Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act File Number: 811-21227
Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)
Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
Maureen A. Gemma
Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110
(Name and Address of Agent for Services)
(617) 482-8260
(Registrant’s Telephone Number)
September 30
Date of Fiscal Year End
September 30, 2010
Date of Reporting Period
 
 

 


Table of Contents

Item 1. Reports to Stockholders

 


Table of Contents

(GRAPHIC)
 


Table of Contents

 
IMPORTANT NOTICES
 
Privacy. The Eaton Vance organization is committed to ensuring your financial privacy. Each of the financial institutions identified below has in effect the following policy (Privacy Policy) with respect to nonpublic personal information about its customers:
 
  •  Only such information received from you, through application forms or otherwise, and information about your Eaton Vance fund transactions will be collected. This may include information such as name, address, social security number, tax status, account balances and transactions.
 
  •  None of such information about you (or former customers) will be disclosed to anyone, except as permitted by law (which includes disclosure to employees necessary to service your account). In the normal course of servicing a customer’s account, Eaton Vance may share information with unaffiliated third parties that perform various required services such as transfer agents, custodians and broker/dealers.
 
  •  Policies and procedures (including physical, electronic and procedural safeguards) are in place that are designed to protect the confidentiality of such information.
 
  •  We reserve the right to change our Privacy Policy at any time upon proper notification to you. Customers may want to review our Privacy Policy periodically for changes by accessing the link on our homepage: www.eatonvance.com.
 
Our pledge of privacy applies to the following entities within the Eaton Vance organization: the Eaton Vance Family of Funds, Eaton Vance Management, Eaton Vance Investment Counsel, Boston Management and Research, and Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. Our Privacy Policy applies only to those Eaton Vance customers who are individuals and who have a direct relationship with us. If a customer’s account (i.e., fund shares) is held in the name of a third-party financial adviser/broker-dealer, it is likely that only such adviser’s privacy policies apply to the customer. This notice supersedes all previously issued privacy disclosures. For more information about Eaton Vance’s Privacy Policy, please call 1-800-262-1122.
 
 
 
 
Delivery of Shareholder Documents. The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) permits funds to deliver only one copy of shareholder documents, including prospectuses, proxy statements and shareholder reports, to fund investors with multiple accounts at the same residential or post office box address. This practice is often called “householding” and it helps eliminate duplicate mailings to shareholders.
 
Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, may household the mailing of your documents indefinitely unless you instruct Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, otherwise. If you would prefer that your Eaton Vance documents not be householded, please contact Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122, or contact your financial adviser. Your instructions that householding not apply to delivery of your Eaton Vance documents will be effective within 30 days of receipt by Eaton Vance or your financial adviser.
 
 
 
 
Portfolio Holdings. Each Eaton Vance Fund and its underlying Portfolio(s) (if applicable) will file a schedule of portfolio holdings on Form N-Q with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year. The Form N-Q will be available on the Eaton Vance website at www.eatonvance.com, by calling Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122 or in the EDGAR database on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Form N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s public reference room in Washington, D.C. (call 1-800-732-0330 for information on the operation of the public reference room).
 
 
 
 
Proxy Voting. From time to time, funds are required to vote proxies related to the securities held by the funds. The Eaton Vance Funds or their underlying Portfolios (if applicable) vote proxies according to a set of policies and procedures approved by the Funds’ and Portfolios’ Boards. You may obtain a description of these policies and procedures and information on how the Funds or Portfolios voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12 month period ended June 30, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-262-1122. This description is also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
 
 
 
 
Additional Notice to Shareholders. A Fund may redeem or purchase its outstanding auction preferred shares (APS) in order to maintain compliance with regulatory requirements, borrowing or rating agency requirements or for other purposes as it deems appropriate or necessary. A Fund also may purchase shares of its common stock in the open market when they trade at a discount to net asset value or at other times if a Fund determines such purchases are advisable. There can be no assurance that a Fund will take such action or that such purchases would reduce the discount.


 

Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds  as of September 30, 2010
(IMAGE)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
         
    2  
 
       
Performance Information and Portfolio Composition
       
    4  
    5  
    6  
    7  
    8  
    9  
    10  
    11  
 
       
Financial Statements
    12  
 
       
Federal Tax Information
    74  
 
       
Notice to Shareholders
    75  
 
       
Annual Meeting of Shareholders
    76  
 
       
Dividend Reinvestment Plan
    77  
 
       
Board of Trustees’ Contract Approval
    79  
 
       
Management and Organization
    82  
 EX-99.CERT Section 302 Certification
 EX-99.906CERT Section 906 Certification
(IMAGE)
1


Table of Contents

Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds  as of September 30, 2010
(IMAGE)
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE

Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds (the “Funds”) are closed-end funds traded on the NYSE Amex, which are designed to provide current income exempt from regular federal income tax, federal alternative minimum tax and, in state specific funds, state personal income taxes. On January 29, 2010, shareholders of the Funds approved a modification to each Fund’s 80 percent policy to eliminate the requirement to invest primarily in insured municipal obligations and to eliminate “Insured” from each Fund’s name. Under normal market conditions, the Funds are now required to invest at least 80 percent of net assets in municipal obligations rated A or better by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Standard & Poor’s Ratings Group or Fitch Ratings.
Economic and Market Conditions
The U.S. economy remained generally stable, if still weak, during the year ending September 30, 2010, even as concerns about high unemployment and budget deficits provoked ongoing skittishness in the capital markets. The U.S. economy grew at an annualized rate of 3.7% in the first quarter of 2010, but slowed to 1.7% in the second quarter, according to the U.S. Department of Commerce. Advance estimates for the third quarter indicated an annualized increase in GDP of 2%.
Municipal bond performance was positive for the fiscal year, in spite of ongoing negative media attention on the tax-exempt sector. Solid performance resulted in part from continued investor concern about the strength (or weakness) of the economic recovery, and investments such as higher-quality municipals and Treasuries benefited. Toward the end of the period, the market was bolstered by very light issuance and sustained demand, as well as a flight to quality during July and August. September 2010 brought a change in sentiment, and investors took on more risk, helping higher-yielding, lower-rated sectors of the market.
Against this backdrop the Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index (the Index)1 – an unmanaged index of municipal bonds traded in the U.S. – posted a return of 5.81% for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010. The Barclays Capital Long Municipal Bond Index (the Long 22+ Index) – an unmanaged index of municipal bonds traded in the U.S. with maturities of 22 years or more – gained 6.56% for the fiscal year ending

Fund shares are not insured by the FDIC and are not deposits or other obligations of, or guaranteed by, any depository institution. Shares are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of principal invested.
September 30, 2010. Munis with longer maturities performed best during the year. Intermediate-maturity bonds, represented by the 7-year segment of the Index, also performed well, gaining 6.48%. Shorter-maturity bonds in the 5-year segment of the Index returned 5.63%.
Management Discussion
In this generally positive environment, Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund II underperformed the Long 22+ Index at net asset value (NAV) for the year ending September 30, 2010. Management’s research and selection of bonds across the sector and credit spectrum helped performance relative to the Long 22+ Index. In particular, an overweighting in high-coupon bonds and AAA-rated bonds made significant contributions to relative performance, as did the Fund’s duration profile. In contrast, the Fund’s stake in insured bonds detracted, and a modest hedging position using Treasury futures and interest rate swaps—an ongoing strategy that management has employed that is designed to help mitigate interest-rate risk—also caused some underperformance for the year. Finally, underweighting 5%-6% coupon bonds and BBB-rated bonds negatively impacted returns.
Five of the state-specific Funds underperformed the Index at NAV. (The exceptions were Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund and Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Bond Fund.) In general, positive contributors to the state-specific Funds included: duration profile versus the Index, overweightings in AAA-rated and high-coupon bonds, and sector selection. Overweighted positions in insured bonds and 5%-6% coupon bonds were negative factors. Overall, the Funds’ modest hedging using Treasury futures and/ or interest rate swaps—an ongoing strategy that management has employed for many years and is designed to help mitigate interest-rate risk—detracted from their relative returns.
Management employed leverage in several of the Funds, through which additional exposure to the municipal market was achieved. Leverage has the
 
1
It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices.
 
 
Past performance is no guarantee of future results.


The views expressed throughout this report are those of the portfolio managers and are current only through the end of the period of the report as stated on the cover. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and the investment adviser disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a fund are based on many factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance fund. Portfolio information provided in the report may not be representative of the Funds’ current or future investments and may change due to active management.
(IMAGE)
2


Table of Contents

Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds  as of September 30, 2010
(IMAGE)
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE

impact of magnifying a Fund’s exposure to its underlying investments in both up and down markets. During the period, the Funds’ leverage generally helped their relative performance.
As we move ahead, we continue to focus on state and local government budget deficits, which likely peaked in 2010 or are expected to peak in early 2011. The decline in tax revenues appears to be reaching a bottom, with some municipalities realizing growth in tax receipts due to a combination of slim economic growth and an increase in actual tax rates. However, spending continues to grow faster than tax receipts despite deep spending cuts enacted by some government officials. We will continue to analyze any new developments and solutions that government leaders formulate to address their fiscal problems.
As of February 19, 2010, Craig R. Brandon became the portfolio manager of Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund and Adam A. Weigold became the portfolio manager of Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund. Mr. Brandon is a Vice President of Eaton Vance and manages other Eaton Vance municipal portfolios. He has been employed by Eaton Vance since 1998. Mr. Weigold is a Vice President of Eaton Vance and manages other Eaton Vance municipal portfolios. He has been employed by Eaton Vance since 1998.
A Note Regarding The Use Of Leverage
The Funds employ leverage through the issuance of Auction Preferred Shares (APS) and for certain Funds, the use of residual interest bond (RIB) financing.1 Each Fund’s APS and RIB leverage percentage as of September 30, 2010, as applicable, is reflected on the Fund-specific pages following this letter. The leverage created by APS and RIB investments provides an opportunity for increased income but, at the same time, creates special risks (including the likelihood of greater volatility of net asset value and market price of the common shares).
 
 
1
See Note 1H to the Financial Statements for more information on RIB investments.
      


(IMAGE)
3


Table of Contents

Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund II  as of September 30, 2010
(IMAGE)
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION AND PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION

                 
Performance1              
NYSE Amex Symbol     EIV          
 
 
               
Average Annual Total Returns (by market price)
 
 
               
One Year
    12.78 %        
Five Years
    3.82          
Life of Fund (11/29/02)
    6.62          
 
               
Average Annual Total Returns (by net asset value)
 
 
               
One Year
    6.26 %        
Five Years
    2.95          
Life of Fund (11/29/02)
    5.32          
 
               
Premium/(Discount) to NAV
    10.14 %        
 
               
Market Yields
 
 
               
Market Yield2
    6.76 %        
Taxable-Equivalent Market Yield3
    10.40          
 
               
Index Performance4 (Average Annual Total Returns)
 
                 
    Barclays Capital Long (22+)        
    Municipal Bond Index        
 
One Year
    6.56 %
Five Years
    4.50  
Life of Fund (11/30/02)
    5.55  
 
       
Lipper Averages5 (Average Annual Total Returns)
 
 
       
Lipper General Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged) Classification (by net asset value)
 
One Year
    9.50 %
Five Years
    4.72  
Life of Fund (11/30/02)
    6.02  

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
Portfolio Manager: William H. Ahern, Jr., CFA
Rating Distribution*6
By total investments
(PERFORMANCE GRAPH)
 
* The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1H to the Fund’s financial statements. Absent such securities, the Fund’s rating distribution as of 9/30/10 is as follows:
                     
AAA
      37.0 %   BBB       7.1 %
AA
    35.0 %   CCC     0.4 %
A
    19.5 %   C     1.0 %
Fund Statistics7
 
     
Number of Issues:
  109 
 
Average Maturity:
  26.3 years 
 
Average Effective Maturity:
  14.0 years 
 
Average Call Protection:
  9.4 years 
 
Average Dollar Price:
  $103.15 
 
APS Leverage**:
  19.8% 
 
RIB Leverage**:
  24.1% 
 
 
**
APS leverage represents the liquidation value of the Fund’s Auction Preferred Shares (APS) outstanding as of 9/30/10 as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets applicable to common shares plus APS and Floating Rate Notes. RIB leverage represents the amount of Floating Rate Notes outstanding as of 9/30/10 as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets applicable to common shares plus APS and Floating Rate Notes. Floating Rate Notes in both calculations reflect adjustments for executed but unsettled RIB transactions.


1 Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in market price or net asset value (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. The Fund’s performance at market price will differ from its results at NAV. Although market price performance generally reflects investment results over time, during shorter periods, returns at market price can also be affected by factors such as changing perceptions about the Fund, market conditions, fluctuations in supply and demand for the Fund’s shares, or changes in Fund distributions. Performance results reflect the effects of APS outstanding and RIB investments, which are forms of investment leverage. Use of leverage creates an opportunity for increased income but, at the same time, creates special risks (including the likelihood of greater volatility of net asset value and market price of common shares). 2 The Fund’s market yield is calculated by dividing the last regular dividend per common share in the period (annualized) by the market price at the end of the period. 3 Taxable-equivalent figure assumes a maximum 35.00% federal income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in a lower tax-equivalent figure. 4 It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Index’s total return does not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. Index performance is available as of month end only. 5 The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper General Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged) Classification (closed-end) contained 63, 59 and 56 funds for the 1-year, 5-year and Life-of-Fund periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only. 6 Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of the Fund. Ratings are based on Moody’s, S&P or Fitch, as applicable. Credit ratings are based largely on the rating agency’s investment analysis at the time of rating and the rating assigned to any particular security is not necessarily a reflection of the issuer’s current financial condition. The rating assigned to a security by a rating agency does not necessarily reflect its assessment of the volatility of a security’s market value or of the liquidity of an investment in the security. If securities are rated differently by the rating agencies, the higher rating is applied. 7 Fund holdings information excludes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1H to the Fund’s financial statements.
(IMAGE)
4


Table of Contents

Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund II  as of September 30, 2010
(IMAGE)
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION AND PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION

                 
Performance1              
NYSE Amex Symbol     EIA          
 
 
               
Average Annual Total Returns (by market price)
 
 
               
One Year
    13.86 %        
Five Years
    4.07          
Life of Fund (11/29/02)
    5.37          
 
               
Average Annual Total Returns (by net asset value)
 
 
               
One Year
    3.93 %        
Five Years
    2.84          
Life of Fund (11/29/02)
    4.61          
 
               
Premium/(Discount) to NAV
    5.83 %        
 
               
Market Yields
 
 
               
Market Yield2
    6.50 %        
Taxable-Equivalent Market Yield3
    11.18          
 
               
Index Performance4 (Average Annual Total Returns)
 
                 
    Barclays Capital   Barclays Capital Long (22+)
    Municipal Bond Index   Municipal Bond Index
 
One Year
    5.81 %     6.56 %
Five Years
    5.13       4.50  
Life of Fund (11/30/02)
  5.16       5.55  
                 
Lipper Averages5 (Average Annual Total Returns)
 
Lipper California Municipal Debt Funds Classification (by net asset value)
 
One Year
    7.95 %
Five Years
    3.87  
Life of Fund (11/30/02)
    5.33  

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
Portfolio Manager: Cynthia J. Clemson
Rating Distribution*6
By total investments
(PERFORMANCE GRAPH)
 
* The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1H to the Fund’s financial statements. Absent such securities, the Fund’s rating distribution as of 9/30/10 is as follows:
                     
AAA
    36.8 %   BB       1.7 %
AA
    39.4 %   Not Rated       1.3 %
A
    20.8 %            
 
Fund Statistics7
 
     
Number of Issues:
  66 
 
Average Maturity:
  22.9 years 
 
Average Effective Maturity:
  12.5 years 
 
Average Call Protection:
  7.5 years 
 
Average Dollar Price:
  $91.28 
 
APS Leverage**:
  31.0% 
 
RIB Leverage**:
  10.5% 
 
 
**
APS leverage represents the liquidation value of the Fund’s Auction Preferred Shares (APS) outstanding as of 9/30/10 as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets applicable to common shares plus APS and Floating Rate Notes. RIB leverage represents the amount of Floating Rate Notes outstanding as of 9/30/10 as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets applicable to common shares plus APS and Floating Rate Notes. Floating Rate Notes in both calculations reflect adjustments for executed but unsettled RIB transactions.


1 Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in market price or net asset value (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. The Fund’s performance at market price will differ from its results at NAV. Although market price performance generally reflects investment results over time, during shorter periods, returns at market price can also be affected by factors such as changing perceptions about the Fund, market conditions, fluctuations in supply and demand for the Fund’s shares, or changes in Fund distributions. Performance results reflect the effects of APS outstanding and RIB investments, which are forms of investment leverage. Use of leverage creates an opportunity for increased income but, at the same time, creates special risks (including the likelihood of greater volatility of net asset value and market price of common shares). 2 The Fund’s market yield is calculated by dividing the last regular dividend per common share in the period (annualized) by the market price at the end of the period. 3 Taxable-equivalent figure assumes a maximum 41.86% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in a lower tax-equivalent figure. 4 It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. Index performance is available as of month end only. 5 The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper California Municipal Debt Funds Classification (closed-end) contained 24, 23 and 23 funds for the 1-year, 5-year and Life-of-Fund periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only. 6 Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of the Fund. Ratings are based on Moody’s, S&P or Fitch, as applicable. Credit ratings are based largely on the rating agency’s investment analysis at the time of rating and the rating assigned to any particular security is not necessarily a reflection of the issuer’s current financial condition. The rating assigned to a security by a rating agency does not necessarily reflect its assessment of the volatility of a security’s market value or of the liquidity of an investment in the security. If securities are rated differently by the rating agencies, the higher rating is applied. 7 Fund holdings information excludes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1H to the Fund’s financial statements.
(IMAGE)
5


Table of Contents

Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund  as of September 30, 2010
(IMAGE)
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION AND PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION

                 
Performance 1              
NYSE Amex Symbol     MAB          
 
 
               
Average Annual Total Returns (by market price)
 
 
               
One Year
    5.44 %        
Five Years
    2.61          
Life of Fund (11/29/02)
    6.66          
 
               
Average Annual Total Returns (by net asset value)
 
 
               
One Year
    6.43 %        
Five Years
    4.87          
Life of Fund (11/29/02)
    6.25          
 
               
Premium/(Discount) to NAV
    3.06 %        
 
               
Market Yields
 
 
               
Market Yield2
    5.54 %        
Taxable-Equivalent Market Yield3
    9.00          
 
               
Index Performance4 (Average Annual Total Returns)
 
                 
    Barclays Capital   Barclays Capital Long (22+)
    Municipal Bond Index   Municipal Bond Index
 
One Year
    5.81 %     6.56 %
Five Years
    5.13       4.50  
Life of Fund (11/30/02)
    5.16       5.55  
                 
Lipper Averages5 (Average Annual Total Returns)
 
Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification (by net asset value)
 
One Year
    7.85 %
Five Years
    4.93  
Life of Fund (11/30/02)
    5.94  

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
Portfolio Manager: Craig R. Brandon, CFA
Rating Distribution*6
By total investments
(PERFORMANCE GRAPH)
 
* The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1H to the Fund’s financial statements. Absent such securities, the Fund’s rating distribution as of 9/30/10 is as follows:
                     
AAA
    22.4 %   BBB       1.8 %
AA
    36.4 %   Not Rated       6.1 %
A
    33.3 %            
Fund Statistics7
 
     
Number of Issues:
  47 
 
Average Maturity:
  24.5 years 
 
Average Effective Maturity:
  12.2 years 
 
Average Call Protection:
  11.8 years 
 
Average Dollar Price:
  $108.86 
 
APS Leverage**:
  31.7% 
 
RIB Leverage**:
  7.8% 
 
 
**
APS leverage represents the liquidation value of the Fund’s Auction Preferred Shares (APS) outstanding as of 9/30/10 as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets applicable to common shares plus APS and Floating Rate Notes. RIB leverage represents the amount of Floating Rate Notes outstanding as of 9/30/10 as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets applicable to common shares plus APS and Floating Rate Notes.


1 Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in market price or net asset value (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. The Fund’s performance at market price will differ from its results at NAV. Although market price performance generally reflects investment results over time, during shorter periods, returns at market price can also be affected by factors such as changing perceptions about the Fund, market conditions, fluctuations in supply and demand for the Fund’s shares, or changes in Fund distributions. Performance results reflect the effects of APS outstanding and RIB investments, which are forms of investment leverage. Use of leverage creates an opportunity for increased income but, at the same time, creates special risks (including the likelihood of greater volatility of net asset value and market price of common shares). 2 The Fund’s market yield is calculated by dividing the last regular dividend per common share in the period (annualized) by the market price at the end of the period. 3 Taxable-equivalent figure assumes a maximum 38.45% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in a lower tax-equivalent figure. 4 It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. Index performance is available as of month end only. 5 The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification (closed-end) contained 46, 46 and 45 funds for the 1-year, 5-year and Life-of-Fund periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only. 6 Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of the Fund. Ratings are based on Moody’s, S&P or Fitch, as applicable. Credit ratings are based largely on the rating agency’s investment analysis at the time of rating and the rating assigned to any particular security is not necessarily a reflection of the issuer’s current financial condition. The rating assigned to a security by a rating agency does not necessarily reflect its assessment of the volatility of a security’s market value or of the liquidity of an investment in the security. If securities are rated differently by the rating agencies, the higher rating is applied. 7 Fund holdings information excludes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1H to the Fund’s financial statements.
(IMAGE)
6


Table of Contents

Eaton Vance Michigan Municipal Bond Fund  as of September 30, 2010
(IMAGE)
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION AND PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION

Performance1              
NYSE Amex Symbol     MIW          
 
 
               
Average Annual Total Returns (by market price)
 
 
               
One Year
    10.60 %        
Five Years
    3.34          
Life of Fund (11/29/02)
    6.03          
 
               
Average Annual Total Returns (by net asset value)
 
 
               
One Year
    5.16 %        
Five Years
    5.11          
Life of Fund (11/29/02)
    6.13          
 
               
Premium/(Discount) to NAV
    -0.76 %        
 
               
Market Yields
 
 
               
Market Yield2
    6.09 %        
Taxable-Equivalent Market Yield3
    9.80          
 
               
Index Performance4 (Average Annual Total Returns)
 
                 
    Barclays Capital   Barclays Capital Long (22+)
    Municipal Bond Index   Municipal Bond Index
 
One Year
    5.81 %     6.56 %
Five Years
    5.13       4.50  
Life of Fund (11/30/02)
    5.16       5.55  
                 
Lipper Averages5 (Average Annual Total Returns)
 
Lipper Michigan Municipal Debt Funds Classification (by net asset value)
 
One Year
    6.70 %
Five Years
    4.57  
Life of Fund (11/30/02)
    5.74  

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
Portfolio Manager: William H. Ahern, Jr., CFA
Rating Distribution*6
By total investments
(PERFORMANCE GRAPH)
 
*   There were no special purpose vehicles in which the Fund held a residual interest as of 9/30/10.
Fund Statistics
 
     
Number of Issues:
  40 
 
Average Maturity:
  19.7 years 
 
Average Effective Maturity:
  8.1 years 
 
Average Call Protection:
  6.1 years 
 
Average Dollar Price:
  $94.48 
 
APS Leverage**:
  37.7% 
 
 
**
APS leverage represents the liquidation value of the Fund’s Auction Preferred Shares (APS) outstanding as of 9/30/10 as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets applicable to common shares plus APS.


1 Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in market price or net asset value (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. The Fund’s performance at market price will differ from its results at NAV. Although market price performance generally reflects investment results over time, during shorter periods, returns at market price can also be affected by factors such as changing perceptions about the Fund, market conditions, fluctuations in supply and demand for the Fund’s shares, or changes in Fund distributions. Performance results reflect the effects of APS outstanding, which is a form of investment leverage. Use of leverage creates an opportunity for increased income but, at the same time, creates special risks (including the likelihood of greater volatility of net asset value and market price of common shares). 2 The Fund’s market yield is calculated by dividing the last regular dividend per common share in the period (annualized) by the market price at the end of the period. 3 Taxable-equivalent figure assumes a maximum 37.83% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in a lower tax-equivalent figure. 4 It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. Index performance is available as of month end only. 5 The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper Michigan Municipal Debt Funds Classification (closed-end) contained 5, 5 and 5 funds for the 1-year, 5-year and Life-of-Fund periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only. 6 Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of the Fund. Ratings are based on Moody’s, S&P or Fitch, as applicable. Credit ratings are based largely on the rating agency’s investment analysis at the time of rating and the rating assigned to any particular security is not necessarily a reflection of the issuer’s current financial condition. The rating assigned to a security by a rating agency does not necessarily reflect its assessment of the volatility of a security’s market value or of the liquidity of an investment in the security. If securities are rated differently by the rating agencies, the higher rating is applied.
(IMAGE)
7


Table of Contents

Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund  as of September 30, 2010
(IMAGE)
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION AND PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION

                 
Performance1              
NYSE Amex Symbol     EMJ          
 
 
               
Average Annual Total Returns (by market price)
 
 
               
One Year
    11.12 %        
Five Years
    5.20          
Life of Fund (11/29/02)
    7.48          
 
               
Average Annual Total Returns (by net asset value)
 
 
               
One Year
    5.10 %        
Five Years
    5.20          
Life of Fund (11/29/02)
    6.61          
 
               
Premium/(Discount) to NAV
    6.52 %        
 
               
Market Yields
 
 
               
Market Yield2
    5.99 %        
Taxable-Equivalent Market Yield3
    10.12          
 
               
Index Performance4 (Average Annual Total Returns)
 
                 
    Barclays Capital   Barclays Capital Long (22+)
    Municipal Bond Index   Municipal Bond Index
 
One Year
    5.81 %     6.56 %
Five Years
    5.13       4.50  
Life of Fund (11/30/02)
  5.16       5.55  
                 
Lipper Averages5 (Average Annual Total Returns)
 
Lipper New Jersey Municipal Debt Funds Classification (by net asset value)
 
One Year
    8.09 %
Five Years
    4.94  
Life of Fund (11/30/02)
    6.25  

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
Portfolio Manager: Adam A. Weigold, CFA
Rating Distribution*6
By total investments
(PERFORMANCE GRAPH)
 
* The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1H to the Fund’s financial statements. Absent such securities, the Fund’s rating distribution as of 9/30/10 is as follows:
                     
AAA
    28.9 %   A       20.7 %
AA
    47.0 %   BBB       3.4 %
Fund Statistics7
 
     
Number of Issues:
  63 
 
Average Maturity:
  21.8 years 
 
Average Effective Maturity:
  11.6 years 
 
Average Call Protection:
  10.5 years 
 
Average Dollar Price:
  $93.11 
 
APS Leverage**:
  31.0% 
 
RIB Leverage**:
  10.0% 
 
 
**
APS leverage represents the liquidation value of the Fund’s Auction Preferred Shares (APS) outstanding as of 9/30/10 as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets applicable to common shares plus APS and Floating Rate Notes. RIB leverage represents the amount of Floating Rate Notes outstanding as of 9/30/10 as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets applicable to common shares plus APS and Floating Rate Notes.


1 Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in market price or net asset value (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. The Fund’s performance at market price will differ from its results at NAV. Although market price performance generally reflects investment results over time, during shorter periods, returns at market price can also be affected by factors such as changing perceptions about the Fund, market conditions, fluctuations in supply and demand for the Fund’s shares, or changes in Fund distributions. Performance results reflect the effects of APS outstanding and RIB investments, which are forms of investment leverage. Use of leverage creates an opportunity for increased income but, at the same time, creates special risks (including the likelihood of greater volatility of net asset value and market price of common shares). 2 The Fund’s market yield is calculated by dividing the last regular dividend per common share in the period (annualized) by the market price at the end of the period. 3 Taxable-equivalent figure assumes a maximum 40.83% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in a lower tax-equivalent figure. 4 It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. Index performance is available as of month end only. 5 The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper New Jersey Municipal Debt Funds Classification (closed-end) contained 12, 11 and 11 funds for the 1-year, 5-year and Life-of-Fund periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only. 6 Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of the Fund. Ratings are based on Moody’s, S&P or Fitch, as applicable. Credit ratings are based largely on the rating agency’s investment analysis at the time of rating and the rating assigned to any particular security is not necessarily a reflection of the issuer’s current financial condition. The rating assigned to a security by a rating agency does not necessarily reflect its assessment of the volatility of a security’s market value or of the liquidity of an investment in the security. If securities are rated differently by the rating agencies, the higher rating is applied. 7 Fund holdings information excludes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1H to the Fund’s financial statements.
(IMAGE)
8


Table of Contents

Eaton Vance New York Municipal Bond Fund II  as of September 30, 2010
(IMAGE)
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION AND PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION

                 
Performance1              
NYSE Amex Symbol     NYH          
 
 
               
Average Annual Total Returns (by market price)
 
 
               
One Year
    9.99 %        
Five Years
    5.80          
Life of Fund (11/29/02)
    6.45          
 
               
Average Annual Total Returns (by net asset value)
 
 
               
One Year
    5.20 %        
Five Years
    3.86          
Life of Fund (11/29/02)
    5.86          
 
               
Premium/(Discount) to NAV
    4.48 %        
 
               
Market Yields
 
 
               
Market Yield2
    6.30 %        
Taxable-Equivalent Market Yield3
    10.65          
 
               
Index Performance4 (Average Annual Total Returns)
 
                 
    Barclays Capital   Barclays Capital Long (22+)
    Municipal Bond Index   Municipal Bond Index
 
One Year
    5.81 %     6.56 %
Five Years
    5.13       4.50  
Life of Fund (11/30/02)
    5.16       5.55  
                 
Lipper Averages5 (Average Annual Total Returns)
 
Lipper New York Municipal Debt Funds Classification (by net asset value)
 
One Year
    8.47 %
Five Years
    4.15  
Life of Fund (11/30/02)
    5.57  

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
Portfolio Manager: Craig R. Brandon, CFA
Rating Distribution*6
By total investments
(PERFORMANCE GRAPH)
 
* The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1H to the Fund’s financial statements. Absent such securities, the Fund’s rating distribution as of 9/30/10 is as follows:
                     
AAA
    25.1 %   BBB      5.2 %
AA
    43.7 %   Not Rated      1.1 %
A
    24.9 %            
Fund Statistics7
 
     
Number of Issues:
  74 
 
Average Maturity:
  22.9 years 
 
Average Effective Maturity:
  11.5 years 
 
Average Call Protection:
  8.5 years 
 
Average Dollar Price:
  $101.20 
 
APS Leverage**:
  22.5% 
 
RIB Leverage**:
  19.2% 
 
 
**
APS leverage represents the liquidation value of the Fund’s Auction Preferred Shares (APS) outstanding as of 9/30/10 as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets applicable to common shares plus APS and Floating Rate Notes. RIB leverage represents the amount of Floating Rate Notes outstanding as of 9/30/10 as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets applicable to common shares plus APS and Floating Rate Notes.


1 Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in market price or net asset value (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. The Fund’s performance at market price will differ from its results at NAV. Although market price performance generally reflects investment results over time, during shorter periods, returns at market price can also be affected by factors such as changing perceptions about the Fund, market conditions, fluctuations in supply and demand for the Fund’s shares, or changes in Fund distributions. Performance results reflect the effects of APS outstanding and RIB investments, which are forms of investment leverage. Use of leverage creates an opportunity for increased income but, at the same time, creates special risks (including the likelihood of greater volatility of net asset value and market price of common shares). 2 The Fund’s market yield is calculated by dividing the last regular dividend per common share in the period (annualized) by the market price at the end of the period. 3 Taxable-equivalent figure assumes a maximum 40.83% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in a lower tax-equivalent figure. 4 It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. Index performance is available as of month end only. 5 The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper New York Municipal Debt Funds Classification (closed-end) contained 20, 19 and 19 funds for the 1-year, 5-year and Life-of-Fund periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only. 6 Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of the Fund. Ratings are based on Moody’s, S&P or Fitch, as applicable. Credit ratings are based largely on the rating agency’s investment analysis at the time of rating and the rating assigned to any particular security is not necessarily a reflection of the issuer’s current financial condition. The rating assigned to a security by a rating agency does not necessarily reflect its assessment of the volatility of a security’s market value or of the liquidity of an investment in the security. If securities are rated differently by the rating agencies, the higher rating is applied. 7 Fund holdings information excludes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1H to the Fund’s financial statements.
(IMAGE)
9


Table of Contents

Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Bond Fund  as of September 30, 2010
(IMAGE)
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION AND PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION

                 
Performance1              
NYSE Amex Symbol     EIO          
 
 
               
Average Annual Total Returns (by market price)
 
 
               
One Year
    13.01 %        
Five Years
    4.88          
Life of Fund (11/29/02)
    5.50          
 
               
Average Annual Total Returns (by net asset value)
 
 
               
One Year
    6.04 %        
Five Years
    2.68          
Life of Fund (11/29/02)
    4.38          
 
               
Premium/(Discount) to NAV
    8.80 %        
 
               
Market Yields
 
 
               
Market Yield2
    5.48 %        
Taxable-Equivalent Market Yield3
    8.99          
 
               
Index Performance4 (Average Annual Total Returns)
 
                 
    Barclays Capital   Barclays Capital Long (22+)
    Municipal Bond Index   Municipal Bond Index
 
One Year
    5.81 %     6.56 %
Five Years
    5.13       4.50  
Life of Fund (11/30/02)
    5.16       5.55  
                 
Lipper Averages5 (Average Annual Total Returns)
 
Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification (by net asset value)
 
One Year
    7.85 %
Five Years
    4.93  
Life of Fund (11/30/02)
    5.94  

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
Portfolio Manager: William H. Ahern, Jr., CFA
Rating Distribution*6
By total investments
(PERFORMANCE GRAPH)
 
* The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1H to the Fund’s financial statements. Absent such securities, the Fund’s rating distribution as of 9/30/10 is as follows:
                     
AAA
    31.1 %   BBB     3.3 %
AA
    24.5 %   Not Rated     6.5 %
A
    34.6 %            
Fund Statistics7
 
     
Number of Issues:
  55 
 
Average Maturity:
  21.4 years 
 
Average Effective Maturity:
  11.2 years 
 
Average Call Protection:
  8.9 years 
 
Average Dollar Price:
  $93.17 
 
APS Leverage**:
  32.7% 
 
RIB Leverage**:
  4.5% 
 
 
**
APS leverage represents the liquidation value of the Fund’s Auction Preferred Shares (APS) outstanding as of 9/30/10 as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets applicable to common shares plus APS and Floating Rate Notes. RIB leverage represents the amount of Floating Rate Notes outstanding as of 9/30/10 as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets applicable to common shares plus APS and Floating Rate Notes. Floating Rate Notes in both calculations reflect the effect of RIBs purchased in secondary market transactions.


