e424b5
Table of Contents

The information in this prospectus supplement is not complete and may be changed. This prospectus supplement and the related prospectus are not an offer to sell these securities, and they are not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(5)
Registration No. 333-110534
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED AUGUST 3, 2005
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
(To Prospectus Dated November 14, 2003)
(ADVANCED ENERGY LOGO)
10,000,000 Shares
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
Common Stock
$                   per share
 
          We are selling 10,000,000 shares of our common stock. We have granted the underwriters an option to purchase up to 1,500,000 additional shares of common stock to cover over-allotments.
      Our common stock is quoted on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol “AEIS.” The last reported sale price of our common stock on the Nasdaq National Market on August 2, 2005 was $9.80 per share.
       Investing in our common stock involves risks. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page S-9 of this prospectus supplement.
       Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus supplement or the related prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
 
             
    Per Share   Total
         
Public Offering Price
  $     $  
Underwriting Discount
  $     $  
Proceeds to Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. (before expenses)
  $     $  
      The underwriters expect to deliver the shares to purchasers on or about August      , 2005.
  Sole Book-Runner
Citigroup Lehman Brothers
Adams Harkness Needham & Company, LLC
August   , 2005


      You should rely only on the information contained in or incorporated by reference in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with different information. We are not making an offer of these securities in any state where the offer is not permitted. You should not assume that the information contained in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus is accurate as of any date other than the date on the front of this prospectus supplement. Information in this prospectus supplement updates and modifies the information in the accompanying prospectus.
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
         
    Page
     
Prospectus Supplement
    S-1  
    S-2  
    S-8  
    S-9  
    S-17  
    S-17  
    S-18  
    S-19  
    S-20  
    S-22  
    S-24  
    S-24  
    S-25  
    S-25  
    F-1  
         
    Page
     
Prospectus
    1  
    1  
    3  
    3  
    4  
    4  
    5  
    6  
    12  
    14  
    14  
    14  
    15  

i


Table of Contents

ABOUT THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
      This prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus are part of a registration statement on Form S-3 (File no. 333-110534) that we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission utilizing a shelf registration process and that was declared effective on December 11, 2003. Under this shelf registration process, we may, from time to time, sell up to $250,000,000 of common stock or debt securities, of which this offering is a part.
      This document is in two parts. The first part is this prospectus supplement, which describes the terms of this offering of common stock and also adds, updates and changes information contained in the accompanying prospectus and the documents incorporated by reference. The second part is the prospectus, which gives more general information, some of which may not apply to this offering of common stock. To the extent the information contained in this prospectus supplement differs or varies from the information contained in the accompanying prospectus or any document incorporated by reference, the information in this prospectus supplement shall control. You should read both this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus as well as the additional information described under “Where You Can Find More Information” on page S-25 of this prospectus supplement before investing in our common stock.
      Unless otherwise stated, information in this prospectus supplement assumes the underwriters will not exercise their over-allotment option to purchase additional shares of our common stock and no other person will exercise any other outstanding options or warrants to purchase shares of our common stock or convert our outstanding convertible subordinated notes into shares of our common stock.
      This document includes product names, trade names and trademarks of other companies. All such product names and trademarks appearing in this document are the property of their respective holders.

S-1


Table of Contents

PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT SUMMARY
      This summary highlights selected information contained elsewhere or incorporated by reference in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus and may not contain all the information that is important to you. For a more complete understanding of this offering, you are encouraged to read this entire prospectus supplement, the accompanying prospectus, and the documents incorporated by reference. Unless otherwise indicated, “we,” “us,” or “our” refer to Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
      We design, manufacture and support a group of key components and subsystems primarily for vacuum process systems. Our primary products consist of complex power conversion and control systems. Our products also control the flow of gases into the process chambers for semiconductor equipment and provide thermal control and sensing within the chamber. Our customers use our products in plasma-based thin-film processing equipment that is essential to the manufacture of, among other things:
  •  Semiconductor devices for electronics applications;
 
  •  Flat panel displays for hand-held devices, computer and television screens;
 
  •  Compact discs, DVDs and other digital storage media; and
 
  •  Optical coatings for architectural glass, eyeglasses and solar panels.
      We also sell spare parts and provide support, educational and consulting services worldwide through our customer service and technical support organization.
      We market and sell our products primarily to large, original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, of semiconductor, flat panel display, data storage and other industrial thin-film manufacturing equipment. Sales to customers in the semiconductor capital equipment industry comprised 53% of our sales in the first six months of 2005 and 60% of our sales in the full year 2004. Sales to customers in the flat panel display equipment industry comprised 21% of our sales in the first six months of 2005 and 14% of our sales in the full year 2004. We sell our products primarily through direct sales personnel to customers in the United States, Europe and Asia and, to a much lesser extent, through distributors. International sales represented approximately 48% of our sales in the first six months of 2005 and 47% of our sales in the full year 2004. Additionally, many of our products sold domestically are placed on systems shipped overseas by our customers.
      Our primary manufacturing facility is located in Shenzhen, China. This manufacturing facility, now comprising over 100,000 square feet, was opened in April 2003 with the intention that it would become our high volume manufacturing location. Approximately 75% of the power units and approximately 90% of the mass flow controller units that we sold in June 2005 were manufactured at our Shenzhen, China facility. In connection with the development of this manufacturing facility, we began to source a significant portion of our raw materials, parts, components and subassemblies from high-quality, low-cost Asian suppliers. We continue to have other manufacturing facilities in Fort Collins, Colorado; Stolberg, Germany; Hachioji, Japan; and Vancouver, Washington. Our Fort Collins and Hachioji manufacturing facilities are now focused on new product design and launch programs, integrated services, low volume legacy products and advanced manufacturing processes. We expect that our manufacturing facility in Shenzhen, China and the use of our Asian-based supply chain will permit us to lower our manufacturing, repair and supply costs, and enhance our operational efficiency.
Our Products
      Our major products fall into four categories: Power, Flow Control, Thermal Instrumentation and Source Technology. Our product solutions are designed to maximize the efficiency and productivity of our customers’ process equipment and lower their cost of ownership of that equipment. We offer our customers

S-2


Table of Contents

integrated and innovative solutions, which better enable their advanced processes, such as plasma-based deposition, etch and electroplating. These processes continue to be critical for our semiconductor customers as silicon wafer sizes have increased to 300mm and line widths have decreased below 90 nanometers. Through a focused and significant commitment to research and development, we have created products that have achieved technology and market leadership in their respective categories. In 2004, according to VLSI Research, an independent research firm, we were a market leader, based on revenue, for power and flow control systems for the semiconductor capital equipment and flat panel display manufacturing equipment industries.
      Power. Our power systems include direct current, or DC, high power, low and mid frequency, and radio frequency, or RF, power supplies, matching networks and RF instrumentation. Our power systems refine, modify and control the raw electrical power from a utility and convert it into power that is uniform, predictable and repeatable. Our power systems are primarily used by semiconductor and flat panel display manufacturers in the following applications: physical vapor deposition, or PVD; chemical vapor deposition, or CVD; reactive sputtering; electroplating; plasma vacuum processes and bias; and oxide, poly and conductor etch. Our products are also used by optical storage and architectural glass manufacturers. According to VLSI Research estimates, our power systems captured a leading market share, based on revenue, of approximately 50% of the DC and RF power subsystems market in 2004.
      Flow Control. Our flow control products include thermal mass flow controllers, or MFCs, pressure-based MFCs, multi-gas, multi-range MFCs, liquid MFCs, liquid vapor delivery systems and pressure control systems. Our flow control products control and monitor the flow of high-purity liquids, liquid vapor, and gases encompassing a wide range of input pressures. Our flow control products are primarily used in semiconductor and flat panel display applications, fiber optics, safe delivery system applications, chemical vapor deposition and silica industries. VLSI Research estimated that our flow control products represented approximately 21% of the mass flow controller market, based on revenue, in 2004.
      Thermal Instrumentation. Our thermal instrumentation products, primarily used in the semiconductor industry, provide thermal management and control solutions for applications where time-temperature cycles affect productivity and yield. They are used in physical vapor deposition, chemical vapor deposition, rapid thermal processing and other semiconductor applications requiring non-contact temperature measurement, chemical mechanical polishing and lithography.
      Source Technology. Our source technology products include plasma and ion beam sources which are used in the direct deposition of thin films of diamond-like carbon, ion-assisted deposition, ion beam etching, optical coating, industrial coating, pre-cleaning, poly-fluorocarbon abatement and chamber cleaning.
      Other Products. We also offer DC-to-DC converters specifically designed to power low-voltage, high-current microprocessors, application-specific integrated circuits, logic and memory chips and servers.
Our Markets
      Most of our sales have historically been to customers in the semiconductor capital equipment industry. Our products are also used in the flat panel display, data storage and advanced product applications markets. Our objective is to leverage our innovative technology solutions used in our core

S-3


Table of Contents

markets to penetrate other adjacent and new high-growth markets. The following table sets forth percentages of our sales by customer type:
                         
            Six Months
        Ended
    Year Ended December 31,   June 30,
         
    2003   2004   2005
             
Semiconductor capital equipment
    59 %     60 %     53 %
Flat panel display
    11       14       21  
Data storage
    10       8       5  
Advanced product applications
    20       18       21  
      Semiconductor Capital Equipment Manufacturing Market. We sell our products to semiconductor capital equipment manufacturers primarily for incorporation into equipment used to make integrated circuits. Our power systems provide the energy to drive the chemical reaction for thin-film processes such as deposition and etch. Our flow control products control the fluid or gas being delivered to ensure high-purity, our thermal instrumentation products measure the temperature of the process chamber and our source technology products optimize CVD clean, deposition and etch processes. The precise control over plasma-based processes enables the production of integrated circuits with reduced feature sizes and increased speed and performance. As the semiconductor industry continues to focus on smaller line-widths and manufacturing geometries, our products become increasingly critical components of leading-edge semiconductor capital equipment. We anticipate that the semiconductor capital equipment industry will continue to constitute a substantial part of the market for our products for the foreseeable future.
      Flat Panel Display Manufacturing Equipment Market. We sell our products to manufacturers of flat panel displays and flat panel projection devices, which have fabrication processes similar to those employed in manufacturing integrated circuits. Flat panel technology produces bright, sharp, large, color-rich images on flat screens for products ranging from hand-held devices to laptop and desktop computer monitors to plasma and liquid crystal display-screen televisions. The transition to larger panel sizes and higher display resolution is driving the need for tighter process controls to reduce manufacturing costs and defects. We sell our power and MFC products into the major submarkets of the flat panel display industry, including liquid crystal displays; field emitter displays; gas plasma displays; liquid crystal projection; and digital micro-mirror displays.
      Data Storage Manufacturing Equipment Markets. We sell products to manufacturers of data storage equipment and data storage devices for use in producing a variety of products, including CDs, CD-ROMs and DVDs; computer hard discs, including both media and thin-film heads; and optical storage media. These products use a PVD process to produce optical and magnetic thin-film layers as well as a protective-wear layer. In this market, the trend towards higher recording densities requires denser, thinner and more precise films. The use of equipment incorporating magnetic media to store analog and digital data has expanded with the growth of the laptop, desktop and workstation computer markets and the consumer electronics audio and video markets.
      Advanced Product Applications Markets. We sell our products to OEMs and producers of end products in a variety of industrial markets. Thin-film optical coatings are used in the manufacture of many industrial products, including solar panels, architectural glass, eyeglasses, lenses, barcode readers and front surface mirrors. Thin films of diamond-like coatings and other materials are currently applied to products in plasma-based processes to strengthen and harden surfaces on such diverse products as tools, razor blades, automotive parts and hip joint replacements. Other thin-film processes that use our products enable a variety of industrial packaging applications such as decorative wrapping and food packaging. The advanced thin-film production processes allow precise control of various optical and physical properties, including color, transparency and electrical and thermal conductivity. The improved adhesion and high-film quality resulting from plasma-based processing make it the preferred method of applying thin films. Many of these thin-film industrial applications require power levels substantially greater than those used in our other markets.

S-4


Table of Contents

      Also included in the advanced product applications markets are our sales to OEMs of industrial laser and medical applications, high-end computing, and automated test equipment products.
Corporate Information
      We incorporated in Colorado in 1981 and reincorporated in Delaware in 1995. In 1995, we effected the initial public offering of our common stock. Our executive offices are located at 1625 Sharp Point Drive, Fort Collins, Colorado 80525, and our telephone number is 970-221-4670. Our website address is www.advanced-energy.com. The information available on or through our website is not a part of this prospectus supplement or the accompanying prospectus.
Recent Developments
Second Quarter Results of Operations
      On July 28, 2005, we announced that our total sales for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 were $87.4 million, up 1.4% compared to first quarter 2005 sales of $86.1 million and down 19.7% from second quarter 2004 sales of $108.9 million. Gross margin was 36.7% of sales in the second quarter of 2005 compared to 33.8% in the first quarter of 2005 and 34.0% in the second quarter of 2004. Net income for the second quarter was $5.9 million, or $0.18 per diluted share, which included income from discontinued operations of $2.6 million, or $0.08 per diluted share, reflecting a gain from the sale of our EMCO Industrial Flow product line. Income from continuing operations was $3.3 million, or $0.10 per diluted share, compared to income from continuing operations of $734,000, or $0.02 per diluted share, in the first quarter of 2005 and income from continuing operations of $4.5 million, or $0.13 per diluted share, in the second quarter of 2004. Included in the second quarter 2005 income from continuing operations is a $1.1 million, or $0.03 per diluted share, after-tax gain from the sale of certain marketable securities.
      Revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2005 was $173.5 million compared to $213.4 million for the first six months of 2004. Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2005 was $6.7 million, or $0.20 per diluted share, which included income from discontinued operations of $2.6 million, or $0.08 per diluted share, reflecting a gain from the sale of our EMCO Industrial Flow product line. Income from continuing operations for the six months ended June 30, 2005 was $4.0 million, or $0.12 per diluted share, compared to income from continuing operations for the six months ended June 30, 2004 of $11.4 million, or $0.34 per diluted share. Income from continuing operations for the six months ended June 30, 2005 includes a $1.1 million, or $0.03 per diluted share, after tax gain from the sale of certain marketable securities.
Appointment of Dr. Hans Betz as President and Chief Executive Officer
      On August 1, 2005, Dr. Hans Betz became our President and Chief Executive Officer. Dr. Betz has served on our Board of Directors since July 2004. Douglas Schatz retired from the President and Chief Executive Officer position, and he is continuing to serve on our Board of Directors as Non-Executive Chairman.

S-5


Table of Contents

The Offering
Common stock offered by Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. 10,000,000 shares
 
Common stock to be outstanding after the offering 42,839,899 shares
 
Use of proceeds We intend to use approximately $68.1 million of the net proceeds of this offering to redeem our 51/4% convertible subordinated notes due 2006, and the remainder for working capital and general corporate purposes, which could include the redemption or repurchase of our outstanding 5% convertible subordinated notes due 2006. Prior to their application, we expect to invest the net proceeds in short-term, interest-bearing, investment-grade securities. See “Use of Proceeds.”
 
Nasdaq National Market symbol AEIS
      The number of shares of common stock that will be outstanding after the offering is based on 32,839,899 shares outstanding as of August 1, 2005. This number does not include:
  •  3,959,630 shares of common stock subject to options outstanding under our employee and director stock option plans, with a weighted average exercise price of $18.23 per share;
 
  •  277,810 shares of common stock subject to restricted stock units outstanding under our 2003 employee stock option plan;
 
  •  1,298,618 additional shares of common stock available for issuance under our employee and director stock option plans;
 
  •  166,650 shares of common stock issuable under our employee stock purchase plan;
 
  •  shares of common stock reserved for issuance upon the conversion of our outstanding 51/4% convertible subordinated notes, with a conversion price of $49.53 per share; and
 
  •  shares of common stock reserved for issuance upon the conversion of our outstanding 5% convertible subordinated notes, with a conversion price of $29.83 per share.

S-6


Table of Contents

Summary Consolidated Financial Data
      The following summary consolidated financial data should be read together with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes included and incorporated by reference in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus. The summary consolidated statement of operations data for the year ended December 31, 2004, was derived from our consolidated financial statements audited by Grant Thornton LLP, independent registered public accounting firm. The summary consolidated statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003 were derived from our consolidated financial statements audited by KPMG LLP, independent registered public accounting firm. The related audit reports are included and incorporated by reference in this prospectus supplement and incorporated by reference in the accompanying prospectus. The unaudited summary consolidated financial data for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2005 and as of June 30, 2005 have been prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements included and incorporated by reference in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus and include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, that we consider necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position and operating results for the periods presented. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected in the future, and results of interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the entire year. The unaudited as adjusted balance sheet data gives effect to the issuance by us of 10,000,000 shares of our common stock, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses, at an assumed public offering price of $9.80 per share, and the application of the net proceeds therefrom.
                                         
        Six Months Ended
    Years Ended December 31,   June 30,
         
    2002   2003   2004   2004   2005
                     
    (In thousands, except per share data)
Statement of Operations Data:
                                       
Sales
  $ 238,898     $ 262,402     $ 395,305     $ 213,356     $ 173,526  
Cost of goods sold
    170,138       174,455       275,626       137,980       112,403  
Gross profit
    68,760       87,947       119,679       75,376       61,123  
Research and development expenses
    48,995       51,647       51,541       26,219       22,031  
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    66,586       53,951       62,444       30,186       27,959  
Total operating expenses
    130,745       111,079       121,223       56,812       52,320  
(Loss) income from operations
    (61,985 )     (23,132 )     (1,544 )     18,564       8,803  
Net (loss) income
  $ (41,399 )   $ (44,241 )   $ (12,747 )   $ 11,394     $ 6,683  
                               
Diluted net (loss) earnings per share
  $ (1.29 )   $ (1.37 )   $ (0.39 )   $ 0.34     $ 0.20  
                               
Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding
    32,026       32,271       32,649       33,435       32,986  
                 
    As of June 30, 2005
     
    Actual   As Adjusted
         
    (In thousands)
Balance Sheet Data:
               
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities
  $ 137,787     $ 162,741  
Working capital
    214,740       240,129  
Total assets
    391,233       415,810  
Total debt and capital lease obligations
    193,719       127,501  
Stockholders’ equity
    146,135       237,365  

S-7


Table of Contents

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
      This prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus include and incorporate by reference certain “forward-looking statements” within the meanings of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements contained or incorporated by reference in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus, other than statements of historical fact, are “forward-looking statements.” For example, statements relating to our beliefs, expectations, plans and projections are forward-looking as are statements that specified actions, conditions or circumstances will continue or change. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by the inclusion of words such as “believe,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “estimate” and similar words.
      Some of the forward-looking statements contained or incorporated by reference in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus are expectations or projections relating to:
  •  Our future revenues;
 
  •  Our future operating expenses and operating results;
 
  •  Demand for our products and our customers’ products in the semiconductor, semiconductor capital equipment and flat panel display industries;
 
  •  Our recent transition of high-volume manufacturing to Shenzhen, China;
 
  •  Our recent transition to high-quality, low-cost suppliers in Asia;
 
  •  Our international operations, including currency fluctuations;
 
  •  Customer inventory levels, requirements and order levels;
 
  •  Remediation of material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting;
 
  •  Sufficiency and availability of raw materials, parts, components and subassemblies;
 
  •  Our ability to redeem, repurchase or refinance our 5% convertible subordinated notes due in 2006;
 
  •  Actions of our competitors;
 
  •  Protection of our existing and future intellectual property; and
 
  •  General global economic conditions.
      Our actual results could differ materially from those projected or assumed in our forward-looking statements, because forward-looking statements by their nature are subject to risks and uncertainties. Factors that could contribute to these differences or prove our forward-looking statements, in hindsight, to have been overly optimistic or unachievable include the factors described in the following section entitled “Risk Factors.” Other factors might also contribute to differences between our forward-looking statements and our actual results. We assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statement or to explain the reasons why our actual results might differ.

S-8


Table of Contents

RISK FACTORS
      You should carefully consider the risks described below before making an investment decision.
Risks Related to our Business
The semiconductor, semiconductor capital equipment and flat panel display industries are highly cyclical, which impacts our operating results.
      Our business and operating results depend in significant part upon capital expenditures by manufacturers of semiconductors and flat panel displays, which in turn depend upon current and anticipated demand for their products. Historically, these industries have been highly cyclical, with recurring periods of over-supply that have had a negative impact on the demand for capital equipment used to manufacture their products.
      During periods of declining demand, our customers typically reduce purchases of, and cancel orders for, our products and delay delivery of their own products. We may incur significant charges as we seek to align our cost structure with any such reduction in sales to these customers. In addition, we may not be able to respond adequately or quickly to the declining demand by reducing our costs. We may also be required to record significant reserves for excess and obsolete inventory as demand for our products changes. Our inability to reduce costs and the charges resulting from other actions taken in response to changes in demand for our products would adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
Our quarterly and annual operating results fluctuate significantly and are difficult to predict.
      Our operating results may be adversely affected by a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control and difficult to predict. These factors include:
  •  Fluctuations in demand in the semiconductor, semiconductor capital equipment and flat panel display industries and other industries in which our customers operate;
 
  •  The timing and nature of orders placed by our customers;
 
  •  Seasonal variations in capital spending by our customers;
 
  •  Changes in our customers’ inventory management practices;
 
  •  Customer cancellation or postponement of previously placed orders;
 
  •  Pricing competition from our competitors;
 
  •  Customer requests for us to reduce prices, enhance features, improve reliability, shorten delivery times and extend payment terms;
 
  •  Component shortages or allocations or other factors that result in delays in manufacturing and sales or result in changes to our inventory levels or causes us to substantially increase our spending on inventory;
 
  •  The introduction of new products by us or our competitors;
 
  •  Declines in macroeconomic conditions;

S-9


Table of Contents

  •  Litigation, especially regarding intellectual property; and
 
  •  Currency exchange rate fluctuations.
We have recently transferred the production of substantially all of our product lines to our manufacturing facility in Shenzhen, China, and may experience unforeseen difficulties and challenges with these new operations.
      We have invested significant human and financial resources to establish our manufacturing facility in Shenzhen, China. These investments were made with the goal of reducing our labor costs by increasing our workforce in China and correspondingly decreasing our workforce in the United States.
      Because our operating history in Shenzhen is limited, we cannot predict the impact that this new facility will have on our operating results. We may continue to incur costs with respect to the integration of this facility and the related workforce. While most of the products we manufacture in Shenzhen have been qualified for many of our customers, we could still incur requalification costs for some customers.
We might not realize all of the intended benefits of transitioning a substantial portion of our supply base to Asian suppliers.
      We anticipate purchasing a substantial portion of components for our products from high-quality, low-cost Asian suppliers, by the end of 2005. These components might have unexpected quality problems and require us to incur higher than anticipated test, repair or warranty costs, which would have an adverse effect on our operating results. Customers, including major customers, might not accept our products if they contain these lower-priced components. A delay or refusal by our customers to accept such products might require us to continue to purchase higher-priced components from our existing suppliers or might cause us to lose sales to these customers, which would have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
Raw material, part, component and subassembly shortages, exacerbated by our dependence on sole and limited source suppliers, could affect our ability to manufacture products and systems and could delay our shipments.
      Our business depends on our ability to manufacture products that meet the rapidly changing demands of our customers. Our ability to timely manufacture our products depends in part on the timely delivery of raw materials, parts, components and subassemblies from suppliers. We rely on sole and limited source suppliers for some of our raw materials, parts, components and subassemblies that are critical to the manufacturing of our products. This reliance involves several potential risks, including the following:
  •  Inability to obtain an adequate supply of required parts, components or subassemblies;
 
  •  Supply shortages if a sole source provider ceases operations;
 
  •  Need to fund the operating losses of a sole source provider;
 
  •  Reduced control over pricing and timing of delivery of raw materials, parts, components or subassemblies;
 
  •  Need to qualify alternative suppliers which could be time consuming and lead to delays in delivery of products to our customers, as well as increased costs; and
 
  •  Inability of our suppliers to develop technologically advanced products to support our growth and development of new products.
      If we are unable to successfully qualify additional suppliers and manage relationships with our existing and future suppliers or if our suppliers cannot meet our performance or quality specifications, or timing requirements, we may experience shortages of raw materials, parts, components or subassemblies, increased material costs and shipping delays for our products, which would adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results and relationships with our current and prospective customers.

