UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(Rule 14A-101)

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o

Check the appropriate box:

o		Preliminary Proxy Statement
o		Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
þ		Definitive Proxy Statement
o		Definitive Additional Materials
o		Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

 

Atrion Corporation

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

þ		No fee required.
o		Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

	(1)		Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
	(2)		Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
	(3)		Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
	(4)		Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
	(5)		Total fee paid:

o		Fee paid previously with preliminary materials:
o		Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

	(1)		Amount Previously Paid:
	(2)		Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
	(3)		Filing Party:
	(4)		Date Filed:

Atrion Corporation
One Allentown Pkwy.
Allen, TX 75002-4211
Tel 972-390-9800

April 8, 2008

Dear Stockholder:

     You are cordially invited to attend the 2008 annual meeting of stockholders of Atrion Corporation which will be held at our offices in Allen, Texas on Friday, May 9, 2008 at 10:00 a.m., Central Time. A notice of the annual meeting and the Company’s proxy statement, together with a proxy card, accompany this letter. Also enclosed is a copy of our 2007 Annual Report. The notice of annual meeting and proxy statement describe the matters to be voted on at the meeting.

     We encourage you to attend the meeting in person. However, whether or not you plan to be personally present, please read the accompanying proxy statement carefully and then complete, date and sign the enclosed proxy card and return it promptly in the envelope provided herewith. This will ensure that your shares of common stock are represented at the meeting if you are unable to attend.

Sincerely,

Emile A. Battat
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

ATRION CORPORATION
One Allentown Parkway
Allen, Texas 75002

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To the Stockholders of Atrion Corporation:

     Notice is hereby given that the annual meeting of stockholders of Atrion Corporation (the “Company”) will be held at the Company’s offices, One Allentown Parkway, Allen, Texas on Friday, May 9, 2008 at 10:00 a.m., Central Time, for the following purposes:

	1.		To elect two Class I directors.
	2.		To ratify the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as independent accountants to audit the Company’s financial statements for the year 2008.
	3.		To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting.

     The Board of Directors fixed the close of business on April 3, 2008 as the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the annual meeting and at any adjournment thereof.

By Order of the Board of Directors

Jeffery Strickland
Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer, Secretary and Treasurer

April 8, 2008

IMPORTANT

WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING, YOU ARE REQUESTED TO COMPLETE, DATE AND SIGN THE ENCLOSED PROXY AND RETURN IT PROMPTLY IN THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED HEREWITH. IF YOU ATTEND THE MEETING, YOU MAY, IF YOU WISH, WITHDRAW YOUR PROXY AND VOTE IN PERSON.

ATRION CORPORATION
One Allentown Parkway
Allen, Texas 75002

PROXY STATEMENT

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
MAY 9, 2008

GENERAL INFORMATION

     This proxy statement is being furnished to the stockholders of Atrion Corporation (the “Company”) in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of the Company to be voted at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held at the Company’s offices, One Allentown Parkway, Allen, Texas on May 9, 2008 at 10:00 a.m., Central Time, and at any adjournment of such meeting. This Proxy Statement and the accompanying proxy card are being first sent or given to stockholders on or about April 8, 2008. The Company’s 2007 Annual Report is being mailed to stockholders with this Proxy Statement.

Purpose of the Meeting

     At the annual meeting, the Company’s stockholders will consider and vote upon the following matters: (i) the election of two Class I directors and (ii) a proposal to ratify the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as independent accountants to audit the Company’s financial statements for the year 2008.

Voting Securities and Record Date

     Stockholders of record at the close of business on April 3, 2008 (the “Record Date”) will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the annual meeting and at any adjournment thereof. At the close of business on the Record Date, the Company had outstanding and entitled to vote 1,960,535 shares of common stock, the only voting securities of the Company. Holders of record of shares of common stock outstanding on the Record Date will be entitled to one vote for each share held of record on that date upon each matter presented to the stockholders to be voted upon at the meeting.

     If the enclosed proxy card is properly executed and received in time for the annual meeting, unless previously revoked, shares of common stock represented thereby will be voted at the annual meeting as specified by the stockholder on the proxy. If no such specification is made, shares represented by such proxy will be voted FOR the election as directors of the nominees of the Board of Directors named herein and FOR ratification of the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as independent accountants to audit the Company’s financial statements for the year 2008. In addition, in their discretion the persons designated in the proxy card will vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting, including voting for any adjournment of the meeting proposed by the Board of Directors. A proxy may be revoked at any time before it is voted at the meeting by delivering to the Company a later-dated proxy, by voting by ballot at the meeting or by filing with the Inspectors of Election an instrument of revocation.

Required Vote

     The presence, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the shares of common stock outstanding on the Record Date is necessary to constitute a quorum at the annual meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted as present and represented at the annual meeting for purposes of determining a quorum. Directors will be elected at the annual meeting by a plurality of the votes cast by the stockholders present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote. Ratification of the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present, in person or by proxy, at the meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the election of directors and will have the same effect as a negative vote on the proposal to ratify the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP.

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

     The Company’s Board of Directors is divided into three classes: Class I, Class II and Class III. Two Class I directors are to be elected at the annual meeting, to serve until the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2011 and until the election and qualification of their successors in office. The nominees for election as Class I directors named below are members of the Board of Directors and were previously elected by the stockholders. It is intended that the persons named in the proxy card will vote for the election of these nominees. If either of the nominees listed below, each of whom has indicated his willingness to serve as a director if elected, is not a candidate when the election occurs, proxies will be voted for the election of the remaining nominee and may be voted for the election of any substitute nominee.

     The following information is furnished with respect to the Board of Directors’ nominees for election as a director and each director whose term will continue after the annual meeting.

Name, Age, Service as a Director of the Company ^(a)
Principal Occupation, Positions and Offices, Other Directorships and Business Experience

NOMINEES FOR ELECTION AS DIRECTOR

Class I - Term Ending in 2011

Emile A. Battat

Mr. Battat, age 70, has been a director since 1987 and has served as Chairman of the Board of the Company since January 1998, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company and as Chairman of the Board or President of each of the Company’s subsidiaries since October 1998, and as President of the Company from October 1998 until May 2007. Mr. Battat holds Bachelor of Science and Master of Science degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a Master of Business Administration degree from Harvard University. He is an associate member of Sigma Xi, a scientific honor society.

Ronald N. Spaulding

Mr. Spaulding, age 44, has been a director since February 2006. Mr. Spaulding is the President of Worldwide Commercial Operations of Abbott Vascular and a Vice President and corporate officer of Abbott Laboratories, which he joined in April 2006 upon its acquisition of Guidant Corporation’s vascular intervention assets. Between 2005 and April 2006, Mr. Spaulding served as the President of International Operations of Guidant Corporation, and also served on the Guidant Management Committee from 2002 until 2005. From 2003 to 2005, he was the President of Europe, Middle East, Africa and Canada of Guidant Corporation. From 2000 to 2003, Mr. Spaulding served as President of Guidant’s Cardiac Surgery business. Mr. Spaulding holds a Master’s degree in Biomedical Engineering and a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Miami.

DIRECTORS CONTINUING IN OFFICE

Class II - Term Ending in 2009

Hugh J. Morgan, Jr.

Mr. Morgan, age 79, has been a director since 1988. Mr. Morgan is a private investor. He served as Chairman of the Board of National Bank of Commerce of Birmingham from February 1990 until April 2003. Mr. Morgan holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from Princeton University and is a graduate of the Vanderbilt University Law School.

Class III - Term Ending in 2010

Roger F. Stebbing

Mr. Stebbing, age 67, has been a director since 1992. Mr. Stebbing is President and Chief Executive Officer of Stebbing and Associates, Inc., an engineering consulting company, and has served in such capacities since 1986. Mr. Stebbing is a licensed professional engineer and has a BSc honors degree in Chemical Engineering from Salford University.

