 | 3,590 | 1,926 | |||||||||||||||||||
Asset impairments and costs associated with exit and disposal activities | 3,850 | (b) | 3,026 | (c) | 1,412 | (d) | 5,022 | (e) | 1,917 | (f) | ||||||||||||||
Goodwill impairment charge | 44,465 | (a) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
899,271 | 899,713 | 908,190 | 838,803 | 758,844 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes | (23,207 | ) | 45,416 | 52,932 | 61,504 | 38,789 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income taxes | 8,928 | (b) | 9,387 | (c) | 16,995 | (d) | 18,319 | (e) | 10,244 | (f) | ||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations (g) | (32,135 | ) | 36,029 | 35,937 | 43,185 | 28,545 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax (g) | — | 850 | (g) | (13,990 | ) | (g) | (14,934 | ) | (g) | (3,690 | ) | (g) | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | (32,135 | ) | $ | 36,879 | $ | 21,947 | $ | 28,251 | $ | 24,855 | |||||||||||||
Diluted earnings (loss) per share (g): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations | $ | (0.99 | ) | $ | 1.11 | $ | 1.10 | $ | 1.34 | $ | 0.89 | |||||||||||||
Discontinued operations | — | 0.02 | (g) | (0.43 | ) | (g) | (0.46 | ) | (g) | (0.12 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net income | $ | (0.99 | ) | $ | 1.13 | $ | 0.67 | $ | 0.88 | $ | 0.77 |
Years Ended December 31 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||
(In Thousands, Except Per-Share Data) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Share Data: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Equity per share (m) | $ | 8.35 | $ | 11.47 | $ | 12.46 | $ | 11.61 | $ | 12.38 | ||||||||||
Cash dividends declared per share | $ | 0.42 | $ | 0.34 | $ | 0.28 | $ | 0.96 | (k) | $ | 0.18 | |||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding during the period | 32,578 | 32,302 | 32,172 | 32,032 | 31,932 | |||||||||||||||
Shares used to compute diluted earnings (loss) per share during the period | 32,578 | 32,554 | 32,599 | 32,193 | 32,213 | |||||||||||||||
Shares outstanding at end of period | 32,682 | 32,422 | 32,305 | 32,069 | 32,057 | |||||||||||||||
Closing market price per share: | ||||||||||||||||||||
High | $ | 23.76 | $ | 28.45 | $ | 30.73 | $ | 26.29 | $ | 23.00 | ||||||||||
Low | $ | 12.63 | $ | 16.76 | $ | 21.06 | $ | 13.49 | $ | 13.92 | ||||||||||
End of year | $ | 13.62 | $ | 22.49 | $ | 28.81 | $ | 20.42 | $ | 22.22 | ||||||||||
Total return to shareholders (h) | (37.6 | )% | (20.8 | )% | 42.5 | % | (3.8 | )% | 15.6 | % | ||||||||||
Financial Position: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets (l) | $ | 623,260 | $ | 788,626 | $ | 793,008 | $ | 783,165 | $ | 780,610 | ||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 44,156 | $ | 50,056 | $ | 52,617 | $ | 48,822 | $ | 68,939 | ||||||||||
Debt | $ | 104,000 | $ | 137,250 | $ | 139,000 | $ | 128,000 | $ | 125,000 | ||||||||||
Shareholders’ equity (net book value) | $ | 272,748 | $ | 372,029 | $ | 402,664 | $ | 372,252 | $ | 396,907 | ||||||||||
Equity market capitalization (i) | $ | 445,131 | $ | 729,173 | $ | 930,711 | $ | 654,857 | $ | 712,307 |
Net Sales (j) | |||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||
PE Films | $ | 385,550 | $ | 464,339 | $ | 495,386 | $ | 473,849 | $ | 507,284 | |||||||||
Flexible Packaging Films | 105,332 | 114,348 | 125,853 | 138,028 | 28,256 | ||||||||||||||
Aluminum Extrusions | 375,457 | 344,346 | 309,482 | 245,465 | 240,392 | ||||||||||||||
Total net sales | 866,339 | 923,033 | 930,721 | 857,342 | 775,932 | ||||||||||||||
Add back freight | 29,838 | 28,793 | 28,625 | 24,846 | 18,488 | ||||||||||||||
Sales as shown in Consolidated Statements of Income | $ | 896,177 | $ | 951,826 | $ | 959,346 | $ | 882,188 | $ | 794,420 | |||||||||
Identifiable Assets | |||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||
PE Films | $ | 270,236 | $ | 283,606 | $ | 291,377 | $ | 301,175 | $ | 329,961 | |||||||||
Flexible Packaging Films | 146,253 | 262,604 | 265,496 | 250,667 | 244,610 | ||||||||||||||
Aluminum Extrusions | 136,935 | 143,328 | 134,928 | 129,279 | 78,661 | ||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 553,424 | 689,538 | 691,801 | 681,121 | 653,232 | ||||||||||||||
General corporate | 25,680 | 49,032 | 48,590 | 53,222 | 40,917 | ||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 44,156 | 50,056 | 52,617 | 48,822 | 68,939 | ||||||||||||||
Identifiable assets from continuing operations | 623,260 | 788,626 | 793,008 | 783,165 | 763,088 | ||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations (g) | — | — | — | — | 17,522 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 623,260 | $ | 788,626 | $ | 793,008 | $ | 783,165 | $ | 780,610 |
Operating Profit | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
PE Films: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ongoing operations | $ | 48,275 | $ | 60,971 | $ | 61,866 | $ | 76,003 | $ | 58,067 | ||||||||||||||
Plant shutdowns, asset impairments, restructurings and other | (4,180 | ) | (b) | (12,236 | ) | (c) | (671 | ) | (d) | 1,011 | (e) | (901 | ) | (f) | ||||||||||
Flexible Packaging Films: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ongoing operations | 5,453 | (2,917 | ) | 9,100 | (6,053 | ) | 1,426 | |||||||||||||||||
