e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For fiscal year ended September 30, 2008
|
Commission File Number 1-14173
MarineMax, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as
Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State of
Incorporation)
|
|
59-3496957
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
18167 U.S. Highway 19 North
Suite 300
Clearwater, Florida 33764
(727) 531-1700
(Address, including zip code,
and telephone number,
including area code, of
principal executive offices)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Exchange Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
|
|
Common Stock, par value $.001 per share
Rights to Purchase Series A Junior Participating
Preferred Stock
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Exchange Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Securities
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated
filer o
|
|
Accelerated
filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting
company)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of common stock held by nonaffiliates
of the registrant (17,157,060 shares) based on the closing
price of the registrants common stock as reported on the
New York Stock Exchange on March 31, 2008, which was the
last business day of the registrants most recently
completed second fiscal quarter, was $213,776,968. For purposes
of this computation, all officers, directors, and 10% beneficial
owners of the registrant are deemed to be affiliates. Such
determination should not be deemed to be an admission that such
officers, directors, or 10% beneficial owners are, in fact,
affiliates of the registrant.
As of November 30, 2008, there were outstanding
18,492,769 shares of registrants common stock, par
value $.001 per share.
Documents
Incorporated by Reference
Portions of the registrants definitive proxy statement for
the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by
reference into Part III of this report.
MARINEMAX,
INC.
ANNUAL
REPORT ON
FORM 10-K
Fiscal
Year Ended September 30, 2008
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
Statements
Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
The statements contained in this report on
Form 10-K
that are not purely historical are forward-looking statements
within the meaning of applicable securities laws.
Forward-looking statements include statements regarding our
expectations, anticipations,
intentions, beliefs, or
strategies regarding the future. Forward-looking
statements relating to our future economic performance, plans
and objectives for future operations, and projections of revenue
and other financial items are based on our beliefs as well as
assumptions made by and information currently available to us.
Actual results could differ materially from those currently
anticipated as a result of a number of factors, including those
discussed in Item 1A. Risk Factors.
PART I
Introduction
Our
Company
We are the largest recreational boat dealer in the United
States. Through 77 retail locations in Alabama, Arizona,
California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia,
Maryland, Minnesota, Missouri, Nevada, New Jersey, New York,
North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Carolina,
Tennessee, Texas, and Utah, we sell new and used recreational
boats, including pleasure and fishing boats, with a focus on
premium brands in each segment. We also sell related marine
products, including engines, trailers, parts, and accessories.
In addition, we arrange related boat financing, insurance, and
extended service contracts; provide repair and maintenance
services; offer boat and yacht brokerage services; and, where
available, offer slip and storage accommodations.
We are the nations largest retailer of Sea Ray, Boston
Whaler, Cabo, Hatteras, and Meridian recreational boats and
yachts, all of which are manufactured by Brunswick Corporation.
Sales of new Brunswick boats accounted for approximately 49% of
our revenue in fiscal 2008. Brunswick is the worlds
largest manufacturer of marine products and marine engines. We
believe our sales represented approximately 10% of all Brunswick
marine sales, including approximately 40% of its Sea Ray boat
sales, during our 2008 fiscal year. We are parties to dealer
agreements with Brunswick covering Sea Ray products and are the
exclusive dealer of Sea Ray boats in almost all of our
geographic markets. We also are the exclusive dealer for
Hatteras Yachts throughout the state of Florida (excluding the
Florida panhandle) and the states of New Jersey, New York, and
Texas; the exclusive dealer for Cabo Yachts throughout the
states of Florida, New Jersey, and New York; the exclusive
dealer for Boston Whaler in many of our markets, including our
locations in the states of New York, North Carolina, South
Carolina, and portions of the states of Florida, California, and
Texas; and the exclusive dealer for Meridian Yachts in most of
our geographic markets, excluding California. In addition, we
are the exclusive dealer for Italy-based Azimut-Benetti Group
for Azimut and Atlantis mega-yachts, yachts, and other
recreational boats for the Northeast United States from Maryland
to Maine and the state of Florida.
We commenced operations as a result of the March 1, 1998
acquisition of five previously independent recreational boat
dealers. Since that time, we have acquired 20 additional
previously independent recreational boat dealers, two boat
brokerage operations, and two full-service yacht repair
operations. We capitalize on the experience and success of the
acquired companies in order to establish a new national standard
of customer service and responsiveness in the highly fragmented
retail boating industry. As a result of our emphasis on premium
brand boats, our average selling price for a new boat in fiscal
2008 was approximately $126,000, an increase of approximately
10% from fiscal 2007, compared with the industry average
calendar 2007 selling price of approximately $35,000 based on
industry data published by the National Marine Manufacturers
Association. Our stores, which operated at least 12 months,
averaged approximately $12.5 million in annual sales in
fiscal 2008. We consider a store to be one or more retail
locations that are adjacent or operate as one entity. Our
same-store sales decreased 28% in fiscal 2008, but averaged an
annual increase of approximately 11% for the preceding five
years.
We adopt the best practices developed by us and our acquired
companies as appropriate to enhance our ability to attract more
customers, foster an overall enjoyable boating experience, and
offer boat manufacturers stable and professional retail
distribution and a broad geographic presence. We believe that
our full range of services, no haggle sales approach, prime
retail locations, premium product offerings, extensive
facilities, strong management and team members, and emphasis on
customer service and satisfaction before and after a boat sale
are competitive advantages that enable us to be more responsive
to the needs of existing and prospective customers.
The U.S. recreational boating industry generated
approximately $37.5 billion in retail sales in calendar
2007, including sales of new and used boats; marine products,
such as engines, trailers, equipment, and accessories; and
related expenditures, such as fuel, insurance, docking, storage,
and repairs. Retail sales of new and used boats, engines,
trailers, and accessories accounted for approximately
$28.7 billion of these sales in 2007 based on industry data
from the National Marine Manufacturers Association. The highly
fragmented retail boating industry generally consists of small
dealers that operate in a single market and provide varying
degrees of merchandising, professional
1
management, and customer service. We believe that many small
dealers are finding it increasingly difficult to make the
managerial and capital commitments necessary to achieve higher
customer service levels and upgrade systems and facilities as
required by boat manufacturers and demanded by customers. We
also believe that many dealers lack an exit strategy for their
owners. We believe these factors contribute to our opportunity.
Strategy
Our goal is to enhance our position as the nations leading
recreational boat dealer. Key elements of our operating and
growth strategy include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
emphasizing customer satisfaction and loyalty by creating an
overall enjoyable boating experience, beginning with a
hassle-free purchase process, superior customer service,
company-led events called Getaways!, and premier facilities;
|
|
|
|
achieving efficiencies and synergies among our operations to
enhance internal growth and profitability;
|
|
|
|
promoting national brand name recognition and the MarineMax
connection;
|
|
|
|
emphasizing the best practices developed by us and
our acquired dealers as appropriate throughout our dealerships;
|
|
|
|
offering additional products and services, including those
involving higher profit margins;
|
|
|
|
pursuing strategic acquisitions to capitalize upon the
consolidation opportunities in the highly fragmented
recreational boat dealer industry by acquiring additional
dealers and related operations and improving their performance
and profitability through the implementation of our operating
strategies;
|
|
|
|
opening additional retail facilities in our existing and new
territories;
|
|
|
|
emphasizing employee training and development;
|
|
|
|
expanding our Internet retail operations and marketing;
|
|
|
|
operating with a decentralized approach to the operational
management of our dealerships; and
|
|
|
|
utilizing technology throughout operations, which facilitates
the interchange of information and enhances cross-selling
opportunities throughout our company.
|
Development
of the Company; Expansion of Business
MarineMax was founded in January 1998. MarineMax itself,
however, conducted no operations until the acquisition of five
independent recreational boat dealers on March 1, 1998, and
we completed our initial public offering in June 1998. Since the
initial acquisitions in March 1998, we have acquired 20
additional recreational boat dealers, two boat brokerage
operations, and two full-service yacht repair operations. Each
of our acquired dealers is continuing its operations under the
MarineMax name.
We continually attempt to expand our business by providing a
full range of services, offering extensive and high-quality
product lines, maintaining prime retail locations, pursuing the
MarineMax Value Price sales approach, and emphasizing the
highest level of customer service and customer satisfaction.
We also evaluate opportunities to expand our operations by
acquiring recreational boat dealers to expand our geographic
scope, expanding our product lines, opening new retail locations
within our existing territories, and providing new products and
services for our customers.
2
Acquisitions of additional recreational boat dealers represent
an important strategy in our goal to enhance our position as the
nations leading retailer of recreational boats. The
following table sets forth information regarding the businesses
that we have acquired and their geographic regions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired Corporation
|
|
Acquisition Date
|
|
Geographic Region
|
|
Bassett Boat Company of Florida
|
|
|
March 1998
|
|
|
Southeast Florida
|
Louis DelHomme Marine
|
|
|
March 1998
|
|
|
Dallas and Houston, Texas
|
Gulfwind USA, Inc.
|
|
|
March 1998
|
|
|
West Central Florida
|
Gulfwind South, Inc.
|
|
|
March 1998
|
|
|
Southwest Florida
|
Harrisons Boat Center, Inc. and Harrisons Marine
Centers of Arizona, Inc.
|
|
|
March 1998
|
|
|
Northern California and Arizona
|
Stovall Marine, Inc.
|
|
|
April 1998
|
|
|
Georgia
|
Cochrans Marine, Inc. and C & N Marine
Corporation
|
|
|
July 1998
|
|
|
Minnesota
|
Sea Ray of North Carolina, Inc.
|
|
|
July 1998
|
|
|
North and South Carolina
|
Brevard Boat Company
|
|
|
September 1998
|
|
|
East Central Florida
|
Sea Ray of Las Vegas
|
|
|
September 1998
|
|
|
Nevada
|
Treasure Cove Marina, Inc.
|
|
|
September 1998
|
|
|
Northern Ohio
|
Woods & Oviatt, Inc.
|
|
|
October 1998
|
|
|
Southeast Florida
|
Boating World
|
|
|
February 1999
|
|
|
Dallas, Texas
|
Merit Marine, Inc.
|
|
|
March 1999
|
|
|
Southern New Jersey
|
Suburban Boatworks, Inc.
|
|
|
April 1999
|
|
|
Central New Jersey
|
Hansen Marine, Inc.
|
|
|
August 1999
|
|
|
Northeast Florida
|
Duce Marine, Inc.
|
|
|
December 1999
|
|
|
Utah
|
Clarks Landing, Inc. (selected New Jersey locations and
operations)
|
|
|
April 2000
|
|
|
Northern New Jersey
|
Associated Marine Technologies, Inc.
|
|
|
January 2001
|
|
|
Southeast Florida
|
Gulfwind Marine Partners, Inc.
|
|
|
April 2002
|
|
|
West Florida
|
Seaside Marine, Inc.
|
|
|
July 2002
|
|
|
Southern California
|
Sundance Marine, Inc.
|
|
|
June 2003
|
|
|
Colorado
|
Killinger Marine Center, Inc. and Killinger Marine Center of
Alabama, Inc.
|
|
|
September 2003
|
|
|
Northwest Florida and Alabama
|
Emarine International, Inc. and Steven Myers, Inc.
|
|
|
October 2003
|
|
|
Southeast Florida
|
Imperial Marine
|
|
|
June 2004
|
|
|
Baltimore, Maryland
|
Port Jacksonville Marine
|
|
|
June 2004
|
|
|
Northeast Florida
|
Port Arrowhead Marina, Inc.
|
|
|
January 2006
|
|
|
Missouri, Oklahoma
|
Great American Marina(1)
|
|
|
February 2006
|
|
|
West Florida
|
Surfside 3 Marina, Inc.
|
|
|
March 2006
|
|
|
Connecticut, Maryland, New York, and Rhode Island
|
Apart from acquisitions, we have opened 26 new retail locations
in existing territories, excluding those opened on a temporary
basis for a specific purpose. We also monitor the performance of
our retail locations and close retail locations that do not meet
our expectations. Based on these factors and the recent
depressed economic conditions, we have closed 25 retail
locations since March 1998, excluding those opened on a
temporary basis for a specific purpose, including 12 in fiscal
2008.
3
As a part of our acquisition strategy, we frequently engage in
discussions with various recreational boat dealers regarding
their potential acquisition by us. In connection with these
discussions, we and each potential acquisition candidate
exchange confidential operational and financial information;
conduct due diligence inquiries; and consider the structure,
terms, and conditions of the potential acquisition. In certain
cases, the prospective acquisition candidate agrees not to
discuss a potential acquisition with any other party for a
specific period of time, grants us an option to purchase the
prospective dealer for a designated price during a specific
time, and agrees to take other actions designed to enhance the
possibility of the acquisition, such as preparing audited
financial information and converting its accounting system to
the system specified by us. Potential acquisition discussions
frequently take place over a long period of time and involve
difficult business integration and other issues, including in
some cases, management succession and related matters. As a
result of these and other factors, a number of potential
acquisitions that from time to time appear likely to occur do
not result in binding legal agreements and are not consummated.
In addition to acquiring recreational boat dealers and opening
new retail locations, we also add new product lines to expand
our operations. The following table sets forth various of our
current product lines that we have added to our existing
locations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Line
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
Geographic Regions
|
|
Boston Whaler
|
|
|
1997
|
|
|
West Central Florida; Stuart, Florida; and Dallas, Texas
|
Hatteras Yachts
|
|
|
1999
|
|
|
Florida (excluding the Florida panhandle)
|
Boston Whaler
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
North Palm Beach, Florida
|
Meridian Yachts
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
Florida, Georgia, North and South Carolina, New Jersey,
Ohio, Minnesota, Texas, and Delaware
|
Grady White
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
Houston, Texas
|
Hatteras Yachts
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
Texas
|
Boston Whaler
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
North and South Carolina
|
Princecraft.
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Minnesota
|
Boston Whaler
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Houston and Dallas, Texas
|
Meridian Yachts
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Chattanooga, Tennessee
|
Tracker Marine
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Las Vegas, Nevada
|
Azimut
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Northeast United States from Maryland to Maine
|
Atlantis
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Northeast United States from Maryland to Maine
|
Cabo
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
West coast of Florida
|
Cabo
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
East coast of Florida
|
Azimut
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Florida
|
Cabo
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
New Jersey and New York
|
Hatteras Yachts
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
New Jersey and New York
|
Meridian Yachts
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Arizona, Nevada, Colorado, and Utah
|
As we add a brand, we believe we are offering a migration for
our existing customer base or filling a gap in our product
offerings. As a result, we do not believe that new product
offerings will compete with or cannibalize the business
generated from our other prominent brands. We also discontinue
offering product lines from time to time, primarily based upon
customer preferences.
During the nine-year period from the commencement of our
operations through our fiscal year ended September 30,
2007, our revenue increased from $291 million to
$1.2 billion. Our revenue and net income increased in seven
of those nine years over the prior year revenue and net income.
This period was marked by an increase in retail locations from
41 on September 30, 1998 to 88 on September 30, 2007,
resulting from acquisitions and opening new stores in existing
territories.
Our growth was interrupted during the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2007, primarily as a result of factors
related to the deteriorating housing market. Substantially
deteriorating economic and financial conditions, reduced
4
consumer confidence and spending, increases in fuel prices,
lower credit availability, stock and bond market declines, and
asset value deterioration all contributed to substantially lower
financial performance in the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2008, including a significant loss.
Those conditions caused us to defer our acquisition program,
slow our new store openings, reduce our inventory purchases,
engage in inventory reduction efforts, close some of our retail
locations, significantly reduce our headcount, and modify our
debt structure and credit agreement. We cannot predict the
length or severity of the current recessionary environment or
the magnitude of the effects it will have on our operating
performance nor can we predict the effectiveness of the measures
we have taken to address this environment.
Despite the foregoing, we are maintaining our core values of
customer service and satisfaction and plan to continue to pursue
strategies that will enable us to achieve long-term growth. We
believe that we are well positioned for long-term success and
growth when economic conditions improve. Upon a return to more
normal economic conditions, we plan to resume expanding our
business through acquisitions in new geographical territories,
new store openings in existing territories, and new product
lines. In addition, we plan to continue to expand other
services, including conducting used boat sales; offering yacht
and boat brokerage services; offering our customers the ability
to finance new or used boats; offering extended service
contracts; arranging insurance coverage, including boat
property, credit-life, accident, disability, and casualty
coverage; selling related marine products, including engines,
trailers, parts, and accessories; providing maintenance and
repair services at our retail locations and at stand-alone
service facilities; and expanding our ability to provide slip
and storage accommodations. Our expansion plans will depend upon
returning to normal economic conditions.
We maintain our executive offices at 18167 U.S. Highway 19
North, Suite 300, Clearwater, Florida 33764, and our
telephone number is
(727) 531-1700.
We were incorporated in the state of Delaware in January 1998.
Unless the context otherwise requires, all references to
MarineMax mean MarineMax, Inc. prior to its
acquisition of five previously independent recreational boat
dealers in March 1998 (including their related real estate
companies) and all references to the Company,
our company, we, us, and
our mean, as a combined company, MarineMax, Inc. and
the 20 recreational boat dealers, two boat brokerage operations,
and two full-service yacht repair operations acquired to date
(the acquired dealers, and together with the
brokerage and repair operations, operating
subsidiaries, or the acquired companies).
Our website is located at www.MarineMax.com. Through our
website, we make available free of charge our annual report on
Form 10-K,
our quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
our current reports on
Form 8-K,
our proxy statements, and any amendments to those reports filed
or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These reports are available as
soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file
those reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We
also post on our website the charters of our Audit,
Compensation, and Nominating/Corporate Governance Committees;
our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Business Conduct
and Ethics, and Code of Ethics for the CEO and Senior Financial
Officers, and any amendments or waivers thereto; and any other
corporate governance materials contemplated by SEC or NYSE
regulations. These documents are also available in print to any
stockholder requesting a copy from our corporate secretary at
our principal executive offices.
5
BUSINESS
General
We are the largest recreational boat dealer in the United
States. Through 77 retail locations in Alabama, Arizona,
California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia,
Maryland, Minnesota, Missouri, Nevada, New Jersey, New York,
North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Carolina,
Tennessee, Texas, and Utah, we sell new and used recreational
boats, including pleasure boats (such as sport boats, sport
cruisers, sport yachts, and yachts), and fishing boats, with a
focus on premium brands in each segment. We also sell related
marine products, including engines, trailers, parts, and
accessories. In addition, we arrange related boat and yacht
financing, insurance, and extended service contracts; provide
repair and maintenance services; offer boat and yacht brokerage
services; and, where available, slip and storage accommodations.
We are the nations largest retailer of Sea Ray, Boston
Whaler, Cabo, Hatteras, and Meridian recreational boats and
yachts, all of which are manufactured by Brunswick Corporation.
Sales of new Brunswick boats accounted for approximately 49% of
our revenue in fiscal 2008. Brunswick is the worlds
largest manufacturer of marine products and marine engines. We
believe our sales represented approximately 10% of all Brunswick
marine sales, including approximately 40% of its Sea Ray boat
sales, during our 2008 fiscal year. We are parties to dealer
agreements with Brunswick covering Sea Ray products and are the
exclusive dealer of Sea Ray boats in almost all of our
geographic markets. We also are the exclusive dealer for
Hatteras Yachts throughout the state of Florida (excluding the
Florida panhandle) and the states of New Jersey, New York, and
Texas; the exclusive dealer for Cabo Yachts throughout the
states of Florida, New Jersey, and New York; the exclusive
dealer for Boston Whaler in many of our markets, including our
locations in the states of New York, North Carolina, South
Carolina, and portions of the states of Florida, California, and
Texas; and the exclusive dealer for Meridian Yachts in most of
our geographic markets, excluding California. In addition, we
are the exclusive dealer for Italy-based Azimut-Benetti Group
for Azimut and Atlantis mega-yachts, yachts, and other
recreational boats for the Northeast United States from Maryland
to Maine and the state of Florida.
U.S.
Recreational Boating Industry
The total U.S. recreational boating industry generated
approximately $37.5 billion in retail sales in calendar
2007, including retail sales of new and used recreational boats;
marine products, such as engines, trailers, parts, and
accessories; and related boating expenditures, such as fuel,
insurance, docking, storage, and repairs. Retail sales of new
and used boats, engines, trailers, and accessories accounted for
approximately $28.7 billion of such sales in 2007. Annual
retail recreational boating sales were $17.9 billion in the
late 1980s, but declined to a low of $10.3 billion in 1992
based on industry data published by the National Marine
Manufacturers Association. We believe this decline was
attributable to several factors, including a recession, the Gulf
War, and the imposition throughout 1991 and 1992 of a luxury tax
on boats sold at prices in excess of $100,000. The luxury tax
was repealed in 1993, and retail boating sales increased each
year thereafter except for 1998, 2003, 2007, and 2008. Based on
the current challenging retail environment, we believe
recreational boat sales may decline in 2009 as well.
The recreational boat retail market remains highly fragmented
with little consolidation having occurred to date and consists
of numerous boat retailers, most of which are small companies
owned by individuals that operate in a single market and provide
varying degrees of merchandising, professional management, and
customer service. We believe that many boat retailers are
encountering increased pressure from boat manufacturers to
improve their levels of service and systems, increased
competition from larger national retailers in certain product
lines, and, in certain cases, business succession issues.
Strategy
Our goal is to enhance our position as the nations leading
recreational boat dealer. Key elements of our strategy include
the following.
Emphasizing Customer Satisfaction and
Loyalty. We seek to achieve a high level of
customer satisfaction and establish long-term customer loyalty
by creating an overall enjoyable boating experience beginning
with a hassle-free purchase process. We further enhance and
simplify the purchase process by
6
helping to arrange financing and insurance at our retail
locations with competitive terms and streamlined turnaround. We
offer the customer a thorough in-water orientation of boat
operations where available, as well as ongoing boat safety,
maintenance, and use seminars and demonstrations for the
customers entire family. We also continue our customer
service after the sale by leading and sponsoring MarineMax
Getaways! group boating trips to various destinations,
rendezvous gatherings, and on-the-water organized events to
provide our customers with pre-arranged opportunities to enjoy
the pleasures of the boating lifestyle. We also endeavor to
provide superior maintenance and repair services, often through
mobile service at the customers wet slip and with extended
service department hours and emergency service availability,
that minimize the hassles of boat maintenance.
Achieving Operating Efficiencies and
Synergies. We strive to increase the operating
efficiencies of and achieve certain synergies among our
dealerships in order to enhance internal growth and
profitability. We centralize various aspects of certain
administrative functions at the corporate level, such as
accounting, finance, insurance coverage, employee benefits,
marketing, strategic planning, legal support, purchasing and
distribution, and management information systems. Centralization
of these functions reduces duplicative expenses and permits the
dealerships to benefit from a level of scale and expertise that
would otherwise be unavailable to each dealership individually.
We also seek to realize cost savings from reduced inventory
carrying costs as a result of purchasing boat inventories on a
national level and directing boats to dealership locations that
can more readily sell such boats; lower financing costs through
our credit sources; and volume purchase discounts and rebates
for certain marine products, supplies, and advertising. The
ability of our retail locations to offer the complementary
services of our other retail locations, such as offering
customer excursion opportunities, providing maintenance and
repair services at the customers boat location, and giving
access to a larger inventory, increases the competitiveness of
each retail location. By centralizing these types of activities,
our store managers have more time to focus on the customer and
the development of their teams.
Promoting Brand Name Recognition and the MarineMax
Connection. We are promoting our brand name
recognition to take advantage of our status as the nations
only coast-to-coast marine retailer. This strategy also
recognizes that many existing and potential customers who reside
in Northern markets and vacation for substantial periods in
Southern markets will prefer to purchase and service their boats
from the same well-known company. We refer to this strategy as
the MarineMax Connection. As a result, our signage
emphasizes the MarineMax name at each of our locations, and we
conduct national advertising in various print and other media.
Emphasizing Best Practices. We emphasize the
best practices developed by us and our acquired
dealers as appropriate throughout our locations. As an example,
we follow a no-haggle sales approach at each of our dealerships.
Under the MarineMax Value-Price approach, we sell our boats at
posted prices, generally representing a discount from the
manufacturers suggested retail price, thereby eliminating
the anxieties of price negotiations that occur in most boat
purchases. In addition, we adopt, where beneficial, the best
practices developed by us and our acquired dealers in terms of
location, design, layout, product purchases, maintenance and
repair services (including extended service hours and mobile or
dockside services), product mix, employee training, and customer
education and services.
Offering Additional Products and Services, Including Those
Involving Higher Profit Margins. We plan to
continue to offer additional product lines and services
throughout our dealerships or, when appropriate, in selected
dealerships. We are offering throughout our dealerships product
lines that previously have been offered only at certain of our
locations. We also may obtain additional product lines through
the acquisition of distribution rights directly from
manufacturers and the acquisition of dealerships with
distribution rights. We have increased our used boat sales and
yacht brokerage services through an increased emphasis on these
activities, cooperative efforts among our dealerships, and the
use of the Internet. We also plan to continue to grow our
financing and insurance, parts and accessories, service, and
boat storage businesses to better serve our customers and
thereby increase revenue and improve profitability of these
higher margin businesses.
Pursuing Strategic Acquisitions. We capitalize
upon the significant consolidation opportunities available in
the highly fragmented recreational boat dealer industry by
acquiring independent dealers and improving their performance
and profitability through the implementation of our operating
strategies. The
7
primary acquisition focus is on well-established, high-end
recreational boat dealers in geographic markets not currently
served by us, particularly geographic markets with strong
boating demographics, such as areas within the coastal states
and the Great Lakes region. We also may seek to acquire boat
dealers that, while located in attractive geographic markets,
have not been able to realize favorable market share or
profitability and that can benefit substantially from our
systems and operating strategies. We may expand our range of
product lines, service offerings, and market penetration by
acquiring companies that distribute recreational boat product
lines or boating-related services different from those we
currently offer. As a result of our considerable industry
experience and relationships, we believe we are well positioned
to identify and evaluate acquisition candidates and assess their
growth prospects, the quality of their management teams, their
local reputation with customers, and the suitability of their
locations. We believe we are regarded as an attractive acquirer
by boat dealers because of (1) the historical performance
and the experience and reputation of our management team within
the industry; (2) our decentralized operating strategy,
which generally enables the managers of an acquired dealer to
continue their involvement in dealership operations;
(3) the ability of management and employees of an acquired
dealer to participate in our growth and expansion through
potential stock ownership and career advancement opportunities;
and (4) the ability to offer liquidity to the owners of
acquired dealers through the receipt of common stock or cash. We
have entered into an agreement regarding acquisitions with the
Sea Ray Division of Brunswick. Under the agreement, acquisitions
of Sea Ray dealers will be mutually agreed upon by us and Sea
Ray with reasonable efforts to be made to include a balance of
Sea Ray dealers that have been successful and those that have
not been. The agreement provides that Sea Ray will not
unreasonably withhold its consent to any proposed acquisition of
a Sea Ray dealer by us, subject to the conditions set forth in
the agreement, as further described in
Business Brunswick Agreement Relating to
Acquisitions.
Opening New Facilities. We intend to continue
to establish additional retail facilities in our existing and
new markets. We believe that the demographics of our existing
geographic territories support the opening of additional
facilities, and we have opened 26 new retail facilities,
excluding those opened on a temporary basis for a specific
purpose, since our formation in January 1998. We also plan to
reach new customers through various innovative retail formats
developed by us, such as mall stores and floating retail
facilities. Our mall store concept is unique to the boating
industry and is designed to draw mall traffic, thereby providing
exposure to boating for the non-boating public as well as
displaying our new product offerings to boating enthusiasts.
Floating retail facilities place the sales facility, with a
customer reception area and sales offices, on or anchored to a
dock in a marina and use adjacent boat slips to display our new
and used boats in areas of high boating activity. We continually
monitor the performance of our retail locations and close retail
locations that do not meet our expectations or that were opened
for a specific purpose that is no longer relevant. Based on
these factors since March 1998, we have closed 25 retail
locations, excluding those opened on a temporary basis for a
specific purpose, including 12 in fiscal 2008 because of
depressed economic conditions.
Emphasizing Employee Training and
Development. We devote substantial efforts to
train our employees to understand our core retail philosophies,
which focus on making the purchase of a boat and its subsequent
use as hassle-free and enjoyable as possible. Through our
MarineMax University, or MMU, we teach our retail philosophies
to existing and new employees at various locations and online,
through MMU-online. MMU is a modularized and instructor-led
educational program that focuses on our retailing philosophies
and provides instruction on such matters as the sales process,
customer service, F&I, accounting, leadership, and human
resources.
Utilization of the Internet. Our web
initiative, www.MarineMax.com, provides customers with the
ability to learn more about our company and our products. Our
website generates direct sales and provides our stores with
leads to potential customers for new and used boats and
brokerage services. We also plan to expand our ability to offer
financing and parts and accessories on our website.
Operating with Decentralized Management. We
maintain a generally decentralized approach to the operational
management of our dealerships. The decentralized management
approach takes advantage of the extensive experience of local
managers, enabling them to implement policies and make
decisions, including the appropriate product mix, based on the
needs of the local market. Local management authority also
fosters responsive customer service and promotes long-term
community and customer relationships. In addition, the
8
centralization of certain administrative functions at the
corporate level enhances the ability of local managers to focus
their efforts on day-to-day dealership operations and the
customers.
Utilizing Technology Throughout Operations. We
believe that our management information system, which currently
is being utilized by each of our dealerships and was developed
over a number of years through cooperative efforts with a common
vendor, enhances our ability to integrate successfully the
operations of our dealerships and future acquired dealers. The
system facilitates the interchange of information and enhances
cross-selling opportunities throughout our company. The system
integrates each level of operations on a company-wide basis,
including purchasing, inventory, receivables, financial
reporting, budgeting, and sales management. The system also
provides sales representatives with prospect and customer
information that aids them in tracking the status of their
contacts with prospects, automatically generates
follow-up
correspondence to such prospects, facilitates the availability
of boats company-wide, locates boats needed to satisfy
particular customer requests, and monitors the maintenance and
service needs of customers boats. Our representatives also
utilize the computer system to assist in arranging customer
financing and insurance packages. Our managers use a web-based
tool to access essentially all financial and operational data
from anywhere at any time.
Products
and Services
We offer new and used recreational boats and related marine
products, including engines, trailers, parts, and accessories.
While we sell a broad range of new and used boats, we focus on
premium brand products. In addition, we assist in arranging
related boat financing, insurance, and extended service
contracts; provide boat maintenance and repair services; provide
boat brokerage services; and offer slip and storage
accommodations.