1 Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in market price or net asset value (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. The Fund’s performance at market price will differ from its results at NAV. Although market price performance generally reflects investment results over time, during shorter periods, returns at market price can also be affected by factors such as changing perceptions about the Fund, market conditions, fluctuations in supply and demand for the Fund’s shares, or changes in Fund distributions. Performance results reflect the effects of APS outstanding and RIB investments, which are forms of investment leverage. Use of leverage creates an opportunity for increased income but, at the same time, creates special risks (including the likelihood of greater volatility of net asset value and market price of common shares). 2 The Fund’s market yield is calculated by dividing the last regular dividend per common share in the period (annualized) by the market price at the end of the period. 3 Taxable-equivalent figure assumes a maximum 39.06% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in a lower tax-equivalent figure. 4 It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. Index performance is available as of month end only. 5 The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification (closed-end) contained 46, 46 and 45 funds for the 1-year, 5-year and Life-of-Fund periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only. 6 Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of the Fund. Ratings are based on Moody’s, S&P or Fitch, as applicable. Credit ratings are based largely on the rating agency’s investment analysis at the time of rating and the rating assigned to any particular security is not necessarily a reflection of the issuer’s current financial condition. The rating assigned to a security by a rating agency does not necessarily reflect its assessment of the volatility of a security’s market value or of the liquidity of an investment in the security. If securities are rated differently by the rating agencies, the higher rating is applied. 7 Fund holdings information excludes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1H to the Fund’s financial statements.
(IMAGE)
10


Table of Contents

Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund  as of September 30, 2010
(IMAGE)
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION AND PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION

                 
Performance1              
NYSE Amex Symbol     EIP          
 
 
               
Average Annual Total Returns (by market price)
 
 
               
One Year
    3.82 %        
Five Years
    4.77          
Life of Fund (11/29/02)
    6.52          
 
               
Average Annual Total Returns (by net asset value)
 
 
               
One Year
    4.53 %        
Five Years
    4.72          
Life of Fund (11/29/02)
    5.95          
 
               
Premium/(Discount) to NAV
    4.32 %        
 
               
Market Yields
 
 
               
Market Yield2
    5.92 %        
Taxable-Equivalent Market Yield3
    9.40          
 
               
Index Performance4 (Average Annual Total Returns)
 
                 
    Barclays Capital   Barclays Capital Long (22+)
    Municipal Bond Index   Municipal Bond Index
 
One Year
    5.81 %     6.56 %
Five Years
    5.13       4.50  
Life of Fund (11/30/02)
    5.16       5.55  
                 
Lipper Averages5 (Average Annual Total Returns)
 
Lipper Pennsylvania Municipal Debt Funds Classification (by net asset value)
 
One Year
    8.22 %
Five Years
    4.67  
Life of Fund (11/30/02)
    5.76  

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
Portfolio Manager: Adam A. Weigold, CFA
Rating Distribution*6
By total investments
(PERFORMANCE GRAPH)
 
* The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1H to the Fund’s financial statements. Absent such securities, the Fund’s rating distribution as of 9/30/10 is as follows:
                     
AAA
    24.2 %   BBB     5.7 %
AA
    28.4 %   Not Rated     8.5 %
A
    33.2 %            
Fund Statistics7
     
Number of Issues:
  70 
 
Average Maturity:
  22.5 years 
 
Average Effective Maturity:
  10.6 years 
 
Average Call Protection:
  9.0 years 
 
Average Dollar Price:
  $97.41 
 
APS Leverage**:
  32.8% 
 
RIB Leverage**:
  6.6% 
 
**
APS leverage represents the liquidation value of the Fund’s Auction Preferred Shares (APS) outstanding as of 9/30/10 as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets applicable to common shares plus APS and Floating Rate Notes. RIB leverage represents the amount of Floating Rate Notes outstanding as of 9/30/10 as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets applicable to common shares plus APS and Floating Rate Notes.


1 Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in market price or net asset value (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. The Fund’s performance at market price will differ from its results at NAV. Although market price performance generally reflects investment results over time, during shorter periods, returns at market price can also be affected by factors such as changing perceptions about the Fund, market conditions, fluctuations in supply and demand for the Fund’s shares, or changes in Fund distributions. Performance results reflect the effects of APS outstanding and RIB investments, which are forms of investment leverage. Use of leverage creates an opportunity for increased income but, at the same time, creates special risks (including the likelihood of greater volatility of net asset value and market price of common shares). 2 The Fund’s market yield is calculated by dividing the last regular dividend per common share in the period (annualized) by the market price at the end of the period. 3 Taxable-equivalent figure assumes a maximum 37.00% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in a lower tax-equivalent figure. 4 It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. Index performance is available as of month end only. 5 The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper Pennsylvania Municipal Debt Funds Classification (closed-end) contained 9, 8 and 8 funds for the 1-year, 5-year and Life-of-Fund periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only. 6 Rating Distribution is determined by dividing the total market value of the issues by the total investments of the Fund. Ratings are based on Moody’s, S&P or Fitch, as applicable. Credit ratings are based largely on the rating agency’s investment analysis at the time of rating and the rating assigned to any particular security is not necessarily a reflection of the issuer’s current financial condition. The rating assigned to a security by a rating agency does not necessarily reflect its assessment of the volatility of a security’s market value or of the liquidity of an investment in the security. If securities are rated differently by the rating agencies, the higher rating is applied. 7 Fund holdings information excludes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1H to the Fund’s financial statements.
(IMAGE)
11


Table of Contents

Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund II as of September 30, 2010
 
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
 
                     
Tax-Exempt Investments — 174.5%
 
Principal Amount
               
(000’s omitted)       Security   Value      
 
 
 
Electric Utilities — 0.5%
 
$ 1,600     Sabine River Authority, TX, (TXU Energy Co. LLC), 5.20%, 5/1/28   $ 627,056      
 
 
            $ 627,056      
 
 
 
 
Escrowed / Prerefunded — 0.5%
 
$ 595     New York, NY, Prerefunded to 1/15/13, 5.25%, 1/15/33   $ 659,242      
 
 
            $ 659,242      
 
 
 
 
General Obligations — 2.5%
 
$ 155     New York, NY, 5.25%, 1/15/33   $ 165,027      
  2,750     New York, NY, 5.25%, 1/15/33(1)     2,948,187      
 
 
            $ 3,113,214      
 
 
 
 
Hospital — 5.7%
 
$ 40     Camden County, NJ, Improvement Authority, (Cooper Health System), 5.00%, 2/15/25   $ 40,169      
  900     Camden County, NJ, Improvement Authority, (Cooper Health System), 5.00%, 2/15/35     866,808      
  750     Camden County, NJ, Improvement Authority, (Cooper Health System), 5.25%, 2/15/27     757,538      
  500     Hawaii Department of Budget and Finance, (Hawaii Pacific Health), 5.60%, 7/1/33     505,150      
  1,285     Highlands County, FL, Health Facilities Authority, (Adventist Health System), 5.25%, 11/15/36     1,318,731      
  1,850     Knox County, TN, Health, Educational and Housing Facilities Board, (Covenant Health), 0.00%, 1/1/38     392,885      
  5,000     Knox County, TN, Health, Educational and Housing Facilities Board, (Covenant Health), 0.00%, 1/1/39     1,001,250      
  960     Lehigh County, PA, General Purpose Authority, (Lehigh Valley Health Network), 5.25%, 7/1/32     977,683      
  1,350     Michigan Hospital Finance Authority, (Henry Ford Health System), 5.00%, 11/15/38     1,337,836      
 
 
            $ 7,198,050      
 
 
 
 
Industrial Development Revenue — 6.0%
 
$ 4,750     Liberty Development Corp., NY, (Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.), 5.25%, 10/1/35(1)   $ 5,039,218      
  2,500     St. John Baptist Parish, LA, (Marathon Oil Corp.), 5.125%, 6/1/37     2,514,675      
 
 
            $ 7,553,893      
 
 
 
Insured-Electric Utilities — 8.8%
 
$ 1,000     American Municipal Power-Ohio, Inc., OH, (Prairie State Energy), (AGC), 5.75%, 2/15/39   $ 1,101,680      
  6,335     Chelan County, WA, Public Utility District No. 1, (Columbia River), (NPFG), 0.00%, 6/1/23     3,777,877      
  2,230     JEA, FL, Electric System Revenue, (AGM), 5.00%, 10/1/34     2,236,423      
  2,220     Mississippi Development Bank, (Municipal Energy), (XLCA), 5.00%, 3/1/41     2,223,041      
  1,595     South Carolina Public Service Authority, (Santee Cooper), (BHAC), 5.50%, 1/1/38     1,778,872      
 
 
            $ 11,117,893      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Escrowed / Prerefunded — 0.1%
 
$ 82     Highlands County, FL, Health Facilities Authority, (Adventist Health System), (BHAC), Prerefunded to 11/15/16, 5.25%, 11/15/36(1)   $ 98,881      
  35     Highlands County, FL, Health Facilities Authority, (Adventist Health System), (BHAC), Prerefunded to 11/15/16, 5.25%, 11/15/36     42,454      
 
 
            $ 141,335      
 
 
 
 
Insured-General Obligations — 18.0%
 
$ 12,165     Chabot-Las Positas, CA, Community College District, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 8/1/43   $ 1,498,120      
  17,000     Coast Community College District, CA, (Election of 2002), (AGM), 0.00%, 8/1/33     4,385,490      
  2,765     District of Columbia, (FGIC), (NPFG), 4.75%, 6/1/33     2,837,941      
  1,500     Goodyear, AZ, (NPFG), 3.00%, 7/1/26     1,436,100      
  2,000     Los Angeles, CA, Unified School District, (AGC), 5.00%, 1/1/34     2,097,380      
  2,750     Palm Springs, CA, Unified School District, (Election of 2008), (AGC), 5.00%, 8/1/33     2,949,677      
  1,250     Philadelphia, PA, (AGC), 7.00%, 7/15/28     1,462,475      
  5,500     Washington, (AGM), 5.00%, 7/1/25(1)     6,176,170      
 
 
            $ 22,843,353      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Hospital — 27.3%
 
$ 1,750     Arizona Health Facilities Authority, (Banner Health), (BHAC), 5.375%, 1/1/32   $ 1,880,130      
  1,500     California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Sutter Health), (AGM), 5.05%, 8/15/38(1)     1,559,670      
  1,695     Centre County, PA, Hospital Authority, (Mount Nittany Medical Center), (AGC), 6.125%, 11/15/39     1,791,395      
  450     Centre County, PA, Hospital Authority, (Mount Nittany Medical Center), (AGC), 6.25%, 11/15/44     475,245      

 
See notes to financial statements

12


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund II as of September 30, 2010
 
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
 
                     
Principal Amount
               
(000’s omitted)       Security   Value      
 
 
Insured-Hospital (continued)
 
                     
$ 2,200     Colorado Health Facilities Authority, (Catholic Health), (AGM), 5.10%, 10/1/41(1)   $ 2,280,322      
  3,418     Highlands County, FL, Health Facilities Authority, (Adventist Health System), (BHAC), 5.25%, 11/15/36(1)     3,586,875      
  1,485     Highlands County, FL, Health Facilities Authority, (Adventist Health System), (BHAC), 5.25%, 11/15/36     1,558,151      
  1,490     Highlands County, FL, Health Facilities Authority, (Adventist Health System), (NPFG), 5.00%, 11/15/35     1,506,688      
  2,500     Illinois Finance Authority, (Children’s Memorial Hospital), (AGC), 5.25%, 8/15/47(1)     2,562,524      
  2,500     Indiana Health and Educational Facility Finance Authority, (Sisters of St. Francis Health Services), (AGM), 5.25%, 5/15/41(1)     2,634,875      
  2,090     Maricopa County, AZ, Industrial Development Authority, (Catholic Healthcare West), (BHAC), 5.25%, 7/1/32     2,220,876      
  1,000     New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, (Hackensack University Medical Center), (AGC), 5.25%, 1/1/36(1)     1,053,810      
  1,385     New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, (Meridian Health Center), Series II, (AGC), 5.00%, 7/1/38     1,441,300      
  500     New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, (Meridian Health Center), Series V, (AGC), 5.00%, 7/1/38(1)     520,360      
  2,245     New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, (Virtua Health), (AGC), 5.50%, 7/1/38     2,457,624      
  2,750     New York Dormitory Authority, (Health Quest Systems), (AGC), 5.125%, 7/1/37(1)     2,875,813      
  1,545     Washington Health Care Facilities Authority, (MultiCare Health System), (AGC), 6.00%, 8/15/39     1,700,952      
  2,300     Washington Health Care Facilities Authority, (Providence Health Care), (AGM), 5.25%, 10/1/33     2,482,988      
 
 
            $ 34,589,598      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Industrial Development Revenue — 1.1%
 
$ 1,340     Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, (Aqua Pennsylvania, Inc. Project), (BHAC), 5.00%, 10/1/39   $ 1,434,711      
 
 
            $ 1,434,711      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 9.2%
 
$ 1,000     Essex County, NJ, Improvement Authority, (NPFG), 5.50%, 10/1/30   $ 1,185,280      
  4,600     Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corp., NY, (NPFG), 4.50%, 2/15/47     4,457,308      
  875     New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (School Facilities Construction), (AGC), 5.50%, 12/15/34     980,761      
  3,250     San Diego County, CA, Water Authority, Certificates of Participation, (AGM), 5.00%, 5/1/38(1)     3,424,850      
  1,500     Tri-Creek Middle School Building Corp., IN, (AGM), 5.25%, 1/15/34(1)     1,617,600      
 
 
            $ 11,665,799      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Other Revenue — 1.3%
 
$ 2,540     Harris County-Houston, TX, Sports Authority, (NPFG), 0.00%, 11/15/34   $ 429,946      
  1,000     New York, NY, Industrial Development Agency, (Yankee Stadium), (AGC), 7.00%, 3/1/49     1,183,250      
 
 
            $ 1,613,196      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Private Education — 3.6%
 
$ 2,500     Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Boston University), (XLCA), 6.00%, 5/15/59   $ 2,976,775      
  1,555     Miami-Dade County, FL, Educational Facilities Authority, (University of Miami), (AMBAC), (BHAC), 5.00%, 4/1/31     1,640,991      
 
 
            $ 4,617,766      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Public Education — 3.3%
 
$ 3,900     University of South Alabama, (BHAC), 5.00%, 8/1/38   $ 4,126,317      
 
 
            $ 4,126,317      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Solid Waste — 1.0%
 
$ 740     Palm Beach County, FL, Solid Waste Authority, (BHAC), 5.00%, 10/1/24   $ 832,508      
  425     Palm Beach County, FL, Solid Waste Authority, (BHAC), 5.00%, 10/1/26     471,958      
 
 
            $ 1,304,466      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Special Tax Revenue — 13.0%
 
$ 4,650     Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority, IL, (McCormick Place Expansion), (NPFG), 0.00%, 12/15/34   $ 1,167,801      
  4,000     Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority, IL, (McCormick Place Expansion), (NPFG), 5.25%, 6/15/42     4,055,560      
  3,000     Miami-Dade County, FL, Professional Sports Franchise Facilities, (AGC), 7.00%, (0.00% until 10/1/19), 10/1/39     2,001,900      

 
See notes to financial statements

13


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund II as of September 30, 2010
 
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
 
                     
Principal Amount
               
(000’s omitted)       Security   Value      
 
 
Insured-Special Tax Revenue (continued)
 
                     
$ 2,175     New York Convention Center Development Corp., Hotel Occupancy Tax, (AMBAC), 4.75%, 11/15/45   $ 2,188,159      
  1,820     New York Convention Center Development Corp., Hotel Occupancy Tax, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 11/15/44     1,851,559      
  29,695     Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (AMBAC), 0.00%, 8/1/54     2,005,006      
  6,075     Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), 0.00%, 8/1/44     819,214      
  12,035     Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), 0.00%, 8/1/45     1,515,688      
  7,595     Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), 0.00%, 8/1/46     895,982      
 
 
            $ 16,500,869      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Student Loan — 1.6%
 
$ 1,860     Maine Educational Loan Authority, (AGC), 5.625%, 12/1/27   $ 2,016,352      
 
 
            $ 2,016,352      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Transportation — 28.6%
 
$ 1,585     Clark County, NV, (Las Vegas-McCarran International Airport), (AGM), 5.25%, 7/1/39   $ 1,663,030      
  7,800     E-470 Public Highway Authority, CO, (NPFG), 0.00%, 9/1/22     3,948,906      
  1,305     Manchester, NH, (Manchester-Boston Regional Airport), (AGM), 5.125%, 1/1/30     1,368,410      
  10,000     Maryland Transportation Authority, (AGM), 5.00%, 7/1/41(1)     10,802,200      
  1,000     Metropolitan Washington, DC, Airports Authority, (BHAC), 5.00%, 10/1/24     1,137,490      
  535     Metropolitan Washington, DC, Airports Authority, (BHAC), 5.00%, 10/1/29     586,767      
  2,870     Minneapolis and St. Paul, MN, Metropolitan Airports Commission, (FGIC), (NPFG), 4.50%, 1/1/32     2,902,574      
  13,885     Nevada Department of Business and Industry, (Las Vegas Monorail -1st Tier), (AMBAC), 0.00%, 1/1/20     1,716,325      
  1,040     New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, (AGC), 5.50%, 12/15/38     1,165,559      
  255     North Carolina Turnpike Authority, (Triangle Expressway System), (AGC), 5.50%, 1/1/29     281,739      
  290     North Carolina Turnpike Authority, (Triangle Expressway System), (AGC), 5.75%, 1/1/39     317,982      
  1,750     North Texas Tollway Authority, (BHAC), 5.75%, 1/1/48     1,924,843      
  2,540     Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, (AGM), 5.25%, 7/15/30     2,976,880      
  5,555     Texas Turnpike Authority, (Central Texas Turnpike System), (AMBAC), 5.00%, 8/15/42     5,480,563      
 
 
            $ 36,273,268      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Water and Sewer — 12.1%
 
$ 670     Bossier City, LA, Utilities Revenue, (BHAC), 5.25%, 10/1/26   $ 756,959      
  420     Bossier City, LA, Utilities Revenue, (BHAC), 5.25%, 10/1/27     471,072      
  660     Bossier City, LA, Utilities Revenue, (BHAC), 5.50%, 10/1/38     722,733      
  1,910     Chicago, IL, Wastewater Transmission Revenue, (BHAC), 5.50%, 1/1/38     2,076,800      
  1,250     District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority, (AGC), 5.00%, 10/1/34(1)     1,334,438      
  435     Houston, TX, Utility System, (AGM), (BHAC), 5.00%, 11/15/33     462,966      
  2,205     New York, NY, Municipal Water Finance Authority, (BHAC), 5.75%, 6/15/40     2,549,620      
  7,610     Pearland, TX, Waterworks and Sewer Systems, (NPFG), 3.50%, 9/1/31     6,977,609      
 
 
            $ 15,352,197      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Water Revenue — 15.6%
 
$ 5,500     Los Angeles, CA, Department of Water and Power, (BHAC), (FGIC), 5.00%, 7/1/43(1)   $ 5,567,210      
  1,000     Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, (AGM), 5.25%, 8/1/35     1,184,160      
  6,110     Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, (AMBAC), 4.00%, 8/1/40     6,051,894      
  6,750     Metropolitan Water District, CA, Water and Sewer Systems, (BHAC), (FGIC), 5.00%, 10/1/36(1)     6,974,910      
 
 
            $ 19,778,174      
 
 
 
 
Private Education — 6.9%
 
$ 2,200     Connecticut Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Wesleyan University), 5.00%, 7/1/39(1)   $ 2,399,298      
  1,000     Houston, TX, Higher Education Finance Corp., (William Marsh Rice University), 5.00%, 5/15/35     1,092,140      
  2,710     Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Harvard University), 5.50%, 11/15/36     3,157,800      
  1,500     New York Dormitory Authority, (Rockefeller University), 5.00%, 7/1/40     1,639,305      
  500     North Carolina Capital Facilities Finance Agency, (Duke University), 5.00%, 10/1/38(1)     540,040      
 
 
            $ 8,828,583      
 
 
 

 
See notes to financial statements

14


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund II as of September 30, 2010
 
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
 
                     
Principal Amount
               
(000’s omitted)       Security   Value      
 
 
 
Public Education — 1.3%
 
$ 1,500     University of Virginia, 5.00%, 6/1/40(2)   $ 1,624,410      
 
 
            $ 1,624,410      
 
 
 
 
Special Tax Revenue — 0.7%
 
$ 750     Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, Sales Tax Revenue, 5.25%, 7/1/33   $ 901,118      
 
 
            $ 901,118      
 
 
 
 
Transportation — 4.9%
 
$ 1,715     Delaware River Port Authority of Pennsylvania and New Jersey, 5.00%, 1/1/35   $ 1,813,784      
  560     Delaware River Port Authority of Pennsylvania and New Jersey, 5.00%, 1/1/40     589,193      
  2,815     Miami-Dade County, FL, (Miami International Airport), 5.00%, 10/1/41     2,838,167      
  420     Orlando-Orange County, FL, Expressway Authority, 5.00%, 7/1/35     439,102      
  505     Orlando-Orange County, FL, Expressway Authority, 5.00%, 7/1/40     526,341      
 
 
            $ 6,206,587      
 
 
 
 
Water and Sewer — 0.9%
 
$ 205     Marco Island, FL, Utility System, 5.00%, 10/1/34   $ 212,847      
  910     Marco Island, FL, Utility System, 5.00%, 10/1/40     950,805      
 
 
            $ 1,163,652      
 
 
     
Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 174.5%
   
(identified cost $221,472,966)
  $ 221,251,099      
 
 
     
Auction Preferred Shares Plus Cumulative
   
Unpaid Dividends — (35.3)%
  $ (44,701,942 )    
 
 
             
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (39.2)%
  $ (49,735,099 )    
 
 
             
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares — 100.0%
  $ 126,814,058      
 
 
 
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets applicable to common shares.
 
AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.
 
AGM - Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.
 
AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
 
BHAC - Berkshire Hathaway Assurance Corp.
 
FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
 
NPFG - National Public Finance Guaranty Corp.
 
XLCA - XL Capital Assurance, Inc.
 
At September 30, 2010, the concentration of the Fund’s investments in the various states, determined as a percentage of total investments, is as follows:
 
         
California
    12.9%  
New York
    11.5%  
Others, representing less than 10% individually
    75.6%  
 
The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at September 30, 2010, 82.9% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 2.4% to 20.5% of total investments.
 
(1) Security represents the underlying municipal bond of an inverse floater (see Note 1H).
 
(2) Security (or a portion thereof) has been pledged to cover margin requirements on open financial futures contracts.

 
See notes to financial statements

15


Table of Contents

Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund II as of September 30, 2010
 
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
 
                     
Tax-Exempt Investments — 166.5%
 
Principal Amount
               
(000’s omitted)       Security   Value      
 
 
 
Electric Utilities — 3.8%
 
$ 1,060     Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, 5.25%, 7/1/40   $ 1,108,485      
  675     Vernon, Electric System Revenue, 5.125%, 8/1/21     720,299      
 
 
            $ 1,828,784      
 
 
 
 
General Obligations — 4.2%
 
$ 1,850     Palo Alto, (Election of 2008), 5.00%, 8/1/40   $ 2,023,530      
 
 
            $ 2,023,530      
 
 
 
 
Hospital — 16.3%
 
$ 1,330     California Health Facilities Financing Authority, (Catholic Healthcare West), 5.625%, 7/1/32   $ 1,384,623      
  1,445     California Health Facilities Financing Authority, (Cedars-Sinai Medical Center), 5.00%, 8/15/39     1,467,701      
  1,330     California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Huntington Memorial Hospital), 5.00%, 7/1/35     1,326,156      
  500     California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (John Muir Health), 5.00%, 8/15/36     501,230      
  1,900     California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Kaiser Permanente), 5.25%, 3/1/45     1,919,532      
  555     Washington Township Health Care District, 5.00%, 7/1/32     551,321      
  750     Washington Township Health Care District, 5.25%, 7/1/29     751,470      
 
 
            $ 7,902,033      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Electric Utilities — 8.7%
 
$ 1,475     Glendale Electric, (NPFG), 5.00%, 2/1/32   $ 1,500,591      
  1,500     Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, (AMBAC), (BHAC), 5.00%, 7/1/26(1)     1,645,065      
  1,000     Sacramento Municipal Utility District, (AGM), 5.00%, 8/15/27     1,099,180      
 
 
            $ 4,244,836      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Escrowed / Prerefunded — 8.6%
 
$ 1,025     California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank, (Bay Area Toll Bridges), (AMBAC), Prerefunded to 1/1/28, 5.00%, 7/1/36   $ 1,292,330      
  3,130     Clovis Unified School District, (FGIC), (NPFG), Escrowed to Maturity, 0.00%, 8/1/20     2,423,684      
  395     Orange County Water District, Certificates of Participation, (NPFG), Escrowed to Maturity, 5.00%, 8/15/34     453,117      
 
 
            $ 4,169,131      
 
 
 
 
Insured-General Obligations — 43.7%
 
$ 740     Antelope Valley Community College District, (Election of 2004), (NPFG), 5.25%, 8/1/39   $ 776,519      
  7,125     Arcadia Unified School District, (AGM), 0.00%, 8/1/38     1,284,638      
  3,115     Arcadia Unified School District, (AGM), 0.00%, 8/1/40     493,728      
  3,270     Arcadia Unified School District, (AGM), 0.00%, 8/1/41     487,688      
  1,500     Carlsbad Unified School District, (Election of 2006), (NPFG), 5.25%, 8/1/32     1,627,905      
  19,350     Chabot-Las Positas Community College District, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 8/1/43     2,382,952      
  6,675     Coast Community College District, (Election of 2002), (AGM), 0.00%, 8/1/35     1,510,619      
  1,060     El Camino Hospital District, (NPFG), 4.45%, 8/1/36     1,051,573      
  1,000     Long Beach Unified School District, (Election of 1999), (AGM), 5.00%, 8/1/31     1,012,720      
  2,075     Los Angeles Community College District, (Election of 2001), (AGM), (FGIC), 5.00%, 8/1/32     2,197,300      
  1,000     Mount Diablo Unified School District, (AGM), 5.00%, 8/1/25     1,040,780      
  1,250     Palm Springs Unified School District, (Election of 2008), (AGC), 5.00%, 8/1/33     1,340,762      
  4,300     San Mateo County Community College District, (Election of 2001), (FGIC), (NPFG), 0.00%, 9/1/21     2,694,380      
  1,390     Santa Clara Unified School District, (Election of 2004), (AGM), 4.375%, 7/1/30     1,409,613      
  3,200     Union Elementary School District, (FGIC), (NPFG), 0.00%, 9/1/22     1,877,696      
 
 
            $ 21,188,873      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Hospital — 6.4%
 
$ 1,250     California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Kaiser Permanente), (BHAC), 5.00%, 3/1/41(1)   $ 1,282,438      
  1,750     California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Sutter Health), (AGM), 5.05%, 8/15/38(1)     1,819,615      
 
 
            $ 3,102,053      
 
 
 

 
See notes to financial statements

16


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund II as of September 30, 2010
 
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
 
                     
Principal Amount
               
(000’s omitted)       Security   Value      
 
 
 
Insured-Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 9.4%
 
$ 1,250     Puerto Rico Public Finance Corp., (AMBAC), Escrowed to Maturity, 5.50%, 8/1/27   $ 1,620,975      
  1,750     San Diego County Water Authority, Certificates of Participation, (AGM), 5.00%, 5/1/38(1)     1,844,150      
  1,075     San Jose Financing Authority, (Civic Center), (AMBAC), 5.00%, 6/1/32     1,092,587      
 
 
            $ 4,557,712      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Private Education — 1.6%
 
$ 785     California Educational Facilities Authority, (Pepperdine University), (AMBAC), 5.00%, 12/1/32   $ 806,705      
 
 
            $ 806,705      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Public Education — 12.7%
 
$ 2,000     California State University, (AGM), (BHAC), 5.00%, 11/1/39(1)   $ 2,098,320      
  4,000     California State University, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 11/1/33     4,051,560      
 
 
            $ 6,149,880      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Special Assessment Revenue — 9.9%
 
$ 2,500     Cathedral City Public Financing Authority, (Housing Redevelopment), (NPFG), 5.00%, 8/1/33   $ 2,405,975      
  1,000     Irvine Public Facility and Infrastructure Authority, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 9/2/26     977,950      
  1,545     Los Osos Community Services District, (Wastewater Assessment District No. 1), (NPFG), 5.00%, 9/2/33     1,442,118      
 
 
            $ 4,826,043      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Special Tax Revenue — 11.4%
 
$ 1,535     Hesperia Public Financing Authority, (Redevelopment and Housing Projects), (XLCA), 5.00%, 9/1/37   $ 1,202,012      
  11,485     Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (AMBAC), 0.00%, 8/1/54     775,467      
  2,320     Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), 0.00%, 8/1/44     312,852      
  4,600     Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), 0.00%, 8/1/45     579,324      
  2,905     Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), 0.00%, 8/1/46     342,703      
  260     San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transportation District, Sales Tax Revenue, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 7/1/31     265,751      
  985     San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transportation District, Sales Tax Revenue, (AMBAC), 5.125%, 7/1/36     1,008,079      
  1,000     Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, Sales Tax Revenue, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 4/1/32     1,052,370      
 
 
            $ 5,538,558      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Transportation — 2.0%
 
$ 3,520     San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency, (NPFG), 0.00%, 1/15/27   $ 999,328      
 
 
            $ 999,328      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Water Revenue — 12.7%
 
$ 1,235     Calleguas Las Virgines Public Financing Authority, (Municipal Water District), (BHAC), (FGIC), 4.75%, 7/1/37   $ 1,268,999      
  100     East Bay Municipal Utility District, Water System Revenue, (AGM), (FGIC), 5.00%, 6/1/32     109,097      
  1,430     East Bay Municipal Utility District, Water System Revenue, (FGIC), (NPFG), 5.00%, 6/1/32     1,560,087      
  1,500     Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, (NPFG), 3.00%, 7/1/30     1,286,280      
  445     Riverside, Water Revenue, (AGM), 5.00%, 10/1/38     468,523      
  1,475     Santa Clara Valley Water District, (AGM), 3.75%, 6/1/28     1,458,952      
 
 
            $ 6,151,938      
 
 
 
 
Private Education — 8.1%
 
$ 780     California Educational Facilities Authority, (Claremont McKenna College), 5.00%, 1/1/39   $ 829,522      
  380     California Educational Facilities Authority, (Loyola Marymount University), 5.00%, 10/1/30     402,302      
  890     California Educational Facilities Authority, (Santa Clara University), 5.00%, 2/1/29     969,219      
  1,155     California Educational Facilities Authority, (Santa Clara University), 5.00%, 2/1/40     1,232,593      
  500     California Educational Facilities Authority, (Stanford University), 5.125%, 1/1/31(2)     501,610      
 
 
            $ 3,935,246      
 
 
 
 
Transportation — 3.5%
 
$ 540     Long Beach, Harbor Revenue, 5.00%, 5/15/27   $ 605,918      
  1,060     Los Angeles Department of Airports, (Los Angeles International Airport), 5.00%, 5/15/35(1)(3)     1,114,516      
 
 
            $ 1,720,434      
 
 
 

 
See notes to financial statements

17


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund II as of September 30, 2010
 
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
 
                     
Principal Amount
               
(000’s omitted)       Security   Value      
 
 
 
Water and Sewer — 3.5%
 
$ 500     Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, (Waterworks Revenue Authorization), 5.00%, 1/1/34   $ 543,425      
  1,050     Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, (Waterworks Revenue Authorization), 5.00%, 1/1/39     1,135,775      
 
 
            $ 1,679,200      
 
 
     
Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 166.5%
   
(identified cost $81,506,560)
  $ 80,824,284      
 
 
     
Auction Preferred Shares Plus Cumulative
   
Unpaid Dividends — (52.9)%
  $ (25,700,304 )    
 
 
             
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (13.6)%
  $ (6,594,661 )    
 
 
             
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares — 100.0%
  $ 48,529,319      
 
 
 
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets applicable to common shares.
 
AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.
 
AGM - Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.
 
AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
 
BHAC - Berkshire Hathaway Assurance Corp.
 
FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
 
NPFG - National Public Finance Guaranty Corp.
 
XLCA - XL Capital Assurance, Inc.
 
 
The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by California municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at September 30, 2010, 76.4% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 1.5% to 26.4% of total investments.
 
(1) Security represents the underlying municipal bond of an inverse floater (see Note 1H).
 
(2) Security (or a portion thereof) has been pledged to cover margin requirements on open financial futures contracts.
 
(3) Security (or a portion thereof) has been pledged as collateral for inverse floating-rate security transactions. The aggregate value of such collateral is $319,516.