Plant shutdowns, asset impairments, restructurings and other | (185 | ) | (591 | ) | — | (1,120 | ) | (5,906 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Goodwill impairment charge | (44,465 | ) | (a) | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Aluminum Extrusions: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ongoing operations | 30,432 | 25,664 | 18,291 | 9,037 | 3,457 | |||||||||||||||||||
Plant shutdowns, asset impairments, restructurings and other | (708 | ) | (b) | (976 | ) | (c) | (2,748 | ) | (d) | (5,427 | ) | (e) | 58 | (f) | ||||||||||
Total | 34,622 | 69,915 | 85,838 | 73,451 | 56,201 | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | 294 | 588 | 594 | 418 | 1,023 | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | 3,502 | 2,713 | 2,870 | 3,590 | 1,926 | |||||||||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on investment accounted for under the fair value method | (20,500 | ) | 2,000 | (c) | 3,400 | (d) | 16,100 | (e) | 1,600 | (f) | ||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of investment property | — | 1,208 | (c) | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized loss on investment property | — | — | 1,018 | (d) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock option-based compensation expense | 483 | 1,272 | 1,155 | 1,432 | 1,940 | |||||||||||||||||||
Corporate expenses, net | 33,638 | (b) | 24,310 | (c) | 31,857 | (d) | 23,443 | (e) | 16,169 | (f) | ||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes | (23,207 | ) | 45,416 | 52,932 | 61,504 | 38,789 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income taxes | 8,928 | (b) | 9,387 | (c) | 16,995 | (d) | 18,319 | (e) | 10,244 | (f) | ||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | (32,135 | ) | 36,029 | 35,937 | 43,185 | 28,545 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax (g) | — | 850 | (g) | (13,990 | ) | (g) | (14,934 | ) | (g) | (3,690 | ) | (g) | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | (32,135 | ) | $ | 36,879 | $ | 21,947 | $ | 28,251 | $ | 24,855 |
Depreciation and Amortization | |||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||
PE Films | $ | 15,480 | $ | 21,399 | $ | 25,656 | $ | 28,962 | $ | 34,201 | |||||||||
Flexible Packaging Films | 9,697 | 9,331 | 9,676 | 10,240 | 2,114 | ||||||||||||||
Aluminum Extrusions | 9,698 | 9,974 | 9,202 | 9,984 | 8,333 | ||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 34,875 | 40,704 | 44,534 | 49,186 | 44,648 | ||||||||||||||
General corporate | 107 | 114 | 121 | 73 | 75 | ||||||||||||||
Total continuing operations | 34,982 | 40,818 | 44,655 | 49,259 | 44,723 | ||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations (g) | — | — | — | 10 | 12 | ||||||||||||||
Total depreciation and amortization expense | $ | 34,982 | $ | 40,818 | $ | 44,655 | $ | 49,269 | $ | 44,735 | |||||||||
Capital Expenditures | |||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||
PE Films | $ | 21,218 | $ | 17,000 | $ | 15,615 | $ | 5,965 | $ | 10,783 | |||||||||
Flexible Packaging Films | 3,489 | 21,806 | 49,252 | 24,519 | 2,324 | ||||||||||||||
Aluminum Extrusions | 8,124 | 6,092 | 14,742 | 2,332 | 2,697 | ||||||||||||||
Subtotal | 32,831 | 44,898 | 79,609 | 32,816 | 15,804 | ||||||||||||||
General corporate | — | — | 52 | 436 | 76 | ||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures for continuing operations | 32,831 | 44,898 | 79,661 | 33,252 | 15,880 | ||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Total capital expenditures | $ | 32,831 | $ | 44,898 | $ | 79,661 | 33,252 | 15,880 |
(a) | Results for 2015 included a goodwill impairment charge of $44.5 million ($44.5 million after taxes) recognized in Flexible Packaging Films in the third quarter of 2015 upon completion of an impairment analysis performed as of September 30, 2015. See further discussion in Executive Summary beginning on page 19. |
(b) | Plant shutdowns, asset impairments, restructurings and other charges for 2015 include charges of $3.9 million (included in “Selling, general and administrative” in the consolidated statements of income) for severance and other employee-related costs associated with the resignation of the Company’s former chief executive and chief financial officers; charges of $2.2 million associated with the consolidation of domestic PE Films manufacturing facilities, which includes severance and other employee-related costs of $0.8 million, asset impairments of $0.4 million, accelerated depreciation of $0.4 million (included in “Cost of goods sold” in the consolidated statements of income) and other facility consolidation-related expenses of $0.6 million ($0.1 million is included in “Cost of goods sold” in the consolidated statements of income); charge of $2.2 million for severance and other employee-related costs associated with restructurings in PE Films ($2.0 million) ($0.4 million included in “Selling, general and administrative expense” in the consolidated statement of income), Flexible Packaging Films ($0.2 million), Aluminum Extrusions ($35,000) and Corporate ($26,000); charges of $1.0 million associated with a non-recurring business development project (included in “Cost of goods sold” in the consolidated statements of income); charges of $0.4 million associated with the shutdown of the aluminum extrusions manufacturing facility in Kentland, Indiana; and charges of $0.3 million related to expected future environmental costs at the Company’s aluminum extrusions manufacturing facility in Newnan, Georgia (included in “Cost of goods sold” in the consolidated statements of income). The unrealized loss on the Company’s investment in kaléo of $20.5 million is included in “Other income (expense), net” in the consolidated statements of income. |