New
Boat Sales
We primarily sell recreational boats, including pleasure boats
and fishing boats. The principal products we offer are
manufactured by Brunswick, the leading worldwide manufacturer of
recreational boats, including Sea Ray pleasure boats, Boston
Whaler fishing boats, Cabo Yachts, Hatteras Yachts, and Meridian
Yachts. In fiscal 2008, we derived approximately 49% of our
revenue from the sale of new boats manufactured by Brunswick. We
believe that we represented approximately 10% of all of
Brunswicks marine product sales during that period.
Certain of our dealerships also sell luxury yachts, fishing
boats, and pontoon boats provided by other manufacturers,
including Italy-based Azimut. During fiscal 2008, new boat sales
accounted for approximately 63.5% of our revenue.
We offer recreational boats in most market segments, but have a
particular focus on premium quality pleasure boats and yachts as
reflected by our fiscal 2008 average new boat sales price of
approximately $126,000, an increase of approximately 10% from
fiscal 2007, compared with an estimated industry average
calendar 2007 selling price of approximately $35,000 based on
industry data published by the National Marine Manufacturers
Association. Given our locations in some of the more affluent,
offshore boating areas in the United States and emphasis on high
levels of customer service, we sell a relatively higher
percentage of large recreational boats, such as mega-yachts,
yachts, and sport cruisers. We believe that the product lines we
offer are among the highest quality within their respective
market segments, with well-established trade-name recognition
and reputations for quality, performance, and styling.
9
The following table is illustrative of the range and approximate
manufacturer suggested retail price range of new boats that we
currently offer, but is not all inclusive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturer Suggested
|
|
Product Line and Trade Name
|
|
Overall Length
|
|
|
Retail Price Range
|
|
|
Motor Yachts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hatteras Motor Yachts
|
|
|
56 to 100
|
|
|
$
|
3,000,000 to $10,000,000
|
+
|
Azimut
|
|
|
39 to 116
|
|
|
|
790,000 to 12,000,000
|
+
|
Convertibles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hatteras Convertibles
|
|
|
54 to 101
|
|
|
|
2,300,000 to 11,000,000
|
+
|
Cabo
|
|
|
32 to 52
|
|
|
|
475,000 to 2,000,000
|
+
|
Pleasure Boats
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sea Ray
|
|
|
17 to 60
|
|
|
|
21,000 to 2,500,000
|
|
Meridian
|
|
|
34 to 59
|
|
|
|
300,000 to 1,600,000
|
|
Fishing Boats
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boston Whaler
|
|
|
11 to 36
|
|
|
|
8,000 to 325,000
|
|
Grady White
|
|
|
18 to 36
|
|
|
|
40,000 to 500,000
|
|
Motor Yachts. Hatteras Yachts and Azimut are
two of the worlds premier yacht builders. The motor yacht
product lines typically include state-of-the-art designs with
live-aboard luxuries. Hatteras offers a flybridge with extensive
guest seating; covered aft deck, which may be fully or partially
enclosed, providing the boater with additional living space; an
elegant salon; and multiple staterooms for accommodations.
Azimut yachts are known for their Americanized open layout with
Italian design, powerful performance, and accuracy. The
luxurious interiors of Azimut yachts are accented by windows and
multiple accommodations that have been designed for comfort.
Convertibles. Hatteras Yachts and Cabo Yachts
are two of the worlds premier convertible yacht builders
and offer state-of-the-art designs with live-aboard luxuries.
Convertibles are primarily fishing vessels, which are well
equipped to meet the needs of even the most serious
tournament-class competitor. Hatteras features interiors that
offer luxurious salon/galley arrangements, multiple staterooms
with private heads, and a cockpit that includes a bait and
tackle center, fishbox, and freezer. Cabo is known for spacious
cockpits and accessibility to essentials, such as bait chests,
livewells, bait prep centers, and tackle lockers. Cabo interiors
offer elegance, highlighted by teak woodwork, halogen lighting,
and ample storage areas.
Pleasure Boats. Sea Ray and Meridian pleasure
boats target both the luxury and the family recreational boating
markets and come in a variety of configurations to suit each
customers particular recreational boating style. Sea Ray
sport yachts and yachts serve the luxury segment of the
recreational boating market and include top-of-the line living
accommodations with a salon, a fully equipped galley, and
multiple staterooms. Sea Ray sport yachts and yachts are
available in cabin, bridge cockpit, and cruiser models. Sea Ray
sport boat and sport cruiser models are designed for performance
and dependability to meet family recreational needs and include
many of the features and accommodations of Sea Rays sport
yacht and yacht models. Meridian sport yachts and yachts are
known for their solid performance and thoughtful use of space
with
360-degree
views and spacious salon, galley, and stateroom accommodations.
Meridian sport yachts and yachts are available in sedan,
motoryacht, and pilothouse models. All Sea Ray and Meridian
pleasure boats feature custom instrumentation that may include
an electronics package; various hull, deck, and cockpit designs
that can include a swim platform; bow pulpit and raised bridge;
and various amenities, such as swivel bucket helm seats, lounge
seats, sun pads, wet bars, built-in ice chests, and refreshment
centers. Most Sea Ray and Meridian pleasure boats feature
Mercury or MerCruiser engines.
Fishing Boats. The fishing boats we offer,
such as Boston Whaler and Grady White, range from entry level
models to advanced models designed for fishing and water sports
in lakes, bays, and off-shore waters, with cabins with limited
live-aboard capability. The fishing boats typically feature
livewells, in-deck fishboxes, rodholders, rigging stations,
cockpit coaming pads, and fresh and saltwater washdowns.
10
Used
Boat Sales
We sell used versions of the new makes and models we offer and,
to a lesser extent, used boats of other makes and models
generally taken as trade-ins. During fiscal 2008, used boat
sales accounted for approximately 20.5% of our revenue, and
approximately 72% of the used boats we sold were Brunswick
models.
Our used boat sales depend on our ability to source a supply of
high-quality used boats at attractive prices. We acquire
substantially all of our used boats through customer trade-ins.
We intend to continue to increase our used boat business as a
result of the availability of quality used boats generated from
our new boat sales efforts, the increasing number of used boats
that are well-maintained through our service initiatives,
including our Premium Certified Pre-Owned Program, our ability
to market used boats throughout our combined dealership network
to match used boat demand, and the experience of our yacht
brokerage operations. Additionally, substantially all of our
used boat inventory is posted on our website, www.MarineMax.com,
which expands the awareness and availability of our products to
a large audience of boating enthusiasts.
To further enhance our used boat sales, we launched a Premium
Certified Pre-Owned Program, or PCPO, in fiscal 2008. Generally,
PCPO boats are less than four years old, have passed a 150+
point inspection, and carry a one year warranty. Additionally,
we offer the Sea Ray Legacy warranty plan available for used Sea
Ray boats less than six years old. The Legacy plan applies to
each qualifying used Sea Ray boat, which has passed a 48-point
inspection, and provides protection against failure of most
mechanical parts for up to three years. We believe these
programs enhance our sales of used Sea Ray boats by motivating
purchasers of used Sea Ray boats to complete their purchases
through our Sea Ray dealerships.
Marine
Engines, Related Marine Equipment, and Boating
Accessories
We offer marine engines and propellers, substantially all of
which are manufactured by Mercury Marine, a division of
Brunswick. We sell marine engines and propellers primarily to
retail customers as replacements for their existing engines or
propellers. Mercury Marine has introduced various new engine
models that reduce engine emissions to comply with current
Environmental Protection Agency requirements. See
Business Environmental and Other Regulatory
Issues. An industry leader for almost six decades, Mercury
Marine specializes in state-of-the-art marine propulsion systems
and accessories. Many of our dealerships have been recognized by
Mercury Marine as Premier Service Dealers. This
designation is generally awarded based on meeting certain
standards and qualifications.
We also sell related marine parts and accessories, including
oils, lubricants, steering and control systems, corrosion
control products, engine care, maintenance, and service products
(primarily Mercury Marines Quicksilver line);
high-performance accessories (such as propellers) and
instruments; and a complete line of boating accessories,
including life jackets, inflatables, and water sports equipment.
We also offer novelty items, such as shirts, caps, and license
plates bearing the manufacturers or dealers logo.
The sale of marine engines, related marine equipment, and
boating accessories accounted for approximately 4.4% of our
fiscal 2008 revenue.
Maintenance,
Repair, and Storage Services
Providing customers with professional, prompt maintenance and
repair services is critical to our sales efforts and contributes
to our success. We provide maintenance and repair services at
most of our retail locations, with extended service hours at
certain of our locations. In addition, in many of our markets,
we provide mobile maintenance and repair services at the
location of the customers boat. We believe that this
service commitment is a competitive advantage in the markets in
which we compete and is critical to our efforts to provide a
trouble-free boating experience. To further this commitment, in
certain of our markets, we have opened stand-alone maintenance
and repair facilities in locations that are more convenient for
our customers and that increase the availability of such
services. We also believe that our maintenance and repair
services contribute to strong customer relationships and that
our emphasis on preventative maintenance and quality service
increases the potential supply of well-maintained boats for our
used boat sales.
11
We perform both warranty and non-warranty repair services, with
the cost of warranty work reimbursed by the manufacturer in
accordance with the manufacturers warranty reimbursement
program. For warranty work, most manufacturers, including
Brunswick, reimburse a percentage of the dealers posted
service labor rates, with the percentage varying depending on
the dealers customer satisfaction index rating and
attendance at service training courses. We derive the majority
of our warranty revenue from Brunswick products, as Brunswick
products comprise the majority of products sold. Certain other
manufacturers reimburse warranty work at a fixed amount per
repair. Because boat manufacturers permit warranty work to be
performed only at authorized dealerships, we receive
substantially all of the warranted maintenance and repair work
required for the new boats we sell. The third-party extended
warranty contracts we offer also result in an ongoing demand for
our maintenance and repair services for the duration of the term
of the extended warranty contract.
Our maintenance and repair services are performed by
manufacturer-trained and certified service technicians. In
charging for our mechanics labor, many of our dealerships
use a variable rate structure designed to reflect the difficulty
and sophistication of different types of repairs. The percentage
markups on parts are similarly based on manufacturer suggested
prices and market conditions for different parts.
At many of our locations, we offer boat storage services,
including in-water slip storage and inside and outside land
storage. These storage services are offered at competitive
market rates and include in-season and winter storage.
Maintenance, repair, and storage services accounted for
approximately 6.6% of our revenue during fiscal 2008. This
includes warranty and non-warranty services.
F&I
Products
At each of our retail locations, we offer our customers the
ability to finance new or used boat purchases and to purchase
extended service contracts and arrange insurance coverage,
including boat property, credit life, and accident, disability,
and casualty insurance coverage (collectively,
F&I).
We have relationships with various national marine product
lenders under which the lenders purchase retail installment
contracts evidencing retail sales of boats and other marine
products that are originated by us in accordance with existing
pre-sale agreements between us and the lenders. These
arrangements permit us to receive a portion of the finance
charges expected to be earned on the retail installment contract
based on a variety of factors, including the credit standing of
the buyer, the annual percentage rate of the contract charged to
the buyer, and the lenders then current minimum required
annual percentage rate charged to the buyer on the contract.
This participation is subject to repayment by us if the buyer
prepays the contract or defaults within a designated time
period, usually 90 to 180 days. To the extent required by
applicable state law, our dealerships are licensed to originate
and sell retail installment contracts financing the sale of
boats and other marine products.
We also offer third-party extended service contracts under
which, for a predetermined price, we provide all designated
services pursuant to the service contract guidelines during the
contract term at no additional charge to the customer above a
deductible. While we sell all new boats with the boat
manufacturers standard hull warranty of generally five
years and standard engine warranty of generally one year,
extended service contracts provide additional coverage beyond
the time frame or scope of the manufacturers warranty.
Purchasers of used boats generally are able to purchase an
extended service contract, even if the selected boat is no
longer covered by the manufacturers warranty. Generally,
we receive a fee for arranging an extended service contract.
Most required services under the contracts are provided by us
and paid for by the third-party contract holder.
We also are able to assist our customers with the opportunity to
purchase credit life insurance, accident and disability
insurance, and property and casualty insurance. Credit life
insurance policies provide for repayment of the boat financing
contract if the purchaser dies while the contract is
outstanding. Accident and disability insurance policies provide
for payment of the monthly contract obligation during any period
in which the buyer is disabled. Property and casualty insurance
covers loss or damage to the boat. We do not act as an insurance
broker or agent or issue insurance policies on behalf of
insurers. We, however, provide marketing activities and other
related services to insurance companies and brokers for which we
receive marketing fees. One of our strategies is to generate
increased marketing fees by offering more competitive insurance
products.
12
During fiscal 2008, fee income generated from F&I products
accounted for approximately 3.6% of our revenue. We believe that
our customers ability to obtain competitive financing
quickly and easily at our dealerships complements our ability to
sell new and used boats. We also believe our ability to provide
customer-tailored financing on a
same-day
basis gives us an advantage over many of our competitors,
particularly smaller competitors that lack the resources to
arrange boat financing at their dealerships or that do not
generate sufficient volume to attract the diversity of financing
sources that are available to us.
Brokerage
Services
Through employees or subcontractors that are licensed boat or
yacht brokers, we offer boat or yacht brokerage services at most
of our retail locations. For a commission, we offer for sale
brokered boats or yachts, listing them on the BUC
system, advising our other retail locations of their
availability through our integrated computer system, and posting
them on our web site, www.MarineMax.com. The BUC system, which
is similar to a real estate multiple listing service, is a
national boat or yacht listing service of approximately 900
brokers maintained by BUC International. Often sales are
co-brokered, with the commission split between the buying and
selling brokers. We believe that our access to potential used
boat customers and methods of listing and advertising
customers brokered boats or yachts is more extensive than
is typical among brokers. In addition to generating revenue from
brokerage commissions, our brokerage services also enable us to
offer a broad array of used boats or yachts without increasing
related inventory costs. During fiscal 2008, brokerage services
accounted for approximately 1.4% of our revenue.
Our brokerage customers generally receive the same high level of
customer service as our new and used boat customers. Our
waterfront retail locations enable in-water demonstrations of an
on-site
brokered boat. Our maintenance and repair services, including
mobile service, also are generally available to our brokerage
customers. The purchaser of a boat brokered through us also can
take advantage of MarineMax Getaways! weekend and day trips and
other rendezvous gatherings and in-water events, as well as boat
operation and safety seminars. We believe that the array of
services we offer are unique in the brokerage business.
Retail
Locations
We sell our recreational boats and other marine products and
offer our related boat services through 77 retail locations in
Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware,
Florida, Georgia, Maryland, Minnesota, Missouri, Nevada, New
Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Rhode Island,
South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Utah. Each retail
location generally includes an indoor showroom (including some
of the industrys largest indoor boat showrooms) and an
outside area for displaying boat inventories, a business office
to assist customers in arranging financing and insurance, and
maintenance and repair facilities.
Many of our retail locations are waterfront properties on some
of the nations most popular boating locations, including
the Delta Basin and Mission Bay in California; Norwalk Harbor in
Connecticut; multiple locations on the Intracoastal Waterway,
the Atlantic Ocean, Biscayne Bay, Boca Ciega Bay, Naples Bay
(next to the Gulf of Mexico), Tampa Bay, and the Caloosahatchee
River in Florida; Lake Lanier and Lake Altoona in Georgia;
Chesapeake Bay in Maryland; Leech Lake and the St. Croix
River in Minnesota; Lake of the Ozarks, Table Rock Lake, and the
Mississippi River in Missouri; Barnegat Bay, the Delaware River,
the Hudson River, Lake Hopatcong, Little Egg Harbor, and the
Manasquan River in New Jersey; Great Sound Bay, the Hudson
River, and Huntington Harbor in New York; the Intracoastal
Waterway in North Carolina; Lake Erie in Ohio; Grand Lake in
Oklahoma; Myrtle Beach in South Carolina; Tennessee River in
Tennessee; and Clear Lake, and Lake Lewisville in Texas. Our
waterfront retail locations, most of which include marina-type
facilities and docks at which we display our boats, are easily
accessible to the boating populace, serve as in-water showrooms,
and enable the sales force to give customers immediate in-water
demonstrations of various boat models. Most of our other
locations are in close proximity to water.
Operations
Dealership
Operations and Management
We have adopted a generally decentralized approach to the
operational management of our dealerships. While certain
administrative functions are centralized at the corporate level,
local management is primarily responsible for
13
the day-to-day operations of the retail locations. Each retail
location is managed by a store manager, who oversees the
day-to-day operations, personnel, and financial performance of
the individual store, subject to the direction of a regional
manager, who generally has responsibility for the retail
locations within a specified geographic region. Typically, each
retail location also has a staff consisting of an F&I
manager, a parts manager, and a service manager, sales
representatives, maintenance and repair technicians, and various
support personnel.
We attempt to attract and retain quality employees at our retail
locations by providing them with ongoing training to enhance
sales professionalism and product knowledge, career advancement
opportunities within a larger company, and favorable benefit
packages. We maintain a formal training program, called
MarineMax University or MMU, which provides training for
employees in all aspects of our operations. Training sessions
are held at our various regional locations covering a variety of
topics. MMU-online offers various modules over the Internet.
Highly trained, professional sales representatives are an
important factor to our successful sales efforts. These sales
representatives are trained at MMU to recognize the importance
of fostering an enjoyable sales process, to educate customers on
the operation and use of the boats, and to assist customers in
making technical and design decisions in boat purchases. The
overall focus of MMU is to teach our core retailing values,
which focus on customer service.
Sales representatives receive compensation primarily on a
commission basis. Each store manager is a salaried employee with
incentive bonuses based on the performance of the managed
dealership. Maintenance and repair service managers receive
compensation on a salary basis with bonuses based on the
performance of their departments. Our management information
system provides each store and department manager with daily
financial and operational information, enabling them to monitor
their performance on a daily, weekly, and monthly basis. We have
a uniform, fully integrated management information system
serving each of our dealerships.
Sales
and Marketing
Our sales philosophy focuses on selling the pleasures of the
boating lifestyle. We believe that the critical elements of our
sales philosophy include our appealing retail locations,
no-hassle sales approach, highly trained sales representatives,
high level of customer service, emphasis on educating the
customer and the customers family on boat usage, and
providing our customers with opportunities for boating. We
strive to provide superior customer service and support before,
during, and after the sale.
Each retail location offers the customer the opportunity to
evaluate a large variety of new and used boats in a comfortable
and convenient setting. Our full-service retail locations
facilitate a turn-key purchasing process that includes
attractive lender financing packages, extended service
agreements, and insurance. Many of our retail locations are
located on waterfronts and marinas, which attract boating
enthusiasts and enable customers to operate various boats prior
to making a purchase decision.
We sell our boats at posted value prices that generally
represent a discount from the manufacturers suggested
retail price. Our sales approach focuses on customer service by
minimizing customer anxiety associated with price negotiation.
As a part of our sales and marketing efforts, we also
participate in boat shows and in-the-water sales events at area
boating locations, typically held in January and February, in
each of our markets and in certain locations in close proximity
to our markets. These shows and events are normally held at
convention centers or marinas, with area dealers renting space.
Boat shows and other offsite promotions are an important venue
for generating sales orders. The boat shows also generate a
significant amount of interest in our products resulting in boat
sales after the show.
We emphasize customer education through
one-on-one
education by our sales representatives and, at some locations,
our delivery captains, before and after a sale, and through
in-house seminars for the entire family on boat safety, the use
and operation of boats, and product demonstrations. Typically,
one of our delivery captains or the sales representative
delivers the customers boat to an area boating location
and thoroughly instructs the customer about the operation of the
boat, including hands-on instructions for docking and trailering
the boat. To enhance our customer relationships after the sale,
we lead and sponsor MarineMax Getaways! group boating trips to
various destinations, rendezvous gatherings, and on-the-water
organized events that promote the pleasures of the boating
lifestyle. Each company-sponsored event, planned and led by a
company employee, also provides a favorable
14
medium for acclimating new customers to boating, sharing
exciting boating destinations, creating friendships with other
boaters, and enabling us to promote actively new product
offerings to boating enthusiasts.
As a result of our relative size, we believe we have a
competitive advantage within the industry by being able to
conduct an organized and systematic advertising and marketing
effort. Part of our marketing effort includes an integrated
prospect management system that tracks the status of each sales
representatives contacts with a prospect, automatically
generates
follow-up
correspondence, facilitates company-wide availability of a
particular boat or other marine product desired by a customer,
and tracks the maintenance and service needs for the
customers boat.
Suppliers
and Inventory Management
We purchase substantially all of our new boat inventory directly
from manufacturers, which allocate new boats to dealerships
based on the amount of boats sold by the dealership. We also
exchange new boats with other dealers to accommodate customer
demand and to balance inventory.
We purchase new boats and other marine-related products from
Brunswick, which is the worlds largest manufacturer of
marine products, including Sea Ray, Boston Whaler, Cabo,
Hatteras, and Meridian. We also purchase new boats and other
marine related products from other manufacturers, including
Azimut, Grady White, and Tracker Marine. In fiscal 2008, sales
of new Brunswick boats accounted for approximately 49% of our
revenue. No other manufacturer accounted for more than 10% of
our revenue in fiscal 2008. We believe our Sea Ray boat
purchases represented approximately 40% of Sea Rays new
boat sales and approximately 10% of all Brunswick marine product
sales during fiscal 2008.
We have entered into agreements with Brunswick covering Sea Ray
products. The dealer agreements with the Sea Ray division of
Brunswick do not restrict our right to sell any Sea Ray product
lines or competing products. The terms of each dealer agreement
appoints a designated geographical territory for the dealer,
which is exclusive to the dealer so long as the dealer is not in
breach of the material obligations and performance standards
under the agreement and Sea Rays then current material
policies and programs following notice and the expiration of any
applicable cure periods without cure.
Upon the completion of the Surfside-3 acquisition, we became the
exclusive dealer for Azimut-Benetti Groups Azimut product
line in the Northeast United States. The Azimut dealer agreement
provides a geographic territory to promote the product line and
to network with the appropriate clientele through various
independent locations designated for Azimut retail sales.
We typically deal with each of our manufacturers, other than the
Sea Ray division of Brunswick, under an annually renewable,
non-exclusive dealer agreement. Manufacturers generally
establish prices on an annual basis, but may change prices in
their sole discretion. Manufacturers typically discount the cost
of inventory and offer inventory financing assistance during the
manufacturers slow seasons, generally October through
March. To obtain lower cost of inventory, we strive to
capitalize on these manufacturer incentives to take product
delivery during the manufacturers slow seasons. This
permits us to gain pricing advantages and better product
availability during the selling season. Arrangements with
certain other manufacturers may restrict our right to offer some
product lines in certain markets.
We transfer individual boats among our retail locations to fill
customer orders that otherwise might take substantially longer
to fill from the manufacturer. This reduces delays in delivery,
helps us maximize inventory turnover, and assists in minimizing
potential overstock or out-of-stock situations. We actively
monitor our inventory levels to maintain levels appropriate to
meet current anticipated market demands. We are not bound by
contractual agreements governing the amount of inventory that we
must purchase in any year from any manufacturer, but the failure
to purchase at agreed upon levels may result in the loss of
certain manufacturer incentives. We participate in numerous
end-of-summer manufacturer boat shows, which manufacturers
sponsor to sell off their remaining inventory at reduced costs
before the introduction of new model year products, typically
beginning in July.
Inventory
Financing
Marine manufacturers customarily provide interest assistance
programs to retailers. The interest assistance varies by
manufacturer and may include periods of free financing or
reduced interest rate programs. The interest
15
assistance may be paid directly to the retailer or the financial
institution depending on the arrangements the manufacturer has
established. We believe that our financing arrangements with
manufacturers are standard within the industry.
In March 2003, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) of the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) revised certain
provisions of its previously reached conclusions on
EITF 02-16,
Accounting by a Customer (Including a Reseller) for
Certain Consideration Received from a Vendor
(EITF 02-16),
and provided additional transitional guidance. We determined
that
EITF 02-16
impacts the way we account for interest assistance received from
vendors beginning after July 1, 2003 with the renewal of
and amendments to our dealer agreements with the manufacturers
of our products.
EITF 02-16
most significantly requires us to classify interest assistance
received from manufacturers as a reduction of inventory cost and
related cost of sales as opposed to netting the assistance
against our interest expense incurred with our lenders.
During December 2008, we entered into an amendment of our second
amended and restated credit and security agreement originally
entered into in June 2006. The amendment modified the amount of
borrowing availability, inventory advance rates, provides the
ability to advance $20 million against certain real estate,
financial covenants, and collateral under the credit facility.
With the amendment, the credit facility provides us a line of
credit with asset-based borrowing availability of up to
$425 million, stepping down to $350 million by
September 30, 2009 and $300 million by May 31,
2010. However, the amendment also contains a provision that
allows us to obtain commitments from existing or additional
lenders, thereby increasing the capacity of the credit facility,
up to $500 million. Amounts under the credit facility may
be used for working capital and inventory financing, with the
amount of permissible borrowings determined pursuant to a
borrowing base formula. The credit facility also permits
approved-vendor floorplan borrowings of up to $20 million.
The amendment replaces the fixed charge coverage ratio with an
interest coverage ratio for years ending on or after
September 30, 2010; it includes a cumulative earnings
before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, or
EBITDA (as defined in the agreement), covenant for each quarter;
it modifies the current ratio requirements; it reduces the
amount of allowable capital expenditures; it requires approval
for any stock repurchases; and it requires approval for
acquisitions. The amended credit facility provides for interest
at the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 425 basis
points through September 30, 2010 and thereafter at LIBOR
plus 150 to 400 basis points, pursuant to a performance
pricing grid based upon our interest coverage ratio, as defined.
Borrowings under the credit facility are secured by our
inventory, accounts receivable, equipment, furniture, fixtures,
and real estate. The amended credit facility matures in May
2011, with two one-year renewal options, subject to lender
approval.
At September 30, 2008, we owed an aggregate of
$372 million under our revolving credit facility and were
in compliance with all of the credit facility covenants.
Advances under the facility accrued interest at a rate of 4.0%
as of September 30, 2008, and the facility provided us with
an additional net borrowing availability of $84 million.
All indebtedness associated with our real estate holdings were
repaid during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008. The
December 2008 amendment, if in place at September 30, 2008,
would have reduced the available borrowings under the facility
to approximately $38 million, excluding $20 million of
potential real estate advances, from $84 million and
increased the interest rate by approximately 275 basis
points.
Management
Information System
We believe that our management information system, which
currently is being utilized by each of our dealerships and was
developed over a number of years through cooperative efforts
with the vendor, enhances our ability to integrate successfully
the operations of our dealerships and future acquisitions,
facilitates the interchange of information, and enhances
cross-selling opportunities throughout our company. The system
integrates each level of operations on a company-wide basis,
including purchasing, inventory, receivables, financial
reporting and budgeting, and sales management. The system
enables us to monitor each dealerships operations in order
to identify quickly areas requiring additional focus and to
manage inventory. The system also provides sales representatives
with prospect and customer information that aids them in
tracking the status of their contacts with prospects,
automatically generates
follow-up
correspondence to such prospects, facilitates the availability
of a particular boat company-wide, locates boats needed to
satisfy a particular customer request, and monitors the
maintenance and service needs of customers boats. Company
representatives also utilize the system to assist in
16
arranging financing and insurance packages. In October 2002,
Brunswick acquired the vendor of our management information
system.
Brunswick
Agreement Relating to Acquisitions
We and the Sea Ray Division of Brunswick are parties to an
agreement extending through December 2015 that provides a
process for the acquisition of additional Sea Ray boat dealers
that desire to be acquired by us. Under the agreement,
acquisitions of Sea Ray dealers will be mutually agreed upon by
us and Sea Ray with reasonable efforts to be made to include a
balance of Sea Ray dealers that have been successful and those
that have not been. The agreement provides that Sea Ray will not
unreasonably withhold its consent to any proposed acquisition of
a Sea Ray dealer by us, subject to the conditions set forth in
the agreement. Among other things, the agreement provides for us
to provide Sea Ray with a business plan for each proposed
acquisition, including historical financial and five-year
projected financial information regarding the acquisition
candidate; marketing and advertising plans; service capabilities
and managerial and staff personnel; information regarding the
ability of the candidate to achieve performance standards within
designated periods; and information regarding the success of our
previous acquisitions of Sea Ray dealers. The agreement also
contemplates Sea Ray reaching a good faith determination whether
the acquisition would be in its best interest based on our
dedication and focus of resources on the Sea Ray brand and Sea
Rays consideration of any adverse effects that the
approval would have on the resulting territory configuration and
adjacent or other dealers sales and the absence of any violation
of applicable laws or rights granted by Sea Ray to others.
Dealer
Agreements with Brunswick
Brunswick, through its Sea Ray division, and we, through our
dealerships, are parties to Sales and Service Agreements
relating to Sea Ray products extending through December 2015.
Each of these dealer agreements appoints one of our dealerships
as a dealer for the retail sale, display, and servicing of
designated Sea Ray products, parts, and accessories currently or
in the future sold by Sea Ray. Each dealer agreement designates
a designated geographical territory for the dealer, which is
exclusive to the dealer as long as the dealer is not in breach
of the material obligations and performance standards under the
agreement and Sea Rays then current material policies and
programs following notice and the expiration of any applicable
cure periods without cure. Each dealer agreement also specifies
retail locations, which the dealer may not close, change, or add
to without the prior written consent of Sea Ray, provided that
Sea Ray may not unreasonably withhold its consent. Each dealer
agreement also restricts the dealer from selling, advertising
(other than in recognized and established marine publications),
soliciting for sale, or offering for resale any Sea Ray products
outside its territory without the prior written consent of Sea
Ray as long as similar restrictions also apply to all domestic
Sea Ray dealers selling comparable Sea Ray products. In
addition, each dealer agreement provides for the lowest product
prices charged by Sea Ray from time to time to other domestic
Sea Ray dealers, subject to the dealer meeting all the
requirements and conditions of Sea Rays applicable
programs and the right of Sea Ray in good faith to charge lesser
prices to other dealers to meet existing competitive
circumstances, for unusual and non-ordinary business
circumstances, or for limited duration promotional programs.