S-10


Table of Contents

A significant portion of our sales is concentrated among a few customers.
      Our ten largest customers accounted for 55% of our total sales during the first six months of 2005 and 59% of our total sales during the full year 2004. Our largest customer, Applied Materials, accounted for 23% of our total sales in the first six months of 2005 and 27% of our total sales in the full year 2004. No other customer represented greater than 10% of our total sales for any of the three years ended December 31, 2004 or for the six months ended June 30, 2005. The loss of any of our significant customers or a material reduction in any of their purchase orders would significantly harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.
      Our customers continuously exert pressure on us to reduce our prices and extend payment terms. Given the nature of our customer base and the highly competitive markets in which we compete, we may be required to reduce our prices or extend payment terms to remain competitive. We may not be able to reduce our operating expenses in an amount sufficient to offset potential margin declines.
      Certain of our largest customers also exert pressure on us to limit the sale of our products to certain OEMs, and to agree to prohibit sales to our end user customer base entirely, among other limitations. Given our size relative to certain of our largest customers, we may be required to agree to limitations of this nature to remain competitive. Limitations imposed on us with respect to our potential customer base could significantly adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
We generally have no written long-term contracts with our customers, which diminishes our ability to plan for future manufacturing needs.
      As is typical in our industry, our sales are primarily made on a purchase order basis, and we generally have no written long-term purchase contracts with our customers. As a result, we are limited in our ability to predict the level of future sales or commitments from our current customers, which diminishes our ability to effectively allocate labor, materials and equipment in the manufacturing process. In addition, we may accumulate inventory in anticipation of sales that do not materialize resulting in excess and absolute inventory write-offs.
If we are unable to adjust our business strategy successfully for some of our product lines to reflect the increasing price sensitivity on the part of our customers, our business and financial condition could be harmed.
      Our business strategy for many of our product lines has been focused on product performance and technology innovation to provide enhanced efficiencies and productivity. As a result of recent economic conditions and changes in various markets that we serve, our customers have experienced significant cost pressures and, as a result, we have observed increased price sensitivity on the part of our customers. If competition for any of our product lines should come to focus solely on price rather than on product performance and technology innovation, we will need to adjust our business strategy and product offerings accordingly and, if we are unable to do so, our business, financial condition and operating results could be materially and adversely affected.
The markets in which we operate are highly competitive.
      We face substantial competition, primarily from established companies, some of which have greater financial, marketing and technical resources than we do. We expect our competitors will continue to develop new products in direct competition with ours, improve the design and performance of their products and introduce new products with enhanced performance characteristics.
      To remain competitive, we must improve and expand our products and product offerings. In addition, we may need to maintain a high level of investment in research and development and expand our sales and marketing efforts, particularly outside of the United States. We might not be able to make the technological advances and investments necessary to remain competitive. Our inability to improve and

S-11


Table of Contents

expand our products and product offerings would have an adverse affect on our sales and results of operations.
Our competitive position could be weakened if we are unable to convince end users to specify that our products be used in the equipment sold by our customers.
      Our competitive success often depends upon factors outside of our control. For example, in some cases, particularly with respect to mass flow controller products, semiconductor device and flat panel display manufacturers may direct equipment manufacturers to use a specified supplier’s product in their equipment at a particular facility. Accordingly, for such products, our success will depend in part on our ability to have end users specify that our products be used at their facilities. In addition, we may encounter difficulties in changing established relationships of competitors that already have a large installed base of products within such facilities. If device manufacturers do not specify the use of our products, our sales may be reduced which would negatively affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
We must achieve design wins to retain our existing customers and to obtain new customers.
      The constantly changing nature of semiconductor fabrication and flat panel display technology causes equipment manufacturers to continually design new systems. We must work with these manufacturers early in their design cycles to modify our equipment or design new equipment to meet the requirements of their new systems. Manufacturers typically choose one or two vendors to provide the components for use with the early system shipments. Selection as one of these vendors is called a design win. It is critical that we achieve these design wins in order to retain existing customers and to obtain new customers.
      Once a manufacturer chooses a component for use in a particular product, it is likely to retain that component for the life of that product. Our sales and growth could experience material and prolonged adverse effects if we fail to achieve design wins. However, design wins do not always result in substantial sales or profits.
      We believe that equipment manufacturers often select their suppliers based on factors such as long-term relationships. Accordingly, we may have difficulty achieving design wins from equipment manufacturers who are not currently our customers. In addition, we must compete for design wins for new systems and products of our existing customers, including those with whom we have had long-term relationships. If we are not successful in achieving design wins, our business, financial condition and operating results will be adversely impacted.
Material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting require us to perform additional analyses and pre and post-closing procedures that if not performed effectively may prevent us from reporting our financial results in an accurate and timely manner.
      We have identified the following two material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting: a lack of appropriate segregation of duties defined within our enterprise resource planning system, and the combination of a lack of information system integration and uniformity regarding our Japan operations and a lack of sufficient human resources for proper segregation of duties and oversight in Japan. Management also has identified, and is developing remediation plans to address, certain significant deficiencies and other control deficiencies which our management did not determine to be material weaknesses. In addition, our internal control over financial reporting might not prevent or detect all misstatements, including immaterial misstatements and misstatements created by collusion or fraud.
      In light of these material weaknesses and the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, we perform additional analyses and other pre and post-closing procedures to ensure that our condensed consolidated financial statements are presented fairly in all material respects in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. These procedures include monthly business reviews led by our Chief Executive Officer and monthly operating and financial statement reviews by various levels of our management team, including our executive officers. We also vigorously enforce our policies and code of ethical conduct applicable to our employees, including the obligation to act in good

S-12


Table of Contents

faith and with due care in connection with the reporting of our financial results, which enforcement has included reassignment of duties, terminations of employment and other appropriate measures.
      If the additional analyses and pre and post-closing procedures are not effective or if actions to remediate these material weaknesses are not successfully implemented or if other material weaknesses are identified in the future, our ability to report our quarterly and annual financial results on a timely and accurate basis could be adversely affected. In addition, if our controls become inadequate because of changes in conditions or our degree of compliance with our own policies or procedures deteriorates, our ability to report our quarterly and annual financial results on a timely and accurate basis could be adversely affected.
Following the application of the net proceeds of this offering, we will have $121.5 million principal amount of our 5% convertible subordinated notes outstanding. There can be no assurance that we will have sufficient cash to repay this debt on the maturity date.
      We will be required to repay our 5% convertible subordinated notes on September 1, 2006, unless the noteholders convert their notes into common stock before the maturity date. There is currently $121.5 million principal amount outstanding under the notes. Our existing, undrawn $40 million line of credit will expire on July 6, 2006, unless renewed by the lender and us. Noteholders will be unlikely to convert their notes unless our stock price rises above the conversion price of $29.83 per share. On August 2, 2005 the closing price of our common stock on the Nasdaq National Market was $9.80 per share. There can be no assurance that we will have sufficient cash to repay these notes when due or be able to refinance them on acceptable terms.
We might not be able to compete successfully in international markets or meet the service and support needs of our international customers.
      Our sales to customers outside the United States were approximately 48% in the first six months of 2005 and 47% in the full year 2004. Our success in competing in international markets is subject to our ability to manage various risks and difficulties, including, but not limited to:
  •  Our ability to effectively manage our employees at remote locations who are operating in different business environments from the United States;
 
  •  Our ability to develop relationships with suppliers and other local businesses;
 
  •  Compliance with product safety requirements and standards that are different from those of the United States;
 
  •  Variations in enforcement of intellectual property and contract rights in different jurisdictions;
 
  •  Trade restrictions, political instability, disruptions in financial markets and deterioration of economic conditions;
 
  •  The ability to provide sufficient levels of technical support in different locations;
 
  •  Collecting past due accounts receivable from foreign customers; and
 
  •  Changes in tariffs, taxes and foreign currency exchange rates.
      Our ability to implement our business strategies, maintain market share and compete successfully in international markets will be compromised if we are unable to manage these and other international risks successfully.
Unfavorable currency exchange rate fluctuations may lead to lower operating margins, or may cause us to raise prices which could result in reduced sales.
      Currency exchange rate fluctuations could have an adverse effect on our sales and results of operations and we could experience losses with respect to our forward exchange contracts. Unfavorable

S-13


Table of Contents

currency fluctuations could require us to increase prices to foreign customers which could result in lower net sales by us to such customers. Alternatively, if we do not adjust the prices for our products in response to unfavorable currency fluctuations, our operating results could be adversely affected. In addition, most sales made by our foreign subsidiaries are denominated in the currency of the country in which these products are sold and the currency they receive in payment for such sales could be less valuable at the time of receipt as a result of exchange rate fluctuations. We enter into forward exchange contracts and local currency purchased options to reduce currency exposure arising from intercompany sales of inventory. However, we cannot be certain that our efforts will be adequate to protect us against significant currency fluctuations or that such efforts will not expose us to additional exchange rate risks which could adversely affect our operating results.
Changes in the value of the Chinese renminbi could impact the cost of our operation in Shenzhen, China.
      The Chinese government is continually pressured by its trading partners to allow its currency to float in a manner similar to other major currencies. The recent revaluation of the renminbi has not had a material impact on our operations. Any further change may impact our ability to control the cost of our products in the world market. Specifically, the decision by the Chinese government to allow the renminbi to begin to float against the U.S. dollar could significantly increase the labor and other costs incurred in the operation of our Shenzhen facility and the cost of raw materials, parts, components and subassemblies that we source in China, thereby negatively affecting our financial condition and operating results.
Warranty costs on certain products may be in excess of historical experience.
      In recent years, we have experienced higher than expected levels of warranty costs on some products. We have been required to repair, rework and, in some cases, replace these products. Our warranty costs generally increase when we introduce newer, more complex products. We recorded warranty expense of approximately $6.0 million in the first six months of 2005 and $10.5 million in the full year 2004. These expenses represented approximately 3.4% of our sales in the first six months of 2005 and 2.6% of our sales in the full year 2004. Within the last several years, our warranty expense has been as high as $13.2 million, or 5.5% of our total sales, which occurred in 2002. If our level of warranty costs increases in the future, our financial condition and operating results would be adversely affected.
We are highly dependent on our intellectual property.
      Our success depends significantly on our proprietary technology. We attempt to protect our intellectual property rights through patents and non-disclosure agreements; however, we might not be able to protect our technology, and competitors might be able to develop similar technology independently. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries might not afford our intellectual property the same protections as do the laws of the United States. Our intellectual property is not protected by patents in several countries in which we do business, and we have limited patent protection in other countries, including China. The cost of applying for patents in foreign countries and translating the applications into foreign languages requires us to select carefully the inventions for which we apply for patent protection and the countries in which we seek such protection. Generally, our efforts to obtain international patents have been concentrated in the United Kingdom, Germany, France and selected countries in Asia, because there are other manufacturers and developers of power conversion and control systems in those countries as well as customers for those systems. If we are unable to protect our intellectual property successfully, our business, financial condition and operating results could be adversely affected.
Intellectual property rights are difficult to enforce in China.
      Commercial law in China is relatively undeveloped compared to the commercial law in the United States. Limited protection of intellectual property is available under Chinese law. Consequently, manufacturing our products in China may subject us to an increased risk that unauthorized parties may attempt to copy or otherwise obtain or use our intellectual property. We cannot assure you that we will be

S-14


Table of Contents

able to protect our intellectual property rights effectively or have adequate legal recourse in the event that we encounter infringements of our intellectual property under Chinese law.
We have been and continue to be involved in patent litigation, which has resulted in substantial costs and could result in additional costs, restrictions on our ability to sell certain products and an inability to prevent others from using technology we have developed.
      MKS Instruments, Inc., or MKS, filed a patent infringement suit against us in the United States District Court in Wilmington, Delaware, alleging that our Xstream With Active Matching Network reactive gas generator products, or Xstream products, infringe patents held by MKS. In July 2004, a jury returned a verdict against us, finding that our Xstream products infringe three MKS patents. We have made a motion to the court for judgment as a matter of law in our favor notwithstanding the verdict, or in the alternative, a new trial on the question of infringement, as well as for the court to consider our challenge to the validity of MKS’s patents. A trial on our remaining defenses is scheduled to commence on October 31, 2005. While MKS has requested both injunctive relief and damages against us, the court will address the question of remedies after a final ruling on the merits of the claims presented. If we are unsuccessful, we could be subject to damages and an injunction preventing us from manufacturing and selling Xstream products in the United States in the future.
      In August, 2004, MKS filed a petition in the District Court in Mannheim, Germany, alleging infringement by our Xstream products of a counterpart German patent owned by MKS. On April 8, 2005, the Mannheim court issued a judgment against us for infringement of MKS’s patent, which did not specify damages. A petition for invalidity of MKS’s patent brought by us is still pending before the German Federal Patent Court. Although we may be enjoined from making or selling the Xstream product in Germany, we believe that the impact of an injunction and the scale of any damages award should be minimal because we have not made or sold the product in Germany and have no plans to do so. We continue to make and sell the Xstream product in countries in which MKS has no corresponding patent rights.
      On October 21, 2004, one of our competitors, Huettinger Electronik, and two customers, von Ardenne Anlagentechnik and Interpane Entwicklungs, petitioned for Opposition of our European patent directed to pulsed-DC reactive sputtering technology. In the event we are unsuccessful in defending against this Opposition, our ability to prevent others from using this technology in Europe may be limited.
      Further patent litigation might:
  •  Cause us to incur substantial costs in the form of legal fees, fines and royalty payments;
 
  •  Result in restrictions on our ability to sell certain products;
 
  •  Result in an inability to prevent others from using technology we have developed; and
 
  •  Require us to redesign products or seek alternative technologies.
Any of these events could have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
      Even apart from patent litigation, our own intellectual property rights may be subject to challenge by other parties. In many countries in which we hold patent rights, for example, procedures are available that permit third parties to contest, oppose, or request reexamination of our issued patents. Defending against these proceedings might cause us to incur substantial costs in the form of legal fees and may result in an inability to prevent others from using technology we have developed.
We are subject to numerous governmental regulations.
      We are subject to federal, state, local and foreign regulations, including environmental regulations and regulations relating to the design and operation of our products and control systems. We might incur significant costs as we seek to ensure that our products meet safety and emissions standards, many of

S-15


Table of Contents

which vary across the states and countries in which our products are used. In the past, we have invested significant resources to redesign our products to comply with these directives. Compliance with future regulations, directives and standards could require us to modify or redesign some products, make capital expenditures or incur substantial costs. If we do not comply with current or future regulations, directives and standards:
  •  We could be subject to fines;
 
  •  Our production could be suspended; or
 
  •  We could be prohibited from offering particular products in specified markets.
      Any inability to comply with current or future regulations, directives and standards could adversely affect our business, financial condition or operating results.
Risks Related to Our Common Stock
We do not intend to pay dividends in the foreseeable future, and therefore investors must rely solely on the market value of our shares to realize a return on their investment.
      We have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our shares since we terminated our election to be treated as an S-corporation for tax purposes effective January 1, 1994. We currently intend to retain any future earnings to fund the development and growth of our business and, therefore, do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
The market price of our common stock has fluctuated and may continue to fluctuate for reasons over which we have no control.
      The stock market has from time to time experienced, and is likely to continue to experience, extreme price and volume fluctuations. Prices of securities of technology companies have been especially volatile and have often fluctuated for reasons that are unrelated to their operating performance. In the past, companies that have experienced volatility in the market price of their stock have been the objects of securities class action litigation. If we were the object of securities class action litigation, it could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our management’s attention and resources.
Future sales of our common stock by our Non-Executive Chairman of the Board may negatively affect the market price of our common stock.
      Following this offering, Mr. Schatz, our Non-Executive Chairman of the Board, will beneficially own approximately 25.1% of our outstanding common stock. The sale of a substantial amount of the shares owned by him could negatively affect the market price of our common stock. Mr. Schatz may sell up to 850,000 shares of common stock pursuant to a written trading plan pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that are not subject to the 90-day lock-up agreement that Mr. Schatz has entered into with the underwriters of this offering and which is described in the “Underwriting” section on page S-22 of this prospectus supplement.
Our Non-Executive Chairman of the Board owns a significant percentage of our outstanding common stock, which could enable him to control our business and affairs.
      Following this offering, Mr. Schatz will beneficially own approximately 25.1% of our outstanding common stock. This stockholding gives Mr. Schatz significant voting power. Depending on the number of shares that abstain or otherwise are not voted on a particular matter, Mr. Schatz may be able to elect all of the members of our board of directors and to control our business affairs for the foreseeable future in a manner with which our other stockholders may not agree.

S-16


Table of Contents

USE OF PROCEEDS
      The net proceeds from the sale of the shares of our common stock in this offering are estimated to be approximately $92.6 million ($106.6 million if the underwriters’ over-allotment option is exercised in full), based on a public offering price of $9.80 per share and after deducting the underwriting discounts and commission and estimated offering expenses.
      We intend to use approximately $68.1 million of the net proceeds of this offering to redeem our 51/4% convertible subordinated notes due 2006, and the remainder for working capital and general corporate purposes, which could include the redemption or repurchase of our outstanding 5% convertible subordinated notes due 2006.
      At August 1, 2005, approximately $66.2 million principal amount of our 51/4% convertible subordinated notes due November 15, 2006 and $121.5 million principal amount of our 5% convertible subordinated notes due September 1, 2006 remained outstanding. We can redeem our 51/4% convertible subordinated notes at 101.5% of the outstanding principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. Beginning September 1, 2005, we can redeem our 5% convertible subordinated notes at 101% of the outstanding principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. Prior to September 1, 2005, to redeem our 5% convertible subordinated notes, we would be required to pay 102% of the outstanding principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
      We intend to issue a notice of redemption for our 51/4% convertible subordinated notes promptly following the completion of this offering.
      Pending their application, we expect to invest the net proceeds of this offering in short-term, interest-bearing, investment-grade securities.
PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK
      Our common stock is quoted on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol “AEIS.” The following table sets forth, for each of the quarterly periods indicated, the range of high and low closing sale prices of our common stock, as reported (without retail markup or markdown and without commissions) on the Nasdaq National Market. The prices cited below do not necessarily represent actual transactions.
                   
Quarter   High   Low
         
2003:
               
 
First Quarter
  $ 17.43     $ 7.91  
 
Second Quarter
    16.83       7.37  
 
Third Quarter
    24.65       13.56  
 
Fourth Quarter
    29.99       18.66  
2004:
               
 
First Quarter
  $ 28.19     $ 19.13  
 
Second Quarter
    23.07       12.83  
 
Third Quarter
    15.32       8.78  
 
Fourth Quarter
    10.97       7.92  
2005:
               
 
First Quarter
  $ 9.96     $ 6.88  
 
Second Quarter
    11.10       7.86  
 
Third Quarter (through August 2, 2005)
    10.65       7.76  
      On August 2, 2005, the last sale price of our common stock as reported on the Nasdaq National Market was $9.80 per share. On August 1, 2005 the number of our common stockholders of record was 813.

S-17


Table of Contents

DIVIDEND POLICY
      We have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital stock since we terminated our election to be treated as an S-corporation for tax purposes, effective January 1, 1994. We currently intend to retain all future earnings to finance our business and do not anticipate paying cash or other dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Furthermore, our revolving credit facility prohibits the declaration or payment of any cash dividends on our common stock.

S-18


Table of Contents

CAPITALIZATION
      The following table shows our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments and capitalization as of June 30, 2005 on an actual basis and on an as adjusted basis to give effect to the issuance by us of 10,000,000 shares of our common stock, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses at an assumed public offering price of $9.80 per share, and the application of the net proceeds therefrom. This table should be read in conjunction with the “Summary Consolidated Financial Data” and our financial statements and notes thereto that are included in this prospectus supplement, as well as “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” that is incorporated by reference herein.
                       
    As of June 30, 2005
     
    Actual   As Adjusted
         
    (in thousands
    except per share amounts)
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments
  $ 137,787     $ 162,741  
             
Senior borrowings and capital leases, net of current portion
  $ 3,280     $ 3,280  
Convertible subordinated notes due 2006 — 5% notes
    121,500       121,500  
Convertible subordinated notes due 2006 — 51/4% notes
    66,218        
Stockholders’ equity:
               
 
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 1,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding
           
 
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 70,000 shares authorized; 32,816 shares outstanding; as adjusted — 42,816 shares
    33       43  
 
Additional paid-in capital
    146,276       238,866  
 
Accumulated deficit
    (6,112 )     (7,482 )(1)
 
Deferred compensation
    (1,201 )     (1,201 )
 
Unrealized holding gains on available-for-sale securities, net of tax
    520       520  
 
Cumulative translation adjustments, net of tax
    6,619       6,619  
             
   
Total stockholders’ equity
    146,135       237,365  
             
     
Total capitalization
  $ 337,133     $ 362,145  
             
 
(1)  The change relates to the expensing of a 1.5% redemption premium of $993,000 and the write-off of the unamortized deferred debt issuance costs of $377,000 related thereto.
      The number of shares of common stock outstanding is based on 32,816,222 shares outstanding as of June 30, 2005. This number does not include:
  •  3,863,728 shares of common stock subject to options outstanding as of June 30, 2005, under our employee and director stock option plans, with a weighted average exercise price of $18.56 per share;
 
  •  227,510 shares of common stock subject to restricted stock units outstanding as of June 30, 2005, under our 2003 employee stock option plan;
 
  •  1,457,612 additional shares of common stock available as of June 30, 2005 under our employee and director stock option plans;
 
  •  190,327 shares of common stock issuable under our employee stock purchase plan;
 
  •  shares of common stock reserved for issuance upon the conversion of our 51/4% convertible subordinated notes, with a conversion price of $49.53 per share; or
 
  •  shares of common stock reserved for issuance upon the conversion of our 5% convertible subordinated notes, with a conversion price of $29.83 per share.
      The table above assumes no exercise of the underwriters over-allotment option to purchase an additional 1,500,000 shares of our common stock.