(c) | Plant shutdowns, asset impairments, restructurings and other for 2014 include a charge of $10.0 million (included in “Other income (expense), net” in the consolidated statements of income) associated with the one-time, lump sum license payment to 3M Company (“3M”) after the Company settled all litigation issues associated with a patent infringement complaint; charges of $2.3 million for severance and other employee-related costs in connection with restructurings in PE Films ($1.7 million), Flexible Packaging Films ($0.6 million) and Aluminum Extrusions ($31,000); charges of $0.9 million related to expected future environmental costs at the aluminum extrusions manufacturing facility in Newnan, Georgia (included in “Cost of goods sold” in the consolidated statement of income); charges of $0.7 million associated with the shutdown of the film products manufacturing facility in Red Springs, North Carolina, which includes severance and other employee-related costs of $0.4 million and asset impairment and other shutdown-related charges of $0.3 million; gain of $0.1 million related to the sale of previously shutdown film products manufacturing facility in LaGrange, Georgia (included in “Other income (expense), net” in the consolidated statements of income); and charges of $54,000 associated with the shutdown of the aluminum extrusions manufacturing facility in Kentland, Indiana. The unrealized gain on the Company’s investment in kaléo of $2.0 million; the unrealized loss on the Company’s investment in Harbinger Capital Partners Special Situations Fund L.P. (“Harbinger”) of $0.8 million and the gain on sale on a portion the Company’s investment property in Alleghany and Bath County, Virginia was $1.2 million in 2014 are included in “Other income (expense), net” in the consolidated statements of income. Income taxes from continuing operations in 2014 includes the recognition of a tax benefit for a portion of the Company’s capital loss carryforwards of $4.9 million. These capital loss carryforwards were previously offset by a valuation allowance associated with expected limitations on the utilization of these assumed capital losses. As a result of changes in the underlying basis of certain foreign subsidiaries, income taxes from continuing operations in 2014 also included an adjustment of $2.2 million to reverse previously accrued deferred tax liabilities arising from foreign currency translation adjustments. |
(d) | Plant shutdowns, asset impairments, restructurings and other for 2013 include a charge of $1.7 million related to expected future environmental costs at the aluminum extrusions manufacturing facility in Newnan, Georgia (included in “Cost of goods sold” in the consolidated statement of income); charges of $0.6 million associated with the shutdown of the Company’s aluminum extrusions manufacturing facility in Kentland, Indiana; charges of $0.5 million associated with the shutdown of the film products manufacturing facility in Red Springs, North Carolina, which includes severance and other employee-related costs of $0.3 million and asset impairment charges of $0.2 million; charges of $0.4 million for severance and other employee-related costs in connection with restructurings in Aluminum Extrusions ($0.3 million) and PE Films ($0.1 million); charges of $0.2 million for integration-related expenses and other nonrecurring transactions (included in “Selling, general and administrative expenses” in the consolidated statements of income) associated with the acquisition of AACOA by Aluminum Extrusions; and a loss of $0.1 million related to the sale of previously impaired machinery and equipment at the Company’s film products manufacturing facility in Shanghai, China (included in “Other income (expense), net” in the consolidated statements of income). The unrealized gain on the Company’s investment in kaléo of $3.4 million, the unrealized loss on the Company’s investment in Harbinger of $0.4 million and the unrealized loss on the Company’s investment property in Alleghany and Bath County, Virginia of $1.0 million in 2013 are included in “Other income (expense), net” in the consolidated statements of income. Income taxes for 2013 include the recognition of an additional valuation allowance of $0.4 million related to the expected limitations on the utilization of assumed capital losses on certain investments. |