Among other things, each dealer agreement requires the dealer to
|
|
|
|
|
devote its best efforts to promote, display, advertise, and sell
Sea Ray products at each of its retail locations in accordance
with the agreement and applicable laws;
|
|
|
|
display and utilize at each of its retail locations signs,
graphics, and image elements with Sea Rays identification
that positively reflect the Sea Ray image and promote the retail
sale of Sea Ray products;
|
|
|
|
purchase and maintain at all times sufficient inventory of
current Sea Ray products to meet the reasonable demand of
customers at each of its locations and to meet Sea Rays
applicable minimum inventory requirements;
|
|
|
|
maintain at each retail location, or at another acceptable
location, a service department that is properly staffed and
equipped to service Sea Ray products promptly and professionally
and to maintain parts and supplies to service Sea Ray products
properly on a timely basis;
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
perform all necessary product rigging, installation, and
inspection services prior to delivery to purchasers in
accordance with Sea Rays standards and perform post-sale
services of all Sea Ray products sold by the dealer and brought
to the dealer for service;
|
|
|
|
provide or arrange for warranty and service work for Sea Ray
products regardless of the selling dealer or condition of sale;
|
|
|
|
exercise reasonable efforts to address circumstances in which
another dealer has made a sale to an original retail purchaser
who permanently resides within the dealers territory where
such sale is contrary to the selling dealers Sales and
Service Agreement;
|
|
|
|
provide appropriate instructions to purchasers on how to obtain
warranty and service work from the dealer;
|
|
|
|
furnish product purchasers with Sea Rays limited warranty
on new products and with information and training as to the safe
and proper operation and maintenance of the products;
|
|
|
|
assist Sea Ray in performing any product defect and recall
campaigns;
|
|
|
|
achieve sales performance in accordance with fair and reasonable
standards and sales levels established by Sea Ray in
consultation with the dealer based on factors such as
population, sales potential, market share percentage of Sea Ray
products sold in the territory compared with competitive
products sold in the territory, local economic conditions,
competition, past sales history, number of retail locations, and
other special circumstances that may affect the sale of Sea Ray
products or the dealer, in each case consistent with standards
established for all domestic Sea Ray dealers selling comparable
products;
|
|
|
|
provide designated financial information that are truthful and
accurate;
|
|
|
|
conduct its business in a manner that preserves and enhances the
reputation and goodwill of both Sea Ray and the dealer for
providing quality products and services;
|
|
|
|
maintain the financial ability to purchase and maintain on hand
and display Sea Rays current product models;
|
|
|
|
maintain customer service ratings in compliance with Sea
Rays criteria;
|
|
|
|
comply with those dealers obligations that may be imposed
or established by Sea Ray applicable to all domestic Sea Ray
dealers;
|
|
|
|
maintain a financial condition that is adequate to satisfy and
perform its obligations under the agreement;
|
|
|
|
achieve within designated time periods or maintain motor dealer
status (which is Sea Rays highest performance status) or
other applicable certification requirements as established from
time to time by Sea Ray applicable to all domestic Sea Ray
dealers;
|
|
|
|
notify Sea Ray of the addition or deletion of any retail
locations;
|
|
|
|
sell Sea Ray products only on the basis of Sea Rays
published applicable limited warranty and make no other warranty
or representations concerning the limited warranty, expressed or
implied, either verbally or in writing;
|
|
|
|
provide timely warranty service on all Sea Ray products
presented to the dealer by purchasers in accordance with Sea
Rays then current warranty program applicable to all
domestic Sea Ray dealers selling comparable Sea Ray
products; and
|
|
|
|
provide Sea Ray with access to the dealers books and
records and such other information as Sea Ray may reasonably
request to verify the accuracy of the warranty claims submitted
to Sea Ray by the dealer with regard to such warranty claims;
|
Sea Ray has agreed to indemnify each of our dealers against any
losses to third parties resulting from Sea Rays negligent
acts or omissions involving the design or manufacture of any of
its products or any breach by it of the agreement. Each of our
dealers has agreed to indemnify Sea Ray against any losses to
third parties resulting from the dealers negligent acts or
omissions involving the dealers application, use, or
repair of Sea Ray products,
18
statements or representation not specifically authorized by Sea
Ray, the installation of any after market components or any
other modification or alteration of Sea Ray products, and any
breach by the dealer of the agreement.
Each dealer agreement may be terminated
|
|
|
|
|
by Sea Ray, upon 60 days prior written notice, if the
dealer fails or refuses to place a minimum stocking order of the
next model years products in accordance with requirements
applicable to all Sea Ray dealers generally or fails to meet its
financial obligations as they become due to Sea Ray or to the
dealers lenders;
|
|
|
|
by Sea Ray or the dealer, upon 60 days written notice to
the other, in the event of a breach or default by the other with
any of the of the material obligations, performance standards,
covenants, representations, warranties, or duties imposed by the
agreement or the Sea Ray manual that has not been cured within
60 days of the notice of the claimed deficiency or within a
reasonable period when the cure cannot be completed within a
60-day
period, or at the end of the
60-day
period without the opportunity to cure when the cause
constitutes bad faith;
|
|
|
|
by Sea Ray or the dealer if the other makes a fraudulent
misrepresentation that is material to the agreement or the other
engages in an incurable act of bad faith;
|
|
|
|
by Sea Ray or the dealer in the event of the insolvency,
bankruptcy, or receivership of the other;
|
|
|
|
by Sea Ray in the event of the assignment of the agreement by
the dealer without the prior written consent of Sea Ray;
|
|
|
|
by Sea Ray upon at least 15 days prior written notice
in the event of the failure to pay any sums due and owing to Sea
Ray that are not disputed in good faith; and
|
|
|
|
upon the mutual consent of Sea Ray and the dealer.
|
Employees
As of September 30, 2008, we had 1,759 employees,
1,675 of whom were in store-level operations and 84 of whom were
in corporate administration and management. We are not a party
to any collective bargaining agreements. We consider our
relations with our employees to be excellent.
Trademarks
and Service Marks
We have registered trade names and trademarks with the
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for various names,
including MarineMax, MarineMax Getaways,
MarineMax Care, Delivering the Dream,
MarineMax Delivering the Boating Dream,
Newcoast Financial Services, MarineMax Boating
Gear Center, and Women on Water. We have
registered the name MarineMax in the European
Community. We have trade name and trademark applications pending
in Canada for various names, including MarineMax,
Delivering the Dream, and The Water
Gene. There can be no assurance that any of these
applications will be granted.
Seasonality
and Weather Conditions
Our business, as well as the entire recreational boating
industry, is highly seasonal, with seasonality varying in
different geographic markets. Over the three-year period ended
September 30, 2008, the average revenue for the quarters
ended December 31, March 31, June 30, and
September 30 represented approximately 19%, 25%, 32%, and 24%,
respectively, of our average annual revenues. With the exception
of Florida, we generally realize significantly lower sales and
higher levels of inventories and related short-term borrowings,
in the quarterly periods ending December 31 and March 31.
The onset of the public boat and recreation shows in January
stimulates boat sales and allows us to reduce our inventory
levels and related short-term borrowings throughout the
remainder of the fiscal year.
Our business is also subject to weather patterns, which may
adversely affect our results of operations. For example, drought
conditions (or merely reduced rainfall levels) or excessive
rain, may close area boating locations or render boating
dangerous or inconvenient, thereby curtailing customer demand
for our products. In addition, unseasonably cool weather and
prolonged winter conditions may lead to a shorter selling season
in certain locations. Hurricanes and other storms could result
in disruptions of our operations or damage to our boat
inventories and
19
facilities, as has been the case when Florida and other markets
were affected by hurricanes. Although our geographic diversity
is likely to reduce the overall impact to us of adverse weather
conditions in any one market area, these conditions will
continue to represent potential, material adverse risks to us
and our future financial performance.
Environmental
and Other Regulatory Issues
Our operations are subject to extensive regulation, supervision,
and licensing under various federal, state, and local statutes,
ordinances, and regulations. While we believe that we maintain
all requisite licenses and permits and are in compliance with
all applicable federal, state, and local regulations, there can
be no assurance that we will be able to maintain all requisite
licenses and permits. The failure to satisfy those and other
regulatory requirements could have a material adverse effect on
our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
The adoption of additional laws, rules, and regulations could
also have a material adverse effect on our business. Various
federal, state, and local regulatory agencies, including the
Occupational Safety and Health Administration, or OSHA, the
United States Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, and
similar federal and local agencies, have jurisdiction over the
operation of our dealerships, repair facilities, and other
operations with respect to matters such as consumer protection,
workers safety, and laws regarding protection of the
environment, including air, water, and soil.
The EPA has various air emissions regulations for outboard
marine engines that impose more strict emissions standards for
two-cycle, gasoline outboard marine engines. Emissions from such
engines must be reduced by approximately 75% over a nine-year
period beginning with the 1998 model year. The majority of the
outboard marine engines we sell are manufactured by Mercury
Marine. Mercury Marines product line of low-emission
engines, including the OptiMax, Verado, and other four-stroke
outboards, have already achieved the EPAs mandated 2006
emission levels. Any increased costs of producing engines
resulting from EPA standards, or the inability of our
manufacturers to comply with EPA requirements, could have a
material adverse effect on our business.
Certain of our facilities own and operate underground storage
tanks, or USTs, for the storage of various petroleum products.
The USTs are generally subject to federal, state, and local laws
and regulations that require testing and upgrading of USTs and
remediation of contaminated soils and groundwater resulting from
leaking USTs. In addition, if leakage from company-owned or
operated USTs migrates onto the property of others, we may be
subject to civil liability to third parties for remediation
costs or other damages. Based on historical experience, we
believe that our liabilities associated with UST testing,
upgrades, and remediation are unlikely to have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition or operating results.
As with boat dealerships generally, and parts and service
operations in particular, our business involves the use,
handling, storage, and contracting for recycling or disposal of
hazardous or toxic substances or wastes, including
environmentally sensitive materials, such as motor oil, waste
motor oil and filters, transmission fluid, antifreeze, freon,
waste paint and lacquer thinner, batteries, solvents,
lubricants, degreasing agents, gasoline, and diesel fuels.
Accordingly, we are subject to regulation by federal, state, and
local authorities establishing requirements for the use,
management, handling, and disposal of these materials and health
and environmental quality standards, and liability related
thereto, and providing penalties for violations of those
standards. We are also subject to laws, ordinances, and
regulations governing investigation and remediation of
contamination at facilities we operate to which we send
hazardous or toxic substances or wastes for treatment,
recycling, or disposal.
We do not believe we have any material environmental liabilities
or that compliance with environmental laws, ordinances, and
regulations will, individually or in the aggregate, have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or
results of operations. However, soil and groundwater
contamination has been known to exist at certain properties
owned or leased by us. We have also been required and may in the
future be required to remove aboveground and underground storage
tanks containing hazardous substances or wastes. As to certain
of our properties, specific releases of petroleum have been or
are in the process of being remedied in accordance with state
and federal guidelines. We are monitoring the soil and
groundwater as required by applicable state and federal
guidelines. In addition, the shareholders of the acquired
dealers have indemnified us for specific environmental issues
identified on environmental site assessments performed by us as
part of the acquisitions. We maintain insurance for pollutant
cleanup and removal. The coverage pays for the expenses to
extract pollutants from land or
20
water at the insured property, if the discharge, dispersal,
seepage, migration, release, or escape of the pollutants is
caused by or results from a covered cause of loss. We also have
additional storage tank liability insurance and
Superfund coverage where applicable. In addition,
certain of our retail locations are located on waterways that
are subject to federal or state laws regulating navigable waters
(including oil pollution prevention), fish and wildlife, and
other matters.
Two of the properties we own were historically used as gasoline
service stations. Remedial action with respect to prior
historical site activities on these properties has been
completed in accordance with federal and state law. Also, two of
our properties are within the boundaries of a
Superfund site, although neither property has been
nor is expected to be identified as a contributor to the
contamination in the area. We, however, do not believe that
these environmental issues will result in any material
liabilities to us.
Additionally, certain states have required or are considering
requiring a license in order to operate a recreational boat.
While such licensing requirements are not expected to be unduly
restrictive, regulations may discourage potential first-time
buyers, thereby limiting future sales, which could adversely
affect our business, financial condition, and results of
operations.
Product
Liability
The products we sell or service may expose us to potential
liabilities for personal injury or property damage claims
relating to the use of those products. Historically, the
resolution of product liability claims has not materially
affected our business. Our manufacturers generally maintain
product liability insurance, and we maintain third-party product
liability insurance, which we believe to be adequate. However,
we may experience legal claims in excess of our insurance
coverage, and those claims may not be covered by insurance.
Furthermore, any significant claims against us could adversely
affect our business, financial condition, and results of
operations and result in negative publicity. Excessive insurance
claims also could result in increased insurance premiums.
Competition
We operate in a highly competitive environment. In addition to
facing competition generally from recreation businesses seeking
to attract consumers leisure time and discretionary
spending dollars, the recreational boat industry itself is
highly fragmented, resulting in intense competition for
customers, quality products, boat show space, and suitable
retail locations. We rely to a certain extent on boat shows to
generate sales. Our inability to participate in boat shows in
our existing or targeted markets could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition, and results of
operations.
We compete primarily with single-location boat dealers and, with
respect to sales of marine equipment, parts, and accessories,
with national specialty marine stores, catalog retailers,
sporting goods stores, and mass merchants. Dealer competition
continues to increase based on the quality of available
products, the price and value of the products, and attention to
customer service. There is significant competition both within
markets we currently serve and in new markets that we may enter.
We compete in each of our markets with retailers of brands of
boats and engines we do not sell in that market. In addition,
several of our competitors, especially those selling boating
accessories, are large national or regional chains that have
substantial financial, marketing, and other resources. However,
we believe that our integrated corporate infrastructure and
marketing and sales capabilities, our cost structure, and our
nationwide presence enable us to compete effectively against
these companies. Private sales of used boats is an additional
significant source of competition.
21
Executive
Officers
The following table sets forth information concerning each of
our executive officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
William H. McGill Jr.
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer, and
Director
|
Michael H. McLamb
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary,
and Director
|
Edward A. Russell
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
Executive Vice President of Operations and Sales
|
Kurt M. Frahn
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
Vice President of Finance and Treasurer
|
Jack P. Ezzell
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer, and Controller
|
T. Glenn Sandridge
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
Vice President of Marketing
|
Jay J. Avelino
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
Vice President of Human Resources
|
William H. McGill Jr. has served as the Chief Executive
Officer of MarineMax since January 23, 1998 and as the
Chairman of the Board and as a director of our company since
March 6, 1998. Mr. McGill served as the President of
our company from January 23, 1988 until September 8,
2000 and re-assumed the position on July 1, 2002.
Mr. McGill was the principal owner and president of
Gulfwind USA, Inc., one of our operating subsidiaries, from 1973
until its merger with us.
Michael H. McLamb has served as Executive Vice President
of our company since October 2002, as Chief Financial Officer
since January 23, 1998, as Secretary since April 5,
1998, and as a director since November 1, 2003.
Mr. McLamb served as Vice President and Treasurer of our
company from January 23, 1998 until October 22, 2002.
Mr. McLamb, a certified public accountant, was employed by
Arthur Andersen LLP from December 1987 to December 1997, serving
most recently as a senior manager.
Edward A. Russell has served as Executive Vice President
of Operations and Sales of our company since February 2008.
Mr. Russell served as Vice President of Operations of our
company from March 2006 until February 2008, and as a Vice
President of our company from October 22, 2002 until March
2006. Mr. Russell served as the Regional Manager of our
Florida operations from August 1, 2002 until
October 22, 2002 and as the District President for our
Central and West Florida operations from March 1998 until
August 1, 2002. Mr. Russell was an owner and General
Sales Manager of Gulfwind USA Inc., one of our operating
subsidiaries, now called MarineMax of Central Florida, from 1984
until its merger with our company in March 1998.
Kurt M. Frahn has served as Vice President of Finance and
Treasurer of our company since October 22, 2002.
Mr. Frahn served as Director of Taxes and Acquisitions of
our company from May 15, 1998 until October 22, 2002.
Mr. Frahn was employed by Arthur Andersen LLP from
September 3, 1991 until May 15, 1998, serving most
recently as a tax consulting manager.
Jack P. Ezzell has served as Vice President and Chief
Accounting Officer of our company since October 22, 2002
and as Corporate Controller of our company since June 1,
1999. Mr. Ezzell served as Assistant Controller from
January 13, 1998 until June 1, 1999. Mr. Ezzell,
a certified public accountant, was employed by Arthur Andersen
LLP from August 1996 until January 1998, serving most recently
as a senior auditor.
T. Glenn Sandridge has served as Vice President of
Marketing of our company since December 2003. Mr. Sandridge
was Director of Marketing-Watercraft for Bombardier Motor
Corporation from August 1998 until December 2003.
Jay J. Avelino has served as Vice President of Human
Resources of our company since February 2008. Mr. Avelino
served as Vice President of Team Development of our company from
May 2000 until February 2008. Previously, Mr. Avelino was
employed by Caliper Corporation, a New Jersey-based personality
assessment and human resources consulting company, most recently
as Senior Vice President.
22
Our
success depends to a significant extent on the well being, as
well as the continued popularity and reputation for quality of
the boating products, of our manufacturers, particularly
Brunswicks Sea Ray, Boston Whaler, Cabo, Hatteras, and
Meridian boat lines and Azimut-Benetti Groups Azimut and
Atlantis products.
Approximately 49% of our revenue in fiscal 2008 resulted from
sales of new boats manufactured by Brunswick, including
approximately 34% from Brunswicks Sea Ray division and
approximately 15% from Brunswicks other divisions. The
remainder of our fiscal 2008 revenue from new boat sales
resulted from sales of products from a limited number of other
manufacturers, none of which accounted for more than 10% of our
revenue.
We depend on our manufacturers to provide us with products that
compare favorably with competing products in terms of quality,
performance, safety, and advanced features, including the latest
advances in propulsion and navigation systems. Any adverse
change in the production efficiency, product development
efforts, technological advancement, marketplace acceptance,
marketing capabilities, and financial condition of our
manufacturers, particularly Brunswick given our reliance on Sea
Ray, Boston Whaler, Cabo, Hatteras, and Meridian, would have a
substantial adverse impact on our business. Any difficulties
encountered by any of our manufactures, particularly Brunswick,
resulting from economic, financial, or other factors could
adversely affect the quality and amount of products that they
are able to supply to us and the services and support they
provide to us.
The interruption or discontinuance of the operations of
Brunswick or other manufacturers could cause us to experience
shortfalls, disruptions, or delays with respect to needed
inventory. Although we believe that adequate alternate sources
would be available that could replace any manufacturer other
than Brunswick as a product source, those alternate sources may
not be available at the time of any interruption, and
alternative products may not be available at comparable quality
and prices.
We maintain dealer agreements with Brunswick covering Sea Ray
products. Each dealer agreement has a multi-year term and
provides for the lowest product prices charged by the Sea Ray
division of Brunswick from time to time to other domestic Sea
Ray dealers. These terms are subject to
|
|
|
|
|
the dealer meeting all the requirements and conditions of Sea
Rays applicable programs; and
|
|
|
|
the right of Brunswick in good faith to charge lesser prices to
other dealers
|
to meet existing competitive circumstances;
for unusual and non-ordinary business
circumstances; or
for limited duration promotional programs.
Each dealer agreement designates a designated geographical
territory for the dealer, which is exclusive to the dealer so
long as the dealer is not in breach of the material obligations
and performance standards under the agreement and Sea Rays
then current material policies and programs following notice and
the expiration of any applicable cure periods without cure.
We also maintain dealer agreements with Hatteras covering
Hatteras products. Each agreement allows Hatteras to revise
prices at any time, and such new prices will supersede previous
prices. Pursuant to the agreements, we must bear any losses we
incur as a result of such price changes and may not recover from
Hatteras for any losses. In addition, certain of our dealerships
may not represent manufacturers or product lines that compete
directly with Hatteras without its prior written consent.
Upon the completion of the Surfside-3 acquisition, we became the
exclusive dealer for Azimut-Benetti Groups Azimut product
line. In September 2008, our geographic territory was expanded
to include Florida. The Azimut dealer agreement provides a
geographic territory to promote the product line and to network
with the appropriate clientele through various independent
locations designated for Azimut retail sales.
As is typical in the industry, we generally deal with
manufacturers, other than the Sea Ray division of Brunswick,
under renewable annual dealer agreements. These agreements do
not contain any contractual provisions concerning product
pricing or required purchasing levels. Pricing is generally
established on a model year basis, but
23
is subject to change in the manufacturers sole discretion.
Any change or termination of these arrangements for any reason
could adversely affect product availability and cost and our
financial performance.
General
economic conditions and consumer spending patterns can
negatively impact our operating results.
General economic conditions and consumer spending patterns can
negatively impact our operating results. Unfavorable local,
regional, national, or global economic developments or
uncertainties regarding future economic prospects could reduce
consumer spending in the markets we serve and adversely affect
our business. Economic conditions in areas in which we operate
dealerships, particularly Florida in which we generated 46%,
44%, and 43% of our revenue during fiscal 2006, 2007, and 2008,
respectively, can have a major impact on our operations. Local
influences, such as corporate downsizing and military base
closings, also could adversely affect our operations in certain
markets.
In an economic downturn, consumer discretionary spending levels
generally decline, at times resulting in disproportionately
large reductions in the sale of luxury goods. Consumer spending
on luxury goods also may decline as a result of lower consumer
confidence levels, even if prevailing economic conditions are
favorable. Although we have expanded our operations during
periods of stagnant or modestly declining industry trends, the
cyclical nature of the recreational boating industry or the lack
of industry growth could adversely affect our business,
financial condition, or results of operations in the future. Any
period of adverse economic conditions or low consumer confidence
has a negative effect on our business.
Lower consumer spending resulting from a downturn in the housing
market and other economic factors adversely affected our
business in fiscal 2007 and continued weakness in consumer
spending resulting from substantial weakness in the financial
markets and deteriorating economic conditions had a very
substantial negative effect on our business in fiscal 2008.
These conditions caused us to defer our acquisition program,
slow our new store openings, reduce our inventory purchases,
engage in inventory reduction efforts, close some of our retail
locations, and reduce our headcount. We cannot predict the
length or severity of these unfavorable economic or financial
conditions or the extent to which they will adversely affect our
operating results nor can we predict the effectiveness of the
measures we have taken to address this environment or whether
additional measures will be necessary.
The
availability and costs of borrowed funds can adversely affect
our ability to obtain adequate boat inventory and the ability
and willingness of our customers to finance boat
purchases.
The availability and costs of borrowed funds can adversely
affect our ability to obtain adequate boat inventory and the
holding costs of that inventory as well as the ability and
willingness of our customers to finance boat purchases. As of
September 30, 2008, we had no long-term debt. However, we
rely on our credit facility to purchase our inventory of boats.
Our ability to borrow under our credit facility depends on our
continuing to satisfy our covenants and other obligations under
our credit facility. The aging of our inventory limits our
borrowing capacity as defined curtailments reduce the allowable
advance rate as our inventory ages. Our access to funds under
our credit facility also depends upon the ability of the banks
that are parties to that facility to meet their funding
commitments, particularly if they experience shortages of
capital or experience excessive volumes of borrowing requests
from others during a short period of time. A continuation of
depressed economic conditions, weak consumer spending, turmoil
in the credit markets, and lender difficulties could interfere
with our ability to utilize the credit agreement to fund our
operations. Any inability to utilize our credit facility
resulting from a covenant violation, insufficient collateral, or
lender difficulties could require us to seek other sources of
funding to repay amounts outstanding under the credit agreement
or replace or supplement the credit agreement, which may not be
possible at all or under commercially reasonable terms.
Similarly, the decreases in the availability of credit and
increases in the cost of credit adversely affect the ability of
our customers to purchase boats from us and thereby adversely
affects our ability to sell our products and impact the
profitability of our finance and insurance activities. Tight
credit conditions during fiscal 2008 adversely affected the
ability of customers to finance boat purchases, which had a
negative affect on our operating results.
24
Fuel
prices and supply may affect our business.
All of the recreational boats we sell are powered by diesel or
gasoline engines. Consequently, an interruption in the supply,
or a significant increase in the price or tax on the sale of
fuel on a regional or national basis could have a material
adverse effect on our sales and operating results. Increases in
fuel prices (such as those that occurred during fiscal
2008) negatively impact boat sales. At various times in the
past, diesel or gasoline fuel has been difficult to obtain. The
supply of fuels may be interrupted, rationing may be imposed, or
the price of or tax on fuels may significantly increase in the
future, adversely impacting our business.
The
availability of boat insurance is critical to our
success.
The ability of our customers to secure reasonably affordable
boat insurance that is satisfactory to lenders that finance our
customers purchases is critical to our success.
Historically, affordable boat insurance has been available. With
the hurricanes that have impacted the state of Florida and other
markets over the past several years, insurance rates have
escalated and insurance coverage has become more difficult to
obtain. Any difficulty of customers to obtain affordable boat
insurance could impede boat sales and adversely affect our
business.
Other
recreational activities and poor industry perception can
adversely affect the levels of boat purchases.
Other recreational activities and poor industry perception can
adversely affect the levels of boat purchases. As a seller of
high-end consumer products, we must compete for discretionary
spending with a wide variety of other recreational activities
and consumer purchases. In addition, perceived hassles of boat
ownership and relatively poor customer service and customer
education throughout the retail boat industry represent
impediments to boat purchases. Our customer-centric strategy is
intended to overcome these perceptions.
Adverse
federal tax policies can have a negative effect on
us.
Changes in federal and state tax laws, such as an imposition of
luxury taxes on new boat purchases, increases in prevailing tax
rates, and weak stock market performance also influence
consumers decisions to purchase products we offer and
could have a negative effect on our sales. For example, during
1991 and 1992, the federal government imposed a luxury tax on
new recreational boats with sales prices in excess of $100,000,
which coincided with a sharp decline in boating industry sales
from a high of more than $17.9 billion in the late 1980s to
a low of $10.3 billion in 1992. Any increase in tax rates,
including those on capital gains and dividends, particularly
those on high-income taxpayers, could adversely affect our boat
sales.
Our
success depends, in part, on our ability to continue to make
successful acquisitions and to integrate the operations of
acquired dealers and each dealer we acquire in the
future.
Since March 1, 1998, we have acquired 20 recreational boat
dealers, two boat brokerage operations, and two full-service
yacht repair facilities. Each acquired dealer operated
independently prior to its acquisition by us. Our success
depends, in part, on our ability to continue to make successful
acquisitions and to integrate the operations of acquired
dealers, including centralizing certain functions to achieve
cost savings and pursuing programs and processes that promote
cooperation and the sharing of opportunities and resources among
our dealerships. We may not be able to oversee the combined
entity efficiently or to implement effectively our growth and
operating strategies. To the extent that we successfully pursue
our acquisition strategy, our resulting growth will place
significant additional demands on our management and
infrastructure. Our failure to pursue successfully our
acquisition strategies or operate effectively the combined
entity could have a material adverse effect on our rate of
growth and operating performance.
Unforeseen
expenses, difficulties, and delays frequently encountered in
connection with rapid expansion through acquisitions could
inhibit our growth and negatively impact our
profitability.
Our growth strategy of acquiring additional recreational boat
dealers involves significant risks. This strategy entails
reviewing and potentially reorganizing acquired business
operations, corporate infrastructure and systems, and financial
controls. Unforeseen expenses, difficulties, and delays
frequently encountered in connection with rapid expansion
through acquisitions could inhibit our growth and negatively
impact our profitability. We may be
25
unable to identify suitable acquisition candidates or to
complete the acquisitions of candidates that we identify.
Increased competition for acquisition candidates or increased
asking prices by acquisition candidates may increase purchase
prices for acquisitions to levels beyond our financial
capability or to levels that would not result in the returns
required by our acquisition criteria. Acquisitions also may
become more difficult in the future as we acquire more of the
most attractive dealers. In addition, we may encounter
difficulties in integrating the operations of acquired dealers
with our own operations or managing acquired dealers profitably
without substantial costs, delays, or other operational or
financial problems.
We may issue common or preferred stock and incur substantial
indebtedness in making future acquisitions. The size, timing,
and integration of any future acquisitions may cause substantial
fluctuations in operating results from quarter to quarter.
Consequently, operating results for any quarter may not be
indicative of the results that may be achieved for any
subsequent quarter or for a full fiscal year. These fluctuations
could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
Our ability to continue to grow through the acquisition of
additional dealers will depend upon various factors, including
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the availability of suitable acquisition candidates at
attractive purchase prices;
|
|
|
|
the ability to compete effectively for available acquisition
opportunities;
|
|
|
|
the availability of borrowed funds or common stock with a
sufficient market price to complete the acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
the ability to obtain any requisite manufacturer or governmental
approvals;
|
|
|
|
the ability to obtain approval of our lenders under our current
credit agreement; and
|
|
|
|
the absence of one or more manufacturers attempting to impose
unsatisfactory restrictions on us in connection with their
approval of acquisitions.
|
As a part of our acquisition strategy, we frequently engage in
discussions with various recreational boat dealers regarding
their potential acquisition by us. In connection with these
discussions, we and each potential acquisition candidate
exchange confidential operational and financial information,
conduct due diligence inquiries, and consider the structure,
terms, and conditions of the potential acquisition. In certain
cases, the prospective acquisition candidate agrees not to
discuss a potential acquisition with any other party for a
specific period of time, grants us an option to purchase the
prospective dealer for a designated price during a specific
time, and agrees to take other actions designed to enhance the
possibility of the acquisition, such as preparing audited
financial information and converting its accounting system to
the system specified by us. Potential acquisition discussions
frequently take place over a long period of time and involve
difficult business integration and other issues, including in
some cases, management succession and related matters. As a
result of these and other factors, a number of potential
acquisitions that from time to time appear likely to occur do
not result in binding legal agreements and are not consummated.
We may
be required to obtain the consent of Brunswick and various other
manufacturers prior to the acquisition of other
dealers.
In determining whether to approve acquisitions, manufacturers
may consider many factors, including our financial condition and
ownership structure. Manufacturers also may impose conditions on
granting their approvals for acquisitions, including a
limitation on the number of their dealers that we may acquire.
Our ability to meet manufacturers requirements for
approving future acquisitions will have a direct bearing on our
ability to complete acquisitions and effect our growth strategy.
There can be no assurance that a manufacturer will not terminate
its dealer agreement, refuse to renew its dealer agreement,
refuse to approve future acquisitions, or take other action that
could have a material adverse effect on our acquisition program.