 
See notes to financial statements

18


Table of Contents

Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund as of September 30, 2010
 
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
 
                     
Tax-Exempt Investments — 162.5%
 
Principal Amount
               
(000’s omitted)       Security   Value      
 
 
 
Escrowed / Prerefunded — 4.8%
 
$ 500     Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Massachusetts College of Pharmacy), Prefunded to 7/31/13, 5.75%, 7/1/33   $ 575,930      
  600     Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Western New England College), Prefunded to 12/1/12, 6.125%, 12/1/32     676,578      
 
 
            $ 1,252,508      
 
 
 
 
Hospital — 9.6%
 
$ 775     Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), 5.00%, 12/1/37   $ 809,550      
  1,250     Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Partners Healthcare System), 5.00%, 7/1/39     1,293,800      
  370     Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (South Shore Hospital), 5.75%, 7/1/29     371,502      
 
 
            $ 2,474,852      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Electric Utilities — 4.8%
 
$ 1,095     Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (NPFG), 5.25%, 7/1/23   $ 1,247,085      
 
 
            $ 1,247,085      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Escrowed / Prerefunded — 6.5%
 
$ 2,900     Massachusetts College Building Authority, (NPFG), Escrowed to Maturity, 0.00%, 5/1/26   $ 1,688,612      
 
 
            $ 1,688,612      
 
 
 
 
Insured-General Obligations — 14.7%
 
$ 1,900     Massachusetts, (AMBAC), 5.50%, 8/1/30   $ 2,432,152      
  1,000     Revere, (AGC), 5.00%, 4/1/39     1,060,010      
  300     Tewksbury, (AGM), 4.625%, 3/15/27     328,266      
 
 
            $ 3,820,428      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Hospital — 2.1%
 
$ 260     Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Cape Cod Healthcare), (AGC), 5.00%, 11/15/25   $ 273,905      
  140     Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Cape Cod Healthcare), (AGC), 5.00%, 11/15/31     145,237      
  125     Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Cape Cod Healthcare), (AGC), 5.125%, 11/15/35     129,320      
 
 
            $ 548,462      
 
 
 
Insured-Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 8.9%
 
$ 1,000     Plymouth County Correctional Facility, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 4/1/22   $ 1,020,370      
  1,000     Puerto Rico Public Finance Corp., (AMBAC), Escrowed to Maturity, 5.50%, 8/1/27     1,296,780      
 
 
            $ 2,317,150      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Other Revenue — 6.0%
 
$ 1,315     Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (WGBH Educational Foundation), (AMBAC), 5.75%, 1/1/42   $ 1,541,088      
 
 
            $ 1,541,088      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Private Education — 20.6%
 
$ 1,250     Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Boston College), (NPFG), 5.00%, 7/1/38   $ 1,319,850      
  1,105     Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Boston University), (XLCA), 6.00%, 5/15/59     1,315,735      
  750     Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (College of the Holy Cross), (AMBAC), 5.25%, 9/1/32(1)     893,925      
  750     Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Massachusetts College of Pharmacy), (AGC), 5.00%, 7/1/35     778,342      
  1,000     Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Massachusetts College of Pharmacy), (AGC), 5.00%, 7/1/37     1,047,450      
 
 
            $ 5,355,302      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Public Education — 14.0%
 
$ 260     Massachusetts College Building Authority, (AGC), 5.00%, 5/1/33   $ 278,353      
  320     Massachusetts College Building Authority, (AGC), 5.00%, 5/1/38     339,997      
  700     Massachusetts College Building Authority, (XLCA), 5.50%, 5/1/39     829,528      
  1,000     Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (University of Massachusetts), (FGIC), (NPFG), 5.125%, 10/1/34     1,012,800      
  1,150     Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Worcester State College), (AMBAC), 5.00%, 11/1/32     1,158,326      
 
 
            $ 3,619,004      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Special Tax Revenue — 18.9%
 
$ 1,225     Martha’s Vineyard Land Bank, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 5/1/32   $ 1,254,927      
  750     Massachusetts, Special Obligation, Dedicated Tax Revenue, (FGIC), (NPFG), 5.50%, 1/1/29     891,997      

 
See notes to financial statements

19


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund as of September 30, 2010
 
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
 
                     
Principal Amount
               
(000’s omitted)       Security   Value      
 
 
Insured-Special Tax Revenue (continued)
 
                     
$ 400     Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, Sales Tax Revenue, (NPFG), 5.50%, 7/1/28   $ 505,400      
  1,160     Massachusetts School Building Authority, Dedicated Sales Tax Revenue, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 8/15/37(1)     1,238,056      
  5,265     Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (AMBAC), 0.00%, 8/1/54     355,493      
  1,725     Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), 0.00%, 8/1/44     232,616      
  2,090     Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), 0.00%, 8/1/45     263,215      
  1,325     Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), 0.00%, 8/1/46     156,310      
 
 
            $ 4,898,014      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Water Revenue — 3.9%
 
$ 860     Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, (AGM), 5.25%, 8/1/36   $ 1,012,822      
 
 
            $ 1,012,822      
 
 
 
 
Private Education — 34.0%
 
$ 750     Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Middlesex School), 5.00%, 9/1/33   $ 766,815      
  150     Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Milton Academy), 5.00%, 9/1/35     162,242      
  1,000     Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Mount Holyoke College), 5.00%, 7/1/36     1,062,950      
  2,000     Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Harvard University), 5.00%, 10/1/38(1)     2,175,180      
  750     Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Harvard University), 5.50%, 11/15/36     873,930      
  1,350     Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Massachusetts Institute of Technology), 5.00%, 7/1/38     1,464,439      
  870     Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Northeastern University), 5.00%, 10/1/35     913,309      
  1,250     Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Tufts University), 5.375%, 8/15/38     1,388,687      
 
 
            $ 8,807,552      
 
 
 
 
Senior Living / Life Care — 2.7%
 
$ 745     Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Berkshire Retirement Community, Inc.), 5.15%, 7/1/31   $ 693,722      
 
 
            $ 693,722      
 
 
 
Special Tax Revenue — 5.1%
 
$ 1,210     Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, Sales Tax Revenue, 5.00%, 7/1/35   $ 1,322,699      
 
 
            $ 1,322,699      
 
 
 
 
Transportation — 5.9%
 
$ 1,000     Massachusetts Department of Transportation, (Metropolitan Highway System), 5.00%, 1/1/37   $ 1,056,820      
  435     Massachusetts Port Authority, 5.00%, 7/1/34     472,932      
 
 
            $ 1,529,752      
 
 
     
Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 162.5%
   
(identified cost $39,776,849)
  $ 42,129,052      
 
 
     
Auction Preferred Shares Plus Cumulative
   
Unpaid Dividends — (52.4)%
  $ (13,576,186 )    
 
 
             
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (10.1)%
  $ (2,633,117 )    
 
 
             
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares — 100.0%
  $ 25,919,749      
 
 
 
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets applicable to common shares.
 
AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.
 
AGM - Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.
 
AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
 
FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
 
NPFG - National Public Finance Guaranty Corp.
 
XLCA - XL Capital Assurance, Inc.
 
The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by Massachusetts municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at September 30, 2010, 61.8% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 3.2% to 26.6% of total investments.
 
(1) Security represents the underlying municipal bond of an inverse floater (see Note 1H).

 
See notes to financial statements

20


Table of Contents

Eaton Vance Michigan Municipal Bond Fund as of September 30, 2010
 
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
 
                     
Tax-Exempt Investments — 159.2%
 
Principal Amount
               
(000’s omitted)       Security   Value      
 
 
 
Electric Utilities — 2.8%
 
$ 620     Michigan Strategic Fund, (Detroit Edison Pollution Control), 5.45%, 9/1/29   $ 624,414      
 
 
            $ 624,414      
 
 
 
 
Escrowed / Prerefunded — 9.4%
 
$ 400     Michigan Hospital Finance Authority, (Chelsea Community Hospital), Prerefunded to 5/15/15, 5.00%, 5/15/30   $ 469,816      
  1,500     Michigan Hospital Finance Authority, (Sparrow Obligation Group), Prerefunded to 11/15/11, 5.625%, 11/15/36     1,601,565      
 
 
            $ 2,071,381      
 
 
 
 
Hospital — 7.5%
 
$ 1,000     Michigan Hospital Finance Authority, (Oakwood Hospital System), 5.75%, 4/1/32   $ 1,012,050      
  640     Michigan Hospital Finance Authority, (Trinity Health), 5.375%, 12/1/30     645,350      
 
 
            $ 1,657,400      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Electric Utilities — 7.5%
 
$ 500     Michigan Strategic Fund, (Detroit Edison Co.), (XLCA), 5.25%, 12/15/32   $ 504,990      
  1,000     Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (NPFG), 5.25%, 7/1/26     1,142,450      
 
 
            $ 1,647,440      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Escrowed / Prerefunded — 42.0%
 
$ 750     Detroit School District, (School Bond Loan Fund), (AGM), Prerefunded to 5/1/12, 5.125%, 5/1/31   $ 804,878      
  1,250     Detroit Sewer Disposal, (FGIC), Prerefunded to 7/1/11, 5.125%, 7/1/31     1,295,362      
  1,500     Lansing Building Authority, (NPFG), Prerefunded to 6/1/13, 5.00%, 6/1/29     1,674,840      
  1,150     Michigan Hospital Finance Authority, (St. John Health System), (AMBAC), Escrowed to Maturity, 5.00%, 5/15/28     1,153,703      
  1,750     Michigan House of Representatives, (AMBAC), Escrowed to Maturity, 0.00%, 8/15/22     1,158,903      
  2,615     Michigan House of Representatives, (AMBAC), Escrowed to Maturity, 0.00%, 8/15/23     1,656,236      
  1,300     Reed City Public Schools, (AGM), Prerefunded to 5/1/14, 5.00%, 5/1/29     1,495,715      
 
 
            $ 9,239,637      
 
 
 
Insured-General Obligations — 22.4%
 
$ 1,960     Grand Rapids and Kent County Joint Building Authority, (DeVos Place), (NPFG), 0.00%, 12/1/27(1)   $ 952,070      
  750     Greenville Public Schools, (NPFG), 5.00%, 5/1/25     766,845      
  1,330     Okemos Public School District, (NPFG), 0.00%, 5/1/19     973,613      
  1,000     Pinconning Area Schools, (AGM), 5.00%, 5/1/33     1,045,870      
  1,000     Royal Oak, (AGC), 6.25%, 10/1/28     1,187,810      
 
 
            $ 4,926,208      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Hospital — 6.7%
 
$ 500     Michigan Hospital Finance Authority, (Mid-Michigan Obligation Group), (AMBAC), 5.00%, 4/15/32   $ 500,720      
  975     Royal Oak Hospital Finance Authority, (William Beaumont Hospital), (NPFG), 5.25%, 11/15/35     969,550      
 
 
            $ 1,470,270      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 6.3%
 
$ 1,000     Michigan Building Authority, (AGM), (FGIC), 0.00%, 10/15/29   $ 373,460      
  3,100     Michigan Building Authority, (FGIC), (NPFG), 0.00%, 10/15/30     1,008,926      
 
 
            $ 1,382,386      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Public Education — 14.8%
 
$ 750     Central Michigan University, (AMBAC), 5.05%, 10/1/32   $ 764,842      
  435     Ferris State University, (AGC), 5.125%, 10/1/33     467,155      
  750     Lake Superior State University, (AMBAC), 5.125%, 11/15/26     755,828      
  1,200     Wayne University, (NPFG), 5.00%, 11/15/37     1,259,664      
 
 
            $ 3,247,489      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Sewer Revenue — 2.1%
 
$ 500     Detroit Sewer Disposal System, (NPFG), 4.50%, 7/1/35   $ 464,690      
 
 
            $ 464,690      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Special Tax Revenue — 13.4%
 
$ 6,100     Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (AMBAC), 0.00%, 8/1/54   $ 411,872      
  1,465     Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), 0.00%, 8/1/44     197,555      
  1,670     Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), 0.00%, 8/1/45     210,320      

 
See notes to financial statements

21


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Michigan Municipal Bond Fund as of September 30, 2010
 
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
 
                     
Principal Amount
               
(000’s omitted)       Security   Value      
 
 
Insured-Special Tax Revenue (continued)
 
                     
$ 1,115     Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), 0.00%, 8/1/46   $ 131,537      
  1,000     Wayne Charter County, (Airport Hotel-Detroit Metropolitan Airport), (NPFG), 5.00%, 12/1/30     981,860      
  1,000     Ypsilanti Community Utilities Authority, (Sanitary Sewer System), (FGIC), (NPFG), 5.00%, 5/1/32     1,012,420      
 
 
            $ 2,945,564      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Utilities — 7.2%
 
$ 1,000     Lansing Board of Water and Light, (Water Supply, Steam and Electric Utility), (AGM), 5.00%, 7/1/25   $ 1,041,260      
  510     Lansing Board of Water and Light, (Water Supply, Steam and Electric Utility), (AGM), 5.00%, 7/1/26     529,681      
 
 
            $ 1,570,941      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Water Revenue — 11.5%
 
$ 1,425     Detroit Water Supply System, (FGIC), (NPFG), 5.00%, 7/1/30   $ 1,427,180      
  1,000     Grand Rapids Water Supply System, (AGC), 5.00%, 1/1/29     1,109,310      
 
 
            $ 2,536,490      
 
 
 
 
Private Education — 2.1%
 
$ 450     Michigan Higher Education Facilities Authority, (Hillsdale College), 5.00%, 3/1/35   $ 450,680      
 
 
            $ 450,680      
 
 
 
 
Water and Sewer — 3.5%
 
$ 650     Grand Rapids, (Sanitary Sewer System), 5.00%, 1/1/28   $ 756,561      
 
 
            $ 756,561      
 
 
     
Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 159.2%
   
(identified cost $33,151,929)
  $ 34,991,551      
 
 
     
Auction Preferred Shares Plus Cumulative
   
Unpaid Dividends — (60.6)%
  $ (13,325,314 )    
 
 
             
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — 1.4%
  $ 318,557      
 
 
             
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares — 100.0%
  $ 21,984,794      
 
 
 
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets applicable to common shares.
 
AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.
 
AGM - Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.
 
AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
 
FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
 
NPFG - National Public Finance Guaranty Corp.
 
XLCA - XL Capital Assurance, Inc.
 
 
The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by Michigan municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at September 30, 2010, 84.1% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 1.4% to 37.6% of total investments.
 
(1) Security (or a portion thereof) has been pledged to cover margin requirements on open financial futures contracts.

 
See notes to financial statements

22


Table of Contents

Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund as of September 30, 2010
 
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
 
                     
Tax-Exempt Investments — 166.7%
 
Principal Amount
               
(000’s omitted)       Security   Value      
 
 
 
Hospital — 8.7%
 
$ 180     Camden County Improvement Authority, (Cooper Health System), 5.00%, 2/15/35   $ 173,362      
  760     Camden County Improvement Authority, (Cooper Health System), 5.75%, 2/15/34     773,384      
  600     New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, (Atlanticare Regional Medical Center), 5.00%, 7/1/37     613,404      
  250     New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, (Hunterdon Medical Center), 5.125%, 7/1/35     251,525      
  1,425     New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, (South Jersey Hospital), 5.00%, 7/1/46     1,436,086      
 
 
            $ 3,247,761      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Electric Utilities — 3.1%
 
$ 1,000     Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (NPFG), 5.25%, 7/1/26   $ 1,142,450      
 
 
            $ 1,142,450      
 
 
 
 
Insured-General Obligations — 37.6%
 
$ 2,415     Bayonne, (AGM), 0.00%, 7/1/23   $ 1,436,563      
  1,000     Bayonne, (AGM), 5.50%, 7/1/39     1,095,480      
  320     Delaware Township, Hunterdon County, (AGC), 5.00%, 10/15/35     347,891      
  340     Delaware Township, Hunterdon County, (AGC), 5.10%, 10/15/36     371,827      
  360     Delaware Township, Hunterdon County, (AGC), 5.15%, 10/15/37     394,416      
  382     Delaware Township, Hunterdon County, (AGC), 5.20%, 10/15/38     418,668      
  895     Egg Harbor Township School District, (AGM), 3.50%, 4/1/28     890,937      
  2,000     Hudson County Improvement Authority, (NPFG), 0.00%, 12/15/38     390,640      
  5,500     Irvington Township, (AGM), 0.00%, 7/15/26     2,919,950      
  2,395     Jackson Township School District, (NPFG), 2.50%, 6/15/27     2,095,266      
  1,000     Jersey City, (AGM), 5.00%, 1/15/29     1,080,910      
  700     Lakewood Township, (AGC), 5.75%, 11/1/31     811,027      
  1,115     Monroe Township Board of Education, Middlesex County, (AGC), 4.75%, 3/1/34     1,179,714      
  110     Nutley School District, (NPFG), 4.75%, 7/15/30     117,454      
  410     Nutley School District, (NPFG), 4.75%, 7/15/31     435,371      
 
 
            $ 13,986,114      
 
 
 
Insured-Hospital — 16.6%
 
$ 1,500     New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, (Englewood Hospital), (NPFG), 5.00%, 8/1/31   $ 1,530,090      
  2,000     New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, (Hackensack University Medical Center), (AGC), 5.25%, 1/1/36(1)     2,107,620      
  625     New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, (Meridian Health Center), Series II, (AGC), 5.00%, 7/1/38     650,407      
  250     New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, (Meridian Health Center), Series V, (AGC), 5.00%, 7/1/38(1)     260,180      
  1,500     New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, (Virtua Health), (AGC), 5.50%, 7/1/38     1,642,065      
 
 
            $ 6,190,362      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 16.4%
 
$ 1,000     Essex County Improvement Authority, (NPFG), 5.50%, 10/1/30   $ 1,185,280      
  1,250     Middlesex County, Certificates of Participation, (NPFG), 5.00%, 8/1/31     1,260,825      
  1,300     New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (School Facilities Construction), (AGC), 5.50%, 12/15/34     1,457,131      
  500     New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (School Facilities Construction), (FGIC), (NPFG), 5.50%, 9/1/28     591,020      
  1,250     Puerto Rico Public Finance Corp., (AMBAC), Escrowed to Maturity, 5.50%, 8/1/27     1,620,975      
 
 
            $ 6,115,231      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Other Revenue — 4.4%
 
$ 1,500     Hudson County Improvement Authority, (Harrison Parking), (AGC), 5.25%, 1/1/39   $ 1,633,350      
 
 
            $ 1,633,350      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Public Education — 14.2%
 
$ 1,945     New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority, (College of New Jersey), (AGM), 5.00%, 7/1/35(1)   $ 2,070,102      
  500     New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority, (Montclair State University), (NPFG), 3.75%, 7/1/24     503,845      
  920     New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority, (Rowan University), (AGM), (FGIC), 3.00%, 7/1/27     830,972      
  465     New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority, (Rowan University), (AGM), (FGIC), 3.00%, 7/1/28     410,906      
  1,145     New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority, (William Paterson University), (AGC), 4.75%, 7/1/34     1,181,640      
  275     New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority, (William Paterson University), (AGC), 5.00%, 7/1/38     290,436      
 
 
            $ 5,287,901      
 
 
 

 
See notes to financial statements

23


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund as of September 30, 2010
 
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
 
                     
Principal Amount
               
(000’s omitted)       Security   Value      
 
 
 
Insured-Sewer Revenue — 2.4%
 
$ 1,975     Rahway Valley Sewerage Authority, (NPFG), 0.00%, 9/1/27   $ 884,010      
 
 
            $ 884,010      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Special Tax Revenue — 14.4%
 
$ 1,000     Garden State Preservation Trust, (AGM), 0.00%, 11/1/21   $ 683,810      
  500     Garden State Preservation Trust, (AGM), 5.80%, 11/1/21     595,760      
  1,000     New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (Motor Vehicle Surcharges), (BHAC), (NPFG), 5.00%, 7/1/27     1,083,570      
  2,390     New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (Motor Vehicle Surcharges), (XLCA), 0.00%, 7/1/26     1,151,454      
  1,120     New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (Motor Vehicle Surcharges), (XLCA), 0.00%, 7/1/27     508,446      
  7,675     Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (AMBAC), 0.00%, 8/1/54     518,216      
  1,520     Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), 0.00%, 8/1/44     204,972      
  3,005     Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), 0.00%, 8/1/45     378,450      
  1,900     Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), 0.00%, 8/1/46     224,143      
 
 
            $ 5,348,821      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Transportation — 23.8%
 
$ 1,560     New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, (Transportation System), (AMBAC), (BHAC), 0.00%, 12/15/26   $ 768,893      
  3,235     New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, (Transportation System), (BHAC), (FGIC), 0.00%, 12/15/31     1,142,569      
  1,500     New Jersey Turnpike Authority, (AGM), (BHAC), 5.25%, 1/1/29     1,807,590      
  3,875     Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, (AGM), 5.00%, 11/1/27(1)     4,154,066      
  720     Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, (AGM), 5.00%, 8/15/33     776,102      
  180     South Jersey Transportation Authority, (AGC), 5.50%, 11/1/33     200,684      
 
 
            $ 8,849,904      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Water and Sewer — 7.4%
 
$ 4,500     Middlesex County Improvement Authority, (Perth Amboy), (AMBAC), 0.00%, 9/1/24   $ 2,190,420      
  895     Passaic Valley Sewerage Commissioners, (FGIC), (NPFG), 2.50%, 12/1/32     577,839      
 
 
            $ 2,768,259      
 
 
 
Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 1.8%
 
$ 650     New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, (Contract Hospital Asset Transformation Program), 5.25%, 10/1/38   $ 682,903      
 
 
            $ 682,903      
 
 
 
 
Private Education — 5.5%
 
$ 2,000     New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority, (Princeton University), 4.25%, 7/1/40(2)   $ 2,046,160      
 
 
            $ 2,046,160      
 
 
 
 
Public Education — 0.7%
 
$ 250     Rutgers State University, 5.00%, 5/1/39   $ 271,318      
 
 
            $ 271,318      
 
 
 
 
Other Revenue — 3.8%
 
$ 1,300     New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (Duke Farms Foundation), 5.00%, 7/1/48   $ 1,402,596      
 
 
            $ 1,402,596      
 
 
 
 
Transportation — 5.9%
 
$ 590     Delaware River Port Authority of Pennsylvania and New Jersey, 5.00%, 1/1/35   $ 623,984      
  210     Delaware River Port Authority of Pennsylvania and New Jersey, 5.00%, 1/1/40     220,947      
  1,325     South Jersey Port Authority, (Marine Terminal), 5.10%, 1/1/33     1,344,875      
 
 
            $ 2,189,806      
 
 
     
Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 166.7%
   
(identified cost $57,915,283)
  $ 62,046,946      
 
 
     
Auction Preferred Shares Plus Cumulative
   
Unpaid Dividends — (52.7)%
  $ (19,600,690 )    
 
 
             
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (14.0)%
  $ (5,223,846 )    
 
 
             
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares — 100.0%
  $ 37,222,410      
 
 
 
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets applicable to common shares.
 
AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.
 
AGM - Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.
 
AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
 
BHAC - Berkshire Hathaway Assurance Corp.

 
See notes to financial statements

24


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund as of September 30, 2010
 
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
 
 
FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
NPFG - National Public Finance Guaranty Corp.
XLCA - XL Capital Assurance, Inc.
 
The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by New Jersey municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at September 30, 2010, 84.1% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 2.7% to 30.2% of total investments.
 
(1) Security represents the underlying municipal bond of an inverse floater (see Note 1H).
 
(2) Security (or a portion thereof) has been pledged to cover margin requirements on open financial futures contracts.

 
See notes to financial statements

25


Table of Contents

Eaton Vance New York Municipal Bond Fund II as of September 30, 2010
 
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
 
                     
Tax-Exempt Investments — 167.0%
 
Principal Amount
               
(000’s omitted)       Security   Value      
 
 
 
Hospital — 3.2%
 
$ 135     New York Dormitory Authority, (Highland Hospital of Rochester), 5.00%, 7/1/26   $ 141,850      
  180     New York Dormitory Authority, (Highland Hospital of Rochester), 5.20%, 7/1/32     186,678      
  750     Suffolk County Industrial Development Agency, (Huntington Hospital), 5.875%, 11/1/32     760,732      
 
 
            $ 1,089,260      
 
 
 
 
Industrial Development Revenue — 2.5%
 
$ 220     Liberty Development Corp., (Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.), 5.25%, 10/1/35   $ 233,396      
  600     Liberty Development Corp., (Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.), 5.25%, 10/1/35(1)     636,533      
 
 
            $ 869,929      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Electric Utilities — 3.4%
 
$ 500     Long Island Power Authority, (BHAC), 5.50%, 5/1/33   $ 564,690      
  500     Long Island Power Authority, (BHAC), 6.00%, 5/1/33     588,140      
 
 
            $ 1,152,830      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Escrowed / Prerefunded — 3.8%
 
$ 545     New York Dormitory Authority, (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center), (NPFG), Escrowed to Maturity, 0.00%, 7/1/26   $ 327,976      
  550     New York Dormitory Authority, (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center), (NPFG), Escrowed to Maturity, 0.00%, 7/1/27     315,243      
  1,385     New York Dormitory Authority, (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center), (NPFG), Escrowed to Maturity, 0.00%, 7/1/30     675,257      
 
 
            $ 1,318,476      
 
 
 
 
Insured-General Obligations — 23.4%
 
$ 535     Brentwood Union Free School District, (AGC), 4.75%, 11/15/23   $ 619,364      
  560     Brentwood Union Free School District, (AGC), 5.00%, 11/15/24     656,516      
  180     Freeport Union Free School District, (AGC), 4.00%, 4/1/23     194,969      
  200     Freeport Union Free School District, (AGC), 4.00%, 4/1/24     215,340      
  250     Hauppauge Union Free School District, (AGC), 4.00%, 7/15/24     268,065      
  250     Hoosic Valley Central School District, (AGC), 4.00%, 6/15/23     269,562      
  185     Longwood Central School District, Suffolk County, (AGC), 4.15%, 6/1/23     199,856      
  190     Longwood Central School District, Suffolk County, (AGC), 4.25%, 6/1/24     204,900      
  1,000     New York, (AGM), 5.00%, 4/1/22     1,119,540      
  1,795     New York Dormitory Authority, (School Districts Financing Program), (NPFG), 5.00%, 10/1/30     1,828,172      
  100     Plattsburgh, (AGC), 4.25%, 11/15/19     113,655      
  300     Plattsburgh, (AGC), 4.25%, 11/15/20     342,774      
  410     Sachem Central School District, (FGIC), (NPFG), 4.25%, 10/15/28     425,592      
  235     Syracuse, (AGC), 5.00%, 6/15/19     276,087      
  185     Wantagh Union Free School District, (AGC), 4.50%, 11/15/19     211,250      
  190     Wantagh Union Free School District, (AGC), 4.50%, 11/15/20     214,734      
  210     Wantagh Union Free School District, (AGC), 4.75%, 11/15/22     238,004      
  220     Wantagh Union Free School District, (AGC), 4.75%, 11/15/23     247,817      
  350     William Floyd Union Free School District, (AGC), 4.00%, 12/15/24     380,117      
 
 
            $ 8,026,314      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Hospital — 6.3%
 
$ 500     New York City Health and Hospitals Corp., (AGM), 5.50%, 2/15/20   $ 586,975      
  1,000     New York Dormitory Authority, (Health Quest Systems), (AGC), 5.125%, 7/1/37(1)     1,045,750      
  500     New York Dormitory Authority, (Hudson Valley Hospital Center), (AGM), (BHAC), 5.00%, 8/15/36     533,955      
 
 
            $ 2,166,680      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Housing — 3.0%
 
$ 1,000     New York City Housing Corp., (NPFG), 4.95%, 11/1/33   $ 1,015,840      
 
 
            $ 1,015,840      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 8.5%
 
$ 1,915     Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corp., (NPFG), 4.50%, 2/15/47   $ 1,855,597      
  950     New York City Transitional Finance Authority, (BHAC), 5.50%, 7/15/38     1,068,541      
 
 
            $ 2,924,138      
 
 
 

 
See notes to financial statements

26


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance New York Municipal Bond Fund II as of September 30, 2010
 
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
 
                     
Principal Amount
               
(000’s omitted)       Security   Value      
 
 
 
Insured-Other Revenue — 16.7%
 
$ 1,360     New York City Cultural Resource Trust, (American Museum of Natural History), (NPFG), 5.00%, 7/1/44   $ 1,403,289      
  2,500     New York City Cultural Resource Trust, (Museum of Modern Art), (AMBAC), (BHAC), 5.125%, 7/1/31(1)     2,628,275      
  1,710     New York City Industrial Development Agency, (Yankee Stadium), (NPFG), 4.75%, 3/1/46     1,696,593      
 
 
            $ 5,728,157      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Private Education — 31.8%
 
$ 1,440     New York Dormitory Authority, (Barnard College), (FGIC), (NPFG), 5.00%, 7/1/24   $ 1,563,422      
  1,275     New York Dormitory Authority, (Brooklyn Law School), (XLCA), 5.125%, 7/1/30     1,307,270      
  2,250     New York Dormitory Authority, (Fordham University), (AGC), (BHAC), 5.00%, 7/1/38(1)     2,408,648      
  1,000     New York Dormitory Authority, (New York University), (AMBAC), (BHAC), 5.00%, 7/1/31(1)     1,024,550      
  345     New York Dormitory Authority, (Pratt Institute), (AGC), 5.00%, 7/1/34     366,449      
  835     New York Dormitory Authority, (Pratt Institute), (AGC), 5.125%, 7/1/39     890,711      
  500     New York Dormitory Authority, (Skidmore College), (FGIC), (NPFG), 5.00%, 7/1/33     517,320      
  850     New York Dormitory Authority, (St. John’s University), (NPFG), 5.25%, 7/1/37     892,764      
  5,425     Oneida County Industrial Development Agency, (Hamilton College), (NPFG), 0.00%, 7/1/32     1,955,604      
 
 
            $ 10,926,738      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Public Education — 0.4%
 
$ 130     New York Dormitory Authority, (City University), (AMBAC), 5.25%, 7/1/30   $ 136,635      
 
 
            $ 136,635      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Special Tax Revenue — 16.0%
 
$ 670     New York Convention Center Development Corp., Hotel Occupancy Tax, (AMBAC), 4.75%, 11/15/45   $ 674,054      
  515     New York Convention Center Development Corp., Hotel Occupancy Tax, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 11/15/44     523,930      
  1,700     Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 7/1/35     361,862      
  13,970     Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), 0.00%, 8/1/44     1,883,854      
  3,200     Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), 0.00%, 8/1/45     403,008      
  2,105     Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), 0.00%, 8/1/46     248,327      
  575     Sales Tax Asset Receivables Corp., (AMBAC), 5.00%, 10/15/29     631,063      
  690     Sales Tax Asset Receivables Corp., (AMBAC), 5.00%, 10/15/32     749,878      
 
 
            $ 5,475,976      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Transportation — 19.7%
 
$ 2,000     Metropolitan Transportation Authority, (AGC), (FGIC), 5.25%, 11/15/31   $ 2,119,440      
  1,000     Metropolitan Transportation Authority, (AGM), (NPFG), 5.00%, 11/15/31     1,062,740      
  510     New York Thruway Authority, (AMBAC), 5.50%, 4/1/20     624,816      
  2,500     Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, (AGM), 5.00%, 11/1/27(1)     2,680,636      
  275     Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, (NPFG), 5.00%, 11/15/32     287,985      
 
 
            $ 6,775,617      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Water and Sewer — 11.6%
 
$ 905     Nassau County Sewer and Storm Water Finance Authority, (BHAC), 5.375%, 11/1/28   $ 1,039,718      
  2,750     New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, (Water and Sewer System), (AMBAC), (BHAC), 5.00%, 6/15/38(1)     2,936,835      
 
 
            $ 3,976,553      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Water Revenue — 1.1%
 
$ 350     Suffolk County Water Authority, (NPFG), 4.50%, 6/1/25   $ 367,066      
 
 
            $ 367,066      
 
 
 
 
Other Revenue — 0.9%
 
$ 1,100     Brooklyn Arena Local Development Corp., (Barclays Center), 0.00%, 7/15/31   $ 319,209      
 
 
            $ 319,209      
 
 
 
 
Private Education — 7.5%
 
$ 500     New York City Industrial Development Agency, (St. Francis College), 5.00%, 10/1/34   $ 501,795      
  1,280     New York Dormitory Authority, (Cornell University), 5.00%, 7/1/37     1,407,961      
  610     New York Dormitory Authority, (Rockefeller University), 5.00%, 7/1/40     666,651      
 
 
            $ 2,576,407      
 
 
 

 
See notes to financial statements

27


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance New York Municipal Bond Fund II as of September 30, 2010
 
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
 
                     
Principal Amount
               
(000’s omitted)       Security   Value      
 
 
 
Transportation — 4.1%
 
$ 350     Nassau County Bridge Authority, 5.00%, 10/1/35   $ 365,981      
  65     Nassau County Bridge Authority, 5.00%, 10/1/40     67,171      
  530     New York Thruway Authority, 5.00%, 4/1/26     606,474      
  340     Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, 5.00%, 11/15/37     362,946      
 
 
            $ 1,402,572      
 
 
 
 
Water Revenue — 3.1%
 
$ 235     New York Environmental Facilities Corp., Clean Water and Drinking Water, (Municipal Water Finance), 5.00%, 6/15/26(2)   $ 257,064      
  750     New York Environmental Facilities Corp., 5.00%, 10/15/39     821,138      
 
 
            $ 1,078,202      
 
 
     
Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 167.0%
   
(identified cost $54,935,398)
  $ 57,326,599      
 
 
     
Auction Preferred Shares Plus Cumulative
   
Unpaid Dividends — (38.6)%
  $ (13,250,311 )    
 
 
             
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (28.4)%
  $ (9,748,271 )    
 
 
             
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares — 100.0%
  $ 34,328,017      
 
 
 
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets applicable to common shares.
 
AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.
 
AGM - Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.
 
AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
 
BHAC - Berkshire Hathaway Assurance Corp.
 
FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
 
NPFG - National Public Finance Guaranty Corp.
 
XLCA - XL Capital Assurance, Inc.
 
 
The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by New York municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at September 30, 2010, 87.2% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 2.3% to 32.7% of total investments.
 
(1) Security represents the underlying municipal bond of an inverse floater (see Note 1H).
 
(2) Security (or a portion thereof) has been pledged to cover margin requirements on open financial futures contracts.