John P. Stupp, Jr.

Mr. Stupp, age 58, has been a director since 1985. He is President of Stupp Bros., Inc., a diversified holding company, and has served in such capacity since March 2004. From April 1995 until March 2004, he served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Stupp Bros., Inc., and since August 1995 he has also served as Chief Executive Officer of Stupp Corporation, a division of Stupp Bros., Inc. Mr. Stupp holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Business and Economics from Lehigh University. He serves as a director and as a member of the audit committee of The Laclede Group, Inc., a public utility holding company.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR ELECTION OF ITS NOMINEES,
EMILE A. BATTAT AND RONALD N. SPAULDING.

Information Regarding Board of Directors and Committees

     Director Independence. The Company’s Board of Directors has determined that the following directors are “independent” within the meaning of The Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”) listing standards: Hugh J. Morgan, Jr., Ronald N. Spaulding, Roger F. Stebbing and John P. Stupp, Jr., and that Emile A. Battat is not independent.

     Meetings. The Board of Directors held five meetings during 2007. Each director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of (i) the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors and (ii) the total number of meetings of all committees on which he served held in 2007 during the time he served as a director or as a member of such committees, except that Mr. Spaulding only attended three of five meetings of the Board of Directors and two of three meetings of the Compensation Committee.

     Nominating Process. Because of the small number of directors, the Board of Directors has determined, and has adopted a resolution providing, that nominees for election to the Board of Directors will be selected by a majority vote of the directors meeting the Nasdaq independence requirements (Messrs. Morgan, Spaulding, Stebbing and Stupp). Accordingly, the Board of Directors does not have a separate nominating committee or a nominating committee charter. In accordance with resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors, in selecting nominees for election as directors, the Board of Directors, with the assistance of the Corporate Governance Committee, will review and evaluate candidates submitted by directors and management and by the Company’s stockholders pursuant to the

procedures set forth in the Company’s Bylaws and described in “STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS — Stockholder Nominations for Directors” below. The Board of Directors, in considering possible nominees, will take into account the following: (a) each director should be an individual of the highest character and integrity; (b) each director should have substantial experience that is relevant to the Company; (c) each director should have sufficient time available to devote to the affairs of the Company; and (d) each director should represent the best interest of all stockholders. All possible nominees are to be reviewed in the same manner, regardless of whether they have been submitted by stockholders, directors or management.

     Committees. The Board of Directors has four standing committees: the Executive Committee, the Corporate Governance Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Audit Committee. The Executive Committee is comprised of Emile A. Battat and Hugh J. Morgan, Jr. The Corporate Governance Committee, which is currently comprised of Hugh J. Morgan, Jr. and Roger F. Stebbing, is to assist in the evaluation of possible nominees for election to the Board of Directors as requested by the Board of Directors, review annually and advise the Board of Directors with respect to the compensation of directors and recommend to the Board of Directors (a) the number of directors to be fixed in connection with each annual meeting of stockholders, (b) the directors to be appointed to each of the committees of the Board, (c) corporate governance guidelines and (d) proposed changes to the charter of the Corporate Governance Committee. In making recommendations to the Board of Directors as to director compensation, the Corporate Governance Committee considers the directors’ responsibilities and time devoted by them in fulfilling their duties as directors, the skills required and market data on director compensation and takes into account recommendations made by Mr. Emile Battat. The Corporate Governance Committee met two times in 2007. The Compensation Committee, which is currently comprised of Hugh J. Morgan, Jr., Ronald N. Spaulding and John P. Stupp, Jr., makes recommendations to the Board of Directors as to the remuneration of all executive officers of the Company, administers the Atrion Corporation 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (the “1997 Stock Incentive Plan”), the Atrion Corporation 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2006 Equity Incentive Plan”), the Atrion Corporation Non-Employee Director Stock Purchase Plan (the “Stock Purchase Plan”) and the Atrion Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”), and reviews and makes recommendations regarding the Company’s other incentive compensation plans. The primary processes and procedures for the consideration and determination of executive compensation, the role of executive officers in determining or recommending the amount and form of executive officer compensation, the extent of delegation of authority and the role of compensation consultants in determining or recommending executive officer compensation are set forth in the section of this proxy statement entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” The Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for the Compensation Committee, a copy of which is available on the Company’s website at www.atrioncorp.com. The Compensation Committee met three times in 2007. The Audit Committee, the current members of which are Hugh J. Morgan, Jr., Roger F. Stebbing and John P. Stupp, Jr., appoints, determines the appropriate compensation for and oversees the work of the Company’s independent auditors, and assists the Board of Directors in its oversight of the Company’s accounting and financial reporting principles and policies and internal audit controls and procedures and oversees related party transactions. The Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee, a copy of which is available on the Company’s website at www.atrioncorp.com. The Audit Committee reviews, at least annually, the Audit Committee Charter and is to recommend any changes to the Audit Committee Charter to the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is independent within the meaning of the Nasdaq listing standards and is financially literate, and that Mr. Stupp qualifies as an audit committee financial expert. The Audit Committee met seven times in 2007.

     Stockholder Communications to the Board of Directors. Any stockholder wishing to communicate with the Board of Directors about any matter should send the communication, in written form, to Emile A. Battat, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, at the Company’s principal office in Allen, Texas. Mr. Emile Battat will promptly send the communication to the other members of the Board of Directors.

     Attendance at Stockholder Meetings. The Board of Directors has adopted a policy encouraging each director to attend, if practicable, annual meetings of stockholders of the Company. The 2007 annual meeting was attended by four directors of the Company.

     Code of Ethics. The Board of Directors has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to the Company’s employees, including the Company’s executive officers.

SECURITIES OWNERSHIP

     The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of shares of common stock of the Company as of March 14, 2008 by (i) each of the directors of the Company, two of whom are also the Board of Directors’ nominees for election as directors at the annual meeting; (ii) the executive officers of the Company who are named in the Summary Compensation Table herein; (iii) all of the directors and executive officers of the Company as a group, and (iv) each other person known by the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding common stock of the Company.

		Number of Shares				Percent
Name of Beneficial Owner		Beneficially Owned (a)				of Class (a)
Emile A. Battat (b)			217,930	(c)			11.08	%
David Battat			6,000				*
Hugh J. Morgan, Jr.			19,070	(d)			*
Ronald N. Spaulding			117				*
Roger F. Stebbing			28,800	(c)			1.46	%
John P. Stupp, Jr.			163,896	(c)(e)			8.30	%
Jeffery Strickland			22,399	(f)			1.14	%
Oak Forest Investment Management, Inc.(g)			132,889				6.78	%
Royce & Associates, LLC (h)			141,106				7.20	%
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (i)			174,000				8.88	%
All directors and executive officers as a group			458,212	(j)			23.37	%

APPROVAL OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     The Audit Committee has appointed the firm of Grant Thornton LLP as independent accountants to audit the financial statements of the Company for the year 2008. Although ratification by stockholders of the selection of Grant Thornton LLP is not required by law, the selection of Grant Thornton LLP is being submitted to stockholders for ratification because the Company believes it is a good corporate practice. If stockholders do not ratify the selection, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether to retain Grant Thornton LLP. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may change the appointment at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders. A representative of Grant Thornton LLP will attend the annual meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE PROPOSAL TO RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF GRANT THORNTON LLP AS INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS TO AUDIT THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE COMPANY FOR THE YEAR 2008.

Audit and Related Fees

     Audit Fees

     The aggregate fees billed by Grant Thornton LLP for professional services rendered for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements and the reviews of the financial statements included in the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q were $281,440 for the year ended December 31, 2007 and $293,302 for the year ended December 31, 2006.

     Audit Related Fees

     The aggregate fees billed by Grant Thornton LLP for professional services rendered for consultations regarding financial and reporting standards were $13,335 for the year ended December 31, 2007 and $950 for the year ended December 31, 2006.