We and the Sea Ray Division of Brunswick have an agreement
extending through June 2015 that provides a process for the
acquisition of additional Sea Ray boat dealers that desire to be
acquired by us. Under the agreement, acquisitions of Sea Ray
dealers will be mutually agreed upon by us and Sea Ray with
reasonable efforts to be made
26
to include a balance of Sea Ray dealers that have been
successful and those that have not been. The agreement provides
that Sea Ray will not unreasonably withhold its consent to any
proposed acquisition of a Sea Ray dealer by us, subject to the
conditions set forth in the agreement. Among other things, the
agreement requires us to provide Sea Ray with a business plan
for each proposed acquisition, including historical financial
and five-year projected financial information regarding the
acquisition candidate; marketing and advertising plans; service
capabilities and managerial and staff personnel; information
regarding the ability of candidate to achieve performance
standards within designated periods; and information regarding
the success of our previous acquisitions of Sea Ray dealers. The
agreement also contemplates Sea Ray reaching a good faith
determination whether the acquisition would be in its best
interest based on our dedication and focus of resources on the
Sea Ray brand and Sea Rays consideration of any adverse
effects that the approval would have on the resulting territory
configuration and adjacent or other dealers sales and the
absence of any violation of applicable laws or rights granted by
Sea Ray to others.
Our growth strategy also entails expanding our product lines and
geographic scope by obtaining additional distribution rights
from our existing and new manufacturers. We may not be able to
secure additional distribution rights or obtain suitable
alternative sources of supply if we are unable to obtain such
distribution rights. The inability to expand our product lines
and geographic scope by obtaining additional distribution rights
could have a material adverse effect on the growth and
profitability of our business.
Boat
manufacturers exercise substantial control over our
business.
We depend on our dealer agreements. Through dealer agreements,
boat manufacturers, including Brunswick, exercise significant
control over their dealers, restrict them to specified
locations, and retain approval rights over changes in management
and ownership, among other things. The continuation of our
dealer agreements with most manufacturers, including Brunswick,
depends upon, among other things, our achieving stated goals for
customer satisfaction ratings and market share penetration in
the market served by the applicable dealership. Failure to meet
the customer satisfaction, market share goals, and other
conditions set forth in any dealer agreement could have various
consequences, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the termination of the dealer agreement;
|
|
|
|
the imposition of additional conditions in subsequent dealer
agreements;
|
|
|
|
limitations on boat inventory allocations;
|
|
|
|
reductions in reimbursement rates for warranty work performed by
the dealer;
|
|
|
|
loss of certain manufacturer to dealer incentives; or
|
|
|
|
denial of approval of future acquisitions.
|
Our dealer agreements with certain manufacturers, including
Brunswick, do not give us the exclusive right to sell those
manufacturers products within a given geographical area.
Accordingly, a manufacturer, including Brunswick, could
authorize another dealer to start a new dealership in proximity
to one or more of our locations, or an existing dealer could
move a dealership to a location that would be directly
competitive with us. These events could have a material adverse
effect on our competitive position and financial performance.
The
failure to receive rebates and other dealer incentives on
inventory purchases or retail sales could substantially reduce
our margins.
We rely on manufacturers programs that provide incentives
for dealers to purchase and sell particular boat makes and
models or for consumers to buy particular boat makes or models.
Any eliminations, reductions, limitations, or other changes
relating to rebate or incentive programs that have the effect of
reducing the benefits we receive, whether relating to the
ability of manufactures to pay or our ability to qualify for
such incentive programs, could increase the effective cost of
our boat purchases, reduce our margins and competitive position,
and have a material adverse effect on our financial performance.
27
Our
growth strategy may require us to secure significant additional
capital, the amount of which will depend upon the size, timing,
and structure of future acquisitions and our working capital and
general corporate needs.
If we finance future acquisitions in whole or in part through
the issuance of common stock or securities convertible into or
exercisable for common stock, existing stockholders will
experience dilution in the voting power of their common stock
and earnings per share could be negatively impacted. The extent
to which we will be able and willing to use our common stock for
acquisitions will depend on the market value of our common stock
and the willingness of potential sellers to accept our common
stock as full or partial consideration. Our inability to use our
common stock as consideration, to generate cash from operations,
or to obtain additional funding through debt or equity
financings in order to pursue our acquisition program could
materially limit our growth.
Any borrowings made to finance future acquisitions or for
operations could make us more vulnerable to downturn in our
operating results, a downturn in economic conditions, or
increases in interest rates on borrowings that are subject to
interest rate fluctuations. If our cash flow from operations is
insufficient to meet our debt service requirements, we could be
required to sell additional equity securities, refinance our
obligations, or dispose of assets in order to meet our debt
service requirements. In addition, our credit arrangements
contain financial and operational covenants and other
restrictions with which we must comply, including limitations on
capital expenditures and the incurrence of additional
indebtedness. Adequate financing may not be available if and
when we need it or may not be available on terms acceptable to
us. The failure to obtain sufficient financing on favorable
terms and conditions could have a material adverse effect on our
growth prospects and our business, financial condition, and
results of operations.
Our current revolving credit facility, as amended, provides a
line of credit with asset-based borrowing availability of up to
$425 million and allows us $20 million in traditional
floorplan borrowings. We have pledged various of our assets,
including boat inventories, accounts receivable, equipment,
fixtures, and real estate, to secure borrowings under our credit
facility. While we believe we will continue to obtain adequate
financing from lenders, such financing may not be available to
us.
Our
internal growth and operating strategies of opening new
locations and offering new products involve risk.
In addition to pursuing growth by acquiring boat dealers, we
intend to continue to pursue a strategy of growth through
opening new retail locations and offering new products in our
existing and new territories. Accomplishing these goals for
expansion will depend upon a number of factors, including the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to identify new markets in which we can obtain
distribution rights to sell our existing or additional product
lines;
|
|
|
|
our ability to lease or construct suitable facilities at a
reasonable cost in existing or new markets;
|
|
|
|
our ability to hire, train, and retain qualified personnel;
|
|
|
|
the timely integration of new retail locations into existing
operations;
|
|
|
|
our ability to achieve adequate market penetration at favorable
operating margins without the acquisition of existing
dealers; and
|
|
|
|
our financial resources.
|
Our dealer agreements with Brunswick require Brunswicks
consent to open, close, or change retail location that sell Sea
Ray products, and other dealer agreements generally contain
similar provisions. We may not be able to open and operate new
retail locations or introduce new product lines on a timely or
profitable basis. Moreover, the costs associated with opening
new retail locations or introducing new product lines may
adversely affect our profitability.
28
As a result of these growth strategies, we expect to expend
significant time and effort in opening and acquiring new retail
locations and introducing new products. Our systems, procedures,
controls, and financial resources may not be adequate to support
our expanding operations. The inability to manage our growth
effectively could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Our planned growth also will impose significant added
responsibilities on members of senior management and require us
to identify, recruit, and integrate additional senior level
managers. We may not be able to identify, hire, or train
suitable additions to management.
Our
business, as well as the entire recreational boating industry,
is highly seasonal, with seasonality varying in different
geographic markets. In addition, weather conditions may
adversely impact our business.
During the three-year period ended September 30, 2008, the
average revenue for the quarterly periods ended
December 31, March 31, June 30, and September 30
represented 19%, 25%, 32%, and 24%, respectively, of our average
annual revenue. With the exception of Florida, we generally
realize significantly lower sales in the quarterly periods
ending December 31 and March 31. The onset of the public
boat and recreation shows in January stimulates boat sales and
allows us to reduce our inventory levels and related short-term
borrowings throughout the remainder of the fiscal year. Our
business could become substantially more seasonal as we acquire
dealers that operate in colder regions of the United States.
Weather conditions may adversely impact our operating results.
For example, drought conditions, reduced rainfall levels, and
excessive rain may force boating areas to close or render
boating dangerous or inconvenient, thereby curtailing customer
demand for our products. In addition, unseasonably cool weather
and prolonged winter conditions may lead to shorter selling
seasons in certain locations. Hurricanes and other storms could
result in the disruption of our operations or damage to our boat
inventories and facilities as has been the case when Florida and
other markets were affected by hurricanes. Many of our
dealerships sell boats to customers for use on reservoirs,
thereby subjecting our business to the continued viability of
these reservoirs for boating use. Although our geographic
diversity and our future geographic expansion will reduce the
overall impact on us of adverse weather conditions in any one
market area, weather conditions will continue to represent
potential material adverse risks to us and our future operating
performance. As a result of the foregoing and other factors, our
operating results in some future quarters could be below the
expectations of stock market analysts and investors.
We
face intense competition.
We operate in a highly competitive environment. In addition to
facing competition generally from non-boating recreation
businesses seeking to attract discretionary spending dollars,
the recreational boat industry itself is highly fragmented and
involves intense competition for customers, product distribution
rights, and suitable retail locations, particularly on or near
waterways. Competition increases during periods of stagnant
industry growth.
We compete primarily with single-location boat dealers and, with
respect to sales of marine parts, accessories, and equipment,
with national specialty marine parts and accessories stores,
catalog retailers, sporting goods stores, and mass merchants.
Competition among boat dealers is based on the quality of
available products, the price and value of the products, and
attention to customer service. There is significant competition
both within markets we currently serve and in new markets that
we may enter. We compete in each of our markets with retailers
of brands of boats and engines we do not sell in that market. In
addition, several of our competitors, especially those selling
marine equipment and accessories, are large national or regional
chains that have substantial financial, marketing, and other
resources. Private sales of used boats represent an additional
source of competition.
Due to various matters, including environmental concerns,
permitting and zoning requirements and competition for
waterfront real estate, some markets in the United States have
experienced an increased waiting list for marina and storage
availability. In general, the markets in which we currently
operate are not experiencing any unusual difficulties. However,
marine retail activity could be adversely effected in markets
that do not have sufficient marine and storage availability to
satisfy demand.
29
We
depend on income from financing, insurance, and extended service
contracts.
A portion of our income results from referral fees derived from
the placement or marketing of various F&I products,
consisting of customer financing, insurance products, and
extended service contracts, the most significant component of
which is the participation and other fees resulting from our
sale of customer financing contracts. During fiscal 2008,
F&I products accounted for approximately 3.6% of our
revenue.
The availability of financing for our boat purchasers and the
level of participation and other fees we receive in connection
with such financing depend on the particular agreement between
us and the lender and the current rate environment. Lenders may
impose terms in their boat financing arrangements with us that
may be unfavorable to us or our customers, resulting in reduced
demand for our customer financing programs and lower
participation and other fees. Customer financing became more
difficult to secure during fiscal 2008.
The reduction of profit margins on sales of F&I products or
the lack of demand for or the unavailability of these products
could have a material adverse effect on our operating margins.
We
depend on key personnel.
Our success depends, in large part, upon the continuing efforts
and abilities of our executive officers. Although we have an
employment agreement with certain of our executive officers, we
cannot assure that these or other executive personnel will
remain with us. Expanding our operations may require us to add
additional executive personnel in the future. As a result of our
decentralized operating strategy, we also rely on the management
teams of our dealerships. In addition, we likely will depend on
the senior management of any significant businesses we acquire
in the future. The loss of the services of one or more of these
key employees before we are able to attract and retain qualified
replacement personnel could adversely affect our business.
The
products we sell or service may expose us to potential liability
for personal injury or property damage claims relating to the
use of those products.
Manufacturers of the products we sell generally maintain product
liability insurance. We also maintain third-party product
liability insurance that we believe to be adequate. We may
experience claims that are not covered by or that are in excess
of our insurance coverage. The institution of any significant
claims against us could subject us to damages, result in higher
insurance costs, and harm our business reputation with potential
customers.
Environmental
and other regulatory issues may impact our
operations.
Our operations are subject to extensive regulation, supervision,
and licensing under various federal, state, and local statutes,
ordinances, and regulations. The failure to satisfy those and
other regulatory requirements could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition, and results of
operations.
Various federal, state, and local regulatory agencies, including
OSHA or the EPA, and similar federal and local agencies, have
jurisdiction over the operation of our dealerships, repair
facilities, and other operations, with respect to matters such
as consumer protection, workers safety, and laws regarding
protection of the environment, including air, water, and soil.
The EPA recently promulgated emissions regulations for outboard
marine engines that impose stricter emissions standards for
two-cycle, gasoline outboard marine engines. Emissions from such
engines must be reduced by approximately 75% over a nine-year
period beginning with the 1998 model year. The majority of the
outboard marine engines we sell are manufactured by Mercury
Marine. Mercury Marines product line of low-emission
engines, including the OptiMax, Verado, and other four-stroke
outboards, have already achieved the EPAs mandated 2006
emission levels. Any increased costs of producing engines
resulting from EPA standards or the inability of our
manufacturers to comply with EPA requirements, could have a
material adverse effect on our business.
Certain of our facilities own and operate USTs for the storage
of various petroleum products. USTs are generally subject to
federal, state, and local laws and regulations that require
testing and upgrading of USTs and remediation of contaminated
soils and groundwater resulting from leaking USTs. In addition,
we may be subject to civil liability to third parties for
remediation costs or other damages if leakage from our owned or
operated USTs migrates onto the property of others.
30
Our business involves the use, handling, storage, and
contracting for recycling or disposal of hazardous or toxic
substances or wastes, including environmentally sensitive
materials, such as motor oil, waste motor oil and filters,
transmission fluid, antifreeze, freon, waste paint and lacquer
thinner, batteries, solvents, lubricants, degreasing agents,
gasoline, and diesel fuels. Accordingly, we are subject to
regulation by federal, state, and local authorities establishing
investigation and health and environmental quality standards,
and liability related thereto, and providing penalties for
violations of those standards.
We also are subject to laws, ordinances, and regulations
governing investigation and remediation of contamination at
facilities we operate or to which we send hazardous or toxic
substances or wastes for treatment, recycling, or disposal. In
particular, the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act, or CERCLA or
Superfund, imposes joint, strict, and several
liability on
|
|
|
|
|
owners or operators of facilities at, from, or to which a
release of hazardous substances has occurred;
|
|
|
|
parties who generated hazardous substances that were released at
such facilities; and
|
|
|
|
parties who transported or arranged for the transportation of
hazardous substances to such facilities.
|
A majority of states have adopted Superfund statutes comparable
to and, in some cases, more stringent than CERCLA. If we were to
be found to be a responsible party under CERCLA or a similar
state statute, we could be held liable for all investigative and
remedial costs associated with addressing such contamination. In
addition, claims alleging personal injury or property damage may
be brought against us as a result of alleged exposure to
hazardous substances resulting from our operations. In addition,
certain of our retail locations are located on waterways that
are subject to federal or state laws regulating navigable waters
(including oil pollution prevention), fish and wildlife, and
other matters.
Soil and groundwater contamination has been known to exist at
certain properties owned or leased by us. We have also been
required and may in the future be required to remove aboveground
and underground storage tanks containing hazardous substances or
wastes. As to certain of our properties, specific releases of
petroleum have been or are in the process of being remediated in
accordance with state and federal guidelines. We are monitoring
the soil and groundwater as required by applicable state and
federal guidelines. We also may have additional storage tank
liability insurance and Superfund coverage where applicable.
Environmental laws and regulations are complex and subject to
frequent change. Compliance with amended, new, or more stringent
laws or regulations, more strict interpretations of existing
laws, or the future discovery of environmental conditions may
require additional expenditures by us, and such expenditures may
be material.
Two of the properties we own were historically used as gasoline
service stations. Remedial action with respect to prior
historical site activities on these properties has been
completed in accordance with federal and state law. Also, two of
our properties are within the boundaries of a Superfund site,
although neither property has been identified as a contributor
to the contamination in the area.
Additionally, certain states have required or are considering
requiring a license in order to operate a recreational boat.
These regulations could discourage potential buyers, thereby
limiting future sales and adversely affecting our business,
financial condition, and results of operations.
The
market price of our common stock could be subject to wide
fluctuations as a result of many factors.
Factors that could affect the trading price of our common stock
include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
variations in our operating results;
|
|
|
|
the thin trading volume and relatively small public float of our
common stock;
|
|
|
|
the level and success of our acquisition program and new store
openings;
|
|
|
|
our ability to continue to secure adequate levels of financing;
|
|
|
|
variations in same-store sales;
|
|
|
|
the success of dealership integration;
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
relationships with manufacturers;
|
|
|
|
changes in earnings estimates published by analysts;
|
|
|
|
general economic, political, and market conditions;
|
|
|
|
seasonality and weather conditions;
|
|
|
|
governmental policies and regulations;
|
|
|
|
the performance of the recreational boat industry in
general; and
|
|
|
|
factors relating to suppliers and competitors.
|
In addition, market demand for small-capitalization stocks, and
price and volume fluctuations in the stock market unrelated to
our performance could result in significant fluctuations in
market price of our common stock.
The performance of our common stock could adversely affect our
ability to raise equity in the public markets and adversely
affect our acquisition program.
The
issuance of additional common stock in the future, including
shares that we may issue pursuant to stock-based grants,
including stock option grants, and future acquisitions, may
result in dilution in the net tangible book value per share of
our common stock.
Our board of directors has the legal power and authority to
determine the terms of an offering of shares of our capital
stock, or securities convertible into or exchangeable for these
shares, to the extent of our shares of authorized and unissued
capital stock.
A
substantial number of shares are eligible for future
sale.
As of September 30, 2008, there were outstanding
18,424,487 shares of our common stock. Substantially all of
these shares are freely tradable without restriction or further
registration under the securities laws, unless held by an
affiliate of our company, as that term is defined in
Rule 144 under the securities laws. Shares held by
affiliates of our company, which generally include our
directors, officers, and certain principal stockholders, are
subject to the resale limitations of Rule 144 described
below. Outstanding shares of common stock issued in connection
with the acquisition of any acquired dealers are available for
resale beginning six months after the respective dates of the
acquisitions, subject to compliance with the provisions of
Rule 144 under the securities laws.
As of September 30, 2008, we had issued options to purchase
approximately 1,740,128 shares of common stock and 830,000
restricted stock awards under our incentive stock plan, and we
issued 629,991 of the 750,000 shares of common stock
reserved for issuance under our 1998 employee stock
purchase plan. We have filed a registration statement under the
securities laws to register the common stock to be issued under
these plans. As a result, shares issued under these plans will
be freely tradable without restriction unless acquired by
affiliates of our company, who will be subject to the volume and
other limitations of Rule 144.
We may issue additional shares of common stock or preferred
stock under the securities laws as part of any acquisition we
may complete in the future. If issued pursuant to an effective
registration statement, these shares generally will be freely
tradable after their issuance by persons not affiliated with us
or the acquired companies.
We do
not pay cash dividends.
We have never paid cash dividends on our common stock. Moreover,
financial covenants under certain of our credit facilities
restrict our ability to pay dividends.
Our
stockholders rights plan may adversely affect existing
stockholders.
Our Stockholders Rights Plan may have the effect of
deterring, delaying, or preventing a change in control that
might otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders.
Under the Rights Plan, we issued a dividend of one Preferred
Share Purchase Right for each share of our common stock held by
stockholders of record as of the close of business on
September 7, 2001.
32
In general, subject to certain limited exceptions, the stock
purchase rights become exercisable when a person or group
acquires 15% or more of our common stock or a tender offer or
exchange offer for 15% or more of our common stock is announced
or commenced. After any such event, our other stockholders may
purchase additional shares of our common stock at 50% of the
then-current market price. The rights will cause substantial
dilution to a person or group that attempts to acquire us on
terms not approved by our board of directors. The rights may be
redeemed by us at $0.01 per stock purchase right at any time
before any person or group acquires 15% or more of our
outstanding common stock. The rights should not interfere with
any merger or other business combination approved by our board
of directors. The rights expire on August 28, 2011.
Certain
provisions of our restated certificate of incorporation and
bylaws and Delaware law may make a change in the control of our
company more difficult to complete, even if a change in control
were in the stockholders interest or might result in a
premium over the market price for the shares held by the
stockholders.
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws divide the board of
directors into three classes of directors elected for staggered
three-year terms. The certificate of incorporation also provides
that the board of directors may authorize the issuance of one or
more series of preferred stock from time to time and may
determine the rights, preferences, privileges, and restrictions
and fix the number of shares of any such series of preferred
stock, without any vote or action by our stockholders. The board
of directors may authorize the issuance of preferred stock with
voting or conversion rights that could adversely affect the
voting power or other rights of the holders of common stock. The
certificate of incorporation also allows our board of directors
to fix the number of directors and to fill vacancies on the
board of directors.
We also are subject to the anti-takeover provisions of
Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which
prohibits us from engaging in a business combination
with an interested stockholder for a period of three
years after the date of the transaction in which the person
became an interested stockholder, unless the
business combination is approved in a prescribed manner.
Certain of our dealer agreements could also make it difficult
for a third party to attempt to acquire a significant ownership
position in our company. In addition, the stockholders
agreement and governance agreement will have the effect of
increasing the control of our directors, executive officers, and
persons associated with them.
Our
sales of Azimut products may be adversely affected by
fluctuations in currency exchange rates between the U.S. dollar
and the euro.
Products purchased from the Italy-based Azimut are subject to
fluctuations in the euro to U.S. dollar exchange rate,
which ultimately may impact the retail price at which we can
sell such products. As a result, fluctuations in the value of
the euro as compared with the U.S. dollar may impact the
price points at which we can sell profitably Azimut products,
and such price points may not be competitive with other product
lines in the United States. Accordingly, such fluctuations in
exchange rates ultimately may impact the amount of revenue, cost
of goods sold, cash flows, and earnings we recognize for the
Azimut product lines. The impact of these currency fluctuations
could increase, particularly as our revenue from the Azimut
products increase as a percentage of our total revenue. We also
could incur losses from hedging transactions designed to reduce
our risk to fluctuation in exchange rates. We cannot predict the
effects of exchange rate fluctuations or currency rate hedges on
our operating results. Therefore, in certain cases, we, from
time to time, enter into foreign currency cash flow hedges to
reduce the variability of cash flows associated with firm
commitments to purchase boats and yachts from Azimut. We cannot
assure that our strategies will adequately protect our operating
results from the effects of exchange rate fluctuations.
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
Not applicable.
33
We lease our corporate offices in Clearwater, Florida. We also
lease 46 of our retail locations under leases, many of which
contain multi-year renewal options and some of which grant us a
first right of refusal to purchase the property at fair value.
In most cases, we pay a fixed rent at negotiated rates. In
substantially all of the leased locations, we are responsible
for taxes, utilities, insurance, and routine repairs and
maintenance. We own the property associated with 30 other retail
locations and operate one additional location as noted below.
The following table reflects the status, approximate size, and
facilities of our various retail locations as of the date of
this report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Square
|
|
|
|
Operated
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Location Type
|
|
Footage(1)
|
|
Facilities at Property
|
|
Since(2)
|
|
Waterfront
|
|
Alabama
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gulf Shores
|
|
Company owned
|
|
4,000
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
1998
|
|
|
Gulf Shores
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
1,112
|
|
Retail only; 7 wet slips
|
|
2008
|
|
Intracoastal Waterway
|
Arizona
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tempe
|
|
Company owned
|
|
34,000
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
1992
|
|
|
California
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oakland
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
17,700
|
|
Retail and service; 28 wet slips
|
|
1985
|
|
Alameda Estuary (San Francisco Bay)
|
Sacramento
|
|
Company owned
|
|
24,800
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
1995
|
|
|
Sacramento Sport Yacht Center
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
500
|
|
Retail only; 11 wet slips
|
|
2001
|
|
Sacramento River
|
San Diego
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
14,500
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
2004
|
|
|
San Diego (Shelter Island)
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
930
|
|
Retail and service; 20 wet slips
|
|
2005
|
|
Mission Bay
|
Colorado
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denver
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
16,400
|
|
Retail, service, and storage
|
|
2003
|
|
|
Grand Junction
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
9,300
|
|
Retail, service, and storage
|
|
1986
|
|
|
Connecticut
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Norwalk
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
7,000
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
1994
|
|
Norwalk Harbor
|
Delaware
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bear
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
5,000
|
|
Retail and service; 15 wet slips
|
|
1995
|
|
Between Delaware Bay and Chesapeake Bay
|
Florida
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cape Haze
|
|
Company owned
|
|
18,000
|
|
Retail, service, and storage; 8 wet slips
|
|
1972
|
|
Intracoastal Waterway
|
Clearwater
|
|
Company owned
|
|
42,000
|
|
Retail and service; 20 wet slips
|
|
1973
|
|
Tampa Bay
|
Cocoa
|
|
Company owned
|
|
15,000
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
1968
|
|
|
Coconut Grove
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
2,000
|
|
Retail only; 24 wet slips
|
|
2002
|
|
Biscayne Bay
|
Dania
|
|
Company owned
|
|
32,000
|
|
Repair and service; 16 wet slips
|
|
1991
|
|
Port Everglades
|
Destin
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
2,200
|
|
Retail only; 24 wet slips
|
|
2005
|
|
Destin Harbor
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Square
|
|
|
|
Operated
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Location Type
|
|
Footage(1)
|
|
Facilities at Property
|
|
Since(2)
|
|
Waterfront
|
|
Ft Lauderdale (Pier 66)
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
2,400
|
|
Retail and service; 12 wet slips
|
|
1977
|
|
Intracoastal Waterway
|
Fort Myers
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
8,000
|
|
Retail and service; 18 wet slips
|
|
1983
|
|
Caloosahatchee River
|
Ft Walton Beach
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
4,800
|
|
Retail only
|
|
2003
|
|
|
Jacksonville
|
|
Company owned
|
|
15,000
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Jacksonville
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
1,000
|
|
Retail only; 7 wet slips
|
|
1995
|
|
St Johns River
|
Key Largo
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
8,900
|
|
Retail and service; 6 west slips
|
|
2002
|
|
Card Sound
|
Miami
|
|
Company owned
|
|
7,200
|
|
Retail and service; 15 wet slips
|
|
1980
|
|
Little River
|
Miami
|
|
Company owned
|
|
5,000
|
|
Service only; 11 wet slips
|
|
2005
|
|
Little River
|
Naples
|
|
Company owned
|
|
19,600
|
|
Retail and service; 14 wet slips
|
|
1997
|
|
Naples Bay
|
North Palm Beach
|
|
Company owned
|
|
22,800
|
|
Retail and service; 8 wet slips
|
|
1998
|
|
Intracoastal Waterway
|
Pensacola
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
24,300
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
1974
|
|
|
Pompano Beach
|
|
Company owned
|
|
23,000
|
|
Retail and service; 16 wet slips
|
|
1990
|
|
Intracoastal Waterway
|
Pompano Beach
|
|
Company owned
|
|
5,400
|
|
Retail and service; 24 wet slips
|
|
2005
|
|
Intracoastal Waterway
|
Sarasota
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
26,500
|
|
Retail, service, and storage; 15 wet slips
|
|
1972
|
|
Sarasota Bay
|
St. Petersburg(3)
|
|
Joint venture
|
|
15,000
|
|
Yacht service, 20 wet slips
|
|
2006
|
|
Boca Ciega Bay
|
Stuart
|
|
Company owned
|
|
29,100
|
|
Retail and service; 66 wet slips
|
|
2002
|
|
Intracoastal Waterway
|
Venice
|
|
Company owned
|
|
62,000
|
|
Retail, service, and storage; 90 wet slips
|
|
1972
|
|
Intracoastal Waterway
|
Georgia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buford (Atlanta)
|
|
Company owned
|
|
13,500
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
2001
|
|
|
Cumming (Atlanta)
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
13,000
|
|
Retail and service; 50 wet slips
|
|
1981
|
|
Lake Lanier
|
Forest Park (Atlanta)
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
47,300
|
|
Retail, service, and storage
|
|
1973
|
|
|
Maryland
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baltimore
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
9,600
|
|
Retail and service; 17 wet slips
|
|
2005
|
|
Baltimore Inner Harbor
|
Joppa
|
|
Company owned
|
|
28,400
|
|
Retail, service, and storage; 294 wet slips
|
|
1966
|
|
Gunpowder River
|
White Marsh
|
|
Company owned
|
|
19,800
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
1958
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Square
|
|
|
|
Operated
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Location Type
|
|
Footage(1)
|
|
Facilities at Property
|
|
Since(2)
|
|
Waterfront
|
|
Minnesota
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayport
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
450
|
|
Retail only; 10 wet slips
|
|
1996
|
|
St Croix River
|
Minnetonka
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
3,500
|
|
Retail and service; 5 wet slips
|
|
2005
|
|
Lake Minnetonka
|
Rogers
|
|
Company owned
|
|
70,000
|
|
Retail, service, and storage
|
|
1991
|
|
|
Walker
|
|
Company owned
|
|
76,400
|
|
Retail, service, and storage
|
|
1989
|
|
|
Walker
|
|
Company owned
|
|
6,800
|
|
Retail and service; 93 wet slips
|
|
1977
|
|
Leech Lake
|
Missouri
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kimberling City
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
500
|
|
Retail only; 7 wet slips
|
|
2000
|
|
Table Rock Lake
|
Lake Ozark
|
|
Company owned
|
|
60,300
|
|
Retail and service; 300 wet slips
|
|
1987
|
|
Lake of the Ozarks
|
Laurie
|
|
Company owned
|
|
700
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Osage Beach
|
|
Company owned
|
|
2,000
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
1998
|
|
|
Springfield
|
|
Company owned
|
|
12,200
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
1997
|
|
|
Nevada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Las Vegas
|
|
Company owned
|
|
21,600
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
1990
|
|
|
New Jersey
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brant Beach
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
3,800
|
|
Retail and service; 36 wet slips
|
|
1965
|
|
Barnegat Bay
|
Brick
|
|
Company owned
|
|
20,000
|
|
Retail and service; 225 wet slips
|
|
1977
|
|
Manasquan River
|
Jersey City
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
500
|
|
Retail only; 6 wet slips
|
|
2000
|
|
Hudson River
|
Lake Hopatcong
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
4,600
|
|
Retail and service; 80 wet slips
|
|
1998
|
|
Lake Hopatcong
|
Ship Bottom
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
19,300
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
1972
|
|
|
Somers Point
|
|
Affiliate lease
|
|
31,000
|
|
Retail and service; 33 wet slips
|
|
1987
|
|
Little Egg Harbor Bay
|
New York
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copiague
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
15,000
|
|
Retail only
|
|
1993
|
|
|
Huntington
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
1,200
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
1995
|
|
Huntington Harbor and Long Island Sound
|
Lindenhurst (Delivery Center)
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
54,000
|
|
Retail, service, and dry storage
|
|
1968
|
|
Neguntatogue Creek to Great South Bay
|
Lindenhurst (Highway Store)
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
10,000
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Lindenhurst (Marina)
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
14,600
|
|
Marina and service; 370 wet slips
|
|
1968
|
|
Neguntatogue Creek to Great South Bay
|
Manhattan
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
1,200
|
|
Retail only; 75 wet slips
|
|
1996
|
|
Hudson River
|
New Rochelle
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
4,650
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
2008
|
|
Long Island Sound
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Square
|
|
|
|
Operated
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Location Type
|
|
Footage(1)
|
|
Facilities at Property
|
|
Since(2)
|
|
Waterfront
|
|
North Carolina
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southport
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
127
|
|
Retail only; 4 wet slips
|
|
2008
|
|
Intracoastal Waterway
|
Wrightsville Beach
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
34,500
|
|
Retail, service, and storage
|
|
1996
|
|
Intracoastal Waterway
|
Ohio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mentor
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
5,000
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Oklahoma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Afton
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
3,500
|
|
Retail and service; 23 wet slips
|
|
2003
|
|
Grand Lake
|
Rhode Island
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wakefield
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
1,800
|
|
Retail only; 3 wet slips
|
|
2006
|
|
Narragansett Bay
|
South Carolina
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Myrtle Beach
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
3,500
|
|
Retail only
|
|
1999
|
|
Coquina Harbor
|
Tennessee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chattanooga
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
3,000
|
|
Retail only; 12 wet slips
|
|
2005
|
|
Tennessee River
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
League City (floating facility)(4)
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
800
|
|
Retail and service; 20 wet slips
|
|
1988
|
|
Clear Lake
|
Lewisville (Dallas)
|
|
Company owned
|
|
22,000
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
2002
|
|
|
Lewisville (Dallas) (floating facility)
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
1,000
|
|
Retail only; 20 wet slips(5)
|
|
1994
|
|
Lake Lewisville
|
Seabrook
|
|
Company owned
|
|
32,000
|
|
Retail and service; 30 wet slips
|
|
2002
|
|
Clear Lake
|
Utah
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salt Lake City
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
21,200
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
1975
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Square footage is approximate and does not include outside sales
space or dock or marina facilities. |
|
(2) |
|
Operated since date is the date the facility was opened by us or
opened prior to its acquisition by us. |
|
(3) |
|
Joint venture entered into with Brunswick to acquire marina and
service facility. |
|
(4) |
|
We own the floating facility, however, the related dock and
marina space is leased by us from an unaffiliated third party. |
|
(5) |
|
Shares service facility located at the other Lewisville retail
location. |
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
We are party to various legal actions arising in the ordinary
course of business. While it is not feasible to determine the
actual outcome of these actions as of September 30, 2008,
we do not believe that these matters will have a material
adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition, results
of operations, or cash flows.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
Not applicable.