 
See notes to financial statements

28


Table of Contents

Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Bond Fund as of September 30, 2010
 
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
 
                     
Tax-Exempt Investments — 152.6%
 
Principal Amount
               
(000’s omitted)       Security   Value      
 
 
 
General Obligations — 4.7%
 
$ 900     Beavercreek, School District, 5.00%, 12/1/30   $ 987,102      
  500     County of Franklin, 5.00%, 12/1/27(1)     562,515      
 
 
            $ 1,549,617      
 
 
 
 
Hospital — 6.0%
 
$ 500     Miami County, (Upper Valley Medical Center), 5.25%, 5/15/26   $ 514,320      
  955     Ohio Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (University Hospital Health Systems, Inc.), 4.75%, 1/15/46     937,285      
  500     Ohio Higher Educational Facility Commission, (Summa Health System), 5.75%, 11/15/40     514,480      
 
 
            $ 1,966,085      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Electric Utilities — 20.5%
 
$ 700     American Municipal Power-Ohio, Inc., (Prairie State Energy Campus), (AGC), 5.25%, 2/15/33   $ 748,454      
  2,750     Cleveland Public Power System, (NPFG), 0.00%, 11/15/27     1,226,693      
  1,000     Cleveland Public Power System, (NPFG), 0.00%, 11/15/38     226,270      
  1,670     Ohio Municipal Electric Generation Agency, (NPFG), 0.00%, 2/15/25     867,331      
  5,000     Ohio Municipal Electric Generation Agency, (NPFG), 0.00%, 2/15/27     2,310,650      
  755     Ohio Water Development Authority, (Dayton Power & Light), (FGIC), 4.80%, 1/1/34     764,800      
  500     Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (NPFG), 5.25%, 7/1/26     571,225      
 
 
            $ 6,715,423      
 
 
 
 
Insured-General Obligations — 39.0%
 
$ 320     Bowling Green City School District, (AGM), 5.00%, 12/1/34   $ 337,117      
  200     Brookfield Local School District, (AGM), 5.00%, 1/15/30     216,274      
  1,000     Cleveland Municipal School District, (AGM), 5.00%, 12/1/27     1,051,710      
  900     Clyde-Green Springs Exempted Village School District, (AGM), 4.50%, 12/1/31     927,324      
  1,575     Cuyahoga Community College District, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 12/1/32     1,622,313      
  1,000     Milford Exempt Village School District, (AGC), 5.25%, 12/1/36     1,082,340      
  1,400     Olentangy Local School District, (AGC), 5.00%, 12/1/36     1,501,640      
  2,400     Plain School District, (FGIC), (NPFG), 0.00%, 12/1/27(2)     1,015,104      
  750     St. Mary’s School District, (AGM), 5.00%, 12/1/35     787,695      
  500     Sylvania City School District, (AGC), 5.00%, 12/1/26     549,705      
  1,000     Sylvania City School District, (AGC), 5.00%, 12/1/32     1,064,910      
  500     Tecumseh School District, (FGIC), (NPFG), 4.75%, 12/1/31     511,160      
  2,000     Wapakoneta City School District, (AGM), 4.75%, 12/1/35     2,105,560      
 
 
            $ 12,772,852      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Hospital — 12.6%
 
$ 820     Hamilton County, (Cincinnati Children’s Hospital), (FGIC), (NPFG), 5.00%, 5/15/32   $ 827,798      
  1,500     Hamilton County, (Cincinnati Children’s Hospital), (FGIC), (NPFG), 5.125%, 5/15/28     1,529,955      
  440     Lorain County, (Catholic Healthcare Partners), (AGM), Variable Rate, 17.493%, 2/1/29(3)(4)(5)     531,362      
  1,250     Ohio Higher Educational Facility Commission, (University Hospital Health Systems, Inc.), (AMBAC), 4.75%, 1/15/46     1,226,812      
 
 
            $ 4,115,927      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 3.4%
 
$ 235     Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority, Government Facilities Revenue, (XLCA), 5.25%, 7/1/36   $ 236,387      
  1,000     Summit County, (Civic Theater Project), (AMBAC), 5.00%, 12/1/33     859,980      
 
 
            $ 1,096,367      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Public Education — 31.0%
 
$ 1,750     Cincinnati Technical and Community College, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 10/1/28   $ 1,771,140      
  1,000     Kent State University, (AGC), 5.00%, 5/1/26     1,116,280      
  360     Kent State University, (AGC), 5.00%, 5/1/29     393,177      
  2,000     Miami University, (AGM), (AMBAC), 3.25%, 9/1/26     1,870,600      
  500     Ohio University, (AGM), 5.00%, 12/1/33     530,175      
  1,170     Ohio University, (AGM), 5.25%, 12/1/23     1,288,533      
  1,000     University of Akron, (AGM), 5.00%, 1/1/38     1,053,660      
  1,000     University of Cincinnati, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 6/1/31     1,021,150      

 
See notes to financial statements

29


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Bond Fund as of September 30, 2010
 
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
 
                     
Principal Amount
               
(000’s omitted)       Security   Value      
 
 
Insured-Public Education (continued)
 
                     
$ 1,000     Youngstown State University, (AGC), 5.50%, 12/15/33   $ 1,089,740      
 
 
            $ 10,134,455      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Sewer Revenue — 2.5%
 
$ 615     Marysville Wastewater Treatment System, (AGC), (XLCA), 4.75%, 12/1/46(2)   $ 623,598      
  180     Marysville Wastewater Treatment System, (AGC), (XLCA), 4.75%, 12/1/47     182,786      
 
 
            $ 806,384      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Special Tax Revenue — 10.8%
 
$ 1,335     Hamilton County Sales Tax, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 12/1/23   $ 748,908      
  3,665     Hamilton County Sales Tax, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 12/1/24     1,942,780      
  8,430     Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (AMBAC), 0.00%, 8/1/54     569,194      
  1,525     Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), 0.00%, 8/1/45     192,058      
  705     Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), 0.00%, 8/1/46     83,169      
 
 
            $ 3,536,109      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Transportation — 1.7%
 
$ 500     Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (AGC), (CIFG), 5.25%, 7/1/41(6)   $ 555,825      
 
 
            $ 555,825      
 
 
 
 
Pooled Loans — 7.1%
 
$ 1,335     Cuyahoga County Port Authority, (Garfield Heights), 5.25%, 5/15/23   $ 1,095,795      
  1,140     Rickenbacker Port Authority, Oasbo Expanded Asset Pool Loan, 5.375%, 1/1/32(6)     1,240,217      
 
 
            $ 2,336,012      
 
 
 
 
Private Education — 8.5%
 
$ 850     Ohio Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (John Carroll University), 5.25%, 11/15/33   $ 864,161      
  500     Ohio Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Kenyon College), 5.00%, 7/1/41     513,755      
  1,000     Ohio Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Oberlin College), 5.00%, 10/1/33     1,031,890      
  350     Ohio Higher Educational Facility Commission, (Kenyon College), 5.00%, 7/1/44     366,201      
 
 
            $ 2,776,007      
 
 
 
 
Public Education — 4.8%
 
$ 1,325     Ohio State University, 5.00%, 12/1/30(7)   $ 1,575,571      
 
 
            $ 1,575,571      
 
 
     
Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 152.6%
   
(identified cost $47,182,499)
  $ 49,936,634      
 
 
     
Auction Preferred Shares Plus Cumulative
   
Unpaid Dividends — (52.0)%
  $ (17,001,276 )    
 
 
             
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (0.6)%
  $ (209,554 )    
 
 
             
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares — 100.0%
  $ 32,725,804      
 
 
 
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets applicable to common shares.
 
AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.
 
AGM - Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.
 
AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
 
CIFG - CIFG Assurance North America, Inc.
 
FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
 
NPFG - National Public Finance Guaranty Corp.
 
XLCA - XL Capital Assurance, Inc.
 
The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by Ohio municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at September 30, 2010, 79.6% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 1.1% to 23.3% of total investments.
 
(1) Security (or a portion thereof) has been pledged to cover margin requirements on open financial futures contracts.
 
(2) Security (or a portion thereof) has been segregated to cover payable for when-issued securities.
 
(3) Security has been issued as a leveraged inverse floater bond. The stated interest rate represents the rate in effect at September 30, 2010.
 
(4) Security is subject to a shortfall agreement which may require the Fund to pay amounts to a counterparty in the event of a significant decline in the market value of the security underlying the inverse floater. In case of a shortfall, the maximum potential amount of payments the Fund could

 
See notes to financial statements

30


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Bond Fund as of September 30, 2010
 
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
 
 
ultimately be required to make under the agreement is $1,320,000. However, such shortfall payment would be reduced by the proceeds from the sale of the security underlying the inverse floater.
 
(5) Security exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in certain transactions (normally to qualified institutional buyers) and remain exempt from registration. At September 30, 2010, the aggregate value of these securities is $531,362 or 1.6% of the Fund’s net assets applicable to common shares.
 
(6) Security represents the underlying municipal bond of an inverse floater (see Note 1H).
 
(7) When-issued security.

 
See notes to financial statements

31


Table of Contents

Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund as of September 30, 2010
 
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
 
                     
Tax-Exempt Investments — 162.2%
 
Principal Amount
               
(000’s omitted)       Security   Value      
 
 
 
Hospital — 16.2%
 
$ 750     Chester County Health and Education Facilities Authority, (Jefferson Health System), 5.00%, 5/15/40   $ 778,402      
  1,000     Franklin County Industrial Development Authority, (The Chambersburg Hospital), 5.375%, 7/1/42     1,031,700      
  1,455     Lehigh County General Purpose Authority, (Lehigh Valley Health Network), 5.25%, 7/1/32     1,481,801      
  1,250     Monroe County Hospital Authority, (Pocono Medical Center), 5.125%, 1/1/37     1,256,875      
  250     Northampton County General Purpose Authority, (Saint Luke’s Hospital), 5.50%, 8/15/33     256,495      
  675     Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (UPMC Health System), 5.00%, 5/15/31     707,009      
  750     Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (UPMC Health System), 6.00%, 1/15/31     769,950      
  250     South Fork Municipal Authority, (Conemaugh Health System), 5.50%, 7/1/29     253,558      
 
 
            $ 6,535,790      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Electric Utilities — 6.1%
 
$ 1,610     Lehigh County Industrial Development Authority, (PPL Electric Utilities Corp.), (FGIC), (NPFG), 4.75%, 2/15/27   $ 1,635,647      
  750     Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), (NPFG), 5.25%, 7/1/35     822,720      
 
 
            $ 2,458,367      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Escrowed / Prerefunded — 3.3%
 
$ 995     Armstrong County, (NPFG), Prerefunded to 6/1/11, 5.40%, 6/1/31   $ 1,028,551      
  270     Southcentral General Authority, (Wellspan Health), (NPFG), Escrowed to Maturity, 5.25%, 5/15/31     279,866      
 
 
            $ 1,308,417      
 
 
 
 
Insured-General Obligations — 28.9%
 
$ 655     Armstrong County, (NPFG), 5.40%, 6/1/31   $ 668,834      
  1,250     Bethlehem Area School District, (AGM), 5.25%, 1/15/25     1,395,375      
  660     Centennial School District, (AGM), 5.25%, 12/15/37     714,080      
  1,350     Central Greene School District, (AGM), 5.00%, 2/15/35     1,422,643      
  1,000     Erie School District, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 9/1/30     396,380      
  500     Harrisburg School District, (AGC), 5.00%, 11/15/33     534,455      
  2,555     McKeesport School District, (NPFG), 0.00%, 10/1/21     1,666,269      
  1,500     Norwin School District, (AGM), 3.25%, 4/1/27     1,403,925      
  1,500     Reading School District, (AGM), 5.00%, 3/1/35     1,585,785      
  1,000     Scranton School District, (AGM), 5.00%, 7/15/38     1,047,500      
  2,550     Shaler Area School District, (XLCA), 0.00%, 9/1/33     815,414      
 
 
            $ 11,650,660      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Hospital — 8.7%
 
$ 250     Allegheny County Hospital Development Authority, (UPMC Health System), (NPFG), 6.00%, 7/1/24   $ 306,057      
  500     Centre County Hospital Authority, (Mount Nittany Medical Center), (AGC), 6.25%, 11/15/44     528,050      
  1,620     Lehigh County General Purpose Authority, (Lehigh Valley Health Network), (AGM), 5.00%, 7/1/35(1)     1,678,547      
  1,000     Washington County Hospital Authority, (Washington Hospital), (AMBAC), 5.125%, 7/1/28     981,630      
 
 
            $ 3,494,284      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Industrial Development Revenue — 3.1%
 
$ 150     Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, (Aqua Pennsylvania, Inc. Project), (BHAC), 5.00%, 10/1/39   $ 160,602      
  1,000     Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, (Aqua Pennsylvania, Inc. Project), (BHAC), 5.00%, 10/1/39(1)     1,070,680      
 
 
            $ 1,231,282      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 4.5%
 
$ 500     Commonwealth Financing Authority, (AGC), 5.00%, 6/1/31   $ 531,025      
  1,215     Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development, (One Benjamin Franklin), (AGM), 4.75%, 2/15/27     1,295,421      
 
 
            $ 1,826,446      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Private Education — 11.7%
 
$ 1,000     Chester County Industrial Development Authority, Educational Facility, (Westtown School), (AMBAC), 5.00%, 1/1/31   $ 1,008,380      
  1,675     Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Drexel University), (NPFG), 5.00%, 5/1/37(2)     1,752,150      
  1,405     Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Temple University), (NPFG), 4.50%, 4/1/36     1,417,954      

 
See notes to financial statements

32


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund as of September 30, 2010
 
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
 
                     
Principal Amount
               
(000’s omitted)       Security   Value      
 
 
Insured-Private Education (continued)
 
                     
$ 500     Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (University of the Sciences in Philadelphia), (AGC), 5.00%, 11/1/37   $ 526,290      
 
 
            $ 4,704,774      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Public Education — 11.2%
 
$ 500     Lycoming County Authority, (Pennsylvania College of Technology), (AGC), 5.50%, 10/1/37   $ 534,660      
  1,200     Lycoming County Authority, (Pennsylvania College of Technology), (AMBAC), 5.25%, 5/1/32     1,201,476      
  1,000     Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Clarion University Foundation), (XLCA), 5.00%, 7/1/33     877,220      
  500     State Public School Building Authority, (Delaware County Community College), (AGM), 5.00%, 10/1/27     549,635      
  375     State Public School Building Authority, (Delaware County Community College), (AGM), 5.00%, 10/1/29     407,066      
  875     State Public School Building Authority, (Delaware County Community College), (AGM), 5.00%, 10/1/32     934,448      
 
 
            $ 4,504,505      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Sewer Revenue — 17.2%
 
$ 300     Allegheny County Sanitation Authority, (BHAC), (FGIC), 5.00%, 12/1/32   $ 318,387      
  1,500     Allegheny County Sanitation Authority, (BHAC), (NPFG), 5.00%, 12/1/22(3)     1,640,280      
  1,000     Ambridge Borough Municipal Authority, Sewer Revenue, (AGM), 4.60%, 10/15/41     997,520      
  1,920     Erie Sewer Authority, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 12/1/26     817,613      
  1,430     Erie Sewer Authority, Series A, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 12/1/25     647,676      
  2,155     Erie Sewer Authority, Series B, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 12/1/25     976,042      
  1,500     University Area Joint Authority, (NPFG), 5.00%, 11/1/26     1,512,075      
 
 
            $ 6,909,593      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Special Tax Revenue — 6.0%
 
$ 22,015     Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (AMBAC), 0.00%, 8/1/54   $ 1,486,453      
  1,770     Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), 0.00%, 8/1/44     238,685      
  3,510     Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), 0.00%, 8/1/45     442,049      
  2,220     Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), 0.00%, 8/1/46     261,893      
 
 
            $ 2,429,080      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Transportation — 22.6%
 
$ 2,000     Allegheny County Port Authority, (FGIC), (NPFG), 5.00%, 3/1/25   $ 2,031,280      
  1,000     Allegheny County Port Authority, (FGIC), (NPFG), 5.00%, 3/1/29     1,014,290      
  2,000     Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, (AGM), 5.25%, 7/15/30(1)     2,344,000      
  295     Philadelphia, Airport Revenue, (AGC), 5.375%, 6/15/29     319,724      
  1,000     Pittsburgh and Allegheny County Sports and Exhibition Authority, (AGM), 5.00%, 2/1/31     1,061,380      
  2,100     Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (AGC), (CIFG), 5.25%, 7/1/41(1)     2,334,465      
 
 
            $ 9,105,139      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Utilities — 2.2%
 
$ 890     Philadelphia Gas Works, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 10/1/37   $ 889,341      
 
 
            $ 889,341      
 
 
 
 
Insured-Water and Sewer — 0.4%
 
$ 150     Saxonburg Water and Sewer Authority, (AGC), 5.00%, 3/1/35   $ 155,060      
 
 
            $ 155,060      
 
 
 
 
Private Education — 12.8%
 
$ 625     Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Saint Joseph’s University), 5.00%, 11/1/40(4)   $ 648,038      
  925     Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Thomas Jefferson University), 5.00%, 3/1/40     976,883      
  2,900     Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (University of Pennsylvania), 4.75%, 7/15/35     2,981,722      
  500     Washington County Industrial Development Authority, (Washington and Jefferson College), 5.25%, 11/1/30     539,015      
 
 
            $ 5,145,658      
 
 
 
 
Public Education — 1.3%
 
$ 500     Pennsylvania State University, 5.00%, 3/1/40   $ 544,025      
 
 
            $ 544,025      
 
 
 

 
See notes to financial statements

33


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund as of September 30, 2010
 
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
 
                     
Principal Amount
               
(000’s omitted)       Security   Value      
 
 
 
Senior Living / Life Care — 0.5%
 
$ 200     Montgomery County Industrial Development Authority, (Foulkeways at Gwynedd), 5.00%, 12/1/24   $ 203,840      
 
 
            $ 203,840      
 
 
 
 
Special Tax Revenue — 0.3%
 
$ 110     Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, 6.75%, 10/1/37   $ 124,654      
 
 
            $ 124,654      
 
 
 
 
Transportation — 3.1%
 
$ 465     Delaware River Port Authority of Pennsylvania and New Jersey, 5.00%, 1/1/35   $ 491,784      
  730     Delaware River Port Authority of Pennsylvania and New Jersey, 5.00%, 1/1/40     768,055      
 
 
            $ 1,259,839      
 
 
 
 
Water and Sewer — 2.1%
 
$ 765     Philadelphia, Water and Wastewater Revenue, 5.25%, 1/1/32   $ 823,798      
 
 
            $ 823,798      
 
 
     
Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 162.2%
   
(identified cost $64,142,281)
  $ 65,304,552      
 
 
     
Auction Preferred Shares Plus Cumulative
   
Unpaid Dividends — (54.0)%
  $ (21,726,900 )    
 
 
             
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (8.2)%
  $ (3,321,320 )    
 
 
             
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares — 100.0%
  $ 40,256,332      
 
 
 
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets applicable to common shares.
 
AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.
 
AGM - Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.
 
AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
 
BHAC - Berkshire Hathaway Assurance Corp.
 
CIFG - CIFG Assurance North America, Inc.
 
FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
 
NPFG - National Public Finance Guaranty Corp.
 
XLCA - XL Capital Assurance, Inc.
 
The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by Pennsylvania municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk
 
associated with such economic developments, at September 30, 2010, 77.6% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 2.6% to 25.8% of total investments.
 
(1) Security represents the underlying municipal bond of an inverse floater (see Note 1H).
 
(2) Security (or a portion thereof) has been segregated to cover payable for when-issued securities.
 
(3) Security (or a portion thereof) has been pledged as collateral for open swap contracts. The aggregate value of such collateral is $437,408.
 
(4) When-issued security.

 
See notes to financial statements

34


Table of Contents

Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds as of September 30, 2010
 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statements of Assets and Liabilities
 
                                     
As of September 30, 2010   Municipal Fund II     California Fund II     Massachusetts Fund     Michigan Fund      
 
 
 
Assets
 
Investments —
                                   
Identified cost
  $ 221,472,966     $ 81,506,560     $ 39,776,849     $ 33,151,929      
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
    (221,867 )     (682,276 )     2,352,203       1,839,622      
 
 
Investments, at value
  $ 221,251,099     $ 80,824,284     $ 42,129,052     $ 34,991,551      
 
 
Cash
  $     $ 355,330     $ 239,006     $      
Interest receivable
    2,896,103       782,365       543,500       477,312      
Receivable for investments sold
    7,306,087       2,755,497                  
Receivable for variation margin on open financial futures contracts
    1,734                        
Receivable from the transfer agent
    17,808       6,256       4,707       1,824      
Deferred debt issuance costs
    119,879       26,118       5,400            
 
 
Total assets
  $ 231,592,710     $ 84,749,850     $ 42,921,665     $ 35,470,687      
 
 
 
Liabilities
 
Payable for floating rate notes issued
  $ 59,060,000     $ 10,370,000     $ 3,330,000     $      
Payable for variation margin on open financial futures contracts
          1,125             31      
Payable for open swap contracts
    69,563       2,707       12,678       10,770      
Due to custodian
    557,866                   84,345      
Payable to affiliates:
                                   
Investment adviser fee
    96,937       37,221       18,722       15,980      
Interest expense and fees payable
    157,013       27,180       8,450            
Accrued expenses
    135,331       81,994       55,880       49,453      
 
 
Total liabilities
  $ 60,076,710     $ 10,520,227     $ 3,425,730     $ 160,579      
 
 
Auction preferred shares at liquidation value plus cumulative unpaid dividends
  $ 44,701,942     $ 25,700,304     $ 13,576,186     $ 13,325,314      
 
 
Net assets applicable to common shares
  $ 126,814,058     $ 48,529,319     $ 25,919,749     $ 21,984,794      
 
 
 
Sources of Net Assets
 
Common shares, $0.01 par value, unlimited number of shares authorized
  $ 99,703     $ 38,751     $ 17,626     $ 15,124      
Additional paid-in capital
    141,296,415       54,899,036       24,973,531       21,421,038      
Accumulated net realized loss
    (15,819,909 )     (6,122,806 )     (1,563,112 )     (1,443,807 )    
Accumulated undistributed net investment income
    1,668,902       387,428       152,179       163,357      
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
    (431,053 )     (673,090 )     2,339,525       1,829,082      
 
 
                                     
Net assets applicable to common shares
  $ 126,814,058     $ 48,529,319     $ 25,919,749     $ 21,984,794      
 
 
 
Auction Preferred Shares Issued and
Outstanding (Liquidation preference of
$25,000 per share)
 
      1,788       1,028       543       533      
 
 
 
Common Shares Outstanding
 
      9,970,255       3,875,090       1,762,574       1,512,368      
 
 
 
Net Asset Value Per Common Share
 
Net assets applicable to common shares ¸ common shares issued and outstanding
  $ 12.72     $ 12.52     $ 14.71     $ 14.54      
 
 

 
See notes to financial statements

35


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds as of September 30, 2010
 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
 
 
Statements of Assets and Liabilities
 
                                     
As of September 30, 2010   New Jersey Fund     New York Fund II     Ohio Fund     Pennsylvania Fund      
 
 
 
Assets
 
Investments —
                                   
Identified cost
  $ 57,915,283     $ 54,935,398     $ 47,182,499     $ 64,142,281      
Unrealized appreciation
    4,131,663       2,391,201       2,754,135       1,162,271      
 
 
Investments, at value
  $ 62,046,946     $ 57,326,599     $ 49,936,634     $ 65,304,552      
 
 
Cash
  $ 28,835     $ 935,378     $ 2,351,711     $ 1,360,953      
Interest receivable
    610,583       766,557       610,855       749,077      
Receivable for investments sold
    594,802                        
Receivable for variation margin on open financial futures contracts
                781            
Receivable from the transfer agent
    10,529       3,497       6,510       5,974      
Deferred debt issuance costs
    7,801       16,799                  
 
 
Total assets
  $ 63,299,496     $ 59,048,830     $ 52,906,491     $ 67,420,556      
 
 
Liabilities
 
Payable for floating rate notes issued
  $ 6,346,000     $ 11,335,000     $ 1,010,000     $ 4,350,000      
Payable for investments purchased
                521,562            
Payable for when-issued securities
                1,545,348       643,687      
Payable for variation margin on open financial futures contracts
    4,062       1,875                  
Payable for open swap contracts
    18,409       19,529       17,120       337,067      
Payable to affiliates:
                                   
Investment adviser fee
    27,153       25,757       22,945       29,991      
Interest expense and fees payable
    19,890       26,636       2,564       11,138      
Accrued expenses
    60,882       61,705       59,872       65,441      
 
 
Total liabilities
  $ 6,476,396     $ 11,470,502     $ 3,179,411     $ 5,437,324      
 
 
Auction preferred shares at liquidation value plus cumulative unpaid dividends
  $ 19,600,690     $ 13,250,311     $ 17,001,276     $ 21,726,900      
 
 
Net assets applicable to common shares
  $ 37,222,410     $ 34,328,017     $ 32,725,804     $ 40,256,332      
 
 
Sources of Net Assets
 
Common shares, $0.01 par value, unlimited number of shares authorized
  $ 25,830     $ 25,613     $ 25,260     $ 29,518      
Additional paid-in capital
    36,601,583       36,281,766       35,766,891       41,822,226      
Accumulated net realized loss
    (3,789,233 )     (4,626,283 )     (5,973,854 )     (2,811,329 )    
Accumulated undistributed net investment income
    260,539       255,427       213,520       390,713      
Net unrealized appreciation
    4,123,691       2,391,494       2,693,987       825,204      
 
 
Net assets applicable to common shares
  $ 37,222,410     $ 34,328,017     $ 32,725,804     $ 40,256,332      
 
 
Auction Preferred Shares Issued and
Outstanding (Liquidation preference of
$25,000 per share)
 
      784       530       680       869      
 
 
Common Shares Outstanding
 
      2,582,997       2,561,263       2,526,031       2,951,783      
 
 
Net Asset Value Per Common Share
 
Net assets applicable to common shares ¸ common shares issued and outstanding
  $ 14.41     $ 13.40     $ 12.96     $ 13.64      
 
 

 
See notes to financial statements

36


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds as of September 30, 2010
 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
 
Statements of Operations
 
                                     
For the Year Ended September 30, 2010   Municipal Fund II     California Fund II     Massachusetts Fund     Michigan Fund      
 
 
 
Investment Income
 
Interest
  $ 11,511,273     $ 4,198,491     $ 1,933,458     $ 1,723,999      
 
 
Total investment income
  $ 11,511,273     $ 4,198,491     $ 1,933,458     $ 1,723,999      
 
 
                                     
                                     
 
Expenses
 
Investment adviser fee
  $ 1,150,771     $ 441,839     $ 221,024     $ 191,164      
Trustees’ fees and expenses
    7,648       3,241       1,874       1,690      
Custodian fee
    102,413       43,113       28,069       24,523      
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees
    17,134       15,260       15,389       15,459      
Legal and accounting services
    52,935       39,233       32,808       29,562      
Printing and postage
    49,309       17,632       12,262       11,967      
Interest expense and fees
    460,286       76,318       21,546            
Preferred shares service fee
    67,127       38,595       20,385       20,010      
Miscellaneous
    51,391       52,588       30,082       28,659      
 
 
Total expenses
  $ 1,959,014     $ 727,819     $ 383,439     $ 323,034      
 
 
Deduct —
                                   
Reduction of custodian fee
  $ 1,004     $ 512     $ 210     $ 163      
Allocation of expenses to affiliate
    16,776       6,532       3,233       2,810      
 
 
Total expense reductions
  $ 17,780     $ 7,044     $ 3,443     $ 2,973      
 
 
                                     
Net expenses
  $ 1,941,234     $ 720,775     $ 379,996     $ 320,061      
 
 
                                     
Net investment income
  $ 9,570,039     $ 3,477,716     $ 1,553,462     $ 1,403,938      
 
 
                                     
                                     
 
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss)
 
Net realized gain (loss) —
                                   
Investment transactions
  $ 1,592,390     $ (384,429 )   $ 9,296     $ (144,708 )    
Extinguishment of debt
    (1,069 )                      
Financial futures contracts
    (1,898,401 )     (551,427 )           (150,916 )    
Swap contracts
    (1,254,374 )     (651,745 )     (307,580 )     (246,866 )    
 
 
Net realized loss
  $ (1,561,454 )   $ (1,587,601 )   $ (298,284 )   $ (542,490 )    
 
 
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) —
                                   
Investments
  $ (500,645 )   $ (376,176 )   $ 282,031     $ 131,797      
Financial futures contracts
    200,505       97,036             23,303      
Swap contracts
    269,245       192,592       80,030       62,329      
 
 
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
  $ (30,895 )   $ (86,548 )   $ 362,061     $ 217,429      
 
 
                                     
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
  $ (1,592,349 )   $ (1,674,149 )   $ 63,777     $ (325,061 )    
 
 
Distributions to preferred shareholders —
                                   
From net investment income
  $ (182,756 )   $ (103,957 )   $ (54,821 )   $ (54,182 )    
 
 
                                     
Net increase in net assets from operations
  $ 7,794,934     $ 1,699,610     $ 1,562,418     $ 1,024,695      
 
 

 
See notes to financial statements

37


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds as of September 30, 2010
 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
 
 
Statements of Operations
 
                                     
For the Year Ended September 30, 2010   New Jersey Fund     New York Fund II     Ohio Fund     Pennsylvania Fund      
 
 
 
Investment Income
 
Interest
  $ 2,980,756     $ 2,731,485     $ 2,523,056     $ 3,146,337      
 
 
Total investment income
  $ 2,980,756     $ 2,731,485     $ 2,523,056     $ 3,146,337      
 
 
                                     
                                     
 
Expenses
 
Investment adviser fee
  $ 320,719     $ 307,467     $ 272,968     $ 348,209      
Trustees’ fees and expenses
    2,488       2,410       2,200       2,650      
Custodian fee
    34,902       35,730       30,552       36,918      
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees
    15,834       15,350       15,200       21,671      
Legal and accounting services
    38,458       40,295       37,828       36,101      
Printing and postage
    17,875       18,922       17,492       20,841      
Interest expense and fees
    59,781       93,982       7,176       29,224      
Preferred shares service fee
    29,434       19,896       25,528       32,624      
Miscellaneous
    33,912       35,688       30,062       33,501      
 
 
Total expenses
  $ 553,403     $ 569,740     $ 439,006     $ 561,739      
 
 
Deduct —
                                   
Reduction of custodian fee
  $ 257     $ 508     $ 250     $ 523      
Allocation of expenses to affiliate
    4,638       4,503       4,002       5,052      
 
 
Total expense reductions
  $ 4,895     $ 5,011     $ 4,252     $ 5,575      
 
 
                                     
Net expenses
  $ 548,508     $ 564,729     $ 434,754     $ 556,164      
 
 
                                     
Net investment income
  $ 2,432,248     $ 2,166,756     $ 2,088,302     $ 2,590,173      
 
 
                                     
                                     
 
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss)
 
Net realized gain (loss) —
                                   
Investment transactions
  $ 231,700     $ (408,974 )   $ 162,250     $ (413,660 )    
Financial futures contracts
    (1,142,075 )     (564,170 )     (582,832 )          
Swap contracts
    (446,024 )     (641,722 )     (311,628 )     (461,765 )    
 
 
Net realized loss
  $ (1,356,399 )   $ (1,614,866 )   $ (732,210 )   $ (875,425 )    
 
 
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) —
                                   
Investments
  $ 710,900     $ 926,087     $ 442,621     $ 239,701      
Financial futures contracts
    10,437       78,521       62,454            
Swap contracts
    115,974       189,114       67,408       (162,902 )    
 
 
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
  $ 837,311     $ 1,193,722     $ 572,483     $ 76,799      
 
 
                                     
Net realized and unrealized loss
  $ (519,088 )   $ (421,144 )   $ (159,727 )   $ (798,626 )    
 
 
Distributions to preferred shareholders —
                                   
From net investment income
  $ (80,417 )   $ (54,269 )   $ (69,754 )   $ (87,380 )    
 
 
                                     
Net increase in net assets from operations
  $ 1,832,743     $ 1,691,343     $ 1,858,821     $ 1,704,167      
 
 

 
See notes to financial statements

38


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds as of September 30, 2010
 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
 
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
 
                                     
For the Year Ended September 30, 2010                            
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets   Municipal Fund II     California Fund II     Massachusetts Fund     Michigan Fund      
 
From operations —
                                   
Net investment income
  $ 9,570,039     $ 3,477,716     $ 1,553,462     $ 1,403,938      
Net realized loss from investment transactions, extinguishment of debt, financial futures contracts and swap contracts
    (1,561,454 )     (1,587,601 )     (298,284 )     (542,490 )    
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments, financial futures contracts and swap contracts
    (30,895 )     (86,548 )     362,061       217,429      
Distributions to preferred shareholders —
                                   
From net investment income
    (182,756 )     (103,957 )     (54,821 )     (54,182 )    
 
 
Net increase in net assets from operations
  $ 7,794,934     $ 1,699,610     $ 1,562,418     $ 1,024,695      
 
 
Distributions to common shareholders —
                                   
From net investment income
  $ (9,355,497 )   $ (3,320,673 )   $ (1,472,968 )   $ (1,321,557 )    
 
 
Total distributions to common shareholders
  $ (9,355,497 )   $ (3,320,673 )   $ (1,472,968 )   $ (1,321,557 )    
 
 
Capital share transactions —
                                   
Reinvestment of distributions to common shareholders
  $ 224,935     $ 69,999     $ 59,710     $ 5,554      
 
 
Net increase in net assets from capital share transactions
  $ 224,935     $ 69,999     $ 59,710     $ 5,554      
 
 
                                     
Net increase (decrease) in net assets
  $ (1,335,628 )   $ (1,551,064 )   $ 149,160     $ (291,308 )    
 
 
                                     
                                     
 
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares
 
At beginning of year
  $ 128,149,686     $ 50,080,383     $ 25,770,589     $ 22,276,102      
 
 
At end of year
  $ 126,814,058     $ 48,529,319     $ 25,919,749     $ 21,984,794      
 
 
                                     
                                     
 
Accumulated undistributed net investment
income included in net assets applicable to
common shares
 
At end of year
  $ 1,668,902     $ 387,428     $ 152,179     $ 163,357      
 
 

 
See notes to financial statements

39


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds as of September 30, 2010
 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
 
 
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
 
                                     
For the Year Ended September 30, 2010                            
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets   New Jersey Fund     New York Fund II     Ohio Fund     Pennsylvania Fund      
 
From operations —
                                   
Net investment income
  $ 2,432,248     $ 2,166,756     $ 2,088,302     $ 2,590,173      
Net realized loss from investment transactions, financial futures contracts and swap contracts
    (1,356,399 )     (1,614,866 )     (732,210 )     (875,425 )    
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments, financial futures contracts and swap contracts
    837,311       1,193,722       572,483       76,799      
Distributions to preferred shareholders —
                                   
From net investment income
    (80,417 )     (54,269 )     (69,754 )     (87,380 )    
 
 
Net increase in net assets from operations
  $ 1,832,743     $ 1,691,343     $ 1,858,821     $ 1,704,167      
 
 
Distributions to common shareholders —
                                   
From net investment income
  $ (2,359,324 )   $ (2,249,070 )   $ (1,922,367 )   $ (2,471,203 )    
 
 
Total distributions to common shareholders
  $ (2,359,324 )   $ (2,249,070 )   $ (1,922,367 )   $ (2,471,203 )    
 
 
Capital share transactions —
                                   
Reinvestment of distributions to common shareholders
  $ 120,969     $ 38,845     $ 79,243     $ 66,978      
 
 
Net increase in net assets from capital share transactions
  $ 120,969     $ 38,845     $ 79,243     $ 66,978      
 
 
                                     
Net increase (decrease) in net assets
  $ (405,612 )   $ (518,882 )   $ 15,697     $ (700,058 )    
 
 
                                     
                                     
 
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares
 
At beginning of year
  $ 37,628,022     $ 34,846,899     $ 32,710,107     $ 40,956,390      
 
 
At end of year
  $ 37,222,410     $ 34,328,017     $ 32,725,804     $ 40,256,332      
 
 
                                     
                                     
 
Accumulated undistributed net investment
income included in net assets applicable to
common shares
 
At end of year
  $ 260,539     $ 255,427     $ 213,520     $ 390,713      
 
 

 
See notes to financial statements

40


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds as of September 30, 2010
 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
 
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
 
                                     
For the Year Ended September 30, 2009                            
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets   Municipal Fund II     California Fund II     Massachusetts Fund     Michigan Fund      
 
From operations —
                                   
Net investment income
  $ 9,377,413     $ 3,390,514     $ 1,583,454     $ 1,399,076      
Net realized loss from investment transactions, financial futures contracts and swap contracts
    (10,730,783 )     (3,248,977 )     (1,136,806 )     (480,219 )    
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments, financial futures contracts and swap contracts
    28,703,972       9,442,700       5,497,042       3,670,791      
Distributions to preferred shareholders —
                                   