(e) | Plant shutdowns, asset impairments, restructurings and other for 2012 include a net charge of $3.6 million associated with the shutdown of the Company’s aluminum extrusions manufacturing facility in Kentland, Indiana, which included accelerated depreciation for property and equipment of $2.4 million (included in “Cost of goods sold” in the consolidated statement of income), severance and other employee-related costs of $1.2 million and other shutdown-related charges of $2.3 million, partially offset by adjustments to inventories accounted for under the last-in, first-out method of $1.5 million (included in “Cost of goods sold” in the consolidated statements of income) and gains of $0.8 million (included in “Other income (expense), net” in the consolidated statements of income); a gain of $1.3 million in PE Films (included in “Other income (expense), net” in the consolidated statements of income) associated with an insurance recovery on idle equipment that was destroyed in a fire at an outside warehouse; charges of $1.3 million for acquisition-related expenses (included in “Selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of income) associated with the acquisition of AACOA by Aluminum Extrusions; charges of $1.1 million for integration-related expenses and other nonrecurring transactions (included in “Selling, general and administrative expenses” in the consolidated statements of income) associated with the acquisition of Terphane by Tredegar; gain of $1.1 million (included in “Other income (expense), net” in the consolidated statements of income) on the sale of assets associated with a previously shutdown film products manufacturing facility in LaGrange, Georgia; losses of $0.8 million for asset impairments associated with a previously shutdown film products manufacturing facility in LaGrange, Georgia; charges of $0.5 million for severance and other employee-related costs in connection with restructurings in PE Films ($0.3 million) and Aluminum Extrusions ($0.2 million); charges of $0.2 million for asset impairments in PE Films; charges of $0.2 million for integration-related expenses and other nonrecurring transactions (included in “Selling, general and administrative expenses” in the consolidated statements of income) associated with the acquisition of AACOA by Aluminum Extrusions; charges of $0.1 million associated with purchase accounting adjustments made to the value of inventory sold by Aluminum Extrusions after its acquisition of AACOA; and a charge of $0.1 million (included in “Costs of goods sold” in the consolidated statements of income) related to expected future environmental costs at the aluminum extrusions manufacturing facility in Newnan, Georgia (included in “Cost of goods sold” in the consolidated statement of income). The unrealized gain on the Company’s investment in kaléo of $16.1 million and the unrealized loss on the Company’s investment in Harbinger of $1.1 million in 2012 are included in “Other income (expense), net” in the consolidated statements of income. Income taxes for 2012 include the recognition of an additional valuation allowance of $1.3 million related to the expected limitations on the utilization of assumed capital losses on certain investments. |
(f) | Plant shutdowns, asset impairments, restructurings and other for 2011 include charges of $4.8 million for acquisition-related expenses (included in “Selling, general and administrative expenses” in the consolidated statements of income) associated with the acquisition of Terphane by Tredegar; charges of $1.4 million for asset impairments in PE Films; a gain of $1.0 million on the disposition of the film products business in Roccamontepiano, Italy (included in “Other income (expense), net” in the consolidated statements of income), which includes the recognition of previously unrecognized foreign currency translation gains of $4.3 million that were associated with the business; charges of $0.7 million associated with purchase accounting adjustments made to the value of inventory sold by Tredegar after its acquisition of Terphane (included in “Cost of goods sold” in the consolidated statements of income); charges of $0.5 million for severance and other employee related costs in connection with restructurings in PE Films; charges of $0.4 million for integration-related expenses (included in “Selling, general and administrative expenses” in the consolidated statements of income) associated with the acquisition of Terphane by Tredegar; and gains of $0.1 million associated with Aluminum Extrusions for timing differences between the recognition of realized losses on aluminum futures contracts and related revenues from the delayed fulfillment by customers of fixed-price forward purchase commitments (included in “Cost of goods sold” in the consolidated statements of income). The unrealized gain on the Company’s investment in kaléo of $1.6 million and the unrealized loss on the Company’s investment in Harbinger of $0.6 million in 2011 are included in “Other income (expense), net” in the consolidated statements of income. |
(g) | On November 20, 2012, Tredegar sold its membership interests in Falling Springs, LLC. All historical results for this business have been reflected in discontinued operations. In 2012, discontinued operations also includes an after-tax loss of $2.0 million from the sale of Falling Springs in addition to operating results through the closing date. In 2012 and 2011, net income of $0.5 million and $0.7 million, respectively, have been reclassified to discontinued operations. On February 12, 2008, Tredegar sold its aluminum extrusions business in Canada. All historical results for this business have been reflected as discontinued operations. In 2014, accruals for indemnifications under the purchase agreement were adjusted, resulting in income from discontinued operations of $0.9 million. In 2013, 2012 and 2011, discontinued operations include after-tax charges of $14.0 million and $13.4 million and $4.4 million, respectively, to accrue for indemnifications under the purchase agreement related to environmental matters. |