37
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for the Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder
Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
Our common stock has been traded on the New York Stock Exchange
under the symbol HZO since our initial public offering on
June 3, 1998 at $12.50 per share. The following table sets
forth high and low sale prices of the common stock for each
calendar quarter indicated as reported on the New York Stock
Exchange.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
34.24
|
|
|
$
|
27.72
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
$
|
36.72
|
|
|
$
|
25.39
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
$
|
26.65
|
|
|
$
|
19.24
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
$
|
29.46
|
|
|
$
|
24.35
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
26.10
|
|
|
$
|
20.01
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
$
|
24.05
|
|
|
$
|
18.80
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
$
|
21.96
|
|
|
$
|
14.30
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
$
|
16.68
|
|
|
$
|
13.50
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
16.18
|
|
|
$
|
10.38
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
$
|
13.82
|
|
|
$
|
6.99
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
$
|
9.66
|
|
|
$
|
4.92
|
|
Fourth quarter (through November 30, 2008)
|
|
$
|
7.45
|
|
|
$
|
1.25
|
|
On November 28, 2008, the closing sale price of our common
stock was $2.78 per share. On November 28, 2008, there were
approximately 100 record holders and approximately 5,000
beneficial owners of our common stock.
Dividends
We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common
stock. We currently plan to retain any earnings to finance the
growth of our business rather than to pay cash dividends.
Payments of any cash dividends in the future will depend on our
financial condition, results of operations, and capital
requirements as well as other factors deemed relevant by our
board of directors. Moreover, financial covenants under certain
of our credit facilities also restrict our ability to pay
dividends.
Repurchases
of Common Stock
In November 2005, our Board of Directors approved a share
repurchase plan allowing our company to repurchase up to
1,000,000 shares of our common stock. Under the plan, we
may buy back common stock from time to time in the open market
or in privately negotiated blocks, dependant upon various
factors, including price and availability of the shares, and
general market conditions. During the fiscal year ending
September 30, 2008, we purchased an aggregate of
71,300 shares of common stock under the plan for an
aggregate purchase price of approximately $1.0 million, as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Purchased as
|
|
|
that May Yet Be
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price Paid
|
|
|
Part of Publicly
|
|
|
Purchased Under
|
|
Period
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Announced Program
|
|
|
the Program
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
71,300
|
|
|
$
|
14.51
|
|
|
|
71,300
|
|
|
|
239,100
|
|
38
Performance
Graph
The following line graph compares cumulative total stockholder
returns for the five years ended September 30, 2008 for
(i) our common stock, (ii) the Russell 2000 Index, and
(iii) the Nasdaq Retail Trade Index. The graph assumes an
investment of $100 on September 30, 2003. The calculations
of cumulative stockholder return on the Russell 2000 Index and
the Nasdaq Retail Trade Index include reinvestment of dividends.
The calculation of cumulative stockholder return on our common
stock does not include reinvestment of dividends because we did
not pay any dividends during the measurement period. The
historical performance shown is not necessarily indicative of
future performance.
COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
Among MarineMax, Inc., The Russell 2000 Index,
And The NASDAQ Retail Trade Index
The performance graph above shall not be deemed
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or Exchange Act, or
otherwise subject to the liability of that section. The
performance graph above will not be deemed incorporated by
reference into any filing of our company under the Exchange Act
or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
39
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
The following table contains certain financial and operating
data and is qualified by the more detailed consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in
this report. The balance sheet and statement of operations data
were derived from the consolidated financial statements and
notes thereto that have been audited by Ernst & Young
LLP, an independent registered certified public accounting firm.
The financial data shown below should be read in conjunction
with the consolidated financial statements and the related notes
thereto and Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations included
elsewhere in this report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2004(1)
|
|
|
2005(1)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands except share, per share, and retail
location data)
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
762,009
|
|
|
$
|
947,347
|
|
|
$
|
1,213,541
|
|
|
$
|
1,255,985
|
|
|
$
|
885,407
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
573,616
|
|
|
|
712,843
|
|
|
|
906,781
|
|
|
|
956,251
|
|
|
|
679,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
188,393
|
|
|
|
234,504
|
|
|
|
306,760
|
|
|
|
299,734
|
|
|
|
206,243
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative expenses
|
|
|
139,470
|
|
|
|
169,975
|
|
|
|
222,806
|
|
|
|
245,224
|
|
|
|
217,426
|
|
Goodwill and intangible asset impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
48,923
|
|
|
|
64,529
|
|
|
|
83,954
|
|
|
|
54,510
|
|
|
|
(133,274
|
)
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
6,499
|
|
|
|
9,291
|
|
|
|
18,616
|
|
|
|
26,955
|
|
|
|
20,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
42,424
|
|
|
|
55,238
|
|
|
|
65,338
|
|
|
|
27,555
|
|
|
|
(153,438
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
16,126
|
|
|
|
21,412
|
|
|
|
25,956
|
|
|
|
7,486
|
|
|
|
(19,161
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
26,298
|
|
|
$
|
33,826
|
|
|
$
|
39,382
|
|
|
$
|
20,069
|
|
|
$
|
(134,277
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.58
|
|
|
$
|
1.88
|
|
|
$
|
2.08
|
|
|
$
|
1.04
|
|
|
$
|
(7.30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
16,666,107
|
|
|
|
18,032,533
|
|
|
|
18,928,735
|
|
|
|
19,289,231
|
|
|
|
18,391,488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Data: (as of year-end)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of retail locations(2)
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
Sales per store(3)(5)
|
|
$
|
12,831
|
|
|
$
|
16,386
|
|
|
$
|
17,064
|
|
|
$
|
15,246
|
|
|
$
|
12,492
|
|
Same-store sales growth(4)(5)
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
|
|
(28
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital
|
|
$
|
88,013
|
|
|
$
|
163,431
|
|
|
$
|
153,465
|
|
|
$
|
170,389
|
|
|
$
|
134,458
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
474,359
|
|
|
|
539,490
|
|
|
|
801,563
|
|
|
|
825,878
|
|
|
|
661,323
|
|
Long-term debt (including current portion)(6)
|
|
|
26,237
|
|
|
|
30,085
|
|
|
|
37,186
|
|
|
|
30,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
196,821
|
|
|
|
283,599
|
|
|
|
349,887
|
|
|
|
373,559
|
|
|
|
248,583
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts exclude the effects of stock-based compensation expense
recognized under the provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based
Payment, as the standard was adopted October 1, 2005. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes only those retail locations open at period end. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes only those stores open for the entire preceding
12-month
period. |
|
(4) |
|
New and acquired stores are included in the comparable base at
the end of the stores thirteenth month of operations. |
|
(5) |
|
A store is one or more retail locations that are adjacent or
operate as one entity. Sales per store and same-store sales
growth is intended only as supplemental information and is not a
substitute for revenue or net income presented in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles. |
|
(6) |
|
Amount excludes our short-term borrowings for working capital
and inventory financing. |
40
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
The following should be read in conjunction with Part I,
including the matters set forth in the Risk Factors
section of this report, and our Consolidated Financial
Statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.
Overview
We are the largest recreational boat retailer in the United
States with fiscal 2008 revenue in excess of $880 million.
Through our current 77 retail locations in 22 states, we
sell new and used recreational boats and related marine
products, including engines, trailers, parts, and accessories.
We also arrange related boat financing, insurance, and extended
warranty contracts; provide boat repair and maintenance
services; and offer yacht and boat brokerage services, and where
available, offer slip and storage accommodations.
MarineMax was incorporated in January 1998. We commenced
operations with the acquisition of five independent recreational
boat dealers on March 1, 1998. Since the initial
acquisitions in March 1998, we have significantly expanded our
operations through the acquisition of 20 recreational boat
dealers, two boat brokerage operations, and two full-service
yacht repair facilities. As a part of our acquisition strategy,
we frequently engage in discussions with various recreational
boat dealers regarding their potential acquisition by us.
Potential acquisition discussions frequently take place over a
long period of time and involve difficult business integration
and other issues, including, in some cases, management
succession and related matters. As a result of these and other
factors, a number of potential acquisitions that from time to
time appear likely to occur do not result in binding legal
agreements and are not consummated. No significant acquisitions
were completed during the fiscal years ended September 30,
2008 and 2007.
General economic conditions and consumer spending patterns can
negatively impact our operating results. Unfavorable local,
regional, national, or global economic developments or
uncertainties regarding future economic prospects could reduce
consumer spending in the markets we serve and adversely affect
our business. Economic conditions in areas in which we operate
dealerships, particularly Florida in which we generated 46%,
44%, and 43% of our revenue during fiscal 2006, 2007, and 2008,
respectively, can have a major impact on our operations. Local
influences, such as corporate downsizing and military base
closings, also could adversely affect our operations in certain
markets.
In an economic downturn, consumer discretionary spending levels
generally decline, at times resulting in disproportionately
large reductions in the sale of luxury goods. Consumer spending
on luxury goods also may decline as a result of lower consumer
confidence levels, even if prevailing economic conditions are
favorable. Although we have expanded our operations during
periods of stagnant or modestly declining industry trends, the
cyclical nature of the recreational boating industry or the lack
of industry growth could adversely affect our business,
financial condition, or results of operations in the future. Any
period of adverse economic conditions or low consumer confidence
has a negative effect on our business.
Lower consumer spending resulting from a downturn in the housing
market and other economic factors adversely affected our
business in fiscal 2007, and continued weakness in consumer
spending resulting from substantial weakness in the financial
markets and deteriorating economic conditions had a very
substantial negative effect on our business in fiscal 2008.
These conditions caused us to defer our acquisition program,
slow our new store openings, reduce our inventory purchases,
engage in inventory reduction efforts, close some of our retail
locations, and reduce our headcount. We cannot predict the
length or severity of these unfavorable economic or financial
conditions or the extent to which they will adversely affect our
operating results nor can we predict the effectiveness of the
measures we have taken to address this environment or whether
additional measures will be necessary.
Although economic conditions have adversely affected our
operating results, we have capitalized on our core strengths to
substantially outperform the industry and deliver market share
gains. Our ability to deliver an increase in market share
supports the alignment of our retailing strategies with the
desires of consumers. We believe the steps we have taken to
preserve and grow market share will yield an increase in future
revenue. As general economic trends improve, we expect our core
strengths and retailing strategies will position us to
capitalize on growth
41
opportunities as they occur and will allow us to emerge from
this challenging environment with greater earnings potential.
During March 2006, we acquired substantially all of the assets
and assumed certain liabilities of Surfside-3 Marina, Inc.
(Surfside), a privately held boat dealership with eight
locations in New York and Connecticut, for approximately
$24.8 million in cash and 665,024 shares of common
stock, plus $24.0 million in working capital adjustments,
including acquisition costs. The shares were valued at $33.71
per share, which was the average closing market price of our
common stock for the
five-day
period beginning two days prior to and ending two days
subsequent to the acquisition date. The acquisition expands our
ability to serve consumers in the Northeast boating community
and allows us to capitalize on Surfsides market position
and leverage our inventory management and inventory financing
resources over the acquired locations. Based on a valuation, the
purchase price, including acquisition costs, resulted in the
recognition of approximately $40.0 million of tax
deductible goodwill and approximately $16.4 million of tax
deductible indefinite-lived intangible assets (dealer
agreements). Surfside has been included in our consolidated
financial statements since the date of acquisition.
During January 2006, we acquired substantially all of the
assets, including certain real estate, and assumed certain
liabilities of the Port Arrowhead Group (Port Arrowhead), a
privately held boat dealership with six retail locations,
including a large marina, in Missouri and Oklahoma, for
approximately $27.5 million in cash, plus $5.0 million
in working capital adjustments, including acquisition costs. The
acquisition expands our ability to serve consumers in the
Midwest boating community, including neighboring boating
destinations in Illinois, Kansas, and Arkansas. The acquisition
also allows us to capitalize on Port Arrowheads market
position and leverage our inventory management and inventory
financing resources over the acquired locations. Based on a
valuation, the purchase price, including acquisition costs,
resulted in the recognition of approximately $6.0 million
of tax deductible goodwill and approximately $2.0 million
of tax deductible indefinite-lived intangible assets (dealer
agreements). Port Arrowhead has been included in our
consolidated financial statements since the date of acquisition.
Application
of Critical Accounting Policies
We have identified the policies below as critical to our
business operations and the understanding of our results of
operations. The impact and risks related to these policies on
our business operations is discussed throughout
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations when such policies affect our reported
and expected financial results.
In the ordinary course of business, we make a number of
estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of results
of operations and financial condition in the preparation of our
financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States. We base our estimates
on historical experience and on various other assumptions that
we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. The results
form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of
assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other
sources. Actual results could differ significantly from those
estimates under different assumptions and conditions. We believe
that the following discussion addresses our most critical
accounting policies, which are those that are most important to
the portrayal of our financial condition and results of
operations and require our most difficult, subjective, and
complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make
estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently
uncertain.
Revenue
Recognition
We recognize revenue from boat, motor, and trailer sales, and
parts and service operations at the time the boat, motor,
trailer, or part is delivered to or accepted by the customer or
service is completed. We recognize commissions earned from a
brokerage sale at the time the related brokerage transaction
closes. We recognize revenue from slip and storage services on a
straight-line basis over the term of the slip or storage
agreement. We recognize commissions earned by us for placing
notes with financial institutions in connection with customer
boat financing when we recognize the related boat sales. We also
recognize marketing fees earned on credit life, accident and
disability, and hull insurance products sold by third-party
insurance companies at the later of customer acceptance of the
insurance product as evidenced by contract execution or when the
related boat sale is recognized. We also
42
recognize commissions earned on extended warranty service
contracts sold on behalf of third-party insurance companies at
the later of customer acceptance of the service contract terms,
as evidenced by contract execution or recognition of the related
boat sale.
Certain finance and extended warranty commissions and marketing
fees on insurance products may be charged back if a customer
terminates or defaults on the underlying contract within a
specified period of time. Based upon our experience of
repayments and defaults, we maintain a chargeback allowance that
was not material to our financial statements taken as a whole as
of September 30, 2007 or 2008. Should results differ
materially from our historical experiences, we would need to
modify our estimate of future chargebacks, which could have a
material adverse effect on our operating margins.
Vendor
Consideration Received
We account for consideration received from our vendors in
accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue
No. 02-16,
Accounting by a Customer (Including a Reseller) for
Certain Consideration Received from a Vendor
(EITF 02-16).
EITF 02-16
most significantly requires us to classify interest assistance
received from manufacturers as a reduction of inventory cost and
related cost of sales as opposed to netting the assistance
against our interest expense incurred with our lenders. Pursuant
to
EITF 02-16,
amounts received by us under our co-op assistance programs from
our manufacturers are netted against related advertising
expenses.
Inventories
Inventory costs consist of the amount paid to acquire the
inventory, net of vendor consideration and purchase discounts,
the cost of equipment added, reconditioning costs, and
transportation costs relating to acquiring inventory for sale.
We state new boat, motor, and trailer inventories at the lower
of cost, determined on a specific-identification basis, or
market. We state used boat, motor, and trailer inventories,
including trade-ins, at the lower of cost, determined on a
specific-identification basis, or market. We state parts and
accessories at the lower of cost, determined on the
first-in,
first-out basis, or market. We utilize our historical
experience, the aging of the inventories, and our consideration
of current market trends as the basis for determining lower of
cost or market valuation allowance. As of September 30,
2007 and 2008, our lower of cost or market valuation allowance
was not material to the consolidated financial statements taken
as a whole. If events occur and market conditions change,
causing the fair value of our inventories to fall below their
carrying value, the lower of cost or market valuation allowance
could increase.
Valuation
of Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
We account for goodwill and identifiable intangible assets in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
(SFAS 142). Under this standard, we assess the impairment
of goodwill and identifiable intangible assets at least annually
and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that
the carrying value may not be recoverable. The first step in the
assessment is the estimation of fair value. If step one
indicates that impairment potentially exists, we perform the
second step to measure the amount of impairment, if any.
Goodwill and identifiable intangible asset impairment exists
when the estimated fair value is less than its carrying value.
During the three months ended June 30, 2008, we experienced
a significant decline in stock market valuation driven primarily
by weakness in the marine retail industry and an overall soft
economy, which hindered our financial performance. Accordingly,
we completed a step one analysis (as noted above) and estimated
the fair value of the reporting unit as prescribed by
SFAS 142, which indicated potential impairment. As a
result, we completed a fair value analysis of indefinite lived
intangible assets and a step two goodwill impairment analysis,
as required by SFAS 142. We determined that indefinite
lived intangible assets and goodwill were impaired and recorded
a non-cash charge of $121.1 million based on our
assessment. We will not be required to make any current or
future cash expenditures as a result of this impairment charge.
43
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144,
Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets (SFAS 144), requires that long-lived assets,
such as property and equipment and purchased intangibles subject
to amortization, be reviewed for impairment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an
asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of the asset is
measured by comparison of its carrying amount to undiscounted
future net cash flows the asset is expected to generate. If such
assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be
recognized is measured as the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds its fair market value. Estimates of
expected future cash flows represent our best estimate based on
currently available information and reasonable and supportable
assumptions. Any impairment recognized in accordance with
SFAS 144 is permanent and may not be restored. As of
September 30, 2008, we had not recognized any impairment of
long-lived assets in connection with SFAS 144 based on our
reviews.
During the three months ended June 30, 2008, we experienced
a significant decline in stock market valuation driven primarily
by weakness in the marine retail industry and an overall soft
economy, which has hindered our financial performance. As a
result of this weakness, we realized a goodwill and intangible
asset impairment charge, as noted above. Based on these events,
we reviewed the valuation of our investment in Gulfport in
accordance with APB 18 and recoverability of the assets
contained within the joint venture. APB 18 requires that a loss
in value of an investment which is other than a temporary
decline should be recognized. We reviewed our investment and
assets contained within the Gulfport joint venture, which
consists of land, buildings, equipment, and goodwill. As a
result, we determined that our investment in the joint venture
was impaired and recorded a non-cash charge of $1.0 million
based on our assessment. We will not be required to make any
current or future cash expenditures as a result of this
impairment charge.
Stock-Based
Compensation
Effective October 1, 2005, we adopted the provisions of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R,
Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R) for our
share-based compensation plans. We adopted SFAS 123R using
the modified prospective transition method. Under this
transition method, compensation cost recognized includes
(a) the compensation cost for all share-based awards
granted prior to, but not yet vested as of October 1, 2005,
based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with
the original provisions of SFAS 123 and (b) the
compensation cost for all share-based awards granted subsequent
to September 30, 2005, based on the grant-date fair value
estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R.
Results for prior periods have not been restated. Additionally,
we accounted for restricted stock awards granted using the
measurement and recognition provisions of SFAS 123R.
Accordingly, the fair value of the restricted stock awards is
measured on the grant date and recognized in earnings over the
requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of
the award.
Income
Taxes
We account for income taxes in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting
for Income Taxes (SFAS 109) and Financial
Accounting Standard Board Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
(FIN 48). Under SFAS 109, we recognize deferred tax
assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences
attributable to temporary differences between the financial
statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities
and their respective tax basis. We measure deferred tax assets
and liabilities using enacted tax rates expected to apply to
taxable income in the years in which we expect those temporary
differences to be recovered or settled. We record valuation
allowances to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount
expected to be realized by considering all available positive
and negative evidence.
Substantially all of our goodwill and intangibles are deductible
for tax purposes. Our loss for the year ended September 30,
2008, including the write-off of goodwill and intangible assets,
combined with other timing differences, gave rise to a net
operating loss, which resulted in a net deferred tax asset of
approximately $41.3 million. Pursuant to Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting
for Income Taxes (SFAS 109), we must consider all
positive and negative evidence regarding the realization of
deferred tax assets, including past operating results and future
sources of taxable income. Under the provisions of
SFAS 109, we determined that our net deferred tax asset
needed to be reserved given recent earnings and industry trends.
Accordingly, recording of the valuation allowance resulted in a
non-cash charge of approximately $39.2 million.
44
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued
Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes. The Interpretation clarifies the
accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an
enterprises financial statements and prescribes a
recognition threshold and measurement attributes of income tax
positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return. Under
FIN 48, the impact of an uncertain tax position taken or
expected to be taken on an income tax return must be recognized
in the financial statements at the largest amount that is
more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon audit by the relevant
taxing authority. An uncertain income tax position will not be
recognized in the financial statements unless it is more likely
than not of being sustained. We adopted the provisions of
FIN 48 as of October 1, 2007, and as a result, we
recognized a charge of approximately $554,000 to the
October 1, 2007 retained earnings balance. As of
September 30, 2008, we had approximately $2.1 million
of gross unrecognized tax benefits, of which approximately
$1.4 million, if recognized, would impact the effective tax
rate.
For a more comprehensive list of our accounting policies,
including those which involve varying degrees of judgment, see
Note 3 Significant Accounting
Policies of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Results
of Operations
The following table sets forth certain financial data as a
percentage of revenue for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
1,213,541
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,255,985
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
885,407
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
906,781
|
|
|
|
74.7
|
%
|
|
|
956,251
|
|
|
|
76.1
|
%
|
|
|
679,164
|
|
|
|
76.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
306,760
|
|
|
|
25.3
|
%
|
|
|
299,734
|
|
|
|
23.9
|
%
|
|
|
206,243
|
|
|
|
23.3
|
%
|
Selling, general, and administrative expenses
|
|
|
222,806
|
|
|
|
18.4
|
%
|
|
|
245,224
|
|
|
|
19.6
|
%
|
|
|
217,426
|
|
|
|
24.6
|
%
|
Goodwill and intangible asset impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
122,091
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
83,954
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
|
|
54,510
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
|
(133,274
|
)
|
|
|
(15.1
|
)%
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
18,616
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
26,955
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
20,164
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
65,338
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
|
27,555
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
(153,438
|
)
|
|
|
(17.4
|
)%
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
25,956
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
7,486
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
(19,161
|
)
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
39,382
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
20,069
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
(134,277
|
)
|
|
|
(15.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
Year Ended September 30, 2008 Compared with Fiscal Year
Ended September 30, 2007
Revenue. Revenue decreased
$370.6 million, or 29.5%, to $885.4 million for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 from
$1.26 billion for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2007. Of this decrease, $27.4 million was attributable to
stores opened, closed, or acquired that were not eligible for
inclusion in the comparable-store base and $343.2 million
was attributable to a 28% decline in comparable-store sales in
fiscal 2008. The decline in our same-store sales resulted
primarily from softer economic conditions, because of the
turmoil in the financial markets, which impacted our results as
well as those of most other retailers. In response to these
declines, we are adjusting our structure, including store
closures, in a manner in which we believe will reduce operating
costs but not result in market share losses.
Gross Profit. Gross profit decreased
$93.5 million, or 31.2%, to $206.2 million for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 from
$299.7 million for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2007. Gross profit as a percentage of revenue decreased to 23.3%
for fiscal 2008 from 23.9% for fiscal 2007. The decrease in
gross profit was a result of the significant reduction in
revenue resulting from the soft economic environment. The
decrease in gross profit as
45
a percentage of revenue was due to margin pressure arising from
the difficult retail environment and a sales mix shift to larger
products, which historically carry lower gross margins.
Selling, General, and Administrative
Expenses. Selling, general, and administrative
expenses decreased $27.8 million, or 11.3%, to
$217.4 million for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2008 from $245.2 million for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2007. Selling, general, and administrative
expenses as a percentage of revenue increased to 24.6% for the
year ended September 30, 2008 from 19.6% for the year ended
September 30, 2007. The fiscal year ended
September 30, 2008 included approximately $3.0 million
in charges associated with store closures, partially offset by
$1.0 million in gains recorded as an expense offset related
to proceeds from business interruption insurance claims
associated with ice storms damage at certain Missouri locations
in 2007 and the favorable settlement of certain interest rate
swaps accounted for as cash flow hedges. Additionally, the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 included
$3.7 million in gains recorded as an expense offset related
to business interruption insurance proceeds that was received
for claims associated with Hurricane Wilma in 2006, the sale of
our corporate jet, and insurance proceeds we received associated
with the ice storm damage at certain Missouri locations.
Excluding these items would result in a comparable selling,
general, and administrative expense reduction of
$33.3 million, or 13.4% and selling, general, and
administrative expenses as a percent of revenue increased to
24.4% for the year ended September 30, 2008 from 19.8% for
the year ended September 30, 2007. This increase in
selling, general, and administrative expenses as a percentage of
revenue was primarily attributable to the reported same-store
sales decline, which resulted in a reduction in our ability to
leverage our expense structure.
Goodwill and Intangible Asset
Impairment. During the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2008, we were required to write-off our
goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets as a result of
the decline in our market valuation and the continuation of the
difficult retail environment, as prescribed by SFAS 142.
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased
$6.8 million, or 25.2%, to $20.2 million for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 from
$27.0 million for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2007. Interest expense as a percentage of revenue increased to
2.3% for fiscal 2008 from 2.1% for fiscal 2007. The decrease in
interest expense was primarily a result of a more favorable
interest rate environment in fiscal 2008, which accounted for a
decrease of approximately $6.6 million in interest expense.
Income Tax Provision. Income taxes decreased
$26.6 million to a benefit of $19.2 million for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 from an income tax
expense of $7.5 million for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2007, primarily as a result of our pretax
loss. The effective tax rate for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2008 differed from previous periods primarily
as a result of the recording of a non-cash valuation allowance
that offsets the majority of income tax benefit that would have
arisen from the goodwill and intangible asset impairment charge.
Fiscal
Year Ended September 30, 2007 Compared with Fiscal Year
Ended September 30, 2006
Revenue. Revenue increased $42.4 million,
or 3.5%, to $1.3 billion for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2007 from $1.21 billion for the fiscal
year ended September 30, 2006. Of this increase,
$50.8 million was attributable to stores opened, closed, or
acquired that were not eligible for inclusion in the
comparable-store base, partially offset by a decline of
$8.4 million attributable to a less than 1% decline in
comparable-store sales in fiscal 2007. The 1% decline in
same-store sales was net of an increase in revenue from our
parts, service, finance, and insurance products of approximately
$6.2 million. The decline in our same-store sales resulted
primarily from soft economic conditions that have adversely
impacted our retail sales.
Gross Profit. Gross profit decreased
$7.1 million, or 2.3%, to $299.7 million for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 from
$306.8 million for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2006. Gross profit as a percentage of revenue decreased to 23.9%
for fiscal 2007 from 25.3% for fiscal 2006. This decrease was
primarily attributable to a margin reduction on boat sales as we
instituted price reduction initiatives in the softer market
place in order to achieve our sales volume.
Selling, General, and Administrative
Expenses. Selling, general, and administrative
expenses increased $22.4 million, or 10.0%, to
$245.2 million for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2007 from $222.8 million for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2006. Selling, general, and administrative
expenses as a percentage of revenue increased approximately
115 basis points to 19.6% for the year ended
September 30, 2007 from 18.4% for the year
46
ended September 30, 2006. For fiscal 2007, we recorded
$2.1 million of business interruption insurance proceeds
that was received for claims associated with Hurricane Wilma in
2006; we recorded a $1.0 million gain from the sale of our
jet; and we recorded a $600,000 gain related to insurance
proceeds we received associated with the snow and ice storm
damage at certain Missouri locations. We recorded these items as
a reduction to selling, general, and administrative expenses.
Excluding these items, selling, general, and administrative
expenses as a percent of revenue was 19.8% for the year ended
September 30, 2007. This approximate 145 basis point
increase in selling, general, and administrative expenses as a
percentage of revenue was primarily attributable to the reported
same-store sales decline and increased personnel and marketing
related costs incurred to drive retail sales in a softer retail
environment. In response to the softer retail environment, we
are working to reduce our cost structure with reductions in
personnel, store closures, and other expenditures.
Interest Expense. Interest expense increased
$8.4 million, or 44.8%, to $27.0 million for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 from
$18.6 million for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2006. Interest expense as a percentage of revenue increased to
2.1% for fiscal 2007 from 1.5% for fiscal 2006. The increase was
primarily a result of increased borrowings associated with our
revolving credit facility and mortgages, which accounted for an
increase in interest expense of approximately $6.8 million
and a less favorable interest rate environment, which accounted
for an increase of approximately $1.6 million in interest
expense.