From net investment income
    (578,404 )     (325,864 )     (174,091 )     (170,213 )    
 
 
Net increase in net assets from operations
  $ 26,772,198     $ 9,258,373     $ 5,769,599     $ 4,419,435      
 
 
Distributions to common shareholders —
                                   
From net investment income
  $ (8,437,461 )   $ (2,954,634 )   $ (1,332,810 )   $ (1,152,527 )    
 
 
Total distributions to common shareholders
  $ (8,437,461 )   $ (2,954,634 )   $ (1,332,810 )   $ (1,152,527 )    
 
 
Capital share transactions —
                                   
Reinvestment of distributions to common shareholders
  $ 167,262     $ 58,277     $ 22,988     $ 1,776      
 
 
Net increase in net assets from capital share transactions
  $ 167,262     $ 58,277     $ 22,988     $ 1,776      
 
 
                                     
Net increase in net assets
  $ 18,501,999     $ 6,362,016     $ 4,459,777     $ 3,268,684      
 
 
                                     
                                     
 
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares
 
At beginning of year
  $ 109,647,687     $ 43,718,367     $ 21,310,812     $ 19,007,418      
 
 
At end of year
  $ 128,149,686     $ 50,080,383     $ 25,770,589     $ 22,276,102      
 
 
                                     
                                     
 
Accumulated undistributed net investment
income included in net assets applicable to
common shares
 
At end of year
  $ 1,538,609     $ 332,866     $ 119,966     $ 148,304      
 
 

 
See notes to financial statements

41


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds as of September 30, 2010
 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
 
 
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
 
                                     
For the Year Ended September 30, 2009                            
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets   New Jersey Fund     New York Fund II     Ohio Fund     Pennsylvania Fund      
 
From operations —
                                   
Net investment income
  $ 2,382,638     $ 2,191,347     $ 2,130,212     $ 2,618,797      
Net realized loss from investment transactions, financial futures contracts and swap contracts
    (2,484,603 )     (2,557,907 )     (4,193,790 )     (1,622,894 )    
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments, financial futures contracts and swap contracts
    9,526,226       7,911,044       8,199,680       7,883,733      
Distributions to preferred shareholders —
                                   
From net investment income
    (227,579 )     (168,414 )     (254,584 )     (210,410 )    
From net realized gain
    (40,658 )                 (132,368 )    
 
 
Net increase in net assets from operations
  $ 9,156,024     $ 7,376,070     $ 5,881,518     $ 8,536,858      
 
 
Distributions to common shareholders —
                                   
From net investment income
  $ (2,106,960 )   $ (2,014,492 )   $ (1,729,034 )   $ (2,217,812 )    
From net realized gain
    (264,989 )                 (803,880 )    
 
 
Total distributions to common shareholders
  $ (2,371,949 )   $ (2,014,492 )   $ (1,729,034 )   $ (3,021,692 )    
 
 
Capital share transactions —
                                   
Reinvestment of distributions to common shareholders
  $ 68,403     $ 26,563     $ 63,002     $ 28,342      
 
 
Net increase in net assets from capital share transactions
  $ 68,403     $ 26,563     $ 63,002     $ 28,342      
 
 
                                     
Net increase in net assets
  $ 6,852,478     $ 5,388,141     $ 4,215,486     $ 5,543,508      
 
 
                                     
                                     
 
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares
 
At beginning of year
  $ 30,775,544     $ 29,458,758     $ 28,494,621     $ 35,412,882      
 
 
At end of year
  $ 37,628,022     $ 34,846,899     $ 32,710,107     $ 40,956,390      
 
 
                                     
                                     
 
Accumulated undistributed net investment
income included in net assets applicable to
common shares
 
At end of year
  $ 288,817     $ 366,357     $ 163,581     $ 397,113      
 
 

 
See notes to financial statements

42


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds as of September 30, 2010
 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
 
Statements of Cash Flows
 
                                     
For the Year Ended September 30, 2010                            
Cash Flows From Operating Activities   Municipal Fund II     California Fund II     New Jersey Fund     New York Fund II      
 
Net increase in net assets from operations
  $ 7,794,934     $ 1,699,610     $ 1,832,743     $ 1,691,343      
Distributions to preferred shareholders
    182,756       103,957       80,417       54,269      
 
 
Net increase in net assets from operations excluding distributions to preferred shareholders
  $ 7,977,690     $ 1,803,567     $ 1,913,160     $ 1,745,612      
Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets from operations to net cash provided by operating activities:
                                   
Investments purchased
    (29,661,886 )     (13,659,660 )     (5,191,114 )     (7,260,216 )    
Investments sold
    39,454,968       17,677,330       8,819,336       9,734,678      
Net accretion/amortization of premium (discount)
    (1,939,891 )     (950,032 )     (683,712 )     (279,826 )    
Amortization of deferred debt issuance costs
    22,210       2,605       489       9,526      
Decrease (increase) in interest receivable
    (83,053 )     16,201       54,128       55,579      
Increase in receivable for investments sold
    (6,565,136 )     (2,755,497 )     (372,099 )          
Decrease in receivable for variation margin on open financial futures contracts
    25,360       10,750             7,500      
Increase in receivable from the transfer agent
    (17,808 )     (6,256 )     (10,529 )     (3,497 )    
Decrease in payable for investments purchased
                (1,356,300 )          
Increase in payable for variation margin on open financial futures contracts
          1,125       4,062       1,875      
Decrease in payable for open swap contracts
    (269,245 )     (192,592 )     (115,974 )     (189,114 )    
Increase in payable to affiliate for investment adviser fee
    13,757       3,746       3,346       3,116      
Decrease in interest expense and fees payable
    (21,940 )     (2,973 )     (1,887 )     (2,344 )    
Increase in accrued expenses
    29,909       13,014       4,092       5,934      
Net change in unrealized (appreciation) depreciation from investments
    500,645       376,176       (710,900 )     (926,087 )    
Net realized (gain) loss from investments
    (1,592,390 )     384,429       (231,700 )     408,974      
Net realized loss on extinguishment of debt
    1,069                        
 
 
Net cash provided by operating activities
  $ 7,874,259     $ 2,721,933     $ 2,124,398     $ 3,311,710      
 
 
                                     
                                     
 
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
 
Distributions paid to common shareholders, net of reinvestments
  $ (9,130,562 )   $ (3,250,674 )   $ (2,238,355 )   $ (2,210,225 )    
Cash distributions paid to preferred shareholders
    (184,263 )     (106,429 )     (80,282 )     (54,140 )    
Proceeds from secured borrowings
    2,430,000       795,000                  
Repayment of secured borrowings
    (735,000 )                      
Decrease in due to custodian
    (254,434 )                 (111,967 )    
 
 
Net cash used in financing activities
  $ (7,874,259 )   $ (2,562,103 )   $ (2,318,637 )   $ (2,376,332 )    
 
 
                                     
Net increase (decrease) in cash
  $     $ 159,830     $ (194,239 )   $ 935,378      
 
 
                                     
Cash at beginning of year
  $     $ 195,500     $ 223,074     $      
 
 
                                     
Cash at end of year
  $     $ 355,330     $ 28,835     $ 935,378      
 
 
                                     
                                     
 
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow
information:
 
Noncash financing activities not included herein consist of:
                                   
Reinvestment of dividends and distributions
  $ 224,935     $ 69,999     $ 120,969     $ 38,845      
Cash paid for interest and fees
    460,015       76,686       61,179       86,800      
 
 

 
See notes to financial statements

43


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds as of September 30, 2010
 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
 
 
Financial Highlights
 
Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated
                                             
    Municipal Fund II
   
    Year Ended September 30,
   
    2010     2009     2008     2007     2006      
 
Net asset value — Beginning of year (Common shares)
  $ 12.880     $ 11.030     $ 15.470     $ 15.860     $ 15.310      
 
 
                                             
                                             
 
Income (Loss) From Operations
 
Net investment income(1)
  $ 0.961     $ 0.943     $ 1.037     $ 1.048     $ 1.058      
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
    (0.164 )     1.813       (4.159 )     (0.383 )     0.605      
Distributions to preferred shareholders
                                           
From net investment income
    (0.018 )     (0.058 )     (0.168 )     (0.303 )     (0.265 )    
From net realized gain
                (0.117 )                
 
 
Total income (loss) from operations
  $ 0.779     $ 2.698     $ (3.407 )   $ 0.362     $ 1.398      
 
 
                                             
                                             
 
Less Distributions to Common Shareholders
 
From net investment income
  $ (0.939 )   $ (0.848 )   $ (0.747 )   $ (0.752 )   $ (0.848 )    
From net realized gain
                (0.286 )                
 
 
Total distributions to common shareholders
  $ (0.939 )   $ (0.848 )   $ (1.033 )   $ (0.752 )   $ (0.848 )    
 
 
                                             
Net asset value — End of year (Common shares)
  $ 12.720     $ 12.880     $ 11.030     $ 15.470     $ 15.860      
 
 
                                             
Market value — End of year (Common shares)
  $ 14.010     $ 13.370     $ 11.650     $ 14.550     $ 15.310      
 
 
                                             
Total Investment Return on Net Asset Value(2)
    6.26 %     26.08 %     (23.08 )%     2.43 %(3)     9.56 %    
 
 
                                             
Total Investment Return on Market Value(2)
    12.78 %     23.88 %     (13.61 )%     (0.20 )%(3)     0.13 %    
 
 

 
See notes to financial statements

44


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds as of September 30, 2010
 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
 
Financial Highlights
 
Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated
                                             
    Municipal Fund II
   
    Year Ended September 30,
   
    2010     2009     2008     2007     2006      
 
 
 
Ratios/Supplemental Data
 
Net assets applicable to common shares, end of year (000’s omitted)
  $ 126,814     $ 128,150     $ 109,648     $ 153,612     $ 157,463      
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets applicable to common shares):(4)
                                           
Expenses excluding interest and fees
    1.22 %     1.28 %     1.09 %     1.00 %(5)     1.02 %    
Interest and fee expense(6)
    0.38 %     0.87 %     0.93 %     0.99 %     0.91 %    
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction
    1.60 %     2.15 %     2.02 %     1.99 %(5)     1.93 %    
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees
    1.22 %     1.27 %     1.05 %     0.99 %(5)     1.01 %    
Net investment income
    7.86 %     9.05 %     7.40 %     6.62 %     6.87 %    
Portfolio Turnover
    13 %     22 %     54 %     31 %     26 %    
 
 
The ratios reported above are based on net assets applicable to common shares. The ratios based on net assets, including amounts related to preferred shares, are as follows:
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets applicable to common shares and preferred shares):(4)
                                           
Expenses excluding interest and fees
    0.89 %     0.89 %     0.69 %     0.64 %(5)     0.65 %    
Interest and fee expense(6)
    0.28 %     0.61 %     0.60 %     0.64 %     0.58 %    
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction
    1.17 %     1.50 %     1.29 %     1.28 %(5)     1.23 %    
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees
    0.89 %     0.89 %     0.67 %     0.63 %(5)     0.64 %    
Net investment income
    5.75 %     6.32 %     4.73 %     4.25 %     4.37 %    
 
 
Senior Securities:
                                           
Total preferred shares outstanding
    1,788       1,788       1,788       3,500       3,500      
Asset coverage per preferred share(7)
  $ 95,926     $ 96,674     $ 86,356     $ 68,894     $ 69,992      
Involuntary liquidation preference per preferred share(8)
  $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000      
Approximate market value per preferred share(8)
  $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000      
 
 
 
(1) Computed using average common shares outstanding.
 
(2) Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market value with all distributions reinvested.
 
(3) During the year ended September 30, 2007, the investment adviser fully reimbursed the Fund for a realized loss on the disposal of an investment security which did not meet investment guidelines. The loss had no effect on total return.
 
(4) Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to preferred shareholders.
 
(5) The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended September 30, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower.
 
(6) Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1H).
 
(7) Calculated by subtracting the Fund’s total liabilities (not including the preferred shares) from the Fund’s total assets, and dividing the result by the number of preferred shares outstanding.
 
(8) Plus accumulated and unpaid dividends.

 
See notes to financial statements

45


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds as of September 30, 2010
 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
 
 
Financial Highlights
 
Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated
 
                                             
    California Fund II
   
    Year Ended September 30,
   
    2010     2009     2008     2007     2006      
 
Net asset value — Beginning of year (Common shares)
  $ 12.940     $ 11.310     $ 15.020     $ 15.330     $ 14.810      
 
 
                                             
                                             
 
Income (Loss) From Operations
 
Net investment income(1)
  $ 0.898     $ 0.877     $ 0.983     $ 0.981     $ 0.989      
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
    (0.433 )     1.601       (3.583 )     (0.301 )     0.547      
Distributions to preferred shareholders
                                           
From net investment income
    (0.027 )     (0.084 )     (0.233 )     (0.282 )     (0.243 )    
From net realized gain
                (0.053 )                
 
 
Total income (loss) from operations
  $ 0.438     $ 2.394     $ (2.886 )   $ 0.398     $ 1.293      
 
 
                                             
                                             
 
Less Distributions to Common Shareholders
 
From net investment income
  $ (0.858 )   $ (0.764 )   $ (0.693 )   $ (0.708 )   $ (0.773 )    
From net realized gain
                (0.131 )                
 
 
Total distributions to common shareholders
  $ (0.858 )   $ (0.764 )   $ (0.824 )   $ (0.708 )   $ (0.773 )    
 
 
                                             
Net asset value — End of year (Common shares)
  $ 12.520     $ 12.940     $ 11.310     $ 15.020     $ 15.330      
 
 
                                             
Market value — End of year (Common shares)
  $ 13.250     $ 12.500     $ 10.250     $ 14.250     $ 14.635      
 
 
                                             
Total Investment Return on Net Asset Value(2)
    3.93 %     23.06 %     (19.81 )%     2.75 %     9.15 %    
 
 
                                             
Total Investment Return on Market Value(2)
    13.86 %     31.17 %     (23.40 )%     2.11 %     4.49 %    
 
 

 
See notes to financial statements

46


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds as of September 30, 2010
 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
 
Financial Highlights
 
Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated
 
                                             
    California Fund II
   
    Year Ended September 30,
   
    2010     2009     2008     2007     2006      
 
 
 
Ratios/Supplemental Data
 
Net assets applicable to common shares, end of year (000’s omitted)
  $ 48,529     $ 50,080     $ 43,718     $ 58,010     $ 59,199      
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets applicable to common shares):(3)
                                           
Expenses excluding interest and fees
    1.39 %     1.51 %     1.23 %     1.11 %(4)     1.13 %    
Interest and fee expense(5)
    0.16 %     0.37 %     0.42 %     0.50 %     0.48 %    
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction
    1.55 %     1.88 %     1.65 %     1.61 %(4)     1.61 %    
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees
    1.38 %     1.50 %     1.19 %     1.09 %(4)     1.11 %    
Net investment income
    7.47 %     8.23 %     7.11 %     6.42 %     6.66 %    
Portfolio Turnover
    17 %     17 %     22 %     37 %     13 %    
 
 
The ratios reported above are based on net assets applicable to common shares. The ratios based on net assets, including amounts related to preferred shares, are as follows:
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets applicable to common shares and preferred shares):(3)
                                           
Expenses excluding interest and fees
    0.89 %     0.93 %     0.76 %     0.71 %(4)     0.71 %    
Interest and fee expense(5)
    0.11 %     0.23 %     0.26 %     0.32 %     0.30 %    
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction
    1.00 %     1.16 %     1.02 %     1.03 %(4)     1.01 %    
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees
    0.89 %     0.93 %     0.74 %     0.69 %(4)     0.70 %    
Net investment income
    4.81 %     5.07 %     4.42 %     4.09 %     4.19 %    
 
 
Senior Securities:
                                           
Total preferred shares outstanding
    1,028       1,028       1,028       1,350       1,350      
Asset coverage per preferred share(6)
  $ 72,208     $ 73,719     $ 67,578     $ 67,980     $ 68,858      
Involuntary liquidation preference per preferred share(7)
  $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000      
Approximate market value per preferred share(7)
  $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000      
 
 
 
(1) Computed using average common shares outstanding.
 
(2) Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market value with all distributions reinvested.
 
(3) Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to preferred shareholders.
 
(4) The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended September 30, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower.
 
(5) Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1H).
 
(6) Calculated by subtracting the Fund’s total liabilities (not including the preferred shares) from the Fund’s total assets, and dividing the result by the number of preferred shares outstanding.
 
(7) Plus accumulated and unpaid dividends.

 
See notes to financial statements

47


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds as of September 30, 2010
 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
 
 
Financial Highlights
 
Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated
 
                                             
    Massachusetts Fund
   
    Year Ended September 30,
   
    2010     2009     2008     2007     2006      
 
Net asset value — Beginning of year (Common shares)
  $ 14.660     $ 12.130     $ 15.090     $ 15.640     $ 15.100      
 
 
                                             
                                             
 
Income (Loss) From Operations
 
Net investment income(1)
  $ 0.882     $ 0.901     $ 0.981     $ 0.969     $ 0.983      
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
    0.036       2.486       (2.981 )     (0.540 )     0.613      
Distributions to preferred shareholders
                                           
From net investment income
    (0.031 )     (0.099 )     (0.289 )     (0.293 )     (0.256 )    
 
 
Total income (loss) from operations
  $ 0.887     $ 3.288     $ (2.289 )   $ 0.136     $ 1.340      
 
 
                                             
                                             
 
Less Distributions to Common Shareholders
 
From net investment income
  $ (0.837 )   $ (0.758 )   $ (0.671 )   $ (0.686 )   $ (0.800 )    
 
 
Total distributions to common shareholders
  $ (0.837 )   $ (0.758 )   $ (0.671 )   $ (0.686 )   $ (0.800 )    
 
 
                                             
Net asset value — End of year (Common shares)
  $ 14.710     $ 14.660     $ 12.130     $ 15.090     $ 15.640      
 
 
                                             
Market value — End of year (Common shares)
  $ 15.160     $ 15.250     $ 13.780     $ 14.820     $ 16.090      
 
 
                                             
Total Investment Return on Net Asset Value(2)
    6.43 %     28.42 %     (15.70 )%     0.88 %(3)     9.14 %    
 
 
                                             
Total Investment Return on Market Value(2)
    5.44 %     17.59 %     (2.46 )%     (3.72 )%(3)     (2.28 )%    
 
 

 
See notes to financial statements

48


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds as of September 30, 2010
 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
 
Financial Highlights
 
Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated
 
                                             
    Massachusetts Fund
   
    Year Ended September 30,
   
    2010     2009     2008     2007     2006      
 
 
 
Ratios/Supplemental Data
 
Net assets applicable to common shares, end of year (000’s omitted)
  $ 25,920     $ 25,771     $ 21,311     $ 26,476     $ 27,419      
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets applicable to common shares):(4)
                                           
Expenses excluding interest and fees
    1.45 %     1.69 %     1.41 %     1.25 %(5)     1.29 %    
Interest and fee expense(6)
    0.09 %     0.23 %     0.71 %     0.98 %     1.54 %    
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction
    1.54 %     1.92 %     2.12 %     2.23 %(5)     2.83 %    
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees
    1.45 %     1.68 %     1.38 %     1.25 %(5)     1.26 %    
Net investment income
    6.29 %     7.41 %     6.83 %     6.27 %     6.50 %    
Portfolio Turnover
    27 %     43 %     12 %     15 %     15 %    
 
 
The ratios reported above are based on net assets applicable to common shares. The ratios based on net assets, including amounts related to preferred shares, are as follows:
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets applicable to common shares and preferred shares):(4)
                                           
Expenses excluding interest and fees
    0.94 %     1.03 %     0.88 %     0.81 %(5)     0.81 %    
Interest and fee expense(6)
    0.05 %     0.14 %     0.45 %     0.62 %     0.97 %    
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction
    0.99 %     1.17 %     1.33 %     1.43 %(5)     1.78 %    
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees
    0.94 %     1.03 %     0.87 %     0.80 %(5)     0.80 %    
Net investment income
    4.06 %     4.53 %     4.27 %     3.99 %     4.10 %    
 
 
Senior Securities:
                                           
Total preferred shares outstanding
    543       543       543       620       620      
Asset coverage per preferred share(7)
  $ 72,737     $ 72,462     $ 64,287     $ 67,711     $ 69,229      
Involuntary liquidation preference per preferred share(8)
  $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000      
Approximate market value per preferred share(8)
  $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000      
 
 
 
(1) Computed using average common shares outstanding.
 
(2) Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market value with all distributions reinvested.
 
(3) During the year ended September 30, 2007, the Fund realized a gain on the disposal of an investment security which did not meet investment guidelines. The gain was less than $0.01 per share and had no effect on total return.
 
(4) Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to preferred shareholders.
 
(5) The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended September 30, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower.
 
(6) Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1H).
 
(7) Calculated by subtracting the Fund’s total liabilities (not including the preferred shares) from the Fund’s total assets, and dividing the result by the number of preferred shares outstanding.
 
(8) Plus accumulated and unpaid dividends.

 
See notes to financial statements

49


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds as of September 30, 2010
 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
 
 
Financial Highlights
 
Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated
 
                                             
    Michigan Fund
   
    Year Ended September 30,
   
    2010     2009     2008     2007     2006      
 
Net asset value — Beginning of year (Common shares)
  $ 14.730     $ 12.570     $ 15.150     $ 15.430     $ 15.000      
 
 
                                             
                                             
 
Income (Loss) From Operations
 
Net investment income(1)
  $ 0.928     $ 0.925     $ 0.975     $ 0.985     $ 0.991      
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
    (0.208 )     2.110       (2.590 )     (0.309 )     0.462      
Distributions to preferred shareholders
                                           
From net investment income
    (0.036 )     (0.113 )     (0.295 )     (0.288 )     (0.252 )    
 
 
Total income (loss) from operations
  $ 0.684     $ 2.922     $ (1.910 )   $ 0.388     $ 1.201      
 
 
                                             
                                             
 
Less Distributions to Common Shareholders
 
From net investment income
  $ (0.874 )   $ (0.762 )   $ (0.670 )   $ (0.668 )   $ (0.771 )    
 
 
Total distributions to common shareholders
  $ (0.874 )   $ (0.762 )   $ (0.670 )   $ (0.668 )   $ (0.771 )    
 
 
                                             
Net asset value — End of year (Common shares)
  $ 14.540     $ 14.730     $ 12.570     $ 15.150     $ 15.430      
 
 
                                             
Market value — End of year (Common shares)
  $ 14.430     $ 13.900     $ 10.400     $ 14.030     $ 14.190      
 
 
                                             
Total Investment Return on Net Asset Value(2)
    5.16 %     25.29 %     (12.66 )%(3)     2.81 %     8.44 %    
 
 
                                             
Total Investment Return on Market Value(2)
    10.60 %     42.90 %     (21.97 )%(3)     3.53 %     (7.67 )%    
 
 

 
See notes to financial statements

50


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds as of September 30, 2010
 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
 
Financial Highlights
 
Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated
 
                                             
    Michigan Fund
   
    Year Ended September 30,
   
    2010     2009     2008     2007     2006      
 
 
 
Ratios/Supplemental Data
 
Net assets applicable to common shares, end of year (000’s omitted)
  $ 21,985     $ 22,276     $ 19,007     $ 22,912     $ 23,335      
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets applicable to common shares):(4)
                                           
Expenses excluding interest and fees
    1.49 %     1.70 %     1.49 %     1.29 %(5)     1.32 %    
Interest and fee expense(6)
                0.54 %     0.98 %     0.90 %    
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction
    1.49 %     1.70 %     2.03 %     2.27 %(5)     2.22 %    
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees
    1.49 %     1.69 %     1.48 %     1.27 %(5)     1.30 %    
Net investment income
    6.55 %     7.30 %     6.72 %     6.43 %     6.62 %    
Portfolio Turnover
    2 %     9 %     11 %     6 %     6 %    
 
 
The ratios reported above are based on net assets applicable to common shares. The ratios based on net assets, including amounts related to preferred shares, are as follows:
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets applicable to common shares and preferred shares):(4)
                                           
Expenses excluding interest and fees
    0.92 %     1.00 %     0.93 %     0.81 %(5)     0.83 %    
Interest and fee expense(6)
                0.33 %     0.62 %     0.56 %    
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction
    0.92 %     1.00 %     1.26 %     1.43 %(5)     1.39 %    
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees
    0.92 %     1.00 %     0.92 %     0.80 %(5)     0.82 %    
Net investment income
    4.04 %     4.30 %     4.16 %     4.06 %     4.15 %    
 
 
Senior Securities:
                                           
Total preferred shares outstanding
    533       533       540       540       540      
Asset coverage per preferred share(7)
  $ 66,248     $ 66,794     $ 60,199     $ 67,442     $ 68,222      
Involuntary liquidation preference per preferred share(8)
  $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000      
Approximate market value per preferred share(8)
  $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000      
 
 
 
(1) Computed using average common shares outstanding.
 
(2) Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market value with all distributions reinvested.
 
(3) During the year ended September 30, 2008, the investment adviser fully reimbursed the Fund for a realized loss on the disposal of an investment security which did not meet investment guidelines. The loss had no effect on total return.
 
(4) Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to preferred shareholders.
 
(5) The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended September 30, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower.
 
(6) Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1H).
 
(7) Calculated by subtracting the Fund’s total liabilities (not including the preferred shares) from the Fund’s total assets, and dividing the result by the number of preferred shares outstanding.
 
(8) Plus accumulated and unpaid dividends.

 
See notes to financial statements

51


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds as of September 30, 2010
 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
 
 
Financial Highlights
 
Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated
 
                                             
    New Jersey Fund
   
    Year Ended September 30,
   
    2010     2009     2008     2007     2006      
 
Net asset value — Beginning of year (Common shares)
  $ 14.620     $ 11.980     $ 15.690     $ 15.840     $ 15.240      
 
 
                                             
                                             
 
Income (Loss) From Operations
 
Net investment income(1)
  $ 0.943     $ 0.926     $ 0.982     $ 0.996     $ 1.002      
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
    (0.207 )     2.740       (3.393 )     (0.150 )     0.671      
Distributions to preferred shareholders
                                           
From net investment income
    (0.031 )     (0.088 )     (0.196 )     (0.286 )     (0.253 )    
From net realized gain
          (0.016 )     (0.114 )                
 
 
Total income (loss) from operations
  $ 0.705     $ 3.562     $ (2.721 )   $ 0.560     $ 1.420      
 
 
                                             
                                             
 
Less Distributions to Common Shareholders
 
From net investment income
  $ (0.915 )   $ (0.819 )   $ (0.706 )   $ (0.710 )   $ (0.820 )    
From net realized gain
          (0.103 )     (0.283 )                
 
 
Total distributions to common shareholders
  $ (0.915 )   $ (0.922 )   $ (0.989 )   $ (0.710 )   $ (0.820 )    
 
 
                                             
Net asset value — End of year (Common shares)
  $ 14.410     $ 14.620     $ 11.980     $ 15.690     $ 15.840      
 
 
                                             
Market value — End of year (Common shares)
  $ 15.350     $ 14.730     $ 11.880     $ 14.790     $ 16.400      
 
 
                                             
Total Investment Return on Net Asset Value(2)
    5.10 %     31.84 %     (18.15 )%     3.64 %     9.65 %    
 
 
                                             
Total Investment Return on Market Value(2)
    11.12 %     33.95 %     (13.88 )%     (5.66 )%     6.53 %    
 
 

 
See notes to financial statements

52


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds as of September 30, 2010
 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
 
Financial Highlights
 
Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated
 
                                             
    New Jersey Fund
   
    Year Ended September 30,
   
    2010     2009     2008     2007     2006      
 
 
 
Ratios/Supplemental Data
 
Net assets applicable to common shares, end of year (000’s omitted)
  $ 37,222     $ 37,628     $ 30,776     $ 40,262     $ 40,620      
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets applicable to common shares):(3)
                                           
Expenses excluding interest and fees
    1.36 %     1.53 %     1.33 %     1.14 %(4)     1.19 %    
Interest and fee expense(5)
    0.17 %     0.46 %     1.16 %     0.92 %     0.86 %    
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction
    1.53 %     1.99 %     2.49 %     2.06 %(4)     2.05 %    
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees
    1.36 %     1.52 %     1.28 %     1.11 %(4)     1.16 %    
Net investment income
    6.79 %     7.81 %     6.72 %     6.29 %     6.59 %    
Portfolio Turnover
    8 %     39 %     48 %     27 %     22 %    
 
 
The ratios reported above are based on net assets applicable to common shares. The ratios based on net assets, including amounts related to preferred shares, are as follows:
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets applicable to common shares and preferred shares):(3)
                                           
Expenses excluding interest and fees
    0.88 %     0.93 %     0.84 %     0.73 %(4)     0.75 %    
Interest and fee expense(5)
    0.11 %     0.28 %     0.73 %     0.59 %     0.55 %    
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction
    0.99 %     1.21 %     1.57 %     1.32 %(4)     1.30 %    
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees
    0.88 %     0.92 %     0.81 %     0.72 %(4)     0.73 %    
Net investment income
    4.39 %     4.75 %     4.24 %     4.05 %     4.18 %    
 
 
Senior Securities:
                                           
Total preferred shares outstanding
    784       784       812       900       900      
Asset coverage per preferred share(6)
  $ 72,478     $ 72,996     $ 62,907     $ 69,751     $ 70,144      
Involuntary liquidation preference per preferred share(7)
  $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000      
Approximate market value per preferred share(7)
  $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000      
 
 
 
(1) Computed using average common shares outstanding.
 
(2) Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market value with all distributions reinvested.
 
(3) Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to preferred shareholders.
 
(4) The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended September 30, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower.
 
(5) Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1H).
 
(6) Calculated by subtracting the Fund’s total liabilities (not including the preferred shares) from the Fund’s total assets, and dividing the result by the number of preferred shares outstanding.
 
(7) Plus accumulated and unpaid dividends.

 
See notes to financial statements

53


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds as of September 30, 2010
 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
 
 
Financial Highlights
 
Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated
 
                                             
    New York Fund II
   
    Year Ended September 30,
   
    2010     2009     2008     2007     2006      
 
Net asset value — Beginning of year (Common shares)
  $ 13.620     $ 11.530     $ 15.240     $ 15.760     $ 15.300      
 
 
                                             
                                             
 
Income (Loss) From Operations
 
Net investment income(1)
  $ 0.847     $ 0.857     $ 0.938     $ 0.969     $ 0.990      
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
    (0.167 )     2.087       (3.483 )     (0.256 )     0.542      
Distributions to preferred shareholders
                                           
From net investment income
    (0.021 )     (0.066 )     (0.237 )     (0.209 )     (0.240 )    
From net realized gain
                (0.049 )     (0.079 )     (0.015 )    
 
 
Total income (loss) from operations
  $ 0.659     $ 2.878     $ (2.831 )   $ 0.425     $ 1.277      
 
 
                                             
                                             
 
Less Distributions to Common Shareholders
 
From net investment income
  $ (0.879 )   $ (0.788 )   $ (0.699 )   $ (0.697 )   $ (0.732 )    
From net realized gain
                (0.180 )     (0.248 )     (0.085 )    
 
 
Total distributions to common shareholders
  $ (0.879 )   $ (0.788 )   $ (0.879 )   $ (0.945 )   $ (0.817 )    
 
 
                                             
Net asset value — End of year (Common shares)
  $ 13.400     $ 13.620     $ 11.530     $ 15.240     $ 15.760      
 
 
                                             
Market value — End of year (Common shares)
  $ 14.000     $ 13.610     $ 10.580     $ 14.440     $ 14.420      
 
 
                                             
Total Investment Return on Net Asset Value(2)
    5.20 %     26.71 %     (19.25 )%     3.00 %     9.02 %    
 
 
                                             
Total Investment Return on Market Value(2)
    9.99 %     37.98 %     (21.80 )%     6.66 %     4.75 %    
 
 

 
See notes to financial statements

54


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds as of September 30, 2010
 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
 
Financial Highlights
 
Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated
 
                                             
    New York Fund II
   
    Year Ended September 30,
   
    2010     2009     2008     2007     2006      
 
 
 
Ratios/Supplemental Data
 
Net assets applicable to common shares, end of year (000’s omitted)
  $ 34,328     $ 34,847     $ 29,459     $ 38,947     $ 40,263      
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets applicable to common shares):(3)
                                           
Expenses excluding interest and fees
    1.41 %     1.51 %     1.33 %     1.16 %(4)     1.14 %    
Interest and fee expense(5)
    0.28 %     0.63 %     0.46 %     0.46 %     0.42 %    
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction
    1.69 %     2.14 %     1.79 %     1.62 %(4)     1.56 %    
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees
    1.41 %     1.50 %     1.28 %     1.14 %(4)     1.11 %    
Net investment income
    6.49 %     7.67 %     6.67 %     6.24 %     6.48 %    
Portfolio Turnover
    13 %     30 %     44 %     38 %     26 %    
 
 
The ratios reported above are based on net assets applicable to common shares. The ratios based on net assets, including amounts related to preferred shares, are as follows:
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets applicable to common shares and preferred shares):(3)
                                           
Expenses excluding interest and fees
    1.01 %     1.03 %     0.83 %     0.74 %(4)     0.72 %    
Interest and fee expense(5)
    0.20 %     0.43 %     0.29 %     0.29 %     0.27 %    
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction
    1.21 %     1.46 %     1.12 %     1.03 %(4)     0.99 %    
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees
    1.01 %     1.02 %     0.80 %     0.73 %(4)     0.71 %    
Net investment income
    4.65 %     5.24 %     4.17 %     3.98 %     4.11 %    
 
 
Senior Securities:
                                           
Total preferred shares outstanding
    530       530       530       900       900      
Asset coverage per preferred share(6)
  $ 89,770     $ 90,749     $ 80,583     $ 68,285     $ 69,746      
Involuntary liquidation preference per preferred share(7)
  $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000      
Approximate market value per preferred share(7)
  $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000      
 
 
 
(1) Computed using average common shares outstanding.
 
(2) Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market value with all distributions reinvested.
 
(3) Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to preferred shareholders.
 
(4) The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended September 30, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower.
 
(5) Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1H).
 
(6) Calculated by subtracting the Fund’s total liabilities (not including the preferred shares) from the Fund’s total assets, and dividing the result by the number of preferred shares outstanding.
 
(7) Plus accumulated and unpaid dividends.