     Tax Fees

     The aggregate fees billed by Grant Thornton LLP for professional services rendered for tax services were $43,707 for the year ended December 31, 2007 and $239,233 for the year ended December 31, 2006. These fees relate to federal and state tax compliance and tax advice in each such year. For the year ended December 31, 2006, these fees include $197,000 for review and documentation of the Company’s research and development tax credits for 2005 and prior-year tax returns.

     All Other Fees

     There were no fees billed by Grant Thornton LLP for services rendered for the year ended December 31, 2007 or for the year ended December 31, 2006 other than those set forth above.

     The Audit Committee has determined that the provision by Grant Thornton LLP of the above referenced services is compatible with maintaining its independence.

     The Audit Committee has adopted policies and procedures for pre-approval of audit and non-audit services in order to ensure that the provision of those services does not impair the auditor’s independence. In accordance with those policies and procedures, the Company is not to engage the independent auditors to render any audit or non-audit services unless either the service is approved in advance by the Audit Committee or the engagement to render the service is entered into pursuant to the Audit Committee’s pre-approval policies and procedures. In the fourth quarter of each year, the Audit Committee is to review the services expected to be performed by the independent auditor. The Audit Committee will pre-approve fee levels for the up-coming fiscal year for each of the following categories: audit, audit-related and tax compliance/planning services (individual projects less than $10,000). Tax compliance/planning projects exceeding $10,000 and all other services not pre-approved in the categories above will require specific pre-approval from the Audit Committee on an individual project basis. Approval for such services may be requested at the next Audit Committee meeting or, if earlier approval is necessary, it may be obtained in accordance with the Audit Committee’s delegation to the Audit Committee Chairman as described below. The Audit Committee will not delegate its responsibilities to pre-approve services performed by the independent auditor to management. However, the Audit Committee has delegated pre-approval authority to the Audit Committee Chairman for unplanned services that arise during the year. The Chairman has the authority to review and approve permissible services up to $10,000 per service, provided that the aggregate amount of such services does not exceed $25,000 in any calendar year. The Audit Committee Chairman must report, for informational purposes only, any pre-approval decisions to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. During the year ended December 31, 2007, no services were provided by Grant Thornton LLP other than in accordance with the pre-approval policies and procedures then in place.

Audit Committee Report

     The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has reviewed and discussed with management the Company’s audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007. The Audit Committee has discussed with Grant Thornton LLP, the Company’s auditors, the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, Communication with Audit Committees, as amended, by the Auditing Standards Board of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. The Audit Committee has received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from the Company’s auditors required by Independence Standard No. 1, Independence Discussions with Audit Committees, as modified or supplemented, by the Independence Standards Board, and has discussed with the auditors their independence.

     Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the financial statements referred to above be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.

Members of the Audit Committee

John P. Stupp, Jr. (Chairman)		Hugh J. Morgan, Jr.		Roger F. Stebbing

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

     Effective July 1, 2007, each non-employee director is paid a fee of $30,000 per year. Non-employee directors were previously paid a fee of $24,000 per year. In addition, the Chairmen of the Corporate Governance Committee and the Compensation Committee are each paid a fee of $6,000 per year, and the Chairman of the Audit Committee is paid a fee of $12,000 per year. The Company reimburses each director for travel and out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending meetings of the Board of Directors.

     In May 2007, the Board of Directors adopted the Stock Purchase Plan, which provides non-employee directors with a convenient method of purchasing shares of the Company’s common stock. The Non-Employee Director Stock Purchase Plan allows non-employee directors to elect to receive fully-vested shares in lieu of some or all of their fees. The foregone fees are converted into shares of common stock on the day the applicable fees otherwise would have been paid.

     Also in May 2007, the Board if Directors adopted the Deferred Compensation Plan, pursuant to which non-employee directors may defer all or part of their fees into deferred stock units (“DSUs”). A DSU account is set up for each participating non-employee director. The DSU account is credited with a number of DSUs equal to the fees deferred by the non-employee director divided by the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the day that the deferred fees would have been paid. Each DSU account is credited with additional whole or partial DSUs reflecting dividends that would have been paid on the number of shares represented by that DSU account. A non-employee director may elect to receive a distribution of his DSU account in the form of shares of common stock, with cash paid for fractional DSUs, in the January following the year in which his service as a director of the Company ceases or in January of a particular year.

     The fees for non-employee directors who elect to participate in either the Stock Purchase Plan or the Deferred Compensation Plan or both were paid in July 2007 for the period from July 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007, and will be paid in January of each year for the calendar year then beginning, in each case to the extent such election or elections apply.

     The following table sets forth summary information concerning the compensation of the non-employee directors of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007:

		Fees
		Earned
		or
		Paid in
		Cash				Total
Name(1)		($)				($)
Hugh J. Morgan, Jr.		$	33,000	(2)		$	33,000
Ronald N. Spaulding		$	27,000	(3)		$	27,000
Roger F. Stebbing		$	33,000	(4)		$	33,000
John P. Stupp, Jr.		$	39,000	(5)		$	39,000

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

     We seek to provide a compensation program that is attractive and competitive in order to attract, retain and motivate executive officers and other key personnel who will further our interests and enhance stockholder value. Our compensation program is designed to reward high level corporate performance as reflected by increases in our operating income and earnings per share. Elements of the program are also intended to reward key personnel based on the performance of our operating units and to reward them for individual responsibilities, experience and performance.

     The principal elements of our compensation program are: (i) base salary; (ii) annual cash bonuses; and (iii) long term incentives in the form of equity awards. Additional elements are retirement benefits under our Section 401(k) plan, or our “retirement benefits,” and our health insurance plan and other perquisites. We utilize these elements because we believe they are necessary or helpful in achieving the objectives of our compensation program. For example, base salaries are designed to attract and retain executive officers and key personnel and are intended to be at a competitive level. Annual cash bonuses and equity awards are intended to reward executive officers and key personnel and provide incentives for superior results by us or one of our operating units and for individual responsibility and performance. Equity awards also are intended to align the interests of our executive officers and key personnel with the interests of our stockholders. Our retirement benefits are primarily intended to enable us to offer a competitive compensation package to our employees. The combination of all of these elements is designed to compensate employees fairly for the services they provide on a regular basis. We believe that base salary is the most crucial element of the program in terms of attracting and retaining key employees. Annual cash bonuses provide our executive officers and other key personnel with the opportunity to receive cash compensation in addition to their salaries and are intended to reward them for the performance of the Company as a whole or of our operating units and for individual performance. We consider long term incentives in the form of equity awards as very important in aligning the interests of our executive officers and key personnel with the interests of our stockholders. We do not have a specific policy of awarding options as opposed to restricted stock or restricted stock units and from time to time our equity awards are in the form of restricted stock or restricted stock units. However, over the years most of our equity awards were in the form of stock options because of the incentive they provide to employees in that they have to be in the money for the employees to realize any benefit from the award. In the past two years, we have shifted the focus of our equity awards to restricted stock units, principally due to the change in accounting treatment for options. Our retirement benefits, along with certain benefits such as health insurance, are necessary components of the program insofar as attracting and retaining employees.

     Our Compensation Committee establishes the overall compensation program for our executive officers and makes recommendations for their base salaries, salary increases, and any discretionary bonuses. In addition, the Compensation Committee administers our equity incentive program. From time to time directors who are not members of the Compensation Committee attend meetings of the Compensation Committee, including Mr. Emile Battat who attends some meetings or parts of meetings. The Compensation Committee does not delegate the authority to make equity awards. Our executive officers are responsible for the salaries, salary increases, and cash bonuses of key personnel in our operating units who are not executive officers, and they administer separate incentive plans for those units, subject, in the case of one of our units, to review by our Compensation Committee with respect to bonuses for one executive officer who participates in that unit’s plan. In considering the base salaries for Mr. David Battat and for Mr. Strickland, the Compensation Committee takes into account the recommendations of Mr. Emile Battat. Mr. Emile Battat also assisted in the development of an annual cash incentive plan for Mr. Strickland that went into effect in 2007 and is modeled after the bonus plan applicable to Mr. Emile Battat. Additionally, Mr. Emile Battat recommended that Mr. David Battat, on becoming one of our executive officers, continue participating in the incentive plan of the

operating unit of which he continues to serve as President and to be responsible for its day-to-day operations. Mr. Emile Battat is the only executive officer or key employee with an employment agreement, which is described below.