Income Tax Provision. Income taxes decreased
$18.5 million, or 71.2%, to $7.5 million for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 from
$26.0 million for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2006, primarily as a result of our decreased earnings. Our
effective tax rate decreased to 27.2% for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2007 from 39.7% for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2006, primarily as a result of the settlement
of certain tax positions under an initiative offered by one of
the states in which we conduct operations. As a result of this
settlement, we reduced the reserve for contingent income taxes
by approximately $5.2 million and reduced income tax
expense by approximately $3.8 million for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2007. Without this reduction, the
effective tax rate would have been approximately 40.9% for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2007.
Quarterly
Data and Seasonality
Our business, as well as the entire recreational boating
industry, is highly seasonal, with seasonality varying in
different geographic markets. With the exception of Florida, we
generally realize significantly lower sales and higher levels of
inventories, and related short-term borrowings, in the quarterly
periods ending December 31 and March 31. The onset of the
public boat and recreation shows in January stimulates boat
sales and allows us to reduce our inventory levels and related
short-term borrowings throughout the remainder of the fiscal
year. Our business could become substantially more seasonal as
we acquire dealers that operate in colder regions of the United
States.
Our business is also subject to weather patterns, which may
adversely affect our results of operations. For example, drought
conditions (or merely reduced rainfall levels) or excessive rain
may close area boating locations or render boating dangerous or
inconvenient, thereby curtailing customer demand for our
products. In addition, unseasonably cool weather and prolonged
winter conditions may lead to a shorter selling season in
certain locations. Hurricanes and other storms could result in
disruptions of our operations or damage to our boat inventories
and facilities, as has been the case when Florida and other
markets were hit by hurricanes. Although our geographic
diversity is likely to reduce the overall impact to us of
adverse weather conditions in any one market area, these
conditions will continue to represent potential, material
adverse risks to us and our future financial performance.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Our cash needs are primarily for working capital to support
operations, including new and used boat and related parts
inventories, off-season liquidity, and growth through
acquisitions and new store openings. We regularly monitor the
aging of our inventories and current market trends to evaluate
our current and future inventory needs. We also use this
evaluation in conjunction with our review of our current and
expected operating performance and expected growth to determine
the adequacy of our financing needs. These cash needs have
historically been financed with cash generated from operations
and borrowings under our line of credit facility. Our ability to
utilize our credit facility to fund operations depends upon the
collateral levels and compliance with the covenants of the
credit facility. Turmoil in the credit markets and weakness in
the retail markets may interfere with
47
our ability to remain in compliance with the covenants of the
credit facility and therefore utilize the credit facility to
fund operations. At September 30, 2008, we were in
compliance with all of the credit facility covenants. Subsequent
to September 30, 2008 we amended the credit facility. We
currently depend upon dividends and other payments from our
dealerships and our line of credit facility to fund our current
operations and meet our cash needs. Currently, no agreements
exist that restrict this flow of funds from our dealerships.
For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2006 and 2007,
cash provided by operating activities approximated
$9.4 million and $20.0 million, respectively. For the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, cash used in
operating activities was approximately $8.8 million. For
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006, cash provided by
operating activities was due primarily to net income, adjusted
for non-cash depreciation, amortization, and stock based
compensation charges, and increases in accounts payable and
accrued expenses, partially offset by an increase in accounts
receivable due to increased revenues, an increase in inventories
to ensure appropriate inventory levels, and a decrease in
customer deposits. For the fiscal year ended September 30,
2007, cash provided by operating activities was due primarily to
net income, adjusted for non-cash depreciation, amortization,
and stock based compensation charges, and increases in customer
deposits and accrued expenses, partially offset by a decrease in
accounts payable, and an increase in inventories to ensure
appropriate inventory levels. For the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2008, cash used in operating activities was
due primarily to our net loss, a decrease in accounts payable
because of reductions in purchases from our manufacturers, and a
decrease in customer deposits due to a reduction in pending
sales. These amounts were primarily offset by noncash charges,
including the impairment of goodwill, stock-based compensation,
and depreciation and amortization expense. The cash used in
operating activities was further offset by reductions in
inventories and accounts receivable due to the reduction in
sales trends.
For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2006, 2007, and
2008, cash used in investing activities was approximately
$95.4 million, $9.4 million, and $7.9 million,
respectively. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006,
cash used in investing activities was primarily used in business
acquisitions and to purchase property and equipment associated
with opening new retail facilities or improving and relocating
existing retail facilities. For the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2007, cash used in investing activities was
primarily used to purchase property and equipment associated
with opening new retail facilities or improving and relocating
existing retail facilities and in the finalization of certain
business acquisitions, partially offset by proceeds received
from the sale and involuntary conversion of property and
equipment. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008,
cash used in investing activities was primarily used to purchase
property and equipment associated with opening new retail
facilities or improving and relocating existing retail
facilities.
For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2006 and 2008,
cash provided by financing activities was approximately
$83.9 million and $16.5 million, respectively. For the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2007, cash used in
financing activities was approximately $5.3 million. For
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006, cash provided by
financing activities was primarily attributable to proceeds from
net borrowings on short-term borrowings as a result of increased
inventory levels and borrowings on long-term debt on equipment
and real estate acquired, and proceeds from common shares issued
upon the exercise of stock options and under the employee stock
purchase plan, partially offset by purchases of treasury stock
and repayments of long-term debt. For the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2007, cash used in financing activities was
primarily attributable to purchases of treasury stock and
repayments of long-term debt, partially offset by proceeds from
net borrowings on short-term borrowings as a result of increased
inventory levels, and proceeds from common shares issued upon
the exercise of stock options and under the employee stock
purchase plan. For the fiscal year ended September 30,
2008, cash provided by financing activities was primarily
attributable to a net increase in short-term borrowings,
partially offset by repayments of long-term debt.
During December 2008, we entered into an amendment of our second
amended and restated credit and security agreement originally
entered into in June 2006. The amendment modified the amount of
borrowing availability, inventory advance rates, provides the
ability to advance $20 million against certain real estate,
financial covenants, and collateral under the credit facility.
With the amendment, the credit facility provides us a line of
credit with asset-based borrowing availability of up to
$425 million, stepping down to $350 million by
September 30, 2009 and $300 million by May 31,
2010. However, the amendment also contains a provision that
allows us to obtain commitments from existing or additional
lenders, thereby increasing the capacity of the credit facility,
up to $500 million. Amounts under the credit facility may
be used for working capital and inventory financing, with the
48
amount of permissible borrowings determined pursuant to a
borrowing base formula. The credit facility also permits
approved-vendor floorplan borrowings of up to $20 million.
The amendment replaces the fixed charge coverage ratio with an
interest coverage ratio for years ending on or after
September 30, 2010; it includes a cumulative earnings
before interest, taxes, depreciations and amortization, or
EBITDA (as defined in the agreement), covenant for each quarter;
it modifies the current ratio requirements; it reduces the
amount of allowable capital expenditures; it requires the
approval for any stock repurchases, and it requires approval for
acquisitions. The amended credit facility provides for interest
at the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 425 basis
points through September 30, 2010 and thereafter at LIBOR
plus 150 to 400 basis points, pursuant to a performance
pricing grid based upon our interest coverage ratio, as defined.
Borrowings under the credit facility are secured by our
inventory, accounts receivable, equipment, furniture, fixtures,
and real estate. The amended credit facility matures in May
2011, with two one-year renewal options, subject to lender
approval.
As of September 30, 2007 and 2008, we owed an aggregate of
$326.0 million and $372.0 million, respectively under
our revolving credit facility and were in compliance with all of
the credit facility covenants. Advances under the facility
accrued interest at a rate of 7.2% and 4.0%, as of
September 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively. All indebtedness
associated with our real estate holdings were repaid during the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2008. As of
September 30, 2008, the facility provided us with an
additional net borrowing availability of $84 million. The
December 2008 amendment, if in place at September 30, 2008,
would have reduced the available borrowings under the facility
to approximately $38 million, excluding $20 million of
potential real estate advances, from approximately
$84 million and increased the interest rate by
approximately 275 basis points.
During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006, we
completed the acquisition of two marine retail operations. We
acquired the net assets, related property, and buildings and
assumed or retired certain liabilities, including the
outstanding floorplan obligations related to new boat
inventories, for approximately $52.3 million in cash, plus
$29.0 million in working capital adjustments, including
acquisition costs, and 665,024 shares of common stock
valued at $33.71 per share. During the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2007 and 2008, we did not complete any
acquisitions.
Except as specified in this Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition, and Results of
Operations and in our consolidated financial statements,
we have no material commitments for capital for the next
12 months. We believe that our existing capital resources
will be sufficient to finance our operations for at least the
next 12 months, except for possible significant
acquisitions.
Contractual
Commitments and Commercial Commitments
The following table sets forth a summary of our material
contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of
September 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-Term
|
|
|
Other Long-Term
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending September 30,
|
|
Borrowings(1)
|
|
|
Liabilities(2)
|
|
|
Leases(3)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
372,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,043
|
|
|
$
|
382,043
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,374
|
|
|
|
8,958
|
|
|
|
13,332
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,015
|
|
|
|
8,015
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,383
|
|
|
|
6,383
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,267
|
|
|
|
4,267
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,014
|
|
|
|
10,014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
372,000
|
|
|
$
|
4,374
|
|
|
$
|
47,680
|
|
|
$
|
424,054
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Estimates of future interest payments for Short-Term Borrowings
have been excluded in the tabular presentation. Amounts due are
contingent upon the outstanding balances and the variable
interest rates. As of September 30, 2008, the interest rate
on our Short-Term Borrowings was 4%. |
|
(2) |
|
The amounts included in other long-term liabilities primarily
consist of our estimated liability for claims on certain
workers compensation insurance policies. While we estimate
the amount to be paid in excess of |
49
|
|
|
|
|
12 months, the ultimate timing of the payments is subject
to certain variability. Accordingly, we have classified all
amounts as due in the following year for the purposes of this
table. |
|
(3) |
|
Amounts for operating lease commitments do not include certain
operating expenses such as maintenance, insurance, and real
estate taxes. These amounts are not a material component of
operating expenses. |
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any transactions, arrangements, or other
relationships with unconsolidated entities that are reasonably
likely to affect our financial condition, liquidity, or capital
resources. We have no special purpose or limited purpose
entities that provide off-balance sheet financing, liquidity, or
market or credit risk support; we do not engage in leasing,
hedging, or research and development services; and we do not
have other relationships that expose us to liability that is not
reflected in the financial statements.
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
At September 30, 2008, all of our short-term debt bore
interest at a variable rate, tied to LIBOR as a reference rate.
Changes in the underlying LIBOR interest rate or the spread
charged under our performance pricing grid on our short-term
debt could affect our earnings. For example, the 275 basis
point increase in the interest rate on our
short-term
debt, as defined in our December 2008 amendment, is projected to
result in an increase of approximately $10.2 million in
annual pre-tax interest expense. This estimated increase is
based upon the outstanding balance of our short-term debt as of
September 30, 2008 and assumes no mitigating changes by us
to reduce the outstanding balances, no additional interest
assistance that could be received from vendors due to the
interest rate increase, and no changes in the base LIBOR rate.
Products purchased from Italian-based manufacturers are subject
to fluctuations in the euro to U.S. dollar exchange rate,
which ultimately may impact the retail price at which we can
sell such products. Accordingly, fluctuations in the value of
the euro as compared with the U.S. dollar may impact the
price points at which we can sell profitably Italian products,
and such price points may not be competitive with other product
lines in the United States. Accordingly, such fluctuations in
exchange rates ultimately may impact the amount of revenue, cost
of goods sold, cash flows, and earnings we recognize for Italian
product lines. We cannot predict the effects of exchange rate
fluctuations on our operating results. In certain cases, we may
enter into foreign currency cash flow hedges to reduce the
variability of cash flows associated with forecasted purchases
of boats and yachts from
Italian-based
manufacturers. We are not currently engaged in foreign currency
exchange hedging transactions to manage our foreign currency
exposure. If and when we do engage in foreign currency exchange
hedging transactions, we cannot assure that our strategies will
adequately protect our operating results from the effects of
exchange rate fluctuations.
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
Reference is made to the financial statements, the notes
thereto, and the report thereon, commencing on
page F-1
of this report, which financial statement, notes, and report are
incorporated herein by reference.
Item 9. Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
Not applicable.
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed
to ensure that material information required to be disclosed by
us in Securities Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms, and
that such information is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
50
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have
evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of
the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation,
such officers have concluded that, as of the end of the period
covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures
were effective.
Changes
in Internal Controls
During the quarter ended September 30, 2008, there were no
changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that
materially affected, or were reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Limitations
on the Effectiveness of Controls
Our management, including our CEO and CFO, does not expect that
our disclosure controls and internal controls will prevent all
errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well
conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not
absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system
are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect
the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits
of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because
of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no
evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all
control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the
company have been detected. These inherent limitations include
the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty,
and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or
mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the
individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more
people, or by management override of the control. The design of
any system of controls also is based in part upon certain
assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can
be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its
stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, a
control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions,
or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a
cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or
fraud may occur and not be detected.
CEO and
CFO Certifications
Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 are the Certifications of the CEO
and the CFO, respectively. The Certifications are required in
accordance with Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (the Section 302 Certifications). This Item of this
report, which you are currently reading is the information
concerning the Evaluation referred to in the Section 302
Certifications and this information should be read in
conjunction with the Section 302 Certifications for a more
complete understanding of the topics presented.
Managements
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term
is defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Under the supervision
and with the participation of the Companys management,
including its principal executive officer and principal
financial officer, the Company conducted an evaluation of the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting as of September 30, 2008 as required by
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Rule 13a-15(c).
In making this assessment, the Company used the criteria set
forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control
Integrated Framework. Based on its evaluation, management
concluded that its internal control over financial reporting was
effective as of September 30, 2008.
Our internal control over financial reporting as of
September 30, 2008 has been audited by Ernst and Young LLP,
an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in
their report which appears below.
51
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
MarineMax, Inc.
We have audited MarineMax, Inc.s internal control over
financial reporting as of September 30, 2008, based on
criteria established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). MarineMax,
Inc.s management is responsible for maintaining effective
internal control over financial reporting, and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting included in the accompanying
managements report on internal control over financial
reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
companys internal control over financial reporting based
on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, MarineMax, Inc. maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as
of September 30, 2008, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of MarineMax, Inc. as of
September 30, 2008 and 2007, and the related statements of
operations, comprehensive income, stockholders equity, and
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
September 30, 2008 of MarineMax, Inc. and our report dated
December 15, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Certified Public Accountants
Tampa, Florida
December 15, 2008
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other
Information
|
Not applicable.
52
PART III
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance
|
The information required by this Item relating to our directors
is incorporated herein by reference to the definitive Proxy
Statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the
Exchange Act for our 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The
information required by this Item relating to our executive
officers included in Business Executive
Officers.
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by
reference to the definitive Proxy Statement to be filed pursuant
to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act for our 2009 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders.
Item 12. Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by
reference to the definitive Proxy Statement to be filed pursuant
to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act for our 2009 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders.
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by
reference to the definitive Proxy Statement to be filed pursuant
to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act for our 2009 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders.
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
|
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by
reference to the definitive Proxy Statement to be filled
pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act for our 2009
Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
53
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules
|
|
|
(a)
|
Financial
Statements and Financial Statement Schedules
|
(1) Financial Statements are listed in the Index to
Consolidated Financial Statements on
page F-1
of this report.
(2) No financial statement schedules are included because
such schedules are not applicable, are not required, or because
required information is included in the consolidated financial
statements or notes thereto.
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant,
including all amendments to date(1)
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant(14)
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating
Preferred Stock(1)
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Specimen of Common Stock Certificate(1)
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Rights Agreement, dated August 28, 2001 between Registrant
and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as
Rights Agent(2)
|
|
10
|
.1(k)
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of March 30, 2006 among
MarineMax of New York, Inc.; Surfside-3 Marina, Inc.; Matthew
Barbara, Paul Barbara, Diane Keeney, and Angela Chianese; and
certain affiliates of Surfside-3 Marina, Inc.
(Form 10-Q
filed May 10, 2006)(3)
|
|
10
|
.3(h)
|
|
Employment Agreement between Registrant and William H. McGill
Jr.(4)
|
|
10
|
.3(i)
|
|
Employment Agreement between Registrant and Michael H. McLamb(4)
|
|
10
|
.3(j)
|
|
Employment Agreement between Registrant and Edward A. Russell(4)
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
1998 Incentive Stock Plan, as amended through November 15,
2000(5)
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan(6)
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
Agreement Relating to Acquisitions between Registrant and
Brunswick Corporation, dated December 7, 2005(9)
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
Hatteras Sales and Service Agreement, dated July 1, 2003
among the Registrant, MarineMax Motor Yachts, LLC, and Hatteras
Yachts Division of Brunswick Corporation(7)
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Credit and Security Agreement dated
June 19, 2006 among the Registrant and its subsidiaries as
Borrowers, Keybank Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., and
various other lenders, as Lenders(8)
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
Agreement Relating to Acquisitions between Registrant and
Brunswick Corporation, dated December 7, 2005(9)
|
|
10
|
.20(a)
|
|
Sea Ray Sales and Service Agreement(9)
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Credit and Security Agreement dated
June 19, 2006 among the Registrant and its subsidiaries, as
Borrowers, and Bank of America, N.A., KeyBank, N.A., General
Electric Commercial Distribution Finance Corporation, Wachovia
Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., National City Bank, N.A.,
U.S. Bank, N.A., and Branch Banking and Trust company, as
Lenders(8)
|
|
10
|
.21(a)
|
|
First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit and
Security Agreement executed on June 5, 2007 effective as of
May 31, 2007 among the Registrant and its subsidiaries, as
Borrowers, and Bank of America, N.A., KeyBank, N.A., General
Electric Commercial Distribution Finance Corporation, Branch
Banking and Trust Company, as Lenders(10)
|
|
10
|
.21(b)
|
|
Third Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit and
Security Agreement executed on March 7, 2008, among
MarineMax, Inc. and its subsidiaries, as Borrowers, and Bank of
America, N.A., Keybank, N.A., General Electric Commercial
Distribution Finance Corporation, Wachovia Bank, N.A., Wells
Fargo Bank, N.A., U.S. Bank, N.A., Branch Banking and
Trust Company, and Bank of the West, as Lenders(13)
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
MarineMax, Inc. 2007 Incentive Compensation Plan(11)
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
Form Stock Option Agreement for 2007 Incentive Compensation
Plan(11)
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
Form Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for 2007
Incentive Compensation Plan(11)
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
Director Fee Share Purchase Program(12)
|
|
21
|
|
|
List of Subsidiaries
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)
and
Rule 15d-14(a),
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)
and
Rule 15d-14(a),
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain information in this exhibit has been omitted and filed
separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the
omitted portions. |
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registration Statement on Form
10-K for the
year ended September 30, 2001, as filed on
December 20, 2001. |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 8-K
Report dated September 30, 1998, as filed on
October 20, 1998. |
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed on
May 10, 2006. |
|
(4) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 8-K,
as filed on June 13, 2006. |
|
(5) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2001, as filed
on February 14, 2002. |
|
(6) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registration Statement on Form
S-1
(Registration
333-47873). |
|
(7) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007, as filed on
May 7, 2007. |
|
(8) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006, as filed on
August 4, 2006. |
|
(9) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 8-K,
as filed on December 9, 2005. |
|
(10) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 8-K,
as filed on June 11, 2007. |
|
(11) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 8-K,
as filed on March 6, 2007. |
|
(12) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form S-8
(File No.
333-141657)
as filed March 29, 2007. |
|
(13) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 8-K,
as filed on March 12, 2008. |
|
(14) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 8-K,
as filed on November 26, 2008. |
|
|
(c)
|
Financial
Statement Schedules
|
(1) See Item 15(a) above.
55
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
MarineMax,
Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ William
H. McGill Jr.
|
William H. McGill Jr.
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Date: December 15, 2008
In accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the
capacities and on the date indicated have signed this report
below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Capacity
|
|
Date
|
|
/s/ WILLIAM
H. MCGILL JR.
William
H. McGill Jr.
|
|
Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
December 15, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ MICHAEL
H. MCLAMB
Michael
H. McLamb
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary,
and Director (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
|
|
December 15, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ HILLIARD
M. EURE III
Hilliard
M. Eure III
|
|
Director
|
|
December 15, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ JOHN
B. FURMAN
John
B. Furman
|
|
Director
|
|
December 15, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ ROBERT
S. KANT
Robert
S. Kant
|
|
Director
|
|
December 15, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ JOSEPH
A. WATTERS
Joseph
A. Watters
|
|
Director
|
|
December 15, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ DEAN
S. WOODMAN
Dean
S. Woodman
|
|
Director
|
|
December 15, 2008
|
56
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
|
|
|
F-8
|
|
F-1
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
MarineMax, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
MarineMax, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2008
and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
comprehensive income, stockholders equity and cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended
September 30, 2008. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of MarineMax, Inc. and subsidiaries at
September 30, 2008 and 2007, and the consolidated results
of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended September 30, 2008, in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in Note 3 to the financial statements, in 2008
the Company changed its method for accounting for income tax
uncertainties.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
MarineMax, Inc.s internal control over financial reporting
as of September 30, 2008, based on criteria established in
Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our
report dated December 15, 2008 expressed an unqualified
opinion thereon.
Certified Public Accountants
Tampa, Florida
December 15, 2008
F-2
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Amounts
in thousands except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
30,375
|
|
|
$
|
30,264
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
57,333
|
|
|
|
35,675
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
478,039
|
|
|
|
468,629
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
8,997
|
|
|
|
7,949
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
6,485
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
581,229
|
|
|
|
542,824
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
118,960
|
|
|
|
113,869
|
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
121,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
4,515
|
|
|
|
3,424
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
825,878
|
|
|
$
|
661,323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
19,980
|
|
|
$
|
4,481
|
|
Customer deposits
|
|
|
33,420
|
|
|
|
6,505
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
27,044
|
|
|
|
25,380
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
326,000
|
|
|
|
372,000
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
4,396
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
410,840
|
|
|
|
408,366
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
11,971
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current maturities
|
|
|
26,437
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
3,071
|
|
|
|
4,374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
452,319
|
|
|
|
412,740
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 1,000,000 shares
authorized, none issued or outstanding at September 30,
2007 and 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.001 par value; 24,000,000 shares
authorized, 19,099,464 and 19,215,387 shares issued and
18,379,864 and 18,424,487 shares outstanding at
September 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
167,912
|
|
|
|
178,830
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
220,375
|
|
|
|
85,544
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost, 719,600 and 790,900 shares held at
September 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively
|
|
|
(14,775
|
)
|
|
|
(15,810
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
373,559
|
|
|
|
248,583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
825,878
|
|
|
$
|
661,323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-3
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Amounts
in thousands except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
1,213,541
|
|
|
$
|
1,255,985
|
|
|
$
|
885,407
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
906,781
|
|
|
|
956,251
|
|
|
|
679,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
306,760
|
|
|
|
299,734
|
|
|
|
206,243
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative expenses
|
|
|
222,806
|
|
|
|
245,224
|
|
|
|
217,426
|
|
Goodwill and intangible asset impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
83,954
|
|
|
|
54,510
|
|
|
|
(133,274
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
18,616
|
|
|
|
26,955
|
|
|
|
20,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
65,338
|
|
|
|
27,555
|
|
|
|
(153,438
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
25,956
|
|
|
|
7,486
|
|
|
|
(19,161
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
39,382
|
|
|
$
|
20,069
|
|
|
$
|
(134,277
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per common share
|
|
$
|
2.18
|
|
|
$
|
1.08
|
|
|
$
|
(7.30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) per common share
|
|
$
|
2.08
|
|
|
$
|
1.04
|
|
|
$
|
(7.30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares used in computing net
income (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
18,028,562
|
|
|
|
18,618,611
|
|
|
|
18,391,488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
18,928,735
|
|
|
|
19,289,231
|
|
|
|
18,391,488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-4
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Amounts
in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
39,382
|
|
|
$
|
20,069
|
|
|
$
|
(134,277
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair market value of derivative instruments, net of
tax expense of $318 for the year ended September 30, 2006
and net of tax benefit of $300 and $228 for the years ended
September 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
(379
|
)
|
|
|
(365
|
)
|
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income,
net of tax of $62 and $211 for the years ended
September 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
39,889
|
|
|
$
|
19,590
|
|
|
$
|
(134,305
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-5
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Amounts
in thousands except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
BALANCE, September 30, 2005
|
|
|
17,678,087
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
125,672
|
|
|
$
|
160,924
|
|
|
$
|
(2,397
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(618
|
)
|
|
$
|
283,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,382
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
(306,300
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,945
|
)
|
|
|
(6,945
|
)
|
Reclassification resulting from adoption of SFAS 123R
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,397
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,397
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued under employee stock purchase plan
|
|
|
59,197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,283
|
|
Shares issued upon exercise of stock options
|
|
|
253,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,581
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,581
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
180,163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,567
|
|
Shares issued upon business acquisition
|
|
|
665,024
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
22,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,418
|
|
Tax benefits of options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,495
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,495
|
|
Change in fair market value of derivative instruments, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, September 30, 2006
|
|
|
18,529,524
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
156,618
|
|
|
|
200,306
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
(7,563
|
)
|
|
|
349,887
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,069
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,069
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
(383,300
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,212
|
)
|
|
|
(7,212
|
)
|
Shares issued under employee stock purchase plan
|
|
|
78,665
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,631
|
|
Shares issued upon exercise of stock options
|
|
|
149,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,587
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
5,195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,307
|
|
Tax benefits of options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
769
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
769
|
|
Change in fair market value of derivative instruments, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(479
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(479
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, September 30, 2007
|
|
|
18,379,864
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
167,912
|
|
|
|
220,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
(14,775
|
)
|
|
|
373,559
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(134,277
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(134,277
|
)
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
(71,300
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,035
|
)
|
|
|
(1,035
|
)
|
Shares issued under employee stock purchase plan
|
|
|
105,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,207
|
|
Shares issued upon exercise of stock options
|
|
|
102,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,024
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
8,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,464
|
|
Tax benefits of options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
Cumulative effect of adoption of FIN 48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(554
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(554
|
)
|
Conversion of restricted stock awards to restricted stock units
|
|
|
(100,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair market value of derivative instruments, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, September 30, 2008
|
|
|
18,424,487
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
178,830
|
|
|
$
|
85,544
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(15,810
|
)
|
|
$
|
248,583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-6
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Amounts
in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
39,382
|
|
|
$
|
20,069
|
|
|
$
|
(134,277
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and intangible asset impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,091
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
8,607
|
|
|
|
9,350
|
|
|
|
11,090
|
|
Deferred income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
1,020
|
|
|
|
(1,367
|
)
|
|
|
(6,303
|
)
|
Gain on sale of property and equipment
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
(1,030
|
)
|
|
|
259
|
|
Gain on involuntary conversion of property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(613
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
5,567
|
|
|
|
7,307
|
|
|
|
8,464
|
|
Tax benefits of options exercised
|
|
|
1,495
|
|
|
|
769
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
(1,127
|
)
|
|
|
(546
|
)
|
|
|
(169
|
)
|
(Increase) decrease in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
(21,385
|
)
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
21,658
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
(25,334
|
)
|
|
|
(15,192
|
)
|
|
|
9,410
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(1,093
|
)
|
|
|
(1,172
|
)
|
|
|
2,633
|
|
Increase (decrease) in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
20,196
|
|
|
|
(17,418
|
)
|
|
|
(16,749
|
)
|
Customer deposits
|
|
|
(21,988
|
)
|
|
|
16,250
|
|
|
|
(26,915
|
)
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
4,104
|
|
|
|
3,332
|
|
|
|
(361
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
9,402
|
|
|
|
19,995
|
|
|
|
(8,786
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(10,164
|
)
|
|
|
(9,507
|
)
|
|
|
(7,969
|
)
|
Cash used in business investment
|
|
|
(4,007
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in acquisitions of businesses, net assets, and
intangible assets
|
|
|
(81,369
|
)
|
|
|
(4,847
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
2,915
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
Proceeds from involuntary conversion of property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(95,435
|
)
|
|
|
(9,432
|
)
|
|
|
(7,857
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings of long-term debt
|
|
|
12,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of long-term debt
|
|
|
(5,140
|
)
|
|
|
(6,353
|
)
|
|
|
(30,833
|
)
|
Net (repayments) borrowings on short-term borrowings
|
|
|
78,729
|
|
|
|
4,500
|
|
|
|
46,000
|
|
Purchases of treasury stock
|
|
|
(6,945
|
)
|
|
|
(7,212
|
)
|
|
|
(1,035
|
)
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
1,127
|
|
|
|
546
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock under option and
employee purchase plans
|
|
|
3,864
|
|
|
|
3,218
|
|
|
|
2,231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
83,875
|
|
|
|
(5,301
|
)
|
|
|
16,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
|
|
|
(2,158
|
)
|
|
|
5,262
|
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period
|
|
|
27,271
|
|
|
|
25,113
|
|
|
|
30,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period
|
|
$
|
25,113
|
|
|
$
|
30,375
|
|
|
$
|
30,264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued in connection with business acquisition
|
|
$
|
22,418
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-7
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
1.
|
COMPANY
BACKGROUND AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION:
|
We are the largest recreational boat retailer in the United
States. We engage primarily in the retail sale, brokerage, and
service of new and used boats, motors, trailers, marine parts,
and accessories and offer slip and storage accommodations in
certain locations. In addition, we arrange related boat
financing, insurance, and extended service contracts. As of
September 30, 2008, we operated through 80 retail locations
in 22 states, consisting of Alabama, Arizona, California,
Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Maryland,
Minnesota, Missouri, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North
Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Carolina,
Tennessee, Texas, and Utah.
We are the nations largest retailer of Sea Ray, Boston
Whaler, Cabo, Hatteras, and Meridian recreational boats and
yachts, all of which are manufactured by Brunswick Corporation
(Brunswick). Sales of new Brunswick boats accounted for
approximately 49% of our revenue in fiscal 2008. Brunswick is
the worlds largest manufacturer of marine products and
marine engines. We believe we represented approximately 10% of
all Brunswick marine sales, including approximately 40% of its
Sea Ray boat sales, during our 2008 fiscal year.
We have dealership agreements with Sea Ray, Boston Whaler, Cabo,
Hatteras, Meridian, and Mercury Marine, all subsidiaries or
divisions of Brunswick. We also have dealer agreements with
Azimut. These agreements allow us to purchase, stock, sell, and
service these manufacturers boats and products. These
agreements also allow us to use these manufacturers names,
trade symbols, and intellectual properties in our operations.