 
See notes to financial statements

55


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds as of September 30, 2010
 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
 
 
Financial Highlights
 
Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated
 
                                             
    Ohio Fund
   
    Year Ended September 30,
   
    2010     2009     2008     2007     2006      
 
Net asset value — Beginning of year (Common shares)
  $ 12.980     $ 11.330     $ 14.970     $ 15.330     $ 14.830      
 
 
                                             
                                             
 
Income (Loss) From Operations
 
Net investment income(1)
  $ 0.828     $ 0.846     $ 0.948     $ 0.966     $ 0.978      
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
    (0.058 )     1.592       (3.665 )     (0.361 )     0.497      
Distributions to preferred shareholders
                                           
From net investment income
    (0.028 )     (0.101 )     (0.298 )     (0.301 )     (0.263 )    
 
 
Total income (loss) from operations
  $ 0.742     $ 2.337     $ (3.015 )   $ 0.304     $ 1.212      
 
 
                                             
                                             
 
Less Distributions to Common Shareholders
 
From net investment income
  $ (0.762 )   $ (0.687 )   $ (0.625 )   $ (0.664 )   $ (0.712 )    
 
 
Total distributions to common shareholders
  $ (0.762 )   $ (0.687 )   $ (0.625 )   $ (0.664 )   $ (0.712 )    
 
 
                                             
Net asset value — End of year (Common shares)
  $ 12.960     $ 12.980     $ 11.330     $ 14.970     $ 15.330      
 
 
                                             
Market value — End of year (Common shares)
  $ 14.100     $ 13.250     $ 11.250     $ 13.710     $ 14.600      
 
 
                                             
Total Investment Return on Net Asset Value(2)
    6.04 %     22.05 %     (20.51 )%     2.17 %     8.58 %    
 
 
                                             
Total Investment Return on Market Value(2)
    13.01 %     25.48 %     (13.81 )%     (1.75 )%     5.69 %    
 
 

 
See notes to financial statements

56


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds as of September 30, 2010
 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
 
Financial Highlights
 
Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated
 
                                             
    Ohio Fund
   
    Year Ended September 30,
   
    2010     2009     2008     2007     2006      
 
 
 
Ratios/Supplemental Data
 
Net assets applicable to common shares, end of year (000’s omitted)
  $ 32,726     $ 32,710     $ 28,495     $ 37,617     $ 38,532      
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets applicable to common shares):(3)
                                           
Expenses excluding interest and fees
    1.36 %     1.57 %     1.35 %     1.16 %(4)     1.19 %    
Interest and fee expense(5)
    0.02 %     0.10 %     0.29 %     0.53 %     0.41 %    
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction
    1.38 %     1.67 %     1.64 %     1.69 %(4)     1.60 %    
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees
    1.36 %     1.57 %     1.33 %     1.14 %(4)     1.16 %    
Net investment income
    6.61 %     7.87 %     6.82 %     6.33 %     6.56 %    
Portfolio Turnover
    11 %     18 %     22 %     30 %     16 %    
 
 
The ratios reported above are based on net assets applicable to common shares. The ratios based on net assets, including amounts related to preferred shares, are as follows:
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets applicable to common shares and preferred shares):(3)
                                           
Expenses excluding interest and fees
    0.88 %     0.95 %     0.83 %     0.74 %(4)     0.75 %    
Interest and fee expense(5)
    0.01 %     0.06 %     0.18 %     0.34 %     0.26 %    
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction
    0.89 %     1.01 %     1.01 %     1.08 %(4)     1.01 %    
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees
    0.88 %     0.95 %     0.82 %     0.72 %(4)     0.73 %    
Net investment income
    4.30 %     4.77 %     4.19 %     4.03 %     4.14 %    
 
 
Senior Securities:
                                           
Total preferred shares outstanding
    680       680       875       875       875      
Asset coverage per preferred share(6)
  $ 73,128     $ 73,104     $ 57,579     $ 67,991     $ 69,036      
Involuntary liquidation preference per preferred share(7)
  $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000      
Approximate market value per preferred share(7)
  $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000      
 
 
 
(1) Computed using average common shares outstanding.
 
(2) Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market value with all distributions reinvested.
 
(3) Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to preferred shareholders.
 
(4) The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended September 30, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower.
 
(5) Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1H).
 
(6) Calculated by subtracting the Fund’s total liabilities (not including the preferred shares) from the Fund’s total assets, and dividing the result by the number of preferred shares outstanding.
 
(7) Plus accumulated and unpaid dividends.

 
See notes to financial statements

57


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds as of September 30, 2010
 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
 
 
Financial Highlights
 
Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated
 
                                             
    Pennsylvania Fund
   
    Year Ended September 30,
   
    2010     2009     2008     2007     2006      
 
Net asset value — Beginning of year (Common shares)
  $ 13.900     $ 12.030     $ 15.270     $ 15.470     $ 14.930      
 
 
                                             
                                             
 
Income (Loss) From Operations
 
Net investment income(1)
  $ 0.878     $ 0.889     $ 0.995     $ 0.995     $ 0.994      
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
    (0.270 )     2.123       (3.047 )     (0.209 )     0.559      
Distributions to preferred shareholders
                                           
From net investment income
    (0.030 )     (0.071 )     (0.236 )     (0.291 )     (0.266 )    
From net realized gain
          (0.045 )     (0.076 )                
 
 
Total income (loss) from operations
  $ 0.578     $ 2.896     $ (2.364 )   $ 0.495     $ 1.287      
 
 
                                             
                                             
 
Less Distributions to Common Shareholders
 
From net investment income
  $ (0.838 )   $ (0.753 )   $ (0.693 )   $ (0.695 )   $ (0.747 )    
From net realized gain
          (0.273 )     (0.183 )                
 
 
Total distributions to common shareholders
  $ (0.838 )   $ (1.026 )   $ (0.876 )   $ (0.695 )   $ (0.747 )    
 
 
                                             
Net asset value — End of year (Common shares)
  $ 13.640     $ 13.900     $ 12.030     $ 15.270     $ 15.470      
 
 
                                             
Market value — End of year (Common shares)
  $ 14.230     $ 14.600     $ 13.400     $ 14.150     $ 15.020      
 
 
                                             
Total Investment Return on Net Asset Value(2)
    4.53 %     27.36 %     (16.07 )%     3.44 %     9.00 %    
 
 
                                             
Total Investment Return on Market Value(2)
    3.82 %     20.09 %     0.88 %     (1.28 )%     1.68 %    
 
 

 
See notes to financial statements

58


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds as of September 30, 2010
 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
 
Financial Highlights
 
Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated
 
                                             
    Pennsylvania Fund
   
    Year Ended September 30,
   
    2010     2009     2008     2007     2006      
 
 
 
Ratios/Supplemental Data
 
Net assets applicable to common shares, end of year (000’s omitted)
  $ 40,256     $ 40,956     $ 35,413     $ 44,955     $ 45,516      
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets applicable to common shares):(3)
                                           
Expenses excluding interest and fees
    1.36 %     1.52 %     1.30 %     1.15 %(4)     1.18 %    
Interest and fee expense(5)
    0.07 %     0.17 %     1.03 %     0.83 %     0.78 %    
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction
    1.43 %     1.69 %     2.33 %     1.98 %(4)     1.96 %    
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees
    1.36 %     1.51 %     1.28 %     1.12 %(4)     1.15 %    
Net investment income
    6.67 %     7.80 %     6.86 %     6.45 %     6.64 %    
Portfolio Turnover
    19 %     8 %     28 %     24 %     22 %    
 
 
The ratios reported above are based on net assets applicable to common shares. The ratios based on net assets, including amounts related to preferred shares, are as follows:
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets applicable to common shares and preferred shares):(3)
                                           
Expenses excluding interest and fees
    0.87 %     0.91 %     0.81 %     0.73 %(4)     0.74 %    
Interest and fee expense(5)
    0.05 %     0.10 %     0.64 %     0.53 %     0.49 %    
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction
    0.92 %     1.01 %     1.45 %     1.26 %(4)     1.23 %    
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees
    0.87 %     0.90 %     0.80 %     0.71 %(4)     0.72 %    
Net investment income
    4.28 %     4.68 %     4.26 %     4.10 %     4.17 %    
 
 
Senior Securities:
                                           
Total preferred shares outstanding
    869       869       1,040       1,040       1,040      
Asset coverage per preferred share(6)
  $ 71,327     $ 72,133     $ 59,091     $ 68,233     $ 68,770      
Involuntary liquidation preference per preferred share(7)
  $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000      
Approximate market value per preferred share(7)
  $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000     $ 25,000      
 
 
 
(1) Computed using average common shares outstanding.
 
(2) Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market value with all distributions reinvested.
 
(3) Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to preferred shareholders.
 
(4) The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended September 30, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower.
 
(5) Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1H).
 
(6) Calculated by subtracting the Fund’s total liabilities (not including the preferred shares) from the Fund’s total assets, and dividing the result by the number of preferred shares outstanding.
 
(7) Plus accumulated and unpaid dividends.

 
See notes to financial statements

59


Table of Contents

Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds as of September 30, 2010
 
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
1   Significant Accounting Policies
 
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund II (formerly, Eaton Vance Insured Municipal Bond Fund II) (Municipal Fund II), Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund II (formerly, Eaton Vance Insured California Municipal Bond Fund II) (California Fund II), Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund (formerly, Eaton Vance Insured Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund) (Massachusetts Fund), Eaton Vance Michigan Municipal Bond Fund (formerly, Eaton Vance Insured Michigan Municipal Bond Fund) (Michigan Fund), Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund (formerly, Eaton Vance Insured New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund) (New Jersey Fund), Eaton Vance New York Municipal Bond Fund II (formerly, Eaton Vance Insured New York Municipal Bond Fund II) (New York Fund II), Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Bond Fund (formerly, Eaton Vance Insured Ohio Municipal Bond Fund) (Ohio Fund) and Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund (formerly, Eaton Vance Insured Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund) (Pennsylvania Fund), (each individually referred to as the Fund, and collectively, the Funds), are Massachusetts business trusts registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as non-diversified, closed-end management investment companies, except for Municipal Fund II, which is a diversified, closed-end management investment company. Each Fund seeks to provide current income exempt from regular federal income tax, including alternative minimum tax, and, in state specific funds, taxes in its specified state.
 
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Funds. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
 
A  Investment Valuation — Debt obligations (including short-term obligations with a remaining maturity of more than sixty days) are generally valued on the basis of valuations provided by third party pricing services, as derived from such services’ pricing models. Inputs to the models may include, but are not limited to, reported trades, executable bid and asked prices, broker/dealer quotations, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, benchmark curves or information pertaining to the issuer, as well as industry and economic events. The pricing services may use a matrix approach, which considers information regarding securities with similar characteristics to determine the valuation for a security. Short-term obligations purchased with a remaining maturity of sixty days or less are generally valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Financial futures contracts are valued at the closing settlement price established by the board of trade or exchange on which they are traded. Interest rate swaps are normally valued using valuations provided by a third party pricing service. Such pricing service valuations are based on the present value of fixed and projected floating rate cash flows over the term of the swap contract. Future cash flows are discounted to their present value using swap quotations provided by electronic data services or by broker/dealers. Investments for which valuations or market quotations are not readily available or are deemed unreliable are valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees of a Fund in a manner that most fairly reflects the security’s value, or the amount that the Fund might reasonably expect to receive for the security upon its current sale in the ordinary course. Each such determination is based on a consideration of all relevant factors, which are likely to vary from one pricing context to another. These factors may include, but are not limited to, the type of security, the existence of any contractual restrictions on the security’s disposition, the price and extent of public trading in similar securities of the issuer or of comparable entities, quotations or relevant information obtained from broker-dealers or other market participants, information obtained from the issuer, analysts, and/or the appropriate stock exchange (for exchange-traded securities), an analysis of the entity’s financial condition, and an evaluation of the forces that influence the issuer and the market(s) in which the security is purchased and sold.
 
B  Investment Transactions and Related Income — Investment transactions for financial statement purposes are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses on investments sold are determined on the basis of identified cost. Interest income is recorded on the basis of interest accrued, adjusted for amortization of premium or accretion of discount.
 
C  Federal Taxes — Each Fund’s policy is to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its taxable, if any, and tax-exempt net investment income, and all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains. Accordingly, no provision for federal income or excise tax is necessary. Each Fund intends to satisfy conditions which will enable it to designate distributions from the interest income generated by its investments in municipal obligations, which are exempt from regular federal income tax when received by each Fund, as exempt-interest dividends.
 
At September 30, 2010, the following Funds, for federal income tax purposes, had capital loss carryforwards which will reduce the respective Fund’s taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investment transactions, if any, to the extent permitted by the Internal Revenue Code, and thus will reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders, which would otherwise be necessary to

60


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds as of September 30, 2010
 
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
 
relieve the Funds of any liability for federal income or excise tax. The amounts and expiration dates of the capital loss carryforwards are as follows:
 
                     
Fund   Amount     Expiration Date      
 
Municipal II
  $ 658,427       September 30, 2016      
      2,011,041       September 30, 2017      
      11,539,291       September 30, 2018      
                     
California II
  $ 52,500       September 30, 2016      
      1,365,711       September 30, 2017      
      3,330,399       September 30, 2018      
                     
Massachusetts
  $ 179,329       September 30, 2013      
      94,578       September 30, 2017      
      1,054,999       September 30, 2018      
                     
Michigan
  $ 384,407       September 30, 2013      
      1,883       September 30, 2016      
      579,696       September 30, 2018      
                     
New Jersey
  $ 244,927       September 30, 2017      
      2,060,337       September 30, 2018      
                     
New York II
  $ 41,818       September 30, 2016      
      1,233,356       September 30, 2017      
      1,545,637       September 30, 2018      
                     
Ohio
  $ 321,978       September 30, 2013      
      83,319       September 30, 2016      
      1,620,085       September 30, 2017      
      3,381,936       September 30, 2018      
                     
Pennsylvania
  $ 1,949,047       September 30, 2018      
 
Additionally, at September 30, 2010, the Municipal Fund II, California Fund II, Massachusetts Fund, Michigan Fund, New Jersey Fund, New York Fund II, Ohio Fund and Pennsylvania Fund had net capital losses of $1,499,034, $1,573,635, $225,669, $524,009, $1,550,366, $1,647,209, $692,166 and $730,899, respectively, attributable to security transactions incurred after October 31, 2009. These net capital losses are treated as arising on the first day of the Funds’ taxable year ending September 30, 2011.
 
As of September 30, 2010, the Funds had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Funds’ federal tax returns filed in the 3-year period ended September 30, 2010 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
 
D  Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Funds. Pursuant to the respective custodian agreements, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance each Fund maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce each Fund’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statements of Operations.
 
E  Legal Fees — Legal fees and other related expenses incurred as part of negotiations of the terms and requirement of capital infusions, or that are expected to result in the restructuring of, or a plan of reorganization for, an investment are recorded as realized losses. Ongoing expenditures to protect or enhance an investment are treated as operating expenses.
 
F  Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
 
G  Indemnifications — Under each Fund’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to each Fund. Under Massachusetts law, if certain conditions prevail, shareholders of a Massachusetts business trust (such as a Fund) could be deemed to have personal liability for the obligations of the Fund. However, each Fund’s Declaration of Trust contains an express disclaimer of liability on the part of Fund shareholders and the By-laws provide that the Fund shall assume the defense on behalf of any Fund shareholders. Moreover, the By-laws also provide for indemnification out of Fund property of any shareholder held personally liable solely by reason of being or having been a shareholder for all loss or expense arising from such liability. Additionally, in the normal course of business, each Fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. Each Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against each Fund that have not yet occurred.
 
H  Floating Rate Notes Issued in Conjunction with Securities Held — The Funds may invest in inverse floating rate securities, also referred to as residual interest bonds, whereby a Fund may sell a fixed rate bond to a broker for cash. At the same time, the Fund buys a residual interest in the assets and cash flows of a Special-Purpose Vehicle (the SPV), (which is generally organized as a trust), set up by the broker, often referred to as an inverse floating rate obligation (Inverse Floater). The broker deposits a fixed rate bond into the SPV with the same CUSIP number as the fixed rate bond sold to the broker by the Fund, and which may have been, but is not required to be, the fixed rate bond purchased from the Fund (the Fixed Rate Bond). The SPV also issues floating rate notes (Floating Rate Notes) which are sold to third-parties.

61


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds as of September 30, 2010
 
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
 
The Inverse Floater held by a Fund gives the Fund the right (1) to cause the holders of the Floating Rate Notes to tender their notes at par, and (2) to have the broker transfer the Fixed Rate Bond held by the SPV to the Fund, thereby terminating the SPV. Should the Fund exercise such right, it would pay the broker the par amount due on the Floating Rate Notes and exchange the Inverse Floater for the underlying Fixed Rate Bond. Pursuant to generally accepted accounting principles for transfers and servicing of financial assets and extinguishment of liabilities, the Funds account for the transaction described above as a secured borrowing by including the Fixed Rate Bond in their Portfolio of Investments and the Floating Rate Notes as a liability under the caption “Payable for floating rate notes issued” in their Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The Floating Rate Notes have interest rates that generally reset weekly and their holders have the option to tender their notes to the broker for redemption at par at each reset date. Interest expense related to the Funds’ liability with respect to Floating Rate Notes is recorded as incurred. The SPV may be terminated by the Fund, as noted above, or by the broker upon the occurrence of certain termination events as defined in the trust agreement, such as a downgrade in the credit quality of the underlying bond, bankruptcy of or payment failure by the issuer of the underlying bond, the inability to remarket Floating Rate Notes that have been tendered due to insufficient buyers in the market, or the failure by the SPV to obtain renewal of the liquidity agreement under which liquidity support is provided for the Floating Rate Notes up to one year. Structuring fees paid to the liquidity provider upon the creation of an SPV have been recorded as debt issuance costs and are being amortized as interest expense to the expected maturity of the related trust. Unamortized structuring fees related to a terminated SPV are recorded as a realized loss on extinguishment of debt. At September 30, 2010, the amounts of the Funds’ Floating Rate Notes and related interest rates and collateral were as follows:
 
                         
              Collateral
     
    Floating
    Interest Rate
  for Floating
     
    Rate
    or Range of
  Rate
     
    Notes
    Interest
  Notes
     
Fund   Outstanding     Rates (%)   Outstanding      
 
Municipal II
  $ 59,060,000     0.27 – 0.32   $ 71,303,338      
California II
    10,370,000     0.27 – 0.29     12,413,421      
Massachusetts
    3,330,000     0.27 – 0.30     4,307,161      
New Jersey
    6,346,000     0.27 – 0.32     8,591,968      
New York II
    11,335,000     0.27 – 0.29     13,361,227      
Ohio
    1,010,000     0.32 – 0.37     1,796,042      
Pennsylvania
    4,350,000     0.28 – 0.37     7,427,692      
 
For the year ended September 30, 2010, the Funds’ average Floating Rate Notes outstanding and the average interest rate including fees and amortization of deferred debt issuance costs were as follows:
 
                     
    Average Floating
           
    Rate Notes
    Average
     
Fund   Outstanding     Interest Rate      
 
Municipal II
  $ 58,263,726       0.79 %    
California II
    9,897,356       0.77      
Massachusetts
    2,812,767       0.77      
New Jersey
    6,346,000       0.94      
New York II
    11,335,000       0.83      
Ohio
    1,010,000       0.71      
Pennsylvania
    2,790,822       1.05      
 
The Funds may enter into shortfall and forbearance agreements with the broker by which a Fund agrees to reimburse the broker, in certain circumstances, for the difference between the liquidation value of the Fixed Rate Bond held by the SPV and the liquidation value of the Floating Rate Notes, as well as any shortfalls in interest cash flows. The Funds had no shortfalls as of September 30, 2010.
 
The Funds may also purchase Inverse Floaters from brokers in a secondary market transaction without first owning the underlying fixed rate bond. Such transactions are not required to be treated as secured borrowings. Shortfall agreements, if any, related to Inverse Floaters purchased in a secondary market transaction are disclosed in the Portfolio of Investments. The Funds’ investment policies and restrictions expressly permit investments in Inverse Floaters. Inverse floating rate securities typically offer the potential for yields exceeding the yields available on fixed rate bonds with comparable credit quality and maturity. These securities tend to underperform the market for fixed rate bonds in a rising long-term interest rate environment, but tend to outperform the market for fixed rate bonds when long-term interest rates decline. The value and income of inverse floating rate securities are generally more volatile than that of a fixed rate bond. The Funds’ investment policies do not allow the Funds to borrow money except as permitted by the 1940 Act. Management believes that the Funds’ restrictions on borrowing money and issuing senior securities (other than as specifically permitted) do not apply to Floating Rate Notes issued by the SPV and included as a liability in the Funds’ Statement of Assets and Liabilities. As secured indebtedness issued by an SPV, Floating Rate Notes are distinct from the borrowings and senior securities to which the Funds’ restrictions apply. Inverse Floaters held by the Funds are securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933.

62


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds as of September 30, 2010
 
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
 
I  Financial Futures Contracts — The Funds may enter into financial futures contracts. The Funds’ investment in financial futures contracts is designed for hedging against changes in interest rates or as a substitute for the purchase of securities. Upon entering into a financial futures contract, a Fund is required to deposit with the broker, either in cash or securities, an amount equal to a certain percentage of the purchase price (initial margin). Subsequent payments, known as variation margin, are made or received by the Fund each business day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the value of the underlying security, and are recorded as unrealized gains or losses by the Fund. Gains (losses) are realized upon the expiration or closing of the financial futures contracts. Should market conditions change unexpectedly, the Fund may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the financial futures contracts and may realize a loss. Futures contracts have minimal counterparty risk as they are exchange traded and the clearinghouse for the exchange is substituted as the counterparty, guaranteeing counterparty performance.
 
J  Interest Rate Swaps — The Funds may enter into interest rate swap agreements to enhance return, to hedge against fluctuations in securities prices or interest rates, or as substitution for the purchase or sale of securities. Pursuant to these agreements, a Fund makes periodic payments at a fixed interest rate and, in exchange, receives payments based on the interest rate of a benchmark industry index. During the term of the outstanding swap agreement, changes in the underlying value of the swap are recorded as unrealized gains or losses. The value of the swap is determined by changes in the relationship between two rates of interest. A Fund is exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the swap counterparty. Risk may also arise from movements in interest rates.
 
K  When-Issued Securities and Delayed Delivery Transactions — The Funds may purchase or sell securities on a delayed delivery or when-issued basis. Payment and delivery may take place after the customary settlement period for that security. At the time the transaction is negotiated, the price of the security that will be delivered is fixed. The Funds maintain security positions for these commitments such that sufficient liquid assets will be available to make payments upon settlement. Securities purchased on a delayed delivery or when-issued basis are marked-to-market daily and begin earning interest on settlement date. Losses may arise due to changes in the market value of the underlying securities or if the counterparty does not perform under the contract.
 
L  Statement of Cash Flows — The cash amount shown in the Statement of Cash Flows of a Fund is the amount included in the Fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities and represents the cash on hand at its custodian and does not include any short-term investments.
 
2   Auction Preferred Shares
 
Each Fund issued Auction Preferred Shares (APS) on January 15, 2003 in a public offering. The underwriting discounts and other offering costs incurred in connection with the offering were recorded as a reduction of the paid-in capital of the common shares of each respective Fund. Dividends on the APS, which accrue daily, are cumulative at rates which are reset every seven days by an auction, unless a special dividend period has been set. If the APS auctions do not successfully clear, the dividend payment rate over the next period for the APS holders is set at a specified maximum applicable rate until such time as the APS auctions are successful. The maximum applicable rate on the APS is 110% (150% for taxable distributions) of the greater of the 1) “AA” Financial Composite Commercial Paper Rate or 2) Taxable Equivalent of the Short-Term Municipal Obligation Rate on the date of the auction. Series of APS are identical in all respects except for the reset dates of the dividend rates.
 
The number of APS issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2010 is as follows:
 
             
    APS Issued and
     
Fund   Outstanding      
 
Municipal II
           
Series A
    894      
Series B
    894      
California II
    1,028      
Massachusetts
    543      
Michigan
    533      
New Jersey
    784      
New York II
    530      
Ohio
    680      
Pennsylvania
    869      
 
The APS are redeemable at the option of each Fund at a redemption price equal to $25,000 per share, plus accumulated and unpaid dividends, on any dividend payment date. The APS are also subject to mandatory redemption at a redemption price equal to $25,000 per share, plus accumulated and unpaid dividends, if a Fund is in default for an extended period on its asset maintenance requirements with respect to the APS. If the dividends on the APS remain unpaid in an amount equal to two full years’ dividends, the holders of the APS as a class have the right to elect a majority of the Board of Trustees. In general, the holders of the APS and the common shares

63


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds as of September 30, 2010
 
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
 
have equal voting rights of one vote per share, except that the holders of the APS, as a separate class, have the right to elect at least two members of the Board of Trustees. The APS have a liquidation preference of $25,000 per share, plus accumulated and unpaid dividends. Each Fund is required to maintain certain asset coverage with respect to the APS as defined in the Funds’ By-laws and the 1940 Act. Each Fund pays an annual fee up to 0.15% of the liquidation value of the APS to broker-dealers as a service fee if the auctions are unsuccessful; otherwise, the annual fee is 0.25%.
 
3   Distributions to Shareholders
 
Each Fund intends to make monthly distributions of net investment income to common shareholders, after payment of any dividends on any outstanding APS. In addition, at least annually, each Fund intends to distribute all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains, (reduced by available capital loss carryforwards from prior years, if any). Distributions to common shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions to preferred shareholders are recorded daily and are payable at the end of each dividend period. The dividend rates for APS at September 30, 2010, and the amount of dividends paid (including capital gains, if any) to APS shareholders, average APS dividend rates, and dividend rate ranges for the year then ended were as follows:
 
                                 
    APS
    Dividends
    Average APS
    Dividend
   
    Dividend Rates at
    Paid to APS
    Dividend
    Rate
   
    September 30, 2010     Shareholders     Rates     Ranges (%)    
 
Municipal II
                               
Series A
    0.43 %   $ 90,406       0.40 %   0.24–0.56    
Series B
    0.46       92,350       0.41     0.24–0.56    
California II
    0.46       103,957       0.40     0.24–0.56    
Massachusetts
    0.46       54,821       0.40     0.24–0.56    
Michigan
    0.43       54,182       0.41     0.26–0.50    
New Jersey
    0.43       80,417       0.41     0.26–0.62    
New York II
    0.43       54,269       0.41     0.26–0.58    
Ohio
    0.46       69,754       0.41     0.24–0.56    
Pennsylvania
    0.46       87,380       0.40     0.24–0.56    
 
Beginning February 13, 2008 and consistent with the patterns in the broader market for auction-rate securities, the Funds’ APS auctions were unsuccessful in clearing due to an imbalance of sell orders over bids to buy the APS. As a result, the dividend rates of the APS were reset to the maximum applicable rates. The table above reflects such maximum dividend rates for each series as of September 30, 2010.
 
The Funds distinguish between distributions on a tax basis and a financial reporting basis. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that only distributions in excess of tax basis earnings and profits be reported in the financial statements as a return of capital. Permanent differences between book and tax accounting relating to distributions are reclassified to paid-in capital. For tax purposes, distributions from short-term capital gains are considered to be from ordinary income.
 
The tax character of distributions declared for the years ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 was as follows:
 
                                     
    Municipal
    California
    Massachusetts
    Michigan
     
Year Ended September 30, 2010   Fund II     Fund II     Fund     Fund      
 
Distributions declared from:                                    
Tax-exempt income
  $ 9,537,273     $ 3,424,169     $ 1,527,589     $ 1,375,739      
Ordinary income
  $ 980     $ 461     $ 200     $      
                                     
                                     
    New Jersey
    New York
    Ohio
    Pennsylvania
     
Year Ended September 30, 2010   Fund     Fund II     Fund     Fund      
 
Distributions declared from:                                    
Tax-exempt income
  $ 2,438,432     $ 2,303,145     $ 1,990,886     $ 2,558,583      
Ordinary income
  $ 1,309     $ 194     $ 1,235     $      
                                     
                                     

64


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds as of September 30, 2010
 
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
 
                                     
    Municipal
    California
    Massachusetts
    Michigan
     
Year Ended September 30, 2009   Fund II     Fund II     Fund     Fund      
 
Distributions declared from:                                    
Tax-exempt income
  $ 9,012,856     $ 3,279,960     $ 1,504,880     $ 1,322,740      
Ordinary income
  $ 3,009     $ 538     $ 2,021     $      
                                     
                                     
    New Jersey
    New York
    Ohio
    Pennsylvania
     
Year Ended September 30, 2009   Fund     Fund II     Fund     Fund      
 
Distributions declared from:                                    
Tax-exempt income
  $ 2,331,670     $ 2,182,191     $ 1,983,618     $ 2,423,937      
Ordinary income
  $ 3,088     $ 715     $     $ 188,110      
Long-term capital gains
  $ 305,428     $     $     $ 752,423      
 
During the year ended September 30, 2010, the following amounts were reclassified due to differences between book and tax accounting, primarily for accretion of market discount.
                                     
                                     
    Municipal
    California
    Massachusetts
    Michigan
     
    Fund II     Fund II     Fund     Fund      
 
Decrease (increase) in accumulated net realized loss
  $ (98,507 )   $ (1,476 )   $ (6,540 )   $ 13,146      
Increase (decrease) in accumulated undistributed net investment income
  $ 98,507     $ 1,476     $ 6,540     $ (13,146 )    
                                     
                                     
    New Jersey
    New York
    Ohio
    Pennsylvania
     
    Fund     Fund II     Fund     Fund      
 
Decrease (increase) in accumulated net realized loss
  $ 20,785     $ (25,653 )   $ 46,242     $ 37,990      
Increase (decrease) in accumulated undistributed net investment income
  $ (20,785 )   $ 25,653     $ (46,242 )   $ (37,990 )    
 

These reclassifications had no effect on the net assets or net asset value per share of the Funds.
 

As of September 30, 2010, the components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on a tax basis were as follows:
                                     
                                     
    Municipal
    California
    Massachusetts
    Michigan
     
    Fund II     Fund II     Fund     Fund      
 
Undistributed tax-exempt income
  $ 1,670,844     $ 387,732     $ 153,365     $ 163,671      
Capital loss carryforward and post October losses
  $ (15,707,793 )   $ (6,322,245 )   $ (1,554,575 )   $ (1,489,995 )    
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
  $ (543,169 )   $ (473,651 )   $ 2,330,988     $ 1,875,270      
Other temporary differences
  $ (1,942 )   $ (304 )   $ (1,186 )   $ (314 )    
                                     
                                     
    New Jersey
    New York
    Ohio
    Pennsylvania
     
    Fund     Fund II     Fund     Fund      
 
Undistributed tax-exempt income
  $ 261,229     $ 255,738     $ 214,796     $ 392,613      
Capital loss carryforward and post October losses
  $ (3,855,630 )   $ (4,468,020 )   $ (6,099,484 )   $ (2,679,946 )    
Net unrealized appreciation
  $ 4,190,088     $ 2,233,231     $ 2,819,617     $ 693,821      
Other temporary differences
  $ (690 )   $ (311 )   $ (1,276 )   $ (1,900 )    
 
The differences between components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) on a tax basis and the amounts reflected in the Statements of Assets and Liabilities are primarily due to wash sales, the timing of recognizing distributions to shareholders, futures contracts, accretion of market discount and inverse floaters.
 
4   Investment Adviser Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates
 
The investment adviser fee is earned by Eaton Vance Management (EVM) as compensation for investment advisory services rendered to each Fund. The fee is computed at an annual rate of 0.55% of each Fund’s average weekly gross assets and is payable monthly. Average weekly gross assets include the principal amount of any indebtedness for money borrowed, including debt securities issued by a Fund, and the amount of any outstanding APS issued by the Fund. Pursuant to a fee reduction agreement with EVM, average weekly gross assets are calculated by adding to net assets the liquidation value of a Fund’s APS then outstanding and the amount payable by the Fund to floating rate note holders, such adjustment being limited to the value of the APS

65


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds as of September 30, 2010
 
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
 
outstanding prior to any APS redemptions by the Fund. EVM also serves as the administrator of each Fund, but receives no compensation.
 
In addition, EVM has contractually agreed to reimburse the Funds for fees and other expenses at an annual rate of 0.15% of average weekly gross assets of each Fund during the first five full years of its operations, 0.10% of a Fund’s average weekly gross assets in year six, and 0.05% in year seven. The Funds concluded their first seven full years of operations on November 29, 2009. For the year ended September 30, 2010, the investment adviser fee and expenses contractually reduced by EVM were as follows:
 
                     
          Expenses
     
    Investment
    Reduced by
     
Fund   Adviser Fee     EVM      
 
Municipal II
  $ 1,150,771     $ 16,776      
California II
    441,839       6,532      
Massachusetts
    221,024       3,233      
Michigan
    191,164       2,810      
New Jersey
    320,719       4,638      
New York II
    307,467       4,503      
Ohio
    272,968       4,002      
Pennsylvania
    348,209       5,052      
 
Except for Trustees of the Funds who are not members of EVM’s organization, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to the Funds out of the investment adviser fee. Trustees of the Funds who are not affiliated with the investment adviser may elect to defer receipt of all or a percentage of their annual fees in accordance with the terms of the Trustees Deferred Compensation Plan. For the year ended September 30, 2010, no significant amounts have been deferred. Certain officers and Trustees of the Funds are officers of EVM.
 