     We believe that our executive compensation program should be internally consistent and equitable. In 2007 Mr. Emile Battat’s base salary was 2.5 times the base salaries of each of our other two executive officers. We believe that this was appropriate for 2007 based on the responsibilities and experience of our executive officers. As discussed below, both Mr. Emile Battat and Mr. Strickland are entitled to annual cash bonuses equal to certain percentages of increases in operating income. The percentage of increase in operating income for Mr. Emile Battat was determined based on our discussions with him. In determining what percentage of our operating income increase would be awarded to Mr. Strickland, the Compensation Committee took into account the responsibilities and experience of these two executive officers and concluded that it would be appropriate for the maximum bonus that could be paid to Mr. Strickland under the formula applicable to him to be approximately 25% of the maximum bonus that could be paid to Mr. Emile Battat under the formula applicable to him.

     In May 2007, Mr. David Battat was promoted to President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company. Although Mr. Strickland’s and Mr. David Battat’s base salaries were fixed at the same level for 2007, their annual cash bonus programs were not the same. Mr. Strickland’s annual cash bonus is based on increases in operating income of the Company as a whole, while Mr. David Battat’s annual cash bonus is based on the performance of our unit for which Mr. David Battat serves as President and for which he is responsible for day-to-day operations.

     We endeavor to structure our compensation program so that our currently-paid-out compensation is adequate to attract and retain key personnel and we have sufficient long-term compensation that motivates our executive officers and other key personnel to focus on our performance over the longer term. Our Compensation Committee considers the following corporate factors in establishing compensation policies and making compensation decisions:

	•		increase in earnings per share
	•		increase in operating income
	•		total stockholder return
	•		safety
	•		efficiency of operations

Base Salaries

     In structuring the compensation program, we start with the base salary and build on that element. Salaries are based on the executive officer’s performance, responsibilities, experience, competitive conditions and length of service with us. Our base salaries are not contingent on our corporate performance. Mr. Emile Battat’s annual base salary is $500,000 and has been at that level since 2002, in accordance with the terms of his employment agreement. Mr. Emile Battat requested that his base salary not be increased during that period, including when his employment agreement was amended in 2006 to, among other things, extend the term of employment.

     Mr. Strickland’s base salary has been increased by $5,000 each year over the past several years. Our Compensation Committee believes these increases were appropriate in light of market conditions, the continuing growth of the Company, Mr. Strickland’s length of service with the Company and his individual performance.

     During 2007, when Mr. David Battat was elected as our President and Chief Operating Officer, his responsibilities were expanded beyond those of President of one of our operating units. In connection with such election and expansion of responsibilities, we increased his annual base salary to $200,000. When determining the base salaries for our executive officers, we review the total annual compensation for those executive officers for previous years, including base salary, cash bonuses, long term incentive awards, retirement benefits, health insurance and other perquisites. To facilitate this review, we have recently begun using tally sheets identifying each of these elements. Each tally sheet also shows the amount payable to the executive officers upon termination of employment under various circumstances and equity ownership.

Annual Incentive Compensation

     Our employment agreement with Mr. Emile Battat and our annual bonus plan for Mr. Strickland each provide for annual cash bonuses based on increases in our operating income, albeit at different levels. Our Compensation Committee has the authority to exercise discretion to adjust any increase in operating income to disregard one-time, nonrecurring extraordinary items and is to make such equitable adjustments as are required to give effect to acquisitions, divestitures or similar corporate transactions. The Compensation Committee also may recommend an increase in the size of an award or payment under both Mr. Battat’s employment agreement and Mr. Strickland’s incentive compensation plan or award compensation if the performance goals are not attained. We believe that this discretionary authority may be useful in that there may be circumstances that would support awards being made in the absence of attainment of the performance goals. Mr. David Battat, our President and Chief Operating Officer, serves as President of one of our operating units and devotes a substantial portion of his time to the operations of that unit. In reviewing Mr. David Battat’s total compensation, our Compensation Committee concluded that for 2007 it was appropriate for Mr. David Battat to continue participating in that unit’s incentive compensation plan. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee has not recommended that a separate plan similar to those for Messrs. Emile Battat and Strickland be implemented for Mr. David Battat. The unit’s plan establishes a pool each year equal to a portion of the unit’s operating profits. The pool is used to pay certain bonuses to that unit’s manufacturing and assembly employees and other discretionary bonuses to employees not designated as key employees and certain other expenses. The balance of the pool, if any, is distributed to key employees, with 75% of a participant’s bonus to be paid prior to March 15 of the year immediately following the year for which the pool is established and 25% paid by March 15 of the following year if the participant is still employed. The plan is administered by our executive officers subject to review and adjustments by our Compensation Committee with respect to bonuses for any of our executive officers who participate in that plan.

Long Term Incentive Awards

     Long term equity-based compensation is an integral part of our total compensation package. It is intended to align executive officers and key personnel with our stockholders in focusing on long-term growth and stock performance. We review the costs and benefits to us from the various forms of long-term compensation, recognizing that stock options will have little or no value if we do not have increased profitability and that restricted stock and restricted stock units may continue to have value, though possibly reduced, if our profitability declines. During 2007, our long-term compensation consisted of awards of restricted stock units to key personnel and we made no equity awards to our executive officers.

     In the past, we have made equity awards from time to time at scheduled meetings of our Compensation Committee. However, in the latter part of 2006 we adopted a policy providing that, if we are going to make equity awards other than in connection with new hires or unusual circumstances, those awards will be made at the meeting of our Compensation Committee held in conjunction with our annual stockholders meetings, which generally occur in May each year. During 2007, we made equity awards to key personnel in the form of restricted stock units at a meeting of our Compensation Committee held in conjunction with our annual stockholders meeting. Due to special circumstances, we also made additional awards of restricted stock units to key personnel in December 2007.

Retirement Benefits

     During 2007, we terminated our cash balance plan and made certain modifications to our Section 401(k) Savings Plan (the “401(k) Plan”). We maintain the 401(k) Plan for all of our employees, including our executive officers. We believe that this plan assists our employees with retirement planning and is a necessary element of a competitive compensation program. Under our 401(k) Plan, we make matching contributions of up to 3.5% of a participant’s eligible compensation. Our executive officers are fully vested in our matching contributions.

Health Insurance and Other Perquisites

     As a part of our total compensation package, we provide health insurance and other benefits and perquisites including life and disability insurance to our executive officers.

Termination and Change in Control Arrangements

     Under the terms of an employment agreement and a severance plan, Messrs. Emile Battat and Strickland, respectively, are entitled to payments and benefits upon termination of employment under certain circumstances. The terms of Mr. Emile Battat’s arrangement were determined on the basis of our discussions with him. The terms of Mr. Strickland’s severance plan were determined by our Compensation Committee after consideration of Mr. Strickland’s total compensation package and length of service with the Company. We have structured our arrangements with our executives so that a change in control alone does not trigger any payments under Mr. Emile Battat’s employment agreement or Mr. Strickland’s severance plan and, with respect to their equity awards, results only in acceleration of vesting. We do not have a change of control agreement with Mr. David Battat. A more complete description of the material terms of these arrangements is set forth beginning at page 18 below.