We are parties to a multi-year dealer agreements with Brunswick
covering Sea Ray products that appoints us as the exclusive
dealer of Sea Ray boats in our geographic markets. We are party
to a multi-year dealer agreement with Hatteras Yachts that gives
us the exclusive right to sell Hatteras Yachts throughout the
states of Florida (excluding the Florida panhandle), New Jersey,
New York, and Texas. We are also the exclusive dealer for Cabo
Yachts throughout the states of Florida, New Jersey, and New
York through a multi-year dealer agreement. We are also the
exclusive dealer for Italy-based Azimut-Benetti Groups
product line Azimut Yachts for the Northeast United States from
Maryland to Maine and for the state of Florida through a
multi-year dealer agreement. We believe the non-Brunswick brands
offer a migration for our existing customer base or fill a void
in our product offerings, and accordingly, do not compete with
the business generated from our other prominent brands.
As is typical in the industry, we deal with manufacturers, other
than Sea Ray, Hatteras, Cabo and Azimut Yachts, under renewable
annual dealer agreements, each of which gives us the right to
sell various makes and models of boats within a given geographic
region. Any change or termination of these agreements, or the
agreements discussed above, for any reason, or changes in
competitive, regulatory, or marketing practices, including
rebate or incentive programs, could adversely affect our results
of operations. Although there are a limited number of
manufacturers of the type of boats and products that we sell, we
believe that adequate alternative sources would be available to
replace any manufacturer other than Brunswick as a product
source. These alternative sources may not be available at the
time of any interruption, and alternative products may not be
available at comparable terms, which could affect operating
results adversely.
General economic conditions and consumer spending patterns can
negatively impact our operating results. Unfavorable local,
regional, national, or global economic developments or
uncertainties regarding future economic prospects could reduce
consumer spending in the markets we serve and adversely affect
our business. Economic conditions in areas in which we operate
dealerships, particularly Florida in which we generated 46%,
44%, and 43% of our revenue during fiscal 2006, 2007, and 2008,
respectively, can have a major impact on our operations. Local
influences, such as corporate downsizing and military base
closings, also could adversely affect our operations in certain
markets.
In an economic downturn, consumer discretionary spending levels
generally decline, at times resulting in disproportionately
large reductions in the sale of luxury goods. Consumer spending
on luxury goods also may decline as a result of lower consumer
confidence levels, even if prevailing economic conditions are
favorable. Although we have expanded our operations during
periods of stagnant or modestly declining industry trends, the
F-8
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
cyclical nature of the recreational boating industry or the lack
of industry growth could adversely affect our business,
financial condition, or results of operations in the future. Any
period of adverse economic conditions or low consumer confidence
has a negative effect on our business.
Lower consumer spending resulting from a downturn in the housing
market and other economic factors adversely affected our
business in fiscal 2007, and continued weakness in consumer
spending resulting from substantial weakness in the financial
markets and deteriorating economic conditions had a very
substantial negative effect on our business in fiscal 2008.
These conditions caused us to defer our acquisition program,
slow our new store openings, reduce our inventory purchases,
engage in inventory reduction efforts, close some of our retail
locations, and reduce our headcount. We cannot predict the
length or severity of these unfavorable economic or financial
conditions or the extent to which they will adversely affect our
operating results nor can we predict the effectiveness of the
measures we have taken to address this environment or whether
additional measures will be necessary.
Unless the context otherwise requires, all references to
MarineMax mean MarineMax, Inc. prior to its
acquisition of five previously independent recreational boat
dealers in March 1998 (including their related real estate
companies) and all references to the Company,
our company, we, us, and
our mean, as a combined company; MarineMax, Inc. and
the 20 recreational boat dealers, two boat brokerage operations,
and two full-service yacht repair operations acquired to date
(the acquired dealers, and together with the
brokerage and repair operations, operating
subsidiaries or the acquired companies).
In order to provide comparability between periods presented,
certain amounts have been reclassified from the previously
reported consolidated financial statements to conform to the
consolidated financial statement presentation of the current
period. The consolidated financial statements include our
accounts and the accounts of our subsidiaries, all of which are
wholly owned. All significant intercompany transactions and
accounts have been eliminated.
We were incorporated in Delaware in January 1998 and commenced
operations with the acquisition of five independent recreational
boat dealers on March 1, 1998. Since the initial
acquisitions, we have acquired 20 recreational boat dealers, two
boat brokerage operations, and two full-service yacht repair
facilities. As a part of our acquisition strategy, we frequently
engage in discussions with various recreational boat dealers
regarding their potential acquisition by us. Potential
acquisition discussions frequently take place over a long period
of time and involve difficult business integration and other
issues, including, in some cases, management succession and
related matters. As a result of these and other factors, a
number of potential acquisitions that from time to time appear
likely to occur do not result in binding legal agreements and
are not consummated. No significant acquisitions were completed
during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2007 and 2008.
During January 2006, we acquired substantially all of the
assets, including certain real estate, and assumed certain
liabilities of the Port Arrowhead Group (Port Arrowhead), a
privately held boat dealership with six locations, including a
large marina, in Missouri and Oklahoma, for approximately
$27.5 million in cash, plus $5.0 million in working
capital adjustments, including acquisition costs. The
acquisition expands our ability to serve consumers in the
Midwest boating community, including neighboring boating
destinations in Illinois, Kansas, and Arkansas. The acquisition
also allows us to capitalize on Port Arrowheads market
position and leverage our inventory management and inventory
financing resources over the acquired locations. Based on a
valuation, the purchase price, including acquisition costs,
resulted in the recognition of approximately $6.0 million
of tax deductible goodwill and approximately $2.0 million
of tax deductible indefinite-lived intangible assets (dealer
agreements). Port Arrowhead has been included in our
consolidated financial statements since the date of acquisition.
Pro forma results of operations have not been presented with
respect to the Port Arrowhead acquisition, as the
pre-acquisition effects of the acquisition was not significant
in fiscal 2006.
F-9
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
During March 2006, we acquired substantially all of the assets
and assumed certain liabilities of Surfside-3 Marina, Inc.
(Surfside), a privately held boat dealership with eight
locations in New York and Connecticut, for approximately
$24.8 million in cash and 665,024 shares of common
stock, plus $24.0 million in working capital adjustments,
including acquisition costs. The shares were valued at $33.71
per share, which was the average closing market price of our
common stock for the five day-period beginning two days prior to
and ending two days subsequent to the acquisition date. The
acquisition expands our ability to serve consumers in the
Northeast boating community and allows us to capitalize on
Surfsides market position and leverage our inventory
management and inventory financing resources over the acquired
locations. Based on a valuation, the purchase price, including
acquisition costs, resulted in the recognition of approximately
$40.0 million of tax deductible goodwill and approximately
$16.4 million of tax deductible indefinite-lived intangible
assets (dealer agreements). Surfside has been included in our
consolidated financial statements since the date of acquisition.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisitions of
Port Arrowhead and Surfside during 2006 (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
$
|
5,501
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
119,808
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
392
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
20,383
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
45,991
|
|
Other identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
18,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
$
|
210,450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short term borrowings
|
|
$
|
(92,770
|
)
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
(14,004
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(106,774
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
103,676
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following unaudited pro forma financial information presents
the combined results of operations of our company with the
operations of Surfside as if the acquisition had occurred as of
the beginning of fiscal 2006 (amounts in thousands, except per
share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
1,264,854
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
37,678
|
|
Net income per common share
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
2.05
|
|
Dilutive
|
|
$
|
1.96
|
|
This unaudited pro forma financial information is presented for
informational purposes only. The unaudited pro forma financial
information includes an adjustment to record income taxes as if
Surfside were taxed as a C corporation from the beginning of the
periods presented until its acquisition date. The unaudited pro
forma financial information does not include adjustments to
remove certain private company expenses, which may not be
incurred in future periods. Similarly, the unaudited pro forma
financial information does not include adjustments for
additional expenses, such as rent, insurance, interest incurred
on borrowings for cash paid at acquisition, and other expenses
that would have been incurred subsequent to the acquisition
date. The unaudited pro forma financial information may not
necessarily reflect our future results of operations or what the
results of operations would have been had we owned and operated
Surfside as of the beginning of the periods presented.
F-10
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
3.
|
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
|
Statements
of Cash Flows
For purposes of the consolidated balance sheets and statements
of cash flows, we consider all highly liquid investments with an
original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
We made interest payments of approximately $17.2 million,
$26.6 million, and $20.6 million for the fiscal years
ended September 30, 2006, 2007, and 2008, respectively,
including interest on debt to finance our real estate holdings
and inventory. We made income tax payments of approximately
$8.9 million, $26.0 million, and $2.6 million for
the fiscal years ended September 30, 2006, 2007, and 2008,
respectively.
Vendor
Consideration Received
We account for consideration received from our vendors in
accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force
Issue No. 02-16,
Accounting by a Customer (Including a Reseller) for
Certain Consideration Received from a Vendor
(EITF 02-16).
EITF 02-16
most significantly requires us to classify interest assistance
received from manufacturers as a reduction of inventory cost and
related cost of sales as opposed to netting the assistance
against our interest expense incurred with our lenders. Pursuant
to
EITF 02-16,
amounts received by us under our co-op assistance programs from
our manufacturers are netted against related advertising
expenses.
Inventories
Inventory costs consist of the amount paid to acquire the
inventory, net of vendor consideration and purchase discounts,
the cost of equipment added, reconditioning costs, and
transportation costs relating to acquiring inventory for sale.
We state new boat, motor, and trailer inventories at the lower
of cost, determined on a specific-identification basis, or
market. We state used boat, motor, and trailer inventories,
including trade-ins, at the lower of cost, determined on a
specific-identification basis, or market. We state parts and
accessories at the lower of cost, determined on the
first-in,
first-out basis, or market. We utilize our historical
experience, the aging of the inventories, and our consideration
of current market trends as the basis for determining lower of
cost or market valuation allowance. As of September 30,
2007 and 2008, our lower of cost or market valuation allowance
was not material to the consolidated financial statements taken
as a whole. If events occur and market conditions change,
causing the fair value of our inventories to fall below their
carrying value, the lower of cost or market valuation allowance
could increase.
Property
and Equipment
We record property and equipment at cost, net of accumulated
depreciation, and depreciate property and equipment over their
estimated useful lives using the straight-line method. We
capitalize and amortize leasehold improvements over the lesser
of the life of the lease or the estimated useful life of the
asset. Useful lives for purposes of computing depreciation are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
5-40
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
3-10
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
5-10
|
|
Vehicles
|
|
|
3-5
|
|
We remove the cost of property and equipment sold or retired and
the related accumulated depreciation from the accounts at the
time of disposition and include any resulting gain or loss in
the consolidated statements of operations. We charge
maintenance, repairs, and minor replacements to operations as
incurred; we capitalize and amortize major replacements and
improvements over their useful lives.
F-11
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Valuation
of Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
We account for goodwill and identifiable intangible assets in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
(SFAS 142). Under this standard, we assess the impairment
of goodwill and identifiable intangible assets at least annually
and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that
the carrying value may not be recoverable. The first step in the
assessment is the estimation of fair value. If step one
indicates that impairment potentially exists, we perform the
second step to measure the amount of impairment, if any.
Goodwill and identifiable intangible asset impairment exists
when the estimated fair value is less than its carrying value.
During the three months ended June 30, 2008, we experienced
a significant decline in market valuation driven primarily by
weakness in the marine retail industry and an overall soft
economy, which hindered our financial performance. Accordingly,
we completed a step one analysis (as noted above) and estimated
the fair value of the reporting unit as prescribed by
SFAS 142, which indicated potential impairment. As a
result, we completed a fair value analysis of indefinite lived
intangible assets and a step two goodwill impairment analysis,
as required by SFAS 142. We determined that indefinite
lived intangible assets and goodwill were impaired and recorded
a non-cash charge of $121.1 million based on our
assessment. We will not be required to make any current or
future cash expenditures as a result of this impairment charge.
There was no goodwill amortization expense for the fiscal years
ended September 30, 2006, 2007, and 2008. Accumulated
amortization of goodwill was approximately $2.6 million at
September 30, 2007.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144,
Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets (SFAS 144), requires that long-lived assets,
such as property and equipment and purchased intangibles subject
to amortization, be reviewed for impairment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an
asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of the asset is
measured by comparison of its carrying amount to undiscounted
future net cash flows the asset is expected to generate. If such
assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be
recognized is measured as the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds its fair market value. Estimates of
expected future cash flows represent our best estimate based on
currently available information and reasonable and supportable
assumptions. Any impairment recognized in accordance with
SFAS 144 is permanent and may not be restored. As of
September 30, 2008, we had not recognized any impairment of
long-lived assets in connection with SFAS 144 based on our
reviews.
Customer
Deposits
Customer deposits primarily include amounts received from
customers toward the purchase of boats. We recognize these
deposits as revenue upon delivery or acceptance of the related
boats to customers.
Insurance
We retain varying levels of risk relating to the insurance
policies we maintain, most significantly workers
compensation insurance and employee medical benefits. We are
responsible for the claims and losses incurred under these
programs, limited by per occurrence deductibles and paid claims
or losses up to pre-determined maximum exposure limits. Any
losses above the pre-determined exposure limits are paid by our
third-party insurance carriers. We estimate our liability for
incurred but not reported losses using our historical loss
experience, our judgment, and industry information.
Derivative
Instruments
We account for derivative instruments in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging
Activities (SFAS 133), as amended by Statement of
F-12
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Financial Accounting Standards No. 138, Accounting
for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activity,
an Amendment of SFAS 133 (SFAS 138) and
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 149,
Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities (SFAS 149), (collectively
SFAS 133). Under these standards, all derivative
instruments are recorded on the balance sheet at their
respective fair values.
We utilize certain derivative instruments, from time to time,
including interest rate swaps and forward contracts, to manage
variability in cash flows associated with interest rates and
forecasted purchases of boats and yachts from certain of our
foreign suppliers in euros. At September 30, 2008, no such
instruments were outstanding.
The accounting for changes in the fair value (i.e., gains or
losses) of a derivative instrument depends on whether it has
been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship
based on its effectiveness in hedging against the exposure and
on the type of hedging relationship. For those derivative
instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging
instruments, we designate the hedging instrument, based upon the
exposure being hedged, as a fair value hedge or a cash flow
hedge.
Our forward contracts and interest rate swap are designated and
accounted for as cash flow hedges (i.e., hedging the exposure to
variability in expected future cash flows that is attributable
to a particular risk). SFAS 133 provides that the effective
portion of the gain or loss on a derivative instrument
designated and qualifying as a cash flow hedging instrument be
reported as a component of other comprehensive income and be
reclassified into earnings in the same line item in the income
statement as the hedged item in the same period or periods
during which the transaction affects earnings. The ineffective
portion of the gain or loss on these derivative instruments, if
any, is recognized in other income/expense in current earnings
during the period of change.
For derivative instruments not designated as hedging
instruments, we recognize the gain or loss in other
income/expense in current earnings during the period of change.
When a cash flow hedge is terminated, if the forecasted hedged
transaction is still probable of occurrence, amounts previously
recorded in other comprehensive income remain in other
comprehensive income and are recognized in earnings in the
period in which the hedged transaction affects earnings.
Additional information with regard to accounting policies
associated with derivative instruments is contained in
Note 9, Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activity.
Revenue
Recognition
We recognize revenue from boat, motor, and trailer sales and
parts and service operations at the time the boat, motor,
trailer, or part is delivered to or accepted by the customer or
service is completed. We recognize commissions earned from a
brokerage sale at the time the related brokerage transaction
closes. We recognize revenue from slip and storage services on a
straight-line basis over the term of the slip or storage
agreement. We recognize commissions earned by us for placing
notes with financial institutions in connection with customer
boat financing when we recognize the related boat sales. We
recognize marketing fees earned on credit life, accident and
disability, and hull insurance products sold by third-party
insurance companies at the later of customer acceptance of the
insurance product as evidenced by contract execution or when we
recognize the related boat sale. Pursuant to negotiated
agreements with financial and insurance institutions, we are
charged back for a portion of these fees should the customer
terminate or default on the related finance or insurance
contract before it is outstanding for a stipulated minimal
period of time. The chargeback allowance, which was not material
to the consolidated financial statements taken as a whole as of
September 30, 2007 or 2008, is based on our experience with
repayments or defaults on the related finance or insurance
contracts.
We also recognize commissions earned on extended warranty
service contracts sold on behalf of third-party insurance
companies at the later of customer acceptance of the service
contract terms as evidenced by contract execution or recognition
of the related boat sale. We are charged back for a portion of
these commissions should the customer terminate or default on
the service contract prior to its scheduled maturity. The
chargeback allowance,
F-13
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
which was not material to the consolidated financial statements
taken as a whole as of September 30, 2007 or 2008, is based
upon our experience with repayments or defaults on the service
contracts.
The following table sets forth percentages of our revenue
generated by certain products and services, for each of last
three years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
New boat sales
|
|
|
70.9
|
%
|
|
|
68.2
|
%
|
|
|
63.5
|
%
|
Used boat sales
|
|
|
17.0
|
%
|
|
|
18.8
|
%
|
|
|
20.5
|
%
|
Maintenance and repair services
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
Finance and insurance products
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
Parts and accessories
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
Brokerage services
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
Effective October 1, 2005, we adopted the provisions of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R,
Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R) for our
share-based compensation plans. We adopted SFAS 123R using
the modified prospective transition method. Under this
transition method, compensation cost recognized includes
(a) the compensation cost for all share-based awards
granted prior to, but not yet vested, as of October 1,
2005, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance
with the original provisions of SFAS 123 and (b) the
compensation cost for all share-based awards granted subsequent
to September 30, 2005, based on the grant-date fair value
estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R.
Results for prior periods have not been restated. Additionally,
we accounted for restricted stock awards granted using the
measurement and recognition provisions of SFAS 123R. The
fair value of the restricted stock awards is measured on the
grant date and recognized in earnings over the requisite service
period for each separately vesting portion of the award.
Advertising
and Promotional Costs
We expense advertising and promotional costs as incurred and
include them in selling, general, and administrative expenses in
the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Pursuant
to
EITF 02-16,
we net amounts received by us under our co-op assistance
programs from our manufacturers against the related advertising
expenses. Total advertising and promotional expenses
approximated $16.5 million, $19.6 million, and
$19.3 million, net of related co-op assistance of
approximately $1.3 million, $1.2 million, and
$700,000, for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2006,
2007, and 2008, respectively.
Income
Taxes
We account for income taxes in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting
for Income Taxes (SFAS 109) and Financial
Accounting Standard Board Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
(FIN 48). Under SFAS 109, we recognize deferred tax
assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences
attributable to temporary differences between the financial
statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities
and their respective tax basis. We measure deferred tax assets
and liabilities using enacted tax rates expected to apply to
taxable income in the years in which we expect those temporary
differences to be recovered or settled. We record valuation
allowances to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount
expected to be realized by considering all available positive
and negative evidence.
Substantially all of our goodwill and intangibles were
deductible for tax purposes. Our loss for the year ended
September 30, 2008, including the write-off of goodwill and
intangible assets, combined with other timing differences, gave
rise to a net operating loss, which resulted in a net deferred
tax asset of approximately
F-14
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
$41.3 million. Pursuant to SFAS 109, we must consider
all positive and negative evidence regarding the realization of
deferred tax assets, including past operating results and future
sources of taxable income. Under the provisions of
SFAS 109, we determined that our net deferred tax asset
needed to be reserved given recent earnings and industry trends.
Accordingly, recording of the valuation allowance resulted in a
non-cash charge of approximately $39.2 million.
FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,
clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes
recognized in an enterprises financial statements and
prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attributes of
income tax positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax
return. Under FIN 48, the impact of an uncertain tax
position taken or expected to be taken on an income tax return
must be recognized in the financial statements at the largest
amount that is more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon audit
by the relevant taxing authority. An uncertain income tax
position will not be recognized in the financial statements
unless it is more likely than not of being sustained. We adopted
the provisions of FIN 48 as of October 1, 2007, and as
a result, we recognized a charge of approximately $554,000 to
the October 1, 2007 retained earnings balance. As of
September 30, 2008, we had approximately $2.1 million
of gross unrecognized tax benefits, of which approximately
$1.4 million, if recognized, would impact the effective tax
rate.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157).
SFAS 157 defines fair value, applies to other accounting
pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements
and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.
SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal
years. We are currently assessing the implications of this
standard and evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS 157 on
our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159,
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities (SFAS 159), which permits an entity to
measure certain financial assets and financial liabilities at
fair value. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007. We are currently
assessing the implications of this standard and evaluating the
impact of adopting SFAS 159 on our consolidated financial
statements.
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141R
Business Combinations (SFAS 141R).
SFAS 141R will require among other things, the expensing of
direct transaction costs, in process research and development to
be capitalized, certain contingent assets and liabilities to be
recognized at fair value and earn-out arrangements may be
required to be measured at fair value recognized each period in
earnings. In addition, certain material adjustments will be
required to be made to purchase accounting entries at the
initial acquisition date and will cause revisions to previously
issued financial information in subsequent filings. SFAS is
effective for transactions occurring after the beginning of the
first annual reporting period beginning on or after
December 15, 2008 and may have a material impact on our
consolidated financial position, results from operations and
cash flows should we enter into a material business combination
after the standards effective date.
In March 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities An Amendment to SFAS 133
(SFAS 161). SFAS 161 applies to all derivative
instruments accounted for under SFAS 133 and requires
entities to provide greater transparency on how and why entities
use derivative instruments, how derivative instruments are
accounted for under SFAS 133 and the effect the derivative
instruments may have on the results of operations and cash
flows. SFAS 161 is effective for fiscal years and interim
periods beginning after November 15, 2008. Since
SFAS 161 only applies to disclosures it will not have a
material impact on our consolidated financial position, results
from operations and cash flows.
F-15
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Concentrations
of Credit Risk
Financial instruments, which potentially subject us to
concentrations of credit risk, consist principally of cash and
cash equivalents and accounts receivable. Concentrations of
credit risk with respect to our cash and cash equivalents are
limited primarily to amounts held with financial institutions.
Concentrations of credit risk arising from our receivables are
limited primarily to amounts due from manufacturers and
financial institutions.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amount of our financial instruments approximates
fair value due either to length to maturity or existence of
interest rates that approximate prevailing market rates unless
otherwise disclosed in these consolidated financial statements.
Use of
Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States requires us to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods.
Significant estimates made by us in the accompanying
consolidated financial statements relate to valuation
allowances, valuation of long-lived assets, and valuation of
accruals. Actual results could differ materially from those
estimates.
Trade receivables consist primarily of receivables from
financial institutions, which provide funding for customer boat
financing and amounts due from financial institutions earned
from arranging financing with our customers. We normally collect
these receivables within 30 days of the sale. Trade
receivables also include amounts due from customers on the sale
of boats, parts, service, and storage. Amounts due from
manufacturers represent receivables for various manufacturer
programs and parts and service work performed pursuant to the
manufacturers warranties.
The allowance for uncollectible receivables, which was not
material to the consolidated financial statements as of
September 30, 2007 or 2008, was based on our consideration
of customer payment practices, past transaction history with
customers, and economic conditions. When an account becomes
uncollectable, it is expensed as a bad debt and payments
subsequently received are credited to the bad debt expense
account. We review the allowance for uncollectible receivables
when an event or other change in circumstances results in a
change in the estimate of the ultimate collectability of a
specific account.
The accounts receivable balances consisted of the following at
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
$
|
28,253
|
|
|
$
|
10,408
|
|
Amounts due from manufacturers
|
|
|
27,811
|
|
|
|
18,343
|
|
Income tax receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,744
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
1,269
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
57,333
|
|
|
$
|
35,675
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-16
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Inventories, net consisted of the following at September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
New boats, motors, and trailers
|
|
$
|
382,121
|
|
|
$
|
386,993
|
|
Used boats, motors, and trailers
|
|
|
83,291
|
|
|
|
72,627
|
|
Parts, accessories, and other
|
|
|
12,627
|
|
|
|
9,009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
478,039
|
|
|
$
|
468,629
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.
|
PROPERTY
AND EQUIPMENT:
|
Property and equipment consisted of the following at
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
43,142
|
|
|
$
|
42,160
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
78,619
|
|
|
|
79,641
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
31,509
|
|
|
|
29,540
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
5,416
|
|
|
|
5,809
|
|
Vehicles
|
|
|
5,629
|
|
|
|
6,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164,315
|
|
|
|
164,013
|
|
Less Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(45,355
|
)
|
|
|
(50,144
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
118,960
|
|
|
$
|
113,869
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense totaled approximately $8.3 million,
$9.5 million, and $10.9 million for the fiscal years
ended September 30, 2006, 2007, and 2008, respectively.
|
|
7.
|
GOODWILL
AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS:
|
The changes in the carrying amounts of net goodwill and
identifiable intangible assets for the fiscal years ended
September 30, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2006
|
|
$
|
94,068
|
|
|
$
|
22,127
|
|
|
$
|
116,195
|
|
Changes during the period
|
|
|
3,378
|
|
|
|
1,601
|
|
|
|
4,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2007
|
|
|
97,446
|
|
|
|
23,728
|
|
|
|
121,174
|
|
Changes during the period
|
|
|
(97,446
|
)
|
|
|
(23,728
|
)
|
|
|
(121,174
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The changes in the carrying amounts of net goodwill and
identifiable intangible assets for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2007 relate to the finalization of the
purchase price of acquisitions we consummated in previous
periods. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008,
we experienced a significant decline in market valuation driven
primarily by weakness in the marine retail industry and an
overall soft economy, which hindered our financial performance.
As a result, we completed a fair value analysis of indefinite
lived intangible assets and a step two goodwill impairment
analysis, as required by SFAS 142. We determined that
indefinite lived intangible assets
F-17
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
and goodwill were impaired and recorded a non-cash charge of
$121.1 million based on our assessment. We will not be required
to make any current or future cash expenditures as a result of
this impairment charge.
|
|
8.
|
OTHER
LONG-TERM ASSETS:
|
During February 2006, we became party to a joint venture with
Brunswick that acquired certain real estate and assets of Great
American Marina for an aggregate purchase price of approximately
$11.0 million, of which we contributed approximately
$4.0 million and Brunswick contributed approximately
$7.0 million. The terms of the agreement specify that we
operate and maintain the service business, and Brunswick operate
and maintain the marina business. Simultaneously with the
closing, the acquired entity became Gulfport Marina, LLC
(Gulfport). We account for our investment in Gulfport in
accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 18,
The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common
Stock. Accordingly, we adjust the carrying amount of our
investment in Gulfport to recognize our share of earnings or
losses.
During the three months ended June 30, 2008, we experienced
a significant decline in market valuation driven primarily by
weakness in the marine retail industry and an overall soft
economy, which hindered our financial performance. As a result
of this weakness, we realized a goodwill and intangible asset
impairment charge, as noted above. Based on these events, we
reviewed the valuation of our investment in Gulfport in
accordance with APB 18 and recoverability of the assets
contained within the joint venture. APB 18 requires that a loss
in value of an investment, which is other than a temporary
decline, should be recognized. We reviewed our investment and
assets contained within the Gulfport joint venture, which
consists of land, buildings, equipment, and goodwill. As a
result, we determined that our investment in the joint venture
was impaired and recorded a non-cash charge of $1.0 million
based on our assessment. We will not be required to make any
current or future cash expenditures as a result of this
impairment charge.
|
|
9.
|
DERIVATIVE
INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITY:
|
During fiscal 2006, we entered into an interest rate swap
agreement with a notional amount of $4.0 million, which
matures in June 2015, is designated as a cash flow hedge, and
effectively converts a portion of the floating rate debt to a
fixed rate of 5.67%. Since all of the critical terms of the swap
exactly match those of the hedged debt, no ineffectiveness has
been identified in the hedging relationship. Consequently, all
changes in fair value are recorded as a component of other
comprehensive income. We periodically determine the
effectiveness of the swap by determining that the critical terms
still match, determining that the future interest payments are
still probable of occurrence, and evaluating the likelihood of
the counterpartys compliance with the terms of the swap.
At September 30, 2007, the swap agreement had a fair value
of approximately $45,000, which was recorded in other long-term
assets on the consolidated balance sheets.
During fiscal 2008, we entered into six interest rate swap
agreements with a total notional amount of approximately
$23.2 million, that were maturing between September 2012
and June 2016, which were designated as cash flow hedges that
effectively convert a portion of the floating rate debt to fixed
rates ranging from 4.36% to 4.87%. Since all of the critical
terms of the swaps exactly matched those of the hedged debt, no
ineffectiveness was identified in the hedging relationships.
Consequently, we recorded all changes in fair value as a
component of other comprehensive income. During fiscal 2008, we
prepaid the outstanding balances of our long-term debt. With
this prepayment, the swaps were terminated and the pretax fair
market value of the swaps of approximately $550,000 was
reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income and
recognized as income in the statements of operations.
|
|
10.
|
SHORT-TERM
BORROWINGS:
|
We entered into a second amended and restated credit and
security agreement with eight financial institutions during June
2006. The credit facility provided us a line of credit with
asset-based borrowing availability of up to $500 million
for working capital and inventory financing, with the amount of
permissible borrowings determined
F-18
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
pursuant to a borrowing base formula. The credit facility also
permitted approved-vendor floorplan borrowings of up to
$20 million. The credit facility accrued interest at the
London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 150 to 260 basis
points, with the interest rate based upon the ratio of our net
outstanding borrowings to our tangible net worth. The credit
facility was secured by our inventory, accounts receivable,
equipment, furniture, and fixtures. The credit facility required
us to satisfy certain covenants, including maintaining a
leverage ratio tied to our tangible net worth.
During June 2007, we entered into an amendment of the credit
facility, which modified the definition of Fixed Charges
Coverage Ratio and extended the term of our second amended
and restated credit and security agreement entered into in June
2006 with the same lenders.
During March 2008, we entered into an amendment to modify
the threshold of the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio and
the Current Ratio and terms of our second amended
and restated credit and security agreement entered into in
June 2006.
During December 2008, we entered into an amendment of our second
amended and restated credit and security agreement originally
entered into in June 2006. The amendment modified the amount of
borrowing availability, inventory advance rates, provides the
ability to advance $20 million against certain real estate,
financial covenants, and collateral under the credit facility.
With the amendment, the credit facility provides us a line of
credit with asset-based borrowing availability of up to
$425 million, stepping down to $350 million by
September 30, 2009 and $300 million by May 31,
2010. However, the amendment also contains a provision that
allows us to obtain commitments from existing or additional
lenders, thereby increasing the capacity of the credit facility,
up to $500 million. Amounts under the credit facility may
be used for working capital and inventory financing, with the
amount of permissible borrowings determined pursuant to a
borrowing base formula. The credit facility also permits
approved-vendor floorplan borrowings of up to $20 million.