5   Purchases and Sales of Investments
 
Purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term obligations, for the year ended September 30, 2010 were as follows:
 
                     
Fund   Purchases     Sales      
 
Municipal II
  $ 29,661,886     $ 39,454,968      
California II
    13,659,660       17,677,330      
Massachusetts
    11,976,517       11,166,698      
Michigan
    698,432       1,418,092      
New Jersey
    5,191,114       8,819,336      
New York II
    7,260,216       9,734,678      
Ohio
    5,260,614       5,690,173      
Pennsylvania
    12,553,417       11,586,979      
 
6   Common Shares of Beneficial Interest
 
Common shares issued pursuant to the Funds’ dividend reinvestment plan for the years ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 were as follows:
 
                     
    Year Ended September 30,
Fund   2010     2009      
 
Municipal II
    17,591       15,775      
California II
    5,807       5,322      
Massachusetts
    4,173       1,835      
Michigan
    391       132      
New Jersey
    8,500       5,648      
New York II
    2,956       2,353      
Ohio
    6,248       5,911      
Pennsylvania
    5,032       2,397      
 
7   Federal Income Tax Basis of Investments
 
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments of each Fund at September 30, 2010, as determined on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:
 
             
Municipal Fund II
           
 
 
Aggregate cost
  $ 167,334,705      
 
 
Gross unrealized appreciation
  $ 3,870,368      
Gross unrealized depreciation
    (4,343,974 )    
 
 
Net unrealized depreciation
  $ (473,606 )    
 
 
             
             
California Fund II
           
 
 
Aggregate cost
  $ 72,590,228      
 
 
Gross unrealized appreciation
  $ 4,333,439      
Gross unrealized depreciation
    (4,804,383 )    
 
 
Net unrealized depreciation
  $ (470,944 )    
 
 
             
             
Massachusetts Fund
           
 
 
Aggregate cost
  $ 36,455,386      
 
 
Gross unrealized appreciation
  $ 2,814,134      
Gross unrealized depreciation
    (470,468 )    
 
 
Net unrealized appreciation
  $ 2,343,666      
 
 
             
             

66


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds as of September 30, 2010
 
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
 
             
Michigan Fund
           
 
 
Aggregate cost
  $ 33,105,511      
 
 
Gross unrealized appreciation
  $ 2,519,258      
Gross unrealized depreciation
    (633,218 )    
 
 
Net unrealized appreciation
  $ 1,886,040      
 
 
             
             
New Jersey Fund
           
 
 
Aggregate cost
  $ 51,492,449      
 
 
Gross unrealized appreciation
  $ 5,109,862      
Gross unrealized depreciation
    (901,365 )    
 
 
Net unrealized appreciation
  $ 4,208,497      
 
 
             
             
New York Fund II
           
 
 
Aggregate cost
  $ 43,738,839      
 
 
Gross unrealized appreciation
  $ 3,574,273      
Gross unrealized depreciation
    (1,321,513 )    
 
 
Net unrealized appreciation
  $ 2,252,760      
 
 
             
             
Ohio Fund
           
 
 
Aggregate cost
  $ 46,089,897      
 
 
Gross unrealized appreciation
  $ 3,880,735      
Gross unrealized depreciation
    (1,043,998 )    
 
 
Net unrealized appreciation
  $ 2,836,737      
 
 
             
             
Pennsylvania Fund
           
 
 
Aggregate cost
  $ 59,923,664      
 
 
Gross unrealized appreciation
  $ 2,962,005      
Gross unrealized depreciation
    (1,931,117 )    
 
 
Net unrealized appreciation
  $ 1,030,888      
 
 
 
8   Overdraft Advances
 
Pursuant to the respective custodian agreements, SSBT may, in its discretion, advance funds to the Funds to make properly authorized payments. When such payments result in an overdraft, the Funds are obligated to repay SSBT at the current rate of interest charged by SSBT for secured loans (currently, a rate above the Federal Funds rate). This obligation is payable on demand to SSBT. SSBT has a lien on a Fund’s assets to the extent of any overdraft. At September 30, 2010, Municipal Fund II and Michigan Fund had payments due to SSBT pursuant to the foregoing arrangement of $557,866 and $84,345, respectively.
 
9   Financial Instruments
 
The Funds may trade in financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of their investing activities. These financial instruments may include financial futures contracts and interest rate swaps and may involve, to a varying degree, elements of risk in excess of the amounts recognized for financial statement purposes. The notional or contractual amounts of these instruments represent the investment a Fund has in particular classes of financial instruments and do not necessarily represent the amounts potentially subject to risk. The measurement of the risks associated with these instruments is meaningful only when all related and offsetting transactions are considered.
 
A summary of obligations under these financial instruments at September 30, 2010 is as follows:
 
                                         
Futures Contracts
 
                            Net
     
                            Unrealized
     
    Expiration
          Aggregate
          Appreciation
     
Fund   Date   Contracts   Position   Cost     Value     (Depreciation)      
 
Municipal II   12/10   41
U.S. 10-Year
Treasury Note
  Short   $ (5,118,450 )   $ (5,167,922 )   $ (49,472 )    
    12/10   44
U.S. 30-Year
Treasury Bond
  Short     (5,793,474 )     (5,883,625 )     (90,151 )    
 
 
California II   12/10   18
U.S. 30-Year
Treasury Bond
  Short   $ (2,418,831 )   $ (2,406,938 )   $ 11,893      
 
 
Michigan   12/10   2
U.S. 10-Year
Treasury Note
  Short   $ (249,681 )   $ (252,094 )   $ (2,413 )    
    12/10   4
U.S. 30-Year
Treasury Bond
  Short     (537,518 )     (534,875 )     2,643      
 
 
New Jersey   12/10   65
U.S. 30-Year
Treasury Bond
  Short   $ (8,702,155 )   $ (8,691,718 )   $ 10,437      
 
 
New York II   12/10   30
U.S. 30-Year
Treasury Bond
  Short   $ (4,031,385 )   $ (4,011,563 )   $ 19,822      
 
 

67


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds as of September 30, 2010
 
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
 
Futures Contracts (continued)
 
                                         
                            Net
     
                            Unrealized
     
    Expiration
          Aggregate
          Appreciation
     
Fund   Date   Contracts   Position   Cost     Value     (Depreciation)      
 
Ohio   12/10   14
U.S. 10-Year
Treasury Note
  Short   $ (1,747,763 )   $ (1,764,656 )   $ (16,893 )    
    12/10   12
U.S. 30-Year
Treasury Bond
  Short     (1,578,490 )     (1,604,625 )     (26,135 )    
 
 
 
                                 
Interest Rate Swaps
Municipal Fund II
 
          Annual
  Floating
  Effective Date/
  Net
     
    Notional
    Fixed Rate
  Rate
  Termination
  Unrealized
     
Counterparty   Amount     Paid By Fund   Paid To Fund   Date   Depreciation      
 
JPMorgan
Chase Co. 
  $ 3,000,000     3.488%   3-month
USD-LIBOR-BBA
  December 14, 2010/
December 14, 2040
  $ (65,082 )    
 
 
Merrill Lynch
Capital
Services, Inc. 
    3,000,000     3.374   3-month
USD-LIBOR-BBA
  November 24, 2010/
November 24, 2040
    (4,481 )    
 
 
                        $ (69,563 )    
 
 
                                 
                                 
California Fund II
 
          Annual
  Floating
  Effective Date/
  Net
     
    Notional
    Fixed Rate
  Rate
  Termination
  Unrealized
     
Counterparty   Amount     Paid By Fund   Paid To Fund   Date   Depreciation      
 
Merrill Lynch
Capital
Services, Inc. 
  $ 1,812,500     3.374%   3-month
USD-LIBOR-BBA
  November 24, 2010/
November 24, 2040
  $ (2,707 )    
 
 
                        $ (2,707 )    
 
 
                                 
                                 
Massachusetts Fund
 
          Annual
  Floating
  Effective Date/
  Net
     
    Notional
    Fixed Rate
  Rate
  Termination
  Unrealized
     
Counterparty   Amount     Paid By Fund   Paid To Fund   Date   Depreciation      
 
JPMorgan
Chase Co. 
  $ 525,000     3.488%   3-month
USD-LIBOR-BBA
  December 14, 2010/
December 14, 2040
  $ (11,390 )    
 
 
Merrill Lynch
Capital
Services, Inc. 
    862,500     3.374   3-month
USD-LIBOR-BBA
  November 24, 2010/
November 24, 2040
    (1,288 )    
 
 
                        $ (12,678 )    
 
 
                                 
                                 
Interest Rate Swaps (continued)
Michigan Fund
          Annual
  Floating
  Effective Date/
  Net
     
    Notional
    Fixed Rate
  Rate
  Termination
  Unrealized
     
Counterparty   Amount     Paid By Fund   Paid To Fund   Date   Depreciation      
 
JPMorgan
Chase Co. 
  $ 450,000     3.488%   3-month
USD-LIBOR-BBA
  December 14, 2010/
December 14, 2040
  $ (9,762 )    
 
 
Merrill Lynch
Capital
Services, Inc. 
    675,000     3.374   3-month
USD-LIBOR-BBA
  November 24, 2010/
November 24, 2040
    (1,008 )    
 
 
                        $ (10,770 )    
 
 
                                 
                                 
New Jersey Fund
 
          Annual
  Floating
  Effective Date/
  Net
     
    Notional
    Fixed Rate
  Rate
  Termination
  Unrealized
     
Counterparty   Amount     Paid By Fund   Paid To Fund   Date   Depreciation      
 
JPMorgan
Chase Co. 
  $ 762,500     3.488%   3-month
USD-LIBOR-BBA
  December 14, 2010/
December 14, 2040
  $ (16,542 )    
 
 
Merrill Lynch
Capital
Services, Inc. 
    1,250,000     3.374   3-month
USD-LIBOR-BBA
  November 24, 2010/
November 24, 2040
    (1,867 )    
 
 
                        $ (18,409 )    
 
 
                                 
                                 
New York Fund II
 
          Annual
  Floating
  Effective Date/
  Net
     
    Notional
    Fixed Rate
  Rate
  Termination
  Unrealized
     
Counterparty   Amount     Paid By Fund   Paid To Fund   Date   Depreciation      
 
JPMorgan
Chase Co. 
  $ 762,500     3.488%   3-month
USD-LIBOR-BBA
  December 14, 2010/
December 14, 2040
  $ (16,542 )    
 
 
Merrill Lynch
Capital
Services, Inc. 
    2,000,000     3.374   3-month
USD-LIBOR-BBA
  November 24, 2010/
November 24, 2040
    (2,987 )    
 
 
                        $ (19,529 )    
 
 
                                 
                                 
Ohio Fund
 
          Annual
  Floating
  Effective Date/
  Net
     
    Notional
    Fixed Rate
  Rate
  Termination
  Unrealized
     
Counterparty   Amount     Paid By Fund   Paid To Fund   Date   Depreciation      
 
JPMorgan
Chase Co. 
  $ 737,500     3.488%   3-month
USD-LIBOR-BBA
  December 14, 2010/
December 14, 2040
  $ (16,000 )    
 
 
Merrill Lynch
Capital
Services, Inc. 
    750,000     3.374   3-month
USD-LIBOR-BBA
  November 24, 2010/
November 24, 2040
    (1,120 )    
 
 
                        $ (17,120 )    
 
 
                                 
                                 

68


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds as of September 30, 2010
 
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
 
Interest Rate Swaps (continued)
 
                                 
Pennsylvania Fund
 
          Annual
  Floating
  Effective Date/
  Net
     
    Notional
    Fixed Rate
  Rate
  Termination
  Unrealized
     
Counterparty   Amount     Paid By Fund   Paid To Fund   Date   Depreciation      
 
Barclays
Bank PLC
  $ 3,000,000     3.889%   3-month
USD-LIBOR-BBA
  October 20, 2010/
October 20, 2040
  $ (319,845 )    
 
 
JPMorgan
Chase Co. 
    725,000     3.488   3-month
USD-LIBOR-BBA
  December 14, 2010/
December 14, 2040
    (15,728 )    
 
 
Merrill Lynch
Capital
Services, Inc. 
    1,000,000     3.374   3-month
USD-LIBOR-BBA
  November 24, 2010/
November 24, 2040
    (1,494 )    
 
 
                        $ (337,067 )    
 
 
 
The effective date represents the date on which a Fund and the counterparty to the interest rate swap contract begin interest payment accruals.
 
At September 30, 2010, the Funds had sufficient cash and/or securities to cover commitments under these contracts.
 
Each Fund is subject to interest rate risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives. Because the Funds hold fixed-rate bonds, the value of these bonds may decrease if interest rates rise. To hedge against this risk, each Fund enters into interest rate swap contracts. The Funds also purchase and sell U.S. Treasury futures contracts to hedge against changes in interest rates.
 
The Funds enter into interest rate swap contracts that may contain provisions whereby the counterparty may terminate the contract under certain conditions, including but not limited to a decline in a Fund’s net assets below a certain level over a certain period of time, which would trigger a payment by the Fund for those swaps in a liability position. At September 30, 2010, the fair value of interest rate swaps with credit-related contingent features in a net liability position was equal to the fair value of the liability derivative related to interest rate swaps included in the table below for each respective Fund. The value of securities pledged as collateral, if any, for open interest rate swap contracts at September 30, 2010 is disclosed in a note to each Fund’s Portfolio of Investments.
 
The non-exchange traded derivatives in which a Fund invests, including swap contracts, are subject to the risk that the counterparty to the contract fails to perform its obligations under the contract. At September 30, 2010, the maximum amount of loss the Funds would incur due to counterparty risk was equal to the fair value of the asset derivative related to interest rate swaps included in the table below for each respective Fund. Counterparties may be required to pledge collateral in the form of cash, U.S. Government securities or highly-rated bonds for the benefit of a Fund if the net amount due from the counterparty with respect to a derivative contract exceeds a certain threshold. The amount of collateral posted by the counterparties with respect to such contracts would also reduce the amount of any loss incurred.
 
The fair values of derivative instruments (not considered to be hedging instruments for accounting disclosure purposes) and whose primary underlying risk exposure is interest rate risk at September 30, 2010 were as follows:
 
                     
    Fair Value
     
    Asset Derivative     Liability Derivative      
 
Municipal Fund II
                   
Futures Contracts
  $     $ (139,623 )(1)    
Interest Rate Swaps
          (69,563 )(2)    
 
 
Total
  $     $ (209,186 )    
 
 
California Fund II
                   
Futures Contracts
  $ 11,893 (3)   $      
Interest Rate Swaps
          (2,707 )(2)    
 
 
Total
  $ 11,893     $ (2,707 )    
 
 
Massachusetts Fund
                   
Interest Rate Swaps
  $     $ (12,678 )(2)    
 
 
Total
  $     $ (12,678 )    
 
 
Michigan Fund
                   
Futures Contracts
  $ 2,643 (3)   $ (2,413 )(1)    
Interest Rate Swaps
          (10,770 )(2)    
 
 
Total
  $ 2,643     $ (13,183 )    
 
 
New Jersey Fund
                   
Futures Contracts
  $ 10,437 (3)   $      
Interest Rate Swaps
          (18,409 )(2)    
 
 
Total
  $ 10,437     $ (18,409 )    
 
 
New York Fund II
                   
Futures Contracts
  $ 19,822 (3)   $      
Interest Rate Swaps
          (19,529 )(2)    
 
 
Total
  $ 19,822     $ (19,529 )    
 
 
Ohio Fund
                   
Futures Contracts
  $     $ (43,028 )(1)    
Interest Rate Swaps
          (17,120 )(2)    
 
 
Total
  $     $ (60,148 )    
 
 
Pennsylvania Fund
                   
Interest Rate Swaps
  $     $ (337,067 )(2)    
 
 
Total
  $     $ (337,067 )    
 
 
 
(1) Amount represents cumulative unrealized depreciation on futures contracts in the Futures Contracts table above. Only the current day’s variation margin on open futures contracts is reported within the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as Receivable or Payable for variation margin, as applicable.

69


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds as of September 30, 2010
 
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
 
(2) Statement of Assets and Liabilities location: Payable for open swap contracts; Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation).
 
(3) Amount represents cumulative unrealized appreciation on futures contracts in the Futures Contracts table above. Only the current day’s variation margin on open futures contracts is reported within the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as Receivable or Payable for variation margin, as applicable.
 
The effect of derivative instruments (not considered to be hedging instruments for accounting disclosure purposes) on the Statement of Operations and whose primary underlying risk exposure is interest rate risk for the year ended September 30, 2010 was as follows:
 
                     
          Change in
     
          Unrealized
     
    Realized Gain
    Appreciation
     
    (Loss) on
    (Depreciation) on
     
    Derivatives
    Derivatives
     
    Recognized in
    Recognized in
     
Fund   Income(1)      Income(2)       
 
Municipal II
  $ (3,152,775 )   $ 469,750      
California II
    (1,203,172 )     289,628      
Massachusetts
    (307,580 )     80,030      
Michigan
    (397,782 )     85,632      
New Jersey
    (1,588,099 )     126,411      
New York II
    (1,205,892 )     267,635      
Ohio
    (894,460 )     129,862      
Pennsylvania
    (461,765 )     (162,902 )    
 
(1) Statement of Operations location: Net realized gain (loss) – Financial futures contracts and swap contracts.
 
(2) Statement of Operations location: Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) – Financial futures contracts and swap contracts.
 
The average notional amounts of futures contracts and interest rate swaps outstanding during the year ended September 30, 2010, which are indicative of the volume of these derivative types, were approximately as follows:
 
                     
    Average Notional Amount      
Fund   Futures Contracts     Interest Rate Swaps      
 
Municipal II
  $ 13,969,000     $ 6,000,000      
California II
    3,531,000       2,862,500      
Massachusetts
          1,388,000      
Michigan
    923,000       1,125,000      
New Jersey
    3,500,000       2,012,500      
New York II
    3,000,000       2,762,500      
Ohio
    4,315,000       1,488,000      
Pennsylvania
          3,879,000      
 
10   Fair Value Measurements
 
Under generally accepted accounting principles for fair value measurements, a three-tier hierarchy to prioritize the assumptions, referred to as inputs, is used in valuation techniques to measure fair value. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
 
  •  Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical investments
 
  •  Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)
 
  •  Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)
 
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
 
At September 30, 2010, the inputs used in valuing the Funds’ investments, which are carried at value, were as follows:
 
                                     
Municipal Fund II
    Quoted
                       
    Prices in
                       
    Active
    Significant
                 
    Markets for
    Other
    Significant
           
    Identical
    Observable
    Unobservable
           
    Assets     Inputs     Inputs            
     
Asset Description   (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)     Total      
 
Tax-Exempt Investments
  $     $ 221,251,099     $      —     $ 221,251,099      
 
 
Total Investments
  $     $ 221,251,099     $     $ 221,251,099      
 
 
                                     
Liability Description
                                   
 
 
Futures Contracts
  $ (139,623 )   $     $     $ (139,623 )    
Interest Rate Swaps
          (69,563 )           (69,563 )    
 
 
Total
  $ (139,623 )   $ (69,563 )   $     $ (209,186 )    
 
 
 

70


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds as of September 30, 2010
 
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
 
                                     
California Fund II
    Quoted
                       
    Prices in
                       
    Active
    Significant
                 
    Markets for
    Other
    Significant
           
    Identical
    Observable
    Unobservable
           
    Assets     Inputs     Inputs            
     
Asset Description   (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)     Total      
 
Tax-Exempt Investments
  $     $ 80,824,284     $      —     $ 80,824,284      
 
 
Total Investments
  $     $ 80,824,284     $     $ 80,824,284      
 
 
Futures Contracts
  $ 11,893     $     $     $ 11,893      
 
 
Total
  $ 11,893     $ 80,824,284     $     $ 80,836,177      
 
 
                                     
Liability Description
                                   
 
 
Interest Rate Swaps
  $     $ (2,707 )   $     $ (2,707 )    
 
 
Total
  $     $ (2,707 )   $     $ (2,707 )    
 
 
 
                                     
Massachusetts Fund
    Quoted
                       
    Prices in
                       
    Active
    Significant
                 
    Markets for
    Other
    Significant
           
    Identical
    Observable
    Unobservable
           
    Assets     Inputs     Inputs            
     
Asset Description   (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)     Total      
 
Tax-Exempt Investments
  $      —     $ 42,129,052     $      —     $ 42,129,052      
 
 
Total Investments
  $     $ 42,129,052     $     $ 42,129,052      
 
 
                                     
Liability Description
                                   
 
 
Interest Rate Swaps
  $     $ (12,678 )   $     $ (12,678 )    
 
 
Total
  $     $ (12,678 )   $     $ (12,678 )    
 
 
 
                                     
Michigan Fund
    Quoted
                       
    Prices in
                       
    Active
    Significant
                 
    Markets for
    Other
    Significant
           
    Identical
    Observable
    Unobservable
           
    Assets     Inputs     Inputs            
     
Asset Description   (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)     Total      
 
Tax-Exempt Investments
  $     $ 34,991,551     $      —     $ 34,991,551      
 
 
Total Investments
  $     $ 34,991,551     $     $ 34,991,551      
 
 
Futures Contracts
  $ 2,643     $     $     $ 2,643      
 
 
Total
  $ 2,643     $ 34,991,551     $     $ 34,994,194      
 
 
                                     
Liability Description
                                   
 
 
Futures Contracts
  $ (2,413 )   $     $     $ (2,413 )    
Interest Rate Swaps
          (10,770 )           (10,770 )    
 
 
Total
  $ (2,413 )   $ (10,770 )   $     $ (13,183 )    
 
 
 
                                     
New Jersey Fund
    Quoted
                       
    Prices in
                       
    Active
    Significant
                 
    Markets for
    Other
    Significant
           
    Identical
    Observable
    Unobservable
           
    Assets     Inputs     Inputs            
     
Asset Description   (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)     Total      
 
Tax-Exempt Investments
  $     $ 62,046,946     $      —     $ 62,046,946      
 
 
Total Investments
  $     $ 62,046,946     $     $ 62,046,946      
 
 
Futures Contracts
  $ 10,437     $     $     $ 10,437      
Total
  $ 10,437     $ 62,046,946     $     $ 62,057,383      
 
 
                                     
Liability Description
                                   
 
 
Interest Rate Swaps
  $     $ (18,409 )   $     $ (18,409 )    
 
 
Total
  $     $ (18,409 )   $     $ (18,409 )    
 
 
 
                                     
New York Fund II
    Quoted
                       
    Prices in
                       
    Active
    Significant
                 
    Markets for
    Other
    Significant
           
    Identical
    Observable
    Unobservable
           
    Assets     Inputs     Inputs            
     
Asset Description   (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)     Total      
 
Tax-Exempt Investments
  $     $ 57,326,599     $      —     $ 57,326,599      
 
 
Total Investments
  $     $ 57,326,599     $     $ 57,326,599      
 
 
Futures Contracts
  $ 19,822     $     $     $ 19,822      
 
 
Total
  $ 19,822     $ 57,326,599     $     $ 57,346,421      
 
 
                                     
Liability Description
                                   
 
 
Interest Rate Swaps
  $     $ (19,529 )   $     $ (19,529 )    
 
 
Total
  $     $ (19,529 )   $     $ (19,529 )    
 
 
 
                                     
Ohio Fund
    Quoted
                       
    Prices in
                       
    Active
    Significant
                 
    Markets for
    Other
    Significant
           
    Identical
    Observable
    Unobservable
           
    Assets     Inputs     Inputs            
     
Asset Description   (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)     Total      
 
Tax-Exempt Investments
  $     $ 49,936,634     $      —     $ 49,936,634      
 
 
Total Investments
  $     $ 49,936,634     $     $ 49,936,634      
 
 
                                     
Liability Description
                                   
 
 
Futures Contracts
  $ (43,028 )   $     $     $ (43,028 )    
Interest Rate Swaps
          (17,120 )           (17,120 )    
 
 
Total
  $ (43,028 )   $ (17,120 )   $     $ (60,148 )    
 
 
 

71


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds as of September 30, 2010
 
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
 
                                     
Pennsylvania Fund
    Quoted
                       
    Prices in
                       
    Active
    Significant
                 
    Markets for
    Other
    Significant
           
    Identical
    Observable
    Unobservable
           
    Assets     Inputs     Inputs            
     
Asset Description   (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)     Total      
 
Tax-Exempt Investments
  $      —     $ 65,304,552     $      —     $ 65,304,552      
 
 
Total Investments
  $     $ 65,304,552     $     $ 65,304,552      
 
 
                                     
Liability Description
                                   
 
 
Interest Rate Swaps
  $     $ (337,067 )   $     $ (337,067 )    
 
 
Total
  $     $ (337,067 )   $     $ (337,067 )    
 
 
 
The Funds held no investments or other financial instruments as of September 30, 2009 whose fair value was determined using Level 3 inputs.
 
11   Name Change
 
Effective February 1, 2010, the names of Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund II, Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund II, Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund, Eaton Vance Michigan Municipal Bond Fund, Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund, Eaton Vance New York Municipal Bond Fund II, Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Bond Fund and Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund were changed from Eaton Vance Insured Municipal Bond Fund II, Eaton Vance Insured California Municipal Bond Fund II, Eaton Vance Insured Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund, Eaton Vance Insured Michigan Municipal Bond Fund, Eaton Vance Insured New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund, Eaton Vance Insured New York Municipal Bond Fund II, Eaton Vance Insured Ohio Municipal Bond Fund and Eaton Vance Insured Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund, respectively. The name changes resulted from a modification to each Fund’s 80 percent policy to eliminate the requirement to invest primarily in insured municipal obligations, which was approved by the Funds’ shareholders.

72


Table of Contents

Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds as of September 30, 2010
 
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
To the Trustees and Shareholders of Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund II (formerly, Eaton Vance Insured Municipal Bond Fund II), Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund II (formerly, Eaton Vance Insured California Municipal Bond Fund II), Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund (formerly, Eaton Vance Insured Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund), Eaton Vance Michigan Municipal Bond Fund (formerly, Eaton Vance Insured Michigan Municipal Bond Fund), Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund (formerly, Eaton Vance Insured New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund), Eaton Vance New York Municipal Bond Fund II (formerly, Eaton Vance Insured New York Municipal Bond Fund II), Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Bond Fund (formerly, Eaton Vance Insured Ohio Municipal Bond Fund), and Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund (formerly, Eaton Vance Insured Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund):
We have audited the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities of Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund II (formerly, Eaton Vance Insured Municipal Bond Fund II), Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund II (formerly, Eaton Vance Insured California Municipal Bond Fund II), Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund (formerly, Eaton Vance Insured Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund), Eaton Vance Michigan Municipal Bond Fund (formerly, Eaton Vance Insured Michigan Municipal Bond Fund), Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund (formerly, Eaton Vance Insured New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund), Eaton Vance New York Municipal Bond Fund II (formerly, Eaton Vance Insured New York Municipal Bond Fund II), Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Bond Fund (formerly, Eaton Vance Insured Ohio Municipal Bond Fund), and Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund (formerly, Eaton Vance Insured Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund) (collectively, the “Funds”), including the portfolios of investments, as of September 30, 2010, and the related statements of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended and the statements of cash flows of Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund II, Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund II, Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund and Eaton Vance New York Municipal Bond Fund II for the year then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Funds’ management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
 
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Funds are not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of their internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Funds’ internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of September 30, 2010, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers; where replies were not received from brokers, we performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial positions of Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund II, Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund II, Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund, Eaton Vance Michigan Municipal Bond Fund, Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund, Eaton Vance New York Municipal Bond Fund II, Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Bond Fund, and Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund as of September 30, 2010, the results of their operations for the year then ended, the changes in their net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and their financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended, and the cash flows of Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund II, Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund II, Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund, and Eaton Vance New York Municipal Bond Fund II for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
 
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
November 15, 2010

73


Table of Contents

Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds as of September 30, 2010
 
FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION (Unaudited)
 
 
The Form 1099-DIV you receive in January 2011 will show the tax status of all distributions paid to your account in calendar year 2010. Shareholders are advised to consult their own tax adviser with respect to the tax consequences of their investment in the Funds. As required by the Internal Revenue Code and/or regulations, shareholders must be notified within 60 days of the Funds’ fiscal year end regarding exempt-interest dividends.
 
Exempt-Interest Dividends. The Funds designate the following percentages of dividends from net investment income as exempt-interest dividends:
 
             
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund II
    99.99 %    
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund II
    99.99 %    
Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund
    99.99 %    
Eaton Vance Michigan Municipal Bond Fund
    100.00 %    
Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund
    99.95 %    
Eaton Vance New York Municipal Bond Fund II
    99.99 %    
Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Bond Fund
    99.94 %    
Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund
    100.00 %    

74


Table of Contents

Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds as of September 30, 2010
 
NOTICE TO SHAREHOLDERS
 
 
At a joint Special Meeting of Shareholders held on January 29, 2010, shareholders of the Funds approved a modification to each Fund’s 80 percent policy to eliminate the requirement to invest primarily in insured municipal obligations. Effective February 1, 2010, the Funds are required, under normal market conditions, to invest at least 80 percent of net assets in municipal obligations rated A or better by Moody’s, S&P or Fitch and each Fund eliminated “Insured” from its name. For purposes of the Funds’ 80 percent requirement, the rating of insured obligations will be deemed to be the higher of the claims-paying rating of the insurer and the rating of the underlying issue.

75


Table of Contents

Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds 
 
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS (Unaudited)
 
 
The Funds held their Annual Meeting of Shareholders on July 23, 2010. The following action was taken by the shareholders:
 
Item 1: The election of Thomas E. Faust Jr., Allen R. Freedman and Benjamin C. Esty as Class II Trustees of each Fund for a term expiring in 2013. Mr. Esty was elected solely by APS shareholders.
 
                             
          Nominee for
    Nominee for
     
    Nominee for Class II
    Class II Trustee
    Class II Trustee
     
    Trustee Elected by
    Elected by All
    Elected by All
     
    APS Shareholders:
    Shareholders:
    Shareholders:
     
Fund   Benjamin C. Esty     Thomas E. Faust Jr.     Allen R. Freedman      
 
 
                             
Municipal Fund II
                           
For
    1,212       9,187,270       9,175,523      
Withheld
    5       271,630       283,377      
California Fund II
                           
For
    623       3,535,825       3,520,474      
Withheld
    0       129,231       144,582      
Massachusetts Fund
                           
For
    461       1,701,728       1,702,590      
Withheld
    4       17,300       16,408      
Michigan Fund
                           
For
    319       1,434,725       1,436,725      
Withheld
    0       61,427       59,427      
New Jersey Fund
                           
For
    476       2,505,713       2,512,062      
Withheld
    0       17,322       10,973      
New York Fund II
                           
For
    308       2,352,431       2,363,970      
Withheld
    11       117,567       106,029      
Ohio Fund
                           
For
    440       2,375,545       2,335,297      
Withheld
    2       51,020       91,028      
Pennsylvania Fund
                           
For
    638       2,835,631       2,831,685      
Withheld
    0       34,483       38,429      

76


Table of Contents

Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds 
 
DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT PLAN
 
 
Each Fund offers a dividend reinvestment plan (the Plan) pursuant to which shareholders may elect to have distributions automatically reinvested in common shares (the Shares) of the same Fund. You may elect to participate in the Plan by completing the Dividend Reinvestment Plan Application Form. If you do not participate, you will receive all distributions in cash paid by check mailed directly to you by American Stock Transfer & Trust Company (AST) as dividend paying agent. On the distribution payment date, if the net asset value per Share is equal to or less than the market price per Share plus estimated brokerage commissions, then new Shares will be issued. The number of Shares shall be determined by the greater of the net asset value per Share or 95% of the market price. Otherwise, Shares generally will be purchased on the open market by the Plan Agent. Distributions subject to income tax (if any) are taxable whether or not shares are reinvested.
 
If your shares are in the name of a brokerage firm, bank, or other nominee, you can ask the firm or nominee to participate in the Plan on your behalf. If the nominee does not offer the Plan, you will need to request that your shares be re-registered in your name with the Fund’s transfer agent, AST, or you will not be able to participate.
 
The Plan Agent’s service fee for handling distributions will be paid by the Fund. Each participant will be charged their pro-rata share of brokerage commissions on all open-market purchases.
 
Plan participants may withdraw from the Plan at any time by writing to the Plan Agent at the address noted on the following page. If you withdraw, you will receive shares in your name for all Shares credited to your account under the Plan. If a participant elects by written notice to the Plan Agent to have the Plan Agent sell part or all of his or her Shares and remit the proceeds, the Plan Agent is authorized to deduct a $5.00 fee plus brokerage commissions from the proceeds.
 
If you wish to participate in the Plan and your shares are held in your own name, you may complete the form on the following page and deliver it to the Plan Agent.
 
Any inquiries regarding the Plan can be directed to the Plan Agent, AST, at 1-866-439-6787.

77


Table of Contents

Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds 
 
APPLICATION FOR PARTICIPATION IN DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT PLAN
 
 
This form is for shareholders who hold their common shares in their own names. If your common shares are held in the name of a brokerage firm, bank, or other nominee, you should contact your nominee to see if it will participate in the Plan on your behalf. If you wish to participate in the Plan, but your brokerage firm, bank, or nominee is unable to participate on your behalf, you should request that your common shares be re-registered in your own name which will enable your participation in the Plan.
 
The following authorization and appointment is given with the understanding that I may terminate it at any time by terminating my participation in the Plan as provided in the terms and conditions of the Plan.
 
Please print exact name on account
Shareholder signature                                   Date
Shareholder signature                                   Date
 
Please sign exactly as your common shares are registered. All persons whose names appear on the share certificate must sign.
 
YOU SHOULD NOT RETURN THIS FORM IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE YOUR DISTRIBUTIONS IN CASH. THIS IS NOT A PROXY.
 
This authorization form, when signed, should be mailed to the following address:
 
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds
c/o American Stock Transfer & Trust Company
P.O. Box 922
Wall Street Station
New York, NY 10269-0560
 
Number of Employees
Each Fund is organized as a Massachusetts business trust and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as a closed-end management investment company, and has no employees.
 
Number of Shareholders
As of September 30, 2010, our records indicate that there are 66, 25, 18, 22, 22, 36, 48 and 96 registered shareholders for Municipal Fund II, California Fund II, Massachusetts Fund, Michigan Fund, New Jersey Fund, New York Fund II, Ohio Fund and Pennsylvania Fund, respectively, and approximately 4,337, 1,312, 828, 893, 1,254, 1,201, 1,358 and 1,640 shareholders owning the Fund shares in street name, such as through brokers, banks and financial intermediaries for Municipal Fund II, California Fund II, Massachusetts Fund, Michigan Fund, New Jersey Fund, New York Fund II, Ohio Fund and Pennsylvania Fund, respectively.
 
If you are a street name shareholder and wish to receive Fund reports directly, which contain important information about a Fund, please write or call:
 
Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
1-800-262-1122
 
         
NYSE Amex symbols
       
Municipal Bond Fund II
 
EIV
   
California Municipal Bond Fund II
 
EIA
   
Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund
 
MAB
   
Michigan Municipal Bond Fund
 
MIW
   
         
New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund
 
EMJ
   
New York Municipal Bond Fund II
 
NYH
   
Ohio Municipal Bond Fund
 
EIO
   
Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund
 
EIP
   

78


Table of Contents

Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds 
 
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ CONTRACT APPROVAL
 
Overview of the Contract Review Process
 
The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), provides, in substance, that each investment advisory agreement between a fund and its investment adviser will continue in effect from year to year only if its continuance is approved at least annually by the fund’s board of trustees, including by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not “interested persons” of the fund (“Independent Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of considering such approval.
 