S-19


Table of Contents

MANAGEMENT
      Our directors and executive officers are:
             
Name   Age   Position
         
Douglas S. Schatz
    59     Non-Executive Chairman of the Board
Hans Betz
    59     Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
Richard P. Beck
    72     Director
Joseph R. Bronson
    57     Director
Barry Z. Posner
    56     Director
Elwood Spedden
    68     Director
Michael El-Hillow
    53     Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
C. Stephen Rhodes
    44     Executive Vice President, Products and Operations
James G. Guilmart
    50     Senior Vice President, Sales
      Douglas S. Schatz is a co-founder of Advanced Energy and has been our Chairman since our incorporation in 1981. Mr. Schatz served as our Chief Executive Officer from our incorporation until his retirement on July 31, 2005. Mr. Schatz also serves as a director of Advanced Power Technology, Inc., a publicly held company that provides high power, high voltage and high performance semiconductors and power modules, and is a member of its nominating committee and the chairman of its compensation committee. Mr. Schatz is also a member of the CEO Committee of the Mountain States Council of the American Electronics Association and serves on the Engineering Advisory Board of Colorado State University.
      Hans Betz joined our Board of Directors in July 2004. On August 1, 2005, Dr. Betz became our Chief Executive Officer and President. Dr. Betz had been Chief Executive Officer of West STEAG Partners GmbH, a German-based venture capital company focused on the high-technology industry, a position he had held since August 2001. From January 1996 to July 2001, he was Chief Executive Officer of STEAG Electronic Systems AG and a Managing Director at Leybold AG. Dr. Betz currently serves as a director of Mattson Technology, Inc., a publicly held supplier of advanced process equipment used to manufacture semiconductors, and serves as a member of its audit and compensation committees. He also serves as a board member and compensation committee member of Steag HamaTech AG, a publicly held supplier of manufacturing equipment and process technology for the manufacture of optical media (CD/DVD) and for processing photomask and wafers for the semiconductor industry.
      Richard P. Beck joined Advanced Energy in March 1992 as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, became Senior Vice President in February 1998 and joined our Board of Directors in September 1995. In October 2001, Mr. Beck retired from the position of Chief Financial Officer, but remained as a Senior Vice President until May 2002. Mr. Beck is Chairman of the Board of Applied Films Corporation, a publicly held manufacturer of flat panel display equipment, and serves on its audit, compensation and nominating and governance committees. He is also a director of TTM Technologies, Inc., a publicly held manufacturer of printed circuit boards, and serves as a member of its nominations and corporate governance committee and as chairman of its audit committee.
      Joseph R. Bronson joined our Board of Directors in December 2004. Mr. Bronson is currently President of FormFactor, Inc., a designer and manufacturer of advanced semiconductor wafer probe cards. Mr. Bronson was appointed President of FormFactor in November 2004 and has been a director of FormFactor since April 2002. Prior to becoming President of FormFactor, Mr. Bronson held significant leadership positions with Applied Materials, Inc., a manufacturer of semiconductor capital equipment. Until his resignation from Applied Materials in October 2004, he had served as an Executive Vice President since December 2000 and as its Chief Financial Officer since January 1998. Mr. Bronson is also a director of Jacobs Engineering Group, a diversified technical consulting firm.
      Barry Z. Posner joined our Board of Directors in September 2004. Dr. Posner is Dean of the Leavey School of Business at Santa Clara University, a professor of leadership and an award-winning author.

S-20


Table of Contents

Dr. Posner has been Dean of the Leavey School of Business since July 1997. Dr. Posner is currently on the editorial review boards of the Journal of Business Ethics and Leadership Review, and section editor for the Journal of Management Inquiry. Dr. Posner also conducts leadership-based workshops for corporations around the world.
      Elwood Spedden joined our Board of Directors in September 1995. Mr. Spedden was Chief Executive Officer of Photon Dynamics, Inc., a publicly held manufacturer of flat panel display test equipment, from January 2003 until his retirement in January 2004. From July 1996 to June 1997, Mr. Spedden was a Vice President of KLA-Tencor Semiconductor, a manufacturer of automatic test equipment used in the fabrication of semiconductors.
      Michael El-Hillow joined us in November 2001 as Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer. In February 2003, Mr. El-Hillow was named Executive Vice President. From April 1997 to July 2001, Mr. El-Hillow was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Helix Technology Corporation, a manufacturer of vacuum products for semiconductors, flat panel display and data storage markets. He was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Spike Broadband Systems, Inc. from July 2001 to October 2001. Prior to his roles at Helix Technology Corporation, he was Vice President, Finance, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer at A.T. Cross Company, and an audit partner at Ernst & Young LLP. Mr. El-Hillow serves on the board of directors and as chairman of the audit committee of Evergreen Solar, Inc., a manufacturer of solar panels and related products.
      C. Stephen Rhoades joined us in September 2002 as Senior Vice President and General Manager of Control Systems and Instrumentation. In November 2004, Mr. Rhoades was named Executive Vice President of Products and Operations. From March 2000 to September 2002, Mr. Rhoades was Vice President, Corporate Development at Portera Systems. Prior to Portera Systems, he was Managing Director of Product Development at Lam Research.
      James G. Guilmart joined us in September 1999 as Director of Applied Materials Account Team and was named Senior Vice President of Sales in October 2000. From October 1998 to August 1999, he was Senior Vice President, SAP Business Unit at Siemens Information and Communications Products, LLC. Prior to Siemens, he was Vice President, Business Implementation at Unisys Corporation.

S-21


Table of Contents

UNDERWRITING
      Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Lehman Brothers Inc., Adams Harkness, Inc. and Needham & Company, LLC are acting as representatives of the underwriters named below. Subject to the terms and conditions stated in the underwriting agreement dated the date of this prospectus supplement, each underwriter named below has severally agreed to purchase, and we have agreed to sell to that underwriter, the number of shares set forth opposite the underwriter’s name.
           
    Number of
Underwriter   Shares
     
Citigroup Global Markets Inc. 
       
Lehman Brothers Inc. 
       
Adams Harkness, Inc. 
       
Needham & Company, LLC
       
       
 
Total
    10,000,000  
       
      The underwriting agreement provides that the obligations of the underwriters to purchase the shares included in this offering are subject to approval of legal matters by counsel and to other conditions. The underwriters are obligated to purchase all the shares (other than those covered by the over-allotment option described below) if they purchase any of the shares.
      The underwriters propose to offer some of the shares directly to the public at the public offering price set forth on the cover page of this prospectus supplement and some of the shares to dealers at the public offering price less a concession not to exceed $          per share. The underwriters may allow, and dealers may reallow, a concession not to exceed $ per share on sales to other dealers. If all of the shares are not sold at the initial offering price, the representatives may change the public offering price and the other selling terms.
      We have granted to the underwriters an option, exercisable for 30 days from the date of this prospectus supplement, to purchase up to 1,500,000 additional shares of common stock at the public offering price less the underwriting discount. The underwriters may exercise the option solely for the purpose of covering over-allotments, if any, in connection with this offering. To the extent the option is exercised, each underwriter must purchase a number of additional shares approximately proportionate to that underwriter’s initial purchase commitment.
      We and our executive officers, other than our Chief Technology Officer who is leaving us on or before August 31, 2005, and directors have agreed that, for a period of 90 days from the date of this prospectus supplement, we and they will not, without the prior written consent of Citigroup, dispose of or hedge any shares of our common stock or any securities convertible into or exchangeable for our common stock, except that Douglas Schatz may sell up to 850,000 shares of common stock pursuant to a written trading plan established or to be established on substantially the same terms as his most recent plan, pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, and Richard Beck may sell up to 19,000 shares of common stock pursuant to a written trading plan established or to be established pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 under the Exchange Act. Our officers and directors are also permitted to transfer shares of common stock as bona fide gifts, provided that the donee or donees agree to be bound by the restrictions set forth in the lock-up agreements. Citigroup in its sole discretion may release any of the securities subject to these lock-up agreements at any time without notice.
      Each underwriter has represented, warranted and agreed that:
  •  it has not offered or sold and, prior to the expiry of a period of six months from the closing date, will not offer or sell any share included in this offering to persons in the United Kingdom except to persons whose ordinary activities involve them in acquiring, holding, managing or disposing of investments (as principal or agent) for the purposes of their businesses or otherwise in

S-22


Table of Contents

  circumstances which have not resulted and will not result in an offer to the public in the United Kingdom within the meaning of the Public Offers of Securities Regulations 1995;
 
  •  it has only communicated and caused to be communicated and will only communicate or cause to be communicated any invitation or inducement to engage in investment activity (within the meaning of section 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (“FSMA”)) received by it in connection with the issue or sale of any shares included in this offering in circumstances in which section 21(1) of FSMA does not apply to us;
 
  •  it has complied and will comply with all applicable provisions of the FSMA with respect to anything done by it in relation to the shares included in this offering in, from or otherwise involving the United Kingdom; and
 
  •  the offer in The Netherlands of the shares included in this offering is exclusively limited to persons who trade or invest in securities in the conduct of a profession or business (which include banks, stockbrokers, insurance companies, pension funds, other institutional investors and finance companies and treasury departments of large enterprises).
      The common stock is quoted on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol “AEIS.”
      The following table shows the underwriting discounts and commissions that we are to pay to the underwriters in connection with this offering. These amounts are shown assuming both no exercise and full exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares of common stock.
                 
    Paid by
    Advanced Energy
    Industries, Inc.
     
    No Exercise   Full Exercise
         
Per share of common stock
  $       $    
Total
  $       $    
      In connection with this offering, Citigroup on behalf of the underwriters, may purchase and sell shares of common stock in the open market. These transactions may include short sales, syndicate covering transactions and stabilizing transactions. Short sales involve syndicate sales of common stock in excess of the number of shares to be purchased by the underwriters in the offering, which creates a syndicate short position. “Covered” short sales are sales of shares made in an amount up to the number of shares represented by the underwriters’ over-allotment option. In determining the source of shares to close out the covered syndicate short position, the underwriters will consider, among other things, the price of shares available for purchase in the open market as compared to the price at which they may purchase shares through the over-allotment option. Transactions to close out the covered syndicate short involve either purchases of the common stock in the open market after the distribution has been completed or the exercise of the over-allotment option. The underwriters may also make “naked” short sales of shares in excess of the over-allotment option. The underwriters must close out any naked short position by purchasing shares of common stock in the open market. A naked short position is more likely to be created if the underwriters are concerned that there may be downward pressure on the price of the shares in the open market after pricing that could adversely affect investors who purchase in the offering. Stabilizing transactions consist of bids for or purchases of shares in the open market while the offering is in progress.
      The underwriters also may impose a penalty bid. Penalty bids permit the underwriters to reclaim a selling concession from a syndicate member when Citigroup repurchases shares originally sold by that syndicate member in order to cover syndicate short positions or make stabilizing purchases.
      Any of these activities may have the effect of preventing or retarding a decline in the market price of the common stock. They may also cause the price of the common stock to be higher than the price that would otherwise exist in the open market in the absence of these transactions. The underwriters may conduct these transactions on the Nasdaq National Market or in the over-the-counter market, or

S-23


Table of Contents

otherwise. If the underwriters commence any of these transactions, they may discontinue them at any time.
      In addition, in connection with this offering, some of the underwriters (and selling group members) may engage in passive market making transactions in the common stock on the Nasdaq National Market, prior to the pricing and completion of the offering. Passive market making consists of displaying bids on the Nasdaq National Market no higher than the bid prices of independent market makers and making purchases at prices no higher than those independent bids and effected in response to order flow. Net purchases by a passive market maker on each day are limited to a specified percentage of the passive market maker’s average daily trading volume in the common stock during a specified period and must be discontinued when that limit is reached. Passive market making may cause the price of the common stock to be higher than the price that otherwise would exist in the open market in the absence of those transactions. If the underwriters commence passive market making transactions, they may discontinue them at any time.
      We estimate that the total expenses of this offering will be $500,000.
      The underwriters have performed investment banking and advisory services for us from time to time for which they have received customary fees and expenses. The underwriters may, from time to time, engage in transactions with and perform services for us in the ordinary course of their business.
      This prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus in electronic format may be made available on the websites maintained by one or more of the underwriters. The representatives may agree to allocate a number of shares to underwriters for sale to their online brokerage account holders. The representatives will allocate shares to underwriters that may make Internet distributions on the same basis as other allocations. In addition, shares may be sold by the underwriters to securities dealers who resell shares to online brokerage account holders.
      We have agreed to indemnify the underwriters against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, or to contribute to payments the underwriters may be required to make because of any of those liabilities.
LEGAL MATTERS
      The validity of the common stock offered by this prospectus supplement is being passed upon for us by Hogan & Hartson LLP, Los Angeles, California. Davis Polk & Wardwell, Menlo Park, California will pass upon legal matters for the underwriters. Davis Polk & Wardwell has acted as counsel to our audit committee in connection with certain matters.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
      The consolidated financial statements of Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. as of December 31, 2004 and for the year then ended are set forth in this prospectus supplement and incorporated by reference in the registration statement that contains this prospectus supplement and have been audited by Grant Thornton LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, as indicated in their reports with respect thereto.
      The consolidated financial statements of Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. as of December 31, 2003, and for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2003, as set forth in this prospectus supplement and incorporated by reference in the registration statement that contains this prospectus supplement, have been audited by KPMG LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, as indicated in their report with respect thereto. KPMG LLP’s report dated February 20, 2004 contains an explanatory paragraph relating to the fact that effective January 1, 2002 the Company adopted Statements of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, Business Combinations, and No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. KPMG LLP’s report dated February 20, 2004 contains an explanatory paragraph relating to the fact that effective January 1, 2003, Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries adopted the

S-24


Table of Contents

provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 145, Rescission of FASB Statements 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
      We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other documents with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC. We also submit copies of such reports, statements and documents to the Nasdaq Stock Market. You may access any of these reports, statements or documents by:
  •  Reading or copying them at the SEC’s public reference office located at 100 F Street, NE, Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549;
 
  •  Writing to the SEC’s public reference office and requesting copies, with payment of a duplicating fee;
 
  •  Reading or copying them at the office of Nasdaq Operations, 1735 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006;
 
  •  Visiting the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov; or
 
  •  Visiting our website at http://www.aei.com. The information available on or through our website is not a part of this prospectus supplement or the accompanying prospectus.
      Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for information on the public reference office.
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE
      In this document, we “incorporate by reference” information that we file with the SEC, which means that we can disclose important information to you by referring to that information. The information incorporated by reference is considered to be a part of this prospectus supplement, and later information filed with the SEC will update and supersede this information. We incorporate by reference the documents listed below and any future filings made with the SEC under Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act until the offering is completed:
  •  Our annual report on Form 10-K and Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2004;
 
  •  Our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005;
 
  •  Our current reports on Form 8-K filed January 6, 2005; February 3, 2005; May 10, 2005; May 25, 2005; July 6, 2005; July 12, 2005 and August 3, 2005;
 
  •  Our definitive proxy statement filed on Schedule 14A on April 7, 2005; and
 
  •  The description of our common stock contained in our registration statement on Form 8-A, filed with the SEC on October 12, 1995, and any further amendment or report filed thereafter for purposes of updating any such description.
      You may request a copy of any or all of the information that has been incorporated by reference in this prospectus supplement but that has not been delivered, at no cost, by writing or calling us at the following address or telephone number:
                    Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
                    1625 Sharp Point Drive
                    Fort Collins, CO 80525
                    Attention: Investor Relations
                    (970) 221-4670

S-25


Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
         
    Page
     
Audited Financial Statements
       
       
    F-2  
    F-5  
    F-6  
    F-8  
    F-9  
    F-10  
    F-11  
    F-41  
Unaudited Financial Statements
       
       
    F-42  
    F-43  
    F-44  
    F-45  

F-1


Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and
Shareholders of Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
      We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive loss, and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
      We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
      In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
      Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. Schedule II listed in the index of financial statements is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. This schedule has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
      We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated July 6, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting because of the existence of material weaknesses.
  /s/ Grant Thornton LLP
Denver, Colorado
July 6, 2005

F-2


Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and
Shareholders of Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
      We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (included in Item 9A of this Form 10-K/ A), that Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. (the Company) did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, because of the effect of material weaknesses identified in management assessment, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
      We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.
      A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
      Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
      A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. The Company’s management has identified and included in its assessment two material weaknesses. The first material weakness relates to the lack of segregation of duties within the Company’s enterprise resource planning (ERP) system, as certain employees have ERP system access to record transactions outside of their assigned job responsibilities. The Company’s ERP system is integrated throughout the organization including material foreign locations, with the exception of the Japan locations. The ERP system interacts with most of the Company’s major processes including manufacturing, payables, receivables and inventory controls. This material weakness could result in a material misstatement of annual and interim financial statements that would not be prevented or detected in the normal course of operations. The second material weakness relates to two significant deficiencies in the Company’s Japan operations, that when considered in the aggregate, represents a material weakness. The first significant deficiency relates to each of the two Japan facilities having its own unique information system, as well as a lack of segregation of duties, with certain employees having access in these systems to

F-3


Table of Contents

record transactions outside of their assigned job responsibilities. The second significant deficiency in Japan was the lack of proper segregation of duties and oversight at the local level. This material weakness could result in a material misstatement of the operating results of the Japanese subsidiaries which are included in the Company’s annual and interim financial statements that would not be prevented or detected in the normal course of operations. These material weaknesses were considered in determining the nature, timing and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2004 consolidated financial statements, and this report does not affect our report dated July 6, 2005, on those financial statements.
      In our opinion, management’s assessment that Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on COSO. Also in our opinion, because of the effect of the material weaknesses described above on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on COSO.
      We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive loss, and cash flows for the year then ended, and our report dated July 6, 2005, expressed an unqualified opinion.
  /s/ Grant Thornton LLP
Denver, Colorado
July 6, 2005

F-4


Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.:
      We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive loss, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period then ended. In connection with our audits of these consolidated financial statements, we also have audited the related financial statement schedules as listed in the accompanying index. These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules based on our audits.
      We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
      In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
      Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries adopted the provisions of Statements of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, Business Combinations, and No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, effective January 1, 2002.
      Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 145, Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections, effective January 1, 2003.
  /s/ KPMG LLP
Denver, Colorado
February 20, 2004

F-5


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
                       
    December 31,
     
    2004   2003
         
ASSETS
               
CURRENT ASSETS:
               
 
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 38,404     $ 41,522  
 
Marketable securities
    69,578       93,370  
 
Accounts receivable —
               
   
Trade (less allowances for doubtful accounts of approximately $1,049 and $1,303 at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively)
    66,610       57,156  
   
Other
    5,443       4,771  
 
Income tax receivable
    404       151  
 
Inventories, net
    73,224       65,703  
 
Other current assets
    5,736       5,486  
             
     
Total current assets
    259,399       268,159  
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, at cost, net of accumulated depreciation of $59,464 and $50,848 at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively
    44,746       44,725  
OTHER ASSETS:
               
 
Deposits and other
    6,468       5,951  
 
Goodwill
    68,276       69,510  
 
Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $9,624 and $11,197 at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively
    12,032       19,433  
 
Demonstration and customer service equipment, net of accumulated amortization of $6,880 and $5,688 at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively
    2,968       3,934  
 
Deferred debt issuance costs, net
    2,086       3,019  
             
     
Total assets
  $ 395,975     $ 414,731  
             
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
are an integral part of these consolidated balance sheets.

F-6


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except per share data)
                     
    December 31,
     
    2004   2003
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
               
 
Trade accounts payable
  $ 17,683     $ 23,066  
 
Taxes payable
    2,974       445  
 
Accrued payroll and employee benefits
    7,788       7,953  
 
Accrued warranty expense
    6,791       6,612  
 
Accrued restructuring charges
    4,414       3,175  
 
Other accrued expenses
    5,986       7,079  
 
Customer deposits and deferred revenue
    662       2,952  
 
Capital lease obligations, current portion
    294       554  
 
Senior borrowings, current portion
    3,432       8,028  
 
Accrued interest payable on convertible subordinated notes
    2,460       2,460  
             
   
Total current liabilities
    52,484       62,324  
             
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES:
               
 
Capital leases, net of current portion
    421       263  
 
Senior borrowings, net of current portion
    4,258       5,905  
 
Deferred income tax liabilities, net
    3,709       4,672  
 
Convertible subordinated notes payable
    187,718       187,718  
 
Other long-term liabilities
    2,407       2,015  
             
   
Total long-term liabilities
    198,513       200,573  
             
   
Total liabilities
    250,997       262,897  
             
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
               
 
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 1,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding
           
 
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 70,000 shares authorized; 32,760 and 32,573 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively
    33       33  
 
Additional paid-in capital
    144,500       142,667  
 
Accumulated deficit
    (12,795 )     (48 )
 
Deferred compensation
          (60 )
 
Unrealized holding gains on available-for-sale securities, net
    1,051       1,491  
 
Cumulative translation adjustments, net
    12,189       7,751  
             
   
Total stockholders’ equity
    144,978       151,834  
             
   
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 395,975     $ 414,731  
             
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
are an integral part of these consolidated balance sheets.

F-7


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
                             
    Years Ended December 31,
     
    2004   2003   2002
             
SALES
  $ 395,305     $ 262,402     $ 238,898  
COST OF SALES
    275,626       174,455       170,138  
                   
 
GROSS PROFIT
    119,679       87,947       68,760  
                   
OPERATING EXPENSES:
                       
 
Research and development
    51,541       51,647       48,995  
 
Selling, general and administrative
    62,444       53,951       66,586  
 
Litigation damages
                4,200  
 
Restructuring charges
    3,912       4,306       9,060  
 
Impairment of intangible assets
    3,326       1,175       1,904  
                   
   
Total operating expenses
    121,223       111,079       130,745  
                   
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS
    (1,544 )     (23,132 )     (61,985 )
                   
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
                       
 
Interest income
    1,737       1,721       3,314  
 
Interest expense
    (11,049 )     (11,254 )     (12,460 )
 
Foreign currency gain
    1,023       869       5,280  
 
Gain on retirement of convertible subordinated notes
                4,223  
 
Other income (expense), net
    1,033       (644 )     (2,064 )
                   
      (7,256 )     (9,308 )     (1,707 )
                   
   
Net loss before income taxes
    (8,800 )     (32,440 )     (63,692 )
(PROVISION) BENEFIT FOR INCOME TAXES
    (3,947 )     (11,801 )     22,293  
                   
NET LOSS
  $ (12,747 )   $ (44,241 )   $ (41,399 )
                   
BASIC AND DILUTED NET LOSS PER SHARE
  $ (0.39 )   $ (1.37 )   $ (1.29 )
                   
BASIC AND DILUTED WEIGHTED-AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING
    32,649       32,271       32,026  
                   
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
are an integral part of these consolidated statements.