The amendment replaces the fixed charge coverage ratio with an
interest coverage ratio for years ending on or after
September 30, 2010; it includes a cumulative earnings
before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, or
EBITDA (as defined in the agreement), covenant for each quarter;
it modifies the current ratio requirements; it reduces the
amount of allowable capital expenditures; it requires approval
for any stock repurchases; and it requires approval for
acquisitions. The amended credit facility provides for interest
at the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 425 basis
points through September 30, 2010 and thereafter at LIBOR
plus 150 to 400 basis points, pursuant to a performance
pricing grid based upon our interest coverage ratio, as defined.
Borrowings under the credit facility are secured by our
inventory, accounts receivable, equipment, furniture, fixtures,
and real estate. The amended credit facility matures in May
2011, with two one-year renewal options, subject to lender
approval.
As of September 30, 2007 and 2008, we owed an aggregate of
$326.0 million and $372.0 million, respectively under
our revolving credit facility and were in compliance with all of
the credit facility covenants. Advances under the facility
accrued interest at a rate of 7.2% and 4.0%, as of
September 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively. All indebtedness
associated with our real estate holdings were repaid during the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2008. As of
September 30, 2008, the facility provided us with an
additional net borrowing availability of $84 million. The
December 2008 amendment, if in place at September 30, 2008,
would have reduced the available borrowings under the facility
to approximately $38 million, excluding $20 million of
potential real estate advances, from approximately
$84 million and increased the interest rate by
approximately 275 basis points.
As is common in our industry, we receive interest assistance
directly from boat manufacturers, including Brunswick. The
interest assistance programs vary by manufacturer and generally
include periods of free financing or reduced interest rate
programs. The interest assistance may be paid directly to us or
our lender depending on the arrangements the manufacturer has
established. We classify interest assistance received from
manufacturers as a reduction of inventory cost and related cost
of sales as opposed to netting the assistance against our
interest expense incurred with our lenders.
F-19
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The availability and costs of borrowed funds can adversely
affect our ability to obtain adequate boat inventory and the
holding costs of that inventory as well as the ability and
willingness of our customers to finance boat purchases. As of
September 30, 2008, we had no long-term debt. However, we
rely on our credit facility to purchase our inventory of boats.
Our ability to borrow under our credit facility depends on our
ability, including further actions which may be necessary, to
continue to satisfy our covenants and other obligations under
our credit facility. The aging of our inventory limits our
borrowing capacity as defined curtailments reduce the allowable
advance rate as our inventory ages. Our access to funds under
our credit facility also depends upon the ability of the banks
that are parties to that facility to meet their funding
commitments, particularly if they experience shortages of
capital or experience excessive volumes of borrowing requests
from others during a short period of time. A continuation of
depressed economic conditions, weak consumer spending, turmoil
in the credit markets, and lender difficulties could interfere
with our ability to utilize the credit agreement to fund our
operations. Any inability to utilize our credit facility or the
acceleration of amounts owed, resulting from a covenant
violation, insufficient collateral, or lender difficulties,
could require us to seek other sources of funding to repay
amounts outstanding under the credit agreement or replace or
supplement our credit agreement, which may not be possible at
all or under commercially reasonable terms.
Similarly, the decreases in the availability of credit and
increases in the cost of credit adversely affect the ability of
our customers to purchase boats from us and thereby adversely
affect our ability to sell our products and impact the
profitability of our finance and insurance activities. Tight
credit conditions during fiscal 2008 adversely affected the
ability of customers to finance boat purchases, which had a
negative affect on our operating results.
During fiscal 2008, we prepaid all outstanding mortgages and
accelerated the amortization of the associated loan costs of
approximately $160,000. For the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2007, long-term debt consisted of various
mortgage notes payable to financial institutions due in monthly
installments ranging from $22,605 to $102,000, bearing variable
interest at rates ranging from 6.58% to 7.75%, maturing
September 2010 through June 2016, and collateralized by
machinery and equipment. At September 30, 2007, we owed an
aggregate amount of mortgage notes payable of
$30.8 million, of which $4.4 million was classified as
current and $26.4 million was classified as long-term in
the accompanying financial statements.
The components of our provision (benefit) for income taxes
consisted of the following for the fiscal years ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
Current provision (benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
22,091
|
|
|
$
|
10,377
|
|
|
$
|
(12,776
|
)
|
State
|
|
|
2,845
|
|
|
|
(1,524
|
)
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current provision (benefit)
|
|
|
24,936
|
|
|
|
8,853
|
|
|
|
(12,858
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred provision (benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
927
|
|
|
|
(1,243
|
)
|
|
|
(5,726
|
)
|
State
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
|
|
(577
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred provision (benefit)
|
|
|
1,020
|
|
|
|
(1,367
|
)
|
|
|
(6,303
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
$
|
25,956
|
|
|
$
|
7,486
|
|
|
$
|
(19,161
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-20
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Below is a reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax
rate to our effective tax rate for the fiscal years ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Federal tax provision
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
(35.0
|
)%
|
State taxes, net of federal effect
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
(4.4
|
)%
|
State income tax settlement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13.7
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
Stock based compensation
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
25.5
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
39.7
|
%
|
|
|
27.2
|
%
|
|
|
(12.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007, we settled
certain tax positions under an initiative offered by one of the
states in which we conduct operations. As a result of this
settlement, we reduced our reserve for contingent income tax
liabilities by approximately $5.2 million. Due to the
amount paid under the settlement, the reduction in income tax
expense was approximately $3.8 million for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2007. Without this reduction, the
effective tax rate would have been approximately 40.9% for the
year ended September 30, 2007.
Deferred income taxes reflect the impact of temporary
differences between the amount of assets and liabilities
recognized for financial reporting purposes and such amounts
recognized for income tax purposes. The tax effects of these
temporary differences representing the components of deferred
tax assets (liabilities) at September 30 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
Current deferred tax assets (liabilities):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
$
|
2,620
|
|
|
$
|
3,225
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
3,865
|
|
|
|
2,915
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
6,485
|
|
|
|
6,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,833
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net current deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
6,485
|
|
|
$
|
307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term deferred tax (liabilities) assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
(15,828
|
)
|
|
$
|
24,483
|
|
Stock based compensation
|
|
|
3,781
|
|
|
|
6,582
|
|
FIN 48 DTA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
634
|
|
State tax loss carryforwards
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
3,330
|
|
Other
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term deferred tax (liabilities) assets:
|
|
|
(11,466
|
)
|
|
|
35,117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(505
|
)
|
|
|
(33,911
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net long-term deferred tax (liabilities) assets
|
|
$
|
(11,971
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substantially all of our goodwill and intangibles were
deductible for tax purposes. In fiscal 2008, the write-off of
goodwill and intangible assets, combined with other timing
differences, gave rise to a net operating loss that resulted in
a net deferred tax asset of approximately $41.3 million.
Pursuant to SFAS 109, we consider all positive and negative
evidence regarding the realization of deferred tax assets,
including past operating results and future sources of taxable
income. Under the provisions of SFAS 109, we determined
that the majority of our net deferred tax asset needed to be
reserved given recent earnings and industry trends. Accordingly,
recording of the valuation
F-21
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
allowance resulted in a non-cash charge of approximately
$39.2 million for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2008. At September 30, 2007, we maintained a valuation
allowance for our separate jurisdiction state tax loss
carryforwards of $505,000. As a result, the total valuation
allowance at September 30, 2008 was $39.7 million. The
valuation allowance represents our net deferred tax asset less
the amounts expected to be realized through the carryback of
federal net operating losses.
Effective February 4, 2007, the we adopted the provisions
of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation
No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes (FIN 48). Under FIN 48, the impact of an
uncertain tax position taken or expected to be taken on an
income tax return must be recognized in the financial statements
at the largest amount that is more-likely-than-not to be
sustained upon audit by the relevant taxing authority. An
uncertain income tax position will not be recognized in the
financial statements unless it is more likely than not of being
sustained. As of September 30, 2008, we had approximately
$2.1 million of gross unrecognized tax benefits, of which
approximately $1.4 million, if recognized, would impact the
effective tax rate.
The reconciliation of the total amount recorded for unrecognized
tax benefits at the beginning and end of the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2008 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits at October 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
2,242
|
|
Increases in tax positions for prior years
|
|
|
81
|
|
Decreases in tax positions for prior years
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
Lapse of statute of limitations
|
|
|
(159
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits at September 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
2,064
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consistent with our prior practices, interest and penalties
related to uncertain tax positions will be recognized as a
component of income tax expense. As of September 30, 2008,
interest and penalties represented approximately $650,000 of the
gross unrecognized tax benefits. There have been no significant
changes to the balance of interest and penalties subsequent to
adoption.
Since inception, we have been subject to tax by both federal and
state taxing authorities. Until the respective statutes of
limitations expire, we are subject to income tax audits in the
jurisdictions in which we operate. We are no longer subject to
U.S. federal tax examinations for fiscal years prior to
2005, and we are not subject to audits prior to the 2004 fiscal
year for the majority of the state jurisdictions.
It is reasonably possible that a change to the total amount of
unrecognized tax benefits could occur in the next 12 months
based on examinations by tax authorities, the expiration of
statutes of limitations, or potential settlements of outstanding
positions. It is not possible to estimate a range of the
possible changes at this time. However, we do not expect the
change to be significant to the overall balance of unrecognized
tax benefits.
|
|
13.
|
STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY:
|
In November 2005, our Board of Directors approved a share
repurchase plan allowing our company to repurchase up to
1,000,000 shares of our common stock. Under the plan, we
may buy back common stock from time to time in the open market
or in privately negotiated blocks, dependant upon various
factors, including price and availability of the shares, and
general market conditions. Through September 30, 2008, we
had purchased an aggregate of 790,900 shares of common
stock under the plan for an aggregate purchase price of
approximately $15.8 million.
|
|
14.
|
STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION:
|
Upon adoption of SFAS 123R, we used the Black-Scholes
valuation model for valuing all stock-based compensation and
shares granted under the ESPP. We measure compensation for
restricted stock awards and restricted stock units at fair value
on the grant date based on the number of shares expected to vest
and the quoted
F-22
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
market price of our common stock. We recognize compensation cost
for all awards in earnings, net of estimated forfeitures, on a
straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each
separately vesting portion of the award.
Cash received from option exercises under all share-based
payment arrangements for the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2006, 2007, and 2008 was approximately
$3.9 million, $3.2 million, and $2.2 million,
respectively. Tax benefits realized for tax deductions from
option exercises for the fiscal years ended September 30,
2006, 2007, and 2008 was approximately $1.5 million,
$800,000, and $223,000, respectively. We currently expect to
satisfy share-based awards with registered shares available to
be issued.
|
|
15.
|
THE
INCENTIVE STOCK PLANS:
|
During February 2007, our stockholders approved our 2007
Incentive Compensation Plan (2007 Plan), which replaced our 1998
Incentive Stock Plan (1998 Plan). Our 2007 Plan provides for the
grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted
stock, stock units, bonus stock, dividend equivalents, other
stock related awards, and performance awards (collectively
awards), that may be settled in cash, stock, or other property.
Our 2007 Plan is designed to attract, motivate, retain, and
reward our executives, employees, officers, directors, and
independent contractors by providing such persons with annual
and long-term performance incentives to expend their maximum
efforts in the creation of stockholder value. The total number
of shares of our common stock that may be subject to awards
under the 2007 Plan is equal to 1,000,000 shares, plus
(i) any shares available for issuance and not subject to an
award under the 1998 Plan, (ii) the number of shares with
respect to which awards granted under the 2007 Plan and the 1998
Plan terminate without the issuance of the shares or where the
shares are forfeited or repurchased; (iii) with respect to
awards granted under the 2007 Plan and the 1998 Plan, the number
of shares that are not issued as a result of the award being
settled for cash or otherwise not issued in connection with the
exercise or payment of the award; and (iv) the number of
shares that are surrendered or withheld in payment of the
exercise price of any award or any tax withholding requirements
in connection with any award granted under the 2007 Plan and the
1998 Plan. The 2007 Plan terminates in February 2017, and awards
may be granted at any time during the life of the 2007 Plan. The
date on which awards vest are determined by the Board of
Directors or the Plan Administrator. The exercise prices of
options are determined by the Board of Directors or the Plan
Administrator and are at least equal to the fair market value of
shares of common stock on the date of grant. The term of options
under the 2007 Plan may not exceed ten years. The options
granted have varying vesting periods. To date, we have not
settled or been under any obligation to settle any awards in
cash.
The following table summarizes option activity from
September 30, 2007 through September 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
|
for Grant
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2007
|
|
|
1,230,841
|
|
|
|
2,156,545
|
|
|
$
|
4,993
|
|
|
$
|
17.36
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
Options authorized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
(37,500
|
)
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options cancelled/forfeited/expired
|
|
|
351,565
|
|
|
|
(351,565
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
13.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock units issued
|
|
|
(335,400
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock units cancelled
|
|
|
5,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(102,352
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
1,215,006
|
|
|
|
1,740,128
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
18.41
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
908,128
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
14.56
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted
during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2006, 2007, and
2008 was $12.53, $12.13, and $6.12, respectively. The total
intrinsic value of options exercised
F-23
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2006, 2007, and
2008 was approximately $5.2 million, $2.0 million, and
$541,000, respectively.
As of September 30, 2007 and 2008, there was approximately
$4.8 million and $2.1 million, respectively, of
unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested options
that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period
of 3.3 years and 2.5 years, respectively. The total
fair value of options vested during the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2006, 2007, and 2008 was approximately
$1.4 million, $1.9 million, and $2.1 million,
respectively.
We continued using the Black-Scholes model to estimate the fair
value of options granted during fiscal 2008. The expected term
of options granted is derived from the output of the option
pricing model and represents the period of time that options
granted are expected to be outstanding. Volatility is based on
the historical volatility of our common stock. The risk-free
rate for periods within the contractual term of the options is
based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the
time of grant. As a result, we recorded compensation expense for
stock options of approximately $3.5 million,
$3.7 million and $2.7 million before tax, for the
fiscal years ended September 30, 2006, 2007 and 2008,
respectively or $0.15, $0.15 and $0.11 per diluted share
after-tax for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2006,
2007 and 2008, respectively.
The following are the weighted-average assumptions used for the
fiscal years ended September 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
0.0%
|
|
0.0%
|
|
0.0%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
4.6%
|
|
4.6%
|
|
3.4%
|
Volatility
|
|
44.5%
|
|
42.7%
|
|
44.2%
|
Expected life
|
|
4.6 years
|
|
6.5 years
|
|
7.5 years
|
|
|
16.
|
EMPLOYEE
STOCK PURCHASE PLAN (THE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN):
|
Our Employee Stock Purchase Plan provides for up to
750,000 shares of common stock to be available for purchase
by our regular employees who have completed at least one year of
continuous service. The Stock Purchase Plan provides for
implementation of up to 10 annual offerings beginning on the
first day of October starting in 1998, with each offering
terminating on September 30 of the following year. Each annual
offering may be divided into two six-month offerings. For each
offering, the purchase price per share will be the lower of
(i) 85% of the closing price of the common stock on the
first day of the offering or (ii) 85% of the closing price
of the common stock on the last day of the offering. The
purchase price is paid through periodic payroll deductions not
to exceed 10% of the participants earnings during each
offering period. However, no participant may purchase more than
$25,000 worth of common stock annually.
During 2008, we continued using the Black-Scholes model to
estimate the fair value of options granted to purchase shares
issued pursuant to the Stock Purchase Plan. The expected term of
options granted is derived from the output of the option pricing
model and represents the period of time that options granted are
expected to be outstanding. Volatility is based on the
historical volatility of our common stock. The risk-free rate
for periods within the contractual term of the options is based
on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of
grant.
The following are the weighted-average assumptions used for the
fiscal years ended September 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
0.0%
|
|
0.0%
|
|
0.0%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
4.8%
|
|
4.9%
|
|
2.3%
|
Volatility
|
|
37.1%
|
|
43.4%
|
|
75.6%
|
Expected life
|
|
six-months
|
|
six-months
|
|
six-months
|
As of September 30, 2008, we had issued 629,991 of the
750,000 shares of common stock reserved for issuance under
our 1998 employee stock purchase plan.
F-24
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
During February 2008, our stockholders approved our
2008 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (2008 Plan). The 2008
Plan provides for up to 500,000 shares of common stock to
be available for purchase by our regular employees who have
completed at least one year of continuous service. The Stock
Purchase Plan provides for implementation of up to 10 annual
offerings beginning on the first day of October starting in
2008, with each offering terminating on September 30 of the
following year. Each annual offering may be divided into two
six-month offerings. For each offering, the purchase price per
share will be the lower of (i) 85% of the closing price of
the common stock on the first day of the offering or
(ii) 85% of the closing price of the common stock on the
last day of the offering. The purchase price is paid through
periodic payroll deductions not to exceed 10% of the
participants earnings during each offering period.
However, no participant may purchase more than $25,000 worth of
common stock annually.
|
|
17.
|
RESTRICTED
STOCK AWARDS:
|
During fiscal 2006, 2007, and 2008, we granted non-vested
(restricted) stock awards or restricted stock units
(collectively restricted stock awards) to certain key employees
pursuant to the 1998 Plan or the 2007 Plan. The restricted stock
awards have varying vesting periods, but generally become fully
vested at either the end of year four or the end of year five,
depending on the specific award. The awards granted in fiscal
2008 require certain levels of performance by us before they are
earned. Such performance metrics must be achieved by September
2011 or the awards will be forfeited. The stock underlying the
vested restricted stock units will be delivered upon vesting.
We accounted for the restricted stock awards granted during
fiscal 2006, 2007, and 2008 using the measurement and
recognition provisions of SFAS 123R. Accordingly, the fair
value of the restricted stock awards is measured on the grant
date and recognized in earnings over the requisite service
period for each separately vesting portion of the award.
The following table summarizes restricted stock activity from
September 30, 2007 through September 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Non-vested balance at September 30, 2007
|
|
|
500,100
|
|
|
$
|
28.30
|
|
Changes during the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares granted
|
|
|
335,400
|
|
|
$
|
15.67
|
|
Shares vested
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Shares forfeited
|
|
|
(5,500
|
)
|
|
$
|
20.29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested balance at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
830,000
|
|
|
$
|
23.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2008, we had approximately
$7.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to restricted stock awards granted under the Plan. We
expect to recognize that cost over a weighted-average period of
3.2 years.
F-25
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
18.
|
NET
INCOME PER SHARE:
|
The following is a reconciliation of the shares used in the
denominator for calculating basic and diluted earnings per share
for the fiscal years ended September 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding used in calculating
basic net income per share
|
|
|
18,028,562
|
|
|
|
18,618,611
|
|
|
|
18,391,488
|
|
Effect of dilutive options
|
|
|
900,173
|
|
|
|
670,620
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common and common equivalent shares used in
calculating diluted net income per share
|
|
|
18,928,735
|
|
|
|
19,289,231
|
|
|
|
18,391,488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options to purchase approximately 699,500, 742,000 and
1.7 million shares of common stock were outstanding at
September 30, 2006, 2007, and 2008, respectively, but were
not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share
because the options exercise prices were greater than the
average market price of our common stock, and therefore, their
effect would be anti-dilutive.
|
|
19.
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES:
|
Lease
Commitments
We lease certain land, buildings, machinery, equipment, and
vehicles related to our dealerships under non-cancelable
third-party operating leases. Certain of our leases include
options for renewal periods and provisions for escalation.
Rental expense, including month-to-month rentals, were
approximately $10.9 million, $13.2 million, and
$13.9 million for the fiscal years ended September 30,
2006, 2007, and 2008, respectively. Rental expense to related
parties under both cancelable and non-cancelable operating
leases approximated $385,000 for each of the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2006, 2007, and 2008.
The rental payments to related parties, under both cancelable
and non-cancelable operating leases during fiscal 2006, 2007,
and 2008, represent rental payments for buildings to an entity
partially owned by a former officer of our company. We believe
the terms of the transaction are consistent with those that we
would obtain from third parties.
Future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating
leases at September 30, 2008, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
10,043
|
|
2010
|
|
|
8,958
|
|
2011
|
|
|
8,015
|
|
2012
|
|
|
6,383
|
|
2013
|
|
|
4,267
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
10,014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
47,680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Commitments and Contingencies
We are party to various legal actions arising in the ordinary
course of business. The ultimate liability, if any, associated
with theses matters was not believed to be material at
September 30, 2008. While it is not feasible to determine
the actual outcome of these actions as of September 30,
2008, we do not believe that these matters will have a material
adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition, results
of operations, or cash flows.
F-26
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Associated with the December 2006 snow and ice storms in
Missouri, we have received approximately $2.0 million of
insurance proceeds to date, of which approximately
$1.4 million offset the related losses associated with the
destruction of marina docks and significant expenses we incurred
regarding damage and related clean up after the storm. The
additional insurance proceeds received of approximately $600,000
were recorded as a gain during fiscal 2007. The insurance
proceeds received to date were recorded as a reduction to
selling, general, and administrative expenses on the
consolidated statements of operations during fiscal 2007.
During fiscal 2007, we received $2.1 million of business
interruption insurance proceeds for claims associated with
Hurricane Wilma, which occurred in October 2005. The business
interruption insurance proceeds were to reimburse us for the
interruption in our operations that resulted in lost revenue and
related profits in addition to the significant expenses incurred
to move and repair inventory and to reimburse us for uninsured
losses recognized by certain locations. These proceeds were
recorded as a reduction to selling, general, and administrative
expenses on the consolidated statements of operations during
fiscal 2007.
We are subject to federal and state environmental regulations,
including rules relating to air and water pollution and the
storage and disposal of gasoline, oil, other chemicals and
waste. We believe that we are in compliance with such
regulations.
|
|
20.
|
EMPLOYEE
401(k) PROFIT SHARING PLANS:
|
Employees are eligible to participate in our 401(k) Profit
Sharing Plan (the Plan) following their
90-day
introductory period starting either April 1 or October 1,
provided that they are 21 years of age. Under the Plan, we
match 50% of participants contributions, up to a maximum
of 5% of each participants compensation. We contributed,
under the Plan, or pursuant to previous similar plans,
approximately $1.7 million, $1.9 million, and
$1.5 million for the fiscal years ended September 30,
2006, 2007, and 2008, respectively.
|
|
21.
|
PREFERRED
SHARE PURCHASE RIGHTS:
|
During September 2001, we adopted a Stockholders Rights
Plan (the Rights Plan) that may have the effect of deterring,
delaying, or preventing a change in control that might otherwise
be in the best interests of our stockholders. Under the Rights
Plan, a dividend of one Preferred Share Purchase Right was
issued for each share of common stock held by the stockholders
of record as of the close of business on September 7, 2001.
Each right entitles stockholders to purchase, at an exercise
price of $50 per share, one-thousandth of a share of a newly
created Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock.
In general, subject to certain limited exceptions, the stock
purchase rights become exercisable when a person or group
acquires 15% or more of our common stock or a tender offer or
exchange offer for 15% or more of our common stock is announced
or commenced. After any such event, other stockholders may
purchase additional shares of our common stock at 50% of the
then-current market price. The rights will cause substantial
dilution to a person or group that attempts to acquire us on
terms not approved by our Board of Directors. The rights should
not interfere with any merger or other business combination
approved by the Board of Directors. The rights may be redeemed
by us at $0.01 per stock purchase right at any time before any
person or group acquires 15% or more of the outstanding common
stock. The rights expire on August 28, 2011.
The Rights Plan adoption and Rights Distribution is a
non-taxable event with no impact on our financial results.
F-27
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
22.
|
QUARTERLY
FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED):
|
The following table sets forth certain unaudited quarterly
financial data for each of our last eight quarters. The
information has been derived from unaudited financial statements
that we believe reflect all adjustments, consisting only of
normal recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair
presentation of such quarterly financial information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
234,031
|
|
|
$
|
325,082
|
|
|
$
|
378,683
|
|
|
$
|
318,189
|
|
|
$
|
215,268
|
|
|
$
|
233,262
|
|
|
$
|
271,277
|
|
|
$
|
165,600
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
177,677
|
|
|
|
252,554
|
|
|
|
291,248
|
|
|
|
234,772
|
|
|
|
167,143
|
|
|
|
178,783
|
|
|
|
209,432
|
|
|
|
123,806
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
56,354
|
|
|
|
72,528
|
|
|
|
87,435
|
|
|
|
83,417
|
|
|
|
48,125
|
|
|
|
54,479
|
|
|
|
61,845
|
|
|
|
41,794
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative expenses
|
|
|
56,165
|
|
|
|
59,533
|
|
|
|
62,444
|
|
|
|
67,082
|
|
|
|
53,191
|
|
|
|
56,198
|
|
|
|
51,623
|
|
|
|
56,414
|
|
Goodwill and intangible asset impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
12,995
|
|
|
|
24,991
|
|
|
|
16,335
|
|
|
|
(5,066
|
)
|
|
|
(1,719
|
)
|
|
|
(111,869
|
)
|
|
|
(14,620
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
6,540
|
|
|
|
7,547
|
|
|
|
7,458
|
|
|
|
5,410
|
|
|
|
5,881
|
|
|
|
5,952
|
|
|
|
4,765
|
|
|
|
3,566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(6,351
|
)
|
|
|
5,448
|
|
|
|
17,533
|
|
|
|
10,925
|
|
|
|
(10,947
|
)
|
|
|
(7,671
|
)
|
|
|
(116,634
|
)
|
|
|
(18,186
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(2,565
|
)
|
|
|
2,116
|
|
|
|
3,636
|
|
|
|
4,299
|
|
|
|
(4,529
|
)
|
|
|
(4,162
|
)
|
|
|
(3,377
|
)
|
|
|
(7,093
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(3,786
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,332
|
|
|
$
|
13,897
|
|
|
$
|
6,626
|
|
|
$
|
(6,418
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,509
|
)
|
|
$
|
(113,257
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,093
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
$
|
0.73
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
$
|
(0.35
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.19
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6.15
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.60
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
18,287,781
|
|
|
|
19,042,015
|
|
|
|
19,034,148
|
|
|
|
19,064,068
|
|
|
|
18,364,676
|
|
|
|
18,363,692
|
|
|
|
18,415,790
|
|
|
|
18,421,629
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to provide comparability between periods presented,
certain amounts have been reclassified from the previously
reported interim financial statements to conform to the
consolidated financial statement presentation of the current
period.
F-28
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant,
including all amendments to date(1)
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant(14)
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating
Preferred Stock(1)
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Specimen of Common Stock Certificate(1)
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Rights Agreement, dated August 28, 2001 between Registrant
and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as
Rights Agent(2)
|
|
10
|
.1(k)
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of March 30, 2006 among
MarineMax of New York, Inc.; Surfside-3 Marina, Inc.; Matthew
Barbara, Paul Barbara, Diane Keeney, and Angela Chianese; and
certain affiliates of Surfside-3 Marina, Inc.
(Form 10-Q
filed May 10, 2006)(3)
|
|
10
|
.3(h)
|
|
Employment Agreement between Registrant and William H. McGill
Jr.(4)
|
|
10
|
.3(i)
|
|
Employment Agreement between Registrant and Michael H. McLamb(4)
|
|
10
|
.3(j)
|
|
Employment Agreement between Registrant and Edward A. Russell(4)
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
1998 Incentive Stock Plan, as amended through November 15,
2000(5)
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan(6)
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
Agreement Relating to Acquisitions between Registrant and
Brunswick Corporation, dated December 7, 2005(9)
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
Hatteras Sales and Service Agreement, dated July 1, 2003
among the Registrant, MarineMax Motor Yachts, LLC, and Hatteras
Yachts Division of Brunswick Corporation(7)
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Credit and Security Agreement dated
June 19, 2006 among the Registrant and its subsidiaries as
Borrowers, Keybank Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., and
various other lenders, as Lenders(8)
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
Agreement Relating to Acquisitions between Registrant and
Brunswick Corporation, dated December 7, 2005(9)
|
|
10
|
.20(a)
|
|
Sea Ray Sales and Service Agreement(9)
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Credit and Security Agreement dated
June 19, 2006 among the Registrant and its subsidiaries, as
Borrowers, and Bank of America, N.A., KeyBank, N.A., General
Electric Commercial Distribution Finance Corporation, Wachovia
Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., National City Bank, N.A.,
U.S. Bank, N.A., and Branch Banking and Trust company, as
Lenders(8)
|
|
10
|
.21(a)
|
|
First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit and
Security Agreement executed on June 5, 2007 effective as of
May 31, 2007 among the Registrant and its subsidiaries, as
Borrowers, and Bank of America, N.A., KeyBank, N.A., General
Electric Commercial Distribution Finance Corporation, Branch
Banking and Trust Company, as Lenders(10)
|
|
10
|
.21(b)
|
|
Third Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit and
Security Agreement executed on March 7, 2008, among
MarineMax, Inc. and its subsidiaries, as Borrowers, and Bank of
America, N.A., Keybank, N.A., General Electric Commercial
Distribution Finance Corporation, Wachovia Bank, N.A., Wells
Fargo Bank, N.A., U.S. Bank, N.A., Branch Banking and
Trust Company, and Bank of the West, as Lenders(13)
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
MarineMax, Inc. 2007 Incentive Compensation Plan(11)
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
Form Stock Option Agreement for 2007 Incentive Compensation
Plan(11)
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
Form Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for 2007
Incentive Compensation Plan(11)
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
Director Fee Share Purchase Program(12)
|
|
21
|
|
|
List of Subsidiaries
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)
and
Rule 15d-14(a),
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)
and
Rule 15d-14(a),
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain information in this exhibit has been omitted and filed
separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the
omitted portions. |
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registration Statement on Form
10-K for the
year ended September 30, 2001, as filed on
December 20, 2001. |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 8-K
Report dated September 30, 1998, as filed on
October 20, 1998. |
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed on
May 10, 2006. |
|
(4) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 8-K,
as filed on June 13, 2006. |
|
(5) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2001, as filed
on February 14, 2002. |
|
(6) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registration Statement on Form
S-1
(Registration
333-47873). |
|
(7) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007, as filed on
May 7, 2007. |
|
(8) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006, as filed on
August 4, 2006. |
|
(9) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 8-K,
as filed on December 9, 2005. |
|
(10) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 8-K,
as filed on June 11, 2007. |
|
(11) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 8-K,
as filed on March 6, 2007. |
|
(12) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form S-8
(File No.
333-141657)
as filed March 29, 2007. |
|
(13) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 8-K,
as filed on March 12, 2008. |
|
(14) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 8-K,
as filed on November 26, 2008. |