At a meeting of the Boards of Trustees (each a “Board”) of the Eaton Vance group of mutual funds (the “Eaton Vance Funds”) held on April 26, 2010, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of existing advisory and sub-advisory agreements for the Eaton Vance Funds for an additional one-year period. In voting its approval, the Board relied upon the affirmative recommendation of the Contract Review Committee of the Board, which is a committee comprised exclusively of Independent Trustees. Prior to making its recommendation, the Contract Review Committee reviewed information furnished for a series of meetings of the Contract Review Committee held between February and April 2010. Such information included, among other things, the following:
 
Information about Fees, Performance and Expenses
 
  •  An independent report comparing the advisory and related fees paid by each fund with fees paid by comparable funds;
  •  An independent report comparing each fund’s total expense ratio and its components to comparable funds;
  •  An independent report comparing the investment performance of each fund (including yield where relevant) to the investment performance of comparable funds over various time periods;
  •  Data regarding investment performance in comparison to relevant peer groups of similarly managed funds and appropriate indices;
  •  For each fund, comparative information concerning the fees charged and the services provided by each adviser in managing other mutual funds and institutional accounts using investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing such fund;
  •  Profitability analyses for each adviser with respect to each fund;
 
Information about Portfolio Management
 
  •  Descriptions of the investment management services provided to each fund, including the investment strategies and processes employed, and any changes in portfolio management processes and personnel;
  •  Information concerning the allocation of brokerage and the benefits received by each adviser as a result of brokerage allocation, including information concerning the acquisition of research through “soft dollar” benefits received in connection with the funds’ brokerage, and the implementation of a soft dollar reimbursement program established with respect to the funds;
  •  Data relating to portfolio turnover rates of each fund;
  •  The procedures and processes used to determine the fair value of fund assets and actions taken to monitor and test the effectiveness of such procedures and processes;
 
Information about each Adviser
 
  •  Reports detailing the financial results and condition of each adviser;
  •  Descriptions of the qualifications, education and experience of the individual investment professionals whose responsibilities include portfolio management and investment research for the funds, and information relating to their compensation and responsibilities with respect to managing other mutual funds and investment accounts;
  •  Copies of the Codes of Ethics of each adviser and its affiliates, together with information relating to compliance with and the administration of such codes;
  •  Copies of or descriptions of each adviser’s policies and procedures relating to proxy voting, the handling of corporate actions and class actions;
  •  Information concerning the resources devoted to compliance efforts undertaken by each adviser and its affiliates on behalf of the funds (including descriptions of various compliance programs) and their record of compliance with investment policies and restrictions, including policies with respect to market-timing, late trading and selective portfolio disclosure, and with policies on personal securities transactions;
  •  Descriptions of the business continuity and disaster recovery plans of each adviser and its affiliates;
  •  A description of Eaton Vance Management’s procedures for overseeing third party advisers and sub-advisers;
 
Other Relevant Information
 
  •  Information concerning the nature, cost and character of the administrative and other non-investment management services provided by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates;
  •  Information concerning management of the relationship with the custodian, subcustodians and fund accountants by each adviser or the funds’ administrator; and
  •  The terms of each advisory agreement.

79


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds 
 
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ CONTRACT APPROVAL CONT’D
 
 
In addition to the information identified above, the Contract Review Committee considered information provided from time to time by each adviser throughout the year at meetings of the Board and its committees. Over the course of the twelve-month period ended April 30, 2010, with respect to one or more Funds, the Board met ten times and the Contract Review Committee, the Audit Committee, the Governance Committee, the Portfolio Management Committee and the Compliance Reports and Regulatory Matters Committee, each of which is a Committee comprised solely of Independent Trustees, met nine, thirteen, three, eight and fifteen times, respectively. At such meetings, the Trustees received, among other things, presentations by the portfolio managers and other investment professionals of each adviser relating to the investment performance of each fund and the investment strategies used in pursuing the fund’s investment objective including, where relevant, the use of derivative instruments, as well as trading policies and procedures and risk management techniques.
 
For funds that invest through one or more underlying portfolios, the Board considered similar information about the portfolio(s) when considering the approval of advisory agreements. In addition, in cases where the fund’s investment adviser has engaged a sub-adviser, the Board considered similar information about the sub-adviser when considering the approval of any sub-advisory agreement.
 
The Contract Review Committee was assisted throughout the contract review process by Goodwin Procter LLP, legal counsel for the Independent Trustees. The members of the Contract Review Committee relied upon the advice of such counsel and their own business judgment in determining the material factors to be considered in evaluating each advisory and sub-advisory agreement and the weight to be given to each such factor. The conclusions reached with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement were based on a comprehensive evaluation of all the information provided and not any single factor. Moreover, each member of the Contract Review Committee may have placed varying emphasis on particular factors in reaching conclusions with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement.
 
Results of the Process
 
Based on its consideration of the foregoing, and such other information as it deemed relevant, including the factors and conclusions described below, the Contract Review Committee concluded that the continuance of the investment advisory agreements of the following funds:
 
  •  Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund II (formerly Eaton Vance Insured Municipal Bond Fund II)
  •  Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund II (formerly Eaton Vance Insured California Municipal Bond Fund II)
  •  Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund (formerly Eaton Vance Insured Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund)
  •  Eaton Vance Michigan Municipal Bond Fund (formerly Eaton Vance Insured Michigan Municipal Bond Fund)
  •  Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund (formerly Eaton Vance Insured New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund)
  •  Eaton Vance New York Municipal Bond Fund II (formerly Eaton Vance Insured New York Municipal Bond Fund II)
  •  Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Bond Fund (formerly Eaton Vance Insured Ohio Municipal Bond Fund)
  •  Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund (formerly Eaton Vance Insured Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund)
 
(the “Funds”), each with Eaton Vance Management (the “Adviser”), including their fee structures, is in the interests of shareholders and, therefore, the Contract Review Committee recommended to the Board approval of each agreement. The Board accepted the recommendation of the Contract Review Committee as well as the factors considered and conclusions reached by the Contract Review Committee with respect to each agreement. Accordingly, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of the investment advisory agreement for each Fund.
 
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
 
In considering whether to approve the investment advisory agreements of the Funds, the Board evaluated the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Adviser.
 
The Board considered the Adviser’s management capabilities and investment process with respect to the types of investments held by each Fund, including the education, experience and number of its investment professionals and other personnel who provide portfolio management, investment research, and similar services to the Funds, including recent changes to such personnel (where applicable). In particular, the Board evaluated, where relevant, the abilities and experience of such investment personnel in analyzing factors such as credit risk, tax efficiency, and special considerations relevant to investing in municipal bonds. The Board considered the Adviser’s large municipal bond team, which includes portfolio managers and credit specialists who provide services to the Funds. The Board also took into account the resources dedicated to portfolio management and other services, including the compensation methods of the Adviser to recruit and retain investment personnel, and the time and attention devoted to each Fund by senior management.

80


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds 
 
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ CONTRACT APPROVAL CONT’D
 
The Board also reviewed the compliance programs of the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof. Among other matters, the Board considered compliance and reporting matters relating to personal trading by investment personnel, selective disclosure of portfolio holdings, late trading, frequent trading, portfolio valuation, business continuity and the allocation of investment opportunities. The Board also evaluated the responses of the Adviser and its affiliates to requests in recent years from regulatory authorities such as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
 
The Board considered shareholder and other administrative services provided or managed by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates, including transfer agency and accounting services. The Board evaluated the benefits to shareholders of investing in a fund that is a part of a large family of funds.
 
After consideration of the foregoing factors, among others, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Adviser, taken as a whole, are appropriate and consistent with the terms of the respective investment advisory agreements.
 
Fund Performance
 
The Board compared each Fund’s investment performance to a relevant universe of similarly managed funds identified by an independent data provider and appropriate benchmark indices and, where relevant, a peer group of similarly managed funds. The Board reviewed comparative performance data for the one-, three-, five- and ten-year periods ended September 30, 2009 for each Fund. The Board considered the impact of extraordinary market conditions during 2008 and 2009 on each Fund’s performance relative to its peer universe in light of, among other things, the Adviser’s long-standing strategy of generating current income through investments in higher quality (including insured) municipal bonds with longer maturities. The Board noted that the Adviser had restructured management of the municipal bond team and had implemented additional processes and tools designed to manage credit and interest rate risk. The Board concluded that appropriate actions are being taken by the Adviser to improve Fund performance and that additional time is required to evaluate the effectiveness of such actions.
 
Management Fees and Expenses
 
The Board reviewed contractual investment advisory fee rates payable by each Fund (referred to as “management fees”). As part of its review, the Board considered each Fund’s management fee and total expense ratio for the year ended September 30, 2009, as compared to a group of similarly managed funds selected by an independent data provider. The Board also considered factors that had an impact on the Funds’ expense ratios, as identified by management in response to inquiries from the Contract Review Committee, as well as actions being taken to reduce expenses at the Eaton Vance fund complex level. The Board considered the fact that the Adviser had waived fees and/or paid expenses for each of the Funds.
 
After reviewing the foregoing information, and in light of the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, the Board concluded with respect to each Fund that the management fees charged to the Fund for advisory and related services are reasonable.
 
Profitability
 
The Board reviewed the level of profits realized by the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof in providing investment advisory and administrative services to each Fund and to all Eaton Vance Funds as a group. The Board considered the level of profits realized with and without regard to revenue sharing or other payments by the Adviser and its affiliates to third parties in respect of distribution services. The Board also considered other direct or indirect benefits received by the Adviser and its affiliates in connection with their relationship with the Funds, including the benefits of research services that may be available to the Adviser as a result of securities transactions effected for a Fund and other investment advisory clients.
 
The Board concluded that, in light of the foregoing factors and the nature, extent and quality of the services rendered, the profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates are reasonable.
 
Economies of Scale
 
In reviewing management fees and profitability, the Board also considered the extent to which the Adviser and its affiliates, on the one hand, and each Fund, on the other hand, can expect to realize benefits from economies of scale as the assets of the Fund increase. The Board acknowledged the difficulty in accurately measuring the benefits resulting from the economies of scale with respect to the management of any specific fund or group of funds. The Board also considered the fact that none of the Funds is continuously offered and concluded that, in light of the level of the Adviser’s profits with respect to each Fund, the implementation of breakpoints in the advisory fee schedule is not appropriate at this time. Based upon the foregoing, the Board concluded that the benefits from economies of scale are currently being shared equitably by the Adviser and its affiliates and each Fund.

81


Table of Contents

Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds 
 
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION
 
 
Fund Management. The Trustees and officers of Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund II (EIV), Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund II (EIA), Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund (MAB), Eaton Vance Michigan Municipal Bond Fund (MIW), Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund (EMJ), Eaton Vance New York Municipal Bond Fund II (NYH), Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Bond Fund (EIO), and Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund (EIP) (the Funds) are responsible for the overall management and supervision of the Funds’ affairs. The Trustees and officers of the Funds are listed below. Except as indicated, each individual has held the office shown or other offices in the same company for the last five years. The “Noninterested Trustees” consist of those Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Funds, as that term is defined under the 1940 Act. The business address of each Trustee and officer is Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110. As used below, “EVC” refers to Eaton Vance Corp., “EV” refers to Eaton Vance, Inc., “EVM” refers to Eaton Vance Management, “BMR” refers to Boston Management and Research and “EVD” refers to Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. EVC and EV are the corporate parent and trustee, respectively, of EVM and BMR. EVD is a wholly-owned subsidiary of EVC. Each officer affiliated with Eaton Vance may hold a position with other Eaton Vance affiliates that is comparable to his or her position with EVM listed below.
 
                         
        Term of
      Number of Portfolios
     
    Position(s)
  Office and
      in Fund Complex
     
Name and
  with the
  Length of
  Principal Occupation(s)
  Overseen By
    Other Directorships Held
Date of Birth   Funds   Service   During Past Five Years and Other Relevant Experience   Trustee(1)     During the Last Five Years(2)
 
 
 
Interested Trustee
                         
Thomas E. Faust Jr.
5/31/58
  Class II
Trustee
  Until 2013.
3 years.
Trustee since 2007.
  Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVC, Director and President of EV, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVM and BMR, and Director of EVD. Trustee and/or officer of 184 registered investment companies and 1 private investment company managed by EVM or BMR. Mr. Faust is an interested person because of his positions with EVM, BMR, EVD, EVC and EV, which are affiliates of the Funds.     184     Director of EVC.
 
Noninterested Trustees
                         
Benjamin C. Esty
1/2/63
  Class II
Trustee
  Until 2013.
3 years.
Trustee since 2005.
  Roy and Elizabeth Simmons Professor of Business Administration and Finance Unit Head, Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration.     184     None
                         
Allen R. Freedman
4/3/40
  Class II
Trustee
  Until 2013.
3 years.
Trustee since 2007.
  Private Investor and Consultant. Former Chairman (2002-2004) and a Director (1983-2004) of Systems & Computer Technology Corp. (provider of software to higher education). Formerly, a Director of Loring Ward International (fund distributor) (2005-2007). Formerly, Chairman and a Director of Indus International, Inc. (provider of enterprise management software to the power generating industry) (2005-2007).     184     Director of Assurant, Inc. (insurance provider) and Stonemor Partners, L.P. (owner and operator of cemeteries).
                         
William H. Park
9/19/47
  Class I
Trustee
  Until 2012.
3 years.
Trustee since 2003.
  Chief Financial Officer, Aveon Group, L.P. (an investment management firm) (since 2010). Formerly, Vice Chairman, Commercial Industrial Finance Corp. (specialty finance company) (2006-2010). Formerly, President and Chief Executive Officer, Prizm Capital Management, LLC (investment management firm) (2002-2005). Formerly, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, United Asset Management Corporation (an institutional investment management firm) (1982-2001). Formerly, Senior Manager, Price Waterhouse (now PricewaterhouseCoopers) (an independent registered public accounting firm) (1972-1981).     184     None
                         
Ronald A. Pearlman
7/10/40
  Class III
Trustee
  Until 2011.
3 years.
Trustee since 2003.
  Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center. Formerly, Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax Policy) and Assistant Secretary (Tax Policy), U.S. Department of the Treasury (1983-1985). Formerly, Chief of Staff, Joint Committee on Taxation, U.S. Congress (1988-1990).     184     None

82


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds 
 
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
 
                         
        Term of
      Number of Portfolios
     
    Position(s)
  Office and
      in Fund Complex
     
Name and
  with the
  Length of
  Principal Occupation(s)
  Overseen By
    Other Directorships Held
Date of Birth   Funds   Service   During Past Five Years and Other Relevant Experience   Trustee(1)     During the Last Five Years(2)
 
 
Noninterested Trustees (continued)
                         
Helen Frame Peters
3/22/48
  Class III
Trustee
  Until 2011.
3 years.
Trustee since 2008.
  Professor of Finance, Carroll School of Management, Boston College. Formerly, Dean, Carroll School of Management, Boston College (2000-2002). Formerly, Chief Investment Officer, Fixed Income, Scudder Kemper Investments (investment management firm) (1998-1999). Formerly, Chief Investment Officer, Equity and Fixed Income, Colonial Management Associates (investment management firm) (1991-1998).     184     Director of BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc. (wholesale club retailer). Formerly, Trustee of SPDR Index Shares Funds and SPDR Series Trust (exchange traded funds) (2000-2009). Formerly, Director of Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston (a bank for banks) (2007-2009).
                         
Heidi L. Steiger
7/8/53
  Class III
Trustee
  Until 2011.
3 years.
Trustee since 2007.
  Managing Partner, Topridge Associates LLC (global wealth management firm) (since 2008); Senior Advisor (since 2008), President (2005-2008), Lowenhaupt Global Advisors, LLC (global wealth management firm). Formerly, President and Contributing Editor, Worth Magazine (2004-2005). Formerly, Executive Vice President and Global Head of Private Asset Management (and various other positions), Neuberger Berman (investment firm) (1986-2004).     184     Director of Nuclear Electric Insurance Ltd. (nuclear insurance provider), Aviva USA (insurance provider) and CIFG (family of financial guaranty companies), and Advisory Director of Berkshire Capital Securities LLC (private investment banking firm).
                         
Lynn A. Stout
9/14/57
  Class I
Trustee
  Until 2012.
3 years.
Trustee since 2002.
  Paul Hastings Professor of Corporate and Securities Law (since 2006) and Professor of Law (2001-2006), University of California at Los Angeles School of Law. Professor Stout teaches classes in corporate law and securities regulation and is the author of numerous academic and professional papers on these areas.     184     None
                         
Ralph F. Verni
1/26/43
  Chairman of
the Board and
Class I Trustee
  Until 2012. 3 years. Chairman of the Board since 2007; Trustee since 2005.   Consultant and private investor. Formerly, Chief Investment Officer (1982-1992), Chief Financial Officer (1988-1990) and Director (1982-1992), New England Life. Formerly, Chairperson, New England Mutual Funds (1982-1992). Formerly, President and Chief Executive Officer, State Street Management & Research (1992-2000). Formerly, Chairperson, State Street Research Mutual Funds (1992-2000). Formerly, Director, W.P. Carey, LLC (1998-2004) and First Pioneer Farm Credit Corp. (2002-2006).     184     None
 
Principal Officers who are not Trustees
 
             
        Term of
   
    Position(s)
  Office and
   
Name and
  with the
  Length of
  Principal Occupation(s)
Date of Birth   Funds   Service   During Past Five Years
 
             
Cynthia J. Clemson
3/2/63
  President of EIA,
MIW, NYH, EIO and
EIP; Vice President
of MAB, EIV and EMJ
  President
since 2005 and
Vice President
since 2004
  Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 96 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR.
             
Thomas M. Metzold
8/3/58
  President of MAB, EIV and EMJ; Vice President of
EIA and EIP
  President since 2010 and Vice President of EIA since 2010 and of EIP
since 2005
  Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 57 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR.

83


Table of Contents

 
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds 
 
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
 
             
        Term of
   
    Position(s)
  Office and
   
Name and
  with the
  Length of
  Principal Occupation(s)
Date of Birth   Funds   Service   During Past Five Years
 
 
Principal Officers who are not Trustees (continued)
             
William H. Ahern, Jr.
7/28/59
  Vice President of
MIW, EIV and EIO
  Of MIW since 2002; of EIV since 2004; and of EIO since 2005   Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 80 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR.
             
Craig R. Brandon
12/21/66
  Vice President of
EIA and NYH
  Of EIA since 2010 and of NYH since 2005   Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 50 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR.
             
Adam A. Weigold
3/22/75
  Vice President of
EIP
  Since 2007   Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 73 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR.
             
Barbara E. Campbell
6/19/57
  Treasurer   Since 2005   Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 184 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR.
             
Maureen A. Gemma
5/24/60
  Secretary and Chief
Legal Officer
  Secretary since 2007 and Chief Legal Officer
since 2008
  Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 184 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR.
             
Paul M. O’Neil
7/11/53
  Chief Compliance
Officer
  Since 2004   Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 184 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR.
 
(1) Includes both master and feeder funds in a master-feeder structure.
 
(2) During their respective tenures, the Trustees also served as trustees of one or more of the following Eaton Vance funds (which operated in the years noted): Eaton Vance Credit Opportunities Fund (launched in 2005 and terminated in 2010); Eaton Vance Insured Florida Plus Municipal Bond Fund (launched in 2002 and terminated in 2009); and Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund (launched in 1998 and terminated in 2009).

84


Table of Contents

Investment Adviser and Administrator of
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds
Eaton Vance Management
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
 
 
 
Custodian
State Street Bank and Trust Company
200 Clarendon Street
Boston, MA 02116
 
 
 
Transfer Agent
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company
59 Maiden Lane
Plaza Level
New York, NY 10038
 
 
 
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Deloitte & Touche LLP
200 Berkeley Street
Boston, MA 02116-5022
 
 
 
 
 
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Funds
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110


Table of Contents

1557-11/10 CE-8IMBIISRC


Table of Contents

Item 2. Code of Ethics
The registrant has adopted a code of ethics applicable to its Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer. The registrant undertakes to provide a copy of such code of ethics to any person upon request, without charge, by calling 1-800-262-1122.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert
The registrant’s Board has designated William H. Park, an independent trustee, as its audit committee financial expert. Mr. Park is a certified public accountant who is the Chief Financial Officer of Aveon Group, L.P. (an investment management firm). Previously, he served as the Vice Chairman of Commercial Industrial Finance Corp. (specialty finance company), as President and Chief Executive Officer of Prizm Capital Management, LLC (investment management firm), as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of United Asset Management Corporation (an institutional investment management firm) and as a Senior Manager at Price Waterhouse (now PricewaterhouseCoopers) (an independent registered public accounting firm).
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
(a) –(d)
The following table presents the aggregate fees billed to the registrant for the registrant’s fiscal years ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2010 by the Fund’s principal accountant, Deloitte & Touche LLP (“D&T”), for professional services rendered for the audit of the registrant’s annual financial statements and fees billed for other services rendered by the principal accountant during such period.
                 
Fiscal Years Ended   9/30/09   9/30/10
 
Audit Fees
  $ 25,380     $ 25,380  
Audit-Related Fees(1)
  $ 3,915     $ 3,915  
Tax Fees(2)
  $ 8,402     $ 8,402  
All Other Fees(3)
  $ 0     $ 500  
     
Total
  $ 37,697     $ 38,197  
     
 
(1)   Audit-related fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the registrant’s financial statements and are not reported under the category of audit fees and specifically include fees for the performance of certain agreed-upon procedures relating to the registrant’s auction preferred shares.
 
(2)   Tax fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by the principal accountant relating to tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning and specifically include fees for tax return preparation.
 
(3)   All other fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for products and services provided by the registrant’s principal accountant other than audit, audit-related, and tax services.
(e)(1) The registrant’s audit committee has adopted policies and procedures relating to the pre-approval of services provided by the registrant’s principal accountant (the “Pre-Approval Policies”). The Pre-Approval Policies establish a framework intended to assist the audit committee in the proper discharge of its pre-approval responsibilities. As a general matter, the Pre-Approval Policies (i) specify certain types of audit, audit-related, tax, and other services determined to be pre-approved by the audit committee; and (ii) delineate specific procedures governing the mechanics of the pre-approval process, including the approval and monitoring of audit and non-audit service fees. Unless a service is specifically pre-approved under the Pre-Approval Policies, it must be separately pre-approved by the audit committee.
The Pre-Approval Policies and the types of audit and non-audit services pre-approved therein must be reviewed and ratified by the registrant’s audit committee at least annually. The registrant’s audit committee maintains full responsibility for the appointment, compensation, and oversight of the work of the registrant’s principal accountant.

 


Table of Contents

(e)(2) No services described in paragraphs (b)-(d) above were approved by the registrant’s audit committee pursuant to the “de minimis exception” set forth in Rule 2-01 (c)(7)(i)(C) of Regulation S-X.
(f) Not applicable.
(g) The following table presents (i) the aggregate non-audit fees (i.e., fees for audit-related, tax, and other services) billed to the registrant by D&T for the registrant’s fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 and the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010; and (ii) the aggregate non-audit fees (i.e., fees for audit-related, tax, and other services) billed to the Eaton Vance organization by D&T for the same time periods
                 
Fiscal Years Ended   9/30/09   9/30/10
 
Registrant
  $ 12,317     $ 12,817  
Eaton Vance(1)
  $ 288,889     $ 278,901  
 
(1)   The investment adviser to the registrant, as well as any of its affiliates that provide ongoing services to the registrant, are subsidiaries of Eaton Vance Corp.
(h) The registrant’s audit committee has considered whether the provision by the registrant’s principal accountant of non-audit services to the registrant’s investment adviser and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant that were not pre-approved pursuant to Rule 2-01(c)(7)(ii) of Regulation S-X is compatible with maintaining the principal accountant’s independence.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants
The registrant has a separately-designated standing audit committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. William H. Park (Chair), Lynn A. Stout, Heidi L. Steiger and Ralph F. Verni are the members of the registrant’s audit committee.
Item 6. Schedule of Investments
Please see schedule of investments contained in the Report to Stockholders included under Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies
The Board of Trustees of the Trust has adopted a proxy voting policy and procedure (the “Fund Policy”), pursuant to which the Trustees have delegated proxy voting responsibility to the Fund’s investment adviser and adopted the investment adviser’s proxy voting policies and procedures (the “Policies”) which are described below. The Trustees will review the Fund’s proxy voting records from time to time and will annually consider approving the Policies for the upcoming year. In the event that a conflict of interest arises between the Fund’s shareholders and the investment adviser, the administrator, or any of their affiliates or any affiliate of the Fund, the investment adviser will generally refrain from voting the proxies related to the companies giving rise to such conflict until it consults with the Board’s Special Committee except as contemplated under the Fund Policy. The Board’s Special Committee will instruct the investment adviser on the appropriate course of action.

 


Table of Contents

The Policies are designed to promote accountability of a company’s management to its shareholders and to align the interests of management with those shareholders. An independent proxy voting service (“Agent”), currently Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc., has been retained to assist in the voting of proxies through the provision of vote analysis, implementation and recordkeeping and disclosure services. The investment adviser will generally vote proxies through the Agent. The Agent is required to vote all proxies and/or refer then back to the investment adviser pursuant to the Policies. It is generally the policy of the investment adviser to vote in accordance with the recommendation of the Agent. The Agent shall refer to the investment adviser proxies relating to mergers and restructurings, and the disposition of assets, termination, liquidation and mergers contained in mutual fund proxies. The investment adviser will normally vote against anti-takeover measures and other proposals designed to limit the ability of shareholders to act on possible transactions, except in the case of closed-end management investment companies. The investment adviser generally supports management on social and environmental proposals. The investment adviser may abstain from voting from time to time where it determines that the costs associated with voting a proxy outweighs the benefits derived from exercising the right to vote or the economic effect on shareholders interests or the value of the portfolio holding is indeterminable or insignificant.
In addition, the investment adviser will monitor situations that may result in a conflict of interest between the Fund’s shareholders and the investment adviser, the administrator, or any of their affiliates or any affiliate of the Fund by maintaining a list of significant existing and prospective corporate clients. The investment adviser’s personnel responsible for reviewing and voting proxies on behalf of the Fund will report any proxy received or expected to be received from a company included on that list to the personal of the investment adviser identified in the Policies. If such personnel expects to instruct the Agent to vote such proxies in a manner inconsistent with the guidelines of the Policies or the recommendation of the Agent, the personnel will consult with members of senior management of the investment adviser to determine if a material conflict of interests exists. If it is determined that a material conflict does exist, the investment adviser will seek instruction on how to vote from the Special Committee.
Information on how the Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12 month period ended June 30 is available (1) without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-262-1122, and (2) on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies
California Municipal Bond Fund II, Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund, Michigan Municipal Bond Fund, Municipal Bond Fund II, New York Municipal Bond Fund II, New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund, Ohio Municipal Bond Fund, Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund
Portfolio Management
Cynthia J. Clemson, portfolio manager of Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund II, William H. Ahern, Jr., portfolio manager of Eaton Vance Michigan Municipal Bond Fund, Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund II and Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Bond Fund, Craig R. Brandon, portfolio manager of Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund and Eaton Vance New York Municipal Bond Fund II and Adam A. Weigold, portfolio manager of Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund and Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund are responsible for the overall and day-to-day management of each Fund’s investments.
Ms. Clemson has been an Eaton Vance portfolio manager since 1991 and is a Vice President of Eaton Vance Management (“EVM”) and Boston Management and Research (“BMR”). Mr. Ahern has been

 


Table of Contents

an Eaton Vance portfolio manager since 1993 and is a Vice President of EVM and BMR. Mr. Brandon has been an Eaton Vance analyst since 1998 and a portfolio manager since 2004, and is a Vice President of EVM and BMR. Mr. Weigold has been a credit analyst with Eaton Vance since 1991 and a portfolio manager since 2007, and is a Vice President of EVM and BMR. This information is provided as of the date of filing of this report.
The following tables show, as of each Fund’s most recent fiscal year end, the number of accounts each portfolio manager managed in each of the listed categories and the total assets (in millions of dollars) in the accounts managed within each category. The table also shows the number of accounts with respect to which the advisory fee is based on the performance of the account, if any, and the total assets (in millions of dollars) in those accounts.
                                 
                    Number of    
    Number   Total Assets   Accounts   Total Assets of
    of All   of All   Paying a   Accounts Paying a
    Accounts   Accounts   Performance Fee   Performance Fee
Cynthia J. Clemson
                               
Registered Investment Companies
    11     $ 3,008.6       0     $ 0  
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles
    0     $ 0       0     $ 0  
Other Accounts
    0     $ 0       0     $ 0  
 
                               
William H. Ahern, Jr.
                               
Registered Investment Companies
    14     $ 3,379.0       0     $ 0  
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles
    0     $ 0       0     $ 0  
Other Accounts
    1     $ 17.8       0     $ 0  
 
                               
Craig R. Brandon
                               
Registered Investment Companies
    14     $ 1,822.8       0     $ 0  
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles
    0     $ 0       0     $ 0  
Other Accounts
    0     $ 0       0     $ 0  
 
                               
Adam A. Weigold
                               
Registered Investment Companies
    14     $ 1,437.1       0     $ 0  
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles
    0     $ 0       0     $ 0  
Other Accounts
    1     $ 17.1       0     $ 0  

 


Table of Contents

The following table shows the dollar range of Fund shares beneficially owned by each portfolio manager as of each Fund’s most recent fiscal year end.
     
    Dollar Range
    of Equity
    Securities Owned
    in the Fund
California Municipal Bond Fund II
   
   Cynthia J. Clemson
  None
 
   
Michigan Municipal Bond Fund
   
Municipal Bond Fund II
   
Ohio Municipal Bond Fund
   
   William H. Ahern, Jr.
  None
 
   
Massachusetts Municipal Bond Fund
   
New York Municipal Bond Fund II
   
   Craig R. Brandon
  None
 
New Jersey Municipal Bond Fund
   
Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund
   
   Adam A. Weigold
  None
Potential for Conflicts of Interest. It is possible that conflicts of interest may arise in connection with a portfolio manager’s management of a Fund’s investments on the one hand and investments of other accounts for which a portfolio manager is responsible on the other. For example, a portfolio manager may have conflicts of interest in allocating management time, resources and investment opportunities among the Fund and other accounts he or she advises. In addition, due to differences in the investment strategies or restrictions between a Fund and the other accounts, a portfolio manager may take action with respect to another account that differs from the action taken with respect to the Fund. In some cases, another account managed by a portfolio manager may compensate the investment adviser or sub-adviser based on the performance of the securities held by that account. The existence of such a performance based fee may create additional conflicts of interest for a portfolio manager in the allocation of management time, resources and investment opportunities. Whenever conflicts of interest arise, a portfolio manager will endeavor to exercise his or her discretion in a manner that he or she believes is equitable to all interested persons. EVM has adopted several policies and procedures designed to address these potential conflicts including: a code of ethics; and policies which govern the investment adviser’s trading practices, including among other things the aggregation and allocation of trades among clients, brokerage allocation, cross trades and best execution.
Compensation Structure for EVM
Compensation of EVM’s portfolio managers and other investment professionals has three primary components: (1) a base salary, (2) an annual cash bonus, and (3) annual stock-based compensation consisting of options to purchase shares of EVC’s nonvoting common stock and/or restricted shares of EVC’s nonvoting common stock. EVM’s investment professionals also receive certain retirement, insurance and other benefits that are broadly available to EVM’s employees. Compensation of EVM’s investment professionals is reviewed primarily on an annual basis. Cash bonuses, stock-based compensation awards, and adjustments in base salary are typically paid or put into effect at or shortly after the October 31st fiscal year end of EVC.
Method to Determine Compensation. EVM compensates its portfolio managers based primarily on the scale and complexity of their portfolio responsibilities and the total return performance of managed funds and accounts versus the benchmark(s) stated in the prospectus, as well as an appropriate peer

 


Table of Contents

group (as described below). In addition to rankings within peer groups of funds on the basis of absolute performance, consideration may also be given to relative risk-adjusted performance. Risk-adjusted performance measures include, but are not limited to, the Sharpe Ratio. Performance is normally based on periods ending on the September 30th preceding fiscal year end. Fund performance is normally evaluated primarily versus peer groups of funds as determined by Lipper Inc. and/or Morningstar, Inc. When a fund’s peer group as determined by Lipper or Morningstar is deemed by EVM’s management not to provide a fair comparison, performance may instead be evaluated primarily against a custom peer group. In evaluating the performance of a fund and its manager, primary emphasis is normally placed on three-year performance, with secondary consideration of performance over longer and shorter periods. For funds that are tax-managed or otherwise have an objective of after-tax returns, performance is measured net of taxes. For other funds, performance is evaluated on a pre-tax basis. For funds with an investment objective other than total return (such as current income), consideration will also be given to the fund’s success in achieving its objective. For managers responsible for multiple funds and accounts, investment performance is evaluated on an aggregate basis, based on averages or weighted averages among managed funds and accounts. Funds and accounts that have performance-based advisory fees are not accorded disproportionate weightings in measuring aggregate portfolio manager performance.
The compensation of portfolio managers with other job responsibilities (such as heading an investment group or providing analytical support to other portfolios) will include consideration of the scope of such responsibilities and the managers’ performance in meeting them.
EVM seeks to compensate portfolio managers commensurate with their responsibilities and performance, and competitive with other firms within the investment management industry. EVM participates in investment-industry compensation surveys and utilizes survey data as a factor in determining salary, bonus and stock-based compensation levels for portfolio managers and other investment professionals. Salaries, bonuses and stock-based compensation are also influenced by the operating performance of EVM and its parent company. The overall annual cash bonus pool is based on a substantially fixed percentage of pre-bonus operating income. While the salaries of EVM’s portfolio managers are comparatively fixed, cash bonuses and stock-based compensation may fluctuate significantly from year to year, based on changes in manager performance and other factors as described herein. For a high performing portfolio manager, cash bonuses and stock-based compensation may represent a substantial portion of total compensation.
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers
No such purchases this period.
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No Material Changes.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures
(a) It is the conclusion of the registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer that the effectiveness of the registrant’s current disclosure controls and procedures (such disclosure controls and procedures having been evaluated within 90 days of the date of this filing) provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the registrant has been recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in the Commission’s rules and forms and that the information required to be disclosed by the registrant has been accumulated and communicated

 


Table of Contents

to the registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer in order to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) There have been no changes in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Item 12. Exhibits
     
(a)(1)
  Registrant’s Code of Ethics – Not applicable (please see Item 2).
(a)(2)(i)
  Treasurer’s Section 302 certification.
(a)(2)(ii)
  President’s Section 302 certification.
(b)
  Combined Section 906 certification.

 


Table of Contents

Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Eaton Vance Pennsylvania Municipal Bond Fund
         
By:
  /s/ Cynthia J. Clemson    
 
 
 
Cynthia J. Clemson
   
 
  President    
Date: November 15, 2010
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
         
By:
  /s/ Barbara E. Campbell    
 
 
 
Barbara E. Campbell
   
 
  Treasurer    
Date: November 15, 2010
         
By:
  /s/ Cynthia J. Clemson    
 
 
 
Cynthia J. Clemson
   
 
  President    
Date: November 15, 2010