F-8


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(In thousands)
                                                               
            Retained       Accumulated    
    Common Stock   Additional   Earnings       Other   Total
        Paid-in   (Accumulated   Deferred   Comprehensive   Stockholders’
    Shares   Amount   Capital   Deficit)   Compensation   (Loss) Income   Equity
                             
BALANCES, December 31, 2001
    31,848     $ 32     $ 131,698     $ 85,592     $ (1,094 )   $ (1,883 )   $ 214,345  
 
Exercise of stock options for cash
    118             1,389                         1,389  
 
Issuance of common stock for acquisition of minority interest of Litmas
    120             4,219                         4,219  
 
Sale of common stock through employee stock purchase plan
    54             689                         689  
 
Tax benefit related to shares acquired by employees under stock compensation plans
                468                         468  
 
Amortization of deferred compensation
                            518             518  
 
Adjustment for forfeited options
                (34 )           34              
 
Comprehensive loss:
                                                       
     
Equity adjustment from foreign currency translation, net of tax
                                  4,400          
     
Unrealized holding losses, net of tax
                                  (2,641 )        
     
Less: reclassification adjustment for amounts included in net loss
                                  1,351          
 
Net loss
                      (41,399 )                    
   
Total comprehensive loss
                                        (38,289 )
                                           
BALANCES, December 31, 2002
    32,140     $ 32     $ 138,429     $ 44,193     $ (542 )   $ 1,227     $ 183,339  
Exercise of stock options for cash
    360       1       3,499                         3,500  
 
Sale of common stock through employee stock purchase plan
    73             739                         739  
 
Amortization of deferred compensation
                            482             482  
 
Comprehensive loss:
                                                       
     
Equity adjustment from foreign currency translation, net of tax
                                  6,491          
     
Unrealized holding gains, net of tax
                                  1,524          
     
Net loss
                      (44,241 )                    
   
Total comprehensive loss
                                        (36,226 )
                                           
BALANCES, December 31, 2003
    32,573     $ 33     $ 142,667     $ (48 )   $ (60 )   $ 9,242     $ 151,834  
 
Exercise of stock options for cash
    122             1,224                         1,224  
 
Sale of common stock through employee stock purchase plan
    65             609                         609  
 
Amortization of deferred compensation
                            60             60  
 
Comprehensive loss:
                                                       
     
Equity adjustment from foreign currency translation, net of tax
                                  4,438          
     
Unrealized holding losses, net of tax
                                  (146 )        
 
Reclassification adjustment for amounts included in net loss related to sales of securities
                                  (294 )        
   
Net loss
                      (12,747 )                    
   
Total comprehensive loss
                                        (8,749 )
                                           
BALANCES, December 31, 2004
    32,760     $ 33     $ 144,500     $ (12,795 )   $     $ 13,240     $ 144,978  
                                           
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
are an integral part of these consolidated statements.

F-9


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
                                 
    Years Ended December 31,
     
    2004   2003   2002
             
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
                       
 
Net loss
  $ (12,747 )   $ (44,241 )   $ (41,399 )
 
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities -
                       
   
Depreciation and amortization
    21,119       21,829       23,289  
   
Demonstration and evaluation equipment write-off
    3,752              
   
Provision (benefit) for deferred income taxes
    444       6,429       (6,888 )
   
Provision for excess and obsolete inventory
    11,262       3,016       5,803  
   
Asset impairment charges
    3,326       1,350       5,066  
   
Provision for (recovery of) doubtful accounts
    198       (429 )     1,870  
   
Unrealized (gain) loss on foreign currency forward contracts
    (107 )     160       388  
   
Gain on retirement of convertible subordinated notes
                (4,223 )
   
Net (gain) loss on disposal of assets
    (864 )     2,846       359  
   
Unrealized gain on intercompany foreign currency loan
                (4,879 )
   
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of assets and liabilities acquired —
                       
     
Accounts receivable — trade
    (8,925 )     (14,556 )     (5,067 )
     
Inventories
    (19,783 )     (11,339 )     3,021  
     
Other current assets
    (675 )     (62 )     (846 )
     
Accounts payable — trade
    (5,849 )     5,873       2,366  
     
Other current liabilities and accrued expenses
    (2,329 )     (2,379 )     8,293  
     
Income taxes payable/receivable, net
    2,507       16,530       608  
     
Non-current assets
    (3,099 )     666       (3,760 )
     
Non-current liabilities
    392       1,321       694  
                   
       
Net cash used in operating activities
    (11,378 )     (12,986 )     (15,305 )
                   
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
                       
 
Purchase of marketable securities
    (1,208 )     (1,308 )     (2,499 )
 
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities
    25,000       10,106       90,439  
 
Proceeds from sale of assets
    2,556       5,196       350  
 
Purchase of property and equipment
    (14,019 )     (20,509 )     (10,714 )
 
Purchase of investments and advances
          (400 )     (2,781 )
 
Acquisition of Aera Japan Limited, net of cash acquired
                (35,689 )
 
Acquisition of Dressler HF Technik GmbH, net of cash acquired
          (1,675 )     (14,395 )
 
Acquisition of interest in Litmas, net of cash acquired
                (400 )
                   
       
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
    12,329       (8,590 )     24,311  
                   
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
                       
 
Proceeds from senior borrowings
    1,585              
 
Repayment of senior borrowings and capital lease obligations
    (8,609 )     (12,847 )     (10,190 )
 
Repurchase of convertible subordinated debt, net
                (14,522 )
 
Sale of common stock through employee stock purchase plan
    609       739       689  
 
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
    1,224       3,500       1,389  
                   
   
Net cash used in financing activities
    (5,191 )     (8,608 )     (22,634 )
                   
EFFECT OF CURRENCY TRANSLATION ON CASH
    1,122       1,518       1,861  
                   
DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
    (3,118 )     (28,666 )     (11,767 )
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of year
    41,522       70,188       81,955  
                   
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of year
  $ 38,404     $ 41,522     $ 70,188  
                   
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
                       
   
Tax benefit related to shares acquired by employees under stock option plans
  $     $     $ 468  
                   
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
                       
 
Cash paid for interest
  $ 9,949     $ 10,521     $ 11,517  
 
Cash paid (received) for income taxes, net
  $ 1,227     $ (9,642 )   $ (16,086 )
 
Assets sold for note receivable
  $ 1,842     $ 1,538     $  
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
are an integral part of these consolidated statements.

F-10


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1) Company Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
      Advanced Energy Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation, is primarily engaged in the development and production of components and subsystems critical to plasma-based manufacturing processes, which are used by manufacturers of semiconductors and in industrial thin-film manufacturing processes.
      Basis of Presentation — The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. and its’ wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) since their dates of acquisition (see Note 2). All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The consolidated financial statements are stated in U.S. dollars and are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
      Segment Reporting — The Company operates in one segment for the manufacture, marketing and servicing of key subsystems, primarily to the semiconductor capital equipment industry. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 131, “Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,” the Company’s chief operating decision maker has been identified as the Chief Executive Officer, who reviews operating results to make decisions about allocating resources and assessing performance for the entire Company. SFAS No. 131, which is based on a management approach to segment reporting, establishes requirements to report selected segment information quarterly and to report annually entity-wide disclosures about products and services, major customers, and the countries in which the entity holds material assets and reports revenue. All material operating units qualify for aggregation under SFAS No. 131 due to their similar customer base and similarities in: economic characteristics; nature of products and services; and procurement, manufacturing and distribution processes. To report revenues from external customers for each product and service or group of similar products and services would not be practicable. Since the Company operates in one segment, all financial information required by SFAS No. 131 can be found in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.
      Estimates and Assumptions — The preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires the Company’s management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates are used when establishing allowances for doubtful accounts, determining useful lives for depreciation and amortization, assessing the need for impairment charges, establishing warranty reserves, allocating purchase price among the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, accounting for income taxes, and assessing excess and obsolete inventory and various others items. The Company evaluates these estimates and judgments on an ongoing basis and bases its estimates on historical experience, current conditions and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. The results of these estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities as well as identifying and assessing the accounting treatment with respect to commitments and contingencies. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
      New Accounting Pronouncements — In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) reissued SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” as SFAS No. 123(R), “Share Based Compensation.” This statement replaces SFAS No. 123, amends SFAS No. 95, “Statement of Cash Flows”, and supersedes Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” SFAS No. 123(R) requires companies to apply a fair-value based measurement method in accounting for share-based payment transactions with employees and to record compensation expense for all stock awards granted, and to awards modified, repurchased or cancelled after the required effective date. Compensation expense for outstanding awards for which the requisite service had not been rendered as of the effective date will be recognized over the remaining service period using the compensation cost calculated for pro forma disclosure purposes under SFAS No. 123, adjusted for

F-11


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
expected forfeitures. Additionally, SFAS No. 123(R) will require entities to record compensation expense for employee stock purchase plans that may not have previously been considered compensatory under the existing rules. SFAS No. 123(R) will be effective for quarterly periods beginning after June 15, 2005, which is the Company’s third quarter of 2005. The Company will adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) using a modified prospective application. This statement may have a significant impact on the Company’s results of operations as the Company will be required to record compensation expense in the consolidated statement of operations rather than disclose the impact on the Company’s results of operations within its notes to the consolidated financial statements (see Note 18).
      In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs”, an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 43, Chapter 4, “Inventory Pricing.” SFAS No. 151 clarifies that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted materials (spoilage) should be recognized as current-period charges. In addition, it requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. SFAS No. 151 will be effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005 and will be applied on a prospective basis by the Company for the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2006. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that adoption of SFAS No. 151 will have on its financial position and results of operations.
      Revenue Recognition — The Company’s standard shipping term is freight on board (“FOB”) shipping point, for which revenue is recognized upon shipment of its products, at which time title passes to the customer, the price is fixed and collectability is reasonably assured. For certain customers, the Company has FOB destination terms, for which revenue is recognized upon receipt of the products by the customer, at which time title passes to the customer, the price is fixed and collectability is reasonably assured. Generally, the Company does not have obligations to its customers after its products are shipped under FOB shipping point terms or after its products are received by the customer under FOB destination terms, other than pursuant to warranty obligations. In limited instances, the Company provides installation of its products. In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue 00-21 “Accounting for Revenue Arrangements With Multiple Deliverables”, the Company allocates revenue based on the fair value of the delivered item, generally the product, and the undelivered item, installation, based on their respective fair values. Revenue related to the undelivered item is deferred until the services have been completed. In certain limited instances, some of the Company’s customers have negotiated product acceptance provisions relative to specific orders. Under these circumstances, the Company defers revenue recognition until the related acceptance provisions have been satisfied. Revenue deferrals are reported as customer deposits and deferred revenue in the consolidated balance sheets.
      In certain instances, the Company requires its customers to pay for a portion or all of their purchases prior to the Company building or shipping these products. Cash payments received prior to shipment are recorded as customer deposits and deferred revenue in the consolidated balance sheets, and then recognized as revenue upon shipment of the products. The Company does not offer price protections to its customers or allow returns, unless covered by its normal policy for repair of defective products.
      Shipping and Handling Costs — Amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling are recorded in sales in the consolidated statements of operations. Shipping and handling costs incurred by the Company for the delivery of products to customers are included in cost of sales in the consolidated statements of operations.
      Excess and Obsolete Inventory — Inventory is written down or written off when it becomes obsolete, generally due to engineering changes to a product or discontinuance of a product line, or when it is deemed excess. Judgment by management is necessary in estimating the net realizable value of inventory based primarily upon forecasts of product demand. Charges for excess and obsolete inventory are recorded, as necessary, within cost of sales in the consolidated statements of operations. For the years ended

F-12


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, the Company recorded charges for excess and obsolete inventory of $11.3 million, $3.0 million and $5.8 million, respectively.
      Warranty Policy — The Company offers warranty coverage for its products for periods typically ranging from 12 to 24 months after shipment. The Company estimates the anticipated costs of repairing products under warranty based on the historical cost of the repairs and expected failure rates. The assumptions used to estimate warranty accruals are reevaluated periodically in light of actual experience and, when appropriate, the accruals are adjusted. The Company’s determination of the appropriate level of warranty accrual is subjective and based on estimates. The industries in which the Company operates are subject to rapid technological change and, as a result, the Company periodically introduces newer, more complex products, which tend to result in increased warranty costs. Estimated warranty costs are recorded at the time of sale of the related product, and are recorded within cost of sales in the consolidated statements of operations. The Company recorded warranty charges of $10.5 million, $8.1 million and $13.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The following summarizes the activity in the Company’s warranty reserves during 2004 and 2003:
                 
    2004   2003
         
    (In thousands)
Balance at beginning of period
  $ 6,612     $ 9,402  
Additions charged to expense
    10,466       8,105  
Deductions
    (10,287 )     (10,895 )
             
Balance at end of period
  $ 6,791     $ 6,612  
             
      Selling, General and Administrative — Selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations are expensed as incurred, including legal and advertising costs.
      Stock-Based Compensation — At December 31, 2004, the Company had three active stock-based compensation plans, which are more fully described in Note 18. The Company accounts for employee stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method prescribed by APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” and related interpretations. APB Opinion No. 25 requires the use of the intrinsic value method, which measures compensation cost as the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of the stock at the measurement date over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock. With the exception of certain options granted in 1999 and 2000 by a shareholder of Sekidenko, Inc., prior to its acquisition by the Company (which was accounted for as a pooling of interests), all options granted under these plans have an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant, therefore no stock-based compensation cost is reflected in the Company’s net loss. Had compensation cost for the Company’s plans been determined consistent with the fair value-based

F-13


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
method prescribed by SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” the Company’s net loss would have increased to the following adjusted amounts:
                           
    2004   2003   2002
             
    (In thousands, except per share data)
Net loss:
                       
 
As reported
  $ (12,747 )   $ (44,241 )   $ (41,399 )
 
Adjustment for stock-based compensation determined under fair value-based method for all awards, net of related tax effects in 2002(a), (b)
    (12,133 )     (12,410 )     (9,794 )
 
Less: Compensation expense recognized in net loss, net of related tax effects in 2002(a), (c)
    60       482       324  
                   
 
As adjusted
  $ (24,820 )   $ (56,169 )   $ (50,869 )
                   
Basic and diluted loss per share:
                       
 
As reported
  $ (0.39 )   $ (1.37 )   $ (1.29 )
 
As adjusted
  $ (0.76 )   $ (1.74 )   $ (1.59 )
 
(a)  Compensation expense in 2004 and 2003 is presented prior to income tax effects due to the Company recording valuation allowances against certain deferred tax assets in 2003 (see Note 12).
 
(b)  Cumulative compensation cost recognized with respect to options that are forfeited prior to vesting is reflected as a reduction of compensation expense in the period of forfeiture. Compensation expense related to awards granted under the Company’s employee stock purchase plan is estimated until the period in which settlement occurs, as the number of shares of common stock awarded and the purchase price are not known until settlement.
 
(c)  Prior to its acquisition by the Company, a shareholder of Sekidenko, Inc. granted employees options under a preexisting arrangement to purchase shares of his common stock already outstanding at exercise prices below fair value. Under this agreement, 29,700 and 34,250 of such options were granted in 1999 and 2000, respectively. These options result in the Company recognizing approximately $2.1 million as compensation expense over the four-year vesting period of the options. The options fully vested during the first quarter of 2004.
      For SFAS No. 123 purposes, the fair value of each option grant and purchase right granted under the ESPP are estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
                         
    2004   2003   2002
             
OPTIONS:
                       
Risk-free interest rates
    3.05 %     2.96 %     3.89 %
Expected dividend yield rates
    0.0 %     0.0 %     0.0 %
Expected lives
    3.0 years       2.9 years       2.9 years  
Expected volatility
    75.23 %     85.64 %     88.05 %
ESPP:
                       
Risk-free interest rates
    1.70 %     1.34 %     1.91 %
Expected dividend yield rates
    0.0 %     0.0 %     0.0 %
Expected lives
    0.5 years       0.5 years       0.5 years  
Expected volatility
    65.31 %     83.82 %     76.62 %

F-14


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
      Based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model, the weighted-average estimated fair value of employee stock option grants was $8.49, $7.88 and $12.54 for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The weighted-average estimated fair value of purchase rights granted under the ESPP was $3.45, $4.99 and $8.92 for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
      The total fair value of options granted was computed to be approximately $10.9 million, $14.3 million and $24.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. These amounts are amortized ratably over the vesting period of the options for the purpose of calculating the pro forma disclosure above.
      The Company will adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) as of the Company’s third quarter of fiscal year 2005, as further discussed the heading “New Accounting Pronouncements” above. The adoption of this statement may have a significant impact on the Company’s results of operations as the Company will be required to record compensation expense in the consolidated statement of operations rather than disclose the impact on the Company’s results of operations within its notes to the consolidated financial statements.
      Commitments and Contingencies — We are involved in disputes and legal actions arising in the normal course of our business. While we currently believe that the amount of any ultimate potential loss would not be material to our financial position, the outcome of these actions is inherently difficult to predict. In the event of an adverse outcome, the ultimate potential loss could have a material adverse effect on our financial position or reported results of operations in a particular quarter. An unfavorable decision, particularly in patent litigation, could require material changes in production processes and products or result in our inability to ship products or components found to have violated third-party patent rights. We accrue loss contingencies in connection with our commitments and contingencies, including litigation, when it is probable that a loss has occurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated.
      Cash and Cash Equivalents — The Company considers all amounts on deposit with financial institutions and highly liquid investments (valued at cost, which approximates fair value) with an original maturity of 90 days or less to be cash and cash equivalents.
      Concentrations of Credit Risk — Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to credit risk, include cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities and trade accounts receivable. The Company maintains cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities and certain other financial instruments with various major financial institutions. The Company performs periodic evaluations of the relative credit standing of these financial institutions and limits the amount of credit exposure with any one institution. The Company’s customers generally are concentrated in the semiconductor capital equipment industry. As a result the Company is generally exposed to credit risk associated with this industry. Sales by the Company’s foreign subsidiaries are primarily denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. The Company establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon factors surrounding the credit risk of specific customers, historical trends and other information.
      Marketable Securities — The Company’s investment in marketable securities, includes commercial paper, municipal bonds and notes and institutional money markets. These investments are classified as available for sale securities, and are recorded at fair value with changes in fair market value recorded as unrealized holding gains or losses in other comprehensive loss, net of tax. Due to the short-term, highly liquid nature of the marketable securities held by the Company, the cost, including accrued interest on such investments, approximates fair value.
      The Company also has investments in marketable equity securities which have been included in deposits and other in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, due to the Company’s expressed intent and demonstrated ability to hold for greater than one year. These investments are classified as

F-15


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
available-for-sale securities and are reported at fair value with unrealized holding gains and losses included in other comprehensive loss, net of tax.
      Inventories, Net — Inventories include costs of materials, direct labor and manufacturing overhead. Inventories are valued at the lower of market or cost, computed on a first-in, first-out basis and are presented net of reserves for excess and obsolete inventory.
      Property and Equipment — Property and equipment is stated at cost or estimated fair value upon acquisition. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over thirty-five to forty years for buildings; three to ten years for machinery, equipment, furniture and fixtures and vehicles; and three years for computers and communication equipment. Amortization of leasehold improvements and leased equipment is calculated using the straight-line method over the lease term or the estimated useful life of the assets, whichever period is shorter. Additions, improvements, and major renewals are capitalized, while maintenance, repairs, and minor renewals are expensed as incurred. When depreciable assets are retired, or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any related gains or losses are included in the consolidated statement of operations. Property and other long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable.
      Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets — Goodwill represents the excess of the cost over the fair market value of net tangible and identifiable intangible assets of acquired businesses.
      Goodwill and certain other intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized. Instead, goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets are subject to periodic (at least annual) tests for impairment. For the periods presented, the Company does not have any indefinite-lived intangible assets, other than goodwill. Impairment testing is performed in two steps: (i) the Company assesses goodwill for potential impairment by comparing the fair value of its reporting unit with its carrying value, and (ii) if potential impairment is indicated because the reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying amount, the Company measures the amount of impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill.
      Finite-lived intangible assets continue to be amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives and are reviewed for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable.
      Demonstration and Customer Service Equipment — Demonstration equipment is a manufactured product that is utilized for sales demonstration and evaluation purposes. Customer service equipment is manufactured product that is utilized as replacement and loaner equipment to existing customers.
      Historically, the Company has amortized demonstration and customer service equipment over its estimated useful life of two years. During the fourth quarter of 2004, as a result of the continuing process of obtaining and analyzing historical data and the Company’s plan for use of the current and future demonstration equipment, the Company made a change in the estimated useful life of the demonstration equipment from two years to zero years. As a result of this change in estimate, the net book value of demonstration equipment of approximately $3.2 million, net of tax, or $0.10 per share, was written off. The Company’s current policy is to record selling, general and administrative expense for the demonstration equipment as it is given to our customer or potential customer. Customer service equipment will continue to be amortized over its estimated useful life of two years.
      Foreign Currency Translation — The functional currency of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries is their local currency, with the exception of the Company’s manufacturing facility in Shenzhen, China where the U.S. dollar is the functional currency. Assets and liabilities of international subsidiaries are translated to U.S. dollars at period-end exchange rates, and statement of operations activity and cash flows

F-16


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
are translated at average exchange rates during the period. Resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a separate component of stockholders’ equity.
      Transactions denominated in currencies other than the local currency are recorded based on exchange rates at the time such transactions arise. Subsequent changes in exchange rates result in foreign currency transaction gains and losses which are reflected in income as unrealized (based on period end translation) or realized (upon settlement of the transactions). Unrealized transaction gains and losses applicable to permanent investments by the Company in its foreign subsidiaries are included as cumulative translation adjustments, and unrealized translation gains or losses applicable to non-permanent intercompany receivables from or payables to the Company and its foreign subsidiaries are included in income.
      Reclassifications — Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
(2) Acquisitions
      Litmas — During 1998, the Company acquired a 29% ownership interest in Litmas, a privately held, North Carolina-based early-stage company that designed and manufactured plasma gas abatement systems and high-density plasma sources. The purchase price consisted of $1.0 million in cash. On October 1, 1999, the Company acquired an additional 27.5% interest in Litmas for an additional $560,000. The purchase price consisted of $385,000 in the Company’s common stock and $175,000 in cash. The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and resulted in $523,000 allocated to intangible assets as goodwill. The results of operations of Litmas have been consolidated in the Company’s financial statements from the date the controlling interest of 56.5% was acquired. In October 2000, the Company acquired an additional 3.0% interest in Litmas for an additional $250,000, bringing the Company’s ownership interest in Litmas to 59.5%. In April 2002, the Company completed its acquisition of the 40.5% of Litmas that it did not previously own, by issuing approximately 120,000 shares of the Company’s common stock valued at approximately $4.2 million, and approximately $400,000 of cash. The acquisition of the remaining minority interest in Litmas resulted in approximately $5.0 million of additional goodwill.
      Dressler — On March 28, 2002, the Company acquired Dressler HF Technik GmbH (“Dressler”), a privately owned Stolberg, Germany-based provider of power supplies and matching networks, for a purchase price of approximately $15.0 million in cash and a $1.7 million escrow. The escrow fund was retained by the Company until January 2003, at which time the related escrow liability was settled. The purchase price was also subject to a $3.0 million earn-out provision if Dressler achieved certain key business objectives by March 30, 2003. These business objectives were not met prior to the expiration date.
      The Company believes that Dressler expands the Company’s product offerings to customers in the semiconductor, data storage, and flat panel equipment markets due to its strong power product portfolio that includes a wide range of power levels and radio frequencies. In addition, with inroads already made into the laser and medical markets, Dressler is used to explore new market opportunities for the Company. Dressler also strengthens the Company’s presence in the European marketplace. Dressler has well established relationships with many European customers, who look to Dressler for innovative technical capability, quality products, and highly responsive customer service.
      The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting in accordance with SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations” (“SFAS No. 141”), and the operating results of Dressler are reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements prospectively from the date of acquisition. The tangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at estimated fair values as determined by the Company’s management. Goodwill and other intangible assets were recorded at estimated fair values based upon independent appraisals.