Other

     The base salaries of our executive officers can be adjusted upwards and downwards, except in the case of Mr. Battat, and discretionary bonuses can be awarded based on the individual performance of the executives. Additionally, we can make equity awards to reward individual performance. We have not had to adjust or restate performance measures upon which awards have been made and, accordingly, have not made any decisions nor adopted any policy with respect to adjusting or reducing awards as a result of any such adjustment or restatement. However, we would expect to reduce or adjust awards if such events were to occur. We recognize that there may be circumstances where the individual responsibilities and performance of our executive officers or our corporate performance is so exceptional that a material increase in compensation would be appropriate. Likewise, we recognize that there could be a material downturn in our corporate performance, in which event we would consider reducing and, if appropriate, materially reduce compensation levels where permitted. In addition, we recognize that it may be necessary to materially increase compensation to retain personnel who may have attractive offers from other companies. However, this has not been a practice that we have engaged in regularly, though we have taken this action on occasion in the past.

     In making equity awards or considering adjustments to base salaries or cash incentives, our Compensation Committee takes into account the other elements of the compensation packages of our executive officers, including the number of unexercised options held and restricted stock or restricted stock units held, as well as the potential benefits they may realize upon the sale of the stock underlying these awards.

     We have reviewed the impact of the recent changes in the accounting treatment for options and have reduced somewhat the use of options in our compensation program. Although we expect to continue to grant options where appropriate to provide longer term incentives to our executive officers and other key personnel, we are continually weighing the benefit we expect to receive from that element of our compensation program against the impact that type of award will have on our corporate earnings under the recent accounting change.

     We have not adopted any guidelines and have no specific requirements respecting the ownership of our securities by our executive officers and other key personnel. However, through our equity awards to our executive officers and other key personnel we encourage ownership of our securities. We also have a policy that discourages hedging the risk of ownership of our securities.

     During our 2006 review of the compensation packages of our executive officers, our outside compensation consultant, Mercer Human Resource Consulting, reviewed the compensation of chief executive officers and chief financial officers in companies with annual revenues of less than $250 million and annual median revenues ranging from $75 million to $125 million. This survey provided us with information regarding base salary, target bonus, target total annual compensation, long term incentives, and total direct compensation. This information has been used by our Compensation Committee in formulating its recommendations to our Board of Directors regarding the compensation structure and levels of our executive officers. In 2007, after Mr. David Battat was promoted to President and Chief Operating Officer, we requested Mercer Human Resources Counseling to supplement its report to cover Mr. David Battat’s position. This supplement was received in early 2008. In addition, the Compensation Committee reviews compensation surveys that include a broad range of companies.

Compensation Committee Report

     The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth above. Based on this review and discussions, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the proxy statement.

Members of the Compensation Committee

Hugh J. Morgan, Jr. (Chairman)		Ronald N. Spaulding		John P. Stupp, Jr.

     The following table sets forth summary information concerning the compensation during the periods indicated of those executive officers of the Company for which such disclosure is required (collectively, the “Named Executive Officers”).

Summary Compensation Table

																				Change in
																		Non-		Pension Value
																		Equity		and
																		Incentive		Nonqualified				All
																		Plan		Deferred				Other
Name and														Stock		Option		Compen-		Compensation				Compen-
Principal						Salary				Bonus				Awards		Awards		sation		Earnings				sation		Total
Position		Year				($)				($)				($)		($)		($)		($)				($)		($)
(a)		(b)				(c)				(d)				(e)		(f)		(g)		(h) (1)				(i)		(j)
Emile A. Battat Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer			2007			$	500,000			$	411,195			$107,790	(2)	$  112,644	(2)	—		$	15,491			$     3,363	(3)	$	1,150,483
			2006			$	500,000			$	100,000			$  44,913	(4)	$    46,936	(4)	—		$	14,640			$     3,089	(5)	$	709,578
Jeffery Strickland Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer			2007			$	200,000				—			—		—		$100,000	(6)	$	18,467			$   21,106	(7)	$	339,573
			2006			$	195,000				—			—		$      6,401	(8)	$  59,603	(9)	$	17,517			$     5,621	(10)	$	284,142
David A. Battat President and Chief Operating Officer (11)			2007			$	186,538				—			—		—		$150,000	(12)	$	8,500			$     2,610	(13)	$	347,648

     The following table sets forth summary information concerning the grants of plan-based awards to the Named Executive Officers of the Company during the year ended December 31, 2007.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

All

All

Other

Other

Option

Stock

Awards:

Awards:

Number

Grant

Estimated Future Payouts

Estimated Future Payouts

Number

Of

Exercise

Date Fair

Under Non-Equity Incentive

Under

Of

Securities

or Base

Value of

Plan Awards

Equity Incentive Plan Awards

Shares

Under-

Price of

Stock

Thresh-

Maxi-

Thresh-

Maxi-

Of Stock

lying

Option

and

Grant

old

Target

mum

old

Target

mum

Of Units

Options

Awards

Option

Name

Date

($)

($)

($)

(#)

(#)

(#)

(#)

(#)

($/Sh)

Awards(2)

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

(h)

(i)

(j)

(k)

(l)

Jeffery Strickland(1)

N/A

$

0

$

100,000

$

100,000

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

David A. Battat(2)

N/A

$

0

$

150,000

N/A

Base Salary

     Mr. Emile Battat’s base salary is fixed by his employment agreement. Base salary for Mr. Strickland and Mr. David Battat is reviewed annually, and adjustments are generally made on the basis of the Company’s performance as measured by certain financial and non-financial criteria, various survey information respecting compensation of executive officers, compensation levels for executive officers in a broad range of companies, cost-of-living information and the individual performance of the respective executive officer. The Compensation Committee has not assigned relative weights or values to any of such criteria. With respect to the financial performance of the Company, the Compensation Committee generally takes into consideration the Company’s operating income, earnings per share and total stockholder return.

Incentive Compensation

     Subject to the terms of any employment agreement or incentive compensation plan, executive officers of the Company are eligible for discretionary bonuses as determined by the Compensation Committee. At the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the Company and its subsidiaries have implemented cash incentive plans covering certain key employees. These plans are intended to foster a corporate culture focused on bottom line results by providing key employees with a substantial stake in reducing costs and increasing sales and productivity while conserving capital resources.

Equity-Based Awards

     Stock Options. The Compensation Committee may grant stock options to eligible persons under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. Each option granted pursuant to the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan is designated at the time of grant as either an option intended to qualify as an incentive stock option under Section 422 of the Code or as an option that is not intended to so qualify, referred to as a nonqualified stock option. Nonqualified stock options may be granted to all eligible persons, but incentive stock options may be granted only to employees of the Company and its subsidiaries. The Compensation Committee may set the exercise price of stock options, provided that the exercise price per share is not less than the par value of a share of common stock and is not less than the fair market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. Stock options will vest and become exercisable in such a manner and on such date or dates as are determined by the Compensation Committee. Any incentive stock options granted pursuant to the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan will expire after a period not exceeding ten years from the date of grant, as determined by the Compensation Committee, subject to earlier termination in the event that the participant’s employment or service with the Company or a subsidiary ceases before the end of the option period. If an incentive stock option is granted to a key employee who owns or is deemed to own more than 10% of the combined voting power of all classes of the Company’s stock, the option period may not exceed five years and the exercise price may not be less than 110% of the fair market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. The exercise price for any option is generally payable in cash or, in certain circumstances, by the surrender, at the fair market value on the date on which the option is exercised, of shares of the Company’s common stock having a value equal to the exercise price. The 2006 Equity Incentive Plan permits optionholders to exercise their options prior to the date on which the options will vest, subject to Compensation Committee action. In such case, the optionholder will, upon payment for the shares, receive restricted stock having vesting terms that are identical to the vesting terms under the original option and subject to repurchase by the Company while the restrictions on vesting are in effect. Each stock option is to be evidenced by an award agreement containing such provisions, consistent with the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, as are determined by the Compensation Committee.