(h) | Total return to shareholders is defined as the change in stock price during the year plus dividends per share, divided by the stock price at the beginning of the year. |
(i) | Equity market capitalization is the closing market price per share for the period multiplied by the shares outstanding at the end of the period. |
(j) | Net sales represent gross sales less freight. Net sales is the measure used by the chief operating decision maker of each segment for purposes of assessing performance. |
(k) | In addition to quarterly dividends of 4 1/2 cents per share in the first and second quarters and 6 cents per share in the third and fourth quarters of 2012, there was a special one-time dividend of 75 cents per share in December 2012. |
(l) | Total assets in 2015 are not comparable to prior years due to the adoption of new FASB guidance associated with the classification of deferred income tax assets and liabilities. See Note 17 to the Notes to the Financial Statements for additional details. |
(m) | Equity per share is computed by dividing Shareholders’ equity at year end by the shares outstanding at end of period. |
Item 7. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
• | An unrealized loss on the Company’s investment in kaléo ($20.5 million), which is accounted for under the fair value method. |
(In thousands, except percentages) | Year Ended December 31 | Favorable/ (Unfavorable) | ||||||||
2015 | 2014 | % Change | ||||||||
Sales volume (pounds) | 160,283 | 175,203 | (8.5 | )% | ||||||
Net sales | $ | 385,550 | $ | 464,339 | (17.0 | )% | ||||
Operating profit from ongoing operations | $ | 48,275 | $ | 60,971 | (20.8 | )% |
Twelve Months Ended December 31, | ||||
(In Thousands) | 2015 | 2014 | ||
Operating profit from ongoing operations, as reported | $48,275 | $60,971 | ||
Contribution to operating profit from ongoing operations associated with lost business: | ||||
Certain babycare elastic films sold in North America | — | 2,106 | ||
Product transitions & other lost business before restructurings & fixed costs reduction | 13,349 | 22,686 | ||
Operating profit from ongoing operations net of the impact of business that will be fully eliminated in future periods | 34,926 | 36,179 | ||
Estimated future benefit of North American facility consolidation | 5,200 | 5,200 | ||
Pro forma estimated operating profit from ongoing operations | $40,126 | $41,379 |
• | An increase in volume of over 6% and a favorable mix for surface protection films ($4.2 million); |
• | A decrease in volume for polyethylene overwrap films and other personal care materials ($2.4 million); |
• | The favorable lag in the pass-through of average resin costs of $1.3 million in 2015 versus a negative $0.1 million in 2014; |
• | An increase in foreign currency translation and transaction losses ($3.7 million); and |
• | Other factors including higher research and development costs partially offset by lower depreciation. |
• | Cash outlays associated with previously discussed exit and disposal expenses of approximately $4 million; |
• | Capital expenditures associated with equipment upgrades at other PE Films manufacturing facilities in the U.S. of approximately $10 million; |
• | Cash incentives of approximately $1 million in connection with meeting safety and quality standards while production ramps down at the Lake Zurich manufacturing facility; and |
• | Additional operating expenses of approximately $1 million associated with customer product qualifications on upgraded and transferred production lines. |
(In thousands, except percentages) | Year Ended December 31 | Favorable/ (Unfavorable) | ||||||||
2015 | 2014 | % Change | ||||||||
Sales volume (pounds) | 82,347 | 72,064 | 14.3 | % | ||||||
Net sales | $ | 105,332 | $ | 114,348 | (7.9 | )% | ||||
Operating profit (loss) from ongoing operations | $ | 5,453 | $ | (2,917 | ) | - |
• | An improvement of $1.4 million in 2015 versus 2014 due to lower general, sales and administration costs of $1.2 million and operating efficiencies of $0.9 million, partially offset by lower margins of $0.7 million primarily from competitive pricing pressures; |
• | Foreign currency transaction gains associated with U.S. dollar denominated export sales in Brazil of $3.5 million in 2015 versus $0.5 million in 2014; |
• | The estimated lag in the pass through of lower raw material costs of $1.0 million in 2015 (none in 2014); |
• | Net refunds of $1.6 million in 2015 as a result of the reinstatement by the U.S. in the third quarter of 2015 of the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) program allowing for duty-free shipment of Terphane’s products to the U.S. versus duties paid of $1.1 million in 2014; and |
• | The favorable settlement of certain loss contingencies of $0.6 million in 2015 versus $0.3 million in 2014. |
(In thousands, except percentages) | Year Ended December 31 | Favorable/ (Unfavorable) | ||||||||
2015 | 2014 | % Change | ||||||||
Sales volume (pounds) | 170,045 | 153,843 | 10.5 | % | ||||||
Net sales | $ | 375,457 | $ | 344,346 | 9.0 | % | ||||
Operating profit from ongoing operations | $ | 30,432 | $ | 25,664 | 18.6 | % |
(in millions) | December 31, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | ||||||
Debt | $ | 104.0 | $ | 137.3 | ||||
Less: Cash and cash equivalents | 44.2 | 50.1 | ||||||
Net debt | $ | 59.8 | $ | 87.2 |