F-17


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
      The purchase price was allocated to the net assets of Dressler as summarized below (in thousands):
         
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 680  
Accounts receivable
    1,939  
Inventories
    1,111  
Other current assets
    83  
Property and equipment
    260  
Goodwill
    9,405  
Other intangible assets
    7,750  
Other assets
    19  
Accounts payable
    (314 )
Accrued payroll
    (39 )
Other accrued expenses
    (474 )
Deferred tax liability
    (2,945 )
Income taxes payable
    (725 )
       
    $ 16,750  
       
      The excess purchase price over the estimated fair value of tangible net assets acquired was allocated to goodwill and other intangible assets (see Notes 1 and 8). The Company recognized approximately $2.3 million, $2.5 million and $769,000 of amortization expense related to these amortizable intangibles acquired from Dressler for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
      Prior to the combination, there were transactions between the Company and Dressler in the first three months of 2002, during which time the Company purchased approximately $500,000 of inventory from Dressler. These purchases were made in the normal course of the Company’s business.
      Aera — On January 18, 2002, the Company acquired Aera Japan Limited (“Aera”), a privately held Japanese corporation. The Company effected the acquisition through its wholly owned subsidiary, AE-Japan, which purchased all of the outstanding stock of Aera. The aggregate purchase price paid by AE-Japan was 5.7 billion Japanese yen (approximately $44.0 million, based upon an exchange rate of 130:1), which the Company funded from its available cash. In connection with the acquisition, AE-Japan assumed approximately $34.0 million of Aera’s debt. Aera supplies the semiconductor capital equipment industry with product lines that include digital mass flow controllers, pressure-based mass flow controllers, liquid mass flow controllers, ultrasonic liquid flow meters and liquid vapor delivery systems.
      The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting in accordance with SFAS No. 141 and the operating results of Aera are reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements prospectively from the date of acquisition. The tangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at estimated fair values as determined by the Company’s management. Goodwill and other intangible assets were recorded at estimated fair values based upon independent appraisals.

F-18


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
      The purchase price was allocated to the net assets of Aera as summarized below (in thousands):
         
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 8,276  
Marketable securities
    115  
Accounts receivable
    8,405  
Inventories
    19,243  
Other current assets
    530  
Property and equipment
    13,388  
Goodwill
    24,869  
Other intangible assets
    12,500  
Other assets
    427  
Accounts payable
    (2,329 )
Accrued payroll
    (2,924 )
Other liabilities
    (2,164 )
Deferred tax liability
    (4,765 )
Current portion of long-term debt
    (12,008 )
Long-term debt
    (19,598 )
       
    $ 43,965  
       
      There were no transactions between the Company and Aera prior to the combination. The excess purchase price over the estimated fair value of tangible net assets acquired was allocated to goodwill and other intangible assets (see Notes 1 and 8). The Company recognized approximately $1.5 million, $1.4 million and $3.0 million of amortization expense related to the amortizable intangibles acquired from Aera for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
      The pro forma results for the Company, Aera and Dressler for the year ended December 31, 2002, assuming the acquisitions of Aera and Dressler occurred on January 1, 2002, are not presented as the difference between the pro forma results and actual results are not material.
(3) Restructuring Costs
      Restructuring charges include the costs associated with actions taken by the Company primarily in response to downturns in the semiconductor capital equipment industry. These charges consist of costs that are incurred to exit an activity or cancel an existing contractual obligation, including the closure of facilities and employee termination related charges.
      Effective January 1, 2003, the Company adopted SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Exit or Disposal Activities”, which nullifies EITF Issue No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity.” SFAS No. 146 requires costs associated with exit or disposal activities to be recognized when they are incurred, whereas under EITF Issue No. 94-3, a liability was recognized at the date of an entity’s commitment to an exit plan. As related to employee termination benefits, the provisions of SFAS No. 146 offer guidance on “one-time termination benefits”, and exclude from the scope “on-going benefit arrangements”, therefore, the Company follows the guidance within SFAS No. 146 for voluntary severances and other one-time termination benefits.
      The accounting for the standard severance benefits that the Company pays for involuntarily severed employees, considered an on-going benefit arrangement, is excluded from the scope of SFAS No. 146. For these benefits, the Company follows the guidance under SFAS No. 88, “Employers’ Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination Benefits.” Severance

F-19


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
costs accounted for under SFAS No. 88 are accrued and recorded as restructuring expense when such amount is probable that employees will be entitled to benefits and the amount can be reasonably estimated.
      The following table summarizes the components of the restructuring charges, the payments and non-cash charges, and the remaining accrual as of December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002:
                                   
    Employee            
    Severance and   Facility   Impairment of   Total
    Termination   Closure   Facility-related   Restructuring
    Costs   Costs   Assets   Charges
                 
    (In thousands)
Accrual balance December 31, 2001
  $ 965     $ 462     $     $ 1,427  
                         
 
Third quarter 2002 restructuring charge
    1,033       1,757       430       3,220  
 
Fourth quarter 2002 restructuring charge
    2,021       2,201       1,618       5,840  
                         
Total restructuring charges 2002
    3,054       3,958       2,048       9,060  
Payments in 2002
    (2,412 )     (468 )           (2,880 )
Write-off of facility-related assets in 2002
                (1,618 )     (1,618 )
                         
Accrual balance December 31, 2002
    1,607       3,952       430       5,989  
                         
 
First quarter 2003 restructuring charge
    1,509                   1,509  
 
Second quarter 2003 restructuring charge
    670       98             768  
 
Third quarter 2003 restructuring charge
    704             307       1,011  
 
Fourth quarter 2003 restructuring charge
    994       24             1,018  
                         
Total restructuring charges 2003
    3,877       122       307       4,306  
Payments in 2003
    (4,924 )     (1,459 )           (6,383 )
Write-off of facility-related assets in 2003
                (737 )     (737 )
                         
Accrual balance December 31, 2003
    560       2,615             3,175  
                         
 
First quarter 2004 restructuring charge
    220                   220  
 
Second quarter 2004 restructuring charge
    187                   187  
 
Third quarter 2004 restructuring charge
    57       31             88  
 
Third quarter 2004 restructuring reversal
    (127 )     (126 )           (253 )
 
Fourth quarter 2004 restructuring charge
    3,639       31             3,670  
                         
Total net restructuring charges 2004
    3,976       (64 )           3,912  
Payments in 2004
    (1,243 )     (1,430 )           (2,673 )
                         
Accrual balance December 31, 2004
  $ 3,293     $ 1,121     $     $ 4,414  
                         
      The Company recorded restructuring charges totaling $9.1 million in 2002, primarily associated with changes in operations designed to reduce redundancies and better align the Company’s Aera mass flow controller business within its operating framework. The Company’s restructuring plans and associated costs consisted of $6.0 million to close and consolidate certain manufacturing facilities, and $3.1 million for related headcount reductions of approximately 223 manufacturing and administrative employees in the Company’s U.S. operations.
      Included in the 2002 expense are charges for the closure of a portion of the Company’s Voorhees, New Jersey manufacturing facilities, due to the transfer of the manufacturing of these products to Fort Collins, Colorado; the closure of a manufacturing facility in Fort Collins; the closure of a manufacturing

F-20


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
facilities in Longmont, Colorado, due to the transfer of the manufacturing of these products to Fort Collins, Colorado and ultimately to Shenzhen, China; and the closure of Litmas. During the fourth quarter of 2002, the Company closed its San Jose, California sales and service location; and the Company’s Austin, Texas manufacturing facility for the Aera-brand mass flow controller products, due to the transfer of the manufacturing of these products to Hachioji, Japan, to be co-located with Aera Japan Limited. These costs consisted primarily of payments required under operating lease contracts and costs for writing down related leasehold improvements.
      At the end of 2002, the Company announced major changes in its operations to occur through the end of 2003. These included establishing a new manufacturing facility in China, consolidating worldwide sales forces, a move to high-quality, low-cost suppliers local to our Shenzhen, China facility (“Tier 1 Asian suppliers”), and the intention to close or sell certain facilities.
      Associated with the above plan, the Company recognized charges during 2003 as follows:
  •  In the first quarter of 2003, the Company recorded charges totaling approximately $1.5 million primarily associated with manufacturing and administrative personnel headcount reductions in the Company’s Japanese operations. In accordance with Japanese labor regulations the Company offered voluntary termination benefits to all of its Japanese employees. The voluntary termination benefits were accepted by 36 employees, with termination dates in the second quarter of 2003.
 
  •  In the second quarter of 2003, the Company recognized charges totaling $768,000 that consisted primarily of the involuntary termination of 55 manufacturing and administrative personnel in the Company’s U.S. operations.
 
  •  In the third quarter of 2003, the Company recognized charges of approximately $1.0 million that consisted of $704,000 of expense for involuntary employee termination benefits for 20 employees and $307,000 related to asset impairments incurred as a result of exiting its Longmont, Colorado manufacturing facilities.
 
  •  In the fourth quarter of 2003, the Company recognized approximately $1.0 million that consisted primarily of the recognition of expense for involuntary employee termination benefits associated with the involuntary employee termination benefits of 34 manufacturing and administrative personnel in the Company’s U.S. operations.
      In the first, second and third quarters of 2004, the Company recorded restructuring charges of $220,000, $187,000 and $88,000, respectively, which primarily consisted of the recognition of expense for involuntary employee termination benefits associated with headcount reductions of approximately 34, 12 and 4 employees, respectively, in the Company’s U.S. operations. All affected employees were terminated prior to the respective quarter ends. Additionally, in the third quarter, the Company reversed $253,000 of previously recorded charges due to variances from the original estimates used to establish the Company’s reserve due to some voluntary employee terminations prior to their agreed upon termination date (no longer meeting the requirements to receive a severance payment) and negotiated lease termination payments below original estimates. As a result of such reversal, the Company’s restructuring accrual balance for employee severance and termination costs was $0 at September 30, 2004.
      In the fourth quarter of 2004, the Company recorded restructuring charges of $3.7 million. The $3.7 million charge primarily consisted of employee termination and related costs associated with the involuntary severance of 212 employees, including 60 agency employees, at the Company’s Fort Collins facility. All of such charges relate to separation costs anticipated to be paid to the terminated employees, in cash, by the end of the second quarter of 2005. The need to reduce headcount in Fort Collins resulted primarily from the transfer of a substantial portion of the Company’s manufacturing operations to Shenzhen, China.

F-21


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(4) Marketable Securities
      Marketable securities consisted of the following:
                 
    December 31,
     
    2004   2003
         
    (In thousands)
Commercial paper
  $ 43,459     $ 40,792  
Municipal bonds and notes
    20,332       46,762  
Institutional money markets
    5,787       5,816  
             
Total marketable securities
  $ 69,578     $ 93,370  
             
      These marketable securities are considered available-for-sale and are stated at period end market value. The commercial paper consists of high-credit quality, short-term money market common and preferreds, with maturities or reset dates of 120 days or less.
      At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company also had $3.6 million and $4.8 million, respectively, of investments in marketable equity securities which are included in deposits and other in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, due to the Company’s expressed intent and demonstrated ability to hold for greater than one year. These investments are classified as available-for-sale securities and are reported at fair value with unrealized holding gains and losses included in other comprehensive loss, net of tax.
      During the fourth quarter of 2002, the fair value of one of these securities continued a substantial decline, and the Company determined the decline was other than temporary. As a result, the Company recorded an impairment charge of approximately $1.5 million. In the first quarter of 2003, this security continued to decline in value, and the Company recorded an additional impairment charge of $175,000. Since the first quarter of 2003, the value of this security has appreciated which has been reflected as a component of other comprehensive loss, net of tax.
(5) Accounts Receivable — Trade
      Trade accounts receivable consisted of the following:
                 
    December 31,
     
    2004   2003
         
    (In thousands)
Domestic
  $ 16,612     $ 17,100  
Foreign
    51,047       41,359  
Allowance for doubtful accounts
    (1,049 )     (1,303 )
             
Total accounts receivable — trade
  $ 66,610     $ 57,156  
             

F-22


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(6) Inventories, Net
      Net inventories consisted of the following:
                 
    December 31,
     
    2004   2003
         
    (In thousands)
Parts and raw materials
  $ 54,069     $ 47,120  
Work in process
    4,491       4,385  
Finished goods
    14,664       14,198  
             
Total inventories, net
  $ 73,224     $ 65,703  
             
      Inventories include costs of materials, direct labor and manufacturing overhead. Inventories are valued at the lower of market or cost, computed on a first-in, first-out basis. Inventory is expensed as cost of sales upon recognition of revenue.
(7) Property and Equipment
      Property and equipment consisted of the following:
                 
    December 31,
     
    2004   2003
         
    (In thousands)
Land
  $ 5,127     $ 5,663  
Buildings
    5,738       4,293  
Machinery and equipment
    40,196       36,039  
Computers and communication equipment
    28,954       24,324  
Furniture and fixtures
    6,221       6,268  
Vehicles
    290       1,368  
Leasehold improvements
    17,684       17,618  
             
      104,210       95,573  
Less — accumulated depreciation
    (59,464 )     (50,848 )
             
Total property and equipment
  $ 44,746     $ 44,725  
             
      Aggregate depreciation expense related to property and equipment for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, was $13.7 million, $12.7 million and $13.4 million, respectively.
      In the fourth quarter of 2002, in conjunction with the restructuring of its operations, the Company determined that certain facilities would be closed. The Company performed an analysis of the fair value of certain long-lived assets, including land and buildings acquired in conjunction with the Company’s acquisition of Engineering Measurements Company in January 2001. As a result, the Company recorded impairments of property and equipment of $1.6 million, which has been reflected as restructuring charges in the consolidated statement of operations.

F-23


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(8) Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
      Goodwill and other intangible assets consisted of the following as of December 31, 2004:
                                           
        Effect of           Weighted-
    Gross   Changes in           Average
    Carrying   Exchange   Accumulated   Net Carrying   Useful Life
    Amount   Rates   Amortization   Amount   in Years
                     
    (In thousands, except weighted-average useful life)
Amortizable intangibles:
                                       
 
Technology-based
  $ 7,304     $ 1,741     $ (5,290 )   $ 3,755       6  
 
Contract-based
    1,200       222       (1,386 )     36       4  
 
Trademarks and other
    8,500       2,689       (2,948 )     8,241       17  
                               
 
Total amortizable intangibles
    17,004       4,652       (9,624 )     12,032       11  
                               
Goodwill
    55,104       13,172             68,276          
                               
 
Total goodwill and other intangible assets
  $ 72,108     $ 17,824     $ (9,624 )   $ 80,308          
                               
      Goodwill and other intangible assets consisted of the following as of December 31, 2003:
                                           
        Effect of           Weighted-
    Gross   Changes in           Average
    Carrying   Exchange   Accumulated   Net Carrying   Useful Life
    Amount   Rates   Amortization   Amount   in Years
                     
    (In thousands, except weighted-average useful life)
Amortizable intangibles:
                                       
 
Technology-based
  $ 7,304     $ 1,544     $ (3,906 )   $ 4,942       6  
 
Contract-based
    9,210       1,709       (5,882 )     5,037       4  
 
Trademarks and other
    8,500       2,363       (1,409 )     9,454       17  
                               
 
Total amortizable intangibles
    25,014       5,616       (11,197 )     19,433       11  
                               
Goodwill
    58,629       10,881             69,510          
                               
 
Total goodwill and other intangible assets
  $ 83,643     $ 16,497     $ (11,197 )   $ 88,943          
                               
      The Company’s goodwill and other intangible assets have primarily resulted from purchases of Japanese and German companies, and accordingly, carrying amounts for these assets are impacted by changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
      Aggregate amortization expense related to amortizable intangibles for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, was $3.9 million, $4.6 million and $5.5 million, respectively. Estimated amortization expense related to the Company’s acquired intangibles fluctuates with changes in foreign currency exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and the Japanese yen and the euro. Estimated amortization

F-24


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
expense related to amortizable intangibles for each of the five years 2005 through 2009 is as follows (in thousands):
         
    Estimated
    Amortization
    Expense
     
    (In thousands)
2005
  $ 2,173  
2006
    2,016  
2007
    1,009  
2008
    876  
2009
    474  
      In the fourth quarter of 2004, the Company performed its annual goodwill impairment test, and concluded that no impairment of goodwill existed at the measurement date, as the estimated fair value of the Company’s reporting unit exceeded its carrying amount. For the year ended December 31, 2004, goodwill was reduced by approximately $3.3 million due to reversals of deferred tax asset valuation allowances established in purchase accounting (see Note 12).
      During the fourth quarter of 2004, in conjunction with our financial forecasting for future periods, it was evident that projected cash flows from certain customers of Dressler were substantially below amounts projected at the time of acquisition and in subsequent forecasting periods. The projected cash flows were considered in determining the fair value of certain contract-based and other amortizable intangible assets recorded at acquisition and also in subsequent periods to assess such assets for potential impairment. Due to the decline in projected cash flows, we performed assessments of the carrying values of the related amortizable intangible assets. These assessments consisted of estimating the intangible asset’s fair value and comparing the estimated fair value to the carrying value of the asset. The Company estimated the intangible asset’s fair value through the use of projected cash flows based upon projected revenue streams over the life of the asset, discounted at rates consistent with the risk of the related cash flows. Based on this analysis the Company determined that the fair values of certain intangible assets were below the respective carrying values, and recorded impairment charges of approximately $2.9 million, which has been reported as an impairment of intangible assets in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.
      Also during the fourth quarter of 2004, in conjunction with the Company’s restructuring plan, employees who were the subject of certain contract-based amortizable intangibles were severed from the Company or their responsibilities were significantly altered. As a result, the Company performed assessments of the carrying values of the related amortizable intangible assets. These assessments consisted of estimating the intangible asset’s fair value and comparing the estimated fair value to the carrying value of the asset. The Company estimated the intangible asset’s fair value through the use of a lost profits method of determining the fair value, arriving at projected cash flows which were then discounted at rates consistent with the risk of the related cash flows. Based on this analysis the Company determined that the fair values of certain intangible assets were below the respective carrying values, and recorded impairment charges of approximately $397,000, which has been reported as an impairment of intangible assets in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.
      During the third quarter of 2003, the Company determined that one of its mass flow controller products would not conform to changing customer technology requirements, and as such would no longer be accepted by the Company’s customers. As a result, the Company performed an assessment of the carrying value of the related intangible asset. This assessment consisted of estimating the intangible asset’s fair value and comparing the estimated fair value to the carrying value of the asset. The Company estimated the intangible asset’s fair value by applying a hypothetical royalty rate to the projected revenue stream and using a cash flow model discounted at rates consistent with the risk of the related cash flows.