     Restricted Common Stock. The Compensation Committee may award restricted common stock to key employees and consultants under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. The participant’s rights to the restricted common stock are subject to certain transferability and forfeiture restrictions during a restricted period which commences on

the date of grant of the restricted common stock and expires from time to time in accordance with a schedule established by the Compensation Committee. While the restrictions are in place, the participant generally has the rights and privileges of a stockholder as to the restricted common stock, including the right to vote the restricted common stock and to receive dividends thereon. Upon the expiration of the restricted period, the restrictions are of no further force or effect with respect to the restricted common stock. Each restricted common stock award is to be evidenced by an award agreement between the Company and the participant setting forth the applicable restrictions.

     Restricted Stock Units and Deferred Stock Units. The Compensation Committee may award restricted stock units and deferred stock units to key employees and consultants under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, each for the duration that it determines in its discretion. Each restricted stock unit and each deferred stock unit is equivalent in value to one share of common stock and entitles the participant receiving the award to receive one share of common stock for each restricted stock unit at the end of the vesting period applicable to such restricted stock unit and for each deferred stock unit at the end of the deferral period. Participants are not required to pay any additional consideration in connection with the settlement of restricted stock units or deferred stock units. A holder of restricted stock units or deferred stock units has no voting rights, right to receive cash distributions or other rights as a stockholder until shares of common stock are issued to the holder in settlement of the stock units. However, participants holding restricted stock units or deferred stock units are entitled to receive dividend equivalents with respect to any payment of cash dividends on an equivalent number of shares of common stock. Such dividend equivalents are credited in the form of additional stock units.

     Stock Appreciation Rights. The Compensation Committee may award stock appreciation rights to key employees and consultants, alone or in tandem with stock options, pursuant to the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. SARs are awards that give the participant the right to receive an amount equal to (1) the number of shares exercised under the right, multiplied by (2) the amount by which the Company’s stock price exceeds the exercise price. Payment may be in cash, in shares of the Company’s common stock with equivalent value, or in some combination, as determined by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee will determine the exercise price, vesting schedule and other terms and conditions of stock appreciation rights; however, SARs expire under the same rules that apply to stock options.

     Performance Units. The Compensation Committee is authorized to establish performance programs and may award performance units to key employees and consultants in accordance with such programs under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. Holders of performance units will be entitled to receive payment in cash or shares of our common stock (or in some combination of cash and shares) if the performance goals established by the Compensation Committee are achieved or the awards otherwise vest. Each performance unit will have an initial value established by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee will set performance objectives, and such performance objectives may be based upon the achievement of Company-wide, subsidiary or individual goals.

     The following table sets forth summary information concerning the outstanding equity awards as of December 31, 2007 for the Named Executive Officers.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Year-End

Option Awards

Stock Awards

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Equity

Awards:

Incentive

Market

Plan

or

Awards:

Payout

Equity

Number

Value

Incentive

Market

of

of

Plan

Number

Value of

Unearned

Unearned

Awards:

of

Shares

Shares,

Shares,

Number

Number

Number

Shares

of

Units or

Units or

of

of

of

or Units

Units of

Other

Other

Securities

Securities

Securities

of Stock

Stock

Rights

Rights

Underlying

Underlying

Underlying

That

That

That

That

Unexercised

Unexercised

Unexercised

Option

Have

Have

Have

Have

Options

Options

Unearned

Exercise

Option

Not

Not

Not

Not

(#)

(#)

Options

Price

Expiration

Vested

Vested

Vested

Vested

Name

Exercisable

Unexercisable

(#)

($)

Date

(#)

($)(1)

(#)

($)

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

(h)

(i)

(j)

Emile A. Battat

17,800

(2)

—

—

$

44.58

2/24/09

6,000

$

750,000

—

—

6,250

18,750

(3)

—

$

71.86

8/6/11

—

—

—

—

Jeffery Strickland

7,000

(4)

—

—

$

44.58

2/24/09

—

—

—

—

     The following table sets forth summary information concerning the exercise of options and the vesting of stock during the year ended December 31, 2007 for the Named Executive Officers.

Option Awards

Stock Awards

Number of

Number of

Shares

Value

Shares

Value

Acquired

Realized

Acquired

Realized

on

on

on

on

Exercise

Exercise

Vesting

Vesting

Name

(#)

($)

(#)

($)

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

Emile A. Battat

—

—

1,500

$

145,785

Jeffery Strickland

5,000

$

310,550

—

—

Cash Balance Plan

     The Company has maintained a Cash Balance Plan, which includes all full-time active employees of the Company and its subsidiaries, other than Quest Medical, Inc., that were hired prior to May 1, 2005. Each participant has an account balance which represents his or her benefit under the Cash Balance Plan. The Cash Balance Plan provided for the Company to make annual allocations to a participant’s cash balance account in an amount equal to 3% of the participant’s eligible compensation up to the Social Security wage base and 6% in excess thereof and for an interest credit each plan year equal to the rate on 30 year U.S. Treasury bonds during November of the preceding plan year. For the 2007 plan year, the interest rate was 4.69%. “Eligible compensation”, for the Named Executive Officers, was the salary as included in the Summary Compensation Table above, subject to an annual limitation imposed by law which was $225,000 in 2007. Generally, each participant was to become fully vested in the benefits under such plan after five years of employment. Benefits may be paid, subject to certain limitations under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, upon termination of employment, retirement or death. The Cash Balance Plan specifies various options that participants may select for the distribution of their accrued balance, including forms of annuity payments and lump sum distributions. Mr. Emile Battat, Mr. Strickland and Mr. David Battat have participated in the Cash Balance Plan. The Board of Directors approved an amendment to the Cash Balance Plan to freeze all future benefit accruals to participants’ account balances after December 31, 2007, and terminated the Cash Balance Plan effective December 31, 2007. Participants in the Cash Balance Plan will continue to earn interest credits on their account balances until such time as the Cash Balance Plan has settled all its obligations with respect to termination.

Pension Benefits

				Number of Years Credited				Present Value of				Payments During Last
				Service				Accumulated Benefit				Fiscal Year
Name		Plan Name		(#)				($)				($)
(a)		(b)		(c)				(d)(1)				(e)
Emile A. Battat		Cash Balance Plan			9.25			$	120,311			$	0
Jeffery Strickland		Cash Balance Plan			24.33			$	218,712			$	0
David A. Battat		Cash Balance Plan			2.83			$	13,463			$	0

Certain Agreements, Plans and Transactions

     In 2002, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Emile Battat which, as amended that same year, provided for his employment for an initial term that expired on December 31, 2006 (as amended, the “Original Battat Agreement”). The Original Battat Agreement provided for base salary for each calendar year of $500,000. In addition, Mr. Emile Battat was entitled to receive a cash bonus each year of not less than $100,000.

     On August 7, 2006, the Board of Directors approved an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with Mr. Emile Battat (the “Amended Battat Agreement”) which became effective on January 1, 2007. The Amended Battat Agreement provides for an initial term that expires on December 31, 2012. The Amended Battat Agreement provides for the same base salary for each calendar year as provided for in the Original Battat Agreement and provides for a cash bonus each year equal to a percentage of the increase in operating income for such calendar year over operating income for the prior calendar year, subject to equitable adjustments in the discretion of the Compensation Committee.