• | A second quarter charge of $3.9 million ($2.5 million after taxes) for severance and other employee-related costs associated with the resignation of the Company’s former chief executive and chief financial officers (included in “Selling, general and administrative expense” in the consolidated statements of income and “Corporate expenses, net” in the statement of net sales and operating profit by segment); |
• | A fourth quarter charge of $1.0 million ($0.6 million after taxes) and a third quarter charge of $1.2 million ($0.7 million) associated with the consolidation of domestic PE Films’ manufacturing facilities, which includes severance and other employee-related costs of $0.8 million, asset impairments of $0.4 million, accelerated depreciation of $0.4 million (included in “Cost of goods sold” in the consolidated statements of income) and other facility consolidation-related expenses of $0.6 million ($0.1 million is included in “Cost of goods sold” in the consolidated statements of income); |
• | A fourth quarter charge of $1.1 million ($0.7 million after taxes) in PE Films ($0.4 million included in “Selling, general and administrative expense” in the consolidated statement of income), a third quarter charge of $0.9 million ($0.6 million after taxes) in PE Films ($0.9 million), Aluminum Extrusions ($35,000) and Corporate ($26,000, included in “Corporate expenses, net” in the statement of net sales and operating profit by segment) and a second quarter charge of $0.3 million ($0.2 million after taxes) in Flexible Packaging Films ($0.3 million) and PE Films ($7,000) for severance and other employee-related costs, and a first quarter reversal of previously accrued severance |
• | A fourth quarter charge of $1.0 million ($0.6 million after taxes) associated with a business development project (included in “Selling, general and administrative expense” in the consolidated statement of income and “Corporate expenses, net” in the statement of net sales and operating profit by segment); |
• | A fourth quarter charge of $31,000 ($19,000 after taxes), a third quarter charge of $0.3 million ($0.2 million after taxes), a second quarter charge of $18,000 ($11,000 after taxes) and a first quarter charge of $15,000 ($9,000 after taxes) associated with the previously shutdown aluminum extrusions manufacturing facility in Kentland, Indiana; and |
• | A fourth quarter charge of $0.3 million ($0.2 million after taxes) related to expected future environmental costs at the aluminum extrusions manufacturing facility in Newnan, Georgia (included in “Cost of goods sold” in the consolidated statements of income). |
(In Millions) | 2015 | 2014 | |||||
Floating-rate debt with interest charged on a rollover | |||||||
basis at one-month LIBOR plus a credit spread: | |||||||
Average outstanding debt balance | $ | 135.1 | $ | 136.5 | |||
Average interest rate | 2.0 | % | 2.0 | % | |||
Fixed-rate and other debt: | |||||||
Average outstanding debt balance | $ | — | $ | — | |||
Average interest rate | n/a | n/a | |||||
Total debt: | |||||||
Average outstanding debt balance | $ | 135.1 | $ | 136.5 | |||
Average interest rate | 2.0 | % | 2.0 | % |
• | A second quarter charge of $10.0 million ($6.8 million after taxes) associated with a one-time, lump sum license payment to the 3M Company after the Company settled all litigation issues associated with a patent infringement complaint (included in “Other income (expense), net” in the consolidated statements of income); |
• | A fourth quarter charge of $0.5 million ($0.3 million after taxes) in Flexible Packaging Films ($0.3 million) and PE Films ($0.2 million), a third quarter charge of $0.4 million ($0.2 million after taxes) in Flexible Packaging Films ($0.3 million), PE Films ($78,000) and Aluminum Extrusions ($31,000), a second quarter charge of $0.6 million ($0.4 million after taxes) in PE Films and a first quarter charge of $0.8 million ($0.5 million after taxes) in PE Films for severance and other employee-related costs associated with restructurings; |
• | A fourth quarter charge of $0.7 million ($0.4 million after taxes), a third quarter charge of $75,000 ($46,000 after taxes) and a second quarter charge of $0.2 million ($0.1 million after taxes) related to expected future environmental costs at the aluminum extrusions manufacturing facility in Newnan, Georgia (included in “Cost of goods sold” in the consolidated statements of income); |
• | A fourth quarter adjustment of previously accrued severance and other employee-related costs of $0.1 million ($63,000 after taxes) and a third quarter charge of $37,000 ($23,000 after taxes), a second quarter charge of $0.3 million ($0.2 million after taxes) and a first quarter charge of $0.5 million ($0.3 million after taxes) associated with the shutdown of the PE Films’ manufacturing facility in Red Springs, North Carolina, which includes net severance and other employee-related costs of $0.4 million and asset impairment and other shutdown-related charges of $0.3 million; |
• | A fourth quarter gain of $0.1 million ($73,000 after taxes) related to the sale of a previously shutdown PE Films’ manufacturing facility in LaGrange, Georgia (included in “Other income (expense), net” in the consolidated statements of income); and |