F-25


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Based on this analysis the Company determined that the fair value of the intangible asset was minimal and recorded an impairment charge of approximately $1.2 million, which has also been reported as an impairment of intangible assets in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.
      In the fourth quarter of 2002, the Company’s sales to the semiconductor capital equipment industry declined substantially from the third quarter of 2002. As a result, we determined there would be a significant delay by the semiconductor capital equipment industry in adopting advanced connectivity technology, and due to these industry conditions as well as our future strategic priorities, our relevant intangible assets were likely impaired. We evaluated the carrying amount of certain intangible assets by comparing its estimated future cash flows to its carrying value. This analysis indicated that such assets were impaired and we recorded a charge of $1.9 million for 2002, which has been reflected as impairment of intangible assets in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.
(9) Senior Borrowings
      Senior borrowings consisted of the following:
                 
    December 31,
     
    2004   2003
         
    (In thousands)
Revolving line of credit of $25 million, expiring May 2005, interest at bank’s prime rate minus 1%, (4.00% at December 31, 2004)
  $     $  
Senior borrowings (assumed in the acquisition of Aera), maturing serially through April 2010, interest from 1.5% to 3.1% at December 31, 2004
    5,953       13,933  
Mortgage note payable, maturing July 2007, interest at 3.0% at December 31, 2004
    1,737        
Less — current portion
    (3,432 )     (8,028 )
             
Senior borrowings, net of current portion
  $ 4,258     $ 5,905  
             
      The Company is subject to covenants on its line of credit that provide certain restrictions related to working capital, leverage, net worth, acquisitions, and payment and declaration of dividends. The Company was in compliance with these covenants at December 31, 2004. The senior borrowings assumed in the acquisition of Aera and the mortgage note payable are collateralized by the Company’s buildings in Japan and Korea, respectively.
      Scheduled maturities of the Company’s outstanding borrowings and convertible subordinated notes payable (see Note 10) are as follows at December 31, 2004:
                           
        Convertible    
    Bank Loans   Subordinated Notes   Total
             
    (In thousands)
2005
  $ 3,432     $     $ 3,432  
2006
    2,185       187,718       189,903  
2007
    2,073             2,073  
                   
 
Total
  $ 7,690     $ 187,718     $ 195,408  
                   
(10) Convertible Subordinated Notes Payable
      In August 2001, the Company issued $125.0 million of 5.00% convertible subordinated notes. These notes mature September 1, 2006, with interest payable on March 1st and September 1st of each year beginning March 1, 2002. Net proceeds to the Company were $121.25 million, after deducting

F-26


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
$3.75 million of offering costs, which have been capitalized and are being amortized as additional interest expense over a period of five years. Holders of the notes may convert the notes at any time before maturity into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion rate of 33.5289 shares per each $1,000 principal amount of notes, equivalent to a conversion price of $29.83 per share. The conversion rate is subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. The Company may redeem the notes from September 4, 2004 through August 31, 2005 at 102% times the principal amount, from September 1, 2005 through August 31, 2006 at 101% times the principal amount, and thereafter at 100% of the principal amount. Upon any provisional redemption, the Company will make an additional payment in cash with respect to the notes called for redemption in an amount equal to $150.56 per $1,000 principal amount of notes, less the amount of any interest paid on the note. The Company may also make this additional payment in shares of its common stock, and any such payment will be valued at 95% of the average of the closing prices of the Company’s common stock for the five consecutive trading days ending on the day prior to the redemption date. The Company will be obligated to make an additional payment on all notes called for provisional redemption. The notes are subordinated to the Company’s present and potential future senior debt, and are effectively subordinated in right of payment to all indebtedness and other liabilities of the Company’s subsidiaries. At December 31, 2004, approximately $2.0 million of interest expense related to these notes was accrued as a current liability.
      In November 1999, the Company issued $135.0 million of 5.25% convertible subordinated notes. These notes mature November 15, 2006, with interest payable on May 15th and November 15th each year beginning May 15, 2000. Net proceeds to the Company were approximately $130.5 million, after deducting $4.5 million of offering costs, which have been capitalized and are being amortized as additional interest expense over a period of seven years. Holders of the notes may convert the notes at any time into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion rate of 20.1898 shares per each $1,000 principal amount of notes, equivalent to a conversion price of $49.53 per share. The conversion rate is subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. The Company may redeem the notes on or after November 19, 2002 at a redemption price of 103% of the principal amount, and may redeem at successively lesser amounts thereafter until November 15, 2006, at which time the Company may redeem at a redemption price equal to the principal amount. At December 31, 2004, approximately $435,000 of interest expense related to these notes was accrued as a current liability.
      In October and November 2000, the Company repurchased an aggregate of approximately $53.4 million principal amount of its 5.25% convertible subordinated notes in the open market, for a cost of approximately $40.8 million.
      In October and November 2002, the Company repurchased approximately $15.4 million and $3.5 million principal amounts of its 5.25% and 5.00% convertible subordinated notes, respectively. These purchases were made in the open market, for a cost of approximately $14.5 million, resulting in a pre-tax gain of $4.2 million. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, approximately $66.2 million and $121.5 million principal amounts of the 5.25% and 5.00% notes, respectively, remained outstanding.
(11) Earnings Per Share
      Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. The computation of diluted EPS is similar to the computation of basic EPS except that the numerator is increased to exclude certain charges which would not have been incurred, and the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding (using the if-converted and treasury stock methods), if securities containing potentially dilutive common shares (convertible notes payable and stock options) had been converted to such common shares, and if such assumed conversion is dilutive. For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, certain stock

F-27


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
options outstanding and the conversion of the Company’s convertible subordinated notes payable were not included in this calculation because to do so would be anti-dilutive. Due to the Company’s net loss for years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, basic and diluted EPS are the same, as the assumed conversion of all potentially dilutive securities would be anti-dilutive. Potential shares of common stock issuable under options for common stock at December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 were approximately 4.7 million, 4.0 million and 3.6 million, respectively. Potential shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Company’s convertible subordinated notes payable were 5.4 million at December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002.
(12) Income Taxes
      The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” SFAS No. 109 requires deferred tax assets and liabilities to be recognized for temporary differences between the tax basis and financial reporting basis of assets and liabilities, computed at current tax rates, as well as for the expected tax benefit of net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. During 2004 and 2003, the Company recorded valuation allowances against certain of its United States and foreign net deferred tax assets in jurisdictions where the Company has incurred significant losses in recent years. Given such experience, the Company’s management could not conclude that it was more likely than not that these net deferred tax assets would be realized. While there were indications that the markets in which the Company operates may have improved in future periods, the Company’s management, in accordance with SFAS No. 109, in evaluating the recoverability of these net deferred tax assets, was required to place greater weight on the Company’s historical results as compared to projections regarding future taxable income. If the Company generates future taxable income, or should the Company be able to conclude that sufficient taxable income is reasonably assured based on profitable operations, in the appropriate tax jurisdictions, against which these tax attributes may be applied, some portion or all of the valuation allowance will be reversed and a corresponding reduction in income tax expense will be reported in future periods. Approximately $2.3 million of the valuation allowance relates to the benefit from stock-based compensation. Any reversal of valuation allowance from this item will be reflected as a component of stockholders’ equity.
      When recording acquisitions, the Company has recorded valuation allowances due to the uncertainty related to the realization of certain deferred tax assets existing at the acquisition dates. The amount of deferred tax assets considered realizable is subject to adjustment in future periods if estimates of future taxable income are changed. Any reversals of valuation allowances recorded in purchase accounting will be reflected as a reduction of goodwill in the period of reversal. For the year ended December 31, 2004, valuation allowances established in purchase accounting were reversed with a corresponding reduction in goodwill of approximately $3.3 million.
      The income tax provision of $3.9 million in 2004 represents an effective tax rate of negative 45% and the income tax provision of $11.8 million in 2003 represents an effective tax rate of negative 36%, due to taxable income earned in certain foreign jurisdictions. The income tax benefit of $22.3 million for 2002

F-28


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
represents an effective tax rate of 35%. The provision (benefit) for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 was, as follows:
                         
    December 31,
     
    2004   2003   2002
             
    (In thousands)
Federal
  $     $ 8,437     $ (18,575 )
State and local
          784       (2,178 )
Foreign taxes
    3,947       2,580       (1,540 )
                   
    $ 3,947     $ 11,801     $ (22,293 )
                   
Current
  $ 3,503     $ 5,372     $ (15,405 )
Deferred
    444       6,429       (6,888 )
                   
    $ 3,947     $ 11,801     $ (22,293 )
                   
      The following reconciles the Company’s effective tax rate to the federal statutory rate for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002:
                         
    December 31,
     
    2004   2003   2002
             
    (In thousands)
Income tax benefit per federal statutory rate
  $ (3,080 )   $ (11,354 )   $ (22,293 )
State income taxes, net of federal deduction
    (810 )     (1,328 )     (1,414 )
Extraterritorial income exclusion
    (350 )     (350 )     (262 )
Nondeductible intangible and goodwill amortization
    98       98       183  
Other permanent items, net
    (514 )     (456 )     760  
Effect of foreign taxes
    (415 )     (333 )     (272 )
Change in valuation allowance
    7,884       29,130       1,255  
Tax credits and other items
    1,134       (3,606 )     (250 )
                   
    $ 3,947     $ 11,801     $ (22,293 )
                   

F-29


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
      The sources of the Company’s deferred income tax assets and liabilities are summarized as follows:
                     
    December 31,
     
    2004   2003
         
    (In thousands)
Current:
               
 
Employee bonuses and commissions
  $ 31     $ 314  
 
Warranty reserve
    2,493       2,463  
 
Bad debt reserve
    201       533  
 
Vacation accrual
    833       806  
 
Restructuring accrual
    1,545       1,222  
 
Excess and obsolete inventory
    3,156       4,093  
 
Other
    2,604       988  
 
Valuation allowance
    (10,863 )     (10,419 )
             
   
Net current
           
Long-term:
               
 
Net operating loss and tax credit carryforward
    42,284       38,246  
 
Accumulated other comprehensive income
    (7,099 )     (5,464 )
 
Depreciation and amortization
    (2,454 )     (7,898 )
 
Other, net
    2,963       3,340  
 
Valuation allowance
    (39,403 )     (32,896 )
             
   
Net long-term
  $ (3,709 )   $ (4,672 )
             
      The following reconciles the change in the net deferred income tax liability from December 31, 2003 to December 31, 2004, to the deferred income tax provision:
         
    2004
     
    (In thousands)
Net change in deferred income tax liability from the preceding table
  $ (963 )
Net change in deferred tax liability associated with foreign currency fluctuation
    (246 )
Net change in deferred tax liability associated with purchase accounting — reduction in Goodwill
    3,288  
Increase in deferred tax liability associated with other comprehensive income
    (1,635 )
       
Deferred income tax provision for the period
  $ 444  
       
      As of December 31, 2004, the Company had a gross federal net operating loss, alternative minimum tax credit and research and development credit carryforwards of approximately $85 million, $2 million and $4 million, respectively, which may be available to offset future federal income tax liabilities. The federal net operating loss and research and development credit carryforwards expire at various dates through December 31, 2024, the alternative minimum tax credit carryforward has no expiration date. In addition, as of December 31, 2004, the Company had a gross foreign net operating loss carryforward of $4 million, which may be available to offset future foreign income tax liabilities and expire at various dates through December 31, 2008.

F-30


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
      The domestic versus foreign component of the Company’s net loss before income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, was as follows:
                         
    December 31,
     
    2004   2003   2002
             
    (In thousands)
Domestic
  $ (20,725 )   $ (35,137 )   $ (60,070 )
Foreign
    11,925       2,697       (3,622 )
                   
    $ (8,800 )   $ (32,440 )   $ (63,692 )
                   
(13) Retirement Plans
      The Company has a 401(k) profit sharing plan which covers most full-time employees age eighteen or older. Participants may defer up to the maximum amount allowed as determined by law. Participants are immediately vested in their contributions.
      The Company may make discretionary contributions based on corporate financial results. In 2002, the Company’s contribution for participants in its 401(k) plan was 10% matching on contributions by employees up to 6% of the employee’s compensation. In 2003, the Company increased its matching contributions to 25% matching on contributions by employees up to 6% of the employee’s compensation; such contribution level was maintained for 2004. The Company’s total contributions to the plan were approximately $698,000, $635,000 and $272,000 for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Vesting in the profit sharing contribution account is based on years of service, with most participants fully vested after four years of credited service.
(14) Commitments and Contingencies
      The Company has committed to purchase approximately $5.0 million of parts, components and subassemblies in 2005 and $2.5 million in 2006. This inventory purchase obligation represents a minimum purchase commitment to ensure the Company has an adequate supply of critical components to meet the demand of its customers. The Company believes these inventory purchases will be consumed in its on-going operations during the respective years of purchase commitment.
      The Company has also committed to advance up to $850,000 to a privately held company in exchange for an exclusive intellectual property license. The amount and timing of this advance is dependent upon the privately held company achieving certain development milestones. As of December 31, 2004, approximately $50,000 has been advanced under this agreement, which was recorded within research and development expense in the consolidated statement of operations.
     Disputes and Legal Actions
      The Company is involved in disputes and legal actions arising in the normal course of its business. Currently and historically, the Company’s most significant legal actions have involved the application of patent law to complex technologies and intellectual property. The determination of whether such technologies infringe upon the Company’s or others’ patents is highly subjective. This high level of subjectivity introduces substantial additional risk with regard to the outcome of the Company’s disputes and legal actions related to intellectual property. While the Company currently believes that the amount of any ultimate potential loss for currently-known matters would not be material to the Company’s financial position, the outcome of these actions is inherently difficult to predict. In the event of an adverse outcome, the ultimate potential loss could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or reported results of operations in a particular period. An unfavorable decision, particularly in patent

F-31


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
litigation, could require material changes in production processes and products or result in the Company’s inability to ship products or components found to have violated third-party patent rights. The Company accrues loss contingencies in connection with its litigation when it is probable that a loss will occur and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated.
      In April 2003, the Company filed a claim in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado seeking a declaratory ruling that its new plasma source products Xstreamtm With Active Matching Networktm (“Xstream products”) are not in violation of U.S. Patents held by MKS Instruments, Inc. (“MKS”). This case was transferred by the Colorado court to the United States District Court for the District of Delaware for consolidation with a patent infringement suit filed in that court by MKS in May 2003, alleging that the Company’s Xstream products infringe five patents held by MKS. On July 23, 2004, a jury returned a verdict of infringement of three MKS patents, which did not stipulate damages. The court has not enjoined the Company from selling the Xstream products. The Company has filed four separate motions to have the verdict set aside based upon defects in the trial. The court has not scheduled any further activity in the case, including trial of the Company’s patent invalidity and inequitable conduct defenses, while the post-trial motions are being reviewed. Potential liability, if any, resulting from the jury verdict is indeterminable at this time, and therefore no amount has been accrued by the Company in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
      On June 2, 2004, MKS filed a petition in the District Court in Munich, Germany, alleging infringement by the Company’s Xstream products of a counterpart German patent owned by MKS. On August 4, 2004, this court dismissed MKS’s petition and assessed costs of the proceeding against MKS. MKS refiled an infringement petition in the District Court of Mannheim. At a hearing held on February 18, 2005, the Mannheim court indicated that a decision on the infringement allegation would be rendered on April 8, 2005. A petition for invalidity of MKS’s patent brought by the Company is still pending before the German Federal Patent Court.
      On July 12, 2004, the Company filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware against MKS alleging that MKS’s Astron reactive gas source products infringe Advanced Energy’s U.S. Patent No. 6,046,546. A stipulation of voluntary dismissal of the action was filed by the parties on March 9, 2005, which leaves the Company free to refile its claims upon conclusion of MKS’s lawsuit against the Company’s Xstream products.
      On September 17, 2001, Sierra Applied Sciences, Inc. (“Sierra”) filed for declaratory judgment asking the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado to rule that its products did not infringe the Company’s U.S. patent no. 5,718,813 and that the patent was invalid. On March 24, 2003, the Court granted the Company’s motion to dismiss the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the dismissal on April 13, 2004 as to all of Sierra’s current activities, but remanded for findings related to past sales of older products. The case was settled and dismissed on September 2, 2004 under terms of a settlement agreement that provided for no monetary consideration to be paid by either party.
      In May 2002, the Company recognized approximately $4.2 million of litigation damages pertaining to a judgment entered by a jury against the Company and in favor of MKS in a patent-infringement suit in which the Company was the defendant. The Company has entered into a settlement agreement with MKS allowing it to sell the infringing product subsequent to the date of the jury award. The settlement agreement is in effect until all patents subject to the litigation expire. Under the settlement agreement, royalties payable to MKS from sales of the related product were not material in any of the periods presented.

F-32


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
     Capital Leases
      The Company finances a portion of its property and equipment under capital lease obligations at interest rates averaging approximately 3%. The future minimum lease payments under capital lease obligations as of December 31, 2004 are as follows:
           
    (In thousands)
2005
  $ 303  
2006
    225  
2007
    112  
2008
    57  
2009
    40  
       
 
Total minimum lease payments
    737  
 
Less — amount representing interest
    (22 )
 
Less — current portion
    (294 )
       
    $ 421  
       
     Operating Leases
      The Company has various operating leases for automobiles, equipment, and office and production facilities (see Note 16). Lease expense under operating leases was approximately $6.2 million, $6.3 million, and $6.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
      The future minimum rental payments required under non-cancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2004 are as follows:
         
    (In thousands)
2005
  $ 6,062  
2006
    5,492  
2007
    4,443  
2008
    3,761  
2009
    2,957  
Thereafter
    9,432  
       
    $ 32,147  
       

F-33


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(15) Foreign Operations and Major Customers
      The Company has operations in the United States, Europe and Asia. The following is a summary of the Company’s operations by region:
                           
    Years Ended December 31,
     
    2004   2003   2002
             
    (In thousands)
Sales (1):
                       
 
Originating in U.S. and sold to domestic customers
  $ 207,279     $ 124,128     $ 141,637  
 
Originating in U.S. and sold to foreign customers
    42,407       35,509       24,607  
 
Originating in Europe and sold to domestic customers
    115       57       2,108  
 
Originating in Europe and sold to foreign customers
    36,151       24,492       18,672  
 
Originating in Asia Pacific and sold to domestic customers
    608              
 
Originating in Asia Pacific and sold to foreign customers
    108,745       78,216       51,874  
                   
    $ 395,305     $ 262,402     $ 238,898  
                   
Loss from operations:
                       
 
United States
  $ (13,603 )   $ (27,639 )   $ (57,305 )
 
Europe
    (1,540 )     559       (725 )
 
Asia
    13,508       4,811       1,865  
 
Intercompany eliminations
    91       (863 )     (5,820 )
                   
    $ (1,544 )   $ (23,132 )   $ (61,985 )
                   
Long-lived assets:
                       
 
United States
  $ 25,266     $ 28,305          
 
Europe
    2,102       1,502          
 
Asia
    21,422       20,040          
                   
    $ 48,790     $ 49,847          
                   
 
(1)  These sales amounts do not contemplate where our customers may subsequently transfer our products.
      Intercompany sales among the Company’s geographic areas are recorded on the basis of intercompany prices established by the Company.
      The Company has a major customer (sales in excess of 10% of total sales) that is a manufacturer of semiconductor capital equipment. Sales to this customer accounted for the following percentages of sales for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002:
                         
    December 31,
     
    2004   2003   2002
             
Applied Materials, Inc.
    27 %     20 %     27 %
                   
      There were no other customers that represented greater than 10% of the Company’s total sales for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002.
      Trade accounts receivable from Applied Materials, Inc. were approximately $7.8 million as of December 31, 2004, which represented approximately 12% of the Company’s total trade accounts receivable. At December 31, 2004, trade accounts receivable from ULVAC, Inc. were approximately $17.4 million, representing approximately 26% of the Company’s total trade accounts receivable. No other

F-34


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
customers had a trade accounts receivable balance in excess of 10% of the total trade accounts receivable at December 31, 2004.
(16) Related Party Transactions
      The Company leases its executive offices and manufacturing facilities in Fort Collins, Colorado from two limited liability partnerships, in which the Company’s Chief Executive Officer holds an interest. The leases relating to these spaces expire in 2009, 2011 and 2016, and contain monthly payments of approximately $87,000, $69,000 and $85,000, respectively.
      For each of the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 approximately $2.8 million was paid attributable to these leases. For the year ended December 31, 2002, approximately $2.7 million was paid attributable to these leases. Rent and related amounts are expensed as incurred.
      The Company also has an agreement whereby monthly payments of approximately $12,000 are made to one of the above mentioned limited liability partnerships, which secures future leasing rights on a parcel of land in Colorado. Such amounts are expensed as incurred. Approximately $132,000 was paid attributable to this agreement for the year ended December 31, 2004, and $156,000 for each of the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002.
      The Company leased, for business purposes, a condominium owned by a partnership of certain stockholders, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. The Company paid the partnership $10,000, $60,000 and $67,000 in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. In February 2004, this lease agreement was terminated.
      The Company charters aircraft from time to time from a company owned by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. Aggregate payments for the use of such aircraft were $16,000, $6,000 and $103,000 in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
(17) Concentrations of Credit Risk
      Forward Contracts — The Company, including its subsidiaries, enters into foreign currency forward contracts with counterparties to mitigate foreign currency exposure from foreign currency denominated trade purchases and intercompany receivables and payables. These derivative instruments are not held for trading or speculative purposes.
      To the extent that changes occur in currency exchange rates, the Company is exposed to market risk on its open derivative instruments. This market risk exposure is generally offset by the gain or loss recognized upon the translation of its trade purchases and intercompany receivables and payables. Foreign currency forward contracts are entered into with major commercial United States, Japanese and German banks that have high credit ratings, and the Company does not expect the counterparties to fail to meet their obligations under outstanding contracts. Foreign currency gains and losses under these arrangements are not deferred. The Company generally enters into foreign currency forward contracts with maturities ranging from one to eight months, with contracts outstanding at December 31, 2004 maturing through January 2005. The Company did not seek specific hedge accounting treatment for its foreign currency forward contracts.

F-35


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
      At December 31, 2004, the Company held the following foreign currency forward contracts to buy U.S. dollars and sell various foreign currencies:
                         
        Market    
    Notional   Settlement   Unrealized
    Amounts   Amounts   (Loss)/Gain
             
    (In thousands)
Japanese yen contracts
  $ 8,200     $ 8,263     $ 63  
Taiwanese dollar contracts
    4,000       4,031       31  
South Korean won contract
    1,300       1,315       15  
Chinese yuan contract
    400       398       (2 )
                   
Balance at December 31, 2004
  $ 13,900     $ 14,007     $ 107  
                   
      Other Concentrations of Credit Risk — The Company uses financial instruments that potentially subject it to concentrations of credit risk. Such instruments include cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable, and foreign currency forward contracts. The Company invests its cash in cash deposits, money market funds, commercial paper, and municipal bonds and notes. The Company places its investments with high-credit quality financial institutions and limits the credit exposure from any one financial institution or instrument. To date, the Company has not experienced significant losses on these investments. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and generally requires no collateral. Because the Company’s receivables are primarily related to companies in the semiconductor capital equipment industry, the Company is exposed to credit risk generally related to this cyclical industry.
(18) Stock Plans
      As of December 31, 2004, the Company had three active stock-based compensation plans; the 2003 Stock Option Plan (the “2003 Plan”), the 2003 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan (the “2003 Directors’ Plan”) and the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”).
      2003 Stock Option Plan — The 2003 Plan is a broad-based plan for employees, executive officers, and consultants in which directors of the Company are not allowed to participate. The Board of Directors currently administers this plan, and makes all decisions concerning which employees, executive officers and consultants are granted options, how many to grant to each optionee, when options are granted, how the plan should be properly interpreted, whether to amend or terminate the plan, and whether to delegate administration of the plan to a committee. The 2003 Plan, adopted in 2003, provides for the issuance of up to 3,250,000 shares of common stock. Shares may be issued under the 2003 Plan on exercise of incentive stock options or non-qualified stock options granted under the 2003 Plan or as restricted stock awards. Stock appreciation rights may also be granted under the 2003 Plan, and the shares represented by the stock appreciation rights will be deducted from shares issuable under the 2003 Plan. The exercise price of incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options may not be less than the market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The Company has the discretion to determine the vesting period of options granted under the 2003 Plan, however option grants will generally vest over four years, contingent upon the optionee continuing to be an employee, executive officer or consultant of the Company. The options are exercisable for ten years from the date of grant. The 2003 Plan will expire in February 2013, unless the administrator of the plan terminates it earlier. As of December 31, 2004, approximately 1.3 million shares of common stock were available for grant under this plan.
      On January 31, 2005, the Company amended the 2003 Plan to provide additional terms for the restricted stock units. The restricted stock units generally vest as to 10% on the first anniversary of the grant date, an additional 20% on the second anniversary of the grant date, an additional 30% on the third

F-36


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
anniversary of the grant date and the remaining 40% on the fourth anniversary of the grant date. Additional terms are set forth in the individual grant agreements between the Company and the award recipient.
      2003 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan — The 2003 Directors’ Plan, adopted in 2003, provides for the issuance of up to 150,000 shares of common stock upon the exercise of non-qualified stock options granted under the 2003 Directors’ Plan. The exercise price of options granted under the 2003 Directors’ Plan may not be less than the market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Non-employee directors are automatically granted an option to purchase 15,000 shares on the first date elected or appointed as a member of the Company’s board, and 5,000 shares on any date re-elected as a member of the board. Options granted on the date first elected or appointed as a member of the Company’s board immediately vest as to one-third of the shares subject to the grant, then another one-third on each of the first two anniversaries of the date granted, provided the optionee continues to be a director. Options granted upon re-election are immediately exercisable. As of December 31, 2004, 40,000 shares of common stock were available for grant under this plan.
      Employee Stock Purchase Plan — In September 1995, stockholders approved an ESPP covering an aggregate of 200,000 shares of common stock. On May 7, 2003, the Company’s stockholders’ approved an amendment to increase the number of common shares reserved for issuance under the plan from 200,000 shares to 400,000 shares. Employees are eligible to participate in the ESPP if employed by the Company for at least 20 hours per week during at least five months per calendar year. Participating employees may have the lessor of 5% their earnings or $1,250 per six-month period withheld pursuant to the ESPP. The purchase price of common stock purchased under the ESPP is equal to 85% of the lower of the fair value on the commencement date of each offering period or the relevant purchase date. During 2004, 2003 and 2002, employees purchased an aggregate of approximately 65,000, 73,000 and 54,000 shares of common stock under the ESPP, respectively. At December 31, 2004, approximately 90,000 shares remained available for future issuance.
      On April 14, 2004, by resolution of the Company’s Board of Directors, the Company terminated its 2002 and 2001 Employee Stock Option Plans. Existing stock options outstanding under the 2002 and 2001 Employee Stock Option Plans remain outstanding according to their original terms. At December 31, 2004, options to purchase approximately 406,000 and 423,000 shares of common stock remained outstanding under the 2002 and 2001 Employee Stock Option Plans, respectively.
      On May 7, 2003, the Company terminated the 1995 Employee Stock Option Plan and the Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan upon stockholder approval of the 2003 Plan and the 2003 Directors’ Plan; however, existing stock options outstanding under these terminated plans remain outstanding according to their original terms. At December 31, 2004, options to purchase approximately 1.8 million and 67,000 shares of common stock remained outstanding under the 1995 Employee Stock Option Plan and the Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan, respectively.