     Mr. David Battat participates in the Halkey-Roberts Plan. The Halkey-Roberts Plan provides for a bonus pool equal to 15% of the excess of Halkey-Robert’s operating profit, reduced by 50% of the amount of the Company’s corporate overhead allocated to Halkey-Roberts each calendar year, over that amount required for Halkey-Roberts to realize a 15% return on the average of total net assets excluding cash but including working capital used in the operations of Halkey-Roberts for such calendar year. The Halkey- Roberts Plan provides that each participant will receive 75% of his or her bonus prior to March 15 of the year following the year to which the

bonus is attributable, and 25% by the next succeeding March 15 provided the participant is then employed by Halkey-Roberts or an affiliate. Mr. David Battat was awarded a bonus of $150,000 for 2007, $112,500 of which was paid in early 2008 and $37,500 of which will be paid on or before March 15, 2009 if Mr. David Battat is then employed by the Company or a subsidiary.

     The Strickland Incentive Plan that was in effect through 2006 provided that, during the first quarter of each calendar year, the Compensation Committee would set a target for earnings per basic share (“EPS”) for the Company. If the target EPS were achieved, Mr. Strickland would have been entitled to receive incentive compensation equal to 25% of his base salary for that year. If the target were exceeded, then for each 1% in excess in actual EPS over the target EPS, Mr. Strickland would have been entitled to an additional bonus equal to 0.75% of his base salary. Mr. Strickland was awarded a bonus of $59,603 for 2006 pursuant to the Strickland Incentive Plan. The Strickland Incentive Plan was terminated following the 2006 calendar year.

     In May 2007, the Board of Directors approved the CFO Plan. The CFO Plan provides that Mr. Strickland will receive a cash bonus each year equal to a percentage of the increase in operating income for such calendar year over operating income for the prior calendar year, subject to equitable adjustments in the discretion of the Compensation Committee. The bonus may not exceed 50% of the CFO’s base salary for such calendar year. Mr. Strickland was awarded a bonus of $100,000 for 2007 pursuant to the CFO Plan.

     In December 2007, the Board of Directors terminated the Company’s Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP) and the Company’s Supplemental Executive Thrift Plan (“SETP”), and authorized the Company to make payments to the participants in those plans to make them whole for early termination of the plans. Mr. Strickland received such a payment in the amount of $15,436. These plans had been frozen since December 31, 1998.

Potential Termination and Change of Control Payments

     If Mr. Emile Battat’s employment is terminated by the Company for “just cause” or by Mr. Emile Battat without “good reason” (as those terms are defined in the Amended Battat Agreement), he is to receive his base salary and the annual bonus for the calendar year in which the termination date occurs, prorated for the number of days in such calendar year prior to the termination date, plus accrued vacation pay and unreimbursed business expenses (the “Accrued Amounts”). In addition, Mr. Emile Battat will be entitled to receive payment of his account balance under the Cash Balance Plan and vested amounts contributed by the Company under the 401(k) Plan (the “Retirement Benefits”). If Mr. Emile Battat’s employment is terminated by the Company without “just cause” or by Mr. Emile Battat with “good reason,” Mr. Emile Battat will be entitled to receive the Accrued Amounts, the Retirement Benefits, one year’s base salary plus the average annual bonus received by him with respect to the three years prior to the year in which the termination occurs (the “Severance Payment”). In addition, all stock options or other equity granted to Mr. Emile Battat will fully vest and become exercisable on the termination date, and the Company will continue to provide Mr. Emile Battat and his spouse and dependents with group health plan benefits for one year (the “Health Benefits”). If his employment is terminated due to his death or disability, Mr. Emile Battat or his personal representative will be entitled to receive the Accrued Amounts, the Severance Payment, the Retirement Benefits, the Health Benefits, and all stock options or other equity granted him shall vest and become exercisable. If a termination without just cause or for good reason occurs in contemplation of or within two years following a “change in control” (as that term is defined in the Amended Battat Agreement), Mr. Emile Battat will be entitled to receive the Accrued Amounts, the Retirement Benefits, and a payment equal to two times the Severance Payment, and will be entitled to accelerated vesting of equity awards and the Health Benefits as described above.

     If Mr. Emile Battat’s employment had been terminated on December 31, 2007 by the Company for just cause, or by Mr. Emile Battat without good reason, he would have received a payment in the amount of $415,693 representing his Accrued Amount for 2007. If his employment had been terminated on such date by the Company without just cause, by Mr. Emile Battat for good reason or due to his death or disability, he would have been entitled to receive $1,015,693 representing his Accrued Amount for 2007 and his Severance Payment. In addition, unvested equity awards having a fair value of $1,746,375, after subtracting the exercise price, would have vested and he would have been entitled to Health Benefits having an estimated value of $9,945. If such termination had been by the Company without just cause or by Mr. Emile Battat for good reason and in contemplation of or within two years after a change in control, he would have been entitled to receive $1,615,693 representing his Accrued Amount for

2007 and two times his Severance Payment, he would have been entitled to Health Benefits having an estimated value of $9,945 and, in addition, unvested equity awards having a fair value of $1,746,375, after subtracting the exercise price, held by him would have vested. In the case of any termination of employment as of December 31, 2007, Mr. Emile Battat would have been entitled to receive payment of his account balance under the Cash Balance Plan as shown on page 18 hereof and the vested amount contributed by the Company under the 401(k) Plan in the amount of $30,599.

     If Mr. David Battat’s employment had been terminated on December 31, 2007, he would have received $112,500 under the Halkey-Roberts Plan, payment of his account balance under the Cash Balance Plan as shown on page 18 hereof and the vested amount contributed by the Company under the 401(k) Plan in the amount of $3,048.

     The Company has a severance plan (the “Strickland Severance Plan”) pursuant to which Mr. Strickland will be entitled to severance compensation if (i) there is a change in control of the Company and Mr. Strickland’s employment is terminated by the Company without “cause” or by Mr. Strickland with “good reason” (as those terms are defined in the Strickland Severance Plan) prior to the occurrence of one of the following: (a) Mr. Strickland’s death; (b) Mr. Strickland’s attainment of age 65; or (c) the expiration of two years following the change in control, or if (ii) the Company is dissolved. The severance pay is to be equal to Mr. Strickland’s annual base salary for the 12 months preceding the termination of employment or dissolution of the Company. In addition, in the case of any termination of employment Mr. Strickland will be entitled to receive payment of his account balance under the Cash Balance Plan and the vested amount contributed by the Company under the 401(k) Plan.

     If Mr. Strickland’s employment had been terminated on December 31, 2007, within the terms of the Strickland Severance Plan, Mr. Strickland would have been entitled to a payment of $200,000. In addition, in the case of any termination of employment on December 31, 2007, Mr. Strickland would have been entitled to receive a bonus for 2007 in the amount of $100,000 under the CFO Plan and a payment of his account balance under the Cash Balance Plan as shown on page 18 hereof and the vested amount contributed by the Company under the 401(k) Plan in the amount of $199,053.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

     During 2007, Messrs. Morgan, Spaulding and Stupp served as members of the Compensation Committee. None of the members of the Compensation Committee was an officer or employee of the Company or its subsidiaries or had any relationship requiring disclosure pursuant to Item 404 of Regulation S-K. Additionally, during 2007, none of the executive officers of the Company was a member of the board of directors, or any committee thereof, of any other entity one of the executive officers of which served as a member of the Board of Directors, or any committee thereof, of the Company.

Related Party Transactions

     The Audit Committee, pursuant to the Audit Committee Charter, is authorized to review and approve or disapprove, in its sole discretion, in advance, any proposed related-party transaction, within the meaning of Nasdaq listing standards and rules and regulations promulgated by the Commission. Under the Audit Committee policies, transactions involving amounts in excess of $120,000 in which a related person has a direct or indirect material interest are subject to review and approval or disapproval. The Audit Committee will approve such a transaction only if it determines that the transaction is in the best interest of the Company.

     In considering a related party transaction, the Audit Committee will consider all relevant factors, including as applicable (i) the Company’s business rationale for entering into the transaction; (ii) the alternatives to entering into a related person transaction; (iii) whether the transaction is on terms comparable to those available to third parties, or in the case of employment relationships, to employees generally; (iv) the potential for the transaction to lead to an actual or apparent conflict of interest and any safeguards imposed to prevent such actual or apparent conflicts; and (vi) the overall fairness of the transaction to the Company.

