Oil and gas producer SM Energy (NYSE: SM) reported Q1 CY2026 results beating Wall Street’s revenue expectations, with sales up 75.1% year on year to $1.48 billion. Its GAAP loss of $1.68 per share was significantly below analysts’ consensus estimates.

Is now the time to buy SM Energy? Find out by accessing our full research report, it’s free.

"SM is off to an outstanding start in 2026," stated President and CEO Beth McDonald.

Company Overview

Operating across three key regions with over 328,000 net acres under its control, SM Energy (NYSE: SM) explores for, develops, and produces oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids primarily from shale formations in Texas and Utah.

Revenue Growth

Cyclical sectors like Energy often flatter weaker operators during favorable price environments, but a longer-term lens separates those from businesses that can consistently perform across market cycles. Over the last five years, SM Energy grew its sales at an incredible 25.5% compounded annual growth rate. Its growth surpassed the average energy upstream and integrated energy company and shows its offerings resonate with customers, a great starting point for our analysis.

Energy cycles can be long enough that a single five-year period can still reflect one price environment, which is why an additional, decade-long view can help capture through-cycle performance. SM Energy’s annualized revenue growth of 11.1% over the last ten years is below its five-year trend, but we still think the results suggest decent demand.

While looking at revenue is important, it can also introduce noise around commodity prices and M&A. Analyzing production, on the other hand, highlights what is happening inside the asset base and whether the economic footprint of a company is expanding. Over the last two years, SM Energy’s oil production per day averaged 43% year-on-year growth while its natural gas production per day averaged 19.9% year-on-year growth.

This quarter, SM Energy reported magnificent year-on-year revenue growth of 75.1%, and its $1.48 billion of revenue beat Wall Street’s estimates by 5.8%. This quarter, SM Energy reported magnificent year-on-year Oil production per day growth of 83.5%.

ALSO WORTH WATCHING: Nvidia’s Quiet Partner. Nvidia’s chips cost a hundred grand. The connectors that make them work cost even more. One company makes them all.

Every AI server needs specialized infrastructure the chip companies don’t make. High-speed cables. Power connectors. Thermal sensors. This 90-year-old company built a monopoly on it. The AI boom just started. This stock is still flying under the radar. Claim The Stock Ticker Here for FREE.

Adjusted EBITDA Margin

Adjusted EBITDA margin strips out accounting distortions tied to depletion and historical drilling spend, providing a clearer view of the cash-generating power of the underlying asset base before financing and reinvestment decisions.

SM Energy has been a well-oiled machine over the last five years. It demonstrated elite profitability for an upstream and integrated energy business, boasting an average EBITDA margin of 57.2%.

Analyzing the trend in its profitability, SM Energy’s EBITDA margin decreased by 2.6 percentage points over the last year. This raises questions about the company’s expense base because its revenue growth should have given it leverage on its fixed costs, resulting in better economies of scale and profitability.

In Q1, SM Energy generated an EBITDA margin profit margin of 10.8%, down 57.3 percentage points year on year. This contraction shows it was less efficient because its expenses grew faster than its revenue. This adjusted EBITDA fell short of Wall Street’s estimates.

Cash Is King

Adjusted EBITDA shows how profitable a company’s existing “rock” is before financing and reinvestment, while free cash flow shows how much value remains after paying to replace those wells. Because production declines over time, strong EBITDA can coexist with weak FCF if drilling is expensive or declines are steep. FCF therefore captures both operating efficiency and the cost of sustaining production.

SM Energy has shown terrific cash profitability, driven by its lucrative business model that enables it to reinvest, return capital to investors, and stay ahead of the competition. The company’s free cash flow margin was among the best in the energy upstream and integrated energy sector, averaging 19.4% over the last five years.

Absolute FCF margin levels matter but so does stability of free cash flow. All else equal, we’d prefer a 25.0% average free cash flow margin that is quite steady no matter how commodity prices behave rather than extremely high margins when times are good and negative ones when they’re tough.

SM Energy’s ratio of quarterly free cash flow volatility to WTI Crude price volatility over the past five years was 3.8 (lower is better), indicating unusually strong insulation from commodity swings. This stability supports superior capital access in downturns and positions SM Energy to act as a consolidator when weaker peers are forced to retrench.

You may be asking why we wait until the free cash flow line to perform this stability analysis versus commodity prices. Why not compare revenue or EBITDA to WTI in the case of SM Energy? Because what ultimately matters is not how much revenue or profit you earn when prices are high but how much cash you can generate when prices are low. Free cash flow is the superior metric because it includes everything from hedging prowess to growth and maintenance capex to management behavior during good times and bad.

SM Energy’s free cash flow clocked in at $85 million in Q1, equivalent to a 5.7% margin. The company’s cash profitability regressed as it was 3 percentage points lower than in the same quarter last year, which isn’t ideal considering its longer-term trend.

Key Takeaways from SM Energy’s Q1 Results

We were impressed by how significantly SM Energy blew past analysts’ revenue expectations this quarter. On the other hand, its EBITDA missed and its EPS fell short of Wall Street’s estimates. Overall, this was a softer quarter. The stock traded up 3.2% to $29.51 immediately after reporting.

Should you buy the stock or not? The latest quarter does matter, but not nearly as much as longer-term fundamentals and valuation, when deciding if the stock is a buy. We cover that in our actionable full research report which you can read here (it’s free).