F-37


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
      The following summarizes the activity relating to stock options for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002:
                                         
    2004   2003   2002
             
        Weighted-       Weighted-       Weighted-
        Average       Average       Average
        Exercise       Exercise       Exercise
    Shares   Price   Shares   Price   Shares   Price
                         
    (In thousands, except share prices)
Stock options:
                                   
 
Employee stock options —
                                   
   
Options outstanding at beginning of period
  3,920   $ 19.95     3,475   $ 23.18     2,108   $ 25.07  
   
Granted
  1,196     16.99     1,790     14.66     1,920     21.73  
   
Exercised
  (117)     9.52     (352)     9.89     (118)     11.70  
   
Terminated
  (472)     19.09     (993)     25.28     (435)     29.02  
                               
   
Options outstanding at end of period
  4,527     19.53     3,920     19.95     3,475     23.18  
                               
   
Options exercisable at end of period
  1,943     22.70     1,230     25.50     1,239     23.25  
                               
Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the period
  $8.40           $7.88           $12.55        
                               
   
Price range of outstanding options
  $3.11 - $60.75           $0.67 - $60.75           $0.67 - $60.75        
                               
   
Price range of options terminated
  $0.83 - $60.75           $0.83 - $60.75           $0.83 - $60.75        
                               
Non-employee directors stock options —
                                   
   
Options outstanding at beginning of period
  104   $ 19.00     112   $ 22.64     90   $ 26.92  
   
Granted
  85     13.62     25     10.67     22     15.58  
   
Exercised
  (5)     10.67     (8)     6.75          
   
Terminated
  (12)     51.10     (25)     30.90          
                               
   
Options outstanding at end of period
  172     15.81     104     19.00     112     22.64  
                               
   
Options exercisable at end of period
  122     16.94     80     21.91     62     22.24  
                               
Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the period
  $9.67           $7.84           $11.33        
                               
   
Price range of outstanding options
  $6.13 - $46.13           $6.13 - $60.75           $6.13 - $64.94        
                               
   
Price range of options terminated
  $6.15 - $64.94           $6.13 - $64.94           $—        
                               

F-38


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
     The following table summarizes information about the stock options outstanding at December 31, 2004 (In thousands except share prices and lives):
                                         
        Options Outstanding   Options Exercisable
             
        Weighted-        
        Average   Weighted-       Weighted-
        Remaining   Average       Average
Range of   Number   Contractual   Exercise   Number   Exercise
Exercise Prices   Outstanding   Life   Price   Exercisable   Price
                     
$3.11 to $7.70
    609       7.7 years     $ 7.46       267     $ 7.24  
$7.92 to $10.37
    682       8.0 years       9.58       197       8.96  
$10.67 to $16.51
    495       7.7 years       13.21       206       13.43  
$17.32 to $19.24
    876       7.9 years       18.56       414       18.34  
$20.81 to $22.30
    634       9.1 years       21.88       13       21.95  
$22.52 to $24.90
    574       8.1 years       23.50       252       24.09  
$26.13 to $38.55
    669       6.3 years       33.17       556       32.48  
$40.00 to $46.13
    117       5.0 years       43.79       117       43.79  
$56.13 to $60.75
    43       5.6 years       59.68       43       59.68  
                               
      4,699       7.7 years       19.39       2,065       22.36  
                               
(19)  Fair Value of Financial Instruments
      The Company’s financial instruments include cash, trade receivables, trade payables, marketable securities, short-term and long-term debt, and foreign currency forward exchange contracts (see Note 17). The fair values of cash, trade receivables, trade payables and short-term debt approximate the carrying values due to the short-term nature of these instruments. Marketable securities are stated at fair value (see Notes 1 and 4). At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the carrying value of long-term debt was $195.4 million and $201.7 million, respectively. The carrying value of senior borrowings approximates their fair value due to the variable interest rates associated with the borrowings. At December 31, 2004, the estimated fair value of the Company’s 5.25% convertible subordinated notes that are due November 15, 2006 was approximately $64.6 million, compared to a book value of $66.2 million. At December 31, 2004, the estimated fair value of the Company’s 5.00% convertible subordinated notes that are due September 1, 2006 was approximately $115.1 million, compared to a book value of $121.5 million. The fair values of the Company’s convertible subordinated notes are based upon quoted market prices. The Company believes that the risk of default on such notes has been inherently factored into such prices.
(20)  Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosures
      In the first quarter of 2004, the Company made a strategic decision to further focus its marketing and product support resources on its core competencies and reorient its operating infrastructure towards sustained profitability. As a result, the Company sold its Noah chiller business to an unrelated third party for $797,000 in cash and a $1.9 million note receivable due March 31, 2009. The note bears interest at 5.0%, payable annually on March 31. The sale included property and equipment with a book value of approximately $300,000, inventory of approximately $1.0 million, goodwill and intangible assets net of accumulated amortization of approximately $900,000, demonstration and customer service equipment of approximately $140,000, and estimated warranty obligations of approximately $140,000. The Company recognized a gain on the sale of $404,000, which has been recorded as other income and expense in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. In the third quarter of 2004, the Company purchased equipment of approximately $71,000 from the buyers of the Noah chiller assets in exchange for an equivalent reduction of the note receivable due March 31, 2009.

F-39


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
      In the second quarter of 2003, as part of the Company’s ongoing cost reduction measures, the Company committed to a plan to sell certain inventory and property and equipment assets to an unrelated third party at their respective net book values. These assets were primarily used in the manufacture of a component for the Company’s direct current and radio frequency products and were sold on June 30, 2003. In conjunction with the sale, the Company received approximately $1.6 million in cash and a short-term note receivable for approximately $1.5 million in exchange for inventory with a carrying value of approximately $2.1 million and property and equipment with a carrying value of approximately $1.0 million.
(21)  Quarterly Financial Data — Unaudited
      The following table presents unaudited quarterly financial data for each of the eight quarters in the period ended December 31, 2004. The Company believes that all necessary adjustments have been included in the amounts stated below to present fairly such quarterly information. The operating results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of results for any subsequent period.
                                                                 
    Quarters Ended
     
    Mar. 31,   June 30,   Sept. 30,   Dec. 31,   Mar. 31,   June 30,   Sept. 30,   Dec. 31,
    2003   2003   2003   2003   2004   2004   2004   2004
                                 
    (In thousands, except per share data)
Sales
  $ 56,158     $ 62,946     $ 68,567     $ 74,731     $ 104,487     $ 108,869     $ 93,550     $ 88,399  
Gross profit
    17,950       20,273       23,093       26,631       38,414       36,962       29,740       14,563  
(Loss) income from operations
    (10,885 )     (6,825 )     (5,741 )     319       9,810       8,754       1,855       (21,963 )
Net (loss) income
  $ (8,590 )   $ (5,774 )   $ (27,438 )   $ (2,439 )   $ 6,924     $ 4,470     $ (1,136 )   $ (23,005 )
                                                 
Diluted (loss) income per share
  $ (0.27 )   $ (0.18 )   $ (0.85 )   $ (0.08 )   $ 0.21     $ 0.13     $ (0.03 )   $ (0.70 )
                                                 
      The Company had a loss in the fourth quarter of 2004 of $23.0 million. Pretax charges in the fourth quarter included $9.2 million to cost of sales for increased excess and obsolete inventory reserves, $3.8 million to selling, general and administrative for the change in estimate of the useful life of the demonstration equipment (see Note 1), $3.7 million to restructuring for employee severance and termination costs primarily attributable to the Fort Collins facility (see Note 3), $3.3 million to impairment of intangible assets related to certain amortizable intangible assets acquired in conjunction with the Company’s purchase of Dressler and Aera (see Note 8). These items contributed significantly to the Company’s fourth quarter 2004 results. The Company increased its reserve for excess and obsolete inventory in the fourth quarter of 2004, as a result of the fourth quarter strategic management decision to discontinue certain product offerings, the outlook for future periods demand and the declining trend in the Company’s sales from the second quarter of 2004 to the fourth quarter of 2004.
      The Company had a loss of $27.4 million in the third quarter of 2003. During this quarter the Company recorded a valuation allowance against certain of its U.S. and foreign net deferred tax assets in jurisdictions where significant losses had been recognized (see Note 12).

F-40


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE II — VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
                                           
            Additions        
    Balance at   Additions   Charged       Balance at
    Beginning of   Due to   to Expense       End of
    Period   Acquisitions   (Recoveries)   Deductions   Period
                     
    (In thousands)
Year ended December 31, 2002:
                                       
 
Inventory obsolescence reserve
  $ 5,631     $ 13,704     $ 5,803     $ 4,719     $ 20,419  
 
Allowance for doubtful accounts
    1,049       416       1,870       279       3,056  
                               
    $ 6,680     $ 14,120     $ 7,673     $ 4,998     $ 23,475  
                               
Year ended December 31, 2003:
                                       
 
Inventory obsolescence reserve
  $ 20,419     $     $ 3,016     $ 13,944     $ 9,491  
 
Allowance for doubtful accounts
    3,056             (429 )     1,324       1,303  
                               
    $ 23,475     $     $ 2,587     $ 15,268     $ 10,794  
                               
Year ended December 31, 2004:
                                       
 
Inventory obsolescence reserve
  $ 9,491     $     $ 11,262     $ 6,102     $ 14,651  
 
Allowance for doubtful accounts
    1,303             198       452       1,049  
                               
    $ 10,794     $     $ 11,460     $ 6,554     $ 15,700  
                               

F-41


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
(In thousands)
                     
    March 31,   December 31,
    2005   2004
         
ASSETS
               
CURRENT ASSETS:
               
 
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 51,366     $ 38,404  
 
Marketable securities
    70,016       69,578  
 
Accounts receivable, net
    69,852       72,053  
 
Inventories, net
    66,168       73,224  
 
Other current assets
    3,546       6,140  
             
   
Total current assets
    260,948       259,399  
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net
    43,802       44,746  
OTHER ASSETS:
               
 
Deposits and other
    6,789       6,468  
 
Goodwill
    65,299       68,276  
 
Other intangible assets, net
    10,910       12,032  
 
Customer service equipment, net
    3,359       2,968  
 
Deferred debt issuance costs, net
    1,811       2,086  
             
   
Total assets
  $ 392,918     $ 395,975  
             
 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
               
 
Trade accounts payable
  $ 24,368     $ 17,683  
 
Accrued payroll and employee benefits
    7,978       7,788  
 
Other accrued expenses
    15,537       20,165  
 
Customer deposits and deferred revenue
    1,239       662  
 
Senior borrowings and capital leases, current portion
    3,067       3,726  
 
Accrued interest payable on convertible subordinated notes
    1,810       2,460  
             
   
Total current liabilities
    53,999       52,484  
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES:
               
 
Senior borrowings and capital leases, net of current portion
    3,960       4,679  
 
Deferred income tax liabilities, net
    1,656       3,709  
 
Convertible subordinated notes payable
    187,718       187,718  
 
Other long-term liabilities
    2,250       2,407  
             
   
Total liabilities
    249,583       250,997  
Commitments and Contingencies
               
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
    143,335       144,978  
             
   
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 392,918     $ 395,975  
             
The accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
are an integral part of these condensed consolidated statements.

F-42


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
                     
    Three Months Ended
    March 31,
     
    2005   2004
         
SALES
  $ 86,140     $ 104,487  
COST OF SALES
    57,065       66,073  
             
 
Gross profit
    29,075       38,414  
             
OPERATING EXPENSES:
               
 
Research and development
    11,015       13,410  
 
Selling, general and administrative
    13,448       14,974  
 
Restructuring charges
    1,262       220  
             
   
Total operating expenses
    25,725       28,604  
             
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS
    3,350       9,810  
             
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
               
 
Interest income
    641       429  
 
Interest expense
    (2,790 )     (2,788 )
 
Foreign currency gain
    83       101  
 
Other (expense) income, net
    (21 )     1,103  
             
      (2,087 )     (1,155 )
             
   
Income before income taxes
    1,263       8,655  
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
    (529 )     (1,731 )
             
NET INCOME
  $ 734     $ 6,924  
             
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE
  $ 0.02     $ 0.21  
             
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
  $ 0.02     $ 0.21  
             
BASIC WEIGHTED-AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING
    32,755       32,581  
             
DILUTED WEIGHTED-AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING
    32,878       33,593  
             
The accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
are an integral part of these condensed consolidated statements.

F-43


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
(In thousands)
                         
    Three Months Ended
    March 31,
     
    2005   2004
         
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
               
 
Net income
  $ 734     $ 6,924  
 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities -
               
   
Depreciation and amortization
    4,577       4,821  
   
Amortization of deferred debt issuance costs
    275       275  
   
Amortization of deferred compensation
    56       60  
   
Provision for deferred income taxes
    726       856  
   
Loss on disposal of property and equipment
          187  
   
Gain on sale of Noah chiller assets
          (404 )
   
Gain on sale of marketable security investment
          (703 )
   
Changes in operating assets and liabilities —
               
     
Accounts receivable, net
    934       (16,922 )
     
Inventories, net
    6,233       (7,106 )
     
Other current assets
    2,184       1,634  
     
Deposits and other
    199       412  
     
Demonstration and customer service equipment, net
    (1,104 )     (863 )
     
Trade accounts payable
    7,057       9,679  
     
Accrued payroll and employee benefits
    210       1,394  
     
Customer deposits and other accrued expenses
    (3,045 )     (6,524 )
     
Income taxes payable/receivable, net
    (896 )     1,936  
             
       
Net changes in operating assets and liabilities
    11,772       (16,360 )
             
       
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
    18,140       (4,344 )
             
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
               
 
Marketable securities transactions, net
    (438 )     9,746  
 
Proceeds from sale of assets
          2,088  
 
Purchase of property and equipment
    (2,917 )     (3,831 )
             
       
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
    (3,355 )     8,003  
             
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
               
 
Payments on senior borrowings and capital lease obligations
    (1,182 )     (1,962 )
 
Proceeds from common stock transactions
    131       374  
             
       
Net cash used in financing activities
    (1,051 )     (1,588 )
             
EFFECT OF CURRENCY TRANSLATION ON CASH
    (772 )     403  
             
INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
    12,962       2,474  
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period
    38,404       41,522  
             
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period
  $ 51,366     $ 43,996  
             
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
               
 
Cash paid for interest
  $ 3,165     $ 3,112  
             
 
Cash paid for (received from) income taxes, net
  $ 853     $ (1,169 )
             
 
Assets sold for note receivable
  $     $ 1,912  
             
The accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
are an integral part of these condensed consolidated statements.

F-44


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
(1)  Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
      In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets, statements of operations and cash flows contain all adjustments, consisting of only normal, recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position of Advanced Energy Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its wholly owned subsidiaries (the “Company”) at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, and the results of their operations and cash flows for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004.
      The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements presented herein have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and do not include all the information and note disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2005.
      Estimates and Assumptions — The preparation of the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires the Company’s management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates are used when establishing allowances for doubtful accounts, determining useful lives for depreciation and amortization, assessing the need for impairment charges, establishing warranty reserves, allocating purchase price among the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, accounting for income taxes, and assessing excess and obsolete inventory and various others items. The Company evaluates these estimates and judgments on an ongoing basis and bases its estimates on historical experience, current conditions and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. The results of these estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities as well as identifying and assessing the accounting treatment with respect to commitments and contingencies. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
      New Accounting Pronouncements — In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) reissued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” as SFAS No. 123(R), “Share Based Compensation.” This statement replaces SFAS No. 123, amends SFAS No. 95, “Statement of Cash Flows”, and supersedes Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” SFAS No. 123(R) requires companies to apply a fair-value based measurement method in accounting for share-based payment transactions with employees and to record compensation expense for all share-based awards granted, and to awards modified, repurchased or cancelled after the required effective date. Compensation expense for outstanding awards for which the requisite service had not been rendered as of the effective date will be recognized over the remaining service period using the compensation cost calculated for pro forma disclosure purposes under SFAS No. 123, adjusted for expected forfeitures. Additionally, SFAS No. 123(R) will require entities to record compensation expense for employee stock purchase plans that may not have previously been considered compensatory under the existing rules. SFAS No. 123(R) will be effective for the first annual period beginning after June 15, 2005, which is the Company’s fiscal year beginning January 1, 2006. The Company anticipates adopting the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) using a modified prospective application. This statement may have a significant impact on the Company’s results of operations as the Company will be required to record compensation expense in the consolidated statement of operations rather than disclose the impact within its notes to the consolidated financial statements.

F-45


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)
      In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs”, an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 43, Chapter 4, “Inventory Pricing.” SFAS No. 151 clarifies that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted materials (spoilage) should be recognized as current-period charges. In addition, it requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. SFAS No. 151 will be effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005 and will be applied on a prospective basis by the Company for the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2006. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that adoption of SFAS No. 151 will have on its financial position and results of operations.
      Revenue Recognition — The Company’s standard shipping term is freight on board (“FOB”) shipping point, for which revenue is recognized upon shipment of its products, at which time title passes to the customer, the price is fixed and collectability is reasonably assured. For certain customers, the Company has FOB destination terms, for which revenue is recognized upon receipt of the products by the customer, at which time title passes to the customer, the price is fixed and collectability is reasonably assured. Generally, the Company does not have obligations to its customers after its products are shipped under FOB shipping point terms or after its products are received by the customer under FOB destination terms, other than pursuant to warranty obligations. In limited instances, the Company provides installation of its products. In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue 00-21 “Accounting for Revenue Arrangements With Multiple Deliverables”, the Company allocates revenue based on the fair value of the delivered item, generally the product, and the undelivered item, installation, based on their respective fair values. Revenue related to the undelivered item is deferred until the services have been completed. In certain limited instances, some of the Company’s customers have negotiated product acceptance provisions relative to specific orders. Under these circumstances, the Company defers revenue recognition until the related acceptance provisions have been satisfied. Revenue deferrals are reported as customer deposits and deferred revenue in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.
      In certain instances, the Company requires its customers to pay for a portion or all of their purchases prior to the Company building or shipping these products. Cash payments received prior to shipment are recorded as customer deposits and deferred revenue in the condensed consolidated balance sheets, and then recognized as revenue as appropriate based upon the shipping terms of the products. The Company does not offer price protections to its customers or allow returns, unless covered by its normal policy for repair of defective products.

F-46


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)
      Warranty Policy — The Company offers warranty coverage for its products for periods typically ranging from 12 to 24 months after shipment. The Company estimates the anticipated costs of repairing products under warranty based on the historical or expected cost of the repairs and expected failure rates. The assumptions used to estimate warranty accruals are reevaluated quarterly, at a minimum, in light of actual experience and, when appropriate, the accruals are adjusted. The Company’s determination of the appropriate level of warranty accrual is subjective and based on estimates. The industries in which the Company operates are subject to rapid technological change and, as a result, the Company periodically introduces newer, more complex products, which tend to result in increased warranty costs. Estimated warranty costs are recorded at the time of sale of the related product, and are recorded within cost of sales in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. The following summarizes the activity in the Company’s warranty reserves during the first three months of 2005 and 2004:
                 
    Three Months Ended
    March 31,
     
    2005   2004
         
    (In thousands)
Balance at beginning of period
  $ 6,791     $ 6,612  
Additions charged to expense
    3,047       2,320  
Deductions
    (3,157 )     (2,421 )
             
Balance at end of period
  $ 6,681     $ 6,511  
             
      Stock-Based Compensation — At March 31, 2005, the Company had three active stock-based compensation plans, which are more fully described in Note 18 of the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. The Company accounts for employee stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method prescribed by APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” and related interpretations. APB Opinion No. 25 requires the use of the intrinsic value method, which measures compensation cost as the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of the stock at the measurement date over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock. With the exception of certain options granted in 1999 and 2000 by a shareholder of Sekidenko, Inc., prior to its acquisition by the Company, all options granted under these plans have an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant, therefore no stock-based compensation cost is reflected in the Company’s net income. The Company records compensation expense related to the grants of restricted stock units, over the period the units vest, typically four years. Had compensation cost for the Company’s plans been determined consistent with the fair value-based method prescribed by SFAS No. 123,

F-47


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)
“Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” the Company’s net income would have decreased to the following adjusted amounts:
                   
    Three Months Ended
    March 31,
     
    2005   2004
         
    (In thousands, except
    per share data)
Net income (loss):
               
 
As reported
  $ 734     $ 6,924  
 
Adjustment for stock-based compensation determined under fair value-based method for all awards(a), (b)
    (1,934 )     (2,786 )
 
Less: Compensation expense recognized in net income(a)
    56       60  
             
 
As adjusted
  $ (1,144 )   $ 4,198  
             
Basic earnings (loss) per share:
               
 
As reported
  $ 0.02     $ 0.21  
 
As adjusted
  $ (0.03 )   $ 0.13  
Diluted earnings (loss) per share:
               
 
As reported
  $ 0.02     $ 0.21  
 
As adjusted
  $ (0.03 )   $ 0.12  
 
(a)  Compensation expense in 2005 and 2004 is presented prior to income tax effects due to the Company fully reserving against the related deferred tax asset.
 