     The Audit Committee will periodically monitor the transaction to ensure that there are no changed circumstances that would render it advisable for the Company to amend or terminate the transaction. Management or the affected director or executive officer is to bring the matter to the attention of the Audit Committee. If a member of the Audit Committee is involved in the transaction, he or she will be recused from all discussions and decisions about the transaction.

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

     Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s executive officers and directors to file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes of ownership of the Company’s common stock with the Commission. The Company assists the directors and officers with completing and filing these reports. Based upon a review of these filings and written representations from the Company’s directors and executive officers, the Company believes that all reports were filed timely in 2007 except that one Form 4 was inadvertently filed late for each of Roger F. Stebbing and John P. Stupp, Jr. to report the crediting of 0.4 DSU and 0.06 DSU, respectively, and representing in the aggregate the equivalent of less than one share of common stock of the Company, to their DSU accounts under the Deferred Compensation Plan.

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

Stockholder Proposals in the Company’s Proxy Statement

     In order for proposals by stockholders to be considered for inclusion in the Company’s proxy material relating to the 2009 annual meeting of stockholders, such proposals must be received by the Company on or before December 9, 2008.

Stockholder Proposals to be Presented at Annual Meetings.

     The Company’s Bylaws provide that a stockholder who desires to propose any business at an annual meeting of stockholders must give the Company written notice of such stockholder’s intent to bring such business before such meeting. Such notice is to be delivered to, or mailed, postage prepaid, and received by, the Secretary of the Company at the principal executive offices of the Company not later than the close of business on the 120th day prior to the first anniversary of the date of the Company’s proxy statement released to stockholders in connection with the preceding year’s annual meeting of stockholders. However, in the event that no annual meeting was held in the previous year or the date of the annual meeting is more than 30 days before or more than 60 days after the anniversary date of the previous year’s meeting, notice by the stockholder must be delivered not later than the close of business on the later of the 120th day prior to such annual meeting and the 10th day following the date on which public announcement of the date of the meeting is first made. Such notice for the 2009 annual meeting must be delivered not later than December 9, 2008, provided the date of the 2009 annual meeting is not more than 30 days before or more than 60 days after May 9, 2009. The stockholder’s written notice must set forth (a) a brief description of the business desired to be brought before the meeting and the reasons for conducting such business at the meeting; (b) the name and address of the stockholder who intends to propose such business; (c) a representation that the stockholder is a holder of record of shares of common stock of the Company entitled to vote at such meeting and intends to appear in person or by proxy at such meeting to propose such business; (d) any material interest of the stockholder in such business; and (e) as to the stockholder giving the notice and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the proposal is made (i) the name and address of such stockholder, as they appear on the Company’s books, and of such beneficial owner and (ii) the class and number of shares of the Company which are owned beneficially and of record by such stockholder and such beneficial owner. The Chairman of the meeting may refuse to transact any business presented at any meeting without compliance with the foregoing procedure.

Stockholder Nominations for Directors.

     The Company’s Bylaws provide that a stockholder who desires to nominate directors at a meeting of stockholders must give the Company written notice, within the same time period described above for a stockholder who desires to bring business before a meeting, setting forth (a) the name and address of the stockholder who intends to make the nomination and of the person or persons to be nominated; (b) a representation that the stockholder is a holder of record of shares of common stock of the Company entitled to vote at such meeting and

intends to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to nominate the person or persons specified in the notice; (c) a description of all arrangements or understandings between the stockholder and each nominee and any other person or persons (naming such person or persons) pursuant to which the nomination or nominations are to be made by the stockholder; (d) such other information regarding each nominee proposed by such stockholder as would have been required to be included in a proxy statement filed pursuant to the proxy rules of the Commission had each nominee been nominated, or intended to be nominated, by the Board of Directors; and (e) the consent of each nominee to serve as a director of the Company if so elected. The Chairman of the meeting may refuse to acknowledge the nomination of any person if a stockholder has failed to comply with the foregoing procedure.

NO INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

     In the Company’s filings with the Commission, information is sometimes “incorporated by reference.” This means that the Company is referring you to information that has previously been filed with the Commission, and that the information should be considered part of a particular filing. As provided in regulations promulgated by the Commission, the “Audit Committee Report” and the “Compensation Committee Report” contained in this proxy statement specifically are not incorporated by reference into any other filings with the Commission. In addition, this proxy statement includes the Company’s website address. This website address is intended to provide inactive, textual references only. The information on the Company’s website is not part of this proxy statement.

COST AND METHOD OF SOLICITATION

     The cost of soliciting proxies will be borne by the Company. In addition to the use of the mails, proxies may be solicited personally or by telephone, telegram, facsimile and other electronic communication methods by the directors, officers and employees of the Company without additional compensation. Brokerage firms, nominees, fiduciaries and other custodians will be requested to forward soliciting materials to the beneficial owners of common stock of the Company held in their names or in those of their nominees and their reasonable expenses will be reimbursed upon request.

OTHER BUSINESS

     The Board of Directors does not intend to bring any business before the meeting other than that stated herein and is not aware of any other matters that may be presented for action at the meeting. However, if any other matters should properly come before the meeting, or any adjournments thereof, it is the intention of the persons named in the accompanying proxy to vote on such matters as they, in their discretion, may determine.

By Order of the Board of Directors

Jeffery Strickland
Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer, Secretary and Treasurer

April 8, 2008

ATRION CORPORATION

May 9, 2008

Please date, sign and mail
your proxy card in the
envelope provided as soon
as possible.

 

ê   Please detach along perforated line and mail in the envelope provided.  ê

n	20230000000000000000  0	050908

PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. PLEASE MARK YOUR VOTE IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS SHOWN HERE x

FOR

AGAINST

ABSTAIN

1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS:

2.

PROPOSAL TO RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF GRANT THORNTON LLP AS INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS OF THE COMPANY

o

o

o

NOMINEES:

o

FOR ALL

¡

Emile A. Battat

¡

Ronald N. Spaulding

o

WITHHOLD AUTHORITY

3.

IN THEIR DISCRETION, UPON SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING.

FOR ALL NOMINEES

o

FOR ALL EXCEPT (See Instructions below)

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NOMINEES LISTED IN ITEM 1 AND “FOR” ITEM 2. IF THIS PROXY IS PROPERLY SIGNED AND RETURNED, THE SHARES REPRESENTED WILL BE VOTED "FOR" THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES LISTED IN ITEM 1 AND "FOR" ITEM 2 UNLESS YOU OTHERWISE SPECIFY HEREIN.

INSTRUCTION: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee, mark “FOR ALL EXCEPT” and fill in the circle next to the name of that nominee, as shown here: =

To change the address on your account, please check the box at right and indicate your new address in the address space above. Please note that changes to the registered name(s) on the account may not be submitted via this method.

o

Signature of Stockholder

Date:

Signature of Stockholder

Date:

n		Note:		Please sign exactly as your name or names appear on this Proxy. When shares are held jointly, each holder should sign. When signing as executor, administrator, attorney, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If the signer is a corporation, please sign full corporate name by duly authorized officer, giving full title as such. If signer is a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person.	n

	0	n

ATRION CORPORATION

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby appoints Roger F. Stebbing and John P. Stupp, Jr., or either of them, proxies of the undersigned, with full power of substitution, to represent and to vote all shares of common stock of Atrion Corporation which the undersigned would be entitled to vote at the annual meeting of stockholders of Atrion Corporation to be held at the offices of Atrion Corporation, One Allentown Parkway, Allen, Texas, on Friday, May 9, 2008 at 10:00 a.m., Central Time, and at any adjournment thereof, in the following manner:

(Continued and to be signed on the reverse side)

 

n		14475  n