• | A fourth quarter charge of $11,000 ($7,000 after taxes), a third quarter charge of $20,000 ($12,000 after taxes) and a second quarter charge of $24,000 ($15,000 after taxes) associated with the previously shutdown aluminum extrusions manufacturing facility in Kentland, Indiana. |
(In Millions) | 2014 | 2013 | |||||
Floating-rate debt with interest charged on a rollover | |||||||
basis at one-month LIBOR plus a credit spread: | |||||||
Average outstanding debt balance | $ | 136.5 | $ | 133.5 | |||
Average interest rate | 2.0 | % | 1.9 | % | |||
Fixed-rate and other debt: | |||||||
Average outstanding debt balance | $ | — | $ | — | |||
Average interest rate | n/a | n/a | |||||
Total debt: | |||||||
Average outstanding debt balance | $ | 136.5 | $ | 133.5 | |||
Average interest rate | 2.0 | % | 1.9 | % |
• | Accounts and other receivables decreased $19.1 million (16.9%). |
• | Accounts and other receivables in PE Films decreased by $9.3 million due mainly to the timing of cash receipts and lower sales volume. DSO (represents trailing 12 months net sales divided by a rolling 12-month average of accounts and other receivables balances) was approximately 42.7 days in 2015 and 42.9 days in 2014. |
• | Accounts and other receivables in Flexible Packaging Films decreased by $6.2 million primarily due to the timing of cash receipts and lower net sales. DSO was approximately 68.9 days in 2015 and 59.5 days in 2014. The increase in DSO from 2014 to 2015 is primarily due to higher export sales, which have longer terms than domestic sales, and pricing pressures, which has led to extending payment terms to remain competitive. |
• | Accounts and other receivables in Aluminum Extrusions decreased by $3.6 million primarily due to the timing of cash receipts. DSO was approximately 45.1 days in 2015 and 45.3 days in 2014. |
• | Inventories decreased $9.0 million (12.1%). |
• | Inventories in PE Films decreased by $3.8 million primarily due to the impact of the change in the U.S. dollar value of currencies for operations outside the U.S. and the timing of shipments at the end of the year. DIO (represents trailing 12 months costs of goods sold calculated on a first-in, first-out basis divided by a rolling 12-month average of inventory balances calculated on the first-in, first-out basis) was approximately 48.3 days in 2015 and 46.2 days in 2014. |
• | Inventories in Flexible Packaging Films decreased by $6.7 million primarily due to the impact of the change in the U.S. dollar value of currencies for operations outside the U.S. DIO was approximately 81.6 days in 2015 and 71.8 days in 2014. The increase in DIO from 2014 to 2015 is primarily due to the impact of the change in the U.S. dollar value of currencies for operations outside the U.S. |
• | Inventories in Aluminum Extrusions increased by $1.5 million primarily due to higher sales volume and the timing of shipments at the end of the year. DIO was approximately 29.8 days in 2015 and 24.1 days in 2014. The increase in DIO from 2014 to 2015 is primarily due to stockpiling of inventory for expected future demand. |
• | Net property, plant and equipment decreased $38.6 million (14.3%) due primarily to depreciation of $30.9 million and a change in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies (a decrease of approximately $40.3 million), partially offset by capital expenditures of $32.8 million. |
• | Goodwill and other intangibles decreased by $62.1 million (28.8%) primarily due to the write-off of $44.5 million of goodwill associated with Flexible Packaging Films (see Note 8 of the Notes to Financial Statements beginning on page 67), amortization expense of $4.1 million and changes in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the Brazilian Real. |
• | Accounts payable decreased by $10.0 million (10.6%). |
• | Accounts payable in PE Films decreased by $3.6 million primarily due to lower inventory balances and the timing of payments at the end of the year. DPO (represents trailing 12 months costs of goods sold calculated on a first-in, first-out basis divided by a rolling 12-month average of accounts payable balances) was approximately 39.0 days in 2015 and 36.2 days in 2014. |
• | Accounts payable in Flexible Packaging Films decreased by $4.6 million, primarily due to lower inventory balances, the timing of payments and the impact of the change in the U.S. dollar value of currencies for operations outside the U.S. DPO was approximately 34.2 days in 2015 and 35.5 days in 2014. |
• | Accounts payable in Aluminum Extrusions decreased by $2.4 million, primarily due to the timing of payments. DPO was approximately 48.0 days in 2015 and 48.0 days in 2014. |
• | Accrued expenses increased by $1.6 million (5.0%) from December 31, 2014. |
• | Other noncurrent liabilities decreased by $3.9 million (3.4%) from December 31, 2014. |
• | Net deferred income tax liabilities in excess of assets decreased by $11.7 million primarily due to numerous changes between years in the balance of the components shown in the December 31, 2015 and 2014 schedule of deferred income tax assets and liabilities provided in Note 17 of the Notes to Financial Statements beginning on Page 79. The Company had a current income tax receivable of $0.4 million at December 31, 2015 compared to a current receivable of $0.9 million at December 31, 2014. The change is primarily due to the timing of tax payments. |
Net Capitalization and Indebtedness as of December 31, 2015 | |||
(In Thousands) | |||