(b)  Cumulative compensation cost recognized with respect to options that are forfeited prior to vesting is reflected as a reduction of compensation expense in the period of forfeiture. Compensation expense related to awards granted under the Company’s employee stock purchase plan is estimated until the period in which settlement occurs, as the number of shares of common stock awarded and the purchase price are not known until settlement.
      For SFAS No. 123 purposes, the fair value of each option grant and purchase right granted under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) are estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
                 
    2005   2004
         
OPTIONS:
               
Risk-free interest rates
    3.43 %     3.07 %
Expected dividend yield rates
    0.0 %     0.0 %
Expected lives
    2.9  years       2.9  years  
Expected volatility
    71.57 %     76.47 %
ESPP:
               
Risk-free interest rates
    2.40 %     1.01 %
Expected dividend yield rates
    0.0 %     0.0 %
Expected lives
    0.5  years       0.5  years  
Expected volatility
    62.48 %     61.57 %
      Based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model, the weighted-average estimated fair value of employee stock option grants was $3.47 and $11.32 for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2005 and

F-48


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)
2004, respectively. The weighted-average estimated fair value of purchase rights granted under the ESPP was $2.84 and $9.10 for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
      The total fair value of options granted was computed to be approximately $916,000 and $5.4 million for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. These amounts are amortized ratably over the vesting period of the options for the purpose of calculating the pro forma disclosure above. The number of stock options exercised during the three-month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 was approximately 15,000 and 26,000, respectively, at a weighted average exercise price per share of $7.89 and $13.91, respectively.
      The Company granted approximately 227,000 restricted stock units to certain employees during the three-month period ended March 31, 2005. The Company did not grant any restricted stock units in 2004. Upon granting of these units, deferred compensation representing an estimate of the units expected to vest at the market value at the date of grant is recorded in shareholders’ equity and subsequently amortized over the periods during which the units vest, generally 4 years. Amortization of deferred compensation relating to the restricted stock units of $56,000 was recorded for the three-month period ended March 31, 2005.
      The Company will adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) as of January 1, 2006, as further discussed under the heading “New Accounting Pronouncements” above. The adoption of this statement may have a significant impact on the Company’s results of operations as the Company will be required to record compensation expense in the consolidated statement of operations rather than disclose the impact within its notes to the consolidated financial statements.
      Income Taxes — The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” SFAS No. 109 requires deferred tax assets and liabilities to be recognized for temporary differences between the tax basis and financial reporting basis of assets and liabilities, computed at current tax rates, as well as for the expected tax benefit of net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. During the third quarter of 2003, the Company recorded valuation allowances against certain of its United States and foreign net deferred tax assets in jurisdictions where the Company has incurred significant losses. Given such experience, the Company’s management could not conclude that it was more likely than not that these net deferred tax assets would be realized. Accordingly, the Company’s management, in accordance with SFAS No. 109, in evaluating the recoverability of these net deferred tax assets, was required to place greater weight on the Company’s historical results as compared to projections regarding future taxable income. The Company will continue to evaluate its valuation allowance on a quarterly basis, and may in the future reverse some portion or all of its valuation allowance and recognize a reduction in income tax expense or increase its valuation allowance for previously unreserved assets and recognize an increase in income tax expense. A portion of the valuation allowance relates to the benefit from stock-based compensation. Any reversal of valuation allowance from this item will be reflected as an increase in additional paid in capital. When recording acquisitions, the Company has recorded valuation allowances due to the uncertainty related to the realization of certain deferred tax assets existing at the acquisition dates. Any reversal of valuation allowances recorded in purchase accounting is reflected as a reduction of goodwill in the period of reversal.
      Commitments and Contingencies — We are involved in disputes and legal actions arising in the normal course of our business. While we currently believe that the amount of any ultimate potential loss would not be material to our financial position, the outcome of these actions is inherently difficult to predict. In the event of an adverse outcome, the ultimate potential loss could have a material adverse effect on our financial position or reported results of operations in a particular quarter. An unfavorable decision, particularly in patent litigation, could require material changes in production processes and products or result in our inability to ship products or components found to have violated third-party patent

F-49


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)
rights. We accrue loss contingencies in connection with our commitments and contingencies, including litigation, when it is probable that a loss has occurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated.
      Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets — Goodwill represents the excess of the cost over the fair market value of net tangible and identifiable intangible assets of acquired businesses.
      Goodwill and certain other intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized. Instead, goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets are subject to periodic (at least annual) tests for impairment. The Company performs the annual test for impairment during the fourth quarter. For the periods presented, the Company does not have any indefinite-lived intangible assets, other than goodwill. Impairment testing is performed in two steps: (i) the Company assesses goodwill for potential impairment by comparing the fair value of its reporting unit with its carrying value, and (ii) if potential impairment is indicated because the reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying amount, the Company measures the amount of impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill.
      Finite-lived intangible assets continue to be amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives and are reviewed for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable.
      Reclassifications — Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
(2)  Restructuring Charges
      Restructuring charges include the costs associated with actions taken by the Company primarily in response to downturns in the semiconductor capital equipment industry or to reduce costs and improve operating efficiencies. These charges consist of costs that are incurred to exit an activity or cancel an existing contractual obligation, including the closure of facilities and employee termination related charges.
      The following table summarizes the components of the restructuring charges, the payments and other settlements, and the remaining accrual as of March 31, 2005:
                           
    Employee   Facility   Total
    Severance and   Closure   Restructuring
    Termination Costs   Costs   Charges
             
    (In thousands)
Accrual balance December 31, 2003
  $ 560     $ 2,615     $ 3,175  
                   
 
First quarter 2004 restructuring charge
    220             220  
 
Second quarter 2004 restructuring charge
    187             187  
 
Third quarter 2004 restructuring charge
    57       31       88  
 
Third quarter 2004 restructuring reversal
    (127 )     (126 )     (253 )
 
Fourth quarter 2004 restructuring charge
    3,639       31       3,670  
                   
Total net restructuring charges 2004
    3,976       (64 )     3,912  
Payments and other settlements in 2004
    (1,243 )     (1,430 )     (2,673 )
                   
Accrual balance December 31, 2004
    3,293       1,121       4,414  
                   
 
First quarter 2005 restructuring charge
    1,262             1,262  
Payments and other settlements in 2005
    (2,172 )     (176 )     (2,348 )
                   
Accrual balance March 31, 2005
  $ 2,383     $ 945     $ 3,328  
                   

F-50


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)
      For the first three quarters of 2004, the Company recorded restructuring charges totaling $495,000, which primarily consisted of the recognition of expense for involuntary employee termination benefits associated with headcount reductions of approximately 50 employees in the Company’s U.S. operations. All affected employees were terminated prior to the respective quarter ends. Additionally, in the third quarter, the Company reversed $253,000 of previously recorded charges due to variances from the original estimates used to establish the Company’s reserve, consequently, the Company’s restructuring accrual balance for employee severance and termination costs was $0 at September 30, 2004.
      In the fourth quarter of 2004, the Company recorded restructuring charges of $3.7 million, which primarily consisted of employee termination and related costs associated with the involuntary severance of 212 employees, including 60 agency employees, at the Company’s Fort Collins facility. All of such charges relate to separation costs anticipated to be paid to the terminated employees, in cash, by the end of the third quarter of 2005. The need to reduce headcount in Fort Collins resulted primarily from the transfer of a substantial portion of the Company’s manufacturing operations to Shenzhen, China.
      Due to the continuing shift of the Company’s volume manufacturing to Shenzhen, China, the Company recorded restructuring charges of $1.3 million in the first quarter of 2005 related to the involuntary severance of the 212 employees at the Company’s Fort Collins facility (discussed above) and 7 employees in the Company’s European locations. All of such charges relate to separation costs anticipated to be paid to the terminated employees, in cash, by the end of the third quarter of 2005.
(3)  Marketable Securities
      Marketable securities consisted of the following:
                 
    March 31,   December 31,
    2005   2004
         
    (In thousands)
Commercial paper
  $ 47,538     $ 43,459  
Municipal bonds and notes
    18,962       20,332  
Institutional money markets
    3,516       5,787  
             
Total marketable securities
  $ 70,016     $ 69,578  
             
      These marketable securities are classified as available-for-sale and are stated at period end market value. The commercial paper consists of high credit quality, short-term preferreds with maturities or reset dates of approximately 120 days.
(4) Accounts Receivable
      Accounts receivable consisted of the following:
                 
    March 31,   December 31,
    2005   2004
         
    (In thousands)
Domestic
  $ 21,280     $ 16,612  
Foreign
    43,537       51,047  
Allowance for doubtful accounts
    (1,007 )     (1,049 )
             
Trade accounts receivable, net
    63,810       66,610  
Other
    6,042       5,443  
             
Total accounts receivable, net
  $ 69,852     $ 72,053  
             

F-51


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)
(5)  Inventories
      Net inventories consisted of the following:
                 
    March 31,   December 31,
    2005   2004
         
    (In thousands)
Parts and raw materials
  $ 47,673     $ 54,069  
Work in process
    5,522       4,491  
Finished goods
    12,973       14,664  
             
Total inventories, net
  $ 66,168     $ 73,224  
             
      Inventories include costs of materials, direct labor and manufacturing overhead. Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market, computed on a first-in, first-out basis and are presented net of reserves for obsolete and excess inventory. Inventory is written down or written off when it becomes obsolete, generally because of engineering changes to a product or discontinuance of a product line, or when it is deemed excess. These determinations involve the exercise of significant judgment by management, and as demonstrated in recent periods, demand for the Company’s products is volatile and changes in expectations regarding the level of future sales can result in substantial charges against earnings for obsolete and excess inventory.
(6)  Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
      Goodwill and other intangible assets consisted of the following as of March 31, 2005:
                                           
        Cumulative            
        Effect of           Weighted-
    Gross   Changes in       Net   Average
    Carrying   Exchange   Accumulated   Carrying   Useful Life
    Amount   Rates   Amortization   Amount   (Years)
                     
    (In thousands, except weighted-average useful life)
Other intangible assets:
                                       
 
Technology-based
  $ 7,304     $ 1,598     $ (5,640 )   $ 3,262       6  
 
Contract-based
    1,200       221       (1,398 )     23       4  
 
Trademarks and other
    8,500       2,249       (3,124 )     7,625       17  
                               
 
Total other intangible assets
    17,004       4,068       (10,162 )     10,910       11  
                               
Goodwill
    54,040       11,259             65,299          
                               
 
Total goodwill and other intangible assets
  $ 71,044     $ 15,327     $ (10,162 )   $ 76,209          
                               

F-52


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)
      Goodwill and other intangible assets consisted of the following as of December 31, 2004:
                                           
        Cumulative            
        Effect of           Weighted-
    Gross   Changes in           Average
    Carrying   Exchange   Accumulated   Net Carrying   Useful Life
    Amount   Rates   Amortization   Amount   (Years)
                     
    (In thousands, except weighted-average useful life)
Other intangible assets:
                                       
 
Technology-based
  $ 7,304     $ 1,741     $ (5,290 )   $ 3,755       6  
 
Contract-based
    1,200       222       (1,386 )     36       4  
 
Trademarks and other
    8,500       2,689       (2,948 )     8,241       17  
                               
 
Total other intangible assets
    17,004       4,652       (9,624 )     12,032       11  
                               
Goodwill
    55,104       13,172             68,276          
                               
 
Total goodwill and other intangible assets
  $ 72,108     $ 17,824     $ (9,624 )   $ 80,308          
                               
      When recording acquisitions, we have recorded income tax valuation allowances due to the uncertainty related to the realization of certain deferred tax assets existing at the acquisition dates. During the first quarter of 2005, approximately $1.1 million of valuation allowance established in purchase accounting was reversed, with a corresponding reduction in goodwill.
      Aggregate amortization expense related to other intangibles for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 was $547,000 and $1.2 million, respectively. Estimated amortization expense related to the Company’s acquired intangibles fluctuates with changes in foreign currency exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and the Japanese yen and the euro. Estimated amortization expense related to acquired intangibles for each of the five years 2005 through 2009 is as follows:
         
    Estimated
    Amortization
    Expense
     
    (In thousands)
2005
  $ 2,173  
2006
    2,016  
2007
    1,009  
2008
    876  
2009
    474  

F-53


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)
(7) Stockholders’ Equity
      Stockholders’ equity consisted of the following:
                 
    March 31,   December 31,
    2005   2004
         
    (In thousands,
    except par value)
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 70,000 shares authorized, 32,775 and 32,760 shares issued and outstanding, respectively
  $ 33     $ 33  
Additional paid-in capital
    145,971       144,500  
Retained deficit
    (12,061 )     (12,795 )
Deferred compensation
    (1,284 )      
Unrealized holding gains on available-for-sale securities, net of tax
    1,425       1,051  
Cumulative translation adjustments, net of tax
    9,251       12,189  
             
Total stockholders’ equity
  $ 143,335     $ 144,978  
             
(8)  Comprehensive (Loss) Income
      Comprehensive (loss) income for the Company consists of net income, foreign currency translation adjustments and net unrealized holding gains on available-for-sale marketable securities as presented below (in thousands):
                   
    Three Months Ended
    March 31,
     
    2005   2004
         
Net income, as reported
  $ 734     $ 6,924  
Adjustment to arrive at comprehensive (loss) income, net of taxes:
               
 
Unrealized holding gain on available-for-sale marketable securities
    374       98  
 
Reclassification adjustment for amounts included in net income related to sales of securities
          (294 )
 
Cumulative translation adjustments
    (2,938 )     935  
             
Comprehensive (loss) income
  $ (1,830 )   $ 7,663  
             
(9)  Convertible Subordinated Notes Payable
      The Company has two convertible subordinated notes totaling $187.7 million as follows:
  •  Approximately $121.5 million of 5.0% convertible subordinated notes outstanding (“5.0% Notes”). These notes mature September 1, 2006, with interest payable on March 1st and September 1st of each year. At March 31, 2005, approximately $506,000 of interest expense related to the 5.0% Notes was accrued as a current liability.
 
  •  Approximately $66.2 million of 5.25% convertible subordinated notes outstanding (“5.25% Notes”). These notes mature November 15, 2006, with interest payable on May 15th and November 15th each year. At March 31, 2005, approximately $1.3 million of interest expense related to the 5.25% Notes was accrued as a current liability.

F-54


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)
(10)  Commitments and Contingencies
      The Company has inventory purchase commitments of approximately $3.8 million for the remainder of 2005 and $2.5 million for 2006 of parts, components and subassemblies from various suppliers. These inventory purchase obligations consist of minimum purchase commitments to ensure the Company has an adequate supply of critical components to meet the demand of its customers. The Company believes that these purchase commitments will be consumed in its on-going operations in the respective periods.
      The Company has also committed to advance up to $850,000 to a privately held company in exchange for an exclusive intellectual property license. The amount and timing of this advance is dependent upon the privately held company achieving certain development milestones. As of March 31, 2005, approximately $200,000 has been advanced under this agreement, which was recorded within research and development expense in the condensed consolidated statement of operations.
Disputes and Legal Actions
      The Company is involved in disputes and legal actions arising in the normal course of its business. Currently and historically, the Company’s most significant legal actions have involved the application of patent law to complex technologies and intellectual property. The determination of whether such technologies infringe upon the Company’s or others’ patents is highly subjective. This high level of subjectivity introduces substantial additional risk with regard to the outcome of the Company’s disputes and legal actions related to intellectual property. While the Company currently believes that the amount of any ultimate potential loss for currently-known matters would not be material to the Company’s financial position, the outcome of these actions is inherently difficult to predict. In the event of an adverse outcome, the ultimate potential loss could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or reported results of operations in a particular period. An unfavorable decision, particularly in patent litigation, could require material changes in production processes and products or result in the Company’s inability to ship products or components found to have violated third-party patent rights. The Company accrues loss contingencies in connection with its litigation when it is probable that a loss will occur and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated.
      In April 2003, the Company filed a claim in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado seeking a declaratory ruling that its new plasma source products Xstreamtm With Active Matching Networktm (“Xstream products”) are not in violation of U.S. Patents held by MKS Instruments, Inc. (“MKS”). This case was transferred by the Colorado court to the United States District Court for the District of Delaware for consolidation with a patent infringement suit filed in that court by MKS in May 2003, alleging that the Company’s Xstream products infringe five patents held by MKS. On July 23, 2004, a jury returned a verdict of infringement of three MKS patents, which did not stipulate damages. The court has not enjoined the Company from selling the Xstream products. The Company has filed four separate motions to have the verdict set aside based upon defects in the trial. On March 31, 2005, the court ordered the case referred to a Special Master for investigation of the Company’s claims and review of the verdict. Potential liability, if any, resulting from the jury verdict is indeterminable at this time, and therefore no amount has been accrued by the Company in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.
      On June 2, 2004, MKS filed a petition in the District Court in Munich, Germany, alleging infringement by the Company’s Xstream products of a counterpart German patent owned by MKS. On August 4, 2004, this court dismissed MKS’s petition and assessed costs of the proceeding against MKS. MKS refiled an infringement petition in the District Court of Mannheim. On April 8, 2005, the Mannheim court issued a judgment of infringement of MKS’s patent. The judgment did not specify damages, but no liability is anticipated because the accused product has not been made or sold in

F-55


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)
Germany. A petition for invalidity of MKS’s patent brought by the Company is still pending before the German Federal Patent Court.
      On July 12, 2004, the Company filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware against MKS alleging that MKS’s Astron reactive gas source products infringe Advanced Energy’s U.S. Patent No. 6,046,546. The case was voluntarily dismissed on March 11, 2005 under an agreement that leaves the Company free to refile its claims upon conclusion of MKS’s lawsuit against the Company’s Xstream products.
(11)  Earnings Per Share
      Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. The computation of diluted EPS is similar to the computation of basic EPS except that the numerator is increased to exclude certain charges which would not have been incurred, and the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding (using the if-converted and treasury stock methods), if securities containing potentially dilutive common shares (convertible notes payable, stock options and restricted stock units) had been converted to such common shares, and if such assumed conversion is dilutive. As of March 31, 2005 and 2004, stock options and restricted stock units totaling approximately 4.5 million and 4.2 million, respectively, were outstanding. Of these amounts, 3.4 million and 1.5 million stock options for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, are not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the effect of including such options in the computation would be antidilutive. Potential shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Company’s convertible subordinated notes payable were 5.4 million at both March 31, 2005 and 2004. For the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, the affect of potential conversion of the Company’s convertible subordinated notes payable was not included in this computation because to do so would be anti-dilutive.
      The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators used in the calculation of basic and diluted EPS for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004:
                     
    Three Months Ended
    March 31,
     
    2005   2004
         
    (In thousands, except
    per share data)
Earnings per common share
               
 
Net income
  $ 734     $ 6,924  
 
Weighted average common shares outstanding
    32,755       32,581  
             
 
Earnings per common share
  $ 0.02     $ 0.21  
             
Earnings per common share — assuming dilution
               
 
Net income
  $ 734     $ 6,924  
 
Weighted average common shares outstanding
    32,755       32,581  
 
Effect of dilutive securities:
               
   
Stock options and restricted stock units
    123       1,012  
   
Convertible subordinated debt
           
             
 
Potentially dilutive common shares
    123       1,012  
             
 
Adjusted weighted average common shares outstanding
    32,878       33,593  
             
 
Earnings per common share — assuming dilution
  $ 0.02     $ 0.21  
             

F-56


Table of Contents

ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — (Continued)
(12)  Foreign Operations and Major Customers
      The Company has operations in the U.S., Europe and Asia Pacific. The following is a summary of the Company’s operations by region:
                   
    Three Months Ended
    March 31,
     
    2005   2004
         
    (In thousands)
Sales:
               
 
Originated and sold in the U.S. 
  $ 44,732     $ 58,802  
 
Originated in U.S. and sold outside the U.S. 
    5,802       13,500  
 
Originated in Europe and sold in the U.S. 
          112  
 
Originated in Europe and sold outside the U.S. 
    7,186       8,512  
 
Originated in Asia Pacific and sold outside the U.S. 
    28,420       23,561  
             
    $ 86,140     $ 104,487  
             
Income (loss) from operations:
               
 
U.S. 
  $ (2,115 )   $ 3,182  
 
Europe
    203       612  
 
Asia Pacific
    5,192       7,386  
 
Intercompany eliminations
    70       (1,370 )
             
    $ 3,350     $ 9,810  
             
                   
    March 31,   December 31,
    2005   2004
         
    (In thousands)
Identifiable assets:
               
 
U.S. 
  $ 392,612     $ 411,324  
 
Europe
    41,235       43,011  
 
Asia Pacific
    279,780       280,351  
 
Intercompany eliminations
    (320,709 )     (338,711 )
             
    $ 392,918     $ 395,975  
             
      Intercompany sales among the Company’s geographic areas are recorded on the basis of intercompany prices established by the Company.
      Applied Materials, Inc. is the Company’s largest customer and accounted for 24% and 28% of the Company’s sales for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Ulvac, Inc. accounted for 11% of the Company’s sales for the three months ended March 31, 2005. No other customer accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s sales during these periods.
(13)  Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosures
      In the first quarter of 2004, the Company sold its Noah chiller business to an unrelated third party for $797,000 in cash and a $1.9 million note receivable due March 31, 2009. The note bears interest at 5.0%, payable annually on March 31. The sale included property and equipment with a book value of approximately $300,000, inventory of approximately $1.0 million, goodwill and intangible assets net of accumulated amortization of approximately $900,000, demonstration and customer service equipment of approximately $140,000, and estimated warranty obligations of approximately $140,000. The Company recognized a gain on the sale of $404,000, which has been recorded as other income and expense in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.

F-57


Table of Contents

PROSPECTUS
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
$250,000,000
Common Stock
Debt Securities
          This prospectus relates to common stock and debt securities that we may sell from time to time, in one or more offerings, for aggregate proceeds of up to $250,000,000. We may offer the securities in one or more series, in amounts, at prices and on terms determined at the time of offering. We will provide specific terms of the securities we actually offer for sale in supplements to this prospectus.
      You should read this prospectus, the documents incorporated by reference and the applicable prospectus supplement carefully before you invest. This prospectus may not be used to offer and sell securities unless accompanied by a prospectus supplement.
      Our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol “AEIS.” The closing price of our common stock on the Nasdaq National Market was $29.74 per share on November 12, 2003. The debt securities are not currently publicly traded.
      We may sell the securities directly to you, through agents we select, through underwriters we select or through a combination of these methods. If we use agents, underwriters or dealers to sell the securities, we will name them and describe their compensation in a prospectus supplement. The net proceeds we expect to receive from these sales will also be included in a prospectus supplement.
&nb