Net capitalization: | |||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 44,156 | |
Debt: | |||
$350 million revolving credit agreement maturing April 23, 2017 | 104,000 | ||
Other debt | — | ||
Total debt | 104,000 | ||
Debt net of cash and cash equivalents | 59,844 | ||
Shareholders’ equity | 272,748 | ||
Net capitalization | $ | 332,592 | |
Indebtedness as defined in revolving credit agreement: | |||
Total debt | $ | 104,000 | |
Face value of letters of credit | 2,684 | ||
Other | 250 | ||
Indebtedness | $ | 106,934 |
Pricing Under Revolving Credit Agreement (Basis Points) | ||||
Indebtedness-to-Adjusted EBITDA Ratio | Credit Spread Over LIBOR | Commitment Fee | ||
> 2.0x but <= 3.0x | 200 | 35 | ||
> 1.0x but <=2.0x | 175 | 30 | ||
<= 1.0x | 150 | 25 |
Computations of Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted EBIT, Leverage Ratio and Interest Coverage Ratio as Defined in the Credit Agreement Along with Related Most Restrictive Covenants | |||
As of and for the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2015 (In Thousands) | |||
Computations of adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBIT as defined in revolving credit agreement for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015: | |||
Net income (loss) | $ | (32,135 | ) |
Plus: | |||
After-tax losses related to discontinued operations | — | ||
Total income tax expense for continuing operations | 8,928 | ||
Interest expense | 3,502 | ||
Depreciation and amortization expense for continuing operations | 34,982 | ||
All non-cash losses and expenses, plus cash losses and expenses not to exceed $10,000, for continuing operations that are classified as unusual, extraordinary or which are related to plant shutdowns, asset impairments and/or restructurings (cash-related of $8,331) | 54,561 | ||
Charges related to stock option grants and awards accounted for under the fair value-based method | 483 | ||
Losses related to the application of the equity method of accounting | — | ||
Losses related to adjustments in the estimated fair value of assets accounted for under the fair value method of accounting | 20,500 | ||
Minus: | |||
After-tax income related to discontinued operations | — | ||
Total income tax benefits for continuing operations | — | ||
Interest income | (294 | ) | |
All non-cash gains and income, plus cash gains and income in excess of $10,000, for continuing operations that are classified as unusual, extraordinary or which are related to plant shutdowns, asset impairments and/or restructurings | — | ||
Income related to changes in estimates for stock option grants and awards accounted for under the fair value-based method | — | ||
Income related to the application of the equity method of accounting | — | ||
Income related to adjustments in the estimated fair value of assets accounted for under the fair value method of accounting | — | ||
Plus cash dividends declared on investments accounted for under the equity method of accounting | — | ||
Plus or minus, as applicable, pro forma EBITDA adjustments associated with acquisitions and asset dispositions | — | ||
Adjusted EBITDA as defined in revolving credit agreement | 90,527 | ||
Less: Depreciation and amortization expense for continuing operations (including pro forma for acquisitions and asset dispositions) | (34,982 | ) | |
Adjusted EBIT as defined in revolving credit agreement | $ | 55,545 | |
Computations of leverage and interest coverage ratios as defined in revolving credit agreement at December 31, 2015: | |||
Leverage ratio (indebtedness-to-adjusted EBITDA) | 1.18x | ||
Interest coverage ratio (adjusted EBIT-to-interest expense) | 15.86x | ||
Most restrictive covenants as defined in revolving credit agreement: | |||
Maximum permitted aggregate amount of dividends that can be paid by Tredegar during the term of the revolving credit agreement ($100,000 plus 50% of net income generated beginning January 1, 2012) | $ | 148,771 | |
Maximum leverage ratio permitted: | 3.00x | ||
Minimum interest coverage ratio permitted | 2.50x |
Payments Due by Period | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In Millions) | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | Remainder | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
Debt: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Principal payments | $ | — | $ | 104.0 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 104.0 | |||||||||||||
Estimated interest expense | 2.3 | 0.7 | — | — | — | — | 3.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated contributions required (1) : | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Defined benefit plans | 6.1 | 8.0 | 13.8 | 13.0 | 12.8 | 52.2 | 105.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other postretirement benefits | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 5.2 | 7.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditure commitments | 7.3 | — | — | — | — | 7.3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Operating leases | 2.3 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 2.3 | 12.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated obligations relating to uncertain tax positions (2) | — | — | — | — | — | 4.2 | 4.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other (3) | 3.1 | 3.0 | 2.1 | — | — | — | 8.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ |